Final 144 Dasu
Final 144 Dasu
Final 144 Dasu
ARTICLE REVIEW
Abstract
Eight hundred years after the death of historical Buddha, when Shamanism was still the indigenous
religion in Korea, Chinese monks and traders came and introduced Buddhism in the peninsula.
Since the latter was not perceived as incompatible with the indigenous religion, Buddhism was
embraced and permitted to meld and coexist alongside Shamanism. It is because of this that the
two religions blended to produce a form of Buddhism that is uniquely Korean, as what was
described as a little bit diverse from its neighbors – China and Japan. As it is discernable today,
Buddhism in Korea now have different competition with Atheism and Christianity, not to mention
a much different form of political system ruling the country. As we all know, for a long period of
time in the history of the Korean Peninsula, the ruling dynasties and monarchies always viewed
religions as a mere political tool in which they can use to unify the common people and control
the monopoly of power by justifying their positions as the one sent by God. Moreover, the purpose
of this review is to look into and provide a critique on the veracity of Korean Buddhism from its
introduction into Korean consciousness, how it became part of their cultural fabric influencing
valiantly the Korean society making it arduous to see where culture, politics and religion sunder.
TITLE:
REVIEWED ARTICLE:
Dasu, Kay. “Buddhism in Ancient Korean Kingdoms”. eJournal of Buddhist Research Studies.
Introduction
Kay Dasu is the contributor of the research article entitled “Buddhism in Ancient Korean
Kingdoms” published under the eJournal of Buddhist Research Studies of the Than Hsiang
Buddhist Research Centre in Penang, Malaysia. She was a postgraduate student at the International
Buddhist College in Thailand and is at the same time part of the academia. She submitted this
research study for publication and made a weighty contribution by putting into light the history of
Buddhism in Korea and its cultural influences leading to indigenous forms of Korean Buddhism.
The writer takes into account and piles up information of how historical eras and each of the ancient
Korean kingdoms played a vital role in the advancement of Korean Buddhist thought by making
use of trade links and cultural exchanges which then led into the formation of a uniquely distinct
and structured form of Buddhism designed for a Korean audience. According to the author,
Buddhism as a living religion has nothing to hide and becomes brighter and brighter when it is
revealed. It just needs more and more scientific investigation to explore its values to the human
the adoption of Buddhism during the first Korean kingdom of Gojoseon as what was recorded in
the Samguk Yusa, from the first dynasty of Imperial China in 3726 while Shamanism as the
indigenous religion was still in the picture. The latter religion holds the belief that human beings,
as well as natural forces and inanimate objects, all possess spirits which must be appeased. On the
other hand, as the former was not seen to conflict with the rites of nature worship, Buddhism was
allowed to blend in with Shamanism. It is because of this that the two religions blended to produce
a form of Buddhism that is uniquely Korean, as what was described as a little bit diverse from its
neighbors. The writer also mentioned that there are 3 spirits with special reverence and importance
being regarded in Korean Shamanism, to wit: the Mountain Spirit, which they call Sanshin in local
term, who is usually depicted as an old man with a tiger at his feet, Toksong, or the recluse, and
Ch’ilsong which they refer to as the spirit of the seven stars or the Big Dipper. She additionally
discussed that aside from the traditional and the fundamental teachings of Buddha brought by the
Chinese traders, Korean Buddhism also accepted and absorbed these three spirits and, even up to
this day, special shrines are set aside for them in most temples while still honoring Buddha at the
main hall. The author justified this by explaining that this is in case the local mountain spirits
mentioned in Korean Shamanism, on whose land the temple stands, become angry. It is also
because of the blending of these two religions that the mountains in Ancient Korea were at the
same time believed to be the residence of spirits in pre-Buddhist times and became the sites of
almost all Buddhist temples. The second part of the paper gave heavy emphasis on the development
of Buddhism as the state religion, most especially during the time when the Korean peninsula was
politically divided into three kingdoms: Goguryeo in the north, which gave its name to present-
day Korea and now included territory currently in Russia and China; Baekje in the southwest; and
Silla in the southeast. In these eras, Korean Buddhist monks traveled to China or India to study
Buddhism. The author exemplified and provided evidence of how Korean monks of the time
traveled overseas and brought back a large number of texts, as well as engaged in extensive
missionary work across the Korean peninsula. The writer also included a brief historical
development of Korean Buddhism under the Unified Silla period after the T’ang army, with the
help of the Silla state in southern Korea, defeated first the Baekje state in 660 and then the
Goguryeo in the North in 668. During the heyday of the Silla kingdom's greatest expansion and
wealth, Buddhism served as a spiritual anchor for the state, and when Buddhism fell out of favor,
so did the state as a whole. She added that after the Three Kingdoms period in Korea was at an
end, the Goryeo Dynasty ruled Korea and later faced the onslaught of Mongol attacks by the Yuan
Dynasty of China and became the vassal state of the Chinese Empire. In 1392, Taejo of Choson
dethroned the Goryeo king and took over the empire, thus founding the Choson Dynasty where
Korea enforced a policy of strict limited contact with all other countries making them a hermit
kingdom as described by the writer. In this period, Buddhism was slowly replaced by Neo-
Confucianism and their practices was limited if not restricted. Korean Buddhism managed to thrive
in the seclusion of the mountain valleys throughout this period of oppression and rejection.
Although there are some good points and a clear discussion of Buddhism in the article,
there are still some passages that do not contain enough information for the reader to understand.
For a long period of time in the history of the Korean Peninsula, one thing that the ruling
dynasties and monarchies always have in common was their perceptions on religion as a mere
political tool in which they can use to unify the common people and control the monopoly of
power. They justified this belief by using their positions as the one sent by God to govern their
people. They supplement this belief with the Buddhist teachings of reincarnation and rebirth, based
on the concept of karma. It was mentioned by the writer herself that Goguryeo became the first
kingdom in the region to adopt Buddhism to the extent that the government recognized and
encouraged the Buddhist teachings, and even built many monasteries and shrines during its history.
