36-1 Tunkiwala
36-1 Tunkiwala
36-1 Tunkiwala
Abstract
The multifactorial nature of tooth wear poses several challenges
when making a definitive diagnosis regarding its etiology. Attrition
and erosion can work at different points in time in the same
dentition to create severe tooth surface loss. When examining the
patient, the clinician must collect all the clinical data and then
make an accurate diagnosis and risk assessment. The treatment
philosophy in such cases is to remain minimally invasive if
possible. However, with moderate to severe erosion, protection of
the remaining tooth structure from acid dissolution is paramount
and may render minimally invasive partial-coverage treatment
options impossible. This article presents an overview of some of
the major causes of tooth wear and provides a systematic approach
to the rehabilitation of afflicted patients with a combination of
digital and adhesive protocols.
a b
Figure 2: A smooth, silky glazed Figures 3a & 3b: Erosion leading to loss of palatal enamel on anterior teeth may lead to shortening of
appearance and cupping of enamel incisors and to subsequent esthetic concerns. Palatal erosion may be due to acid reflux, bulimia, or
is characteristic of early erosion. anorexia nervosa. In this case, it was due to a lemon-sucking habit of several years.
Figure 6: Preoperative retracted 1:2 view in Figure 7: Preoperative 1:1 view showing
maximum intercuspation. deteriorated incisal edges and unsightly resin
fillings.
Figure 8: Preoperative maxillary occlusal view Figure 9: Preoperative mandibular occlusal view
depicting severe loss of occlusal enamel on depicting severe loss of occlusal enamel on all
all posterior teeth. Facial enamel was also posterior teeth. Facial enamel was also affected.
affected, and there were multiple carious Again, the teeth least affected by erosion, #20
lesions and defective old restorations. It is and #30, had metallic full coverage.
noteworthy that the tooth that survived the
erosion, #15, had metallic full coverage.
Case Report
Patient Complaint and History
A 55-year-old male presented with severe generalized Table 1. Preoperative Clinical Findings
sensitivity in the posterior teeth and food lodging. His
Clinical Examination Findings
immediate concern was the esthetic appearance of his
teeth and the inability to enjoy food. Facial analysis • maxilla canted to the right
The patient had undergone a cardiac bypass five years • occlusal plane uneven
earlier. He was a heavy smoker and consumed alcohol • canted dental midline
in moderation. A thorough dental history revealed the
presence of a large number of carious lesions and erosive Dentolabial analysis • high lip line
loss of tooth structure, mainly in the posterior quadrants. • full visibility of maxillary incisors
with uneven incisal edges
Sensitivity and food lodgement were ongoing issues, with
• wide smile displaying a large
the patient reporting several craters on the biting surfaces number of teeth
of the teeth. He stated that in the past five years, his teeth • incisal edges not conforming to
had become thinner and the upper front teeth were los- curvature of lower lip
ing their edge and their color had drastically changed for
the worse. He reported episodes of nocturnal grinding Dental analysis • unesthetic incisal embrasures
and clenching, and to prevent damage arising from this, • asymmetrical and uneven locations
he had been wearing a soft nightguard for several years. of gingival levels and zeniths
• uneven axial inclinations
Intermittent episodes of gastric reflux were present, but
• displeasing teeth proportions
did not require medical treatment (Figs 4-9). He report- • displeasing teeth color
ed that the episodes of gastric reflux, as well as nocturnal • large cup-shaped defects with silky
grinding, had become much less frequent recently. smooth appearance. detected on
most posterior teeth
Clinical Findings • caries in several posterior teeth
Clinical examination, photography, and preoperative • worn lower incisors, possibly due to
video analysis were carried out to chart the various extrinsic erosion
clinical findings, shown in Table 1.14 The musculature
and the TMJs were normal. The negative load test and the Phonetic analysis • “F” and “V” sounds revealed upper
incisal shortening
overall clinical picture and patient history confirmed that
• “S” and “M” sounds revealed
the TMJs were in a healthy state. adequate VDO
The radiographic examination (Fig 10) revealed over-
all good bone condition with no relevant pathology.
