Irc SP 19
Irc SP 19
Irc SP 19
1
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1 INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................ 6
2 SCOPE ....................................................................................................................... 7
3 STAGES IN PROJECT PREPARATION ......................................................................... 8
3.1 Stages............................................................................................................................. 8
3.2 Pre-feasibility study .......................................................................................................... 8
3.3 Feasibility Study ............................................................................................................... 9
3.4 Detailed Project Report ..................................................................................................... 9
4 GUIDING PRINCIPLES FOR ROUTE SELECTION AND ALIGNMENT IMPROVEMENT . 12
5 SURVEY OF SOCIO-ECONOMIC PROFILE................................................................. 15
6 TRAFFIC SURVEYS AND ANALYSIS ......................................................................... 16
6.1 General .......................................................................................................................... 16
6.2 Network Study ................................................................................................................ 16
6.3 Classified Traffic Volume Counts ........................................................................................ 16
6.4 Origin-Destination (O-D) Surveys ...................................................................................... 17
6.5 Speed and Delay Studies .................................................................................................. 18
6.6 Turning Movement Surveys at Intersections ....................................................................... 18
6.7 Traffic Surveys for Replacing Railway Level Crossings with Over Bridges/ Subways. ................ 19
6.8 Axle Load Survey............................................................................................................. 19
6.9 Accident Records ............................................................................................................. 19
6.10 Pedestrian / animal cross traffic surveys ............................................................................ 20
6.11 Truck Terminal / Parking surveys ....................................................................................... 20
6.12 Traffic Projection ............................................................................................................. 20
7 RECONNAISSANCE SURVEY .................................................................................... 23
7.1 Purpose .......................................................................................................................... 23
7.2 Survey Method ................................................................................................................ 23
7.3 Study of Survey Sheets, Maps, etc. ................................................................................... 23
7.4 Aerial Reconnaissance...................................................................................................... 24
7.5 Ground Reconnaissance ................................................................................................... 25
7.6 Alignment Report ............................................................................................................ 25
8 PRELIMINARY SURVEY ........................................................................................... 26
2
8.1 Purpose .......................................................................................................................... 26
8.2 Survey Procedure ............................................................................................................ 26
8.3 Selection of Optimum Alignment in the Design office .......................................................... 29
9 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT AND RESETTLEMENT AND
REHABILTATION STUDY ......................................................................................... 30
9.1 General .......................................................................................................................... 30
9.2 Environmental Analysis .................................................................................................... 31
9.3 Environmental Design ...................................................................................................... 31
9.4 Environmental Management Action Plan ............................................................................ 31
9.5 Resettlement and Rehabilitation Action Plan (RAP) .............................................................. 32
10 FEASIBILITY REPORT ............................................................................................. 33
11 FINAL LOCATION SURVEY....................................................................................... 36
11.1 Staking of final center line and right of way ....................................................................... 36
11.2 Proper Protection of Points of Reference ............................................................................ 36
11.3 Boundary Pillars .............................................................................................................. 37
12 SOIL AND MATERIALS SURVEYS ............................................................................. 38
12.1 General .......................................................................................................................... 38
12.2 Study of Available Information .......................................................................................... 38
12.3 Soil Investigations for Low Embankments .......................................................................... 38
12.4 Special Investigations for High Embankments..................................................................... 42
12.5 Soil Investigations for Cut Sections.................................................................................... 42
12.6 Special Investigations in Landslide-Prone Areas .................................................................. 43
12.7 Geo-technical Investigations and Sub-Soil Exploration ......................................................... 43
12.8 Subgrade Characteristics and Strength .............................................................................. 44
12.9 Detailed Investigation for Flexible Pavement Design ............................................................ 44
12.10 Detailed Investigation for Rigid Pavement Design ............................................................... 45
12.11 Naturally Occurring Aggregates for Pavement Courses ........................................................ 45
12.12 Manufactured Aggregates (Brick Aggregate) ...................................................................... 45
12.13 Manufactured sand .......................................................................................................... 46
12.14 Manufactured Items ........................................................................................................ 46
12.15 Water for Construction Purposes ....................................................................................... 46
13 ROAD INVENTORY AND CONDITION SURVEY ......................................................... 51
13.1 Road and Pavement Investigations .................................................................................... 51
3
13.2 Road Inventory Surveys ................................................................................................... 51
13.3 Pavement Investigation .................................................................................................... 52
14 DRAINAGE STUDIES ............................................................................................... 55
14.1 General .......................................................................................................................... 55
14.2 High Flood Level.............................................................................................................. 55
14.3 Depth of Water-Table ....................................................................................................... 56
14.4 Ponded Water Level ......................................................................................................... 56
14.5 Special Investigations for Cut-Sections............................................................................... 56
14.6 Surface Run-off ............................................................................................................... 57
15 CROSS-DRAINAGE STRUCTURES ............................................................................ 58
15.1 Selection of Site .............................................................................................................. 58
15.2 Collection of Data for New Structures ................................................................................ 58
15.3 Design of Cross-drainage Structure ................................................................................... 59
15.4 Data where improvements are proposed to existing drainage structures ............................... 60
16 PREPARATION AND PRESENTATION OF PROJECT DOCUMENTS DETAILED
PROJECT REPORT (DPR) ......................................................................................... 61
16.1 General .......................................................................................................................... 61
16.2 Project Report ................................................................................................................. 61
16.3 Pavement studies ............................................................................................................ 63
16.4 Material, labour and equipment ........................................................................................ 64
16.5 Rates and cost estimates.................................................................................................. 64
16.6 Economic and financial analysis (where required): .............................................................. 64
16.7 Construction programming ............................................................................................... 64
16.8 Miscellaneous items ......................................................................................................... 65
16.9 Estimate ......................................................................................................................... 67
16.10 Drawings ........................................................................................................................ 67
16.11 Check List ....................................................................................................................... 69
17 ECONOMIC & FINANCIAL ANALYSIS ....................................................................... 70
17.1 Economic Analysis ........................................................................................................... 70
17.2 Financial Analysis ............................................................................................................ 70
18 PRE-CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES & PROJECT CLEARANCES .................................. 72
18.1 General .......................................................................................................................... 72
18.2 Environment and Social Impact Assessment ....................................................................... 72
4
18.3 Land acquisition process .................................................................................................. 72
18.4 Utility shifting proposals and estimates .............................................................................. 78
18.5 MOEF Clearance .............................................................................................................. 81
18.6 Forest Land Diversion ...................................................................................................... 82
18.7 Clearance from the National Board of Wild Life (NBWL) ....................................................... 84
18.8 Coastal Regulatory Zone (CRZ) Clearance .......................................................................... 85
18.9 Procurement of Clearance from Railways for ROB, RUB etc. ................................................. 89
18.10 Tree Felling Permission..................................................................................................... 90
18.11 Clearance for Irrigation canals: ......................................................................................... 90
18.12 Clearance for Underpasses / Overpasses : ......................................................................... 90
APPENDIX-1 GUIDING PRINCIPLES COVERING ROUTE SELECTION AND HIGHWAY
LOCATION ............................................................................................................... 91
APPENDIX-2 TRAFFIC GROWTH RATE ESTIMATION .......................................................... 96
APPENDIX-3 POINTS ON WHICH DATA MAY BE COLLECTED DURING GROUND
RECONNAISSANCE .................................................................................................. 99
APPENDIX -4 CHECKLIST OF MAJOR OPERATIONS INVOLOVED IN THESURVEY AND
INVESTIGATION FOR A ROAD PROJECT ................................................................ 102
APPENDIX -5 RECOMMENDED MITIGATING MEASURES AND SUGGESTED GRADINGS
FOR INITIAL ENVIRONMENTAL EXAMINATION (IEE) ........................................... 103
APPENDIX -6 CHECKLIST FOR A HIGHWAY PROJECT FEASIBILITY REPORT ................... 105
APPENDIX -7 SURVEY AND INVESTIGATIONS FORMATS ................................................. 110
APPENDIX -8 ALIGNMENT OPTION STUDY ...................................................................... 128
APPENDIX -9 CHECKLIST OF ITEMS FOR DETAILED PROJECT REPORT FOR A HIGHWAY 134
APPENDIX -10 LIST OF LABORATORY TESTS TO BE CONDUCTED FOR HIGHWAY
EMBANKMENTS ..................................................................................................... 139
APPENDIX -11 SALIENT FEATURES OF THE MOEF & CC ENVIRONMENT GUIDELINES
FOR HIGHWAY PROJECTS ..................................................................................... 141
APPENDIX -12 INTRODUCTION OF COMPUTER BASED ROAD DATA BANK ...................... 162
APPENDIX -13 STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURES INVESTIGATIONS USING
MODERN TECHNOLOGY......................................................................................... 165
5
1 INTRODUCTION
1.1 Preparation of highway projects involves a chain of activities, such as, study of road
network, selection of alignment, conducting field surveys and investigations, preparing
various designs, reports, drawings, estimates, schedules and bid documents etc. To be
compatible with technical requirements, specifications and standards, and to be consistent
with economy, it is essential that every project is prepared after thorough investigations
and collection of all the relevant information and complete evaluation of all possible
alternatives.
1.2 The extent and quality of studies and investigations have a strong influence on selection of
the most cost-effective design, estimation of quantities, cost and execution of the job itself.
As such, accuracy and completeness of surveys deserve special attention in project
preparation. This objective can be achieved by carrying out the project preparation work
either departmentally or with the help of consultants. In any case, it should be ensured
that experts having the required knowledge are deployed on the work. Use of new
technology, modern instruments and survey techniques ensure high degree of accuracy
and can speed up the work. Quality Assurance Plan, consisting of formats for conducting
various surveys and investigations, and checklists for ensuring that the designs and reports
are complete, has to be drawn before the start of field investigations.
1.3 Adequate funds should be earmarked for the work of surveys, investigations and project
preparation. Realistic estimation of funds and time required for project preparation, will go
a long way in making the project preparation a success. It will be found in the long run
that, such investment pays more than for itself in the form of well prepared and cost-
effective projects, orderly schedule of work and timely completion.
1.4 Systematic presentation of project details is no less important. The project document is the
very basis of technical, administrative and financial sanction of a project. It is also crucial
for accurate execution of work in the field. The project report should, therefore, be
comprehensive enough for proper appreciation of the proposals as well as for easy
understanding of the details. This Manual lays down guidelines both for surveys and
investigations and presentation of the project details.
1.5 The Indian Roads Congress first published this manual in 1977 and revised it in 2001.
Since then, considerable experience has been gained by the Highway Departments and
Consultants in this field, making it necessary to revise the manual. The work was taken up
by the G-1 Committee commissioned for the purpose of Project Preparation, Contract
Management, Quality Assurance and Public Private Partnership Committee of the Indian
Roads Congress. Initial revised draft of the manual was prepared by …………….
1.6 The manual was approved by Highways Specifications and Standards Committee, Executive
Committee and Council (held at Patna) of Indian Roads Congress in their meetings held on
6th Dec’19 (GSS), ……. and 19th Dec’19 (Council) respectively.
6
2 SCOPE
2.1 The manual deals with rural sections of Expressways, National Highways, State Highways
and Major District Roads. It does not deal with Other District Roads and Village Roads, for
which a reference may be made to "IRC:SP:20 Manual on Route Location, Design,
Construction and Maintenance of Rural Roads". However, the provisions and guidelines in
this manual are expected to be applicable to a large extent to Urban Roads also. But for
these roads, some additional specific requirements may be there, beyond those dealt in
this document. The manual deals with new construction as well as improvements to
existing roads under various modes of implementation including item rate, EPC, BOT, HAM
etc. Special aspects of each mode have been highlighted wherever necessary.
2.2 The selection of alignment of any road is generally not governed by the siting of cross-
drainage structures except in case of major bridges of length more than 60 m. IRC:SP:54
"Project Preparation Manual for Bridges" lays down guidelines covering various aspects,
which are to be detailed in the preparation of bridge projects. The survey and investigation
for culverts is covered in IRC:SP:13. For hill roads and road tunnels, reference may also be
made to IRC: 52 "Recommendations about the Alignment, Survey and Geometric Design of
Hill Roads", IRC:SP:48 "Hill Road Manual" and IRC:SP - 91 “Guidelines for Road Tunnels”.
2.3 In order to ensure that the Surveys and Investigations, Feasibility Report and Detailed
Project Report are complete, and no essential detail is missed, checklists for each of those
activities are presented in the Appendices - 6, 9.
2.4 It should be understood clearly that the extent of operations involved in surveys and
investigations including the detailing of the individual aspects, would depend very much on
the size and scope of each project and the class of the highway. Depending on the needs
of the situation, one or more phases of investigations might be curtailed, telescoped or
made more extensive than prescribed in this manual.
2.5 The order in which various surveys are discussed in the manual, should not be taken to
mean that such work must strictly follow the same pattern or sequence. Some of the
surveys could easily be initiated in advance and carried out simultaneously overlapping
each other. For example, some results of soil and materials survey and study of cross-
drainage structures would be needed as an essential input to the Feasibility Report. But
more detailed investigations on these aspects may be continued in the detailed engineering
phase. It should be up to the Client to exercise discretion and adopt a flexible approach.
The requirements of the funding agencies or the Client according administrative approval,
may also result in rescheduling the sequence of activities, and in redefining the extent of
coverage of each activity.
7
3 STAGES IN PROJECT PREPARATION
3.1 Stages
Broadly, the stages involved in the preparation and sanction of Project are:
a. Pre-feasibility study
b. Feasibility Study
c. Detailed Project Report
d. Project Clearances
3.2.2 At this stage, the viability of the Project has to be established by carrying out minimum
surveys and investigations, in the least possible time. In order to do that, one has to
largely depend on desk top study of the available data, exploration of alignments on the
digital maps, and field reconnaissance to understand and decide the features of the
proposed project highway.
3.2.3 Road Net Work in the project influence area shall be studied to understand the primary
road corridor in which the project road falls, the alternative routes available between the
proposed origin and designation, and to assess the traffic likely to be attracted to the
project road after its upgradation. Available traffic data on the project corridor and the
region, can be collected from the field to estimate the possible revenue.
3.2.4 Various alignment options shall be prepared on digital maps in accordance with the criteria
given in section 4, and the optimum alignment shall be selected by the Client with due care
to avoid environmentally / ecologically sensitive areas. The final alignment should aim at
reduction in length, travel time, travel costs between the origin and destinations, life cycle
costing etc., in addition to improvement in the existing geometric features / elements.
3.2.5 A minimum of reconnaissance survey, inventory and condition surveys of road and
structures shall be conducted for the selected alignment, and based on these inventories,
preliminary project upgradation proposals shall be made, and corresponding cost estimates
shall be prepared. Traffic forecast and revenue estimation shall be done based on
preliminary assessment of traffic from secondary data. And finally, economic and financial
analysis shall be carried out using the projected traffic and cost of the project, and viability
shall be established.
3.2.6 Prefeasibility Report can be used by the Client to decide if the project is viable and if it
should proceed further for feasibility study and preparation of detailed project report.
8
3.3 Feasibility Study
In the event that the Client decides to conduct feasibility study and the detailed project
report, it is required to carry out detailed surveys and investigations. Feasibility Study also
aims to establish whether the proposal is acceptable in terms of soundness of engineering
design and expected benefits from the project, for the investments involved.
Detailed road & structure inventory and condition surveys, possible upgradation proposals,
detailed topographic surveys, detailed traffic surveys and projections, soil, material and
geo-technical investigations, environmental and social impact assessment, shall be carried
out for the purpose of feasibility study. It is ideal to carry out sub-soil investigations at
feasibility stage for a better estimation of project viability. A detailed scope of conduct of
feasibility study is presented in section 10 of this code.
In feasibility study, project cost will be estimated based on the preliminary designs of the
highway, structures and other miscellaneous components and facilities. Due to the advent
of LiDAR, NSV and other modern survey equipment, one shall have to invariably establish
the primary control points and capture the details of all the features along the alignment,
including the exhaustive point cloud required for development of a digital terrain model at
this point of time. So, only detailed structural designs remain for the DPR stage. However,
project clearances will be an important activity that would be taken up after receiving the
in-principle approval / administrative approval / stage I clearance (as the case may be)
from the competent authority of the Client.
3.4.2 For externally funded projects, the requirements at various stages are different and the
agencies may ask for specific information involving various degree of accuracy of survey
and investigations. The sequence of survey operations and project preparation may thus,
have to be structured to meet the specific needs of the project, its funding option and the
requirements of the authority sponsoring it.
Fig. 3.1. gives a flow chart of the operations involved in highway project preparation.
9
3.5.1 The process of land acquisition needs to be started immediately after finalising the
alignment. Provisions of the appropriate Land Acquisition Act will govern the various steps
to be followed in the process of land acquisition. Depending on the quantum of land
acquisition, creation of separate land acquisition authority is generally necessary.
Acquisition of Government land, Private Land, Forest Land and land falling under Costal
Regulation Zone, etc. will attract different acts/regulations.
3.5.2 The various steps in land acquisition, namely, appointment of exclusive competent
authority (CALA), if required, declaring intention of acquisition, issuing notices and giving
hearing to the affected parties, joint measurements, final notices and acquisition of the
land, etc. require considerable time and need to be closely monitored to acquire the land
within the desired time limit.
3.5.3 Temporary and permanent structures coming in the alignment, trees need to be cut,
including those in the forest lands, need special attention for obtaining
permission/valuation from the Competent Authority. Similarly, obtaining permission of the
Ministry of Forest and Environment for the forest land, Wild Life Clearance and the land
coming in the coastal regulation zone need to be processed in time.
3.5.4 Detailed procedures for obtaining various project clearances are presented in section 18 of
this manual.
10
11
4 GUIDING PRINCIPLES FOR ROUTE SELECTION AND
ALIGNMENT IMPROVEMENT
4.1 The fundamental principle of route selection and alignment improvement is to achieve
the least overall cost on transportation, having regard to the costs of initial
construction of the highway facility, its maintenance, and road user cost, while at the
same time, satisfying the social and environmental requirements.
4.2 Different possibilities exist for route selection and alignment improvement. There can
be a totally green field alignment, or improvement of the existing road is done with
bypasses and realignments. Green field alignment alternatives shall be prepared by
using survey of India toposheets / satellite imageries / digital maps etc., duly
considering various factors listed in Appendix-1 and in Fig. 4.1. It should be
understood that all these factors may not be applicable to each and every highway
project and some of them, even if applicable, may not be feasible in many
circumstances. For each case, the Client has to exercise judgement to reach an
optimum solution, in the light of the fundamental principle of minimum transportation
cost enunciated earlier.
4.3 Where the project involves improvements to an existing road, every effort should be
directed towards removing the inherent deficiencies with respect to
4.4 Any disregard of these aspects may lead to unnecessary expenditure, since at a later
date the alignment may again have to be improved at a considerable extra cost. It is,
therefore, imperative that the final center line of the road with respect to which, the
improvements are designed and to be carried out, is fixed with great care in view of
ultimate geometric requirements and economy. The other important point is removal
of structural deficiencies with an eye on future needs with respect to pavement, cross
drainage and area drainage requirement, etc.
4.6 Apart from engineering factors, environmental impact of the proposal should be fully
kept in view in terms of such aspects as air pollution, damage to life systems, soil
erosion, drainage pattern, landscaping, disruption of life of local communities, etc.
12
4.7 Comparison of overall cost shall be carried for various greenfield alignment options
and improvement of the existing alignment and the alignment option involving
minimum overall cost shall be selected.
13
14
IRC : SP : 19-2020
5.2 The economic profile data are generally collected at two levels, viz., (a) Region or
State and (b) Project influence Area. The regional economic profile gives an idea of
how the economic growth has taken place in relation to growth of traffic, thus, giving
a basis for estimation of future growth of traffic for various scenarios of economic
growth. The Project Influence Area is the zone in the near vicinity of the highway
project where investments in the project serve as a catalytic agent towards the speedy
development of the area. Such a development generates additional traffic other than
the normal. It may be sometimes necessary to collect data pertaining to other zones
far from the region, if it has the potential to affect the traffic on the project corridor.
5.3 The economic profile survey of the region should enable the presentation of an
overview of the region's/ state's economy, population and transport system over the
past years and projected to future years. The data should be collected for at least past
ten years.
5.4 The socio-economic status of the Road Influence Area should provide a descriptive
and quantified profile from available data on population, agricultural production, area
under crops, annual industrial and mining production by type of establishment,
tourism potential and the inputs and outputs moving by road. Information on major
planned development projects (type of establishment and expected annual production)
should also be collected.
5.5 The historical trend data should be analyzed statistically to determine the growth
trends and elasticity of traffic with respect to population, industrial production and
agricultural output. The planned rates of growth of those selected indicators viz., GDP,
NSDP, Per Capita Income, Population in the future should be obtained and used in the
estimation of traffic.
15
IRC : SP : 19-2020
6.1 General
Information about traffic is indispensable for any highway project, since it would form
the basis for the design of the pavement, fixing the number of traffic lanes, design of
intersections and economic appraisal of the project, etc.
6.4.2 A seven days count will give the Average Daily Traffic (ADT). This value may be
converted to Annual Average Daily Traffic (AADT) by applying seasonal factors and / or
by using conversion factors from any continuous traffic count in the region.
16
IRC : SP : 19-2020
6.4.3 When traffic census data from existing count stations are compiled, it may be found
useful to collect past data (preferably about 10 years) so as to establish meaningful
growth trends in the past for each vehicle class. Secondary data like fuel sales at
nearest fuel stations may be considered if past traffic data is not available. Data
pertaining to revenue collected at the Toll Plazas in the adjoining packages, or in the
region may also be collected and judiciously used for estimation of past trends.