Following shortly after, the Kingdoms of Baekje and Silla adopted Buddhism in favor of their
previous religious system, which was centered on the notion that the ruler was a son of God. As
what the author puts it, Buddhism became so popular during this Three Kingdoms period that many
kings converted, and the same time several cities and locations were renamed after famous places
during the time of Buddha. As per the researcher, Buddhism flourished under the patronage and
protection of the royal houses and their associated aristocrats. The way I see it, religion offered a
sense of well-being for the state and by extension for the ordinary individual. The author also
asserted that at this time, monks had a high level of social standing and were so influential in
societal matters that they were given the special ranks of a national teacher, which they describe
to in local terms as kuksa and wangsa alluding to the King's teacher. It is also worth noting that the
first monarch of the Goryeo dynasty, King T’aejo was a devout Buddhist who built ten great
monasteries in the capital. However, as it was pointed out by the author in the middle of this essay,
the later Goryeo period saw a sharp decline in the spirituality of Goryeo Buddhism as a result of
the monasteries' gradual accumulation of wealth, their illegal endowment of land, and their
excessive power. Even though it was at first widely accepted and even promoted as the
governmental ideology throughout the Goryeo era, this did not endure long. Buddhism in Korea
suffered extreme repression during the Choson era that lasted for over five hundred years due to
its pro-Confucian national ideology. Even while monarchs continued to embrace Buddhism in
secret, Neo-Confucianism quickly gained popularity, and Confucianism came to dominate and
regulate their culture and the government. As what was previously tackled, Korean Buddhism
managed to thrive in the seclusion of the mountain valleys throughout this period of oppression
and rejection. On the brighter side of the issue, this banishment proved to be quite valuable to
Buddhism. The practice of Buddhism flourished communally, and temples for Buddhist worship
in the highlands served as hubs for this activity. It also because of this that Buddhism became an
instrument that help developed closer ties with the common people.
Critique
The author has done a great job in recognizing the history of several religious traditions of
the ancient Korean Kingdoms. It is good for the author that she demystified clearly the functions
of the clan or tribal leaders during the ancient period and what role they played between their
people and the realm of the spirits. It is as well earthshaking to found out that the fundamental
religion of the ancient period did not disappear with the arrival of Buddhism in the fourth century.
Instead, it became the foundation of all Korean religious experience most especially during the
gained a broader awareness and erudition of the Korean Buddhism. The way I see it, this shows
how devoted she is to publish research papers of Buddhist studies mainly with the intention of
providing them to a wider audience. I felt enchanted the moment she tackled about the Tripitaka,
which is known as the ‘basket’ of Shakyamuni’s sermons to his disciples and the masses. A long
time ago, when word of mouth was the only option and before people realized the importance of
records for posterity, the proper means of documentation was absent. As it was jotted down by the
writer, the human memory is inherently flawed, and any transmitted content varied depending on
how the narrator delivers the message, to the point that in some cases, these contents or messages
became unrecognizable. It is because of this that Buddha’s disciples had to find a solution. Feeling
the need to ascertain and set down the discourse before their memory faded, they gathered to
exchange their thoughts that were afterwards transformed into written Sutras.
Korean Buddhists also have their own Tripitaka Koreana which they call in local term as
Palman Daejanggyeong, carved onto 81,258 wooden printing blocks in the 13th century. The
52,330,152 characters, which are arranged in over 1496 titles and 6568 volumes, were described
and elucidated by the author as the most complete and historically intact edition of the Buddhist
canon ever created in Hanja script. It is stored in Haein-sa, a Buddhist Temple in South
Gyeongsang province in South Korea, was designated as a National Treasure of South Korea in
1962 and was inscribed in the Memory of the World Register by UNESCO in 2007.
However, as I delve deeper into the spellbound concept of the Tripitaka Koreana in Korean
Buddhism, the interrogative nature as to who engraved those tablets and what does it take for the
carvers to go about this backbreaking task still wanders inside my mind. Another thing is her lack
of demystification as to how did the woodblocks found their way to Haein-sa. which is off the
beaten path even by today’s standards. In my perspective, this could’ve added more veracity to her
study if it were not for the fact that she failed to address this despite of her being aware of these
Altogether, I commend how she presented in the concluding part of her study that the
religious history of Korea was divided into four broad periods and how she incorporated these
periods with each other. An example was the way she illustrated the blending of the era of
Shamanistic practices with the era of Buddhist teachings, as well how Confucianism replaced
Buddhism dominance, not to mention the post-Confucian era, truly is worthy of confidence.
Conclusion
After thorough deliverance, Buddhism indeed is a living religion that has nothing to hide
and will shine even more brighter when it is revealed with more exploring and investigation on its
values leading into a revelation on its aftermath in the human life’s wellbeing and progress.
Undeniably, each historical era and each Korean kingdom magnanimously played a vigorous role
in the advancement of Korean Buddhist thought. No dubitation, Buddhism in the Korean peninsula
will still prosper and dominates even without the aid of the other religions as these answers the
questions of how abstruse and profound is its political relationship with the state or the different
kingdoms that have existed during its arrival in the Korean Peninsula. This evidently show that
even when Korea was isolated and was then occupied by foreigners, Korean Buddhism
philosophies lay just beneath the surface of the Korean society. Incontestably, it became part of
their cultural fabric influencing valiantly the Korean society making it arduous to see where
culture, politics and religion sunder. As Korean Buddhist thought has adapted, suppressed and still
flourishing over for years, the fundamental teachings of the Buddha have remained.