BS Module 3
BS Module 3
BS Module 3
• The analysis can provide an appreciation of the risks and benefits to the
project and the organisations involved from the way in which the
communication process is implemented.
• It takes a snapshot view of an organisation or situation and where things
stand at a certain point in time.
• It is sometimes accomplished by means of a SWOT analysis (Strengths,
Weaknesses, Opportunities and Threats), which examines all aspects in
relation to the success or results of the project in question.
Components of a situation analysis
• The company
• An analysis of a company’s vision, strategy, and goals—and if it’s meeting
them—is a good start.
• Examining how the company is performing by reviewing sales, market
share, and customer retention provides a useful snapshot that reveals if
the business is fulfilling its goals.
• It will also help you evaluate competitors and market share.
SA contd.
• Distribution
• The distribution portion of a situation analysis reviews how you get your
products to market and compares it to your competitors’ to determine
the best distribution channels for your business.
• Opportunities
• Unmet or underserved needs represent market opportunities. Knowing
how to capture that market share is essential to a company’s success
(SWOT Analysis).
SA Contd.
• Environmental factors
• Determine the external and internal environmental factors, which can
include economic or sociological factors that impact your business's
performance
• Competitors
• An analysis of your main competitors will help you determine how your
business measures up.
• Identifying and comparing the competitive advantages of one company
to another can help your business adapt to compete more effectively.
Situation Analysis Tools
• SWOT Analysis
• PESTLE Analysis (Done)
• STEEPLE Analysis (*a variant of PESTLE)
• Porter’s Five Forces (Done)
• 5 C Analysis
SWOT Analysis
• The four legs encompass the vision and strategy of an organization and require
active management to analyze the data collected.
• The balanced scorecard analyzes is often referred to as a management tool rather
than a measurement tool because of its application by a company's key personnel.
• Kaplan and Norton cited two main advantages to the four-pronged balanced
scorecard approach.
• First, the scorecard brings together disparate elements of a company's
competitive agenda in a single report.
• Second, by having all important operational metrics together, managers are
forced to consider whether one improvement has been achieved at the expense
of another.
Corporate Strategy
Generic strategies are the three basic strategies of cost leadership, differentiation and focus
(sometimes called niche) open to any business.
Porter’s contribution was based on earlier work in industrial economics, exploring how firms
compete.
Porter made the bold claim that there were only three fundamental strategies that any business
could undertake – that is why he called them generic.
During the 1980s, they were regarded as being at the forefront of strategic thinking. Arguably, they
still have a contribution to make in the new century in the development of strategic options.
GS contd.
• Porter argued that there were three basic, i.e., generic, strategies open to
any business:
• 1. cost leadership
• 2. differentiation
• 3. focus
• According to the theory, every business needs to choose one of these in
order to compete in the marketplace and gain sustainable competitive
advantage.
• Each of these three strategic options represents an area that every
business and many not-for-profit organisations can usefully explore.
Overall-Cost Leadership
• The low-cost leader in an industry has built and maintains plant, equipment,
labour costs and working practices that deliver the lowest costs in that
industry.
• The essential point is that the firm with the lowest costs has a clear and
possibly sustainable competitive advantage.
• However, in order to cut costs, a low-cost producer must find and exploit all the
sources of cost advantage.
• Low-cost producers typically sell a standard, or no-frills, product and place
considerable strategic emphasis on reaping scale or absolute cost advantages
from all sources.
• In practice, low- cost leaders achieve their position by shaving costs off every
element of the value chain – the strategy comes from attention to detail.
Overall-Cost Leadership