128

HYBRID WARFARE – CHALLENGES FOR PAKISTAN

Dr. Tughral Yamin

Abstract
In order to achieve political aims; the traditional means of kinetic warfare have always
been supplemented by aggressive diplomacy, economic coercion, intelligence gathering,
propaganda and proxy wars. A combination of all these tools is essential for a nation to
achieve its political goals set out to win a war. All through the ages, technology has played
a significant role in enhancing the capacity and capability of nations to win wars. The
tools of modern warfare based on cyber and information technology has transformed the
nature of warfare. Social media in particular is being used subtly as well as aggressively to
shape public opinion and weaken the morale of the nation. The geographical dimensions
of the battlefield have been eliminated. War is now waged in the minds of not only the
opposing commanders but also in the minds of the nation. The dictum that strategy is the
dialectic of opposing will is truer now than ever before. Wars can now be won without
firing a single bullet. This changed nature of warfare needs to be understood in its entirety.
While contingency plans exist in military headquarters to counter a physical invasion,
there is little by way of collectively responding to the threats launched from various
technical platforms. This paper is an attempt to look into the transformation of war
fighting and suggests a few policy options for Pakistan to take up the challenges of hybrid
warfare and keep the national will and morale intact during the worst of times.

Keywords: Cyber Warfare, Social Media, Propaganda, National Will, Morale

and Public Opinion.

Introduction

A s per famous military sage Karl von Clausewitz, war is the extension of policy
by other means. In order to fulfill a policy objective, kinetic means of warfare
have always been supplemented by diplomatic pressure and economic coercion;
intelligence gathering and propaganda; espionage and proxy wars. A balanced
combination of all these means and other traits and characteristics such as the
quality of leadership and the resilience of a nation in adversity; and the economic


The author is the Associate Dean at the Centre for International Peace & Stability (CIPS), National University of
Sciences & Technology (NUST) Islamabad and Aizah Azam who is a MS in Peace & Conflict Studies from Centre for
International Peace & Stability (CIPS), National University of Sciences & Technology (NUST) Islamabad helped the
author during the development of this article. The authors’ email address is [email protected].

Strategic Thought-2019 (Issue-I)

Hybrid Warfare – Challenges for Pakistan 129

and political standing of a nation and internal stability are instrumental in leading
to the successful culmination of the war effort.

Ever since the Stone Age, technology and scientific innovation have played
an important role in ushering in successive waves of revolution in military affairs.
These scientific discoveries have increased the power potential of nations manifold
through the introduction of such revolutionary means of conducting warfare such
as gun powder; wind, steam and fossil fuel energy to propel battleships and battle
tanks; and nuclear power to cause widespread death and destruction. Technology is
now moving at a phenomenal speed to bring about fundamental changes in the
nature of warfare. The theatre of warfare has drastically expanded from its pre-
established definitions due to the introduction of ‘virtual’ battle spaces. The
discourse on warfare is now more technologically driven than before. It has become
elusive in character and is marked by the creation of abstract settings and use of
multiple means of power to establish supremacy and achieve the political goals.
This has led to the elimination of physical barriers and has empowered hidden
forces that can manoeuvre and defeat the adversary without fighting an actual
battle. It has become a mind game and Andre Beufre’s famous dictum that strategy
is the dialectic of opposing wills, has now become the absolute truth.

Scholars and academics refer to this transition as the ‘hybridization’ of

warfare. In all honesty, there is little agreement on what actually constitutes a
hybrid threat and what does not but there is substantial agreement over its
existence and the fact that states use hybrid tactics in modern times for the
extension of their political and economic goals. The term ‘hybrid warfare’ was used
for the first time by Frank Hoffman. Hoffman asserted that hybrid threats
fundamentally comprised simultaneous usage of conventional competencies
coupled with other asymmetrical tactics, which portray a stride of criminality.
Hoffman, like others before him and like those who followed him did not identify
the actors engaged in the use of hybrid tactics and / or the targets. The basic
explanation of the synchronized deployment of forces, both regular and irregular is
rooted in producing a well-coordinated synergistic effect encompassing both, the
physical and psychological dimension of conflict. These effects, he believed could
be gained at all levels of warfare i.e. tactical, operational as well as strategic.
Hoffman’s understanding of hybrid wars described the conduct and use of force as
the conjunction of regular and irregular threats through the use of sophisticated
technology and decentralized system of execution. He built this idea by positing
hybrid warfare as the synergistic fusion of conventional and unconventional forces
in conjunction with terrorism and criminal behaviour. This fusion was oriented

Strategic Thought-2019 (Issue-I)

130 Dr. Tughral Yamin

towards a desired objective through a political narrative, which simultaneously and

1
adaptively unified all the elements of the force.

