2008 Nautilus EIS PNG

Volume A
Mai$ &e(ort
Te-t
./01&2/M./T34 1MP36T ST3T.M./T
September 2008
Nautilus Minerals Niugini Limited
CR 7008_9_v4
Sol9ara 1 Pro;ect

Coffey Natural Systems Pty Ltd ABN 61 005 041 878
Level 21, 12 Creek Street Brisbane QLD 4000 Australia
T (+61) (7) 3002 0400 F (+61) (7) 3002 0444
www.coffey.com/naturalsystems

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT
STATEMENT
Solwara 1 Project

VOLUME A: MAIN REPORT
TEXT
CR 7008_09_v4
September 2008

Project director David Gwyther
Project manager Michael Wright
Version: Details: Approved:
CR 7008_09_v1 Initial draft to client July 2008
CR 7008_09_v2 Second draft to client August 2008
CR 7008_09_v3 Third draft to client September 2008
CR 7008_09_v4 Final for exhibition September 2008

Environmental Impact Statement
Solwara 1 Project

Nautilus Minerals Niugini 7008_09_ToC_v4.doc
i
Coffey Natural Systems

CONTENTS
1. INTRODUCTION 1-1
1.1 Background 1-1
1.2 Project History 1-2
1.3 Solwara 1 Project Proponent 1-3
1.4 Purpose of the Development 1-3
1.5 Environmental Settings and Issues 1-3
1.6 This Report 1-4
1.6.1 Approach to EIS 1-4
1.6.2 Statutory Context 1-5
1.6.3 EIS Scope 1-6
1.6.4 Report Structure 1-6
1.7 Areas Defined 1-8
2. VIABILITY OF THE PROJECT 2-1
2.1 Proponents Credentials 2-1
2.2 Feasibility Investigations 2-1
2.2.1 Geophysics 2-2
2.2.2 Engineering 2-3
2.2.3 Geotechnical Investigations 2-3
2.2.4 Resource Investigation 2-3
2.2.5 Oceanography 2-4
2.2.6 Water and Sediment Quality 2-4
2.2.7 Biology 2-4
2.3 Compatibility with PNG Government Strategies 2-5
3. POLICY, LEGAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE FRAMEWORK 3-1
3.1 PNG Legislation and Agreements 3-1
3.1.1 Mining Act 1992 3-1
3.1.2 Environment Act 2000 3-1
3.2 Other Legislation and Regulations 3-3
3.2.1 Existing 3-3
3.2.2 Proposed 3-4
3.2.3 Guidelines 3-4
3.3 International Environmental Agreements 3-5
3.4 Socioeconomic Impact Assessment Requirements 3-6
3.5 International Standards and Principles 3-7
3.5.1 Australian Guidelines 3-7
3.5.2 Equator Principles 3-7
Solwara 1 Project

ii

4. STAKEHOLDER CONSULTATION 4-1
4.1 Overview 4-1
4.2 Independent State of Papua New Guinea Consultation Requirements 4-1
4.3 Stakeholders 4-1
4.4 Public Consultation and Disclosure Program 4-4
4.4.1 Goals 4-4
4.4.2 Consultation Methods 4-4
4.4.3 Consultation Program 4-5
4.5 Documentation of Stakeholder Consultation 4-9
4.6 Consultation Outcomes 4-10
4.7 Continuing Consultation 4-11
5. DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT 5-1
5.1 Project Area Definition 5-1
5.1.1 Solwara 1 and South Su 5-1
5.1.2 Barge Corridor and Crew Transfers 5-1
5.1.3 Port of Rabaul 5-1
5.2 Project Components 5-2
5.2.1 Offshore 5-2
5.2.2 Onshore 5-2
5.3 Rationale for the Location of Project Components 5-3
5.3.1 Mining Method 5-3
5.3.2 Location of Onshore Facilities 5-3
5.4 Mineral Resource 5-4
5.5 Scale of the Project 5-4
5.6 Offshore Mining Equipment 5-5
5.6.1 Seafloor Mining Tool 5-5
5.6.2 Riser and Lift System 5-8
5.6.3 Mining Support Vessel 5-9
5.6.4 Remotely Operated Vehicles 5-10
5.7 Mining 5-10
5.7.1 Mine Plan 5-10
5.7.2 General Mining Sequence 5-13
5.8 Hazardous Materials Management 5-16
5.8.1 Transportation 5-16
5.8.2 Storage, Handling and Disposal 5-17
5.8.3 Fuel and Oil 5-17
5.8.4 Explosives 5-17
5.9 Workforce 5-17
5.9.1 Employment Policy 5-17
5.9.2 Workforce 5-18
5.10 Construction and Operating Standards 5-18
5.10.1 Design Codes 5-18
5.10.2 Health and Safety 5-18
Solwara 1 Project

iii

5.11 Commissioning 5-19
5.12 Decommissioning and Closure 5-19
5.12.1 Offshore Infrastructure 5-19
5.12.2 Onshore Facilities 5-19
6. DEVELOPMENT TIMETABLE 6-1
7. DESCRIPTION OF THE EXISTING ENVIRONMENT 7-1
7.1 General 7-1
7.1.1 Tectonics and Seismicity 7-1
7.1.2 Volcanism 7-2
7.1.3 Tsunamis 7-2
7.2 Studies Completed 7-3
7.3 Hydrothermal Vents 7-8
7.3.1 Introduction 7-8
7.3.2 Vent Environment and Biology 7-9
7.3.3 Issues and Studies 7-10
7.4 Meteorology and Air Quality 7-11
7.4.1 Climate 7-11
7.4.2 Air Quality 7-12
7.5 Physical Oceanography and Deep Sea Sedimentation 7-12
7.5.1 Regional Current Circulation 7-12
7.5.2 Tides in the Eastern Bismarck Sea 7-13
7.5.3 Oceanography at Solwara 1 7-13
7.5.4 Deep Sea Sedimentation 7-15
7.6 Water Quality 7-16
7.7 Sediment Quality 7-20
7.7.1 Seafloor Geological Setting 7-20
7.7.2 Sediment Mineralogy and Geochemistry 7-21
7.8 Biological Environment 7-23
7.8.1 Surface and Water Column 7-24
7.8.2 Seafloor 7-29
7.8.3 Underwater Light, Noise and Vibrations 7-45
7.9 Description of the Existing Nearshore and Onshore Environment 7-47
7.9.1 General 7-48
7.9.2 Marine Environment 7-48
7.9.3 Terrestrial Flora and Fauna 7-50
7.9.4 Landform, Soils and Geology 7-50
7.9.5 Air Quality and Noise 7-50
7.9.6 Cultural Heritage 7-50
7.9.7 Existing Use 7-50
7.9.8 Port Management 7-52
8. SOCIOECONOMIC ENVIRONMENT 8-1
8.1 Papua New Guinea in Brief 8-1
8.1.1 Population and Society 8-1
8.1.2 Sovereignty 8-1
8.1.3 Communities, Religion and Language 8-1
Solwara 1 Project

iv

8.1.4 Land Ownership 8-2
8.1.5 Economy 8-2
8.1.6 United Nations Millennium Development 8-3
8.1.7 Government 8-4
8.2 Project Impact Area 8-5
8.2.1 Kavieng 8-5
8.2.2 Rabaul 8-6
8.3 Fisheries 8-7
8.3.1 Commercial Fisheries 8-7
8.3.2 Subsistence Fisheries 8-8
8.3.3 Simpson Harbour 8-8
8.4 Transportation 8-9
9. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS AND MITIGATION MEASURES 9-1
9.1 Definitions and Impact Assessment Criteria 9-1
9.1.1 Extent 9-2
9.1.2 Duration 9-2
9.1.3 Severity 9-2
9.2 Air Quality 9-2
9.3 Oceanography and Deep-sea Sedimentation 9-3
9.4 Offshore Water Quality 9-3
9.4.1 Issues to be Addressed 9-3
9.4.2 Mitigation and Management Measures 9-4
9.4.3 Residual Impacts 9-5
9.5 Sediment Quality 9-10
9.6 Biological Environment 9-14
9.6.1 Surface, Water Column and Nearshore 9-14
9.6.2 Seafloor Habitat and Biodiversity 9-18
9.6.3 Light and Underwater Noise 9-27
9.7 Maritime Safety and Interactions with Shipping 9-30
9.8 Quarantine 9-31
9.9 Waste Management and Emergency Response 9-32
9.10 Port of Rabaul 9-38
9.10.1 Marine Environment 9-38
9.10.2 Landform, Soils and Geology 9-39
Solwara 1 Project

v

9.10.3 Noise 9-39
9.10.4 Air Quality 9-40
10. SOCIOECONOMIC IMPACTS AND MITIGATION AND MANAGEMENT 10-1
10.1 Issues to be Addressed 10-1
10.2 Mitigation and Management Measures 10-3
10.2.1 Optimisation of Benefits 10-3
10.2.2 Management and Mitigation 10-3
10.3 Residual Impacts 10-4
10.3.1 Economic 10-4
10.3.2 Community Development Fund 10-5
10.3.3 Industry Diversity and Skills Development 10-5
10.3.4 In-migration and Community Conflicts 10-6
10.3.5 Fisheries and Marine Traffic 10-6
11. ACCIDENTAL EVENTS AND NATURAL HAZARDS 11-1
11.1 General 11-1
11.2 Extreme Weather 11-1
11.3 Seismicity, Volcanism and Tsunamis 11-2
11.4 Hazardous Material Leakage or Spillage 11-6
11.5 Fire and Explosion 11-7
11.6 Collisions 11-8
12. GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS AND CLIMATE CHANGE 12-1
12.1 Introduction 12-1
12.2 Estimated GHG Emissions 12-1
12.3 GHG Emissions Assessment 12-1
13. ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, MONITORING AND REPORTING 13-1
13.1 Introduction 13-1
13.2 Organisational Structure and Responsibilities 13-1
13.3 Environmental Management System 13-2
13.4 Environmental Management Plan 13-2
Solwara 1 Project

vi

13.4.1 Mitigation and Management 13-3
13.4.2 Monitoring 13-4
13.4.3 Reporting 13-5
14. STUDY TEAM 14-1
14.1 Nautilus 14-1
14.2 Coffey Natural Systems 14-1
14.3 EIS Specialist Subconsultants 14-2
15. REFERENCES 15-1
16. GLOSSARY 16-1

Tables
1.1 Solwara 1 Project EIS Supporting Studies 1-7
3.1 Other environmental legislation and regulations 3-3
3.2 General legislation and regulations 3-3
3.3 Proposed marine pollution bills 3-4
3.4 Applicable international agreements to which PNG is a signatory 3-5
3.5 Applicable IFC guidelines 3-8
4.1 Project stakeholders 4-2
4.2 Public consultation 4-5
4.3 Project response to issues raised during consultation sessions 4-10
5.1 Indicated and inferred mineral resource estimate (4% Cu cut off) 5-4
5.2 Comparison of the Solwara 1 Project with other PNG mines at time of EIS approval 5-5
5.3 SMT instrumentation and sensors 5-6
5.4 Mining support vessel technical details 5-9
5.5 Unconsolidated sediment removal rates 5-11
5.6 Competent waste material side casting rates 5-12
5.7 Offshore operations workforce 5-18
7.1 Geophysical and environmental studies completed at Manus Basin 7-3
7.2 General water quality and filtered metals at Solwara 1 in 2006 7-17
7.2 General water quality and filtered metals at Solwara 1 in 2006 (contd) 7-18
7.3 Wave Mercury 07 Campaign filtered metal concentrations at Solwara 1 7-19
7.4 Cetacean species likely to occur at Solwara 1 7-27
7.5 Meiobenthos from sediments at Solwara 1 and South Su (numbers of
individuals/10 cm
2
in top 1 cm of sediment) 7-42
7.6 Meiobenthos taxa (number of individuals/10 cm
2
) in abyssal plain sediments remote
from Solwara 1 7-43
7.7 Marine water quality adjacent to the Port of Rabaul 7-48
7.8 Port of Rabaul Ship Movement 1993 to 1997 7-51
7.9 Port of Rabaul Berth Dimensions 7-51
8.1 PNG development indicators at 2000 8-3
8.2 New Ireland performance against millennium goals 8-5
8.3 East New Britain performance against millennium goals 8-6
8.4 PNG domestic and locally based foreign fishing fleet catch composition 8-7
8.5 International fleet catch composition in the PNG EEZ 8-8
Solwara 1 Project

vii

9.1 Maximum acid-extractable metal concentrations measured in samples 9-6
9.2 Maximum concentrations of the metals measured in Phase 1 elutriate tests 9-7
9.3 Plume concentrations probability 9-9
9.4 Deposition of unconsolidated sediment and competent waste rock 9-12
9.5 Estimates of ballast water discharge 9-32
12.1 Predicted emissions of greenhouse gases (CO2-equivalent) 12-1
13.1 Summary of proposed seafloor monitoring program 13-6

Boxes
13.1 Environment Policy 13-2

Attachment
A Risk Register

Solwara 1 Project

viii

Solwara 1 Project

Nautilus Minerals Niugini 7008_09_Ch01_v4.doc
1-1

1. INTRODUCTION
1.1 Background
Nautilus Minerals Niugini Limited (Nautilus) is advancing a proposal to develop the Solwara 1
Project (the Project). The development involves world-first mining of high-grade polymetallic
Seafloor Massive Sulphide (SMS) deposits that are located at approximately 1,600 m water depth
on the floor of the Bismarck Sea, New Ireland Province, Papua New Guinea (PNG), about 50 km
north of Rabaul (Figure 1.1). SMS deposits are associated with hydrothermal vent systems and
are considered modern-day analogues of Volcanogenic Massive Sulphide (VMS) deposits that
have historically been major sources of the worlds copper, zinc, gold and silver.
The Project comprises two phases and it is proposed to develop Phase 1 in advance of Phase 2.
The two Project phases can be summarised as follows:
Phase 1. The initial phase of the Project involves recovering copper-, gold-, zinc- and silver-
rich SMS ore deposits from the ocean floor using a Seafloor Mining Tool (SMT) deployed from
a Mining Support Vessel (MSV). Ore mined by the SMT will be pumped to the MSV via a riser
and lifting system (RALS). Once at the surface, the ore will be dewatered and barged to a
temporary holding facility at the Port of Rabaul and then shipped overseas to a processing
facility and smelter.
Phase 2. The second phase involves treating the recovered materials locally in PNG and a
feasibility study will commence when Phase 1 has demonstrated the extraction and recovery
process and the Project has successfully achieved commercial production. The dewatered ore
mined from the seafloor will be barged to the concentrator (the preferred location within PNG is
yet to be finalised) for processing and the concentrate then shipped to an overseas smelter.
Phase 1 and Phase 2 of the Project will be addressed in separate environmental impact
statements (EISs). This EIS addresses Phase 1 only and therefore Phase 2 will not be discussed
further.
Nautilus, the Project Operator, has prepared this EIS as the statutory basis for the environmental
assessment of the Project. This will enable a ministerial decision on whether the Project should
proceed and, if so, under what conditions. Coffey Natural Systems Pty Ltd (Coffey) was
commissioned to assist Nautilus in the preparation of this EIS.
The EIS is founded on a series of supporting studies (see Section 1.6.4). Hard copies of the EIS
can be obtained on request from:
Mr Mel Togolo
PNG Country Manager, Nautilus Minerals Niugini Limited
Level 1, Deloitte Tower, Douglas Street
Port Moresby, NCD, Papua New Guinea

The EIS sets out a development proposal intended to enable engineering, cost, environmental,
commercial and social implications to be assessed by:
Solwara 1 Project

1-2

The Project proponent (see Section 1.3) in their decision to sanction the Project to proceed.
The public in formulating their responses to the EIS.
The relevant government agencies of the Independent State of Papua New Guinea in
evaluating the Projects public interest credentials and in formulating conditions under which it
might proceed.
The development proposal will continue to evolve as engineering work proceeds through the
detailed design phase. Nautilus does not expect these changes to materially affect the
conservative findings of this EIS but will assess these variations as a matter of course and report
any potentially significant change to the relevant government agencies.
1.2 Project History
Initial discovery of seafloor hydrothermal vent activity in the Bismarck Sea occurred in 1985 when
the US research vessel RV Moana Wave photographed sulphide deposits on the northern portion
of a geological feature known as Manus Ridge. The vent field, now known as Solwara 2, lies
approximately 200 km west-northwest of Solwara 1.
Subsequent to the discovery of Solwara 2, eleven additional hydrothermal vent systems have
been discovered in the Bismarck Sea during numerous international scientific research cruises.
Solwara 1, located in the Eastern Manus Basin, was discovered in 1996 by the Australian
Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO) during their
PACMANUS III cruise.
Several sulphide samples were collected from Solwara 1 during a number of scientific cruises in
the late 1990s. Analysis of samples indicated very high grades of copper, gold and silver and,
based on these findings, Nautilus applied for an exploration licence over Solwara 1. On 28
November 1997, Nautilus was granted Exploration Licence (EL) 1196, allowing exploration to
commence at Solwara 1.
Initial commercial exploration at Solwara 1 occurred in early 2005, when Placer Dome Oceania
Limited, as part of a Farm-In Agreement with Nautilus, completed a deep tow, side scan sonar
and lister dredge sampling program. Bulk sampling and ship-based drilling followed in early 2006.
During this campaign, simultaneous biological and physical environmental characterisation of
Solwara 1 commenced.
In mid 2006, Nautilus recovered all exploration rights from Placer Dome Oceania Limited and
undertook further exploration and scientific work. A scientific cruise with Woods Hole
Oceanographic Institute in August 2006, and a six-month exploration and environmental
investigation campaign in 2007 allowed further geological characterisation of the mineral resource
and EIS characterisation studies to take place.
Results from the geological investigations of the sulphide deposits at Solwara 1 have confirmed
the presence of copper and gold in grades high enough to allow commercial development to
proceed. Nautilus has committed to developing the Project, subject to obtaining the required
approvals, and engineering design has proceeded in parallel with the preparation of this EIS.
Solwara 1 Project

1-3

1.3 Solwara 1 Project Proponent
The development of the Solwara 1 Project is being proposed by Nautilus, its consultants and
contractors. Nautilus is a wholly owned subsidiary of Nautilus Minerals Inc., a publicly traded
company listed on the Toronto (TSX) and the London (AIM) stock exchanges.
Among Nautilus' cornerstone shareholders are three of the world's largest resource companies,
namely Anglo American (5.7%), Teck Cominco (7.2%), and Epion Holdings (22.4%).
Within PNG, Nautilus holds exploration licences in the Bismarck and Solomon Seas totalling 51
granted exploration licences, covering 107,917 km
2
, and 37 exploration licence applications,
covering 88,906 km
2
. Outside PNG, Nautilus holds granted prospecting licences in Tonga and the
Solomon Islands and has applications pending in Tonga, Fiji and New Zealand.
1.4 Purpose of the Development
The proposed development will mine SMS deposits from the seafloor at Solwara 1 and focus on
the recovery of copper and gold using methods that are environmentally responsible, socially
acceptable, technologically achievable and economically viable. The Project will implement the
PNG resource development policy in a manner consistent with current legislation that enables the
Project to proceed whilst appropriately regulating its development and impacts. The Project is
consistent with the Fourth National Goal and Directive Principle of the Constitution of PNG, which
states:
We declare our Fourth Goal to be for Papua New Guineas natural resources and environment to be
conserved and used for the collective benefit of us all, and be replenished for the benefit of future
generations.
Seafloor mining presents a potential new source of income and growth for PNG from a resource
that has yet to be utilised. The Project will bring benefits in the form of:

Training and employment opportunities for PNG citizens.
Opportunities for local businesses to provide goods and services to the Project.
Monetary benefits such as taxes, royalties, fees and compensation payments.
Ongoing generation of human and financial capital in PNG, which will underpin further
economic and social development in PNG.
Improvements in the nations balance of trade, infrastructure development and commercial,
employment and educational opportunities.

In particular, these benefits would be maintained for the nominal Project life and beyond.
Stakeholder consultation has indicated that the Project has good support in the region.
Seafloor mining also presents a possible source of resource development and industry
diversification for PNG. Nautilus has exploration interests throughout the Bismarck and Solomon
seas and will seek to continue seafloor mining in PNG if this Project is successful.
1.5 Environmental Settings and Issues
There are a number of aspects of the Project that set it apart from other mining projects
worldwide.
Solwara 1 Project

1-4

First of all, it is relatively small scale; there is no need for large-scale site preparation or
construction of complex facilities, and no direct landowner issues. Instead, its footprint is
principally that of a single mining vessel (with attendant support vessels) and precision mining
machinery operating on a target area of just 0.112 km
2
of seafloor. The Project proposes the first-
ever attempt to commercially develop SMS deposits, including small areas of active mineralised
chimney habitats and their associated colonies of hydrothermal vent fauna. Understanding the
impacts of mining on these biological communities is the fundamental environmental issue for the
Project.
In an effort to enhance scientific knowledge while meeting the needs of this EIS, Nautilus has
engaged international scientific experts to design and conduct environmental studies at Solwara 1
and the surrounding area. In addition, Nautilus has provided the oceanographic and deep sea
sampling platforms required to conduct this work.
The facilities required for the environmental research comprise the same basic platform of vessel
and remotely operated vehicle (ROV) seafloor sampling equipment utilised for mineral exploration
of the seafloor. Consequently, the proposed mine site at Solwara 1 and a reference site 2 km to
the southeast have become the most intensively studied hydrothermal areas in the region. In
particular, sampling by ROV enables visual and manipulative precision in sampling (e.g., of
sediments and animals, even down to selected species and individuals) that is impossible by
remote grab sampling from surface, however sophisticated the equipment.
The application of complex ship-borne technology is not limited to exploration and baseline
studies. Once in operation, the mining process provides a larger but similar vessel and ROV
platform for continuing environmental monitoring work, allowing validation of predictions and
effects of mitigation measures. These are developed in detail in the ensuing sections of this EIS.
The fact that mining cannot exhaust the underlying geothermal energy that drives the formation of
the chimneys and sulphide deposits is unique to this Project and this, combined with the precision
abilities of the ROVs, offers opportunities to enhance recovery. These too are explored in this
EIS.
In comparison with typical EISs for land-based projects in PNG, the offshore location of the
Project has necessarily shifted the consultative focus from landowner issues (as there are no
direct impacts) to the more international scientific input described above. Nevertheless,
consultation with governments, regional communities in New Ireland and East New Britain and
other offshore resource users has been followed throughout the impact assessment process to
ensure awareness of the fundamentals of the Project, particularly those that differentiate it from
other projects, and to provide the forum for raising and receiving responses to concerns.
All of the factors mentioned in this section have defined the conduct of the baseline studies and
consultation plans and Nautilus approach to the EIS.
1.6 This Report
1.6.1 Approach to EIS
The approach to this EIS necessarily reflects the Project characteristics, and the proposed studies
and assessments were described in the Environmental Inception Report (Enesar, 2007), which
was approved by DEC in May 2007. Detailed and well-planned studies are required in order to
understand the pre-development environment to allow an assessment of expected impacts and to
propose effective mitigation and management measures.
Solwara 1 Project

1-5

To accomplish this, Nautilus has engaged with international experts and non government
organizations (NGOs) which, via workshops and consultation, have provided input into identifying
the main areas of concern, and the studies needed to address those issues. Nautilus has
dedicated vessel and ROV time specifically for the use of deep sea hydrothermal vent specialists
in completing the baseline surveys, some of which have extended into a broader acquisition of
knowledge and publishable scientific research.
The reports of these studies are included as supporting documents in the appendices (Volume B
of this EIS), with summaries given in Chapter 7. While the impacts to the seafloor and its
hydrothermal chimneys have been identified as the main defining issue for this Project, Chapter 7
also includes all other descriptions of existing environment, including meteorology, air quality,
oceanography, water and sediment quality, mid-water and surface-water biology, resource use
and occurrence of large marine mammals and turtles.
The offshore components of the Project have no impacts to landowners. Nevertheless, social
awareness and general acceptance of the Project will be important for successful operation.
Nautilus has maintained regular contact with regional stakeholders and government agencies
from New Ireland, East New Britain and Port Moresby to keep them informed of Project
development progress and to understand any concerns. Meetings have been held regularly over
the past two years to maintain this contact and consultation is described in Chapter 4. The
general demographic characteristics of the Project area are described in Chapter 8, together with
the issues raised at these meetings and how they have been addressed. Most have related to
distribution of benefits and access to fisheries resources.
The process of impact assessment was approached first through an internal risk assessment of
issues at each engineering step of the process. The results of this provided the initial assessment
of potential hazards, impacts, mitigation strategies and severity of residual effects. This was
further developed at the April 2008 workshop held in San Diego, USA, where input was provided
by an international team of scientists on appropriate mitigation measures aimed at protecting
biodiversity of the Solwara 1 area. These measures have been adopted and proposed by
Nautilus. Chapter 9, Offshore Environmental Impacts and Mitigation Measures, is structured in
three parts: a) the main issues, b) proposed mitigation measures and c) the residual effects after
mitigation measures have been implemented. This mirrors each of the sections in Chapter 7 and
covers all operational aspects of the Project. Residual risks are assessed in terms of the scale
and duration of impact. The equivalent for social issues is provided in Chapter 10.
The final chapters of the EIS cover accidental and natural hazards, such as volcanic eruptions,
earthquakes and tsunamis (Chapter 11), greenhouse gas and climate change (Chapter 12), and
environmental management, monitoring and reporting (Chapter 13). Much of the environmental
management and monitoring programs emerged from the San Diego workshop, where impacts
were considered as impact hypotheses, testable in the binary sense that a predicted condition
would or would not occur. This has set the framework for the monitoring tasks and, while details
of locations of sites and frequencies are yet to be provided, Chapter 13 comprises a
comprehensive set of conditions for pre-operational baseline and ongoing operational (and post-
operational) monitoring tasks.
A detailed list of the EIS structure is provided in Section 1.6.4.
1.6.2 Statutory Context
For new mineral development projects in PNG, the proponent is required to meet the applicable
PNG laws and regulations. In November 2000, the PNG Government approved the Environment
Solwara 1 Project

1-6

Act 2000, which was implemented with its associated regulations in January 2004. The Project is
a Level 3 activity under the Environment Act 2000 (Sub-Category 17), for which an Environmental
Impact Statement (EIS) is required to be submitted to the Department of Environment and
Conservation (DEC).
This report constitutes the EIS for the Phase 1 of the Project. The EIS process is described in
Section 3.1.
1.6.3 EIS Scope
This EIS seeks approval to construct and commission both the onshore and offshore components
for Phase 1 of the Solwara 1 Project.
1.6.4 Report Structure
The EIS is presented in three volumes:
A stand-alone executive summary, prepared in English and Pidgin that provides a summary of
the proposal.
A main report (this report, Volume A), intended to be a stand-alone document that can
generally be understood without reference to the technical reports upon which it is based.
A volume (Volume B) comprising the technical reports generated by the various investigations
supporting the EIS. These reports are appendices to the main EIS report.
The EIS does not disclose information that is confidential for cultural or commercial reasons, but
Nautilus may provide the latter in confidence to DEC upon request.
The main report comprises 16 chapters, as well as a table of contents that outlines figures, tables
and plates in the relevant chapters. The references include bibliographic details for each source
cited in the main report.
The format of the main report is:
Chapter 1 (this chapter) provides background and purpose of the development and structure
of the EIS.
Chapter 2 details the viability of the Project, including the proponents credentials, feasibility
investigations and compatibility with PNG Government objectives.
Chapter 3 provides an overview of PNG legislative requirements, legal administration,
international agreements and other guidelines applicable to the Project.
Chapter 4 describes the consultation program that has been undertaken and is ongoing for
the Project.
Chapter 5 describes the proposed Project including both onshore and offshore elements and
alternatives considered.
Chapter 6 the proposed timetable for implementation of the Project.
Chapter 7 describes the existing environment within and around the Project area.
Chapter 8 describes the socioeconomic situation in the Project area.
Solwara 1 Project

1-7

Chapter 9 documents potential environmental issues, the approach and nature of various
investigations, mitigation and management measures and assessment of residual impacts.
Chapter 10 documents the potential socioeconomic impacts, the approach and nature of
various investigations, mitigation and management measures and assessment of residual
impacts.
Chapter 11 details potential natural hazards, accidents and corresponding safeguards.
Chapter 12 details Project greenhouse gas emissions.
Chapter 13 provides a summary of Nautilus proposed environmental management policy
and an outline of the proposed monitoring and reporting activities.
Chapter 14 details the individuals who contributed to the preparation of the EIS.
Chapter 15 bibliographic details of each reference used in the main report.
Chapter 16 glossary.
The supporting studies that are appendices to the main EIS report are set out in Table 1.1.
Table 1.1 Solwara 1 Project EIS Supporting Studies
Appendix Number Supporting Study Title Author
1 Baseline Environmental Study Eastern Manus Basin,
Papua New Guinea Module 1 Preliminary Scoping
Study
CSIRO Division of
Exploration and Mining
2 Baseline Environmental Study Eastern Manus Basin,
Papua New Guinea Module 2 Detailed Scoping
Study
CSIRO Division of
Exploration and Mining
3 Oceanography at Solwara 1 Coffey Natural Systems
4 Characterization and comparison of macrofauna at
inactive and active sulphide mounds at Solwara 1 and
South Su (Manus Basin)
Duke University Marine
Laboratory
5 Macroinfauna of Active and Inactive Hydrothermal
Sediments From Solwara 1 and South Su, Manus
Basin, Papua New Guinea
Integrative Oceanography
Division Scripps
Institution of
Oceanography
6 Quality Including Trace Elements of Sediments from
the SuSu Knolls, Manus Basin, Bismarck Sea, Papua
New Guinea
Department of Geology,
University of Toronto
7 Water and Sediment Characterisation and Toxicity
Assessment for the Solwara 1 Project
CSIRO Land and Water
Science
8 Juvenile Amphipod Whole Sediment Test Report CSIRO Land and Water
Science
9 Elutriate Testing Report Solwara 1 Project,
Incorporating Phase 1: Effect of Holding Time;
Phase 2: Effect of Temperature
Charles Darwin University
10 Biomass, Biodiversity and Bioaccumulation Desktop
Study
Hydrobiology Pty Ltd
11 Modelling the Dispersion and Settlement of Sediment
Removal Operation Prior to Mining at the Solwara 1
Mining Lease, Papua New Guinea
Asia-Pacific ASA
Solwara 1 Project

1-8

Table 1.1 Solwara 1 Project EIS Supporting Studies (contd)
Appendix Number Supporting Study Title Author
12 Modelling the Dispersion of the Returned Water
Discharge Plume from the Solwara 1 Seabed Mining
Project Manus Basin, Papua New Guinea
Asia-Pacific ASA
13 Prediction of underwater noise associated with a
proposed deep-sea mining operation in the Bismarck
Sea
Curtin University of
Technology Centre for
Marine Science and
Technology
14 The Potential for Natural Disasters being Triggered by
Mineral Extraction at the Solwara 1 Seafloor
Hydrothermal Vent Site
Rabaul Volcanological
Observatory
15 Stakeholder Consultation Coffey Natural Systems

1.7 Areas Defined
This EIS discusses the issues and impacts associated with the Project in a range of spatial
contexts that are set out below and outlined below.
Solwara 1, North Su and South Su - the areas defined as Solwara 1, North Su and South Su
are shown in Figure 1.2.
Barge corridor and crew transfer routes barge and crew transfer routes that will be used
during operations are shown in Figure 1.3.
Port of Rabaul - project facilities to be used during operations at the Port of Rabaul are shown
in Figure 1.3.

Solwara 1 Project

2-1

2. VIABILITY OF THE PROJECT
2.1 Proponents Credentials
Nautilus Minerals Niugini Limited (Nautilus) is a wholly owned subsidiary of Nautilus Minerals Inc.,
a publicly listed company on the Toronto (TSX:NUS) and London (AIM: NUS) stock exchanges
with interests in the commercial exploitation of seafloor SMS deposits.
The Project first received international attention in 1997 when the PNG Government granted the
worlds first exploration licence (EL 1196) for Manus Basin SMS deposits to Nautilus. After limited
exploration activities in the following years, Nautilus (then known as Nautilus Minerals Corporation
Limited) negotiated a Farm-In Agreement with Placer Dome Oceania Limited (PDOL) (wholly
owned by Placer Dome Inc. [PDI]) in 2004, in which PDOL committed to earning a percentage of
the Nautilus projects via specific expenditure. Successful exploration programs were
subsequently completed by PDOL in early 2005 and 2006.
Barrick Gold Corporation (Barrick) acquired PDI in early 2006 and, in July 2006, Barrick entered
into an agreement with Nautilus whereby Barricks interest in the Project was converted into an
equity stake in Nautilus. Following Barricks equity stake, three companies, Epion Holding Limited,
Taurus Investments SA (a wholly owned subsidiary of Anglo American PLC (Anglo)) and Teck
Cominco Limited invested in Nautilus and became major shareholders of the company.
In February 2007, Nautilus completed a listing on the London Alternative Investment Market (AIM)
and raised US$100 million in a brokered institutional equity placement. It also raised
US$75 million in a brokered private placement on the Toronto Stock Exchange.
Within PNG, Nautilus holds exploration licences in the Bismarck and Solomon Seas totalling
51 granted exploration licences, covering 107,917 km
2
, and 37 exploration licence applications,
covering 88,906 km
2
. Outside PNG, Nautilus holds granted prospecting licences in Tonga and the
Solomon Islands and has applications pending in Tonga, Fiji and New Zealand.
The Independent State of Papua New Guinea has a statutory right to acquire up to 30% equity in
the Project. Should this occur, the State is required to reimburse Nautilus the equivalent
percentage of funds expended by Nautilus to date, and contribute to further exploration and
development costs on a pro rata basis.
2.2 Feasibility Investigations
While the Project is the first proposed commercial development of SMS deposits anywhere in the
world, much of the remote subsea technology required is available or adaptable from that
commonly used in offshore oil and gas, telecommunication and dredging industries. Technology
commonly used by these industries, such as ROVs, electric motors, hydraulic systems, subsea
pumps, and umbilical power cables, is expected to be directly transferable to the Project. Nautilus
has developed alliances with key offshore equipment and service providers, which have
conducted engineering tests and assisted in the development of suitable seafloor mining
equipment.
The Solwara 1 deposit comprises high-grade sulphide mineralisation that has been sampled and
tested to indicate that marketable concentrates of copper and gold can be produced using
standard froth flotation techniques. The financial viability of the Project is underpinned by the high
mineral grades of Solwara 1. A National Instrument 43-101-compliant (CSA, 2005) estimate of the
Solwara 1 Project

2-2

seafloor massive sulphide resource at Solwara 1 has been completed (Golder Associates, 2008).
The basis for the estimate is provided in Section 5.4 and shows that at Solwara 1:
The Indicated Mineral Resource is 870 kt of ore containing 6.8% copper and 4.8 g/t of gold.
The Inferred Mineral Resource is 1,300 kt of ore containing 7.5% copper and 7.2 g/t of gold.
Accessing the high grade ores directly from the seafloor surface involves substantially less use of
heavy machinery in the stripping and storage of overburden and waste rock and some reductions
in gaseous emissions and solid wastes per tonne of product compared with conventional mining.
On the other hand, the environmental characteristics and potential impacts to the seafloor areas
of the massive sulphide deposits are less well known. Consequently, long-lead time,
environmental monitoring studies have been conducted since December 2005 to provide the
basis for understanding the existing environment at Solwara 1. Specifically, the aim of these (and
subsequent) studies was to:
Establish existing conditions and an understanding of the existing environment.
Determine potential environmental issues.
Provide a basis for determining avoidance, management and mitigation measures (and their
effective implementation).
Provide a basis for environmental impact assessment. Details of the EIS studies are provided
in Section 7.2.
Socioeconomic studies have been undertaken to:
Establish existing conditions.
Identify potential commercial, educational, health and employment opportunities.
Provide a basis for a socioeconomic impact assessment.
Determine management priorities.
While environmental studies commenced at the end of 2005, Nautilus has been actively exploring
the Manus Basin since 1997. Studies have included geophysical surveys, bulk sampling,
conceptual mining studies, water quality investigations, oceanographic investigations, seafloor
mapping and biological surveys. A significant amount of information on the mineral resource and
existing environmental conditions has been collected. Major studies and surveys carried out so far
are summarised below.
2.2.1 Geophysics
Geophysical survey (Williamson and Associates, 2005 as cited in Enesar, 2007). This
geophysical survey used geophysics, sonar, induced polarisation, resistivity, self potential,
magnetics and gravity measurements in order to map the seafloor.
Video survey (College of William and Mary, James Cook University and University of Toronto
on behalf of Placer Dome and Nautilus, 2006 as cited in Enesar, 2007). This survey of the
seafloor provided detailed video images of chimney locations and other geological and
biological features at Solwara 1.
Bathymetric survey (Century Subsea and Williamson and Associates, 2005 to 2006 as cited in
Enesar, 2007). This side scan sonar survey resulted in the generation of a detailed
bathymetric map of Solwara 1 site.
Solwara 1 Project

2-3

Electromagnetic survey by Nautilus during the Wave Mercury 07 Campaign. The survey
delineated a conductivity anomaly that correlates extremely well with 2007 drill hole data and
has been used to aid the interpretation of the geology.
2.2.2 Engineering
Pre-feasibility study (PFS) (Worley Parsons, 2005). This study concluded that much of the
technology required for the Project was already available from the offshore oil, gas and
telecommunications industries. The study further assessed the Project on a financial basis and
found that the mining venture could be economically competitive with terrestrial mines.
Subsea cutting test (Cellula Robotics, 2006). These tests investigated the performance of an
excavator deployed to the ocean floor at depths 1,500 to 1,700 m. The purpose of the trial was
to determine the excavator and cutterhead performance under hydrostatic pressure and depth.
Dewatering system study (Technip Offshore, 2006a). This study investigated potential
dewatering systems for Solwara 1.
Mining system design concept study (Cellula Robotics, 2006). This compared and described
various mining concepts for Solwara 1.
Seafloor Mining Tool design (SMD, 2008). This design resulted in a detailed engineering
design for the Seafloor Mining Tool.
Riser and Lift System design (Technip Offshore, 2008b). Design of the riser and lift system
and dewatering process aboard the Mining Support Vessel.
Mining services design (Clough, 2008). A detailed design of the mining process.
2.2.3 Geotechnical Investigations
Detailed testwork program (Golder Associates & Nautilus Minerals, 2008). A program of
geotechnical testwork on drill core in a laboratory established onboard the vessel Wave
Mercury during the Wave Mercury 07 Campaign allowed geotechnical and density
characteristics of the ore to be established.
Compression testing (Strata Testing Services, 2007). These tests were conducted on 17
samples and resulted in a characterisation of undrained triaxial compression of Solwara 1 ore.
Abrasivity testing (University of Melbourne, 2007). Forty core samples were tested for
abrasiveness and showed that seafloor materials at Solwara 1 can be mined.
2.2.4 Resource Investigation
Drilling program (SRK, 2006). Trial cutting tests and bulk sampling also provided an
opportunity for a number of environmental investigations of water quality, oceanography and
biology.
Polymetallic sulphide property test (Placer Dome, 2006). Detailed mineralogical analyses were
carried out on the polymetallic sulphide material mined from the Manus Basin.
Drilling program (Golder Associates, 2008). A program of diamond core drilling of 111 holes
from the vessel Wave Mercury using ROVs lowered onto the seafloor. Nautilus engaged
Golder Associates to provide a range of services including establishment of an onboard
geotechnical logging and testing program.
Solwara 1 Project

2-4

Resource estimate (Golder Associates, 2008). A National Instrument 43-101-compliant (CSA,
2005) estimate was completed in 2008.
2.2.5 Oceanography
Oceanographic study (Coffey Natural Systems, 2008) [Appendix 3] Full ocean water column
current metering was undertaken during January 2006 and from October 2006 to March 2008.
Additionally, oceanographic profiles of conductivity, temperature, salinity and transmissivity
were conducted at Solwara 1.
Regional oceanographic characterisation (Cresswell, G., 2007). This provides a compilation of
the locations of all available oceanographic and meteorological data for the Manus Basin. Data
was found as far back as 1985.
Metocean data summary (Triton, 2006). This study examined and summarised commercial
sources of meteorological and oceanographic data.
Design Criteria Study (RPS Metocean, 2008). This report summarises the analysis carried out
and the data prepared to determine specific meteorological and oceanographic design criteria
for the components of the mining system.
2.2.6 Water and Sediment Quality
Water quality monitoring (Enesar, 2006a). Water sampling was undertaken during the drilling
program. The parameters measured included physico-chemical variables, inorganic species
and total organic carbon.
Water sampling program (CSIRO, 2007) [Appendix 7]. A water sampling program at Solwara 1
was carried out by CSIRO Land and Water Science in 2007. Laboratory analysis provided a
characterisation of physico-chemical parameters.
Sediment geochemistry (University of Toronto, 2007) [Appendix 6]. A sampling program was
undertaken in 2007 that collected sediment cores from Solwara 1 and South Su. The cores
were analysed in association with cores taken from previous studies to determine baseline
sediment geochemistry and composition of seafloor sediments.
2.2.7 Biology
Global sulphide mound ecosystems research (Cindy L. van Dover, 2005 ongoing as cited in
Enesar 2007). A series of studies has compared different sulphide chimney sites in terms of
their associated biology and vent activity.
Manus Basin baseline environmental study (CSIRO, 2005-2007) [Appendices 1 and 2]. CSIRO
was engaged to complete three modules of study as follows:
Module 1 identified and compiled information already available from the Bismarck Sea,
including published materials and cruise reports and unpublished data.
Module 2 followed on from Module 1 and included a detailed review of databases,
culminating in a gap analysis report with recommendations for a baseline environmental
study.
Module 3 involved the compilation of environmental baseline data on species diversity and
endemism, habitat distribution of microfauna and macrofauna associated with sulphide
chimney systems in the Manus Basin.
Solwara 1 Project

2-5

Macrofauna research project (The College of William and Mary, 2006 as cited in Enesar 2007).
This study included biological observations of megafauna (animals >2 cm) from sample
collections from Solwara 1, using digital photography and real-time video analysis.
Macrofauna research project (James Cook University, 2006 as cited in Enesar, 2007).
Investigations of the macrofauna (animals 250 !m to 2 cm) of the sediments and sedimentary
characteristics of the Solwara 1 deposit area were carried out from samples collected using
ROV-operated box cores.
Microfauna research project (University of Toronto, 2006 as cited in Enesar, 2007).
Investigations of the microfauna (animals 63 !m to 250 !m) of the Solwara 1 deposit area from
sediment samples collected using ROV-operated push cores.
Benthic habitat assessment (Scripps Institution of Oceanography, 2007) [Appendix 5]. Visual
assessment from video transects, and sediment samples for faunal characterisation adjacent
to areas of venting at Solwara 1.
Biomass, biodiversity and bioaccumulation study (Hydrobiology, 2008) [Appendix 10]. A
desktop study assessed the potential for contaminants to accumulate via the food chain into
top-order species such as surface schooling mackerel and tuna. The study also predicted the
effect of mining activities on deep-sea species that rely on bioluminescence.
Endemicity investigations (Duke University, 2007) [Appendix 4]. This study sampled
macrofauna at active and inactive sites at Solwara 1 and South Su. The study identified
species present at these two locations and determined the taxonomic and genetic similarities
via deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) analysis with species of vent communities at local, regional
and global scales.
Video survey (Placer Dome & Nautilus Minerals, 2006). A systematic survey of Solwara 1 and
South Su was undertaken with still and video cameras mounted on an ROV. This footage,
combined with images captured during other work at both sites, has resulted in the capture of
over 3,000 hours of footage.
These studies have assisted Nautilus to define the Solwara 1 deposit, and to understand the
geological, biological and environmental characteristics of the resource.
2.3 Compatibility with PNG Government Strategies
The proposed development will mine SMS deposits at Solwara 1 for copper and gold using
methods that are environmentally responsible, socially acceptable, technologically achievable and
economically viable. As such, the Project is consistent with the Fourth National Goal and Directive
Principle of the Constitution of PNG, which states:
We declare our Fourth Goal to be for Papua New Guineas natural resources and environment to be
conserved and used for the collective benefit of us all, and be replenished for the benefit of future
generations.
Seafloor mining presents a potential new source of wealth and growth for PNG. The Project will
bring benefits in the form of royalties, and improvements in the nations balance of trade,
employment opportunities and potential for new industrial development that will have positive
social and economic effects within PNG. In particular, these benefits would be maintained for the
nominal Project life and probably beyond.
Solwara 1 Project

2-6

Seafloor mining also presents a possible source of industry diversification for PNG. Nautilus has
exploration licences throughout the Bismarck and Solomon seas and intends to evaluate the
potential of these licences and, where appropriate, apply for and mine any additional economic
resources that it discovers.
Project compatibility with PNG Government legislation and policy is discussed further in
Chapter 3.

Solwara 1 Project

3-1

3. POLICY, LEGAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE
FRAMEWORK
This chapter describes the PNG legislation and agreements relevant to the Project. Additionally, it
discusses international standards and principles that the Project has adopted.
The Independent State of Papua New Guinea promotes the development of its mineral resources
through various policies to manage investment and impacts. This is supported by a legislative and
policy framework, which ensures that approved developments assess, reduce and manage any
residual social and environmental impacts such that they are as low as practicable.
It is a government priority and constitutional requirement to ensure the people of PNG benefit
from the development of their resources, but within a sustainable, environmentally responsible
and socially acceptable manner. The Mining Act provides that mineral resources belong to the
state and that licences are required to explore, recover or sell these resources.
3.1 PNG Legislation and Agreements
The principal pieces of PNG legislation regulating the environmental and socioeconomic aspects
of the Solwara 1 Project are the Mining Act 1992 and the Environment Act 2000.
3.1.1 Mining Act 1992
The Mining Act is presently the principal policy and regulatory document governing the mining
industry in PNG. The Mining Act vests ownership of all minerals in or below the surface of land (or
under the sea) with the national government, and governs the exploration, development,
processing and transport of minerals.
This is the first proposal for deep-sea mining of seafloor massive sulphide deposits and, as such,
represents a new activity in environments where potential impacts have not previously been
assessed. While the project is located beyond PNGs internal waters
1
, the Mining Act allows
exploration activities and mining of minerals to be undertaken on the seafloor within PNG
territorial waters. The Solwara 1 deposit falls into this category.
3.1.2 Environment Act 2000
The Department of Environment and Conservation (DEC) administers the Environment Act 2000,
the legal framework for regulating the environmental effects of the Solwara 1 Project.
On 5 October 2006, Nautilus submitted a Notification of Preparatory Work on Level 2 and Level 3
Activities to the DEC under the provisions of the Environment Act 2000 for the first phase of the
Solwara 1 Project.
Phase one of the Solwara 1 Project is a Level 3 activity under the Environment Act 2000
(Category 18.1), for which an environmental impact statement (EIS) is required. Accordingly, on

1
A nations internal waters are defined as all waters and waterways on the landward side of the baseline (usually defined
as the lowest astronomical tide line) from which a nations territorial waters are defined. It includes waterways such as
rivers and lakes, and sometimes the water within small bays.
Solwara 1 Project

3-2

17 October 2006, DEC issued a Notice To Undertake Environmental Impact Assessment under
Section 50 in the following manner:
Submit an Environmental Inception Report (EIR) under Section 52. The objectives of the EIR
were to:
Identify the potential environmental and social issues of developing the Project.
Describe the scope of the EIS to address these issues.
Initiate the formal process of stakeholder consultation.
Enable DEC to review the proposed EIS scope and redress any shortcomings.
Nautilus submitted the EIR for the offshore component of the Solwara 1 Project on 1 February
2007. DEC approved the EIR on 28 May 2007.
Submit an EIS under Section 53 (this document).
The DEC (2004) publication Guideline for Conduct of Environmental Impact Assessment and
Preparation of Environmental Impact Statement describes EIS requirements. It requires the EIS to
assess potential environmental and social impacts of the Solwara 1 Project and to describe how
the proponent intends to avoid, manage or mitigate these impacts.
Approval Process
Figure 3.1 shows the EIS approval process stipulated by Section 51 of the Environment Act 2000.
The EIS is submitted to the Director who has 30 days to inform the proponent how long the
assessment period will be. The Director, while assessing the EIS, may refer the EIS to a number
of bodies, such as an environment consultative group or a public enquiry committee. If a
provincial environment committee has been established, the Director must refer the EIS to the
committee for its comments.
After this preliminary assessment period, the Director will make the EIS available for public review
and, during this time, the proponent may be required to make public presentations or submit a
program of public review.
Following the public review, the Director must make a decision to accept or reject the EIS. If the
EIS is rejected, the decision can be appealed under Section 68 of the Environment Act 2000. If
the EIS is accepted, the Director must refer the decision to the Environment Council together with
an assessment report and any public submissions. The Environment Council then has 90 days to
decide whether it is satisfied with the EIS. If the Council is not satisfied with the EIS, it is returned
to the proponent for revision and resubmission. If the Council is satisfied with the EIS, it advises
the Minister to approve the proposed activity in principle. The proponent can then apply for a
permit to carry out its project.
Environmental Permit and Management
An EIS (e.g., this document) must accompany a permit application for a Level 3 activity.
Sections 65 and 66 of the Environment Act 2000 provide criteria for granting and setting
conditions of permits respectively. Under Section 66, these conditions may include installation of
monitoring equipment (s.66(1)(c)), preparation and carrying out an environmental management
program (s.66(1)(d)), audits (s.66(1)(g)), emergency response (s.66(1)(h)), baseline studies
(s.66(1)(k)) and rehabilitation (s.66(1)(l)). Part VII of the Environment Act 2000 provides for
permits for the use of water resources in PNG, including dams, diversions, discharges of wastes
and/or contaminants and the taking of water resources via water use and investigation permits.
Solwara 1 Project

3-3

The Environmental (Water Quality Guidelines) Regulation 2002 (Independent State of Papua New
Guinea, 2002) prescribes water quality guidelines to be met beyond a mixing zone by discharges
to the natural water environment.
Chapter 13 describes the proposed environmental management framework for the Project.
3.2 Other Legislation and Regulations
3.2.1 Existing
The PNG legislation has been reviewed to identify those acts and regulations that are applicable
to preparing the EIS and implementing the Project. Table 3.1 provides a summary of legislation
that may apply.
Table 3.1 Other environmental legislation and regulations
Statutory Instrument Implications for Solwara 1 Project
Environmental Legislation
The Fauna (Protection and Control
Amendment) Act 1974 (Chapter 154)
Propose/implement measures to prevent workforce
poaching.
The International Trade (Fauna and Flora) Act
1979 (Chapter 391)
Propose/implement measures to prevent workforce
poaching.
Dumping of Wastes at Sea Act 1979 (see
Section 3.2.2 below)
Requirement for a permit for dumping of substances other
than those substances and articles derived from the
normal operation of a vessel.
Prevention of Pollution at Sea Act 1979
(Chapter 371) (see Section 3.2.2 below)
Standard offshore operating requirements for contractors.
Environment Regulations
Environment (Councils Procedures)
Regulation 2002
Procedures of the Environment Council (who will provide
advice to the Minister on this EIS).
Environment (Prescribed Activities) Regulation
2002
The Project is Level 3 activity (Sub-Category 17) requiring
an EIS (this document).
Environment (Water Quality Criteria)
Regulation 2002
Permit required to set a mixing zone, at whose boundary
prescribed water quality criteria are to be met.
Environment (Fees and Charges) Regulation
2002
Fees for an EIS.
Procedures for permit fees and charges for water use,
discharges to water and disturbed area runoff.
Fees and charges to be set by DEC.
In addition, a range of acts and regulations covering commercial, professional and health issues
of relevance to the Project are provided in Table 3.2.
Table 3.2 General legislation and regulations
Mining (Safety) Act 1977
Mining (Safety) Regulations 1935
Industrial Safety, Health and Welfare Act 1961
(Chapter 175) (Mining (Safety Act 1977 takes
precedence)
Industrial Safety, Health and Welfare Regulation
1965 (Chapter 175A)
Industrial Safety (Explosive-Powered Tools)
Order 1973 (Chapter 175D)
Telecommunications Act 1996
Trade Licensing Act 1969 (Chapter 96)
Accountants Act 1996
Business Names Act 1963 (Chapter 145)
Business Name Regulation 1964 (Chapter 145)
Investment Promotion Act 1992
Investment Promotion Regulation 1992
Medical Registration Act 1980 (Chapter 398)

Solwara 1 Project

3-4

Table 3.2 General legislation and regulations (contd)
Explosives Act 1953 (Chapter 308)
Building Act 1971 (Chapter 301)
Building Regulations 1994
Licensing of Heavy Vehicles Act 1977 (Chapter
367)
National Institute of Standards and Technology
Act 1993
Road Maintenance Act 1971 (Chapter 246)
Customs Act 1951 (Chapter 101)
Customs Regulation 1951 (Chapter 101A)
Customs (Prohibited Imports) Regulation 1973
(Chapter 101C)
Public Health (Drinking Water) Regulation 1984
(Chapter 226)
Public Health (Sanitation and General)
Regulation 1973 (Chapter 226G)
Public Health (Septic Tanks) Regulation 1973
(Chapter 226H)
Medical Registration By-Laws 1984 (Chapter
398)
Professional Engineers (Registration) Act 1986
Central Banking (Foreign Exchange and Gold)
Regulation 2000
Customs Duty (Rebate) Act 1982 (Chapter 390)
Excise Act 1956 (Chapter 105)
Goods and Services Tax Act 2003
Stamp Duties Act 1952 (Chapter 117)
Stamp Duties Regulation 1953 (Chapter 117)
Radio Spectrum Act 1996
Radio Spectrum Regulation 1996
Motor Traffic Regulation 1967 (Chapter 243)
Inflammable Liquid Act 1953 (Chapter 311)
Inflammable Liquid Regulation 1968 (Chapter
311)
Employment Act 1978 (Chapter 373)
Employment of Non-Citizens Act 1978 (Chapter
374)

3.2.2 Proposed
Two new bills have been proposed that address marine pollution. They are intended to repeal a
number of existing acts and regulations (Table 3.3). While the bills do not yet form part of PNG
legislation, requirements and regulations contained in them have been considered in this EIS.
Table 3.3 Proposed marine pollution bills
Bill Description
Marine Pollution (Sea Dumping) Bill Designed to repeal the Dumping of Wastes at Sea Act
1979.
Marine Pollution (Ships & Installations) Bill Designed to repeal the Prevention of Pollution at Sea
Act 1979 and Prevention of Pollution at Sea Regulation
3.2.3 Guidelines
Ambient Water Quality
In PNG, discharges to water are regulated under the Environment Act 2000, whereby application
is required for an Environment (Waste Discharge) Permit.
When granted, the permit will contain a number of conditions, one of which is the need to comply
with prescribed water quality guidelines at the downstream limit of a site-specific mixing zone
2

that is applied at the time the permit is granted. These legally enforceable water quality guidelines

2
A mixing zone is the body of water into which waste is discharged and where the prescribed water quality guidelines are
not required to be met. The downstream end of the mixing zone is normally the first location downstream of the proposed
discharge point where local people use the river and is called the compliance point. A similar concept applies to the
marine environment where discharge to the environment occurs.
Solwara 1 Project

3-5

(for fresh and marine receiving waters) are contained in Schedule 1 of the Environment (Water
Quality Guidelines) Regulation 2002 (Independent State of Papua New Guinea, 2002).
Drinking Water Quality
Schedule 2 of the Public Health (Drinking Water) Regulation 1984 (Independent State of Papua
New Guinea, 1984) describes enforceable standards for drinking water quality. These standards
were adopted from World Health Organisation (WHO) International Standards for Drinking Water,
1971.
Sewage Effluent
Specific guidelines for the discharge of sewage effluent do not exist, although sewage treatment
plant effluent water quality criteria may be specified in an Environment (Waste Discharge) Permit,
which is required under the Environment Act 2000. In the absence of PNG guidelines,
International Finance Corporation (IFC) guidelines (see section 3.5.2) have been adopted. In
addition, any sewage discharges would need to comply with Schedule 1 of the Environment
(Water Quality Guidelines) Regulation 2002 (Independent State of Papua New Guinea, 2002).
Air Quality
PNG regulations do not specify air quality criteria and appropriate standards. In the absence of
PNG guidelines, Australian guidelines (see Section 3.5.1) for ambient air quality and effects on
terrestrial vegetation, and IFC guidelines (see Section 3.5.2) have been adopted.
Noise Quality
PNG regulations do not specify noise level criteria and appropriate standards from Australian (see
Section 3.5.1) and IFC (see Section 3.5.2) guidelines have been adopted.
3.3 International Environmental Agreements
Table 3.4 summarises the international treaties, conventions and protocols relevant to the Project
and to which the Independent State of Papua New Guinea is a signatory.
Table 3.4 Applicable international agreements to which PNG is a signatory
Title Objective Solwara 1 Project Issue
United Nations Convention on the Law
of the Sea (UNCLOS) (1994)
Multilateral agreement on the law of
the sea that allows countries to
exploit their own resources under an
internationally agreed framework that
establishes guidelines for businesses,
the environment and the
management of marine natural
resources
Marine biodiversity analysis
and management
Convention for the Protection of the
Natural Resources and Environment of
the South Pacific Region (SPREP)
(1990)
Protection, development and
management of the South Pacific
marine and coastal environment
Biodiversity studies and
management
Vienna Convention for the Protection
of the Ozone Layer (the Vienna
Convention) (1993)
Protection of the ozone layer Compliance with standards
and protocols
Solwara 1 Project

3-6

Table 3.4 Applicable international agreements to which PNG is a signatory (contd)
Title Objective Solwara 1 Project Issue
Kyoto Protocol to United Nations
Framework Convention on Climate
Change (1997)
Has as its objective the reduction of
negative changes to the earths
climate, with a particular focus on
greenhouse gases. Places onus on
industrialised countries (Annex 1
countries) to reduce emissions.
Developing countries like PNG are
exempt from the reduction
requirement.
Greenhouse gas emissions
to be reported to the
Greenhouse Gas/Ozone
Unit, Department of
Environment and
Conservation
Convention on Biological Diversity
(1993)
Preserving and sustaining biological
diversity
Biodiversity studies and
management
International Convention for the
Prevention of Pollution from Ships
1973 (as modified by the London
Protocol of 1978) (MARPOL) (1994)
The ICPPS requires member states
to minimise the risk of marine
pollution from ships, in particular oil
tankers
Vessel operations
Convention to Ban the Importation into
Forum Island Countries of Hazardous
Wastes and Radioactive Wastes and
to Control the Transboundary
Movement and Management of
Hazardous Wastes Within the South
Pacific (Waigani Convention) (2001)
Proscription of international trade in
hazardous waste and notification
procedures, monitoring mechanisms
and cooperative authorities
Materials selection
The ratification of UNCLOS by the PNG Government in 1997 established the nations Exclusive
Economic Zone (EEZ), extending the states sovereign rights to 200 nautical miles offshore. The
ratification of UNCLOS by PNG has enabled deep-sea mining to be approved and regulated by
the state beyond PNGs territorial waters, and out to the limits of its EEZ.
3.4 Socioeconomic Impact Assessment Requirements
Consideration of social and economic impacts is an integral part of the assessment of the
Solwara 1 Project under the Environment Act.
Section 51 of the Environment Act requires that the likely social impacts of the proposed activity
be set out in the EIS in accordance with issues identified in the approved environmental inception
report. Two DEC guidelines apply:
Guideline for the Conduct of Environmental Impact Assessment and Preparation of
Environmental Impact Statement, Section 6 (DEC, 2004).
Social Impact Assessment Guideline, pages 1 to 8.
DEC (2004) guides that a social impact statement should form part of the EIS. It should include,
but not be limited to, demographic information, information on existing infrastructure, public health
issues and social services availability, and present economic status of the Project area.
This EIS addresses the socioeconomic impact assessment requirements outlined above by way
of a social impact assessment. The scope and findings of this study are detailed in Chapter 8 and
Chapter 10.
Given the setting of the onshore components of the Project, i.e., on fully developed and alienated
land (see Chapter 5), an archaeological and cultural heritage survey was not necessary.
Solwara 1 Project

3-7

3.5 International Standards and Principles
3.5.1 Australian Guidelines
Air Quality
The Project has adopted the following guidelines:
The National Environmental Protection Measure for ambient air quality (EPHC/NEPC, 1998),
which addresses particulate matter, SO
2
and NO
2
.
The Approved Methods and Guidance for Modelling and Assessment of Air Pollutants in New
South Wales (NSW EPA, 2001), which provides guidance relating to particulate matter and the
nuisance of fugitive emissions (dust deposition).
Noise
The Project has adopted the Australian Standard AS 1055 Description and Measurement of
Environmental Noise and the New South Wales Industrial Noise Policy (AS, 1997; NSW EPA,
2000).
No PNG legislation exists to address the impacts of in-water noise as it affects marine animals,
particularly cetaceans. Therefore the Australian Government Environment Protection and
Biodiversity Conservation Act Policy Statement 2.1 Interaction Between Offshore Seismic
Exploration and Whales (DEWR, 2007) has been adopted.
3.5.2 Equator Principles
Projects in the developing world are frequently assessed within the context of the Equator
Principles (EPFI, 2006), which were developed in 2003 as an international banking industry
framework to determine the environmental and social risks of project financing, and are commonly
referred to as World Bank guidelines. They provide a framework for a financial institution to
assess the environmental and social impacts, management and risks of the projects that they
fund, the underlying premise being that financial institutions will provide loans directly only to
projects that have met International Finance Corporation (IFC)
3
requirements with respect to
environmental and social aspects.
Nautilus will endeavour to comply with Equator Principles where appropriate and concomitantly
comply with all relevant IFC performance standards. IFC guidelines that Nautilus consider
applicable to the Project are provided in Table 3.5.
The IFC has developed eight performance standards and complementary guidance notes that set
out the requirements a project must meet (IFC, 2006a).
In addition to the performance standards, the IFC has developed environmental, health and safety
(EHS) guidelines that serve as a technical reference to support the implementation of the IFC
performance standards. The EHS performance standards, most of which were released in April
2007, replace those documents previously used as technical references in the World Bank
Pollution Prevention and Abatement Handbook. IFC performance standards in relation to mining
are currently in draft form.

3
The IFC is the private lending arm of the World Bank Group and the largest multilateral source of loan and equity
financing for private sector projects in developing nations.
Solwara 1 Project

3-8

Table 3.5 Applicable IFC guidelines
Guideline Description
IFCs Policy and Performance Standards
on Social and Environment Sustainability
(IFC, 2006a).
Standards developed to manage social and
environmental risks and impacts in the private sector of
countries eligible for financing.
IFCs Guidance Notes: Performance
Standards on Social and Environment
Sustainability (IFC, 2006b).
A technical reference that supports the implementation
of the IFC Performance Standards.
Environmental, Health and Safety
General Guidelines (IFC, 2007a).
A technical reference that provides guidance on
common environmental, health and safety issues
potentially applicable to all industry sectors.
Environmental, Health, and Safety
Guidelines for Mining (IFC, 2007b).
A technical reference in draft form that provides
guidance on environmental, health and safety issues
potentially applicable to mining projects.
Guidelines for Offshore Oil and Gas
Development (IFC, 2007c).
environmental, health and safety issues potentially
applicable to offshore oil and gas projects.
Guidelines for Shipping (IFC, 2007d).
environmental, health and safety issues potentially
applicable to the operation and maintenance of ships
used for the transport of bulk cargo and goods.

