Decription of The QM-Certification Procedure 13485 MDD E
Decription of The QM-Certification Procedure 13485 MDD E
Decription of The QM-Certification Procedure 13485 MDD E
The certification of a management system based on the standard EN ISO 13485, as well as the
conformity assessment procedure for management systems according to EC directives for medical
devices, consists of the offer and contract phase, the audit preparation, performance of the Stage 1
audit with evaluation of the management documentation, performance of the Stage 2 audit, issue of
certificate and surveillance/recertification.
The auditors are selected by the Head of the Certification Body for Medical Devices of TÜV NORD
CERT GmbH in accordance with their approvals for the particular sector and their qualification.
1. Certification procedure
Following signing of the contract, the auditor prepares for the audit on the basis of his contract
appointment and the relevant customer documentation and discusses and agrees the further
procedure with the organisation to be audited.
During preparation for the surveillance or recertification audit, the organisations to be audited have the
duty to report fundamental changes in their organisational structure or changes in procedure to the
Certification Body.
If nonconformities were identified in the stage 1 audit, these must be corrected by the customer before
the stage 2 audit.
If at the end it cannot be established positively that the customer is ready for the Stage 2 Audit, the
audit is broken off after the Stage 1 Audit.
The lead auditor is responsible for the co-ordination of the activities of the stage 1 audit and if
necessary for co-ordination and co-operation of the auditors concerned amongst themselves.
The customer receives an audit plan at the beginning of the stage 2 audit. The plan is agreed with the
customer in advance.
The audit begins with a start-up meeting, in which the participants are introduced to each other. The
procedure to be followed in the audit is explained. Within the framework of the audit at the
organisation's premises, the auditors review and assess the effectiveness of the introduced
management system according to the applicable standard as applied for and the module of the EC
directive.
The task of the auditors is to compare the practical application of the management system with the
documented processes and to assess them in relation to fulfilment of the requirements of the
standard. This is achieved by means of questioning of the employees, examining the relevant
documents, records, orders and guidelines and also by visiting relevant areas of the organisation.
A final meeting takes place at the end of the onsite audit. At least those employees take part in the
audit who have management functions within the organisation and whose areas were included in the
audit. The lead auditor reports on the individual elements and explains the positive and negative
results. In the case of any nonconformities found, the leading auditor can only recommend that the
company be granted a certificate after corrective measures have been accepted or verified by the
audit team. For the documents to be submitted subsequently, periods must be complied with as
indicated by the auditor. In case the corrective measures cannot be verified on site, the auditor may
recommend a re-audit.
The audit is documented in the audit report (the documentation must be separate for stage 1 and
stage 2 audits) and is completed by means of further records (e.g. audit questionnaire and hand-
written records).
The certificate is issued when the certification procedure has been reviewed and released by the head
of the Certification Body or his deputy or nominated representative. The person who reviews and
releases the procedure may not have participated in the audit.
The certificate can only be issued when the nonconformities have been eliminated i.e. the corrective
measures have been accepted or verified by the audit team.
The certificates are valid for 3 years. On request and especially for MDD-certifications 5 years validity
can be issued.
2. Surveillance audit
Surveillance audits must be conducted once per year during the period of validity of the certificate (3
years).
When the set date / audit-relevant date is set for the surveillance audits, a difference must be made
between new clients (initial certification as from 01 January 2008) and existing clients (initial
certification before 01 January 2008).
New clients:
- The audit-relevant date for the annual surveillance audit, which follows the certification audit, may
not be later than 12 months after the last day of the stage 2 audit.
Existing clients:
- The audit-relevant date for the annual surveillance audit is the date of validity of the certificate
which was valid on 01 January 2008 (day and month) minus 1 month.
New and existing clients:
- The audit-relevant date controls all the following audits (surveillance and recertification audits).
- Each surveillance audit including review and acceptance and verification, if appropriate, of the
measures for correction of nonconformities, drafting of the audit report and release by the
Certification Body, must be completed at the latest 3 months after the audit-relevant date.
- within the framework of annual surveillance, a surveillance audit can be conducted at the earliest
3 months before the audit-relevant date.
3. Recertification audit
Recertification audits must be completed before the end of the period of validity of the certificate,
including review of the measures for correction of nonconformities.
In the recertification audit, a review of the documentation of the management system of the
organisation takes place and an onsite audit is conducted, whereby the results of the previous
surveillance programme(s) over the period of the certification are to be taken into consideration. All
requirements of the standard are audited.
Activities related to the recertification audit may include a stage 1 audit if there are significant changes
in the management system or in connection with the activities of the organisation (e.g. changes to the
law).
The audit methods used in the recertification audit correspond to those used in a stage 2 audit.
Description of certification procedure_Decription of the QM-Certification Page 3 of 5
procedure _13485_MDD_E.DOC01.10 Rev.0
Description of the QM system certification procedure
EN ISO 13485 and /or MD-Directives
4. Extension audit
If it is intended to extend the scope of an existing certificate, this can be implemented by means of an
extension audit. An extension audit can be conducted within the framework of a surveillance audit, a
recertification audit or at a time which is set independently.
The period of validity of a certificate does not change as a result. Exceptions must be justified in
writing.
In general, only certificates from accredited certification bodies can be taken over. Organisations with
certificates which originate from non-accredited certification bodies are treated like new clients.
A "Pre-Transfer-Review“ must be conducted by a competent person from the Certification Body which
is taking over the certificate. This review generally consists of an examination of important documents
and a visit to the customer.
Certificates which have been suspended, or where there is a risk of suspension, may not be taken
over. Any nonconformities which have not been corrected should as far as practicable be clarified with
the previous Certifier before the takeover. Otherwise they must be dealt with in the audit.
In MDD contracts regulatory requirements on change of the Notified Body have to be considered.
The further surveillance programme is based on the programme which has been in place up to the
time of the takeover of the certificate.
If a multi-site organisation is being certified, these sites must also be audited. Organisations with
several production sites/branch offices/locations etc. with similar types of activity and which operate
under a single management system are certified by means of random sampling procedure.
7. Management of nonconformities
An analysis of the causes must be performed for each nonconformity and corresponding corrective
measures must be implemented. The organisation has the duty, depending on the seriousness of the
nonconformity, to inform the audit team within 60 days either with regard to the corrective measures
which have been laid down and the dates for their implementation or that the corrective measures
have been implemented. The second case generally requires to send in additional documents. In case
a verification of corrective measures cannot be implemented by document review a re-audit may be
performed. In this case a positive result of that audit shall be documented within 90 days. If this period
is not observed, the audit is considered not to be successful, i.e. not to be passed. No certificate can
be issued, or an existing certificate is withdrawn.