Artigo 2
Artigo 2
Artigo 2
Quinones are important scaffolds that are present in a variety of natural products or synthetic bioactive
molecules. Arylation is an important strategy for accomplishing structural modifications, leading to new
potential candidates for use as drugs. In the present work, palladium-catalysed, ligandless and phosphine-
free Suzuki coupling reactions between 2-hydroxy-3-iodo-1,4-naphthoquinone and boronic acids were
employed to prepare several 2-hydroxy-3-aryl-1,4-naphthoquinones in aqueous conditions using microwave
irradiation or conventional heating. Because of the biological activities of quinones, which are related to their
ability to accept electrons to form semiquinones and hydroquinones, the electrochemical behaviour of the
Received (in Montpellier, France)
18th March 2016, synthesized molecules was investigated. The Osiris and Molinspiration Cheminformatics programs, utilizing
Accepted 4th July 2016 in silico analyses, imply that these naphthoquinones are candidates for use as drugs which was reinforced
DOI: 10.1039/c6nj00872k by the outcomes of the in vitro antifungal and trypanocidal activity tests. Our in vitro data indicated a MIC
1
value of 8 mg mL against Candida albicans ATCC 24433 strains, and an EC50 of 0.67 mM with respect
www.rsc.org/njc to trypanocidal activity against Trypanosoma cruzi epimastigote strains (Y).
Introduction
Quinones occur widely in nature and play important roles in
the life cycle of cells. Quinone-based compounds display a
variety of pharmacological activities, such as anticancer, anti-
viral and anti-neurodegenerative activities, among others.1
Atovaquone (Fig. 1) is a potent anti-malarial drug that inhibits the Fig. 1 Atovaquone.
mitochondrial electron transport chain (cytochrome bc1 complex)
of parasites. The naphthoquinone moiety in atovaquone interacts
with highly conserved amino acid residues of cytochrome b by Other biologically active molecules were synthesized based
multiple non-polar interactions. Currently, atovaquone is used on 1 as the lead compound using rational drug design.2
for the treatment and prophylaxis of malaria in association with Fungi are eukaryotic organisms that are found in the commensal
proguanil hydrochloride (Malarones, GlaxoSmithKline, UK). microbiota of healthy humans. They may colonize mucosal surfaces
such as the skin, gastrointestinal tract and oral cavity. These
organisms may present different forms, including a rounded
a
Departamento de Quı́mica Orgânica, Universidade Federal Fluminense,
form, a hyphal form or a dimorphic form.3
Campus do Valonguinho, Centro, Niterói 24020-141, Brazil.
E-mail: [email protected]ff.br
Candida spp are fungi of clinical importance that undergo
b
Departamento de Quı́mica Analı́tica, Universidade Federal Fluminense, phenotypic switching from yeast to hyphal forms, becoming
Campus do Valonguinho, Centro, Niterói 24020-141, Brazil infectious and causing candidiasis. There are several predisposing
c
LABioMol – Laboratório de Antibióticos, Bioquı́mica e Modelagem Molecular, factors for the development of candidiasis, such as AIDS, diabetes,
Instituto de Biologia, Universidade Federal Fluminense, Niterói 24210-130, Brazil
d
cytotoxic therapy and prolonged antibiotic therapy.4
Laboratory of Toxoplasmosis and other Protozooses – Oswaldo Cruz
Institute – Fiocruz, Brazil
Over the last few years, Candida strains have been recognized
e
Laboratory of Biochemistry of Peptides, Oswaldo Cruz Institute – Fiocruz, Brazil as a major cause of opportunistic fungal infections that occur
† Electronic supplementary information (ESI) available. See DOI: 10.1039/c6nj00872k around the world. They represent a great threat, especially to
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry and the Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique 2016 New J. Chem., 2016, 40, 7643--7656 | 7643
View Article Online
Paper NJC
immune compromised patients, and cause significant morbid- prepared that displayed promising chemotherapeutic activity
ity and mortality.5 In this regard, Candida albicans is the most against T. cruzi.
common aetiological agent of candidiasis, but non-albicans T. cruzi shows some similarities to fungi in terms of the sterol
Candida species, such as C. glabrata, C. krusei, C. parapsilosis lipid biosynthesis, being both susceptible to the inhibitors
and C. tropicalis, are also important in causing this infection. of the sterol biosynthesis. Antifungals such as posaconazole or
Currently, there are a few classes of antifungal agents that ketoconazole can inhibit the growth of T. cruzi strains.15
are available for the treatment of candidiasis. They include Arylation is an interesting approach that can accomplish
polyenes, azoles and echinocandins, but none of them are fully structural modifications of quinones and naphthoquinones
effective due to their lack of efficacy or their toxicity. This with the goal of synthesizing new substances with biological
Published on 05 July 2016. Downloaded by UNIVERSITY OF ADELAIDE on 12/10/2017 07:06:05.
scenario worsens because of the emergence of and/or increase activities.16 In this regard, palladium-catalysed Suzuki coupling
in fungal resistance against the antifungals that are clinically in between boronic acids and electrophiles is an important C–C
use. Widespread and non-rational use of these antifungal bond-forming tool. Additionally, greener protocols, including
agents has led to a strong selection of resistant strains.6 reactions in aqueous medium, have been developed to accom-
The emergence of antifungal resistance and the side effects plish the Suzuki coupling reactions.17
of current antifungal therapy make it difficult to treat fungal 3-Aryl-2-hydroxy-1,4-naphthoquinones can be considered
infections. Therefore, new treatment options ought to be developed as analogues of atovaquone, but with a simpler structure.
by researching new antifungal prototypes with effective activities This is very interesting because although atovaquone is a
against Candida strains and with low toxicity. highly active and safe drug against protozoan infections, its
A similar scenario is observed in a protozoan infection that production costs have precluded its use in the developing
affects millions of people and kills 12 000 per year. Chagas countries.