Solwara 1 Project

4-1

4. STAKEHOLDER CONSULTATION
This chapter describes the consultation program that has been undertaken to date and the
Projects ongoing program. The sections of the chapter provide an overview of the Projects
consultation and disclosure program (Section 4.1), outlines the regulatory requirements related to
public consultation (Section 4.2), lists the Projects stakeholders (Section 4.3), describes the
public consultation and disclosure program that was implemented for the Project (Section 4.4),
documents stakeholder consultation and outcomes (Section 4.5 and Section 4.6) and describes
processes for continuing stakeholder consultation into the future (Section 4.7).
4.1 Overview
A key component of EIS investigations and approval process is an effective, ongoing
communications program involving Nautilus, national, provincial and local governments, local
communities, non-governmental organisations (NGOs) and various other stakeholders, including
the international scientific community.
The Projects consultation and disclosure program has involved extensive interactions with
stakeholder groups using multiple approaches designed to suit each group. Information about the
Project has been presented to communities in New Ireland and East New Britain Provinces and
also other provinces. Mining Wardens Hearings were carried out for a total of nine provinces.
There has been ongoing regular consultation with the Independent State of Papua New Guinea
(the State) government departments. An overview of the areas visited as part of the stakeholder
consultation program is presented in Figure 4.1.
Consultation with NGOs and the international scientific community has included formal meetings,
presentations and workshops, both within PNG and overseas.
4.2 Independent State of Papua New Guinea Consultation
Requirements
Public consultation is a requirement of the States environmental impact assessment process
under the Environment Act 2000. Guideline notes from the States Department of Environment
and Conservation (DEC, 2004) state that an EISs Executive Summary should provide details of
the consultation program undertaken by the applicant, including the degree of public interest.
In addition, as part of the EIS approval process under the Environment Act 2000 (Section 51), the
Director of DEC will make the EIS available for public review after a preliminary assessment
period. During this time, the proponent may be required to make public presentations or submit a
program of public review.
4.3 Stakeholders
A comprehensive list of stakeholders has been developed and grouped into broad categories
reflecting differing interests in relation to the Project. These categories are shown Table 4.1.
During the course of the consultation process, all stakeholders listed have been engaged.
Solwara 1 Project

4-2

Table 4.1 Project stakeholders
Category Individual Groups Types of Engagement
Prime Ministers Department Face-to-face meetings, workshops
Mineral Resources Authority Face-to-face meetings, workshop
Department of Environment and
Conservation
Face-to-face meetings, workshops
Department of Mineral Policy and Geo
Hazard
Face-to-face meetings, workshop
Department of Commerce and Industry Face-to-face meetings, workshop
National Fisheries Authority Face to face meetings
Department of Finance and Treasury Face-to-face meetings, workshops
Department of National Planning and
Monitoring
Workshops

Department of Foreign Affairs and
Immigration
Face-to-face meetings
Department of Trade and Industry Face-to-face meetings, workshop
Department of Labour and Industrial
Relations
Workshops
Department of Provincial and Local Level
Government
Workshops
National Maritime Safety Authority Face-to-face meetings
Internal Revenue Commission Face-to-face meetings, workshops
Independent
State of Papua
New Guinea
State Solicitors Office Workshop
New Ireland Face-to-face meetings, workshop, wardens
hearing
East New Britain Face-to-face meetings, workshop, wardens
hearing
West New Britain Face-to-face meetings, workshop, wardens
hearing
Milne Bay Face-to-face meetings, workshop, wardens
hearing
Manus Face-to-face meetings, workshop, wardens
hearing
Madang Face-to-face meetings, workshop, wardens
hearing
Morobe Face-to-face meetings, workshop, wardens
hearing
Provincial
governments
East Sepik Face-to-face meetings, workshop, wardens
hearing
Southwest coast of New Ireland, Central
New Ireland and Kavieng districts
Face to face meetings Communities
near Solwara 1
In East New Britain Province districts
visited included Kokopo, Rabaul and
Gazelle
Face to face meetings
Solwara 1 Project

4-3

Table 4.1 Project stakeholders (contd)
Category Individual Groups Types of Engagement
The Nature Conservancy, Pacific Island
Countries Program
Face-to-face meetings, workshop
Conservation International Face-to-face meetings, workshop
Barefoot Workshop
Wildlife Conservation Society Workshop
Centre for Environmental Law and
Community Rights
Workshop
Papua New Guinea Institute of
Biodiversity
Workshop, face-to-face meetings
East New Britain Social Action
Committee
Workshop
Mahonia Na Dari Workshop
New Ireland Environment, Monitoring
and Awareness Committee
Workshop
Ailan Awareness Workshop
Individual and community rights
Advocacy Forum
Workshop
World Wildlife Fund Face-to-face meetings
Catholic Church in New Ireland Face-to-face meetings, workshop
United Church in New Ireland Face-to-face meetings, workshop
NGOs
Sea Turtle Restoration Project Written correspondence
The fishing industry (PNG Fisheries
Association)
The tourism industry, in particular
SCUBA diving operators
Workshop
Chamber of Mines and Petroleum Workshop, Face-to-face meetings
Rabaul Chamber of Commerce and
Industry
Industry
groups
New Ireland Chamber of Commerce and
Industry
University of Papua New Guinea, Port
Moresby
Face-to-face meetings, seminar
Divine Word University Face-to face meeting
Academic and
research
organisations
University of Southampton Workshop
National Oceanographic Centre (NOC,
UK)
Workshop
Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution Workshops, scientific collaboration
Duke University Workshops, scientific collaboration
Scripps Institution of Oceanography Workshops, scientific collaboration
University of Toronto Workshop, scientific collaboration
CSIRO Workshops
College of William and Mary Scientific collaboration
Solwara 1 Project

4-4

4.4 Public Consultation and Disclosure Program
4.4.1 Goals
The goals of the Projects public consultation and disclosure program are to:
Build an understanding among stakeholders to reduce the potential for stakeholder disaffection
resulting from a misunderstanding of the Project and to provide a structure for stakeholder
inclusion in the environmental impact assessment process.
Ensure that relevant government departments and communities adjacent to Solwara 1 are
properly informed about the Project and that there is a structure for these stakeholders to
provide input to the environmental assessment process.
Ensure consideration is given to the valid concerns and interests of stakeholders.
Incorporate concerns into mitigation plans as practicable.
Ensure that the applicable regulatory requirements related to public consultation and
disclosure are met.
Provide the groundwork for:
Final presentation of the EIS and its supporting studies.
Input, where required, into the Project Development Forum, as part of the mining licence
application process.
Ongoing consultation throughout the life of the project, i.e., construction, operations and
decommissioning phases.
4.4.2 Consultation Methods
The Projects public consultation and disclosure program uses both formal (e.g., presentations,
meetings, surveys and workshops) and informal (e.g., visits to villages in New Ireland and East
New Britain provinces and briefing for Manus Provincial Government), leaflet and brochure
distribution, face-to-face and telephone conversations, emails or facsimiles, radio interviews and
talk-back shows, EM TV, newspapers) methods to disseminate information to, and to solicit
comments from, stakeholders regarding the project.
The methods used in the consultation and disclosure program are listed below:
Face-to-face discussions, telephone conversations, emails and facsimiles with key individuals
(at all levels of stakeholder involvement) to disseminate information about the Project and to
receive questions, comments, opinions and concerns.
Information briefings and formal workshops with national, provincial and local governments,
community organisations (communities) and NGOs to provide information about the Project,
to discuss specific issues, and to solicit questions, comments, opinions and concerns.
Presentation of information about the Project to community members, which included Project
Awareness presentations to villages in New Ireland and East New Britain. Figure 4.1 shows
the locations of the villages visited during the Project Awareness program to date. Prior
Solwara 1 Project

4-5

warning of Project Awareness program visits enabled communities from surrounding areas to
attend the presentations. The Project Awareness program sessions held in May 2007 were
through face-to-face meetings in the villages in New Ireland and through Power point
presentations in East New Britain districts to describe the Project and its components.
The EIS will be made available for public review after its submission to the Director of DEC.
Nautilus has consulted with DEC on the nature of the consultation to be undertaken, the exhibit
locations for the EIS and the media in which the public review will be advertised. Presentations of
key findings and recommendations of the EIS will be made to stakeholder groups via a
roadshow, most likely in Kavieng, Rabaul and other community centres in New Ireland and East
New Britain.
This will provide an opportunity for DEC and the Project not only to outline the EIS but also to
respond to questions and concerns raised in previous consultation sessions. The roadshow
satisfies the requirement under Section 51 of the Environment Act to make public presentations or
submit a program of public review after the submission of the EIS.
4.4.3 Consultation Program
A summary of the public consultation undertaken for the Project is provided in Table 4.2.
Table 4.2 Public consultation
Date Location Number of
Attendees
Organisations Represented
Churches
6 August 2007 Kimadan, New Ireland <69 Uniting Church
9 November 2007 Kavieng, New Ireland <47 Catholic Church
Awareness Program
16 to 19 May 2007 West coast New Ireland
(Namatanai and other
villages)
2,000 General community
3 July 2008 University of Papua New
Guinea
About 200 Students, PNG Government,
NGOs
Community Meetings and Engagement Workshops
22 March 2007 West coast, New Ireland 25 Various community
18 August 2007 Bagabag Island, Madang
Province
50 to 60 General community
Various Rabaul, East New Britain
(including Rabaul, Kokopo
and Gazelle Districts)
About 250 General community and
students
13 December 2007 Rabaul, East New Britain 27 East New Britain-based NGOs,
Duke of York see community
members (Appendix 15)
20 February 2008 Kavieng, New Ireland 26 Various stakeholders (see
Appendix 15)
Solwara 1 Project

4-6

Table 4.2 Public consultation (contd)
Date Location Number of
Attendees
Organisations Represented
Mining Wardens Hearings
20 March 2007 Kimbe, West New Britain 6 WNB Admin and community
22 March 2007 Kavieng, New Ireland 15 NIP Admin and community
24 April 2007 Lorengau, Manus 11 Manus Admin and community
23 May 2007 Alotau, Milne Bay not recorded MBA and community
29 May 2007 Kimbe, West New Britain 10 Provincial government officers
19 June 2007 Madang, Madang 9 Provincial government officers
and community
25 July 2007 Kavieng, New Ireland 8 Kavieng Admin and community
22 October 2007 Wewak, East Sepik 60 Provincial government officers
and community
6 November 2007 Lorengau, Manus 70 Provincial government officers
and community
17 January 2008 Lae, Morobe 12 Provincial government and
community
23 January 2008 Alotau, Milne Bay 11 MBA and community
New Ireland Provincial Workshop
8 to 15 October 2007 Kavieng, New Ireland Approximately
200
Provincial government and
community
Scientific Workshops
13 to 14 March 2007 Port Moresby, PNG 30 Various. See Appendix 15
16 March 2007 Rabaul, PNG 7 Duke University,
Scripps Institute of
Oceanography
17 to 18 April 2008 San Diego, USA 13 Duke University,
Scripps Institute of
Oceanography,
Bangor University,
Woods Hole Oceanographic
Institution

6, 12 and
24 June 2008
Internet conferences 5 Duke University
1 to 2 July 2008 Brisbane, Australia 5 Duke University

Lists of participants at each workshop, recorded on the day, are given in Appendix 15.
Summaries of selected meetings are provided below.
Solwara 1 Project

4-7

Church and Community Meetings and Awareness Programs
A number of well-attended meetings (Table 4.2) were held on Bagabag Island (Madang
Province), in Kavieng, various villages and settlements on the west coast of New Ireland
Province, and the Gazelle Peninsula (East New Britain Province). Project information and
Nautilus activities were presented to attendees, who had the opportunity to respond.
The majority of attendees were generally positive while not expressing full support. Most issues
and concerns raised were based on and influenced by existing perceptions of land-based
operations, in particular that a similar scale of disturbance to the environment would occur on the
seafloor.
The main issues arising from the meetings were (see Table 4.3):
Missing out financial and social benefits.
Adverse impacts of fish and marine line.
Impacts on tides and currents.
Impacts on water quality, particularly at the surface and close to shore.
Damage to fringing coral reefs.
Impacts to traditional fishing practices i.e., shark calling.
Potential for Project activities to cause tsunamis or volcanic eruptions.
Rabaul Engagement Workshop
A workshop held on 13 December 2007 in Kokopo was attended by 27 individuals representing
provincial NGOs, provincial government officials and representatives of community groups,
including those from the Duke of York Islands (Appendix 15). The purpose was to present the
Project to these groups and to understand their major concerns associated with the Project. The
main issues arising from the workshop were distribution of benefits and protection of the
environment (Table 4.3).
Kavieng Engagement Workshop
A workshop held in Kavieng on 20 February 2008 provided an opportunity for various groups
within New Ireland Province to learn about the Project and allow their concerns to be heard. A
total of 26 representatives from various provincial governments, community, industry and NGO
groups attended the workshop (Appendix 15). The issues that came out of the workshop included
environmental protection of the marine environment, in particular reefs and fisheries. Additionally,
the distribution of benefits was an issue that was high on the agenda (Table 4.3).
Mining Wardens Hearings
A total of 11 Mining Wardens Hearings were held over the period 20 March 2007 to
23 January 2008. Locations of the hearings are shown in Table 4.2 and were presided over by a
Mineral Resource Authority warden, who acted as an impartial arbitrator between attendees (local
community, provincial administrators and other stakeholders) and Nautilus, who presented the
Solwara 1 Project to attendees and answered questions.
Support for the Project was generally strong and the main issues raised during the meetings were
focused on the environment, distribution of benefits, ownership of the resource and the potential
for involvement in the Project (Table 4.3).
Solwara 1 Project

4-8

New Ireland Provincial Workshop
This workshop was organized by the New Ireland Provincial Government. A total of about 200
individuals from NGO groups, local businesses, and public servants attended. Nautilus was
invited to give a presentation about its activities in PNG. The general concerns raised were in
relation to the environment.
Deep Sea Science Seminar at the University of Papua New Guinea
As part of the mobilisation of Duke University scientists for the NorSky 08 Campaign, a seminar
was given by the scientists at the University of Papua New Guinea in Port Moresby on
3 July 2008. The presentation was attended by approximately 200 students and some NGO
representatives (e.g. Sea Turtle Restoration Project and Mineral Policy Institute). An overview of
deep sea science and the work to be conducted during the Norsky 08 Campaign was given.
Pictures and video of the seafloor taken during previous Nautilus offshore campaigns were
included in the presentation.
Representatives from PNG Government attended the presentation and participated during the
ensuing discussions with students and NGOs.
Port Moresby Scientific Workshop
A multi-stakeholder workshop was held in Port Moresby over two days in March 2007. The
workshop was attended by local and international scientists and researchers, NGOs,
environmentalists, anthropologists, consultants, and representatives from the PNG Department of
Mining and Department of Environment and Conservation. The purpose was to allow for early
identification of issues, input into EIS study design in the initial phases of the Project, and to
provide transparency of proponent purpose.
The main issues arising from the Port Moresby Workshop were (Table 4.3):
Endemism.
Impacts of mining (loss of habitat, water and sediment quality).
Protection of biodiversity.
Active versus inactive areas (definitions).
Natural variation in chimney activity, i.e., switching on/off of active chimneys and hydrothermal
vents.
Recovery: gene pools and gene flow.
Resilience of systems.
Precaution in dealing with uncertainty.
Control areas and set aside areas for conservation and recovery.
Monitoring.
The main outcome of the workshop was the incorporation of these issues in the design of the
studies and research tasks that were completed during the Wave Mercury 07 Campaign over the
period 22 March to 28 April 2007.
Solwara 1 Project

4-9

Rabaul Scientific Workshop
On 16 March 2007 a scientific workshop was held in Rabaul and was attended by international
scientists who were about to undertake investigations during the Wave Mercury 07 Campaign.
Duke University Marine Laboratory, Scripps Institution of Oceanography Integrative
Oceanography Division and the University of Toronto Department of Geology were represented at
the workshop.
Outcomes from the Port Moresby Workshop were revisited, to ensure that commitments from that
workshop would be fulfilled during the Wave Mercury 07 Campaign.
San Diego Scientific Workshop
A follow-up workshop was held in San Diego, USA on 17 and 18 April 2008, principally with the
international research scientists, in order to discuss the findings of the research studies that were
completed on the Wave Mercury 07 Campaign and, in the light of these, recommend:-
Appropriate mitigation measures (principally for the protection of biodiversity of the area and
facilitation of recolonisation of mined areas).
Further baseline studies required prior to commencement of mining to fill in gaps in
understanding.
Ongoing monitoring components for the duration of mining and beyond.
These recommendations have been accepted by Nautilus and are reflected in the mitigation plans
described in Section 9.6.2 (where they relate to seabed ecology) and baseline and monitoring
study plans as described in Chapter 13.
Internet Conferences and Brisbane Scientific Workshops
A number of internet conferences were held on 6, 12 and 24 June 2008 and a scientific workshop
was held in Brisbane on 1 and 2 July 2008. These meetings were conducted in preparation of a
scientific cruise at Solwara 1 to undertake monitoring and commence baseline work which came
out of the San Diego Workshop (see Section 13.3.2 for details). The meetings were attended by
scientists from Duke University Marine Laboratory, who would be undertaking studies aboard the
scientific cruise.
Major findings and recommendations from the San Diego Workshop were revisited to ensure
commitments would be met.
Publishing Rights
In some cases the collaborating scientists (i.e., their institutes) have contributed time and
resources to extend the EIS-specific studies to more general scientific research. The scientists
involved in these studies are free to publish findings in the scientific literature. Consequently,
Solwara 1 and South Su are now the most intensively studied hydrothermal areas in the region.
4.5 Documentation of Stakeholder Consultation
The information obtained from all forms of public consultation is documented in meeting notes,
consultation logs and as part of various EIS studies. These records are maintained by the Project.
Solwara 1 Project

4-10

Consultation logs established to keep track of consultations undertaken for the Project include
logs of meetings with government departments, NGOs and industry groups (e.g., fisheries).
4.6 Consultation Outcomes
The Nautilus team and senior members of different levels of government attended the majority of
meetings. As much as possible, Nautilus answered all issues and concerns raised at the
meetings. A Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) sheet has been developed for the main
concerns raised and will be made available to the public on the Nautilus website after the EIS is
submitted to DEC. The FAQs illustrates how issues have been addressed by project design,
mitigation measures, and the development and implementation of systems and processes. The
majority of issues raised during the stakeholder program were centred on the environment and
social impacts. Table 4.3 is a summary of issues raised during public consultation sessions and
other interactions with stakeholders, and illustrates how issues have been, and are proposed to
be, addressed by project design, mitigation measures, and the development and implementation
of systems and processes.
Table 4.3 Project response to issues raised during consultation sessions
Stakeholder Issue/Concern Project Response
Environmental Impacts
Several concerns regarding the possibility of
Project activities setting off a natural disaster.
A risk assessment addressing the potential for
operations to set off a natural disaster has been
undertaken. A disaster and emergency plan will be
completed and submitted to DEC prior to operations.
Concern regarding impacts to the biological
life.
Completion of baseline and monitoring study plans as
described in Chapter 13. The establishment of
temporary refuge areas at Solwara 1 and a control site
at South Su (see Section 5.1.1 and Section 7.1 for
further information regarding South Su), against which
Project impacts can be measured. Inclusion of
mitigation plans as described in Chapter 9 of the EIS.
Impacts to local fishing and shark calling. Investigations into the local fishery and potential
impacts are included in the EIS (see Chapter 10).
Ownership and Benefits
Concern that the benefits would not reach the
people or provincial governments directly
impacted by the project.
Commitment by the Project to employ PNG nationals
to the maximum extent practicable. All things being
equal, hiring preference will be given to appropriately
skilled individuals from communities in New Ireland
first, then East New Britain and then to other suitably
skilled and qualified PNG nationals. Currently,
approximately 25% of current workforce is comprised
of PNG nationals.
Fewer jobs for PNG nationals due to the
project area being remote.
Investigation into the potential for capacity building of
PNG nationals.
Solwara 1 Project

4-11

Table 4.3 Project response to issues raised during consultation sessions (contd)
Stakeholder Issue/Concern Project Response
Ongoing Community Awareness/Consultation
Local nationals wont be involved. An ongoing community awareness program, which
included bringing videos showing subsea operations
(drilling and cartoons of mining for now), to help
explain the project to villagers. More workshops were
organised to allow people to ensure information is
disseminated appropriately and properly to the local
people.
PNG Government Capacity
Does the government have the capacity to
regulate this project?
Yes. Under PNG legislation, the government has the
statutory right and obligation to ensure the Project is
permitted and operated in alignment with PNG law.

4.7 Continuing Consultation
Consultation with stakeholders will continue during the remainder of the EIS and approvals
process associated with the Project and will include:
An EIS information briefing roadshow by Project representatives with assistance from DEC
officers (see Section 4.4.2 above), soon after the submission of the Draft EIS.
A program for consultation and disclosure prior to and during operations will be included in
the Environmental Management Plan (see Chapter 13).
Queries and concerns raised during the EIS roadshow will be documented and reviewed by the
Project team in conjunction with other submissions made to DEC during the EIS assessment and
public review period. Responses to the queries and concerns will be provided to DEC, including
information on any design modifications or mitigating measures the project may institute in
response to voiced issues, concerns, and comments. Any new or modified mitigation measures or
changes to systems and processes will be captured in the Environmental Management Plan.
Consultation will continue prior to and during operations of the Project. This will include the
regular preparation and distribution of printed materials, the placement of information on websites,
formal and informal discussions with stakeholders, the development and implementation of
mechanisms for the receipt and handling of stakeholder concerns and comments, and the
communication of relevant project milestones via various media announcements.
Procedures for recording and responding to issues raised during such consultations will be
detailed in the Environmental Management Plan. A grievance procedure will also be established
that will set out, for people affected by the project, how to bring their grievances forward so that
they may be considered in a culturally appropriate and expeditious manner.
Solwara 1 Project

4-12

Solwara 1 Project

5-1

5. DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPOSED
DEVELOPMENT
The optimised development proposal presented in this chapter relates to Phase 1 of the Project
(see Section 1.1), and involves the recovery of ore from the seafloor and whole-of-ore export to
an overseas processing facility, based on an assessment of technical, financial, environmental
and social factors relevant to commercial feasibility and public acceptability. The proposal
optimises Project parameters (such as mining rate, ore handling and waste management)
according to criteria of safety, environmental protection and profitability, in a manner that
maximises the positive and minimises the negative impacts of mine development.
Further optimisation will occur as the Project proceeds through detailed design but, in general,
Project parameters relevant to environmental and social planning and impact assessment can
now be assessed.
5.1 Project Area Definition
Activities associated with Phase 1 will occur in distinct operational zones, as described below and
shown in Figures 1.2 and 1.3.
5.1.1 Solwara 1 and South Su
Project mining activities will be confined to the Solwara 1 mound (see Section 5.7). A 500-m
exclusion zone will be put in place around the Mining Support Vessel (MSV) to minimise the risk
of collisions with non-Project vessels, in accordance with accepted international shipping and oil
and gas facility procedures
1
. The exclusion zone will fall within the future mining lease (ML)
boundary, which in and of itself will be a no-go area for non-Project vessels and persons, as is the
custom for MLs on land. Figure 5.1 shows the proposed extent of the future ML boundary.
Additionally, some environmental monitoring activities will be conducted at South Su, as
described in Section 13.4.2.
Figure 1.2 shows the areas defined as Solwara 1 and South Su, including the 500-m exclusion
zone extending around the boundary of where the MSV. will be operating Additionally, North Su
sited between Solwara 1 and South Su is shown and delineated in Figure 1.2.
5.1.2 Barge Corridor and Crew Transfers
Dewatered ore will be barged from the MSV to the Port of Rabaul for temporary storage. MSV
crew changes will generally be serviced out of Kokopo.
Barge and crew transfer routes are shown in Figure 1.3 and described in Sections 5.7.2 and 5.9.2
respectively.
5.1.3 Port of Rabaul
Ore will be temporarily stored within the existing PNG Ports Corporation Ltd facilities at the Port of
Rabaul, prior to being shipped to an overseas processing plant. Figure 1.3 shows the location of
the storage facility and storage activities are described further in Section 5.2.2.

1
Various acts (e.g., the Australian Offshore Petroleum Act 2006 and United Kingdom Petroleum Act 1987) suggest a
minimum 500-m exclusion zone around permanent offshore oil and gas facilities to avoid ship collision.
Solwara 1 Project

5-2

5.2 Project Components
5.2.1 Offshore
The general arrangement of offshore Project activities is shown in Figure 5.2. The main
components of the offshore activities are:
Mine area (Section 5.7). Five zones will be mined at Solwara 1. Mining will commence in a
zone of relatively flat seafloor topography. Prior to mining occurring in new areas, pre-
stripping of unconsolidated surface sediment will be required. Approximately 130,000 t of
unconsolidated sediment will be moved across the five zones. Additionally, approximately
115,000 t of competent waste material within the mining zones, which is below the mine cut-
off grade, will be side cast during mining operations.
Seafloor Mining Tool (SMT) (Section 5.6.1). Initially, the SMT will walk along the seafloor
and extract ore with a cutter-suction head to disaggregate the ore to the size required for
transfer to surface. The SMT will be remotely controlled from the surface and aided in mining
activities by two remotely operated vehicles (ROVs). Once the more rugged seafloor areas
have been mined, the SMT will be fitted with tracks.
Riser and Lifting System (RALS) (Section 5.6.2). Mined ore will be pumped to the surface via
a riser pipe attached to the SMT. One pump attached to the bottom of the RALS will pump
both water and ore to the surface. The pump will be hydraulically powered by return water
from the surface. A flexible riser transfer pipe (RTP) connects the SMT to the base of the
RALS.
Mining Support Vessel (MSV) (Section 5.6.3). A dynamically positioned 153-m-long MSV will
be used as the base for the associated surface mining activities. A control room on the MSV
will allow remote operation of the SMTs and ROVs. The MSV will include all facilities for
dewatering the ore prior to its transfer to shuttle barges for transport to temporary storage at
the Port of Rabaul. Water separated during the dewatering process will be pumped back to
the seafloor and will be used to drive the RALS pump.
Remotely operated vehicles (ROVs) (Section 5.6.4). Two work-class ROVs will be used to
assist in mining operations on the seafloor at Solwara 1, including the removal of non-
mineralised unconsolidated sediments. Additionally, the ROVs will be used to undertake
environmental monitoring and management activities as discussed in Chapter 13.
Shuttle barges (Section 5.7.2). Shuttle barges, either self-propelled or towed by tugs, will be
used to transfer dewatered ore from the MSV to the Port of Rabaul.
Support vessel (Section 5.8.1). Consumables such as fuel, lubricants, spare parts, food and
water will be regularly transported to the MSV on a support vessel. Crew transfers will also
occur at regular intervals using the support vessel.
5.2.2 Onshore
Onshore facilities will be located at the Port of Rabaul and will mostly utilise existing facilities
(Figure 5.3). The main components (Section 5.7.2) are:
Shuttle barge wharf. The barges will manoeuvre alongside the existing Berth 1 at the port
where ore will be transferred to shore.
Solwara 1 Project

5-3

Ore transfer. Ore will be transferred from the shuttle barges to a mobile conveyor with a crane
and grab system. The conveyor will transport the ore to the temporary storage facility.
Temporary storage facility. Ore will be stored in stockpiles in a new-build covered storage
facility until enough material has accumulated for transfer to bulk carriers for shipping to an
overseas processing facility.
Ship loading. A dedicated ship loader will be installed to transfer ore from temporary storage
to bulk carriers.
5.3 Rationale for the Location of Project Components
Resource projects are restricted in the manner of their development in the following ways:
Physically, by the location of the orebody and the environmental and geotechnical conditions
found at that location.
Environmentally, by the environmental setting of the Project.
Socially, by the expectations and concerns of stakeholders.
Economically, by the need to extract and treat the ore profitably.
5.3.1 Mining Method
The mineral resource at Solwara 1 is a Seafloor Massive Sulphide (SMS) deposit (see
Section 7.3). The deposit sits proud of the surrounding seafloor and generally is covered by a thin
drape of unconsolidated sediment. There is also minor waste rock (below cut-off grades) at the
five mining zones, i.e., there is no significant overlying layer of overburden. Therefore, after
removal of the unconsolidated sediment and waste rock, the deposit will be mined in a method
similar to offshore dredging of hard rock.
Removal of the unconsolidated sediment and mining methods are discussed below in Section 5.7.
5.3.2 Location of Onshore Facilities
Terrestrial mineral resource development can only occur where a commercial deposit is found
and this is also true for the Solwara 1 deposit. However, unlike most terrestrial projects, due to the
freedom allowed by the shipping of ore, a number of locations for siting the onshore components
of the Project were able to be considered.
The Port of Rabaul was selected as the preferred site based on the following attributes:
The Port of Rabaul is approximately 50 km south of Solwara 1 and therefore allows for
minimal shipping distance.
The port, located within Simpson Harbour, is well protected and provides safe sea conditions
year round i.e., it is an all-weather port.
The Port of Rabaul is an established international port with good existing facilities and port
operations. It does not require significant modification prior to use as a storage location. Apart
from dedicated conveyor and ship-loading facilities, storage and handling can be conducted
within the existing facilities and current operations of the port.
The port is located on alienated land and therefore does not require the use of customary
land as would likely be necessary elsewhere.
Solwara 1 Project

5-4

5.4 Mineral Resource
Resource
2
estimates were undertaken by Golder Associates (2008). Exploration and drilling
programs at Solwara 1 have allowed the well-drilled central portions of the deposit to be classified
as indicated, while the remaining majority of the deposit has been classified as inferred
(Table 5.1).
Table 5.1 Indicated and inferred mineral resource estimate (4% Cu cut off)
Class Ore
(t)
Copper Grade
(%)
Copper
(t)
Gold Grade
(g/t)
Gold
(oz)
Indicated 870,000 6.8 59,160 4.8 134,264
Inferred 1,300,000 7.5 97,500 7.2 300,936
Mineralisation is hosted by sulphide-rich chimneys and sediments (see Section 7.3 for further
information). Due to the process in which the deposit has formed, mineralisation occurs at the
surface of the deposit, i.e., there is no significant hard-rock overburden. Parts of the deposit are
covered by unconsolidated sediment, which will be moved prior to mining. Access to the base of
the target ore will require some benching and any volumes of adjacent waste rock cut during
benching will be side cast, along with ore below cut-off grades encountered during mining.
Section 5.7 provides a description of mining methods.
During the 2007 core drilling campaign, 111 holes were drilled to a maximum depth of 20 m. At
present, it is unclear to what depth below the seafloor the mineralised zone extends as 38% of
core holes drilled during the campaign terminated within the orebody. This is shown in Figure 5.4
as a cross section through the Central Zone at Solwara 1. Additionally, mineralisation may occur
laterally outside the identified zones of mineralisation.
Potential therefore exists for the mineral resource to be greater than that provided in Table 5.1,
which may result in an extended mine life. If mineralisation continues below the 20-m drilling limit
or extends laterally, mining will likely continue until mineralisation ceases or it becomes either
financially, technically or environmentally unfeasible to continue.
In addition to the drilling campaign, an ocean floor electromagnetic (OFEM) survey was
undertaken during the Wave Mercury 07 Campaign to delineate massive sulphide deposits at and
immediately below the seafloor. The OFEM system remotely measures electromagnetic fields
associated with induced seafloor electrical currents but cannot record how deep below the
seafloor mineralised areas extend. Survey outputs were ground-truthed using drilling and bulk
sampling results, allowing further delineation of the ore body at Solwara 1 (Figure 5.5).
Mineral resource investigations have identified five main zones of mineralisation, namely Far
West, West, Central, East and Far East. All five zones are shown in Figure 5.5 and described
further in Section 5.7.1.
5.5 Scale of the Project
Based on the current resource estimates, the Project has a mine life of approximately 30 months,
if extracting ore at a maximum rate of up to 5,900 t/d is achieved. Mining could, however, extend

2
A resource estimate is based primarily on geoscientific information only, with an expectation that it could be economic. A
reserve must, however, consider those factors affecting extraction, including mining, metallurgical, economic, marketing,
legal, environmental, social and governmental factors, and should in most instances be estimated with input from a
range of disciplines (MCA, 2004).
Solwara 1 Project

5-5

to 5 years and beyond depending upon discoveries of additional mineralisation at Solwara 1. The
proposed mining activities at Solwara 1 are relatively small when compared to terrestrial mines in
PNG (Table 5.2), particularly the open cut operations.
The portion of Solwara 1 to be mined covers an area of 0.112 km
2
(see Figure 5.5). Compared
with existing mines in PNG, the volume of overburden (both unconsolidated sediment and
competent waste material) that requires management at Solwara 1 over the life of the Project is
minor.
Table 5.2 Comparison of the Solwara 1 Project with other PNG mines at time of EIS
approval
Mine Ore at Time of
Project
Approval (Mt/a)
Overburden
(Mt/a)
Ore and
Overburden
(Mt/a)
Status Type
Ok Tedi 15.2 23.7 38.9 Operations Open cut
Hidden
Valley
2.1 27.7 29.8 Constructing Open cut
Lihir 7.2 20.6 27.8 Operations Open cut
Porgera 17.0 2.7 19.7 Operations Underground and
open cut
Misima 5.1 6.3 11.4 Closed Open cut
Ramu 4.6 1.1 5.7 Constructing Open cut
Solwara 1 1.2 0.12 1.32 Seeking approval Seafloor open cut
Kainantu 1.17 0.07 1.24 Operations Underground
Simberi 1.1 0.0 1.1 Constructing Open cut
Tolukuma 0.2 0.81 1.01 Operations Underground
Wau CIP 0.4 0.39 0.79 Closed Open cut

5.6 Offshore Mining Equipment
While the Project is a world first in terms of commercially mining SMS deposits, as stated in
Chapter 2, much of the technology that will be newly applied to the mining industry is already in
common usage in the offshore oil and gas, telecommunication and dredging industries.
Proven technology, such as the dynamically positioned vessel, ROVs, electric motors, pumps,
riser pipes, hydraulic systems, umbilical power cables etc., will be directly transferable to the
Project. Partnerships and alliances with key offshore equipment and service providers have
resulted in development of suitable seafloor mining equipment. This section describes the
specialised equipment to be used at Solwara 1. A diagram showing major components is
provided in Figure 5.2.
5.6.1 Seafloor Mining Tool
Ore will be mined by a purpose-built Seafloor Mining Tool (SMT) (Figure 5.6). Two SMTs will be
built for the Project and it is envisaged that, at any one time, one SMT will be mining the seafloor
while the second SMT will either be on standby or undergoing maintenance on the MSV.
Solwara 1 Project

5-6

The SMTs will be built by Soil Machine Dynamics Ltd., one of the worlds leading subsea
equipment manufacturers. The SMTs are based on technology currently used in the offshore
trenching, dredging and diamond-mining industries.
Each SMT will weigh 250 t in air and 190 t in water. The machine will measure 8 m tall, be 17 m
long (with the boom extended) and 13 m wide. The tool is capable of working in depths up to
2,500 m and can operate in water temperatures ranging from 0C to 35C. Details of the SMT are
set out below.
Control and Instrumentation
Each SMT will be electrically powered and controlled by an umbilical cable from a control room on
the MSV. The umbilical cable will house copper conductors to transmit electricity at 3,000 V and
fibre optic cables to transmit instructions to the SMT and carry data back to the control room.
Electricity supplied via the umbilical will power six 400-kW electro-hydraulic power units on the
SMT. These units will in turn power the cutter head, slurry pump, movement system and other
services.
The SMT will be fitted with a range of instrumentation and sensors as described in Table 5.3. All
instruments and sensors will provide data to the control room in real time.
Table 5.3 SMT instrumentation and sensors
Instrument Description and Purpose
SMT Instrumentation
Video and still cameras 7 x monochrome and 2 colour units to allow visual observation of subsea
operations. A number of the cameras will be able to tilt and pan.
Lamps 15 x incandescent and dimmable units to light the surrounding seafloor and
water.
Multibeam sonar 5 x sonar systems will be fitted to the front and rear of the SMT and on the
cutter head, and an additional 2 will be placed on the RALS or ROV. The
sonar systems will map the seafloor and mining face in real time, allowing
operators to control SMT movement and mining activities.
Gyrocompass 1 x sensor to provide SMT heading.
Acoustic positioning 2 x units fitted to the SMT will allow the MSV to track the position of the SMT.
Hydrophone 1 x sensor to measure cutting noise to assist in determined the differences in
materials being mined.
SMT Sensors
Pressure transducers Placed at various locations on the SMT, these will include measurement of
pressure of system hydraulics, the suction pipe at the crusher, the water pump
inlet and outlet and the dilution pump.
Linear transducers Fitted to critical components of the SMT to measure electronic component oil
reservoir volumes, compensator levels and positions of the boom and dipper,
cutter and spuds. Additionally, spud position and SMT travel are monitored.
Temperature Sensors will monitor motor, electronics, hydraulic oil, valve pack and ambient
seawater temperatures.
Moisture Fitted to all electronics and components susceptible to damage by moisture.
Bathymetry 1 x sensor will be fitted to the SMT to provide information on SMT depth,
altitude above the seafloor, temperature and conductivity.
Solwara 1 Project

5-7

Table 5.3 SMT instrumentation and sensors (contd)
Instrument Description and Purpose
SMT Sensors (contd)
Inclination Pitch and roll will be measured to ensure stability of the SMT.
Speed and rotation Both the cutter head and crusher (if fitted) will be monitored.
Load cells Cells will measure lift load and loads on the riser, cutter boom, spuds and SMT
belly.
Process monitoring Flow and concentration of the mined ore will be measured.

Launch and Recovery
Each SMT will operate for approximately five days, after which time it will return to the surface for
maintenance and be replaced with the standby SMT. The SMT will be deployed from the stern of
the MSV using an A-frame system similar to that often used to launch and recover ROVs. The
launching sequence can be summarised as follows:
The SMT is raised off the deck of the MSV by a lift wire attached to a lift winch. It is then
lowered over the back deck of the MSV into the water.
The SMT is lowered down through the water column and guided by the ROV into position
adjacent to the area to be mined.
Once on the seafloor, the lift wire is disconnected from the top of the SMT and the Riser
Transfer Pipe (RTP) is attached to the SMT by an ROV.
Recovery occurs in reverse order to that of the launch sequence.
Movement Along the Seafloor
The SMT will be capable of operating on seafloor slopes up to 20 and will use two methods to
move along the seafloor. When operating in relatively rough terrain and when cutting mining
ramps (see Cutting System below), the SMT will walk along the seafloor by employing four
hydraulically powered spuds (Figure 5.6) as follows:
The four spuds are planted into the seafloor and the SMT raises itself clear of the seafloor.
The SMT then slides forward 2 m.
The SMT is then lowered to the seafloor and the spuds are raised. At this point, it is possible
for the SMT to rotate the chassis, cutter head and spuds to the left or right, allowing it to turn in
either direction.
The four spuds are moved forward and then lowered to the seafloor and the SMT is raised for
another forward movement.
The above sequence allows the SMT to travel across the seafloor in any direction at a maximum
rate of 30 m/h.
Where seafloor slopes are relatively flat, the SMT will be fitted with a tracked crawler drive
system, allowing the SMT to move at maximum speed of 700 m/h.
Solwara 1 Project

5-8

Cutting System
A 2-m-diameter drum cutter head will be mounted on a hydraulic boom that is able to move both
vertically and horizontally, maximising the amount of rock able to be cut while the SMT is
stationary (see Figure 5.7).
The drum cutter will mine ore in downward cut swathes approximately 1.8 m wide and
approximately 650 mm deep. A collection hood will sit behind the cutter head to capture mined
ore via a suction pipe.
When cutting ore, it is expected that 30% of the material will be too large to be sucked into the
collection system and will fall to the seafloor directly below where it was cut. This lost material will
be reworked by the cutting and suction system. Due to design limitations, one third of the lost
material (i.e., 10% of the original ore cut) will remain on the seafloor.
5.6.2 Riser and Lift System
The RALS will serve two main functions: pumping mined ore to the MSV and transferring return
water from the MSV to drive the subsea slurry pump (SSLP) and thereafter discharging back to
the ocean immediately above the seafloor.
The RALS, shown in Figure 5.8, consists of a bottom-tensioned vertical riser, dump valve, twin
return water pipes, SSLP and associated stabilising mechanisms suspended from the MSV. A
flexible riser transfer pipe (RTP) connects the base of the RALS to the SMT.
The SSLP will be recovered approximately every 100 days for servicing and preventative
maintenance. This may or may not necessitate recovery of the entire riser system. The RALS
handling and deployment equipment is all off the shelf equipment, typical of offshore gas and oil
exploration, which will be custom-fitted to the MSV.
Details of the RALS are provided below.
Riser Transfer Pipe
The RTP, made of 229-mm-diameter flexible pipe will be approximately 155 m in length. It will
incorporate steel armouring, have a wear-resistant inner coating and will be fitted with buoyancy
collars along the 100 m length closest to the SMT. The buoyancy collars will create an S-shaped
vertical profile and allow the SMT to operate in the following ranges from the base of the RALS
(see Figure 5.8):
Horizontally between 80 and 130 m.
Vertically between 10 and 60 m.
Operational flexibility within the RTP will allow a degree of freedom of movement between the
SMT and MSV. The MSV will hold station above the SMT, and dynamically position itself so that
the SMT is always within its operational range on the seafloor.
Subsea Slurry Lift Pump
The SSLP, located at the bottom of the riser pipe (see Figure 5.8), is the system by which the ore
slurry is pumped to the surface. The SSLP includes two, multiple-chamber, positive-displacement
pump modules. The modules are hydraulically driven by pressurised return water delivered to the
system by the twin return water pipes. The system is controlled from the surface control room by
umbilical cables attached to the riser pipe.
Solwara 1 Project

5-9

The SSLP incorporates design redundancy, which will allow it to continue operating (albeit at
reduced pumping capacity) if any of the pump modules fail. In the event of an emergency
shutdown or other unforseen event leading to a loss of flow, an automatic dump valve will purge
the slurry in the riser pipe to the seafloor, thereby avoiding blockage of the system.
If discharged to the environment, the maximum volume of purged ore would be approximately
11 m
3
. Once operations recommence, the dumped ore would be recovered by the SMT.
Riser and Return Water Pipes
The riser pipe consists of 20-m-long sections of 308-mm-diameter steel pipe. The sections,
similar to those used for subsea drilling activities in the oil and gas industry, will be hoisted into
position with a derrick tower onboard the MSV. They will be joined together and sequentially
lowered to the seafloor.
Similarly, the twin return water lines, also in sections, will be joined sequentially. The pipes will be
attached to the riser pipe and lowered to the seafloor at the same time. The bottom end of the
triple pipe system will suspend the SSLP and the whole system will be suspended from the MSV.
Helical strakes will be fitted to the main riser pipe in the upper 800 m of the water column to
minimise vortex-induced vibrations caused by ocean currents.
Water from the dewatering process will be pressurised by four centrifugal pumps on the MSV to
approximately 110 bar. The water (including solid material less than 8 !m in diameter) will be
pumped down the return water pipes and provide hydraulic pressure to drive the SSLP.
Once the return water has passed through the SSLP, the pipes will discharge directly upwards at
a rate in the order of 0.3 m
3
/s, thereby allowing plume dispersion to occur at a faster rate than if
the water was discharged directly downwards.
5.6.3 Mining Support Vessel
A MSV has been identified for the Project which is under build at the time of writing this EIS. The
ship will be single-hulled, dynamically positioned and act as the platform for mining operations at
Solwara 1 (Figure 5.9). Main technical details of the MSV are provided in Table 5.4.
Table 5.4 Mining support vessel technical details
Item Detail
Flag Malta
Overall length 160 m
Breadth 30 m
Maximum draft 7 m
Maximum speed 17 knots
Deadweight capacity 14,200 t
Deck area 2,900 m
2

Fuel oil capacity 2,000 m
3

Fresh water capacity 1,000 m
3

Water ballast 8,000 m
3

Main cranes 1 x 50 t deck crane,
1 x 400 t deck crane
Solwara 1 Project

5-10

Table 5.4 Mining support vessel technical details (contd)
Item Detail
Power 21 MW
Diesel generators 6, producing 3,500 kW
Dynamic positioning thrusters 3 x 3,800 kW aft,
2 x 3,800 kW forward,
1 x 2,000 kW side
Accommodation 120 persons
Dynamic positioning will allow the MSV to position itself accurately during operations. Acoustic
beacons deployed on the seafloor will provide the MSV with information on the location of the
SMT and ensure that all components of the mining spread are located within operational limits.
The MSV will contain a large work moon pool. A derrick tower will sit above the moon pool and
will be used to lower the RALS system from the surface to the seafloor.
The MSV will be capable of supporting mining activities and launching and recovering all subsea
equipment, i.e., the SMT, RALS and ROVs in conditions up to sea state 5 (where significant wave
heights
3
can reach 3.5 m).
An ore dewatering system and ore transfer conveyor will be fitted to the MSV. These are
described further in Section 5.7.2 below.
Operations at sea will use marine-grade diesel at an average rate of 40 t/d. To continue
operations, the MSV requires refuelling every month, but will likely be refuelled more often to
ensure sufficient fuel supplies are onboard the MSV at all times.
The MSV systems will be subject to an ongoing daily, weekly, monthly, six-monthly and annual
maintenance schedule that will not require a shut down of operations. It is anticipated that dry
docking of the MSV will not be necessary for the first five years of operations.
5.6.4 Remotely Operated Vehicles
Two work-class ROVs will be used to assist mining activities. During removal of the
unconsolidated sediment prior to mining, each ROV will be fitted with a dredge skid and discharge
pipe system to pump the material away from the mining area as described in sections 5.7.1 and
5.7.2 below.
5.7 Mining
Mining operations will occur 24 hours per day, 365 days per year with the exception of scheduled
or unscheduled maintenance stops.
5.7.1 Mine Plan
The five mineralised areas of Solwara 1 targeted for mining are shown in Figure 5.5. Delineation
of the mining area has been based on the results of the exploration program to data, which have
included electromagnetic surveys, bulk chimney sampling and core drilling.

3
The average height (trough to crest) of the one-third of the largest waves.
Solwara 1 Project

5-11

Gold and copper grades vary across the deposit, but the five mineralised zones Far West,
West, Central, East and Far East contain the highest-grade zones within the mining area. The
zones will be mined in the following sequence:
Mining will commence in the Far West Zone where the seafloor topography is flattest and
therefore the easiest zone to mine. It is expected to take three months to complete mining
activities within this zone.
Central Zone will be mined next. Activities will commence in the northeast section of the zone
and progress to the southwest.
Once mining is complete within the Central Zone, it will continue in the West Zone. It is
envisaged that mining of Central and West zones will take between 12 and 24 months,
depending on conditions encountered.
The final zones mined will be East Zone and Far East.
Temporary refuge areas will be incorporated into the mine plan (see Sections 9.6.2 and 13.4 for
details).
Figure 5.10 shows the seafloor at Solwara 1 prior to mining and an estimation of how it will look
following mining at the five zones.
Once ore has been extracted from the five zones, it is envisaged that mining at Solwara 1 will
cease. However, if mineralisation is found to continue with depth, or additional exploration
activities discover additional lateral resources (particularly to the north or west, which at this stage
show signs of continuing mineralisation), mining may continue at Solwara 1.
Unconsolidated Sediment
Geotechnical investigations (Golder Associates, 2008 R104]) show the presence of a layer of
unconsolidated sediment in low-lying areas of the proposed mine (Figure 5.11). The sediment
layer, in some places up to 6 m deep, consists of silts and clays with an average density of
1.2 t/m
3
. Prior to mining, this unconsolidated sediment will be moved by a pump and pipe system
attached to an ROV to areas outside the mining area (see Figure 5.11). Removal of the sediment
will prevent an inflow of material at the mining face, thereby removing the potential to interfere
with and slow mining activities.
Unconsolidated sediment removal rates are provided in Table 5.5 and show that the total amount
of sediment to be removed is approximately 108,000 m
3
, or 130,000 t.
Table 5.5 Unconsolidated sediment removal rates
Monthly Unconsolidated
Sediment Removal
Cumulative Unconsolidated
Sediment Removal
Month
(from Start of
Mining)
(m
3
) (t) (m
3
) (t)
1 1,059 1,271 1,059 1,271
2 3,343 4,012 4,402 5,283
3 12,081 14,497 16,483 19,779
4 4,408 5,290 20,891 25,069
5 6,574 7,889 27,466 32,959
6 14,854 17,825 42,319 50,783
Solwara 1 Project

5-12

Table 5.5 Unconsolidated sediment removal rates (contd)
Monthly Unconsolidated
Sediment Removal
Cumulative Unconsolidated
Sediment Removal
Month
(from Start of
Mining)
(m
3
) (t) (m
3
) (t)
7 4,463 5,356 46,783 56,139
8 2,832 3,398 49,614 59,537
9 3,506 4,207 53,120 63,744
10 3,477 4,172 56,597 67,916
11 2,124 2,549 58,721 70,465
12 4,576 5,491 63,297 75,956
13 2,049 2,459 65,346 78,415
14 5,502 6,603 70,848 85,018
15 19,431 23,317 90,279 108,335
16 1,793 2,151 92,072 110,486
17 2,997 3,596 95,069 114,082
18 4,068 4,881 99,136 118,964
19 3,989 4,787 103,126 123,751
20 4,447 5,336 107,572 129,087
21 377 452 107,949 129,539
Competent Waste Material
Competent waste material, consisting of waste rock and ore below cut-off grades exists at various
locations within the five mineralised mining zones. Additionally, as mining progresses below the
seafloor to access the base of the orebody, some benching into waste material will occur.
When removing waste material, the SMT will be fitted with a diversion pipe to pump the material
to the unconsolidated disposal points outside the mining area, where it will be side cast (see
Figure 5.11). In total, approximately 115,000 t of competent waste material will be side cast over
the first 19 months of mining as shown in Table 5.6.
Table 5.6 Competent waste material side casting rates
Month
(from Start of
Mining)!
Monthly Competent Waste
Removal
(t)!
Cumulative Competent
Waste Removal
(t)!
1! 500! 500!
2! 1,380! 1,880!
3! 3,550! 5,430!
4! 1,120! 6,550!
5! 5,450! 12,000!
6! 4,070! 16,070!
7! 2,040! 28,110!
8! 6,400! 34,510!
9! 6,590! 41,100!
10! 7,170! 48,270!
Solwara 1 Project

5-13

Table 5.6 Competent waste material side casting rates (contd)
Month
(from Start of
Mining)!
Monthly Competent Waste
Removal
(t)!
Cumulative Competent
Waste Removal
(t)!
11! 3,190! 51,460!
12! 3,120! 54,580!
13! 2,750! 57,330!
14! 4,050! 61,380!
15! 8,170! 69,550!
16! 5,380! 74,930!
17! 5,770! 80,700!
18! 34,280! 114,980!
19! 640! 115,620!

5.7.2 General Mining Sequence
The general sequence of mining activities will be the same for high-grade and lower-grade zones
within the deposit and will include:
Pre-mining inspections with ROVs, including selective removal and relocation of some
organisms (as practicable) from the area to be mined.
Removal of any unconsolidated sediment material and any competent waste material.
Levelling of chimneys and cutting of a mining bench with the SMT. Chimneys and any
mineralised bench cut materials will be treated as ore and pumped to the MSV via the RALS.
Open-cut mining with the SMT and pumping of ore via the RALS to the MSV at the surface.
Dewatering of ore and return of water to the seafloor.
Transfer of dewatered ore to shuttle barges for transport to temporary storage facilities at the
Port of Rabaul.
Transport of ore from the Port of Rabaul to overseas processing facilities.
Ongoing environmental monitoring.
Pre-mining Activities
Prior to mining an area, a visual inspection will be carried out by at least one ROV. The ROV will
visually survey the area to determine ground conditions prior to the SMT moving into the area.
Additionally, the ROV may remove a number of vent-specific snail species (i.e., Ifremeria and
Alviniconcha) and associated fauna from areas to be mined and relocate them in appropriate
habitats in areas that have already been mined (see Section 9.6.2 for further details).
Removal of Unconsolidated Sediments and Competent Waste Material
The removal of unconsolidated sediments will be undertaken by one of the ROVs fitted with a
suction pump and discharge pipeline. The discharge pipeline will be laid across the seafloor and
terminate outside the mining area (see Figure 5.11), where material will be discharged at a rate of
250 m
3
/h (at a solids to seawater ratio of 4:96).
Solwara 1 Project

5-14

Competent waste will be removed by the SMT fitted with a discharge pipeline laid across the
seafloor and terminating at the same locations as the unconsolidated sediment discharge points.
Material will be discharged at a rate of 1,000 m
3
/h (with a solids to seawater ratio of 1:9).
Ore Mining and Transport to the Surface
Although the operations will be continuous, ore extraction is not expected to be undertaken for
more than 20 hours per day, with the remaining time being dedicated to maintenance and re-
positioning of the SMT as the mine face advances.
Using the SMT, ore will be mined at a maximum rate of 5,900 t/d and pumped to the MSV via the
RALS. Benches formed during ore extraction are expected to be between 2.5 to 3.5 m high. The
mine face will advance at an average rate of 180 m/d. Any chimney to be mined will first be
knocked over by the SMT cutter head and then mined from the seafloor.
Material will be pumped to the surface at a maximum rate of 1,000 m
3
/h and will comprise a ratio
of seawater to ore of 9:1.
From the time it has been mined, it will take six minutes for the material to be pumped from the
seafloor to the surface (a distance of 1,600 m). Material will be drawn in the SMT cutter head at
around 3C and, by the time it reaches the surface, it will have increased in temperature to a
maximum of 5.2C.
Ore Dewatering and Return Water
Once at the surface, ore will be separated from the seawater in the MSV dewatering system,
consisting of screens, centrifuges, hydrocyclones and disk filters. Figures 5.12 and 5.13 show the
onboard dewatering process. All solid material greater than 8 !m will be recovered and
transferred directly via a conveyor to a shuttle barge alongside the MSV for subsequent transport
to the Port of Rabaul. By their nature, conveyors are designed to minimise spillage when
transporting materials. In addition to inherent designs that will minimise ore spillage, additional
measures to further minimise spillage during transfer from the MSV to shuttle barges include:
Stopping mining and dewatering operations when shuttle barges are being changed over.
Running the conveyor until it is empty prior to moving loading operations to a new shuttle
barge.
Using removable hungry boards on the conveyors, which assist in containing ore while it is
being conveyed.
Dewatered ore will have the following characteristics:
Minimum bulk density: 2 t/m3.
Specific gravity: 2.5 to 3.8.
Moisture content: 5 to 10% by weight.
Separated seawater and solid material less than 8 !m with an expected total suspended solids
concentration of 6,350 mg/L will be transferred to a header tank where surface seawater will be
added at a rate of 0.04 m
3
/s (or as required) to ensure a constant volume of water is present in
the tank. Prior to being pumped into the header tank, the surface seawater will pass through a
100-!m filter to remove anything that could damage the pumping system.
The seawater mix in the header tank will be pressurised to 100 bar in a two-stage surface pump
system onboard the MSV, consisting of a bank of injection pumps and a bank of charge pumps.
Solwara 1 Project

5-15

The pressurised water will then be pumped down the twin return water pipes to power the subsea
slurry lift pump at the base of the RALS (Section 5.6.2). The pipes terminate immediately below
the pump, i.e., between 25 m and 50 m above the seafloor, and will discharge return water
upwards at a rate of 0.3 m
3
/s. Upward discharge will allow plume dispersion to occur at a faster
rate than if the water was discharged directly downward (see Section 9.5.2 for further details).
The onboard dewatering process will take around 12 minutes and it will take a further 6 minutes
for return water to be pumped from the surface to the point of discharge above the seafloor.
During descent, the water will be cooled by surrounding seawater due to the relatively large
surface area of the return water pipes. Discharge temperatures are expected to vary between 5.8
and 11.4C, depending on operating conditions (Technip USA, 2008).
Ore Transfer and Barging to the Port of Rabaul
Each shuttle barge will be capable of holding 6,000 t of ore and will either be self-propelled or
maneuvered and towed by a dedicated tug boat.
Once the shuttle barge is filled with ore, it will be covered for transit to the Port of Rabaul. It is
anticipated that shuttle barges will be filled and transit to the Port of Rabaul between three and
nine time each week. A fleet of two tug boats (Plate 5.1) and shuttle barge ore transporters will be
utilised for ore transfer activities. The shuttle barges will have the following typical dimensions
(Plate 5.2):
Overall length: 85 m.
Breadth: 25 m.
Maximum draft: 5 m.
It will take approximately seven hours for a shuttle barge to be towed between Solwara 1 and the
Port of Rabaul at a speed of 4.5 knots.
The shuttle barges will be equipped with sufficient below-deck storage and ore drainage systems
to capture any water that drains from the ore during transit. This water will be stored on board the
shuttle barges until they return to the MSV, where it will be transferred to the dewatering system
during barge loading.
Shore Transfer and Storage in Rabaul
Once at the Port of Rabaul, the tug boat will maneuver the shuttle barge to Berth 1 (Figure 5.3).
Ore will be offloaded from the shuttle barge using front end loaders via ramps at a rate of 500 t/h.
It is anticipated to take 14 hours to offload all of the ore.
Ore will be transported via conveyor to the storage area and unloaded to a feed pile where it will
be fed into a mobile stacker (Plate 5.3) by a front-end loader. The stacker will deposit the ore on
one of two stockpiles, each capable of storing 25,000 t. If required, dust suppression will be
achieved by spraying recycled water onto conveyors and stockpiles.
The stockpiles will be covered in new-built structures open at two ends as shown in Plate 5.4. The
base of each stockpile will be lined with a polymer membrane impervious layer to prevent any
runoff or drainage water infiltrating the ground, and bunding will direct runoff water to
sedimentation ponds for treatment to ANZECC/ARMCANZ (2000) standards prior to use in dust
suppression or return to the MSV for discharge at depth with return water discharge.
Solwara 1 Project

5-16

Export of Ore
Handysize bulk carriers will export ore to existing overseas concentrators. Characteristics of the
carriers are:
25,000 deadweight t.
160 m overall length.
25 m breadth.
9 m maximum draft.
The carriers will dock and be loaded at Berth 2 shown in Figure 5.3. The current maximum vessel
size capable of berthing at the wharfs is 35,000 dwt. To accommodate potential larger bulk
carriers which may be required from time to time by the Project, dredging of the seafloor next to
the wharf, which is already part of existing operations at the Port of Rabaul, may be undertaken.
Ore will be loaded onto the bulk carrier via a dedicated mobile ship loader (see Figure 5.3 and
Plate 5.5) at a rate of 1,000 t/h. At this rate, it will take between one and two days to load the bulk
carrier, depending on its size. Once loaded, the bulk carrier will export the ore to an overseas
processing facility. To meet mining rates, between three and six bulk carriers will be required
each month.
5.8 Hazardous Materials Management
The classification, packaging, labeling and safe transport of dangerous goods will be the
responsibility of manufacturers, suppliers and transport contractors
4
. However, where Nautilus
has these responsibilities, it will comply with the relevant statutory requirements (typically the
Australian Dangerous Goods Code 2008 (NTC, 2008) and Nautilus will seek the advice of the
appropriate authority, where necessary.
Process chemicals will not be required for any stage of mining at Solwara 1 or storage of ore at
the Port of Rabaul. Materials to be used that will require management procedures include fuels,
solvents, grease, detergents, hydraulic fluid, etc.
5.8.1 Transportation
In most cases, the transportation of materials bound for the MSV will be delivered to the Port of
Rabaul and will be the responsibility of contractors until they are delivered to the port. A logistics
contractor will be in charge of transporting goods from the Port of Rabaul (or other PNG ports) to
the MSV.
A transport procedure will be prepared and included in relevant company documentation, and will
include:
Loading and unloading procedures.
Control of emissions and spills.
Cleanup and contingency procedures.
Vehicle cleaning procedures.
Operator training and audit procedures.

4
Suppliers and transport contractors will be required to comply with Nautilus standards, which will be defined in their
contracts.
Solwara 1 Project

5-17

Responsibility for each aspect of dangerous goods transport will be clearly established. Written
agreements between Nautilus and the producer, PNG Ports Corporation, stevedores and
transporters will address the following:
Packaging as per relevant authority (United Nations (for international sector) and PNG).
Labelling in both English and Pidgin languages.
Transport to Port of Rabaul and the MSV.
Any unloading at Port of Rabaul that may occur.
Safety of transportation vehicle and security throughout transportation.
Training of handlers during transportation and unloading.
Emergency response for the duration of the transportation.
5.8.2 Storage, Handling and Disposal
Storage and handling of hazardous substances will be in accordance with Australian Standards
AS 2243.10 (AS/NZS, 1993) and AS 2508 (AS, 2000 and 2001). Nautilus will maintain a register
that will include information cards (which will be displayed as required in Pidgin as well as
English) and material safety data sheets, prepared by manufacturers or suppliers. Containers of
hazardous substances will be labeled in both Pidgin and English.
Nautilus will develop a dangerous goods management procedure, which will include the following:
Lists of dangerous goods and their quantities and locations.
Required handling and storage practices.
Safety and hazard management.
Audit procedures.
Contingency, cleanup and disposal procedures.
Personnel training procedures.
Waste oils, solvents and other hazardous materials will be collected in drums and stored in
bunded areas onshore or until transferred to shore (in the case of offshore operations) for
collection by the supplier for recycling or disposal to an approved waste disposal facility.
5.8.3 Fuel and Oil
Nautilus will maintain a fuel and oil storage log, including the following information:
Types and volumes of fuel and oils on the MSV and at Port of Rabaul.
Locations of storage facilities, storage (both primary and secondary containment) methods.
Pumping, piping, transfer and separation procedures.
Fire protection measures.
Spill containment and cleanup procedures.
Maintenance, testing and audit procedures.
Waste oil collection, treatment, recycling/disposal procedures.
5.8.4 Explosives
Explosives are not required by the Project.
5.9 Workforce
5.9.1 Employment Policy
Where practicable, based on Nautilus Recruitment and Training Policy, preferential employment
will be given to suitably qualified PNG citizens (in order of preference: residents of New Ireland,
Solwara 1 Project

5-18

residents of the New Guinea Islands region, other PNG nationals). Any skills not available within
the national community will be provided by expatriates until such time as PNG citizens have been
suitably trained.
5.9.2 Workforce
Construction of all offshore Project components will occur at specialised international facilities
and, at this stage, no construction is expected to occur within PNG. During operations, the Project
is expected to employ approximately 130 people on the MSV and shuttle barge tugs (Table 5.7).
The MSV will operate two crews working 12 hours per day (i.e., two shifts per day).
Onshore work involving ore transfer and storage will be undertaken by existing PNG Ports
Corporation Ltd employees and no net increase in employment is expected.
Table 5.7 Offshore operations workforce
Department No. of Employees
MSV 70
Shuttle barge tugs 30
Vessel team 30
Office 10
Total 140 (including office staff)
The offshore workforce will work a roster of four weeks on, four weeks off. Non-resident staff will
fly-in, fly-out from Port Moresby on a similar roster. Crew transfers to and from the MSV are
expected to be serviced out of Kokopo and or Rabaul.
5.10 Construction and Operating Standards
5.10.1 Design Codes
Equipment and facilities design and construction will be in accordance with applicable codes for
PNG. Where no PNG code exists, designs will be in accordance with the appropriate codes and
regulations for Australia. If there are no PNG or Australian standards, then appropriate
international standards will be used, for example, those of the American National Standards
Institute (ANSI) or International Standards Organisation (ISO).
5.10.2 Health and Safety
An occupational health and safety management system (OH&SMS) exists which defines Nautilus
safety policy, and will be implemented to achieve high safety performance. The management
system generally complies with the Australian Standard AS/NZS 4804 (AS/NZS, 2001). The
OH&SMS will take into account the operating complexities of working offshore, the Projects
location and the cultural backgrounds of the workforce.
Components of the management system will include:
Safety induction, training and awareness education.
Publication and distribution of a series of safety manuals.
Hazard identification and risk control.
Work procedure compliance.
Auditing and monitoring of safety performance.
Recognition and achievement of targets.
Solwara 1 Project

5-19

Written standards for engineering controls, training, chemical storage and transportation will be
established and enforced.
A first-aid clinic will be established on the MSV and the first-aid facilities at the Port of Rabaul will
be inspected and upgraded if necessary, with procedures in place for medical evacuation to
hospitals at Rabaul or Kavieng, Port Moresby, or Australia, as deemed necessary.
Preventable health care will focus on issues that control sanitation (particularly potable water),
garbage disposal, food services, pest control, laundry services, personal hygiene and protective
measures.
5.11 Commissioning
The ramp-up process for offshore operations at Solwara 1 will be gradual. Full commissioning of
the offshore mining activities is expected to take approximately three to six months by which time
the operation, both offshore and onshore, should be operating at full capacity.
5.12 Decommissioning and Closure
When the mining operations are complete, the underlying natural hydrothermal energy, which has
remained unchanged, will enable venting to resume and associated chimneys to reform at the
same or nearby locations to where they previously occurred. As the vents provide the sulphidic
trophic basis for the ecological characteristics of the Project area, a succession of vent-dependent
communities is expected to re-establish over time. The process of recovery at Solwara 1 will be
enhanced by various mitigation strategies described in Section 9.6.2, and regular monitoring of
recolonisation by those and other organisms forms a part of the environmental management and
monitoring program as described in Section 13.
Specific aspects of decommissioning and closure of offshore infrastructure and onshore facilities
are considered below.
5.12.1 Offshore Infrastructure
Once mining is complete at Solwara 1, all components of the offshore mining operation, e.g., the
MSV, SMT and RALS, will be recovered and removed from Solwara 1. The equipment will be
shipped to another site to commence mining in a location where seafloor mining has been
approved, either within PNG or overseas.
5.12.2 Onshore Facilities
Operations at the Port of Rabaul are expected to cease prior to completion of mining activities at
Solwara 1, i.e., when Phase 2 of the Solwara Project commences, all onshore operations will be
transferred to the yet-to-be-determined location of Phase 2 operations.
Decommissioning of infrastructure at the Port of Rabaul will be limited to the conveyors and ship
loaders. This equipment will either be sold to the port authority or dismantled and taken for use at
the Phase 2 facility.
Ore stockpile areas will be returned to a state suitable for alternative uses as agreed with the port
authority. Any contaminated stockpile soil, and the impervious lining and bunds will be safely
buried or treated.
Solwara 1 Project

5-20

Solwara 1 Project

6-1

6. DEVELOPMENT TIMETABLE
The overall schedule to first ore, including government approvals and Project development, is
shown in Figure 6.1.
Engineering and mine design have occurred concurrently with the environmental investigations
and preparation of the EIS. Results of the EIS investigations have informed the design of the mine
layout and selection of equipment required for the Project.
Key milestones in the Project timetable are:
Submission of the EIS and mining lease application in the third quarter of 2008.
Development Forum to be held during the first quarter of 2009.
Memorandum of Agreement to be completed in the first quarter of 2009.
Receipt of EIS approval and issue of a mining lease by the end of the first quarter of 2009.
Port of Rabaul facilities commissioned in the second quarter of 2010.
Mining equipment integration completed and pre commissioned by the third quarter of 2010.
First ore in the fourth quarter of 2010.
Solwara 1 Project

6-2

Solwara 1 Project

7-1

7. DESCRIPTION OF THE EXISTING ENVIRONMENT
7.1 General
This chapter describes the current environmental setting of the offshore, nearshore and onshore
Project area. That is, the offshore area of the mineral resource at Solwara 1, the nearshore and
onshore area of the port operations at and directly offshore the Port of Rabaul in Simpson
Harbour and the route between, as defined in Sections 1.7 and 5.1 and shown in Figures 1.2 and
1.3. Much of the information summarised in this chapter is taken from studies that have been
undertaken by Nautilus and these are described in Section 7.2, supplemented with other relevant
literature, observations made during field studies and personal communications. The existing
offshore environment is described under headings of hydrothermal vents (Section 7.3),
meteorology and air quality (Section 7.4), oceanography (Section 7.5), water quality (Section 7.6),
sediment quality and mineralogy (Section 7.7) and biological environment (Section 7.8). The
nearshore and onshore environment at the Port of Rabaul is discussed in (Section 7.9).
Geological processes including regional tectonics, seismicity and volcanism significantly impact
on the environmental conditions within the Project area. As a result, sometimes air, water and
sediment quality parameters fail to meet national, international and Project-adopted criteria
(Chapter 3). Biological communities in the Project area are those that have adapted to and can
cope with these conditions. In addition, these communities are exposed to periodic sudden
changes (such as volcanism, variability of hydrothermal venting activity, etc.). In other words the
environmental setting in the Project area is not constant, and can even fluctuate wildly over
relatively short time frames.
Solwara 1 is a deep sea site which exhibits some hydrothermal venting. Hydrothermal vent
ecosystems are based on chemosynthesis (Van Dover, 2000a), meaning the immediate vent
organisms derive energy from chemical nutrients rather than sunlight, which is used for energy in
photosynthesis. Applying water or sediment quality criteria or toxicity protection limits developed
for surface organisms is not relevant for these vent organisms. Where such data is used in this
EIS, it is provided to allow comparative (and most likely conservative) indications of conditions.
The data does not represent any thresholds for organisms of the hydrothermal seafloor areas of
the deep sea.
7.1.1 Tectonics and Seismicity
PNG straddles several major tectonic plate boundaries and is part of the Pacific Ring of Fire
1

(Figure 7.1). Modelling indicates that the IndiaAustralia and Pacific plates are moving towards
each other at a rate between 3 and 10 cm/a (Greenbaum et. al., 1995). The complex movement
of the plates has resulted in significant faulting and seismic activity, creating the potential for both
shallow- and large-magnitude earthquakes on land and in the sea. Consequently, the PNG region
is one of the most seismically active zones in the world, regularly experiencing earthquakes of

1
The Pacific Ring of Fire is an area of frequent earthquakes and eruptions encircling the Pacific Ocean in a horseshoe
shape. It is associated with an almost continuous chain of oceanic trenches, volcanic arcs and belts, and plate
movements. Over 50% and 90% of the worlds volcanoes (active and dormant) and earthquakes, respectively, are
located along the Pacific Ring of Fire (USGS, 2003).
Solwara 1 Project

7-2

magnitude 7.0 or more on the Richter scale (Figure 7.2). The geological setting of the project
seafloor area is described in more detail in Section 7.7.
Solwara 1 is located on volcanic rocks relating to the Bismarck Sea Seismic Lineation (BSSL),
which divides the North and South Bismarck plates and is spreading at a rate of 11 to 14 cm/a.
Most earthquakes produced on the BSSL have been small and shallow and no damaging
earthquakes have originated from here in recorded history (Appendix 14).
The PNG earthquake loadings code indicates that the Solwara 1 deposit is located within Zone 2
(where Zone 1 is most unstable) and the Port of Rabaul component of the Project is located within
Zone 1 (PNGS, 1982). The more stringent Global Seismic Hazard Assessment Program
(GSHAP) specifies a 10% chance of exceedance (of a ground motion parameter) within the
assumed life of the structure PNGS (1982) specifies 15% and has assessed the Rabaul area
as having a peak ground acceleration range of 4.0 g to 4.8 g (a very high hazard) for a return
period of 475 years (Giardini, et. al., undated)) (Figure 7.3).
7.1.2 Volcanism
Volcanic activity and hydrothermal venting associated with the Solwara 1 site are described in
Section 7.3.
The plate movements described in Section 7.1.1 have resulted in a significant subduction zone
where the Solomon Plate has moved beneath the South Bismarck Plate. An island arc, the
Bismarck Volcanic Arc System that extends from the East Sepik Province to Rabaul, is
associated with this subduction (Greenbaum et. al., 1995) (see Figure 7.2). There are 14 active
volcanoes in PNG, most of which are located on the Bismarck Volcanic Arc System (Geological
Survey PNG, undated).
The Rabaul Caldera is located on the Gazelle Peninsula (northeast New Britain Island; see
Figure 7.4) and was formed by a volcanic eruption approximately 7,100 years ago that was
thought to have originated offshore to the north. Simpson Harbour was formed by the flooding of
the caldera about 1,400 years ago. Volcanoes within the Rabaul Caldera have formed during
large post-caldera eruptions and have produced major explosive activity (Volcano World, 2005).
Of the eight active vents in the Rabaul Caldera, two erupted simultaneously in 1994 destroying
the town of Rabaul (Volcano Live, 2008). Aeroplane pilots flying in the area reported ash clouds
up to 18 km above the town that extended over the PNG mainland. Ash fell over extensive areas
of land turning to mud with rain and then drying as hard as cement. Lava flowed and rocks were
thrown into the bay causing flooding (Geoscience Australia, 2008), buildings collapsed and the
airport was permanently closed.
There have been a number of eruptions since 1994, with the most recent activity in the Rabaul
Caldera focussing on Tavurvur Volcano, which is constantly active (Plates 7.1 and 7.2).
7.1.3 Tsunamis
Tsunamis are waves caused by large-scale underwater movement, such as earthquakes,
volcanoes or landslides that displace water. Transfer of energy from falling debris (e.g., from
volcanic eruptions) which fall at a rate faster than the ocean can absorb, can also displace large
volumes of water causing a tsunami. These tsunamis however, are more localised and may
dissipate quickly.
Solwara 1 Project

7-3

Since 1888, there have been 14 tsunami-induced tidal surges recorded at Rabaul, of which 9
occurred last century and 4 this century. Associated wave heights depend on location and
historically have ranged from less than one metre up to tens of metres for an individual event
(Saunders, pers. com., 2008a). One of the more devastating tsunamis occurred on 17 July 1998
when a series of tsunamis hit the north cost of PNG near the settlement of Aitape in West Sepik
Province. The tsunamis were caused by an earthquake of magnitude 7.0 that occurred
approximately 25 km off the coast and resulted in a subsea landslide (slumping seabed
sediments), which in turn triggered the tsunami. Wave heights of 10 to 15 m were estimated and
the tsunami resulted in the deaths of over 2,000 people.
7.2 Studies Completed
Nautilus and others have actively explored the Manus Basin, including Solwara 1, since the early
1990s. The main objective of the exploration activities has been to assess the mineral resources
of the seafloor massive sulphide deposits and to provide the equipment platform for conducting
baseline environmental studies of the area. Once the potential viability of the resource became
apparent in the mid to late 1990s, significant ship and ROV time has been devoted to gathering
baseline environmental data from the area in order to understand the oceanographical, chemical
and biological setting of the area, and this now represents the most comprehensive sampling of
vent sites in Manus Basin and of inactive sulphide mounds to date. The studies are listed below,
under the headings of:
Biological.
Engineering.
Geophysical.
Oceanography.
Resource investigation.
Water quality.
Other.
These are summarised, where applicable, in Chapters 7 and 8 and listed in Table 7.1.
Table 7.1 Geophysical and environmental studies completed at Manus Basin
Type of
Survey/Study
Company/
Research Group
Date
Studied
Brief Description of the Study Reference
Biological E.A. Blake, K.L.
Erickson and C.L.
van Dover
1985 to
1998
A review of the biology of
chemosynthetic ecosystems in Manus
Basin.
Blake et al., 2005
E.C. Southward
and S.V. Galkin
May 1990 A new vestimentiferan (Pogonophora:
Obturata) from hydrothermal vent fields
in the Manus Back-arc Basin (Bismarck
Sea).
Southward &
Galkin, 1997
S.V. Galkin June 1990 Megafauna associated with
hydrothermal vents in the Manus Back-
arc Basin (Bismarck Sea).
Galkin, 1997
CSIRO (Australia) 1991 to
2007

CSIRO was engaged to complete three
modules of study for the Manus Basin
baseline environmental study. Module 1
identified information already available
from the Bismarck Sea (incl. initial and
preliminary studies), Module 2 provided
a gap analysis and Module 3 involves
sediment analysis, vent plume mapping,
water analysis and endemism studies.
Appendix 1,
Appendix 2,
CSIRO, 2005;
CSIRO, 2007.
Solwara 1 Project

7-4

Table 7.1 Geophysical and environmental studies completed at Manus Basin (contd)
Type of
Survey/Study
Company/
Research Group
Date
Studied
Biological
(contd)
Specialised
Hydrothermal Vent
Research Group
1996 and
1998
Results of the BIOACCESS cruises
'96 and '98 over hydrothermal vent
communities in the Manus Basin,
Papua New Guinea.
Hashimoto et al.,
1999
L. Kumoru 1998 to
2002 (but
mainly
focuses on
2002)
The shark longline fishery in Papua
New Guinea.
Kumoru, 2003
L. Kumoru and
L. Koren
2001 to
2005
Tuna fisheries report in Papua New
Guinea.
Kumoru & Koren,
2007
C. L. van Dover 2005 -
ongoing
Global sulphide mound ecosystems
research that compared different
hydrothermal vent sites in terms of
their associated biology and vent
activity.

James Cook
University
(Australia)
January/
February
2006
Macrofauna research project that
investigated the macrofauna of the
sediments and sedimentary
characteristics of the Solwara 1
hydrothermal field. Sample material
collected using ROV-operated box
cores.

