Intro To Linguistic Module
Intro To Linguistic Module
Intro To Linguistic Module
INTRO TO LINGUISTICS
EL 100
LEARNING MODULE
It regards language learning as a behavior like other forms of human behavior, not
a mental phenomenon, learned by a process of habit formation. Since language is
viewed as mechanistic and as a human activity, it is believed that learning a
language is achieved by building up habits on the basis of stimulus-response
chains. Behaviorism emphasizes the consequences of the response and argues that
it is the behavior that follows a response which reinforces it and thus helps to
strengthen the association.
a. The child imitates the sounds and patterns which s/he hears around her/him.
b. People recognize the child’s attempts as being similar to the adult models and
reinforce (reward) the sounds by approval or some other desirable reaction.
c. In order to obtain more of these rewards, the child repeats the sounds and
patterns so that these become habits.
d. In this way the child’s verbal behavior is conditioned (‘shaped’) until the
habits coincide with the adult models.
The behaviorists claim that the three crucial elements of learning are: a stimulus,
which serves to elicit behavior; a response triggered by the stimulus, and
reinforcement, which serves to mark the response as being appropriate (or
inappropriate) and encourages the repetition (or suppression) of the response.
3. Krashen’s Monitor Model (1981). Probably this is the most often cited among
theories of second language acquisition; considered the most comprehensive, if
not the most ambitious, consisting of five central hypotheses:
a. The acquisition/ learning hypothesis. It claims that there are two ways of
developing competence in L2:
Acquisition - the subconscious process that results from informal, natural
communication between people where language is a means, not a
focus nor an end, in itself.
Krashen suggests that monitoring occurs when there is sufficient time, where
there is pressure to communicate correctly and not just convey meaning, and
when the appropriate rules are known.
d. The input hypothesis. Krashen proposes that when learners are exposed to
grammatical features a little beyond their current level (i.e., i + 1), those
features are ‘acquired’. Acquisition results from comprehensible input, which
is made understandable with the help provided by the context. If learners
receive understandable input, language structures will be naturally acquired.
Ability to communicate in a second language ‘emerges’ rather than indirectly
put in place by teaching.
2. The cognitive learning theory has given birth to the cognitive approach to learning
that puts language analysis before language use and instruction by the teacher, before
the students practice forms. It is compatible with the view that learning is a thinking
process, a belief that underpins cognitive-based and schema-enhancing strategies
such as Directed Reading Thinking Activity, Story Grammar, Think-Aloud, to name
a few.
TASK: Answer the following questions in two paragraphs. Submit your work (Printed) at TEP Faculty
of the assignment. Deadline for submission: Friday, until 4 PM.
1) Some features common to all natural languages have been mentioned above. Can you think of
some additional properties that unite all languages?
2) How do you understand innateness of language?
3) Think about your usual working day. Do you speak more or do you write more? In this
connection, would you give priority to spoken or written language?
4) (Advanced) If someone you know says to you over a glass of wine on a Saturday evening “I
love you”, how would you interpret the utterance? In other words, can the utterance have other
interpretations apart from its direct meaning and how some interpretations may depend on the
context of the situation?