2072 Paris 1984 (10 Pages)
2072 Paris 1984 (10 Pages)
2072 Paris 1984 (10 Pages)
M. WILLIAMS
CONSULTANT
NOGENT SUR MARNE
FRANCE
Presented at A U D ' O
Az
Oe
cmwr__ \ _ Xmsr
_o' Rs4# T \
- Fig. 8 - - Fi{r.9 -
It is now possible to use Figs. 3 to 7 to determine the usable angle
for coherent stereophonic recording (recording angle) for a spaced
pair of cardioide microphones for different distances and angles
between microphones.
For instance in Fig. 4, one can see that with spacing of 17cm and
110 ° angle between microphones, the half recording angle is about 55 ° .
However, the same recording angle can be obtained with 12cm 130 °
(Fig. 3), 22cm 80 ° (Fig. 5), 30cm 60 ° (Fig. 6), 40cm 40 ° (Fig. 7), etc.
The relationship between this "recording angle" and the values of
spacing and mic angles produces the following graphical representation
(Fig. 10).
One can deduce from this graph that the "recording angle" can be varied
by keeping one of the axes (_or_) constant and varying the other, or
by gradually varying both. This situation is somewhat similar to the
zoom lens of a television or film camera. For instance, starting with
15 cm 45 ° and gradually changing to 60 cm 175 ° one "zooms" from a total
recording angle of 200 ° (wide angle lens) to a recording angle of 40 °
(narrow angle lens).
11
o
....
I
A whole series of combinations of distance and mic angles are possible
for a given recording angle. For instance, for a total recording
angle of 90", the following combinations are possible : 12cm 160",
17cm 140 °, 22cm 120 ° , 30cm 90 ° (NOS), 40cm 60 ° and 50cm 40 _. For
adjacent "equivalents" the difference in subjective quality is quite
difficult to determine. However, if extreme equivalents (12cm 160 °
as against 40cm 60 °) are compared, the listener can begin to feel the
subjective contribution of intensity differences as against time
differences. The final choice is of course a personal one and long
may it remain so!
Conclusion
MICHAEL WILLIAMS