University of
Toronto (Canada)
January/
February
2006
Microfauna research project that
investigated the microfauna of the
Solwara 1 hydrothermal field. Sample
material collected using ROV-
operated push cores.

Hydrobiology
(Australia)
March 2007 Solwara 1 Project biomass,
biodiversity and bioaccumulation
desktop study.
Appendix 10
Duke University
and College of
William and Mary
(USA)
2007 to
2008
Characterisation and comparison of
macrofauna at inactive and active
sulphide mounds at Solwara 1 and
South Su (Manus Basin).
Appendix 4

Scripps Institution
of Oceanography,
La Jolla (USA)
2008 Macroinfauna of active and inactive
hydrothermal sediments from
Solwara 1 and South Su, Manus
Basin, Papua New Guinea.
Appendix 5
Engineering Earth Mechanics
Institute
2004 Linear cutting test results for
mechanical mining of sub-sea poly-
metallic sulphides.
Earth Mechanics
Institute, 2004
E. Jackson 2004 to
2005
Solwara 1 Project rock-cutting test
program.
Jackson, 2006
Technip Offshore
Inc. (France)
2005 Pre-feed report. Technip
Offshore, 2005
Solwara 1 Project

7-5

Type of
Survey/Study
Company/
Research Group
Date
Studied
Engineering
(contd)
Worley Parsons
Services Pty Ltd
June 2005 Pre-feasibility study (PFS), which
concluded that much of the
technology required for the
project was already available from
the offshore oil, gas and
telecommunications industries.
The study further assessed the
Project on a financial basis and
found that the mining venture
could be economically
competitive with terrestrial mines.
Worley Parson,
2005
Technip Offshore
Inc. (France)
January
2006
A riser and jumper analysis
report.
Technip
Offshore, 2006a
Technip Offshore
Inc. (France)
February
2006
Investigation of potential
dewatering systems for
Solwara 1.
Technip
Offshore, 2006b
Cellula Robotics
(Canada)
February
2006
Subsea cutting test that
investigated the performance of
an excavator deployed to the
ocean floor at depth 1,500
to1,700 m. The purpose of the
trial was to determine excavator
and cutterhead performance
under hydrostatic pressure and
depth.
Devaux &
Clarke, 2006
Cellula Robotics
(Canada)
August 2006 A description of various mining
concepts for Solwara 1.
Cellula
Robotics, 2006
Klohn Crippen
Berger Ltd. (KCBL)
November
2006
Assessment of various sites in
PNG for suitability for establishing
the on-land (site processing)
facilities for the operation.
Klohn Crippen
Berger, 2006
Geophysical F. Martinez and B.
Taylor
1985 Back-arc spreading, rifting, and
microplate rotation, between
transform faults in the Manus
Basin. Primarily based on the
results from the RV Moana Wave
cruise.
Martinez
&Taylor, 1996
Williamson and
Associates
February
2005
A geophysical survey using
geophysics, sonar, IP, resistivity,
SP, magnetics and gravity
measurements.

Century Subsea
(UK) and
Williamson and
Associates
2005 to
2006
Generation of a detailed
bathymetric map of Solwara 1 site
using side scan sonar.

Solwara 1 Project

7-6

Type of
Survey/Study
Company/
Research Group
Date
Studied
Geophysical
(contd)
Collaboration of
College of William
and Mary (USA),
James Cook
University
(Australia) and
University of
Toronto (Canada)
on behalf of Placer
Dome and Nautilus
January
2006

Video survey of the seafloor,
including chimney locations and
other geological and biological
observations.

E. Hrischeva and
S. Scott
2006 to
2007
Quality including trace elements
of sediments from the SuSu
Knolls, Manus Basin, Bismarck
Sea, Papua New Guinea. Draft
report prepared for Nautilus
Minerals Inc, Milton, Queensland.
Appendix 6
Oceano-
graphic
G. Cresswell 1985 to
2002
Regional oceanographic
characterisation.
Cresswell, 2007
AIMS and The
Nature
Conservancy
1997 to
2002
(currents
and
temperature
s), 1998 to
2001 (sea
surface
temperature)
Currents in the Bismarck Sea and
Kimbe Bay, Papua New Guinea.
Steinberg et al.,
2006
Enesar Consulting
Pty Ltd. (Australia)
December
2005,
January
2006
Two full ocean water column
current metering profiles and two
profiles of conductivity,
temperature, salinity and
transmissivity.
Enesar, 2006a
Triton Consultants
Ltd.
April 2006 Metocean data summary that
examined commercial sources of
meteorological and
oceanographic data.
Triton, 2006
RPS MetOcean August 2008 Study identifying specific
meteorological and
oceanographic criteria for mining
system components.
RPS Metocean,
2008
Resource
investigation
R. Moss, S. D.
Scott and R. A.
Binns
1991, 1993,
1995, 1996
Gold content of Eastern Manus
Basin volcanic rocks and its
implications for enrichment in
associated hydrothermal
precipitates.
Moss et al.,
2001
R. A. Binns and S.
D. Scott
October
1991
Actively forming polymetallic
sulphide deposits associated with
felsic volcanic rocks in the
Eastern Manus Basin.
Binns & Scott,
1993
Solwara 1 Project

7-7

Type of
Survey/Study
Company/
Research Group
Date
Studied
Resource
investigation
(contd)
R. Moss and S. D.
Scott
PACMANUS
cruises II, III,
and IV
(1993, 1996-
1997) and
1995
Manusflux
cruise
Geochemistry and mineralogy of
gold-rich hydrothermal
precipitates from the Eastern
Manus Basin, Papua New
Guinea.
Moss & Scott,
2001
E. Hrischeva, S.D.
Scott, and R.
Weston
1996 to
1997
Metalliferous sediments
associated with presently forming
volcanogenic massive sulphides
in the SuSu Knolls hydrothermal
field, Eastern Manus Basin,
Papua New Guinea.
Hrischeva et al.,
2007

A.M.M. Pinto,
F.J.A.S. Barriga
and S.D. Scott
2000 to
2001
Sulphide and oxide mineral
chemistry of an active back arc
hydrothermal systems:
PACMANUS, ODP holes 1188A,
1188F, 1189A, and 1189B.
Pinto et al.,
2003
A.M.M. Pinto,
J.M.R.S. Relvas,
F.J.A.S. Barriga, J.
Munha, N. Pacheco
and S.D. Scott
2005 Gold mineralisation in recent and
ancient volcanic-hosted massive
sulphides: the PACMANUS field
and the Neves Corvo deposit.
Pinto et al.,
2005
Placer Dome January
2006
Detailed mineralogical analyses
of the polymetallic sulphide
material mined from the Manus
Basin.

Seacore (UK) January/Feb
ruary 2006
Drilling program, including trial
cutting tests and bulk sampling,
that provided an opportunity for a
number of environmental
investigations.

Donald Bren
School of
Environmental
Science and
Management
Thesis
2006 A case study of potential deep-
sea mining of seafloor massive
sulphides in Papua New Guinea.
Birney et al.,
2006
Water quality Enesar Consulting
Pty Ltd. (Australia)
February
2006
Water sampling undertaken
during the drilling program.
Parameters measured included
physico-chemical variables,
inorganic species and total
organic carbon.
Enesar, 2006b
CSIRO Land and
Water, Australia
April 2007 Water and sediment
characterisation and toxicity
assessment for the Solwara 1
Project.
Appendix 7
Solwara 1 Project

7-8

Type of
Survey/Study
Company/
Research Group
Date
Studied
Other S. D. Scott and R.
A. Binns
1995 Hydrothermal processes and
contrasting styles of
mineralisation in the western
Woodlark and eastern Manus
Basins of the western Pacific.
Scott & Binns,
1995
J.M. Parr and E.A.
Binns
1997 Report on the PACMANUS-III
cruise, RV Franklin, Eastern
Manus Basin, Papua New
Guinea: Exploration and Mining.
Parr & Binns,
1997
D.A. Vanko,
W. Bach,
S. Roberts,
C.J. Yeats and
S.D. Scott
2000 to
2001
Fluid inclusion evidence for
subsurface phase separation and
variable fluid mixing regimes
beneath the deep-sea
PACMANUS hydrothermal field,
Manus Basin back-arc rift, Papua
New Guinea.
Vanko et al.,
2004
R. Binns 2004 Guides for volcanogenic massive
sulphide exploration from a
modern seafloor analogue,
Eastern Manus Basin, Papua
New Guinea.
Binns, 2004
SRK Consulting February to
March 2005
Independent technical
assessment of exploration
tenements in the Bismarck Sea
and the Solomon Sea, Papua
New Guinea.
Hodkiewicz et
al., 2005
SRK Consulting February to
March 2005
Independent technical
assessment of seafloor massive
sulphide exploration tenements in
Papua New Guinea and Fiji.
Jankowski &
Hodkiewicz,
2006
M. Tivey, W. Bach,
J. Seewald,
M. Tivey, and
D. Vanko
2006 Fluid chemistry and magnetic
structure as guides to seafloor
processes in hydrothermal
systems in the Eastern Manus
Basin.
Tivey et al.,
2006
S. Saunders 2008 The potential for natural disasters
being triggered by mineral
extraction at the Solwara 1
seafloor hydrothermal vent site.
Appendix 14
7.3 Hydrothermal Vents
7.3.1 Introduction
Seafloor hydrothermal vents were first discovered in 1976 on the Galapagos Rift in the Pacific
Ocean and the first major studies commenced in 1977 (Desbruyres et al., 2006). Since then,
hydrothermal vents have been found on the seafloor close to tectonic plate boundaries all over
the world (Halbach et al., 2003). Hydrothermal vents are of particular interest to biologists as they
support a much higher abundance of fauna compared to surrounding deep-sea environments.
Locations of some well-studied hydrothermal vent sites are provided in Figure 7.5.
Solwara 1 Project

7-9

Hydrothermal vents are usually found along mid-ocean ridges and back-arc basins. Mid-ocean
ridges are underwater mountain ranges that are formed through the movement of tectonic plates
away from each other and typically have a valley, known as a rift, running along their axis (Van
Dover, 2000b). Back-arc basins, such as the Manus Basin, are formed where tectonic plates meet
and move towards one another, with one plate sliding underneath the other. The downward force
of the sinking plate pulls on the edge of the overlying plate, causing it to split. This split allows
magma to flow upwards, forming underwater volcanoes. The back-arc basin is the basin formed
behind these volcanoes (Figure 7.6).
Hydrothermal vent systems are formed when cold seawater is drawn into the oceanic crust in the
seafloor near the mid-ocean ridges and back-arc basins. This water becomes heated to
temperatures of up to 400C by molten magma, rises to the surface and flows out of openings
along cracks (i.e., hydrothermal vents) in the ridges and basins (Alt & Bach, 2003, Halbach et al.,
2003).
Chimneys are often associated with hydrothermal vents and are formed when the hot and acidic
hydrothermal vent fluid (approximately 350C) interacts with cold seawater (2C), releasing
elements into the water and causing minerals to precipitate as shown in Figure 7.7. These
minerals form chimney-like structures around the vents and can sometimes produce smoke-like
clouds, which can be rich in copper, gold, zinc, iron, manganese, carbon dioxide and sulphur
(Halbach et al., 2003).
When chimneys first form, their walls are comprised of calcium sulphate (anhydrite) and as the
chimneys develop, the anhydrite forms a surface onto which copper-iron-sulphide (chalcopyrite)
precipitate binds (see Figure 7.7). Chimneys become more metal rich with time as aqueous ions
including copper, iron, hydrogen sulphide, zinc, sodium, chloride and magnesium are transported
from areas of high concentration to areas of low concentration by diffusion and deposit on the
inner walls of the chimneys (Tivey, 1998).
Large concentrations of sulphides can accumulate near hydrothermal vents, such as at
Solwara 1, and are known as Seafloor Massive Sulphide (SMS) deposits (Alt & Bach, 2003;
Halbach et al., 2003). The formation of these deposits is caused by the precipitation of sulphides
in the chimneys and underlying volcanic rock. Mounds of sulphide talus often form on the seafloor
when chimneys fall over and as further sulphides precipitate within the mound, the size of the
deposit slowly increases (see Figure 7.7) (Alt & Bach, 2003; Halbach et al., 2003).
7.3.2 Vent Environment and Biology
There are a number of fundamental characteristics of active hydrothermal areas that influence
biology, the most important of which is the chemistry of the fluid emitted from actively venting
chimneys or as diffuse flow.

Some micro-organisms
2
can make use of the chemicals from the fluid chemistry to produce
energy (note: there is no photosynthetic primary production at these depths). Some animals
consume the micro-organisms directly, while in others, the micro-organisms reside as
endosymbionts, i.e., living within the host animal tissues to provide the source of energy. The

2
These include Eubacteria and Archaea, which are bacteria-like prokaryotes, having no cell nucleus or any other
organelles within their cells.
Solwara 1 Project

7-10

animal communities around the vents typically include species of tube worms, gastropods,
bivalves and crustaceans.
The endosymbiotic relationship enables the generation of extremely high biomass, and the
animals are adapted for tolerance of sulphides and heavy metals at levels to which surface
organisms are not typically exposed. Many of these animals are dependent on the micro-
organisms that break down hydrogen sulphide and cannot exist away from the influence of vents
activity. Where the vent system has become inactive or extinct, the animals cannot survive and
these are termed vent-dependent or vent-obligate species.
Vent temperatures are highly variable and cover a range from a few degrees above ambient to
350
o
C (Tivey, 1998). The microbial populations can survive in temperatures up to 121
o
C (Kashefi
& Lovley, 2003), whereas the host invertebrate populations (for example, Alviniconcha sp.) tend
to live at more modest temperatures, generally at or below 40
o
C (Henry et al., 2008).
Since their first discovery, the number of species recognised from published descriptions of deep-
sea hydrothermal environments, including those associated with the dominant snail, worm and
mussel beds, is over 500 (Desbruyeres et al., 2006). In vent sediments, one or two species
usually make up 70 to 90% of total abundance. In non-vent deep sea sediments, abundances are
more evenly distributed among species, with the single most common species making up less
than 20% of the total (Van Dover, 2000a).
With increasing distance from active areas, seafloor sediments show a transition to inactive
areas, where there is no flux of hydrothermal fluids. In these areas, macrofauna communities are
different from those at active areas. Apart from those associated with whale falls, methane seeps
and cuttings piles around petroleum drilling, for example, animals occur at much lower biomass in
the inactive sites. In some areas, inactive SMS deposits may cap thermal systems and these may
begin to vent if they are disturbed, for example, by drilling. This was observed at Solwara 1
where, following drilling, active venting was seen to occur from a drill hole (see Section 7.8.2) as
shown in Plate 7.3.
7.3.3 Issues and Studies
Scientific interest in the biological communities of hydrothermal vent systems has greatly
increased since first discovery. As scientific understanding has grown, so to have concerns about
the potential impacts of exploitation. Workshops and seminars of the International Seabed
Authority and other forums have discussed a need to consider management and conservation.
While there are positive scientific impacts of exploration, including discoveries of new sites and
opportunities to study ecosystems in extreme environments, actual development by mining could
have negative impacts such as:
Potential loss of habitat and degradation of habitat quality.
Potential local, regional or wider-scale loss of endemic or rare species.
Potential decreased diversity of species or higher taxonomic levels.
Potential loss of knowledge or of other future opportunities (i.e., of what we do not know).
In consequence, Nautilus has committed from the outset to combine exploration work and
background research by engaging world experts in deep-sea hydrothermal vent ecology and by
devoting substantial ship and ROV time specifically to environmental studies. The nature of these
studies and the tasks undertaken were developed in consultation with marine and deep sea
experts and also with input from other government and NGO stakeholders, as described in
Chapter 4.
Solwara 1 Project

7-11

The earlier PACMANUS discovery cruises provided an extensive baseline of the seafloor
geological and biological setting of the offshore Project area from which to extend those studies,
and to determine the risks from mining to the seafloor environment at Solwara 1, South and North
Su. The reports of these studies are attached to this EIS and the results are summarised mainly
in Chapters 7 and 9. The area is now the best-studied hydrothermal vent ecosystem in the Manus
Basin and the scientists were involved in the designing of the mitigation measures that have been
developed to meet environmental protection, as described in Chapters 9 and 13.
7.4 Meteorology and Air Quality
7.4.1 Climate
The climate of the Project area, based on data collected from East New Britain and central New
Ireland, is described as Lowland Humid (McAlpine et al., 1983), a category which includes regions
with elevations between 0 and 500 m and annual rainfall between 2,000 and 3,500 mm. Relative
humidity is high throughout the year and shows little seasonal variation, with an annual average of
about 80 to 85%.
Temperature and Rainfall
Temperature in the Project area is fairly constant with the monthly average ranging between 27
and 30C year round. The consistency in temperature explains why the degree of seasonality in
PNG is actually a reflection of the difference between the wettest and the driest periods of the
year (McAlpine et al., 1983).
During the northwest monsoon season (the wet season), the highest rainfall occurs in January. In
Rabaul (East New Britain) and Namatanai (central New Ireland), the average monthly rainfall in
January is 352 mm and 438 mm, respectively (McAlpine et al., 1975). During the southeast
monsoon season (the dry season), the lowest rainfall is recorded in September, during which time
the average monthly rainfalls for Rabaul and Namatanai are 86 and 125 mm, respectively.
Winds
Weather in the Bismarck Sea is driven by the larger weather patterns over the Pacific Ocean and
the Project area experiences two very distinct seasons associated with the Southeast
Asian/Australian monsoon system. The southeast monsoon season extends from May to October
and the northwest monsoon season occurs from November to April.
Northwest trade winds bring in low-pressure troughs resulting in heavy rainfall during the
northwest monsoon (wet) season. Historical data collected over 23 years from 1946 to 1969
shows that northwesterly winds dominate the Project area in January and strengthen during the
day. The northwesterlies are not as well developed in the transition period around April and are
replaced in July by moderate to fresh south-southeasterly winds that are relatively constant
throughout the day. The southeasterly monsoon season gradually weakens and the cycle is
completed by the strengthening of the northwesterly component and return to January conditions
(McAlpine et al., 1983).
Relevant climatic data for the Bismarck Sea is held by the Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial
Research Organisation (CSIRO) and was obtained for the purposes of this report from the CSIRO
Division of Marine Research. Wind roses prepared using the CSIRO data, collected over 16 years
up until 2002, are shown in Figure 7.8.
Solwara 1 Project

7-12

Cyclones
The frequency of tropical cyclones, with sustained surface winds of greater than 34 kt (62 km/h),
is very low in the PNG region (McAlpine et al., 1983), the near-equatorial latitudes being outside
the cyclone belt. The Bismarck Sea has, in recent history, been free of tropical cyclone activity
(Triton, 2004).
7.4.2 Air Quality
Air quality at Solwara 1 has not been monitored. However, given the remoteness of the site,
which is situated in the Bismarck Sea at least 50 km from any significant industrial and other
anthropogenic sources, background air quality is likely to be near pristine. Localised, episodic
periods of elevated particulate matter may occur due to the activities of Tavurvur Volcano, located
50 km to the south at the entrance to Simpson Harbour, Rabaul. Figure 7.9 shows a plume of ash
and steam from the active Tavurvur Volcano adjacent to Rabaul (see Figure 7.4) extending over
the Bismarck Sea on 29 May 2008.
Air quality for the onshore component of the Project is discussed in Section 7.9.5.
7.5 Physical Oceanography and Deep Sea Sedimentation
Oceanographic conditions at Solwara 1 and South Su have been characterised through a number
of investigations, including:
A review of existing oceanographic data in the Bismarck Sea (Cresswell, 2007).
Oceanographic profiles through the water column (i.e., temperature, salinity, conductivity,
transmissivity and photosynthetically active radiation [PAR]).
In situ measurements of ocean currents over the entire water column (surface to the seafloor),
covering a non-contiguous, 12-month period.
Deep-sea sedimentation rates and the chemical properties of the material collected (with the
latter discussed in Section 7.7).
Findings are summarised below and a detailed analysis of results are provided in Appendix 3.
7.5.1 Regional Current Circulation
Surface Currents
During the southeast monsoon season (May to October) the major surface current system of the
Pacific Ocean involves a broad westward flow of water on the northern arm of the South Pacific
gyre
3
.
This wind-driven, surface-current system, known as the Southern Equatorial Current (SEC)
produces current flows through the Coral Sea that branch north when they meet northeastern
Australia. These currents meet to form the New Guinea Coastal Current (NGCC) (Figure 7.10).
The NGCC flows through the Louisiade Archipelago and Vitiaz Strait into the Bismarck Sea (see

3
A gyre is any manner of swirling vortex. It is often used to describe large-scale wind or ocean currents. Gyres are caused
by the Coriolis effect, the planetary vorticity along with horizontal and vertical friction that determine the circulation
patterns from the wind curl (torque).
Solwara 1 Project

7-13

Figure 7.1 for the location of seas, archipelagos and other features). The more northern
component of the SEC tends to flow past the Solomon Islands and can either enter the Bismarck
Sea through St Georges Channel or Ysabel Channel from the north.
During the northwest monsoon season (November to April), the NGCC and the northern arm of
the East Australian Current can reverse direction and flow southeast through the Vitiaz Strait
along the northern coast of Papua New Guinea (Steinberg et al., 2006).
The Bismarck Archipelago acts as a barrier to the main SEC flow and any circulation outside the
major current pathways is likely to be characterised by complex flows and recirculations in the
sheltered side of the island arcs, especially during the prevailing southeast monsoon season
(Steinberg et al., 2006).
Computer modelling indicated that surface currents enter and leave the eastern Bismarck Sea in
the vicinity of Solwara 1 through St Georges Channel (King, pers. com., 2007).
Sub-surface Currents
Below the surface, large-scale sub-surface currents flow through the waters of PNG (Wells et. al.,
1999). The New Guinea Coastal Undercurrent transports water at 220 m depth from the Solomon
Sea, through the Vitiaz Strait and into the Bismarck Sea (Figure 7.10). Further to the east, the St
Georges Undercurrent enters the Bismarck Sea from the Solomon Sea, eventually flowing in a
westerly direction at 220 m water depth. The two sub-surface currents flow in the same direction
year-round. They meet in the eastern Bismarck Sea and flow to the northwest until reaching the
equator, where they turn to the east and form the Equatorial Undercurrent.
7.5.2 Tides in the Eastern Bismarck Sea
The Bismarck Sea predominantly experiences diurnal tides (one high and one low per day) with
flooding and ebbing occurring over 12 hours (with a correspondingly large tidal excursion
4
). Tides
have a maximum vertical range of 1 m (during spring tides), and sea level anomalies (tides,
seasonal cycles and trend removed) for the region are highly correlated with the Southern
Oscillation Index (SOI)
5
, as the Bismarck Sea is located in the Western Pacific Warm Pool
6
. Local
trade wind changes associated with El Nino Southern Oscillation (ENSO) therefore directly affect
the local sea levels (Steinberg et al., 2006).
7.5.3 Oceanography at Solwara 1
Water Column Structure
CSIRO undertook six oceanographic campaigns between 1985 and 2005 in the Bismarck Sea in
close proximity to (and directly over) Solwara 1. During this period, over 80 oceanographic
profiles were performed from the surface to the seafloor and measured the changes in
temperature, salinity, oxygen and turbidity with depth.

4
The net horizontal distance over which a water particle moves during one tidal cycle of flood and ebb; the distances
traversed during ebb and flood are rarely equal in nature, since there is usually a layered circulation, with a net surface
flow in one direction compensated by an opposite flow at depth.
5
SOI is based on the (atmospheric) pressure difference between Tahiti and Darwin, Australia.
6
The Western Pacific Warm Pool has the highest mean annual sea surface temperatures on earth ranging from 28C to
greater than 29.5C. Because of the high temperatures, the Warm Pool supplies the earth's atmosphere with a large
portion of its water vapor and heat, largely in the form of latent heat.
Solwara 1 Project

7-14

In addition, Nautilus has thus far conducted over 35 oceanographic profiles at Solwara 1 from
2005 to 2008 and measured salinity, temperature, transmissivity and photosynthetically active
radiation (PAR).
Interpretation of available data indicates that the surface mixed layer
7
at Solwara 1 varies in depth
from the surface to 185 m below the surface (Figure 7.11), while the euphotic zone
8
thickness has
a range of 33 to 80 m below the surface. Surface light does penetrate below the euphotic zone,
and in some cases reaches depths of over 200 m, but is insufficient for photosynthesis to take
place and is known as the disphotic zone.
Current Velocity
Current velocity data has been collected at Solwara 1 over the period August 2006 to February
2008 using four Acoustic Doppler Current Profiler (ADCP) current meters (Plates 7.4 and 7.5 and
Figure 7.12) which enabled the measurement of three-dimensional currents through the water
column (i.e., from the surface to the seafloor). An additional earlier short-term survey in January
2006 was undertaken at Solwara 1 using a number of current meters.
On average, current speed in the upper 400 m of the water column at Solwara 1 ranges between
10 and 20 cm/s. Strongest horizontal current speeds across the whole water column were
observed at approximately 250 m depth and occasionally exceeded 40 cm/s. Year-round net
water drift in the upper water column is to the northwest (as shown in Figure 7.13); this direction is
likely governed by the St Georges Undercurrent (Section 7.5.1).
Water speed in the mid-water column (from 400 to 800 m) is also generally between 10 to
20 cm/s. Net drift in the mid water during the northwest monsoon season is to the southeast but
changes direction and flows to the west-northwest during the southeast monsoon season
(Figure 7.13).
Net water movement between 800 and 1,200 m water depth is generally to the east-northeast but
can move to the west on occasions, as shown in the progressive vector diagrams in Figure 7.13
and 7.14. The direction in which naturally occurring particulate plumes measured between 1996
and 1997 also shown in Figure 7.14 are influenced by currents at these depths.
Currents at and immediately above the seafloor at Solwara 1 are relatively weak, averaging
6 cm/s and exceeding 15 cm/s only 5% of the time (see Appendix 3). The current regime at this
depth can be summarised as follows:
At short time scales (i.e., days), flow directions are dominated by tidal influences. Figure 7.15
shows that during any given month in the year currents typically flow to the north-northeast
and west-southwest, corresponding to the tidal axis at this depth.
The overall net drift over longer time scales (i.e., weeks to months) above Solwara 1 is from
the southeast to the northwest, away from North Su and South Su (Figure 7.13).

7
The surface mixed layer is the upper layer in the ocean, which is kept well mixed by the turbulent action of wind and
waves and therefore tends to be composed of water of similar temperature, salinity and density. Surface mixed layers
near the coast are generally shallower than in the open sea, as is the case at Solwara 1.
8
The euphotic zone is the zone in the upper ocean where photosynthesis takes place. The base of the euphotic zone is
defined as the depth which is reached by only 1% of transmitted light from the surface.
Solwara 1 Project

7-15

Upwelling
Vertical currents from the surface to 400 m depth at Solwara 1 are dominated by regular upward
and downward movements, which do not match tidal frequencies. Instead the downward motions
peak at sunrise every day and the upward motions begin at sunset and continue for four to five
hours after sunset. The vertical motions are interpreted to represent the vertical migrations of
zooplankton. It has been estimated that each creature travels about 150 m vertically through the
water column during each migration. Further information is provided in Appendix 3.
Tidal Influence
In the upper water column (from 150 m to 250 m below the surface), northwesterly wind-driven
currents are relatively strong. The velocity of the both the upper and deep-water currents
increases as the southeast monsoon season commences.
Analysis of currents (Appendix 3) suggest that from the surface to 1,200 m depth currents appear
to be driven by wind and large-scale water surface and sub-surface currents (Section 7.5.1). In
the deeper waters (from 1,470 m to the seafloor), the currents are primarily driven by tides.
7.5.4 Deep Sea Sedimentation
Sedimentation Rates in the Pacific Ocean
Sedimentation rates in the ocean are controlled by a number of factors:
Proximity to continental land masses with associated increased detrital input and the
occurrence of boundary currents.
Proximity to the equator and other regions of high biological productivity and the concomitant
increased biogenous sedimentation.
Depth, i.e., increased dissolution of carbonate.
In general, detrital sediments only form a small portion of the pelagic sediments of the Pacific
Ocean (averaging less than 10%); hence, the total accumulation rate largely represents
biogenous sedimentation.
A belt of high biogenous sediment accumulation has proven to exist along the equator (Worsely &
Davies, 1979). Accumulation rates along this belt are high for total sediment and carbonate, the
difference between the two being an approximate measure of the rate of biogenous silica
accumulation in the equatorial region during the time period in question. As Solwara 1 is located
420 km south of the equator, it falls within this equatorial belt.
Between latitudes 3 south to 4 south (which includes the location of Solwara 1) composition and
rate of sediment deposition on the seafloor generally accumulate at 0.055 g/m
2
/d for total
sediment and range between 0.003 and 0.006 g/m
2
/d for organic carbon. Inorganic carbon flux
shows a clear latitudinal trend. At similar latitudes, sedimentation rates are 0.005 g/m
2
/d (Lampitt
& Antia, 1997).
Sedimentation Rates at Solwara 1
An average sedimentation rate of 0.95 g/m
2
/d was measured at Solwara 1 via the deployment of
six sediment traps around Solwara 1 (see Figure 7.12). On average, the total inorganic carbon
content accounts for 1.70% of the material collected (at an average rate of 0.02 g/m
2
/d).
The average sedimentation rate determined from six sediment traps deployed at South Su was
0.82 g/m
2
/d.
Solwara 1 Project

7-16

Average sedimentation rates at Solwara 1 and South Su are higher than those determined from
open ocean global trends (Lampitt & Antia, 1997). The higher rate of sedimentation is likely due to
hydrothermal vent activity in the area, combined with volcanic venting of North Su, which
discharges material into the water column (Figure 7.14), thereby increasing sedimentation rates at
Solwara 1 and South Su (see Section 7.3).
7.6 Water Quality
In open oceanic waters away from influences of terrestrial discharges, background natural levels
of trace metals are typically low and well below the various international standards and guideline
levels and below limits of detection by analytical methods applied to compare against standards.
Typical background ocean levels would be expected within the majority of the water column at the
offshore project site, which is in deep water and more than 30 km from the nearest shore.
However, given the nature of the area, deep layers of the water column near to the seabed are
likely to be naturally influenced by discharges from active vents of Solwara 1, and from the
plumes observed at depths around 1,000 m, generated by vents and submerged volcanic activity,
for example from North Su. Studies were therefore undertaken to determine if any effects from
these natural phenomena could be detectable on water quality.
Two water-columnsampling programs have been undertaken to date at the Solwara 1 location.
The first was during January and February 2006 when Nautilus undertook a drilling and bulk
sampling program in the Solwara 1 prospect area. This program opportunistically included a
number of environmental investigations including water sampling.
Water samples were taken with 1.5-L Niskin
bottles mounted on an ROV. Of interest are the five

samples taken when no drilling and bulk sampling contamination was present: at water depths
383 m (duplicates at this depth), 1,125 m, 1,490 m, and 1,518 m. Results for general water quality
parameters and nutrients, and filtered metals (passing <0.45 !m filter) are shown in Table 7.2.
Table 7.2 shows that concentrations of filtered metals are at or near detection limits except for
arsenic and zinc. Concentrations of all filtered metals are less than PNG water quality criteria and
ANZECC/ARMCANZ (2000) trigger values (ANZECC/ARMCANZ, 2000).
There is an ammonia anomaly, but any high results from this program need to be assessed with
caution since the field blanks indicate contamination with ammonia from an unknown source.
The second field sampling of waters was conducted by CSIRO Centre of Environmental
Contaminants Research during the Wave Mercury 07 Campaign, using ultra-trace metal
techniques to determine background concentrations of metals in the water column in the vicinity
of the SMS deposits, and metal concentrations in plumes created during sampling of these
deposits. Samples were collected from 1, 5, 10 and 20 m from the seafloor above active vents at
Solwara 1, with background samples collected from 500 m depth in the water column above
Solwara 1. Samples from depths of 1,000 m were also taken to determine water quality where
naturally occurring plumes had previously been observed (note that plume activity was weak at
the time of sampling). Details of methods and results are provided in Appendix 7.
E
n
v
i
r
o
n
m
e
n
t
a
l

I
m
p
a
c
t

S
t
a
t
e
m
e
n
t

S
o
l
w
a
r
a

1

P
r
o
j
e
c
t

N
a
u
t
i
l
u
s

M
i
n
e
r
a
l
s

N
i
u
g
i
n
i

7
0
0
8
_
0
9
_
C
h
0
7
_
v
4
.
d
o
c

7
-
1
7

C
o
f
f
e
y

N
a
t
u
r
a
l

S
y
s
t
e
m
s

T
a
b
l
e

7
.
2

G
e
n
e
r
a
l

w
a
t
e
r

q
u
a
l
i
t
y

a
n
d

f
i
l
t
e
r
e
d

m
e
t
a
l
s

a
t

S
o
l
w
a
r
a

1

i
n

2
0
0
6

N
u
t
r
i
e
n
t
s

S
a
m
p
l
e

N
u
m
b
e
r

L
a
t
i
t
u
d
e

L
o
n
g
i
t
u
d
e

D
e
p
t
h

D
O

T
r
a
n
s

T
u
r
b
i
d
i
t
y

(
N
T
U
)

T
S
S

H
y
d
r
o
x
i
d
e

a
l
k
a
l
i
n
i
t
y

a
s

C
a
C
O
3

C
a
r
b
o
n
a
t
e

a
l
k
a
l
i
n
i
t
y

a
s

C
a
C
O
3

B
i
c
a
r
b
o
n
a
t
e

a
l
k
a
l
i
n
i
t
y

a
s

C
a
C
O
3

T
o
t
a
l

a
l
k
a
l
i
n
i
t
y

a
s

C
a
C
O
3

T
O
C

S
u
l
f
i
d
e

a
s

S
2

A
m
m
o
n
i
a

a
s

N

N
i
t
r
i
t
e

a
s

N

N
i
t
r
a
t
e

a
s

N

S
R
P

a
s

P

D
i
s
s
o
l
v
e
d

S
i
l
i
c
o
n

D
e
t
e
c
t
i
o
n

L
i
m
i
t

1

1

1

1

1

1

0
.
1

0
.
0
1
0

0
.
0
1
0

0
.
0
1
0

0
.
0
1
0

0
.
0
5

U
n
i
t
s

m

m
g
/
L

%

m
g
/
L

m
g
/
L

m
g
/
L

m
g
/
L

m
g
/
L

m
g
/
L

m
g
/
L

m
g
/
L

m
g
/
L

m
g
/
L

m
g
/
L

m
g
/
L

8
5
3
_
0
4

S
0
3

4
7
.
3
0
6
7

E
1
5
2

0
5
.
6
5
3
3

3
8
3

7
.
9

8
6
.
8

5
.
0

1
0
.
0

<
1

<
1

1
3
1
.
0

1
3
1
.
0

<
1

<
0
.
1

<
0
.
0
1
0

<
0
.
0
1
0

0
.
3
7
0

<
0
.
0
1
0

0
.
4
2

8
5
3
_
0
5

S
0
3

4
7
.
3
0
6
7

E
1
5
2

0
5
.
6
5
3
3

3
8
3

7
.
9

8
6
.
8

5
.
0

1
4
.
0

<
1

<
1

1
3
2
.
0

1
3
2
.
0

1

<
0
.
1

<
0
.
0
1
0

<
0
.
0
1
0

0
.
4
0
6

<
0
.
0
1
0

0
.
4
0

8
5
3
_
1
8

S
0
3

4
7
.
4
9
0
5

E
1
5
2

0
5
.
5
8
3
7

1
,
1
2
5

7
.
8

7
8
.
0

3
.
0

1
4
.
0

<
1

<
1

1
3
6
.
0

1
3
6
.
0

<
1

<
0
.
1

0
.
0
5
9

<
0
.
0
1
0

0
.
6
1
4

<
0
.
0
1
0

2
.
8
6

M
E
A
N

7
.
9

8
3
.
9

4
.
3

1
2
.
7

<
1

<
1

1
3
3
.
0

1
3
3
.
0

<
1

<
0
.
1

0
.
0
2
3

<
0
.
0
1
0

0
.
4
6
3

<
0
.
0
1
0

1
.
2
3

M i d W a t e r
S
T
A
N
D
A
R
D

D
E
V
I
A
T
I
O
N

0
.
1

5
.
1

1
.
2

2
.
3

2
.
6

2
.
6

0
.
1
3
2

1
.
4
1

8
5
3
_
0
6

S
0
3

4
7
.
3
3
4
4

E
1
5
2

0
5
.
7
3
4
1

1
,
4
9
0

5
.
9

9
0
.
2

5
.
0

1
0
.
0

<
1

<
1

1
3
6
.
0

1
3
6
.
0

<
1

<
0
.
1

<
0
.
0
1
0

<
0
.
0
1
0

0
.
6
0
9

<
0
.
0
1
0

4
.
7
5

8
5
3
_
1
5

S
0
3

4
7
.
2
8
1
7

E
1
5
2

0
5
.
7
1
0
0

1
,
5
1
8

7
.
4

9
1
.
3

3
.
0

1
2
.
0

<
1

<
1

1
3
8
.
0

1
3
8
.
0

<
1

<
0
.
1

0
.
0
5
5

<
0
.
0
1
0

0
.
6
5
7

<
0
.
0
1
0

4
.
0
7

M
E
A
N

6
.
7

9
0
.
8

4
.
0

1
1
.
0

<
1

<
1

1
3
7
.
0

1
3
7
.
0

<
1

<
0
.
1

0
.
0
3
0

<
0
.
1
0

0
.
6
3
3

<
0
.
0
1
0

4
.
4
1

P r e - c u t t i n g
S
T
A
N
D
A
R
D

D
E
V
I
A
T
I
O
N

1
.
1

0
.
8

1
.
4

1
.
4

1
.
4

1
.
4

0
.
0
3
4

0
.
4
8

8
5
3
_
0
2

S
0
3

4
7
.
3
3
2
1

E
1
5
2

0
5
.
6
4
6
4

1
,
5
0
7

6
.
8

3
8
.
3

4
.
0

1
0
.
0

<
1

<
1

1
3
2
.
0

1
3
2
.
0

<
1

<
0
.
1

<
0
.
0
1
0

<
0
.
0
1
0

0
.
6
6
7

<
0
.
0
1
0

4
.
2
4

8
5
3
_
0
7

S
0
3

4
7
.
1
3
7
7

E
1
5
2

0
5
.
6
4
2
3

1
,
5
6
5

7
.
2

1
7
.
6

5
.
0

1
4
.
0

<
1

<
1

1
4
4
.
0

1
4
4
.
0

1

<
0
.
1

<
0
.
0
1
0

<
0
.
0
1
0

0
.
6
7
7

<
0
.
0
1
0

4
.
3
7

8
5
3
_
0
8

S
0
3

4
7
.
4
3
3
2

E
1
5
2

0
5
.
4
6
3
1

1
,
5
5
8

6
.
8

2
8
.
0

6
.
0

1
3
.
0

<
1

<
1

1
3
9
.
0

1
3
9
.
0

<
1

<
0
.
1

<
0
.
0
1
0

<
0
.
0
1
0

0
.
6
9
0

<
0
.
0
1
0

4
.
4
3

8
5
3
_
0
9

S
0
3

4
7
.
4
3
3
2

E
1
5
2

0
5
.
4
6
3
1

1
,
5
5
8

6
.
7

1
7
.
4

5
.
0

1
2
.
0

<
1

<
1

1
3
9
.
0

1
3
9
.
0

<
1

<
0
.
1

<
0
.
0
1
0

<
0
.
0
1
0

0
.
7
1
4

0
.
0
2
6

4
.
1
9

8
5
3
_
1
0

S
0
3

4
7
.
4
8
3
5

E
1
5
2

0
5
.
4
6
3
2

1
,
5
6
2

7
.
4

1
0
1
.
7

5
.
0

1
7
.
0

<
1

<
1

1
3
9
.
0

1
3
9
.
0

<
1

<
0
.
1

<
0
.
0
1
0

<
0
.
0
1
0

0
.
6
4
2

<
0
.
0
1
0

4
.
1
3

8
5
3
_
1
1

S
0
3

4
7
.
1
1
2
3

E
1
5
2

0
5
.
4
6
0
2

1
,
5
6
1

6
.
8

7
.
2

3
.
0

1
0
.
0

<
1

<
1

1
3
9
.
0

1
3
9
.
0

<
1

<
0
.
1

0
.
0
2
4

<
0
.
0
1
0

0
.
7
0
4

<
0
.
0
1
0

4
.
1
3

8
5
3
_
1
2

S
0
3

4
7
.
4
3
5
7

E
1
5
2

0
5
.
4
6
3
9

1
,
5
6
0

6
.
8

3
.
8

1
0
.
0

1
0
.
0

<
1

<
1

1
3
8
.
0

1
3
8
.
0

<
1

<
0
.
1

0
.
0
4
2

<
0
.
0
1
0

0
.
6
5
8

0
.
0
2
1

4
.
2
4

8
5
3
_
1
3

S
0
3

4
7
.
2
8
1
4

E
1
5
2

0
5
.
6
5
5
8

1
,
5
2
3

6
.
5

1
.
3

4
.
0

1
7
.
0

<
1

<
1

1
3
8
.
0

1
3
8
.
0

<
1

<
0
.
1

0
.
0
3
0

<
0
.
0
1
0

0
.
6
2
8

<
0
.
0
1
0

4
.
1
5

8
5
3
_
1
7

S
0
3

4
7
.
4
0
8
2

E
1
5
2

0
5
.
5
8
7
8

1
,
5
0
8

6
.
7

1
.
4

1
0
5
.
0

3
6
.
0

<
1

<
1

1
4
0
.
0

1
4
0
.
0

<
1

<
0
.
1

0
.
0
5
1

<
0
.
0
1
0

0
.
7
0
3

<
0
.
0
1
0

4
.
8
5

M
E
A
N

6
.
9

2
4
.
1

1
6
.
3

1
5
.
4

<
1

<
1

1
3
8
.
7

1
3
8
.
7

<
1

<
0
.
1

0
.
0
2
0

<
0
.
0
1
0

0
.
6
7
6

<
0
.
0
1
0

4
.
3
0

D u r i n g C u t t i n g
S
T
A
N
D
A
R
D

D
E
V
I
A
T
I
O
N

0
.
3

3
1
.
7

3
3
.
3

8
.
2

3
.
1

3
.
1

0
.
0
1
2

0
.
0
3
0

0
.
2
3

E
n
v
i
r
o
n
m
e
n
t
a
l

I
m
p
a
c
t

S
t
a
t
e
m
e
n
t

S
o
l
w
a
r
a

1

P
r
o
j
e
c
t

N
a
u
t
i
l
u
s

M
i
n
e
r
a
l
s

N
i
u
g
i
n
i

7
0
0
8
_
0
9
_
C
h
0
7
_
v
4
.
d
o
c

7
-
1
8

C
o
f
f
e
y

N
a
t
u
r
a
l

S
y
s
t
e
m
s

T
a
b
l
e

7
.
2

G
e
n
e
r
a
l

w
a
t
e
r

q
u
a
l
i
t
y

a
n
d

f
i
l
t
e
r
e
d

m
e
t
a
l
s

a
t

S
o
l
w
a
r
a

1

i
n

2
0
0
6

(
c
o
n
t
d
)

N
u
t
r
i
e
n
t
s

S
a
m
p
l
e

N
u
m
b
e
r

L
a
t
i
t
u
d
e

L
o
n
g
i
t
u
d
e

D
e
p
t
h

D
O

T
r
a
n
s

T
u
r
b
i
d
i
t
y

(
N
T
U
)

T
S
S

H
y
d
r
o
x
i
d
e

a
l
k
a
l
i
n
i
t
y

a
s

C
a
C
O
3

C
a
r
b
o
n
a
t
e

a
l
k
a
l
i
n
i
t
y

a
s

C
a
C
O
3

B
i
c
a
r
b
o
n
a
t
e

a
l
k
a
l
i
n
i
t
y

a
s

C
a
C
O
3

T
o
t
a
l

a
l
k
a
l
i
n
i
t
y

a
s

C
a
C
O
3

T
O
C

S
u
l
f
i
d
e

a
s

S
2

A
m
m
o
n
i
a

a
s

N

N
i
t
r
i
t
e

a
s

N

N
i
t
r
a
t
e

a
s

N

S
R
P

a
s

P

D
i
s
s
o
l
v
e
d

S
i
l
i
c
o
n

D
e
t
e
c
t
i
o
n

L
i
m
i
t

1

1

1

1

1

1

0
.
1

0
.
0
1
0

0
.
0
1
0

0
.
0
1
0

0
.
0
1
0

0
.
0
5

U
n
i
t
s

m

m
g
/
L

%

m
g
/
L

m
g
/
L

m
g
/
L

m
g
/
L

m
g
/
L

m
g
/
L

m
g
/
L

m
g
/
L

m
g
/
L

m
g
/
L

m
g
/
L

m
g
/
L

8
5
3
_
0
1

S
0
3

4
7
.
3
3
1
8

E
1
5
2

0
5
.
6
4
6
4

1
,
5
0
7

6
.
0

8
4
.
0

3
.
0

1
3
.
0

<
1

<
1

1
3
0
.
0

1
3
0
.
0

<
1

<
0
.
1

0
.
0
7
1

0
.
0
2
5

0
.
5
0
9

<
0
.
0
1
0

4
.
5
4

8
5
3
_
1
4

S
0
3

4
7
.
2
8
6
6

E
1
5
2

0
5
.
7
0
8
0

1
,
5
0
4

6
.
3

8
1
.
0

1
3
.
0

1
1
.
0

<
1

<
1

1
3
9
.
0

1
3
9
.
0

1

<
0
.
1

0
.
0
4
9

<
0
.
0
1
0

0
.
6
8
4

<
0
.
0
1
0

4
.
4
0

8
5
3
_
1
6

S
0
3

4
7
.
2
8
6
7

E
1
5
2

0
5
.
6
9
1
4

1
,
5
1
3

6
.
8

5
3
.
5

4
.
0

9
.
0

<
1

<
1

1
4
0
.
0

1
4
0
.
0

<
1

<
0
.
1

0
.
0
6
4

<
0
.
0
1
0

0
.
6
3
3

<
0
.
0
1
0

4
.
1
2

8
5
3
_
0
3

S
0
3

4
7
.
3
3
2
1

E
1
5
2

0
5
.
6
4
6
4

1
,
5
0
7

6
.
9

2
8
.
7

4
.
0

1
3
.
0

<
1

<
1

1
3
1
.
0

1
3
1
.
0

<
1

<
0
.
1

<
0
.
0
1
0

<
0
.
0
1
0

0
.
6
3
1

<
0
.
0
1
0

4
.
6
6

M
E
A
N

6
.
5

6
1
.
8

6
.
0

1
1
.
5

<
1

<
1

1
3
5
.
0

1
3
5
.
0

<
1

<
0
.
1

0
.
0
6
1

<
0
.
0
1
0

0
.
6
1
4

<
0
.
0
1

4
.
4
3

P O S T - C U T T I N G
S
T
A
N
D
A
R
D

D
E
V
I
A
T
I
O
N

0
.
4

2
6
.
0

4
.
7

1
.
9

5
.
2

5
.
2

0
.
0
1
1

0
.
0
7
4

0
.
2
3

Solwara 1 Project

7-19

At sites within 20 m of the seafloor, total (unfiltered) concentrations of arsenic, selenium and
mercury in the waters collected in the vicinity of the proposed mining operations were at
concentrations typical of ocean water. Total concentrations of copper, lead and zinc exceeded
water quality guidelines for dissolved concentrations of these metals (ANZECC/ARMCANZ, 2000)
in a number of water samples. This indicated the need for measurements of filtered (<0.45 !m
filtered) metal concentrations using trace level techniques. Results showed that filtered metal
concentrations in the waters near the proposed ore body, and in the surrounding ocean waters,
were generally very low and below water quality guideline concentrations for all metals (95%
protection levels, ANZECC/ARMCANZ 2000), and for all metals except zinc (99% protection
levels), the latter possibly a result of sample zinc contamination.
For the background 500-m site, total and dissolved concentrations of silver, cobalt, and lead were
typical of ocean waters, while concentrations of cadmium, chromium, copper, nickel and zinc
were a little higher than typical. Samples from 1,000 m did not indicate presence of plumes at the
time of sampling, as total suspended solid (TSS) values were low and total metals were also low.
Concentrations of TSS were generally low (mean 1.2 mg/L and range from 0.1 to 6.6 mg/L) in all
samples. Compared with other water quality indicators in open seawater around the world,
concentrations of filtered cadmium and zinc were generally greater at Solwara 1 than at other
regions (Appendix 7). Summaries of results of dissolved metal concentrations in relation to
ANZECC/ARMCANZ (2000) standards are given in Table 7.3.
Table 7.3 Wave Mercury 07 Campaign filtered metal concentrations at Solwara 1
Dissolved Metal, !g/L
Location

Ag Cd Co Cr Cu Ni Pb Zn
Seawater at 500 m
depth
Min
Max
<0.005
<0.005
0.044
0.045
<0.024
<0.024
0.20
0.24
0.054
0.12
0.29
0.38
<0.015
0.034
5.0
7.4
1 to 20 m above
seafloor
Min
Max
<0.005
0.0072
0.015
0.087
<0.024
0.053
0.15
0.23
0.099
0.21
0.52
0.67
0.015
0.21
1.5
8.0
Guidelines
ANZECC/ARMCANZ
(2000)
95% PL
99% PL
1.4
0.8
5.5
0.7
14
1
4.4
b

0.14
b

1.4
0.3
120
14
4.4
2.2
15
7
Number of samples
with
dissolved metal
concentrations
exceeding the
Guidelines
95% PL
99% PL
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
c

0
0
0
0
0
0
0
4
d

Number of samples
with
total metal
concentrations
exceeding the
Guidelines
a

95% PL
99% PL
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
c

6
13
0
1
3
4
3
6
a
Total metal analysis is used to assess unfiltered waters; however, dissolved metal guideline values were used for
comparisons as no guidelines exist for total metals, where PL = protection level.
b
Guidelines for Cr(VI), with corresponding guidelines for Cr(III) of 10 and 0.8 !g/L, respectively.
c
If all Cr was present as Cr(VI), then all 21 samples, including field blanks exceeded the Cr guideline; however, as less
than half the Cr is expected to be present as Cr(III), the guideline is not considered to be exceeded.
d
The highest dissolved zinc concentrations were measured in the field blanks and indicate a possible source of sample
contamination.
Solwara 1 Project

7-20

7.7 Sediment Quality
7.7.1 Seafloor Geological Setting
The Manus Basin in the Bismarck Sea is bounded along its northeast side by a series of Eocene
to Oligocene island arcs generated by subduction of the Pacific Plate along the now inactive
Manus Trench (Martinez & Taylor, 1996). On its western border lies the mainland of Papua New
Guinea and, to the south, the New Britain island arc. On the south side of this volcanically active
island arc is the New Britain Trench, which is the current locus of subduction of the northward-
moving, Indo-Australian Plate. Subduction along this trench is believed to have begun at
approximately 15 million years ago (Ma), after subduction of the westward moving Pacific Plate
came to a halt upon collision of the Ontong Java Plateau with the Manus Trench (Martinez &
Taylor, 1996).
The Manus Basin shows typical back-arc characteristics with basalt-dominated volcanism
occurring along the more mature western and central seafloor spreading segments, whereas
mafic to felsic magmas characterise the rifting of the eastern Manus Basin. These three zones of
active volcanism are separated by northwest to west-northwest- trending transform faults
(Martinez & Taylor, 1996). The eastern Manus Basin, which is the least mature of the three active
extensional zones, is an 80 to 100-km-wide, pull-apart structure bounded by a set of sinistral
faults; on its western edge, the Djaul Fault, and on its eastern edge, the Weitin Fault
(Figure 7.16).
It is between these transform faults that the mineral-rich PACMANUS and SuSu Knolls
hydrothermal fields were discovered (Binns & Scott, 1993; Scott & Binns, 1995; Binns et al., 1997,
cited in Appendix 6). Rifting began in the Pliocene at approximately 3.5 million years ago (Binns
et al., 1995, cited in Appendix 6). Located in this immature back-arc basin is a series of northeast-
trending oblique volcanic ridges with rock types ranging from basaltic andesite to highly
differentiated dacite and rhyolite. Exposures of Eocene to Oligocene arc crust on the islands of
New Britain and New Ireland are thought to be a continuation of the basement lithologies of the
eastern Manus Basin (Binns et al., 1995, cited in Appendix 6).
Solwara 1 (originally known as Suzette) is a sulphide mound that is part of SuSu Knolls. The
SuSu Knolls are in the eastern part of eastern Manus Basin, at a water depth of 1,160 to 1,550 m
and extending for approximately 4 km in a north-northwest to south-southeast direction. They
consist of two prominent porphyritic dacite domes, North Su and South Su, and a deeper and
lower andesite complex, Solwara 1 (Binns et al., 1997, cited in Appendix 6). The hydrothermal
field at SuSu Knolls consists of four main sites: Solwara 1, South Su, North Su and a valley
between North Su and Solwara 1 (see Figure 1.2).
The PACMANUS and SuSu Knolls hydrothermal fields were discovered during the 1991
PACMANUS I and 1996 PACMANUS III marine expeditions, respectively (Binns & Scott, 1993;
Scott & Binns, 1995; Binns et al., 1997, cited in Appendix 6; Parr & Binns, 1997) by means of
multiple real-time CTD (conductivity, temperature, depth) and transmissometry plume-detection
profiles across what was believed, from their bathymetry, to be active volcanoes (Parr & Binns,
1997; McDonald et al., 1998, cited in Appendix 6). During the 1996 PACMANUS III expedition,
two recognisable particulate plumes were detected (Figure 7.14); a lower plume at 1,260 to 1,460
m water depth and an upper plume at 1,060 to 1,140 m water depth. Fallout from these plumes
could have contributed hydrothermal constituents to the seafloor sediments. Eleven months later
during the 1997 PACMANUS IV cruise, the lower plume had all but disappeared but the upper
plume had intensified. The upper plume clearly emanated from the top of North Su. The lower
Solwara 1 Project

7-21

plume appeared to have had two sources; a strong source from South Su and a weaker one from
Solwara 1.
The South Su and North Su sites are characterised by extensive natroalunite-bearing alteration of
the porphyritic dacite as well as scattered sulphide chimneys and mounds dominated by pyrite-
enargite-fukuchilite mineralisation (Yeats et al., 2000, cited in Appendix 6; Binns, 2004). In
contrast, the deeper and lower andesitic complex at Solwara 1 displays a northsouth aligned
field of pyrite-poor, chalcopyrite- and gold-rich chimneys with barite gangue, similar to those of the
PACMANUS site, located 50 km to the west (Binns & Scott, 1993; Scott & Binns, 1995; Moss &
Scott, 2001 cited in Appendix 6).
The SuSu Knolls are covered by a thick (up to several meters) and widespread tuffite apron of
layered, dark, locally sulphidic sandy sediment (Binns, 2004).
7.7.2 Sediment Mineralogy and Geochemistry
Sediment Mineralogy
The unconsolidated sediment cover of grey volcanic sandy silts and silty sands (Appendix 6) over
Solwara 1 can be over 6 m deep in some areas and, in parts of the mound, blocks of chimneys
and volcanic rocks are buried under sediment. This material is called unconsolidated sediment
throughout this EIS. These volcaniclastic sediments of Solwara 1 and South Su have similar
mineral compositions suggesting a common source. They are composed of angular fragments of
volcanic rock, calcium plagioclase and pyroxene that are equivalent to the plagioclase-pyroxene
porphyritic dacite lavas building North Su and South Su (Binns, 2004). The sediments also
contain cristobalite, alunite, pyrite and barite that are products of sub-seafloor hydrothermal
alteration and mineralisation of volcanic rocks and are found in altered volcanics in the eastern
Manus Basin (Yeats et al., 2000, cited in Appendix 6). Binns (2004) proposed derivation of
components of the volcaniclastic sediment at SuSu Knolls from violent hydrothermal eruptions at
North Su.
The Nautilus 2006 and 2007 core sample results support this interpretation. Locations of sample
sites are shown in Figure 7.17. The grey volcaniclastic sediments at Solwara 1 exhibit
characteristics similar to those of volcaniclastic deposits interpreted to be a product of phreatic
eruptions (Heiken & Wohletz, 1985, cited in Appendix 6), including those occurring at or below
1,350 m water depth (Clague et al., 2003, cited in Appendix 6). The ash produced from these
eruptions consists of fragments from vent walls and crater fields, including hydrothermal alteration
products. The volcaniclastic sediment could have been emplaced as submarine ash falls, turbidity
currents or both.
Large aggregates of pyrite and iron-copper sulphide that account for increased sulphide
concentrations (up to 5 wt %) were found in greyish-black volcanic sands from the 23 to 33 cm
interval of core SC-4 from the southeastern rim of Solwara 1 (see Figure 7.17).
Sediment traps were placed around the Solwara 1 mound in 2007 (see Section 7.5.4) with the
average sedimentation rate determined to be 0.95 g/m
2
/d. The average copper content measured
in the trap sediments was determined to be approximately 1,500 mg/kg, and the average iron was
approximately 33,000 mg/kg.
Faecal Pellets
Some of the sediments at Solwara 1 contain patches and layers that appear to have a biogenic
origin. A characteristic feature of Solwara 1 is the occurrence of greenish, greenish-brown and
greenish-black volcaniclastic sediments on the western rim and slope of the mound where they
Solwara 1 Project

7-22

are covered by grey volcaniclastic sediments. The greenish, greenish-brown and greenish-black
sediments contain up to 10 % clay and faecal pellets at different stages of preservation (see parts
E and F of Figure 7.18). An interpretation by Hrischeva et al., (2007) has concluded that the
sediments were originally deposited near chimney fields where there was an abundance of
organisms producing faecal pellets. The organisms were ingesting sediment particles including
hydrothermal particles. The sediments were later transported and re-deposited on the slopes of
the mound together with glass fragments. The absence of well-preserved faecal pellets in
sediments away from the mound could be a result of their destruction during the down-slope
transportation.
Sulphide Chimneys
A previous study of an 80-cm-long gravity core (MS-36) close to the western rim of Solwara 1
showed the occurrence of copper- and gold-rich metalliferous sediment that contains glass
fragments, amorphous silica-rich material, pyrite, chalcopyrite, barite, gypsum and atacamite
(Hrischeva et al., 2007). The highly metalliferous sediment was recovered below 39 cm depth and
was overlaid by grey volcaniclastic sediment. It was proposed that the metalliferous sediment
originated from erosion of old oxidised sulphide chimneys and is an indicator for proximity to a
previous chimney field. Similar metalliferous sediments may have broader distribution in depth
along the western rim of Solwara 1. During the Wave Mercury 07 Campaign, attempts were made
to collect 1-m-long push cores from the western rim of the mound in the hope of recovering such
metalliferous sediment. However, the attempts were not successful as the maximum recovered
depth was 28 cm.
Sediment Geochemistry
The grey volcaniclastic sediments of Solwara 1 have similar major element compositions that are
analogous to that of the feldspar-porphyritic dacite across the broader SuSu Knolls (Moss et al.,
2001). The grey volcaniclastic sediments also have comparable background concentrations of
trace metals and arsenic. The background concentration of copper in the sediments of Solwara 1
(Figure 7.19) is higher than average copper in continental shelf sediments of eastern Manus
Basin (Hrischeva et al., 2007), in continental shelf Pacific sediments from other areas (Goodfellow
& Peter, 1991, cited in Appendix 6) and in typical volcaniclastic sediments (Cronan et al., 1984,
cited in Appendix 6).
Copper and gold have background concentrations that are significantly higher than in the SuSu
Knolls dacite (Moss et al., 2001). Sources for the anomalous copper and gold are probably the
products of volcanic rock alteration and mineralisation in the volcaniclastic sediments. The
background concentrations of zinc, lead, barium, cobalt, chromium, nickel and molybdenum in the
grey volcaniclastic sediments of Solwara 1 are comparable to the average concentrations of these
elements in continental shelf sediments although the study was not as detailed.
In contrast, the volcaniclastic sediments of Solwara 1 show patchy anomalies in the
concentrations of trace metals and arsenic. It is suggested that there are two major sources of
metal anomalies: dispersal of hydrothermal particles from eroded chimneys and deposition of
hydrothermal particles within faecal pellets. Fallout from particulate plumes appears to be minor
compared to that from violent hydrothermal eruptions. Dispersal of chimney fragments does not
leave large-scale anomalies in the sediments over the mound, but has only local expression. A
strong anomaly created by dispersal of sulphides and barite that were probably derived from
erosion of proximal chimneys was found at a depth below 25 cm in core SC-4 (see Figure 7.17)
from the southeastern rim of Solwara 1.
Solwara 1 Project

7-23

In most cases, volcaniclastic sediments as deep as 25 cm that are proximal to chimneys and
chimney fragments, do not exhibit metal anomalies created by dispersal of chimney fragments.
Probably anomalies created by mass wasting of chimneys are more extensive in deeper intervals
of sediments from the western rim of the mound, as suggested by a previous study (Hrischeva et
al., 2007). Organisms inhabiting areas close to venting are another factor that may have
contributed to the metal enrichment of the sediments of Solwara 1. Presence of hydrothermal
particles in faecal pellets has created small-scale metal anomalies in black and brownish-green
patches of grey volcaniclastic sediments. Biogenic deposition of hydrothermal particles is a likely
factor for the more widespread anomalies found in greenish, greenish-brown and greenish-black
volcaniclastic sediments from the western slope of Solwara 1. Barite and sulphides dispersed
from chimneys may have also contributed to the metal anomalies in these sediments.
Venting Plume
The plumes from local venting at Solwara 1 and South Su (see Figure 7.14) are not producing
obvious, extensive anomalies in metal concentrations over much of the surface sediments. Only
local metal enrichments in sediments of two sites (cores SC-28 and SC-83) (see Figures 7.17 and
7.19) near active vents at Solwara 1 could be the result of settling of hydrothermal particles from
distinct chimney plumes (although from observation during Nautilus surveys, there are few
chimneys present).
The lack of a clear signal from plume fallout could be attributed to recent deposition of
volcaniclastic material. Continental shelf sediments, indicative of long-time exposure to the water
column, were not recovered during the sampling in 2006 and 2007. Sediments as far as
approximately 350 m to the west of Solwara 1 are volcaniclastic sediments re-deposited from the
mound. Therefore, there is no data on concentrations of trace metals in continental shelf
sediments from the area surrounding Solwara 1 that could be potentially contaminated during
mining at Solwara 1.
However, the background concentrations of metals, except for copper, in the volcaniclastic
sediments of Solwara 1 are comparable to metal concentrations in continental shelf sediment
approximately 10 km east of the SuSu Knolls (Hrischeva et al., 2007) and could be referred to as
pre-mining concentrations of metals in sediments from a broader area surrounding the SuSu
Knolls.
7.8 Biological Environment
This section describes the biological environment of the seawater surface, mid-water and deep-
water zones at the offshore Project area of Solwara 1. It also includes the barge transportation
route between the offshore project area and the Port of Rabaul. The seafloor, or benthic
environment, including the overlying water up to 50 m above the seafloor at Solwara 1, is
described in Section 7.8.2. The nearshore and onshore Project area of the Port of Rabaul is
described in Section 7.9.
Information presented in this section is primarily based on the supporting study by Hydrobiology
Pty Ltd, which is provided as Appendix 10. Hydrobiologys study included a desktop review of
scientific literature and analysis of underwater footage from the ROV as it descended through the
water column at Solwara 1 during the Wave Mercury 07 Campaign. Additional information
presented in this section has been sourced from the relevant literature.
Solwara 1 Project

7-24

7.8.1 Surface and Water Column
Within PNG, the local coastal people have expressed most concern for the quality of the marine
environments, and the protection of the reefs and fisheries upon which they depend, as well as on
the wellbeing of the larger animals that are present such as whales, sharks and turtles.
Habitat Zones
The water column can be divided into the following depth zones, broadly characterised by the
degree of light penetration (Figure 7.20):
Epipelagic zone: Well lit (0 to 200 m).
Mesopelagic zone: Some light penetration (200 to 1,000 m).
Bathypelagic zone: No light penetration (greater than 1,000 m).
Epipelagic Zone
The epipelagic zone includes the euphotic zone, which is defined as the deepest extent to which
light penetration allows photosynthesis and net oxygen production (maximum depth to 80 m), and
the surface mixed layer (see Section 7.5 for a definition). Below the surface mixed layer is the
thermocline, within which temperatures drop steadily with increasing depth. The depth of the
surface mixed layer varies but typically ranges from the surface to 185 m below the surface (see
Section 7.5).
The epipelagic zone generally contains the highest biological diversity of the water column zones
and is inhabited by plankton, large agile predatory fish (such as tuna and sharks) and prey
species (such as smaller fish and invertebrates). Food webs in this zone are based on
phytoplankton (driven by photosynthesis and various microbial processes), leading to secondary
production of zooplankton, larger consumers and finally to large mobile predators.
While photosynthesis only occurs where there is sufficient penetration of sunlight (i.e., the
euphotic zone), it supports life in deeper parts of the ocean through the vertical migration and
feeding of animals (Figure 7.21), and the downward drift of particulate organic matter, known as
marine snow derived from surface productivity. As animal biomass declines exponentially with
depth through the water column, the epipelagic zone generally has the greatest biomass.
Mesopelagic Zone
The mesopelagic zone encompasses the water column between approximately 200 and 1,000 m
depth. This zone is below the top of the surface mixed layer and euphotic zone, and is
characterised by low light and low temperatures. Typically, the mesopelagic zone has lower
dissolved oxygen than the epipelagic zone, as it is below the euphotic zone of photosynthetic
oxygen production. However, oceanographic structure within the mesopelagic zone and internal
waves or other topographically induced currents can result in layers of relatively high nutrients
and oxygen. In this zone, bioluminescence becomes more common, and various colouration and
body morphological adaptations exist to camouflage animals against weak, down-welling surface
light by counter-illumination. Fish and invertebrate species also use bioluminescence for finding
prey and for communication with others of the same species for reproduction.
Bathypelagic Zone
The bathypelagic zone and, to a lesser extent, the mesopelagic zone typically have higher
concentrations of nutrients than the epipelagic zone. While oxygen concentrations can sometimes
be higher in the bathypelagic zone than in the mesopelagic zone, for example where the deep
water originates from subducted temperate region waters, dissolved oxygen is nevertheless low.
Solwara 1 Project

7-25

In these conditions and zones abundance and biomass of animals is reduced, partly due to
diminished food supply falling from the surface.
Animals adapted to tolerate these conditions generally have low metabolic rates, soft skeletons,
reduced protein levels and slow swimming ability. Bioluminescence plays a crucial role in these
zones, and organisms are highly opportunistic feeders. The delivery of organic matter to the
bathypelagic zone in the form of marine snow can be slow with sporadic events, such as whale-
falls, providing a significant attractant to scavengers. Close to the seafloor, free-swimming
animals are more abundant and some have stronger musculature possibly because there is a
greater abundance of food sources at the sediment-water interface.
The bathypelagic zone around Solwara 1 differs from typical oceanic environments due to the
plumes generated by hydrothermal activity (e.g., at Solwara 1 and South Su, and from eruptions
of the underwater volcano at North Su). The presence of these plumes is discussed in
Sections 7.5 and 7.7 and, as shown in Figure 7.14, these plumes often drift over Solwara 1. While
the influence of volcanic activity on the environment in and around the offshore Project area is
primarily limited to the benthos (i.e., where the sediments of Solwara 1 and South Su are covered
by an apron of dark grey volcanic sandy silts; see Section 7.7), these plumes also create an
environment of higher turbidity and suspended sediments at the depths where they occur (see
also Sections 7.5 and 7.6).
Fish
There are many species of epipelagic, mesopelagic and bathypelagic fish that are likely to occur
in the offshore Project area and these are described and listed in Attachment 1 of Appendix 10.
Species of particular importance within this area include those targeted by commercial fisheries,
such as tuna and shark (see Section 8.3). While these commercial species mainly occur in the
surface epipelagic layers, they sometimes forage deeper and a number of tuna and tuna schools
were observed in ROV footage at depths within the mesopelagic zone and, in one instance, a
tuna was seen to swim past the ROV at 615 m depth. While this observation represents a vertical
range for these species that extends well into the mesopelagic zone, most observations of tuna
were made in water depths less than 200 m (Plate 7.6).
Although it is considered unlikely that the foraging range of the tunas would extend into the
permanently dark bathypelagic zone, their observed depth range extends the potential for trophic
interactions between the surface and mesopelagic zones in the ocean water column via vertically
migrating zooplankton (see Section 7.5.1), micronekton (small fish, squid and shrimps) and larger
predatory fish (Appendix 10). Figure 7.21 shows the potential trophic links between surface and
middle zones. Most of the bathypelagic species remain in deep waters at all times and rely on
nutrient flow descending from above.
The large predatory fish of the epipelagic zone (including tuna and sharks) feed on smaller
pelagic fish in the surface waters and also on micronekton, which are caught at times when
vertical migration brings the micronekton into the epipelagic or upper mesopelagic zones and
when there is enough light for predators to hunt visually.
Fish that inhabit zones where there is little or no light (i.e., the lower mesopelagic zone and the
bathypelagic zone) often use bioluminescence for attracting prey, predator evasion and
communication. The most common types of fish in the bathypelagic zone include bristlemouths,
hatchetfish, lanternfish and deep-sea angler fish. Fish in these great depths are typically small-
Solwara 1 Project