6.4.2 The survey should normally be conducted for three consecutive days, on sample basis,
during a representative week in the year and must encompass the weekly market day
and one working day. For exceptional cases, in heavy density corridors and where the
daily variation in the traffic is not much, at least one day's survey may be conducted on
a normal working day. Seasonal variation in traffic shall be kept in mind while
interpreting the data.
6.4.3 There are several methods available for conducting the O-D survey. Information is
available in IRC: 102 'Traffic Studies for Planning Bypasses Around Towns". Generally,
the "Roadside Interview Method (RSI)" and “Registration Plate Method (RPM)” are well-
suited for roads in rural areas and can be conveniently adopted. RSI consists basically
of interviewing drivers of vehicles at suitably located points with reference to the type
of road scheme in consideration. At these stations, the number as well as the type of
all vehicles passing the station are recorded. However, only a percentage of the drivers
at random need to be stopped and interviewed for origin, destination and other travel
particulars, like, commodity carried etc. The sampling should be systematic. Generally,
25 to 30 per cent of the vehicles may be covered in the peak periods, and 35 to 40 per
cent in the normal periods. RPM consists of noting the registration numbers of vehicles.
The sample size for Registration plate method shall be 60 to 80 percent in rural
highways.
6.4.4 The sample should be upscaled to ADT and preferably hourly based classified vehicle
type. The location of origin and destination zones will be determined in relation to each
individual station and the possibility of traffic diversion to the project road from other
road routes including bypasses. In principle, the zoning should bisect areas where
competing roads pass and the zonal configuration shall be adequate on either side of
the O-D station; thereafter, districts will serve as zones within the State. Zoning outside
the State will relate to individual or groups of States in accordance with the distance
from the O-D station. For coding purposes, code lists or code maps (to be shown to
drivers) will be prepared giving zone number and towns within that zone. The updated
(ADT) numbers shall then be presented by trip matrix. Information on weight of trucks
17
IRC : SP : 19-2020
should, following upscaling to ADT, be summed up by commodity type and the results
tabulated, giving total weight and average weight per truck for various commodity
types. Sample sizes for each vehicle type should also be indicated. A sample map of
Zonal Division is indicated in Fig. 1.
6.4.5 After processing the O-D results, traffic is assigned from the trip matrix's elements to
the project road's homogeneous sections, provided the route including the project road
in its improved condition is the most desirable of the alternative routes available in
terms of least vehicle operating costs.
6.5.2 The study is conveniently conducted by the "Moving Observer" method. By this method
a test vehicle is run along with the traffic stream, at approximately the perceptible
average speed of the traffic stream. A separate run is needed for each direction. The
average of around six runs ensures accuracy of results. By noting down the travel time,
including actual running time and stopped delays, the vehicles counted in the opposite
direction and those overtaken/overtaking, it is possible to calculate the volume, speed
and delay. For further information, IRC: 102 "Traffic Studies for Planning Bypasses
Round Towns" may be consulted.
6.6.2 For simple 'T' or 4-way junction, the survey could be conducted by stationing
enumerators on each arm of the junction to note the number of vehicles entering
through the arm and the direction of their exit. At multi-legged junctions or rotaries,
quick judgement about the exit direction or vehicles may not be possible. In such
cases, a registration plate survey may have to be conducted. This consists of noting the
registration numbers (generally only the last three digits) of a sample of vehicles
entering the intersection.
6.6.3 Simultaneously, on each exit, the registration numbers of vehicles leaving the junction
are noted. The two sets of numbers are then matched in the office to determine the
directional movements. For recording traffic movement at a junction Table 3.1,
Intersection Design Data given in IRC: SP:41 Guidelines for the design of At-Grade
intersections in rural and urban areas shall be used.
6.6.4 Usually, it is not necessary to conduct traffic surveys on junctions where traffic on the
minor cross road is less than 100 vehicles per day.
18
IRC : SP : 19-2020
6.7 Traffic Surveys for Replacing Railway Level Crossings with Over Bridges/
Subways.
6.7.1 Present criteria of replacing railway level crossings with over bridges/underpasses are
based on the product of gate closures and fast traffic per day. For this purpose, counts
should be taken in a week spread over three consecutive days and 24 hours each day if
such information is not already available. The number and duration of gate closures
should be ascertained from the Railway Authorities and also counted at site by
conducting a 24 hours survey.
6.7.2 Information should also be obtained on the angle of crossing of the roadway and the
railway. In case the road alignment has curves near the railway crossing, to make it a
perpendicular crossing, an index plan including these curves and the straight alignment
beyond, should also be included to study the feasibility of improving the road alignment
as part of the project for replacing the level crossing.
6.7.3 As such, for safety considerations, all the level crossings on the State Highways and
National Highways shall be replaced by an ROB or RUB. Continuation of Service roads
across the railway line shall be decided in consultation with the Authority.
6.8.2 This survey shall be carried out along with classified volume count survey. Number of
days of survey will depend on the project location, the type of project and the intensity
and expected variation in traffic. This survey duration may vary between 24 hours and
3 days, but should be carried out at least for one day at the traffic count stations on a
random basis for commercial vehicles. Buses may be omitted as their weight can be
easily calculated and they do not result in excessive overloads.
6.8.3 The period of conducting the survey should also be judiciously selected keeping the
movement of commodity/destination oriented dedicated type of commercial vehicles in
view.
6.8.4 While finalizing the design by Equivalent Standard Axle Load (ESAL), the following
should be considered:
a. Past axle load spectrum in the region as well as on the road to the extent available
b. Annual variation in commercial vehicles
c. Optimistic and pessimistic considerations of future generation of traffic
d. Generation of changing VDF factor during the project period
Portable weigh pads shall be calibrated before conducting the survey. Axle load data
shall also be collected from nearest toll plaza or weigh bridge for validating the
collected data.
19
IRC : SP : 19-2020
b. Surveys for provision of pedestrian crossings shall also be conducted at all junctions
being replaced by grade separators.
c. Information shall be collected from local consultations, and inputs shall be taken
from local governmental/ non-governmental agencies in selecting sites for checking
pedestrian/ animal crossing traffic surveys.
6.12.1 Traffic counts and O-D surveys would provide information about present traffic on the
road (in the case of existing roads), or the possible diverted traffic (in the case of new
construction, such as, bypasses). For design purpose, however, it is necessary that
classified traffic should be predicted for the future horizon year for which the facility is
to be designed.
6.12.2 Period of projection depends on the type of the project, importance of the road,
availability of finances and other related factors. For major trunk routes, the desirable
and minimum forecast periods are 15/20/30 years, (excluding the period of
construction) though occasionally an even shorter period of 10 years is adopted
depending on the policies of stage construction. In the case of lower category roads,
the desirable period of projection is 10 years, but it no case should be less than 5
years. The Design Life shall be as stipulated in the manual of specifications and
standards for different category of roads.
6.12.3 Traffic growth should be assessed in the first instance on the basis of observed trend of
traffic in the recent years and other economic indicators using the technique given in
Appendix-2. In this connection, the IRC: 108 “Guidelines for Traffic Prediction on
Rural Highways”, may be referred to. If reliable information is not available, as a broad
20
IRC : SP : 19-2020
guide, a compound growth rate of 5 per cent per annum could be adopted for this
purpose.
6.12.4 Forecast of traffic based on past trends should also be modified for 'generated' traffic
that may be using the highway facility after it is constructed. Generated traffic is quite
distinct from the diverted traffic and represents journeys induced by reduced journey
times and higher level of travel comfort which would not otherwise have been made. It
is not necessary to allow for generated traffic on small schemes, but this may be called
for on comparatively larger projects. Estimation of generated traffic should be carried
out as per the guidelines given in IRC -108.
21
IRC : SP : 19-2020
22
IRC : SP : 19-2020
7 RECONNAISSANCE SURVEY
7.1 Purpose
7.1.1 The main objective of reconnaissance survey is to examine the general character of the
area for the purpose of determining the most feasible route, or routes, for furthermore
detailed investigations. Data collected should be adequate to examine the feasibility of
all the different routes in question, as also to furnish the Client with approximate
estimates of quantities and costs, so as to enable him to decide on the most suitable
alternative or alternatives. The survey should also help in determining any deviations
necessary in the basic geometric standards to be adopted for the highway facility.
7.3.1 Reconnaissance begins with a study of all the available maps. The types of useful map
information which are currently available in the country are as below:
i. The most useful maps are the topographical sheets available in the scale of
1:25,000, 1:50,000 and 1:250,000. Map coverage on 1:50,000 and 1:250,000
scale are available for the whole of India but map coverage with the preferable
scale of 1:25,000 is at present, available for about 30 percent of the country.
These are useful as index maps or to indicate an overview of the project location and
are available for most of the States.
b. Apart from the above-mentioned SOI maps there are special purpose maps, like,
Forest Survey of India, Vegetation Maps on scale 1:25,000,000 showing incidence
of orchards, reserve forests, clusters of social forestry areas, etc. which may be
helpful in selection of alignment in special cases.
c. Also, maps prepared by National Bureau of Soil Survey and Land Use Planning
(NBSS & LUP) indicating information on Soil, Wasteland etc., and Geological Survey
of India Maps (on scale 1:50,000 or smaller) with information on geology,
23
IRC : SP : 19-2020
geomorphology and changes in drainage, river courses, etc. are available for many
areas.
7.3.2 After study of the topographical features on the maps, a number of alignments feasible
in a general way are selected keeping the following points in view:
a. The alignment should take into account all the control points and should be the
shortest and most economical, compatible with the geometric requirements of
gradient and curvature.
f. Green field alignments may reduce the distance between the origin and destination.
However, comparison of costs i.e. cost of construction, land acquisition, utility
shifting, dismantling of structures etc. between widening of the existing alignment
and green field alignment is required to finalise the alignment option.
This technique is used with the help of satellites. At present, it gives a resolution of the
order of 6 metres. Photographic products of imagery are available from National
Remote Sensing Agency, Hyderabad on scales of 1: 12,500, 1:25,000 and 1:50,000.
Major advantage of satellite imagery is, it’s repeatability, as orbiting satellites visit the
same spot on earth every few weeks. Thus, the latest information regarding the
physical features (like, the extent of a town or urban area, etc.) can be obtained to
update on the available map. The information on natural resources namely, geology,
geomorphology, land use, soil status (waterlogging, erosion, etc.), drainage, extent of
forest, etc. as available may be most useful input for the planners of highway
alignment.
7.4.1 Aerial reconnaissance will provide a bird's eye view of the alignments under
consideration along with the surrounding area. It will help to identify factors, which call
for rejection or modification of any of the alignment. Aerial mobile LiDAR (Light
24
IRC : SP : 19-2020
Detection and Ranging) is a relatively new technology and is widely available for
undertaking aerial reconnaissance surveys. At this stage, aerial survey may also be
done using UAV with Photogrammetry also. Final decision about the alignments to be
studied in detail on the ground could be taken on the basis of the aerial
reconnaissance.
7.4.2 After collection of various maps, a tentative alignment shall be prepared for the project
road. In case of bypasses, a minimum of three alternatives shall be prepared. While
preparing alternatives, all points listed in Appendix-1 shall be considered. These
alternatives shall be verified during ground reconnaissance survey for further
improvement.
7.5.1 Various alternative routes located as a result of the map study are further examined in
the field by ground reconnaissance. As such, this part of the survey is an important link
in the chain of activities leading to selection of the final route.
7.5.2 General reconnaissance consists of general examination of the ground walking or riding
along the probable route and collecting all available information necessary for
evaluating the same. In the case of hill sections, it may sometime be advantageous to
start the reconnaissance from the obligatory point situated close to the top. If an area
is inaccessible for the purposes of ground reconnaissance, recourse may be had to
aerial reconnaissance to clear the doubts.
7.5.3 While carrying out ground reconnaissance, it is advisable to leave reference pegs to
facilitate further survey operations.
7.5.4 Instruments generally used during ground reconnaissance include hand held GPS,
Walkie-talkie sets and mobile phones for communication.
7.5.5 In difficult hilly and forest terrain assistance of Global Positioning System (GPS) or
Differential GPS (DGPS) may also be taken where the magnitude and importance of the
work justify their provision. GPS is a comparatively new technology which utilizes the
satellites orbiting around the earth. A minimum of four satellites are needed to indicate
the co-ordinates (X, Y, Z) on the ground at any time of day and night. The observations
are made to an accuracy of nearly a few metres or so. For more precise work with
accuracy of a few centimeters, two geo-receivers are used and this mode of using two
GPS is known as differential GPS (DGPS).
7.5.6 Points on which data may be collected during ground reconnaissance are listed in
Appendix-3
Based on the information collected during the reconnaissance survey, a report should
be prepared. The report should include all relevant information collected during the
survey, a plan to the scale of 1:50,000 or larger as available showing the alternative
alignments studied along with their general profile and rough cost estimates. It should
discuss the merits and demerits of the different alternatives to help the selection of one
or more alignments for detailed survey and investigation. For selection of most feasible
option, quantitative approach may be followed as illustrated in Appendix-8.
25
IRC : SP : 19-2020
8 PRELIMINARY SURVEY
8.1 Purpose
8.1.1 Preliminary survey is a relatively large-scale instrument survey conducted for the
purpose of collecting all the physical information, which affects the proposed location of
a new highway or improvements to an existing highway. In the case of new roads, it
consists of running an accurate traverse line along the route previously selected on the
basis of the reconnaissance survey. In the case of existing roads where only
improvements are proposed, the survey line is run along the existing alignment. During
this phase of the survey, topographic features and other features, like, houses,
monuments, places of worship, cremation or burial grounds, utility lines, existing road
and railway lines, streams, rivers, canal crossings, cross-drainage structures, etc. are
tied to the traverse line. Longitudinal-sections and cross- sections, are taken and
benchmarks established. The data collected at this stage will form the basis for the
determination of the final center line of the road. For this reason, it is essential that
every precaution should be taken to maintain a high degree of accuracy.
8.1.2 Besides the above, general information, which may be useful in fixing design features
within close limits, is collected during this phase. The information may concern traffic,
soil, construction materials, drainage, etc. and may be collected from existing records
and through intelligent inspection/simple measurements. It may be found convenient to
divide the road into homogeneous sections from traffic consideration and prepare a
typical estimate for one km stretch as representative of each homogeneous section.
With the data collected, it should be possible to prepare rough cost estimates within
reasonably close limits for obtaining administrative approval, if not already accorded
and for planning further detailed survey and investigations. In particular, information
may be collected regarding:
a. The highest sub-soil and flood water levels, the variation between the maximum
and minimum, and the nature and extent of inundation, if any, gathered from local
enquires or other records. These should be correlated to data about the maximum
and minimum rainfall and its duration, intensity, spacing, etc. by appropriate
hydrological analysis.
c. Any particular construction problem of the area, like, sub-terranean flow, high level
water storage resulting in steep hydraulic gradient across the alignment canal
crossings and their closure periods. Information regarding earlier failure in the area
of slides or settlements of slopes, embankments and foundations, together with
causes thereto may also be gathered from records and enquiry where feasible.
d. In cut sections, the nature of rock i.e., hard, soft etc. should be determined by trial
pits or boreholes. This is essential to make realistic cost estimates.
26
IRC : SP : 19-2020
8.2.1 Topographic surveys, which are one of the most important and crucial field tasks under
the project, should normally be taken up after the completion of reconnaissance
surveys. Technologies that can meet the following accuracy levels shall be adopted.
8.2.2 For land-based surveys, Mobile LiDAR (Light Detection and Ranging) or better
technology that can meet the above requirements shall be adopted. Laser used shall be
Class 1 (eye safe), 905 nm, with a maximum resolution of 2 mm and scan rate of 700 k
shots per sec. For aerial based surveys, Photogrammetry or Aerial Mobile LiDAR (Light
Detection and Ranging) or better technology that can meet above requirements shall
be adopted. Where possible, mobile/ terrestrial LiDAR and total station or better system
should be used to supplement aerial LiDAR for the final alignment chosen. Aerial based
surveys shall be used as the primary source of topographical data only in cases where a
new/green field alignment is being planned and/or major junctions are being planned
where it is necessary to significantly increase the survey corridor beyond the
capabilities of mobile LiDAR. In shadow areas such as invert levels below culverts,
terrestrial LiDAR / Total Station may be used. Where it is not feasible to use LiDAR or
better technologies for any reason, especially for small Projects, the Project Proponent
may decide to permit traditional methods of GPS/ Total Station/ Auto Level to carry out
the study. Standard operating procedures for use of Mobile LiDAR, Aerial LiDAR, Aerial
Photogrammetry are presented in Appendix 13.
8.2.3 Prior to start of the topographic survey, GPS Pillars / Traverse Pillars / Benchmark pillars
shall be erected all along the selected route. The size of each precast pillar shall be 15
cm X 15 cm X 45 cm and be cast in RCC of grade M 15 with a nail fixed in the center of
the top surface. The precast pillar shall be embedded in concrete up to a depth of
30cm with CC M10 (5 cm wide all around). The balance 15 cm above ground shall be
painted yellow. The spacing shall be 250m apart. GTS Benchmarks shall be established
on these pillars with RL and BM No. marked on it with red paint.
8.2.4 After erecting the above survey monuments, survey shall be carried out to establish the
primary control stations along the selected alignment at an interval of 2.5 km with
Differential Global Positioning System (DGPS). A pair of observations to be made on
control points for a duration of an hour using DGPS to observe the latitude and
longitude. After completion of all the observations on control points along the entire
alignment, they shall be converted to UTM Coordinate system based on WGS 84
Datum. These points should give Northing and Easting (X,Y coordinates). Further,
Accurate Level Control shall be established by carrying out the fly levelling on these
pillars using auto level duly connecting the traverse to nearest GTS benchmarks
established by Survey of India.
27
IRC : SP : 19-2020
a. The width of the survey corridor should take into account the layout of the
proposed alignment including the extent of embankment and cut slopes and the
general ground profile. While carrying out the field surveys, the widening scheme
(i.e. right, left or symmetrical to the center line of the existing carriageway) should
be taken into consideration so that the topographic surveys cover sufficient width
beyond the center line of the proposed carriageway. Normally the surveys should
extend a minimum of 30 m beyond either side of the center line of the proposed
carriageway or the proposed right of way, whichever is more
b. In case the reconnaissance survey reveals the need for bypassing the congested
locations, the traverse lines would be run along the possible alignments in order to
identify and select the most suitable alignment for the bypass. The detailed
topographic surveys should be carried out along the bypass alignment approved by
Client. At locations where grade separated intersections could be the obvious
choice, the survey area will be suitably increased. Field notes of the survey should
be maintained which would also provide information about traffic, soil, drainage
etc.
d. Where existing roads cross the alignments, the survey will extend a minimum of
100 m either side of the road center line and will be of sufficient width to allow
improvements, including at grade intersection to be designed.
8.2.6 The detailed field surveys shall include Physical features, such as, buildings,
monuments, burial grounds, cremation grounds, places of worship, posts, pipelines,
existing roads and railway lines, stream/river/canal crossings, cross-drainage structures,
etc. that are likely to affect the project proposals. Where the survey is for improving or
upgrading an existing road, measurements should also be made for existing
carriageway, roadway and location and radii of horizontal curves. In case of highways in
rolling and hilly terrain the nature and extent of grades, ridges and valleys and vertical
curves should necessarily be covered.
8.2.7 When the detailed survey is done with the help of Total Stations, cross sections shall be
taken at 25 m interval to cover the entire survey corridor including cross roads, future
intersections, interchanges, flyovers, underpasses etc. In hilly terrain the cross sections
can be at 10 m intervals. In both the cases, cross sections can be taken at closer
intervals in sharp / steep curves, as required. In case of terrestrial / mobile / aerial
LiDAR, the equipment shall be capable of taking 300 points per sq.m with which point
cloud is generated and design is carried out. After carrying out the designs, cross
sections can be automatically generated with utmost accuracy without any
extrapolation. In case of the photogrammetry using UAV, care shall be taken to achieve
70% of overlap in imaging.
8.2.8 Additional survey shall be done for the bridges and the other cross drainage structures
as per relevant codes. Cross section of the streams, HFLs, invert levels etc. for the CD
works shall be taken with supplementary surveys using Total Station and Auto Level.
This will be integrated into the main survey data.
8.2.9 Field notes of the survey should be clear and concise, yet comprehensive enough for
easy and accurate plotting.
28
IRC : SP : 19-2020
8.2.10 Apart from traverse survey, general information about traffic, soil, drainage should be
collected while the traverse is being run, as mentioned in para 8.1.2.
8.2.11 In hilly areas, a 1.0 to 1.2 m wide trace cut may be made, if required, during the
preliminary survey. For details in this regard, reference may be made to IRC: 52
”Recommendations about the Alignment Survey and Geometric Design of Hill Roads".
a. Making use of the maps and data from preliminary survey showing the longitudinal
profile, cross-sections and contours, a few alternative alignments for the final
center line of the road are drawn and studied and the best one satisfying the
engineering, aesthetic and economic requirements is selected.
b. For the selected alignment, a trial grade line is drawn taking into account the
controls which are established by intersections, railway crossings, streams and
other drainage requirements. In the case of improvements of an existing road, the
existing road levels are also kept in view.
c. For the selected alignment, a study of the horizontal alignment in conjunction with
the profile is carried out and adjustments made in both as necessary for achieving
proper co-ordination.
d. Horizontal curves including transitions with adequate provision for visibility are
designed and final center line marked on the map.
8.3.2 The alignment determined in the design office shall be cross checked in the field.
8.3.3 Determination of the final center line of the road forms the appropriate stage for
preparing plans and estimates for land acquisition and obtaining other clearances.
29
IRC : SP : 19-2020
9.1 General
9.1.1. The Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) has become an integral part of highway
project preparation work. The main purpose of ElA is to identify the environmental
impact of the project proposal and its different alternatives, weigh their significance
and severance, propose possible mitigating measures and provide necessary
information for taking decision regarding the overall acceptability of the project from
environmental angle.
