Respiratory Challenges and Ventilatory Management in Different Types of Acute Brain-Injured Patients

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 11

Frisvold 

et al. Critical Care (2023) 27:247 Critical Care


https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-023-04532-4

REVIEW Open Access

Respiratory challenges and ventilatory


management in different types of acute
brain‑injured patients
S. Frisvold1,2, S. Coppola3,4,5, S. Ehrmann6,7, D. Chiumello3,4,5 and Claude Guérin8* 

Abstract 
Acute brain injury (ABI) covers various clinical entities that may require invasive mechanical ventilation (MV) in the
intensive care unit (ICU). The goal of MV, which is to protect the lung and the brain from further injury, may be difficult
to achieve in the most severe forms of lung or brain injury. This narrative review aims to address the respiratory issues
and ventilator management, specific to ABI patients in the ICU.
Keywords  Acute brain injury, Mechanical ventilation, Lung protective ventilation, Cerebral autoregulation,
Neurogenic pulmonary edema, Acute respiratory distress syndrome

Introduction often able to breathe spontaneously [1–3]. Better under-


In patients with acute brain injury (ABI) the delivery of standing the complex relationship between brain and res-
mechanical ventilation (MV) in the intensive care unit piration/ventilation and providing judicious respiratory
(ICU) involves adequate timing for intubation, lung pro- support are critical issues.
tective ventilation (LPV), brain protection, and weaning.
Unlike non-neurocritical patients, ABI patients usually Respiratory challenges in patients with ABI
have no primary respiratory indication for ventilator sup- Severe ABI refers to a sudden event that results in brain
port, but often require prolonged MV, although they are damage and reduced perfusion leading to reduced alert-
ness. ABI is heterogeneous and covers different sub-
types, notably traumatic brain injury (TBI), subarachnoid
*Correspondence: hemorrhage (SAH), intracranial bleeding and hypoxic
Claude Guérin ischemic brain injury. Since the brain is surrounded by
[email protected]
1
Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, University Hospital the inextensible skull, any change affecting brain volume
of North Norway, Tromso, Norway would result in an increase in intracranial pressure (ICP)
2
Department of Clinical Medicine, UiT the Arctic University of Norway, and impairment of cerebral blood flow upon depletion of
Tromso, Norway
3
Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, ASST Santi Paolo e Carlo, the compensatory reserve. Therefore, perfusion is tightly
San Paolo University Hospital, Milan, Italy regulated by cerebral autoregulation (CA) to preserve
4
Department of Health Sciences, University of Milan, Milan, Italy cerebral blood flow facing variations in systemic pressure
5
Coordinated Research Center On Respiratory Failure, University of Milan,
Milan, Italy and metabolism. CA is a potent modulator of cerebral
6
CHRU Tours, Médecine Intensive Réanimation, CIC INSERM 1415, CRICS- vasoreactivity [4].  Changes in P ­ aCO2 alters CA:  both
TriggerSep F-CRIN Research Network, Tours, France hypo and hypercapnia can induce cerebral ischemia from
7
INSERM, Centre d’étude Des Pathologies Respiratoires, U1100, Université
de Tours, Tours, France the reduction of perfusion through vasoconstriction or
8
Faculté de Médecine Lyon Est, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, 8 vasodilatation, respectively, the latter also promoting
Avenue Rockefeller, 69008 Lyon, France higher ICP.

© The Author(s) 2023. Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which
permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the
original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or
other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line
to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory
regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this
licence, visit http://​creat​iveco​mmons.​org/​licen​ses/​by/4.​0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://​creat​iveco​
mmons.​org/​publi​cdoma​in/​zero/1.​0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
Frisvold et al. Critical Care (2023) 27:247 Page 2 of 11

Respiratory dysfunction is common in ABI and can Acute lung injury


result from either dysregulation of the breathing patterns Apart from a damaged or dysregulated respiratory center,
or acute lung injury. ABI is commonly associated with acute lung injury, such
as neurogenic pulmonary edema (NPE), lung inflamma-
Dysregulated respiratory centers function tion, acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), aspira-
The brainstem contains the respiratory centers responsi- tion pneumonia, ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP)
ble for regulating breathing. In ABI, the respiratory cent- and lung contusion [10–12].
ers can be dysregulated either through direct damage to The most common ABIs associated with NPE are SAH,
the brainstem or indirectly through an increase in ICP aneurysm rupture and TBI. NPE is typically character-
and mass effects due to cerebral hemorrhage or edema. ized by the presence of respiratory distress, hypoxemia
Damage to the respiratory center leads to impaired res- and bilateral alveolar opacities with diffuse infiltrates
piratory drive [5]. in both lungs in the absence of any other cause of res-
They regulate the respiratory response to stabilize C
­ O2, piratory failure [13, 14]. Thus, NPE is like the most
e.g., after an increase in ­PaCO2 and low pH in the cere- severe form of acute hypoxemic respiratory failure,  e.g.
brospinal fluid or brain tissue [6]. The peripheral chemo- the ARDS, but with a different pathophysiology (Fig. 1).
receptors located in the carotid body and the lungs affect Typically, in the presence of increased ICP, a massive
drive by modifying the sensitivity and threshold of cen- neural sympathetic discharge from anatomical regions
tral chemoreceptors, providing faster and more intense such as the hypothalamus, the basal portion of the pre-
response to changes in hypoxemia, P ­ aCO2 and pH [7]. optic nucleus and periventricular system can occur [15].
In addition, the lung mechanoreceptors are stretch This central sympathetic discharge likely induces pul-
receptors activated by lung inflation and inhibit central monary and systemic vasoconstriction or impairment in
chemoreceptors that terminate inspiration during the vascular permeability, promoting pulmonary edema [16].
Hering–Breuer inhibitory reflex [8]. The respiratory drive In addition to the catecholamines storm that leads to
pathway can be compromised not only because of respir- NPE, a massive release of cytokines from the injured
atory biochemical input (respiratory acidosis or hypox- brain can contribute to cytokine-induced inflammation
emia) and/or a mechanical input such as atelectasis, but leading to ARDS [17–19]. The mechanisms of neuro-
also from the primary brain injury [9]. immunomodulation and ARDS have been recently
reviewed [20]. Lung contusion due to multiple trauma

