Tenet To Cure Thesc Nnens Shouuh Mabe Enemmnt Egucoditures, Dhe
Tenet To Cure Thesc Nnens Shouuh Mabe Enemmnt Egucoditures, Dhe
Tenet To Cure Thesc Nnens Shouuh Mabe Enemmnt Egucoditures, Dhe
Background
Afler the Second World W, several developing naicns pot frecdom from
colonial domination They had 1o decide os a develapment stratcgy, For several
Fasons most of them hose a deveogment strategy whee the state had a very
impurtant ole to play.Fin, mn e the co
Aewod income distributi,thatis there were islands ef riches wiah larse pos
of peverty, There wre also high uncplaynet levcls The tackt, it was fcl
vry important role to play. Thinly, uring the Second Woid Wat, widcsprcad
ue was made of control and rationing with administrative consideration taking
ocakceove
the eounomy, Further heginning 199 and through much of the (910s, several
industrial cconemies esperinced a severe depesicn whos jeblessness was
a aa only hwed d nghuth, but levels ef
The Mid E
What the industrial westers world had taàen ceuries to achicve, the Soviet
Md
Unn, or soit soemed, would ahieve in decades Social welfare measures wee
alse ot neylected AIl these imgressed policy makers in the develping natios
em to ethethinkint ksat tht time washat cial sinoe therie
particularty eoonomie theories develpod in the wetnd parenly fer the west
ester
adoptod echusively in the devckoping nation Not so, Eoonmists like Paul
Nebie descnbed the
eumple, claims thut in the American economy, the stae, and many by the
prate sectur undertake lots of economic activitics Morcover, the state
ale ectr by erngla inga variety of
critics-and indecd the state has ben in retrcat in devcoped countries as also in
developing countries Wewillcume te this aspect presently
The second pount to ramenber is that mied econny does not mean a mix
betwecs scialism and capialisn Alhough many devciping cuustrics that
ef reulation.
What thcn is a mied economy
India's principal economic strategy was givem a blucprint im the Second fiveyear
Pan, The finst Five Year Pan was over the period of 1951-1956 It was mainly a 105
forn had b be growth, and it was heped that thc henefits ofgrowth could trickle
down to the poople in kow socio-eoonomic status, Economist Jagdish Bhagwati
has opincd that the strategy should be called a 'pulling up' rather than "trickle
latier bype are called heavy industries twas thought important in the straicy of
the second Five Year Plan (the principal architect of the plan model was PC.
Maboalanobis and hcnce the strategy is callod Mahalanobis strategE) that there
he canital sock llere it dcs not can an indiviual spendine money lo hex
financial asscts like shares or mutual fnd lt means an aggregate economy leve
addition to the stock of machine. plants, cquipmest, ete.,
Now for amachine investment of this magnitade, it was felt that the rivate
sector at the time was simply not in a pesition te undertake it. Moreover.
imvestment in these and infrastructure imvolod a considerable lag after which
prufits would start to flow. Indian private capitalists, who were moily in trade.
Thus, the
There was noher plank to the strategy. t was felt that dependence on imports
for all type ef goods had te be lessenod Foreign excange was a scarce item,
which had lo be coeeu an g dt
cope of esperts did not cxist and hence an expot peomotion strategy was ot put
into place
Thus, in India the publis sector was givg charge of the heay industries
indrastratug, darns, ctg State owned mcans of prohuction and other state ewnsd
firms were guided by an objective of the peomotion of social weltfare. The private
secter was allowed in areas of comsumet goods and in arcas where econcmics of
the statc soughi to regulate the pcivate sector thevegh asvstem of incuring in
onder to peevent build-up of monopolies and unfair business practices
110