What Is Sectional Completion
What Is Sectional Completion
What Is Sectional Completion
In this Ask the team, we adopt the second meaning. In summary, rather than requiring the contractor to complete the
whole of the works on a given date, sectional completion allows the employer to require two or more sections to be
delivered at different times. For example:
The contractor could be required to deliver two identical blocks of flats, Block A and Block B, under a single
building contract.
It might deliver Block A (and access to Block A) as Section A, Block B (and access to Block B) as Section B,
and the landscaping around both completed blocks as Section C.
The completion dates could be 1 September, 1 November and 1 March, respectively.
The sections could be priced at £750,000, £750,000 and £25,000 respectively, with separate agreed rates
of liquidated damages (LDs) for a delay to any section.
A building contract may allow the employer to take partial possession of part of the works, before they have been
formally completed. It is unusual (save in exceptional circumstances) to use both sectional completion and partial
possession on a single project. Partial possession often requires the agreement of the contractor, but allows the
employer to use part of the works for their intended purpose prior to completion of the whole of the works.
Despite the importance of practical completion in construction contracts, there is no precise legal definition of practical
completion. A building contract can define what practical completion means under it, but often does not. As such,
these general rules often apply:
Practical completion means the completion of all the construction work that has to be done under the contract.
Works can be practically complete even though there are latent (hidden) defects.
Works are not practically complete if there are patent defects.
A practical completion certificate can be issued where minor, de minimis, work is outstanding.
Under clauses 2.33-2.37 of the JCT Standard Building Contract, 2011 edition (SBC11), the contractor needs to
consent to the employer taking partial possession. If the contractor consents and the employer takes partial
possession of part of the works (the “relevant part”), that counts as practical completion of the relevant part. From the
deemed date of practical completion of the relevant part, the:
Typically, the parties will not have pre-agreed what is a relevant part and how much that part is worth, compared the
whole of the works.
The JCT SBC11 addresses sectional completion throughout its terms. It no longer uses a sectional completion
supplement. (See, for example, clauses 2.26-2.32.) In addition, the parties set out the sections (or where they are
defined) in the JCT Contract Particulars, which form part of the building contract.
Sectional completion of a section is not “deemed” practical completion of that section, it is practical completion of that
section. In some senses the effects are similar to partial possession, in that the:
However, these effects are more certain, because the parties have already agreed:
A distinct rate of LDs for each section, so there is no argument about what a proportionate reduction would
be.
A section sum, so there is no argument about what the release of retention should amount to (provided the
interim certificates have kept track of sections sums).
That there is no need for contractor consent: the architect or contract administrator certifies when a section
has been completed.
In addition, if the works are delayed, the architect or contract administrator can assess whether any individual section
has been delayed and by how much.
Sectional completion leaves less to chance, because the parties have agreed many of the practical consequences of
that completion in advance. If something does go wrong, it is also easier for the employer and architect or contract
administrator to deal with delays, changes or even acceleration with sections in place. For example, if a project is
already in delay, and then the employer takes partial possession of part of the works, it may be difficult to agree
exactly what the reduced rate of LDs should be for the remainder.