disease is caused by the protozoan parasite Trypanosoma cruzi. Arylations of naphthoquinones have already been reported
The transmission of such a disease can occur in different ways in the literature by using C–H activation procedures,18 diazo-
(e.g., via the faeces of bloodsucking bugs known as ‘kissing nium salts, Lewis acid-catalyzed arylations with aromatic
bugs’). Within urban areas, it is not only caused by transfusion aldehydes, arenes or hydrazines, and Stille and Suzuki cross-
of contaminated blood, but also by food contaminated with the coupling reactions.18 Many of the procedures reported fail
parasite, as well as by urine or anal secretions from infected when it comes to introducing electron-poor groups at the C-3
marsupials, to name a few. Additionally, infected mothers can position of the naphthoquinones. Additionally, there are few
transmit T. cruzi to their foetus during pregnancy.7 reports regarding the arylation of unprotected 2-hydroxy-1,4-
In Latin America, Chagas disease affects mainly poor naphthoquinones. Spyroudis and co-workers19 reported the
communities, where it sets in endemically. However, this neglected Suzuki cross-coupling of phenyliodonium ylides of hydroxyqui-
disease has spread to other continents, and more than 6 million nones with arylboronic acids (0.5 mmol of iodonium, 1.1 mmol
people are estimated to be infected.8 of boronic acid, 4% Pd(OAc)2, LiOH, DME : H2O, R3P, 5–8 h).
The main drugs used in the treatment of Chagas disease are The yields were found to be dependent on the phosphine
nifurtimox 2 and benznidazole 3 (Fig. 2). These drugs are very employed, with better yields when P(t-Bu)3 was used, which
effective if applied in the acute phase, but not in the chronic was attributed to the minimization of transylidation reaction
phase, when the effectiveness decreases. In addition, treatments with formation of the corresponding phosphonium ylides.
with these drugs are of long duration and have severe side Iodobenzene was formed as a side product, which on coupling
effects.9 Similar to the Candidiasis scenario, it is also necessary with the excess of the boronic acids resulted in the formation
to discover new trypanocidal agents to replace the few that are of Ph–Ar. 3-Aryl-2-hydroxy-1,4-naphthoquinones bearing electron-
currently available for treating Chagas disease. withdrawing groups (F, CHO or CN) in the phenyl ring were
Several reports in the literature describe the potential not synthesized using the procedure reported by Spyroudis.
of naphthoquinones as antifungal and trypanocidal agents. 2-Hydroxy-3-iodo-1,4-naphthoquinone or 2-amino-3-iodo-1,4-
Tran and co-workers demonstrated the antifungal activity of naphthoquinone was not employed in the Suzuki cross-coupling
several halo-1,4-naphthoquinones,10 Yoshizaki and co-workers reactions, phosphine-free coupling reactions were not reported for
reported on the antifungal activity of naphthoquinone deriva- these substrates, as well as the effect of microwave irradiation in
tives constituting Lithospermum erythrorhizon11 and terpenyl- these reactions was not investigated. Furthermore, the 3-aryl-2-
1,4-naphthoquinones were considered active in vitro against hydroxy-1,4-naphthoquinones were not evaluated with respect to
pathogenic yeasts and filamentous fungi.12 In our research their antifungal or trypanocidal activities.
group and in others,13,14 several naphthoquinones were We prepared different 3-aryl-2-hydroxy-1,4-naphthoquinone
analogues of atovaquone under aqueous conditions, employing
conventional heating or microwave irradiation using inexpensive
phosphine-free sources of palladium and inexpensive bases. These
molecules were tested for in vitro antifungal and trypanocidal
activities, and an in silico study was performed to evaluate their
potential as pharmaceuticals, as well as their pharmacokinetic
Fig. 2 Trypanocidal agents. properties and toxicity.
7644 | New J. Chem., 2016, 40, 7643--7656 This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry and the Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique 2016
View Article Online
NJC Paper
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry and the Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique 2016 New J. Chem., 2016, 40, 7643--7656 | 7645
View Article Online
Paper NJC
7646 | New J. Chem., 2016, 40, 7643--7656 This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry and the Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique 2016
View Article Online
NJC Paper
1 71
2 64
Published on 05 July 2016. Downloaded by UNIVERSITY OF ADELAIDE on 12/10/2017 07:06:05.
3 78
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry and the Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique 2016 New J. Chem., 2016, 40, 7643--7656 | 7647
View Article Online
Paper NJC
10i 2.12 3.75 2.07 0.46 0 0.22 0.34 0.19 0.01 0.36 0.21
10j 2.03 4.50 10.0 0.38 0 0.14 0.27 0.31 0.12 0.25 0.30
10k 2.54 4.07 2.59 0.43 0 0.26 0.37 0.12 0.07 0.41 0.19
Benz 0.25 1.62 + 1.66 0.33 0 0.33 0.39 0.49 0.71 0.05 0.02
Flu 0.31 1.55 4.84 0.95 0 0.04 0.01 0.09 0.23 0.09 0.03
Properties calculated using the Osiris Explorer program: c log P, Sol = solubility, M = mutagenic, T = tumourigenic, Ref = reproductive effect, I =
irritant, DL = druglikeness and DS = drug-score. Properties estimated using the Molinspiration program: L. R. viol. = number of violations of
Lipinski’s rule. Theoretical inhibitory profile against GPCRL = GPCR ligand, ICM = ion channel modulator, KI = kinase inhibitor, NRL = nuclear
receptor ligand, PI = protease inhibitor, EI = enzyme inhibitor. Flu = fluconazole, Benz = benznidazole.
Water solubility is an important parameter to be evaluated Table 4 Comparison of the inhibitory effects (halo = mm) of the active
for the drug candidates because it is related to their distribu- naphthoquinones (10a, 10b, 10d and 10e) in the DDST against Candida
strains of clinical importance
tion in the body. Interestingly, suitable values for logs 4 4
were observed for the naphthoquinones that were synthesized Inhibition growth zone (halo = mm)
herein. Analogously, lipophilicity and hydrophilicity are impor- Compounds Control
tant properties that affect the absorption of a drug in the body.