Hybrid wars can hence be defined as coordinated and often simultaneous

deployment of multiple instruments of power and influence aimed at exploiting the
adversary at every level from leaders to citizens. Most vulnerable in fact is the latter
so tactics deployed constitute non-linear, ambiguous and yet a cognitive
2
manipulation of the adversary population. Of the many intriguing features of
hybrid warfare, one of the most perplexing is the inherent ambiguity in its conduct.
There is definitely a definitional dilemma in this form of warfare, when it comes to
the delineation of Actors i.e. who wages it? Tactics i.e. what means are deployed for
it? Timeframe of the engagement i.e. how long would the hostilities stretch? and
most importantly the Repercussions i.e. what are its effects? It is this ambiguity in
the character of hybrid warfare that adds to the challenge of defining it and
eventually deterring and preventing it. The hybridization of warfare has blurred the
demarcations/distinctions between the physical and virtual domain; combatants
and non-combatants; and state and non-state actors. It has added to the complexity
of effectively defining risk and threat to state security by broadening the basis of
3
the perils and pitfalls in this kind of nebulous warfare.

With a broadened risk base, hybrid tools to conduct war beyond the
concrete battle spaces have come to include cyber-attacks on national databases,
hostile narrative building through propaganda, misinformation and disinformation
through social media. The main objective is to hurt the adversary at the
psychological and cognitive level, without necessarily causing any harm within the
4
physical space. There are limited restrictions when it comes to the use of available
resources. In this connection, hybrid wars have often times been referred to as
‘unrestricted warfare’ as well. This unrestricted arena of warfare works with
completely transformed notions of weaponry such as resorting to the use of
computer viruses during combat operations. However, it must be noted that the
core aim of the use of these reformed techniques, remain purely Clausewitzian, that
is to cloud the adversary’s judgment and decision making, compelling it to
5
surrender to one’s own planned agendas, without using any overt force.

Considering factors such as unhindered access to virtual spaces and their

manipulation by state parties and shadowy non-state actors all dabble in hybrid
war to achieve their political ends. Often times they operate silently by remaining
under the radar to escape notice till it is too late. Axiomatically, therefore, the
impact of hybrid means of warfare cast on the nation now constitutes a critical

Strategic Thought-2019 (Issue-I)

Hybrid Warfare – Challenges for Pakistan 131

aspect of national security paradigms. Needless to say, the national will can be
broken if the enemy is allowed to operate with impunity. Clearly, the planners and
decision makers of modern wars must be able to comprehend, shape and reinforce
national behaviours and opinions. This is only possible by creating legitimately
6
good ‘information’. Doctored or malicious ‘information’ based on propaganda and
fake news can cause terrible harm to the morale of the nation. In the recent times,
some significant changes in a nation’s inherent will to resist have fallen victim to
the coordinated propagation of fake news and malicious untruths to influence
public opinion.

Pakistan is confronted by a wide array of multi-dimensional threats.

Hostile forces are in full play to isolate it internationally. Terms like ‘irresponsible’
state and ‘sponsor of state terrorism’ are used liberally to malign it. Money and
agents provocateurs are being used to weaken the national resolve. The aim is to
create an image of a weak and vacillating national leadership that lacks the ability
to comprehend or manage the developing situation. The strands of hybrid threats
are built upon ‘credible’ psy ops themes through an offensive propaganda spread by
traditional means such as print and electronic media and not traditional means
such as social media campaigns; threat of cyber-attacks; looming risk of economic
7
coercion to the risk of political isolation on the global stage.

Unfortunately, despite evident risks, the national thought process to

respond to hybrid threats remains archaic and outdated. There is only a limited
understanding of the security threats and there is a lack of imaginative responses to
this nebulous threat. The planning and execution of Pakistan’s security policies
with reference to India are built up around frameworks such as the Cold Start
8
Doctrine (CSD) or the Proactive Strategy (PAS). The response is more in military
terms and the redlines are in geographical terms. The defensive strategies have
been recycled from previous wars and war like experiences. There is a need for a
fresh approach to respond to the hydra headed monster of hybrid warfare.