Multiple carious lesions were detected on posterior teeth,
and defective restorations with marginal concerns were
rampant on almost all previously treated teeth. Teeth
#15, #22, and #30 showed issues with previous end-
odontic intervention.
The lateral cephalogram revealed that most parameters
were within normal limits. However, it was observed that
there was no loss in VDO. Also, the facial proportions
revealed that the lower third of the face already had an
increased dimension. Phonetic analysis was in sync with
these findings (Fig 11 & Table 2).
Risk Assessment
Risk assessment is an important aspect of patient-cen-
tered, evidence-based decision making in contemporary Figure 10: Preoperative panoramic radiograph revealing the extent
dentistry.15,16 A detailed analysis of patient data allows of tooth wear, the defective endodontics, and the presence of
the clinician to assess risk and determine the prognosis. periapical lesions in several teeth.
Periodontally, the patient was at low risk, as the overall
gingival health and bone levels were within acceptable
limits. Biomechanically, he was categorized as high risk.
Treatment and the upper anterior face height/lower anterior face height
The treatment was divided into four distinct phases: (UAFH-LAFH) showed that the lower third of the face was al-
1. diagnostic wax-up ready larger in proportion. As analysis of facial esthetics and
2. provisional restorations phonetic tests revealed the same, it was decided to accomplish
3. tooth preparations and impressions the treatment without any major change to the VDO and to use
4. laboratory protocols and finalization. the mounted casts in CR to create a diagnostic wax-up. The cen-
Each phase had a definitive role in the treatment, and tric occlusion contact was on the right second molars, thereby
breaking down such complex work into organized steps enabled leading to a 1-mm increase in VDO. This contact was retained
treatment that was comfortable for the patient and allowed the and the rest of the teeth were made to contact uniformly with
clinician to accurately assess the outcome at each step. the wax-up. The wax-up gauge on the dento-facial analyzer’s
Diagnostic wax-up: Digital impressions of the upper and mounting platform was used to create the wax-up with an es-
lower arches were made (CS 3600, Carestream Dental; Atlanta, thetically oriented maxillary occlusal plane. Morphological ac-
GA). The patient was deprogrammed before the centric bite curacy in the diagnostic wax-up is paramount, and the wax-up
record to allow the jaw relation record to be taken in centric was done as a full coverage on all teeth. All smile design prin-
relation (CR). A bite wafer (Aluwax; Allendale, MI) was used ciples were followed as recommended19 (Figs 12-15b).
to record the CR using a custom-made Lucia jig (Pattern Res- Provisional restorations: There are several methods for
in, GC America; Alsip, IL)17 and a Kois dento-facial analyzer making provisional restorations for the full mouth. The ideal
(Panadent; Colton, CA)18 recorded the orientation relation requirement for these provisional restorations is that they be
for the upper arch. The upper and lower models were printed made without any tooth preparation. Indirect laboratory-fab-
in three dimension (3D). The upper cast was mounted on a ricated provisional restorations can be made in this manner,
semi-adjustable articulator using the bite tab from the dento- provided the dentition and teeth do not have large undercuts.
facial analyzer, and the lower arch was mounted using the Usually, these lab-fabricated, indirect provisional restorations
aluwax bite in CR. The sella-nasion to mandibular plane are made in the form of an overlay on the whole arch and
(Sn-MP) angle from the lateral cephalogram showed that the may tend to get bulky. Direct techniques, however, offer some
vertical dimension was almost as desired cephalometrically, advantages, as these provisionals can be bonded intraorally,
Figure 12: Digital scans of the preoperative Figure 13: Maxillary 3D-printed model mounted Figure 14: Mounted study casts depicting
dentition status in maximum intercuspation. on an articulator using the dento-facial analyzer. contact only on the posterior molars in
CR.
a b
Figures 15a & 15b: Diagnostic wax-up accurately conforming to the wax-up guide and
morphologically replicating the lost tooth anatomy.