MO strain 10a 10b 10d 10e Fluconazole
On this subject, the Lipinski’s rule of five29 is used to predict
oral bioavailability. According to our analysis, none of the C. tropicalis ATCC 750 0 11 11 15 14
C. glabrata ATCC 90030 09 15 0 0 12
compounds studied violated Lipinski’s rule of five, which C. krusei ATCC 34135 13 11 11 0 14
indicates a good theoretical bioavailability. C. albicans ATCC 24433 13 18 11 0 13
Our in silico analyses revealed negative values for the drugli-
keness parameter of these naphthoquinones, which suggested Table 5 Comparison of the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC)
fragments different from those present in commercial pharma- values for the derivatives that presented antifungal activities in the DDST
ceuticals. The drug-score, which is a global parameter that is 1
MIC mg mL
related to the potential of a molecule to be a drug candidate,
indicates that the 3-aryl-1,4-naphthoquinones are good drug MO strain 10a 10b 10d 10e Fluconazole
candidates. Analysis of the predictions of bioactivities, accord- C. albicans ATCC 24433 16 16 0.8 — 0.75
ing to the Molinspiration tool, indicated the inhibition of C. krusei ATCC 34135 4512 128 256 — 64
C. tropicalis ATCC 750 — 4512 32 32 0.3
kinase and other enzymes as latent activities of the compounds C. glabrata ATCC 90030 16 32 — — 0.3
under study. In agreement, most of the drugs that interact with
enzymes in the body show c log P values between 2 and 5 and all
of the naphthoquinones that were evaluated herein presented
c log P values in this range.
Based on the in silico analyses that suggested the potential
biological profiles for this new series, we performed in vitro
antifungal and antiparasitic tests to search for biological activ-
ities associated with the arylnaphthoquinones. Among all of
the compounds that were tested, 10a, 10b, 10d and 10e were
found to inhibit the growth of Candida strains, whereas com-
pound 10e exhibited a high trypanocidal activity, which was
superior to that observed with benznidazole (Tables 4 and 5
Fig. 3 Naphthoquinone-induced injury. J774.G8 cells treated with
and Fig. 3–7). These data are in agreement with those of the naphthoquinones (100 mM) for 24 h. Cytotoxicity was measured using
active compounds detected in silico that presented drug-scores resazurin reduction to resorufin as an index of proliferation. Data shown
higher than 0.4 except for compound 10d, and scores for kinase are the mean SD of four independent experiments. Comparisons: *** or
inhibitors and enzyme inhibitors greater than 0.2. These *, treated vs. non-treated. n.s. – no significant difference.
experimental observations reinforced our in silico predictions,
as the in vitro data are in good agreement with them. The low viability studies in mice primary cells that were exposed to
theoretical toxicity value was also confirmed by the in vitro the arylnaphthoquinones. These results supported additional
7648 | New J. Chem., 2016, 40, 7643--7656 This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry and the Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique 2016
View Article Online
NJC Paper
Published on 05 July 2016. Downloaded by UNIVERSITY OF ADELAIDE on 12/10/2017 07:06:05.
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry and the Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique 2016 New J. Chem., 2016, 40, 7643--7656 | 7649
View Article Online
Paper NJC
7650 | New J. Chem., 2016, 40, 7643--7656 This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry and the Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique 2016
View Article Online
NJC Paper
Biological assays
Five fungal strains of different species of the genus Candida were
obtained from America Type Culture Collection and were used
Fig. 9 (a) Cyclic voltammogram of 10a, (b) UV-Vis of 10a at a potential of to evaluate the antifungal activity of the naphthoquinones:
1.19 V. C. parapsilosis ATCC 90028, C. albicans ATCC 24433, C. krusei
ATCC 34135, C. glabrata ATCC 90030 and C. tropicalis ATCC 750.
load (1% with microwave vs. 5% with conventional heating). Disk diffusion susceptibility test (DDST)
Five of the aryl-naphthoquinones synthesized herein are new.
To determine the susceptibility of each of the five Candida
Arylnaphthoquinones were evaluated in silico with respect to
ATCC strains to the compounds used, a suspension of each
their ADME/Tox and druglikeness properties. The in silico
strain in 5 mL of saline solution was prepared. Then, an aliquot
analysis indicated good biological and toxicological profiles
of 500 mL was inoculated onto a Sabouraud-dextrose agar plate,
for the synthesized naphthoquinones, and this was reinforced
and a 6 mm filter paper disk impregnated with the naphtho-
by the biological assays. None of the arylnaphthoquinones
quinones diluted in dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) (5 mg mL 1)
displayed toxicity to wild type mouse primary peritoneal macro-
was placed on the agar plate. The plate was then incubated for
phages at a concentration of 100 mM (24 h). Four of the
24–48 h at a temperature of 35 1C. Fungal growth inhibition
arylnaphthoquinones that were prepared (10a, 10b, 10d and
zones were measured when the compounds displayed activity
10e) exhibited antifungal activities against strains of clinical
against the Candida strains tested. DMSO was used as a
importance (10d, MIC = 8 mg mL 1, against C. albicans ATCC
negative control, and fluconazole (5 mg mL 1) was used as a
24433). Compound 10d exhibited an antiparasitic effect against
positive control.
the epimastigote strain (Y) of T. cruzi, with an EC50 of 0.67 mM.
Although the trypanocidal effects were observed only after 72 h, Determination of minimum inhibitory concentrations (DMIC)
this EC50 value is 59 times higher than the reported EC50 value
The compounds that exhibited antifungal activity in the DDST
for benznidazole, a trypanocidal agent that is used clinically.
were evaluated further to define the lowest concentrations of
These results indicate that arylnaphthoquinones are promising
the compounds that inhibited visible growth of the Candida
hit compounds whose structures deserve to be optimized.
strains (MIC). Serial dilutions of the compounds were prepared
using Sabouraud-dextrose broth medium in a 96-well microtiter
Experimental plate (0.5 mg mL 1 to 512 mg mL 1) and 100 mL inoculums of the
Candida strains. The microtiter plate was incubated for 24–48 h
Materials and measurements at a temperature of 35 1C, and the minimum inhibitory concen-
Boronic acids were purchased from Sigma Aldrich Brazil LTDA tration (MIC) was defined as the lowest concentration that was
and Combi-Blocks. They were used without further purification. capable of inhibiting visible fungal growth.