9.1.2. The subject is being briefly described in the following paragraphs but in all cases of
actual project preparation the provision in the "Guidelines for Environmental Impact
Assessment of Highway Projects" (IRC: 104) , Guidelines on Requirements for
Environmental Clearance for Road Projects (IRC: SP-93) together with relevant
circulars, notifications, guidelines and instructions issued by the Ministry of
Environment, Forest and Climate Change (MOEF & CC) shall be followed as guiding
principles.
In most of the cases the second element i.e. Environmental Design within its Scope will
have a brief socio-economic base-line study, assessment of special requirements viz.,
Wild Life, Forests and Coastal Regulatory Zones and preparation of a Resettlement and
Preliminary Rehabilitation Action Plan (RAP) may become necessary.
9.1.5. The provisions in the Notification of the Government of India in Ministry of Environment
and Forest and Climate Change No. S. O. 1533 dated 14.09.2006 and S.O. 2559 (E)
dated 22.08.2013 shall be followed. As per the current provisions, Expansion of
National Highways having length less than 100 km do not require Environmental
Clearance irrespective of the width of land acquisition. Also, Expansion of National
Highways having length more than 100 km but involving additional right of way or land
acquisition not exceeding 40 m on existing alignments and 60 m on re-alignments or
by-passes do not require Environment Clearance. However, obtaining environmental
30
IRC : SP : 19-2020
Clearance is mandatory for all new Green Field Highways irrespective of length. For
State Highways, Environmental Clearance is required only for new State Highways and
SH expansion projects in hilly terrain (above 1000 m AMSL) and or ecologically
sensitive areas.
9.1.6. Salient features of MOEF&CC "Environmental Guidelines for Highway Projects" are
covered in Appendix-11.
Positive and negative impacts of upgrading the highway or constructing a new highway
shall be identified. Cost-effective measures may be proposed to enhance the positive
impacts and to avoid or mitigate the effect of negative impacts.
Where felt necessary, public consultation with the affected groups or involved NGO' s
may be carried out.
From the Environmental analysis, all elements with potential for adverse impacts should
be identified, for which steps can then be taken to avoid/mitigate through judicious
design changes (e.g., shifting the road alignment to save trees on one side of the
road). Adverse impacts, such as, soil erosion, flooding, loss of vegetation cover, etc.
should be identified and appropriate mitigating measures, like ground cover planting,
installation of proper drainage system, etc. can be incorporated in design to reduce the
impact. Cost effective proposals may also be included in the design proposal to suitably
upgrade or enhance the environmental quality along the highway or the new alignment
in a sustainable manner. Where possible, a few stretches along the project road may be
selected for provision of facilities for non-motorized transport, which may provide an
indirect encouragement to enhancement of environmental quality.
MoEF & CC directions stipulate the use of fly-ash in construction projects. The
applicable guidelines regarding utilization of fly-ash shall be complied.
31
IRC : SP : 19-2020
9.5.1 Whenever the project will entail acquisition of land, structures and other assets and
cause displacement or loss of assets within the public right of way, the project should
undertake a socio-economic base line study and prepare a Resettlement and
Rehabilitation Action Plan (RAP).
a. To assess and bring out the impacts of land acquisition and assets for the project
civil works on the people, who own properties in the area to be acquired or live on
the land to be acquired and/or derive their income from the land or own
enterprises operating on the land to be acquired,
b. To present the entitlement policy for compensation and assistance to people
affected by the project, and
c. To prepare an action plan for delivery of compensation and assistance outlined in
the policy to the persons duly identified as entitled to such assistance.
9.5.3 The present policy of the Government is that the population adversely affected by the
project should receive benefits from it or at the least, they should not be worse off than
before because of the project. Since acquisition of land and other assets may be
unavoidable and is an integral part of project design and implementation, undertaking a
social impact assessment and preparing RAP may also be included as a part of project
design from the start and undertaken in close co-ordination with environmental analysis
and environmental action plan. Also, as far as possible involuntary settlement may be
avoided or at least minimized wherever possible, by exploring other alternative project
designs.
9.5.4 The initial screening of social and environmental impacts should be a part of final
selection of alignment. In this connection the initial Environmental Examination grading
suggested in the table in Appendix-5 may be seen.
9.5.5 In cases where displacement, loss of assets or other negative impacts on people are
unavoidable, the project should assist the affected persons with means to improve their
former living standards, income-earning capacities, production levels or at least
maintain the previous standards of living.
9.5.6 Since no civil work can be undertaken on any stretch of road before land acquisition
and payment of compensation as per RAP, it is essential that planning and
implementation of civil works may be coordinated with RAP.
9.5.7 Preparation of RAP requires a thorough understanding of the local people, and the
social, economic and cultural factors influencing their lives. It is essential that detailed
base line studies are conducted with a participatory approach through consultation with
potentially affected persons and other stake holders in the area, the local NGO's,
municipal authorities, etc. and a mutually satisfactory solution is achieved.
32
IRC : SP : 19-2020
10 FEASIBILITY REPORT
10.1 A Feasibility Report is prepared after the preliminary survey is completed. The report is
intended to serve as the basis for according Administrative Approval (AA) for the
project by the Highway Department/Public Works Department. When International
funding is sought, it forms the basis for entering into negotiations with the funding
agency and concluding an agreement for loan. The Feasibility Report must establish the
economic viability and technical soundness of the alternative selected. Thus, it must be
preceded by the engineering surveys and investigations of sufficient accuracy and detail
so as to result in a fairly firm estimation of the cost of the project. It must be based on
accurate traffic projections and must contain an economic analysis.
10.2 A full account of the socio-economic profile of the state and the Road Influence Area
must be given in the Feasibility Report. The transport infrastructure of the state must
be fully described, giving details of the road/transport sector. The Feasibility Report
shall include discussion on different alternative alignments, alternative pavement design
for deciding the one most suitable option as final option. Feasibility of stage
construction should also be examined in the light of the rate of growth of traffic and
other relevant parameters.
10.3 A brief outline of the organizational structure of the Authority must be given,
establishing its adequacy in handling the project and giving details of any capacity
augmentation / support system proposed.
10.4 The Report should give a brief description of the scope of the project, it’s need, sources
of funding, budget and plan provision, selection of route alignment, cross-sectional
elements, drainage facilities and construction technology.
10.5 The methodology adopted for the various studies must be described. These include
traffic surveys, soil, material and sub-soil investigations, hydrological and drainage
studies.
10.6 The design standards and design methodology adopted must be explained.
10.7 The Report must contain a reasonably accurate estimate of costs, giving the basis for
adopted rates. Any provision for escalation of costs must be explained.
10.9 The economic analysis must be based on current costs. The IRC Manual on Economic
Analysis of Highway Projects (Special Publication No. 30) gives details of the procedure
that may be adopted. Some other models like HDM IV or its latest revision developed
by the World Bank, RTEM III developed by Transport Research Laboratory U.K. after
suitable calibration for Indian conditions also can be used, if so desired. A sensitivity
analysis must be presented for the following cases:
33
IRC : SP : 19-2020
c. Base benefits minus 15 per cent and base costs plus 15 per cent
d. Implementation delay: one year
10.10 In addition to catering for the uncertainties in the generated and diverted traffic, a
sensitivity analysis shall be carried out considering the non-occurrence of the
development envisaged and/or the diverted traffic not attracted as per assumption. For
cost benefit assessment, the sensitivity analysis shall include:
a. Base Case
b. Pessimistic Scenario
c. Optimistic Scenario
10.11 The construction arrangements envisaged must be discussed. The procedure for
prequalification of contractors and for bidding and supervision arrangements must be
discussed. Generally, these shall be as per the extant policies of the Client.
10.12 In case of Build, Operate and Transfer (BOT) Projects, the financial analysis with
different financial scenarios must be presented. The financial analysis may include cash
flows, minimum construction time and exploring other revenues including the tolls.
a. Locality map
b. Plans showing various alternative alignments considered and the selected alignment
c. Typical cross-sections showing pavement details and widening scheme
d. Plan and Profile drawings
e. Drawings for cross-drainage and other structures
f. Road junction drawings
g. Strip plan showing the salient project features
h. Preliminary land acquisition plans
10.14 The Feasibility Study shall have the following broad coverage:
a. Executive summary
b. Regional/State socio-economic profile
c. Socio-economic profile of the project influence area
d. Methodology adopted for the studies
e. Traffic surveys and analysis
f. Engineering survey investigations and analysis
g. Project road description and or improvement proposals
h. Environmental impact assessment
i. Resettlement and rehabilitation action plan
j. Project cost estimates including L.A. cost
k. Economic analysis including sensitivity Analysis and Financial Analysis
l. Conclusions and recommendations
34
IRC : SP : 19-2020
35
IRC : SP : 19-2020
11.1.1 Based on the study of the existing road network and the corridor where the project
highway falls, control points etc., the alignment options are drawn on the digital maps,
duly taking references from survey of India maps (Topo Sheets), satellite imageries
validated by field reconnaissance. Based on the feasibility of the alignment options and
their financial viability, the most optimum alignment is selected, and administrative
approval is obtained from the competent authority, through approval of pre-feasibility
report or alignment report, as the case may be.
11.1.2 After establishment of GPS Pillars for primary control, Traverse Stations and Temporary
Bench Marks for secondary control along the chosen alignment, topographic surveys
are conducted using Terrestrial / mobile / Arial LiDAR or Aerial Photogrammetry, which
are very detailed in nature. There is no way of doing preliminary surveys with these
methods. After development of the digital terrain model, preliminary designs are done,
and feasibility report is prepared. Upon receipt of approval of feasibility report from
Client, the final alignment can be transferred to the field.
11.1.3 Where topographic surveys are done by traditional methods using Total Station and
Auto Levels, Longitudinal Sections and cross sections can be taken at a larger interval
for the purpose of feasibility study. Once the feasibility study is approved, detailed
topographical survey can be done at a closer interval. But, as already explained, use of
modern equipment allows us to do detailed survey only.
11.1.4 However, it is necessary to stake the final center line on the ground for the purposes of
carrying out the pre-construction activities including land acquisition, enumeration of
utilities, trees, structures etc. After the publication of Notification for land acquisition
i.e. publication of 3A in the Gazette as per NHA act, it is possible to erect the boundary
pillars for the purpose of joint measurement survey for land acquisition.
11.1.5 The completeness and accuracy of the project drawings and estimates of quantities
depend, to a great deal, on the precision with which the final location is staked on
ground. The accuracy of the survey should be test checked by the senior professionals
of the concerned authority.
11.1.6 The final center line of the road should be suitably staked by fixing points at 50m
interval in plain and rolling terrain & 20m interval in hilly terrain. The stakes are
intended only for short period for taking levels of the ground along the center line and
cross section with reference thereto, in case of traditional survey. In the case of
existing roads, paint marks with button headed steel nails may be used instead of
stakes.
36
IRC : SP : 19-2020
At the time of execution, all construction lines will be set out and checked with
reference to the final center line established during the final location survey. It is
important, therefore, that not only all the points referencing the center line should be
protected and preserved but these are so fixed at site that there is little possibility of
their being disturbed or removed till the construction is completed.
A checklist indicating the major operations involved in the different types of survey and
investigation for a road project is given in Appendix-4.
37
IRC : SP : 19-2020
12.1 General
12.1.1 Investigations for soil and other materials required for construction are carried out in
respect of the likely sources and the availability and suitability of materials. Some other
investigations, for instance in respect of landslide prone locations may also be
conducted at this stage.
(i) to determine the nature and physical characteristics of soil and soil profile for
design of embankment and pavement.
(ii) to determine the salt content in soil in areas known to have problems, where the
composition of the design crust requires such testing
(iv) to classify the earthwork involved, into various categories, such excavation in soft
rock, hard rock, hard soil etc.
(v) to gather general information regarding sub-soil water level and flooding; and
(vii) quarries for fine aggregate and course aggregates required for pavement and
structures and to ascertain their availability and suitability for use.
(viii) locate sources of good quality water suitable for use in different items and work
12.2.1 The soil and materials location surveys should include study of all available information
such as geological maps, data published by various authorities regarding location of
construction materials and the information available with ground water authorities
regarding depth of water table etc. Soil maps prepared by the local agricultural
department and records of existing highways may also provide useful information. A
study of these data, if available, will be of great help in the planning and conduct of
further surveys and investigations. This information should be perused in conjunction
with general information gathered during the preliminary survey (see para 8.1.2).
12.2.2 After studying the available information, detailed programme of survey can be drawn
up. Points needing attention during detailed soil survey are highlighted further.
12.3.1 The first operation in the detailed soil survey is to demarcate the possible borrow areas.
While demarcating borrow areas the directions contained in IRC: 36 "Recommended
38
IRC : SP : 19-2020
Practice for Construction of Earth Embankments and Sub-Grade for Road Works "
should be kept in view. The extent of borrow areas should be commensurate with the
volume of work involved in the embankment.
12.3.2 The general character of material excavated from test pits should be recorded and tests
conducted on it in the laboratory for properties mentioned. Where the type on material
varies in a single pit, tests should be conducted on each type of soil separately and the
horizon of occurrence is noted. Following tests should be carried out on material from
cuts for the suitability of its use in the embankment shall be ascertained:
(iii) Density and optimum moisture content (IS:2720 Part VII or Part VIII as relevant)
(iv) Deleterious constituents (only in salt infested areas or where presence of salt is
suspected) (IS:2720 Part XXVII)
However, in case of highly plastic, poorly draining and unstable soils, some additional
soil tests for shrinkage properties may also need to be performed before accepting the
same either for foundation or embankment / subgrade.
12.3.3 The results of the laboratory investigations should be summarized in a convenient form
for which a proforma is suggested in Table 1. Usually this information should be
enclosed in full, with the project report. Based on results of the tests, sand content,
and classification of the soil in accordance with IS 1498 should also be determined. The
final selection of the borrow areas, whether for the body of the embankment or the
subgrade could then be made in accordance with the norms recommended in IRC:36 "
Recommended Practice for Construction of Earth Embankments and Sub-Grade for
Road Works " or MORTH Specifications. Great caution should be exercised to ensure
and mark, as far as possible, homogenous soils only for this purpose. Heterogeneous or
variable soils should be avoided. In making the selection, it should be ensured that the
best available homogeneous, soil is reserved for use in the subgrade and top 500 mm
portion of the embankment. After completing the analysis of the results, borrow area
charts similar to the sample shown in Fig. 12. 1 should be prepared.
39
IRC : SP : 19-2020
Note : If desired, the classification could alternatively be done according to the IS system of
classification. See respective paras of IRC 36: Recommended Practice for the Construction of
Embankment of Road Work in this Regard.
40
IRC : SP : 19-2020
41
IRC : SP : 19-2020
12.4.2 In addition to the above, some special considerations required have been enumerated
in Appendix-1 to this manual for locating roads in hilly areas, desert areas, water-
logged areas and areas subject to soil erosion. These points may be kept in view.
12.4.3 IRC Special Report No. 13 State of Art: High Embankment on Soft Ground Part- A-
Stage Construction Contains recommendations for foundations for high Embankments.
Special Report 14 entitled State of the Art High Embankments on Soft Ground- Part-B-
Ground Improvement. The points mentioned in them would be of help in preparation of
projects in similar situations. Software HED Version 1.0 (available with the IRC) for
design of high embankment is recommended for analysis. Slope stability analysis for
seismic forces and reinforcement force can be handled by this software. This software
has Graphic Capability.
12.4.4 Ministry of Road Transport and Highways circular No. NH-VI-50(21)/79 dated 25th
January, 1980 regarding "Investigation and Design for High Embankments at
Approaches to Bridges and Over bridges on National Highways and other Centrally
Financed Roads" has been printed with 17 Annexures in Addendum to Ministry's
Technical Circulars and Directives on National Highways and Centrally Sponsored Road
and Bridge Projects published by IRC. This circular is very exhaustive and covers basic
steps and procedures for soil investigation, typical worked out example for stability
analysis of embankments, filter design, settlement analysis, etc. (Copy of Circular is
annexed as…….)
12.5.1 In the same manner as described in para 12.4 for embankment material, soil in cut
sections along the center line of the road at an elevation corresponding to the design
subgrade level should be tested for the following general properties:
i. Gradation
ii. Atterberg limits
iii. Field density and moisture content
iv. Proctor density
v. California Bearing Ratio
vi. Shear strength parameters
42
IRC : SP : 19-2020
12.5.2 In the case of rock cuts where necessary, trial pits or boreholes should be made to the
foundation level, to make realistic estimates of the type of cutting involved. The interval
of trial bores may be 30 to 50 m or as otherwise decided by the Engineer-in-charge
depending on specific requirements.
12.6.1 Information collected during preliminary survey (see para: 8.1.2) would normally
identify the landslide prone areas along the alignment and every effort would have
been made to avoid these while fixing the center line of road. However, in case where
the same is not feasible, further investigations would be required to study the extent of
the problem and plan appropriate remedial measures. For this purpose, services of
geologist or soil specialist may often be needed.
12.6.2 Depending on the geological configuration and drainage of the area, slides may take
the form of rock or soil fall (i.e., movement of detached rock fragments at steep
angles), rock flows (i.e., soil or rock mass suddenly losing strength and flowing like a
liquid), or rotational slides (i.e., slips triggered under-cutting, erosion, external load on
upper parts of the slope, or water seepage), investigation in each case will, therefore,
depend on site conditions and the type of slide expected. These will involve collection
of information about the existing slides, sources of water in the area, substrata profile,
and other pertinent data which may facilitate inferences being drawn as to the cause,
mechanism, and potentiality of slides.
12.6.3 For detailed guidance in regard to such investigation, reference might be made to
standard publications on the subject and IRC Special Report No. 15 - "State of the Art:
Landslide Correction Techniques".
12.7.1 Geotechnical investigations shall be carried out to determine the sequence, extent and
suitability of the soil and rock stratum to support the foundations of bridge or other
structure and also to determine soil parameters and rock characteristics required for design
of foundations by in-situ testing or laboratory testing of soil and rock samples collected from
boreholes.
12.7.2 The geotechnical investigation shall be carried out in such a way that the profiles of
different types of soil for the entire length of the proposed bridge or other structure is
obtained and recorded.
12.7.3 Subsoil exploration shall consist of excavation, drilling of boreholes for the purpose of
collection of undisturbed and disturbed samples, standard penetration tests, in situ vane
shear tests and other field tests as specified by Engineer. Relevant Indian standards such as
IS 1498, IS 1892, IS 2131, IS 2132, IS 4434, IS 4464 and annex 2 of IRC 78 shall be
followed.
12.7.4 The scheme of boring, indicating the proposed locations and the depth of boring, shall be
submitted to Client for approval.
43
IRC : SP : 19-2020
12.7.5 For the approach road pavement, bore holes at each major change in pavement condition or
in deflection readings or at 2 km intervals whichever is less shall be carried out to a depth of
at least 2 m below embankment base or to rock level and are to be fully logged.
12.8.1 Based on the data derived from condition (surface condition, roughness) and structural
strength surveys, the project road section should be divided into segments
homogenous with respect to pavement condition and strength. The delineation of
segments homogenous with respect to roughness and strength should be done using
the cumulative difference approach (AASHTO).
a. For the widening (2-Laning) of existing road within the ROW, at least three sub-
grade soil samples shall be tested for each homogenous road segment or three
samples for each soil type encountered, whichever is more.
b. For the roads along new alignments, the test pits for sub grade soil shall be @ 5 km
interval or for each soil type, whichever is less. A minimum of three samples should
be tested corresponding to each homogenous segment.
12.9.1 New flexible pavements are to be designed in accordance with IRC:37 "Guidelines for
the Design of Flexible Pavement". General principles laid down in this publication for
moulding and testing soil specimens under different situations to use the CBR method
of design should be kept in view.
12.9.2 For new roads, the soil data already collected in earlier phases of the survey should be
studied in detail for ascertaining the variability/homogeneity of the soil profile and
planning further investigations. Where pavement design relates to
widening/strengthening of an existing road, the road should be divided into more or
less identical sections on the basis of actual performance and pavement composition,
as the basis for further testing.
12.9.3 For pavement design, apart from the general soil tests referred to earlier, CBR test
should be conducted for soaked, unsoaked or both these conditions depending on the
design requirement spelt out in IRC:37. Frequency of CBR testing may be decided
based on the soil classification tests conducted at close interval of 500 m-1,000 m.
Overall objective should be to get strength results for all changes in soil type or each
demarcated section of similar performance.
12.9.4 A suggested proforma for presenting soil investigation data pertinent to flexible
pavement design is given in Table 12.2.
44
IRC : SP : 19-2020
12.9.5 Overlay design shall be done by Falling Weight Deflectometer (FWD) using IRC 115:
Guidelines for Structural Evaluation and Strengthening of Flexible Road Pavements
Using Falling Weight Deflectometer (FWD) Technique. Standard Operating Procedure
for using FWD is presented in Appendix 13.
Where the use of brick aggregates is envisaged, a survey should be made to identify
the location and average lead from the work site of existing kilns capable of producing
overburnt bricks/ brick bats. Where suitable kilns are not in operation, the survey
should indicate the possibility of opening new kilns for the purpose.
45
IRC : SP : 19-2020
Manufactured sand could be utilised in construction where natural sand is not easily
available subject to meeting the specifications stipulated.
For manufactured items, like lime, cement, steel and bitumen, information about their
sources of supply and the distance of the nearest rail-head from the location of works
should be gathered during the survey. For lime, in addition to source and lead, the
information should cover its purity.
Information should also be gathered about the availability of water near the work site
and its suitability in conformity with IS:456 for construction purposes.