Figure 19: The full-mouth bonded provisional Figure 20: The provisional restorations must be
restoration must replace the lost morphology of teeth esthetically satisfactory and approved by the patient.
and achieve all the functional criteria of dynamic
occlusion.
a b
Figures 21a & 21b: Uniform contacts on cuspids and all posterior teeth in static occlusion in the maxilla and
mandible.
thereby allowing a perfect “test drive” for the final esthetics sive. Once the adhesive was cured, bis-GMA-based chemically
and occlusion. However, errors in placement of the matrix dur- cured resin (Protemp 4, 3M ESPE; St. Paul, MN) was loaded
ing fabrication of the provisional restorations can lead to an on the putty wash matrix generated from the diagnostic wax-
inadvertent increase in VDO and a subsequent mismatch in up. With a correct orientation, the putty matrix was seated
occlusion that may require intraoral corrections. It is advisable on the teeth. After the material was set, the putty matrix was
to measure the distance between the free gingival margins of removed and the gross excess material was cleaned from the
the upper and lower cuspids on the wax-up and to achieve that teeth. The procedure was then repeated on the opposing arch.
dimension after the provisional restorations have been made Fine-tipped finishing carbides and a number 12 blade (Swann-
and adjusted intraorally. Morton; Sheffield, UK) were used carefully to remove all excess
The teeth in one arch were isolated and etched with 37% material from the gingival sulci around all teeth. The connec-
phosphoric acid (Uni-Etch, Bisco; Schaumburg, IL) for 10 sec- tors between the teeth were shaped to have no overcontouring
onds, followed by drying and application of universal adhe- at the gingival embrasure (Figs 16-21b).
Figure 23: Deep cervical margin placement is Figure 24: Knife-edged margins allow
detrimental to the strength of the tooth and conservation of enamel and better bond
exposes dentin, thereby compromising bond strength with less sensitivity.
strengths.
GA) were made on the provisional restorations to control the After the anterior preparations were finalized, a Lucia jig was
preparation depth, allowing adequate room for the final res- constructed intraorally with the posterior provisional restora-
torations while at the same time enabling the conservation of tions still in place. Thereafter, the posterior teeth were prepared
enamel. At this point, it is crucial to finalize the material choice to receive the full-coverage restorations, again with knife-edged
and restorative design specifics, as each material will have dif- margins. The Lucia jig on the anterior preparations was used to
ferent tooth preparation requirements. Lithium disilicate (IPS maintain the VDO and to ensure adequate room for the final
e.max, Ivoclar Vivadent; Amherst, NY) was the material of restorations on the posterior teeth (Figs 25-27).
choice for this case and was fabricated using the pressing tech- Tissue management was done with a gingival retraction cord
nique, as marginal fits with pressing have shown to be better (Ultrapak, Ultradent; South Jordan, UT) soaked in aluminum
compared to milling.21,22 chloride (Viscostat Clear, Ultradent).27 Digital impressions of
The final preparations of the anterior teeth were done using the upper and lower prepared teeth were taken. The bite record
the bonded provisional restoration as a preparation guide.23,24 was done on the posterior teeth digitally while the Lucia jig
The anterior margins were placed equigingivally.25 The mar- held the vertical dimension as an anterior stop (Figs 28-30).
gin geometry was knife-edged to allow a conservative prepa- Laboratory protocols and finalization: After the digital
ration on all teeth, saving the residual enamel for bonding.26 scans were received in the lab, the scanned data of the approved
Increased depth of preparation at the margins (Fig 23) leads provisional restoration were superimposed onto the definitive
to removal of thin cervical enamel and moves the preparation preparations to allow the final restorations to be of the same
into the dentin, leading to increased sensitivity and reduced length. The occlusal plane was replicated from the scans of the
bond strengths. Preparing deep chamfers and creating a very approved provisional restorations and the labial and lingual
prominent horizontal margin geometry also weakens the tooth morphologies were modified to achieve a good surface texture
structure and leads to increased incidence of biomechanical and finish. The lithium disilicate allowed for a good translu-
tooth failures, mainly due to the decreased rigidity of the tooth cency in the final esthetic work and was used as a monolithic
structure.24 Leaving the margins knife-edged (Fig 24) allows for design with staining only for the posterior quadrants. The ante-
conservation of tooth structure; however, this has the potential rior teeth were minimally layered to achieve good incisal char-
to create an overcontoured restoration with a cervical ledge. acteristics and translucency. The upper and lower models were
The lithium disilicate restoration must be thinned down (up to printed in 3D to allow seating of all restorations and to adjust
0.3 to 0.5 mm in the cervical region) at the bisque stage to pre- the proximal and occlusal contacts, as well as accomplish the
vent this from happening. The restoration margin is then hand layering (Figs 31-37).