7-26

bodied, have less developed gills and muscles, and have smaller eyes than those fish that reside
higher in the water column.
Crustaceans
Crustaceans are found in all zones of the open ocean and feed primarily on microplankton. They
are an important part of the diet of many large predators, including tuna.
Crustaceans likely to be found in the water column above Solwara 1 include caridean shrimps (of
the families Oplophoridae, Pandalidae, Pasiphaeidae and Palaemonidae) and penaeid prawns (of
the families Sergestidae, Aristaeidae, Benthesicymidae and Solenoceridae). Some were
observed in midwater from the operations of the ROV at Solwara 1.
Deepsea crustaceans are often camouflaged a deep red colour: red light does not penetrate
water as well as other colours and therefore predators do not easily see red-coloured animals.
Some crustacean species also utilise bioluminescence for defense by expelling bioluminescent
clouds.
Molluscs
There are three classes of molluscs: bivalves, gastropods and cephalopods. While most marine
molluscs have a planktonic larval stage, some are found in the water column as free-swimming
adults. Bivalves and gastropods primarily inhabit benthic environments as adults and, as such,
are described in Section 7.8.2.
The cephalopod class consists of four main animal types: octopi, squid, cuttlefish and nautili.
They commonly occur in the mesopelagic zone and migrate to the epipelagic zone at night. ROV
footage show squid occur in high concentrations above Solwara 1 at 400 m water depth in the
early hours of the morning (i.e., 1 a.m.). Plate 7.7 shows a squid at 16 m water depth at 2.50 a.m.
Many species of cephalopod utilise bioluminescence for both attracting prey (e.g., some species
of squid have luminescent arm tips used to lure prey) and as a defense mechanism (e.g., some
species expel bioluminescent clouds to confuse predators).
Cephalopods, particularly squid, are of considerable importance in marine pelagic food webs as
they provide a key trophic link from vertically migrating micronekton and small mesopelagic fish
schools to high tropic level predators in the epipelagic zone, such as tuna and billfish.
Marine Mammals
Cetaceans
Cetaceans are the group of marine mammals that include whales and dolphins. Cetacean species
that are likely to occur at Solwara 1 are listed in Table 7.4. These species were recorded in Kimbe
Bay, Bismarck Sea during a monitoring program in 2003, (Visser, 2003) During the survey,
multiple sightings of each species were recorded over a short sampling period and cetaceans
were observed resting, foraging and mating.
All of the cetaceans listed are toothed whales, as opposed to the plankton-feeding baleen whales.
Toothed whales are high trophic level species (feeding mainly on fish and squid) and the
presence of 15 cetacean species, some at relatively high numbers, indicates that the area has
high biodiversity and supports a multitude of lower trophic level species.
Solwara 1 Project

7-27

Table 7.4 Cetacean species likely to occur at Solwara 1
Scientific Name Common Name
Feressa attenuata Pygmy killer whale
Globicephela macrohynchus Pilot whale
Grampus griseus Rissos dolphin
Kogia breviceps Pygmy sperm whale
Mesoplodon densirostris Densebeak whale
Orcinus orca Orca
Peponecephala electra Melon-headed whale
Physeter macrocephalus Sperm whale
Pseudorca crassidens False killer whale
Stenallas longirostris Spinner dolphin
Stenella attenuata Pantropical spotted dolphin
Steno bredanensis Rough-toothed dolphin
Tursiops aduncas Indo-Pacific bottlenose dolphin
Tursiops truncates Bottlenose dolphin
Ziphius cavirostris Cuviers beaked whale
Source: Visser, 2003.
Sperm whales are known to occur in Bismark Sea. Approximately 200 sperm whales (along with
other cetacean species) were seen in this area during February to August 2001, as part of Ocean
Alliances Voyage of the Odyssey Program (Visser & Bonoccorso, 2003). Groups of sperm
whales in differing compositions of abundance, sex and age and several mother/calf pairs were
observed during this program, indicating that the Bismarck Sea is a breeding and calving ground
for the sperm whale (Johnson, 2001).
There have been 94 sightings of killer whales in PNG as part of research undertaken by Orca
Research Trust (Visser & Bonoccorso, 2003). Thirty-seven of these sightings have been recorded
with exact data and location information, while a further 57 sightings are anecdotal. This research
indicates that killer whales are present in PNG waters between March and December and are
often found in association with sperm whales and spinner dolphins (Visser & Bonoccorso, 2003).
In the Project area, sightings of whales are not common. During the Wave Mercury 07 Campaign,
located at Solwara 1 and South Su between 22 March and 28 April 2007, only two pods of
approximately 12 pilot whales were observed. Although there were no dedicated whale
observations, crew and researchers were on deck at all times and it is unlikely that any more
significant presence of whales went unnoticed. Nevertheless, it is possible that some of the
species listed in Table 7.4 occur in the Project area.
While cetaceans primarily inhabit the epipelagic zone, many species, such as pilot whales (Soto
et al., 2008) and sperm whales, are known to dive to depths over 1,000 m into the mesopelagic
and bathypelagic zones to hunt prey.
Dugongs
The dugong (Dugong dugon) is a herbivorous mammal and the only surviving member of the
family Dugongidae (Marsh et al., 1996). Worldwide, the dugong has an extensive distribution and
occurs along the coast of the northern half of Australia and throughout the coastline of the South
Pacific, Asia and Africa (Marsh, 2006). It is believed that the dugong is represented across this
Solwara 1 Project

7-28

range (about 26
o
north and south of the equator) by relict populations separated by large areas
where it is rare or extinct. The largest known population of dugongs occurs in Torres Strait,
between PNG and Australia (Marsh et al., 1996). Dugongs feed on all available species of
seagrass and their range generally does not extend far from their feeding grounds.
While dugongs have been recorded feeding on seagrass up to 58 km offshore (Marsh et al.,
1999), the water depth at Solwara 1 is too great to support seagrass and dugongs are unlikely to
be found in this area.
Dugongs are not regularly sighted in Simpson Harbour but are seen near the Duke of York
Islands group (see Figure 1.1) and the Credner Islands (located between Kokopo and the Duke of
York Islands) (Alexander, pers. com., 2008a).
Marine Reptiles
The three main groups of marine reptiles inhabiting PNGs marine waters are crocodiles, turtles
and sea snakes.
Crocodiles
The saltwater crocodile, (Crocodilus porosus), occurs in many areas along PNGs coast. This
species primarily inhabits nearshore areas and, while they do periodically move locations, it is
most unlikely that they would be found at Solwara 1. There is no known resident crocodile
populations in Simpson Harbour; however, transient individuals are infrequently seen (Alexander,
pers. com., 2008b). Crocodiles are known to occur around Matupit Harbour (see Figure 7.4) and
the Duke of York Islands group (see Figure 1.1), and there are healthy crocodile populations
along the coast of New Ireland (Alexander, pers. com., 2008b).
Turtles
All seven of the worlds marine turtle species are listed on the International Union for
Conservation of Nature (IUCN) Redlist (IUCN, 2008a) and are therefore a high international
conservation priority. Six of these, namely the green turtle (Chelonia mydas), hawksbill turtle
(Eretmochelys imbricata), leatherback turtle (Dermochlys coriacea), olive ridley turtle
(Lepidochelys olivacea), loggerhead turtle (Caretta caretta) and flatback turtle (Natator
depressus) have been recorded in PNG (WWF, 2001).
Leatherback turtles are found from tropical to sub-polar oceans (Sarti Martinez, 2000) and are
known to nest along the Morobe coast of PNG, between Labu Butu and Busama beach and along
the Madang coast. Quin et al., (1983) estimated that 1,000 to 1,500 leatherbacks nest annually in
this area. However, this region has witnessed a 90% decrease in the number of nesting
leatherbacks since the Quin et al. (1983) survey was conducted. The Tagging of Pacific Predators
(TOPP) Project found that leatherbacks migrate through the Bismarck Sea en route from Papua
to the coast of southeastern Australia (TOPP, 2008).
The green turtle is the most common marine turtle in PNG. There are known nesting beaches at
Manus, Madang, New Ireland, Milne Bay, around the Engineer and Conflict island groups and the
Calvados chain (WWF, 2001).
There are 25 known hawksbill turtle nesting beaches in PNG (Spring, 1995), including sites at
Manus, New Hanover, New Ireland and northeast New Britain (WWF, 2001). The largest
hawksbill nesting beach in the South Pacific is on the Arnovan Islands (between Choiseul and
Santa Isabel islands in the Solomon Islands). Turtles that nest on these islands migrate through
PNG waters.
Solwara 1 Project

7-29

While the loggerhead turtle has been recorded in PNG, there are no known loggerhead nesting
beaches. Tag and recapture data collected over a 21-year period by Limpus et al., (1992) indicate
that adult loggerhead turtles travel to PNG waters between nesting seasons in Australia; however,
there is no specific data indicating the presence of loggerheads in the Project area.
Olive ridley nesting beaches occur on Rambutyo Island, the island of New Britain (WWF, 2001).
The Bismarck Sea area is listed in an IUCN update for the olive ridley as being a foraging and
migratory area (IUCN, 2008b).
The flatback turtle has a limited distribution in southern PNG waters and has only been recorded
on a few occasions (WWF, 2001). There is no specific data indicating the presence of flatback
turtles in the Project area.
Published literature on turtle migratory pathways (UNEP-WCMC, 2006) does not indicate major
routes between New Ireland and New Britain, although data are from tagging, which does not
reveal detailed movements and it is expected that most species may travel past the project area
from time to time. There are few nesting sites recoded in this database for the Bismarck Sea, but
this is not taken to assume that there is no nesting in the area.
Sea Snakes
There are 23 species of sea snake known to inhabit PNG waters. While most sea snakes species
occupy nearshore waters and estuaries, some species inhabit the open sea and can dive to
depths in excess of 100 m (Williams et al., 2004). Therefore, it is possible that sea snakes are
present in Simpson Harbour, Rabaul, and possibly also at Solwara 1.
Marine Birds
There are several species of marine birds that potentially occur within the Project area. Two of
these, Becks petrel (Pseudobulweria becki) and Heinroths shearwater (Puffinus heinrothi), are of
particular conservation significance as they are listed as critically endangered and vulnerable,
respectively (IUCN, 2007).
The Becks petrel was observed in the Bismarck Sea by Shirihai (2008) in 2007. The highest
concentration of Becks petrel occurs at Cape St George, approximately 145 km to the southeast
of Solwara 1 and they are thought to nest around the southern montane forests of southern New
Ireland (Shirihai, 2008). As the species are thought to prefer sea mounds and areas where the
water depth is between 1,000 and 2,000, it is possible that they may occur at Solwara 1.
The Heinroths shearwater is mainly found off Bougainville, PNG and Kolombangara, Solomon
Islands, where their breeding grounds are thought to occur. However, some sightings of the
species have occurred in the Bismarck Sea and it is possible that they occur at Solwara 1
(BirdLife International, 2008).
7.8.2 Seafloor
Seafloor Habitats
The defining features of the offshore Project area include the seafloor massive sulphide mounds
of Solwara 1 and South Su located respectively about 1 km to the northwest and southeast of the
central North Su active submarine volcano (see Figure 1.2). The mineralised ore body of
Solwara 1 forms a mound approximately 2 km in diameter that rises about 200 m above the
seafloor. Mineral resource investigations have identified five main zones of mineralisation, namely
Far West, West, Central, East and Far East (see Figure 5.5), which will form the basis of mining
activities. Within these zones, temporary refuge areas will be established for protection of vent-
Solwara 1 Project

7-30

specific organisms (see Sections 9.6.2 and 13 for details) during mining. Within these mineralised
areas, clusters of seafloor chimney structures exist, some of which are actively or intermittently
venting hydrothermal fluids, while some are dormant (Figure 7.22).
At Solwara 1, it is estimated that there may be up to 40,000 chimneys over 0.25 m high (Riley,
pers. com., 17 July 2008). Some typical chimneys at Solwara 1 are shown in Plate 7.8. Between
the chimneys, the seafloor consists of exposed hard surfaces and areas of sedimentary deposits.
The hard surfaces are comprised either of heavily mineralised sulphidic rock/ore, or outcrops of
dacite (volcanic glass-like material). The latter are located mainly outside, and generally to the
north of, the main mineralised area as shown in Plate 7.9.
The sediments at Solwara 1 and South Su have been described as resembling a variable apron of
dark grey, volcanic sandy silt including volcanic rock fragments, volcanic glass and other minerals
(Appendix 6). It is likely that the source of these sediments is from local subsea volcanic activity,
e.g., North Su, which is approximately 1 km up-current from Solwara 1. Nearby active land-based
volcanoes may also contribute to the sediment composition by fallout of ash (e.g., Tavurvur is an
active volcanic vent sitting at the mouth of Blanche Bay, Rabaul).
In many parts of Solwara 1, soft, unconsolidated sediments exhibit patchiness and surface colour
differences. These colour differences may be attributed to a number of factors, including iron or
sulphur compounds, microbial mats, and/or the presence of faecal pellets at various stages of
decomposition, as described in Appendix 6. These sediments can be active or dormant,
depending on whether or not they are influenced by diffuse fluxing of hydrothermal fluids,
according to their proximity to active chimneys (Appendix 5).
The unconsolidated sediments occurring within the five mineralised zones are shown in
Figure 5.11. The sediments are generally less than 2 m deep but in some locations can have
depths greater than 6 m.
The temperature of the fluids within the chimneys can reach up to 300C or more, although, as
discussed in Section 7.3.2, the known maximum temperature limit of life is thought to be 121C
(Kashefi & Lovley, 2003). The animals colonise the outer surfaces of chimneys that are formed by
the deposition of minerals from the hydrothermal flow, where the temperature drops rapidly from
the point of fluid exit. To date, there is limited data on temperatures inside and immediately
outside Solwara 1 chimneys, or at more diffuse venting through softer seafloors. The
measurements that exist suggest temperatures of venting fluids at Solwara 1 vary from 5C to a
maximum recorded of 302C (Tivey et al., 2006).
Variable Vent Activity
The ROV research work conducted by Nautilus enabled visual comparisons to be made between
venting areas observed in 2006 and the same areas visited in 2007, which show that venting
activity at Solwara 1 is variable. Some areas observed to be venting in the 2006 survey were not
venting when subsequently re-surveyed during 2007, and conversely, venting was observed in
2007 in some areas where it had not previously been observed in 2006 (Figure 7.22). Some of
these differences may be due to sampling or observation frequency but some show clear
evidence of switching on and off of vents, and this pattern is also suggested on a macro-scale
through regional plume studies that likewise show variability from year to year (Appendix 1 and 2;
Parr & Binns, 1997).
Hydrothermal vent fauna can often tolerate changes to their environment. For example, Johnson
et al. (1994) measured variable environmental conditions at a vent community at the Galapagos
Solwara 1 Project

7-31

Spreading Centre and demonstrated that the mussel, Bathymodiolus thermophilus, was able to
tolerate these wide ranges in conditions through adaptations in feeding strategies. Van Dover
(2000a) also notes that fauna of short-lived vents that are relatively close together are unlikely to
become extinct from the shut-down of a particular vent. This is due to the high likelihood of the
species being able to disperse to an adjacent vent that is actively venting.
During the 2006, 2007 and 2008 Nautilus offshore campaigns, patches of apparently dead snails
were observed at several areas where venting had ceased and which could no longer support
these vent-dependent species (see Plates 7.10 and 7.11 and Figure 7.23). Both Ifremeria nautilei
(a gastropod snail, with dark coloured shell) and Alviniconcha sp. (a species of gastropod snail,
with a shell of hairy appearance) reside in elevated temperatures (up to 25C) compared to that of
ambient seawater (approximately 3C). Recent studies have shown that the normal habitat
temperature ranges of Ifremeria nautilei and Alviniconcha sp in the Lau Basin are 6 to 21C and
15 to 33.5C respectively (Henry et al., 2008) but they can tolerate elevated temperatures (up to
40C for Ifremeria nautilei and 45C for Alviniconcha sp).
The patches of dead snails were always observed in areas where there was no venting (either
sedimented seafloor areas or at the base of inactive chimneys) and their presence may indicate
where venting had switched off and/or the movement of snails in search of venting fluid. The
movement of snails (Alivniconcha sp) was observed (Nautilus observations) when live individuals
were removed from one active vent and placed at the foot of another active vent. Each time this
was done, the snails moved towards the new active vent, presumably seeking out the vent
fluid/heat source. In contrast, moved individuals of Ifremeria nautilei tended to clump together and
did not show the same movement.
These observations are of significance in characterising the existing seafloor habitats of
Solwara 1 and South Su, and show that vents naturally turn on and off. It is a dynamic system
and no areas are guaranteed to be constantly venting at Solwara 1, i.e., there is no durable
differentiation of active and inactive areas.
The presence of vent-dependent species can be used to define locations of currently active sites,
since these species cannot exist away from their chemotrophic energy source. Accordingly, the
absence of vent-dependent species may indicate a currently inactive habitat in terms of
hydrothermal activity, which may be associated with peripheral areas where there may be
intermittent activity or partial (e.g., down-current) influence.
The active venting sites at Solwara 1 and at South Su, are characterised by a number of biomass-
dominant species including Alviniconcha sp and Ifremaria nautilei as well as Eochionelasmus sp.
(a barnacle) and, at South Su only, the mussel Bathymodiolus manusensis (Appendix 4). These
occur at various densities at different vent sites. Pictures of these animals in high and low
densities around vents are given in Plates 7.12 and 713.
Images taken by ROV of the Solwara 1 mound during the exploration phases of the Project have
revealed three main zones of actively venting areas, in addition to intermittently venting areas and
non-venting areas, as determined by presence of particular species. Actively venting chimneys
are also visually apparent by the shimmering from the exit of the hot fluids into the ambient cold
seawater (Plate 7.14), which has a temperature of around 3C. In some cases, there is also the
emission of plumes of sediment (Plate 7.15), but on Solwara 1 and South Su, there are relatively
few examples of large plumes typical of chimneys that have been found at other vent systems
around the world. Solwara 1 is a weakly active system, thought to be waning. At the neighbouring
Solwara 5 area, 2.4 km to the northwest (see Figure 5.1), there are no signs of active venting,
Solwara 1 Project

7-32

suggesting perhaps the thermal hot spot in the Susu Knolls area has migrated progressively
south-southeast over time.
The non-venting areas can be hard (sulphide or dacite) or unconsolidated sediments, as
described in Appendices 5 and 6. In contrast, ROV images of the actively erupting North Su
volcano have been difficult to obtain because of the extensive plumes generated from its crater.
Some small-scale releases of hydrothermal fluids from a previously non-venting area were
observed in 2007, possibly initiated by exploration drilling although, if so, this was a very localised
phenomenon. There have been no observed cases where the exploration or sampling activity has
caused any venting to cease. In some areas, after chimneys or parts of chimneys had been
sampled, formation of new chimney lattice material was seen to occur in as little as 21 hours (see
Plate 7.3), indicating the dynamic nature of these areas. In other cases, numbers of the vent-
dependent snail species were seen actively moving towards and colonising areas where venting
had started following the disturbances of exploration.
Given this natural variability in venting activity, the seafloor habitats in the project area are
therefore most practically characterised as follows:
Active and intermittently active hydrothermal vents, as defined by the presence of vent-
dependent macrofauna and/or visible signs of venting of warm water fluids.
Hard surfaces close to vents, with potential for peripheral influence of chemotrophic energy
source, but without vent-dependent species or visible signs of venting.
Hard surfaces remote from vent influences.
Unconsolidated sediments close to hot vent fluids, with diffuse venting or peripheral influence
of chemotrophic energy source.
Unconsolidated sediments remote from hot vent fluids.
Biological Communities
Global Level Studies
Since the discovery of hydrothermal vents in 1977 (see Section 7.3), studies of vent communities
have been undertaken in many areas of the world (see Van Dover, 2000a and Figure 7.5). While
a detailed summary of these studies and findings is beyond the scope of this chapter, the
distribution of the main areas of study includes:
Mid-Atlantic Ridge (e.g., Lucky Strike (1,700 m depth), TransAtlantic Geotraverse (3,600 m
depth) and Snake Pit (3,600 m depth)).
Northeast Pacific Ridge (e.g., Explorer Ridge (1,850 m depth) and Gorda Ridge (3,250 m
depth)).
East Pacific Rise (e.g., Guaymas Basin, 9N, 21N, 13N and the Spike Area; all at 2,600 m
water depth).
Galapagos Spreading Centre (e.g., Rose Garden at 2,500 m water depth).
Western Pacific (e.g., Okinawa (550 m depth), Mariana Arc (3,600 m depth), North Fiji Basin
(2,000 m depth), Lau Basin (1,800 m depth), Manus Basin (2,500 m depth)).
Solwara 1 Project

7-33

Some general zoogeographic characteristics of these areas can be very briefly summarised as
follows. The Mid-Atlantic Ridge, including the Lucky Strike, TransAtlantic Geotraverse (TAG) and
Snake Pit areas, has been well studied. Lucky Strike is dominated by a sulphide-colonising
mussel species (Bathymodiolus azoricus). No tube worms or clams have been found in this area.
TAG is a single large sulphide mound, approximately 200 m in diameter, which is dominated by
shrimp and anemones. Snake Pit communities are comprised of fauna similar to that at TAG;
however, mussels (Bathymodiolus puteoserpentis) are also present, predominately at the base of
the sulphide mounds.
Several areas along the Northeast Pacific Ridge system have been studied. Communities at the
Explorer Ridge, Endveavour Ridge, Axial Seamount, CoAxial Site and Cleft Segment have similar
faunal compositions, including tube worms (Ridgea piscesae), polychaetes and small gastropods
(including Lepetodrilus fucensis and Depressigyra globulosus). The soft sediment environment of
the Gorda Ridge supports species not found at other Northeast Pacific Ridge sites, including a
variety of polychaete species and thyasirid clams.
Areas studied within the East Pacific Rise, a fast-spreading ridge system, include the Guaymas
Basin, 9N, 21N, 13N and the Spike Area. The Guaymas Basin has large populations of giant
tube worms (Riftia pachyptila), scale worms and paralvinellid polychaetes. Infauna includes
bivalves and polychaetes and bivalves such as mussels (Bathymodiolus thermophilus) and giant
clams (Calyptogena magnifca). Communities at 9N, 21N, 13N and the Spike Area are similar;
however, mussels are not present at 21N.
The Rose Garden on the Galapagos Spreading Centre, upon discovery, supported typical vent
fauna such as tube worms, clams, mussels, limpets, alvinocarid shrimp, bythograeid crabs,
serpulid worms, anemones, etc. High-temperature vents were not found in this area and therefore
high temperature taxa such as Alvinella spp. were not recorded. Since discovery, the site known
as Rose Garden has been overrun by lava and no longer exists (Van Dover, pers. com., 2008).
Studies areas of the Western Pacific include Okinawa, Mariana, North Fiji Basin, Lau Basin and
Manus Basin. The Okinawa site is dominated by the mussel Bathymodiolus japonicus, and also
supports tube worms, clams, crabs and other mussel species. Mariana fauna includes hairy
gastropods (Alviniconcha hessleri), suspension-feeding barnacles, alvinocarid shrimp and
bythograeid crabs. Tube worms have not been found at this site. The Fiji and Lau basins are
dominated by gastropods (Ifremeria nautilei and A. hessleri) and mussels (Bathymodiolus
brevior). Faunal communities of the Manus Basin are similar to that of the Fiji and Lau basins and
are described in more detail below.
Manus Basin Studies
Previous faunal studies of the Manus Basin provide descriptions of the macrofauna communities
typical of the western Pacific back-arc basins. The first biological material sampled from the
Project area was taken during the PACMANUS and Binatang cruises in 2000 from PACMANUS
sites and SuSu Knolls (including South Su and Solwara 1) (Appendix 2).
Further studies of species collected from the PACMANUS sites during these cruises (CSIRO,
2007) described the abundances of mussels of the genus Bathymodiolus (although not located at
Solwara 1), large gastropods of the genera Alviniconcha and Ifremeria, vestimentiferan tube
worms of the genus Alaysia and species of crabs, squat lobsters and barnacles. Results of DNA
analyses of 85 animal specimens of these animals showed that one species of tube worm Alaysia
spiralis has a range from Tonga to the east Manus Basin, while another new species of Alaysia
was found. The data for Alviniconcha hessleri, the only currently recognised species, suggests
Solwara 1 Project

7-34

that it is widely distributed across vent systems of the Western Pacific, including East Manus, Lau,
North Fiji and Okinawa Trough (see Figure 7.5) (CSIRO, 2007). However, two undescribed
species are reported from the Manus and North Fiji Basins and further DNA studies (see
Appendix 4) suggested these are not Alviniconcha hessleri.
This distribution may also be similar for the vent-dependent snail Ifremeria nautili. Others, such as
the mussel Bathymodiolus, appeared to have a high degree of endemism and were found only in
limited geographic areas. Two species of Bathymodiolus were present; one (provisionally named
Bathymodiolus manusensis) only known from the Manus Basin and the other extending to New
Zealand. However, whether separate species occur could not be confirmed at the time of this
study without additional sampling and more detailed taxonomy, including analysis of DNA data
undertaken by Nautilus. The study also highlighted the generally poor understanding of the
macrobenthic fauna of inactive hydrothermal sites.
Prospect Level Studies (Solwara 1, South Su)
With this understanding of the environmental setting of the seafloor of the offshore Project area,
Nautilus commissioned further extensive biological surveys of the macrobenthos of both active
and inactive hard surfaces (chimneys and sulphide/dacite substrata) and also of the active and
inactive sediments around the Solwara 1 and South Su areas. The studies were carried out to
provide the environmental baseline and understanding for the present Project. The Wave Mercury
07 research campaign (March to April 2007) allowed the most comprehensive sampling of active
hydrothermal vents and inactive sites in Manus Basin to date (Appendix 4). Benthic habitat
studies were designed and undertaken in collaboration with international hydrothermal vent
experts, and key issues for study were identified during a March 2007 workshop in Port Moresby
(see Chapter 4). Some aspects of the studies have extended beyond that necessary for the EIS
and impact prediction, and ongoing taxonomic work will add to the more general level of scientific
knowledge of the Manus Basin. It is also Nautilus intention that material collected during baseline
and future monitoring studies will be available for experts around the world to pursue research
(with approval from PNG authorities) and all of the scientists who have contributed to the baseline
studies are free to publish their findings in the scientific literature.
The aim of the studies was to characterise benthic habitats, not only at active chimneys but also
areas adjacent to the chimneys, including both active and inactive hard and soft substrates.
Studies combined visual assessment from video transects with quantitative sampling of both hard
and soft substrates (Appendix 4 and Appendix 5) and the main findings are summarised in the
sections below. Note that in these studies, macrofauna of active and inactive hard substrates
(Appendix 4) included all animals retained on sieve size of 250 m, this being the mesh size on
the ROV sampling suction chamber. Macrofauna of active and inactive sediments (Appendix 5)
included all animals retained on sieve of 300 m in order to maximise numbers for analyses.
Meiofauna included all those animals passing through 500 m and being retained on sieve of
53 m, as is standard for meiofauna studies generally.
Macrofauna at Active Vents
Solwara 1 and South Su Studies
The macrofaunal (invertebrate) communities at active vents were studied by Van Dover et al., (as
cited in Appendix 4), with the objectives of building an inventory of macroinvertebrate species
associated with active sulphide mounds, and comparing communities at Solwara 1 to those at
South Su, a potential non-mined control site, a little over 2 km southeast of Solwara 1 (see
Figure 1.2).
Solwara 1 Project

7-35

Active sites were defined by the presence of the typical vent-dependent species that host
symbionts (e.g., Ifremaria nautilei, Alviniconcha sp. and/or Bathymodiolus manusensis) and/or by
the visual evidence of warm water effluents and plumes. Sampling was only carried out where
animals were observed, and the specimens were carefully collected using suction sampling or
mechanical arms on an ROV. This sampling was undertaken quantitatively, with parallel replicate
samples of equivalent numbers at Solwara 1 and South Su sites, to enable statistical analysis.
The active-vent sites at South Su and Solwara 1 share three visually similar, and generally
concentric, habitat zones, characterised by the biomass-dominant species of gastropod
Alviniconcha sp. (closest to the vent) and Ifremaria nautilei (middle zone) and the barnacle
Eochionelasmus ohtai (outer zone), surrounding the host vent (Plate 7.16). The zones are most
likely correlated with fluid activity, fluid chemistry and temperature along a gradient from the
centre of vent activity to the outside. While this has not been demonstrated at Solwara 1, the
correlation is based on evidence from other areas (Appendix 4). The species of mussel,
Bathymodiolus manusensis and the vestimentiferan tube worms (Alaysia sp. and Arcovestia
ivanovi) were only observed at South Su, where they occupied the outer barnacle zone. These
species are shown in Plates 7.17 and 7.18 respectively.
These zones of dense animal biomass also provide habitat for many other species, including
crabs, squat lobsters, shrimps, limpets and polychaete worms that live in association with the
biomass-dominant snails and barnacles. More detailed descriptions of these groups with plates
are given in Appendix 4. Many of these species were found at both Solwara 1 and South Su but
some only at either site. In total, over 24,800 individuals were collected for quantitative analyses,
of which 49 species were identified. Of these, 23 were common to both areas, 10 were only
observed at Solwara 1, and 16 were only observed at South Su.
Statistically, there were few significant differences in the indices of species density and species
diversity between the Alviniconcha and Eochionelasmus zones from Solwara 1 and South Su.
However, diversity was significantly higher in the Ifremaria zone samples from South Su
compared to Solwara 1. This was due to the large proportion of a single mollusc species,
Lepetodrilus schrolli, of which 10,000 more individuals were collected at South Su. Community
analyses of species abundance data using multivariate analyses showed no overall significant
difference between Solwara 1 and South Su sites.
The main difference between Solwara 1 and South Su was the relative proportion of numerically
dominant species rather than the composition, i.e., of the 23 species shared between South Su
and Solwara 1, most were represented by less than 5 individuals at Solwara 1. In contrast, at
South Su, these species were more abundant, with one species of limpet Lepetodrilus schrolli
being particularly abundant. Another difference at South Su was the presence of the mussel beds
and tube worms. These are characteristic elements of vent-dependent species in other vent
systems but were not observed at Solwara 1. South Su is a suitable control insofar as it shares
the same faunal elements and densities found at Solwara 1. South Su also has greater
abundance of those and other organisms not at Solwara 1, and, in that respect, is a potential up-
current source of recolonising larvae.
Comparison to other Hydrothermal Vent Sites
Overall, the studies undertaken during the Wave Mercury 07 Campaign represents the most
comprehensive and systematic survey of the Manus Basin to date (Appendix 4) and at least 20
new species have been added to the species list at active vent sites. The community structure
observed at South Su and Solwara 1 is visually similar to Lau and North Fiji basins. Clear
alliances between Manus, Lau and North Fiji faunal composition are apparent at the genus level.
Solwara 1 Project

7-36

Both Solwara 1 and South Su active vent sites are similar in faunal zonation and composition.
They differ mainly in the superabundance of the limpet Lepetodrilus schrolli and the presence of
mussels and tube worms at South Su.
However, the species density (i.e., numbers of species per sample) and diversity at both Solwara
1 and South Su was low for all of the habitat zones when compared with other vent systems
worldwide, such as the East Pacific Rise (see Figure 7.5), where the vestimentiferan tube worm
habitats (characteristic of vents) are typically more extensive and provide habitats for much
greater numbers of epifaunal animals.
While not fully understood, and beyond the scope of this project to research reasons why
differences occur, the presence of the mussel Bathymodiolus manusensis, and the small colonies
of tube worms, Alaysia sp. and Acovestia ivanovi at South Su but not at Solwara 1, may indicate
different stages in successional sequence. It is possible that the naturally variable nature of active
venting (i.e., turning on and off) at Solwara 1 is likely to have some bearing on the succession and
establishment of communities and their duration. The evidence of the collections of dead (or
possibly dormant) snails observed at vents where venting has been intermittent suggests that the
processes of colonisation are periodically extinguished naturally, with succession reset with the
strength of venting. The periodic episodes of volcanic ash deposition may also contribute to
mortality and the continuous process of succession.
While the turning on and off of vents at South Su was not determined to the same extent during
the exploration period, it provides a logical explanation of the differences in composition and
relative abundances of species at Solwara 1.
Macrofauna of Inactive Hard Surfaces
In the past, with the natural focus on vents, the inactive sulphide substrates have not been well
studied and the level of knowledge of fauna is poor (CSIRO, 2007). To provide the necessary
information and as part of the above macrofauna study (Appendix 4), macrofauna on hard
surfaces away from active vents at Solwara 1 and South Su were also sampled during the Wave
Mercury 07 Campaign to provide essential descriptions of the macrofaunal characteristics of
these habitats. Termed inactive hard substrates in Appendix 4, the sample areas were
determined by the presence of hard sulphidic or dacite (basaltic, non-sulphidic) substrata but
without any characteristic vent-dependent snail and barnacle species or visible evidence of
venting. Sampling was at least 10 m from the nearest chimney.
From these inactive hard surfaces, 91 species were collected, of which 32 were common to both
Solwara 1 and South Su, 26 were only observed at South Su and 33 only observed at Solwara 1.
The most conspicuous and characteristic species colonising inactive sites were:
Suspension-feeding bamboo corals Keratoisis sp. (Plate 7.19).
Stalked barnacles Vulcanolepas parensis (Plate 7.20).
Hydroids (Plate 7.21).
Carnivourous sponges Abyssocladia sp. (Plate 7.22).
Of the species associated with these main groups, amphipods of the family Stenothoidae were
one of the most abundant at both sites. This family is well represented at other vent sites
worldwide, where they live in association with sponges, tunicates and other colonial animals
outside the direct influence of vents. A large diversity of barnacles was observed and is thought
likely to occur elsewhere on hard substrate in the surrounding seafloor environment.
Solwara 1 Project

7-37

Bivalves were well represented in samples from inactive sites but also included species that are
known from other locations to be vent-dependent. Other species sampled at these inactive sites
were previously thought to be active-vent fauna, including some limpets, gastropods, shrimps and
squat lobsters. Recruitment of active-vent taxa to non-venting areas has been reported before
(Van Dover et al., 1988; Mullineaux et al., 1998) and their survival is likely to be dependent on the
exposure to influence of nearby hydrothermal activity.
However, clear discrimination between active and inactive hard surfaces is not straightforward.
This may be partly because inactive sites are comparatively less well studied than active areas
and partly because other influences may apply: the inactive sampled areas may be in a dormant
phase of intermittent venting, they may receive some influence of nearby but unseen vents or
they may be exposed to sulphidic influences in near-seafloor current flows or in sub-surface
fissures (Appendix 4). For example, species were observed from inactive dacite (basaltic, non-
sulphide substrata) areas that were about 450 m from the nearest observed active chimney, but
were northwest and down-current from Solwara 1, which may have provided sources of food. It is
likely that animals observed exhibit scales of dependence, or ability to utilise such energy source
that reflect distance from vents and frequency of exposure to vent influence. Given the dynamic
and variable nature of venting activity, attempts at clear differentiation of zones with or without
venting influences is not practicable.
Overall, there were no obvious differences between Solwara 1 and South Su in terms of the most
abundant macroinvertebrate fauna associated with the inactive hard surfaces. Differences in the
character of the fauna of inactive sulphide mounds between sites were due mainly to differences
in assemblages of the least abundant, rarely sampled species. While the species richness and
composition of biomass-dominant species were similar at each site, species effort curves
9
had not
levelled out at these sites, suggesting incomplete characterisation of the lesser abundant species.
However, it is expected that the species colonising inactive sulphide mounds would occur
elsewhere (Appendix 4), and endemism at the scale of sampling sites is unlikely. As with all
benthic baseline and monitoring studies, it is unlikely that all of the more rare species will be
observed.
Prior to the work outlined here, the focus of most studies completed to date has been on active
vent areas rather than the peripheral areas, making it difficult to set the biodiversity context of the
present findings. Overall, coral and sponge areas were the prominent biogenic features of inactive
hard substrates. Assemblages are similar to those observed at seamounts, where dense coral
and sponge meadows are prominent biogenic features that rely on enhanced delivery of
particulate food in flow regimes associated with topographic relief. The bamboo corals are a
diverse group of deep-water corals colonising seamounts and flat-bottom areas. They represent a
biogenic habitat that supports other associated fauna. They are thought to be a long-lived
species, with some colonies estimated at being over 100 years old. As discussed in Appendix 4,
there is evidence that the bamboo corals near hydrothermal systems derive some of their organic
sulphur from nearby chemotrophic sources. At Solwara 1, they were observed on sulphidic and

9
A graph recording the cumulative number of species of living things recorded in a particular environment as a function of
the cumulative effort expended searching for them (usually measured in area or volume or number of individuals). The
species effort curve will necessarily be increasing, and will normally be negatively accelerated (that is, as more species
are discovered and added to the curve, its rate of increase will slow down). Plotting the curve gives a way of estimating
the number of additional species that will be discovered with further effort.
Solwara 1 Project

7-38

dacite substrata, which may indicate different species or more likely, different growth forms in
areas of greater exposure to chemotrophic energy (i.e., they can use but are not dependent on
this energy).
Characterising the degree of endemism of these bamboo corals and their taxonomic relationship
with those from other areas is currently difficult and beyond the scope of this EIS. They are a
diverse and widely distributed group, with current literature divided regarding endemicity versus
widespread distribution. Notwithstanding, they are prominent biogenic features of the inactive
hard surfaces that support associated invertebrates, and will be considered along with the vent
fauna in management and mitigation of impacts of mining.
Active and Inactive Sediments
Active sediments include unconsolidated sediments close to vents, where there is diffuse venting
or influence of chemotrophic energy source. Typically, it is mostly hard substrates that are found
at hydrothermal systems but, at Solwara 1 and South Su, sediment deposits of volcanic origin
occur in some areas through which there is diffuse flux of fluids where these deposits are close to
active vents. These sediments represent transitional habitats from the active sediments peripheral
to the chimneys to sediments with progressively less influence of hydrothermal activity, with
inactive sediments outside of this range. Given the natural variations in vent activity already
described, there may be no durable distinction between active and inactive sediments beyond
that at the time of sampling, and faunal communities may be at some successional stage
reflecting this.
Macrobenthos
Levin et al., (as cited in Appendix 5) studied benthic macrofaunal communities (greater than
0.3 mm) in active and inactive sediments in order to quantify and compare communities at
Solwara 1 and at South Su. The activity status of the sediments was determined by proximity to
actively venting chimneys, with areas more than 20 to 50 m from vents likely to represent inactive
conditions.
As for the hard surfaces, a parallel quantitative sampling design of the sediments involved careful
sampling of macroinvertebrates from active and inactive areas at Solwara 1 and South Su using a
push-core sampling device attached to the ROV arm (Plate 7.23). Replicate samples at
equivalent numbers of sites at Solwara 1 and South Su were taken (as far as was practicable) to
enable statistical comparisons between the communities. A total of 35 push-core (55 mm internal
diameter) samples were taken, 17 from Solwara 1 (7 inactive; 10 active) and 18 from South Su (8
inactive; 10 active) and, where possible, analyses of different depth horizons within the cores was
made. In order to supplement the core sampling, a total of 16 scoop samples were also taken to
provide additional material for analysis. However, the scoop samples allowed semi-quantitative
analysis only.
Results show that faunal densities in active and inactive sediments are very low compared with
published literature from studies undertaken at other sediment-hosted hydrothermal vent sites
Appendix 5). Only 220 individuals representing 15 species were observed in 35 cores sampled.
Most of the fauna were found in the top 2 cm of sediment, and none below 5 cm from the
seawater-sediment interface. Compared with the macrofauna of sediment-hosted hydrothermal
vents known from the eastern Pacific Ocean, which are all much deeper than the Manus Basin,
densities of animals observed at Solwara 1 and South Su were much lower. In the eastern Pacific
examples, numbers from 3,000 to 18,000 individuals/m
2
have been recorded (Desbruyeres et al.,
2006; Grassle & Petrecca, 1991; as cited in Appendix 5) while Solwara 1 and South Su densities
Solwara 1 Project

7-39

(active and inactive sites) ranged from 445 to 3,494 individuals/m
2
. Only in areas of hot muds (up
to 94C) were macrofaunal densities as low as those observed at Solwara 1 and South Su
inactive sites.
The dominant taxa were tanaids (crustaceans) and nuculanoid bivalves at both Solwara 1 sites
and at the South Su inactive site. The tanaids belong to two species: Paraleptognathia sp. (family
Anarthruridae; subfamily Akanthophoreinae) and Pseudotanais sp. (family Pseudotanaidae). The
spionid polychaete Prionospio (Minuspio) sp. was the dominant taxon at the active South Su site,
comprising 76% of the total number of individuals. Other taxa present included polychaetes from
seven families, crustaceans (gammarid amphipods, cumaceans, isopods) and limpets
(Lepetodrilus). Appendix 5 describes these main species (including plates of all species found) in
greater detail.
Despite the density differences compared with other regions, the fauna show some taxonomic
similarities with those described from the east Pacific, in particular, the genera Prionospio, and
nuculanoid bivalves, although it is likely that the species collected at Solwara 1 and South Su are
undescribed. The small extent of sampling of these kinds of hydrothermal sediments does not
necessarily imply localised endemism, and cumulative species curves suggest that increased
sampling would reveal more species. However, the low densities make quantitative comparisons
difficult. Of the 15 species observed, 5 were observed at Solwara 1 only, 6 were observed at
South Su only, and 4 were common to both areas.
Statistically, the results were not consistent between areas and sites, mostly because of the low
numbers and variability. However, the following differences were apparent:
Faunal densities were significantly higher in the active South Su sediments than in the South
Su inactive or Solwara 1 sites, which were not significantly different from each other.
Within each area, the active site densities were generally higher than the inactive site densities
but because of variability, these differences were significant only at South Su.
Biomass was higher at the inactive than active Solwara 1 sites, but the South Su active site
had biomass over 100 times higher than the inactive site and South Su active macrofaunal
biomass was significantly higher than that observed at the three other sites.
Diversity indices were highest in Solwara 1 active sediments, intermediate in Solwara 1
inactive and South Su inactive sediments, and much lower in South Su active sediments.
Dominance, or the proportion of the most abundant species, is inversely correlated with
diversity and hence was highest in South Su active sediments because of the high abundance
of Prionospio and in Solwara 1 inactive sediments (Paraleptognathia sp.), and slightly lower
(but still high) in South Su inactive sediments (nuculanoid bivalves) and active Solwara 1
sediments (Paraleptognathia sp.).
Multivariate analyses of community composition showed that active sites differed from inactive,
and Solwara 1 differed from South Su. The difference in densities of tanaids, nuculanoid bivalves
and Prionospio sp. accounted for most of the observed among-site differences.
In addition to the cores, 16 scoop samples were taken to provide additional material for faunal
characterisation. The scoop samples contained a total of 664 individuals belonging to more than
31 taxa. In general, dominant taxa in scoops resembled those in cores, with tanaids the most
abundant group at the Solwara 1 sites (two species) and nuculanoids (one specie) most abundant
at South Su. Isopods, found mainly at Solwara 1, belonged to three species in three families:
Solwara 1 Project

7-40

Notoxenoides sp. (Paramunnidae), Janirella sp. (Janirellidae), and Ilyarachna sp. (Munopsidae).
These species are undescribed and true distributions not currently known. As was found for the
macrofauna on hard substrates and in the cores, the species effort curves had not levelled,
suggesting that more species would be found with increased sampling effort.
Apart from the effect of the large numbers of biomass-dominant species (particularly Prionospio)
in the active sediments at South Su, it is difficult to interpret any other minor differences in indices
of species density, biomass and diversity between Solwara 1 and South Su, and between active
and inactive sediments. This was partly because of the low number and partly because of the
uncertainty of classifying sediments as active or inactive on the basis of proximity to the nearest
known active vent.
The differentiation of active versus inactive sediment is also compounded by the visible
heterogeneity of sediments over scales of centimetres to tens of metres. The variations included
colour (orange, tan, brown, grey/orange, grey/white, greenish etc.), physical appearance (ripples,
iron oxide crusts), and biological activity (microbial mats, faecal pellets, worm casts). These
observations are consistent with those of Hrischeva and Scott (2008) (Appendix 6). Not all of
these sediment types were sampled during the Wave Mercury 07 Campaign, but it is anticipated
that each would most likely show some faunal differences if even more sampling effort were to be
applied. However, given the sampling effort applied, numbers and densities of animals were so
low that more extensive sampling of these sediments would be necessary to capture all of the
rarer species and would require a level of effort beyond the scope of baseline characterisation
studies.
Despite density differences between the Manus Basin and the eastern Pacific hydrothermal
sediments, there are some similarities in taxonomic composition, most notably the abundance of
the genus Prionospio (Minuspio) (only sampled at South Su active) and nuculanoid bivalves
(sampled at all sites). The genus Prionospio is a widespread and species-rich genus and reported
from many areas of the eastern Pacific and Atlantic oceans. Similarly, the nuculanoid bivalves,
which comprised 17 to 43% of the fauna at the Solwara 1 and South Su sites are also abundant in
eastern Pacific hydrothermal areas.
The tanaids appeared more abundant in the Manus Basin than in other hydrothermal sediments,
but related taxa are reported from other eastern Pacific troughs (Appendix 5). Overall, there are
obvious similarities at the generic level or higher that appear widespread over Pacific and Atlantic
oceans. In comparison with other vents in the eastern Pacific, the Manus Basin macrofauna
sampled are not particularly abundant or diverse, although those present are likely to be new
species of more widely abundant genera and families.
Meiobenthos
Meiobenthos are microscopic metazoan benthic animals that live in the interstitial spaces of the
top few centimetres of the seafloor sediments and pass through a sieve of 0.5 mm (500 !m) but
are retained on sieve size of 53 !m. They are much more abundant than the macrofauna (in this
study, animals greater than 300 !m) and therefore more suitable for quantitative monitoring of
benthos of deep-sea sediments. Samples were taken from the top 1 cm (i.e., the surface) of core
samples collected from active and inactive sediments at South Su and Solwara 1 during the 2007
Wave Mercury 07 Campaign. These are not reported in Appendix 5 but have subsequently been
identified separately to the level of major taxa (Neira, unpublished data). This is usual for
meiobenthos, for which identification to genus or species level requires considerable effort, and,
in the case of samples from deep water, the majority of animals are likely to be species that are
undescribed. Nevertheless, statistical comparisons of community composition and diversity can
Solwara 1 Project

7-41

still be achieved if required where the animals are just identified to major taxa (Clarke & Warwick,
1994) as is currently done with other deep-sea monitoring projects for other mines in PNG and
elsewhere. The numbers of the different meiobenthos groups found in active and inactive
sediment samples from South Su and Solwara 1 are given in Table 7.5.
At South Su, the numbers are higher in the inactive compared with the active sediments, while at
Solwara 1, there is greater variability between samples and no consistent difference between
counts from active and inactive areas. Typically, nematodes and harpacticoid copepods are the
most abundant of the groups. However, the numbers of animals observed are at the lower end of
the ranges of those typically observed in deep-sea sediments around the world (Coull, 1988),
where numbers in excess of 1,000 are commonly recorded. This is also consistent with the low
numbers of macrobenthos observed in the sediment samples from the same sampling locations
(220 individuals representing 15 species observed in 35 cores sampled); conceivably, dynamic
changes at the sediment surface due to the natural fallout of sediment from the overlying plumes,
particularly from the North Su subsea volcano, may account for the low numbers.
Abyssal Plain
During March 2008, sediment samples were collected along a transect from three locations 2.9,
7.6, and 10.4 km from Solwara 1 (see Figure 7.24) in order to sample the meiobenthos
(microscopic metazoan animals between 53 !m and 500 !m) of the abyssal plain sediments
outside the influence of the hydrothermal activity of Solwara 1. In these abyssal sediments,
macrofauna are generally so sparse that only the microscopic meiobenthos can be sampled
quantitatively. Samples were collected at depths from 2,000 to 2,020 m by means of a multi-corer
(4 cores, each 55 mm internal diameter), deployed from the research vessel Miss Rankin. The
multi-corer is appropriate for quantitative sampling of meiobenthos in sediments as it retrieves the
sediment with minimal disturbance to the surface layers in which most of the meiobenthic animals
occur. The sampling device is shown in Plate 7.24.

E
n
v
i
r
o
n
m
e
n
t
a
l

I
m
p
a
c
t

S
t
a
t
e
m
e
n
t

S
o
l
w
a
r
a

1

P
r
o
j
e
c
t

N
a
u
t
i
l
u
s

M
i
n
e
r
a
l
s

N
i
u
g
i
n
i

7
0
0
8
_
0
9
_
C
h
0
7
_
v
4
.
d
o
c

7
-
4
2

C
o
f
f
e
y

N
a
t
u
r
a
l

S
y
s
t
e
m
s

T
a
b
l
e

7
.
5

M
e
i
o
b
e
n
t
h
o
s

f
r
o
m

s
e
d
i
m
e
n
t
s

a
t

S
o
l
w
a
r
a

1

a
n
d

S
o
u
t
h

S
u

(
n
u
m
b
e
r
s

o
f

i
n
d
i
v
i
d
u
a
l
s
/
1
0

c
m
2

i
n

t
o
p

1

c
m

o
f

s
e
d
i
m
e
n
t
)

L
o
c
a
t
i
o
n

S
o
u
t
h

S
u

A
c
t
i
v
e

S
o
u
t
h

S
u

I
n
a
c
t
i
v
e

S
o
l
w
a
r
a

1

A
c
t
i
v
e

S
o
l
w
a
r
a

1

I
n
a
c
t
i
v
e

D
e
p
t
h

(
m
)

~
1
,
3
0
0
*

1
,
3
1
2

1
,
3
4
7

1
,
4
3
0

1
,
5
1
1

1
,
5
1
5

1
,
5
1
6

1
,
5
3
0

1
,
5
3
2

1
,
3
3
5

1
,
6
0
1

1
,
6
2
3

1
,
6
2
5

1
,
6
3
4

M
a
j
o
r

T
a
x
a

T

N
e
m
a
t
o
d
a

6
9

9

1
1
4

1
5
7

1

1
3

1
9

2
6

3
5

2
9

9
4

1
6

1
3

3

H
a
r
p
a
c
t
i
c
o
i
d
a

1
1

7

2
7

7

0

3

3
6

3
3

4
9

2
6

7

1
1

0

2

N
a
u
p
l
i
i

0

1

1
6

0

0

1

1

2
0

4

3

0

2

0

0

R
o
t
i
f
e
r
a

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

1

0

0

T
a
n
a
i
d
a
c
e
a

0

0

0

0

0

0

2

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

P
o
l
y
c
h
a
e
t
a

0

0

0

5

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

2

0

0

T
o
t
a
l

8
0

1
7

1
5
7

1
6
9

1

1
7

5
8

7
9

8
8

5
8

1
0
1

3
2

1
3

5

*

N
o

d
e
p
t
h

g
i
v
e
n

t
h
e
r
e
f
o
r
e

a
s
s
u
m
e
d

a
r
o
u
n
d

1
,
3
0
0

m
.

Solwara 1 Project

7-43

Analyses of the samples involved separation of the samples by elutriation, collecting on sieves of
53 !m and microscopic identification to the level of main taxa, as was undertaken for those from
South Su and Solwara 1. Counts of meiobenthos are given in Table 7.6
10
.
Table 7.6 Meiobenthos taxa (number of individuals/10 cm
2
) in abyssal plain sediments
remote from Solwara 1
Sample Site Taxa
SISS04
(10.4 km west of
Solwara 1)
SISS03
(7.6 km west of
Solwara 1)
SISS06
(2.9 km west of
Solwara 1)
Nematoda 590 89 178
Harpacticoida 55 7 20
Nauplii 8 1 1
Calanoid copepods 1 0 0
Ostracoda 14 0 2
Polychaeta 7 2 11
Tanaida 1 0 0
Kinorhyncha 3 1 1
Isopoda 0 0 1
The results in Table 7.6 show higher numbers of main taxa and higher abundances of the
dominant nematodes compared with those at Solwara 1 and South Su (see Table 7.5). This may
reflect the greater distance from the North Su volcano (and lessening effect from its fallout), and
different sediment composition and grain sizes.
Endemism
A genetic characterisation of macrofauna collected from active hydrothermal vents during the
Wave Mercury 07 Campaign was undertaken by Van Dover et al., (Appendix 14). Its aim was to
determine the taxonomic and genetic similarities of the Solwara 1 and South Su species, and to
compare with species of vent communities at other regional back-arc basins and other
hydrothermal vent areas. The method involved extraction and sequencing of the DNA from
tissues of the animals, followed by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) methods to amplify
mitochondrial cytochrome oxidase subunit 1 genes (CO1).
A database of CO1 gene sequences (GenBank) is maintained by the US National Center for
Biological Information, and includes some species of invertebrate macrofauna from hydrothermal
vent areas. This allows a rapid assessment of whether the gene sequences from species found at
Solwara 1 and South Su match any that have already been included in the GenBank database.
The detailed methods are described in Appendix 4.
At present, the GenBank includes very few gene sequences from hydrothermal vent species,
making it difficult to perform phylogenetic comparisons on more than those species currently
included. The sequence data lodged by the Project will be extremely valuable in increasing the
geographic range of source material and will enable consistent comparisons in future. However,

10
Identifications made by Dr John Moverley.
Solwara 1 Project

7-44

being one of the leaders in applying these techniques to hydrothermal vent species, comparisons
will necessarily be slow while material from other areas is similarly analysed.
In the present study, a total of 126 individuals of 26 morphologically identified species were
successfully sequenced. Exact matches with species from the GenBank (greater than 99%
similarity) were documented for six species (Alviniconcha, itself differentiated into two species sp1
and sp2; Ifremaria nautilei, Bathymodiolus manusensis, Arcovestia ivanovi, Paraescarpia sp, and
Munidopsis lauensis). There were six other morphological species that had close matches to
GenBank species of the same genus (Lepetodrilus, Alaysia, Lamellibrachia, Prionspio,
Alvinocaris, Lebbeus), and an additional two genera (Nereis sp., Opaepele sp.) that matched
GenBank sequences of species in the same families.
These results are consistent with, and have extended the findings from, an earlier study (CSIRO,
2007) to show that:
The biomass-dominant species of gastropod Alviniconcha sp 1 and sp. 2 from Solwara 1 and
South Su also occur in the North Fiji Basin but were distinct from those in the Lau Basin.
Gene sequences from the gastropod Ifremaria nautilei from Solwara 1 and South Su matched
specimens collected from Manus, North Fiji and Lau basins.
The vestimentiferan tube worm Arcovestia ivanovi occurs in Fiji and Manus basins, (including
South Su but not Solwara 1).
The squat lobster species Munidopsis lauensis occurs in Manus, North Fiji and Lau basins.
The bivalve mussel Bathymodiolus manusensis is so far only known from the Manus Basin. It
was observed at South Su (and also Solwara 4, 6 and 8) but not at Solwara 1.
In summary, some biomass dominant species (Ifremaria nautilei, Munidopsis lauensis) have
ranges that extend across all regional back-arc basins, while other species (Alviniconcha sp 1 and
2, Arcovestia ivanovi) inhabit some basins but not all, and some species (Bathymodiolus
manusensis) are so far only observed in the Manus Basin. While these results indicate the
geographical ranges of species, they do not indicate the degree of genetic interaction among and
between the populations in different geographical ranges.
Fish
It was not practicable to sample fish from the areas around the vents and non-venting habitats of
Solwara 1 and South Su. However, during the ROV sampling, at least 10 species of fish were
observed, either present around the vents or attracted to the lights of the ROV (Appendix 4).
Several species of Chimaera were observed and provisionally identified on the basis of visual
images only. These are cartilaginous fish in the order Chimaeriformes and they are related to the
sharks and rays, and are sometimes called ghost sharks, or ratfish. The species provisionally
identified from the visual images included the pointy-nosed blue chimaera (Hydrolagus trolli),
which is known from depths from 600 to 1,700 m in the western Pacific, including New Zealand
and New Caledonia. The Pacific spookfish (Rhinochimaera pacifica) was also observed and this
species has a distribution in the western Pacific and Indian Ocean.
Various other species of fish were also observed; Hexatrygon bickelli among sulphide deposits
near chimneys, Lepidion schmidti (gadoid or cod family), feeding on vent animals (6-gilled
stingray) and Psychrolutes marcidus (blobfish) in small numbers at the base of chimneys.
Pyrolycus manusanus, a vent-endemic zoarcid eelpout, was common at Solwara 1 and South Su,
Solwara 1 Project

7-45

although it was more frequently observed at South Su. As far as could be determined from video
observation, no new or unidentifiable taxa of fish was observed. Plates of these species are
provided in Appendix 4.
7.8.3 Underwater Light, Noise and Vibrations
Marine Light Environment
Appendix 10 provides a review of the underwater light environment of the different depths in the
ocean, including bioluminescence from deep-sea organisms. The two main natural sources of
light in the sea are from celestial bodies (sun, moon and stars), and bioluminescence produced by
aquatic organisms.
Natural daylight penetrates through the sea but intensity diminishes with depth as it is absorbed
and virtually no daylight that can be perceived by animals reaches past 1,000 m. In clear water,
such as in the Project area, surface waters are generally well lit. Photosynthetically active
radiation that of sufficient intensity for plant photosynthesis and net oxygen production i.e., the
euphotic zone is mostly within the first 80 m. Light may reach as deep as 200 m, although at
intensities not strong enough to allow photosynthesis to occur (Section 7.5.3).
Different wavelengths are transmitted differently: blue light (475 nm) penetrates further than
orange-red light (550nm), which is almost entirely absorbed within 100 m depth. The mesopelagic
waters between the euphotic zone (80 m) and the bathypelagic zone (1,000 m) are characterised
by very low levels of light, (sometimes referred to as the twilight zone) below the photosynthetic
compensation point, and hence lower dissolved oxygen than the euphotic zone. In this zone,
animals receive a constant blue light and an exponential decline of intensity with depth. At the
mesopelagic zone and below, bioluminescence begins to play an important ecological role.
Surface lights, such as the light of the moon, are used by some marine fauna for navigation.
Seaturtles navigate to and from nesting beaches by using the light of the moon and hatchlings
migrate out to sea using the same navigational technique. Other species will alter their vertical
migration pattern in the water column based on the phase of the moon. They will migrate closer to
the surface when the moon is full.
There are many species of bioluminescent organisms that are likely to inhabit these depths in the
Manus Basin, including invertebrates (salps, coelentrates, ctenophores, shrimps, squid) and
many species of fish such as hatchetfish and lanternfish, and anglerfishes in deeper water.
Bioluminescence in deep water serves many ecological functions. Primarily, it is a defence
mechanism, where light or flashes of light serve to change outlines of the animal or distract
predators. It also serves to aid feeding, for example by illuminating and attracting prey. Some
species use bioluminescence for signalling behaviour and (it is assumed) to aid location between
sexes.
Marine Acoustics
The principal sources of ambient ocean noise in the project area are from:
Air ocean interaction and other oceanic processes.
Naturally occurring and biogenic background noise.
Noise from shipping activities.
Natural Physical Sources
Ambient background noises are given in a review by the National Research Council of the
National Academy of Sciences (NRC, 2003) and are summarised below. The dominant source of
Solwara 1 Project

7-46

naturally occurring noise across the band frequencies from 1 to 100 Hz is associated with ocean
surface waves generated by wind. Average ambient noise levels of 98 dB, 20 to 1,000 Hz have
been determined in the Canadian Beaufort Sea (Richardson et al., 1990). In the generally calm
waters of the Bismarck Sea, levels from wind would be expected to be at the lower end of the
range. Below 5 to 10 Hz, the dominant ambient source is non-linear interaction of oppositely
propagating ocean surface waves (called microseisms). Above 100 Hz, thermal noise caused by
the pressure fluctuations associated with thermal agitation of the ocean is the dominant
contributor. Across the remainder of the band, the main sources are bubbles oscillating
individually or collectively in the water column.
Meteorological processes that may be experienced in the project area vary in frequency and are
largely dependent on seasons. Sources of noise such as raindrops on the sea surface can
increase the ambient noise levels by up to 35 dB across a broad range of frequencies extending
from several hundred hertz to >20 kHz. Thunder and lightning has characteristic spectra peaks
between 50 to 250 Hz and up to 15 dB above ambient have been recorded 5 to 10 km away
(NRC, 2003). Seismic energy from geological and tectonic sources can travel over great
distances, extending to frequencies higher than 100 Hz with sharp onset and variable duration.
Submarine volcanoes and hydrothermal vents are evident within the project area and have the
potential to influence ambient noise levels substantially, particularly with low frequency sounds
that may be audible for great distances. Recent studies have discovered what were believed to be
relatively silent, black smokers actually generate significant acoustic emissions at all frequencies
up to 500 Hz (Crone et al., 2006). It is estimated that the broadband signals generated by these
hydrothermal vents would be above the ambient noise levels. However of all physical processes,
in the project area, wind action on surface waves and hydrothermal vent activity are expected to
be the dominant contributors of natural noise.
Natural Biological Sources
Marine animals such as whales, dolphins, fish and invertebrates are responsible for creating
biological noise associated with communication, navigation, echolocation and feeding strategies.
Biological sources make contributions to the ambient ocean noise at certain seasons or periods of
the day.
Marine mammal vocalisations are associated with behavioural adaptations and cover a wide
range of frequencies. Odontocetes (dolphins and toothed whales) produce broadband clicks that
are characteristic of species, and cover a wide energy range from less than 10 Hz to more than
200 kHz (NRC, 2003). Vocalisations of mysticetes (baleen whales) are significantly lower in
frequency than those of odontocetes and are broadly categorised as low-frequency moans. Peaks
around 20 Hz, created by calls of large baleen whales are often present in deep ocean noise
spectra. However, there are a wide variation of calls and songs, potentially used in long-distance
communication and topological echolocation (NRC, 2003).
Source levels for whale and dolphin vocalisations have been reported as high as 228 dB re1!Pa
for echolocation of false killer whales (Thomas and Turl, cited in NRC, 2003) and bottle-nosed
dolphins echolocating in the presence of noise (Au, cited in NRC, 2003). The highest levels are
calculated at 232 dB re1!Pa for adult male sperm whales (Mhl et al., cited in NRC, 2003). Such
high source levels are required for acoustic imaging of the environment using return echoes from
objects with low target strength. The short duration of the echolocating clicks (50 to 200 !s)
means that the energy content integrated over time is low, even though the source levels are high
(Au, cited in NRC, 2003). Baleen whale vocalisations have the potential to be detected over long
distances because of their low frequencies. Blue whales and fin whales produce low frequency
Solwara 1 Project

7-47

(10 to 25 Hz) moans with estimated source levels up to 190 dB re1!Pa (NRC, 2003).
Vocalisations below 1 kHz and source levels above 180 dB re1!Pa have also been recorded for
other large baleen whales such as bowhead, southern right and humpback whales (Richardson et
al., 1995). Humpback whales can significantly increase background noise during breeding
season. Time-averaged peak levels recorded 2.5 km offshore (Hawaii) reached 125 dB re1!Pa.
(NRC, 2003) and it is the baleen whales that can be detected over the longest distances.
The diversity of fish inhabiting the project area may also contribute to the ambient noise levels.
Many species of marine fish and invertebrates produce sound and use it primarily for
communication. Fish produce sounds by means such as striking bony structures against one
another, or by muscle movement amplified by the gas-filled swim bladder (NRC, 2003). Many
species participate in regular chorusing behaviour (when a large number of individuals call
simultaneously), often at dawn or sunset, with characteristic peak frequency of 1 KHz at
broadband levels of 86 dB re 1 !Pa (APPEA, 2005). Snapping shrimps are capable of generating
very distinct broad peaks within the 2,000-15,000 Hz frequency bands by snapping closed its
large front claw (McCarthy, 2004).
Man-made Sources
Commercial shipping is a major contributor to ambient noise levels, especially at low frequencies
between 5-500 Hz (NRC, 2003). Low frequency ship noise sources include propeller noise
(cavitation, blade frequency and blade passage forces), hydrodynamic hull flow, engines and
other machinery. The noise of merchant shipping falls into two categories: first, the noise of
distant traffic that is not really audible as a ship but contributes to elevated sea noise levels
across a defined frequency range affecting large geographic areas and, second, from nearby
traffic that is identifiable as such. Sound levels and frequency characteristics are roughly related
to ship size and speed, but vessel signatures can be specific. Generally, the more distant the
source, the more indiscernible are the characteristics, and the geography of the project area
between New Ireland and New Britain may shield noise from distant shipping. Richardson et al.
(1995) reports data from commercial vessels from literature sources. Noise levels measured for
the larger class vessels (e.g., supertankers) are highest, with a recorded value of more than 180
dB, at the lower frequency band of 20 Hz. National and local cargo transporters travel through the
Bismarck Sea to PNG ports including Port Moresby, Kimbe Bay, Rabaul, Madang and Lae but
few pass through the project area. Most marine traffic comprises of coastal trading ships and
smaller fishing vessels moving between New Ireland and East New Britain.
To put the audibility range of these sources in context, it is important to note that long-range
sound propagation in the ocean is common for both natural and man-made sounds. For example,
low frequency sounds produced by the nearby North Su subsea volcano are likely to be audible
for thousands of kilometres, and other seismic events such as earthquakes can produce sounds
that are well above ambient noise levels at ranges of thousands to tens of thousands of
kilometres. In the case of man-made sources, sounds produced by airgun arrays during seismic
surveys have been recorded by the authors at ranges of several thousand kilometers
(Appendix 13).
7.9 Description of the Existing Nearshore and Onshore
Environment
Ore will be stored in stockpiles in a purpose-built covered storage facility at the Port of Rabaul
until enough material has accumulated for transfer to bulk carriers for shipping to an overseas
Solwara 1 Project

7-48

processing facility (see Section 5.7 for further details). This section provides a description of the
existing environment at and around the Port of Rabaul.
7.9.1 General
Rabaul is situated in a large breached volcanic caldera on the north coast of New Britain (see
Figure 7.4). The caldera, which measures 9 km by 14 km, is open to the sea (Blanche Bay) on the
eastern side. The naturally sheltered Simpson Harbour is situated in the northern extent of the
caldera. Several extinct, dormant and active volcanic vents are located along the northern and
eastern rim of the caldera.
Rabaul township and the Port of Rabaul are located on a narrow, coastal fringe inside the caldera
at the northern edge of Simpson Harbour. Rabaul was East New Britains largest town and
provincial capital before the 1994 volcanic eruptions of Vulcan and Tavurvur that buried it in
volcanic ash. After these eruptions, the town was evacuated and the administrative centre for
East New Britain moved to Kokopo, a small town 20 km southeast of Rabaul (Figure 1.1).
Today, the town of Rabaul is slowly rebuilding and the Port of Rabaul continues to act as the main
port in the region for incoming and outgoing cargo, while Kokopo remains the administrative and
provincial capital.
7.9.2 Marine Environment
Water Quality
Seawater sampling was undertaken in June 2008 to provide baseline water quality data for Port of
Rabaul. Samples were collected from the surface at three sites adjacent to the port facilities within
Simpson Harbour (see Figure 7.25). The results of the survey are consistent with an area already
influenced by port activities. A summary of the results are provided in Table 7.7 and are
discussed below.
Table 7.7 Marine water quality adjacent to the Port of Rabaul
Sample Location Parameter
RH1 RH2 RH3 RH3
(duplicate)
pH 8.06 8.11 8.16 8.18
Salinity (ppt) 32 34 34 35
Total suspended solids (mg/L) 108 152 26 168
Total alkalinity as CaCO3 (mg/L) 114 115 118 118
Sulphate as SO4 (mg/L) 2,290 2,680 2,600 2,750
Chloride (mg/L) 20,100 19,500 22,400 20,500
Calcium (mg/L) 340 412 420 444
Magnesium (mg/L) 1,140 1,290 1,330 1,350
Sodium (mg/L) 9,980 11,000 11,300 11,400
Potassium (mg/L) 417 452 459 466
Aluminium (!g/L) 40 20 10 10
Selenium (!g/L) 10 5 <2 <2
Iron (!g/L) 31 8 5 7
Arsenic (!g/L) 2.1 2.2 2.2 2.4
Solwara 1 Project

7-49

Table 7.7 Marine water quality adjacent to the Port of Rabaul (contd)
Sample Location Parameter
RH1 RH2 RH3 RH3
(duplicate)
Cadmium (!g/L) <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2
Chromium (!g/L) <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5
Cobalt (!g/L) <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2
Copper (!g/L) <1 <1 <1 <1
Lead (!g/L) <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2
Manganese (!g/L) 12.3 7.7 6.4 5.2
Nickel (!g/L) <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5
Silver (!g/L) <0.1 0.1 <0.1 <0.1
Zinc (!g/L) 5 <5 <5 <5
Fluoride (mg/L) 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8
Ammonia as N (mg/L) <0.010 <0.010 <0.010 <0.010
Nitrite as N (mg/L) <0.010 <0.010 <0.010 <0.010
Nitrate as N (mg/L) <0.010 <0.010 <0.010 <0.010
Total Nitrogen as N (mg/L) 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.3
Total Phosphorus as P (mg/L) 0.1 0.12 0.08 0.07

Physico-chemical Parameters
Percent of hydrogen (pH) at the site ranged from 8.06 to 8.18 and was within the range normally
expected for seawater. Electrical conductivity (49,300 to 52,900 !S/cm) and salinity (32 to 35
ppm) were within the ranges expected for seawater and indicated that there was no recent influx
of freshwater from rivers or direct rainfall. Total suspended solids ranged from 108 to 168 mg/L
(except for site RH3, which was 26 mg/L; however the duplicate result indicated a much higher
value). These results are typical of an operating port site.
Major Ions
Four major cations (Ca
2+
, Mg
2+
, Na
+
and K
+
) and four major anions (HCO
3
-
, CO
3
-
, Cl
-
and SO
4
2-
)
were analysed. The system is Na
+
/Cl
-
dominated, as expected for seawater.
Nutrients
Total phosphorus ranged from 0.07 mg/L to 0.12 mg/L. These values are within the
ANZECC/ARMCANZ (2000) guidelines for nearshore, tropical marine sites.
Total nitrogen ranged from 0.3 mg/L to 0.4 mg/L and are significantly greater than the
ANZECC/ARMCANZ (2000) guidelines (0.1 mg/L), indicating a possible point source of organic
nitrogen loads.
Total Metals
Although some metals exceeded detection limits (aluminium, selenium, iron, arsenic, manganese
and zinc), all were within ANZECC/ARMCANZ (2000) guidelines for nearshore tropical marine
sites.
Solwara 1 Project

7-50

Aquatic Fauna
There is a high diversity of marine species in and around Simpson Harbour. Munday (2000)
reports that before the 1994 volcanic eruptions, coral reefs flourished with live coral cover typically
around 50%. Following the eruptions, the fringing reefs within the harbour were buried by ash and
mudflows however, by 1996, corals had extensively recolonised hard surfaces such as volcanic
boulders and tree stumps (Maniwavie, 2001).
7.9.3 Terrestrial Flora and Fauna
The port area has been mostly cleared of original vegetation. A few patches of coconut trees
remain close to the waters edge on the eastern side of the port; however, these are likely to have
been planted rather than have grown naturally.
7.9.4 Landform, Soils and Geology
The Port of Rabaul has been operational for many years and soils and landforms have been
altered by this continuous use. The geology of the coastal area around Simpson Harbour is
typically basalt, which is a volcanic rock formed by the rapid cooling of lava (Greene et al., 1985).
7.9.5 Air Quality and Noise
There is very little information currently available on the air quality of Rabaul. The World Health
Organisation, in conjunction with the Rabaul Volcano Observatory, has recently completed an air
quality study, however results from this study are not yet available.
The proximity of Tavurvur to Rabaul has a noticeable effect on the air quality. Prevailing winds
often bring ash and volcanic gases to town as shown in Plate 7.25. Monthly reports from the
Rabaul Volcanological Observatory indicate that Tavurvur emits almost continuous ash and
vapour plumes that result in regular ashfalls on Rabaul. A hydrogen-sulfide (H
2
S) odour is also
regularly detected in Rabaul (Saunders and Patia, 2008).
During extreme eruptions, Tavurvur can produce large amounts of ash and gas. For example,
Figure 7.26 shows concentrations of sulphur dioxide (SO
2
) in the atmosphere in the days
following a particularly strong eruption on 7 October 2006.
Existing noise levels are well above rural background levels at the port and are typical of an
industrial, urban location.
7.9.6 Cultural Heritage
The Port of Rabaul is a developed industrial facility and any culturally significant materials will
have been removed, disturbed or destroyed during initial port construction activities.
During World War II, Rabaul served as the main Japanese Naval base in the South Pacific. As a
result, Simpson Harbour has a multitude of ships and aircraft wrecks, which are now popular
diving sites for local tour operators.
7.9.7 Existing Use
The Port of Rabaul is the fourth largest port in PNG, behind Port Moresby, Lae and Kimbe and
has an average throughput of approximately 300,000 tonnes per annum (World Bank, 1999). The
port is crucial to East New Britains economy for the export of agricultural products (mostly copra
and cocoa) and the import of manufacturing and containerised goods. Ship movements by type of
cargo at the port are set out in Table 7.8. On average, there are 12 scheduled vessels berth each
Solwara 1 Project

7-51

month at the port. Photos of some of the vessels currently using the port are shown in Plates
7.26, 7.27 and 7.28.
Table 7.8 Port of Rabaul Ship Movement 1993 to 1997
Year Vessel Type
1993 1994
1
1995 1996 1997 1998
2

Overseas Container 69 49 37 32 43 34
General
Cargo
37 19 13 34 32 9
Tanker 57 32 28 29 31 21
Roll-
on/Roll-off
24 17 9 11 17 16
Cruise 11 8 2 0 1 3
Log Ship 171 148 65 185 139 78
Other 58 32 51 99 143 205
Subtotal 427 305 205 390 406 366
Coastal General
Cargo
50 45 58 74 65 47
Tanker 11 10 16 33 12 25
Barge 4 28 30 41 63 20
Passenger 16 26 22 27 6 4
Other 13 66 35 48 11 59
Subtotal 94 175 161 223 157 155
Total 521 480 366 613 563 521
1
Volcanic eruption in Rabaul occurred September 19, 1994.
2
January to September (inclusive).
Source: (World Bank, 1999).
The layout of Port of Rabaul is shown in Figure 5.3. It is approximately 4.5 hectares in size and is
bordered by an oil tank farm to the west, Blanche Street to the north and private wharves and
storage areas to the east. The port has two main berths, the dimensions of which are provided in
Table 7.9. The largest and most used berth is Berth 2. The smaller Berth 1 is used as a back-up
facility.
Table 7.9 Port of Rabaul Berth Dimensions
Berth Length (m) Width (m) Maximum
Draft (m)
Average Monthly
Berth Occupancies
(%)
Berth 1 (Blanche St) 122 12.1 7.9 25
Berth 2 (Bay Road) 152 15.2 10.2 40

The two main storage sheds at the port are Shed 1 and Shed 2, which are located at the back of
Berths 1 and 2 respectively. Shed 2 has been recently maintained and renovated (Plate 7.29).
There are plans to renovate Shed 1 in the near future (Plate 7.30).
Solwara 1 Project

7-52

Shed 1 (103.6 m by 30.4 m) has been leased to the following clients and port users:
Copra buyer and exporter (40%).
East New Britain Port Services as office space (10%).
PNG Ports Corporation Limited (10%).
Unavailable space due to condition of shed (40%).
Shed 2 (121.9 m by 30.4 m) usage is as follows:
Cocoa storage (80%).
Cargo storage (10%).
Office space by other clients and port users (10%).
In addition to the sheds, there is approximately 20,000 m
2
of open storage area at the port. This
area is currently unused.
7.9.8 Port Management
The Port of Rabaul is part of PNG Ports Corporation Limited (PPCL). PPCL operates 17
commercial ports in PNG and is responsible for:
The regulation, management, operations and control of declared ports.
The movement of shipping in such ports.
The provision and maintenance of navigation aids, mooring, wharves, docks, landing facilities
and platforms in such ports as well as equipment and installations used in connection with
such ports.
East New Britain Port Services is the sole licensed stevedore for the Port of Rabaul.
PPCL does not currently have an environmental management plan or environmental monitoring
program for the Port of Rabaul. However, it does police and report environmental incidents such
as oil spills to the Department of Environment and Conservation who regulate environmental
legislation in PNG. A waste management plan and emergency management plan is currently
being drafted by the PPCL.
No industrial wastewater treatment facilities are available at the port. Waste from vessels is
disposed of by National Agricultural Quarantine and Inspection Authority (NAQIA), who have a
specialised waste disposal plant outside of the port area. The local waste from the port is
disposed of by PPCL through the normal waste disposal process of the town authority.
Silt traps have been installed at the two-runoff water discharge points at the port to trap silt
washed down from the hinterlands during wet seasons.

