Cost Benefit
Cost Benefit
Cost Benefit
Ultimate Guide
Scott Beaver | Senior Product Marketing Manager
April 9, 2021
In any business, department heads have competing priorities. For example, the chief
revenue officer of a B2B software-as-a-service provider wants to establish an indirect
channel sales program, while marketing wants to hire a content writer to help
organically acquire new leads. Both make good cases — each department is sure they
can increase revenue with a few more people and a little more money, after all.
Key Takeaways
Cost-benefit analyses help businesses weigh pros and cons in a data-driven way so they can
make complex decisions in a systematic manner.
For a successful CBA, leaders need to identify and project the explicit and implicit costs
and benefits of a proposed action or investment.
It’s also a good idea to assign someone to make the case for the status quo as a way to
compare the opportunity cost of doing nothing and investing cash versus proposed actions.
A cost-benefit analysis is only as good as the data on which it’s based, so companies with
more mature financial reporting have a higher likelihood of success.
A CBA requires considering both monetary and opportunity costs over a period of
time. To compare multiple CBAs, extract a CBA ratio from each. The formula for a
cost-benefit analysis ratio can be expressed as:
Projected benefits / projected costs = CBA ratio
For example, the CMO of our fictional SaaS provider wants to hire a content writer to
improve the company’s web site content so that it helps deliver more qualified leads
to sales. The CRO thinks a channel program can win both new customers and more
mindshare. In all cases, the leaders would be asked to approve at least one additional
FTE along with some required software and other services.identify and attach dollar
values to the explicit and implicit costs of their projects and compare those to the
explicit and implicit benefits. The CFO may also run the numbers on “none of the
above.”
Then there’s the fact that while a project or purchase with a high benefit-to-cost ratio
is generally considered the most favorable option, that’s not a given.
In the future, a CBA can be revisited to evaluate the actual cost and ROI of a project
or purchase compared with projections and improve the analysis process.
For example, the CMO’s plan to employ a writer to attract new customers involves
recurring investments in both marketing software subscriptions and salary and
benefits. Expected returns include increased revenue, a larger customer base and
better visibility for the company. Some of these costs and returns are difficult to
quantify. In contrast, the CROs ’plan will require the attention of sales leaders to
create an entirely new revenue stream that may take a year or two to become
profitable. There’s a substantial opportunity lost in pursing more sales through
existing channels, but the payoff could be substantial. There’s also the internal
dynamic that will surface as the new indirect sales channel takes some of the revenue
of the existing sales team.A CBA seeks to select the project with the greatest overall
benefit for the incurred costs.
A cost-benefit analysis, often paired with the sensitivity or “what if” analyses used
in financial modeling, also offsets biases that may sway decisions, like the dreaded
HiPPO — highest-paid person’s opinion.
OPTION 1
OPTION 2
OPTION 3
Criteria set 1 = Match to needs, reliability, value for price, competitive positioning, roadmap/innovation,
integrations
Criteria set 2 = Assists with customer acquisition, adds operational efficiency, staff familiarity, loaded
cost
But leaders do need to go beyond the numbers and consider intangibles: Which
project or purchase better advances the business’s long- and near-term goals? For
example, our fictional CMO makes a strong case, but if the company wants to
undertake expansion, whether geographically or selling into a new market segment or
industry, the indirect sales channel program championed by the CRO may be the
better choice with a bigger eventual payoff, even though accurately comparing the
cost of direct versus indirect sales is a complex analysis.
Point is, data needs to play a strong yet balanced role in the decision-making process.
By allowing a company to better weigh the implicit costs of taking or not taking an
action, where there is no obvious or immediate explicit cost, projects that may not
generate a clear profit on the balance sheet may still be moved forward. Think
advancing sustainability objectives, diversity and inclusion initiatives and helping
employees navigate new workplace realities.
Business process change: A business process is any defined set of actions that are
repeated often and produce a desired result. A company may think that a task that’s
high volume, high touch, repetitive and prone to error is a candidate for business
process automation. A CBA can help prove the theory. For example, should you
purchase software that automatically adds inventory receipts to the inventory ledger
and the asset column on the balance sheet versus manual entry? Or, a growing
company may run a CBA and find that hiring a third-party to manage the payroll
process now makes sense and is a source of savings.
In any cost-benefit analysis, ensure the stakeholder asks: How can we drive
inefficiency out of this business function? And how do we attach a dollar value to
that?
Costs
The costs of taking an action or of doing nothing include:
Explicit costs: These are accounting costs with explicit monetary value and may
include direct costs such as labor, manufacturing and the cost of software or
machinery and indirect costs, such as utilities or rent.
Implicit costs: These are opportunity costs, both financial and non-financial, like
purchasing a capital asset versus investing free cash, or of pulling employees off one
project to work on the new initiative.
Benefits
As with costs, benefits should be categorized:
Direct benefits: This is the accounting profit from the decision and could include, for
instance, cost savings or increased revenue from a new product or service.
Our fictional SaaS provider has a traditional direct sales model, where its asset
maintenance scheduling software is sold as service directly to end customers.
Customers may also purchase direct from the website, which does not generate a
commission.
Goal: The company sells mainly to manufacturers but believes it can expand to serve
healthcare groups, which need to perform regular maintenance on expensive medical
equipment.
The problem is that the sales team would need to start from scratch to make contacts
in this new market. The CMO believes her marketing team can generate sales-
qualified leads by hiring a content producer familiar with healthcare, but the chief
revenue officer thinks there’s a better way.
Premise: The CRO believes the company can more quickly succeed by establishing
an indirect sales channel to complement existing sales capabilities. The program
would be open to 10 to 15 value-added resellers and managed service providers that
focus on healthcare. The CRO would sign on the partners initially then pass them to a
channel salesperson. The company would develop an online portal for partners to
register opportunities and execute purchases on behalf of customers.
Note: The numbers below are designed to be illustrative, not a representation of the
industry.
Assumptions: The software costs $15000 per year fifty seats – an average sale. The
CRO believes that the partner program can bring in 50 new customers in Year 1 and
that all will renew. By year three, the partners will bring in 200 new logos per year.
Partners earn 20% of sales. Support will take1 $70,000 FTE specialist per 75 logoss.
The product for indirect sale is the same as what is sold through the direct sales
channel, and pricing will be the same. To avoid channel conflict, direct sales wouldn't
be allowed to work deals in certain verticals. And they won't follow up on website
leads for for those verticals.
Commissions to Partners (50 sales) $150,000 Partner sales numbers grow each year
25% CRO comp to launch $50,000 Moves to channel team next year
Commissions (50 existing + 100 New) $450,000 Channel partners are better at selling af
Commissions (150 existing + 200 New) $1,050,000 Channel partners are better at selling af
In contrast, the CMO’s proposal would entail gaining those 50 new healthcare
customers by spending $100,000 on an FTE plus $250,000 on new marketing tools
and ad buys.
Federal agencies are now required by law to conduct cost-benefit analyses to study the
implications of policy across a broad range of areas — transportation, public health,
criminal justice, defense, education and the environment. These agencies are often
called upon to apply dollar values to intangibles, such as the value of clean air or safer
highways.
Companies that work with public-sector customers may be more familiar with the
CBA process, but all businesses can benefit.
Perhaps one of the more challenging parts of a CBA is when a leader selects a project
that the numbers say is less profitable than other options. The reason may be a desire
to forward long-term goals, or that company culture and values dictate spending more
or leaving profit on the table.
And of course, sometimes the right answer will be “do nothing.” At least with a solid
cost-benefit analysis, companies can make hard decisions with their eyes wide open.