Fig. 1  Pathways of acute lung injury directly related to acute brain injury. High intracranial pressure (ICP) can promote two different sequences of
events that end up into neurogenic pulmonary edema or acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). Both of them may coexist in a given patient.
SVR: systemic vascular resistance, PVR: pulmonary vascular resistance, LV: left ventricle, DAMP: damage-associated molecules pattern
Frisvold et al. Critical Care (2023) 27:247 Page 3 of 11

that TBI patients frequently experience represents an upper safety P­ aO2 target in all-comer critically ill patients
additional risk factor for ARDS [21]. [34]. Cerebral oxygen supply by the use of microdialysis
The reduced consciousness also makes the ABI patients or brain tissue oxygen monitoring may serve as a marker
more susceptible for aspiration pneumonia, impaired for impending cerebral hypoxia [35]. Oxygen targeted
mucus clearance and VAP than ICU patients without ABI by continuous monitoring of brain tissue oxygen will be
[19, 22, 23]. In a recent large European cohort of about addressed in an ongoing study [36]. To conclude, the role
thousand patients with TBI, one out of five developed of excessive hyperoxemia is uncertain and avoiding it
VAP after a median interval of 5 days (interquartile range seems to be a reasonable strategy.
3–7 days, indicating that 75% of episodes occurred in the Hypocapnia is used to control acute bursts of high
first week of MV) [24]. Systematic performance of bron- ICP. Recently, a retrospective analysis found that mild
choalveolar lavage within 24 h after intubation of trauma hypocapnia (30–34 mmHg) might be associated to better
patients showed that 80% of samples grew some micro- cerebrovascular reactivity and did not worsen cerebral
organisms and 30% are suspect of early pneumonia [22]. energy metabolism [37]. Guidelines suggest that ­PaCO2
In summary, ABI can affect the respiratory system should be maintained in the normal or low normal ref-
through different mechanisms and may interfere with erence range when ICP is high [3, 38]. The increased
evaluation of cerebral recovery and further delay the cerebral blood flow that follows hypercapnia might have
initiation of the weaning process. The respiratory sup- a role in delayed cerebral ischemia (DCI), if ICP is con-
port should simultaneously  accomodate  the inter- trolled with external ventricular drainage [39]. Since
play between ICP, P ­ aCO2 and cerebral perfusion, and patients with ABI are a heterogeneous group, future
deliver the lung protective ventilation, e.g. protecting the studies should identify those patients who may benefit
brain and the lung simultaneoulsy, which are potential from higher P­ aCO2 targets.
contradictory goals. While invasive MV represents the standard manage-
ment strategy to achieve above mentioned physiological
Ventilatory management of patients with ABI goals for ABI patients, non-invasive methods could be an
Figure 2 summarizes the brain–lung interactions during option in some circumstances.
mechanical ventilation, the role of ­PaCO2 and the CA.
High‑flow oxygen and non‑invasive ventilation
Oxygen and carbon dioxide targets There is limited evidence for use of high-flow oxygen
The safety range of oxygenation targets in ABI patients is and non-invasive ventilation (NIV) in ABI patients, at
uncertain. Traditionally, the goal of oxygen supplemen- variance of  acute hypoxemic respiratory failure in other
tation in patients with ABI has been to avoid hypoxia patient populations [40, 41]. Coma is a contraindication
[25]. Recent research supports the need to consider for NIV unless it is due to acute hypercapnia in patients
an upper limit of oxygen supplementation [26, 27]. The with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease [42]. Skull
CENTER-TBI, which is a large European, multicenter base fracture is a relative contradiction for use of high
observational study, showed that the median highest flow and NIV. Chest trauma might also complicate
arterial oxygen partial pressure (­PaO2) level during the the use of  NIV although some studies showed it feasi-
first week after ICU admission was 134 mmHg [26]. The ble in case of isolated chest trauma [43]. To our knowl-
maximal and mean P ­ aO2 were independently associated edge, there are no published RCTs on the use of NIV in
with an unfavorable functional neurologic outcome or patients with TBI. Clinicians need to consider the indi-
death at 6 months. However, a cut-off for upper limit of vidual patient´s clinical status and coexisting respiratory
­PaO2 related to worse outcome was not defined [2]. By abnormalities when making decisions about the use of
contrast, no difference in outcome based on P ­ aO2 lev- NIV. However, most often, ABI compromises the air-
els ranging from 60 to > 300  mmHg was found by oth- way, warranting early intubation, sometimes after a brief
ers [28, 29]. A post hoc analysis of a randomized trial, attempt of NIV.
identified ­PaO2 thresholds of 150 and 200  mmHg asso-
ciated with better functional neurological outcome [30]. Invasive mechanical ventilation
This is supported by a meta-analysis of observational Indications for endotracheal intubation are to provide
studies on adult ABI patients where hyperoxemia ­(PaO2 airway protection, treat hypoxemia and inadequate ven-
cut-off point > 200  mmHg) was associated with poor tilation, management of brain edema with tight P ­ aCO2
neurological outcome [31]. Among randomized clinical targets and reduction of cerebral metabolism.
trials (RCTs) performed in the ICU setting, the adverse Table  1 provides an overview of the ventilation man-
effects of hyperoxemia has not been confirmed [32, 33]. agement, fluid strategies, and indication for steroid use
Recent meta-analysis of RCTs did not support to set an
Frisvold et al. Critical Care (2023) 27:247 Page 4 of 11

Fig. 2  Schematic representation of the lung–brain interactions. During positive pressure mechanical ventilation, cerebral blood flow (CBF) can be
reduced from different sources. The transmission of airway pressure to the cardiovascular structures depends on the pleural pressure and thus on
the transpulmonary pressure ­(PL) and lung compliance. With normal lung compliance, the higher the airway pressure, the higher the right atrial
pressure, which can lead to a reduction in venous return (orange flash). Increase in abdominal pressure counteracts this effect in normal conditions.
Increased tidal volume increases pulmonary venous pressure (Pv). These changes result in lower right ventricular ejection volume, and thus, cardiac
output (CO) will decrease. CO reduction is limited by the fact that the increased intrathoracic pressure will decrease the left ventricle afterload.
Despite changes in CO and arterial pressure, cerebral autoregulation maintains CBF and intracranial pressure (ICP) within a certain range of arterial
pressure. However, ICP is highly dependent on venous outflow from the cranial cavity. Positive pressure ventilation with increased right atrial
pressure can reduce venous outflow from the cranial cavity and thereby increase ICP. In patients with impaired pulmonary compliance (i.e., severe
acute respiratory distress syndrome), the effects of positive pressure mechanical ventilation on alveolar pressure (PA) and P ­ L are often attenuated.
Hypoxemia (low ­PaO2) and hypercapnia (high ­PaCO2) both increase pulmonary artery pressure (Pa) and pulmonary vascular resistance, thereby
increasing right ventricular afterload. Alterations in ­PaCO2, ­PaO2 and hydrogen ion also trigger chemoreceptors (yellow circles) to send signals to
the respiratory center to regulate respiratory drive. At the level of cerebral circulation, hypercapnia increases CBF and hypocapnia has the opposite
effect. The interaction between low brain compliance, cerebral autoregulation and different levels of C ­ O2 has not been studied. Ao aorta, ­PaCO2
partial pressure of carbon dioxide, ­PaO2 partial pressure of oxygen, Ca carotid artery, cardiac output (CO), CBF cerebral blood flow, CPP cerebral
perfusion pressure, CVR cerebral vascular resistance, ICP intracranial pressure, IVC inferior vena cava, MAP mean arterial pressure, Pa pulmonary
artery pressure, PA alveolar pressure, Pv pulmonary venous pressure, ­PaO2 partial pressure of oxygen, ­PL transpulmonary pressure, SVC superior vena
cava
Frisvold et al. Critical Care