46
Table 12. 2 SUGGESTED PROFORMA FOR RECORDING SOIL INVESTIGATION DATA FOR FLEXIBLE PAVEMENT DESIGN
Note: **The moulding density (Whether Proctor density or field density) and the testing condition of samples (soaked or unsoaked) will depend on the nature of circumstances
and design requirement. In some cases only unsoaked CBR values may be needed in others only soaked values, and in some, both unsoaked and soaked values. Both
columns 15 & 16 do not therefore have to be filled in each and every case. For further guidance in this regard, references should be made to IRC 37-2001 "Guidelines for
the Design of Flexible Pavements"
47
IRC : SP : 19-2020
Table 12. 3 SUGGESTED PROFORMA FOR RECORD OF TEST VALUE OF AGGREGATES LIKE STONE METAL ETC.,
State :
District :
Date of Testing :
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
Average
Average
Average
Note : * For every quarry source, at least 3 specimens should be tested for each type of material met with
** For hard aggregates, like, stone metal, any one of the two tests given in columns 4 & 5 may be conducted
Wet test in column 6 has to be done in th ecase of soft aggregates like laterite, kankar, brick metal etc.,
48
IRC : SP : 19-2020
*** Not required to be carried out for soft aggregates, likes, laterite, kankar, brick metal etc.,
**** To be performed only when the material is to be used in bituminous constructions.
49
IRC : SP : 19-2020
State
District
Date of Testing :
Gradation : Per cent by weight passing the Atterberg limits (IS:2720-Part- Proc
Location and name General Sieve (IS:2720-Part-IV) V)
of quarry if any description Specimen
(correlated with of the No 75 Liquid Plastic
80 40 20 10 4.75 2.36 600 Plasti
index map) material micron Limit (LL) Limit (PL)
mm mm mm mm mm mm micron Index
% %
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14
1
2
3
Average
Average
Average
Note : *** Tested in accordance with IS:2720 Part XVI on samples prepared at Proctor density, OMC and
Soaked in water for 4 days.
50
IRC : SP : 19-2020
In case the above sources are not available, a fresh road inventory shall have to be
prepared. In any case, for preparation of DPR, the agency deployed for the purpose
may have to carry out the inventory and condition survey to confirm the records being
maintained by the Department and carry out the detailed designs.
51
IRC : SP : 19-2020
j. Height of embankment or depth of cut @ every 200m and every change of feature
whichever is earlier.
k. Land width i.e. ROW from the boundary pillars & building lines
l. Culverts, (type, size, span arrangement and location)
m. Roadside arboriculture
n. Existing utility services on either side within ROW.
o. General drainage conditions
i. The data concerning the pavement composition may be already available with
the PWD. However, trial pits shall be made to ascertain the pavement
composition. Alternately, Ground Penetration Radar of appropriate configuration
may be deployed to identify the pavement layers by non-destructive means.
ii. If a test pit is made, the following information shall be recorded for each test
pit:
Detailed field studies shall be carried out to collect road and pavement surface
conditions. The data should generally cover:
i. Pavement Condition
52
IRC : SP : 19-2020
• General condition
• Connectivity of drainage turnouts into the natural topography
• Condition in cut sections
• Condition at high embankments
The objective of the road and pavement condition surveys shall be to identify
defects and sections with similar characteristics. All defects shall be systematically
referenced, recorded and quantified for the purpose of determining the mode of
rehabilitation.
i. In addition to visual means, the pavement condition surveys shall be carried out
using Network Survey Vehicle mounted with equipment such as high resolution
cameras, digital laser profilometer, transverse profiler, the data from which
should be geo-referenced using a DGPS receiver and in-vehicle data processing
software, or equivalent technology to accurately measure the pavement surface
properties covered earlier. This vehicle also takes the images of the assets to
generate the road inventory. The Pavement Camera in the rear of the vehicle
takes the pictures of the pavement showing the distress. The transverse profile
logger (TPL) measures the rut depth, roughness and the camber of the
pavement with the help of the lasers fitted on the TPL. The measurements
made should be having an accuracy of at least 1.0m.
iii. The shoulder and embankment conditions shall be evaluated by visual means
and the existence of distress modes (cuts, erosion marks, failure, drops) and
extent (none, moderate, frequent and very frequent) of such distress
manifestations would be recorded.
iv. For sections with severe distresses, additional investigations as appropriate shall
be carried out to determine the cause of such distresses.
v. Middle 200m could be considered as representative sample for each one km. of
road and incase all other things are considered similar.
The data obtained from the condition surveys should be analyzed and the road
segments of more or less equal performance may be identified using the criteria given
in IRC: 81-1997.
c. Pavement Roughness
i. The roughness surveys shall be carried out using a network survey vehicle
mounted laser profilometer or better technology. A standard operating
procedure for using Net Work Survey Vehicle is presented in Appendix 13.
53
IRC : SP : 19-2020
• The IRI shall be determined for both wheel-paths over a minimum length of
250m for a minimum of 6 calibration sites with a roughness range between
2m/km and 8m/km. Calibration shall be made for speeds of 20, 30, 40, 50,
60 km/h.
ii. The surveys shall be carried out along the outer wheel paths. The surveys shall
cover a minimum of two runs along the wheel paths for each direction.
iii. The results of the survey shall be expressed in terms of BI and IRI, and shall be
presented in tabular and graphical forms. The processed data shall be analyzed
using the cumulative difference approach to identify road segments
homogenous with respect to surface roughness.
54
IRC : SP : 19-2020
14 DRAINAGE STUDIES
14.1 General
14.1.1 Drainage of highway refers to the satisfactory disposal of surplus water within the
highway limits. The water involved may be precipitation falling on the road, surface run
off form the adjacent land, seepage water moving through sub-terranean channels, or
moisture rising by capillary action. Adequate information about drainage patterns is
necessary to devise an effective drainage system, which brings into focus the need for
requisite studies and investigations.
14.1.3 Main components of the drainage investigation are determination of catchment area,
HFL and ponded water level, depth of water table, range of tidal levels, where
appropriate and the amount of surface runoff. Besides this, for cut sections in rolling
and hilly areas, it would be necessary to carry out special investigations for sub-
terranean flows and seepage of irrigation water from fields situated above the road.
14.1.4 Extent of studies and the data to be collected will depend on the type and scope of the
project. Preliminary information could be collected through site inspection, single
measurements and local enquiry. Most appropriate time for such enquiries is during the
stage of preliminary survey (see section 8) so that the information gathered can be of
use in fixing the alignment and finalizing the broad strategy for improving the drainage.
Detailed investigations could continue till the final location survey, when any
adjustment in light of further data could still be made before the project is finally ready.
In the case of cut sections, investigations for seepage and sub-terranean flows may
generally have to be done again at the stage of formation cut, when new features may
come to light warranting modifications in design or the need for special measures.
14.2.1 HFL governs the road top level and the grade, and its reasonably precise estimation is
particularly important. The design HFL should be based on a return period depending
upon the importance of the structure. Information in this regard can normally be had
from the irrigation department, who maintains and analyzes such data. Inspection and
local enquiry can often provide very useful information, such as marks left on guide
bunds, river banks, trees or structures indicating the maximum flood level. HFLs so
determined should also be compared with those for the adjoining sections of the road
or nearby railway/irrigation embankments to correct any mistake.
14.2.2 Construction of a highway embankment may sometime block the natural drainage
paths and cause heading up of water on upstream side. In finalizing the HFL, due
allowance for the possible afflux in such circumstances must be made. Preferably,
adequate number of openings shall be provided to avoid heading up of water on
upstream side.
55
IRC : SP : 19-2020
14.3.1 Knowledge of high water-table (for various return periods) is necessary for fixing the
subgrade level deciding the thickness of pavement and taking other design measures
such as provision of capillary cut-offs or interceptor drains. Depth of water-table may
be measured in open wells along the alignment or in holes specially bored for the
purpose. Usually, observations should be taken at intervals of one kilometre or less,
preferably at the time of withdrawal of the monsoon, when the water-table is likely to
be the highest. If there is any evidence of spring flow in the test holes, this should be
carefully recorded. The depth of water table should be measured with reference to a
common datum.
14.3.2 Besides high water table, it may be helpful to know the fluctuations in water-table. For
this purpose, measurements of the lowest water-table in the driest month should also
be made.
14.3.3 In areas, where the climate is arid and the water-table is known to be at least one
metre below the general ground level, depth of water table need not be measured.
In situation where water stagnates by the roadside for considerable period, e.g.,
irrigated fields etc., information about the level of standing water should also be
collected and considered for design in conjunction with HFL and water-table.
14.5.1 In cut sections in rolling or hilly terrain, the problem of seepage flows is common. The
seepage water may be due to high water-table, sub-soil water moving through
subterranean channels, where a permeable soil layer overlies an impermeable stratum,
or irrigation water in adjoining fields situated at a higher level. Where such conditions
exist, it may be necessary to intercept the seepage flow to prevent saturation of the
pavement.
14.5.2 Preventive measures in this regard can consist of deep side drains of open or French
type (to check sideway seepage or lower the water-table), buried transverse drains (to
cut-off the longitudinal sub-surface flow, underneath the pavement, especially at the
transition from cut to fill sections), or blanket course/sub-drains below the pavement in
combination with side drains (to protect the pavement from excess hydraulic pressure).
Actual treatment in each case will depend on factors such as the intensity of seepage,
depth of the permeable strata etc., for which investigations would be required.
14.5.3 Analysis of water-table information (see para 13) in conjunction with the surface profile
will indicate the possible problematic areas with regard to seepage flows. As an adjunct
to this, ground within the highway limits should be surveyed soon after the rainy
season to visually identify the seepage zones, normally characterized by wet areas and
patches. The following detailed investigations could then be taken up at these locations
to decide the appropriate drainage measures against seepage:
56
IRC : SP : 19-2020
a. Soil profile of the area i.e. soil type and the depth of various strata.
b. The head under which seepage water is flowing and its hydraulic gradient. This
could be measured through a series of stand pipes placed in observation holes.
c. Permeability tests on strata through which the ground water is flowing.
14.5.4 It is desirable that investigations for seepage flows may have to be repeated during
execution, particularly at the stage of formation cut, when it may be possible to make a
closer examination to locate the seepage areas more accurately. The additional
observations may warrant changes in the original design or the need for special
measures.
14.6.1 Surface run-off to be catered for includes precipitation on the highway itself and flow
from the adjoining areas. Run-off is ultimately led away from the highway area to the
natural drainage channels by means of side drains. For the design of these drains, the
following investigations, would be needed:
a. Study of ground contours of the land adjacent to the highway for determining the
catchment contributing to the flow in side drains.
b. Determination of the surface characteristics of catchment area, i.e., the type of soil,
vegetation, slopes etc., and
14.6.2 For further guidance about the design of surface drainage system, reference may be
made to the "IRC SP:42 & IRC SP:50".
Rain water harvesting requirements shall be assessed taking the Ministry of
Environment & Forest Notification, into consideration. The construction of rainwater
harvesting structure is mandatory in and around water scarce / crisis areas notified by
the Central Ground Water Board.
57
IRC : SP : 19-2020
15 CROSS-DRAINAGE STRUCTURES
For cross-drainage structures, i.e., culverts, surveys and investigations are carried out
essentially for:
Surveys and investigations, for bridges shall be conducted in accordance with IRC:SP
54 “Project Preparation Manual for Bridges”. Surveys and investigations, for culverts
shall be conducted in accordance with IRC-SP-13. The detailed designs of the
structures shall be carried out as per relevant manuals and codes.
By and large, the siting of culverts should be guided by the geometric features of the
road alignment unless there are specific problems of location and design. Where
defined channels exist for watercourses, the culverts may be located on them. In case
of a flat and featureless terrain, culverts shall be provided for balancing purposes. The
spacing and location may be decided by study of the catchment and allocation of the
expected runoff among the culverts. Where there is a choice, the following points
should be kept in view:
a. The site should be on a straight reach of the stream sufficiently below bends.
b. The location should be as far away from the confluence of the large tributaries as
possible. So as to be beyond their disturbing influence.
d. As far as possible the site should enable a straight alignment and a square crossing.
15.2.2 The essential data needed for design of new culverts are:
a. Catchment Area: Where the catchment, as seen from the topographic sheet,
is less than about 1.25 sq.km. in area, traverse should be made along the
watershed. Where the area is flat without defined watershed, it would first be
necessary to conduct a local contour survey to identify the watershed before
taking up the traverse for larger catchments, the area can be measured from
the 1:50,000 topographic maps.
58
IRC : SP : 19-2020
the site, all to the horizontal scale of not less than 1:1000 and exaggerated
vertical scale of not less than 1:100. Approximate distance upstream and
downstream of the selected site, where cross-sections may be taken as shown
in Table 5.
The cross-section at the proposed site of the crossing should show levels at close
intervals and indicate outcrops of rock, formation of pools, scour holes etc. Where
the existing road or a cart-track crosses the stream at the selected site, the cross-
section should not be taken along the center line of the road or the track as that
will not represent the natural shape and size of the channel. Instead the cross-
section should be taken at a short distance upstream or downstream.
In the case of very small streams (Catchments of 40 hectares or less), one cross-
section may do but it should be carefully plotted so as to represent truly the
normal size and shape of the channel on a straight reach.
c. The Maximum HFL: The maximum high flood level should be ascertained by
intelligent local observation, supplemented by local enquiry and marked on the
cross-sections.
f. Trial Pits: Where rock or some firm undisturbed soil stratum is not likely to be
far below the bed of the stream, a trial pit should be dug up to the rock or firm
soil. But if there is no rock or undisturbed firm soil close to the stream bed
level, then the trial pit should be taken down roughly up to twice the maximum
depth of the existing or anticipated scour line. The location of each trial pit
should be shown in the cross-section of the proposed site. The trial pit section
should be plotted to show the kind of soils passed through. Where trial pits are
not possible because of longer depths or for other reasons, trial bores should
instead be made. For very small culverts, one trial pit will be sufficient.
59
IRC : SP : 19-2020
15.4.1 The existing drainage structures proposed for improvement should be surveyed and
data collected on the following points:
15.4.2 The data collected should be presented in a tabular form along with proposals for
correcting deficiencies.
60
IRC : SP : 19-2020
16.1 General
The project data collected during the survey and investigation together with the
proposal worked out on that basis should be presented in a proper form for full
appreciation by the appropriate authority. These should be prepared in three parts
under the following headings which when read together will constitute the complete
project document:
a. The Report
b. Estimate
c. Drawings
Details to be presented in each part are brought out in subsequent paragraphs for
guidance. It should, however, be understood that the extent of detailing of an
individual aspect would depend upon the size of the concerned project and its scope,
e.g., whether new construction or improvement to an existing road.
The Project Report is one of the most important parts of the project document and
should give a precise amount of the different features for easy understanding and
appreciation of the proposals. The information provided may be conveniently dealt with
under the following heads:
i. Executive Summary
ii. Introduction
iii. Socio-economic Profile
iv. Traffic surveys and investigations,
v. Engineering surveys and investigations, and proposed road features
vi. Pavement studies
vii. Design standards and specifications
viii. Drainage facilities including cross-drainage structures
ix. Environmental and social considerations including rehabilitation and resettlement
x. Materials, labour and equipment
xi. Rates and cost estimates
xii. Economic analysis and financial analysis (where required)
xiv. Miscellaneous
xv. Conclusions and Recommendations
The design calculations, etc., with regard to the above items should be attached.
16.2.1 Executive Summary: Executive summary will summarise the entire report. All the
salient points will be included. The executive summary should be such that a top
executive is able to know all the features of the project that are required for decision
making.
61
IRC : SP : 19-2020
a. Name of the work and its broad scope: Information here should give a general
idea of the scheme as a whole.
b. Authority and plan provision: Give reference to the order of the competent
authority calling for the project and the provision for the work in the relevant
development plan.
i. Previous history of the road and its present condition (in the case of existing
roads) or development history for project as regards economic activity,
population served, available transport facilities, etc. (in the case of a new
roads).
ii. Highlight aspects such as prone to flooding of the area, waterlogging, etc.
iv. Rainfall, annual average intensity and distribution during the year, range of
temperature during summer and winter months periods of low and high water
levels in river/canal, etc.
d. Necessity: Indicate the necessity for the project and the circumstances which
have made its execution urgent.
16.2.3 Socio-economic profile: This should cover Socio-economic profile of the region and
the Project influence Area (see Section 5)
16.2.4 Traffic surveys and traffic forecasts: Discuss the type of traffic surveys conducted
for various sections, the data collected and the results of future growth. Present the
design traffic figures separately for each element of the project, e.g., width of
carriageway, pavement, intersections, railway crossings, etc. For existing roads, discuss
the accident data with special reference to the known accident- 'prone location.
a. Route Selection
Considerations governing the route selection and the effect of the proposed
route on the overall transportation pattern of the area with respect to other
facilities, like, railways, inland waterways, etc. (in the case of new roads).
Discuss the merits and demerits of alternative routes investigated and reasons
for selecting the proposed route.
b. Alignment
The general alignment of the road and its details, section by section, with
reference to topographical and geological features, obligatory points, such as,
bridge sites, important population centres, existing or prospective industrial
centres, etc. Also, discuss points of general importance, like, high banks, heavy
cuttings, nature of gradients, radii of curves, sight distance, nature of soil along
that alignment, etc.
62
IRC : SP : 19-2020
d. In case of the existing roads or where relevant, the above subject should cover
aspects, such as, road inventory, road condition survey, geo-technical
investigations, bridge inventory study, bridge condition survey, etc.
Bring out the special features of road design, e.g., fixation of grade line vis-a-vis HFL,
water table, high embankments, treatment of cut sections, design of road junctions,
removal of geometric deficiencies in the case of existing roads, remedial measures for
land-side prone location, etc. Attach design calculations where necessary. Discuss any
deviations from the prescribed standards, with reasons for the same.
b. Pavement Design
Present the soil investigation data for pavement design in a tabular form (including
Benkelman Beam deflection data, if collected in the case of existing roads). Discuss the
methodology of collecting these data and bring out the pavement design proposals with
respect to the alternatives considered.
Bring out the proposal for retaining walls, breast walls, pitching, parapet walls, railings,
etc. Attach design calculation where required.
16.2.6 Designs standards and specifications: Give reference to the standard specifications, in
accordance with which the works are proposed to be executed. Highlight where any
modifications are proposed, or special specifications are advocated.
a. Discuss the investigations carried out for designing the drainage measures and
bring out the salient points in respect of H.F.L., water-table, ponded water level,
seepage flows, closure periods in case of canals, etc.
c. Highlight if any special measures are proposed to check soil erosion and assist soil
conservation.
d. Discuss the proposal regarding small cross-drainage structures i.e., culverts. Give
details of the proposed structures in a tabular form with cross reference to the
standard designs adopted on the detailed drawings enclosed. The table should also
indicate special features of each structures like design HFL, deck level, waterway,
etc. Attach water-way calculations.
63
IRC : SP : 19-2020
f. State whether the structures to be built with regard to standard designs. If so, give
reference to the relevant drawings. Otherwise, attach design calculations and
drawings.
16.2.8 Environmental and social consideration including R&R: Significant beneficial and
detrimental impact of the proposed works on the environment in terms of air pollution,
damage to life system, stream pollution, soil erosion, drainage pattern, landscaping,
etc. Discuss the planning and design measures proposed to minimize/eliminate the
adverse effects. Discuss also the resettlement and rehabilitation action plan.
b. Bring out the items for which suitable rates are not available in the schedule and for
such items give reference to the analysis of rates attached to the estimate.
64
IRC : SP : 19-2020
b. Draw up a construction schedule, either in the form of a bar chart or on the basis
of critical path method (CPM). For details of the latter, reference may be made to
IRC :SP 14.
c. Traffic and Traffic Safety: The number of accidents occurring on our roads and
the number of lives lost in road accidents is one of the highest in the world.
Consequently, the total economic loss to the country is huge even excluding the
cost of delay, pain, deprivation and suffering, etc. for which it is difficult to make
economic evaluation. Pursuant to the national targets for reduction in accidents and
fatalities, it is necessary to make provisions for traffic safety in the design and
estimates of the project.
It is commonly said that traffic safety is dependent on provision of five E's, i.e..
Engineering, Enforcement, Education, Environment and Emergency. In the project
preparation stage care can be taken only on the engineering aspect. Geometric and
structural provisions in the project should, therefore, conform to the engineering
standards and elements essential for the design speed, capacity, etc. of the
concerned project. Since pedestrians and cyclists constitute a large percentage of
the fatalities, specially on urban roads, adequate safety provisions, like,
segregation, provision of side-walks, footpaths, cycle tracks, crossing facility at
intersection, proper lighting, etc. where relevant, shall, have to be provided.
The MORT&H has published a " Manual for Safety in Road Design - A Guide for
Highway Engineers", the suggestions of which should be kept in view during project
65
IRC : SP : 19-2020
d. Safety Audit: Depending upon the importance of the project, where considered
necessary, arrangement for competent safety audit on the design and engineering
provisions may be made for experts’ advice by some eminent consultant or
professional organisations.
e. Toll Plazas: For collection of toll fee for using a particular highway facility, it is
often necessary to construct suitable toll plazas on the highways. The location of
the Plaza should be decided consistent with the guidelines issued by Ministry of
Road Transport and Highways from time to time, for planning, construction and
operation of modern toll plazas on National Highways including procedural details
for selection of an appropriate design, layout, construction keeping in view traffic,
terrain and type of operating system desired (manual, semi-automatic, automatic),
duly keeping the distance from the adjacent toll plazas on either side.