Solwara 1 Project

8-1

8. SOCIOECONOMIC ENVIRONMENT
8.1 Papua New Guinea in Brief
8.1.1 Population and Society
Papua New Guinea is located in Oceania and consists of a group of islands, including the eastern
half of the island of New Guinea, between the Coral Sea and the South Pacific Ocean, east of
Indonesia. The countrys total land area is approximately 465,000 km
2
. The country has a
population of approximately 5.7 million people (in 2004), and the current population growth rate is
2.23% (UN, 2004). The capital is Port Moresby, with a population of about 255,000 (City
population, 2008). Papua New Guinea is by far the largest and most populated of all Pacific island
countries. While the overall population density in the country is low, there are pockets of high
population density.
The spectrum of PNG society ranges from traditional village-based life dependent on subsistence
production (sago cultivation, hunting and gathering, fishing and agriculture) and small-scale cash
cropping to modern urban life in the main population centres of Port Moresby, Lae, Madang,
Wewak, Goroka, Mt Hagen and Rabaul.
8.1.2 Sovereignty
The eastern half of the island of New Guinea was divided between Germany (north) and the
United Kingdom (south) in 1885. The latter area was transferred to Australia in 1902. Australia
occupied the northern portion during World War I and continued to administer the combined areas
as a UN trusteeship until creation of the Independent State of Papua New Guinea in 1975.
8.1.3 Communities, Religion and Language
The population of Papua New Guinea is ethnically diverse (most people are of Melanesian origin,
but some are of Micronesian or Polynesian origin) and one of the most heterogeneous in the
world. Papua New Guinea has several thousand separate communities, most with only a few
hundred people. Divided by language, customs, and tradition, some of these communities have
engaged in low-scale tribal conflict with their neighbours for millennia. The three key elements of
PNGs social environment are the traditional land tenure system, the wantok system, and faith-
based and community-based groups. The wantok system is PNGs social safety net under which
family and group members support each other under customary obligations defined by their
shared language, culture, and kinship.
Migration from rural to urban areas is substantial. A considerable urban drift toward Port Moresby
and other major centres has occurred in recent years. The trend toward urbanisation accelerated
in the 1990s, bringing in its wake squatter settlements, ethnic disputes, unemployment, and
attendant social problems.
According to the 2000 census, 96% of the population are Christian. Of these, 27% are Catholic,
19.5% are Lutheran, and the balance are members of other Protestant denominations (CIA,
2008). Although the major churches are under local leadership, a large number of missionaries
Solwara 1 Project

8-2

remain in the country. The non-Christian portion of the population as well as a portion of the
nominal Christians, practice a wide variety of religions that are an integral part of traditional
culture, mainly animism (spirit worship) and ancestor cults.
English, the official language, is spoken by only 1% to 2% of the population. Melanesian Pidgin is
the lingua franca, and over 800 other languages are spoken. These languages are generally used
by only a few hundred to a few thousand people, although Enga, a language used in the
highlands, is spoken by some 130,000 people. Many of the languages used in Papua New
Guinea are extremely complex grammatically.
8.1.4 Land Ownership
Underlying the Projects socio-cultural environment is perhaps the single most important feature
of Papua New Guinean society: the customary system of land ownership. Land is Papua New
Guineas most important resource and is collectively owned via various forms of social
organisation based on kinship and descent principles. Few social, economic or developmental
issues can be described or assessed without reference to this system. Some 97% of the land of
Papua New Guinea is held under customary tenure. This means that there are very few places
outside urban areas where activities can be conducted without the consent of, and partnerships
with, traditional landowners.
While any activities undertaken on the portion of the seafloor from the shoreline to 3 nm offshore
require consultation with, and permission from, traditional owners of land immediately onshore,
the seafloor further offshore is owned by the state.
8.1.5 Economy
Papua New Guinea has a dual economy, comprising a formal, corporate-based economy and a
large informal economy in which subsistence production accounts for the bulk of economic
activity. The formal sector provides a rather narrow employment base, consisting of workers
engaged in exploitation of Papua New Guineas vast natural resources, i.e., mineral and oil or gas
production. Additional sectors include a relatively small manufacturing sector, the public sector,
and service industries, including finance, construction, transportation and utilities. The bulk of the
population is engaged in the informal sector, which provides a subsistence livelihood for 85% of
the population (CIA, 2008).
In 2007, major exports were estimated to be worth PGK11.93 billion
1
(free on board), of which
mineral resources accounted for nearly two-thirds of export earnings. Imports were estimated to
cost the country PGK5.95 billion over the same period. The estimated 2007 gross domestic
product (GDP) of Papua New Guinea is approximately PGK41.94 billion (PGK7,600 per capita),
with an estimated growth rate of 4% (CIA, 2008).

1
Based on an exchange rate of USD1 equal to PGK2.62.
Solwara 1 Project

8-3

8.1.6 United Nations Millennium Development
In 2000, the United Nations established eight Millennium Development Goals and set a target of
2015 to achieve those goals. PNG-gender-differentiated development indicators as of the year
2000 have been produced by the United Nations Millennium Development Goals and are
presented in Table 8.1 (UN, 2004).
The population has been growing at an average rate over the past 20 years of almost 3% per
year. Fertility remains high, with an estimated 3.96 children born per woman. Approximately 40%
of the population is under the age of 15.
The rapid decline in mortality during the 1970s did not continue after 1980 and the level of infant,
child and adult mortality remains high to this day.
Table 8.1 PNG development indicators at 2000
Indicator Total Male Female
Population Size
Total 5,171,548 2,679,769 2,491,779
Rural 4,496,145 2,314,236 2,181,909
Urban 675,403 365,533 309,870
Average population growth rate from 1980 to 2000
(% per year)
2.7 2.7 2.7
Crude population density (per km
2
) 11.2 na na
Age structure
Population under 15 (%) 40 40.6 39.4
Population 15 to 59 (%) 55.9 55.1 56.8
Population 60 and over (%) 4.1 4.3 3.8
Adult (over 15) literacy rate (%) 49.2 55.2 43.9
Youth (age 15 to 24) literacy rate (%) 61.7 64.4 58.9
Cohort retention rate at primary level (%) 56.8 58.3 55.2
Infant mortality rate (per 1,000 live births)
Total 64 67 61
Rural 69 72 65
Urban 29 31 26
Under age 5 mortality rate (per 1,000) 88 93 83
Attendance at antenatal clinic (%) na na 58
Supervised delivery (%) na na 41
Life expectancy at birth (years)
Total 54.2 53.7 54.8
Rural 53.0 52.5 53.6
Urban 59.6 59.0 60.3
Proportion of children under age 5 with <80%
weight for age (%)
24.9 na na
Immunisation (%)
Measles in children less than age 1 53 na na
Triple antigen (3
rd
dose) in children less than age 1 59 na na
Source: UN (2004). N.A. Not available.
Solwara 1 Project

8-4

8.1.7 Government
National Government
Papua New Guinea is a constitutional monarchy with a parliamentary democracy. The head of
state is Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II, represented in Papua New Guinea by the Governor-
General, who is appointed by the National Executive Council (cabinet).
The head of the government is the Prime Minister, who is appointed and dismissed by the
Governor-General on the proposal of Parliament. The Prime Minister is usually the leader of the
majority party (or majority coalition) in Parliament.
The nation is divided into 20 administrative units (19 provinces and the National Capital District of
Port Moresby). Each province is subdivided into various districts that have a number of local-level
governments (LLGs), with councils having elected ward representatives.
Provincial Government
The Department of Provincial and Local Government Affairs is charged with the responsibility for
administering the Organic Law on Provincial and Local-level governments, which establishes the
political, planning and financial management relationships between the national government and
the provinces.
The Provincial Assembly is the paramount decision-making body in a province. It is composed of
members of the National Parliament (MPs), heads of local-level governments and a limited
number of appointed members representing women and other groups.
The onshore and offshore components for Phase 1 of the Solwara 1 Project are located in the
East New Britain and New Ireland provinces, respectively.
Local-level Governments
Local-level governments are given certain legislative powers and, in principle, guaranteed
funding.
Local-level governments only function in some parts of PNGs provinces. The provincial
governments have included local-level government administration costs in forecast budgets but
have done little to assist in their inauguration or to arrange for accounts into which funds, such as
development levies, might flow.
The onshore component of the Solwara 1 Project is located in the Rabaul Urban local government
area and it is envisaged that the offshore component of the project will be under the local
jurisdiction of the Kavieng Urban local level government.
Provincial and Local-level Government Financing
Provincial and local-level governments are financed by grants from the national government and
by internal revenue, which is made up mainly of transfers of national taxation funds and a small
amount of revenue that is generated by investments or under their own tax laws.
For provinces where mining and petroleum resources are present, the national government
revenue transfers include royalty payments and development levies.
Solwara 1 Project

8-5

8.2 Project Impact Area
In land-based mining projects, impact areas defined in a social impact assessment are generally
determined by reference to the areas associated with landowners who are entitled to benefits
because their land lies within the area of project development. However, because the Solwara 1
mining area is located offshore (where the workforce will also be accommodated) and owing to
the fact that the onshore Project components will utilise an existing commercial facility on
alienated land, the social impact assessment Project impact area has been based on areas
where:
Employees will be recruited.
Contractors and suppliers are located.
Benefit streams, e.g., royalties and taxes, will be distributed.
Offshore activities will take place, e.g., where fishing and marine traffic occur.
The main local areas, Kavieng and Rabaul, are discussed in the following sections. Fisheries,
resource use and transportation are addressed in Sections 8.3 and 8.4.
8.2.1 Kavieng
Kavieng, the capital of the New Ireland Province (Figure 1.1), is the largest town on the island of
New Ireland. The last census data (2000) recorded a town population of 11,560 (City population,
2008); however, informal information sources suggest that the population has increased to
approximately 14,500 (ESM, 2008).
Kavieng is both a trading and tourist destination and is serviced by the main port for New Ireland
and the Kavieng airport. Services provided in Kavieng include local government offices, shopping,
hotels, hospital and a weekly market.
The PNG Millennium Development Goals rank province performance against the Papua New
Guinea average and show that, in general, as for the other provinces in the islands region, New
Ireland Province performs well above the national average (Table 8.2).
Table 8.2 New Ireland performance against millennium goals
Goal New Ireland
Average life expectancy (years). Far above national average
Average percentage for the years 1999 to 2003 for children under age 5
who have attended clinics and weighed less than 80% of that expected
for their age.
Above national average
Cohort retention rates (%) at the primary level in 2000. Above national average
Youth (15 to 24) literacy rates (%) in 2000. Far above national average
Female labour force participation rates (%) in 2000. Far below national average
Difference (%) between male and female youth (15 to 24) literacy rates
in 2000.
Females performing above
national average
Infant mortality rates (per thousand) in 2000. Below national average
Average percentage for the years 1999 to 2003 of children under age 1
who received their 9 to 11 months dose of measles vaccine.
Solwara 1 Project

8-6

Table 8.2 New Ireland performance against millennium goals (contd)
Goal New Ireland
who received three doses of the triple antigen vaccine.
Average percentage for the years 1999 to 2003 of pregnant women who
had at least one antenatal visit.
Far above national average
Average percentage for the years 1999 to 2003 of births supervised in a
health facility or by a trained village birth attendant.
Source: UN, 2004.
8.2.2 Rabaul
Rabaul is a township in East New Britain Province (see Figure 1.1) that was formally the
provincial capital until it was destroyed by the falling ash from a volcanic eruption in 1994. The
capital was moved to Kokopo approximately 20 km away. Consequently, the population of Rabaul
has declined from 17,044 in 1990 to 3,885 in 2000.
Rabaul remains a tourist destination popular for diving and snorkelling but is no longer the
premier commercial and travel destination that it was prior to the 1994 volcanic eruption.
The PNG Millennium Development Goals rank province performance against the Papua New
Guinea average and show that, in general, East New Britain Province performs well above the
national average (Table 8.3).
Table 8.3 East New Britain performance against millennium goals
Goal East New Britain
Average life expectancy (years). Above national average
Average percentage for the years 1999 to 2003 for children under age 5
who have attended clinics and weighed less than 80% of that expected
for their age.
About national average

Cohort retention rates (%) at the primary level in 2000. Far above national average
Youth (15 to 24) literacy rates (%) in 2000. Far above national average
Female labour force participation rates (%) in 2000. About national average
Difference (%) between male and female youth (15 to 24) literacy rates
in 2000.
Females performing above
national average
Infant mortality rates (per thousand) in 2000. Below national average
who received their 9 to 11 months dose of measles vaccine.
who received three doses of the triple antigen vaccine.
Average percentage for the years 1999 to 2003 of pregnant women who
had at least one antenatal visit.
Average percentage for the years 1999 to 2003 of births supervised in a
health facility or by a trained village birth attendant.
Source: UN, 2004.
Solwara 1 Project

8-7

8.3 Fisheries
8.3.1 Commercial Fisheries
The primary commercial fisheries in PNG target tuna and prawn.
The tuna fishery is dominated by purse-seine and long-line fishing in the Bismarck Sea, Coral Sea
and Pacific Ocean (Figure 8.1). In 2005, a total of 284,204 tonnes (t) of tuna was caught in the
PNG Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ), with the purse seine fleet catching 280,630 t or 99% and
the long-line fishery catching the remaining 3,574 t or 1% of the total catch (Kumoru and Koren,
2006).
The main prawn fisheries are in the Gulf of Papua, Orangerie Bay, the Torres Strait and offshore
Western Province. As there are no prawn fisheries in the Project area, they are not discussed
further.
Domestic and Locally Based Foreign Purse Seine Tuna Fishery
The domestic and locally based foreign purse seine tuna fishery has a fleet of 41 boats (in 2006)
fishing within the PNG EEZ. The domestic and locally based foreign fleet has steadily increased
its catch over the last five years and exceeded 100,000 t/a in 2003, 2004 and 2005 (Table 8.4).
The fleet now accounts for over 40% of the purse seine tuna catch in the PNG EEZ. In 2005, the
domestic and locally based foreign catch comprised 65.1% skipjack, 33.7% yellowfin tuna, bigeye
0.9% and other species 0.3% (Kumoru and Koren, 2006).
Table 8.4 PNG domestic and locally based foreign fishing fleet catch composition
Year Skipjack
(t)
Catch
(%)
Yellowfin
(t)
Catch
(%)
Bigeye
(t)
Catch
(%)
Other
(t)
Catch
(%)
Total
(t)
2001 35,068 64.6 18,700 34.4 451 0.9 67 0.1 54,286
2002 46,686 67 22,634 32.5 122 0.2 287 0.3 69,728
2003 82,880 72.7 30,948 27.1 94 0.1 69 0.1 113,991
2004 92,328 84.3 17,101 15.6 100 0.1 47 0 109,577
2005 73,350 65.1 37,998 33.7 1,056 0.9 199 0.3 112,602
Source: Kumoru and Koren (2006).
International Purse Seine Tuna Fishery
PNG has bilateral fishing access agreements with China, Korea, Taiwan, Vanuatu, Japan and the
Philippines. In 2006, the licensed international purse seine fishing vessels operating in the PNG
EEZ totalled 155 vessels. The species catch composition from the international fishery is similar
to that of the domestic fleet and is dominated by skipjack, which in 2005 accounted for 79% of the
total catch (Table 8.5) (Kumoru and Koren, 2006).
Solwara 1 Project

8-8

Table 8.5 International fleet catch composition in the PNG EEZ
Year Skipjack
(t)
Catch
(%)
Yellowfin
(t)
Catch
(%)
Bigeye
(t)
Catch
(%)
Other
(t)
Catch
(%)
Total
(t)
2001 61,910 71 24,701 28 655 0.08 12 0.02 87,278
2002 75,152 80 18,473 20 863 0.09 18 0.01 94,525
2003 167,793 77 48,465 22 1,177 0.09 115 0.01 217,950
2004 184,035 89 21,372 10 751 0.09 54 0.01 206,211
2005 132,708 79 34,645 20 598 0.09 76 0.01 168,028
Source: Kumoru and Koren (2006).
Long-line Fishery
Since 1995, the PNG long-line fishery has been restricted to national or citizen companies
resulting in a fleet of wholly owned PNG vessels. In 2005, the long-line fleet had a total catch of
3,450 t. This catch consisted of 61% albacore, 30% yellowfin, 6% bigeye and 3% other species
(Kumoru and Koren, 2006).
Fishing Effort
Figure 8.1 shows the distribution of fishing effort in the PNG EEZ. The fishing effort of the
domestic and locally based purse seine fleets is concentrated in the Bismarck Sea and along the
northwest coast of PNG and is the only fishery near Solwara 1.
The foreign purse seine fleets focus their efforts further offshore, extending from the east coast of
New Ireland to the eastern boundary of the PNG EEZ. The long line fleet focuses its effort in the
southern portion of the EEZ in the Coral Sea (Kumoru and Koren, 2006).
8.3.2 Subsistence Fisheries
There are no subsistence fisheries at Solwara 1 as it is some 30 km from the New Ireland coast
and 40 km from East New Britain; however, some interaction between ore transport and support
vessel activities to and from Solwara 1 and subsistence fisheries may occur closer to shore, as
discussed below in Section 8.3.3. However, nearer to the coast and reef areas, subsistence
fishing is an important activity to provide food for daily needs and surplus sale at local markets. In
addition, traditional activities, such as shark calling, are important, especially along the coast of
New Ireland. The reported success (Post Courier of 16 August 2008) of the West Coast, Central
New Ireland shark calling festival from 30 July to 1 August 2008 emphasises the importance of
this activity and the need to avoid adverse impacts.
8.3.3 Simpson Harbour
A number of fishing charters operate in and around Simpson Harbour. These charters catch
marlin, sail fish, Spanish mackeral, wahu, mahee mahee, barracoota and shark. Commercial
fishing is banned in St. Georges Channel (Byrne, pers. com., 2008).
Very little subsistence fishing is conducted in Simpson Harbour.
Solwara 1 Project

8-9

8.4 Transportation
Marine traffic in the Bismarck Sea includes national and local cargo and passenger traffic moving
between the main PNG ports of Port Moresby, Kimbe Bay, Rabaul, Madang and Lae. Generally,
routes are poorly defined and companies operate largely without charts or navaids and rely on the
local knowledge and skill of their ships masters.
There are some smaller local transportation boats (mostly motorised dinghies and banana boats)
that move between New Ireland and East New Britain.

Solwara 1 Project

8-10

Solwara 1 Project

9-1

9. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS AND MITIGATION
MEASURES
This chapter discusses the assessment of the potential environmental and social issues or
impacts that may be associated with the Project; in this case, the operations of the Seafloor
Mining Tool (SMT), mining support vessels, ore barging and activities within the Port of Rabaul.
Identification of potential issues and impacts is based on knowledge of the existing environment,
experience from equivalent operations in this or other areas, and issues of concern raised by local
(in PNG) and international stakeholders.
These issues are identified and initially discussed without taking into consideration the mitigation
measures that will be employed by Nautilus to reduce impacts. The proposed mitigation and
management measures that are technically and economically feasible within the context of the
Projects setting are then discussed and these reflect Nautilus commitment to best practice
environmental management. Being the first proposed developer of Seafloor Massive Sulphide
(SMS) deposits, the consequences of mining in such areas of hydrothermal activity is an aspect
of this EIS not yet addressed in PNG or elsewhere. Nautilus has acknowledged this responsibility
and, since 2005, has undertaken extensive pioneering research to understand the characteristics
of the seafloor environment and, with the help of international scientists, used this understanding
to form the basis of plans that are put forward specifically to maintain biodiversity at Solwara 1
and enhance recovery during and after mining.
The final part of the assessment describes the residual risks or impacts, assuming effective
implementation of the proposed mitigation measures. The risks and impacts are qualitatively
evaluated according to the extent that they will occur, both in duration and distance from the
particular project activity. In some cases, boundaries of expected impacts are calculated, based
on, for example, dispersion of contaminants or attenuation of sound. Such boundaries that are
described are conservative. No detectable adverse impacts would be expected outside these
boundaries.
Impact assessment criteria are described (Section 9.1), followed by the identification of the
environmental issues to be addressed, their proposed mitigation measures and residual impacts
after the mitigation measures have been applied. The areas considered include:
Air quality (Section 9.2).
Oceanography (Section 9.3).
Offshore water quality (Section 9.4).
Sediment quality (Section 9.5).
Biological environment (Section 9.6).
Maritime safety and interaction with shipping (Section 9.7).
Quarantine (Section 9.8).
Waste management and emergency response (Section 9.9).
Nearshore and onshore environment at the Port of Rabaul (Section 9.10).
9.1 Definitions and Impact Assessment Criteria
Over the course of the environmental assessment of the Project, several internal and external risk
assessment workshops have been held to assess the hazards and potential consequences of
each of the Projects activities; i.e., essentially those of the SMT, Riser and Lift System (RALS),
Solwara 1 Project

9-2

the Mining Support Vessel (MSV) and transfer of ore to the Port of Rabaul, temporary storage and
final shipping.
Results of these workshops are summarised in tabular form in Attachment A. For each of the
consequences (potential impacts), mitigation measures were determined in consultation with
engineers and scientists and residual impacts assessed. However, being the first seafloor mining
project, a true matrix-type assessment of risk, likelihood and consequence for the deep seabed
environment is difficult given the limits of prior experience.
Instead, the precautionary and research approach has been followed in the development of
mitigation measures and the assessment of residual impacts, based primarily on the observations
and knowledge obtained from the studies undertaken by the scientists during the various research
campaigns conducted by Nautilus (and its predecessors), as reported in this EIS.
Residual impact assessment assumes the successful implementation of appropriate mitigation
measures. Criteria for assessing residual impacts in the marine environment are based (wherever
practicable) on likely extent, duration and severity. The definitions for each criterion are provided
below.
9.1.1 Extent
Site scale immediate area within 1 km of the project impact location.
Local scale extending between 1 km and 10 km from the project impact location.
Regional scale extending more than 10 km from the project impact location.
9.1.2 Duration
Prolonged impacts expected to last beyond one year from the completion of the project.
Short duration impacts not lasting beyond one year from completion of the project and are
generally restricted in duration to the duration of the project itself.
9.1.3 Severity
Negligible impact unlikely to be detectable.
Low effect may be detectable but is small and highly unlikely to have any significance.
Moderate effect will be detectable but not severe; populations or the areal extent of
communities may be reduced but unlikely to lead to major changes to population, community
or ecosystem survival or health.
High effect likely to have severe negative impact on population, community or ecosystem
survival or health.
9.2 Air Quality
The MSV, shuttle barges and the support vessels will operate 24 hours per day and operation of
diesel engines and generators will emit exhaust emissions to the air.
Air quality modelling has not been conducted because mine operations are not expected to have
an adverse impact on air quality as the nearest sensitive receptors to Solwara 1 are
approximately 30 km to the east, comprising a number of villages along the southern coast of
New Ireland. The tugs operating out of the Port of Rabaul will increase shipping movements by
three to nine vessels per week, and this increase is unlikely to change the existing conditions at
the port or contribute to significant changes in existing air quality.
Solwara 1 Project

9-3

Given these distances are so large and considering the dispersion affects from winds, no
particular mitigation measures are practical or necessary as a result of operation of the mining
vessels. The MSV will be a newly constructed vessel designed for worldwide deep-water
operations, equipped with state-of-the-art propulsion systems with reduced emissions from fuel
consumption. Routine maintenance of the mining vessel will be conducted to ensure engines are
running as efficiently as possible, thus minimising exhaust emissions. A greenhouse gas
assessment that considers the vessel emissions is presented in Chapter 12.
9.3 Oceanography and Deep-sea Sedimentation
Impacts of mine-related sediments in the mid and upper water column will be avoided by
discharging return water close to the seafloor.
Deep-sea sedimentation rates will be affected by mining operations, with a predicted net increase
resulting from the discharge of fine sediments from the return water, the mining plume created by
SMT operations and the relocation of unconsolidated sediment and competent waste material
away from the mineralised zones to the periphery of the Solwara 1 mound.
The potential impacts to sedimentation and the deep seafloor were assessed through
hydrodynamic dispersion modelling for each scenario and the results are discussed in
Section 9.5.
9.4 Offshore Water Quality
9.4.1 Issues to be Addressed
No construction is necessary at Solwara 1 prior to the commencement of mining operations;
therefore this section considers impacts which may occur during operations.
Seafloor Mining Tool
The SMT may affect water quality via the generation of suspended plumes of sediment at
Solwara 1 in a number of ways:
Plumes may be generated when the SMT lands on the seafloor after being lowered from the
surface and as it moves along the seafloor.
As ore is cut during mining activities, finer fractions of the cut ore may escape the SMT cutter
head and suction system and generate plumes.
Return Water Plumes
Ore mined by the SMT will be pumped as a slurry to the MSV via the RALS. Once on board the
MSV, the ore will be dewatered and transferred to a shuttle barge as described in Chapter 5.
The seawater (and any solids <8 !m in diameter) component of the slurry that has been
separated from the ore will be pumped to the seafloor to drive the subsea slurry lift pump (SSLP)
and then discharged as return water between 25 and 50 m above the seafloor. The return water
will be discharged at a rate of 0.3 m
3
/s and have a suspended solids concentration of
approximately 6,000 mg/L.
During the dewatering process, ore will be exposed to some oxidation and an increase in
temperature, and some geochemical changes could occur prior to discharge at depth.
Solwara 1 Project

9-4

Return water may impact water quality in receiving waters by:
Causing plumes of suspended sediment due to the solids being discharged.
Increasing concentrations of metals which may have leached from the ore during the mining
and dewatering process.
Unconsolidated Sediment Disposal and Side Casting of Competent Waste Material
Prior to mining in new areas, pre-stripping of unconsolidated surface sediment will be required.
Approximately 130,000 t of unconsolidated sediment will be moved across the five zones.
Additionally, approximately 115,000 t of competent waste rock within the mining zones, which is
below the mine cut-off grade, will be side cast during mining operations (Section 5.7.1).
The unconsolidated sediment will be disposed of, and competent waste material side cast, at a
number of locations adjacent to the mining area as shown in Figure 5.11. Plumes of suspended
sediment will likely be created during these activities, with resulting impacts on water quality near
the seafloor.
While suspended sediment plumes may be created, no significant geochemical changes are
expected to occur as the unconsolidated sediment and competent waste material will remain near
the seafloor and not be exposed to any increases in temperature or oxidation.
Other Hazards Potentially Affecting Water Quality
Risk assessment workshops (Attachment A) identified other potential causes of impacts to water
quality at Solwara 1, including small hydraulic fluid leaks, fuel spills during transfers at the site of
the MSV, ore spills during transfer to barges and bulk ore carriers and accidental collisions
resulting in loss of vessels.
Unexpected equipment malfunctions could result in the loss of material in the riser pipe through
failure of the riser transfer pipe, subsea slurry lift pump or RALS. The maximum amount of mined
ore in the riser pipe at any one time is approximately 11 m
3
, which could be lost to the seafloor,
most likely via a dump valve at the base of RALS (Section 5.6.2). Any of these occurrences could
cause localised impact to water quality near the seafloor or in surface waters, along with
associated smothering of animals on the seafloor.
Although it is not a hazard, the MSV and associated mining equipment at Solwara 1 will become
covered by marine growth, which, based on other observations of moored vessels, will act as a
fish-attracting device, increasing marine life at the location.
9.4.2 Mitigation and Management Measures
When lowered to the seafloor, the SMT, assisted by an ROV, will be positioned as close as
possible to the area to be mined. While plumes may be generated when the SMT lands on the
seafloor, the distance required to travel over the seafloor prior to mining will be minimised and
concomitantly the potential for plume generation during SMT travel will be reduced.
The SMT cutter and suction system has been designed such that all fine material (which has the
potential to form plumes in the water column) will be collected by the system and pumped to the
surface. Therefore, no plumes are expected to be generated at the cutter head.
Solwara 1 Project

9-5

While approximately 30% of cut material will be too large to be drawn into the collection system
and instead fall to the seafloor, it will be too large to form plumes. The majority of this lost material
will be recovered during subsequent sweeps of the cutter head.
Return Water Plumes
The ore dewatering system has been designed to retain all solid material greater than 8 !m, and
only allow solids smaller than this to be discharged to the ocean. Additionally, from the time ore is
mined to the time return water is discharged is expected to take 24 minutes, thereby reducing the
time for any effects of oxidative changes of particulate material to occur, both from exposure to
oxygen and an increase in temperature.
The return water system has been designed so that return water is discharged near to where it
was collected, i.e., between 25 and 50 m above the seafloor, thereby removing any impacts on
water quality in the mid and upper water column. To enhance plume dispersion, return water will
be discharged upwards rather than downwards (where it would hit the seafloor as a jet and
resuspend sediment, causing secondary plumes).
Unconsolidated Sediment Disposal and Side Casting of Competent Waste Material
During disposal of unconsolidated sediment and side casting of competent waste, all material will
be discharged horizontally along the seafloor rather than into the water column to minimise plume
formation and enhance the rate at which material settles to the seafloor.
Other Hazards Potentially Affecting Water Quality
All mining and support systems will be designed and constructed to appropriate international
standards, thereby minimising the risk of an equipment malfunction discharging waste materials
to the ocean.
Additionally, the development and implementation of environmental management plans,
specifically covering waste minimisation and loss prevention will be implemented to minimise
impacts on water quality. The plans will address, among other things, MSV deck drainage, non-
process wastewater discharges, MSV waste management and ballast water.
Emergency response procedures will also be developed for all operations in the event of
accidents leading to spills affecting water quality. These are described in Section 9.9.
9.4.3 Residual Impacts
Assessment of the residual impacts to water quality at Solwara 1 after the implementation of
mitigation measures have been determined following investigations of reactivity and elutriate
characteristics of representative ore material (Appendices 7 and 9) and hydrodynamic modelling
of material discharged to the environment (Appendices 11 and 12).
Mineral Reactivity and Elutriate Tests
Ore that is mined at the seafloor will be transported to the surface and dewatered, and the return
water will be discharged at the base of the RALS. During this process, the ore and water will be
exposed to increased temperatures and oxygen. To understand how this process will affect the
quality of return water (including ore <8 !m) being discharged to the environment, a
comprehensive series of tests were undertaken.
Mineral samples were taken from active and inactive (weathered) chimneys and the seafloor
within the mineralised zones to be mined in order to determine total and dilute acid-extractable
metals (AEM) present within those materials.
Solwara 1 Project

9-6

Measurements of acid-volatile sulphide (AVS) and simultaneous extractable metals (SEM) were
also undertaken to investigate sulphide-binding of metals; these providing a measure of reactivity
and potential for metal release from the samples into dissolved and potentially bioavailable form.
As sulphide is a strong metal binding phase of many metals, the ratios of SEM to AVS provide
some indication of potential release of metals:
Where there is a molar excess of AVS over SEM, the metals silver, cadmium, chromium,
copper, mercury, nickel, lead and zinc are predicted to be bound as sulphide phases that have
a very low solubility in water.
A molar excess of SEM over AVS indicates potential availability in dissolved form. Elutriate
experiments were also conducted using the mineral samples in order to estimate rates of
metal release.
The elutriate tests involved shaking the crushed sample in representative seawater to investigate
metal release processes under various conditions of time, temperature, particle size and total
suspended solids (TSS) concentration. The experiments were undertaken to determine if metals
released from crushed ore could be an environmental issue either in water discharged from the
dewatering process or from crushed particles side cast by the SMT. Methods and results of the
reactivity and elutriate investigations are provided in Appendices 7 and 9.
The maximum strong acid-extractable (2:1 HCl:HNO
3
) total metal concentrations measured in the
sediment and chimney mineral samples and maximum weak-acid extractable (1-M HCl) metal
concentrations in the mineral samples are shown in Table 9.1. Particulate metal concentrations
are high, which is expected due to the high-grade ore in the proposed mining area.
Table 9.1 Maximum acid-extractable metal concentrations measured in samples
Metal Strong Acid-extractable Metal
Concentration
(mg/kg)
Weak Acid-extractable Metal
Concentration
(mg/kg)
Ag 182 9
As 8,420 490
Cd 580 44
Co 670 20
Cr 4.9 1.4
Cu 147,000 2,400
Mn 108,000 1,700
Ni 20 11
Pb 9,570 1,400
Zn 76,700 1,000
The AVS concentrations of the mineral samples ranged from 0.1 to 18 !mol/g; however, many of
the samples had a molar excess of SEM (ranging from 1.0 to 59 !mol/g), indicating that there was
insufficient AVS to bind all of the SEM fraction should it dissolve.
Crushed chimney material and weathered chimney material had the highest metal concentrations
and also the greatest excess of reactive metals (SEM) compared to AVS. While it is possible that
some oxidation of the AVS material had occurred during handling (i.e., between collection and
analysis), particulate metal concentrations were very high, and the excess of SEM is not likely to
have been significantly affected.
Solwara 1 Project

9-7

Initial Elutriate Tests
Due to incorrect instructions being provided to the specialist consultant undertaking the testwork,
incorrect procedures were used for collection, transportation, crushing and storage of the samples
in the initial elutriate tests. This caused higher readings of the metals release than is likely to
occur under operating conditions.
For example, water temperature during the initial tests was at room temperatures (223
o
C), which
is significantly higher than the temperatures expected during the dewatering process. Rates of
oxidation and dissolution were greater in the experimental set-up compared to actual operating
conditions due to extended exposure of samples to air during storage and crushing. Furthermore,
the individual samples from the chimneys are not likely to be representative of the ore as a whole
as they represent the worst-case scenario.
Elutriate tests were repeated using correct procedures (and are presented further in this section).
Regardless, results for Phase 1 tests are provided here for completeness.
Field and laboratory-based elutriate tests were undertaken on sample material crushed to form
chips of approximately 25 mm diameter to simulate mining conditions. The test conditions were
aimed to mimic the particle size (80% less than 25 mm) and dewatering time of approximately
12 minutes. Sample materials used in the laboratory tests were stored under refrigerated
conditions at 4
o
C (Appendix 7).
The effects on metal release of elutriate times of 5 minutes, 6, 12 and 24 hours and at TSS
concentrations of 10, 40 and 90 g/L were investigated. The results indicated that total suspended
solids concentration and the resuspension time had the greatest effect on metal concentrations in
the elutriate waters.
In general, metal release was high for arsenic, copper, manganese and zinc and relatively low for
silver, cadmium, nickel and lead. The maximum concentrations of the metals measured (including
results from elutriate tests performed for toxicity testing) are provided in Table 9.2.
Table 9.2 Maximum concentrations of the metals measured in Phase 1 elutriate tests
Metal Metal Concentration
(!g/L)
Mn 8,900
Zn 6,200
Cu 3,300
As 2,800
Pb 120
Cd 80
Ni 40
Ag 30
Based on the metals concentrations measured in the elutriate waters, dilutions of over 1,000
times may be necessary before the concentrations would meet the 95% protection levels of the
ANZECC/ARMCANZ (2000) water quality guidelines.
Repeat Elutriate Tests
Due to the non-realistic experimental conditions used in the initial elutriate tests described above,
repeat elutriate tests were undertaken to obtain results from material more reliably representative
of actual ore and conditions of processing. Samples of representative run-of-mine materials were
Solwara 1 Project

9-8

obtained from the seafloor at Solwara 1, crushed to 25-mm-diameter chips and stored in nitrogen
to prevent oxidation prior to testing.
The first round of repeat elutriate tests was carried out at 6C, over times ranging from 5 to 1,440
minutes (Appendix 9) to investigate the effect that the holding time onboard the mining support
vessel may have on the material. Under these conditions, the metal requiring the most dilutions to
meet ANZECC/ARMCANZ (2000) guidelines was zinc, which would require a 300-fold dilution to
achieve 95% protection levels.
A second round of repeat elutriate tests was carried out to investigate the possible effects that
temperature change has on contaminant release from the material. Separate tests were carried
out at 12 and 24C over a period of 180 minutes. Results showed that the metal controlling the
number of dilutions required to meet ANZECC/ARMCANZ (2000) guidelines was, again, zinc. To
meet 95% protection levels, a 600-fold dilution would be required.
These reactivity and elutriate tests were undertaken in part to understand the risks of reactive
changes taking place in the ore material when at the surface, and in part to assess the potential
impacts if discharges from the dewatering were to occur at depths in the water column where
these materials do not occur naturally.
However, the proposed use of the discharge water to drive the subsea slurry lift pump at the base
of the RALS and its discharge close to the seafloor in the region of its source substantially
reduces impacts to water quality, where there is already elevation from natural sources near to
chimneys.
Hydrodynamic modelling of the return water discharge (Appendix 12) shows that a 600-fold
dilution required to meet ANZECC/ARMCANZ (2000) 95% protection limits will be achieved
within 85 m of the point of discharge (see Section 9.4.3.2, Suspended Sediment and Plume
Formation, for details of modelling results).
Suspended Sediment and Plume Formation
The ANZECC/ARMCANZ (2000) target for total suspended solids (TSS) is 1.2 mg/L (note that
baseline water column measurements at Solwara 1 location show a background range of 0.1 to
6.6 mg/L and maximum TSS concentrations of 14 mg/L (as described in Section 7.6).
Based on a return water discharge rate of 1,000 m
3
/h and an estimated 5,000 mg/L maximum fine
sediment residual in this discharge, the dilutions required to meet the ANZECC/ARMCANZ (2000)
target are approximately 4,200. For the purposes of this impact assessment, a conservative
dilution of 5,000 has been adopted for return water discharge as being necessary to meet the
ANZECC/ARMCANZ (2000) guidelines for all contaminants discharged to the environment in the
return water stream.
Stochastic hydrodynamic modelling was undertaken to estimate the behaviour and fate of the
return water and associated material <8 !m post-discharge (Appendix 12). Based on engineering
data, two discharge temperature scenarios were modelled, namely a discharge temperature of
5.8C and 11.4C.
Modelling results show that:
For both discharge temperatures, a subsurface plume will be formed which will initially exceed
the ANZECC/ARMCANZ (2000) TSS target of 1.2 mg/L.
Solwara 1 Project

9-9

Plumes will rapidly dissipate and achieve 5,000 dilutions a short distance from the point of
discharge, at which time TSS concentrations will meet the ANZECC/ARMCANZ (2000) TSS
target.
During the time it takes for 5,000 dilutions to occur, plumes will be no more that 175 m thick
and will stay between 1,300 and 1,475 m water depth.
Table 9.3 and Figure 9.1 show the probability of the return water plume exceeding the
ANZECC/ARMCANZ (2000) TSS target a certain distance (and associated area) from the point of
discharge over a 12-month period.
Table 9.3 Plume concentrations probability
Probability of
Exceedance
(%)
Area (km
2
) from
Point of
Discharge
Distance from Point
of Discharge
(km)
Area (km
2
) from
Point of
Discharge
Distance from Point
of Discharge
(km)
Discharge Temperature = 5.8C Discharge Temperature = 11.4C
0-10 11.6 4.2 9.71 5.0
10-20 3.78 2.5 2.49 1.9
20-30 2.33 1.7 1.50 1.2
30-40 1.61 1.2 1.05 0.95
40-50 1.11 1.0 0.76 0.81
50-60 0.81 0.9 0.58 0.67
60-70 0.60 0.7 0.43 0.58
70-80 0.42 0.6 0.29 0.44
80-100 0.27 0.41 0.19 0.36
On average (i.e., for 183 days per year), at a discharge temperature of 5.8C, plumes will not
extend more than 900 m beyond the point of discharge (and cover an area of 0.81 km
2
) before
meeting the target TSS concentration.
The maximum distance plumes will travel before meeting the TSS target is 4.2 km, at which point
it will cover an area of 11.6 km
2
; however, this is expected to occur less than 37 days per year.
Figure 9.1 shows that plumes will not affect North Su or South Su, but will generally occur above
Solwara 1 and to the northwest.
Plumes will be formed during disposal of unconsolidated sediment and side casting of competent
waste material. Modelling has shown that, due to material being discharged horizontally from
pipes laying on the seafloor, plume formation will be minimal and all suspended material will
deposit on the seafloor within 1 km of the point of discharge (Appendix 11).
Water quality monitoring will be undertaken at sampling sites around Solwara 1 during operations
to monitor compliance with limits (or dilution amounts) in the event that TSS criteria are exceeded
naturally.
Toxicity Tests (Elutriates)
Toxicity of initial elutriate test waters exposed to ore was assessed to understand the
characteristics of the material and the potential impacts if return water discharges were to occur at
shallower depths in the water column where organisms are not naturally exposed to (or tolerant
of) elevated metals.
The toxicity of the elutriate waters was investigated using tests that determine inhibition of growth
Solwara 1 Project

9-10

rate of the alga Nitzschia closterium and inhibition of mobility of the marine copepod Acartia
sinjiensis (as described in Appendix 7). The elutriate test water was prepared with a high
solid:water ratio to provide high solids load and sufficient test water. Metal concentrations
measured in the elutriate waters prepared for the toxicity tests were higher than those measured
in the elutriate tests for the same sediment material.
Based on the metal concentrations measured in the elutriate waters prepared for the toxicity tests,
copper requires the most dilutions at 4,000 to meet 95% protection levels of the
ANZECC/ARMCANZ (2000) water quality guidelines.
The toxicity assessment used surrogate species, as no tests using local species from Solwara 1
were available or practicable, i.e., animals living at Solwara 1 do not survive for very long under
conditions found at the surface. The philosophy of using surrogate species is that it is expected
that species with similar exposure pathways and similar sensitivity will exist at the local sites. It is
unlikely that this is the case, however, as species that exist at Solwara 1 have both differing
exposure pathways (e.g., water versus food) and sensitivity to metals.
In the metal-enriched sediments and waters surrounding the active chimneys, it is likely that these
vent-dependent species have specialised behaviour (e.g., chemotrophic feeding) adapted for the
local conditions. Nevertheless, the tests were undertaken to provide some context of the likely
toxicity that would be expected for typically used shallow water test organisms exposed to such
water quality. Methods and detailed results are provided in Appendix 7).
The undiluted elutriate waters prepared from the cold sediment, and crushed active and
weathered chimney mineral samples were found to be toxic to both the algae and copepods.
Dilutions of up to 700 times would be required to result in no toxicity from the elutriate waters to
these two species. These results are expected to be quite conservative for a number of reasons.
They are indicative of responses of shallow water species, which will not come into contact or be
exposed to such elutriate waters during normal operating conditions, and are not considered to be
relevant to the vent-dependent species, which are naturally exposed and more tolerant to higher
metal concentrations.
Summary of Residual Impacts
Overall, the water column mixing zone required to meet ANZECC/ARMCANZ (2000) water quality
guidelines are limited to deep waters and are relatively small in extent. Fine sediment fall-out from
the return water discharge is slow and the thickness on the seafloor less than the rate of natural
deposition.
The results of the elutriate and toxicity tests to surface test species are not relevant given the
proposed discharge from dewatering close to the seafloor, where natural discharges from vents
are elevated in metals and the resident animals are evidently tolerant of highly mineralised
habitats. Discharges from dewatering are therefore not expected to have any adverse toxicity
effects to seafloor ecosystems and will have negligible overall effects.
9.5 Sediment Quality
The Project will not involve any construction phase at Solwara 1 prior to the commencement of
mining operations; therefore, this section considers all activities and impacts occurring during the
operational phase. During operations, impacts to seafloor sediment quality are likely to occur
mainly through activities of the SMT, unconsolidated sediment disposal, competent waste
Solwara 1 Project

9-11

material side casting and, to a lesser degree, from the discharge of water from the dewatering
process on the MSV.
Disposal of Unconsolidated Sediment and Competent Waste Material
During disposal unconsolidated sediment, the ROV will pump material from each mining zone and
transport it through a weighted pipe for placement at designated disposal points (see
Figure 5.11). Approximately 130,000 t of unconsolidated sediment and

115,000 t of competent
waste material will be disposed of in this manner.
The SMT will mine a combined area of approximately 0.112 km
2
over the five target mineralised
areas at Solwara 1 (Figure 5.10). The SMT will potentially affect sediment quality of areas
adjacent to mining through disturbance to seafloor.
Dewatering Plumes
Recovery of the ore raised to the MSV via the RALS will involve onboard separation of solids from
the seawater by means of a dewatering plant that is designed to retain all particles greater than
8 !m. This is expected to reduce significantly the quantities of sediment lost in the dewater
discharge, where the proportion of ore below this size is estimated to be <5%. Discharge of this
water, together with the residual entrained fine particles, will occur via a return discharge at a rate
of approximately 1,000 m
3
/hr (during normal operations), at the base of the RALS, between 25
and 50 m from the seafloor.
Settling of fine particulates in the seawater discharge produced from dewatering the crushed ore
is a source of potential impact to seafloor sediments. Material from dewatering will also be
exposed to some oxidation and higher temperatures during the time of dewatering on the MSV
and prior to discharge at depth.
Other Hazards
Potential malfunctions could result in the loss of material in the riser pipe through failure of the
riser transfer pipe, subsea slurry lift pump or RALS. At any time, the volume of material in the riser
pipe would be 11 m
3
, which could be lost to the seafloor via a dump valve.
Disposal of unconsolidated sediment and side casting of competent waste will not expose these
materials to increased temperatures or oxidation; therefore, there will not be any physical
changes that could cause significant geochemical changes to sediment quality.
The SMT cutter head and suction system has been designed to recover the maximum volume of
ore and minimise the amount of cut material being lost to the surrounding environment. Initial loss
at the cutter head in the order of 30% is possible although much will be recovered on subsequent
sweeps of the cutter. It is estimated that 90% of mined ore will be recovered and up to 10% will
remain on the seafloor.
Return Water Plumes
At the MSV, all ore will be retained and only fine material smaller than 8 !m will be discharged
with the return water. The discharge will be oriented in an upward direction to maximise
dispersion and avoid seafloor disturbance. The fine sediment will settle over a wide area at low
Solwara 1 Project

9-12

concentrations as described in Section 9.4.3. Furthermore, the expected time of transit from
seafloor to MSV and back to seafloor is 24 minutes, with 12 minutes at the surface, with
temperature at discharge to be limited to a range of 5.8 to 11.4
o
C.
Make-up seawater (for optimum RALS pumping) will be added pre-discharge to the return water
leading to some oxidation and temperature increase; however, there will be a temperature
decrease travelling the downwards route to discharge as the pipe will be specifically designed to
accommodate temperature loss to ambient conditions. This proposed management of the
dewatering process will reduce oxidation and temperatures thereby reducing the reactivity of
particulate material discharged to the ocean which will eventually settle on the seafloor.
Other Hazards
Emergency response procedures will also be developed for all operations in the event of
accidents leading to ore spills affecting seafloor quality. These are described in Section 9.9.
Assessment of the residual impacts to sediment quality after the implementation of the above
mitigation measures has been determined following investigations of reactivity, sediment toxicity
testing and dispersion.
A hydrodynamic model was created to predict the behaviour and fate of unconsolidated
sediments discharged and competent waste rock side cast during operations at Solwara 1
(Appendix 11).
The coarser fraction of material disposed of will rapidly settle immediately downslope of the
disposal point and form mounds slightly over 0.5 m deep (Figure 9.2). Lighter materials will travel
further from the disposal points, and the lightest components of the disposed materials will form
plumes near the seafloor.
Plumes will rapidly settle on the seafloor no further than 1 km from the point of discharge around
Solwara 1. The resultant footprint depth will be between 0.18 and 500 mm as shown in Table 9.4
and on Figure 9.2 and cover an area just over 2.3 km
2
. Some deposition will occur further afield,
but at a thickness less than natural sedimentation rates.
Table 9.4 Deposition of unconsolidated sediment and competent waste rock
Depositional Thickness
(mm)
Depositional Area (km
2
)
from Point of Discharge
Maximum Distance from
Disposal Point
(km)
0.18 to 0.5 2.343 0.972
0.1 to 1 1.798 0.710
1 to 5 1.568 0.660
5 to 10 1.047 0.615
10 to 50 0.801 0.565
50 to 100 0.278 0.264
100 to 500 0.166 0.166
> 500 0.003 0.036
Post-mining, the sediment depths due to material disposal outside the mining area will be a
maximum of just over 500 mm greater than would naturally have occurred. Within the five
Solwara 1 Project

9-13

mineralised zones, additional sediment thickness will be 500 mm or less. This is considered to be
a minor impact given existing sediment thicknesses at Solwara 1 are up to 6 m deep in some
places (see Figure 5.11).
Although no plumes will be formed as the SMT cuts ore and competent waste material,
approximately 10% of material mined will be lost to the seafloor. This material will not undergo
any geochemical changes and will therefore not affect sediment quality. Additionally, this material
will be confined to locations within the mining area.
Movement of the SMT will disturb sediment, but no impacts to sediment quality are expected.
Impacts to sediment quality from SMT cutting and movement are therefore considered to be
negligible.
Return Water Plumes
Plume dispersion modelling show that over the period of mining, sediment will flocculate and
settle on the seafloor approximately 5 to 10 km to the west and northwest of Solwara 1. Maximum
depositional thicknesses will not exceed 0.1 mm and rates of settling are less than existing deep-
sea sedimentation rates as measured at Solwara 1 and South Su.
Impacts to sediment quality as return water plumes settle on the seafloor are therefore local scale
but considered negligible as they are unlikely to be detectable.
Toxicity Tests (Sediments)
The toxicity of the sediments was investigated using the juvenile amphipod Melita plumulosa
subjected to a 10-day whole sediment test (Appendix 8). The toxicity assessment used surrogate
species, as no standard tests using local species from Solwara 1 are available or practicable for
reasons described in Section 9.4.3.
A representative sample of crushed ore was progressively diluted with inert sand to determine the
toxicity of varying concentrations of ore. Complete methods and detailed results are provided in
Appendix 8.
The test show the median lethal concentration was found to be 4.3%, i.e., that 50% of amphipods
survived the 10-day test period in materials comprising 4.3% ore. No observed effects on
survivability were found when ore concentrations were less than 1%, i.e., a 100-fold dilution.
It is important to note that Melita plumulosa is a shallow water Australian species found in
intertidal non-metalliferous sediments up to depths of 25 m. Therefore the high toxicity result is
not surprising given the elevated natural metal content of the Solwara 1 sediments.
These tests were undertaken to understand the toxicity characteristics of the material in the event
of dispersion and settlement in areas remote from hydrothermal vent activity, where animals may
be less tolerant.
Regardless, dispersion modelling by APASA (Appendix 12) shows that to achieve the 95%
protection level of the ANZECC/ARMCANZ (2000) water quality guidelines for suspended
sediments, the required 5,000-fold dilution threshold occurs more than 50% of the time over an
area of 0.8 km
2
at no more than 0.9 km from the point of discharge.
It is difficult to predict where the 100-fold dilution of settled sediments may occur (required for no
toxicity to animals not naturally exposed to mineralised sediments). Conceivably, in the areas
where return-water fine sediments are predicted to settle, some impacts could occur to resident
Solwara 1 Project

9-14

macrofauna and meiofauna in these areas. However, in the context of the natural sediment fallout
from plumes of volcanic or hydrothermal origin, these impacts are not likely to be detectable, and
overall regional scale of the impact would be low.
9.6 Biological Environment
This section describes the potential, Project-related sources of impacts to the biological
environment of the Project area (offshore and ore barging operations), the mitigation measures
that will be applied to reduce those impacts, and the residual impacts after those mitigation
measures have been successfully applied. It is divided into two sections: firstly, the surface, water
column and nearshore (which effectively includes everything from the surface to just above the
seafloor) (Section 9.6.1), and secondly, the seafloor and the deepest water layers (Section 9.6.2).
Issues associated with underwater light and noise, and water quality are discussed in
Sections 9.6.3 and 9.4, respectively. Issues associated with operations at the Port of Rabaul are
discussed in Section 9.10.
9.6.1 Surface, Water Column and Nearshore
This section describes the potential issues of:
Interactions with marine animals, including endangered species.
Discharges impacting on marine biota.
Bioaccumulation of metals through the food chain.
Increased turbidity effects on species reliant on bioluminescence.
Electric and magnetic fields produced by cables to the SMT and ROV.
Issues to be Addressed
Interactions with Endangered Species
There are a number of protected and endangered species of whales, turtles and marine birds
inhabiting the waters of the Bismarck Sea and, over the life of the project, these may pass
through the Project area. There is the risk, albeit extremely low, that animals such as whales,
turtles and dugongs could collide with the MSV or the vessels involved with the transportation of
ore and supplies.
Discharges
Within PNG, the local coastal people have expressed most concern for the quality of the marine
environments, and the protection of the reefs and fisheries upon which they depend, as well as on
the wellbeing of the larger animals that are present such as whales, sharks and turtles. The
maintenance of health of the marine environment is not a matter for negotiation and the project
must demonstrate that the shallow water animals are not exposed to the mineralised materials of
the seafloor to which they are not adapted, such that there is no risk to daily subsistence and
traditional local activities, such as shark calling.
During operations at the MSV, the only discharge to surface waters will be the discharge of
sewage, treated to meet MARPOL standards (see Section 9.9 for further detail). This may elevate
nutrients locally and the resultant plankton productivity. Minor quantities of spills of ore may occur
during transfer to and from barges. As discussed in Section 9.4, there will be no discharge of
water from the dewatering process within the surface or mid-water (mesopelagic) depths in the
ocean, therefore no thermal changes to these layers will occur.
Solwara 1 Project

9-15

Bioaccumulation Potential Impact to Tuna Fisheries
The discharge from dewatering will contain some fines that pass through the dewatering of the
ore and may contain elevated levels of some dissolved metals, depending on conditions, as
indicated in the elutriate test studies by CSIRO (Appendix 7) and Charles Darwin University
(Appendix 9). Many species of tuna occur in the project area, including skipjack, yellowfin and
bigeye, and along with sharks they form the basis of a commercial fishery and important
subsistence and traditional fisheries such as shark calling.
Although the project area is not within the most heavily fished area, these species would
nevertheless be expected to pass through the area. Given that some species of tuna can also
forage well into the mesopelagic layer, and the vertical migration of plankton can occur between
the mesopelagic and epipelagic layers (Appendix 10), there is the potential for some
bioaccumulation through the food chain via uptake by plankton and subsequent predation by
small fish/crustaceans and larger fish. There are many other non-commercially exploited species
that are also known to occur in the surface (epipelagic) and mid-water (mesopelagic) levels in the
water column (Appendix 10) and these may also form part of the food chain. While there is some
predation on bathypelagic species by mesopelagic species, this predation is not widespread and,
as illustrated by Figure 7.21, there are limited pathways through the food chain upwards from
deeper in the bathypelagic zone.
Bioluminescence and Surface Lighting
As described in Section 7.8.1 and Appendix 10, many species in the mesopelagic and
bathypelagic zones are dependent on bioluminescence for functions such as catching prey,
defence against predators and communication with others of the same species. Any sources of
increased turbidity could potentially interfere with these processes by decreasing visibility through
the water column.
Lighting on the MSV is required for night-time operations but can be a potential source of
confusion or interference to animals, particularly turtles during nesting and hatching.
Electric and Magnetic Fields
The cables to the SMT and ROV will carry current at approximately 30 amps that will generate
magnetic fields in addition to the Earths natural magnetic field, in the same way as any power
cable or the leads to any operating electrical appliance. This may be detectable by animals
sensitive to electric fields (e.g., some species of sharks).
Mitigation and Management Measures
Interaction with Endangered Species
From time to time, species of whales and turtles may be in the project area and while these
encounters are not expected to be frequent, effective mitigation measures will be needed to
minimise the risk of injury from ship strike or collision. A study that modelled vessel speed
highlighted the fact that speeds below 15 knots substantially reduced the chances of lethal injury
to whales (Vanderlaan & Taggart, 2007). Once on location, the MSV will be virtually stationary
and the tugs towing ore barges to and from the MSV will travel at speeds of around 4.5 knots
minimising the likelihood of boat strike.
If any whales encounter the RALS or the SMT lift wire or control umbilicals, there is little to cause
harm and no lines that would be loose or flexible enough to cause entanglement. In the case of
turtles and dugongs, vessel speed is closely related to the number of strikes (Groom et al.,
undated) with boats travelling at higher speeds striking more animals.
Solwara 1 Project

9-16

The highest risk areas for encounter are most likely to be within Simpson Harbour and along
shores of the Duke of York Islands (Figures 1.3 and 1.1 respectively). The supply vessel, tugs
and barges travelling between the offshore location of the MSV and the Port of Rabaul will
observe normal shipping speeds and channels in the approaches to the Port of Rabaul, as
required by all other vessels using that port i.e., 10 knots.
During operations, a procedure will be established to record any whales, dugongs or turtles
observed from the MSV (or other vessels), noting (where possible) species and any behavioural
aspects such as direction of travel, resting or feeding. It will be an obligation of persons on watch
to make such recordings in the event of a sighting, and forms for this purpose (already used
during Nautilus exploration activities) will be employed. This will add to the knowledge base of the
presence of whales and other endangered species in the area.
The endangered Becks petrel is said not to be attracted to vessels (Shirihai, 2008) and hence the
presence of the MSV is unlikely to interfere with their activities, nor to represent any significant
threat to the birds, should they be attracted. Therefore, no specific mitigation measures for this
species are proposed.
Discharges
On the MSV, sewage will be treated in an approved sewage treatment plant certified to meet
operational requirements of Regulation 9.1.1, Annex IV of MARPOL such that operational
discharges of treated effluent will not produce surface floating solids nor cause discolouration of
the surrounding seawater (see Section 9.9 for further detail). There will be no normal discharge of
oils, chemicals or garbage, which will all be returned to shore for treatment or disposal.
Operational deck areas where hazardous chemicals and oils are used will have drainage to
oil/water separators and treatment tanks. A shipboard marine pollution Emergency Response
Plan will be implemented to combat accidental spills or non-routine discharges of pollutants (see
Section 9.9 for further detail).
Leatherback turtles have the largest ranges of all reptiles in the world because they have the
ability to control their body temperature (James & Mrosovsky, 2004). As they migrate from the
tropics to arctic water, marginal and localised changes in the thermocline will have an effect on
them, if such changes were to occur; however, as the Project will not discharge any cold water to
the surface, no changes to the thermocline will occur.
Since the ore recovered from the seafloor is a highly valuable product, all systems will be in place
during transfer from the MSV to the barges to avoid spillage. The MVS and handling equipment
will be new and built to current international standards. Therefore, it is likely that only minor spills,
if any, will occur.
Bioaccumulation Potential Impact to Tuna Fisheries
The proposed depth of discharge of water from dewatering at depths between 25 to 50 m from
the seafloor, was chosen primarily for reasons of pumping efficiency of the RALS, but effectively
avoids any exposure or possible pathways of impacts back to surface ecosystems. Modelling
shows that the plumes (and any dissolved/particulate metals) will not rise above 1,300 m water
depth (see Section 9.4.3) and oceanographic data collected in this area does not reveal any
upwelling below 400 m water depth (see Section 7.5.3). Hence, the main pathways potentially
giving rise to risks of bioaccumulation have been engineered out of the project and risks to mid-
and surface-water species such as tuna are assessed as low (Appendix 10). While there is
confidence in this assessment for the mid- and shallow-water species, based on vertical
separation, a ranking of moderate confidence is given to the assessment in relation to potential
Solwara 1 Project

9-17

impacts to the bathypelagic (deep) species, which may be exposed to the return water
(Appendix 10). The moderate confidence level reflects general uncertainty about responses of
bathypelagic species to metals, although the naturally high exposure to elevated metals in the
bathypelagic environment of the project area suggests that any risks from returning the material to
this deep environment would be extremely low. Species at the maximum depth that the return
water plume is expected to rise to are naturally exposed to this type of material through naturally
occurring particulate plumes (see Figure 7.14), which occur at water depths similar to those to
which the return water plume is expected to rise.
Confidence in the assessment of low risks of uptake of metals via the food chain from mine
wastes discharged at sea has previously been shown for an analogous case study of the disposal
of jarosite (residue from zinc smelting containing high levels of metals, particularly zinc, cadmium,
lead, arsenic and mercury), which was discharged at a rate of up to 240,000 tonnes per 12-month
period by barge dumping off southeast Australia between 1972 and 1996. By combination of field
sampling and modelling, CSIRO (1994) examined the likelihood of contact with plumes and
uptake via marine animals at different trophic levels into a number of predatory species, including
seasonally migrating bluefin tuna.
Even though the jarosite material was disposed at the surface and descended through the full
2,000 m of the water column, CSIRO concluded that, even under worst case scenarios, the
predicted increases in heavy metal from the jarosite disposal were all relatively low, and the
increase in heavy metal load predicted on the fish populations would not be expected to be
detectable above natural sampling variability without extremely large numbers of samples. In the
light of this example, it is unlikely that any effect could occur from a substantially lesser volume of
solid material from the dewatering process, discharged at a depth of around 1,450 m.
Bioluminescence and Surface Lighting
Risks of interference of mid-water fish species and other invertebrates that use luminescence for
functions of feeding, predator avoidance or communication are avoided by the proposed
discharge at depths approximately 25 to 50 m from the seafloor, from where plumes are not
expected to rise above 1,300 m depth (Appendix 12). Natural plumes also occur at these and
shallower depths (1,100 m) from nearby hydrothermal and seafloor volcanic activity (Appendix 6),
and within this context, project-related effects are not expected to be significant or detectable.
There is a risk that artificial lighting can be disruptive to hatchling turtles during times of new
moon, and to minimise the risks of increases of the already high mortality rates during hatching,
options that can be included are shielding or re-orientation of direction of lights or reductions in
the heights of the source (APPEA, 2005). In the case of the MSV, it is well offshore so that height
of source is effectively at the horizon and unlikely to cause disorientation that could increase risks
of predation or mortality. There are few turtle nesting sites reported in the Bismarck Sea and none
around the project area (Section 7.8.1).
Electric and Magnetic Fields
The umbilical cables connecting the MSV with the SMT and ROVs will be fully shielded and carry
approximately 30 amps. At most, electric and magnetic fields created by the cables will be very
small, and will dissipate within a few metres of the cable. These cables are frequently used for
controlling ROVs and submersible vessels in deep-sea applications, and have been used during
exploration activities by Nautilus and its predecessors, without adverse impacts to fauna.
Solwara 1 Project

9-18

Residual Impacts
Discharge of treated sewage will result in localised nutrient input that will be dissipated by
currents and taken up by planktonic organisms, as per the intention of MARPOL. Impacts are
negligible and localised to project scale.
The transfer of ore onto and off the barge and loading onto bulk carriers will be managed to
reduce any spillage to a minimum, such that there will be no significant or sustained source of
input to the offshore or inshore marine environment (see Section 9.9 for further detail) and no
prolonged detectable impacts to biota.
As discussed in Section 9.4, by disposing of the return water from dewatering between 25 and
50 m from the seafloor, plumes are not anticipated to reach above 1,300 m water depth. From this
depth, there will be no significant vertical migration pathways for bioaccumulation to affect any
mid-water or surface-dwelling fish, including tunas or other important food species.
For the same reasons, there will be no risk of any adverse interference with species reliant on
bioluminescence in the mesopelagic zone or bathypelagic zone shallower than 1,300 m.
The MSV is virtually stationary, and the barges move at slow enough speeds to minimise risks of
collisions with whales or turtles. The operations present no threat or obstacle to normal migration
that would be materially different from normal shipping and commercial fishing activities. Deck
lighting at night is not likely to be a source of interference to turtle nesting and overall, impacts are
assessed as occurring at the local scale, of short duration (time of presence of MSV) and of low
severity.
9.6.2 Seafloor Habitat and Biodiversity
The Project will not involve any construction phase at the offshore mine site prior to the
commencement of mining operations; hence, this EIS considers all activities and impacts as
operational. The pre-operational activities are minor and involve locating six concrete bases and
weights on the seafloor for the attachment of position fixing instruments and current meters. The
MSV will be dynamically positioned and will therefore not require any anchors or preparatory
layout for anchoring construction at the mining location.
Impacts to the seafloor and its biological communities will arise from a number of sources, as
shown in Figure 9.3, and described below.
On the seafloor, the actions of the SMT will affect seafloor fauna in following ways.
The seafloor of most of the target area is hard, and initial access of the SMT to the ore will be on
a hard pad area, from where it can commence cutting an access ramp and start mining. However,
the exploration surveys have indicated that some accumulations of soft, unconsolidated
sediments occur in the valleys, which in places might pose some risks of subsidence of the SMT.
In these locations, the ROV will be fitted with skids and the material pumped laterally off the slope
of the mound. The ROV will pump unconsolidated sediment from each mining zone and transport
it for placement at designated tip head sites on the outer areas of the Solwara 1 mound away
from mining. (see Figure 5.11). A total of approximately 130,000 m
3
of unconsolidated sediment
will be moved in this way over 30 months of mining. This process can run concurrently with the
SMT operations where it is required.
Solwara 1 Project