The well-defined military offensive across the international border within

the overarching framework of CSD and PAS is being replaced. The Indian civil and
military leadership has changed tack and is now talking about launching surgical
strikes across the Line of Control (LoC). The Indian army chief Gen Bipin Rawat
has claimed that his forces had carried out such strikes in 2016 in response to
Pakistani backed strikes by Kashmiri freedom fighters against border outposts in
places like Uri in Occupied Kashmir and Pathankot. A new movie titled Uri: The
Surgical Strike set for release early this year emphasizes the capability of

Strategic Thought-2019 (Issue-I)

132 Dr. Tughral Yamin

9
conducting such fanciful strikes into Azad Kashmir. It is naturally blatant
propaganda aimed to raise their own morale and to depict the Pakistani forces in
poor light.

Noted academician and current federal minister for human rights

Dr Shireen Mazari is of the opinion that the purpose of the Indian hybrid warfare is
10
to strike at the Centre of Gravity (CoG) of Pakistan. The CoG is the fighting spirit
of the general public. If they know that their national leadership is strong and their
armed forces capable of repelling and deterring all kinds of attacks, whether these
are physical, political or financial, they can survive all the propaganda and fake
news being spewed out to weaken their resolve. Propaganda and intelligence
gathering it may be noted were recommended tools of war enshrined in
Arthashastra - ancient Indian Hindu strategist Kautliya’s famous treatise on
statecraft.

Social Media
In this age of hybrid warfare, it is instructive to study how social media
influences the minds of the citizens of a country. Between the years 2005 and 2018,
there has been a considerable increase in the number of Facebook and twitter users
all over the world. With easy access to social media forums like Facebook, twitter
and YouTube, there has been a staggering increase in the number of users over the
said forums over the past few years. Capitalising on the outreach of the social
media, it was used most effectively to support and propagate the Arab Spring to
remove and replace aging dictatorships and monarchies in the Middle East. It is
quite well documented that public protests in Tahrir Square in the heart of Cairo in
11
2011 were mobilized through Facebook.

According to the Pew Research Centre, in USA alone, the percentage

engaged with social media usage has increased from a minimum low of 5 per cent
12
in 2005 to a massive 69 per cent in 2018. Among these, the number of female
Facebook users outnumber the male users. The numbers have continued to rise
ever since. Of the most used social media forums, Facebook has played a distinctive
role in gauging public opinion during election season. In this context, facebook
users actively took part in the online polls during the elections in the US, UK,
Netherlands and even in Pakistan. Considering that a large segment of the
potential voters are using Facebook, it is quite evident that electoral managers have
13
used this medium to shape opinions. The perception building company

Strategic Thought-2019 (Issue-I)

Hybrid Warfare – Challenges for Pakistan 133

Cambridge Analytica used the Facebook to harvest data of potential voters to shape
public opinion during the US national elections in 2016.

When considering the heightened role and prominence of social media in

the realm of mainstream politics and governance, there are two critical dimensions
that shouldn’t be missed. One, these forums are not just used as means to gauge
public opinion but also to significantly alter it. Two, the vital component in the
entire social media theatre is ‘information’. Valid or not, once a part of the
electronic web, the information is shared and re-posted at lengths, to a point that a
considerable chunk of the population comes to believe it. The entire exercise
results in nothing but often in a blind faith in essentially constructed realities based
on distorted facts and misconstrued information. Alongside Facebook, twitter and
14
YouTube have also been used as similar means.

However, the use of twitter and YouTube has been more prone towards
dissemination of information and communication unlike Facebook which is mostly
equated with the steering of public opinion. As of recently, the use of Twitter by
major world leaders to express their views on global developments and most
importantly to communicate their foreign policy preferences, has been a common
practice. This electronic communication among the leaderships of major countries
is a rather new phenomenon, but has resulted in a state of spontaneity whereby the
leaders do not necessarily have to conduct meetings in designated spaces to
communicate and discuss the issues of national significance. Particularly, twitter
remained an important pillar of US President Trump’s election campaigning. Even
after the assumption of office, Trump has continued to extensively rely on Twitter
as a continuum of his aggressive foreign policy rhetoric directed for countries like
North Korea, Iran and at times Pakistan. Unhindered use of YouTube and the
blogging culture adhered to mostly by politicians and the academic fraternity has
further fuelled the dissemination of questionable and unverified information.
Information on all sorts of topics is released as a part of video logs and/or private
blogs has become a part of the large body of discourse, offering contesting
alternative narratives on issues of grave concern for countries, yet without any
15
substantial empirical reasoning.

