Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 30 views

    Military

    Uploaded by

    Akkarachart Pinthong
    This document summarizes the results of a pavement structure analysis for a new section at an airport. It includes details of the 688mm thick pavement structure consisting of HMA, aggregate and subgrade layers. It also lists 19 airplane types that will use the runway, providing their weight, annual operations and each plane's contribution to cumulative damage of the subgrade. The analysis found no planes contribute more than 1% to subgrade damage.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Military

    Uploaded by

    Akkarachart Pinthong
    30 views3 pages
    This document summarizes the results of a pavement structure analysis for a new section at an airport. It includes details of the 688mm thick pavement structure consisting of HMA, aggregate and subgrade layers. It also lists 19 airplane types that will use the runway, providing their weight, annual operations and each plane's contribution to cumulative damage of the subgrade. The analysis found no planes contribute more than 1% to subgrade damage.

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    This document summarizes the results of a pavement structure analysis for a new section at an airport. It includes details of the 688mm thick pavement structure consisting of HMA, aggregate and subgrade layers. It also lists 19 airplane types that will use the runway, providing their weight, annual operations and each plane's contribution to cumulative damage of the subgrade. The analysis found no planes contribute more than 1% to subgrade damage.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf or txt
    30 views3 pages

    Military

    Uploaded by

    Akkarachart Pinthong
    This document summarizes the results of a pavement structure analysis for a new section at an airport. It includes details of the 688mm thick pavement structure consisting of HMA, aggregate and subgrade layers. It also lists 19 airplane types that will use the runway, providing their weight, annual operations and each plane's contribution to cumulative damage of the subgrade. The analysis found no planes contribute more than 1% to subgrade damage.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf or txt
    of 3

    Federal Aviation Administration FAARFIELD 2.

    0 Section Report
    FAARFIELD 2.0.18 (Build 05/26/2022)

    Job Name: New Job 1

    Section: New Section 1

    Analysis Type: New Flexible

    Last Run: Thickness Design 2023‐06‐27 14:20:46

    Design Life = 20 Years

    Total thickness to the top of the subgrade = 688mm

    Pavement Structure Information by Layer

    Thickness Modulus Poisson's Strength R


    No. Type
    (mm) (MPa) Ratio (MPa)

    1 P‐401/P‐403 HMA Surface 102 1,378.95 0.35 0


    2 P‐401/P‐403 HMA Stabilized 127 2,757.90 0.35 0
    3 P‐209 Crushed Aggregate 459 445.53 0.35 0
    4 Subgrade 0 103.42 0.35 0

    Airplane Information

    Gross Wt. Annual % Annual


    No. Name
    (kg) Departures Growth

    1 A400M LH 141,400 1,200 0


    2 A400M LN1 137,900 1,200 0
    3 A400M TLL1 131,400 1,200 0
    4 A400M TLL2 115,400 1,200 0
    5 B‐52 221,353 1,200 0
    6 B‐52 Belly 221,353 1,200 0
    7 C‐5 348,812 1,200 0
    8 C‐17A 265,351 1,200 0
    9 C‐123 27,216 1,200 0
    10 C‐130 70,307 1,200 0
    11 C‐130‐57 70,307 1,200 0
    12 C‐130‐70 70,307 1,200 0
    13 F‐15C 30,844 1,200 0
    14 F‐16C 19,187 1,200 0
    15 F/A‐18C 25,401 1,200 0
    16 KC‐10 264,444 1,200 0
    17 KC‐10 Belly 264,444 1,200 0
    18 P‐3C 64,410 1,200 0
    19 Sabreliner T‐39 10,659 1,200 0
    17 KC‐10 Belly 264,444 1,200 0
    18 P‐3C 64,410 1,200 0
    19 Sabreliner T‐39 10,659 1,200 0

    Additional Airplane Information

    Subgrade CDF

    CDF CDF Max P/C


    No. Name
    Contribution for Airplane Ratio

    1 A400M LH 0.00 0.00 1.3


    2 A400M LN1 0.00 0.00 1.3
    3 A400M TLL1 0.00 0.00 1.31
    4 A400M TLL2 0.00 0.00 1.32
    5 B‐52 0.96 0.96 1.24
    6 B‐52 Belly 0.04 0.09 1.26
    7 C‐5 0.00 0.00 0.58
    8 C‐17A 0.00 0.00 1.04
    9 C‐123 0.00 0.00 1.98
    10 C‐130 0.00 0.00 1.91
    11 C‐130‐57 0.00 0.00 1.91
    12 C‐130‐70 0.00 0.00 1.91
    13 F‐15C 0.00 0.00 2.26
    14 F‐16C 0.00 0.00 2.26
    15 F/A‐18C 0.00 0.00 2.09
    16 KC‐10 0.00 0.00 1.34
    17 KC‐10 Belly 0.00 0.00 1.23
    18 P‐3C 0.00 0.00 1.4
    19 Sabreliner T‐39 0.00 0.00 1.92

    User Is responsible For checking frost protection requirements.

    You might also like