Table 1  Respiratory management of intubated ABI patients with and without intracranial hypertension and/or ARDS
Respiratory management Normal lung Normal lung ARDS ARDS
(references) Normal ICP High ICP Normal ICP High ICP
(2023) 27:247

VT [44–46] 7–9 ml/kg PBW 7–9 ml/kg PBW 6–8 ml/kg PBW 6–8 ml/kg PBW


PEEP [47, 47–50] 5 ­cmH2O 5 ­cmH2O. If higher PEEP, surveil- At least 5 ­cmH2O, higher PEEP in At least 5 ­cmH2O, higher PEEP in more
lance of ICP/CPP/multimodal brain more severe ARDS, titration based on severe ARDS, titration based on plateau
monitoring plateau pressure, driving pressure, pressure, driving pressure, oxygenation
oxygenation and hemodynamic and hemodynamic response to higher
response to higher PEEP PEEP
ICP/CPP/multimodal brain monitoring
PaO2 target (mmHg) [25, 26, 51] Avoid hyperoxemia ­(PaO2 > 200) PaO2 80–200 PaO2 80–120, depending of ARDS PaO2 80–200
severity
PaCO2 target (mmHg) [38] PaCO2 35–45 PaCO2 32–38 Permissive hypercapnia (< 60), Permissive hypercapnia contraindi-
depending on pH (> 7, 25) cated. Adjunctive therapy earlier
ICP/CPP/multimodal brain monitoring
Prone position [52] Not recommended Not recommended PaO2/FIO2 < 150 mmHg with PEEP ≥ 5 PaO2/FIO2 < 150 mmHg
­cmH2O Case-by-case basis
ICP/CPP/multimodal brain monitoring
Lung recruitment [53] Systematic use, not recommended Systematic use, not recommended Systematic use, not recommended Systematic use, not recommended
Fluid restriction strategy [54, 55] Not recommended unless specific Avoid positive fluid balance and tar- Yes Avoid positive fluid balance and target
indication get euvolemia for CPP management euvolemia for CPP management
Avoid hypotonic fluids Avoid hypotonic fluids
ICP/CPP/multimodal brain monitoring
Steroids [56, 57] No indication except for specific Higher mortality in TBI with high dose Dexamethasone may be indicated If TBI severity is the main problem
indication of methylprednisolone steroids may be avoided. Steroids may
be beneficial if ARDS is the dominant
problem
Page 5 of 11
Frisvold et al. Critical Care (2023) 27:247 Page 6 of 11

in patients with ABI with and without high ICP and/or contradictory results about the response related to
ARDS based on the studies included in this review. brain and lung compliance [66–68]. Measurement of
transpulmonary pressure could not clarify which ABI
Specific types of ABI patients and ventilatory management patients had adverse effect on high PEEP [44]. PEEP
The management of ABI in the acute phase is mainly adjustment is therefore recommended only during
driven by the goal to ensure adequate cerebral perfusion, rigorous ICP monitoring and curve analysis if brain
by cerebral perfusion pressure or ICP-oriented targets compliance is suspected to be low [44]. The role of res-
[38, 58]. piratory mechanics variables other than PEEP and VT
The different forms of severe ABI have disease-specific has been explored in recent observational studies. A
characteristics that can influence ventilation manage- sub-analysis of the Target Temperature Management-2
ment. Patients with severe TBI are most treated with ICP trial found that respiratory rate, driving pressure, and
monitoring, which serves as a guide to ICU management mechanical power were independently associated with
[38, 59]. Strict low-range P­ aCO2 and PEEP targets are 6-month mortality in post-cardiac arrest survivors [69].
used for ICP control. Recently, CA as part of ICP man- Mechanical power  (MP) might also be associated with
agement and the interaction of PEEP and LPV with CA mortality in patients with ABI from other causes [70,
has been evaluated [44, 47]. 71]. A recent observational study found that the  MP
ICU management of patients with SAH targets pre- during the first week of MV was associated with poor
vention of rebleeding, intraventricular hemorrhage, outcome independently on oxygenation [71]. MP might
and later-stage DCI [60]. In contrast to  TBI, general- also be related to PEEP-induced high ICP [44].
ized contusion and cytotoxic edema are not the primary
pathophysiological problem. Since these patients com-
monly have external ventricular drainage, strict P ­ aCO2 Ventilatory management of ABI patients with concurrent
targets for ICP monitoring are not required as often as ARDS
in patients with TBI. In the DCI phase, microdialysis or As detailed earlier in the ventilator management of
brain tissue oxygen is sometimes used to detect local patients with ABI some conflicting physiological goals
cerebral hypoxia and set ­PaO2 targets [61, 62]. An assess- may arise when aiming at protecting both the lung
ment of neurological function and reduced sedation is and the brain [72]. Typical, permissive hypercapnia
required to diagnose DCI. Spontaneous ventilation with as part of LPV may have cerebral side effects leading
the following broader ­ PaCO2 target is therefore used to a complex if not impossible evaluation of the ben-
more liberally than in TBI patients. efit-risk ratio. While in patients without lung injury
Most patients with severe intracerebral hemorrhage the value of strict LPV remains debated and cerebral
have systemic  hypertension. Lowering blood pressure, physiology may predominantly drive patient manage-
rather than measures to lower ICP, has been the focus of ment, the situation is more complex in case of estab-
general management in the ICU [63]. Treatment in the lished ARDS [11, 73]. Permissive hypercapnia might
stroke unit is associated with a better outcome, but this be feasible if ICP is controlled with external ventricu-
does not necessarily improve when the patient is admit- lar drainage. Another option is to increase respiratory
ted to the ICU [64]. The indication for the use of ICP rate up to the limit of Auto-PEEP or plateau pressure.
monitoring and targets is unclear and is often derived Since respiratory rate contributes to  MP, compensat-
from the TBI literature. ing for low VT by increasing respiratory rate might not
be the solution for regulating P­ aCO2 in ABI. RCTs are
Ventilatory settings for ABI patients with no lung injury required to assess the interplay between inflammatory
In non-ARDS patients, no difference in patient out- and mechanical stress of the lungs in this population,
come was found in two large multicenter RCTs as well as potential interventions and their impact on
between low (6 ml/kg predicted body weight) vs. inter- long-term outcomes on both cerebral and pulmonary
mediate (10  ml/kg) tidal volume (VT) [45] and low (5 recovery (weaning of MV).
­cmH2O) vs. high (8 ­cmH2O) PEEP [48]. As these trials Prone position in patients with moderate to severe
were not dedicated to ABI patients, a small propor- ARDS is a cornerstone treatment that might be con-
tion of the patients had ABI. Limiting VT with con- sidered in patients with co-existing ABI. Since prone
comitant permissive hypercapnia is difficult to carry position might affect ­PaCO2 and venous return from
out with a simultaneous ICP control. Dead space the brain, ICP monitoring is strongly advised in acute,
reduction by replacing heat-moisture exchangers with severe ABI [3, 74]. High ICP was a non-inclusion crite-
heated-humidifiers is feasible and can set low VT rion in Proseva trial [52]. The role of alveolar recruit-
without increasing P
­ aCO2 [65]. High PEEP has shown ment maneuvers to improve oxygenation in ARDS is
Frisvold et al. Critical Care (2023) 27:247 Page 7 of 11