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry and the Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique 2016 New J. Chem., 2016, 40, 7643--7656 | 7651
View Article Online
Paper NJC
In silico analysis of the toxicity were counted using a Neubauer chamber, maintained in
The compounds 10a–10k were submitted to toxicological ana- serum-free medium for macrophages (Gibco, USA) and cultured
lysis in silico using the Osiris Property Explorer27 and Molin- at 37 1C in an atmosphere of 5% CO2 for 24 hours. Our
spiration programs.28 The Osiris program presents a predictive protocols adhered to the Ethical Principles in Animal Experi-
algorithm that evaluates the potential toxicological risks of the mentation adopted by the Brazilian College of Animal Experi-
compounds tested by analysis of the molecular structure using a mentation and were approved by the Fiocruz Research Ethics
database of 3300 drugs. This program predicts whether the com- Committee (number L-041/08).
pounds are mutagenic, tumourigenic, irritants, or have reproductive The murine macrophage line J774.G8 was used in all experi-
ments. This strain is derived from the original J774.A1 cell line
Published on 05 July 2016. Downloaded by UNIVERSITY OF ADELAIDE on 12/10/2017 07:06:05.
7652 | New J. Chem., 2016, 40, 7643--7656 This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry and the Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique 2016
View Article Online
NJC Paper
2-Amino-3-iodonaphthalene-1,4-dione. The reaction pro- 7.95 (1H, td, J = 1.5, 7.5 Hz); 7.55–7.45 (5H, m, Ph). dC (125 MHz;
duced the compound 7 (0.592 g, 91%) as a red-brick solid, CDCl3) 183.7, 181.8, 152.2, 135.3, 133.1, 132.8, 130.6, 130.0,
mp 188–190 1C (lit. 201–202 1C).21 IR (KBr) nmax/cm 1 1271 (C– 129.3, 128.6, 127.9, 127.3, 126.1, 122.2 ppm. MS (EI+) m/z (%):
N), 1579 (N–H), 1621 (CQO), 1671 (CQO), 3346 and 3447 250 (M+, 100), 221 (19) 194 (21), 165 (47).
(NH2). dH (500 MHz; DMSO-d6; J in Hz) 8.12–8.10 (2H, m), 2-(4-Fluorophenyl)-3-phenylnaphthalene-1,4-dione (10b). The
7.91 (1H, td, J = 1.5, 7.5 Hz), 7.88–7.85 (1H, m). dC (125 MHz; reaction produced the compound 10b as a yellow solid (0.086 g,
DMSO-d6) 177.3, 176.5, 152.5, 134.5, 132.5, 131.5, 129.4, 126.4, 0.321 mmol, 64%), mp 185–188 1C. IR (KBr) nmax/cm 1
126.3, 82.2 ppm. 1643 (CQO), 1665 (CQO), 3330 (OH). dH (500 MHz; DMSO-d6;
2-Bromo-3-hydroxynaphthalene-1,4-dione (8). Lawsone 5a J in Hz) 8.07 (1H, dd, J = 1.0, 7.5 Hz); 8.03 (1H, dd, J = 1.5, 7.5 Hz);
Published on 05 July 2016. Downloaded by UNIVERSITY OF ADELAIDE on 12/10/2017 07:06:05.
(1.16 g, 6.7 mmol) and acetonitrile (100 mL) were added to a 7.88 (1H, td, J = 1.5, 7.5 Hz); 7.84 (1H, td, J = 1.5, 7.5 Hz); 7.45–
250 mL flask equipped with a magnetic stirrer. Bromine (0.5 mL) 7.41 (2H, m); 7.27–7.22 (2H, m). dC (125 MHz; CDCl3) 183.3,
was added after solubilization of 5a and the resulting solution 181.3, 163.0, 159.8, 154.9, 134.6, 133.2, 132.8, 132.0, 129.9, 127.6,
was refluxed for 3 hours and then 1.2 mL of cyclohexene was 126.0, 125.5, 121.1, 114.4 ppm. MS (EI+) m/z (%): 268 (M+, 100),
added. Solvents were removed using a rotary evaporator. The 239 (18) 240 (19), 183 (57).
residue was washed with hexane, solubilized in ether and treated 2-(3-Fluorophenyl)-3-phenylnaphthalene-1,4-dione (10c). The
with charcoal. Subsequently, the solution was filtered, and the reaction produced the compound 10c as an orange solid (0.105 g,
ether was evaporated. The solid that was obtained was dried at 0.391 mmol, 78%), mp 163–165 1C. IR (KBr) nmax/cm 1 1648 (CQO),
room temperature protected from light and was then stored 1672 (CQO), 3246 (OH). dH (500 MHz; DMSO-d6; J in Hz) 8.07 (1H,
protected from light and under refrigeration. This reaction dd, J = 1.5, 7.5 Hz); 8.04 (1H, dd, J = 1.0, 7.5 Hz); 7.89 (1H, td, J = 1.5,
produced compound 8 (1.306 g, 77%) as a yellow solid, mp 7.5 Hz); 7.84 (1H, td, J = 1.5, 7.5 Hz); 7.48–7.43 (1H, m); 7.23 (1H, dd,
203–205 1C (lit. 201–203 1C).22,35 IR (KBr) nmax/cm 1 3176 (O–H), J = 1.0, 7.5 Hz); 7.20–7.17 (2H, m). dC (125 MHz; DMSO-d6) 183.4,
1672 (CQO), 1580 and 1454 (CQC), 3161 (OH). dH (500 MHz; 181.5, 162.6, 160.7, 155.3, 135.0, 133.9, 133.5, 132.1, 130.1, 129.5,
DMSO-d6; J in Hz) 8.03–8.00 (2H, m); 7.85–7.80 (2H, m). dC 127.1, 126.3, 125.8, 121.0, 117.6, 114.6 ppm. HRMS (ESI) m/z calc. for
(125 MHz; DMSO-d6) 179.2, 178.6, 158.7, 135.1, 134.0, 131.9, C16H9FO3 [M H] 267.0457, found 267.0462.
130.2, 126.9, 126.8, 111.1 ppm. 2-Hydroxy-3-(thiophen-2-yl)naphthalene-1,4-dione (10d).