9-19

The SMT will disturb the seafloor habitat as it is lowered onto the bottom and as it crawls along
the seafloor, levelling chimneys and other irregularities in advance of mining and during the
process of mining itself. These actions will destroy habitat and cause some loose sediments to
become resuspended and affect water quality and deposition in the vicinity of the SMT. The
actions of the SMT and of the cutter head will generate some resuspension of fine suspended
material as described in Section 9.5. Sessile fauna the path of mining will be unavoidably
entrained in the ore stream and pumped to the surface, resulting in an unavoidable loss of these
animals.
Any fines that are resuspended directly or via relocation from the SMT will be subject to advection
as suspended particles in the ambient seafloor currents, and settlement back on to the seafloor.
The potential effects of these sediments will be mainly by smothering of nearby benthic
organisms, for which modelling has been used in determining the potential extent of any effects.
It is expected that the majority of the mineralised zones indicated in Figure 5.10, including the
venting areas, will be mined, subject to mitigation measures proposed to protect biodiversity (see
below). Under the mine plan, the SMT will start at the Far West mineralised zone, then move in
turn to the Central, West and then East and Far East zones.
Once the SMT leaves a zone, the mined area will then be left to rehabilitate. Mining will level off
the chimneys and irregularities of the mound, creating a smoother and mainly hard final surface
which for some 60% of the area will be to an expected depth of no more than 20 m below the
existing seafloor.
Dewatering Plumes
Water and some residual entrained sediment remaining in suspension after separation of the ore
during the de-watering process will be discharged (Section 9.4). Some geochemical changes may
take place to this material through exposure to oxygenation and higher temperatures at the
surface while on the MSV. Details of the nature and volumes of water discharged from the
dewatering process are given in Section 9.5. The potential issues to be addressed from the de-
watering plumes to the seafloor biological communities include:
Impacts to free swimming and epi-benthic organisms within the predicted area of influence of
altered water quality (based on results of elutriate tests and dilutions to meet water quality
guidelines and conditions of no toxicity to animals).
Smothering or burial by settlement of sediments, particularly on filter feeders in areas where
sediments potentially settle.
Loss of Habitat, Biodiversity and Endemic Species
Overall, the main issues to be addressed from the effects of mining and dewatering are the
potential loss of habitat and its associated biodiversity and endemic species from Solwara 1 and
the pathways for recolonisation of the biological communities after cessation of mining. To the
extent that the numbers and biomass of animals at Solwara 1 will decrease during the progress
of mining at Solwara 1 and prior to its recovery, there may be potential effects by way of a
reduction in spawning biomass of the Solwara 1 animals and reduced downstream larval
recruitment that would otherwise naturally occur, for example at Solwara 8, which is 45 km down
current of Solwara 1. Hence diminished recruitment may occur at equivalent habitats downstream
of Solwara 1. However, relative impacts to Solwara 8 are likely to be diminished given the
distance from the Solwara 1 and similar distance from the unaffected South Su. Samples of
Solwara 1 Project

9-20

animals from Solwara 8 will be taken as part of the completion of baseline studies to determine
the genetic relationship between Solwara 1, South Su and Solwara 8.
Other Hazards Near Seafloor
In addition to the above, there are a number of other potential causes of impact that were
identified in the December 2007 risk assessment workshop. These included circumstances
ranging from small hydraulic leaks to accidental collisions resulting in loss of vessels. Other
potential malfunctions could result in the loss of material in the riser pipe through failure of the
riser transfer pipe, pump or RLS. It is estimated that at any time, the amount of material in the
riser pipe would be 11m
3
, which could be lost to the seafloor beneath, causing localised
smothering.
Noise from the SMT cutter head has not been modelled, in absence of details of likely source
spectra and frequencies. However, low frequency sound is likely and would be expected to be
audible for considerable distance. However, natural background noise from the erupting North Su
volcano is likely to mask the sound of the SMT to a considerable extent and it is not considered
further.
There are many mitigation approaches open to Nautilus, including design of the mine plan based
around enhancing natural aspects of the prevailing environment and minimising impacts.
The proposed area to be mined is very small and the combined area of the five mineralised areas
presently targeted for mining is only about 0.112 km
2
.
The two main objectives of the proposed mitigation measures are:
To maintain biodiversity and endemic species at the Solwara 1 hydrothermal area during and
after mining.
To determine the environmental impacts of mining at the mineralised active chimneys and
adjacent inactive hard surfaces, and active/inactive sediments.
The mitigation measures that are outlined below to meet these objectives at Solwara 1 have been
developed in consultation between the Nautilus project engineers and stakeholders represented
by scientific experts in hydrothermal vent biology, PNG Government agencies, PNG academics
and NGOs, via workshops (see Chapter 4) and made in the light of result from research studies
completed during Nautilus survey campaigns.
Natural Mitigation
There are a number of natural features of the environment of the project area that will reduce the
scale of the potential impacts as described above. These are not direct actions taken by Nautilus,
but nevertheless act to limit impacts and can be enhanced by the various mitigation measures
proposed by Nautilus.
First, the mining cannot remove or exhaust the natural venting energy source at Solwara 1, which
will continue until the underlying energy source naturally dissipates. The active venting field will
remain, chimney structures will reform and the underlying hydrothermal energy basis will still exist
for the potential re-establishment of vent-dependent and associated communities. The time
sequence of recovery of fauna is not known but it is expected that, within 1 to 3 years, the major
faunal elements will have re-established. It is also proposed to enhance this process by other
mitigation plans summarised below. The vents may re-emerge in the same or different locations,
Solwara 1 Project

9-21

and vents in nearby unmined areas may alter in intensity or frequency of venting in response to
adjacent disturbance. Fundamentally, however, the active venting field will remain, chimney
structures will reform and the underlying hydrothermal energy basis will still exist for the potential
re-establishment by vent-dependent and associated communities. There are a number of
dependencies regarding the time scale and potential sources and sequences of faunal recovery
that are not yet known, but which form subject matters for the mitigation and associated
monitoring programs.
Second, the highly mineralised habitat of the vent-associated animals means that the predictions
of the boundaries of impact to water quality that are based respectively on application of the
numbers of dilutions to meet ANZECC/ARMCANZ (2000) water quality guidelines for dissolved
metals, and to achieve no toxicity are relevant only to the protection of shallow water surrogate
test species. These are likely to have quite different sensitivities to dissolved metals when
compared with the vent-dependent deep sea species, which cannot survive away from such
areas, beyond which the relevance of the standards may have little bearing on their survival. The
mixing zone boundaries of expected effects on surface test organisms have nevertheless been
applied, based on results of elutriate and toxicity tests from representative material at expected
conditions of temperature and time of handling on the surface (Sections 9.4 and 9.5). There are
no standard tests or established ways to allow for different tolerances of the deep-water species,
particularly those adapted for life at hydrothermal vents. The results therefore give some
representation of toxicity of the material in a shallow water context, but it is noted that the dilution
boundaries presented are likely to be extremely conservative if applied to the fauna of deep-sea
hydrothermal vents.
Furthermore, ambient baseline concentrations of some dissolved metals such as copper, lead
and zinc already exceeded ANZECC/ARMCANZ (2000) guidelines (95% and 99% protection
level) in some water samples that were taken in the vicinity of the vents (Appendix 7). These
concentrations naturally dilute rapidly away from the vents, where metal concentrations were
below detection or at trace levels typical of the ocean generally. However, it is at the vents where
the animals are most exposed, including their larvae and juveniles at the point of release and
settlement. It can be inferred from this that a high tolerance to metal concentrations on water and
sediments would be of selective and survival value.
While the same logic cannot necessarily also apply to species located in sediments or hard
surfaces away from direct influence of vents, the volcanic origins of sediments (Appendix 6)
suggests that periodic episodes of sedimentation may be experienced. Certainly, extensive
plumes have been observed emanating from North Su, blanketing visibility to the ROV on a
number of occasions and, during the 1996 PACMANUS III and 1997 PACMANUS IV expeditions,
there were two recognisable particulate plumes, both below 1,000 m, the fallout from which could
have contributed to the seafloor sediments (Appendix 6).
Seafloor mineralised areas are often discovered initially by detection of plumes in near-bottom
waters from vent or subsea volcanic activity; hence, settlement of sediment is likely to be a
naturally intermittent activity to which benthic communities are tolerant, or in some stage of
response after natural (volcanic) sediment deposition episodes. Conceivably, the very low
numbers of benthic animals observed in sediments at Solwara 1 may reflect such stages after
some recent event. Additionally, the low animal densities, presence of opportunistic genera and
high dominance patterns suggest that settling is naturally subject to periodic disturbance. Either
way, the assessments of the potential impacts of sediment from SMT disturbance or discharged
in the dewatering are conservative when considered within this context.
Solwara 1 Project

9-22

SMT Limitations
Mining will not occur where water temperatures exceed SMT operating capabilities (Section 5.6.1).
However, given the rapid thermal gradients between hot and cold water at Solwara 1, it is
expected that this limitation will apply only within a metre or so from areas of elevated
temperature.
It is uncertain whether or not the areas that cannot be mined for this reason will represent any
significant refugia for animals, and whether or not the venting at such areas will vary as a result of
adjacent mining. However, such areas may be an additional potential source of benthic
macrofaunal communities to add to spawning and recolonisation potential.
Unmined Control Area at South Su
No mining is proposed at South Su, which will remain as an unmined control area about 2 km up
current from Solwara 1. It will provide a potential source of recruitment to mined areas and
provides a control location to set up transects to monitor natural variations in vent activity and
communities over time. South Su and Solwara 1 are part of same hydrothermal system on the
southeast and northwest flank of the North Su active seafloor volcano, respectively. The South Su
mound is of a similar overall size to Solwara 1 although its active area is a single main central
region of venting whereas Solwara 1 has more dispersed venting activity. Biological comparisons
of the two areas have shown that the active sites at both areas share the same biomass-dominant
species and generally similar indices of diversity and community structures. Where there are
significant differences, South Su generally has higher abundances of secondary (i.e., less
dominant) species and higher dominance of some groups. Some recruitment may also come from
North Su, which will also not be mined. However, because of the actively erupting conditions and
sediment-occluded visibility at North Su at the times of surveys, it has not been possible to
characterise vent communities there to the same extent as at Solwara 1 and South Su.
Continued monitoring at South Su control site during mining will enable natural variations in
indices to be assessed away from any influence of mining at Solwara 1. South Su lies
approximately 2 km distant from Solwara 1 and is directly upstream of the prevailing seafloor
currents. This is advantageous from the point of view of South Su providing a source of parent
stock for recolonisation by larvae. Some recruitment may also come from North Su, which will
also not be mined.
Temporary Refuge Areas within Solwara 1
Not all of the resource can be mined simultaneously; mining will be sequenced according to the
mine plan, which currently proposes that mining of the mineralised East and Far East zones will
be the last in the development of the Solwara 1. Hence these areas will remain for the longest
time as an undisturbed source of parent fauna and supply of larvae within Solwara 1 (see
Figure 5.5). However, it is difficult to prescribe which areas will be the last to be mined, or the size
of any areas potentially set aside as refuge areas, while allowing for flexibility in the mine plan that
may be required during the progress of mining. As the last areas to be mined are reached,
recovery across the mined areas will represent various stages in the sequences of recolonisation,
with the initially mined areas having had the longest recovery time before the majority of intact
pre-mined communities are themselves removed, and the most recently mined areas the least. A
temporary refuge area is proposed, which is effectively a representative area of unmined and
unaffected seafloor in part or the entire final zone to be mined (depending on zone). It is referred
to as temporary on the expectation that, by then, it can be demonstrated by monitoring that
recovery at active chimneys in the earliest mined out area meets specified criteria that the major
community elements (i.e., the three biomass-dominant species) have re-established. However,
Solwara 1 Project

9-23

mining at the temporary refuge area will not commence until these recovery criteria have been
met.
Transplant of Animals
The loss of animals in the path of the SMT is partially avoidable and it is proposed to remove the
largest clumps and relocate them initially to unmined areas and ultimately to venting areas where
mining is complete. The extent to which this will be done is a matter of practicality and will be
undertaken opportunistically and during routine monitoring. Clearly a sweep of the entire mining
area is not practical, but large clumps can be gathered by the ROV and repositioned away from
mining initially, and when possible, to areas where mining is completed. The removal of clumps
will include the biomass-dominant species and any other associated attached or sessile fauna.
Mobile animals such as crabs, squat lobsters and shrimps are likely to swim away but being
mobile, are also more able to move from one area to another. It will not be practicable to confirm
whether or not the rare species, or those only observed at Solwara 1, are amongst the clumps of
animals transplanted, as this involves bringing the animals to the surface for analysis (from which
they would not survive). However, even for the rarest species, (i.e., those only observed at
Solwara 1), it is not likely that their real distribution could be geographically limited to such a small
area as that represented by Solwara 1. The success of this relocation of clumps of animals to
vents in mined areas will be observed periodically using the ROVs included in the mining set-up.
Subject to testing during the baseline campaign in July 2008, artificial substrates may be placed
over new vents to simulate and enhance habitat reformation. The success of this strategy will be
routinely monitored.
Artificial Substrate
It is thought that rates of colonisation and growth of organisms such as the bamboo coral
Keratoisis on hard inactive substrates are slow (Van Dover, 2000a) and hence, recovery of
Keratoisis and its associated fauna may take longer than recovery of active vent communities. In
order to enhance this process, hard settlement surfaces such as concrete blocks or various other
settlement substrates will be located opportunistically in appropriate areas. If practical,
representative stands of Keratoisis will also be removed from the path of mining (where these are
encountered in dense enough stands, and repositioned in compartmentalised structures such as
crates, where they might re-form attached colonies. The survival and growth of such transplants
will be monitored, with continued relocation if successful.
SMT Plume Minimisation
The suction mouth, positioned within or below the cutting head (depending on final design) is
designed so that during operation, there is minimal escape of suspended fine material during
cutting. Removal of unconsolidated sediment and competent waste rock to tip head locations on
the outer slopes of Solwara 1 will be achieved at the seafloor, with minimal risk of reactive
changes to this material from oxidation or temperature change.
Dewatering Plume Minimisation
Minimisation of impacts from discharge of water and entrained sediments from the dewatering
process on the MSV will be achieved by:
Discharge between 25 and 50 m from the seafloor to confine all impacts to the bottom zones
from where the water/sediment originated and animals are most adapted.
Solwara 1 Project

9-24

Retention of all particles above 8 !m in size, which is expected to reduce significantly the
quantities of sediment lost in the dewater discharge, where the proportion below this size is
estimated to be <5%.
Limiting the time of exposure to surface temperatures and oxygenation to approximately
12 minutes (once operational and after a period to develop equilibrium conditions), thereby
reducing potential geochemical changes to occur. During this time, temperatures are not
expected to exceed 13.5
o
C.
This depth of exit point location has been selected both for reasons of engineering and pumping
efficiency, and for environmental benefits by returning the water and any entrained particles
directly to their deep sea zone of origin. It eliminates risks of any adverse effects to water quality
and biota of the shallow and middle levels of the oceanic water column.
Removal of Free-floating or Swimming Organisms by the SMT
Water pumped with ore from the SMT to the MSV will potentially contain some entrained
organisms such as planktonic larvae or small fish that would not be able to escape or survive the
subsequent rise to surface. However, the volume of water being pumped to the surface (24 ML/d)
represents only 0.3% of the net volume of water moving over Solwara 1 (8,800 ML/d). Therefore
the SMT will potentially remove 0.3% of free-floating or swimming organisms as they move over
and past Solwara 1.
Lighting
Illumination of the SMT will potentially attract fish or other mobile species in the area and place
these at some risk of being sucked into the cutter head and the RALS, from which they would not
survive. The lighting must be aimed at illuminating the area of operation of the cutter head and the
location of the lighting on the SMT is fixed, about 3 to 6 m distant from the suction system. Hence,
there is limited flexibility to locate the lighting further from the suction area to reduce any
incidental entrainment of fish in the pumped ore stream. Some accidental loss of fish may occur
but this is not expected to be significant.

Other Hazards Near Seafloor
Risks of major losses of equipment or spills of ore or fuel oils due to accidental events will be
extremely low with the implementation of vessel and equipment maintenance procedures,
navigational procedures, safety plans, environmental management plans, and emergency
response plans. Any ore that could be lost in the event of failure of the pumping or riser system
(i.e., an estimated maximum of 11 m
3
in the RALS at any time) would be recovered by mining
once systems were repaired or replaced.
Residual Impacts
The residual impacts that are predicted after the implementation of the above mitigation measures
are described as follows.
Venting
In areas where the SMT has completed mining, venting of fluids will continue at new or pre-
existing locations. New chimney structures will start to reform as the vent fluids mix with the
seawater causing metal sulphides to precipitate. Depending on temperatures, this can be quite
rapid, with new chimneys forming within days to weeks (Van Dover, 2000a), which is consistent
with observations made during exploration. Diffuse venting will also continue in any mined areas
where soft sediments settle, although in the directly mined areas, the majority of the existing soft
Solwara 1 Project

9-25

sediments will have been mined. It is possible that the dynamics of venting activity in the areas
adjacent to the mined areas may change because of alterations to the fluid flow or release of
venting in newly cleared areas, resulting in some changes to the frequency and intensity of
venting in the nearby undisturbed areas.
The extent of the impacts to vents and other seafloor habitats directly mined will inevitably be
severe at the site scale (i.e., the area of mining). However, impacts are reversible, as vents and
chimneys start to reform almost immediately, although it may be many years before development
of chimneys returns to pre-mining conditions from a geological perspective.
Recolonisation of Fauna
Most of the animals and their existing habitat in the path of the SMT are likely to be removed by
mining, hence the immediate loss at local scale will be severe. However, loss and recovery is
progressive and risks of loss of species diversity at Solwara 1 will be reduced to levels as low as
practicable, with recovery of communities facilitated through three principal means:
By the survival of clumps of biomass-dominant animals (and other species) relocated to
suitable unmined areas (using the ROV).
By active migration of adults or settlement of larvae produced by those adults from the
unmined areas or temporary refuge area to be located in the final unmined area of Solwara 1.
From settlement of larvae produced from the unaffected communities of the South Su control
area, and other locations.
After an area is mined and the SMT has been relocated to the next area, recolonisation of mined
areas will begin. Around actively venting areas, this is expected to follow a succession, initiated
by the formation of microbial mats on the newly exposed surfaces, followed by the establishment
of the characteristic vent-dependent, zone-forming snail and barnacle species and their
associated fauna respectively. This is equivalent to the dynamic succession processes described
at other ocean vent systems (Van Dover, 2000a), although potentially with less complexity of
assemblages at Solwara 1. The rates of recovery of communities equivalent in diversity or
density to originals are expected to be faster at active vent and active sedimentary sites provided
that the supply of recruits is not disrupted, With the measures to maintain spawning populations
in the refuge area, it is expected that after a transition period of 1 to 3 years, post-mining,
populations characteristic of active sulphide mounds will return and reorganise to a condition of
biomass and diversity that resembles the pre mining state (Appendix 11). In the inactive hard
(sulphidic) surfaces and sediments, it may take more years to return pre-mining conditions, due
to presumed slower growth rates. The genetic structure of the recolonising animals is expected to
be the same as the baseline, reflecting nearest sources of parent stock at Solwara 1 and
South Su.
The actions to relocate species out of the path of the SMT are proposed in an effort to enhance
recolonisation of mined areas. At the very least, these efforts will salvage some of the densest
clumps of animals for continued survival and contribution to the genetic stock at Solwara 1. The
extent to which this will result in the successful establishment of colonies will be a subject for
monitoring by observation. It will be dependent on practicalities, availability of suitable venting
sites nearby and the long-term viability of the venting at the translocated area. Some
enhancement of recolonisation at inactive hard surface areas may be possible, for example, by
the placement of artificial hard settlement surfaces, and/or by the relocation of some stands of
Solwara 1 Project

9-26

Keratoisis (where practicable). At the inactive sedimentary areas, natural recolonisation is
expected to be slow, with no practical means of enhancement by relocation of benthic fauna.
Overall, the mitigation measures will significantly reduce or avoid any risks of loss of biodiversity
and endemism at Solwara 1. The extent of the impacts to seafloor benthic faunas will be mainly at
the site scale (i.e., the area of mining), with temporary reduction in larval production for
recolonisation at down-current areas during mining. Impacts to fauna are reversible, but recovery
of the main community elements is expected to take within 1 to 3 years at vents and longer at
inactive areas. Overall, assuming successful outcomes of the mitigation measures proposed, the
ecological impacts are expected to be moderate.
Sediment Re-suspension from the SMT
Impacts to benthic communities of both hard and sedimented surfaces in active and inactive
areas is likely to be through physical settlement of particles released into the water column during
operations.
Unconsolidated sediments that are removed during operations are the same materials that
naturally occur at Solwara 1 and will not undergo any significant geochemical changes as they
are relocated from the path of mining to the periphery of the Solwara 1 mound.
Unconsolidated sediment is likely to contain its complement of benthic infauna, the most robust of
which (e.g., meiofauna) are likely to survive and establish communities, depending on
comparative sediment conditions and frequency of exposure to hydrothermal influences between
the old and new site.
Some faunal community changes could occur, for example, where sediments from active areas
are relocated to inactive areas (or vice versa), or where sediments settle across existing
heterogenous patches of surface sediments (described in Appendices 5 and 6).
However, given the generally low densities and variability between sediment samples
(Appendix 6), such community changes are unlikely to be detectable without a large sampling
effort. Settlement of sediments from the SMT may cause some smothering or changes in
communities; however, this process is unlikely to be substantially different from the original
settlement from its volcanic origins and impacts are expected to be low.
Suction of Entrained Organisms
The proportion of larvae entrained in water sucked up by the SMT is estimated at 0.3% of
organisms passing over Solwara 1 at any one time; hence, impacts are not likely to be detectable,
and considered as very low.
Plumes from Dewatering Discharge
Results of elutriate tests (Appendix 9) carried out on representative ore material at representative
temperatures and durations of exposure indicate that at the point of discharge, 600 dilutions
would be required to meet ANZECC/ARMCANZ (2000) guidelines for 95% protection level.
Modelling of the dispersion of the discharge water plumes indicates that this protection level will
be met within 85 m of the discharge (Appendix 12). The modelling has also shown that plumes
from dewatering discharge will not rise above 1,300 m depth.
Over the 30-month life of the mining operation, most sediment will settle within 0.9 km from
dewatering source. Fine sediments (<10 micron) are expected to fall out in patchy areas
approximately 5 to 10 km to the west of the mining site and at thicknesses <0.1 mm
(Appendix 12), where animals may be less exposed to mineralised sediments. Some impacts may
Solwara 1 Project

9-27

occur but, within the background of settlement of sediments from natural plumes from volcanic
and hydrothermal activity, such impacts are not likely to be detectable.
Reduction of Recruitment at Solwara 8
Over the mining period, there will be a progressive reduction of larval production from Solwara 1,
followed by a recovery as surviving adults and new recruitment enhanced by the mitigation
measures at Solwara 1 and South Su. This may affect recruitment at any downstream areas
dependent on Solwara 1 as a source. The nearest equivalent massive sulphide mound
downstream of Solwara 1 with active venting is at Solwara 8, approximately 45 km to the
northwest of Solwara 1.
To whatever extent Solwara 8 is dependent on recruitment from Solwara 1, the risks will be
minimised to the same extent that the efforts to enhance recovery of communities at Solwara 1
are successful. The unaffected South Su is a similar distance upstream from Solwara 8 and likely
to be as important a supply of larvae; hence, risks of impacts to Solwara 8 are likely to be low
and reversible to any extent that they occur at all. Results of genetic studies underway will
confirm this.
Modelling studies (Appendix 12) indicate patches of settlement of fine particles at distances of 5
to 10 km from the dewatering source. However, thicknesses are <0.1 mm, and it is not likely that
any substantial volumes of sediment from disturbance at Solwara 1 could reach Solwara 8.
9.6.3 Light and Underwater Noise
This section addresses the potential impacts of underwater light and noise derived from the
offshore vessels and seafloor mining activities on marine animals. It presents the principal issues,
proposed mitigation measures and residual environmental impacts of the project during the
operations phase. In particular, the project has the potential to interact with large marine animals
such as whales, dolphins and turtles and their environment, and this section considers their
behavioural response.
The primary issue associated with the proposed offshore vessels and seafloor mining is the
additional light and noise over ambient levels and above that of regular natural processes and
commercial (shipping and fishing) traffic to any extent that might be significant. The offshore
vessels and seafloor mining tool will operate 24 hours per day using artificial lighting at both the
surface (at night) and seafloor, which will have the potential to attract marine fauna including
seabirds, fish, squid and larger predatory species.
The operations of the SMT and the MSV will add to the natural existing noise levels of the ocean.
An assessment of the underwater noise characteristics of the project and results of numerical
modelling of underwater sound levels from operational activities are given in the Curtin University
Report (Appendix 13), and summarised here.
Of the sound sources involved in the project, the most significant will be the cavitation noise
produced by the thrusters on the MSV. Cavitation noise is well understood and predictable with
confidence from the size and power characteristics of the vessel. The exact characteristics of the
SMT are not known but likely to be low frequency sounds related to the rate that the cutting teeth
strike the rock face. Details of this source and likely decay rates are not known well enough to
model at this stage but will be modelled during prior to operations.
Solwara 1 Project

9-28

Surface Lighting
Decking lights on the surface vessels will be kept to the lowest levels needed to maintain safe
working conditions. In principle, this will be not materially different from lighting associated with
other vessels traversing the area and no adverse impacts to flora and fauna are therefore
predicted.
Seafloor Lighting
Illumination of the SMT will potentially attract fish or other mobile species in the area and place
these at risk of being sucked into the cutter head and the riser and lifting system, from which they
would not survive. Lighting must be aimed at illuminating the cutter head and there is limited
scope for altering its position or intensity. Most fish life will be attracted to the lights which will be
some metres away from the suction mouth and unlikely to place them at risk. Some accidental
entrainment of fish in the pumped ore stream may occur.
Underwater Noise
Noises associated with operations will likely to be generated by the SMT, surface support vessels
and the MSV principally when using its dynamic positioning thrusters. This is mostly unavoidable
during the normal course of operations. The implementation of a whale observing procedure will
require all observations and encounters with marine mammals to be documented in a log, which
will then be used to alert all other vessels. In the event of marine mammals approaching within
1 km of the MSV, the level of power to the thrusters will be reduced as far as practicable while
maintaining safety of the operation. The predicted broadband noise levels from the mining vessel
are less than 180 dB re 1!Pa at close range and therefore it is unlikely that these levels will cause
significant physiological effects to marine mammals unless they are immediately adjacent to the
vessel.
Residual Impacts
Subsequent to the implementation of the above mitigation measures, the predicted residual
impacts of this project are described as follows.
Lighting on the MSV at night will attract fish and other marine animals, although without
substantial adverse effects. Being so far offshore (30 km from New Ireland) the light is not likely to
affect orientation of turtles moving to or from nesting beaches. Lighting around the cutter head
may attract some fish and some individuals may be sucked into the riser system. Most suction at
the cutter head will be directed towards the rock face and the extent of the potential entrapment
area is small so that no impact to populations is likely.
Modelling of predicted noise associated with the project has assumed a basaltic, sound-reflective
seafloor surface and although softer and more sound-absorbing seafloor sediments occur, these
results give worst-case predictions (Appendix 13). Propagation of cavitation noise from the MSVs
thrusters will be the most significant source of noise; however, modelling indicates that received
levels will drop rapidly within the first 2 km, and more slowly thereafter. The sound may be audible
(e.g., to whales) at up to 600 km (a similar range as with other large ocean going vessels), but at
long ranges, the sound will not be greatly above that of background ocean noise depending on
sea surface conditions.
The maximum distances for specific received level thresholds being exceeded show that it would
not be until an animal approached closer than 1.1 km from the source that the levels would be
greater than 140 dB re 1!Pa (considered loud). Received levels are less than 180 dB re 1!Pa
Solwara 1 Project

9-29

(sufficient to cause detectable physiological effects) at very close range and drop to 160 dB re
1!Pa within 70 m; hence, harmful effect to whales is unlikely.
Responses of whales, based on worldwide literature, suggests behavioural avoidance at received
levels generally between 140 to 130 dB re 1!Pa, which is equivalent to distances ranging from
1.1 to around 15 km, although distances and responses varies on species and behaviour of the
whales at the time. These results are typical of modelled received level sounds with distance from
other applications such as offshore drilling (APPEA, 2005). Masking of marine animal calls
(signals) may occur if the mining vessel noise interrupts or prevents the listener from detecting the
communicative signal.
The operational noise associated with dynamic positioning of the mining vessel is continuous over
a wide frequency bandwidth. Animals may suffer signal-masking effects at similar ranges up to
approximately 15 km.
Actual risks to whales and other animals are reduced by a number of factors (Appendix 13). The
MSV is effectively static, which reduces risks of collisions and favours marine animals readily
acclimatising to them after a period of time. Sudden exposure to sound will not occur as the MSV
will be audible for considerable distance, and rapid changes of speed and direction of the MSV
will not occur. It is possible that some animals (including fish and whales) may be attracted to the
sound out of curiosity and through time the vessel may be treated as a landmark (Appendix 13).
The Project is effectively a single ship on the surface, with attendant barges and supply vessels
and, in that respect, has analogues in offshore oil and gas production and dredging projects in
many part of the world. The annual humpback whale migrations have continued off the east and
west coasts of Australia notwithstanding the extensive development of oil and gas facilities and
shipping that has developed off the west and east coasts of Australia respectively. Much has
been leant from the interactions between these offshore structures and whale behaviour (APPEA,
2005), none of which has indicated adverse impacts to whale populations or annual migrations
from these offshore structures and associated operations.
Consequently, seismic surveys in areas of potential activity of whales, turtle, dugongs or whale
sharks, such as off the Northwest shelf of Australia, are routinely approved provided means such
as onboard observations, minimisation of lights to the level necessary for safety of operations and
eduction of sound (in case of seismic) reduction (e.g., Enfield marine seismic survey proposed by
Woodside [DEWHA, 2008]). In principle and as applicable, these measures are also incorporated
into the operations of the MSV.
To a great extent, the exploration activities that have occurred over the past few years from
vessels such as the DP Hunter (December 2005 to February 2006), Wave Mercury (March 2007
to October 2007) and the Norsky (June 2008 and still in progress) represent similar aspects and
magnitudes of vessel presence, lighting, underwater sound and discharge of treated and
macerated food waste/sewage as expected for the MSV. The Wave Mercury is of very similar
dimensions and power as the MSV; hence, the impacts of the activities of surface vessel have
been experienced already over protracted periods, albeit without the SMT or the ore barging
operations.
Concern that underwater noise may affect other species such as sharks has also been expressed
by local people. The reported success (Tiden, 2008) of the West Coast, Central New Ireland
shark calling festival from 30 July to 1 August 2008 coincided with active survey by the Norsky in
the area, which suggests that the surface vessels activities or its underwater noise spectrum did
not negatively affect the reef sharks or shark calling.
Solwara 1 Project

9-30

9.7 Maritime Safety and Interactions with Shipping
Operation of the offshore phase of the project must meet company, national and international
standards of safety.
Weather and sea conditions present safety issues for the vessels engaged in offshore operation
activities. Strong winds and strong currents may periodically generate difficult sea states,
especially during the southeast trade wind season, and in the event of cyclones.
Installation of the MSV, from which the mining seafloor mining machine will be launched, the
operation of the shuttle barges, which will transfer ore to the storage facility in the Port of Rabaul,
and the bulk carriers that will export the ore, give rise to the following issues:
The stationary MSV will create a long-term obstacle, and the shuttle barges and bulk carriers
will add to offshore traffic, creating a short-term obstacle for other vessels.
MSV, shuttle barge vessels and bulk carriers will pose a hazard to small boats and sea-going
canoes if the latter approach too closely, especially when approaching and departing the Port
of Rabaul.
Project Safety
Offshore operations will be carried out to comply with:
Safety, health, and environment policies and plans for all offshore operations to be developed
by Nautilus and its contractors.
Applicable PNG occupational health and safety legislation.
Various DNV Offshore Standards (DNV, 2005), including:
DNV-OS-A101 Safety Principles and Arrangements, 2005.
DNV-OS-D101 Marine and Machinery Systems and Equipment, 2005.
DVN-OS-D301 Fire Protection, 2005.
Matching safety performance expectations to give effect to PNG legislation and international
standards will be established between Nautilus and its contractors, and these will be documented
in the EMP.
The MSV and shuttle barges will also be regularly inspected to assess their ability to work safely,
and to ensure the MSV can maintain its position in the sea conditions likely to be encountered.
Interaction with Other Vessels
The operations of the MSV are outside the main commercial tuna fishing grounds (see
Section 10.3.5), but the ore barge transit routes to the Port of Rabaul, are likely to intersect the
routes of the fishing vessels and other commercial vessels using the port. The physical presence
of the MSV and barges will be an unavoidable but minor obstacle to fishing and movement of
fishing vessels, as will be the case for other shipping in the region. The unlikely risk also has to be
considered that ghost fishing gear (fishing gear that has been accidentally lost or discarded from
fishing boats, including drift nets and long lines etc.) may be present and become tangled with the
Solwara 1 Project

9-31

RALS or umbilicals. The RALS and umbilicals will be regularly inspected to ensure that ghost
fishing gear, if entangled, is removed as soon as reasonably practical.
A buffer zone of 500 m will be established around the MSV for observance of all vessels. Normal
maritime navigational and communication systems and procedures are to be followed by the
MSV, shuttle barges and bulk carriers to ensure safety at sea. Where possible, the shuttle barges
will utilise existing shipping routes, limiting the possibility of collisions or interrupting the course of
other vessels. This exclusion zone will be communicated via notices to mariners in advance of the
MSV taking up its position. The MSV will have officers on watch at all times and to advise of any
specific activities or to warn ships potentially approaching within the exclusion zone. The small
area of ocean alienated to fishing around the MSV is not significant for highly migratory species
such as tuna.
A hazard may apply to villagers if, out of curiosity, their boats or canoes approach too close to the
offshore vessels. Such encounters are not likely to be frequent near the MSV, being 50 km
offshore from Rabaul, but they may occur for the shorter period when the shuttle barges, and to a
lesser degree, bulk carriers are closer to shore en route to the Port of Rabaul and within access of
the small boats. This is unlikely to be a new source of risk to local canoe movements, given the
current use of the Port of Rabaul for shipping. Nevertheless, villagers will be informed about the
presence and potential hazards of vessels.
The implementation of the mitigation measures described above will ensure that the risk of safety
hazards from operation activities will be reduced to be as low as practicable and consistent with
normal maritime operations.
9.8 Quarantine
A potential pathway for the introduction of non-native marine flora and fauna into PNG waters is
the presence of non-native organisms in ballast water or on the hulls of the vessels associated
with transporting ore or consumables (including packaging) and equipment to the Port of Rabaul
and to the offshore mine location.
Vessels entering the Bismarck Sea for project purposes may arrive under full ballast so there will
be a need to discharge ballast sourced from overseas ports. To minimise the impacts of
introducing foreign ballast water, vessels will adhere to MARPOL requirements (IMO,1973/1978)
to exchange ballast in mid ocean. Additional guidelines, developed as a basis for a new annex to
the MARPOL requirements, are included in Guidelines for the Control and Management of Ships'
Ballast Water to Minimise the Transfer of Harmful Aquatic Organisms and Pathogens (IMO,
1997), which are being implemented under the Global Ballast Water Management Program to
help developing countries understand the problem and monitor the situation. Another international
convention, the International Convention for the Control and Management of Ships Ballast Water
and Sediments (IMO, 2004) requires that new ships implement a Ballast Water Management
Plan.
Antifouling refers to substances applied to the hulls of vessels to prevent attachment and growth
of marine organisms that could affect the performance of the vessels and introduce exotic marine
organisms. The International Convention on the Control of Harmful Antifouling Systems on Ships
Solwara 1 Project

9-32

(IMO, 2001) contains protocols measures to minimise antifouling. However, the use of organotin
compounds in antifouling systems is being phased out because of its adverse environmental
effects and Nautilus will comply with proposed changes to Marine Pollution (Ships and
Installations) legislation in PNG in this regard. Alternative antifouling paint systems must therefore
be used to prevent introduction of exotic organisms and hull-antifouling records of vessels
entering PNG waters can be inspected by State authorities.
The carriers contracted by Nautilus must comply with the relevant conventions and guidelines,
along with consultation with PNG Ports in regards to PNG requirements including water exchange
locations and treatments. Information on vessel operators, destinations, routes and origin of
ballast water will be determined closer to mining; however, Nautilus will ensure that reputable
carriers that are aware of IMO guidelines and practice satisfactory ballast water and antifouling
management procedures during operations and that management plans are in place to address
the issues of introduction of exotic organisms in ballast or on cargo, and that antifouling systems
conform to PNG requirements and form part of contractual requirements.
Cargo and packaging (e.g., pallets) will be inspected for the presence of stray organisms (e.g.,
African land snails) to prevent unintended introduction of such pest animals. Any such animals
detected will be dispatched humanely.
To meet mining rates, between three and six bulk carriers will be required each month to export to
existing overseas concentrators. Typical ballast water tanks capacity for contemplated bulk
carriers would be in the range of 10,000 to 20,000 cum. Table 9.5 shows that approximations of
the minimum and maximum volume of ballast water to be discharged per year of operation are
360,000 m
3
and 1,440,000 m
3
, respectively.
Table 9.5 Estimates of ballast water discharge
Bulk Carrier Trips Per Month Ballast Water Volume
(cum)
Ballast Discharge Per Year
(cum)
10,000 360,000 3
20,000 720,000
10,000 720,000 6
20,000 1,440,000
With implementation of ballast water treatment, antifouling systems and adhesion to the relevant
guidelines and the conventions, low residual impacts are predicted in relation to the introduction
of non-native marine species from the discharge of ballast water, on the hulls of vessels or with
cargo involved in the operation the Project.
9.9 Waste Management and Emergency Response
This section describes how the Solwara 1 Project will manage wastes produced during operation
of both offshore and onshore aspects of the project.
Activities on the MSV, shuttle barges and bulk carriers include the handling and storage of
wastes, including domestic wastes and small quantities of wastes with hazardous properties that
could impact the marine environment. The description of the waste management strategy and
expected waste types is presented below.
Solwara 1 Project

9-33

Offshore Wastes
The types of wastes potentially generated by the offshore component of the project during
operation are listed below:
Used lubricating oils.
Oily debris, e.g., oil filters, oily rags from vehicle and equipment maintenance.
Accidental contamination, small-volume releases, spills or leaks of hydrocarbons and
chemicals.
Drilling fluids and cuttings.
Domestic waste or trash.
Domestic wastewater, sewage and sludge.
Empty barrels, drums, containers, and gas cylinders.
Batteries (lead acid and other types).
Construction debris, e.g., wood, metal, glass, insulation.
Ash from waste incinerators.
Unused, spent, expired and contaminated solvents, chemicals, and additives.
Medical wastes.
Scrap metal.
Onshore Wastes
In order to accommodate the anticipated production rates, on-land storage and export facilities
are envisaged for the project, consisting of ore storage and berthing and loading of export vessels
at the Port of Rabaul. Waste management at the port will be coordinated by PNG Ports
Corporation Limited. The types of wastes potentially generated by the onshore component of the
project during operation are listed below:
Used lubricating oils.
Oily debris, e.g., oil filters, oily rags from vehicle and equipment maintenance.
Contaminated soil as a result of accidental, small-volume releases, spills or leaks of
hydrocarbons and chemicals.
Domestic waste or trash.
Domestic wastewater, sewage and sludge.
Empty barrels, drums, containers, and gas cylinders.
Batteries (lead acid and other types).
Construction debris, e.g., wood, metal, glass, insulation.
Ash from waste incinerators.
Solwara 1 Project

9-34

Unused, spent, expired and contaminated solvents, chemicals, and additives.
Medical wastes.
Stormwater from under or around operating equipment (potentially contaminated with
hydrocarbons).
Paint.
Plastic.
Scrap metal.
Tyres.
Conventions, Legislation and Principles
Conventions, legislation and principles (see Chapter 3) relevant to the Projects waste
management strategy are listed below. Nautilus is committed to developing a waste management
plan for the generation of offshore and onshore waste that is consistent with the documents
below, and in line with current leading practices.
International Maritime Conventions
United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS)
UNCLOS is a multilateral agreement on the law of the sea, in particular, the protection and
preservation of the marine environment.
International Convention for the Safety of Life at Sea (SOLAS)
International Maritime Organisation (IMO) has developed the International Convention for the
Safety of Life at Sea (SOLAS), a treaty that deals with maritime safety.
IMO has also developed and adopted international collision regulations and global standards for
seafarers, as well as international conventions and codes relating to search and rescue, the
facilitation of international maritime traffic, load lines, the carriage of dangerous goods and
tonnage measurement.
MARPOL 1973/1978 Convention
The MARPOL convention is the main international convention covering prevention of pollution of
the marine environment by ships from operational or accidental causes. Currently the convention
includes six technical annexes:
Annex I Regulations for the Prevention of Pollution by Oil.
Annex II Regulations for the Control of Pollution by Noxious Liquid Substances in Bulk.
Annex III Prevention of Pollution by Harmful Substances Carried by Sea in Packaged Form.
Annex IV Prevention of Pollution by Sewage from Ships.
Annex V Prevention of Pollution by Garbage from Ships.
Annex VI Prevention of Air Pollution from Ships.
Papua New Guinea has ratified annexes I, II, III, IV, and VI of the MARPOL Convention, which
include regulations aimed at preventing and minimising pollution from vessels, including dumping,
oil, exhaust pollution and both accidental pollution and from routine operations.
Solwara 1 Project

9-35

PNG Legislation
Papua New Guinea National Maritime Safety Authority
Existing legislation relevant to waste management of the Project includes:
Dumping of Wastes at Sea Act 1979 places restrictions on the dumping of waste at sea.
Prevention of Pollution at Sea Act 1979 (Chapter 369) provides standard offshore operating
requirements.
Drafts of two new bills relevant to the Project, designed to bring PNG into line with international
standards, are currently available for public comment. The bills were developed by the National
Maritime Safety Authority (NMSA) in PNG for the prevention and control of marine pollution from
vessels, offshore installations and other maritime sources.
Descriptions of the two new bills are detailed below:
Marine Pollution (Ships and Installations) Bill designed to regulate all forms of marine
pollution from ships and offshore installations, and implements the MARPOL Convention and
Anti-Fouling Systems (AFS) Convention. This Bill is designed to repeal the Dumping of Wastes
at Sea Act 1979.
Marine Pollution (Sea Dumping) Bill designed to regulate the dumping of wastes at sea and
implements the London Dumping Protocol. This Bill is designed to repeal the Prevention of
Pollution at Sea Act 1979 and Prevention of Pollution at Sea Regulation.
Another new act may also be developed to implement the IMO Ballast Water Convention in PNG.
Nevertheless, Nautilus intend to take measures to ensure that the risk of marine pest
introductions via ballast water from ships entering the Bismarck Sea is minimised and that
comprehensive risk-based ballast water management arrangements are in place (see
Section 9.8).
Equator Principles
Equator principles that apply to the waste management strategy adopted by the Solwara 1 Project
are as follows:
Waste management.
Wastewater and ambient water quality.
Hazardous materials management.
Waste Management
A waste management procedure will be developed to ensure that all hazardous and dangerous
goods that will be used on the vessels, including diesel fuel, oxy-acetylene gas (for welding),
lubricants, hydraulic fluids, solvents, corrosion inhibitors are used in areas where deck drainage is
directed to oil/water separators and treatment tanks, and waste products are transported to shore
and disposed of in accordance with the MARPOL international standards (IMO,1973/1978)
governing the transport, handling and disposal of hazardous and dangerous goods.
Domestic wastes (i.e., kitchen scraps) will be treated by maceration before discharge (into
international waters >3 nautical miles from shore). Sewage and grey water are to treated in
accordance with MARPOL requirements by comminution and disinfection (via a certified
Solwara 1 Project

9-36

treatment plant onboard) prior to being discharged, and will not cause visible floating solids or
discolouration of the surrounding waters.
Discharge of garbage, including victual, domestic and operational waste, including all forms of
plastic waste, packaging, scrap wood and cargo lining is prohibited under MARPOL (1973/1978)
and all such material will be brought to shore for appropriate disposal at the Port of Rabaul, where
suitable waste disposal facilities exist. Waste from the vessels will be disposed of by the PNG
National Agricultural Quarantine and Inspection Authority, who have a specialised waste disposal
plant outside of the port area. Solids waste from the port will be disposed of by the town
authoritys existing waste disposal process.
The vessels employed in the offshore operations of the Project are to store, use and handle all
hazardous chemicals and materials in accordance with MARPOL (1973/1978) requirements. This
will include:
The development of a hazardous materials register.
Separate storage of paints and other flammable materials.
Wastes produced by the MSV, shuttle barges and bulk carriers will be stored on board and
then transferred to approved onshore facilities for treatment, reuse, recycling or disposal.
Waste Management Strategy
The project and its contractors will comply with applicable PNG legislative requirements, including
the proposed marine pollution bills, related to the management of wastes (see above), and
appropriate industry waste management standards and practices will be implemented in the
absence of such requirements.
The projects waste management objectives, which apply to both offshore and onshore
components, are as follows:
Where possible, utilise to the maximum extent the waste management facilities or capabilities.
Establish and operate new fit-for-purpose waste management facilities or capabilities to
augment the existing facilities and capabilities.
Optimise the selection and use of materials in order to avoid or reduce the production of
wastes.
Reuse or recycle certain waste materials to the extent practical.
Properly and prudently treat or dispose of non-reusable or non-recyclable wastes and waste
treatment residues.
Classify or characterise wastes, and then store, handle, transport, and track wastes
appropriately.
This waste management strategy will evolve into waste management plans that will be
incorporated into the Environmental Management Plan. These waste management plans will
feature the following:
Solwara 1 Project

9-37

Waste characterisation criteria.
Overall waste storage, inventory, transportation, and tracking requirements. A waste-by-waste
listing including:
Definition of the waste type and source.
Waste-specific storage, handling, and transportation requirements, including safety
considerations.
Reuse or recycling and treatment options (if appropriate).
Waste disposal options.
Emergency Response Spill Contingency Planning
Personnel on the offshore vessels are to be inducted into the relevant contractors environment,
health and safety policies, and emergency response procedures (approved by Nautilus)
pertaining to the offshore activities.
Emergency (spill) response procedures will be developed and implemented in the event of a spill
and these will include:
Spill prevention procedures for the most likely situations (refuelling, routine operations).
An active spill trajectory model to estimate direction of travel, distance, time and weathered
fate of under ambient conditions of any fuel or other oils that may be spilled, such that
application of retaining and clean-up equipment can be most effective.
Allocated responsibilities and lines of communication in the event of any spills.
Booms will be available for oil spills.
Inductions (for all on-board personnel) regarding responsibilities and lines of communication
related to spill response.
Availability of appropriate containment and clean-up equipment (on board MSV and in Port of
Rabaul, as appropriate) to prevent and respond to spills.
Training for those workers responsible for implementing emergency procedures.
Details related to emergency response and spill contingency planning and capabilities will be
provided in the offshore Environmental Management Plan.
Cleaner Production and Energy Balance
The MSV is brand new and offers a state of the art design for the project, as is all mining
equipment to be used. The latest and best technologies for energy efficiency will therefore be
incorporated into the vessels design.
The shuttle barges and bulk carriers will be surveyed prior to use in the Project, as will all onshore
infrastructure, to ensure that energy efficiencies are in line with leading practice standards.
Residual impacts after implementation of the waste management procedures for wastes
generated during offshore operations will be limited to the discharge of treated sewage and
macerated kitchen wastes into offshore waters. These discharges will be rapidly diluted and will
Solwara 1 Project

9-38

result in only extremely localised and very short-duration impacts to water quality. Nutrients will
cause some localised increase of phytoplankton and zooplankton and organisms feeding on
these but this is not likely to have any detectable effect on the pelagic ecosystem of the Project
area.
9.10 Port of Rabaul
Nautilus will enter a Heads of Agreement (HOA) with the PNG Ports Corporation Ltd (Ports
Corporation) to manage all Project-related activities proposed for the Port of Rabaul. Nautilus will,
however, undertake regular audits of the port to ensure that onshore infrastructure is designed,
constructed and operated in accordance with appropriate standards (see Chapter 3) and the
environmental management measures provided in this section are implemented.
9.10.1 Marine Environment
Pollution of the marine environment can arise from hydrocarbon and chemical spills or
inappropriate disposal of waste. The risk of pollution and product spillage is likely to be greater
around areas such as refuelling stations and loading/unloading areas.
Increased water turbidity may result from water runoff from the stockpile escaping into the
environment, increased shipping movements and any berth upgrades or dredging that may be
required in the future. Water turbidity can decrease light penetration through the water column
and decrease phytoplankton and zooplankton productivity.
There is the potential for acid generation through the oxidation of any sulphidic materials in
stockpiled ore. This can result in runoff of low pH (acidic) water from the stockpile. Acid
generation increases the potential for heavy metals to leach from the ore and the runoff often
carries dissolved heavy metals, such as copper and zinc, which can be toxic to many marine
organisms.
To prevent discharge of hydrocarbons or contaminated water, fuel and other hydrocarbons will be
stored in appropriately sized, lined and bunded areas. A designated refuelling area will be
established in order to contain potential hydrocarbon spillages. A spill response procedure will be
developed and spill containment and recovery spill equipment will be kept at the port.
Waste from ships will be managed in accordance with MARPOL 73/78 Convention and the
Protection of the Sea (Prevention of Pollution from Ships) Act 1983, which states that no disposal
of food wastes or untreated sanitary wastes shall take place within 12 nautical miles of land and
no disposal of treated sewage shall take place within 3 nautical miles of land (see Section 9.9 for
more information).
To prevent acid generation, stockpiles will be covered to limit exposure to wind and rainfall (see
Plate 5.4 and Section 5.7.2). Clean water runoff will be diverted away from the stockpiles and
drainage from the stockpiles will be directed into a bund and channel to enable monitoring and
treatment, if necessary. Any contaminated runoff will be neutralised (most likely via lime dosing)
and solids returned to stockpiles. Water will be discharged to Simpson Harbour after being treated
to applicable water quality standards (i.e., ANZECC/ARMCANZ (2000)) or returned to the MSV
for combination with the dewatering plant discharge at depth after treatment.
Solwara 1 Project

9-39

Baseline monitoring of marine water and sediment quality will be undertaken for a minimum of
12 months before operations. Regular marine water and sediment quality monitoring will be
undertaken during operations and records kept of any contaminant releases to the marine
environment.
Residual Impacts
Given the management measures described above, it is considered unlikely that a hydrocarbon or
chemical spill will occur. The consequence of such an event, if it were to occur, is expected to be
minor, since it would most likely be localised, small in size and of negligible significance beyond
the immediate environs of the port area.
Given that the maximum period ore will be stockpiled at the port is approximately four weeks, it is
likely that management of the covered stockpiles will avoid the generation of acid. In the event
that acid generation does occur and report to the marine environment, the severity of the impact
is expected to be low due to the low volumes likely to be generated.
9.10.2 Landform, Soils and Geology
The stockpiled ore has the potential to leach heavy metals, which could result in soil and
groundwater contamination.
Management Measures
Before the commencement of operations, geochemical characterisation of the ore will be
undertaken to assess the risk of impacts associated with acidification of the stockpiled ore. All
stockpile areas will be constructed from compacted clay or other low-permeability, nonacid-
generating or acid-consuming materials to minimise infiltration into the underlying substrate.
Residual Impacts
Residual impacts on landforms, soils and geology are anticipated to be negligible.
9.10.3 Noise
Noise impacts from handling and loading activities at the port have the potential to disrupt the
amenity of surrounding sensitive receptors. The closest sensitive receptor to the port has been
identified as a house approximately 60 m from the ore stockpile area.
The equipment associated with the most dominant Project-related noise sources at the port
(conveyor drives on the shiploader and shiploader compressor) will be carefully designed to
reduce operational noise.
Non-Project shiploading and unloading activities currently occur 24 hours/day and the incremental
increase to night-time activities at the port due to the Project is not expected to be detectable.
However, a complaints register will be implemented and any noise-related complaints will be
investigated and, if deemed to be valid and caused by Project activities, operation procedures will
be reviewed.
Solwara 1 Project

9-40

Residual Impacts
Noise impacts from construction activities at the port are expected to be moderate. Equipment
when operating may be heard by nearby residents; however, as there are already industrial noise
sources in the area, the level of disruption to local residents is not anticipated to be noticeable.
9.10.4 Air Quality
Dust may be generated during ore handling and storage at the Port of Rabaul. Additionally, ore
transport vessels and onshore ore handling equipment will release both sulphur dioxide (SO
2
) and
oxides of nitrogen (NO
X
) into the atmosphere.
The potential exists for dust and air emissions to impact health and amenity, particularly at the
nearest sensitive receiver, located 60 m from onshore activities.
Management Measures
A Dust Management Plan will be included in the Operations EMP and will outline all mitigation
measures to be undertaken to control dust emissions. Measures will include:
Covers on all stockpiles to prevent entrainment by wind.
If necessary, water-spray dust suppression at transfer points, including shiploading. However,
it is not envisaged that this will be required as the ore will remain moist from the time it is
transferred to shore until the time it is exported on bulk carriers.
Limiting activities generating high dust levels (e.g., ore transfer) in adverse wind conditions.
All vessels, vehicles and machinery involved in Project-related activities at the Port of Rabaul will
be regularly serviced and fitted with appropriate exhaust systems to minimise the volumes of SO
2

and NO
X
emitted to the atmosphere.
Residual Impacts
The increased dust associated with the port operations is expected to have a negligible impact on
nearby receptors due to the existing high background particulate matter associated with the
nearby volcanic activity, the small amounts of ore being stored at any one time and the
management measures that will be put in place.
While not quantified, onshore activities are not expected to increase levels of SO
2
and NO
X
at the
port above existing levels.

Solwara 1 Project

10-1

10. SOCIOECONOMIC IMPACTS AND MITIGATION
AND MANAGEMENT
This chapter provides a summary of the socioeconomic impacts (both positive and negative) of
the first phase of the Solwara 1 Project. Mitigation measures proposed by the Project are also
described.
Due to the majority of Phase 1 Project activities being located offshore, few direct socioeconomic
impacts are expected. Onshore components of the Project will be associated with existing
commercial facilities at the Port of Rabaul. No components of the Project will be located on
customary or alienated land that is occupied or used by descendents of the former customary
owners.
Impacts for the Project are centred on:
Employment and training opportunities (for both genders).
Opportunities to support the Project through the provision of goods and services.
The potential for employees to interact with the community during crew shift changeover.
The distribution of beneficial streams, i.e., taxes and royalties.
Resource use (both nearshore and offshore) in the Bismarck Sea.
The Papua New Guinea Millennium Goals Progress Report (UN, 2004) highlights that, while the
New Ireland and East New Britain provinces are performing reasonably well with respect to the
goals (Section 8.1.6), there is large disparity between provinces and overall Papua New Guinea is
unlikely to achieve the millennium goals by the target date of 2015. The country, therefore, faces
development challenges, especially since the population is growing quickly and there are limited
resources to invest in health, education and job creation to support the increasing population.
External financing provides a very large proportion of financial resources available for the support
and facilitation of the governments development program.
The Project will provide the government revenue through royalties and taxes (Section 10.3.1) and
establishment of the Community Development Fund that will support existing provincial
development projects in New Ireland and the island provinces (Section 10.3.2).
10.1 Issues to be Addressed
Many socioeconomic and sociocultural issues that are normally associated with terrestrial mining
projects are absent from the Solwara 1 Project as the majority of Project activities will occur at
sea and not be located on occupied land. Additionally, land-based Project activities in Rabaul will
be limited within the confines of the Port of Rabaul, which is an existing development located on
alienated land and is not accessible by the public. Therefore, the Project will not cause the
displacement of people from their land or alter existing land use practices.
The positive socioeconomic aspects of the Solwara 1 Project relate to the income, services and
personal opportunities that development brings. On the negative side are the effects that these
changes can bring to social organisation, in terms of conflicts over the distribution of benefits or
between people in the areas adjacent to the Project and those living outside.
Solwara 1 Project

10-2

Positive socioeconomic aspects of the Solwara 1 Project include:
Economic benefits to the national and provincial economies through the payment of royalties
and taxes.
Economic benefits to local business that support the Project through the provision of goods
and services.
Community development through company support of community programs in the health and
education sectors.
Increased industry diversity for PNG and development of specialised knowledge and skills that
can be shared with other Pacific Nations where future seafloor mining projects may occur.
Training associated with employment of PNG nationals on the Project.
Potential negatives relevant throughout the Project include:
Ineffective distribution of benefits.
Conflict between employees from areas outside the immediately adjacent Project area and the
local community at shift changeovers. Conflict would potentially result from a lack of
awareness of environmental and social sensitivities in the area.
In-migration of people from other parts of New Ireland, East New Britain and other parts of
PNG to Rabaul and Kavieng seeking employment (either directly with Nautilus or indirectly
through service providers). Increased in-migration has the potential to:
Reduce the opportunity for local people to gain employment.
Cause disruptive social tensions.
Overwhelm existing social and economic infrastructure.
Disruption to fishing activities and other vessels operating in the vicinity of Solwara 1 and
Project marine transport corridors.
Danger to local peoples fishing around mining vessels.
Disruption to local customs (for example, shark calling).
As the major components for Phase 1 of the Project are located offshore, minimal socioeconomic
impacts are expected to result from the Project. However, based on other larger projects in PNG,
local impacts are expected to arise from:
Employment created during the operational phase of the Project.
Business opportunities generated by the supply of goods and services, such as fuel, security
and catering services.
Subsidiary employment and business opportunities arising from expenditure of incomes
earned from Project employees.
Solwara 1 Project

10-3

10.2 Mitigation and Management Measures
10.2.1 Optimisation of Benefits
Nautilus will aim to optimise the socioeconomic benefits resulting from the Project by:
Establishing a Community Development Fund to support existing and proposed provincial
government health and education projects in New Ireland and other island provinces (see
Section 10.3.2).
Continue to put a high emphasis on stakeholder consultation to foster and maintain good
relationships with stakeholders.
Continue to offer skills development-based scholarships to people from PNG organisations
such as universities and government agencies (see Section 10.3.3).
Indirect benefits to the PNG economy may arise from the multiplier effects of money spent within
the local economy by various Project income recipients. An unpublished and confidential socio-
economic impact assessment for another project in PNG estimated that, for every one Kina
increase in spending in the local economy, total income might increase by an additional 0.7 Kina.
10.2.2 Management and Mitigation
Mitigation and management measures will include:
The development and implementation of a cultural awareness program for employees. The
program will include a formal community awareness program induction on arrival at the
workplace and distribution of a community awareness booklet that emphasises the rules for
employees and contractors. This booklet will be available in both English and Tok Pisin and
will provide descriptions of:
The Project and its environmental and social setting.
The Companys environmental policy.
The local culture, beliefs and customs.
The rules for employees, and the consequences of breaching these rules.
Direct transfer of fly in/fly out employees from airports to the crew boat or vessel to eliminate
the need for overnight accommodation in Rabaul or Kavieng. This will minimise the potential
for interaction between outsider employees and the local communities.
Preparation of a Training Associated Plan that provides general principles for employment and
training. The plan will seek to maximise employment opportunities for local labour, i.e., New
Ireland Province, before looking at others from further afield.
Measures to manage possible interactions between fishing and other vessels operating near the
Project area will include:
Establishment of a 500-m-radius exclusion zone around the MSV
1
.