In case of Pakistan, the paradoxical dilemma of effectively defining the

social media spaces, constitution of public opinion itself and the distressing
inclination of the public to fall for unverified and unauthenticated news are further
multiplied by a notch. In similitude to other major countries, the population in
Pakistan, particularly the youth has major inclination and association with an ad

Strategic Thought-2019 (Issue-I)

134 Dr. Tughral Yamin

nauseam use of social media websites. On the political front, both twitter and
facebook were used as active arenas for political deliberations and communications
during the past election. Exchange of rhetoric with other political leaders has also
remained a rather glaring feature of the Pakistani politics. As per the statistics
collected by the Alpha Pro, a digital marketing firm, there has been an astounding
increase in the number of social media users over the past many years. In this view,
as of June, 2018, 44.6 million people of the 198.9 million of total Pakistani
population are active internet users. And of these 44.6 million internet users, 35.0
million alone actively engage with social media websites. This actually means that
of the total population in Pakistan, only 22 per cent has an active access to general
internet and of this 22 per cent, 18 per cent uses social media to the extent which
can be referred to an active presence on the forum. Intriguingly so, of the 35.0
million active social media users, a massive 92.06 per cent of the masses prefer
facebook over a small 4.68 per cent YouTube users and a smaller 1.50 per cent of
16
twitter users. In view of iteration made above, the very fact that most of the
Pakistani public, primarily its youth associates more with facebook which is an
information sharing forum, than with twitter and/or YouTube which primarily
serve the purpose of communication, establishes the critical opening in the realm
of responsible information sharing within the country. In case of Pakistan, the
entire premise of irresponsible information sharing and the susceptibility to fall for
fake news, without necessarily authenticating the source of it, is deeply intertwined
with the intricate socio-political and cultural dynamics of the nation from a
psychological perspective. The reasons behind adhering to and/or associating with
a certain news shared over such forums is deeply rooted in some prior connection
of the individual with the subject that the news is about or with the source that
which has posted it in the first place. However, in most cases, there is always a self-
serving underlying agenda and a deliberate unauthenticated sharing of the online
information. As a far-fetched repercussion, this tendency of sharing unverified
news has borne deep into one of the defining features of our national character.
Above anything else, this tendency is rather detrimental given the fluid nature of
information which is half through until the time it has been authenticated at least
once. Ironically though, Pakistan stands at least a decade away from instilling
among its people a culture of rational and responsible information sharing which
17
takes into account all the long and short term consequences of their actions.

Cyber Attacks
Cyber warfare has increased the asymmetrical threat to a nation’s
databases and its decision making mechanisms. The threat of cyber-attacks needs
immediate attention as nations with considerable resources and more sophisticated

Strategic Thought-2019 (Issue-I)

Hybrid Warfare – Challenges for Pakistan 135

informational technology defenses have been compromised by this wave of hybrid

warfare. For instance, the attack on over fifteen Iranian facilities and resources by
the Stuxnet worm gave its creators access to crucial industrial information as well
as giving them the ability to operate various machinery at the individual industrial
sites. This introduced a new dimension into the perilous nature of cyber warfare
18
and attacks. However, the unprecedented threats emanating from cyber warfare
have led to ventures in countries consolidating more robust security frameworks
19
and Pakistan needs to follow suit. In the case of Pakistan, the technological
revolution has made most of digital bases vulnerable. This vulnerability is tested
from time to time in the financial, commercial and banking sectors; medical and
health services; communication and energy; and national security architectures
20
etc. Keeping in view, the nuanced uses of knowledge and information in the
contemporary times, cyber-attacks and information warfare poses dangers to
national security that is more profound than conventional threats. For instance, in
November, 2018, data from “almost all” the banks in Pakistan was compromised in
a cyber-attack and extensive amount of money was stolen from many accounts as
21
the security system was breached. This attack came to light after a few days of
another attack on the Pakistani banking security infrastructure where Bank Islami
22
Pakistan reported that it had been a victim of theft of almost 3 million rupees.
Repeated and consistent attacks to the national wealth of the state need to prompt
a more robust policy and practical response to bolster the security systems and
infrastructure of the state. It goes without saying that another precious data base of
a country is the concerning armed forces in the country which are also open to
attacks. There are persistent threats to breach these data bases.