The reaction produced the compound 10d as a purple solid
General procedure for preparing 3-arylnaphthoquinones under (0.046 g, 0.179 mmol, 36%), mp 146–147 1C (lit. 134–137 1C).16d
conventional heating 10a–k IR (KBr) nmax/cm 1 1652 (CQO), 3344 (OH). dH (500 MHz;
2-Hydroxy-3-iodo-1,4-naphthoquinone (0.150 g, 0.5 mmol), DMSO-d6; J in Hz) 8.27 (1H, dd, J = 1.0, 4.0 Hz); 8.18 (1H, dd, J =
K2CO3 (0.346 g, 2.5 mmol), arylboronic acid (0.75 mmol) and 1.0, 7.5 Hz); 8.13 (1H, dd, J = 1.0, 7.5 Hz); 7.98 (1H, td, J = 1.0, 7.5
Pd(OAc)2 (0.005 g, 5 mol%) were added to a 25 mL round- Hz); 7.94–7.91 (1H, m); 7.85 (1H, dd, J = 1.0, 5.5 Hz); 7.32–7.30
bottom flask equipped with a reflux condenser and a magnetic (1H, m). dC (125 MHz; DMSO-d6) 183.5, 180.5, 153.4, 134.7,
stirrer. Then, 5.0 mL of distilled water was added. The reaction 133.4, 132.0, 131.9, 130.9, 129.8, 129.7, 126.5, 126.4, 125.5,
mixture was refluxed for 6 h. The reaction mixture was acidified 115.4 ppm. MS (EI+) m/z (%): 256 (M+, 100), 228 (33), 172 (27),
with concentrated H3PO4 (pH D 2). The solid that formed was 171 (64), 76 (17).
vacuum filtered, dried at room temperature and purified by 2-Hydroxy-3-(thiophen-3-yl)naphthalene-1,4-dione (10e).
flash chromatography using silica gel and was eluted with an The reaction produced the compound 10e as a red-brick solid
increasing polarity gradient mixture of hexane and dichloro- (0.092 g, 0.359 mmol, 72%), mp 132–134 1C (lit. 125–127 1C).16
methane – 4 : 1 to 1 : 1. IR (KBr) nmax/cm 1 1649 (CQO), 3325 (OH). dH (500 MHz;
DMSO-d6; J in Hz) 8.06–8.03 (2H, m); 7.94–7.93 (1H, m); 7.87
General procedure for preparing 3-arylnaphthoquinones under (1H, td, J = 1.5, 7.5 Hz); 7.82 (1H, td, J = 1.5, 7.5 Hz); 7.56–7.53
microwave irradiation 10a–k (2H, m). dC (125 MHz; DMSO-d6) 183.5, 181.2, 154.4, 134.6,
A 10 mL Pyrex tube equipped with a magnetic stirrer was 133.2, 132.2, 130.8, 129.9, 129.8, 127.9, 126.2, 125.4, 123.7,
charged with 3-halo-1,4-naphthoquinone (0.5 mmol), K2CO3 117.0 ppm. MS (EI+) m/z (%): 256 (M+, 100), 228 (63), 172 (34),
(0.346 g, 2.5 mmol), arylboronic acid (0.75 mmol) and 171 (95), 76 (28).
Pd(OAc)2 (0.001 g, 1 mol%). The mixture was irradiated for 3-(3-Hydroxy-1,4-dioxo-1,4-dihydronaphthalen-2-yl)benzalde-
10 min at 100 1C. Then, the reaction media were acidified with hyde (10f). The reaction produced the compound 10f as a yellow
H3PO4 (pH D 2). The solid that was obtained was purified solid (0.083 g, 0.300 mmol, 60%), mp 221–223 1C. IR (KBr)
by flash column chromatography on silica gel and eluted nmax/cm 1 1667 (CQO), 1691 (CQO), 3137 (OH). dH (500 MHz;
with an increasing polarity gradient mixture of hexane and DMSO-d6; J in Hz) 10.05 (1H, s, CHO); 8.09–8.04 (2H, m);
dichloromethane. 7.93 (1H, s); 7.91–7.88 (2H, m); 7.86–7.83 (1H, m); 7.73
2-Hydroxy-3-phenylnaphthalene-1,4-dione (10a). Product 10a (1H, dt, J = 1.5; 7.5 Hz); 7.66 (1H, t, J = 7.5 Hz). dC (125 MHz;
was obtained as a yellow solid (0.089 g, 0.356 mmol, 71%), mp DMSO-d6) 193.0, 183.3, 181.3, 155.4, 136.8, 135.6, 134.7, 133.3,
145–146 1C (lit. 146 1C).36 IR (KBr) nmax/cm 1 1649 (CQO), 1659 132.5, 132.0, 131.6, 130.0, 128.8, 128.3, 126.1, 125.6, 120.8 ppm.
(CQO), 3346 (OH). dH (500 MHz; DMSO-d6; J in Hz) 8.19 (1H, dd, HRMS (ESI) m/z calc. for C17H10O4 [M H] 277.0501, found
J = 1.0, 7.5 Hz); 8.15 (1H, dd, J = 1.0, 7.5 Hz); 8.02–7.99 (1H, m), 277.0510.
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry and the Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique 2016 New J. Chem., 2016, 40, 7643--7656 | 7653
View Article Online
Paper NJC
131.4, 129.9, 128.4, 126.0, 125.6, 120.9 ppm. HRMS (ESI) m/z 8.13 (1H, d, J = 7.5 Hz); 8.10 (1H, d, J = 7.0 Hz); 7.95 (1H, td,
calc. for C17H10O4 [M H] 277.0501, found 277.0509. J = 1.0, 7.5 Hz); 7.86 (1H, td, J = 1.0, 7.5 Hz); 7.57 (2H, t,
2-Hydroxy-3-(4-methoxyphenyl)naphthalene-1,4-dione (10h). J = 7.5 Hz); 7.47 (1H, t, J = 7.5 Hz); 7.41–7.39 (2H, m). dC
The reaction produced the compound 10h as a dark red solid (125 MHz; DMSO-d6) 181.7, 180.2, 146.1, 134.7, 130.4, 128.3,
(0.106 g, 0.378 mmol, 75%), mp 180–182 1C (lit. 172–173 1C).18f 127.3, 125.7, 125.5, 114.8 ppm.