uncertain [53]. In patients with acute, severe ABI, the as compared to the liberal fluid strategy, was similar in
role of the recruitment maneuver with cardiopulmo- terms of patient mortality but was associated with less
nary interaction, should lead to caution when using this days spent under invasive MV [54]. In ABI patients, in
maneuver. addition to careful adjustment of the ventilator pres-
Asynchronies between patient to ventilator  might be sures, ensuring that patients are euvolemic might protect
the clinical consequences of the alterations in the respira- against the adverse effects of higher ventilator pressures
tory drive or prolonged MV. and fluctuations in P­ aCO2. Fluid management must con-
During assisted mechanical ventilation, the critical sider administrating fluids vs the risk of cerebral edema
determinant of respiratory drive and work of breathing due to disruption of the blood brain barrier and cell
is the set peak flow. An insufficient peak flow is associ- damage.
ated with higher drive and work of breathing. Low peak In ABI patients with or without ARDS, the restrictive
flow leads to air hunger and excessive peak flow leads to fluid strategy is therefore recommended to prevent any
excessively short inspiratory time associated with asyn- further brain edema. However, it is important to take
chrony and breath stacking. Highest peak flows increase care to avoid hypovolemia in order to achieve the  cere-
respiratory rates because of shortened inspiratory time. bral perfusion pressure goal [55, 75].
In fact, a shorter inspiratory time decreases the negative Steroids. In patients with ARDS, steroids may play a
feedback derived from lung inflation, resulting in a higher beneficial role in the acute phase [56]. In TBI, the MRC-
ventilatory frequency. Physiologically, high volume or CRASH trial found that mortality was higher with meth-
lung inflation reduces the respiratory drive and the peak ylprednisolone than with placebo; therefore, steroid use
flow becomes less relevant. Flow dyssynchrony is typical is not recommended [57]. In general, steroid use is not
in situations of high drive or of activation of respiratory recommended in any form of ABI patients with acute
muscles after time-initiated ventilator cycles during con- cerebral swelling due to a lack of evidence [76].
trolled MV called “respiratory entrainment” secondary
to a sustained activation of the Hering–Breuer reflex and Weaning
C3, C5 spinal reflex leading to reverse triggering [77]. Luo Prolonged MV may further delay rehabilitation and ICU
et  al. investigated the patient–ventilator asynchrony in discharge, increasing the risk of long-term sequelae and
mechanically ventilated brain-injured patients and found complications with physical, psychological and psychi-
that the prevalence of asynchrony was 38% higher than in atric as well as cognitive symptoms as part of the post-
patients without brain injury [78], while the most preva- intensive care syndrome which does also affect patients’
lent type of asynchrony was ineffective triggering, char- relatives [80]. Also, in patients with ABI, there has been
acterized by a lower drive in terms of P0.1 values. The increased focus on weaning practices and early rehabili-
asynchrony index was similar after stroke, craniotomy for tation [81, 82].
brain tumor or TBI, and significantly lower during pres- Uncertainty persists about the best approach to suc-
sure control/assisted ventilation than during other venti- cessful weaning of ABI patients and involves sedation
lation modes and higher during combined use of opioids practices, weaning criteria, and timing for tracheotomy.
and sedatives. Similarly, to non-neurological patients, Traditionally, critically ill patients have been treated with
asynchrony is a sign of uncoupling between the neuronal deep sedation and immobilization, which prolong time
input and muscular efficiency and is associated with pro- to extubation [83]. This practice is in particularly com-
longed MV [78]. Recently, in patients with ABI, patient- mon in patients with ABI, where deep sedation has been
ventilator asynchrony was monitored with esophageal used to reduce cerebral metabolism, prevent intracranial
pressure monitoring [78]. It was demonstrated that asyn- hypertension and for fever control. Recently, ABCDEF
chrony, in particular ineffective trigging is common and bundle (Assess, prevent, and manage pain; Both sponta-
associated with combination of analgesia and sedation neous awakening and breathing trials: Choice of Analge-
strategy. The prevalence of ventilator-induced diaphragm sia and Sedation; Delirium assess, prevent, and manage;
dysfunction in brain-injured patients is likely to play an Early Mobility and Exercise; Family engagement/ empow-
important role but remains to be investigated [79]. erment) received acknowledgement within intensive care
medicine [84]. Among ABI patients, data are lacking to
Additional management precisely decipher the relative contributions of sequelae
Two additional strategies relevant for the ventilatory of the initial cerebral insult and intensive care acquired
management will be briefly discussed in this part: fluid long-term neurological, muscular and cognitive symp-
balance and steroids. toms. Patients with ABI have higher extubation failure
Fluid management in ABI. The FACCT trial in ARDS than patients without [85, 86].
patients (with no ABI) found that a restrictive strategy,
Frisvold et al. Critical Care (2023) 27:247 Page 8 of 11