Incontrovertibly, the nature of warfare has shifted from physical to online

threats; the new cyber arsenal disguises itself as state sponsored attacks,
disinformation and espionage. This transformed threat cannot be addressed with
conventional and customary responses, but needs to be approached with
accelerated development of innovative cyber and information strategies, regulatory
frameworks, common standards and tangible capabilities all aimed at achieving a
harmonized regime to counter cyber warfare.

Psychological Manoeuvring; Targeting the National Will

The most distressing feature of hybrid wars and the one that adds manifold
to the challenge of effectively deterring them is the damage that it causes on the
psychological level. As discussed earlier, a kinder form of war that it is, the impact
that the strategies deployed under this stream of warfare are twice as severe in their
tenacity. The information-centric component within the hybrid warfare doctrine

Strategic Thought-2019 (Issue-I)

136 Dr. Tughral Yamin

targets the very spirit of the adversary country. Information based wars have the
potential to influence political, economic or military goals at any and all levels.
They can sabotage the economy, development ventures, and/ or the sabotage or
destruction of the entire information network system. It essentially includes
collection of tactical information, deliberately spreading propaganda and
23
disinformation to demoralize or manipulate the adversary. Endless debates over
electronic media citing the inadequacy in the policy and governance structures
within lead to a state of conditioning nations into believing in the inability of their
national leaders to lead their countries into the rightful direction. It must be noted
that like other forms of hybrid warfare, the linchpin of psychologically tarnishing
the very spirit of nations lies in ‘information’, its unverified release and sharing. It
must also be noted that for the advancement of such an agenda, it does not
necessarily have to be an external source to act as a carrier of fake news. In case of
Pakistan, there is a lot that needs to be done on this front. At present, varying
discourses in the electronic, print and social media regarding Pakistan’s
engagement with the multi-billion dollar deal CPEC is one such example. The
doubts about the longevity and credibility about the engagement began on a
similar note and have now grown into a daily dose of debate as to whether the
alliance is a good idea or not.

Policy Options
There is an urgent need to understand and address the multi-faceted threat
posed by hybrid warfare. Due to the heightened susceptibility to fall victim to these
24
stratagems, national security paradigm needs to be overhauled. There is a clear
cut need to devise a strategy, build capacities and allocate resources. The response
should be a whole of government approach and the people should be made a part
of it. Operating in silos and turf rivalry can only increase the threat and not
decrease it. Recommended options are as under:

 First and foremost, there is a need to create awareness among our top level
policy and decision makers about the need to register and recognize hybrid
warfare as the contemporary currency of war and to come up with an
imaginative counter strategy. Notwithstanding the fact that there should
be an integrated and holistic approach to synergise all resources (civil and
military), there is no harm to make one of the ministries the lead agency.
This ministry can be officially mandated to develop a national narrative to
counter false claims of disunity or worse disintegration. Innovative themes
can be constructed to produce a positive ambience and raise the morale of

Strategic Thought-2019 (Issue-I)