polished and acts as a scaffold for the gingival tissue without Trials were carried out and final checks were performed
creating a detrimental horizontal ledge or overhang. to verify esthetics and marginal fit. Proximal contacts were
Figure 25: Approved provisional restorations acting Figure 26: A Lucia jig on anterior teeth was fabricated
as a preparation guide for the final restorative phase. while the posterior provisional restorations were still
in place.
Figure 28: Tissue management of the maxillary arch Figure 29: Final digital impressions of all teeth at the
prior to digital impression-taking. desired VDO.
Figure 30: Digital impressions of the final preparations with knife-edged margins for lithium disilicate.
Figure 34: Facial surface of anterior lithium Figure 35: Final lithium disilicate Figure 36: The lost occlusal anatomy was
disilicate veneered with translucent ceramic restorations. recreated with lithium disilicate restorations.
powders.
Figure 38: Postoperative smile showing a good harmony Figure 39: Postoperative retracted 1:2 view with a
between the teeth and the envelope of the lips. beautiful perio-restorative harmony evident.
a b c
Figures 40a-40c: Postoperative frontal, right lateral, and left lateral retracted 1:2 views in maximum intercuspation.
a b
Figures 41a & 41b: Postoperative maxillary and mandibular occlusal views. Figure 42: Emergence of the final maxillary
anterior teeth.
Figure 43: Final mandibular anterior teeth depicting healthy Figure 44: Maxillary equilibrated Figure 45: Postoperative
dentogingival esthetics. occlusal splint to protect the layered portrait.
ceramic from chipping.
Summary References
Tooth wear is multifactorial. Attrition, abrasion, erosion, and
abfraction can contribute to tooth surface loss in the same 1. Rufenacht C. Fundamentals of esthetics. Hanover Park (IL): Quintessence
dentition at different points over a lifetime. Organized data Pub.; 1990.
collection and methodical analysis of the cause of tooth wear
are imperative for long-term successful treatment. Severe 2. Zero DT, Lussi A: Erosion—chemical and biological factors of importance to
erosion that affects the entire dentition leaves the patient the dental practitioner. Int Dent J. 2005;55(4 Suppl 1):285-90.
with dentinal hypersensitivity and negatively affects esthetics.
In such advanced cases, it is prudent to protect the residual 3. Grippo JO, Simring M, Coleman TA. Abfraction, abrasion, biocorrosion,
tooth structure with full-coverage restorations so that the need and the enigma of noncarious cervical lesions: a 20-year perspective. J Esthet
for larger interventions due to continuous acid dissolution is Restor Dent. 2012 Feb;24(1):10-23.
prevented. Adhesively bonded restorations done with careful
tooth preparation techniques allow the treatment to remain 4. Mair LH. Wear in the mouth: the tribological dimension. In: Addy M, Em-
conservative while saving the maximum enamel possible. A bery G, Edgar WM, Orchardson R, editors. Tooth wear and sensitivity: clini-
robust erosion management system for preventing further acid cal advances in restorative dentistry. London: Martin Dunitz; 2000. p. 181-8.
dissolution is mandatory.
5. Bartlett D, Smith BGN. Definition, classification, and clinical assessment of
Acknowledgments attrition, erosion and abrasion of enamel and dentine. In: Addy M, Embery
G, Edgar WM, Orchardson R, editors. Tooth wear and sensitivity: clinical
The author thanks Mr. Danesh Vazifdar at Adaro Dental Lab
advances in restorative dentistry. London: Martin Dunitz; 2000. p. 87-92.
