GT Reviewer Burpolo
GT Reviewer Burpolo
GT Reviewer Burpolo
protection under the Intellectual Property Law. "requirements" provided under Section 40 are present.
A patent is a valuable asset that must be protected.
-Patent is a set of exclusive rights granted by a state
to an inventor or his assignee for a fixed period of
time in exchange for a disclosure of an invention.
-the ultimate goal however of a patent system is
to bring new designs and technologies into the
public domain through disclosure.
-The patent system thus embodies a carefully
crafted bargain for encouraging the creation and
disclosure of new useful and non-obvious advances in
technology and design, in return for the exclusive
right to practice the und
invention for a number of years.
Priority Date
-Priority date therefore comes into play when there is
an application for patent for the same invention that
was filed in another country.
-The right of priority given to a patent applicant is only
relevant when there are two or more conflicting patent
applications on the same invention.
Non-Prejudicial Disclosure
-The element of novelty requires that the thing is not yet
known to anyone besides the inventor.
These are disclosure of information contained in the
application as long as the disclosure was:
1. Made during the 12 months preceding the
filing date or the priority date of the application;
2. made by any of the following person:
• 2.1. The inventor;
• A Patent Office and the information was
contained (a) in another application filed by the
inventor application filed without the knowledge or
consent of the inventor by a third party which
obtained the information directly or indirectly from the
inventor;
• A third party which obtained the
information directly or indirectly from the
inventor.
Inventive Step.
-An invention involves an inventive step if, having
regard to prior art, it is not obvious to a person skilled in
the art at the time of the filing date or priority date of
the application claiming the inventions
Graham Factors
-The factors a court will look at when
determining obviousness and non-obviousness
by looking at
1. the scope and content of the prior art;
2. the level of ordinary skill in the art;
3. the differences between the claimed invention
and the prior art; and
4. objective evidence of non-obviousness.
Unity of Invention However, the applicant may request for the early
publication of is application provided that the:
-The application should always relate to one 1. applicant submits a written waiver of the: (a)
invention only or to a group of inventions forming a above-mentioned 18-month period, and (b)
single general inventive concept. establishment of a search report;
2. publication shall not be earlier than six
months from filing date; and
3. required fee for early publication is paid in full.
Confidentiality Before Publication Amendment of Application
patent application, which has not yet been An applicant may amend the patent application during
published, and all relate documents, shall not be the examination provided that such amendment will
made available for inspection without the consent of not include new matter outside the scope of the
the applicant. only confidential befor its publication. disclosure contained in the application as filed.
The confidentiality in patent applications under the Should amendments touching the merits of the
Intellectual Property Code is not absolute since a application be presented after final rejection, or after
party may alread intervene after the publication of the appeal has been taken, or when such amendment
application. might not otherwise be proper,
COMPULSOrY LICENSING
-licenses are awarded against the will of the patent
owner.
-Director of Legal Affairs has original jurisdiction over
petitions for compulsory licensing of patents.
-may grant a license to exploit patented invention
under the grounds
GROUNDS
-National emergency or other circumstances of
extreme urgency;
-public interest, in particular, national security,
outrtion, healt or dine dev eletermined by the
appropriate nutrition, health or the development of
other vital sectors agency of the Government, so
requires;
-judicial or administrative body has determined that
the manner of exploitation by the owner of the patent
or his licensee is anti-competitive;
-public non-commercial use of the patent by the
patentee, without satisfactory reason;
-patented invention is not being worked in the
Philippines on a commercial scale, although capable of
being worked, without satisfactory reason: Provided,
That the importation of the patented article shall
constitute working or using the patent; and
-Where the demand for patented drugs and medicines
is not being met to an adequate extent and on
reasonable terms, as determined by the Secretary of
the Department of Health.