Which Diet Will Help Save Our Planet

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 3

Which diet will help save our planet: climatarian, flexitarian, vegetarian or vegan?

The food we consume has a massive impact on our planet. Agriculture takes up half
the habitable land on Earth, destroys forests and other ecosystems and produces
a quarter of the world’s greenhouse gas emissions. Meat and dairy specifically
accounts for around 14.5% of global greenhouse gas emissions.

So changing what we eat can help reduce carbon emissions and promote sustainable
farming. But there are several “climate-friendly” diets to choose from. The best
known are the completely plant-based vegan diet, the vegetarian diet, which also
allows eggs and dairy, and the pescetarian diet, which also allows seafood.

There are also “flexitarian” diets, where three quarters of meat and dairy is replaced
by plant-based food, or the Mediterranean diet which allows moderate amounts of
poultry, pork, lamb and beef. Deciding which diet to choose is not as simple as you
might expect.

Let us start with a new fad: the climatarian diet. One version was created by the not-
for-profit organisation Climates Network, which says this diet is healthy, climate
friendly and nature friendly. According to the publicity “with a simple diet shift you
can save a tonne of CO₂ equivalents per person per year” (“equivalents” just means
methane and other greenhouse gases are factored in alongside carbon dioxide).

Sounds great, but the diet still allows you to eat meat and other high emission foods
such as pork, poultry, fish, dairy products and eggs. So this is just a newer version of
the “climate carnivore” diet except followers are encouraged to switch as much red
meat (beef, lamb, pork, veal and venison) as possible to other meats and fish.

The diet does, however, encourage you to cut down on meat overall and to choose
high-welfare and local meat where possible, while avoiding food waste and choosing
seasonal, local foods.

So saving a tonne of carbon dioxide is great but switching to vegetarianism or


veganism can save even more. A western standard meat-based diet produces
about 7.2 kilograms of CO₂ equivalent per day, while a vegetarian diet produces 3.8
kg and a vegan diet 2.9 kg. If the whole world went vegan it would save nearly 8
billion tonnes CO₂e while even a switch to the Mediterranean diet would still save 3
billion tonnes. That is a saving of between 60% and 20% of all food emissions as
which are currently at 13.7 billion tonnes of CO₂e a year.

How much CO2e (in billions of tonnes, or Gt) would be saved if the whole world
switched to each of these diets. Terms as defined by CarbonBrief. Data:
IPCC, Author provided
Water and land use

To save our planet, we must also consider both water and land usage. Beef, for
instance, needs about 15,000 litres of water per kilo.

Some vegetarian or vegan foods like avocados and almonds also have a huge water
footprint, but overall a plant-based diet has about half the water consumption of a
standard meat-based diet.

Brazil together with the US produces most of the world’s soy. It’s also a world leader
in deforestation. Alf Ribeiro / shutterstock
A global move away from meat would also free up a huge amount of land, since
billions of animals would no longer have to be fed. Soya, for instance, is one of the
world’s most common crops yet almost 80% of the world’s soybeans are fed to
livestock.

The reduced need for agricultural land would help stop deforestation and help
protect biodiversity. The land could also be used to reforest and rewild large areas
which would become a natural store of carbon dioxide.

(Mostly) healthier

A plant based diet is also generally healthier. Meat, especially highly processed meat,
has been linked to a string of major health issues including high blood pressure,
heart disease and cancer.

However, meat, dairy and fish are the main sources of some essential vitamins and
minerals such as calcium, zinc, iodine and vitamin B12. A strict vegan diet can put
people at risk of deficiencies unless they can have access to particular foods or take
supplements. Yet both specialist food and supplements are too expensive for many
people around the world and it would be hard to scale up supplements production
to provide for billions of extra people.

So a climatarian or flexitarian approach means there are fewer health risks and also
allows people to still exercise choice. One study suggests a move to a global plant-
based diet could reduce global mortality by up to 10% by 2050.

Nine animals per person per year

One of the issues that seems to be lacking in many food discussions is the ethical
dimension. Every year we slaughter 69 billion chickens, 1.5 billion pigs, 0.65 billion
turkeys, 0.57 billion sheep, 0.45 billion goats, and 0.3 billion cattle. That is over nine
animals killed for every person on the planet per year – all for nutrition and protein
which we know can come from a plant-based diet.
Poultry production has almost doubled this century, as chicken has raced ahead of
pork and beef. Our World In Data / data: FAO, CC BY-SA
So what is the ideal global diet to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, reduce habitat
destruction and help you live longer? Well I suggest being an “ultra-flexitarian” – a
diet of mostly plant-based foods but one that allows meat and dairy products in
extreme moderation, but red and processed meat are completely banned. This
would save at least 5.5 billion tonnes of CO₂ equivalent per year (40% of all food
emissions), decrease global mortality by 10% and prevent the slaughter of billions of
innocent animals.

You might also like