The plaza should be away from the municipal limits of the nearby towns, villages,
structures etc. and preferably lie in a straight alignment. The location should be
such that the cost of acquisition of land, structures etc. is minimum. It should in
general not lie in bypasses and locations, where traffic may evade the plaza and ply
through alternate routes.
f. Dumping Grounds: One of the essential requirement of road planning and design
is to make proper provision for utilisation of unwanted surplus materials resulting
from construction excavations in earth work and rock, etc. are normally tried to be
adjusted between cut and fill sections or utilisation low level areas within
reasonable leads. Where no such thing is possible or if the surplus material is of
unwanted nature (like, dismantled old road crust, elements of dismantled
structures, stumps and root system for trees, rejected bituminous mixes, etc.) these
require to be dumped in specially earmarked places. Depending upon the
requirement of space suitable fallow land or naturally depressed low lands in need
of filling may be identified within easy and economic leads for dumping of such
materials. The project estimate may make suitable provisions for such
arrangement.
66
IRC : SP : 19-2020
16.9 Estimate
16.9.1 The project estimate should give a clear picture of the financial commitment
involved and should be realistic. This is possible only if the items of work are
carefully listed, the quantities determined to a reasonable degree of accuracy, and
the rates provided on a realistic basis.
a. General abstract of cost: This should give the total cost of the scheme with
a general break-up under major heads (with further sub-divisions as
necessary), e.g., site clearance, earthwork, sub-bases and bases, bituminous
work/cement concrete pavement; cross- drainage and other miscellaneous
structures; miscellaneous items, percentage charges for contingencies,
escalation, , quality control, etc. The General Abstract of cost should also
include the cost of land acquisition, shifting utilities, like, electric lines,
telephone poles, underground cables, gas lines, sewers, water pipes, cost of
arboriculture, cost of removal of trees and compensatory afforestation.
i. abstract of cost
ii. estimate of quantities
iii. analysis of rates for items not covered by the relevant schedule of rates;
and
iv. quarry/material source charts
16.10 Drawings
16.10.1 General:
Project drawings should depict the proposed works in relation to the existing features,
besides other information necessary for easy and accurate translation of the proposals
in the fields. For easy understanding and interpretation, it is desirable that the drawings
should follow a uniform practice with regard to size, scales, and the details to be
incorporated.
67
IRC : SP : 19-2020
overlap on either side, if drawn to the horizontal scale of 1 :2500. A wider margin of 40
mm may be kept on the left hand side of the drawing to facilitate stitching into a folio.
The drawings usually required for a road project include the following:
Locality map-cum-site plan: This is combination of a key map and index map drawn on
a single sheet. This will be the first sheet in folio of drawings for a particular section of
the road. However, where the length of a section is substantial, it may become
necessary to separate out the locality map and the site plan. The former being
accommodated in one sheet and the latter on a series of sheets.
The locality map (same as key map) should show the location of the road with respect
to important towns and industrial centres and the existing means of communication' in
the neighbourhood so as to give a bird's eyeview of the proposed work. The map may
be to a scale of 1 :250,000 which is one of the common scales used in Survey of India
maps.
The site plan (same as index map) should show the project road and its immediate
neighbourhood covering the important physical features, such as, hills, rivers, tanks,
railway lines, etc. It may be to a scale of 1 :50,000 and should show the, kilometres
from the beginning to end.
The sheet containing the locality map-cum-site plan should have a legend to explain
the abbreviations and symbols used in subsequent drawing sheets.
b. Plan and longitudinal section: Plan and longitudinal section for one km length
of the road should be shown on a single drawing sheet as far as possible the plan
should be at the top and the longitudinal section at the bottom. Common scale
adopted is 1 :2500 for the horizontal, and 1 :250 for the vertical, but this may be
changed suitably for hilly stretches.
The plan, among other things, should show the final centreline of the road, right-
of-way limits, roadway of the existing road where applicable, existing structures,
drainage, courses, intersecting roads, railway lines, electric and telephone lines,
cables, location of cross drainage structures, design details of horizontal curves,
bench marks, location of cross sections, contours, north point, etc.
The longitudinal section should show the profiles of the proposed road, the general
ground, and the existing road where applicable. In addition, it should show details,
such as, the gradients, location and set out data for vertical curves, super-
elevation, details of horizontal alignment, the design HFL, location of drainage
68
IRC : SP : 19-2020
The manner of presenting the details on the plan and longitudinal section drawings
is illustrated in Plate-2.
69
IRC : SP : 19-2020
The benefit and cost streams should be worked out for the project using HDM-IV or
other internationally recognized life-cycle costing model, for each of the project
sections identified.
ii. Calculation of VOCs for the existing road situation and those for the project;
iv. Estimation of the Economic Internal Rate of Return (EIRR) for the project over a
30-year period. In calculating the EIRRs, identify the tradable and non-tradable
components of projects costs and the border price value of the tradable
components.
Economic Internal Rate of Return (EIRR) and Net Present Value (NPV), “with “and
“without time and accident savings” should be worked out based on these cost-benefit
streams. Furthermore, sensitivity of EIRR and NPV shall be worked out for different
scenarios as given under:
The sensitivity scenarios given above are only indicative. More scenarios can be
selected taking into account possible construction delays, construction costs overrun,
traffic volume, revenue shortfalls, operating costs, exchange rate variations,
convertibility of foreign exchange, interest rate volatility, non-compliance or default by
contractors, political risks and force majeure.
The economic analysis shall also take into account all on-going and future road and
transport infrastructure projects and future development plans in the project area.
70
IRC : SP : 19-2020
The main objective of financial analysis is to find the likely returns to the investor. This
covers aspects like financing through debt and equity, loan repayment, debt servicing,
taxation, depreciation etc. The viability of the project shall be evaluated on the basis of
cash flow analysis, where both costs and revenue have been indexed to take in to
account of the inflation.
Financial viability analysis shall be done on the basis of a financial model developed by
the agency. The model projects the key financial statements of the investor over the
concession period. Concession period of 10/15/20/25/30 years shall be considered and
the growth rate of the traffic may be assumed at minimum of 5% per annum. All
investment costs and capital expenses will be identified in the year in which they are
deemed to occur. A 25% inflation rate per annum will be applied to all cost and
revenue items.
The construction is to be financed through both equity and loan. A Debt-Equity ratio of
70:30 would be appropriate as most financial institutions hesitate to lend at higher
leverages and also in view of the fact that a high gearing invariably subjects projects to
substantial financial risks. A 15-year period is proposed for construction loan
repayment. The rate of interest considered shall be in line with the prevailing lending
rates of financial institutions. The actual financial parameters to be adopted in the
analysis will be reviewed after gathering additional data from published sources and
finalised in consultation with the Authority as per the TOR.
Depreciation of capital items will be calculated by using two methods, viz. the Written
down Value (WDV) Method and the Straight Line Method (SLM). The WDV method
favors income shielding and is, therefore, used only to calculate taxes payable by the
concessionaire. The rate permitted for a toll road enterprise, viz. 10 percent will be
used in the analysis.
Tax holiday (100% tax exemption on profits and gains), as per Section 80-IA of Income
Tax Act, shall be available from such business for 10 consecutive assessment years out
of 20 years beginning with the year in which undertaking or the enterprise develops
and begins to operate any infrastructure facility or develops an industrial park or special
economic zone or generates power or commences transmission or distribution of power
or undertakes substantial renovation or modernization. The corporate tax rate adopted
will be based on the latest Finance Bill.
The NPV and FIRR for the project shall be calculated. It shall undertake sensitivity
analysis by identifying the most critical factors and determine their impact on FIRR,
including varying project costs and benefits, implementation period, and combination of
these factors. Risk analysis will be conducted by considering the possible values for key
variables based on records and their occurrence probability.
71
IRC : SP : 19-2020
18.1 General
Besides preparation of the Project Report, it is equally important to procure the
clearances required for implementation of the Project viz. environmental clearance,
wild life clearance, CRZ clearance, clearance for ROBs/RUBs, cross drainage structures
/ bridges over canals, Underpasses over cross roads etc. from various statutory
bodies, Railways, Irrigation Department, R&B Department, Electrical Department, RWS
Department and so on. Handing over of vacant access to Site being the primary task,
Land Acquisition, removal of encumbrances / encroachments / Structures / Utilities
and other hindrances assumes top priority. A brief procedure for each Preconstruction
Activity, the requirements and the methodology for obtaining various clearances is
presented in the following section.
The Central Government appoints the Competent Authority for Land Acquisition
(CALA) in exercise of its powers under Section 3(a) of the NH Act, 1956. As such, the
CALA appointed by the Central Government, is obliged to take all actions for
acquisition of land under the NH Act and the guidelines issued by the Central
Government on the subject. As a general practice, Revenue Divisional Officer / Joint
Collector in the District level is appointed as CALA.
Appointment of CALA is the first step of the LA process, who oversees the entire
process of land acquisition, and acts as a liaison between the state government and
the Executing Agency / Authority.
72
IRC : SP : 19-2020
"Land" includes benefits to arise out of land and things attached to the earth or
permanently fastened to anything attached to the earth.
The 3 (a) Notification broadly describes about the list of villages through which the
proposed alignment passes, the corresponding Police Stations, the Taluk, and District.
In normal practice, the process of “3(a)” notification is initiated by the respective
executive agency and the following details are incorporated in Bhoomirashi Portal:
i. Project information
ii. Sanction details
iii. Detailed account of CALA(s)
iv. Name of the villages with Taluka & District where LA is to be done.
73
IRC : SP : 19-2020
initiating the LA process. The area of the land under acquisition shall be provided in
square hectares or square meters.
The procedure for preparation of LAPs and schedules (3(A)) is given in the following
steps:
i. Collection of revenue maps from revenue authorities.
ii. Conversion of Village maps to TIF or JPG file after scanning
iii. Digitization of Scanned map using Auto CAD software
iv. Stitching the scanned maps using match lines
v. Correction of the final map using field data, specific features / land marks,
images etc.
vi. Superimposition of the Final alignment of the Highway on the stitched map.
vii. Demarcation of the proposed Right of Way of Final alignment on the Map.
viii. Importing the digitized Map into GIS software.
ix. Identifying the affected survey numbers using GIS.
x. Estimation of the affected area Survey number wise / sub division number wise
using GIS.
xi. Preparation of the Draft Land Acquisition Schedule (3A) as per standard Gazette
notification.
xii. Preparation of Village wise LAPs in the prescribed drawing format.
xiii. Submission of the Draft 3A to the user agency for verification and approval.
xiv. Verification of the proposed 3A notification by the concerned revenue
authorities as per the direction of CALA.
xv. Preparation of Final 3A notification duly complying with the comments, if any.
xvi. Certification / Authentication of the 3A notification by CALA for Gazette
Publication.
xvii. Uploading the 3(A) details in the Bhoomirashi Portal for approval and
publication.
xviii. Publishing 3A Gazette notification by Government of India,
xix. Publishing the notification in the local newspapers, one in English and another
in the vernacular language to make the public aware of the agency’s intention
to acquire the land for a specific purpose.
The flow chart given below shows the process of 3A Gazette Notification/Publication.\
74
IRC : SP : 19-2020
Following the gazette notification as per Section 3A, the Land Acquisition Officer or
any Competent Authorities concerned in land acquisition and authorized by the Central
Government can:
75
IRC : SP : 19-2020
vi. Any order made by CALA, the competent authority shall be final.
The Competent Authority (CALA) shall submit a report to the Government of India
based on the Joint Measurement Survey (JMS) & Enjoyment Surveys conducted where
the land is proposed under acquisition. The procedure involved in Joint measurement
survey and preparation of 3D are described below.
The user agency shall install the ROW Boundary Pillars for the purpose of Joint
Measurement Survey, to be conducted by the Revenue department officials as well as
with the staff of Survey & Land Records department of the State to determine the
actual requirement of the land.
During the JMS, Survey number wise and Sub division number wise exact affected area
of land and affected structures (i.e. bore-wells, trees, houses, etc.,) are measured.
Further, JMS report is prepared & submitted to the CALA for review and approval. In
order to facilitate the JMS Survey, the details of the ROW Pillars shall be marked on the
digitized revenue map, where the individual survey numbers also are digitised and
inserted. The sketch of the individual survey number along with the ROW Pillar and its
distance from the nearest physical or identifiable revenue feature shall be marked too
facilitate easy identification of the survey number and the confirmation of the affected
area in the field. Such a method can hasten the process of JMS.
Enjoyment Survey
The enjoyment survey has to be conducted in order to identify the ownership of the
affected land and the details shall be submitted to authority after verification by CALA.
These surveys have to be conducted with utmost care as the final compensation shall
be worked out based on these.
After completion of JMS & Enjoyment survey, revenue department shall prepare the
JMS report along with LA sketches of individual survey numbers / sub-divisions. The
Draft 3D notification shall be prepared by revenue authorities based on the JMS report
and submitted to CALA for review and approval. Once approved, the Draft 3D
notification shall be uploaded in the Bhoomirashi Portal.
76
IRC : SP : 19-2020
The competent authority shall notify in writing to the owner as well as any other person
who may be in possession of the land, to surrender the same to the competent
authority (or any person duly authorised) within sixty days of the service of notice.
Notice shall be served to the beneficiaries for collection of award, and the certificate of
possession shall be issued to the user agency / Authority. Section 3(F) – Power to
enter into the land where land has vested in the central government
Any authorised official shall be able to enter the land and conduct activities of
construction, maintenance, management or operation of the Project Highway.
Structure evaluation:
During the process of JMS, survey number wise and subdivision number wise
affected structures (i.e. bore-wells, trees, houses, etc.,) shall be identified/ measured.
Further, a report on affected structures shall be submitted to the respective Road &
Buildings Department/Horticulture /Forest Department for validation and fixing-up the
compensation.
77
IRC : SP : 19-2020
Public notice is published in two leading newspapers, one of which will be in, one in
English and another in the vernacular language to invite claims from the affected land
owners.
The current status of utilization of land shall be acquired and ownership status is
ascertained from revenue records and local Panchayat office.
Land rates of various categories are collected from respective Collector/Sub Registrar
offices.
Compensation to be paid to the appropriate owner of the land for any land acquired
under the Act shall be determined. 3G award along with valuation details is prepared
for the approval of the CALA and the same shall be delivered upon approval. CALA staff
shall prepare a field book which contains award by each beneficiary after 3G award is
declared based on 3A, 3D and 3G notifications
The compensation amount determined as per Section 3G and payable to the persons
entitled thereto, shall be deposited by the executing agency in the account of the CALA
for payment to the affected persons. Alternatively, payment may be made to the
affected persons directly through Bhumirashi or by other means as per the procedures
in vougue.
This procedure is for the Projects using NH Act’1956 for land Acquisition. The User
Agency using State LA Act shall follow relevant provisions of the Act.
Various utilities are found in the existing and the proposed right of way (ROW), for
which clearances are required from the concerned user departments, before relocating
them out of the ROW.
Types of utilities
Different types of utilities generally observed along the project corridor are:
i. Electrical Poles and Lines
ii. High Tension Towers
iii. Water Supply Pipe lines
iv. Under Ground Drainage Pipes
v. Telephone Lines
78
IRC : SP : 19-2020
It is necessary to identify the electrical utilities falling within the proposed ROW and
relocate them in the designated utility corridor inside / outside the proposed Right of
Way. The utilities have to be inspected, enumerated and estimates for shifting them
shall be prepared with the help of the user department. Such estimates have to be sent
to the executing agency for approval so that the same can be shifted through a
separate agency or the agency doing the civil works. Further, the executing agency is
required to pay the supervision charges etc., as required and get the utilities relocated.
In this regard, the details of the surface electrical utilities to be identified are:
The organizations that are associated with the relocation of HT towers are Transco and
Power grid. Details of the HT lines/towers to be identified in the field are:
a. Type of Transmission i.e. 132 KV, 220 KV, 330 KV, 440 KV etc.
b. Available Clearance of Transmission line above the proposed FRL of the
road
c. Section of HT Line
The organizations that are associated with the relocation of Water Supply are RWS,
Public Health, Municipal Corporation and Panchayat Raj Departments. Joint Inspection
has to be carried out with the concerned departments to identify the affected existing
water pipe lines, water tanks etc., along the project corridor.
The organizations that are associated with the relocation of OFC Cables are BSNL,
Reliance, TATA Teleservices, etc. Joint Inspection has to be carried out with the
concerned departments to show the Utility Corridor, confirm if any of their utilities are
passing through, so that these can be relocated in the designated utility corridor.
The overhead lines or surface utilities falling in the proposed ROW or affecting the
construction can be identified easily. But, for identifying the underground utilities
Ground Penetration Radar (GPR) is used. Ground Penetration Radar can be used to
screen all the underground utilities like electrical cables, water pipelines, OFC cables,
etc.
GPR can be run longitudinally on the existing road / project alignment and any
incidence of utility crossing can be identified. Later, GPR can be run across the road at
79
IRC : SP : 19-2020
After completion of the above field enumeration, affected surface & sub-surface utility
plans shall be generated by using Auto CAD & GIS software based on the information
collected from all the utility agencies in the region and maps/plans available with
executive agencies .
The organizations that are associated with Gas pipe lines are ONGC, HPCL and GAIL
etc. Joint inspection with the concerned officials shall be organized to identify the
affected gas pipe lines all along the project corridor. Based on the site visit best feasible
option (GADs) shall be prepared to accommodate the Gas pipe line with proper care
and safety features. Finalized GAD shall be submitted to the concerned agencies for
obtaining NOC. Sometimes, new structures may have to be built for protecting the gas
lines crossing the project highway. The tentative location of gas lines can be obtained
from the agencies’ web sites or other portals, which can be used to avoid the conflict
with gas lines in the first place
a. Identification of utilities falling in the existing / proposed right of way that require
relocation to enable construction of the proposed project road.
b. Incorporation of the space required for relocating elevated and under-ground utility
corridors and utilities crossings as required for existing and future utilities in
consultation with user departments
c. Obtaining draft utilities shifting proposal from user departments for all utilities
identified for shifting along project road
d. Preparation of utility shifting cost estimates using latest schedule of rates and
seeking approval from user departments
e. Review of final designs submitted, cost estimates, completion of checklist, obtaining
the required declarations.
f. Coordination with the user department to incorporate any changes requested in
shifting proposal and cost estimate.
80
IRC : SP : 19-2020
g. Procuring all the required utilities shifting proposal estimates and required
approvals from user department
a. The project alignment passes through reserve forest, sanctuaries, national parks,
protected natural reserves etc.
b. All new National and State Highways including Expressways
c. Expansion of National Highways greater than 100 km involving additional RoW or
land acquisition greater than 40 m on existing alignment and 60 m on re-
alignments or bypasses
d. If there are plantations on the RoW, that are notified as Protected Forests
e. State Highway expansion projects in hilly terrain (above 1000 m AMSL) and or
ecologically sensitive areas.
All State Highways and National Highways including Expressways passing through
notified forest (Reserved, Protected or any other).
a. User Agency to upload Form I (Pre-Feasibility Report TOR) in the MoEF & CC web
portal (https://parivesh.nic.in) for approval of TOR.
b. Environmental Advisory Committee (EAC), MoEF & CC, New Delhi to hold a review
meeting to know the necessity and requirement of the project corridor.
c. EAC / SEAC to recommend TOR and forward to MOEF & CC / SEIAA for grant of
ToR and conducting EIA studies.
d. User agency or the agency deployed by the user agency shall commission
Environmental base line studies for the project corridor as per the approved TOR,
and prepare the Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) Report
e. User Agency to organize Public hearing through State Pollution Control Board
(SPCB).
f. Prepare final EIA report based on the above studies & outcome of the public
hearing and submit to MoEF along with copy of FSR/DPR through user agency for
obtaining clearance.
g. User agency along with QCI / NABET approved Consultants to make a detailed
presentation on EIA to Expert Appraisal Committee (EAC/SEAC) at MoEF & CC, New
Delhi for obtaining final approval of EIA Report.
h. Procure the Environmental Clearance from MoEF&CC duly complying with the
comments given during EIA presentation and submit the same to the user agency.
81
IRC : SP : 19-2020
No Objection Certificate has to be obtained from State Pollution Control Board as part
of requirement for obtaining Environmental Clearance.
Diversion of forest land for non-forest purpose shall be done under the provisions of
the Forest Conservation Act 1980 and Forest Conservation Rules 2003.
Further the Ministry also provided several explanations and exemptions from time to
time though various GOs to enable the process of diverting the forest land for non-
forest purposes.
The Ministry also published a Handbook on Forest Conservation Act to enable the
process. The latest Handbook was published in the year 2019.
The definition of forest is enshrined in the Act. However, by its order of 1996, the
Supreme Court of India has extended the provisions of the Act to all forests,
irrespective of ownership (including ‘forests” as understood in the dictionary sense)
I. Procedure to be adopted for diverting the forest land for linear projects or
Roads
STAGE – 1
a. After the finalization of the proposed alignment of the road, Forest patches
intervening with the proposed road shall be identified. The same shall be confirmed
by the forest department in their pre-proposal visit.
b. Based on the data, the Form – A of part – I would be developed with required
Maps, certificates and undertakings as required.
c. In some states the DGPS survey of the proposed forest patches for diversion is a
prerequisite for the preparation of the Form – A. In such cases the project
82
IRC : SP : 19-2020
proponent shall submit the raw data of the DGPS survey conducted by any
authorized agency and get it authenticated by the forest department.
a. The project proponent shall register on ‘PARIVESH' the designated web portal of
the Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change (MoEF&CC) as a user
agency.
b. Based on the data of the identified forest patches, the form – A shall be uploaded,
with all the required Maps, KML files, certificates and undertakings. Authenticated
DGPS maps and their corresponding KML files only be uploaded.
c. Thus, submitted Form – A will be reviewed by the concerned state Nodal officer
and if found correct the same would be forwarded to the concerned DFOs and
district collectors for further action.
d. At this stage the forest department would ask the Project proponent to submit 4-8
sets of hard copies of the proposal (with original signatures of the project
proponent) to DFO and 1 copy to DC.
e. The DFOs after conducting site inspection of the proposed forest patches for
diversion would forward the same to the concerned Conservator of Forests (CF) by
filling up the Part – II limited to his / her jurisdiction with comments and
recommendations.
f. In case of State Government projects, the Project Proponent shall identify non
forest land for Compensatory Afforestation (CA), equal to the area proposed for
diversion, certified by the DFO. If non forest area for Compensatory afforestation is
not available, then a certificate from the Chief Secretary of the state shall be
submitted by the Project Proponent stating that land for CA is not available hence,
the CA land may be identified in any other state by the Ministry.
g. In case of Central Government projects, the State forest department has to identify
the land for CA. The CA land would be double the area proposed for diversion.
