Assignment 1571227167 Sms
Assignment 1571227167 Sms
Assignment 1571227167 Sms
CHAPTER AT A GLANCE
Introduction
• Word “company” is derived from Latin word “Com Panis” meaning Com i.e. with/together and
Panis i.e. bread.
• it is originally referred to an association of persons who took their meals together.
• The word “company” denotes a joint stock enterprise in which the capital is contributed by a
large number of people.
• In Smith V. Anderson, it was observed that company in broad sense may mean an association of
individuals formed for some purpose.
• Company can be an incorporated (profit making) or unincorporated (non profit making like a
club or a society) body.
An incorporated company refers to a separate person distinct from the individuals constituting it.
An unincorporated company such as-partnership refers to only a collection of individuals.
• It is called a body corporate because the persons comprising it are made into one body by
incorporating it according to law and clothing it with legal personality and so turn it in ' a corporation.
• Word “Corporation” is derived from Latin word “corpus” which means “body”.
• It is a legal person created by process other than natural birth, thus called artificial person.
• A Company have a personality, distinct and separate from its members.
• The Incorporated company is formed either:
(i) under Special Act of Parliament: E.g. LIC, Damodar Valley Corporations etc. or
(ii) under Companies Act, 2013 or under any previous Company law. E.g. Hindustan Lever Ltd., Tata
Steel Ltd., etc.
• As per Section 2(20) of the Companies Act, 2013. “Company” means a company incorporated
under Companies Act, 2013 or under any previous company law. Section should be exactly as per law.
The unincorporated Company formed not for profit purpose falls within the meaning of a company
licenced U/S 8 of the Companies Act, 2013.
Characteristics:
(1) Corporate Personality
• Company is a separate legal entity distinct from individuals who are its members. (It is also
known as separate legal entity)
• It is known by its own name.
• It has its own seal. (Common seal i.e. official signature of a company) [Amendment of Sec. 9 - “the
word common seal” has been omitted]
• Its members are its owners but they can be its creditors simultaneously.
• It is capable of owning property, incurring debts, borrowing money, having a bank account,
employing people, entering into contracts and suing or being sued in the same manner as an individual.
• A shareholder cannot be held liable for the company’s act even if he holds virtually the company’s
entire share capital.
• Shareholders are not the company’s agent and so they cannot bind it by their acts.
• This was brought forward in the case of Salomon V. Salomon and Co. Ltd., (1897)
• The company does not hold its property as an agent or trustee for its members and they cannot
sue to enforce its rights, nor can they be sued in respect of its liabilities.
Respective Case Law:
(1) Salomon V. Salomon and Co. Ltd
• Mr. Salomon was carrying on the business of leather merchant and boot manufacturing as a sole
proprietor.
• He formed a limited company for taking over his business.
• The Company’s nominal capital was £ 40,000 in £1 shares.
• Payment of total purchase consideration of £ 38,782 was in the following form:
(i) Fully paid shares of E, each issued to Salomon £ 20,000
(ii) Secured debentures issued to Salomon £10,000
(iii) Cash Paid £ 8,782
• Other 6 members of his family were issued 1 share each.
• Salomon held virtually the entire share capital of the company. Hence, the company was called as
‘one man company’
• Due to trade depression, company went into liquidation.
• Company’s liabilities was £ 10,000 secured by debentures and its assets realised £ 6,050.
• Unsecured creditors owing £ 8,000 claimed that Salomon was carrying on business in the name
of the company. Thus, company was a mere agent of Salomon.
They claimed that one man cannot owe money to himself.
• Court held that:
(i) Salomon & Co. was a real company fulfilling all the legal requirements.
(ii) It had an identity separate from its members..
(iii) Thus, secured debentures even though held by Salomon, were to be paid in priority to unsecured
creditors.
This case established the legality of “one-man company” and principle of limited liability.
(2) Lee V. Lee’s Air farming Ltd.
Alternative
Case Study:
Corporate personality: Salomon v/s Salomon & Co. Ltd. (1897)
(2) Limited Liability
• Members of a company cannot be held liable for its debts.
• In case of limited company, the liability of members is limited to the extent of unpaid value of
shares held by them.
• In case of company limited by guarantee, members are liable to the extent of amount
guaranteed by them.
• Guaranteed amount can be called only at the time of company’s liquidation winding up.
(3) Transferability of Shares
• Shares are movable property which are transferable subject to certain conditions.
• In public company, shares are freely transferable.
• However, there are certain restrictions on the transfer of shares in a private company.
• Any absolute restriction on the right to transfer shares is void.
• Shares in a public company can be transferred without any restriction but shares in private
company can not be transferred.
(4) Common Seal
• It is the official signature of the company.
