CORPORATION
CORPORATION
CORPORATION
Corporation = a body formed and authorized by law to act as a single person although constituted
Has its own rights and liabilities.
Company Law or Corporation Law?
UK Law - The word “corporation” has a wider concept than “company”, including “corporation sole” and “Corporation
aggregate”
“Corporare”: to furnish (something) with a body or to infuse with substance
Corporation: artificial construct infused by the law with the ability to have legal rights and incur legal liabilities.
Historical development of corporation law:
See hang-outs
Company Law or Corporation Law: are the same thing
- In UK, company or corporation are understood the same
- The word “corporation” has a wider concept than “company”, including “corporation sole” and “corporation aggregate”
- Corporation sole are limited by law to one member. It provided for a separate legal personality for an individual position (the
corporation sole is distinct in Law from the individual who occupies the post)
Eg: bishop, mayors
- People would often leave property (as an offering to Saints) to Church
- Church officials (Father A – “Bishop” – Corporation sole)
Bishop can decide anything the property because the have power
Corporation Aggregate: May have one or more member
- Types of corporation aggregate: Statutory corporations, chartered corporartions, registered companies, building societies, credit
unions, and limited liability partnership
A company is one type of corporation aggregate (incorporated entities only), brought into being by the registration procedures
laid down by CA2006 not including a partnership or any other unincorporated entities.
US Law: “Corporation” corresponds to “company” Incorporated entities which are created under and regulated by Corporation
Act (Code)
Partnerships
Limited Unlimited
companies companies
Limited companies:
Only companies limited by shares may be a public company. (Public companies are able to offer their shares by advertisement
to the public for investment [s.755]
Companies limited by shares:
if member’s/shareholder’s liability is limited to the amount, if any, unpaid on the shares held by them, the company is “limited
by shares ” [s.3.2]
ex: John is a shareholder of the company limited by share. He agree to buy one share 10 pounds, however he only paid 5 pounds
(that is have a debt with that company is 5 pounds). There is a debt from the company so that mr.John have paid 5 pounds.
Nếu John mua cổ phần của công ty có giá trị 10 pound nhưng chỉ trả 5 pound thì khi công ty có nợ thì john chỉ trả cho công ty 5
pound nợ còn lại của John.
Public companies (plc)
Private companies (ltd)
+ Companies limited by guarantee
+ Companies limited by shares may be public companies (công ty đại chúng ở Việt Nam) or private companies (same as công
ty không đại chúng ở Việt Nam)
+ The name of a public limited company must end with ‘plc’ or public limited company’ and the name of a private
+ Shareholders’ rights, responsibilities, and liabilities are determined by the number, class, and value of their shares.
+ Internal structure and management rules are set out in the CA 2006, articles of association and shareholders’s agreement.
Companies limited by guarantees:
If membes’/shareholders’ liability is limited so much amount as the members undertake to contribute to the assets of the company
in the event of its being wound up, the company is “limited by guarantees” [s3.3, CA 2006]
(i) Companies limited by guarantee must be formed without any share capital (s5), thus, there are no shareholders, but the company
must have one or more members
This corporation type is widely used mainly for non-profit organization as charities, community projects, clubs, societies and
other similar bodies (các công ty này không có vốn góp nhưng vẫn có vốn từ nhà nước)
(ii) Members are only liable to make a contribution to the assets of the company in the event of its being wound-up, and the amount
of contribution is fixed at the outset by the company’s constitution
(iii) Profit is not distributed among the members but put back into the company or used further the company’s public purposes.
Vì sao thành viên của công ty chỉ có nghĩa vụ góp vốn khi công ty mất khả năng thanh toán?
Why do the members only pay the assets when the company wound up?
Theo tư cách pháp lý thì công ty là pháp nhân nên có nợ xảy ra thì công ty phải tự chịu trách nhiệm của chính công ty
Unlimited companies:
If there is no limit on the liability of its members the company is an “unlimited company” [s.3.4]
+ Incorporated at an govermental agency
+ Separate legal personality
+ It a winding up or formal liquidation, all the shareholders bear joint, several and unlimited liabiality for the company’s debts and
financial obligation.
- Unlimited company is the combiantion of Partnership and limited company. It don’t private information as partnership and
their structure is also the same the limited company.
- When the company is wound up, shareholders’ will liable to make a contribution to all assets of their company.
Cổ đông có trách nhiệm vô hạn.
Mô hình công ty đơn giản, members không có trách nhiệm phải công bố thông tin nhưng họ phải chịu trách nhiệm vô hạn. (mô
hình sáng tạo của nhà làm luật để giúp các doanh nhân)
In VN, we don’t have unlimited company
Limited liability partnerships (LLP):
- LLPS are incorporated organizations governed by the Limited Liability Partnerships Act 2000 (and extensive regulations made
pursuant to both that Act and the Companies Act 2006).
- They are legal persons
- Are partners have limited liability (similar to công ty trách nhiệm hữu hạn ở Việt Nam)
2.3 Chartered and Statutory Corporation:
- These corporations are formed by obtaining a charter of incorporation from the Crown or securing a private Act of Parliament
- This type of formation is unlikely to happen today
- Many of these corporations are not-for-profit organization (hoạt động không vì lợi nhuận)
Hiện tại đã không xảy ra nữa
III. The nature of companies (The company limited by shares)
s.15 of the CA 2006: companies become incorporated and separate persons on registration
Separate legal personality of a company and limited liability of its members are two key consequences of the incorporation.
Two key:
+ The separate legal personality
+ Limited liability
1. 1. The principle of corporate entity (Separate legal personality)
- Separate legal personality: a company is a legal person in its own right, separate and distinct from its members.
- Has the legal capacities and powers of a naturalperson:
Sue or be sured in its own name
Enter into and enforce contracts
Hold title to and transfer and property
Hold civil or crimial liabily for violations of law.
- The company will not die when its members die (perpetual lifetime);
- The share capital once subcribed must be maintained by the company, it no longer belongs to the members and cannot be
returned except some exceptional cases;
- In general liability of members/shareholders is limited to the total value of the shares that they agreed to buy
HOMEWORK: SALOMON V A SALOMON & CO LTD [1897] AC 22 (HOUSE OF LORDS) (THE LEADING CASE WHICH
GAVE EFFECT TO THE SEPARATE ENTITY PRINCIPLE)
WHAT HAPPENED
LÝ DO GÌ TÒA ÁN TRAO TRÁCH NHIỆM CHO CÔNG TY Biến một công ty thành một pháp nhân
2. 3. Limited liability
- The doctrine of limited liability was introduced 1855 (Limited Liability Act 1955) in UK
- A company, as a separate juridical person must satisfy claims and judgement against it, to the extent of its assects.
Limited liability of shareholders
Disadvantages of limited liability
∆ Có thể bị lạm dụng bởi các mục đích sai trái
∆ Không thể thu hồi hết số nợ
Advantages of limited liability
∆ Limited liability encourages capital formation
∆ Limited liability shields shareholders from the debts and obligations of the company.
Criticisms on limited liability
∆ With the shield of limited liability, the shareholders and managers may have incentives to engage in high-risk business
activities.
∆ The legal personality of a company in some cases is abused by the shareholders for wrongful or unjustifiable purposes.
3. 3.3 Lifting the company veil (Piercing the corporate veil, veil-piercing)
Veil refer to the legal personality of the company
o Lifting the corporate veil refers to the possibility of looking behind the company’s separate personalitty to make the
shareholders liable for their company’s debts (an exception to the rule that they are normally shielded by the corporate shell).
o In this way, the company and its shareholders are treated as one, and all the rights, activities and obligations of the companies
are also the rights, activities and obligations of the shareholders.
Grounds for lifting the corporate veil
The company is deemed to be nothing more than an “alter ego” of the owners: a shareholder (or shareholders) dominates a
company and misuses it for improper purposes
(i) The company was formed or used to facilitate the evasion of legal obligation (sometimes tort obligation)
Jones v Lipman [1962] 1WLR 832
(ii) The company is used as a means to perpetuate a fraud.
(iii) Separateness has not been maintained between the company and its shareholders
was never
incoprorated
NOTES:
1. When the company is registered, it is not bound by the pre-incorporation contract
Ex: Phonogram Ltd v Lane [1982]
2. The person who is made liable under s.51 can void personal liability by a clear agreement on exclusion of personal liability with
the other party to the contract.
3. A company may not become a party to a pre-incorporation contract by ratification
4. A company may become a party to a pre-incorporation contract by novation
Novation is a tripartite transaction in which the parties to the original agreement, together with the company, enter into a new
agreement.
III. The articles of association (back bond)
Constitutional documents of a company
o Articles of association
o Special resolutions – Nghi quyet
o Resolutions/ agreements of all memebers/ shareholders
o Current statement of capital
o Certificate of incorporation
Notes:
- All constitutional documents must be registered with the regiatrar of companies and are available for public scrutiny (s30) and
must be sent to a member on request (s32).
- Shareholders’ agreements fall within s29 must be registered.
- The most important constitutional document of a company is it’s articles of a association.
Articles of association (AOA)
Definition
The regulations governing a company’s internal management including the rights of shareholders, the conduct of meetings and the
appointment, removal and powers of directors.
Model articles
There are different sets of model articles for different types of companies, these operate as the articles of a company to the extent that
they have not been excluded or modified. (s19, s20)
Content of the AOA
The content of the articles is a mater to be agreed upon by the orginal shareholders of the company and maybe changed from time to
time as the company develops.
Articles which are inconsistent with the law are void and unenforceable
Ex: Articles purporting to override certain statutory rights or powers may be held to be void and unenforceable.q
Characteristics that distinguish the AOA as a statutory contract from other typical contracts
o A mendament of a contract usually required the argreement of all parties >< The articles can be amended by a special resolution
which means a resolution passed by a majority of not less than 75% (s21(1), s 283(1))
o A contract only binds those parties who argee to it >< All members at any time are bound by the articles, so that a new member
who has played no part in the drafting of the articles, upon being registered as a member, is bound by the articles.
o The Articles cannot be challenged based on the doctrines of misrepresentation mistake or undue influence.
o The court may not rectify (sua doi) the articles even if they do not represent the intentions of the members on incorporation.
Amending the articles of association
o Special resolutions (Nghi quyet) must be passed by sharerholders representing not less than 75% of the total voting rights of
shareholders who vote on the resolution.
o Ordinary resolutions must be passed by not less than a simple majority 50% + 1 vote.
o A company may amend its articles by special resolution (s21)
the relevent special resolution and a copy of the new articles must be sent to the registrar of companies (s26 and s30).
Vdu: ordinary resolutions - 100% deu thong qua cai nghi quyet thi amending the articles of association co valid hay ko? Attention the
names of resolutions – more than enough; 70, 80% is not enough
Exceptions: matters that does not require a special resolution to be amended:
(i) s 551.8
(ii) s 685.1,2
Ex: A 100 shares
B 100
C 300
Ordinarychary (1 share=1vote)
Only C approve resolutions will be pass?? NO,
Shareholders’ argeements (thoa thuan co dong)
Shareholders’ argeements are usually entered into when the company is first registered but may be entered into at any time. They may
not or may be a part of the official constitution of the company, but either ways can fundamentally affect the way a company is
managed and controlled.
Ex: 10 shareholders act together - 1 of them say yes all of the others say yes 1 of them say no no
Ex: if 1 shareholders want to transfer
Parties to shareholders’ argeement
o Are contracts entered into by two or more shareholders, binding only those shareholders and can only be amended with the
argeement of all parties.
o A company can be made a party to a shareholders’ argeement.
Confidential (bi mat) chi nhung shareholder’s moi biet, ko dc public nhu AOA
Enforcing shareholders’ argeements
If a shareholder who is a party to a shareholders’ argeement breaches (vipham) the argeement, any other shareholder who is a party to
the argeement who has suffered loss caused by the breaches may sue for damages (tien boi thuong thiet hai) for breach of contract.
(based on contract law).
[The company receives in funding and the shareholders receives owns shares in the company. When shareholders buy shares
from company, they will have to pay for the shares, they have to pay the issue price of the shares. The money that the
shareholders pay for the company will become the capital of the company and in return shareholders all owners of the shares.
They have a membership of the company.]
[Compares debt financing and equity financing [does not create any payment obligation to the company] simply the owners of
the company provide capital to the company and the company doesn’t have any obligation to return to the company. Only
when the business of the company is succesful, and have profit, then that profit will distributed to the shareholders or the
company is resolved after using all of the assets for the payment, all of the assets will distributed to shareholders.]
Even though a company may have payment obligation, but shareholders of that company always more benefit from the
company, because a creators lends money to the company, the maximum amount that creators can receives back is the value
of the debt
You are the creator of the company, you lend 10 milions dong to a company, you will receive interest based on 10 milions.
However, the maximum you will receive for a company is 10 milions + some interest.
When you are a share of the company, after years, you receive profit distribution from the company. Ex: In this year, your
company has a total amount of a profit for 10 bilions dong, that 10 bilions dong will be distributed to you base on your
shareholding.]
[The shareholders will receive much more from the company, however there is a risk, if the business of the company is going
down hell, you will lost anything. From the creators, there is something wrong to the company, the company will have to sell
all of the assets to return for the creators. If there is nothing left in the assets of the company then creators receive nothing]
Membership
- The relationship between a company and its shareholders is governed by a ‘standard form contract’ – the articles of association
The AOA is a standard form of contract, the word ‘membership’ reflaxed relationship between a company and its shareholders.
The moment you decide to become a shareholder in the company, that moment you are deem to have accepted all of the contents
of the articles of association, eventhough you did not take part in the drafted of the articles, but the moment you buy shares you
have deem accepted to hold contents of the articles
- Shareholders are part-owners of the company, have the role as part of the decision-making of the company, manifest in voting
rights attched to their shares.
Not all shareholders in the company are allow to vote at minute at a company, because it depends on types of shares that they
own, some shares do not allow the holder to voting rights
- The law usually requires that a shareholder us given a share certificate in respect of his shares (S769, 776 CA 2006)
Ex: in VN, co phan so huu co tuc always vote right
- When some shareholders will they receive a share certificate? In VN, you always receive a share certificate in join stock
company; in UK, always receive a share certificate, in what situation?
- How u can buy share in joint stock company in VN? And where? market share – destionation where should you go – san giao
dich chung khoan – buy by phone or and apps
When you buy online, you don’t receive a share certificate.
- Who run that apps? Securities company - Stock exchanges
- Without that apps, how can you approve owner in company
- In every joint stock company always have a register list of shareholders
Ex: mua nhung ko dc update ten trong a list of shareholder, co quyen nao hay ko hay quyen duoc vote hay ko? Dc ghi ten vao so
dang ki thanh vien
- Dc ghi ten vao trong so dang ki thanh vien, thi trc khi co ten, shareholder co quyen nao hay ko? Co dc quyen chuyen hay ko? –
you are the owner your share, still have a right owner, and your property after you buy, so you can transfer any one else, but
you don’t receive profit of company because you don’t have a right of shareholders, your name has not in a list of
shareholders, you are not allow attend the meeting.
- When u buy a share u pay a share u receive the share and the capital u can sell or give your share for someone else
Repurchase of shares
S694-701
Difference between a repurchase and a redemption
In a repurchase, the buyer and the seller need to agree to terms and conditions of repurchase at the time of the repurchase
In a redemption, the shares will have been issued as redeemable shares, so that the terms and conditions of the re-acquisition
will be known from the outset.
Notes
- Share cannot be repurchased unless fully paid (s691)
- The repurchased shares must be cancelled, and the company reduce its issued share capital by the nominal value of the
cancelled
Repurchased Redemption
Market value Nominal value
If the shareholders make a request, the terms are not set out at the The terms are already set out the articles
articles, only the set up once when the shareholders’ request
Distribution
(i) The first and primary rule (s830), applicable to all companies, is that a company may not make distribution to any of its
members except out of profits which are availble for the purpose
(ii) Additional limit on distribution by public companies:
Net asset test (giá trị tài sản rồng – chưa trừ đi các nghĩa vụ trả nợ): công ty không được chia lợi nhuận nếu như net asset test
không vượt qua called-up share capital + undistributed preserve
S831 states that a public company may only make a distribution up to the amount by which its net assets exceed the aggregate of
its called up share capital and undistributable reserves (s731).
CHAPTER 4 CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
(QUẢN TRỊ CÔNG TY)
I. Shareholders’ meeting
1.1 Definition
OECD principales of Corporate Governance 2004:
“Corporate governace involves a set of relationships between company’s management, its board, its shareholders and other
stakeholders. Corporate governance also provides the structure through which the objectives of the company are set and the mean
of attaining those objectives and monitoring performance are determined”
Report of the Cadbury committee on the financial aspects of corporate governance 1992:
“Corporate governance is a system [of rules] by which companies are directed and controlled”
The UK corporate governance framework
The UK corporate governace framework is framework of legislation, codes and voluntary practices.
The UK corporate governance code sets out good governance principles and practice. applied to listed companies on a
“comply or explain” basis [is not legal documents]
The listed companies they have a choice with comlying or not complying with the code, but if they choose not comply they have to
give explanation.
1.2 Different systems of CG
Three power
o Sovereign power : is held by the shareholders
o Executive power: difines the strategy and implements the operational decisions that guide the company. This is exercised by
the management body of a company (directors and board of directors)
o Supervisory power: ensures that the exercise of executive power is compatible with the corporate’s benefits, and the
company’s permanence (supervisory board)
Shareholders in the company they owner/ belong to all of 3 power. Excutive power and supervisory power
The one-tier system
Shareholders just established only 1 board
- The single body excercises both the executive and the supervisory powers at the same time – “board of directors’ or
sometimes “management board” in the various national laws.
- Executive members are responsible for day-to-day management of the company while the non-executive members have the
power to supervise management by the board members.
Two types of directors: the executive directors exercise executive power and the non-executive members are independent
directors, they exercise supervisory directors.
In VN, we have choice the one-tier system and the other system. How can we know independent directors or the non-executive
directors? What are the standards the non-executive directors in VN? Article 155
Do you think those standards in article 155 can ensure independents of non-executive directors [are good enough]? Is not good
enough. Relationship [supervisory powers relate with executive powers]
Ex: MrA is the non-executive directors, mrA is a bestfriend mrB (executive directors), who is executive directors? Do you think
mrA is truly independent?How can mrA exercises the supervisory directors?
In the UK, it is a open list, but in VN provide a fix list.
The two-tier system
Separates the executive power from supervisory power by stipulating that they be exercised by two different bodies: a
management body and a supervisory body.
Shareholders established 2 boards (executive power and supervisory power)
In VN, you can choose the one-tier system and the two-tier system (traditional system).
Which system do you think better? It’s the one-tier system, the non-executive of directors who is responsble for the superviosory
power, they are inside the BOD, they are members of directors, they can attend a meeting of the BOD, they can vote so they know
what is going on inside the BOD. The supervisory power can be exercise better by the non-executive directors. Because the non-
executive directors is a person having supervisory power.
There are 2 difference boards, the supervisory system separates board of directors, what is going on board of directors what
business we taking about? Does the supervisory board really know what is going on inside the board of directors? The superviser
can not attend a meeting of the BOD.
Risk: the one-tier system - if the non-executive directors are not really independent from the executive directors and other
manager of the company. This system is becomes very risky for coverage government of the company. The one-tier system is best
only when the non-executive directors are truly independent.
The mixed system
Offers companies a choice between the one-tier system and the two-tier system
In VN have the mixed system because we can choose one-tier or two-tier
The UK CG system (the one-tier system)
The key organs of governance of a company are the board of directors and the shareholders:
- As a governing organ of the company, the shareholders are often referred to as the ‘shareholders in general meeting’.
- The board of directors is principal organ of management.
In UK, shareholders just sets up the board of directors, principal governance organ the management.
II. Shareholders’ meeting
II.1Power of Shareholders
- The role of shareholders in the governance of any company is established by:
∆ The AOA
∆ Statue law
∆ Cases recognizing the power of the shareholders in certain circumstances.
- Statutory powers of shareholders : hand-outs
- Default powers of shareholders : management power will revert to the shareholders in circumstances where the board is
unable to act
Nếu như the BOD thất bại trong việc điều hành công ty thì sẽ trao trả lại cho shareholders. Only the BOD can exercise the
executive of directors, but the shareholder is the true owner of the board, and they give the power to the board.
[Barron V Potter [1914] Ch 895]
- How shareholders exercise their powers: by taking decision (in the form of resolutions)
II.2Meetings
Shareholder meetings, also called company meetings, are an important part of shareholder decision-making
Quorum
The minimum number of people necessary at a meeting (s.318)
- In the case of a company has only one number, one qualifying person present at a meeting is a quorum
- Apart from the above circumstance, and unless the articles require a higher number, two shareholders present at a meeting
are a quorum.
In VN, chỉ cần sở hữu 50% tổng số cổ phần có thể tiến hành cuộc họp (ex: 1 người sở hữu 50% cuộc họp được tiến hành), but
in UK, thì dù có sở hữu 50% tổng số cổ phần nhưng nhưng không đủ 2 shareholders thì cuộc họp cũng không được tiến hành vì
đã là cuộc họp thì phải có ít nhất 2 người. If you are a major shareholders, but you forget come to the meeting, you give up your
right attend the meeting.
Types of meetings
Annual general meetings
- Every public company must hold an annual general meeting (AGM) within six months of the end of its financial year and if
the company fails to do so, a criminal offense is committed by every director and the company secretary (s336)
In the private company base on the AOA
General meetings (mid-term)
- Call of directors (s302)
- Request of holders of at least 5% of the voting rights (s303; 304) the directors have to call a general meeting within 21 days
of such request or hold the meeting within 28 days of the request.
- If the directors fail to call, the shareholders who made request may call a meeting and hold it within 3 months of the request
(s305).
Ex: MrA (holder) decided to call a meeting: whether or not mrA sent a request to the BOD and has waited 21 days?
2 steps:
Sent a request to the BOD
Waiting 21 days
Notice of general meetings
All shareholders and directors are entitled to receive notice of every general meeting unless the articles provide otherwise (s310).
A notice must state the general nature of the business to be dealt with as well as the time, date and place of the meeting (s311).
Ex: if the person (the minority shareholders) own 0,5% the company must sent the notice of general meetings
II.3Resolutions
Public companies: resolutions of the shareholders of the public company must be passed at shareholders’ meetings , held and
conducted in accordance with the Act.
Private companies: shareholders pass resolutions either at shareholders’ meetings or by written resolutions [s288(1)].
Proportion of votes needed to pass resolutions
The two basic types of resolutions passed by shareholders are ordinary resolutions and special resolutions.
Ordinary resolutions must be passed by not less than a simple majority 50% + 1 vote (s282)
Special resolutions must be passed by not less than 75% (s283)
How do we able to know which matter is ordinary resolutions or special resolutions, you must to read the AOA.
Unanimous informal decisions can be effective
A resolution that is UNANIMOUSLY passed by shareholders still has effectiveness without the need for compliance with formal
procedures (the “duomatic principle”)
“Một nghị quyết được thông qua bằng tỉ lệ tuyệt đối mặc dù quy trình thông qua không tuân thủ theo quy định của pháp luật”
Chỉ có trái quy trình thông qua mới được áp dụng, còn trường hợp illegal content of resolution, quy trình đúng thì không được
áp dụng.
Re Express Engineering Works Ltd [1920] 1 Ch 466 (CA)
Euro Brokers Holdings Ltd v Monecor (London) Ltd [2003] BCLC 506 (CA)]
Voting methods
Vote on a show of hands
Used at shareholders meetings
Poll vote (tỉ lệ)
Written resolution vote used for written resolutions and available to private companies only
Vote on a show of hands is based on shareholders in attendance at a meeting raising their hands to indicate support for, or
opposition to, a resolution put to the meeting.
Ex: 6 shareholders
A & B 400 ordinary shares/ per
C & D 100 ordinary shares/ per
E 200 ordinary shares
F 300 preference shares (carry no votes)
At the meeting: E is absent
Special resolution:
A, B approve
C, D disapprove
2 of 4 say yes 50% not be pass (75%) your shareholdings is not a matter
And ordinary resolutions not be pass (50% + 1 vote)
Poll vote
A poll vote is not based on the number of shareholders who vote but on the voting rights of the shareholders who vote
Total number of votes: A+B+C+D= 1000votes
A, B: 80% pass (75%)
Written resolution vote
Written resolution vote is based on the voting rights of all shareholders eligible to vote.
(!) Written resolution can only be used by private companies and even private companies cannot use the written resolution
proceudre to remove a director or to remove an auditor before expiry of his term of office (s188, 288 (2))
Chỉ được sử dụng bởi private companies, và không được sử dụng phương pháp này để miễn nhiệm giám đốc và kiểm toán viên
trước thời hạn kết thúc nhiệm kì
Special resolution:
A, B, C approve
No meetings, A+B+C = 900votes/1200= 75% pass
Which methods is the best?
Proxies and corporate representatives
Proxy: a person appointed by a shareholder to vote at a general meeting. The proxy can speak at the meeting and vote on the
show of hands and on the poll. The proxy need not be a shareholder of the company (s324)
Corporate representatives: is an individual who represent a company X at any meeting of a company of which company X is a
shareholder
The representative has the full rights of the corporate shareholder he or she represents (s323)
Ex: Company X (is not a real person) is a shareholder of company Y, a company is a shareholder of other company, then
appointed representative is a must. When you are an invidual shareholder, having or not having proxy depends on your choice.
III. Board of directors
III.1 Board powers and decision-making
A. Powers of the board
The board of directors is a body distinct from the individual directors. The board collectively is an organ of government of
the company, entrusted by the articles with the resonsibility to manage the company and to exercise all the powers of the
company.
Ex: The BOD (A, B, C, D) – Can each of mrA, B, C, D perform the right and duties form the board? mrA is a member of the
BOD, so can mrA perform all of the rights and duties on behalf of his BOD?
Issued new reference shares, mrA is member of the BOD, mrA exercised all of the rights and duties on behalf of his board? Of
course not because the authority to issue new shares is a power of directors not of mrA
B. Board decision-making
Statule law does not regulate board decision-making. Establishing the rules for how the board of directors is to take decision is an
important part of the articles of both private and public companies
In VN, condition meeting conducted phải theo luật DN, Đ157 ¾ of the board, second time ½ of the board
Condition resolution conducted – K12157
UK Law is better than VN Law
III.2 Defination and classification of directors
- The details of directors are recorded by the company in the register of directors (s162 CA 2006) and their appointment is
notified to the registrar of companies (s167)
- S250(1) of the CA 2006: “Director includes any person occupying the position of director by whatever name called”
A person who is not legally appointed as director but if effect that person is exercising a power as director, so that person is a
director.
Ex: mrA (major shareholder) is not a director, not appointed director, he just a major shareholder of the company, because
major shareholder effect he can exercises some power of director mrA is a director but he is not legally appointed director
Một người không cần giữ vị trí chính thống là giám đốc có thể là legally as directors
De Jure Directors: director appointed in accordance with the articles of association who has agreed to become a director and
the appointment of whom is registered and filled in accordance with the requirements of the CA.
De Facto Directors : person who has not been legally appointed to be director or whose appointment has terminated, but
opened occupy and assume the position of director, despite a lack of authority and right to act.
Smithton Ltd v Naggar [2014] EWCA Civ 939
Ex: mrA is just a major shareholder, not legally appointed director, so he exercises power of director mrA is recognizes a De
Facto Directors
Shadow directors: (s251) means a person in accordance with whose directions or instructions the directors of the company
are accustomed to act (except where that person gives advice in a professional capacity like a solicitor or accountant (s251(2))
Ex1: mrA is a shareholder, he owns 90% of the shares of the company, the BOD must listen to mrA, mrA doesn’t have openly
occupy the position of directors, mrA can just stay in the shadow and gives directors to the BOD to act.
Ex2: mrB is a business strategy adviser of the BOD. He gives advice for the BOD, the BOD needs to listen the adiviser, mrA is
not a shadow director, because mrB just to give advice. Tới chừng nào thì mrB (a solicitor) will become shadow directors?
Whenever the advice of mrB becomes the directions or instructions to the BOD, then mrA becomes shadow directors.
What is the purpose of recognizing giám đốc thực tế và giám đốc ẩn? impose application and liability on them
The non-executive directors don’t always independent the director, only when the non-executive directors can satisfy the status/
the list of standard to become independent directors, then we will be consider independent. The non-executive directors do not
manage the company, it just supervisory the company.
Trade and Industry v Deverell [2000] 2 WLR 907
Both de facto and shadow directors owe the general duties of directors set out in Part 10 of the CA 2006
3.3 Appointing and removing directors
Executive and non-excutive directors
Indepentdent directors
Composition of a board
A private company must have at lease one director and a public company must have a minimum of two directors (s154 CA 2006)
but no statutory maximum number of directors is set for either private or public companies.
- A person will be not permitted to act as a director if he falls into one of these categories:
A person who hast not attanied the age of 16 (s257 CA);
A bankrupt person (company directors Disquilification Act (CDDA) 1986, s11);
Persons subject to a disqualified order or an undertaking in lieu thereof, under the CDDA 1986;
In VN, limitation about maximum number (at least 3 and maximum 11)
In VN, K2Đ17 LDN2020 (18t) – luật phá sản không áp dụng cho cá nhân
In UK, luật phá sản áp dụng cho cá nhân, apply cho TA, TA cut down the debt và have new scheduled cho món nợ
Appointing directors
- The CA 2006 is silent on how directors are to be appointed rules regarding appoitment of directors are normally set out in
the articles.
Shareholders have a right appointed the directors
- In general directors are appointed or removed by a resolution passed by a mojority of shareholders present and voting at a
shareholders’ meeting
Removal of directors
S168(1) CA 2006: “A company may, by ordinary resolution at a meeting, remove a director before the expiration of his office,
not with standing any thing in any agreement between it and him”
the written resolution procedure cannot be used in remove a director
IV. Directors’ duties
Directors duties can be classified into:
Management duties (s171-174)
Conflict-of-interest duties (s175- 177)
IV.1 General Management Duties
Duty to act within powers (s171)
“A director of a company must –
- Act in accordance with the company’s constitution, and
- Only exercise powers for the purposes for which they are conferred.”
Ex1: Company A’s articles: loans in excess of 200k to be approved in advance by shareholders
Without shareholder approval, the directors unanimously resolved to enter into a loan with a third-party for 500k
Has the BOD violated the duty to act?
Ex2: Company A Ltd’s artilces: the board has the power to issue new share
Company A is at the edge of being taken over by Company B who controls 50% of Company A’s shares
The directors of Company A have decide to issue new shares, which makes Company B unable to complete its acquisition
Reaching duties to act the powers, HĐQT có sử dụng đúng mục đích quyền hạn của mình để phát hành cổ phiếu mới hay không?
Is the BOD using the power issue new shares for the correct purpose on which of this power giving to them - To raise the share
capital, to expense the size of the company more capital – main purpose to giving this power. The board of directors using this
power to prevent the company B from taking over company A, it is wrongful purpose?
To determine whether or not there has been a breach of this duty:
∆ Ascertain the nature of the power
∆ Define the limits within which it maybe excercised;
∆ Examnine the substantial purporse for which it was excercised;
∆ Reach a conclusion whether the exercise was proper or not
[Howard Smith v Ampol Petroleum Ltd [1974] AC 821 (PC)]-
Duty to promote the success of the company (s172)
A director must act in the way he considers in good faith would be most likely to promote the success of the company for the
benefit of the shareholders
A director must exercise power in the way that he thinks it is the best to promote the best. Whether or not the directors has acted
to the good faith (mind of person)?
Ex: The BOD decided to left the company to signs the contract and later the contract is fail Has the BOD breach the duties to
the promote? Time to the BOD makes the decided – they truly belive that the contract is success - financial document, statistic,
some evaluation – these evidences to see whether or not the directors is exactly
Courts consider the beliefs of the director
Courts have introduced an objective dimension test into consideration of whether or not the duty has been breached.
o Evidence that the director did not stop to consider the interests of the company
o If no intelligent and honest person in the position of the director could in the circumstances have reasonably believed he was
acting in the interests of the company, the courts will find that the duty has been breached.
Duty to exercise independent judment (s173)
“(1) a director of the company must exercise independent judgment.
(2) This is duty not infringed by his acting---
+ In accordance with an agreement entered into by the company that restricts the future exercise of discretion by its directors,
or
+ In a way authorised by the company’s constitution.”
(!) Directors seeking consultation from solicitors, advisers
When the BOD listen or take adviser – các giám đốc phải có sự đánh giá riêng của mình về lời khuyên của adviser – it is
independent judment
Duty to exercise reasonable care, skill and diligence (s174)
- “the general knowledge, skill and experience that may reasonably be expected of a person carrying out the functions carried
out by the director in relation to the company, and
- The general knowledge, skill experience that the director has.”
Ex: MrA is a director of Company A Ltd (a Real-Estate Company)
MrA made a decision on purchasing a building. Later on, it turned out that Company A has purchased the building that did not
worth the price.
To become a real estate director:
- Significant professional experience in real estate development and sales
- Educational qualifications: a bachelor’s degree and a master’s degree in real estate, engineer, business, or finance, a liscensed
real estate broker
- A number of years of work experience in business administration or finance
- Other professional qualifications and desired skills that each particular company may require.
Khi nào thoả hết các quy định này và đã tìm kiếm mọi nguồn nhưng vẫn áp dụng sai thì mới vi phạm duty này, vì mrA chưa có
kinh nghiệm nhưng đã xem xét kỹ lưỡng nhưng vẫn thất bại thì không áp dụng
IV.2 Conflict of-interest duties
Conflict of-interest duties are the duties imposed on directors primarily to discourage them from acting in their own self-interest
or the interest of another person that is not their company.
A breach of conflict of interest duty can aslo entail a breach of a management duty (not true on reverse)
Duty to avoid conflicts of interest (s175) (trach nhiem tranh xay ra xung dot loi ich)
A director of a company must avoid a situation in which he has, or can have, a direct or indirect interest that conflicts , or
possibly may conflict, with the interests of the company.
Ex1: A (director 1– major shareholder company 2) – 1 and 2 enter transaction –
Ex2: A (director 1) and his wife (director 2 – only owner) – 1 and 2 enter transaction – conflict – tai san chung – relationship
between husband and wife
Co phai tat ca cac giao dich conflict voi giam doc deu bi cam hay ko?
The board of directors can authorize conflicts of interest (a director is not liable for the breach of this duty if the conflict of
interest is approved by the board)
The director having the self-interest is not allowed to vote at the meeting of the board.
CASE LAW:
∆ Directors who leave or are in the process of leaving the company are still subject to the duty to avoid conflicts of interest
[Canadian Aero Service Ltd V O’Mallym [1973] 40 DLR (3d) 371]
(A director is in breach of this duty if he takes advantage of an opportunity that the company would otherwise be interested in but
cannot or do not wish to persue a corporate opportunity).
Duty NOT to accept benefits from third parties (s176)
Directors must not accept benefits from third parties conferred by reason of his being a director or doing or not doing anything as
a director.
(!) receiving any benefit from a third party is a breach of this duty? In other to make a conclusion on breach of duty, we need
to examine whether or not the director has to do something in his own power director, in return of benefits that he has
received
Ex1: A (director – company A) tour – company B hotel
Ex2: christmas gift
Third party benefits must be approved by the shareholders if a director wants to avoid liability (s180 (4b))
The shareholders not the board of directors
Duty to declare interest in transactions (s177 + 182) (nghia vu cong khai loi ich trong cac giao dich)
Duty to declare any interest in proposed transactions (s177)
Duty to declare any interest in existing transactions (s182)
If a director in any way, directly or indirectly, has interest in a proposed/ existing transaction or arragement with the company, he
must declare the nature and extent of the interest to the other directors at a meeting of the directors.
Directors contracting with their own company (GD co HD voi chinh cty cua minh)
A director enters into a contract with his company
does the director violate the duty to avoid conflicts of interest (s175)?
Ex: mrA sells his house to the company valid the duty?
S175.3 This duty does not apply to a conflict of interest arising in relation to a transaction or arrangement with the company
Conditions for a contract between a director and his company
1. Duty to declare interest in proposed transactions (s177)
2. Contracts that must be approved by shareholders: other requirements under the company’s articles of association
(1) Substantial property transaction (s190) – cac giao dich co gia tri lon
- The object of these transactions: substantial non-cash asset (s190)
- An asset is a substantial assest if its value: (s191)
+ Exceeds 10% of the comoany’s asset value value and is more than 5000
+ Exceeds 100.000
NOTES
S190 also applies to a substantial property transaction between the company and a person who is connected with a director (the
person in s252, 253)
(2) Loans and similar arrangements to directors (s197)
(3) Long-term service contracts (s188)
(4) Payment for loss of office (s215)