Further the DFO shall prepare a scheme for afforestation and include the same with
the part – II.
b. The Nodal Office after verifying the merit of the case would forward it to the
Secretary (forest department) of the state by filling comments and
recommendations in part – IV of the proposal.
c. The Secretary forest department would forward the same to the Regional
Empowered Committee of MoEF and CC by signing in part – V of the proposal, with
a copy to the Nodal officer to present the proposal to the Chairperson of Regional
Empowered Committee directly, if the proposed land for diversion is less than 40Ha.
83
IRC : SP : 19-2020
d. If the proposed land for diversion is more than 40Ha the proposal shall be sent
directly to the Secretary to the Government of India, Ministry of Environment and
Forests, Paryavaran Bhavan, CGO Complex, Lodhi Road, New Delhi-110 003, with a
copy of the proposal (with complete enclosures) to the concerned Regional Office
as per the rules framed for the Forest Conservation Act in 2003.
a. If the proposed land for diversion is less than 5Ha, the Chairperson of the REC would
make a decision without calling for the REC meeting.
b. If the proposed land for diversion is 5 – 40 Ha, the proposal will be discussed by the
REC based on the recommendations of the committee and a decision is made.
c. If the proposed land for diversion is more than 40Ha, the proposal will be discussed in
the REC meeting and its recommendations will be sent to the Secretary, MoEF and CC,
for final decision.
d. If the proposed land for diversion is more than 100 Ha, the REC has to conduct site
inspection and then the recommendations of the committee will be sent to the
Secretary, MoEF and CC, for final decision.
e. Execution of the project can be started after the Stage – I clearance is accorded by
making payment towards the demand raised by the forest department.
f. While this process is going on, the Project Proponent shall try and submit the certificate
in the prescribed format from the concerned district collector about the status of
settlement of rights of the forest dependent communities as per the provisions of the
Forest Rights Act – 2006.
g. As per the extant policy, Project Proponent can submit the certificate under FRA – 2006,
till the stage – II clearance is accorded.
The National Board for Wildlife (NBWL) is constituted by the Central Government under
Section 5 A of the Wildlife (Protection) Act, 1972 (WLPA)
a. After the finalization of the proposed alignment of the road, if the prosed alignment is
passing through any Wildlife Sanctuary or Corridor or Protected Forest or National Park
area, the user agency shall approach the concerned DFO or DCF of the wildlife division
and get the area confirmed by organizing a pre-proposal visit.
b. The process of wildlife clearance as well as the forest land diversion can be initiated
simultaneously.
c. Preparation of the Part – I of the wildlife clearance proposal with all supporting
84
IRC : SP : 19-2020
documents shall be uploaded on the designated web portal of the MoEF and CC '
PARIVESH'
d. After reviewing the proposal with all necessary documents, the CCF – Nodal, would
forward the same to the concerned DCF
e. The DCF after conducting the site inspection, would forward the proposal to the State
wildlife Warden, with comments and recommendations in part – II.
f. The Wildlife Warden upon receiving the part – II from the concerned DCF, would
forward the proposal to the CCF- Nodal, by filling part – III.
g. At this stage, the forest department would ask the Project Proponent to submit 18 sets
of the hard copy of the proposal (with original signatures of the Project Proponent)
h. The CCF – Nodal would forward the proposal to the State government by recommending
the same in part – IV, to discuss in the State Board for Wildlife (SBWL), Chaired by the
Chief Minister.
i. Based on the recommendations of the SBWL, the proposal will be forwarded to the
NBWL through the secretary, MoEF and CC.
j. The NBWL, would review the proposal and make the final decision.
Classification of CRZ:
(a) CRZ – I:
These areas are environmentally most critical and are further classified as under:
CRZ – IA: shall constitute the following ecologically sensitive areas (ESAs) and the
geomorphological features which play a role in maintaining the integrity of the
coast.
a. Mangroves (in case mangrove area is more than 1000 square meters, a buffer of 50
meters along the mangroves shall be provided and such area shall also constitute
CRZ–I A)
b. Corals and coral reefs
c. Sand dunes
d. Biologically active mudflats
e. National parks, marine parks, sanctuaries, reserve forests, wildlife habitats and
other protected areas under the provisions of Wild Life (Protection) Act, 1972 (53 of
1972), Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980 (69 of 1980) or Environment (Protection)
Act, 1986 (29 0f 1986), including Biosphere Reserves
f. Salt marshes
g. Turtle nesting grounds
h. Horseshoe crabs’ habitats
i. Sea grass beds
85
IRC : SP : 19-2020
CRZ – IB: The intertidal zone i.e. the area between Low Tide Line* and High Tide
Line** shall constitute the CRZ-I B.
(b) CRZ – II: shall constitute the developed land areas up to or close to the
shoreline, within the existing municipal limits or in other existing legally
designated urban areas, which are substantially built-up with a ratio of built-up
plots to that of total plots being more than 50 per cent and have been provided
with drainage and approach roads and other infrastructural facilities, such as
water supply, sewerage mains, etc.
(c) CRZ – III: Land areas that are relatively undisturbed (viz. rural areas, etc.)
and those which do not fall under CRZ-II, shall constitute CRZ–III, and CRZ-III
shall be further classified into the following 2 categories.
CRZ – IIIA:
Such densely populated CRZ-III areas, where the population density is more than 2161
per square kilometer as per 2011 census base, shall be designated as CRZ–III A and in
CRZ-III A, area up to 50 meters from the HTL on the landward side shall be earmarked
as the ‘No Development Zone (NDZ)’, provided the CZMP as per this notification,
framed with due consultative process, have been approved, failing which, a NDZ of 200
meters shall continue to apply.
CRZ – IIIB:
All other CRZ-III areas with population density of less than 2161 per square kilometer,
as per 2011 census base, shall be designated as CRZ-III B, and in CRZ-III B, the area
up to 200 meters from the HTL on the landward side shall be earmarked as the ‘No
Development Zone (NDZ)’.
Land area up to 50 meters from the HTL, or width of the creek whichever is less, along
the tidal influenced water bodies in the CRZ III, shall also be earmarked as the NDZ in
CRZ III.
The CRZ- IV shall constitute the water area and shall be further classified as under:
CRZ – IVA:
The water area and the seabed area between the Low Tide Line, up to twelve nautical
miles on the sea side shall constitute CRZ-IV A.
CRZ – IVB:
Areas shall include the water area and the bed area between LTL, and the tidal
influenced water body, where and to the extent the salinity is greater than five parts
per thousand (ppt) during the driest season of the year.
86
IRC : SP : 19-2020
The Project Proponent shall apply with the following documents to the concerned State
or the Union territory Coastal Zone Management Authority for seeking prior clearance
as per CRZ notification.
c. Comprehensive EIA with cumulative studies for projects, (except for building
construction projects or housing schemes with built-up area less than the threshold
limit stipulated for attracting the provisions of the EIA Notification, 2006 number
S.O 1533(E), dated 14th September, 2006) shall be carried out if located in low and
medium eroding stretches, as per the CZMP of CRZ notification.
d. Submit Risk Assessment Report and Disaster Management Plan, except for building
construction projects or housing schemes with built-up area less than the threshold
limit stipulated for attracting the provisions of the EIA Notification, 2006 number
S.O 1533(E), dated 14th September, 2006).
e. CRZ map in 1:4000 scale, drawn up by any of the agencies identified by the
Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change vide its Office Order number
J-17011/8/92-IAIII, dated the 14th March, 2014 using the demarcation of the HTL
or LTL, as carried out by National Center for Sustainable Coastal Management.
f. Project layout superimposed on the CRZ map duly indicating the project boundaries
and the CRZ category of the project location as per the approved Coastal Zone
Management Plan of CRZ notification.
g. The CRZ map normally covering 7 kilometer radius around the project site shall be
submitted indicating the CRZ-I, II, III and IV areas including other notified
ecologically sensitive areas.
i. The concerned Coastal Zone Management Authority shall examine the documents
in clause (i) above, in accordance with the approved Coastal Zone Management
Plan and in compliance with CRZ notification and make recommendations within a
period of sixty days.
j. The Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change shall consider complete
project proposals for clearance based on the recommendations of the Coastal Zone
Management Authority, within a period of sixty days.
87
IRC : SP : 19-2020
k. In case the Coastal Zone Management Authorities are not in operation due to their
reconstitution or any other reasons, then it shall be responsibility of the
Department of Environment in the State Government or Union territory
Administration, who are the custodians of the CZMP of respective States or Union
territories, to provide comments and recommend the proposals in terms of the
provisions of the said notification.
l. The clearance accorded to the projects under this notification shall be valid for a
period of seven years, provided that the construction activities are completed, and
the operations commence within seven years from the date of issue of such
clearance.
m. The validity may be further extended for a maximum period of three years,
provided an application is made to the concerned authority by the applicant within
the validity period, along with recommendation for extension of validity of the
clearance by the concerned State or Union territory Coastal Zone Management
Authority.
Following coastal areas shall be accorded special consideration for the purpose of
protecting the critical coastal environment and difficulties faced by local communities.
a. Critically Vulnerable Coastal Areas (CVCA): Sundarban region of West Bengal and
other ecologically sensitive areas identified as under Environment (Protection) Act,
1986 such as Gulf of Khambat and Gulf of Kutchh in Gujarat, Malvan, Achra-
Ratnagiri in Maharashtra, Karwar and Coondapur in Karnataka, Vembanad in Kerala,
Gulf of Mannar in Tamil Nadu, Bhaitarkanika in Odisha, Coringa, East Godavari and
Krishna in Andhra Pradesh shall be treated as Critical Vulnerable Coastal Areas
(CVCA) and managed with the involvement of coastal communities including fisher
folk, who depend on coastal resources for their sustainable livelihood.
b. CRZ for inland Backwater islands and islands along the mainland coast.
88
IRC : SP : 19-2020
a. It is the Executing Agency’s obligation to procure the approval of the Railways for
the ROBs, RUBs or any similar structures to be constructed across a railway line
within the Right of Way of the Railways Department. Process of obtaining ROB
clearance is as follows:
b. GAD shall be prepared based on the field studies conducted at the proposed
crossing. During the field visit following details shall be identified:
89
IRC : SP : 19-2020
Further, requisition form shall be submitted to competent authority (DFO) through user
agency for obtaining felling permission. Joint field verification has to be carried out with
concerned forest / revenue officials for approval of enumeration report. No Objection
Certificate (NOC) has to be obtained for felling of roadside trees, which have been
planted by individuals, and the Planning and Extension Division of the Forest
Department, R&B and Highways. The current Upset Price and tree felling estimates
shall be obtained from concerned forest officials. The felling permission and its value
for fruit bearing trees shall be obtained from Horticulture / revenue departments as per
WALTA / State Government rules.
90
IRC : SP : 19-2020
1. General
1.1. The highway should be as direct as possible between the cities or towns to be linked,
thereby, satisfying the major desired links. A direct highway link results in economy in
construction, maintenance and operation.
1.2. The location should result in minimum interference to agriculture and industry.
1.3. The location should, as far as possible, facilitate easy grades and curvature.
1.4. The location should steer clear of obstruction, such as, cemeteries, burning ghats, places
of worship, archaeological and historical monuments, and as far as possible, from public
facilities, like, hospitals, schools, playgrounds, etc.
1.5. Where the proposed location interferes with utility, services, like, overhead transmission
lines, underground water supply lines, sewerage lines, gas lines etc., decision between
changing the highway alignment or shifting the utility services should be based on study of
the relative economics and feasibility.
1.6. As far as possible, frequent crossing and re-crossing of a railway line should be avoided.
For design requirements in such cases, reference may be made to IRC:39 "Standards for
Road-Rail Level Crossings".
1.7. An important obligatory point in the selection of the route is the location of river crossings.
While crossings of major rivers (waterway exceeding 200 m.) may have to be as normal to
the river flow if possible, with highway alignment sub-ordinated to considerations of the
bridge siting. Crossings of medium/minor streams should be generally governed by the
requirements of the highway proper. If necessary, such structures could be made skew/
located on curves.
1.8. The location should be such that the highway is fully integrated with the surrounding
landscape of the area. In this connection, it would be necessary to study the
environmental impact of the highway and ensure that the adverse effects of it are kept to
the minimum.
1.9. The highway should, as far as possible, be located along the edges of properties rather
than through their middle so as to cause least interference to cultivation and other
activities and to avoid the need for frequent crossing of the highway by the local people.
1.10. The location should be, such as, to avoid unnecessary and expensive destruction of
wooded areas. Where intrusion into such areas is unavoidable the highway should be
aligned on a curve if possible so as to preserve an unbroken background.
1.11. The location should, as far as possible, be close to sources of embankment and pavement
materials so that haulage of these over long distances is avoided and the cost minimized.
1.12. A preferred location is one which passes through areas having better type of soil and
permits a balancing of the cost of cut and fill for the formation.
91
IRC : SP : 19-2020
1.13. Marshy and low-lying land, and areas having poor drainage and very poor embankment
material should be avoided, as far as possible. Also, areas susceptible to subsidence due to
mining operations should be by-passed.
1.15. Highways through villages and towns increase traffic hazards and cause delay and
congestion. Wherever a serious problem of this nature is encountered it may be advisable
to by-pass the built-up area playing well clear of the limits upto which the town or village is
anticipated to grow in the future.
1.16. As far as possible, areas likely to be unstable due to toe-erosion by rivers, shall be avoided.
1.17. During fixing of alignment by the side of a river, the direction of flow of the river and HFL
records for past 50 years shall be kept in view.
1.18. In spite of all conscious effort to avoid running through forest areas many times roads are
required to be aligned passing through the forest land. With increase in traffic roads
require to be widened often leading to cutting of trees on one or both sides of the road. All
this unavoidable felling needs to be made good by provision of compensatory afforestation
in equal or additional areas at suitable locations. Project preparation needs to keep this
aspect in view and make necessary provisions for compensatory afforestation where the
same is warranted.
1.19. If prior to project preparation it is known that a facility under construction is to be widened
to additional lanes, the project should be prepared by locating the first embankment and
pavement in an eccentric position with respect to the total land available and also freeze
the total land required for the entire envisaged facility right in the beginning. The
subsequent construction may then be undertaken symmetrically with respect to the center
line of the land.
If provision of additional lanes has to be made to an old road, it can be done either by
addition of half the requirement symmetrically on each side on the entire new addition on
one side only. The points to be considered in such a case are:
(i) the availability of land and convenience of additional acquisition in view of presence of
buildings and existing constructions on each side
(iii) the width of new construction and facility of compaction equipment to operate and
1.20 The location should, as far as possible, to avoid or minimize the CRZ areas while planning
the highway in coastal region.
92
IRC : SP : 19-2020
1.21 Defense establishment, future development of Airport Areas should be avoided, as far as
possible
2.1. The route should enable the ruling gradient to be attained in most of the length.
2.2. Steep terrain and other inaccessible area should be avoided, as far as possible.
2.3. Unstable hilly features, areas having frequent landslide or settlement problems and up
slope benched agricultural field with potential for standing water may be avoided as far as
possible.
2.4. Locations, along a river valley have the inherent advantage of comparatively gentle
gradients, proximity of inhabited villages, and easy supply of water for construction
purposes. However, this solution is be-set with disadvantages, such as, the need for large
number of cross-drainage structures and protective works against erosion. It would,
therefore, be necessary to take the various aspects into account before making the final
selection.
2.5. The alignment should involve least number of hair-pin bends. Where unavoidable, the
bends should be located on stable and gentle hill slopes.
2.6. In certain cases, it may be expedient to negotiate high mountain ranges through tunnels.
For such cases, the decision should be based on relative economics or strategic
considerations.
2.7. In crossing mountain ridges, the location should be such that the highway preferably
crosses the ridge at their lowest elevation.
2.8. An alignment likely to receive plenty of sunlight should receive due preference over the one
which will be in shade.
2.10. As far as possible, needless rise and fall must be avoided, specially where the general
purpose of the route is to gain elevation from a lower point to a higher point.
2.11. Areas of valuable natural resource and wildlife sanctuaries shall be avoided.
3.1. Locations where sand is loose and unstable should be avoided and the alignment selected
along ridges having vegetation.
3.2. Preference should be given to areas having coarse sand than to areas having fine
windblown sand.
3.3. In locating a road in an area having longitudinal sand dunes, the best location is always at
the top of a ridge or in the inter-dunal space. Location along the face of longitudinal dunes
should be avoided.
93
IRC : SP : 19-2020
3.4. The alignment of road should as far as possible run parallel to sand dunes, sand dunes
should be crossed without disturbing their existing profile.
4.1. Suitable forms of stabilization, specially mixing of lime in pulverized soil may be necessary
to achieve desired gain in strength.
5.2. In locating the road in medium and highly saline soil precautions for diversion of water
away from road bed should be taken.
5.3. On wet saline soils, highway embankment should be constructed of good imported soil free
from salts.
In case the marine clay site is under the influence of tide rise and fall of water, the
subgrade should be 1.0 meter above the highest tidal water level.
Marine clay are soft and compressible. Therefore, stability of fill and the magnitude and
time rate of settlement needs to be evaluated and considered. If these factors are not
within the acceptable limit ground improvements methods may be adopted.
7.2. Provision of capillary cut-off or blanket drainage facility below pavement may be necessary.
8.1. The road construction project estimates should provide for not only the requisite scale of
investigation but also the necessary measures against soil erosion so that these can be
built into the project with adequate financial provision.
8.2. Before finalizing the alignment erosion potential of each alternative should be carefully
examined and the one involving least disturbance to the natural ground should be
preferred.
8.3. Roads should not be located in geological by unstable strata, if this can be avoided. Study
of the geological maps of the area and consultation with the local Geological Department
will be helpful in this regard.
8.4. Road alignment should avoid large scale cutting and filling and follow the profile of the
land as far as possible. Use of tunnels to avoid deep cuts should be considered where
feasible and economical.
94
IRC : SP : 19-2020
8.5. To the extent feasible, roads should be aligned away from streams except where these are
to be crossed, since the greatest damage always occur along water courses. Special
attention is necessary to create protective belts of forests on both sides.
8.6. It will be advisable, at least for important roads, to have consultation with officers of Forest
Department at the stages of route alignment selection, surveys and investigations, etc., so
as to ensure that the selected alignment has minimum potential for soil erosion and that
the project designs and estimates provide for the necessary soils erosion control measures.
8.7. On hill Slopes half cut and half fill type of cross-section which involves least disturbance to
the natural ground, should be adopted subject to^ consideration of economy and road
stability being satisfied.
8.8. The cut slope should be made stable for the type of strata in the initial construction stage
itself by resorting to stable cut slopes with benches, etc., including the use of slope
stabilizing structures, like, breast walls, pitching, etc.
8.9. Area for clearing and grubbing should be kept minimum subject to technical requirements
of the road. The clearing area should be properly demarcated to save desirable trees and
shrubs and to prevent over clearing.
8.10. Location and alignment of culverts should be so chosen as to avoid adverse erosion at
outlets and siltation at inlets.
8.11. The cross-drainage structures should discharge safely on the valley side and in this
connection all necessary precautions/safe guards should be taken to ensure that the
discharging water does not cause erosion even when they flow for long period.
8.12. Drainage of water from the roadside must be given top attention and necessary system of
drains will be received to deal the run-off to natural water courses.
8.13. Appropriate mitigating Pleasures, like, ground cover planting and compulsory afforestation
may be catered for.
95
IRC : SP : 19-2020
1.1. Traffic growth rate is required to be estimated to assess the future corridor traffic. To be
realistic, this projection must be made by considering traffic flow pattern by Origin-
Destination pairs and changes in vehicle mix expected during the time horizon of the study.
Since the transport demand can change due to shift in the pattern of economic activities, it
is also necessary to consider trip generation potentials within a region. In view of this,
projecting regional socio-economic characteristics, plus the rate of change likely to take
place in the economy, the population size, urbanization and the spatial distribution of the
economic activities are required to be considered in estimation of growth rate for traffic
projection. Simple methods which may be considered suitable are described below:
For this purpose classified volume count data are to be collected at selected survey
locations, which are reasonably representative of the traffic flow conditions along the
corridor.
The analysis is then carried out generally by Linear Regression Analysis. AR2 value of 0.75
or more would be acceptable for forecasting. Erratic and scattered values of R may require
consideration of other parameteres and appropriate unbiased purification of data base or
adjustment of growth rates. Nevertheless, this method has its limitations particularly in its
applications to a new facility. Secondly, historical growth rates do not cover the changes in
the socio-economic structure, as such, fail to reflect fully the prospective growth envisaged
in the economy and the spatial distribution of economic activities, population size and,
urbanization. These may require some zonal-level forecasting along the corridor. Thus,
something more than simple extrapolation of historical growth rates by vehicle type is
required.
This method is more related to the projections of Origin-Destination linkages at the zonal-
level, as related to the prospective growth in population and the economy.
The traffic forecasting models developed for the study involve the estimation of future
transport demand, in terms of future growth rates based on the growth of population and
Net State Domestic Project (NSDP), together with the elasticity of transport demand for
both passengers and freight, in relation to income and population.