IR (KBr) nmax/cm 1 1609 (CQO), 1635 (CQO), 3366 (OH). dH
(500 MHz; DMSO-d6; J in Hz) 8.07–8.01 (2H, m), 7.90–7.79 (2H,
m), 7.37–7.32 (2H, m), 7.00–6.95 (2H, m), 3.80 (3H, s, CH3). dC Acknowledgements
(125 MHz; DMSO-d6) 184.4, 181.8, 159.2, 154.9, 135.2, 133.8,
We acknowledge CNP-q/Universal (455739/2014-5), CAPES (for
132.5, 132.4, 130.3, 126.6, 126.0, 123.7, 122.5, 113.5, 55.6 ppm.
the student scholarships and research fellowships), FAPERJ/
2-Hydroxy-3-(3-methoxyphenyl)naphthalene-1,4-dione (10i).
APQ-1 (E26/110.724/2012/2), and FAPERJ (Support for Studies of
The reaction produced the compound 10i as a yellow solid
Neglected and Reemerging Diseases – E-26/010.001535/2014),
(0.092 g, 0.328 mmol, 66%), mp 126–127 1C. IR (KBr) nmax/cm 1
and Brazilian foundations for financial support and research
1652 (CQO), 1661 (CQO), 3359 (OH). dH (500 MHz; DMSO-d6;
fellowships. We thank Dr. Ivano Philippis, responsible for the
J in Hz) 8.06 (1H, dd, J = 0.5, 7.5 Hz), 8.03 (1H, dd, J = 1.0,
Reference Microorganisms Collection (CMRVS) – Fiocruz, for the
7.5 Hz); 7.88 (1H, td, J = 1.5, 7.5 Hz); 7.83 (1H, td, J = 1.0, 7.5 Hz);
donation of the fungal strains. We also thank Dr Marcos da
7.34–7.31 (1H, m); 6.94–6.92 (3H, m); 3.76 (3H, s, CH3). dC
Veiga Kalil for allowing the use of his laboratory facilities to
(125 MHz; DMSO-d6) 183.4, 181.4, 158.4, 154.8, 134.6, 133.1,
perform some antifungal assays and Professor Elias Barreto for
132.7, 132.0, 129.9, 128.3, 126.0, 125.5, 123.0, 122.1, 116.4,
his kind suggestions with regard to writing in English.
113.0, 55.0 ppm. HRMS (ESI) m/z calc. for C17H12O4 [M H]
279.0657, found 279.0658.
4-(3-Hydroxy-14-dioxo-1,4-dioxo-1,4-dihydronaphthalen-2- Notes and references
yl)benzonitrile (10j). The reaction produced the compound
10j as a yellow solid (0.059 g, 0.214 mmol, 43%), mp 253– 1 (a) V. F. Ferreira, S. B. Ferreira and F. C. da Silva, Org.
255 1C. IR (KBr) nmax/cm 1 1653 (CQO), 1674 (CQO), 2239 Biomol. Chem., 2010, 8, 4793–4802; (b) A. V. Pinto and
(CRN), 3211 (OH). dH (500 MHz; DMSO-d6; J in Hz) 8.07 S. L. Castro, Molecules, 2009, 14, 4570–4590; (c) F. Epifano,
(1H, dd, J = 1.5, 7.5 Hz), 8.05–8.03 (1H, m), 7.91–7.83 (4H, m), S. Genovese, S. Fiorito, V. Mathieu and R. Kiss, Phytochem.
7.59 (2H, d, J = 8.0 Hz). dC (125 MHz; DMSO-d6) 182.9, 181.1, Rev., 2014, 13, 37–49; (d) A. Ortega, Á. Rincón, K. L.
155.5, 136.8, 134.8, 133.3, 131.9, 131.7, 131.2, 130.0, 126.0, Jiménez-Aliaga, P. Bermejo-Bescós, S. Martı́n-Aragón, M. T.
125.6, 120.4, 118.8, 110.0 ppm. HRMS (ESI) m/z calc. for Molina and A. G. Csákÿ, Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett., 2011, 21,
C17H9NO3 [M H] 274.0504, found 274.0520. 2183–2187.
2-Hydroxy-3-(p-tolyl)naphthalene-1,4-dione (10k). The reac- 2 (a) S. Y. Dike, D. Singh, B. N. Thankachen, B. Sharma,
tion produced the compound 10k as an orange solid (0.102 g, P. K. Mathur, S. Kor and A. Kumar, Org. Process Res. Dev.,
0.386 mmol, 77%), mp 169–171 1C (lit. 168 1C).36 IR (KBr) 2014, 18, 618–625; (b) A. Sharma, I. O. Santos, P. Gaur,
nmax/cm 1 1645 (CQO), 3361 (OH). dH (500 MHz; DMSO-d6; J in V. F. Ferreira, C. R. S. Garcia and D. R. da Rocha, Eur. J. Med.
Hz) 8.06–8.05 (1H, m), 8.03–8.02 (1H, m), 7.89–7.86 (1H, m), Chem., 2013, 59, 48–53.
7.83 (1H, td, J = 1.0, 7.5 Hz), 7.27 (2H, d, J = 8.5 Hz), 7.22 (2H, d, 3 A. Singh, R. Verma, A. Murari and A. Agrawal, Int. J. Oral
J = 8.0 Hz), 2.35 (3H, s). dC (125 MHz; DMSO-d6) 183.5, 181.3, Maxillofac. Pathol., 2014, 18, 81–85.
154.5, 136.7, 134.5, 133.0, 131.9, 130.4, 129.8, 128.2, 127.8, 4 C. B. Ford, J. M. Funt, D. Abbey, L. Issi, C. Guiducci, D. A.
