DEPARTMENT OF MUSIC AND MUSIC EDUCATION

FACULTY OF MUSIC & PERFORMING ARTS

APPLIED MUSIC I, II, III

EVALUATION FORM (FINAL ASSESSMENT)

Name : ______________________________ Program Name : ____________________

Student ID : ______________________________ Course Code : ____________________

Instrument : ______________________________ Date : _____/_____/_____

Pieces/repertoires marking rubric.

Criteria 1 - Poor 2 - Substandard 3 - Average 4 - Good 5 - Excellent 1st piece 2nd piece
Tone Quality & Melodic and ensemble Intonation is Intonation is Melodic, harmonic and Melodic and harmonic
Intonation (not for piano intonation (as inconsistent, but there consistent, with many ensemble intonation is very intonation is excellent
or similar fixed appropriate) is were attempts to attempts to correct good. Problems are quickly throughout the selection.
intonation instruments) inconsistent. Intonation correct obvious obvious problems. corrected. /5 /5
problems are rarely problems
corrected quickly.
Technique / Accuracy Adequate technique is not Technical facility is Technical facility is Coordination, accuracy and Demonstrates thorough
demonstrated. adequate, but some adequate for a flexibility are very good. knowledge and command
inconsistencies Diploma/Bachelor of technique. /5 /5
occurred. student
Rhythm/Tempi Rhythmic inaccuracies Rhythmic accuracy Rhythmic accuracy Stylistic and accurate Rhythm and tempi
frequently present and not and precision is and precision is good. overall. Some passages convincing throughout, with
related to musicality or adequate. Tempo is Tempo is mostly may lack stylistic interpretations and
interpretation. Tempi mostly appropriate appropriate and interpretation but do not variations appropriate.
selected are inappropriate and consistent. consistent. detract from the
for repertoire and/or not performance. Musical /5 /5
controlled. phrasing is mostly
expressive.

Interpretation and Very little meaningful Stylistic accuracy is Stylistic accuracy is Stylistic and accurate Stylistically accurate and
Expression (Musicality) stylistic interpretation of demonstrated some of demonstrated most of overall. Some passages consistent throughout.
musical passages. Style the time. Stylistic the time. Stylistic may lack stylistic Excellent, expressive
is undeveloped and interpretation is interpretation is interpretation but do not phrasing and interpretation.
inconsistent. Musical demonstrated some of demonstrated most of detract from the
phrasing is mostly the time, but is often the time,. Musical performance. Musical /5 /5
mechanical and non- rigid and mechanical. phrasing is mostly phrasing is mostly
musical. Musical phrasing is always expressive. expressive.
basic but not always
expressive
TOTAL
/ 20 / 20
 Etudes/Studies marking rubric.

Criteria Very poor Poor Fair Good Excellent

1-4 5-7 8-11 12-17 18-20
Etudes/Studies The student realizes the work The student seldom realizes The student mostly realizes the The student realizes the work The student artistically
with many inaccurate notes the work consistent with style work consistent with style and consistent with style and genre. The realizes the work
(pitch), rhythm and tempo and genre. The performance genre. The performance lacks performance is expressive and the consistent with style
throughout. is lack of expression and is of expression and the delivery delivery is convincing. and genre. The
overall unconvincing. is not always convincing. performance is
expressive and the /20
delivery is very
convincing.

Scales and Arpeggios / Rudimental studies marking rubric.

Criteria Very poor Poor Fair Good Excellent

1-4 5-7 8-11 12-17 18-20
Scales and Student still weak in - Student performs with many - Student performs many of - The student nearly performs - The student performs
Arpeggios / fingering/sticking inaccurate rhythmic patterns rhythmic patterns accurately but accurate rhythm and consistent with accurate rhythms
Rudimental and inconsistent tempo some notes not consistent. tempo. and consistent tempo
studies (rushing or etc).- Student - Played with fair articulation - Played with good articulation throughout.
cannot apply articulation given by examiner. given by examiner. - Played with excellent /20
given by examiner. articulation given by
examiner.

Sight reading marking rubric.

Criteria Very poor Poor Fair Good Excellent
1-2 3-4 5-6 7-8 9-10
Sight reading The student performs many The student still performs The student performs about half The student performs almost all The student perform all
inaccurate notes (pitch), many inaccurate notes (pitch), notes (pitch), rhythm and tempo notes (pitch), rhythm and tempo notes (pitch), rhythm
rhythm and tempo throughout. rhythm and tempo after 2 accurately. accurately. and tempo accurately. /10
chances.

General Concert organisation, stage management, programme notes, TOTAL MARKS

performance criteria score preparation, performance etiquette, attire
/10 100
ACTUAL MARKS (50%)

1st examiner + 2nd examiner marks X 50

200

* ONLY the coordinator will merge both marks to get the Actual Marks of 50%

_______________________________
Signature of Examiner 1 / Examiner 2

Name: