Line Pressure Drop
Line Pressure Drop
Line Pressure Drop
Document Title:
A54-24-031 Page 1 of 14
AMEC BKW Process Engineering Desk Manual – Prediction of Line Pressure Drop in A1
Non-Newtonian Fluids - A54-24-031
Contents
1.0 Introduction
6.0 References
A54-24-031 Page 2 of 14
AMEC BKW Process Engineering Desk Manual – Prediction of Line Pressure Drop in A1
Non-Newtonian Fluids - A54-24-031
1.0 INTRODUCTION
A non-Newtonian fluid is one whose viscosity is a function of the shear stress (or
equivalently of the shear rate) as well as temperature and pressure. Non-Newtonian fluids
with properties independent of time under shear are:
Bingham Plastic
Pseudoplastic
Dilatent
Generalised Bingham Plastic.
This Standard Method provides methods of calculating the pressure drop through a pipeline
for each of these four material types. Wherever possible, Client and/or test data should be
sought to back up calculations based on viscometric measurements.
Section 5.0 provides methods of determining pressure losses through pipe fittings. These
losses are particularly significant for laminar flow at very low Reynold's numbers
frequently encountered when handling non-Newtonian fluids. Note that Section 5.0 also
applies to Newtonian fluids.
A54-24-031 Page 3 of 14
AMEC BKW Process Engineering Desk Manual – Prediction of Line Pressure Drop in A1
Non-Newtonian Fluids - A54-24-031
This Standard Method does not provide design methods for Thixotropic and Rheopectic
fluids whose properties are dependent on the duration of shear or Viscoelastic materials
which exhibit many characteristics of a solid. Little guidance for predicting pressure losses
of these materials has been identified in the literature and as a consequence reliance must be
placed on Client experience and test data.
A Bingham plastic is a fluid which requires a yield stress (τ0) to initiate flow - see Fig. 1.
Printing ink
Suspensions of coal, rock or grains
Molten chocolate
Sewage sludge.
Line pressure drops can be calculated using equations in A54-24-061, Section 1.2 using a
Moody friction factor ƒ determined by the method below (based on Ref. 1).
A54-24-031 Page 4 of 14
AMEC BKW Process Engineering Desk Manual – Prediction of Line Pressure Drop in A1
Non-Newtonian Fluids - A54-24-031
A54-24-031 Page 5 of 14
AMEC BKW Process Engineering Desk Manual – Prediction of Line Pressure Drop in A1
Non-Newtonian Fluids - A54-24-031
Example 1
400 m3/h coal slurry pumped through 450mm sch 20 pipeline (i.d. = 441.3 mm)
ρ = 1500 kg/m3
µ L= 30 cP
τ0 = 2 N/m2
From Fig. 2:
ƒ = 0.032
Example 2
9500 kg/h printing ink pumped through 80 mm NB sch 40 pipeline (i.d. 77.9 mm)
ρ = 950 kg/m3
µ L = 2300 cP
τ0 = 130 N/m2
i.e. ƒ = 7.71
τ = K γn (5)
Hence a logarithmic plot of shear stress versus shear rate is a straight line, enabling K and n
to be determined.
Note that this equation may apply to only a limited range of shear rates. See example 3 for
flow curve of 30% by volume TiO2 suspension which exhibits pseudoplastic behaviour at
low shear rates and dilatency at higher shear rates.
The Moody friction factor may be determined from Fig. 3 using the modified Reynolds
number N're:
A54-24-031 Page 7 of 14
AMEC BKW Process Engineering Desk Manual – Prediction of Line Pressure Drop in A1
Non-Newtonian Fluids - A54-24-031
Fig. 3 applies to smooth pipes. For a rough pipe, the friction factor should be corrected by
multiplying by the ratio of friction factor for rough and smooth pipe assuming Newtonian
flow at the Reynolds number determined above.
ƒ = 64 / N're (8)
The pressure drop for laminar flow through round tubes may also be determined from the
expressions:
It should be noted that if capillary tube or pipeline measurements of the flow properties are
available, they may be used directly in design of larger pipes using the equation for the
shear stress at the wall:
Example 3
50 m3/h of 30% vol. titanium dioxide suspension pumped through 150 mm Sch 40 pipeline
(i.e. = 154.1mm).