125.9, 125.4, 122.0, 20.8 ppm. Martinez, T. Delorey, B. Y. Li, T. C. White, C. Cuomo,
R. P. Rao, J. Berman, D. A. Thompson and A. Regev, eLife,
Synthesis of 2-amino-3-phenylnaphthalene-1,4-dione using 2015, 4, 1–27.
conventional heating 5 C. G. Pierce and J. L. Lopez-Ribot, Expert Opin. Drug Discovery,
2-Amino-3-iodo-1,4-naphthoquinone (0.149 g, 0.5 mmol), 2013, 8, 1117–1126.
K2CO3 (0.346 g, 2.5 mmol), arylboronic acid (0.75 mmol) and 6 S. S. W. Wong, R. Y. T. Kao, K. Y. Yuen, Y. Wang, D. Yang,
Pd(OAc)2 (0.005 g, 5 mol%) were added to a 25 mL round- L. P. Samaranayake and C. J. Seneviratne, PLoS One, 2014,
bottom flask equipped with a reflux condenser and a magnetic 9, e85836, 1–17.
7654 | New J. Chem., 2016, 40, 7643--7656 This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry and the Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique 2016
View Article Online
NJC Paper
7 (a) D. A. Saúde-Guimarães and A. R. Faria, Braz. J. Pharmacog., (c) J. G. Taylor, A. V. Moro and C. R. D. Correia, Eur.
2007, 17, 455–465; (b) G. Crisante, A. Rojas, M. M. G. Teixeira J. Org. Chem., 2013, 1403–1428; (d) S. Koulouri,
and N. Añez, Acta Trop., 2006, 98, 247–254; (c) J. C. P. Dias, E. Malamidou-Xenikaki, S. Spyroudis and M. Tsanakopoulou,
Rev. Soc. Bras. Med. Trop., 2006, 39, 370–375; (d) WHO-World J. Org. Chem., 2005, 70, 8780–8784; (e) Aqueous Suzuki proto-
Health Organization 2012 Research Priorities for Chagas cols: B. Saikia, P. R. Boruah, A. A. Ali and D. Sarma, RSC Adv.,
Disease, Human African Trypanosomiasis and Leishmaniasis 2015, 5, 50655–50659; ( f ) G. Hervé, G. Sartori, G. Enderlin,
no. 975. G. Mackenzi and C. Len, RSC Adv., 2014, 4, 18558–18594;
8 WHO-World Health Organization, http://www.who.int/med (g) C. Dong, L. Zhang, X. Xue, H. Li, Z. Yu, W. Tang and
iacentre/factsheets/fs340/en/, accessed January 2016. L. Xu, RSC Adv., 2014, 4, 11152–11158; (h) T. Azadbakht, M. A.
Published on 05 July 2016. Downloaded by UNIVERSITY OF ADELAIDE on 12/10/2017 07:06:05.
9 E. I. Ramos, K. M. Garza, R. L. Krauth-Siegel, J. Bader, Zolfigol, R. Azadbakht, V. Zhakyzadeh and D. M. Terrin, New
L. E. Martinez and R. A. Maldonado, J. Parasitol., 2009, 95, J. Chem., 2015, 39, 439–444.
461–466. 18 (a) M. T. Molina, C. Navarro, A. Moreno and A. G. Czákÿ,
10 (a) N.-C. Tran, M.-T. Le, D.-N. Nguyen and T.-D. Tran, 13rd Org. Lett., 2009, 11, 4938–4941; (b) D. Wang, B. Ge, L. Li,
International Electronic Conference on Synthetic Organic J. Shan and Y. Ding, J. Org. Chem., 2014, 79, 8607–8613;
Chemistry (ECSOC-13), 1–30 November 2009, http://www. D. W. Cameron, G. I. Feutrill, A. F. Patti, P. Perlmutter and
usc.es/congresos/ecsoc/13/hall_c_BMNPC/c12.pdf; M. A. Sefton, Aust. J. Chem., 1982, 35, 1501–1508;
(b) A. Riffel, L. F. Medina, V. Stefani, R. C. Santos, B. Bizani (c) M. Lamblin, G. Naturale, J. Dessolin and F. X. Felpin, Synlett,
and A. Brandell, Braz. J. Med. Biol. Res., 2002, 35, 811–818. 2012, 1621–1624; (d) K. Kanplon, O. M. Demchuk,
11 K. Sasaki, H. Abe and F. Yoshizaki, Biol. Pharm. Bull., 2002, M. Wieczorek and K. M. Pietrusiewicz, Curr. Chem. Lett., 2014,
25, 669–670. 3, 23–36; (e) P. Patil, A. Nimonkar and K. G. Akamanchi,
12 M. Á. Castro, A. M. Gamito, V. Tangarife-Castaño, B. Zapata, J. Org. Chem., 2014, 79, 2331–2336; ( f ) K. W. Stagliano and
J. M. M. del Corral, A. C. Mesa-Arango, L. Betancur-Galvis H. Malinakova, Tetrahedron Lett., 1997, 38, 6617–6620;
and A. San Feliciano, Eur. J. Med. Chem., 2013, 67, 19–27. (g) I. R. Green, S. Sagar, F. Ameer and M. Meyer, Archive for
13 (a) E. N. da Silva Júnior, M. A. B. F. de Moura, A. V. Pinto, Organic Chemistry, 2011, 193–212; (h) M. K. Hadden, S. A. Hill.
M. C. F. R. Pinto, M. C. B. V. de Souza, A. J. Araújo, J. Davenport, R. L. Matts and B. S. J. Blagg, Bioorg. Med.
C. Pessoa, L. V. Costa-Lotufo, R. C. Montenegro, M. O. de Chem., 2009, 17, 634–640; (i) Z. She, Y. Che, Y. Huang,
Moraes, V. F. Ferreira and M. O. F. Goulart, J. Braz. Chem. Y. Cheng, F. Song and J. You, Chem. Commun., 2014, 50,
Soc., 2009, 20, 635–643; (b) D. R. da Rocha, A. M. T. 13914–13916.
de Souza, A. C. G. de Souza, H. C. Castro, C. Rodrigues, 19 G. Kazantzi, E. Malamidou-Xenikaki and S. Spyroudis,
R. F. S. Menna-Barreto, S. L. de Castro and V. F. Ferreira, Synlett, 2006, 2597–2600.
Med. Chem., 2014, 10, 564–570; (c) M. F. C. Cardoso, 20 R. V. Rice and H. Heights, US Pat., 2290710, 1942.