1
Various acts (e.g., the Australian Offshore Petroleum Act 2006 and United Kingdom Petroleum Act 1987) suggest a
minimum 500-m exclusion zone around permanent offshore oil and gas facilities to avoid ship collision.
Solwara 1 Project

10-4

Installation of appropriate devices on the MSV to allow monitoring of and communication with
approaching vessels.
Regular communication with PNGs National Maritime Safety Authority and National Fisheries
Authority to advise on Project activities and planned vessel movements.
Revision of nautical charts (in consultation with PNGs National Maritime Safety Authority) to
include the location of the MSV, the mining leases, associated exclusion zones around these
two locations, and routine shipping routes to be used by the Project.
10.3 Residual Impacts
10.3.1 Economic
Benefit streams generated by the Project have the potential to enhance the quality of life of the
general populace of PNG, particularly in New Ireland and East New Britain. The State will capture
a share of profit and labour income via royalties and taxes. Total tax, duties and royalty receipts
are estimated at approximately US$40.8 million over the nominal life of the Project. The New
Ireland and other island provincial governments will receive funding for health and education
projects from a voluntary Community Development Fund to be established by Nautilus
(Section 10.3.2). The major government benefit streams are described below.
Royalties: Royalties are paid at 2% of the net smelter returns of mine products exported from
PNG. This is estimated at US$23.2 million over the life of the Project. The royalty is shared
between the national and provincial governments according to negotiated agreements, usually
agreed upon during the Development Forum.
Taxes: Company tax will be paid on the profits of the company at a rate of 30%. However, as the
Project is largely seen as a proof of concept and taking into account the current carried losses, it
is expected that no company tax will be payable during the life of the Project.
Salary tax will be levied on the wages paid during operations. Gross wages expected to be paid to
PNG citizens over the the Project are US$6 million. Assuming a tax rate of 30%, a total of
US$1.8 million will be paid in salary and wages tax.
Taxes paid by expatriate and company withholding taxes have not been modelled at present, and
are awaiting Treasury input.
Production Levy: Under the Mining Act 1992 (Section 3.1.1), mineral producers are required to
pay a Production Levy of 0.25% of assessable income. This levy is the principal funding for the
Mineral Resources Authority (MRA). The MRA manages and implements mining sector related
Public Investment Programme (PIP) projects approved by the State (MRA, 2007).
Fuel Excise Tax: Nautilus expecs to pay approximately PGK500,000 in fuel excise taxes every
year.
Value Added Tax: PNG has a single rate value added tax (VAT) of 10% that is collected by
customs when goods are imported into the country.
Solwara 1 Project

10-5

Community Development Fund: Two kina for every tonne of ore mined will be paid into a
community development fund. This is a voluntary fund being established by Nautilus, and will be
used to support health and education projects in New Ireland and other island provinces (see
Section 10.3.2). Nautilus will administer the fund, with advice provided from an independent
committee.
Total direct economic benefits to PNG associated with the Solwara 1 Project are projected to be
approximately US$142 million over the anticipated life of the Project. This income has the
potential to improve social and economic welfare in PNG.
Due to the fact that key Project workforce and activities will be located offshore, the potential for
local people to develop Project-associated businesses is considered to be limited in the first
instance. However, some opportunities for commercial development in towns such as Kaiveng
and Rabaul (where support services such catering, laundry and accommodation are likely to be
sought) are expected to result from the Project.
Import Duties: The Companys operations will primarily be related to mining operations and as
such the impact of import duties is expected to minimal.
10.3.2 Community Development Fund
Nautilus has evolved a Community Development Fund under which it will work with the provincial
governments of New Ireland and other island provinces to identify community priorities, and to
create opportunities for improved quality of life through the provision of health and education
services. To this end Nautilus will pay PGK2 per tonne of ore mined into the trust, which will be
managed by Nautilus.
Requests for funding of projects will be reviewed by an independent committee established by
Nautilus, namely the Community Development Advisory Committee (CDAC). Committee
members will consist of provincial government, church, industry and PNG-based NGO groups.
Funding recommendations will be submitted to Nautilus for consideration.
Preference will be given to projects which are:
Based in New Ireland Province.
Based in island provinces, i.e., East New Britain and thereafter other selected islands.
Part of existing provincial government development projects and leveraging funding from other
sources (e.g., provincial or national government or international aid organisations).
It is anticipated that a total of PGK5.8 million will be paid into the fund over the Project life and be
available for development projects.
10.3.3 Industry Diversity and Skills Development
It is anticipated that PNG nationals will be trained and receive skills development, with an
expectation that the number of PNG nationals employed by the Project will increase over time.
Nautilus is committed to an active training program for the Solwara 1 Project. This program will be
focused on enhancing the employment benefits for PNG and providing training for the people of
Solwara 1 Project

10-6

PNG in this new industry, whilst maintaining the long-term international competitiveness and
success of the Project.
10.3.4 In-migration and Community Conflicts
When the Project proceeds, some in-migration to Kavieng and Rabaul will likely occur, even if the
strategies proposed in the Training Associated Plan are effective. This has the potential to create
added pressures on social and economic infrastructure and to cause disruptive social tensions,
especially if migrants fail to procure employment with Nautilus.
Nautilus recruitment policy will assist in deterring non-local people moving to Rabaul and Kavieng
with the expectation of employment with the Project. Therefore, it is not expected that migrants
will reduce the opportunity for local people to gain employment. Nautilus will work with local and
district authorities to monitor in-migration and, if required, seek ways of improving its
management.
Interaction between outside employees and local communities is inevitable. However,
implementation of the above measures will minimise the potential for conflict.
10.3.5 Fisheries and Marine Traffic
Commercial Fisheries
The long-term presence of the MSV at Solwara 1, and the associated 500-m exclusion zone, may
cause some inconvenience to the PNG local purse seine fishery (as it focuses its fishing efforts in
the Bismarck Sea). However, the exclusion zone is negligible in size when compared to existing
Bismarck Sea purse seine fishing grounds. Therefore, any inconvenience experienced by the
commercial fleets operating in the Bismarck Sea relating to restriction of movement and fishing
areas is also expected to be negligible.
Other fishing fleets operating in PNG, i.e., international purse seine and the PNG long-line fleets,
do not focus their fishing effort in the eastern extent of the Bismarck Sea and the Project is not
expected to have any impact on their operations.
Subsistence Fisheries
When operating at Solwara 1, the MSV will be located some 30 km from New Ireland landfall and
40 km from East New Britain landfall (the Duke of York Islands are approximately 50 km distance
from Solwara 1). Subsistence and small-scale coastal fishing activities are restricted to waters
close to shore and no fishing is expected to occur at Solwara 1. Therefore no adverse effects due
to interference with subsistence fishing vessels is anticipated.
Modelling has shown that plumes from the return seawater will not rise above than 1,300 m in the
water column (see Chapter 9). The processes of mining and dewatering will therefore not affect
the pelagic tunas, tuna fisheries or nearshore coral reefs, including traditional reef fishing
activities such as shark calling.
Solwara 1 Project

10-7

Marine Traffic
The implementation of the mitigation measures described above will ensure that the disruption to
marine traffic from Project activities will be kept to a minimum. Overall impact on marine traffic
from the Project is anticipated to be low.
Solwara 1 Project

10-8

Solwara 1 Project

11-1

11. ACCIDENTAL EVENTS AND NATURAL HAZARDS
11.1 General
Environmentally hazardous discharges resulting from accidental and extreme natural events are
fundamentally different from normal operational discharges of wastes and waste waters described
previously in Chapter 9. The probability of accidental events is low, given that the design, which
factors in the requirements of relevant technical codes and operating and control measures
adopted by Nautilus, will have the specific aim of their prevention. Similarly, natural occurrences
of sufficient magnitude to cause significant damage to Project infrastructure have a low probability
of occurrence over the life of the Project.
Nevertheless, both accidental and natural events can occur and the main risks have been
assessed. Should accidental events and natural hazards occur, Nautilus resources will be
mobilised in accordance with their emergency plans to respond to the event. Other general
safeguards that will be adopted by Nautilus include:
Induction training and regular refresher courses that address site safety and emergency
procedures in the event of an accident or natural hazard.
Government notification and liaison procedures in the event of an accidental event or natural
hazard.
The following sections provide an initial assessment of specific events and their associated main
risks, mitigation and management measures and emergency control procedures, drawing
predominantly on Appendix 14.
Note that occupational, health and safety issues associated with accidental events and natural
hazards are not addressed in this chapter.
11.2 Extreme Weather
Gale force winds and rough seas associated with extreme weather increase the risks associated
with the offshore component of the Solwara 1 Project. Operating during such conditions adds
another level of difficulty to standard operating procedures and increases the potential for injury,
damage to vessels and equipment and spillage of hydrocarbons and ore during transfer.
Equipment has been designed such that mining activities at Solwara 1 can be undertaken in
conditions up to sea state 5 (see Section 5.6.3), but not in conditions exceeding this state.
The main mitigation measure during extreme weather will be to suspend operations, a decision
that will be made in conjunction with the Nautilus site representative and the Mining
Superintendent based on weather reports, alerts and the prevailing conditions. Other mitigation
measures will include:
Solwara 1 Project

11-2

Depending on the duration and severity of the event, recovery of all seafloor equipment for
safe storage on the MSV.
Turning the MSV, shuttle barges and tugs toward oncoming weather to minimise the cross-
sectional hull area exposed to prevailing conditions, thereby minimising movement and
protecting vessels.
Securing the vessels and waiting for the event to pass. The vessels will either sail to the
nearest safe port or stand by at Solwara 1.
Maintaining safe distances between vessels during extreme weather conditions.
The suspension of operations and implementation of the measures described in Section 11.2.2
will minimise the potential for uncontrolled releases of contaminants, such as hydrocarbons, into
the marine environment.
11.3 Seismicity, Volcanism and Tsunamis
The greatest potential environmental implications for the Project specifically the onshore
component following a major earthquake would likely arise from an associated tsunami or from
infrastructure damage at the Port of Rabaul, e.g., to roads, the wharf, ore handling systems and
hydrocarbon storages, with possible disruptions to operations. Similarly, volcanic eruptions have
the potential to cause damage to onshore infrastructure (and, to a much lesser extent, Project
components at Solwara 1) and may disrupt port operations due to lava flows, through the
accumulation of ash that, due to a high sulphur content, can be corrosive when wet and as hard
as cement when dry, or pumice floating in the harbour preventing vessel access. Specific
environmental impacts to downstream water quality due to an adverse release of trace metals
and hydrocarbons include:
Uncontrolled releases of hydrocarbons due to the failure or flooding of storages.
Formation of acidic runoff from the exposure of oxidised ore to water (either through damage
to, or failure of, ore storage areas or transport system).
The primary issue associated with trace metals and hydrocarbons is a toxicological one, i.e.,
impacts on water quality and to marine fauna.
Some local communities around the Bismarck Sea have expressed concern that the extraction of
minerals could trigger volcanic activity, earthquakes and tsunamis. These concerns relate to the
possibility of extraction uncovering a shallow magma body or destabilising the local stress regime
causing the depression (the weakening of pressures) of a deeper magma body or activating faults
leading to seismic activity. It is perceived that any of these events could then cause a tsunami.
Solwara 1 Project

11-3

Seismicity
Nautilus will enter a Heads of Agreement (HOA) with the PNG Ports Corporation Ltd (Ports
Corporation) for activities at the Port of Rabaul. While the Ports Corporation will be responsible for
infrastructure, operations and maintenance at the port, Nautilus will undertake a facility due
diligence to ensure that short- and long-term stability analyses under static and earthquake
conditions have been undertaken and that onshore infrastructure are designed, constructed and
operated in accordance with appropriate standards, e.g., bunding, and suggested methods for the
structural design of the relevant seismic zone as defined in Section 7.1.1.
The Nautilus review will also address the ports operating plans for the transport, storage and
handling of hazardous (hydrocarbons and chemicals) materials and management of site drainage
to ensure that any off-site release of water is not contaminated and meets Schedule 1 of the
Environment (Water Quality Criteria) Regulation 2002 (Independent State of Papua New Guinea,
2002) for the protection of ambient water quality.
Volcanism
Nautilus will review the Ports Corporations operating procedures and management plans to
check that the management of sediment, drainage and air quality are in accordance with relevant
guidelines and standards adopted by the Project that are set out in Chapter 3. The review will
specifically include the ports maintenance schedule to ensure that volcanic ash is regularly
cleaned off infrastructure, especially that which has moving parts, e.g., conveyors, and that
storages are regularly inspected for corrosion. The due diligence will also ensure that there is an
adequate system for managing maintenance work identified from inspections.
A rise in water level associated with volcanic lava flows will be managed the same way as
inundation from a tsunami (see Tsunamis below).
Tsunamis
Emergency procedures will be implemented at Solwara 1 and the Port of Rabaul in the event of a
tsunami.
The depth of water at Solwara 1 is expected to mitigate the effect of a tsunami offshore; however,
depending on the tsunami alert level, Nautilus will implement emergency procedures, based on
the emergency response plan, in the event that the Vessel Master decides to suspend operations,
and possibly cut the SMT umbilical and steer the MSV out into deeper water. The procedures will
also address hydrocarbon spills that may result from a collision between the MSV, shuttle barges
or tugs, caused by a tsunami or extreme weather (see Section 11.2 and Section 11.4).
As described in Seismicity above, a due diligence will be completed to assess the adequacy of
the ports infrastructure and operating procedures, especially secondary containment capacity in
the event of flooding, the extent of which has varied at Rabaul with past tsunami events (see
Section 7.1.3). A similar exercise will be completed for the Ports Corporations emergency
response plan with which Nautilus will comply when operating within Simpson Harbour. Nautilus
own emergency response plan will be implemented in the event of a tsunami when the shuttle
barges and tugs are operating in shallow water beyond the harbour.
Solwara 1 Project

11-4

Seismicity
There are various sites around the world where subaerial mining has induced seismic events,
e.g., Book Cliffs coal mines, Utah. These occur when the local elastic stress regime has been
changed by the loading or unloading of large volumes of rock or changing hydrostatic pore-
pressures and are not related to seismic activity associated with volcanism or faulting. It is
unlikely that seafloor mining at Solwara 1 will induce a seismic event as:
The area is naturally very seismically active so stresses have not built up in the rocks.
There are favourable unloading differentials in an aqueous environment. Material will only be
removed in 1-m-thick swathes at a time (to a maximum depth of 220 m), where 1 m
3
of
material is replaced by 1,000 kg of water resulting in a density differential of less than 2:1,
which is stable compared to a subaerial differential of 1,500:1, where air replaces the material.
Changes in hydrostatic pore-pressure are not going to occur at depths of 1,500 m. No
dewatering is required at the point of extraction and the mining equipment is deigned to
operate submerged with the ambient pressures encountered at the seafloor.
The mitigation and management measures described in Section 11.3.2, Seismicity, for normal
operating conditions, will help to minimise onshore, and consequent offshore, environmental
impacts associated with an earthquake, e.g., release of non-compliant water containing
hydrocarbons or elevated metals (Section 11.4.3).
Volcanism
Volcanic activity is caused by the rise of molten rock and gases from depth to the earths surface.
The violence of these eruptions is controlled by the decompression of dissolved gases and the
ease with which these gases escape from the magma. It is possible to calculate the volume of
gas in magmas for submarine eruptions by applying Boyles Law that states gas volume will halve
with each 10-m increase in water depth.
The volume of bubbles naturally released from magma on the seafloor at Solwara 1 would be
infinitesimal and would not result in violent explosions/eruptions. Instead, gentle lava outpourings
onto the seafloor would occur and be unnoticed by, and pose no hazard to, coastal populations
and marine traffic.
At Solwara 1, magma is located at least 1 km below the seafloor and concomitantly any seafloor
mining activities. It is unlikely that the gradual removal of low-density porous material to a depth of
20 m below the seafloor will depress magma at 1 km. Should extraction uncover a shallow
magma body or alter the stress regime causing dilation of faults through which magma could flow,
as described above, there would be no noticeable effects at the surface.
Fine dust (ash), from normal
1
volcanic eruptions within the Rabaul Caldera, could be transported
the distance of 50 km to where the Solwara 1 Project MSV, shuttle barges and tugs will be

1
Normal refers to the regular eruptions that are occurring at the time this EIS was being prepared, i.e., May to June 2008.
Solwara 1 Project

11-5

operating, but this would not be at nuisance levels. At this location, larger debris such as gravel-
sized pumice could only be expected from caldera-forming volcanic events (the probability of
occurrence is 1 in 4,000 years and the last one occurred 1,400 years ago (see Section 7.1.2)).
Such debris would behave in much the same manner as hail and float on the sea surface, and is
not be expected to result in any environmental impacts (Saunders, pers. comm., 2008a). It is
certain that volcanic ash, and possibly larger debris, would effect port operations (Plates 7.25,
11.1 and 11.2), but the ports operating procedures and management plans will ensure that any
Project-derived off-site releases will comply with Schedule 1 of the Environment (Water Quality
Criteria) Regulation 2002 (Independent State of Papua New Guinea, 2002) to provide the
required protection to the marine environment.
Tsunamis
Mining operations at Solwara 1 are located where water depths are approximately 1,600 m;
therefore, it is unlikely that the large swells associated with tsunami waves will be felt by the MSV,
shuttle barges and tugs positioned above the mining equipment. During the Wave Mercury 07
Campaign, the Nautilus-chartered, 140-m-long vessel, the Wave Mercury was undertaking
exploration activities at Solwara 1 (see Section 2.2) when the 2 April 2007 Solomon earthquake
occurred. Wave surges of up to 2.5 m were recorded around the region and a maximum peak to
trough surge of 1.68 m was recorded at the Port of Rabaul. However, no tsunami-derived wave
surges were observed at Solwara 1 on the Wave Mercury (Saunders, pers. comm., 2008b and
Smith, per. comm., 2008b). The potential for consequent environmental impacts is, therefore, low.
Emergency procedures, implemented by the Vessel Master, will further reduce the potential for
environmental impacts during a tsunami event in the Bismarck Sea.
It is possible, however, that onshore facilities at the Port of Rabaul could be inundated by a
tsunami wave should one hit the coast. While the return period of tsunamis, such as the Aitape
Tsunami (see Section 7.1.3), is unknown, a tsunami of this magnitude is likely to be a very low
probability event, particularly over the life of the Project. In such an event, it would be difficult or
impossible to defend most coastal areas.
Potential environmental impacts caused by tsunami damage to the onshore facilities and to
shuttle barges and tugs operating outside Simpson Harbour will be minimised by the
implementation of appropriate operating, maintenance and emergency response plans.
Onshore inundation would likely result in extensive flooding that would disrupt operations. Good
port operating and maintenance procedures will reduce the potential for metals and hydrocarbon
contamination; however, there will be elevated sediment in floodwater runoff from ore stockpiles
and the remobilisation of volcanic ash. This sediment may be deposited inland as the tsunami
wave retreats or may be washed into the harbour, along with large amounts of other debris and
contaminants mobilised from coastal areas during the tsunami. Wetting of the high-sulphide-
content oxidised ore by a tsunami wave may result in acidic runoff with elevated metal
concentrations, i.e., acid rock drainage, which may damage vegetation and contaminate soils.
Solwara 1 Project

11-6

11.4 Hazardous Material Leakage or Spillage
There is the potential that hazardous materials, such as fuel, may leak or spill from their
containment vessels, especially during transport and transfer, with the associated hydrocarbon
contamination impacting water quality or marine fauna.
This section focuses on hydrocarbons as no process chemicals are required for Phase 1 of the
Project.
Section 5.6 describes the management measures Nautilus will, and expect the Ports Corporation
to, implement for the transport, handling, storage and disposal of hydrocarbons. Nautilus will also
ensure that the fuel supply boats that service the MSV have management plans that meet their
requirements and standards required.
Of particular importance are the fuel transfer and spill contingency procedures for the offshore
operation that include the following mitigation measures:
The MSV has a fuel storage capacity of 2,000 m
3
(1,840 t assuming a density of 920 kg/m
3
)
and operations at Solwara 1

will use up to 40 t/day of fuel. Fuel deliveries will be required at
least monthly thereby reducing the risks associated with the transport and transfer of fuel at
sea.
Shuttle barges do not require fuel, and tugs and support vessels will refuel while they are at
port in Rabaul.
Stocks of hydrocarbon spill response equipment will be regularly checked and replenished to
ensure appropriate supply quantities are on hand at all times.
In the event of a spill on the MSV or at the port, absorbent material will be used to remove spill
material prior to any washing activities.
Pipe/hose pressure will be monitored during fuel transfers to enable early detections of any
leakages or spillage.
There will be regular transfer hose integrity testing and maintenance.
Bunding will be in accordance with PNG and Australian standards.
Weather forecasts and alerts will be monitored and fuel transfers suspended during extreme
weather.
There will be a high level of operator training on fuel transfer procedures and emergency
response to spills to ensure that personnel are aware of requirements.
Procedures will be put in place for warning potentially affected parties.
There will be appropriate storage and disposal of clean up materials (Chapter 13).
Solwara 1 Project

11-7

Nautilus will utilise existing fuel infrastructure at the port. The Ports Corporations hydrocarbon,
spill contingency and emergency management plans will be reviewed by Nautilus to ensure they
meet both Nautilus and regulatory requirements.
The safeguards described in Section 11.4.2 will minimise the potential for hydrocarbon spills
during both offshore and onshore operations and, should they occur, minimise the volume of
material spilled.
If the spill is contained either on a vessel or at the port, drainage and waste management
procedures will minimise the contaminants that are released to the environment. It is expected
that, given the relatively remote location of the offshore components of the Project, there would be
limited impact to the coast should the spill be directly into the water. Also, the marine diesel oil will
evaporate and degrade quickly in tropical temperatures; however, this will be verified by spill
trajectory modelling during baseline studies (Chapter 13). Further, compared to coastal areas, the
open ocean lacks environmental sensitivities that could be impacted by a hydrocarbon spill. A spill
directly into the water at or close to the port would be more visible, raising the concerns of local
communities, and have the potential to cause greater environmental harm to vegetation and
marine fauna.
In the event of a spill, the animals most likely to have direct physical contact with the slick are
seabirds and it is possible that oiled birds will ingest toxic hydrocarbons and have difficulty flying.
Lesser effects would be experienced by other marine fauna such as plankton, fish, reptiles and
mammals; however, some fauna deaths may be observed. Some localised coral death is
expected if spilled oil comes into contact with coral within Simpson Harbour. Recovery would
occur once clean, hard surfaces emerge and new settlement occurs, as would be the case after a
volcanic ash dump.
11.5 Fire and Explosion
Mining operations involve the storage and handling of flammable and combustible substances
that can lead to the generation of potentially explosive and/or flammable gas emissions resulting
in a fire or explosion. While the Project does not require the use of explosives, potential
environmental impacts associated with the use of other consumables, such as fuel, may include
breakout of fire into neighbouring properties, release of significant quantities of air emissions and
contaminated runoff from firewater.
While no explosives are required by the Project, flammable and combustible substances will be
used. Preliminary mitigation measures include:
Storage and handling of all flammable and combustible substances, including waste, under
conditions which minimise the risk of fire or toxic emissions.
Specific design criteria for fire prevention, detection, control and personnel safety
requirements.
Solwara 1 Project

11-8

Ensuring that hotworks do not take place near flammable materials.
Identification and regular maintenance and testing of fire equipment adequate for the level of
risk to ensure good working order.
Implementation of waste (solid and liquid) management plans for the mining support vessel,
shuttle barges and tugs.
Implementation of a drainage management plan for the Port of Rabaul that minimises the
potential for the release of contaminated water.
Implementation of appropriate measures from relevant PNG and Australian standards (see
Chapter 3) on the mining vessels and barges and at the Port of Rabaul, as required.
Implementation of the measures detailed in Section 11.5.2 will minimise the potential for fire and
explosion and, in the event of a fire, reduce the potential for air and water pollution. However,
safety will take precedence over the control of off-site emissions. The remote location of the
mining operation would further reduce the potential for air pollution. Any pollution associated with
a fire or explosion is expected to be short-term in duration.
11.6 Collisions
Collisions between Project vessels (including the MSV, shuttle barges and tugs) and other marine
traffic may occur during extreme weather conditions or due to human error. Resulting damage
could result in the release of ballast water, fuel (especially if the collision occurs during the
refuelling process) or ore. Such releases have the potential to impact water quality and marine
fauna through the introduction of marine pests that compete with local endemic species for food
and habitat, in the case of ballast water, or the release of contaminants, in the case of fuel and
ore.
A number of mitigation and management measures will be implemented to minimise the potential
for collisions:
Provision of digital and printed information to fishing operators and other commercial vessels
travelling past Solwara 1 on the mining location and position of MSV, shuttle barges and tugs.
Appropriate navigational lights on all Project vessels. Vessels will be equipped with sound
horns that will be used if required.
Vessel positioning equipment, including marine radar and a Global Navigation Satellite System
(i.e., the United States Government NAVSTAR Global Positioning System).
Vessel masters to determine a safe working distance between vessels.
Constant radio communication between vessels and the Ports Corporation.
Solwara 1 Project

11-9

Establishing a permanent 500-m exclusion zone around the mining operation and advising
appropriate marine organisations of this zone.
Ongoing consultation with commercial fishing groups and other marine operations regarding
the mining location, ore transport routes and duration of activities.
Extreme weather procedures as described in Section 11.2.
Measures that will be implemented to manage materials with the greatest potential to cause
environmental harm if spilled in the event of a collision, i.e., ballast water, fuel and ore, include:
Each vessel will have their own ballast management plan that will be consistent with the
requirements of the International Convention for the Control and Management of Ships' Ballast
Water and Sediments (adopted 13 February 2004) (IMO, 2004).
All vessels related to the Project will be subject to standard requirements for the prevention of
the introduction of exotic pests including the exchange of ballast water in the open ocean
before arrival at the Port of Rabaul, such that the potential to introduce marine pests in the
event of an emergency, e.g., a collision where ship safety would take priority over avoiding the
release of ballast water, would be minimised.
Procedures for the management of hydrocarbons, e.g., fuel, especially refuelling and the
transfer of fuel from one vessel to another as described in Sections 5.8 and 11.4.2.
Storage of ore in covered cargo holds on bulk carriers and in covered stockpiles surrounded
by a deck side wall on barges, minimising risks of material and metalliferous runoff being
released in the environment in case of adverse event.
The implementation of the above measures are expected to minimise the potential for collision
especially with third party vessels since fishing activity in the Project area is low and other marine
traffic through the area is limited.
It is not expected that marine pests would be introduced to the environment, should a collision
occur resulting in the release of ballast water, as the:
Open, deep water ocean environment lacks suitable habitat for fouling species.
Likelihood for the introduction of fouling species is lower in open ocean environment than
coastal waters.
Shuttle barges shall only carry ballast water originating from PNG coastal and deep waters,
eliminating the risk of introducing exotic marine pest.
Potential impacts associated with the release of hydrocarbons are discussed in Section 11.4.3.
It is not expected that spillage of ore resulting from a collision will impact water quality or marine
fauna as:
The ore will become saturated in the ocean and therefore any oxidation processes will cease,
stopping the formation of acid.
Solwara 1 Project

11-10

Dispersion of any metalliferous runoff, formed from the oxidation and wetting of the ore prior to
the collision, will be diluted.

Solwara 1 Project

12-1

12. GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS AND CLIMATE
CHANGE
12.1 Introduction
Papua New Guinea is a signatory to the Kyoto Protocol United Nations Framework Convention on
Climate Change (Kyoto Protocol), which has as its objective the reduction of negative changes to
the Earths climate, with a particular focus of greenhouse gases (GHGs).
GHG emissions from the Phase 1 project consist almost entirely of fuel combustion CO
2

emissions. As there is no ore processing in this phase of the Project, total GHG emissions are
relatively low compared to other PNG mining projects and therefore the contribution to PNG GHG
emissions in the context of potential climate change impacts is minor.
12.2 Estimated GHG Emissions
Fuel use estimates and resulting GHG emission estimates from Phase 1 of the Project are shown
in Table 12.1.
Table 12.1 Predicted emissions of greenhouse gases (CO2-equivalent)
Activity Diesel Use CO2-equivalent Emissions
(t/a) (Mt/a)
Seafloor Mining Tool and
Mining Support Vessel
14,600
Barging 3,830
Crewboat 1,825
Rabaul (ore handling) 99

Total 20,354 0.062
12.3 GHG Emissions Assessment
Total annual GHG emissions from Phase 1 Project activities are estimated to be 0.062 Mt/a
CO
2
-equivalent. This compares to total PNG GHG (CO
2
)

emissions for 2005 (latest available data)
of 4.35 Mt/a CO
2
-equivalent emissions from fuel combustion (including flaring from the gas fields
in the Southern Highlands).
Therefore, within the context of PNGs small industrial sector, the Project is expected to increase
annual GHG emissions from fuel combustion in PNG by 1.43%.
Solwara 1 Project

12-2

Solwara 1 Project

13-1

13. ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, MONITORING
AND REPORTING
13.1 Introduction
The preparation of environmental management plans (EMPs) is expected to be a condition of
approval of the EIS. The EMPs, which will demonstrate how Nautilus environment policy
(Section 13.3) will be implemented, will compile the commitments and conditions applied to the
Project during the EIS approvals process and propose the programs for their implementation. The
EMPs have three specific objectives to:
Document the more general aspects of Nautilus approach to environmental management,
such as the environmental management system, schedule for environmental management and
organisational structure and responsibilities.
Describe how the Projects waste management and associated environmental issues will be
addressed. Nautilus management measures will be based on a hierarchical approach
determined by technical feasibility, cost and benefit, and involving firstly, pre-emption and
secondly, mitigation or containment of the impact.
Detail the program that will monitor and report on the Projects effects and its compliance with
regulatory permits and licences. In particular, this program will:
Validate and monitor impact predictions as described in Chapters 9 and 10.
Identify unforeseen effects and the need for additional management, mitigation or remedial
measures.
This chapter describes the environmental management framework that will be implemented by
Nautilus to achieve the above objectives.
13.2 Organisational Structure and Responsibilities
The Solwara 1 Project will be managed by Nautilus and the management structure is shown in
Figure 13.1. Specific responsibilities and accountabilities for the key personnel who will oversee
environmental management of the Project will be assigned to Nautilus personnel and contractors
and documented in the EMPs.
The Nautilus Project/Operations Manager will be responsible for ensuring that activities
associated with the Project are undertaken in full compliance with all statutory regulations and are
consistent with the Nautilus environmental policy. Nautilus will ensure that the environmental
approval conditions are accessible to senior management and other personnel on request at all
times. All personnel are responsible for ensuring that their work complies with these conditions
and the EMPs.
Individual accountability will continue to be defined through conditions of contracts of
employment. Further, environmental and social responsibilities will be written into the service
agreements for contractors.
Solwara 1 Project

13-2

13.3 Environmental Management System
The Solwara 1 Project will be managed under the governance of an environmental management
system (EMS) that will be developed in accordance with the international EMS standard, ISO
14001:2004, adapted for use in Australia and New Zealand as AS/NZS ISO 14001:2004. These
standards provide Nautilus with the elements of an effective EMS, that is, a procedure for
implementing, achieving, reviewing and maintaining the companys environment policy
(Box 13.1). Good industry environmental management practice, which forms the basis of a
Project-specific EMS, is also incorporated.
Box 13.1 Environment Policy
Environment Policy
Nautilus Minerals as a responsible corporate citizen, has the obligation to minimise the impact of its
operations on the environment. Nautilus is committed to comply with and where appropriate, surpass
environmental statutes and regulations. In addition, Nautilus is dedicated to improving its environmental
performance at every operational site. Nautilus will also work with government and civic agencies, the local
population, environmental groups and the scientific community to enable continual enhancement of its
environmental performance.
To achieve its Environmental Policy objectives, Nautilus Minerals will:
As a minimum, comply with all local and/or applicable environmental laws and regulations. In jurisdictions
where regulation is absent or inadequate, Nautilus will apply appropriate management practices to
minimise environmental impacts and risks.
Maintain environmental care as a core company value and the integration of environmental
policies, programs, and practices will be a vital part of management.
Develop project environment management plans and, once developed, ensure that its directors, officers,
managers, and employees understand and adhere to these plans.
Conduct periodic reviews of its operations to monitor environmental performance and to guide its
environmental management plan, with the vision to continually improve its environmental performance.
Support research aimed at expanding scientific knowledge and/or developing improved technologies to
protect the environment and/or achieving optimal solutions to environmental issues.
Recognise local communities as stakeholders and engage with them in discussions regarding
environmental management issues.
Promote environmental awareness among its employees and the communities within which it operates.

13.4 Environmental Management Plan
The EMPs for the Solwara 1 Project will be prepared and implemented within the EMS
framework. The Projects EMPs will address the management, monitoring and reporting
requirements for the various phases of the Project, e.g., baseline, operations and
Solwara 1 Project

13-3

decommissioning. These plans will take into account the commitments made in this EIS and the
conditions of approval stipulated by the State.
The purpose of the plans will be to ensure that the required environmental commitments to control
discharges and losses to the environment are applied to engineering and operational practices
involved in offshore mining, ore transfer and operations at the Port of Rabaul, and to manage
aqueous and airborne emissions to specified standards.
Plans will also be required, where practicable, for the application of policies for the employment,
training and accommodation of the workforce that will maximise benefits to the community and
minimise disruption to normal community life from outside workers. These will meet the regulatory
requirements anticipated to arise from the following management and mitigation measures
proposed by Nautilus.
13.4.1 Mitigation and Management
Proposed management and mitigation measures that will be adopted by Nautilus to avoid adverse
environmental and socioeconomic impact during the implementation of the Project include, the
following:
The application of sound engineering design, deployment and operational practices for the
Seafloor Mining Tool so as to minimise disturbance to the seafloor and the suspension of
sediments.
The adoption of a dewatering management strategy that will involve discharge at depths from
which the material originated (i.e., close to the seafloor), thereby avoiding impacts to the water
column.
The retention of a set-aside (unmined) area at South Su and temporary reserve areas in
Solwara 1 as necessary to aid in the recolonisation of the mined areas and conservation of
biodiversity. Transplanting of animals to unmined and mined-out areas will also be considered
as will placement of artificial substrates to enhance recolonisation.
The adoption of lighting and noise strategies that will address surface and subsea operational
and safety requirements and minimise the potential for the attraction of, and interaction with,
marine animals.
The adoption of a waste management strategy that will address the management of sewage,
chemical and hazardous materials to minimise the potential for contamination of the water
column.
The adoption of appropriate water management strategies at the Port of Rabaul that will
involve the containment and, possibly, treatment of surface runoff to ANZECC/ARMCANZ
(2000) standards (to avoid any impacts of acid drainage) prior to any discharge to minimise
impacts to receiving water quality, e.g., shallow Simpson Harbour waters.
Where practicable, the application of policies for the employment and training of the workforce
that will maximise benefits to the local communities and minimise adverse social effects.
The development of emergency response plans to mitigate the effects of natural disasters and
unplanned events.
Solwara 1 Project

13-4

Further details of Nautilus environmental management program will be described in the detailed
EMPs to be submitted to the government after approval of the EIS.
13.4.2 Monitoring
Approach
The validity of the predicted effects of the Project, as set out in Chapters 9 and 10, depends upon
the following conditions:
The Project is constructed and operated in the manner described in this EIS in all
environmentally relevant respects.
The understanding of the relevant environmental dynamics (and hence the derived predictions
of the impacts) presented in this EIS has, as far as possible, been correct.
With regard to the first condition, Nautilus will notify the provincial and national governments
should significant changes be made to the Project subsequent to the issue of this EIS. The
second condition is met by the monitoring program, which is designed to allow periodic
reassessment of the Projects effects and a review of management and mitigating measures and
safeguards.
The monitoring program will involve the following sequential steps:
Compilation of an environmental baseline with a range of pertinent variables describing
background conditions. To a large extent, this has already been completed (see the
appendices supporting this EIS). The baseline was supplemented by the August 2008 Norsky
08 Campaign and will be extended to address information gaps, prior to operations.
An intensive short-term validation study in order to verify the adopted mixing zones for
discharges from the Project.
Operations monitoring to ensure regulatory compliance and to identify material unforeseen
effects.
Program
Details of Nautiluss proposed monitoring program, including descriptions of the components to be
monitored, frequency of monitoring and purpose, will be included in the detailed EMPs to be
submitted to the government after approval of the EIS, and will take into account any relevant
conditions of approval. These will typically include the environmental aspects relevant to each
offshore and onshore activity, to confirm impact predictions and to demonstrate compliance with
regulatory permits and licences.
At the Port of Rabaul, a focus will be on the management of potential acid runoff from ore
stockpiles and, in the offshore location of the Mining Support Vessel, supply vessels and barges,
an important aspect will be management of possible interactions with large marine animals such
as whales and turtles. However, the nature of the Project involves none of the land disturbance,
sedimentation and air quality issues normally associated with a new mine development and which
comprise a large part of a monitoring program.
Solwara 1 Project

13-5

Instead, Project impacts are predominantly to the seafloor at Solwara 1, in hydrothermally active
areas where impacts from disturbances have not previously occurred, but for which a number of
mitigation plans and expected residual impacts have been developed in detail as part of this EIS.
Scientific findings from the Wave Mercury 07 Campaign formed the basis for the monitoring
program, which was developed during the scientific workshop that was held in San Diego in April
2008 (Section 4.4.3). Details are provided in Table 13.1. These details have been structured
around expected impacts and are presented as testable hypotheses (and in part completed
during the 2008 Norsky 08 Campaign) for the baseline studies (which are required to be
undertaken prior to mining). The validation monitoring is also listed in Table 13.1.
13.4.3 Reporting
Monitoring
The Solwara 1 Project will provide the State with the compliance reports as stipulated in
environment, water abstraction and waste discharge permits.
Regulatory authority and internal assessments of EMP implementation will occur, with the
schedule for such assessments and reporting (including monitoring) to be determined in
consultation with DEC.
Much of the proposed monitoring of the deep seafloor is anticipated to extend into more general
scientific research, for which Nautilus will encourage publication through the normal scientific peer
review process.
Incidents
Incidents that occur as a result of an emergency, accident or malfunction or that cause or threaten
serious adverse environmental impacts or are likely to adversely impinge on relations with local
communities will be immediately reported to Project senior management in addition to the
relevant PNG regulatory authorities. Other lesser incidents will be reported within an agreed
timeframe to the relevant PNG authorities.
E
n
v
i
r
o
n
m
e
n
t
a
l

I
m
p
a
c
t

S
t
a
t
e
m
e
n
t

S
o
l
w
a
r
a

1

P
r
o
j
e
c
t

N
a
u
t
i
l
u
s

M
i
n
e
r
a
l
s

N
i
u
g
i
n
i

7
0
0
8
_
0
9
_
C
h
1
3
_
v
4
.
d
o
c

1
3
-
6

C
o
f
f
e
y

N
a
t
u
r
a
l

S
y
s
t
e
m
s

T
a
b
l
e

1
3
.
1

S
u
m
m
a
r
y

o
f

p
r
o
p
o
s
e
d

s
e
a
f
l
o
o
r

m
o
n
i
t
o
r
i
n
g

p
r
o
g
r
a
m

E
n
v
i
r
o
n
m
e
n
t
a
l

I
s
s
u
e

I
m
p
a
c
t

H
y
p
o
t
h
e
s
e
s

P
r
o
p
o
s
e
d

B
a
s
e
l
i
n
e

(
=
b
a
s
e
l
i
n
e

s
t
u
d
i
e
s
)

P
r
o
p
o
s
e
d

M
o
n
i
t
o
r
i
n
g

a
n
d

M
i
t
i
g
a
t
i
o
n

(
=
v
a
l
i
d
a
t
i
o
n
/
m
o
n
i
t
o
r
i
n
g
)

V
e
n
t
i
n
g

d
y
n
a
m
i
c
s

H
0
1
.

N
e
w

v
e
n
t
s

a
n
d

c
h
i
m
n
e
y
s

w
i
l
l

f
o
r
m

i
n

t
h
e

a
c
t
i
v
e

a
r
e
a
s

a
f
t
e
r

m
i
n
i
n
g

a
n
d

t
h
e
r
e

w
i
l
l

b
e

f
l
u
c
t
u
a
t
i
o
n
s

i
n

t
h
e

v
e
n
t
i
n
g

d
y
n
a
m
i
c
s

o
f

t
h
e

m
i
n
e
d

a
n
d

a
d
j
a
c
e
n
t

u
n
m
i
n
e
d

v
e
n
t
s
.

P
r
e
p
a
r
e

a

b
a
s
e
l
i
n
e

t
e
m
p
e
r
a
t
u
r
e

m
a
p

o
f

t
h
e

a
r
e
a
s

t
o

b
e

m
i
n
e
d

(
u
s
i
n
g

t
h
e
r
m
a
l

l
a
n
c
e
s

a
n
d

t
h
e
r
m
i
s
t
o
r
s
)
.

R
e
s
u
r
v
e
y

v
e
n
t
s

p
r
e
v
i
o
u
s
l
y

p
h
o
t
o
g
r
a
p
h
e
d

d
u
r
i
n
g

e
x
p
l
o
r
a
t
i
o
n

a
n
d

r
e
s
e
a
r
c
h

c
r
u
i
s
e
s

u
s
i
n
g

a
n

a
u
t
o
n
o
m
o
u
s

u
n
d
e
r
w
a
t
e
r

v
e
h
i
c
l
e

(
A
U
V
)
.

P
l
a
c
e

t
i
m
e
-
l
a
p
s
e

c
a
m
e
r
a
s

o
n

t
h
e

s
e
a
f
l
o
o
r

t
o

o
b
s
e
r
v
e

s
e
l
e
c
t
e
d

v
e
n
t
s
.

C
o
m
p
l
e
t
e

f
l
u
i
d

c
h
e
m
i
s
t
r
y

b
a
s
e
l
i
n
e

d
a
t
a
.

C
o
m
p
l
e
t
e

b
a
s
e
l
i
n
e

w
a
t
e
r

q
u
a
l
i
t
y

a
t

l
o
w
-
t
e
m
p
e
r
a
t
u
r
e

(
n
e
a
r

v
e
n
t
)

a
r
e
a
s
.

R
e
p
e
a
t

t
e
m
p
e
r
a
t
u
r
e

m
a
p
p
i
n
g

o
f

m
i
n
e

a
r
e
a

a
t

a
p
p
r
o
p
r
i
a
t
e

i
n
t
e
r
v
a
l
s
,

a
t

l
e
a
s
t

a
n
n
u
a
l
l
y
.

V
i
d
e
o

a
n
d

m
a
p

a
c
t
i
v
e

c
h
i
m
n
e
y
s

i
n

a
r
e
a
s

a
f
t
e
r

S
e
a
f
l
o
o
r

M
i
n
i
n
g

T
o
o
l

(
S
M
T
)

(
i
.
e
.
,

m
i
n
i
n
g
)

a
c
t
i
v
i
t
y
.

O
b
t
a
i
n

l
o
n
g
-
t
e
r
m

t
e
m
p
e
r
a
t
u
r
e

m
o
n
i
t
o
r
i
n
g

i
n

s
e
l
e
c
t
e
d

v
e
n
t
s

u
s
i
n
g

t
h
e
r
m
i
s
t
o
r
s
.

O
b
s
e
r
v
e

v
e
n
t

a
c
t
i
v
i
t
y

w
i
t
h
i
n

t
e
m
p
o
r
a
r
y

r
e
f
u
g
e

a
r
e
a
s

a
t

S
o
l
w
a
r
a

1

a
n
d

a
t

S
o
u
t
h

S
u
.

C
o
m
p
l
e
t
e

a

c
e
n
t
r
e
-
l
i
n
e

t
r
a
n
s
e
c
t

i
m
a
g
i
n
g

s
u
r
v
e
y

a
t

S
o
l
w
a
r
a

1

a
n
d

S
o
u
t
h

S
u

a
f
t
e
r

t
h
r
e
e

t
o

s
i
x

m
o
n
t
h
s
,

a
n
d

t
h
e
r
e
a
f
t
e
r

s
i
x
-
m
o
n
t
h
l
y

o
r

a
t

a
n

a
p
p
r
o
p
r
i
a
t
e

f
r
e
q
u
e
n
c
y

t
o

b
e

d
e
t
e
r
m
i
n
e
d
.

P
h
o
t
o

m
o
s
a
i
c
/
v
i
d
e
o

p
a
s
s

(
f
r
e
q
u
e
n
c
y

a
s

a
b
o
v
e
)
.

R
e
s
a
m
p
l
e

c
h
e
m
i
s
t
r
y

o
f

f
l
u
i
d

f
l
o
w

a
t

a
n

a
p
p
r
o
p
r
i
a
t
e

f
r
e
q
u
e
n
c
y

(
a
s

a
b
o
v
e
)
.

A
n
i
m
a
l

r
e
c
o
l
o
n
i
s
a
t
i
o
n

H
0
2
.

W
i
t
h
i
n

t
w
o

y
e
a
r
s

a
f
t
e
r

c
e
s
s
a
t
i
o
n

o
f

m
i
n
i
n
g

a
n

a
r
e
a
,

a
n
i
m
a
l

c
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
i
e
s

w
i
l
l

r
e
c
o
l
o
n
i
s
e

a
n
d

r
e
t
u
r
n

t
o
w
a
r
d
s

b
a
s
e
l
i
n
e

a
b
u
n
d
a
n
c
e
/
d
i
v
e
r
s
i
t
y

s
t
r
u
c
t
u
r
e

(
f
o
l
l
o
w
i
n
g

a

p
r
e
d
i
c
t
e
d

s
e
q
u
e
n
c
e

s
p
e
c
i
f
i
c

t
o

t
h
e

a
c
t
i
v
e
/
i
n
a
c
t
i
v
e

v
e
n
t
s
)
.

E
s
t
a
b
l
i
s
h

p
e
r
m
a
n
e
n
t

o
b
s
e
r
v
a
t
i
o
n

t
r
a
n
s
e
c
t
s

a
t

S
o
l
w
a
r
a

1

a
n
d

S
o
u
t
h

S
u

f
o
r

b
a
s
e
l
i
n
e

(
a
n
d

o
n
g
o
i
n
g
)

v
i
s
u
a
l

c
e
n
s
u
s

m
o
n
i
t
o
r
i
n
g

o
f

a
b
u
n
d
a
n
c
e

a
n
d

d
i
v
e
r
s
i
t
y

a
t

a
c
t
i
v
e
/
i
n
a
c
t
i
v
e

h
a
r
d

a
n
d

s
o
f
t

s
e
a
f
l
o
o
r

a
r
e
a
s
.

E
s
t
a
b
l
i
s
h

a

t
r
i
a
l

c
l
e
a
r
i
n
g

p
a
t
c
h

a
n
d

i
n
s
t
a
l
l

a

t
i
m
e
-
l
a
p
s
e

c
a
m
e
r
a

t
o

o
b
s
e
r
v
e

r
e
c
o
l
o
n
i
s
a
t
i
o
n
.

P
l
a
c
e

a
r
t
i
f
i
c
i
a
l

s
e
t
t
l
e
m
e
n
t

s
u
r
f
a
c
e
s

f
o
r

o
b
s
e
r
v
a
t
i
o
n

o
f

r
e
c
o
l
o
n
i
s
a
t
i
o
n
.

C
o
n
t
i
n
u
e

v
i
d
e
o

t
r
a
n
s
e
c
t

o
b
s
e
r
v
a
t
i
o
n
s

a
t

S
o
l
w
a
r
a

1

t
e
m
p
o
r
a
r
y

r
e
f
u
g
e

a
r
e
a
s

a
n
d

a
t

S
o
u
t
h

S
u

t
r
a
n
s
e
c
t

s
i
t
e
s

a
t

a
p
p
r
o
x
i
m
a
t
e
l
y

s
i
x
-
m
o
n
t
h
l
y

i
n
t
e
r
v
a
l
s
.

V
i
s
u
a
l

a
n
a
l
y
s
i
s

o
f

s
p
e
c
i
e
s
,

d
e
n
s
i
t
y

a
n
d

a
b
u
n
d
a
n
c
e

f
r
o
m

v
i
d
e
o

t
r
a
n
s
e
c
t
s
.

S
e
l
e
c
t

o
b
s
e
r
v
a
t
i
o
n

a
r
e
a
s

(
a
c
t
i
v
e

a
n
d

i
n
a
c
t
i
v
e
)

i
n

l
o
c
a
l
e
s

w
h
e
r
e

m
i
n
i
n
g

i
s

c
o
m
p
l
e
t
e
d
.

V
i
d
e
o

o
r

t
i
m
e
-
l
a
p
s
e

o
b
s
e
r
v
a
t
i
o
n
s

o
f

s
u
c
c
e
s
s
i
o
n

(
m
i
c
r
o
b
i
a
l

m
a
t
s

t
o

m
a
c
r
o
f
a
u
n
a
)

a
n
d

s
p
e
c
i
e
s
,

d
e
n
s
i
t
y

a
n
d

a
b
u
n
d
a
n
c
e
.

O
b
s
e
r
v
e

l
i
f
e

c
y
c
l
e
s

o
f

s
n
a
i
l
s

(
a
b
u
n
d
a
n
c
e

a
n
d

s
i
z
e

f
r
e
q
u
e
n
c
i
e
s
)
.

E
n
v
i
r
o
n
m
e
n
t
a
l

I
m
p
a
c
t

S
t
a
t
e
m
e
n
t

S
o
l
w
a
r
a

1

P
r
o
j
e
c
t

N
a
u
t
i
l
u
s

M
i
n
e
r
a
l
s

N
i
u
g
i
n
i

7
0
0
8
_
0
9
_
C
h
1
3
_
v
4
.
d
o
c

1
3
-
7

C
o
f
f
e
y

N
a
t
u
r
a
l

S
y
s
t
e
m
s

T
a
b
l
e

1
3
.
1

S
u
m
m
a
r
y

o
f

p
r
o
p
o
s
e
d

s
e
a
f
l
o
o
r

m
o
n
i
t
o
r
i
n
g

p
r
o
g
r
a
m

(
c
o
n
t
d
)

E
n
v
i
r
o
n
m
e
n
t
a
l

I
s
s
u
e

I
m
p
a
c
t

H
y
p
o
t
h
e
s
e
s

P
r
o
p
o
s
e
d

B
a
s
e
l
i
n
e

(
=
b
a
s
e
l
i
n
e

s
t
u
d
i
e
s
)

P
r
o
p
o
s
e
d

M
o
n
i
t
o
r
i
n
g

a
n
d

M
i
t
i
g
a
t
i
o
n

(
=
v
a
l
i
d
a
t
i
o
n
/
m
o
n
i
t
o
r
i
n
g
)

A
n
i
m
a
l

r
e
c
o
l
o
n
i
s
a
t
i
o
n

(
c
o
n
t
d
)

S
u
p
p
l
e
m
e
n
t
a
r
y

s
a
m
p
l
i
n
g

a
t

S
o
l
w
a
r
a

1

a
n
d

S
o
u
t
h

S
u

(
n
o
t

a
t

o
b
s
e
r
v
a
t
i
o
n

a
r
e
a
s
)

t
o

e
x
t
e
n
d

s
p
e
c
i
e
s
/
e
f
f
o
r
t

c
u
r
v
e
s

f
o
r

i
n
a
c
t
i
v
e

h
a
r
d

a
n
d

s
o
f
t

s
e
d
i
m
e
n
t
s
.

S
a
m
p
l
e

h
e
t
e
r
o
g
e
n
e
o
u
s

s
e
d
i
m
e
n
t
s

a
s

f
a
r

a
s

p
r
a
c
t
i
c
a
b
l
e
.

A
n
a
l
y
s
e
/
c
o
m
p
a
r
e

p
r
o
p
o
r
t
i
o
n
s

o
f

r
a
r
e

s
p
e
c
i
e
s
;

i
m
p
r
o
v
e

t
a
x
o
n
o
m
i
c

r
e
s
o
l
u
t
i
o
n
.

E
x
a
m
i
n
e

g
r
o
w
t
h

r
a
t
e
s

b
y

s
t
a
i
n
i
n
g

o
f

b
a
m
b
o
o

c
o
r
a
l
s

(
K
e
r
a
t
o
i
s
i
s
)
.

R
e
s
a
m
p
l
e

s
t
a
i
n
e
d

b
a
m
b
o
o

c
o
r
a
l
s

t
o

a
s
s
e
s
s

g
r
o
w
t
h

a
n
n
u
a
l
l
y
.

S
e
t

u
p

s
e
d
i
m
e
n
t

r
e
c
o
l
o
n
i
s
a
t
i
o
n

t
r
a
y
s

a
t

m
i
n
e
d

a
r
e
a
s

a
n
d

r
e
s
a
m
p
l
e

a
n
n
u
a
l
l
y
.

R
e
c
o
r
d

n
u
m
b
e
r
s
,

s
i
z
e
s

a
n
d

s
p
e
c
i
e
s

o
f

f
i
s
h

o
b
s
e
r
v
e
d

i
n

v
i
d
e
o

t
r
a
n
s
e
c
t
s
.

C
o
n
t
i
n
u
e

t
r
a
n
s
e
c
t

m
o
n
i
t
o
r
i
n
g

f
o
r

t
h
r
e
e

y
e
a
r
s

a
f
t
e
r

m
i
n
i
n
g

o
r

f
o
r

a

p
e
r
i
o
d

(
e
a
r
l
i
e
r

o
r

l
a
t
e
r
)

d
e
t
e
r
m
i
n
e
d

b
y

r
e
s
u
l
t
s

i
n

c
o
n
s
u
l
t
a
t
i
o
n

w
i
t
h

D
E
C

a
n
d

s
c
i
e
n
t
i
s
t
s
.

T
h
e

g
e
n
e
t
i
c

s
t
r
u
c
t
u
r
e

o
f

t
h
e

p
o
p
u
l
a
t
i
o
n

H
0
3
.

T
h
e

g
e
n
e
t
i
c

s
t
r
u
c
t
u
r
e

o
f

t
h
e

p
o
p
u
l
a
t
i
o
n
s

i
n

t
h
e

a
r
e
a

w
i
l
l

n
o
t

b
e

a
l
t
e
r
e
d
.

O
b
t
a
i
n

s
i
x

s
t
r
a
t
e
g
i
c

s
p
e
c
i
e
s

(
b
i
o
m
a
s
s
-
d
o
m
i
n
a
n
t

a
n
d

a
s
s
o
c
i
a
t
e
d
)

f
r
o
m

S
o
l
w
a
r
a

1
,

S
o
u
t
h

S
u

a
n
d

S
o
l
w
a
r
a

8

(
4
5

k
m

w
e
s
t
-
n
o
r
t
h
w
e
s
t

o
f

S
o
l
w
a
r
a

1
)

(
u
s
i
n
g

s
c
o
o
p

a
n
d

t
r
a
p
s

f
o
r

s
h
r
i
m
p
s
)
.

A
n
a
l
y
s
e

g
e
n
e
t
i
c

a
l
l
i
a
n
c
e

(
D
N
A

f
l
o
w
)

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

u
p
s
t
r
e
a
m

(
S
o
u
t
h

S
u
)

a
n
d

d
o
w
n
s
t
r
e
a
m

(
S
o
l
w
a
r
a

8
)

c
o
h
o
r
t
s
.

O
b
t
a
i
n

j
u
v
e
n
i
l
e

s
a
m
p
l
e
s

u
s
i
n
g

a
r
t
i
f
i
c
i
a
l

s
u
b
s
t
r
a
t
e
s
.

E
s
t
a
b
l
i
s
h

t
h
e

g
e
n
e
t
i
c

s
t
r
u
c
t
u
r
e

o
f

s
p
e
c
i
e
s

i
n

t
h
e

a
r
e
a
.

U
s
e

s
e
t
t
l
e
m
e
n
t

c
o
l
l
e
c
t
o
r
s

t
o

o
b
t
a
i
n

s
e
t
t
l
i
n
g

a
n
i
m
a
l
s
.

C
o
l
l
e
c
t

a
n
d

a
n
a
l
y
s
e

D
N
A

o
f

t
h
e

s
a
m
e

s
p
e
c
i
e
s

c
o
l
o
n
i
s
i
n
g

m
i
n
e
d

a
r
e
a
s

a
t

S
o
l
w
a
r
a

1

(
a
n
n
u
a
l
l
y

t
o

i
n
c
l
u
d
e

t
h
e

s
i
x

b
a
s
e
l
i
n
e

s
p
e
c
i
e
s
)
.

I
n
c
l
u
d
e

o
t
h
e
r

r
e
c
o
l
o
n
i
s
i
n
g

s
p
e
c
i
e
s

t
h
a
t

m
a
y

b
e

a
b
u
n
d
a
n
t

o
r

e
a
s
y

t
o

c
a
t
c
h
.

E
n
h
a
n
c
e
m
e
n
t

o
f

r
e
c
o
l
o
n
i
s
a
t
i
o
n

b
y

t
r
a
n
s
p
l
a
n
t
a
t
i
o
n

H
0
4
.

I
f

a
n
i
m
a
l
s

a
r
e

t
r
a
n
s
p
l
a
n
t
e
d
,

t
h
e
y

w
i
l
l

e
s
t
a
b
l
i
s
h

a

c
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
.

C
o
n
d
u
c
t

o
p
p
o
r
t
u
n
i
s
t
i
c

t
r
a
n
s
p
l
a
n
t

o
b
s
e
r
v
a
t
i
o
n
s

i
f

p
r
a
c
t
i
c
a
b
l
e
.

U
s
i
n
g

R
O
V

a
n
d

s
c
o
o
p
s

(
o
p
p
o
r
t
u
n
i
s
t
i
c
a
l
l
y

a
n
d
/
o
r

d
u
r
i
n
g

r
o
u
t
i
n
e

m
o
n
i
t
o
r
i
n
g
)
,

t
r
a
n
s
p
o
r
t

s
a
m
p
l
e
s

o
f

d
e
n
s
e
s
t

c
l
u
m
p
s

o
f

s
n
a
i
l
s

i
n

p
a
t
h

o
f

m
i
n
i
n
g

a
n
d

r
e
l
o
c
a
t
e

t
o

a
d
j
a
c
e
n
t

a
r
e
a
s

(
i
n
i
t
i
a
l
l
y
)
.

P
i
c
k

u
p

e
v
e
r
y
t
h
i
n
g

w
i
t
h

t
h
e

s
n
a
i
l
s

e
.
g
.
,

m
u
s
s
e
l
s

a
s

p
r
a
c
t
i
c
a
b
l
e
.

T
r
a
n
s
p
l
a
n
t

t
o

a
r
e
a
s

a
w
a
y

f
r
o
m

m
i
n
i
n
g

o
r

r
e
f
o
r
m
e
d

v
e
n
t
i
n
g

a
r
e
a
s

w
h
e
r
e

m
i
n
i
n
g

i
s

c
o
m
p
l
e
t
e
.

S
e
l
e
c
t

a
r
e
a
s

w
i
t
h

t
e
m
p
e
r
a
t
u
r
e

a
l
i
g
n
m
e
n
t

i
f

p
r
a
c
t
i
c
a
b
l
e
.

E
n
v
i
r
o
n
m
e
n
t
a
l

I
m
p
a
c
t

S
t
a
t
e
m
e
n
t

S
o
l
w
a
r
a

1

P
r
o
j
e
c
t

N
a
u
t
i
l
u
s

M
i
n
e
r
a
l
s

N
i
u
g
i
n
i

7
0
0
8
_
0
9
_
C
h
1
3
_
v
4
.
d
o
c

1
3
-
8

C
o
f
f
e
y

N
a
t
u
r
a
l

S
y
s
t
e
m
s

T
a
b
l
e

1
3
.
1

S
u
m
m
a
r
y

o
f

p
r
o
p
o
s
e
d

s
e
a
f
l
o
o
r

m
o
n
i
t
o
r
i
n
g

p
r
o
g
r
a
m

(
c
o
n
t
d
)

E
n
v
i
r
o
n
m
e
n
t
a
l

I
s
s
u
e

I
m
p
a
c
t

H
y
p
o
t
h
e
s
e
s

P
r
o
p
o
s
e
d

B
a
s
e
l
i
n
e

(
=
b
a
s
e
l
i
n
e

s
t
u
d
i
e
s
)

P
r
o
p
o
s
e
d

M
o
n
i
t
o
r
i
n
g

a
n
d

M
i
t
i
g
a
t
i
o
n

(
=
v
a
l
i
d
a
t
i
o
n
/
m
o
n
i
t
o
r
i
n
g
)

E
n
h
a
n
c
e
m
e
n
t

o
f

r
e
c
o
l
o
n
i
s
a
t
i
o
n

b
y

t
r
a
n
s
p
l
a
n
t
a
t
i
o
n

(
c
o
n
t
d
)

W
h
e
r
e

d
e
n
s
e

p
a
t
c
h
e
s

o
f

K
e
r
a
t
o
i
s
i
s

o
c
c
u
r

i
n

a
r
e
a
s

t
o

b
e

m
i
n
e
d
,

p
l
a
c
e

f
r
a
g
m
e
n
t
s

i
n
t
o

c
h
a
m
b
e
r
s

o
f

w
e
i
g
h
t
e
d

c
r
a
t
e
s

(
o
r

s
i
m
i
l
a
r
)

f
o
r

r
e
l
o
c
a
t
i
o
n

a
w
a
y

f
r
o
m

t
h
e

m
i
n
i
n
g

p
a
t
h

(
o
p
p
o
r
t
u
n
i
s
t
i
c
a
l
l
y

o
r

d
u
r
i
n
g

r
o
u
t
i
n
e

m
o
n
i
t
o
r
i
n
g
)
.

V
i
d
e
o

a
r
e
a
s

o
f

t
r
a
n
s
l
o
c
a
t
e
d

a
n
i
m
a
l
s

(
s
n
a
i
l
s
,

K
e
r
a
t
o
i
s
i
s
,

e
t
c
.
,
)

t
o

d
e
t
e
r
m
i
n
e

o
n
g
o
i
n
g

s
u
r
v
i
v
a
l

(
i
n
c
l
u
d
i
n
g

t
h
e

u
s
e

o
f

t
i
m
e

l
a
p
s
e

c
a
m
e
r
a
s
)

o
p
p
o
r
t
u
n
i
s
t
i
c
a
l
l
y

o
r

d
u
r
i
n
g

r
o
u
t
i
n
e

m
o
n
i
t
o
r
i
n
g
.

C
o
n
t
i
n
u
e

p
h
o
t
o
g
r
a
p
h
i
c

m
o
n
i
t
o
r
i
n
g

f
o
r

t
h
r
e
e

y
e
a
r
s

a
f
t
e
r

m
i
n
i
n
g

o
r

f
o
r

a

p
e
r
i
o
d

(
e
a
r
l
i
e
r

o
r

l
a
t
e
r
)

d
e
t
e
r
m
i
n
e
d

b
y

r
e
s
u
l
t
s

i
n

c
o
n
s
u
l
t
a
t
i
o
n

w
i
t
h

D
E
C

a
n
d

s
c
i
e
n
t
i
s
t
s
.

A
l
t
e
r
a
t
i
o
n
s

i
n

p
l
u
m
e

f
o
r
m
a
t
i
o
n

b
y

r
e
s
u
s
p
e
n
s
i
o
n

o
f

s
e
d
i
m
e
n
t

H
0
5
.

S
e
d
i
m
e
n
t

r
e
s
u
s
p
e
n
s
i
o
n

a
n
d

p
l
u
m
e

f
o
r
m
a
t
i
o
n

(
f
r
o
m

m
i
n
i
n
g

a
c
t
i
v
i
t
i
e
s
,

s
e
d
i
m
e
n
t

r
e
m
o
v
a
l
,

c
o
m
p
e
t
e
n
t

w
a
s
t
e

m
a
t
e
r
i
a
l

s
i
d
e

c
a
s
t
i
n
g

a
n
d

f
r
o
m

d
e
w
a
t
e
r
i
n
g
)

w
i
l
l

n
o
t

a
f
f
e
c
t

c
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
i
e
s

(
s
u
s
p
e
n
s
i
o
n

a
n
d

f
i
l
t
e
r

f
e
e
d
e
r
s
)

o
u
t
s
i
d
e

a

d
e
f
i
n
e
d

m
o
d
e
l
l
e
d

(
m
i
x
i
n
g

z
o
n
e
)

b
o
u
n
d
a
r
y
.

E
s
t
a
b
l
i
s
h

s
a
m
p
l
i
n
g

s
i
t
e
s

a
t

s
e
d
i
m
e
n
t

h
a
b
i
t
a
t
s

(
r
e
p
r
e
s
e
n
t
a
t
i
v
e

o
f

a
r
r
a
y

o
f

h
e
t
e
r
o
g
e
n
o
u
s

t
y
p
e
s
)

a
t

p
e
r
i
p
h
e
r
y

o
f

S
o
l
w
a
r
a

1

w
h
e
r
e

d
e
p
o
s
i
t
i
o
n

i
s

e
x
p
e
c
t
e
d

(
f
r
o
m

m
o
d
e
l
l
i
n
g

(
c
o
m
b
i
n
e

w
i
t
h

h
y
p
o
t
h
e
s
i
s

H
0
2

s
a
m
p
l
i
n
g

a
s

p
r
a
c
t
i
c
a
b
l
e
)
.

V
i
d
e
o

t
r
a
n
s
e
c
t
s

a
n
d

t
a
k
e

s
c
o
o
p
/
c
o
r
e

s
a
m
p
l
e
s

o
f

m
e
i
o
f
a
u
n
a

a
t

t
h
e

e
s
t
a
b
l
i
s
h
e
d

s
a
m
p
l
i
n
g

s
i
t
e
s
.

E
s
t
i
m
a
t
e

d
e
n
s
i
t
y

a
n
d

r
a
t
i
o
s

o
f

s
u
s
p
e
n
s
i
o
n
/
f
i
l
t
e
r

f
e
e
d
e
r
s
.

V
i
d
e
o

o
b
s
e
r
v
a
t
i
o
n

o
f

p
l
u
m
e
s

g
e
n
e
r
a
t
e
d

b
y

S
M
T

a
c
t
i
v
i
t
i
e
s

(
i
n
c
l
u
d
i
n
g

m
i
n
i
n
g
,

s
e
d
i
m
e
n
t

r
e
m
o
v
a
l

a
n
d

c
o
m
p
e
t
e
n
t

w
a
s
t
e

m
a
t
e
r
i
a
l

s
i
d
e

c
a
s
t
i
n
g
)

d
u
r
i
n
g

o
p
e
r
a
t
i
o
n
.

C
T
D

o
b
s
e
r
v
a
t
i
o
n

o
f

p
l
u
m
e
s

f
r
o
m

r
e
t
u
r
n
-
w
a
t
e
r

d
i
s
c
h
a
r
g
e
.

E
s
t
a
b
l
i
s
h

s
e
d
i
m
e
n
t
a
t
i
o
n

t
r
a
p
s

a
t

t
h
e

s
e
l
e
c
t
e
d
/
c
o
n
t
r
o
l

s
i
t
e
s

t
o

m
o
n
i
t
o
r

n
a
t
u
r
a
l
/
m
i
n
e
-
i
n
d
u
c
e
d

s
e
t
t
l
e
m
e
n
t
.

B
o
t
t
o
m

c
u
r
r
e
n
t

m
e
a
s
u
r
e
m
e
n
t
s
.

P
a
r
t
i
c
l
e

s
i
z
e

a
n
a
l
y
s
i
s

a
n
n
u
a
l
l
y
.

R
e
p
e
a
t

v
i
d
e
o

a
n
d

s
a
m
p
l
i
n
g

o
f

s
u
s
p
e
n
s
i
o
n
/
f
i
l
t
e
r

f
e
e
d
e
r
s
,

a
n
d

m
e
i
o
f
a
u
n
a

a
t

t
h
e

s
a
m
e

s
i
t
e
s

(
a
n
n
u
a
l
l
y
)
.

T
e
m
p
o
r
a
r
y

s
e
d
i
m
e
n
t

d
e
p
o
s
i
t
i
o
n
,

m
i
x
i
n
g

a
n
d

d
i
s
r
u
p
t
i
o
n

H
0
6
.

S
e
d
i
m
e
n
t

d
e
p
o
s
i
t
i
o
n
,

m
i
x
i
n
g

a
n
d

d
i
s
r
u
p
t
i
o
n

w
i
l
l

t
e
m
p
o
r
a
r
i
l
y

a
l
t
e
r

c
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
y

s
t
r
u
c
t
u
r
e
.

X
-
r
a
y

a
n
a
l
y
s
i
s

o
f

l
a
y
e
r
i
n
g
,

b
u
r
r
o
w
i
n
g

e
t
c
.
,

i
n

s
e
d
i
m
e
n
t

c
o
r
e
s

i
n

e
x
p
e
c
t
e
d

a
r
e
a
s

o
f

d
e
p
o
s
i
t
i
o
n

a
n
d

i
n

p
a
t
h

o
f

t
h
e

S
M
T

(
u
s
e

o
f

a
p
p
r
o
p
r
i
a
t
e

c
o
r
i
n
g

e
q
u
i
p
m
e
n
t
)
.

D
e
t
e
r
m
i
n
e

g
r
a
i
n

s
i
z
e
s

a
t

s
e
l
e
c
t
e
d

m
i
n
i
n
g

a
r
e
a

s
i
t
e
s
,

e
.
g
.
,

a
t

t
h
o
s
e

s
e
l
e
c
t
e
d

u
n
d
e
r

h
y
p
o
t
h
e
s
i
s

H
0
2

f
o
r

s
u
p
p
l
e
m
e
n
t
a
r
y

s
a
m
p
l
i
n
g
.

R
e
p
e
a
t

X
-
r
a
y

a
n
a
l
y
s
i
s

o
f

s
e
d
i
m
e
n
t

c
o
r
e
s

(
a
n
n
u
a
l
l
y

t
o

e
n
d

o
f

m
i
n
e

l
i
f
e
)
.

V
i
d
e
o

r
e
d
e
p
o
s
i
t
i
o
n

o
f

s
e
d
i
m
e
n
t
s

o
n

m
i
n
e

a
r
e
a
s

a
n
d

c
h
a
n
g
e
s

t
o

t
o
p
o
g
r
a
p
h
y

o
f

m
i
n
e
d

a
r
e
a
s
.

C
o
r
e

s
a
m
p
l
e
s

f
o
r

g
r
a
i
n

s
i
z
e

a
n
a
l
y
s
i
s

(
a
n
n
u
a
l
l
y
)
.

E
n
v
i
r
o
n
m
e
n
t
a
l

I
m
p
a
c
t

S
t
a
t
e
m
e
n
t

S
o
l
w
a
r
a

1

P
r
o
j
e
c
t

N
a
u
t
i
l
u
s

M
i
n
e
r
a
l
s

N
i
u
g
i
n
i

7
0
0
8
_
0
9
_
C
h
1
3
_
v
4
.
d
o
c

1
3
-
9

C
o
f
f
e
y

N
a
t
u
r
a
l

S
y
s
t
e
m
s

T
a
b
l
e

1
3
.
1

S
u
m
m
a
r
y

o
f

p
r
o
p
o
s
e
d

s
e
a
f
l
o
o
r

m
o
n
i
t
o
r
i
n
g

p
r
o
g
r
a
m

(
c
o
n
t
d
)

E
n
v
i
r
o
n
m
e
n
t
a
l

I
s
s
u
e

I
m
p
a
c
t

H
y
p
o
t
h
e
s
e
s

P
r
o
p
o
s
e
d

B
a
s
e
l
i
n
e

(
=
b
a
s
e
l
i
n
e

s
t
u
d
i
e
s
)

P
r
o
p
o
s
e
d

M
o
n
i
t
o
r
i
n
g

a
n
d

M
i
t
i
g
a
t
i
o
n

(
=
v
a
l
i
d
a
t
i
o
n
/
m
o
n
i
t
o
r
i
n
g
)

E
f
f
e
c
t
s

o
n

a
b
u
n
d
a
n
c
e

a
n
d

r
e
c
r
u
i
t
m
e
n
t

d
o
w
n
s
t
r
e
a
m

o
f

S
o
l
w
a
r
a

1

H
0
7
.

D
e
c
r
e
a
s
e
d

r
e
c
r
u
i
t
m
e
n
t

a
n
d

l
o
w
e
r

a
b
u
n
d
a
n
c
e

w
i
l
l

r
e
s
u
l
t

d
o
w
n
s
t
r
e
a
m

o
f

S
o
l
w
a
r
a

1

d
u
r
i
n
g

m
i
n
i
n
g

f
r
o
m

r
e
d
u
c
t
i
o
n

i
n

r
e
c
r
u
i
t
m
e
n
t

p
o
t
e
n
t
i
a
l
.

S
e
t

t
r
a
n
s
e
c
t

s
i
t
e
s

a
n
d

o
b
t
a
i
n

v
i
d
e
o

o
f

e
x
i
s
t
i
n
g

c
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
s

a
t

S
o
l
w
a
r
a

8

(
d
o
w
n
s
t
r
e
a
m

s
i
t
e
)
.

I
n
c
l
u
d
e

s
a
m
p
l
e
s

f
r
o
m

S
o
l
w
a
r
a

8

i
n

g
e
n
e

f
l
o
w

s
t
u
d
y

(
h
y
p
o
t
h
e
s
i
s

H
0
3
)
.

R
e
p
e
a
t

v
i
d
e
o

o
b
s
e
r
v
a
t
i
o
n
s

o
f

c
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
i
e
s

a
t

S
o
l
w
a
r
a

8

a
f
t
e
r

m
i
n
i
n
g

i
s

c
o
m
p
l
e
t
e

a
t

S
o
l
w
a
r
a

1

a
n
d

b
e
f
o
r
e

a
n
y

(
a
s

y
e
t

u
n
p
l
a
n
n
e
d
)

b
u
t

p
o
t
e
n
t
i
a
l

m
i
n
i
n
g

a
t

S
o
l
w
a
r
a

8
.

S
a
m
p
l
e

c
o
l
o
n
i
s
i
n
g

a
n
i
m
a
l
s

a
t

S
o
l
w
a
r
a

8

f
o
r

D
N
A

a
n
a
l
y
s
e
s
.

R
e
c
o
v
e
r
y

o
f

t
h
e

t
r
o
p
h
i
c

s
t
r
u
c
t
u
r
e

H
0
8
.

T
h
e

t
r
o
p
h
i
c

s
t
r
u
c
t
u
r
e

w
i
l
l

r
e
t
u
r
n

t
o

t
h
e

p
r
e
-
e
x
i
s
t
i
n
g

b
a
s
i
s

w
i
t
h
i
n

t
w
o

t
o

t
h
r
e
e

y
e
a
r
s
.

U
n
d
e
r
t
a
k
e

s
t
a
b
l
e

i
s
o
t
o
p
e

(
C
,

N
,

S
)

a
n
a
l
y
s
e
s

o
f

s
e
l
e
c
t
e
d

s
p
e
c
i
e
s

a
t

S
o
l
w
a
r
a

1

a
n
d

S
o
u
t
h

S
u
.

I
n
c
l
u
d
e

i
n
v
e
r
t
e
b
r
a
t
e

p
r
e
d
a
t
o
r

s
p
e
c
i
e
s
.

R
e
p
e
a
t

s
t
a
b
l
e

i
s
o
t
o
p
e

s
a
m
p
l
i
n
g

f
r
o
m

r
e
c
o
l
o
n
i
s
i
n
g

a
n
i
m
a
l
s

a
t

S
o
l
w
a
r
a

1

a
n
d

S
o
u
t
h

S
u

(
a
c
t
i
v
e

i
n
a
c
t
i
v
e
)

(
a
f
t
e
r

o
n
e

a
n
d

t
w
o

y
e
a
r
s
)
.

A
n
a
l
y
s
e

s
a
m
e

a
r
r
a
y

o
f

s
p
e
c
i
e
s

i
n

m
i
n
e
d

a
r
e
a

t
o

d
e
t
e
r
m
i
n
e

p
o
t
e
n
t
i
a
l

c
h
a
n
g
e
s

t
o

b
a
s
e

o
f

f
o
o
d

s
o
u
r
c
e
.

W
a
t
e
r

r
e
m
o
v
a
l

e
f
f
e
c
t
i
n
g

l
a
r
v
a
l

r
e
c
r
u
i
t
m
e
n
t

H
0
9
.

T
h
e

r
a
t
e

o
f

w
a
t
e
r

r
e
m
o
v
a
l

(
i
.
e
.
,

b
e
i
n
g

s
u
c
k
e
d

i
n
t
o

t
h
e

S
M
T

d
u
r
i
n
g

m
i
n
i
n
g
)

w
i
l
l

n
o
t

r
e
d
u
c
e

l
a
r
v
a
l

r
e
c
r
u
i
t
m
e
n
t
.

D
e
s
k
t
o
p

c
o
m
p
a
r
i
s
o
n
s

(
r
i
s
k

a
s
s
e
s
s
m
e
n
t

o
f

p
u
m
p
i
n
g

r
a
t
e
s

a
n
d

n
a
t
u
r
a
l

c
u
r
r
e
n
t

f
l
o
w
,

a
n
d

p
r
o
p
o
r
t
i
o
n
s

o
f

l
a
r
v
a
e

p
o
t
e
n
t
i
a
l
l
y

a
f
f
e
c
t
e
d
)
.

R
e
v
i
e
w

o
f

r
e
l
e
v
a
n
t

l
i
t
e
r
a
t
u
r
e

o
n

d
i
s
t
r
i
b
u
t
i
o
n
/
t
i
m
i
n
g

o
f

l
a
r
v
a
e
.

S
e
e

m
o
n
i
t
o
r
i
n
g

f
o
r

h
y
p
o
t
h
e
s
i
s

H
0
2
.

N
o

s
p
e
c
i
f
i
c

t
a
s
k
.

L
i
g
h
t
,

n
o
i
s
e

a
n
d

v
i
b
r
a
t
i
o
n

t
h
a
t

S
M
T

c
r
e
a
t
e
s

w
i
l
l

a
t
t
r
a
c
t

a
n
i
m
a
l
s

H
1
0
.

A
n
i
m
a
l
s

w
i
l
l

b
e

a
t
t
r
a
c
t
e
d

t
o

t
h
e

S
M
T

b
y

t
h
e

l
i
g
h
t
,

n
o
i
s
e

a
n
d

v
i
b
r
a
t
i
o
n

t
h
a
t

i
t

c
r
e
a
t
e
s
.

R
e
c
o
r
d

a
n
y

m
a
r
i
n
e

m
a
m
m
a
l
s
/
o
t
h
e
r

l
a
r
g
e

a
n
i
m
a
l
s

i
n

v
i
c
i
n
i
t
y

o
f

M
S
V

a
n
d

i
f

o
b
s
e
r
v
e
d

f
r
o
m

R
O
V
.

V
i
d
e
o

m
o
n
i
t
o
r
i
n
g

o
f

S
M
T

a
t
t
r
a
c
t
i
n
g

o
r

r
e
p
e
l
l
i
n
g

o
r
g
a
n
i
s
m
s

(
r
o
u
t
i
n
e

o
p
e
r
a
t
i
o
n
a
l
)
.

H
y
d
r
o
p
h
o
n
e

m
o
n
i
t
o
r
i
n
g

o
f

s
o
u
n
d

c
h
a
r
a
c
t
e
r
i
s
t
i
c
s

o
f

M
S
V
,

R
i
s
e
r

a
n
d

L
i
f
t

S
y
s
t
e
m

a
n
d

S
M
T

o
p
e
r
a
t
i
o
n
s
.

R
e
c
o
r
d

a
n
y

o
b
s
e
r
v
a
t
i
o
n
s

o
f

m
a
r
i
n
e

m
a
m
m
a
l
s

i
n

t
h
e

v
i
c
i
n
i
t
y

o
f

o
p
e
r
a
t
i
o
n
s

d
u
r
i
n
g

l
i
f
e

o
f

m
i
n
e
.