Several factors may contribute to extend the dura- combination of neuro- and respiratory monitoring and
tion of MV, some are non-modifiable such as the brain large multicenter trials in ABI patients advances our
injury itself, recovery of consciousness being one key knowledge in terms of optimized treatment and out-
factor for weaning readiness; others, like  management- comes. The future will offer the opportunity to combine
related factors may be modified such as deep and pro- physiological studies and the use of big data analysis to
longed sedation and screening practice for weaning identify predictors and optimize ventilation strategies for
readiness [87, 88]. Once extubated, patients with ABI are patients with severe ABI.
at high risk of re-intubation, mainly because of respira-
tory and airway failure due to dysphagia, lack of muscle
Abbreviations
strength and poor cough. In a large international obser- ABI Acute brain injury
vational study, that evaluated 1512 patients with ABI who ARDS Acute respiratory distress syndrome
were ventilated more than 24  h with an initial Glasgow CA Cerebral autoregulation
DCI Delayed cerebral ischemia
coma scale (GCS) ≤ 12, 19% of patients were reintubated GCS Glasgow coma scale
within 5  days of extubation. Authors identified predic- ICP Intracranial pressure
tors of extubation failure at day 5 which were combined ICU Intensive care unit
LPV Lung protective ventilation
in a score which may be easy to use at the bedside and MP Mechanical power
comprising the following variables associated with extu- MV Mechanical ventilation
bation success: TBI, vigorous cough, gag reflex, swallow- NPE Neurogenic pulmonary edema
NIV Non-invasive ventilation
ing attempts, endotracheal suctioning less than twice per PaCO2 Arterial carbon dioxide partial pressure
hour, GCS motor component at 6, body temperature nor- PaO2 Arterial oxygen partial pressure
mal or low. The score area under the receiver operating PEEP Positive end-expiratory pressure
RCT​ Randomized controlled trial
characteristics curve was 0.65 (95% confidence interval, SAH Subarachnoid hemorrhage
0.53–0.76) in the validation cohort, clinical evaluation of TBI Traumatic brain injury
cut-offs with high or low positive predictive value may be VT Tidal volume
VAP Ventilator associated pneumonia
warranted to decipher potential clinical use of this score.
Of note, 21% of the patients of this large international Acknowledgements
cohort did not undergo usual weaning toward extubation Not applicable.
but underwent direct tracheostomy. The optimal tim- Author contributions
ing of eventual tracheostomy of ICU patients has been Each author has made substantial contributions to the conception of the work
the matter of long-lasting debates, with a current lack of and substantively revised it; approved the submitted version; agreed both to
be personally accountable for the author’s own contributions and to ensure
firm benefit of early tracheostomy. A recent large scale that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work,
retrospective study including 1538 patients, specifically even ones in which the author was not personally involved, are appropriately
evaluated timing of tracheostomy among the subgroup investigated, resolved, and the resolution documented in the literature.
of 498 patients with a GCS below 8 at ICU admission Funding
and showed a lack of significant link between tracheos- Shirin K. Frisvold was funded by Northern Norway Regional Health Authority
tomy timing and patient outcome [89]. An observational (Grant no. 181021).
study on 1358 patients with TBI showed an association Availability of data and materials
between late tracheostomy and poor neurological out- Data sharing is not applicable to this article as no datasets were generated or
come [90]. However, this finding was not confirmed by analyzed during the current study.
the SETPOINT2 RCT on patients with stroke [91]. Cur-
rent guidelines recommend considering tracheostomy Declarations
in patients who failed an extubation or have persistent Ethics approval and consent to participate
reduced level of consciousness with no recommenda- Not applicable.
tion on optimal timing of tracheostomy [3]. Focusing on
Consent for publication
measures to reduce sedation/analgesia with early wean- Not applicable.
ing of patients with severe ABI  are the target of future
studies (NCT04291235, NCT04080440). Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Conclusions Received: 29 April 2023 Accepted: 15 June 2023


Neurologically ill patients have specific  challenging res-
piratory problems and lung–brain interactions. Opti-
mal delivery of  MV  has not been studied extensively in
this setting  and RCTs are scarce. Recent interest in the
Frisvold et al. Critical Care (2023) 27:247 Page 9 of 11