K. Salomão, A. C. Bombaça, D. R. da Rocha, F. C. da Silva, 21 (a) A. L. Perez, G. Lamoureux and A. Herrera, Synth.
J. A. S. Cavaleiro, S. L. de Castro and V. F. Ferreira, Bioorg. Commun., 2004, 34, 3389–3397; (b) L. C. R. M. da Frota,
Med. Chem., 2015, 23, 4763–4768; (d) S. C. Bourguignon, R. C. P. Canavez, S. L. S. Gomes, P. R. R. Costa and
D. F. B. Cavalcanti, A. Souza, H. C. Castro, C. R. Rodrigues, A. J. M. da Silva, J. Braz. Chem. Soc., 2009, 20, 1916–1920.
M. G. Albuquerque, D. O. Santos, G. G. da Silva, F. C. da 22 V. K. Tandon, D. B. Yadav, R. V. Singh, A. K. Chaturvedi and
Silva, V. F. Ferreira, R. T. de Pinho and C. R. Alves, Exp. P. K. Shukla, Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett., 2005, 15, 5324–5328.
Parasitol., 2011, 127, 160–166. 23 I. Singh, R. T. Ogata, R. E. Moore, C. W. J. Chang and
14 (a) L. Salmon-Chemin, E. Buisine, V. Yardley, S. Kohler, P. J. Scheuer, Tetrahedron, 1968, 24, 6053–6073.
M.-A. Debreu, V. Landry, C. Sergheraert, S. L. Croft, 24 A. L. Perez, G. Lamoureux and B. Y. Zhen-Wu, Tetrahedron
R. L. Krauth-Siegel and E. Davioud-Charvet, J. Med. Chem., Lett., 2007, 48, 3995–3998.
2001, 44, 548–565; (b) C. O. Salas, M. Faúndez, A. Morello, 25 (a) D. Dallinger, H. Lehmann, J. D. Moseley, A. Stadler and
J. D. Maya and R. A. Tapia, Curr. Med. Chem., 2011, 18, C. O. Kappe, Org. Process Res. Dev., 2011, 15, 841–854;
144–161. (b) P. Lidström, J. Tierney, B. Wathey and J. Westman,
15 R. L. Kessler, M. J. Soares, C. M. Probst and M. A. Kriger, Tetrahedron, 2001, 57, 9225–9283; (c) M. Lei, L. Gao and
PLoS One, 2013, 8, e55497, 1–17. J.-S. Yang, Org. Lett., 2009, 50, 5135–5138; (d) M. Kalek,
16 (a) X. Lu, A. Altharawi, J. Gut, P. J. Rosenthal and T. E. Long, A. Ziadi and J. Stawinski, Org. Lett., 2008, 10, 4637–4640;
ACS Med. Chem. Lett., 2012, 3, 1029–1033; (b) Y. Zhao, (e) D. L. Martins, H. M. Alvarez, L. C. S. Aguiar and O. A. C.
Y. Zhang, J. Wang, H. Li, L. Wu and Z. Liu, Synlett, 2010, Antunes, Appl. Catal., A, 2010, 408, 47–53; ( f ) D. L. Martins,
2352–2356; (c) A. Deb. S. Manna, A. Maji, U. Dutta and H. M. Alvarez, L. C. S. Aguiar and O. A. C. Antunes, Lett. Org.
D. Maiti, Eur. J. Org. Chem., 2013, 5251–5256; (d) E. Glinis, Chem., 2007, 4, 253–255.
E. Malamidou-Xenikaki, H. Skouros, S. Spyroudis and 26 (a) S. M. D. Cunha, R. G. Oliveira and M. L. A. A.
M. Tsanakopoulou, Tetrahedron, 2010, 66, 5786–5792. Vasconcellos, J. Braz. Chem. Soc., 2013, 24, 432–438;
17 (a) P. Nilson, K. Olofsson and M. Larhed, Top. Curr. Chem., (b) Y. K. C. da Silva, C. T. M. Reyes, G. Rivera, M. A. Alves,
2006, 266, 103–144; (b) D. L. Martins, H. M. Alvarez and E. J. Barreiro, M. S. A. Moreira and L. M. Lima, Molecules,
L. C. S. Aguiar, Tetrahedron Lett., 2010, 51, 6814–6817; 2014, 19, 8456–8471; (c) H.-L. Cheah, V. Lim and D. Sandai,
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry and the Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique 2016 New J. Chem., 2016, 40, 7643--7656 | 7655
View Article Online
Paper NJC
PLoS One, 2014, 9, e95951; (d) M. A. de Brito, Braz. J. Pharm. M. O. F. Goulart, J. Braz. Chem. Soc., 2002, 13, 822–829;
Sci., 2011, 47, 797–806. (c) C. Frontana and I. González, J. Braz. Chem. Soc., 2005, 16,
27 Osiris Property Explorer, http://www.openmolecules.org/ 299–307; (d) D. Frontana and I. González, J. Electroanal.
propertyexplorer/applet.html, accessed August 2014. Chem., 2007, 603, 155–165.
28 Molinspitration Cheminformatics, http://www.molinspira 33 M. Faundez, P. Pino, P. Letelier, C. Ortiz, R. López,
tion.com, accessed January 2016. C. Seguel, J. Ferreira, M. Pavani and A. Morello. J. D. Maya,
29 C. A. Lipinski, F. Lombardo, B. W. Dominy and P. J. Feeney, Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., 2005, 49, 126–130.
Adv. Drug Delivery Rev., 2001, 46, 3–26. 34 S. Anoopkumar-Dukie, J. B. Carey, T. Conere, E. O’Sullivan,
30 J. C. Coa, W. Castrillón, W. Cardona, V. Ospina, J. A. Muñoz, F. N. van Pelt and A. Allshire, Br. J. Radiol., 2005, 78,
Published on 05 July 2016. Downloaded by UNIVERSITY OF ADELAIDE on 12/10/2017 07:06:05.
7656 | New J. Chem., 2016, 40, 7643--7656 This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry and the Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique 2016