ρ = 1250 kg/m3
Shear stress versus shear rate data from viscometer measurements as curve below:
For shear rates 500 - 1000 sec-1, n = 1.54, K = 0.0077 Nsn m-2
A54-24-031 Page 9 of 14
AMEC BKW Process Engineering Desk Manual – Prediction of Line Pressure Drop in A1
Non-Newtonian Fluids - A54-24-031
n = 0.78
K = 0.59 Nsn m-2
Example 4
Sewage sludge pumped at a mean velocity of 2.5 m/s through a cast iron 0.1043m dia.
pipeline.
ρ = 1000 kg/m3
τ = 0.20 γ0.71
i.e. n = 0.71
K = 0.20 Nsn/m2
Hence:
From Fig. 3
ƒ = 0.030
A54-24-031 Page 10 of 14
AMEC BKW Process Engineering Desk Manual – Prediction of Line Pressure Drop in A1
Non-Newtonian Fluids - A54-24-031
These materials behave as pseudoplastic or dilatent fluids but the flow curve does not pass
through the origin. See Fig. 1. The general form of the flow curve is :
τ = τ0 + K γ n (12)
Examples are:
Paints
Foodstuffs
Activated Sewage Sludge.
For laminar flow, the Moody friction factor is determined by iteration using equation below
from Ref. 3:
For turbulent flow, the effect of the yield stress can be ignored (Ref. 3). Hence the
correlation shown in Fig. 3 in Section 3.0 may be used.
Example 5
4 L/s polyvinyl acetate emulsion paint pumped through 80mm Sch. 40 pipeline (i.d. =
77.9mm). Physical properties at pumping temperature :
ρ = 1400 kg/m3
τ0 = 1.0 N/m2
n = 0.82
A54-24-031 Page 11 of 14
AMEC BKW Process Engineering Desk Manual – Prediction of Line Pressure Drop in A1
Non-Newtonian Fluids - A54-24-031
From equation 13 :
ƒ = 0.043
Turbulent Flow
Laminar Flow
Correlations for Newtonian flow can be used provided the non-Newtonian Reynolds number
is used. Suitable correlations are given below (Refs. 5 and 6).
A54-24-031 Page 12 of 14
AMEC BKW Process Engineering Desk Manual – Prediction of Line Pressure Drop in A1
Non-Newtonian Fluids - A54-24-031
Pipe Fitting K1 K2
Elbows (R/D = 1.5):
90° 800 0.20
45° 500 0.15
Tees:
Flow through branch 1000 1.00
Flow through run 100 0
Valves:
Gate / ball / plug:
ß = 1.0 300 0.10
ß = 0.9 500 0.15
ß = 0.8 1000 0.25
Globe 1500 4.00
Diaphragm 1000 2.00
Butterfly 800 0.25
Check Valves:
Lift 2000 10.00
Swing 1500 1.50
Tilting Disc 1000 0.50
Entrances / Exits:
K = K1 / Nre + K2
Pipe exit K1 = 0
K2 = 1.0
A54-24-031 Page 13 of 14
AMEC BKW Process Engineering Desk Manual – Prediction of Line Pressure Drop in A1
Non-Newtonian Fluids - A54-24-031
6.0 REFERENCES
1. Darby R and Melson J. How to Predict the Friction Factor for Flow of Bingham
Plastics. Chemical Engineering, December 28 1981.
2. Streeter. Handbook of Fluid Dynamics. McGraw-Hill, New York, 1961. See Note 1.
3. Heywood N I. Pipeline Design for Non-Settling Slurries.Lecture No. 2, Slurry
Handling Seminar, Warren Spring Laboratory, March 1989. See Note 2.
4. Perry R H, Green D. Perry's Chemical Engineers' Handbook. Sixth Edition. See Note 3.
5. Hooper W B. The Two-K Method Predicts Head Losses in Pipe Fittings. Chemical
Engineering, August 24 1981.
6. Hooper W B. Calculate Head Loss Caused by Change in Pipe Size. Chemical
Engineering, November 7 1988.
7. Govier G W, Aziz K. The Flow of Complex Mixtures in Pipes. Van Nostrand
Reinhold. London 1972. See Note 5.
NOTES
A54-24-031 Page 14 of 14