References 25. McHugh GS, Engel DC, Butcher I, Steyerberg EW, Lu J, Mushkudiani N,
1. Pelosi P, Ferguson ND, Frutos-Vivar F, Anzueto A, Putensen C, Raymondos et al. Prognostic value of secondary insults in traumatic brain injury:
K, et al. Management and outcome of mechanically ventilated neurologic results from the IMPACT study. J Neurotrauma. 2007;24(2):287–93.
patients. Crit Care Med. 2011;39(6):1482–92. 26. Rezoagli E, Petrosino M, Rebora P, Menon DK, Mondello S, Cooper DJ,
2. Ziaka M, Exadaktylos A. Brain–lung interactions and mechanical ventila- et al. High arterial oxygen levels and supplemental oxygen administra-
tion in patients with isolated brain injury. Crit Care. 2021;25(1):1–10. tion in traumatic brain injury: insights from CENTER-TBI and OzENTER-TBI.
3. Robba C, Poole D, McNett M, Asehnoune K, Bösel J, Bruder N, et al. Intensive Care Med. 2022;48:1709–25.
Mechanical ventilation in patients with acute brain injury: recommenda- 27. Singer M, Young PJ, Laffey JG, Asfar P, Taccone FS, Skrifvars MB, et al.
tions of the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine consensus. Dangers of hyperoxia. Crit Care. 2021;25:1–15.
Intensive Care Med. 2020;46(12):2397–410. 28. Weeden M, Bailey M, Gabbe B, Pilcher D, Bellomo R, Udy A. Functional
4. Meng L, Gelb AW. Regulation of cerebral autoregulation by carbon diox- outcomes in patients admitted to the intensive care unit with traumatic
ide. Anesthesiology. 2015;122:196–205. brain injury and exposed to hyperoxia: a retrospective multicentre cohort
5. North JB, Jennett S. Abnormal breathing patterns associated with acute study. Neurocrit Care. 2021;34(2):441–8.
brain damage. Arch Neurol. 1974;31(5):338–44. 29. Schmidt H, Kjaergaard J, Hassager C, Mølstrøm S, Grand J, Borregaard
6. Smith CA, Rodman JR, Chenuel BJA, Henderson KS, Dempsey JA. B, et al. Oxygen targets in comatose survivors of cardiac arrest. N Engl J
Response time and sensitivity of the ventilatory response to C ­ O2 in Med. 2022;387(16):1467–76.
unanesthetized intact dogs: central vs. peripheral chemoreceptors. J Appl 30. Alali AS, Temkin N, Vavilala MS, Lele AV, Barber J, Dikmen S, et al. Matching
Physiol. 2006;100(1):13–9. early arterial oxygenation to long-term outcome in severe traumatic
7. Vaporidi K, Akoumianaki E, Telias I, Goligher EC, Brochard L, Georgopoulos brain injury: target values. J Neurosurg. 2019;132(2):537–44.
D. Respiratory drive in critically Ill patients pathophysiology and clinical 31. Hirunpattarasilp C, Shiina H, Na-Ek N, Attwell D. The effect of hyperoxemia
implications. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2020;201(1):20–32. on neurological outcomes of adult patients: a systematic review and
8. Hamilton RD, Winning AJ, Horner RL, Guz A. The effect of lung inflation meta-analysis. Neurocrit Care. 2022;36(3):1027–43.
on breathing in man during wakefulness and sleep. Respir Physiol. 32. Lång M, Skrifvars MB, Siironen J, Tanskanen P, Ala-Peijari M, Koivisto T, et al.
1988;73(2):145–54. A pilot study of hyperoxemia on neurological injury, inflammation and
9. Spinelli E, Mauri T, Beitler JR, Pesenti A, Brodie D. Respiratory drive in the oxidative stress. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2018;62(6):801–10.
acute respiratory distress syndrome: pathophysiology, monitoring, and 33. Semler MW, Casey JD, Lloyd BD, Hastings PG, Hays MA, Stollings JL, et al.
therapeutic interventions. Intensive Care Med. 2020;46(4):606–18. Oxygen-saturation targets for critically ill adults receiving mechanical
10. Johnson NJ, Carlbom DJ, Gaieski DF. Ventilator management and respira- ventilation. N Engl J Med. 2022;387(19):1759–69.
tory care after cardiac arrest: oxygenation, ventilation, infection, and 34. Barbateskovic M, Schjørring OL, Krauss SR, Meyhoff CS, Jakobsen JC,
injury. Chest. 2018;153(6):1466–77. Rasmussen BS, et al. Higher vs lower oxygenation strategies in acutely
11. Aisiku IP, Yamal JM, Doshi P, Rubin ML, Benoit JS, Hannay J, et al. The ill adults: a systematic review with meta-analysis and trial sequential
incidence of ARDS and associated mortality in severe TBI using the Berlin analysis. Chest. 2021;159(1):154–73.
definition. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2016;80(2):308–12. 35. Veldeman M, Albanna W, Weiss M, Park S, Hoellig A, Clusmann H, et al.
12. Shih JA, Robertson HK, Issa MS, Grossestreuer AV, Donnino MW, Berg KM, Invasive multimodal neuromonitoring in aneurysmal subarachnoid
et al. Acute respiratory distress syndrome after in-hospital cardiac arrest. hemorrhage: a systematic review. Stroke. 2021;52:3624–32.
Resuscitation. 2022;177:78–84. 36. Bernard F, Barsan W, Diaz-Arrastia R, Merck LH, Yeatts S, Shutter LA.
13. Busl KM, Bleck TP. Neurogenic pulmonary edema. Crit Care Med. Brain oxygen optimization in severe traumatic brain injury (BOOST-3): a
2015;43(8):1710–5. multicentre, randomised, blinded-endpoint, comparative effectiveness
14. Davison DL, Terek M, Chawla LS. Neurogenic pulmonary edema. Crit Care. study of brain tissue oxygen and intracranial pressure monitoring versus
2012;16(2):1–7. intracranial pressure alone. BMJ Open. 2022;12(3):60188.
15. Mrozek S, Constantin JM, Geeraerts T. Brain-lung crosstalk: Implications 37. Svedung Wettervik T, Howells T, Hillered L, Nilsson P, Engquist H, Lewén A,
for neurocritical care patients. World J Crit Care Med. 2015;4(3):163–78. et al. Mild hyperventilation in traumatic brain injury—relation to cerebral
16. Theodore J, Robin ED. Pathogenesis of neurogenic pulmonary oedema. energy metabolism, pressure autoregulation, and clinical outcome. World
The Lancet. 1975;306(7938):749–51. Neurosurg. 2020;133:e567–75.
17. Kalsotra A, Zhao J, Anakk S, Dash PK, Strobel HW. Brain trauma leads to 38. Chesnut R, Aguilera S, Buki A, Bulger E, Citerio G, Cooper DJ, et al. A
enhanced lung inflammation and injury: evidence for role of P4504Fs in management algorithm for adult patients with both brain oxygen and
resolution. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2007;27(5):963–74. intracranial pressure monitoring: the Seattle International Severe Trau-
18. Fisher AJ, Donnelly SC, Hirani N, Burdick MD, Strieter RM, Dark JH, et al. matic Brain Injury Consensus Conference (SIBICC). Intensive Care Med.
Enhanced pulmonary inflammation in organ donors following fatal non- 2020;46:919–29.
traumatic brain injury. Lancet. 1999;353(9162):1412–3. 39. Stetter C, Weidner F, Lilla N, Weiland J, Kunze E, Ernestus RI, et al. Thera-
19. Hu PJ, Pittet JF, Kerby JD, Bosarge PL, Wagener BM. Acute brain trauma, peutic hypercapnia for prevention of secondary ischemia after severe
lung injury, and pneumonia: more than just altered mental status subarachnoid hemorrhage: physiological responses to continuous
and decreased airway protection. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol. hypercapnia. Sci Rep. 2021;11(1):1–11.
2017;313(1):L1-15. 40. Kea B, NKJ BurnsKEA A. Cochrane library Cochrane database of systematic
20. Ziaka M, Exadaktylos A. ARDS associated acute brain injury: from the lung reviews noninvasive positive-pressure ventilation as a weaning strategy
to the brain. Eur J Med Res. 2022;27(1):1–11. for intubated adults with respiratory failure (review) noninvasive positive-
21. Schieren M, Wappler F, Wafaisade A, Lefering R, Sakka SG, Kaufmann J, pressure ventilation as a weaning strategy for intubated a. Cochrane

injury- a matched-pair analysis of the TraumaRegister DGU®. Scand J


et al. Impact of blunt chest trauma on outcome after traumatic brain Database Syst Rev. 2013;4127.
41. Frat JP, Brugiere B, Ragot S, Chatellier D, Veinstein A, Goudet V, et al.
Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2020;28(1):1–7. Sequential application of oxygen therapy via high-flow nasal cannula and
22. Harrell KN, Lee WB, Rooks HJ, Briscoe WE, Capote W, Dart BW, et al. Early noninvasive ventilation in acute respiratory failure: an observational pilot
pneumonia diagnosis decreases ventilator-associated pneumonia rates study. Respir Care. 2015;60(2):170–8.
in trauma population. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2023;94:30–5. 42. Boles JM, Bion J, Connors A, Herridge M, Marsh B, Melot C, et al. Weaning
23. François B, Cariou A, Clere-Jehl R, Dequin PF, Renon-Carron F, Daix T, et al. from mechanical ventilation. Eur Respir J. 2007;29(5):1033–56.
Prevention of early ventilator-associated pneumonia after cardiac arrest. 43. Chiumello D, Coppola S, Froio S, Gregoretti C, Consonni D. Noninvasive
N Engl J Med. 2019;381(19):1831–42. ventilation in chest trauma: systematic review and meta-analysis. Inten-
24. Robba C, Rebora P, Banzato E, Wiegers EJA, Stocchetti N, Menon DK, et al. sive Care Med. 2013;39(7):1171–80.
Incidence, risk factors, and effects on outcome of ventilator-associated 44. Beqiri E, Smielewski P, Guérin C, Czosnyka M, Robba C, Bjertnæs L, et al.
pneumonia in patients with traumatic brain injury: analysis of a large, Neurological and respiratory effects of lung protective ventilation in
multicenter, prospective. Observational Longitudinal Study Chest. acute brain injury patients without lung injury: brain vent, a single centre
2020;158(6):2292–303. randomized interventional study. Crit Care. 2023;27(1):115.
Frisvold et al. Critical Care (2023) 27:247 Page 10 of 11