E
n
v
i
r
o
n
m
e
n
t
a
l

I
m
p
a
c
t

S
t
a
t
e
m
e
n
t

S
o
l
w
a
r
a

1

P
r
o
j
e
c
t

N
a
u
t
i
l
u
s

M
i
n
e
r
a
l
s

N
i
u
g
i
n
i

7
0
0
8
_
0
9
_
C
h
1
3
_
v
4
.
d
o
c

1
3
-
1
0

C
o
f
f
e
y

N
a
t
u
r
a
l

S
y
s
t
e
m
s

T
a
b
l
e

1
3
.
1

S
u
m
m
a
r
y

o
f

p
r
o
p
o
s
e
d

s
e
a
f
l
o
o
r

m
o
n
i
t
o
r
i
n
g

p
r
o
g
r
a
m

(
c
o
n
t
d
)

E
n
v
i
r
o
n
m
e
n
t
a
l

I
s
s
u
e

I
m
p
a
c
t

H
y
p
o
t
h
e
s
e
s

P
r
o
p
o
s
e
d

B
a
s
e
l
i
n
e

(
=
b
a
s
e
l
i
n
e

s
t
u
d
i
e
s
)

P
r
o
p
o
s
e
d

M
o
n
i
t
o
r
i
n
g

a
n
d

M
i
t
i
g
a
t
i
o
n

(
=
v
a
l
i
d
a
t
i
o
n
/
m
o
n
i
t
o
r
i
n
g
)

C
o
n
c
e
n
t
r
a
t
i
o
n

o
f

c
o
n
t
a
m
i
n
a
n
t
s

i
n

t
h
e

r
e
t
u
r
n

w
a
t
e
r

d
i
s
c
h
a
r
g
e

H
1
1
.

A
n
y

c
o
n
c
e
n
t
r
a
t
i
o
n
s

o
f

c
o
n
t
a
m
i
n
a
n
t
s

i
n

r
e
t
u
r
n

w
a
t
e
r

d
i
s
c
h
a
r
g
e

w
i
l
l

m
e
e
t

d
i
l
u
t
i
o
n

c
h
a
r
a
c
t
e
r
i
s
t
i
c
s

w
i
t
h
i
n

t
h
e

m
o
d
e
l
l
e
d

m
i
x
i
n
g

z
o
n
e

b
o
u
n
d
a
r
i
e
s
.

(
D
i
l
u
t
i
o
n

c
h
o
s
e
n

a
s

m
e
a
s
u
r
e

a
s

a
m
b
i
e
n
t

w
a
t
e
r

q
u
a
l
i
t
y

m
a
y

b
e

c
l
o
s
e

t
o

e
n
v
i
r
o
n
m
e
n
t
a
l

g
u
i
d
e
l
i
n
e
s
.
)

S
e
l
e
c
t

s
a
m
p
l
i
n
g

s
i
t
e
s

a
n
d

t
a
k
e

s
a
m
p
l
e
s

d
o
w
n
s
t
r
e
a
m

o
f

d
e
w
a
t
e
r
i
n
g

e
x
i
t

a
n
d

m
i
x
i
n
g

z
o
n
e

b
o
u
n
d
a
r
y

(
b
a
s
e
d

o
n

m
o
d
e
l
l
i
n
g

r
e
s
u
l
t
s
)
.

S
u
p
p
l
e
m
e
n
t

b
a
s
e
l
i
n
e

s
e
d
i
m
e
n
t
a
t
i
o
n

r
a
t
e
s

a
n
d

w
a
t
e
r

q
u
a
l
i
t
y

a
t

t
h
e
s
e

s
i
t
e
s

(
s
e
e

l
o
w

t
e
m
p
e
r
a
t
u
r
e

w
a
t
e
r

q
u
a
l
i
t
y

t
a
s
k

f
o
r

h
y
p
o
t
h
e
s
i
s

H
0
1
)
.

C
o
n
f
i
r
m

d
i
l
u
t
i
o
n

c
h
a
r
a
c
t
e
r
i
s
t
i
c
s

a
t

d
i
s
t
a
n
c
e
s

f
r
o
m

d
e
w
a
t
e
r
i
n
g

d
i
s
c
h
a
r
g
e

p
o
i
n
t

u
s
i
n
g

f
l
u
o
r
e
s
c
e
n
t

t
r
a
c
e
r

a
n
d

f
l
u
o
r
i
m
e
t
e
r
.

S
a
m
p
l
i
n
g

o
f

w
a
t
e
r

q
u
a
l
i
t
y

(
i
n
c
l
u
d
i
n
g

C
T
D

p
r
o
f
i
l
e
s
)

a
t

s
i
t
e
s

t
o

d
e
t
e
c
t

p
l
u
m
e
s

a
n
d

v
a
l
i
d
a
t
e

m
i
x
i
n
g

z
o
n
e

b
o
u
n
d
a
r
y
.

C
o
m
p
l
i
a
n
c
e

m
o
n
i
t
o
r
i
n
g

(
a
t

s
t
a
r
t
-
u
p

a
n
d

t
h
r
e
e

t
o

s
i
x

m
o
n
t
h
l
y
)
.

C
h
a
n
g
e
s

t
o

f
l
o
w

r
e
g
i
m
e

a
n
d

s
t
a
b
l
e

h
a
b
i
t
a
t
s

t
h
r
o
u
g
h

t
o
p
o
g
r
a
p
h
y

c
h
a
n
g
e
s

H
1
2
.

T
o
p
o
g
r
a
p
h
i
c

c
h
a
n
g
e
s

w
i
l
l

c
h
a
n
g
e

c
u
r
r
e
n
t

f
l
o
w

r
e
g
i
m
e

a
n
d

h
a
b
i
t
a
t
s
.

N
A

D
e
p
l
o
y

a

c
u
r
r
e
n
t

m
e
t
e
r

(
A
D
C
P
)

f
o
r

c
o
n
t
i
n
u
o
u
s

r
e
c
o
r
d
i
n
g

a
t

a

f
i
x
e
d

s
i
t
e

f
o
r

o
c
e
a
n

c
u
r
r
e
n
t
s

a
n
d

p
l
u
m
e

p
r
e
d
i
c
t
i
o
n
s
.

D
e
f
i
n
i
t
i
o
n
s
:

B
a
s
e
l
i
n
e

S
t
u
d
i
e
s

o
c
c
u
r

p
r
i
o
r

t
o

c
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n

a
n
d

o
p
e
r
a
t
i
o
n
.

T
h
e
s
e

s
t
u
d
i
e
s

c
h
a
r
a
c
t
e
r
i
s
e

c
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
s

p
r
i
o
r

t
o

a
n
y

P
r
o
j
e
c
t

a
c
t
i
v
i
t
i
e
s

a
n
d

f
o
r
m

a

b
a
s
e
l
i
n
e

a
g
a
i
n
s
t

w
h
i
c
h

c
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
s

d
u
r
i
n
g

c
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
,

o
p
e
r
a
t
i
o
n
s

a
n
d

p
o
s
t
-
c
l
o
s
u
r
e

c
a
n

b
e

m
e
a
s
u
r
e
d
.

T
h
e

N
o
r
s
k
y

0
8

C
a
m
p
a
i
g
n

m
a
y

b
e

t
h
e

o
n
l
y

o
p
p
o
r
t
u
n
i
t
y

f
o
r

b
a
s
e
l
i
n
e

w
o
r
k
,

t
h
e
r
e
f
o
r
e
,

p
r
i
o
r
i
t
i
e
s

o
f

t
h
e

p
r
o
p
o
s
e
d

b
a
s
e
l
i
n
e

s
t
u
d
i
e
s

w
i
l
l

n
e
e
d

t
o

b
e

s
e
t
.

V
a
l
i
d
a
t
i
o
n

S
t
u
d
i
e
s

g
e
n
e
r
a
l
l
y

o
c
c
u
r

a
s

s
o
o
n

a
s

p
o
s
s
i
b
l
e

a
f
t
e
r

n
o
r
m
a
l

o
p
e
r
a
t
i
n
g

c
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
s

a
r
e

a
c
h
i
e
v
e
d
.

T
h
e
s
e

s
t
u
d
i
e
s

a
r
e

u
s
u
a
l
l
y

s
h
o
r
t

t
e
r
m

a
n
d

a
r
e

u
s
e
d

t
o

c
o
m
p
a
r
e

p
r
e
d
i
c
t
e
d

P
r
o
j
e
c
t

i
m
p
a
c
t
s

d
u
r
i
n
g

o
p
e
r
a
t
i
o
n
s

w
i
t
h

a
c
t
u
a
l

c
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
s
.

M
o
n
i
t
o
r
i
n
g

S
t
u
d
i
e
s

a
r
e

c
o
n
d
u
c
t
e
d

d
u
r
i
n
g

t
h
e

c
o
u
r
s
e

o
f

o
p
e
r
a
t
i
o
n
s

a
n
d

c
a
n

c
o
n
t
i
n
u
e

p
o
s
t
-
c
l
o
s
u
r
e
.

T
h
e
s
e

s
t
u
d
i
e
s

a
r
e

d
e
s
i
g
n
e
d

t
o

p
r
o
v
i
d
e

r
e
g
u
l
a
r

u
p
d
a
t
e
s

o
n

e
n
v
i
r
o
n
m
e
n
t
a
l

c
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
s

a
n
d

a
r
e

u
s
e
d

t
o

m
a
n
a
g
e

a
n
d

m
i
n
i
m
i
s
e

P
r
o
j
e
c
t

i
m
p
a
c
t
s
.

Solwara 1 Project

14-1

14. STUDY TEAM
Coffey was commissioned by Nautilus to assist in the preparation of this Environmental Impact
Statement (EIS). Coffey engaged a number of specialist subconsultants and the EIS draws on
their work. These contributions are gratefully acknowledged.
The following individuals contributed to the preparation of this EIS.
14.1 Nautilus
S. Smith Environmental Manager
A. Swaddling Environmental Scientist
K. Adams Offshore Project Manager
M. Frazer Marine Operations Manager
D. Heydon Former Chief Executive Officer
M. Johnston VP Corporate Development
G. Jones Senior Mining Engineer
R. Lari Environmental Scientist
S. McLay Onshore Project Manager
T. OSullivan Chief Operating Officer
G. Osborne GIS/IT Manager
C. Riley Exploration Manager
S. Rogers Chief Executive Officer
M. Togolo PNG Country Manager
14.2 Coffey Natural Systems
D. Gwyther Project Director
M. Wright Project Manager
J. Bant Editing/administration
K. Bull Drafting
H. Blaszkiewicz Drafting
L. David Assessment report
A. Dennis Assessment report
H. Doodie Oceanography
J. Grady Administration/report production
A. Goldman Assessment report
N. Goldsmith Assessment report/oceanography
M. Haywood Sediment and water quality field work/assessment report/oceanography
H. Kotasek GIS
J. Lockyer Assessment report
C. Monahan Assessment report
D. Moriarty Water quality field work
R. Morris Assessment report
J. ONeil Formatting
C. Ralph Assessment report
D. Ryan Sediment and water quality field work/oceanography
D. Smith GIS
K. Sutherland Assessment report
Solwara 1 Project

14-2

G. Terrens Assessment report
J. Wiltshire Oceanography field work/assessment report
G. Young GIS coordination
14.3 EIS Specialist Subconsultants
Asia-Pacific Applied Science Associates
T. Gilbert Hydrodynamic modelling
B. King Hydrodynamic modelling
Charles Darwin University
D. Parry Water and sediment characterisation
D. Cambell Water and sediment characterisation
F. Foti Water and sediment characterisation
J. Tsang Water and sediment characterisation
CSIRO
S. Simpson Water and sediment characterisation and toxicity
B. Angel Water and sediment characterisation and toxicity
I. Hamilton Water and sediment characterisation and toxicity
D. Spadaro Water and sediment characterisation and toxicity
M. Binet Water and sediment characterisation and toxicity
Curtin University of Technology
A. Duncan Underwater Noise
R. McCauley Underwater Noise
C. Salgado-Kent Underwater Noise
Duke University Marine Laboratory
C. Van Dover Macrofauna at Solwara 1 and South Su
P. Collins Macrofauna at Solwara 1 and South Su
C. Logan Macrofauna at Solwara 1 and South Su
M. Mungkaje Macrofauna at Solwara 1 and South Su
R. Jones Macrofauna at Solwara 1 and South Su
K. Yang Macrofauna at Solwara 1 and South Su
Hydrobiology Pty Ltd
A. Flynn Biomass, biodiversity and bioaccumulation
J. Alawo Biomass, biodiversity and bioaccumulation
M. Hobbs Biomass, biodiversity and bioaccumulation
J. Shelley Biomass, biodiversity and bioaccumulation
Rabaul Volcano Observatory
S. Saunders Natural hazards
Scripps Institution of Oceanography
L. Levin Sediment macroinfauna at Solwara 1 and South Su
F. Mendoza Sediment macroinfauna at Solwara 1 and South Su
T. Konotchick Sediment macroinfauna at Solwara 1 and South Su
Solwara 1 Project

14-3

E. Hrischeva Sediment quality at Solwara 1 and South Su
S. Scott Sediment quality at Solwara 1 and South Su

Solwara 1 Project

14-4

Solwara 1 Project

15-1

15. REFERENCES

Alt, J.C., and Bach, W. 2003. Alteration of oceanic crust: Subsurface rock-water interactions. In
Energy and Mass Transfer in Marine Hydrothermal Systems. Edited by P.E. Halbach, V.
Tunnicliffe, and J.R. Hein. Dahlem University Press, Berlin. 7-28.
ANZECC/ARMCANZ. 2000. Australian and New Zealand Guidelines for Fresh and Marine Water
Quality. Canberra, Australia: Australian and New Zealand Environment and Conservation
Council and the Agriculture and Resource Management Council of Australia and New Zealand.
APPEA. 2005. A compilation of recent research into the marine environment. Report prepared by
the Australian Petroleum Production and Exploration Association.
AS. 1997, AS 1055 Acoustics: Description and Measurement of Environmental Noise, Sydney.
AS. 2000. Australian Standards AS 2508.10.001: Safe storage and handling information card -
Agricultural and veterinary chemicals. Prepared by Standards Australia.
AS. 2001. Australian Standard AS 2508.2.007: Safe Storage and Handling Information Cards -
Liquefied petroleum gas. Prepared by Standards Australia.
AS/NZS. 1993. Australian Standard AS 2243.10:1993 Safety in laboratories Part 10: Storage of
chemicals. Prepared by Standards Australia/Standards New Zealand.
AS/NZS. 2001. Australian Standard AS 4804:2001 Occupational Health and safety management
systems - General guidelines on principles, systems and supporting techniques. Prepared by
Standards Australia/Standards New Zealand.
Binns, R.A. 2004. Eastern Manus Basin, Papua New Guinea: Guides for volcanogenic massive
sulphide exploration from a modern seafloor analogue. In Copper-zinc massive sulphide
deposits in Western Australia. Edited by T.F. McConachy, and B.I.A. McInnes. CSIRO
Exploration and Mining, Australia.
Binns, R.A., and Scott, S.D. 1993. Actively forming polymetallic sulfide deposits associated with
felsic volcanic rocks in the Eastern Manus Basin, Papua New Guinea. Economic Geology
88:2226-2236.
BirdLife International. 2008. Species factsheet: Puffinus heinrothi. A WWW publication accessed
on 3 June 2008 at
http://www.birdlife.org/datazone/species/index.html?action=SpcHTMDetails.asp&sid=3947&m
=0.
Birney, K., Griffin, A., Gwiazda, J., Kefauver, J., Nagai, T., and Varchol, D. 2006. Potential deep-
sea mining of seafloor massive sulfides: A case study in Papua New Guinea. Donald Bren
School of Environmental Science and Management Thesis. 117 pages.
Blake, E.A., Erickson, K.L., and Van Dover, C.L. 2005. A review of the biology of chemosynthetic
ecosystems in Manus Basin. Report prepared for Placer Dome Oceania Ltd.
Cellula Robotics. 2006. PDTS sea floor mining project: Mining system design concept. Report
prepared by Cellula Robotics Ltd for Nautilus Minerals Inc., Milton, Queensland.
CIA. 2008. The World Factbook. Papua New Guinea. A www publication accessed on 3 May
2008 at http://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/geos/pp.html.
City Population. 2008. Papua New Guinea. A WWW publication accessed on 8 May 2008 at
http://www.citypopulation.de/PapuaNewGuinea.html.
Solwara 1 Project

15-2

Clarke, K.R., and Warwick, R. M. 2001. Change in marine communities: an approach to statistical
analysis and interpretation. 2nd ed. PRMER-E. Plymouth.
Clough. 2008. Solwara 1 FEED Study, Provision of Mining Services, Tender No. SOL01/002.
April. Report prepared by Clough Oil and Gas International Ltd for Nautilus Minerals Niugini
Ltd.
Coull, B. 1988. Ecology of marine meiofauna. In Introduction to the study of meiofauna. Edited by
R. P. Higgins and H. Thiel. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington D.C.
Cresswell, G. 2007. Solwara Project: Regional Oceanographic Characterisation - Progress
Report. Report prepared by George Cresswell and Associates for Nautilus Minerals Niugini
Limited.
Crone, T.J., Wilcock, W.S.D., Barclay, A.H., and Parsons, J.D. 2006. The sound generated by
mid-ocean ridge black smoker hydrothermal vents. PLoS ONE 1(1): e133.
doi:10.1371/jounal.pone.0000133
CSA. 2005. National Instrument 43-101 Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects.
December. Canadian Securities Administrators.
CSIRO. 1994. Research on Jarosite Dumping at Sea. A program of research on jarosite dumping
by Pasminco Metals-EZ: physical dispersal of jarosite and surveys of marine biota heavy metal
levels 1991/1994 (5 volumes) CSIRO Australia.
CSIRO. 2005. Baseline Environmental Study, Eastern Manus Basin, Papua New Guinea.
Proposal prepared by McConachy, T.F. for CSIRO Exploration and Mining, North Ryde, New
South Wales.
CSIRO. 2007. Baseline environmental study, Eastern Manus Basin, Papua New Guinea: Module
3. Report prepared by Johns, S.M., Yeats, C.J., Hough, R.M., Binns, R.A., and Rouse, G.W.
CSIRO Exploration and Mining, North Ryde, New South Wales.
DEC. 2004. Guideline for conduct of Environmental Impact Assessment and Preparation of
Environmental Impact Statement. Information Guideline No. GL-Env/02/2004. Department of
Environment and Conservation, Waigani, PNG.
Desbruyres, D., Segonzac, M., and Bright, M. 2006. Handbook of the deep sea hydrothermal
vent fauna. Linz, Austria: Denisia, Volume 18; Land Oberosterreich, Biologiezentrum der
Oberosterreichische Landesmuseen.
Devaux, M., and Clarke, D. 2006. Nautilus Minerals Inc. - Solwara 1 Project Subsea Cutting
Report. Report prepared for Nautilus Minerals Inc., Milton, Queensland.
DEWHA. 2008. EPBC Act Referral: Woodside Energy Ltd/Exploration (mineral, oil and gas -
marine)/Permits WA-28-L WA-255-P WA-155-P1 WA-32-L WA-271/WA/Enfield M3 4D,
Vincent 4D & 4D Line Test Marine Seismic Surveys. A WWW publication accessed on 21
Spetember 2008 at http://www.environment.gov.au/cgi-
bin/epbc/epbc_ap.pl?name=current_referral_detail&proposal_id=4122. Australian
Government.
DEWR. 2007. EPBC Act Policy Statement 2.1 Interaction between offshore seismic exploration
and whales. May. Australian Government Department of the Environment and Water
Resources.
DNV. 2005. DNV Managing Risk Webshop. A WWW publication accessed on 15 May 2008 at
http://webshop.dnv.com/global/. Det Norske Veritas, Norway.
Earth Mechanics Institute. 2004. Linear cutting test results for mechanical mining of sub-sea poly-
metallic sulfides. Report prepared for Cellula Robotics, Vancouver, BC.
Solwara 1 Project

15-3

Enesar. 2006a. Solwara Project: Water Quality Monitoring Report. Report prepared by Enesar
Consulting Pty Ltd for Nautilus Minerals Inc., Milton, Queensland.
Enesar. 2006b. Project Salty Daug: Preliminary Oceanographic Data Summary. Report prepared
by Enesar Consulting Pty Ltd for Placer Dome Oceania.
Enesar. 2007. Environmental Inception Report. May. Report prepared by Enesar Consulting Pty
Ltd for Nautilus Minerals Niugini.
EPFI. 2006. The Equator Principles A financial industry benchmark for determining, assessing
and managing social and environmental risk in project financing. July. Prepared by Equator
Principles Financial Institutions.
EPHC/NEPC. 1998. Ambient Air Quality National Environmental Protection Measure. Measure
prepared by the Environment Protection and Heritage Council Secretariat
National Environment Protection Council Service Corporation.
ESM. 2008. Kavieng (New Ireland, Papua New Guinea). From Embedded Semanitics Wiki. A
www publication accessed on 8 May 2008 at http://liverpool.informatik.uni-
freiburg.de/index.php/Kavieng_(New_Ireland,_Papua_New_Guinea).
Galkin, S.V. 1997. Megafauna associated with hydrothermal vents in the Manus Back-Arc Basin
(Bismarck Sea). Marine Geology 142:197-206.
Geological Survey PNG. undated. Active volcanoes of Papual New Guinea. A WWW publication
accessed on 6 March 2008 at http://www.mineral.gov.pg/volcObs/activeVolc.htm. Geological
Papual New Guinea. Department of Mining.
Geoscience Australia. 2008. Major Historic Volcanic Eruptions. A WWW publication accessed on
6 March 2008 at http://www.ga.gov.au/hazards/volcano/historic.jsp. Australian Government.
Giardini, D., Grnthal, G., Shedlock, K., and Zhang, P. Undated. The GSHAP Global Seismic
Hazard Map. A www publication accessed on 23 September 2008 at
http://www.seismo.ethz.ch/GSHAP/.
Golder Associates. 2008. Mineral resource estimate: Solwara 1 Project, Bismarck Sea, Papua
New Guinea. Report prepared by Lipton, I. for Nautilus Minerals Niugini Limited.
Golder Associates & Nautilus Minerals. 2008. Solwara 1 SMS deposit geotechnical review,
Manus basin, Papua New Guinea. April.
Greenbaum, D., Tutton, M., Bowker, M. R., Browne, T. J., Buleka, J., Greally, K. B., Kuna, G.,
McDonald, A. J. W., Marsh, S. H., O'Conner, E. A. and Tragheim, D. G. 1995. Rapid methods
of landslide hazard mapping: Papua New Guinea case study. Technical report WC/95/27.
Overseas Geology Series. British Geological Survey. Geological Survey of Papua New
Guinea.
Greene, G., Tiffin, D. and McKee, C. 1985. Structure and Sedimentation in an active caldera,
Rabaul, Papua New Guinea. A WWW publication accessed on 23 May 2008 at
http://www.sopac.org/data/virlib/TR/TR0039.pdf.
Groom, R.A., Lawler, I.R., and Marsh, H. Undated. The risk to dugongs of vessel strike in the
southern bay islands of Moreton Bay. School of Tropical Environment Studies and Geography,
James Cook University, Townsville.
Halbach, P.E., Fouquet, Y., and Herzig, P. 2003. 'Mineralization and compositional patterns in
deep-sea hydrothermal systems'. In Energy and Mass Transfer in Marine Hydrothermal
Systems. Edited by P.E. Halbach, V. Tunnicliffe, and J.R. Hein. Dahlem University Press,
Berlin. 85-122.
Solwara 1 Project

15-4

Hashimoto, J., Ohta, S., Fiala-Medione, A., Auzende, J., Kojima, S., Segonzac, M., Fujiwara, Y.,
Hunt, J.C., Gena, K., Miura, T., Kikuchi, T., Yamaguchi, T., Toda, T., Chiba, H., Tsuchida, S.,
Ishibashi, J., Henry, K., Zbinden, M., Pruski, A., Inoue, A., Kobayashi, H., Birrien, J-L., Naka,
J., Yamanaka, T., Laporte, C., Nishimura, K., Yeats, C., Malagun, S., Kia, P., Oyaizu, M., and
Katayama, T. 1999. Hydrothermal vent communities in the Manus Basin, Papua New Guinea:
Results of the BIOACCESS cruises '96 and '98. InterRidge News 8(2):12-18.
Henry, M. S., Childress, J. J., and Figuera, D. 2008. Metabolic rates and thermal tolerances of
chemoautotropic symbioses from Lau Basin hydrothermal vents and their implications for
species distributions. Deep-Sea Research 1 55:679-695.
Hodkiewicz, P., Clark, D. and Williams, P. 2005. Independent technical assessment of exploration
tenements in the Bismarck Sea and the Solomon Sea, Papua New Guinea. Report prepared
by SRK Consulting for Nautilus Minerals Inc., Milton, Queensland.
Hrischeva, E., Scott, S.D., and Weston, R. 2007. Metalliferous sediments associated with
presently forming volcanogenic massive sulfides: The SuSu Knolls hydrothermal field, Eastern
Mauns Basin, Papua New Guinea. Economic Geology 102:55-73.
IFC. 2006a. IFCs policy and performance standards on social and environment sustainability.
Report prepared by the International Finance Corporation, Washington.
IFC. 2006b. IFCs Guidance Notes: performance standards on social and environment
sustainability. Report prepared by the International Finance Corporation, Washington.
IFC. 2007a. Environmental, health and safety general guidelines. Report prepared by the
International Finance Corporation, Washington.
IFC. 2007b. Environmental, health and safety guidelines for mining. Draft report prepared by the
IFC. 2007c. Environmental, health and safety guidelines for offshore oil and gas development.
Report prepared by the International Finance Corporation, Washington.
IFC. 2007d. Environmental, health and safety guidelines for shipping. Report prepared by the
IMO. 1973/1978. International Convention for the Prevention of Pollution From Ships. A WWW
publication accessed on 22 May 2008 at
http://www.amsa.gov.au/Marine_Environment_Protection/Revision_of_Annexes_I_and_II_of_
MARPOL_73-78/index.asp.
IMO. 1997. Guidelines for the control and management of ships' ballast water to minimize the
transfer of harmful aquatic organisms and pathogens. December. Prepared by the
International Maritime Organisation.
IMO. 2001. International Convention on the Control of Harmful Anti-fouling Systems on Ships.
October. Prepared by the International Maritime Organisation.
IMO. 2004. International Convention for the Control and Management of Ships Ballast Water and
Sediments. A WWW publication accessed on 22 May 2008 at
http://194.196.162.45/Conventions/mainframe.asp?topic_id=867.
Independent State of Papua New Guinea. 1984. Regulation. Public Health (Drinking Water),
Schedule 1 (Raw Water) and Schedule 2 (Drinking Water).
Independent State of Papua New Guinea. 2002. Environment (Water Quality Guidelines)
Regulation, Schedule 1.
IUCN 2008a. The IUCN redlist. A WWW publication accessed on the 27 March 2008 at
http://www.iucnredlist.org/search/search.php?freetext=marine+turtles&modifier=phrase&criteri
Solwara 1 Project

15-5

a=wholedb&taxa_species=1&redlistCategory%5B%5D=all&country%5B%5D=all&cty_default=
1&aquatic%5B%5D=all&aqu_default=1&regions%5B%5D=all&reg_default=1&habitats%5B%5
D=all&threats%5B%5D=all&redlistAssessyear%5B%5D=all&growths%5B%5D=all.
IUCN 2008b. New assessment for Lepidochelys olivacea. A report prepared for the update of the
IUCN Redlist of threatened species. A WWW publication accessed at
http://intranet.iucn.org/webfiles/doc%5CSSC%5CRedList%5CLepidochelys_olivacea_2008_as
sessment.pdf
IUCN. 2007. IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. A WWW publication accessed on 4 June
2008 at www.iucnredlist.org.
Jackson, E. 2006. Nautilus Minerals Inc. - Solwara 1 Project Rock-Cutting Test Program Report.
Report prepared for Nautilus Minerals Inc., Milton, Queensland.
James, M.C., and Mrosovsky, N. 2004. Body temperatures of leatherback turtles (Dermochelys
coriacea) in temperate waters off Nova Scotia, Canada. Canadian Journal of Zoology
82:13021306.
Jankowski, P., and Hodkiewicz, P. 2006. Independent technical assessment of seafloor massive
sulphide exploration tenements in Papua New Guinea and Fiji. Report prepared for Nautilus
Minerals Inc., Milton, Queensland.
Johnson, G. 2001. Voyage of the Odyssey Papua New Guinea logs. A WWW publication
accessed on the 21 November 2007 at
http://www.pbs.org/odyssey/20010402_log_transcript.html.
Johnson, K. S., Childress, J. J., Beehler, C. L., and Sakamoto, C. M. 1994. Biogeochemistry of
hydrothermal vent mussel communities: The deepsea analogue to the intertidal zone. Deep-
Sea Research 1 41:993-1011.
Kashefi, K., and Lovley, D. R. 2003. Extending the Upper Temperature Limit for Life. Science
301:394.
Klohn Crippen Berger. 2006. Processing Plant Site Evalution. Report prepared fby Klohn Crippen
Berger Ltd or Nautilus Minerals Niugini Limited.
Kumoru L. and Koren. L. 2006. Tuna Fisheries Report. Papua New Guinea National Fisheries
Authority, Port Moresby, PNG July 2006.
Kumoru, L. 2003. The Shark Longline Fishery in Papua New Guinea. Report prepared for the
Billfish and By-catch Research Group, Mooloolaba, Queensland.
Kumoru, L., and Koren, L. 2007. Tuna fisheries report - Papua New Guinea. Report prepared for
the 3rd Science Committee Meeting, Honolulu, Hawaii.
Lampitt, R. and Antia, A. 1997. Particle flux in deep seas: regional characteristics and temporal
variability. Deep-Sea Research 1. 44:1377-1403. Elsevier Science Ltd Great Britain.
Limpus, C.J., Miller, J.D., Parmenter, C.J., Reimer, D., McLachlan, N., and Webb, R. 1992.
Migration of green (Chelonia mydas) and loggerhead (Caretta caretta) turtles to and from
Eastern Australian rookeries. Wildlife Research, 19:347-358.
Maniwavie, T., Rewald, J., Wagner, T., Aije, J. and Munday, P.L. 2001. Recovery of coral reefs
from volcanic eruptions at Rabaul. Coral Reefs 20:24.
Marsh, H. 2006. Dugong dugon. A WWW publication accessed on 5 August 2008 at
www.iucnredlist.org. International Union for Conservation of Nature.
Marsh, H., Eros, C., Corkeron, P., and Breen, B. 1999. A conservation strategy for dugongs:
implications of Australian research. Marine and Freshwater Research 50:979-990.
Solwara 1 Project

15-6

Marsh, H., Penrose, H., Eros, C., Hugues, J. 1996. Dugong: Status report and action plans for
countries and territories. A report compiled for the IUSN/SSC Sirenia specialist group.
Martinez, F., and Taylor, B. 1996. Backarc spreading, rifting, and microplate rotation, between
transform faults in the Manus Basin. Marine Geophysical Researches 18:203-224.
MCA. 2004. Australasian code for Reporting of Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and Ore
Reserves (The JORC Code 2004 Edition). Minerals Council of Australia.
McAlpine, J. Keig, G. and Falls, R. 1983. Climate of Papua New Guinea. CSIRO. Australia.
McAlpine, J. Keig, G. and Short, K. 1975. Climatic Tables for Papua New Guinea. Division of
Land Use Research Technical Paper No. 37. CSIRO. Australia.
McCarthy, E. 2004. International regulation of underwater sound: Establishing rules and
standards to address ocean noise pollution. Springer Publishing, Dordrecht.
Moss, R., and Scott, S.D. 2001. Geochemistry and minerology of gold-rich hydrothermal
precipitates from the Eastern Manus Basin, Papua New Guinea. The Canadian Mineralogist
39:957-978.
Moss, R., Scott, S.D., and Binns, R.A. 2001. Gold content of Eastern Manus Basin volcanic rocks:
Implications for enrichment in associated hydrothermal precipitates. Economic Geology 96:91-
107.
MRA. 2007. Corporate Profile. A WWW publication accessed on 17 May 2008 at
http://www.mra.gov.pg/LinkClick.aspx?fileticket=uYX%2FTVEM7Jg%3D&tabid=36&mid=444
Mullineaux, L.S., Mills, S.W., and Goldman, E. 1998. Recruitment variation during a pilot
colonization study of hydrothermal vents (950N, East Pacific Rise). Deep Sea Research Part
II: Topical Studies in Oceanography 45:441-464.
Munday, P. 2000. The Status of Coral Reefs in Papua New Guinea. GCRMN. AIMS, Townsville.
NRC 2003. Ocean noise and marine mammals. The National Academic Press. National Research
Council of National Academy of Science, Washington, D.C.
NSW EPA. 2001. Approved Methods and Guidance for Modelling and Assessment of Air
Pollutants in New South Wales. Prepared by NSW Environment Protection Authority, a part of
the Department of Environment and Conservation, NSW.
NSW EPA. 2000. NSW Industrial Noise Policy. Prepared by the Environment Protection Authority,
NSW.
NTC. 2008. Australian Dangerous Goods Code, 7th Edition. Prepared by the National Transport
Commission.
Parr, J.M., and Binns, E.A., 1997. Report on the PACMANUS-III cruise, RV Franklin, Eastern
Manus Basin, Papua New Guinea: Exploration and Mining Report 345R, CSIRO Division of
Exploration and Mining pp 179.
Pinto, A.M.M., Barriga, F.J.A.S., and Scott, S.D. 2003. Data report: Sulfide and oxide mineral
chemistry of an active backarc hydrothermal systems: PACMANUS, ODP holes 1188A,
1188F, 1189A, and 1189B. Proceedings of the Ocean Drilling Program, Scientific Results
193:1-31.
Pinto, A.M.M., Relvas, J.M.R.S., Barriga, F.J.A.S., Munha, J., Pacheco, N., and Scott, S.D. 2005.
Gold mineralisation in recent and ancient volcanic-hosted massive sulphides: the PACMANUS
field and the neves corvo deposit. Mineral Deposits Research: Meeting the Global Challenge
1:683-686.
Solwara 1 Project

15-7

Placer Dome and Nautilus Minerals. 2006. Live video survey of Solwara 1 using a TST 212 ROV
aboard the DP Hunter. Events logged using WinFrog software. Recorded by Placer Dome
Group for Nautilus Minerals Niugini Ltd.
PNGS. 1982. PNGS 1001-1982: Part 4. General Structural Design and Design Loadings for
Buildings. Part 4 - Earthquake Loadings. National Standards Council of Papua New Guinea.
Quin, N., Anguru, B., Chee Kapua, K.O. 1983. Preliminary survey of Leatherback rookeries in
Morobe Province with notes on their biology. Research Report. Series 83/1. A report prepared
for the Department of Fisheries, University of Technology, Lae, Papua New Guinea.
Richardson, W.J., Greene, C.R. Jnr., Malme, C.I., and Thomson, D.H. 1995. Marine Mammals
and Noise. Academic Press, California.
Richardson, W.J., Wursig, B., and Greene, C.R. Jnr. 1990. Reactions of bowhead whales
(Balaena mysticetus) to drilling and dredging noise in the Canadian Beaufort Sea. Marine
Environmental Research 29:135-160.
RPS Metocean. 2008. Final Metocean design criteria study for Solwara 1 location in the Bismarck
Sea. August. Report prepared by RPS Metocean Engineers Pty Ltd for Nautilus Minerals
Niugini Pty Ltd.
Sarti Martinez, A. L. 2000. Dermochelys coriacea. A WWW publication accessed on 1 June 2008
at www.iucnredlist.org.
Saunders, S. and Patia, H. 2008. Rabaul Volcanological Observatory Monthly Reports. A WWW
publication accessed on 18 June 2008 at
http://www.volcano.si.edu/world/volcano.cfm?vnum=0502-14=&volpage=var#bgvn_3303
Scott, S.D. and Binns, R.A. 1995. 'Hydrothermal processes and contrasting styles of
mineralisation in the western Woodlark and eastern Manus Basins of the western Pacific'. In
Hydrothermal vents and processes. Edited by L.M. Parson, C.L. Walker and D.R. Dixon.
Geological Society Special Publication 87:191-205.
Shirihai, H. 2008. Rediscovery of Beck's Petrel Pseudobulweria becki, and other observations of
tubenoses from the Bismark archipelago, Papua New Guinea. Bulletin of the British
Ornithologists' Club 128:3-16.
SMD. 2008. SMT preliminary analysis for vibrations and noise generated by a drum cutter. Report
prepared by Soil Machine Dynamics for Nautilus Minerals Inc., Milton, Queensland.
Soto, N.A., Johnson, M.P., Madsen, P.T., Diaz, F., Dominguez, I., Brito, A. and Tyack, P. 2008.
Cheetahs of the deep sea: deep foraging sprints in short-finned pilot whales off Tenerife
(Canary Islands). Journal of Animal Ecology in press.
Southward, E.C. and Galkin, S.V. 1997. A new vestimentiferan (Pogonophora: Obturata) from
hydrothermal vent fields in the Manus Back-arc basin (Bismarck Sea, Papua New Guinea,
Southwest Pacific Ocean). Journal of Natural History 31:43-55.
Spring, 1995. Status of marine turtle populations in Papua New Guinea. In Bjorndal, K.A. (ed)
Biology and Conservation of Sea Turtles. Smithsonian Institute Press. Washington. 281-289.
SRK. 2006. Independent Technical Assessment of Sea Floor Massive Sulphide Exploration
Tenements in Papua New Guinea, Fiji and Tonga. Report prepared by Jankowski, P. and
Hodkiewicz, P. F., SRK Australasia Pty Ltd for Nautilus Minerals Limited.
Steinberg, C.R., Choukroun, S.M., Slivkoff, M.M., Mahoney, M.V., and Brinkman, R.M. 2006.
Currents in the Bismarck Sea and Kimbe Bay, Papua New Guinea. Report prepared by the
Australian Institute of Marine Science for The Nature Conservancy. TNC Pacific Island
Countries Report No. 6/06.
Solwara 1 Project

15-8

Technip Offshore. 2005. Placer Dome Deepwater Mining Project: Pre-feed Report. Report
prepared by Technip Offshore Inc for Placer Dome Group.
Technip Offshore. 2006a. Placer Dome Deepwater Mining Project: Dewatering System Study.
Report prepared by Technip Offshore Inc for Placer Dome Group.
Technip Offshore. 2006b. Placer Dome Deepwater Mining Project: Riser and Jumper Analysis
Report. Report prepared by Technip Offshore Inc for Placer Dome Group.
Technip USA. 2008. Riser Temperature Study. Solwara 1 Project Riser and Lifting System
(RALS). Report prepared by Technip USA, Inc for Nautilus Minerals Singapore Limited.
Tiden, G. 2008. Shark calling under threat. Postcourier. 16 August 2008. p24.
Tivey, M. 1998. How to build a black smoker chimney: The formation of mineral deposits at mid-
ocean ridges. Oceanus 41(2):22-26.
Tivey, M., Bach, W., Seewald, J., Tivey, M. and Vanko, D. 2006. Hydrothermal systems in the
Eastern Manus Basin: Fluid chemistry and magnetic structure as guides to seafloor processes.
Cruise report prepared for Nautilus Minerals Inc., Milton, Queensland.
TOPP. 2008. Tagging of Pacific Pelagics. A WWW publication accessed on the 27 February 2008
at http://las.pfeg.noaa.gov/TOPP_recent/TOPP_tracks180.html?species=0&zone=10.
Triton. 2004. Salty Daug Project Feasibility Study Mining of Subsea Massive Sulphide Deposits.
November. Report prepared by Triton Consultants Ltd. Placer Dome Group Vancouver, BC.
Triton. 2006. SaltyDaug Project Feasibility Study Mining of Subsea Massive Sulphide Deposits,
Metocean Data Summary. Report prepared by Triton Consultants Ltd for Placer Dome Group,
Vancouver, BC.
UN. 2004. Papua New Guinea - Millennium Development Goals Progress Report 2004.
Government of Papua New Guinea. United Nations in Papua New Guinea.
UNEP-WCMC. 2006. Marine Turtle Interactive Mapping System; http://stort.unep-
wcmc.org/imaps/indturtles/viewer.htm accessed in April 2006 and August 2008.
USGS. 2003. Cascades Volcano Observatory. A www publication accessed on 22 September
2008 at http://vulcan.wr.usgs.gov/Glossary/PlateTectonics/description_plate_tectonics.html.
U.S Geological Survey.
Van Dover, C. L. 2000b. The ecology of hydrothermal vents. Princeton University Press, New
Jersey.
Van Dover, C. L., Berg Jr., C.J. and Turner, R.D. 1988. Recruitment of marine invertebrates to
hard substrates at deep-sea hydrothermal vents on the East Pacific Rise and Galapagos
spreading center. Deep-Sea Research 35:1833-1849.
Van Dover, C.L. 2000a. The ecology of deep-sea hydrothermal vents. Princeton University Press,
Princeton, New Jersey, USA.
Vanderlaan, A. S. M. and Taggart, C. T. 2007. Vessel collisions with whales: the probability of
lethal injury based on vessel speed. Marine Mammal Science 23:144-156
Vanko, D.A., Bach, W., Roberts, S., Yeats, C.J. and Scott, S.D. 2004. Fluid inclusion evidence for
subsurface phase separation and variable fluid mixing regimes beneath the deep-sea
PACMANUS hydrothermal field, Manus Basin back-arc rift, Papua New Guinea. Journal of
Geophysical Research 109:B03201.
Visser, I.N. 2003. Kimbe Bay Second Marine Mammal Rapid Ecological Assessment (REA) April
2003. Unpublished survey report for the Nature Conservancy. A WWW publication accessed
on 26 November at www.orcaresearch.org.
Solwara 1 Project

15-9

Visser, I.N. and Bonoccorso, F.J. 2003. New observations and a review of killer whale (Orcinus
orca) sightings in Papua New Guinea waters. Aquatic Mammals 29.1:150-172.
Volcano Live. 2008. Rabaul Volcano. A WWW publication accessed on 6 March 2008 at
http://www.volcanolive.com/rabaul.html. John Seach.
Volcano World. 2005. Rabaul Caldera, Papua New Guinea. Eruptive History. A WWW publication
accessed on 6 March at http://volcano.und.edu/vwdocs/current_volcs/rabual/rabaul.html.
Wells, M., Vallis, G. and Silver, S. 1999. Tectonic Processes in Papua New Guinea and Past
Productivity in the Eastern Equatorial Pacific Ocean. Nature 398:601-604
Williams, D., Jensen, S. and Winkel, K. 2004. Clinical management of snakebite in Papua New
Guinea. Independent Publishing, Port Moresby.
World Bank. 1999. Project Appraisal Document on the First Phase of a Proposed Loan in the
amount of US$25.26 million equivalent to the Independent State of Papua New Guinea for a
Second Gazelle Restoration Project. A WWW publication accessed on 24 May 2008 at
http://www-
wds.worldbank.org/external/default/main?pagePK=64193027&piPK=64187937&theSitePK=52
3679&menuPK=64187510&searchMenuPK=64187283&theSitePK=523679&entityID=0000949
46_99112505311322&searchMenuPK=64187283&theSitePK=523679
Worley Parsons. 2005. Seafloor massive sulphide mining project: Pre-feasibility study. Report
prepared by Worley Parsons Services Pty Ltd for Nautilus Minerals Inc., Milton, Queensland.
Worsley, T. and Davies, T. 1979. Cenozoic sedimentation in the pacific ocean: steps toward a
quantitative evaluation. Journal of Sedimentary Research. 49:1131-1146.
WWF. 2001. Marine Resource Management and Conservation Planning. Bismarck-Solomon seas
Ecoregion: Papua New Guinea/Solomon Islands. World Wide Fund For Nature. Fiji.
Personal Communications
Alexander, B. Rabaul Hotel. Email. 30 May 2008a.
Alexander, B. Rabaul Hotel. Email. 30 May 2008b.
Byrne, G. Rapopo Dive. Conversation in person. 6 June 2008.
King, B. Chief Scientist and Managing Director of Asia-Pacific Applied Science Association.
Queensland. E-mail. 13 September 2007.
Riley, C. Exploration Manager, Nautilus Minerals, Milton, Queensland. Email. 17 July 2008.
Smith, S. Environmental Manager, Nautilus Minerals, Milton, Queensland. Email. 23 May 2008.
Saunders, S. Rabaul Volcano Observatory Email. 20 June 2008a.
Saunders, S. Rabaul Volcano Observatory Email. 5 June 2008b.
Van Dover, C. L. Email. 22 September 2008.

Solwara 1 Project

15-10

Solwara 1 Project

16-1

16. GLOSSARY
abundance total numbers of individual animals or of taxonomic groups of animals.
antifouling substances applied to the hulls of vessels to prevent attachment and growth of
marine organisms that could affect the performance of the vessels and
introduce exotic marine organisms.
barnacle a type of encrusting arthropod, barnacles attach themselves permanently to a
hard substrate, mostly inshallow and intertidal tidal waters, but also on floating
objects and deep sea
bathypelagic
zone
the region of an ocean below 1,000 m depth. No light penetrates this zone.
biogenous producing or produced by living things (adj.)
bioluminescence emission of visible light by living organisms.
bivalve molluscs belonging to the class Bivalvia. They have two-part shells, and
typically both valves are symmetrical along the hinge line.
caldera a volcanic feature formed by the collapse of land following a volcanic eruption.
chemoautotroph an organism, typically a bacterium, that derives energy from the oxidation of
inorganic compounds.
chemosynthesis the synthesis of organic compounds by bacteria or other living organisms
using energy derived from reactions involving inorganic chemicals, typically in
the absence of sunlight.
chemotrophic the derivation of energy by organisms, not from the sun but from the oxidation
of molecules in the environments (in the present case, from inorganic H
2
S
molecules)
chimney a structure on the seafloor that forms when hot hydrothermal fluids vent in cold
seawater and sulphide materials precipitate on the edges of a conduit, forming
a chimney
density with respect to animals, the numbers (of individuals or taxa) per unit area
diversity a statistical index describing, in combination, the numbers of individuals
representing the numbers of species within a sample or location.
Dobson unit the Dobson unit (DU) is defined to be 0.01 mm thickness at STP (standard
temperature and pressure). Ozone layer thickness is expressed in terms of
Dobson units, which measure what its physical thickness would be if
compressed in the Earth's atmosphere.
Solwara 1 Project

16-2

epifaunal living on and in association with other animals (but not parasitic).
epipelagic zone the region of an ocean extending from the surface to a depth of about 200 m.
Light penetrates this zone, allowing photosynthesis.
euphotic zone the upper region of an ocean that receives light and thus where
photosynthesis is possible.
free on board FOB is an abbreviation for Free On Board (an alternative term is Freight on
Board). The term FOB (often seen as f.o.b.) is commonly used when shipping
goods, to indicate who pays loading and transportation costs, and/or the point
at which the responsibility of the goods transfers from shipper to buyer. FOB
shipping is the term used when the ownership/liability of goods passes from
the seller to the buyer at the time the goods cross the shipping point to be
delivered. FOB destination designates that the seller is responsible for the
goods until the buyer takes possession. This is important in determining who
is responsible for lost or damaged goods when in transit from the seller to the
buyer. The buyer is responsible when shipped FOB shipping and the seller is
responsible if shipped FOB destination. CAP, or customer arranged pickup, is
used to denote that the buyer will arrange a carrier of their choice to pick the
goods up and the liability for any damage or loss belongs to the buyer.
gastropod belonging to the phylum of Mollusca, gastropods are soft bodied animals with
a head, a foot, a visceral body mass and a mantle, often (but not always)
protected by an external shell.
indicated
resource
a resource whose size and grade have been estimated from sampling at
places spaced closely enough that its continuity can be reasonable assumed.
infauna aquatic animals that live within the bottom substratum rather than on its
surface.
inferred
resource
a resource whose size and grade have been estimated mainly or wholly from
limited sampling data, assuming that the mineralized body is continuous
based on geological evidence.
macrofauna macrofauna are benthic or soil organisms, which are normally > 0.5 mm, but in
this case, also include animals at least 0.25 mm in length.
meiofauna microscopic, multicellular organisms that live in both marine and fresh water
environments defined by size, being those that can pass through a 0.5 mm
mesh but retained by a 45 m mesh.
mesopelagic
zone
the region of an ocean extending from 200 m down to 1,000 m below sea
level. Some light penetrates this zone, however, it is insufficient for
photosynthesis.
Metazoa multicellular organisms (i.e. not bacteria or protozoa).
Solwara 1 Project

16-3

mollusc belonging to the phylum of Mollusca, molluscs are soft bodied animals with a
head, a foot, a visceral body mass and a mantle, often (but not always)
protected by an external shell.
nekton organisms with swimming abilities that permit them to move actively through
the water column and to move against currents.
peak ground
acceleration
a short-period ground motion parameter that is proportional to force, the most
commonly mapped ground motion parameter because current building codes
that include seismic provisions specify the horizontal force a building should
be able to withstand during an earthquake.
pelagic of, relating to, or living in open oceans or seas.
photosynthesis the process by which green plants, algae, diatoms, and certain forms of
bacteria make carbohydrates from carbon dioxide and water in the presence
of chlorophyll, using energy captured from sunlight by chlorophyll, and
releasing excess oxygen as a byproduct.
phyllogenetic the relationships between taxa (species, genus family etc.) on the basis of
gene sequences.
phytoplankton the photosynthesising organisms residing in the plankton.
plankton organisms living suspended in the water column and incapable of moving
against water currents.
ROV remotely operated underwater vehicles, usually tethered, unoccupied and
operated by a person aboard a vessel.
species richness the number of different species in an area.
spring tide the phase of the tidal cycle when tidal range is at a maximum.
spud moveable anchor points allowing the Seafloor Mining Tool to walk over the
seafloor.
stratovolcano a stratovolcano, also called a composite volcano, is a tall, conical volcano
composed of many layers of hardened lava, tephra, and volcanic ash. These
volcanoes are characterised by a steep profile and periodic, explosive
eruptions. The lava that flows from them is viscous, and cools and hardens
before spreading very far. The source magma of this rock is classified as
acidic, having high to intermediate levels of silica (as in rhyolite, dacite, or
andesite). This is in contrast to less viscous basic magma that forms shield
volcanoes (such as Mauna Loa in Hawaii), which have a wide base and more
gently sloping profile.
subduction the process by which one tectonic plate moves beneath another.
Solwara 1 Project

16-4

symbionts microorganisms that live on or within the cells of host animals with both
deriving mutual benefit
taxa classification of organisms into groups (taxa) according to similarity
tsunami an ocean wave generated by a submarine earthquake, volcano or landslide.
(Also known as a seismic sea wave, and incorrectly as a tidal wave).
vestimentiferan belonging to the phylum Vestimentifera, Vestimentiferan tube worms are soft
bodied organisms that lack a digestive system and inhabit areas close to deep
sea hydrothermal vents or areas of cold water seeps on continental margins.
zooplankton the animal component of plankton.

Attachment A
Risk Register

Attachment A Risk Register
Component/ Activity Hazard
Incident/ Event Potential Impact Mitigation Residual effect / Severity
EIS chapter
representation
Mining Machine
Removal of habitat
Seafloor surface structure (hard and
soft surfaces) will change
Vent energy cannot be removed
and will resume
Localised to mining area.
Resumption of natural venting will
recreate chimneys in the short
term and mineralised seafloor
habitat in the long term
9.6.2
Removal of
organisms
Death of organisms changes
species diversity
Refugia zone, mining plan,
creation of control area at South
Su. Transplant of animals
Refugia and control areas will
provide nearby communities for
spawning / recolonisation of
mined areas 9.6.2
Plume generation Smothering of organisms
Efficient operation of suction
mouth to reduce sediment
escape
Localised temporary impact;
recovery
9.3, 9.4, 9.6.1, 9.6.2
Plume generation
Reduction of bioluminescence,
leading to changes in biodiversity
escape
Localised around area of
operation
9.3, 9.4, 9.6.1, 9.6.2
Release of metals
(from sediments) into
the water column
Toxic effects on biota,
bioaccumulation, human health
escape
Effect (if any) to locally tolerant
organisms restricted to seafloor
layers
9.4, 9.6.1
Lighting of Seafloor
Mining Tool (SMT):
fish attraction
Some individuals attracted to
suction area may be lost
No practicable controls Minor localised effect
9.6.3
Noise
Disturbance of organisms; e.g.
whales
No practicable controls
Sound levels and frequencies not
likely to cause impacts to
cetaceans or other animals. Low
exposure at depths of Seafloor
Mining Tool (SMT) operation near
seafloor 9.6.3
Vibration
Detectable noise but not at any
harmful levels
No practicable controls No detectable or harmful effect
9.6.3
Hydraulic leak Localised impact on water quality
Maintenance. Limited volume of
hydraulic oil may be leaked,
biodegradable, regular
maintenance of machine
Minor, very localised effect
9.4
Changes to
hydrothermal venting
Removal of chimneys and seafloor
material around active venting
areas
Cannot remove underlying
energy source: venting will
resume
Venting will resume in the same
or at new (e.g., unplugged) areas.
Recolonisation will start in short
term and reach similar
diversity/biomass during and
after mining (2-5 years)
9.6.2
Raising/lowering machine to
vessel
Plume generation of
materials on skid
Smothering of organisms
Minimal amount, likely only to
affect immediate mined area 9.6.3
Sonar Noise Cetacean disturbance
Impact expected to be minimal
therefore no mitigation
measures required
Sonar power too low to injure
animals
9.6.3
Umbilicals
Hazard in water
column
Cetacean entanglement
No loose or floating ropes;
Umbilicals too taught to cause
entanglement
Unlikely and low risk
9.6.1
Riser Transfer Pipe
Loss of material in
riser transfer pipe
(RTP) and riser pipe
material - max 30
tonne
Smothering of organisms leading to
death either directly or via plume
Keep pumping seawater to
prevent material in riser pipe
from escaping, engineering
standards, existing technology
Localised smothering in already
mined area
9.6.2
Loss of material in
riser transfer pipe
material - max 30
tonne
Localised impact on water quality -
increased metals
from escaping, engineering
standards, existing technology
affect immediate mined area
9.4
Noise Cetacean detection; disturbance
measures required
Sound levels and frequencies not
likely to cause impacts to
cetaceans or other animals. Low
exposure at depths of operation
near seafloor 9.6.3
Hydraulic leak Localised impact on water quality
Maintenance. Limited volume of
hydraulic oil may be leaked,
biodegradable, regular
maintenance of machine
9.4
Vibration
harmful levels
measures required
No detectable effect
9.6.3
Breakage/failure
Loss of material in
riser pipe material -
max 30 tonne
Keep pumping seawater (if
possible) to prevent material in
riser pipe from escaping,
engineering standards, existing
technology
mined area
9.6.2
Riser Pipe
Loss of material in
riser transfer pipe
material - max 30
tonne
from escaping, eng standards,
existing technology
mined area
9.6.2
Loss of material in
riser transfer pipe
material - max 30
tonne
Localised impact on water quality -
increased metals
Engineering standards, existing
technology
affect immediate mined area
9.4
Biofouling
Added loading
causing failure
Leak of material
Cleaning; abrasion during
normal use will prevent fouling
Limited to surface waters 9.6.1, 9.7
Operation Noise at bottom Disturbance of organisms
measures required
Minimal noise at riser transfer
pipe (RTP)/pipe link; no harmful
effects
9.6.3
Operation Vibration
harmful levels
Vibration dampers No detectable effect 9.6.3
Mining Support Vessel (MSV)
Source
Settling on seafloor and moving
Cutting head operation
Breakage/failure
Pump Modules
Operation
Breakage/failure
Operational discharges Dewatering
Plumes, with elevated total
suspended solids (TSS), metals,
bioaccumulation
Design total suspended solids
(TSS), water treatment to
discharge only particles 5-10 !m
Modeling combined with
geochemical (elutriate and
toxicity) tests indicate plume
dimensions < 500 m laterally (for
700 dilutions) and 120 m
vertically (all dilutions); and will
not rise shallower than 1,390 m
9.4
Dynamic Positioning
(DP) fails
Break connection between mining
tool and riser transfer pipe - lost
max 30 tonne material
Riser transfer pipe (RTP)
provides a weak link Material
can be recovered
No impact to water column.
mined area 9.6.2
Dynamic Positioning
(DP) fails
Umbilical breaks on mining machine No hydraulics in umbilical
No adverse environmental
impacts
9.7
Dynamic Positioning
(DP) noise
Cetacean/turtle disturbance
Reduce use of Dynamic
Positioning (DP) if whales seen
to encroach within 3 km (if
practicable regarding
maintenance of operational
safety). Record whale / turtle
activity in project area
Some avoidance by whales at
threshold distance of about 2 km
on max Dynamic Positioning (DP)
power. Low frequency of whale
and exposure. No indication of
adverse effects on turtles
9.6.3
Light Attraction of marine animals
Directional lighting will be
implemented to reduce light
exposure to the marine
environment
9.6.1
Vessel noise (other
than Dynamic
Positioning)
Cetacean/turtle disturbance
Reduce sources of noise (as
practicable regarding
maintenance of operational
safety). Record whale / turtle
activity in project area
Potential response distances
less than for Dynamic Positioning
(DP)
9.6.3
Waste
Localised nutrient increase in
discharge of macerated waste
MARPOL compliance,
Environmental Management
Plans (EMPs)
Localised and minor
9.9
Dewatering
Plumes, with elevated total
suspended solids (TSS), metals,
bioaccumulation
Design total suspended solids
(TSS), water treatment to
discharge only particles 5-10 !m
Modeling combined with
geochemical (elutriate and
toxicity) tests indicate plume
dimensions < 500 m laterally (for
700 dilutions) and 120 m
vertically (all dilutions); and will
not rise shallower than 1,390 m
9.4
Cleaning hull of
biofouling
Toxicity from anti-fouling agents
Dry dock every 2 years when
cleaning or hull cleaning on site.
Adherence to PNG and
international conventions on use
of organotin compounds
No detectable effects
9.8, 9.10
Sinking
Loss of life; spillage of
fuels/chemicals causing
pollution/kills/bioaccumulation
Maintenance, ship designed for
Bismarck Sea conditions (it will
also have to be designed for
wherever else it will operate in
the future e.g., Tonga), crew
competency, maintenance of
vessel class/in survey.
Emergency Response
Procedures
Extremely low probability
9.7, 9.9
Collision with other
ships / fishing boats
Damage, spills, sinking
500 m exclusion zone. Normal
maritime radio communications
9.7
Transfer of hazardous materials
(incl. fuel oil)
Spillage of
hazardous materials
Pollution - animal kills, particularly
to surface animals
Correct materials storage during
transfer; standard operating
procedures, use of non-
toxic/biodegrading materials
wherever possible. Spill
response / cleanup equipment
available; assess trajectory;
and implement Emergency
Response Procedures
Emergency Response Plan will
minimise extent and duration of
any spills.
9.4, 9.6.1, 9.9
Ore transfer Transfer of ore between vessels Spillage
Pollution - potential animal kills,
bioaccumulation, increased
contamination of sediments
Monitor transfers to detect
spillages and stop transfer
ASAP to minimise spill volumes
Small volumes and rapid
dispersal; any impacts restricted
to localised area of spill
9.6.2
Ore spillage during
loading
Avoidance of overloading
Small volumes and rapid
dispersal; any impacts are
restricted to localised area of spill
9.6.2
Sinking
Spillage of fuel/ore; navigation
hazard in shallow water;
bioaccumulation
Operate to standard
navigational and communication
procedures
9.4, 9.9
Collisions with other
vessels
Spillage of fuel/ore; loss of life
Operate to standard
procedures
9.7, 9.9
Piracy Loss of life, spillage of fuel/ore
Security systems operational at
all times. Communication links
with authorities
9.7, 9.9
Collisions with
cetaceans/turtles
Loss of animal life
All speeds <10 km during barge
movements
Whales / turtles are able and
expected to avoid slow moving
vessels 9.6.1, 9.6.2
Interference with
resource use e.g.,
commercial fishing
Loss of fishing income (real or
claimed), knock-on economic
effects, deterioration of community
acceptance
Operate to standard
procedures
Occasional need to avoid barges;
no loss of fishing grounds
9.7
Spillage to
nearshore/inshore
waters
nearshore reefs
Procedures to minimise loss
during transfer and clean up as
necessary
Small volumes and localised to
port - minimal effect after clean
up
9.4, 9.6.1, 9.6.2
Spillage to land
outside storage area
9.10
Dust Human health, vegetation kills
Wet ore, design of transfer
system to minimise potential
Baseline medicals of local
population 9.2, 9.10
Noise/light Annoyance to locals
Shield lighting if necessary,
Nearest residential areas xx km
from port.
Impacts managed to low levels
9.10
Dust Human health, vegetation kills Watering Dusting will be avoided 9.2
Dewatering
Escape of water to environment
leading to pollution
Storage on constructed
compacted base, bunding,
lining. Water treatment prior to
discharge. Covering stockpile to
minimise rainfall infiltration and
runoff as necessary
Escape of runoff or drainage to
environment prevented
9.4, 9.6.1, 9.6.2, 9.9
Supply and Servicing Mining Support Vessel
Dynamic Positioning (DP)
operation
Operations
Operational discharges
At sea
Barging
Transfer of materials
Ore barging to shore
Ore transfer from barge to
shore
Ore Storage
Storage
Land alienation -
storage and facilities
> 250 x 100 m loss of bush
resources, cash crops,
archaeological/cultural sites, travel
routes (restricted beach access,
along shore, land routes),
biodiversity
Within existing Port of Rabaul
facilities
9.10
Acid formation
Acidic drainage to environment,
seepage to groundwater
See dewatering above Impacts managed to low levels
9.9
Fire
Fire spreads, leading to damage to
land/resources outside of storage
area
Environmental Response Plan
(ERP)
9.9
Light/noise Annoyance to locals
from port.
9.10
Workforce
Interaction with
locals
Social tensions - gambling, alcohol,
violence, sexually transmitted
diseases (STDs), immigration,
hunting bushland fauna, aquatic,
marine resources
facilities
10.8
Security
Stoppage of
operations
Erosion of community relations, bad
public relations
facilities 10.8
Accommodation
Waste disposal -
general, hazardous,
sewage
Pollution - on site, transport to off-
site disposal facility
Standard operating procedures
(SOPs), batch sewage plant,
waste disposal, recycling etc
9.9
Feral/exotic animals Introduction to site Death of local flora and fauna
Inspection of sea containers, etc
arriving on site, correct food
storage, eradication program
African snails, cane toads already
on site
9.8
Visual amenity
facilities
Barge movement Prop wash
Degraded water quality - impacts on
reefs, mangroves, fish, etc 9.4, 9.6.1, 9.6.2
Pile construction Construction
Turbidity, noise, water quality on
resource use, aesthetics 9.4, 9.6.1, 9.6.2, 9.6.3
Navigation markers/piles/buoys
facilities
Fuel storage Leak Fish kill Bunding etc 9.4, 9.6.1
Ore spillage Potential pollution, sedimentation Correct loading procedures
9.4, 9.6.1, 9.6.2
Dust Public health, visual amenity Manage moisture content of ore
9.2
Steaming
Bulk carrier steaming
into port
Social impact, visual amenity
Unavoidable but all activity near
populations will be within
existing shipping lanes
See barging to shore above for
others
9.7
Ballasting
Introduction of exotic
species
Impact on local species
Specify ballasting
restrictions/treatment in
contracts 9.8
Crew down time in port
Interaction with
locals
diseases (STDs)
MSV crew transfer schedules
will result in minimal stop over
times in Rabaul 10.8 (?)
Anchoring
Anchoring in non-
specified locations
Drag damage to corals, seagrass
(?), other sensitive marine benthic
habitats
Fixed mooring/dolphins
9.6.2
Seismic
Earthquake at ore
storage
Damage to facilities - spillage
Design to seismic area
standards 9.9, 9.10
Tsunami Event at ore storage Damage to facilities - spillage
Sitting of facilities above water
line 9.9, 9.10
Volcanic activity Event at Solwara 1
Damage to ship/mining equipment -
spillages/loss of life 9.7, 9.9
Volcanic activity Event in Rabaul
Blamed on project - bad public
relations 9.9, 9.10
Natural Gas Escape at Solwara 1
spillages/loss of life 9.7, 9.9
Cyclone
Occurrence in project
area
spillages/loss of life
Monitor weather reports
Rabaul/Bismarck Sea too far
north for cyclones 9.7, 9.9
Change of process,
baseline data no
longer sufficient
Delayed approval
European Union (EU) group deep
sea tailing placement (DSTP)
recommendations (more
applicable to Phase 2) 3.0
Corruption Delayed approval Maintain company integrity 3.0
Engineering Design
Design process
Changes during
design
Delayed ESIA completion to
accommodate design changes
Continuous communication
between engineering and ESIA
team 4.0
Opposition
Approval delay, increased
opposition in local communities
Non-government organisation
(NGO) engagement/ proactive
publicity from project/ "get there
first" with local communities/
and government
4.0
Publishing incorrect
information/spurious
arguments
Negative project perception
and government
4.0
He said she said
expert arguments
Erosion of our expert's credibility
and government
4.0
Uninformed
arguments
Raising project opposition
and government
4.0
Lack of community
acceptance
No support for
project
Project delay
Proactive publicity from project/
"get there first" with local
communities/ and government
4.0
DEC, PNG government
Lack of familiarity with vent
mining process
Fear of approving the
unknown
Delayed approval
Continuous liaison with
Department of Environment and
Conservation (DEC) /PNG
government departments 3.0, 4.0
ESIA specialist consultants
Unrealistic requirements/
recommendations
Rejection by project
Removal of project support by sub-
consultants
Get sign off from sub-
consultants of ESIA content 3.0, 4.0
Public - international and
PNG
Non-specific project opposition
"just because"
Large-scale
opposition
PNG government/local communities
influenced - approval delayed
"get there first" with local public
3.0, 4.0
Ore Storage
Storage
Transfer to bulk carrier
Transfer
Bulk carrying to international
waters
Natural hazards
Political Environment
Non-government
organisation (NGO)
Change of provincial/ national
government
External Political Unrest/Agitation
Scrutiny
Local/provincial
communities
Expectations
Unrealistic
expectations
Shutting down
construction/operations
Community affairs (CA) to
manage level of expectation,
understanding of memorandum
of agreement (MOA)
3.0, 4.0
Approvals Process Approval conditions
More stringent/unrealistic approval
conditions
Continuous liaison with
DEC/PNG government
departments 3.0, 4.0
Perception
Public, international, government
perception
Misperception of
project affecting
fisheries, volcanoes,
greenhouse gas
(GHG), global
warming, tsunami,
cetaceans, turtles,
shark culling, birth
defects, fish kills,
disease (skin rashes,
cancer) etc.
Project approval delay, project gets
shut down
"get there first" with local,
national, international
communities and government
4.0
Port Operations
Dust Human health, vegetation kills
Wet ore, design of transfer
system to minimise potential
Baseline medicals of local
population 9.2, 9.10
Noise/light Annoyance to locals
from port.
9.10
Dust Human health, vegetation kills Watering Dusting will be avoided 9.2
Dewatering
Escape of water to environment
leading to pollution
Storage on constructed
compacted base, bunding,
lining. Treatment of any
drainage water prior to
discharge Covering of stockpile
to minimise rainfall infiltration
and runoff as necessary
Escape of runoff or drainage to
environment prevented
9.4, 9.9
Acid formation
Acidic drainage to environment,
seepage to groundwater
See dewatering above Impacts managed to low levels
9.9
Land alienation -
storage and facilities
Use of existing facilities - no
alienation of new land
Upgrading of facilities as
required to managed dust and
runoff
9.10
Fire
Fire spreads, leading to damage to
land/resources outside of storage
area
Emergency Response Plan.
Plan / construct bunding to
prevent fire water impacting
coast (in event of fire)
9.9, 9.10
Light/noise Annoyance to locals
from port.
9.10
Workforce
Interaction with
locals
diseases (STDs), immigration,
hunting bushland fauna, aquatic,
marine resources
facilities
10.8
Security
Stoppage of
operations
Erosion of community relations, bad
public relations
facilities 10.8
Accommodation
Waste disposal -
general, hazardous,
sewage
Pollution - on site, transport to off-
site disposal facility
Standard operating procedures
(SOPs), batch sewage plant,
waste disposal, recycling etc
9.9
Feral/exotic animals Introduction to site Death of local flora and fauna
Inspection of sea containers, etc
arriving on site, correct food
storage, eradication program
African snails, cane toads already
on site
9.8
Visual amenity
facilities
Barge movement Prop wash
Degraded water quality - impacts on
reefs, mangroves, fish, etc 9.4, 9.6.1, 9.6.2
Pile construction Construction
Turbidity, noise, water quality on
resource use, aesthetics 9.4, 9.6.1, 9.6.2, 9.6.3
Navigation markers/piles/buoys
facilities
Fuel storage Leak Fish kill Bunding etc
Ore spillage Potential pollution, sedimentation Correct loading procedures
9.4, 9.6.1
Dust Public health, visual amenity Manage moisture content of ore
9.4, 9.6.1, 9.6.2
Steaming
Bulk carrier steaming
into port
Social impact, visual amenity
Unavoidable but all activity near
populations will be within
existing shipping lanes
See barging to shore above for
others
9.2
Ballasting
Introduction of exotic
species
Impact on local species
Specify ballasting
restrictions/treatment in
contracts 9.7
Crew down time in port
Interaction with
locals
diseases (STDs)
MSV crew transfer schedules
will result in minimal stop over
times in Rabaul 9.6.1, 9.6.2, 9.8, 9.10
Anchoring
Anchoring in non-
specified locations
Sensitive marine benthic habitats Fixed mooring/dolphins
9.1
Seismic
Earthquake at ore
storage
Damage to facilities - spillage
Design to seismic area
standards 9.6.2
Tsunami Event at ore storage Damage to facilities - spillage
Sitting of facilities above water
line 9.8, 9.9, 9.10
Volcanic activity Event at Solwara 1
spillages/loss of life 9.8, 9.9, 9.10
Volcanic activity Event in Rabaul
Blamed on project - bad public
relations 9.8, 9.9
Natural Gas Escape at Solwara 1
spillages/loss of life 9.8, 9.9, 9.10
Cyclone
Occurrence in project
area
spillages/loss of life
Monitor weather reports
Rabaul/Bismarck Sea too far
north for cyclones 9.8, 9.9
Ore transfer from barge to
shore
Ore Storage
Transfer of materials
Storage
Transfer Transfer to bulk carrier
Bulk carrying to international
waters
Natural hazards

This material is printed on CPI Papers (CyclusPrint matt/ Cyclus Offset), a 100% post-consumer recycled paper from Dalum Paper an
EMAS accredited mill.
EMAS is the European Unions regulated environmental management scheme.

2008 Nautilus EIS PNG

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

2008 Nautilus EIS PNG

Uploaded by

Document Information

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

2008 Nautilus EIS PNG

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Volume A

bottles mounted on an ROV. Of interest are the five

You might also like