(Mumbai, India) for his splendid ceramic artistry on the final resto-
rations in this case, and Zach Turner for creating the illustrations 6. Meurman JH, Sorvari R. Interplay of erosion attrition and abrasion in tooth-
in Figures 23 and 24. wear and possible approaches to prevention. In: Addy M, Embery G, Edgar
WM, Orchardson R, editors. Tooth Wear and Sensitivity. Tooth wear and
sensitivity: clinical advances in restorative dentistry. London: Martin Du-
nitz; 2000. p. 171-80.
8. Ray DS, Wiemann AH, Patel PB, Ding X, Kryscio RJ, Miller CS. Estimation of 23. Magne P, Belser UC. Novel porcelain laminate preparation approach driven
the rate of tooth wear in permanent incisors: a cross-sectional digital radio- by a diagnostic mock-up. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2004;16(1):7-16.
graphic study. J Oral Rehabil. 2015 Jun;42(6):460-6.
24. Magne P, Belser U. Bonded porcelain restorations in the anterior dentition:
9. Bell EJ, Kaidonis J, Townsend G, Richards L. Comparison of exposed a biomimetic approach. Berlin: Quintessence Pub.; 2002.
dentinal surfaces resulting from abrasion and erosion. Aust Dent J. 1998
Oct;43(5):362-6. 25. Spear F. Using margin placement to achieve the best anterior restorative
esthetics. J Am Dent Assoc. 2009 Jul;140(7):920-6.
10. Imfeld T. Dental erosion. Definition, classification and links. Eur J Oral Sci.
1996 Apr;104(2 ( Pt 2)):151-5. 26. Imburgia M, Canale A, Cortellini D, Maneschi M, Martucci C, Valenti M.
Minimally invasive vertical preparation design for ceramic veneers. Int J
11. Lussi A. Dental erosion: from diagnosis to therapy. Basel (Switzerland): Esthet Dent. 2016;11(4):460-71.
Karger; p. 215-20.
27. Chiche GJ, Pinault A. Esthetics of anterior fixed prosthodontics. Hanover
12. Tunkiwala A, Chitguppi R. Conservative, functional, and esthetic Park (IL): Quintessence Pub.; 1994.
rehabilitation of severe palatal erosion (Class IV) using modified Dahl
Approach. Compend Contin Educ Dent. 2017 May;38(5):289-94. 28. Kois JC, Chaiyabutr Y. Intraoral occlusal adjustment and polishing for
modern ceramic materials: clinical performance depends more on surface
13. Kois JC. No dentistry is better than no dentistry…really? J Cosmetic Dent. finish than the type of ceramic used. Inside Dent. 2015 Nov;11(3). jCD
2016 Spring;32(1):54-61.
17. Dawson PE. Functional occlusion: from TMJ to smile design. St. Louis:
Mosby; 2007. p. 227-30.
18. Lux LH, Thompson GA, Waliszewski KJ, Ziebert GJ. Comparison of the Kois
Dento-Facial Analyzer System with an earbow for mounting a maxillary
cast. J Prosthet Dent. 2015 Sep;114(3):432-9.
20. Bakeman EM, Kois JC. The myth of anterior guidance. J Cosmetic Dent.
2012 Fall;28(3):56-62.
21. Azar B, Eckert S, Kunkela J, Ingr T, Mounajjed R. The marginal fit of lithium
disilicate crowns: press vs. CAD/CAM. Braz Oral Res. 2018;32:e001.
22. Schestatsky R, Zucuni CP, Venturini AB, de Lima Burgo TA, Bacchi A, Va-
landro LF, Rocha Pereira GK. CAD-CAM milled versus pressed lithium-
disilicate monolithic crowns adhesively cemented after distinct surface
treatments: Fatigue performance and ceramic surface characteristics. J Mech
Behav Biomed Mater. 2019 Jun;94:144-54.