The data inputs required by this method for the determination of growth rates of vehicular
traffic comprise:
The data, particularly the income and transport demand elasticity, are generally not
available at zonal level, the state level data may be used with due consideration of the
zone under consideration.
96
IRC : SP : 19-2020
This approach is primarily based on the broad guidelines for economic analysis for highway
investments circulated for schemes under the proposed assistance by the Asian
Development Bank. IRC - 108
Forecast future normal demand for transport by project road based on, but not necessarily
limited to, annual population and real income per capita growth rates (in per cent per year)
estimated in Road Influence Area (RIA), elasticity of transport demand in relation to
income, and estimated annual production increases (in per cent per year) in RIA. In other
words, annual traffic growth must be related to specific economic activity in each RIA.
Transport demand should be projected on an annual basis over the project period. The
formulae for annual growth (in per cent) of passenger vehicles and trucks may be assumed
as follows:
a. Passenger Vehicles
Example: Assumptions
(i) Population growth: 2.1 per cent a year during 1 98 1 -9 1 (expected population
growth rates during 1991-2001 2 per cent per year)
(ii) Real income per capita growth: 3.0 per cent per year
Then,
b. Freight Traffic
Estimation of freight traffic is more complex in nature and involves the process of
iteration as well as subjective decision so as to be compatible with the regional
perspective plans and other indicators. The basic steps will comprise:
(i) From socio-economic profile find out the annual weighted average growth
rate in per cent in the agricultural, industrial, mining and tourism sectors
(assumed as the predominant sectors) from the State Domestic Product
(SDP) data base. This growth may be computed in five (5) year blocks;
97
IRC : SP : 19-2020
(ii) To the above growth rate, apply the elasticity of transport demand. For
example
For the first five years 2.0, second five years 1.8 and third five years 1.6;
(iv) Now assume percentage of likely market shares by LCV, HCV and MAV during
the project period;
(v) Further assign lead distance to connect the commodity movement into tonne-
km and using step(iv) generate numbers of vehicles in blocks of five years;
(vi) As a check back calculate the growth rates to examine its appropriateness in
the context of regional development perspective and other development
parameters. Apply suitable corrections, on subjective basis, to finalise the
growth rates and generate annualised traffic streams in terms of LCV, HCV
and MAV for use in pavement design as well as economic analysis.
1.5. Conclusion
From the findings of the alternative methods described, appropriate growth rates may be
adopted for the project road concerned.
98
IRC : SP : 19-2020
1. Details of route vis-a-vis topography of the area, whether plain, rolling or hilly.
4. Geometries Features:
(a) Gradient that are feasible, specifying the extent of deviations called for
5. Existing means of surface travel-mule path, jeep track, earthen cart tracks, rail way lines,
waterway, etc.
(iii) Rocky stretches with indication of the length in loose rock stretches
99
IRC : SP : 19-2020
7.6. General elevation of the road indicating maximum and minimum heights negotiated
by mam ascents and descents in hill sections
8. Climatic Condition
8.2. Rainfall data-average annual, peak intensities, monthly distribution (to the extent
available)
8.3 Snowfall data-average annual, peak intensities, monthly distribution (to the extent
available)
8.5. Visibility
8.7. Water Table and its variation between maximum and minimum
9. Facilities Resources
9.3. Foodstuff
9.5. Construction material timber, bamboo, sand, stones, shingle, etc. with extent of
their availability, leads involved and availability of easy access
10. Value of land-agriculture land, irrigated land, built-up land, forest land, etc.
100
IRC : SP : 19-2020
18. Other major developmental projects being taken up in the area, e.g, railway project hydro-
electric projects, railway projects, dams, reservoirs, mining/agricultural projects, etc.
22. Position of ancient monuments, burial grounds, cremation grounds, religious structures,
hospitals and schools.
101
IRC : SP : 19-2020
102
IRC : SP : 19-2020
EE
ACTIONS AFFECTING ENVIRONMENTAL RECOMMENDED FEASIBLE GRADING
RESOURCES AND VALUES MITIGATING MEASURES (SUGGE-
STIVE)
(a) Environmental Impacts Due to Project Location :
(i) Disruption to hydrology May be avoided through planning D2
measures
(ii) Resettlement Suitable compensation and resettlement D1
planning require consideration
(iii) Environmental aesthetics degradation Care shall be taken to avoid / minimise D2
effect
(iv) Inequitable locations for rural roads Cross roads suitably clubbed for access D3
to the road. For the purpose, suitable
connectors to be planned as part of
project
(v) Loss of terrestrial ecology including forests May be avoided through planning D2
and wildlife exercise or minimise the effect with
mitigation measures
(vi) Loss of aquatic ecology May be avoided through planning D2
exercise or minimise the effect with
mitigation measures
(b) Impacts During Construction Phase :
(i) Site runoff from cut and fill area Suitable measures to be adopted during D1
construction
(ii) Safety of works from accidents All safety measures may be incorporated D1
in tender document
(iii) Slum creation hazards Appropriate planning for housing of D1
construction workers must be made
(iv) Cultural differences hazards Should preferably be avoided and public --
learning be made and considered
(v) Escape of hazardous materials Strict monitoring of the movement of D2
hazardous materials
(vi) Escape of air pollution (including dusts) Suitable measures will be adopted to D1
prevent minimise
(vii) Noise and vibrations Effect shall be assessed and measures D1
taken based on significant
(viii) Quarrying hazards (including use of Appropriate planning operation of D3
explosives) blasting and use of Operating Quarries
(ix) Disruption of utilities along route Shifting of utilities shall be planned in D2
advance and provision kept in the
project
(x) Disruption of traffic along route Judiciously planned to avoid / minimise D1
disruption
(ix) Disruption of utilities along route Shifting of utilities shall be planned in D2
103
IRC : SP : 19-2020
EE
ACTIONS AFFECTING ENVIRONMENTAL RECOMMENDED FEASIBLE GRADING
RESOURCES AND VALUES MITIGATING MEASURES (SUGGE-
STIVE)
advance and provision kept in the
Project
(x) Disruption of traffic along route Judiciously planned to avoid / minimise D1
disruption
(c) Impacts from Project Operations :
(i) Noise disturbances Shall not go up from present level D1
(ii) Vibration disturbances appropriate planning and post- D1
construction monitoring may be made
(iii) Air pollution appropriate planning and post D1
construction monitoring may be made
(iv) Continuing erosion Protective vegetation and Other D2
methods shall be adopted
(v) Highway runoff contamination Appropriate planning and post D2
construction monitoring to take care
(vi) Highway spills of hazardous materials Appropriate spills control program and D1
post construction monitoring to take
care
(vii) Escape of sanitary wastes Appropriate planning / post-construction D1
monitoring to be considered
(viii) Congestion at access / exit points Appropriate planning / post-construction D2
monitoring be made to reduce eliminate
the effect
(ix) Inadequate highway maintenance Post-construction monitoring is D3
recommended
104
IRC : SP : 19-2020
General Details:
Project Name -
Consultant's Name -
Date of Review -
Details /
S. No. SECTION OF THE REPORT YES / NO / NA Remarks
Specifications
1 Executive Summary Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
Overview of client organization /
2 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
activities
Methodology adopted for feasibility
3 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
study
Socioeconomic profile of the project
4 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
areas
Regional economic profile basis last 10
4.1 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
years data as per IRC
Economic profile of project influence
4.2 area basis last 10 years data as per Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
IRC
Socio Economic status of project
4.3 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
influence area
Indicative design standards,
5 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
methodologies, and specifications
6 Traffic surveys and analysis Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
Classified traffic volume counts using
6.1 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
IHMCL data (7day data)
Traffic projection methodology as per
6.2 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
IRC:108
6.3 Projected Traffic data for 20 years Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
6.4 Current and Projected PCU Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐
6.5 Current and Projected TVU Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐
Origin destination surveys as per IRC:
6.6 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
102
Speed and delay studies as per
6.7 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
IRC:102
Traffic surveys for the design of road
6.8 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
junctions as per data in IRC: SP:41
Analysis for replacing railway level
6.9 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
crossings with over bridges/ subways
105
IRC : SP : 19-2020
Details /
S. No. SECTION OF THE REPORT YES / NO / NA Remarks
Specifications
6.10 Axle load survey Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
Any other details relevant to the
6.11 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
project
Traffic surveys monitored and reviewed
6.12 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
by the client
7 Reconnaissance survey Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
7.1 Road Inventory Survey Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
Review of Road Inventory survey by
7.2 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
client
Chainage wise details of pavement
7.3 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
composition survey
Geological Survey
7.4 • Geological Map of the Area Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
• Seismicity
Climatic Conditions
• Temperature
7.5 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
• Rainfall
• Wind
Pavement composition and condition
7.6 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
survey
Review of pavement composition and
7.7 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
condition survey by client
Pavement roughness survey as per
7.8 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
IRC:SP:16
Review of pavement roughness survey
7.9 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
by client
Pavement structural strength survey as
7.10 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
per IRC:81
Review of pavement structural strength
7.11 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
survey by client
7.12 Sub grade characteristics and strengths Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
Topographical survey
7.13 • Gradient Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
• Terrain
106
IRC : SP : 19-2020
Details /
S. No. SECTION OF THE REPORT YES / NO / NA Remarks
Specifications
Geo-technical and sub-soil explorations
8.1 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
as per IRC:78
Bore holes dug for every pier and
8.2 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
abutment
Review of geo-technical and sub-soil
8.3 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
explorations by client
Field testing, soil sampling, laboratory
8.4 testing in accordance with BIS/ Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
AASHTO/ BS
Recommendation of Foundation Type
8.5 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
and Depth
Any other details relevant to the
8.6 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
project
9 Hydraulic and Hydrological Survey Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
Hydraulic and hydrological
9.1 investigations as per IRC:SP:13 and Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
IRC:5
9.2 High Flood Level specified Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
9.3 Depth of Water Table specified Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
9.4 Ponded Water Level specified Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
Any other details relevant to the
9.5 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
project
Review of hydrological investigations
9.6 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
by client
10 Materials Survey Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
10.1 Materials Survey conducted Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
Sources of Naturally Occurring
Aggregates specified
10.2
• Details of Borrow Pits with Distance Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐
from Project Site
• Cost of Material/ Transportation
Sources of Manufactured Items
specified
10.3 • Details of suppliers with distance Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
from project site
• Cost of material/ transportation
Sources of water for construction
10.4 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
specified as per IS: 456
Any other details relevant to the
10.5 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
project
Environmental screening/ preliminary
11 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
environmental assessment
Analysis basis Initial Environment
11.1 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
Examination
Recommended feasible mitigation
11.2 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
measures
12 Initial social assessment/ preliminary Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
107
IRC : SP : 19-2020
Details /
S. No. SECTION OF THE REPORT YES / NO / NA Remarks
Specifications
LA resettlement plan
Analysis basis Initial Environment
12.1 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
Examination
Details of consultation with potentially
12.2 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
affected persons
Names/ Details of consultation with
12.3 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐
local NGOs
Names/ Details of consultation with
12.4 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐
municipal authorities
12.5 Preliminary resettlement plan Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
Any other details relevant to the
12.6 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
project
13 Cost estimates Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
13.1 Item rates and rate analysis Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
13.2 Escalation Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
14 Economic and financial analysis Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
14.1 Estimated cost details Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
14.2 Projected revenues details Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
14.3 Assumptions stated Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
Analysis and results (IRR, Sensitivity
14.4 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
Analysis, Financial Viability)
15 Strip plan and Alignment Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
Details of center line of proposed
15.1 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
highway
15.2 Details of existing RoW Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
15.3 Details of proposed RoW Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
Details about ownership of land to be
15.4 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
acquired
Strip plan basis reconnaissance and
15.5 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
topographic surveys
Strip plan reviewed and approved by
15.6 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
the client
16 Alignment Options Study Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
At least two alignments proposed
16.1 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
• Details of Alignments on Map
16.2 Review of options with client Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
16.2.1 Review of options with local authority Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
Length of the project along proposed
16.3 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐
alignment options
Land Acquisition required along
16.4 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐
alignment options
16.4.1 Environmental impact of each option Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐
Review of road geometry and safety
16.4.2 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐
for each option
108
IRC : SP : 19-2020
Details /
S. No. SECTION OF THE REPORT YES / NO / NA Remarks
Specifications
16.5 Cost Estimates of alternatives Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐
Recommended Alignment with
16.6 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
Justification
Any other details relevant to the
16.7 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
project
17 Technical Specifications Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
MoRTH technical specifications for
17.1 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
Roads and Bridge works followed
17.2 Details of technical specifications Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
18 Rate Analysis Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
Rate analysis for all relevant items as
18.1 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
per latest SoR
19 Cost Estimates Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
Cost estimates for all relevant items as
19.1 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
per latest SoR
20 Bill of quantities Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
21 Conclusions and recommendations Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
21.1 Conclusions and recommendations Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
Report fulfils project objectives and
21.2 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
scope as per RFP
Report reviewed for errors and
21.3 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
omissions
Compliance report prepared on client
21.4 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
observations
109
Sl. No.
Structure No.
Project Name:
Name of River Bridge
Existing Chainage
(Km)
Skew / Normal
Existing Type
IRC : SP : 19-2020
Existing Span
Arrangement
Flow Direction
FORMAT FOR INVENTORY AND CONDITION SURVEY OF BRIDGES
Width of Bridge
(Inner to Inner Face of
Railing or Parapet)(m)
Type
cture
Conditio
Existing
Type
Superstru Railing
Parapet
Conditio
Crash Barrier
n
/
Type
/ Bearings
Conditio
n
Type
Joints
Expansion
Conditio
n
Type
Height
from
GL(m)
Existing Substructure
Inventory and Condition Survey for Bridges
Conditio
n
Type
Existing
Conditio
Foundation
Appendix -7 SURVEY AND INVESTIGATIONS FORMATS
Type
Wing Walls
Size
Conditio
Existing Return /
Bed Protection
Observations
Repair / Rehabilitation
Measures
Remarks
General Condition
Recommendations
110
(Ref: para 14.1)
No.
Stru
n (Km)
Locatio
Project Name:
IRC : SP : 19-2020
ent
Existin Span
Existing
g Type Arrangem
Length
(m)
Total width
(O/O
Parapet) (m)
Horizontal
Vent
width(m)
Opening
Height (m)
Slab
Thickness
Existing Structure Details
(m)
Abutment
details
FORMAT FOR INVENTORY AND CONDITION SURVEY OF SLAB/BOX CULVERTS
Road Level
from Bed (m)
Flow direction
Inventory and Condition Survey for Culverts
Details
Wall
Wing
Wall/
Return
Condition
Pitching
Details
Parapet
Condition
Bed Protection
Remarks
Repair / Rehabilitation
measures
Observations
111
General Condition
Recommendation
Sl. No.
Structure No
Project Name:
Existing Type
Total Width
(Outer to Outer Parapet
/ Head wall) (m)
Flow direction
Length (m)
FORMAT FOR INVENTORY AND CONDITION SURVEY OF HUME PIPE CULVERTS
Thickness
Head Wall
(m)
Length (m)
Parapet
Thickness
(m)
Height (m)
Remarks
Repair / Rehabilitation
measures
112
Recommendations
IRC : SP : 19-2020
Project Name:
Stretch
Pavement Condition Embankment Condition Drainage Condition
(km)
Cracking Edge
Pot Rut Height
Ravelli fretting General Slope Connectivity Stagnation Culvert
From To Narrow Wide hole Depth Failures (m)
ng % (length in Condition Erosion E/NE/D E/NE E/D
Type (<3mm) (>3mm) (%) (mm)
m)
% %
113
IRC : SP : 19-2020
Project Name:
Cracking
Narrow Edge fretting Pot hole Rut Depth Edge Drop Material Loss/
From To Wide Raveling % Condition
Type (<3mm) (length in m) (%) (mm) (cm) Corrugations
(>3mm) %
%
114
IRC : SP : 19-2020
Carriage
Chainage Earthwork
Land Use way Width Shoulder Road Side Drain
(km) Type C/L/F Width
Terra Surfac (m) Soil
of
in ing Type &
Median Left Right LHS RHS
Type Colour
From To Left Right Left Right LHS RHS (m) Width Width
Type Type Type Condition Type Condition
(m) (m)
115
IRC : SP : 19-2020
Sub Total
Sub Total
Sub Total
Sub Total
Grand
Total
116
IRC : SP : 19-2020
Sub
Total
Sub
Total
Sub
Total
Sub
Total
Grand
Total
117
IRC : SP : 19-2020
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
118
IRC : SP : 19-2020
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
119
IRC : SP : 19-2020
120
IRC : SP : 19-2020
Goods Vehicle
S. No. Time 2 Axle Truck 3 Axle Truck LCV M Axle Mini LCV
State No State No State No State No State No
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
121
IRC : SP : 19-2020
Date :_______________________
Time :_______________________
122
IRC : SP : 19-2020
Date :_______________________
Time :_______________________
123
IRC : SP : 19-2020
Date :_______________________
Time :_______________________
124
IRC : SP : 19-2020
Date :_______________________
Time :_______________________
125
IRC : SP : 19-2020
Section :
Location:
Direction:
Date & Time :_______________________
Weather ____________________________
126
IRC : SP : 19-2001
Directon 1 Direction 2
127
IRC : SP : 19-2020
Finding preferred highway alternatives with existing methods requires considerable resources e.g.,
manpower and time. The agencies often face complex situations in aligning a road and estimating
its cost because the project should be based on comprehensive analyses of many relevant factors,
such as land availability, earthwork, maintenance, life-cycle cost, demand, land-use, user travel
time, environmental impacts, safety, effects on the performance of other transportation modes,
and effects on regional development.
The following flow chart describes the major steps in evaluation process. The evaluation process
is divided into initial evaluation of alternative alignments through reconnaissance and discussions
with various agencies followed by detailed evaluation.
128
IRC : SP : 19-2020
The attributes considered in any bypass/ new alignments study may take many forms, but of prime
importance are physical, economic, social and environmental ones. After considering all the major
aspects, the alternative alignments have to be evaluated with respect to the following five major
criteria;
a) Engineering Aspects
b) Socioeconomic Aspects
c) Environmental Aspects
d) Cost Aspects
e) Safety Aspects
Evaluation for each criteria & Overall evaluation through Decision Matrix
This assessment refers to the impact on community facilities, the social/community severance
or integration, aesthetic factors, noise factors, and heritage issues.
129
IRC : SP : 19-2020
Each of the parameter has been assigned with the same unit value.
The Environmental assessment measures the degree to which there is an undesirable impact
on environmental factors along and in the vicinity of the alignment.
Each of the parameter has been assigned with the same unit value.
130
IRC : SP : 19-2020
The final choice of alternatives as most feasible one needs to be confirmed through
assessment with relative weightage factors from Engineering, Socioeconomic, Cost, Safety
and Environmental considerations.
The above percentages of weightages are admittedly subjective but based on the overall
understanding on the study area with reference to the objective and requirements of the
project. After evaluation of each alternative, the one which scores higher will be preferred
alternative.
131
IRC : SP : 19-2020
11 Demolition of small
type houses no 1 3 0.33 1 1.00 1 1.00
Demolition of
12 important
buildings/houses no 1 0 1.00 0 1.00 0 1.00
Subtotal 12 11.14 11 11.66
Environmental Aspects
1 Alignment Length km 1 7.5 0.77 5.8 1.00 7.9 0.73
2 Cross roads no 1 10 0.60 6 1.00 8 0.75
3 Canal/river crossings no 1 6 0.67 4 1.00 5 0.80
4 Use of Existing road km 1 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00
Damage of Agriculture
5
land % 1 100 0.90 90 1.00 100 0.90
6 Damage of residential
and commercial land % 1 0 1.00 10 0.00 0 1.00
7 Damage of Garden /
Plantation % 1 0 1.00 0 1.00 0 1.00
Use of
8
pond/Ditch/Barren % 1 0 1.00 0 1.00 0 1.00
Length through
9
Habitation km 1 0 1.00 0 1.00 0 1.00
10 Presence of sensitive
locations
Reserve forest/ Protect
10.1 forest/ Breeding centre
etc. hct 1 0 1.00 0 1.00 0 1.00
School, College,
10.2 Religious structures
and Hospitals no 1 0 1.00 0 1.00 0 1.00
Subtotal 11 8.94 9 9.18
Cost Aspects
1 Civil Cost (Rs Crores) Rs. 1 150 0.77 116 1.00 158 0.73
Overall Cost (Rs
2
Crores) Rs. 1 183 0.77 141.52 1.00 192.76 0.73
Subtotal 2 1.55 2.00 1.47
Safety
1 Road Geometry 1 Good 1.00 Good 1.00 Good 1.00
2 No. of Intersections no 1 10 0.60 6.00 1.00 8.00 0.75
3 Road Safety 1 Safe 1.00 Safe 1.00 Safe 1.00
Subtotal 3 2.6 3 2.75
Total Score 41 33.70 36 34.50
132
IRC : SP : 19-2020
133
IRC : SP : 19-2020
General Details:
Project Name -
Consultant's Name -
Date of Review -
Details /
S. No. SECTION OF THE REPORT YES / NO / NA Remarks
Specifications
1 Main Report Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
2 Introduction and project background Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
Overview of project location, project
2.1 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
objectives etc
Overview of report structure,
2.2 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
deliverables etc.