Hybrid Warfare – Challenges for Pakistan 137

the nation. The person responsible for this effort should be answerable to
the Prime Minister and should regularly update the Parliament and where
needed the nation. This person should also be provided adequate financial,
material and human resources to plan and fight a meaningful battle to
counter hybrid threats.
 Secondly there is a need to make a clear cut policy integrating all the civil
and military agencies to come up with a sustainable model. The
government can achieve this by engaging all the stakeholders within the
society in the formulation of an altogether new security paradigm. In this
view, practically viable means to lessen the vulnerability in the cyber realm
must be made part of the country’s national security doctrine. The military
can be asked to revise its threat hypothesis to cover all aspects of the
hybrid threat. Inputs from noted economists, academics, cyber war experts,
scientists and law enforcement agents can be factored into formulating the
new threat dimensions.
 Thirdly, at the foreign policy level, alliances should be sought with friendly
countries to strengthen our digital defences. International best practices
must be introduced with the help of partner countries and organizations to
achieve the gold standard in cyber security. Universities should be
encouraged to come up with policies and technologies to secure our cyber
and mental frontiers.
 Fourthly, investment should be made in human resource. Young university
students and fresh graduates in the market with the knack of fighting cyber
warfare in the domain of not only science and technology but also in hard
core information warfare should be hired. They should be trained to work
in small teams to counter various facets of the hybrid threats.
 Fifthly, serious planning should be done to manufacture our own hardware
and software. Currently all computers, laptops, smartphones and servers
are imported. None of our data bases are running on machinery produced
by our own technologists. Similarly all our operating systems are those
produced by companies such as Microsoft. We do not have any digital
search engine of our own. Our universities submit all their intellectual
outputs to similarity index software such as Turnitin. This can only
perpetuate intellectual hegemony of the West. None of our thoughts and
research belongs to us. It is captured by software produced externally.
 Last but not the least, Pakistan must energize its defensive information
mechanism on state and social media to spread competing narratives to
25
fight gloom and doom stories. This is easier said than done, it will need a

Strategic Thought-2019 (Issue-I)

138 Dr. Tughral Yamin

lot of imagination and foresight to develop positive themes to raise the

national spirit and morale and nip the negative broadcasts in the bud.

Conclusion
Wars have always been waged with all the tools available to a nation
(financial, political and diplomatic) to achieve a political goal. A weak nation
remains always at the mercy of a stronger adversary. This does not only mean just
having a top class military outfitted with latest weapons of war but a strong and
resilient nation willing to undergo all sorts of trials and tribulations in order to
survive at its own terms. This means essentially that the nation should be at peace
with itself. It should believe in its leadership and the capacity and capability of the
state institutions to function for its good. Common man must have two square
meals a day and a roof over his/her head. The children must be in schools and not
out on the streets begging. There should be access to quick and fair justice. There
should be hospitals for the sick, water in the taps, gas in the pipelines and the bulbs
must light up after dusk. The state should be sympathetic towards its citizens and
in a position to look after the needy. The police should protect the citizens from
the criminals and the army should be able to defend the borders.

In such a state of satisfaction and contentment, hybrid threats would be

ineffective. Such threats can only thrive if the people are unhappy or they perceive
that the government is either incapable or worse unwilling to provide them or a
certain segment of society their due share as the responsible citizens of the
country. If their basic human needs are fulfilled they will not fall prey to malicious
propaganda and no amount of canvassing would convince that a collapse is
imminent any time soon.

To prevent any worst case scenario from happening not only a positive
narrative needs to be created but also all national policies should be made on the
basic principles of being people friendly and welfare oriented. Physical frontiers can
be defended but collapse on the mental front can lead to surrender without
fighting. This must be prevented come what may and the national will and spirit
must be protected at all costs.

Strategic Thought-2019 (Issue-I)