45. Simonis FD, Serpa Neto A, Binnekade JM, Braber A, Bruin KCM, Deter- mortality in patients with intracerebral hemorrhage. Eur J Neurol.
mann RM, et al. Effect of a low vs intermediate tidal volume strategy on 2020;27(5):825–32.
ventilator-free days in intensive care unit patients without ARDS. JAMA. 65. Pitoni S, D’Arrigo S, Grieco DL, Idone FA, Santantonio MT, Di Giannatale
2018;320(18):1872. P, et al. Tidal volume lowering by instrumental dead space reduction
46. Network TARDS. Ventilation with lower tidal volumes as compared with in brain-injured ARDS patients: effects on respiratory mechanics, gas
traditional tidal volumes for acute lung injury and the acute respiratory exchange, and cerebral hemodynamics. Neurocrit Care. 2021;34(1):21–30.
distress syndrome. N Engl J Med. 2000;342(18):1301–8. 66. Chen H, Chen K, Xu JQ, Zhang YR, Yu RG, Zhou JX. Intracranial pressure
47. Giardina A, Cardim D, Ciliberti P, Battaglini D, Ball L, Kasprowicz M, et al. responsiveness to positive end-expiratory pressure is influenced by
Effects of positive end-expiratory pressure on cerebral hemodynamics in chest wall elastance: a physiological study in patients with aneurysmal
acute brain injury patients. Front Physiol. 2023;14:690. subarachnoid hemorrhage. BMC Neurol. 2018;18(1):124.
48. Algera AG, Pisani L, Serpa Neto A, den Boer SS, Bosch FFH, Bruin K, et al. 67. Boone MD, Jinadasa SP, Mueller A, Shaefi S, Kasper EM, Hanafy KA, et al.
Effect of a lower vs higher positive end-expiratory pressure strategy on The effect of positive end-expiratory pressure on intracranial pressure
ventilator-free days in ICU patients without ARDS: a randomized clinical and cerebral hemodynamics. Neurocrit Care. 2016;26(2):174–81.
trial. JAMA. 2020;324(24):2509–20. 68. Robba C, Ball L, Nogas S, Battaglini D, Messina A, Brunetti I, et al. Effects
49. Boone MD, Jinadasa SP, Mueller A, Shaefi S, Kasper EM, Hanafy KA, et al. of positive end-expiratory pressure on lung recruitment, respiratory
The effect of positive end-expiratory pressure on intracranial pressure mechanics, and intracranial pressure in mechanically ventilated brain-
and cerebral hemodynamics. Neurocrit Care. 2016;26:174–81. injured patients. Front Physiol. 2021;12:1684.
50. Robba C, Ball L, Nogas S, Battaglini D, Messina A, Brunetti I, et al. Effects 69. Robba C, Badenes R, Battaglini D, Ball L, Brunetti I, Jakobsen JC, et al.
of positive end-expiratory pressure on lung recruitment, respiratory Ventilatory settings in the initial 72 h and their association with outcome
mechanics, and intracranial pressure in mechanically ventilated brain- in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients: a preplanned secondary analysis
injured patients. Front Physiol. 2021;12:1684. of the targeted hypothermia versus targeted normothermia after out-of-
51. Hirunpattarasilp C, Shiina H, Na-Ek N, Attwell D. The effect of hyperoxemia hospital cardiac arrest (TTM2) tr. Intensive Care Med. 2022;48(8):1024–38.
on neurological outcomes of adult patients: a systematic review and 70. Jiang X, Zhu Y, Zhen S, Wang L. Mechanical power of ventilation is associ-
meta-analysis. Neurocrit Care. 2022;36:1027–43. ated with mortality in neurocritical patients: a cohort study. J Clin Monit
52. Guérin C, Reignier J, Richard JC, Beuret P, Gacouin A, Boulain T, et al. Prone Comput. 2022;36(6):1621–8.
positioning in severe acute respiratory distress syndrome. N Engl J Med. 71. Wahlster S, Sharma M, Taran S, Town JA, Stevens RD, Cinotti R, et al. Utili-
2013;368(23):2159–68. zation of mechanical power and associations with clinical outcomes in
53. Cavalcanti AB, Suzumura ÉA, Laranjeira LN, Paisani DDM, Damiani LP, brain injured patients: a secondary analysis of the extubation strategies in
Guimarães HP, et al. Effect of lung recruitment and titrated positive neuro-intensive care unit patients and associations with outcome (ENIO)
end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) vs low PEEP on mortality in patients with trial. Crit Care. 2023;27(1):156.
acute respiratory distress syndrome a randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 72. Robba C, Camporota L, Citerio G. Acute respiratory distress syndrome
2017;318(14):1335–45. complicating traumatic brain injury. Can opposite strategies converge?
54. Wiedemann HP, Clinic C, Wheeler AP, Bernard GR, University V, Taylor Intensive Care Med. 2023;49(5):583–6.
Thompson B, et al. Comparison of two fluid-management strategies in 73. Elmer J, Hou P, Wilcox SR, Chang Y, Schreiber H, Okechukwu I, et al. Acute
acute lung injury. N Engl J Med. 2006;354(24):2564–75. respiratory distress syndrome after spontaneous intracerebral hemor-
55. Wiegers EJAB, JoanneCooper JD, et al. Fluid balance and outcome in rhage. Crit Care Med. 2013;41(8):1992.
critically ill patients with traumatic brain injury (CENTER-TBI and OzENTER- 74. Roth C, Ferbert A, Deinsberger W, Kleffmann J, Kästner S, Godau J, et al.
TBI): a prospective, multicentre, comparative effectiveness study. Lancet Does prone positioning increase intracranial pressure? A retrospective
Neurol. 2021;20(8):627–38. analysis of patients with acute brain injury and acute respiratory failure.
56. Villar J, Ferrando C, Martínez D, Ambrós A, Muñoz T, Soler JA, et al. Neurocrit Care. 2014;21(2):186–91.
Dexamethasone treatment for the acute respiratory distress syn- 75. Oddo M, Poole D, Helbok R, Meyfroidt G, Stocchetti N, Bouzat P, et al. Fluid
drome: a multicentre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet Respir Med. therapy in neurointensive care patients: ESICM consensus and clinical
2020;8(3):267–76. practice recommendations. Intensive Care Med. 2018;44:23.
57. Crash TC. Final results of MRC CRASH, a randomised placebo-controlled 76. Cook AM, Morgan Jones G, Hawryluk GWJ, Mailloux P, McLaughlin D,
trial of intravenous corticosteroid in adults with head injury—outcomes Papangelou A, et al. Guidelines for the acute treatment of cerebral edema
at 6 months. The Lancet. 2005;365(9475):1957–9. in neurocritical care patients. Neurocrit Care. 2020;32(3):647–66.
58. Le-Roux P, Menon DK, Citerio G, Vespa P, Bader MK, Brophy GM, et al. 77. Albaiceta GM, Brochard L, Dos Santos CC, Fernández R, Georgo-
Consensus summary statement of the international multidisciplinary poulos D, Girard T, et al. The central nervous system during lung
consensus conference on multimodality monitoring in neurocritical injury and mechanical ventilation: a narrative review. Br J Anaesth.
care: a statement for healthcare professionals from the neurocritical care 2021;127(4):648–59.
society and the European Society of Intensive C. Intensive Care Med. 78. Luo XY, He X, Zhou YM, Wang YM, Chen JR, Chen GQ, et al. Patient–venti-
2014;40(9):1189–209. lator asynchrony in acute brain-injured patients: a prospective observa-
59. Meyfroidt G, Bouzat P, Casaer MP, Chesnut R, Hamada SR, Helbok R, et al. tional study. Ann Intensive Care. 2020;10:1–10.
Management of moderate to severe traumatic brain injury: an update for 79. Goligher EC, Dres M, Patel BK, Sahetya SK, Beitler JR, Telias I, et al. Lung-
the intensivist. Intensive Care Med. 2022;48(6):649–66. and diaphragm-protective ventilation. Am J Respir Crit Care Med.
60. Hoh BL, Ko NU, Amin-Hanjani S, Hsiang-Yi Chou S, Cruz-Flores S, Dan- 2020;202(7):950–61.
gayach NS, et al. 2023 Guideline for the management of patients with 80. Herridge MS, Azoulay É. Outcomes after critical illness. N Engl J Med.
aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: a guideline from the American 2023;388(10):913–24.
Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke. 2023. 81. Cinotti R, Mijangos JC, Pelosi P, Haenggi M, Gurjar M, Schultz MJ, et al.
61. Torné R, Culebras D, Sanchez-Etayo G, García-García S, Muñoz G, Llull L, Extubation in neurocritical care patients: the ENIO international prospec-
et al. Double hemispheric microdialysis study in poor-grade SAH patients. tive study. Intensive Care Med. 2022;48(11):1539–50.
Sci Rep. 2020;10(1):1–9. 82. Asehnoune K, Mrozek S, Perrigault PF, Seguin P, Dahyot-Fizelier C, Lasocki
62. Helbok R, Kofler M, Schiefecker AJ, Gaasch M, Rass V, Pfausler B, et al. Clini- S, et al. A multi-faceted strategy to reduce ventilation-associated mortal-
cal use of cerebral microdialysis in patients with aneurysmal subarach- ity in brain-injured patients. The BI-VILI project: a nationwide quality
noid hemorrhage-State of the art. Front Neurol. 2017;8:1. improvement project. Intensive Care Med. 2017;43(7):957–70.
63. Greenberg SM, Ziai WC, Cordonnier C, Dowlatshahi D, Francis B, Goldstein 83. Shehabi Y, Bellomo R, Reade MC, Bailey M, Bass F, Howe B, et al. Early
JN, et al. 2022 Guideline for the management of patients with spontane- intensive care sedation predicts long-term mortality in ventilated criti-
ous intracerebral hemorrhage: a guideline from the American Heart cally ill patients. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2012;186(8):724–31.
Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke. 2022;53:E282-361. 84. Devlin JW, Skrobik Y, Gélinas C, Needham DM, Slooter AJC, Pandhari-
64. Ungerer MN, Ringleb P, Reuter B, Stock C, Ippen F, Hyrenbach S, et al. pande PP, et al. Clinical practice guidelines for the prevention and
Stroke unit admission is associated with better outcome and lower
Frisvold et al. Critical Care (2023) 27:247 Page 11 of 11

