Duties of Advicate by Richa Mittal
Duties of Advicate by Richa Mittal
Duties of Advicate by Richa Mittal
In conclusion, an advocate has various duties towards the court, including acting with integrity
and fairness, maintaining confidentiality, assisting the court, acting in the best interests of the
client, and respecting the court. These duties are essential for upholding the integrity of the legal
system and ensuring that justice is served.
3. Duty to act in the client’s best interests: An advocate has a duty to act in the client’s
best interests at all times. This means that the advocate should not take any action that
would be detrimental to the client’s case. In the case of Bal Mukund Gupta v. Union of
India (2003), the Supreme Court of India held that an advocate has a duty to act in the
client’s best interests and not to take any step that would be detrimental to the client’s
case.
4. Duty to maintain a professional relationship with the client: An advocate has a duty
to maintain a professional relationship with the client. This means that the advocate
should not engage in any conduct that would compromise the integrity of the advocate-
client relationship. In the case of Bar Council of India v. A.K. Balaji & Ors (2018), the
Supreme Court of India held that an advocate has a duty to maintain a professional
relationship with the client and should not engage in any conduct that would compromise
the integrity of the advocate-client relationship.
5. Duty to disclose all relevant facts to the client: An advocate has a duty to disclose all
relevant facts to the client. This means that the advocate should provide the client with
complete and accurate information about the case, including the strengths and
weaknesses of the case. In the case of Ramesh Chandra Sankla v. Vikram Cement &
Anr (2008), the Supreme Court of India held that an advocate has a duty to disclose all
relevant facts to the client.
In conclusion, the duties of an advocate towards their client are extensive and require the
advocate to act in the best interests of the client at all times while maintaining confidentiality,
providing competent representation, and disclosing all relevant facts.
2. Honesty and Fairness: An advocate should be honest and fair when dealing with other
advocates, and should not misrepresent facts or the law to gain an unfair advantage.
Overall, the duty of an advocate towards other advocates is to maintain professional and ethical
standards in the practice of law, while upholding the principles of justice and fairness.
D. Concept of Touting
The term “touting” refers to the act of soliciting or offering legal services or advice in exchange
for payment. Touting is illegal in India under the Advocates Act, 1961, which regulates the legal
profession in the country.
Section 36 of the Advocates Act, 1961, prohibits advocates from touting their services or
soliciting clients. The section reads as follows: “No person shall, except in accordance with the
rules and conditions made under this Act, practise in any court or before any authority or person
unless he is an advocate enrolled under this Act.”
Section 38 of the Advocates Act states that no person other than an advocate is entitled to
practice law in India or to solicit work or advertise their services as a legal practitioner. This
provision effectively bars touting by non-advocates. Section 44 of the Act also prohibits
advocates from employing touts or agents for the purpose of procuring or soliciting legal work.
In addition to these provisions, the Bar Council of India has issued rules that further restrict
touting by advocates. Rule 36 of the Bar Council of India Rules prohibits advocates from
soliciting work, either directly or indirectly, by circulars, advertisements, personal
communications, interviews, or any other means. The rule also prohibits advocates from paying
any person for soliciting or procuring work on their behalf.
Violation of these provisions and rules can result in disciplinary action against the advocate,
including suspension or disbarment from the practice of law. These measures are intended to
uphold the integrity of the legal profession and protect the public from unscrupulous practices.
In the case of Bar Council of India v. A.K. Balaji & Ors. (2018), the Supreme Court of India
clarified that touting by advocates is strictly prohibited under the Advocates Act, 1961. The court
held that advocates cannot advertise their services or solicit clients directly or indirectly. This
includes sending unsolicited emails, making unsolicited phone calls, or using any other means to
offer or advertise their services to potential clients.
Furthermore, in the case of State of Maharashtra v. Milind Suryakant Kamble (2011), the
Bombay High Court held that touting is a serious offence that can lead to the suspension or
cancellation of an advocate’s license. The court held that advocates must maintain the highest
standards of professional ethics and conduct and refrain from engaging in any form of touting or
solicitation.
In conclusion, touting is strictly prohibited under the Advocates Act, 1961 in India, and
advocates who engage in such activities can face serious consequences, including suspension or
cancellation of their license to practice law.