Hybrid Warfare – Challenges for Pakistan 139

NOTES
1
Frank G. Hoffman, “Conflict in the 21st Century: The Rise of Hybrid Wars”, (Arlington: Virginia, 2007), 7-10, accessed
August 6, 2018, http://www.potomacinstitute.org/images/stories/publications/potomac_hybridwar_0108.pdf.
2
Patrick J. Cullen and Erik Reichborn-Kjennerud, “Understanding Hybrid Warfare: A Multinational Capability
Development Campaign Project,” January 2017, Accessed December 31,2018,
https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/647776/dar_mc
dc_hybrid_warfare.pdf.
3
Timothy B. McCulloh, “Understanding Hybrid Warfare and Gray Zone Threats,” in Terrorism: Commentary on
Security Documents - Hybrid Warfare and the Gray-Zone Threats, ed. Douglas C. Lovelace, Jr., (New York: Oxford
University Press, 2016), 59-65.
4
Peter R. Mansoor, “Introduction: Hybrid Warfare in History” in Hybrid Warfare- Fighting Complex Opponents from
Ancient Worlds to the Present, ed. Williamson Murray and Peter R. Mansoor (USA: Cambridge University Press,
2012), 1-15.
5
James K. Wither, “Making Sense of Hybrid Warfare”, Connections 15, no.2, (2016): 74-78.
6
Brian Nichiporuk, “U.S: Military Opportunities: Information-Warfare Concepts of Operation” in Strategic Appraisal:
The Changing Role on Information Warfare, ed. Zalmay K., White J.O., and Marshall A W (Santa Monica: RAND
Corporation, 1999): 187-195.
7
Saghir Iqbal, “Hybrid Warfare and its Impact on Pakistan’s Security”, (CreateSpace Independent Publishing
Platform, 2018):5-13.
8
Hafeez ullah Khan and Ijaz Khalid, “Indian Cold Start Doctrine: Pakistan’s Response,” Journal of Research Society of
Pakistan 55, no.1 (2018): 325-341.
9
Uri: The Surgical Strike Imdb (2019), https://www.imdb.com/title/tt8291224/ .
10
Shireen M. Mazari, “Hybrid Warfare and Centre of Gravity,” The News, December 27, 2018,
https://www.thenews.com.pk/print/411092-hybrid-warfare-and-centre-of-gravity (accessed January 7, 2019).
11
Zeynep Tufekci and Christopher Wilson, “Social Media and the Decision to Participate in Political Protest:
Observations from Tahrir Square,” Journal of Communication 62, no.2, (2012):363-379.
12
“Social Media Fact Sheet”, Pew Research Centre,
http://www.pewinternet.org/fact-sheet/social-media/ (Accessed December 27, 2018).
13
Nick Anstead and Ben O’ Loughlin, “Social Media Analysis and Public Opinion: The 2010 UK General Election,”
Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 20, (2015):204-210.
14
Robin Effing, Jos van Hillegersberg and Theo Huibers, “Social Media and Political Participation: Are Facebook,
Twitter and YouTube Democratizing Our Political Systems?” Department of Information Systems & Change
Management, University of Twente, School of Management and Governance, (2011): 25-29.
15
Rebecca Rabby et al., “Vlogging on YouTube: the online, political engagement of young Canadians advocating for
social change,” Journal of Youth Studies 21, no.4, (2018):495-509.
16
“Pakistan Social Media Stats 2018, http://alphapro.pk/pakistan-social-media-stats-2018/ (Accessed January 2, 2019).
17
Hamid Bilal, Consultant Psychologist, Compass Training and Consultancy Pvt. Ltd. (Interviewed January 3, 2019).
18
Michael Holloway, Stuxnet Worm Attack on Iranian Nuclear Facilities. July 15, 2015,
http://large.stanford.edu/courses/2015/ph241/holloway1/ (Accessed January 01, 2019).
19
Kate O'Flaherty, Cyber Warfare: The Threat From Nation States, Accessed January 01, 2019,
https://www.forbes.com/sites/kateoflahertyuk/2018/05/03/cyber-warfare-the-threat-from-nation-
states/#3d35c84f1c78
14
Farooq Baloch and Iftikhar Firdous, Pakistani banks hit by biggest cyber-attack in country’s history,
https://www.samaa.tv/news/2018/11/pakistani-banks-hit-by-biggest-cyber-attack-in-countrys-history/ (Accessed
January 01, 2019).
21
Shakeel Qarar, 'Almost all' Pakistani banks hacked in security breach, says FIA cybercrime head. Accessed January
01, 2019, https://www.dawn.com/news/1443970
22
Salman Siddiqui, Pakistan's banking system witnesses another cyberattack. Accessed January 01, 2019,
https://tribune.com.pk/story/1836466/2-pakistans-banking-system-witnesses-another-cyberattack/.
23
Dragan Z. Damjanović, “Types of Information Warfare and Examples of Malicious Programs of Information
Warfare”, Military Technical Courier 65, no.4 (2017): 1044-1053. http://dx.doi.org/10.5937/vojtehg65-13590
24
Andrew Korybko, “Applicability of Hybrid Wars to Pakistan: Challenges and Possible Responses”, NDU Journal
XXXI, (2017): 207-228. http://www.ndu.edu.pk/issra/issra_pub/articles/ndu-journal/NDU-Journal-
2017/Journal_2017.pdf
25
Sehar Kamran, “Hybrid Warfare- Emerging Challenges for Pakistan”, The Nation, April 29, 2018.
https://nation.com.pk/29-Apr-2018/592255 (Accessed December 27, 2018).

Strategic Thought-2019 (Issue-I)