• Company’s name is engraved on it.
• A document not bearing common seal of the company is not authentic and has no legal force
behind it.
• A rubber stamp does not serve the purpose.
• Amendment made by Companies (Amendment) Act, 2015.
Amendment of Section 9:
• In Section 9 of the Principal Act, the words “and a common seal” shall be omitted.
Amendment of Section 22:
• In Section 22 of the Principal Act,
(i) In Sub-Section(2)
(a) for the words “under its common seal”, the words “under, its common seal” if any, shall be
substituted;
(b) the following proviso shall be inserted, namely:
“Provided that in case a company does not have a common seal, the authorisation under this sub-section
shall be made by two directors or by a director and the Company Secretary, wherever the company has
appointed a Company Secretary”.
(ii) In sub-section (3), the words “and have the effect as if it were made under its common seal” shall
be omitted.
Amendment of Section 46:
In Section 46 of the Principal Act, in sub-section (1), for the words “issued under the common seal of the
company”, the words “issued under the common seal, if any, of the company or signed by two directors or
by a director and the Company Secretary, wherever the company has appointed a Company Secretary”
shall be substituted.
(5) Perpetual Succession
• Death, insolvency, insanity etc. of any member does not affects continuity legal existence and
identity of the company.
• “Members may come and go, but the company goes on forever.”
• It can be dissolved only under law through winding up procedure.
(6) Separate Property
• No member can claim to be the owner or co-owner of company’s property. Member cannot get
insurance of the property belonging to the company.
• Company can own and hold property in its own name.
Relevant Case Law: Macaura V. Northern Assurance Co. Ltd.
(7) Capacity to sue and be sued in its own name:
• A company is a legal person, thus it can sue others and can be sued
by others in its own name.
• In an unincorporated association, an action may have to be brought in name of members either
individually/collectively.
Lifting of Corporate Veil
• Due to law’s fiction, company is seen as an entity distinct from its members, but actually
company is an association of persons who are the beneficial owners of company’s property.
• No member can be held, liable for the company’s act even if he holds virtually the entire share
capital of the company.
• Lifting of corporate veil means ignoring the company’s separate legal identity. It involves
disregarding of the corporate personality and looking behind the corporate entity, at the controlling
persons and make them liable for debts and obligations of the company.
• It is permissible only when it is permitted by the statute.
• It is permitted in the following cases:
(i) If the company is formed for commission of.
(a) fraud and improper conduct.
(b) to defraud creditors
(c) to avoid legal obligations.
Relevant Case Law:
1. Gilford Motor Co. V. Horne
2. Jones V Lipman
(ii) To determine whether company is an enemy company or not.
Relevant Case Law:
1. Daimler Co. Ltd. V. Continental Tyre and Rubber Co.
(iii) To prevent evasion of taxes and duties.
Relevant Case Law:
1. CIT V Meenakshi Mills Ltd.
2. Sir Dinshaw Manakjee Petit.
(iv) If purpose of company’s formation is to avoid a welfare legislation e.g. reducing its liability of
bonus payable under Bonus Act.
Relevant Case Law:
1. The workers employed in Associated Rubber Industries Ltd. Bhavnagar V. The Associated Rubber
Industries Ltd. Bhavnagar and other, A.I.R. 1986 SCI
(v) For the purpose of protecting the public policy and thus, preventing
the transaction contrary to public policy.
Relevant Case Law:
1. Connors Bros V. Connors
(vi) If the holding company has incorporated the subsidiary company
for the sole purpose of using it as an agent. .
Relevant Case Law:
1. Re, R.G Films Ltd.
| Various Statutory Provisions for lifting the corporate veil are as follows:
1. Reduction in Membership
2. Misdescription of name.
3. Presentation of group accounts of holding and subsidiary companies.
4. Fraudulent Trading.
5. Payment of Arrears of tax.
6. Ultra-vires acts.
7. Misrepresentation in prospectus.
Difference Between Company and Partnership
Company Partnership
1. Complex formation due to various legal formalities. 1. Easy formation due to comparatively less legal
formalities.
2. Compulsory registration is required. 2. Registration is not compulsory.
3. Governed by Companies Act, 2013. 3. Governed by Partnership Act, 1932.
4. Separate legal entity of company from its members. 4. No separate legal entity.
5. Management is in the hands of B.O.D. appointed by 5. Its affairs are managed by all or any of them acting
shareholders. for all.
6. Property of the Co. is not the property of individuals. 6. Property of the firm, is the property of individuals.
7. Members of the Co. are not its agents. 7. Partners are the agents of the firm.
8. Members can contract with the company. 8. Partners cannot contract with the firm.
9. Shares are freely transferable. 9. Shares are transferable with the consent of the
other partners.