management of pain, agitation/sedation, delirium, immobility, and sleep


disruption in adult patients in the ICU. Crit Care Med. 2018;46:825–73.
85. Tejerina EE, Robba C, del Campo-Albendea L, Pelosi P, Muriel A, Peñuelas
O, et al. Weaning outcomes in patients with brain injury. Neurocrit Care.
2022;37(3):649–59.
86. Taran S, Angeloni N, Pinto R, McCredie V, Schultz M, Robba C, et al. Prog-
nostic factors associated with extubation failure in acutely brain-injured
patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Can J Anesth. 2022;69(1
SUPPL):S109–11.
87. Pham T, Serpa Neto A, Pelosi P, Laffey JG, De Haro C, Lorente JA, et al.
Outcomes of patients presenting with mild acute respiratory dis-
tress syndrome: insights from the LUNG SAFE study. Anesthesiology.
2019;130(2):263–83.
88. Burns KEA, Rizvi L, Cook DJ, Lebovic G, Dodek P, Villar J, et al. Ventilator
weaning and discontinuation practices for critically ill patients. JAMA J
Am Med Assoc. 2021;325:1173–84.
89. Tanaka A, Uchiyama A, Kitamura T, Sakaguchi R, Komukai S, Matsuyama
T, et al. Association between early tracheostomy and patient outcomes
in critically ill patients on mechanical ventilation: a multicenter cohort
study. J Intensive Care. 2022;10(1):1–10.
90. Robba C, Galimberti S, Graziano F, Wiegers EJA, Lingsma HF, Iaquaniello
C, et al. Tracheostomy practice and timing in traumatic brain-injured
patients: a CENTER-TBI study. Intensive Care Med. 2020;46(5):983–94.
91. Bösel J, Niesen WD, Salih F, Morris NA, Ragland JT, Gough B, et al. Effect of
early vs standard approach to tracheostomy on functional outcome at 6
months among patients with severe stroke receiving mechanical ventila-
tion: the SETPOINT2 randomized clinical trial. JAMA J Am Med Assoc.
2022;327(19):1899–909.

Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in pub-
lished maps and institutional affiliations.

Ready to submit your research ? Choose BMC and benefit from:

• fast, convenient online submission


• thorough peer review by experienced researchers in your field
• rapid publication on acceptance
• support for research data, including large and complex data types
• gold Open Access which fosters wider collaboration and increased citations
• maximum visibility for your research: over 100M website views per year

At BMC, research is always in progress.

Learn more biomedcentral.com/submissions

You might also like