10. Liability of a shareholder is limited by shares or a 10. Liability of a partner is unlimited.
guarantee.
11. Death or insolvency of a shareholder does not effect 11. Death or insolvency of a partner dissolves the
the life of the company. firm.
12. A Co. is legally required to have it’s accounts 12. The accounts of the firm are audited at the
audited annually by a Chartered Accountant. discretion of the partners.
Differences between Company and LLP
Company LLP
(1) It is regulated by statute i.e. Companies Act, (1) It is regulated, by a contractual agreement
2013. between partners.
(2) There is a management- ownership divide. (2) There is no such divide.
(3) It is less flexible than LLP. (3) It has more flexibility.
(4) It has comparatively more compliance (4) It has lesser compliance requirements.
requirements than LLP.
LLP is a separate legal entity, liable to the full extent of its assets but liability of the partners is limited to
their agreed contribution in the LLP.
No partner is liable on account of the independent or un-authorized actions of other partners.
LLP is not relieved of the liability for its other obligations as a separate entity. As LLP consists elements of
both ‘a corporate structure’ as well as ‘a partnership firm', it is called a hybrid between a company and a
partnership.
Difference Between Company and HUF
Company HUF
1. It consists of heterogeneous members. 1. It consists of homogeneous members.
2. No karta and coparceners system. 2. Karta has the sole authority to contract, debts for
the purpose of the business. While coparceners do not
have such authority.
3. Person becomes member on fulfilment of certain 3. Person becomes member by birth.
requirements.
4. Its registration is compulsory. 4. Its registration is not compulsory.
Difference Between Company and Club
Company Club
1. It is a trading association. 1. It is a non-trading association.
2. Its registration is compulsory. 2. Its registration is not compulsory.
Difference Between Company and Corporation
• Corporation refers to an association of persons incorporated as per the relevant law and covered
with a legal personality separate from the persons constituting it.
• It is wider than the word ‘company’
• it is also known as ‘body corporate’
It includes: It does not include:
• a company incorporated outside India. • a co-operative society registered under any law
relating to societies, cooperative.
• any other body corporate (not being a company as
defined in this act), which the CG may by notification specify
in this behalf.
Society whether a body corporate or not?
• Any society registered under Societies Registration Act does not come under body corporate.
Relevant Case Law:
(i) Board of Trustees V State of Delhi, A.I.R. 1962 S.C. 458
Advantages of an incorporated Company
• Corporate Personality: It has a legal personality which is completely separate from its
members.
• Limited liability: Liability of the members is limited by shares or guarantee.
• Perpetual Succession: Death or insolvency of members does not affect the existence or
continuity of the company. Even death of a member does not affect its existence.
• Transferability of Shares: Members are allowed to transfer their shares freely, thus having
liquidity of their investment. Share of Private Co. are not freely transferable.
• Separate Property: Being an artificial legal person, company can own funds and assets in its
own name. Company’s property is not its member’s property.
• Capacity to Sue: Company can sue and be sued by others in its own name.
• Flexibility and autonomy: Company can form and amend its own policy with much
independence subject to the. principles of law, equity and good conscience and in accordance with
provisions of Companies
. Act, 2013 MOA and AOA. Key Managerial Personnel (KMP) has been defined in Companies Act, 2013 to
mean:
(i) the Chief Executive officer or the managing director or the manager;
(ii) the company secretary;
(iii) the whole-time director;
(iv) the Chief Financial officer; and
(v) such other officer as may be prescribed.
As per the Amendment made by Companies (Amendment) Act, 2017 Revised Section 2(51)-
"Key Managerial Personnel" in relation to a company, means—
(i) the Chief Executive Officer or the Managing Director or the Manager;
(ii) the Company Secretary;
(iii) the Whole-time Director;
(iv) the Chief Financial Officer;
(v) such 6ther officer, not more than one level below the directors who is in whole-time
employment, designated as key managerial personnel by the Board; and
(vi) such other officer as may be prescribed;”
Disadvantages of an Incorporated Company
• Several legal formalities: Incorporation of a company involves adherence to several legal
formalities which requires lot of time and money. Failure to perform any formality or provision attracts
penal consequence.
• Separation of Ownership and Management: Members have no direct control over the affairs of
company which makes their ownership position more passive.
• Greater Tax Burden: It is liable to pay income tax at a flat rate without any minimum taxable
limit.
• Corporate Disclosures: Members have comparatively restricted assessibility to company’s
internal management and day to day working.
• Greater Social Responsibility: The enormous powers used by companies have an impact on
society, thus are subject to greater control and regulation.
• Lengthy winding up procedure: Even at the time of its winding up, detailed procedure is to be
followed which is expensive and time consuming.