3 Social analysis of the project Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
Project impact on stakeholders such as
3.1 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
local people
Project impact on residential,
3.2 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
commercial and public properties
3.3 Any other details relevant to the project Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
4 Reconnaissance survey Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
Geometric Features of the Existing Road
Design Speed
• Sight distance details
4.1 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐
• Horizontal Alignment Details
• Vertical Alignment Details
• Height of Embankment
Topographical Survey using LiDAR (or
equivalent technology)
4.2 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
•Gradient
• Terrain
Pavement composition and condition
4.3 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
survey
Pavement roughness survey as per
4.4 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
IRC:SP:16
Pavement structural strength survey as
4.5 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
per IRC:81
Geological Survey
4.6 • Geological Map of the Area Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
• Seismicity
Climatic Conditions
• Temperature
4.7 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
• Rainfall
• Wind
134
IRC : SP : 19-2020
Details /
S. No. SECTION OF THE REPORT YES / NO / NA Remarks
Specifications
Land Use along the existing alignment
4.8 • Map of the Project Area depicting Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
Agricultural/Habitation/Forest Area
Details of Existing Structures
• Map of the Project Area depicting
4.9 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
Hutments/Buildings/Temples/Public
Building/Any Other Significant Structure
Inventory and condition survey of
4.10 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
culverts
Geo-technical and sub-soil explorations
4.11 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
as per IRC:78
Number of Bore holes dug (holes for
4.12 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐
every pier and abutment)
Field testing, soil sampling, laboratory
4.13 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
testing as per IRC: 78
Recommendation of Foundation Type
4.14 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐
and Depth
4.15 Hydrological investigations as per IRC:5 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
4.16 High Flood Level specified Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
4.17 Depth of Water Table specified Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
4.18 Ponded Water Level specified Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
4.19 Materials Survey conducted Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
Sources of Naturally Occurring
Aggregates specified
4.20 • Details of Borrow Pits with Distance Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐
from Project Site
• Cost of Material/Transportation
Sources of environmentally friendly
4.20.1 construction materials identified as per Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
MoRT&H circular
Sources of Manufactured Items specified
•Details of Suppliers with Distance from
4.21 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
Project Site
•Cost of Material/Transportation
Source of Water for construction
4.22 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
specified as per IS:456
4.23 Any other details relevant to the project Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
Traffic studies and demand forecast
5 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
designs
Classified traffic volume counts using
5.1 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
IHMCL data (7 day data)
Traffic projection methodology as per
5.2 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
IRC:108
5.3 Projected Traffic data Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
5.4 Current and Projected PCU Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐
5.5 Current and Projected TVU Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐
Origin destination surveys as per IRC:
5.6 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
102
5.7 Speed and delay studies as per IRC:102 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
135
IRC : SP : 19-2020
Details /
S. No. SECTION OF THE REPORT YES / NO / NA Remarks
Specifications
Traffic surveys for the design of road
5.8 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
junctions as per data in IRC: SP:41
Analysis for replacing railway level
5.9 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
crossings with over bridges/ subways
5.10 Axle load survey Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
5.11 Any other details relevant to the project Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
Traffic surveys monitored and reviewed
5.12 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
by the client
6 Cost estimates Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
6.1 Project costing as per latest SoR Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
7 Environmental aspects Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
Environment profile of the project
7.1 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
region
Details of Public consultation at
7.2 residential and commercial settlements Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
affected
Impact analysis and mitigation
7.3 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
measures
8 Economic and commercial analysis Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
8.1 Estimated cost details Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
8.2 Projected revenues details Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
8.3 Assumptions stated Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
Analysis and results (IRR, Sensitivity
8.4 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
Analysis, Financial Viability)
8.5 Conclusions and recommendations Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
Financial model shared with client and
8.6 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
reviewed
136
IRC : SP : 19-2020
Details /
S. No. SECTION OF THE REPORT YES / NO / NA Remarks
Specifications
10.9 Utility relocation Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
10.10 Pavement Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
10.11 Structures Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
10.12 Any other details relevant to the project Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
Pavement deflection survey as per IRC
10.13 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
81-1997
10.14 Any other details relevant to the project Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
11 Materials Report Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
11.1 Material investigations as per IRC:10 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
Review of material investigations by
11.2 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
client
11.3 Multiple borrow areas identified Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
11.4 Material survey Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
11.5 Review of material survey by client Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
Geo-technical and sub-soil explorations
11.6 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
as per IRC:78
Review of geo-technical and sub-soil
11.7 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
explorations by client
Field testing, soil sampling, laboratory
11.8 testing in accordance with BIS/ Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
AASHTO/BS
Pavement composition and condition
11.9 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
survey
Review of pavement composition and
11.10 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
condition survey by client
Pavement roughness survey as per
11.11 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
IRC:SP:16
Review of pavement roughness survey
11.12 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
by client
Pavement structural strength survey as
11.13 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
per IRC:81
Review of pavement structural strength
11.14 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
survey by client
Water sample tests as per MoRTH
11.15 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
specifications
11.16 Any other details relevant to the project Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
Environmental Assessment
12 Report/Resettlement and Rehabilitation Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
Plan
Option for alignment alternatives
12.1 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
considered and conclusions
Land environment data collection and
12.2 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
details/ impact/ mitigation measures
Air environment data collection and
12.3 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
details/ impact/ mitigation measures
Water resources details/ impact/
12.4 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
mitigation measures
137
IRC : SP : 19-2020
Details /
S. No. SECTION OF THE REPORT YES / NO / NA Remarks
Specifications
Noise environment details/
12.5 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
impact/mitigation measures
Biological environment details/
12.6 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
impact/mitigation measures
12.7 Details of public consultation Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
Environment monitoring and
12.8 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
management plan
12.9 Details of social impact assessment Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
Details of resettlement and
12.10 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
rehabilitation action plan
12.11 Measures to minimize resettlement Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
Details of public consultation with
12.12 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
stakeholders
Details of implementation arrangement /
12.13 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
budget
12.14 Any other details relevant to the project Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
13 Technical Specifications Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
MoRTH technical specifications for
13.1 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
Roads and Bridge works followed
13.2 Details of technical specifications Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
14 Rate Analysis Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
Rate analysis for all relevant items as
14.1 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
per latest SoR
15 Cost Estimates Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
Cost estimates for all relevant items as
15.1 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
per latest SoR
16 Bill of quantities Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
17 Drawing Volume Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐ NA
18 Digital drawings of road Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐
18.1 Highway cross sections Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐
3D engineered models of:
• Road alignment geometry
18.2 Yes ☐ No ☐ NA ☐
• Proposed highway
• Proposed structures
138
IRC : SP : 19-2020
A. BOREHOLE SAMPLES
Undisturbed samples are those collected in 100 mm dia thin-walled tubes conforming to
IS:2132-1972. These should be tested in the laboratory for the determination of the following
soil properties.
Where the method of stage construction of embankment based on the effective stress
method of design requires to be kept in view, selected and representative undisturbed
samples should be further tested in the laboratory for the determination of the following soil
properties:
c'/Ø' and A-factor from consolidated undrained triaxial tests with measurement of pore
pressure i.e., C-U tests (according to IS:2720 Part XII-1981). Bulk density, void ratio and
moisture content before/after C-U test should also be determined.
Samples from test pits must be tested for the following tests. Samples recovered from the
SPT spoon should be retained in sealed air-tight glass jars. These samples may be treated as
disturbed samples and should be tested in the laboratory for the determination of following
soil properties:
(For soils suspected to be organic in nature by virtue of colour, odour, texture, etc., LL on
fresh as well as on oven-dry specimens may be separately found out).
139
IRC : SP : 19-2020
iv. Moisture-density relation ship using light / heavy compaction, commonly known as
Standard / modified proctor test (as per IS:2720 Part-VIII-1980)
On the basis of tests conducted as per (a) above, the samples may be categorised into types,
each showing the same or closely similar soil characteristics. One or two samples out of each
category may be judiciously selected so as to be representative and subjected to the following
tests:
• For cohesive fill material (e.g. clay or silty / sandy clay mixed with silt / sand), c and Ø may
be determined from unconsolidated undrained (UU) triaxial test (according to
IS:2720 Part-XI-1972) on specimens remoulded to 95% proctor density at OMC plus 2%.
• If the fill material is cohesionless, Ø may be determined from direct shear test (according
to IS:2720 Part-XIII-1972) on specimens remoulded to 95% proctor density at OMC.
• For cohesive fill materials which may be used for forming embankments likely to be
subjected to submergence and drawdown, effective stress parameters c and Ø as also A-
factor, may be determined from consolidated undrained test with measurement of pore
pressure i.e. CU tests (according to IS:2720 Part-XII-1981) on specimens remoulded to
95% proctor density at OMC plus 2%. The test specimens in the triaxial cell need to be
saturated by applying back pressure before shearing. This test will be in addition to that
mentioned in (b) (i) above and may be carried out for selected few representative samples
only.
• For any of the types of strength tests mentioned above, the actual bulk density, void ratio
and moisture content of the specimens before / after the test should be found out and
recorded.
140
IRC : SP : 19-2020
1. Purpose of Guidelines
• To assist the project authorities in planning and carrying out EIA and evolving
Environmental Management Plan.
• These guidelines apply to both new projects and upgrading of existing facilities
• EIA procedure identifies the possible positive and negative impacts resulting from a
proposed project (Table A-11.1).
It is implementation plan for mitigation and conservation measures recommended in the EIS.
It may include several implementation plans. Each should include;
• Objective
• Work plan for Design criteria
• Implementation schedule
• Manpower requirements and
• Monitoring.
5. Identification of Impacts
Physical Resources
Impacts on hydrology, surface water quality, air quality, soils and noise impacts.
Ecological Resources
Impacts on Aquatic and Terrestrial ecosystems such as fisheries, forestry, wild life, etc,..
141
IRC : SP : 19-2020
Careful attention be paid to site planning to minimise adverse impact to the extent possible.
Protection measures may include establishment of forest reserve to minimise encroachment,
fencing of road land, promoting new rural occupations.
➢ ROW to have buffer strip on each side of road and where possible tree belts be
planted
➢ Nose insulation including noise barries in certain areas such as schools /
hospital
➢ Rerouting heavy traffic
➢ Changing speed limits
➢ Changing alignment
(v) Vibration
(vi) Relocation
142
IRC : SP : 19-2020
7. Environmental Monitoring
i. Air Monitoring
Monitoring stations for air quality are recommended along the project road to
compare with the background data parameter to be monitored are CO, HC, SO2, NOx
and Pb. Frequency and duration of sampling may be sorted out with the concerned
meteorological departments.
Monitoring of lead (Pb) content in the nearby water bodies and plants is
recommended. Locations be determined in consultation with the Pollution Control
Boards. Monitoring stations be set-up in consultation with the Pollution Control Board
of the Centre/State.
8. Management Considerations
Note: Vide MOEF letter No. J-21012/15/96-IA-III dated 12 March, 1997, the
MOEF wrote to Secretary Ministry of Surface Transport regarding
recommendations of the Working Graph constituted to consider issues
relating to exemption from environmental clearance for road projects along
existing alignments.
a. Recommendations are
i. Projects for improvement works along existing alignments with marginal land
143
IRC : SP : 19-2020
ii. Cases involving acquisition of marginal land would be examined by the concerned
Ministry and approval accorded at their end, keeping in view the following:
iii. Where diversion of forest land is involved, clearance would be required under the
forest (conservation) Act 1980
iv. Where diversion of land from wildlife sanctuaries or National Parks or Protected area is
involved, clearance would be required under the wildlife (Protection) Act 1972
v. It is necessary for project proponents to carry out EIA study and provide mitigation
measures
vi. Environmental Clearance is a per-requisite for all Green Field roads
vii. MOEF & CC would be kept apprised of any developmental projects being implemented.
Coastal stretches of seas, bays, estuaries, creeks, rivers and backwaters which are influenced
by tidal action (in the landward side) upto 500 meters from the High Tide Level (HTL) and the
land between the Low Tide Level and the HTL is declared as Coastal Regulation Zone.
Construction activities are prohibited in the Coastal Regulation Zone except for existing roads
or those specifically approved in the Coastal Zone Management Plan of the area categorised
as CRZ II, viz., the areas that have already been developed upto or close to the shore line and
provided inter-alia with approach road.
144
IRC : SP : 19-2020
Table –1
Beneficial and Negative Impacts of Highway Projects
145
IRC : SP : 19-2020
Table – A.2
Some Environmental Parameters Associated with Transportation Sector Projects
Developmental Environmental
Projects Parameters
Highway Surface water quality
Air Quality
Siesmology/Geology
Erosion
Land Quality
Fisheries
Aquatic wildlife
Forests
Terrestrial Wildlife
Noise
Land use
Aesthetics
Industries
Resettlement
Archaeological/Historic
Significance
Public Health
Socio-Economic
146
IRC : SP : 19-2020
A) Date of Advertisement
B) Newspapers in which the advertisement appeared
C) Date of Hearing
D) Panel Present
E) List of Public present along with addresses and occupation
The data and information given in this Performa are true to the best of my knowledge and belief
147
IRC : SP : 19-2020
Table – A.3
Note 1 : All information given in the form of annexures should be part of this file itself.
Annexures as separate files will not be accepted.
I. General Information
D. Geographical Information
1. Latitude From To
2. Longitude From To
3. G.T. Sheet No. (Survey of India Map No.).
4. Elevation above Mean Seal Level (metres)
Min. Max.
5. Total Area proposed for the Project (in ha.)
6. Nature of Terrian
7. Nature of Soil
(Clayey, Sandy, Silty, Loam, etc.)
8. Permeability along the route
In various Sections
II. Current land use of the proposed project site area (in ha.)
A. Agricultural
1. Irrigated
2. Unirrigated
B. Homestead
C. Forest
D. Notified Industrial Area / Estate
E. Grazing
148
IRC : SP : 19-2020
F. Fallow
G. Mangroves
H. Orchards
I. Sand Dunes
J. No Development Zone
K. Marshes
L. National Park/Sanctuary
Total
A. ____________________________________________
B. ____________________________________________
C. ____________________________________________
D. ____________________________________________
A. Does the proposed project confirm to the approved land use all along the route / alignment ?
(To be certified by the concerned Department of State Government).
Yes No
B. If not, clearly indicated, which of the stretches are not as per approved land use.
Yes No
Yes No
149
IRC : SP : 19-2020
E. Gradient details
Yes No
2. Location
3. Soil Type
Yes No
2. Depth of cut
3. Location
4. Soil Type
150
IRC : SP : 19-2020
Yes No
1. Lithology
3. Diameter (meters)
4. Length (kilometer)
5. Location
Yes No
Yes No
VII. In case the route / alignment falls totally or partially in the CRZ area
CRZ-IA CRZ-IIIA
CRZ-II
CRZ-IB CRZ-IIIB
CRZ-IVA
CRZ-IVB
B. Does the proposed activity quality under the category of permissible activity ?
Yes No
151
IRC : SP : 19-2020
D. In case the road passes through a flood plain of a river, please furnish :
1. Detailed micro-drainage
2. Flood passages
Yes No
Yes No
1. Stetch
2. Area (sq. metres)
Yes No
Yes No
152
IRC : SP : 19-2020
Yes No
1. Area
2. Species
3. Existing health
IX. Does the proposed project site involve any breeding or nesting ground ?
Yes No
B. Type of habitat
Yes No
153
IRC : SP : 19-2020
XII. Whether there will be any change in the drainage pattern after the proposed activity ?
Yes No
Yes No
A. Name of fauna
B. Habitat
154
IRC : SP : 19-2020
J. No.of Culverts
K. Length of Culverts (metres)
Item Quantity
S.No Mode of Transport Source
(Tonnes)
1. Stonemetal
2. Bricks
3. Sand
4. Cement
5. Bitumen
6. Diesel
7. Others (Please specify)
Type Treated /
S. Average Peak
Purpose Source Untreated/Fres Remarks
No Demand Demand
h/Recycled
1. Road making
2. Dust Suppression
3. Drinking
4. Others (Please
specify)
TOTAL
155
IRC : SP : 19-2020
XVII. Whether there will be any ingress of saline water into ground water due to project ?
Yes No
XVIII. Whether any of the following exist within 10km of the project site. If so please
indicate aerial and the name of the site.
XIV. Ambient Air Quality (for RPM, SPM, SO2, NOX, CO)
Procedures adopted should be as per guidelines of CPCB and should cover one full season
(Locations should be so selected to represent the varying geographical locations and sensitive
receptors)
Remarks
Concentration as monitored Permissible
Stretch of the Date, Time & (Name of the
S.No (in ug/m3) Standard (As per
Road Location instrument and
SPM, SO2, NOX, CO SPCB guidelines)
sensitivity)
156
IRC : SP : 19-2020
1 Top Soil
2 Overburden
Total
Method
1. Landfill
3. In case of landfill
2.
3.
XXII. Projected Air Quality (taking into account the traffic projections on this road).
157
IRC : SP : 19-2020
Maximum Quantity at
Consumption
S.No Name any point of time Means of Transportation
(in TPD)
(tonnes)
1. Bitumen
2. Diesel
3. Others (please
specify)
A. What are the major occupational health hazards and hazards anticipated due to use of
explosive, if any and safety measures to be adopted?
Nos.
1. Planted
2. Proposed
3. List of species
158
IRC : SP : 19-2020
2. Average
D. What provisions has been made for the sanitation for the construction workers ?
E. How the fuel (kerosene/wood, etc.) requirement of labour force will be met to avoid
cutting of trees from the adjoining areas.
F. Measures for Health care will emphases on protection from endemic diseases.
A. Human Settlement
Of which
SC/ST
Number of Houses
Present
Occupational Pattern
B. Economic Activity
Occupation
S.No Population (Agriculture/Horticulture/Fishing/To Average Income per annum
urism/Transport/Construction)
159
IRC : SP : 19-2020
XXVIII. Rehabilitation & Resettlement Plan including vocational training and other
avenues of employment
A. Population to be displaced
Population
S.No Name of Village Land oustees only Homestead Oustees Land + Homestead
only Oustees
1.
2.
3.
D. Compensation package
Yes No
1. Agricultural Land
2. Grazing Land
3. Top Soil
4. Natural Resources
160
IRC : SP : 19-2020
(Rs. Lakhs)
161
IRC : SP : 19-2020
1. Introduction
The advent of personal computers desk top, lap top or palmtop has made it possible to
establish road data banks which can be used both for macro and micro level administration of
various road networks.
As far as possible all project preparation work shall be made computer oriented and the basic
steps starting from collection of data on Road Inventory, condition survey etc. shall be
formulated with due consideration to the requirement of computer-based Road Data Bank
(RDB).
The important element in establishment of an RDB is the choice of reference system. The
reference system for the National and State Highways may be the kilometer posts. For
secondary road system the same may be tied to the NH and SH road networks. Hence, prior
to collection of data the reference system has to be determined to suit the application of data
for easy storage and retrieval.
2. Role of Computer-aided
The rapid development of computer packages in recent years has transformed the highway
and junction design process. No longer do large numbers of repetitive calculations have to be
laboriously carried out by hand. Instead increasingly powerful and compact computers,
together with increasingly sophisticated and commercially available software packages, which
now include computer graphics, make it possible to investigate a greater number of design
options, and to undertake the necessary design calculations more reliably and in a much
sorter period of time.
(a) Because they enable repetitive calculations to be carried out quickly and accurately,
the designer can investigate a wide range of possible solutions and determine their
consequences.
(b) It follows from the above that any modifications to a particular scheme involving
recalculations can also be easily and quickly carried out.
(c) Computer package are capable of storing considerable volumes of design data. These
can be readily recalled if necessary. Furthermore, if any design modifications are
carried out, the new information goes into the memory and replaces the original
information. Three advantages follow from this :
ii. information on various aspects of a design, such as, horizontal and vertical
alignment calculations, drainage alignment details including inlet and manhole
162
IRC : SP : 19-2020
locations, lighting column positions, details of public utility services runs and
depths are stored, and so any potential design conflicts can be identified by
retrieving and plotting from appropriate data sets (e.g. lighting column
coincident with a drainage pipe, or inadequate clearance under a bridge after
adjusting the road vertical alignment.
iii. all the information can be stored centrally, but accessed from remote
terminals, including any on the construction site.
The visual appearance of a scheme can be determined from a wide range of viewing
positions. Normally the proposed scheme is set against the development background in order
that an assessment can be made of the visual impact (if any) on the local area. It is also
possible to assess the extent to which landscaping and planting will reduce the visual
intrusion.
Many Commercial design packages are now available in this country for determining the best
alignment for a length of roads.
3. What is CAD :
When using any design package it is important to realize its limitation, for example, although
the compute can carry out calculations rapidly and accurately, it can only do these in the way
specified within the program. It cannot be creative not can it usually take decisions except in
very simple situations. What it can do, however, is to provide information as an input into the
decision making process. This information will often include not only numerical comparisons
between alternative schemes,. such as capital cost, but also subjective comparisons, such as
the extent of visual intrusion.
In all computer applications it is important to know precisely the analytical basis of the design
program, and its limitations. It should be remembered that the onus of interpreting any
outputs always lies with the designer using the program.
When using any CAD packages it is important to ensure that ll the input information is soundly
based and up to date. This will range from information on site conditions, such as, locations and
types of property, existing accesses, topographic information and existing road and junction layout
details (since these impose possible constraints on what proposals might be developed) to the
design year traffic flow predictions. If the input data are inaccurate or unreliable, then the output
will also be poor, and this can lead to sub-optimal layouts being produce and adopted.
A CAD System will normally consists of the four main components as below:
a. Input devices
b. Processor
c. Data Storage
d. Output Devices
A Single compute can either operate in isolation or be linked to other computers via a modern or
the normal telecommunications network. These linkage can be within the same office, or with
outside locations. This enables information and drawings to be transmitted quickly without the
necessity of physical moving large amounts of paper
Highway design CAD programs and packages can be considered under two broad heading junction
163
IRC : SP : 19-2020
design and road alignment design. Some CAD packages deal only with one or other of the above
design areas, but more comprehensive interactive packages, embrace both.
To utilize the speed and accuracy of any electronic data processing system through use of
sophisticated computer hardware's and software packages, it is necessary to modernise the data
capturing from field / site and down loading the same direct to the computer. Any manual input
will slow down the process and may involve error. Use of survey equipment such as Total Station,
Electronic Theodolite, Electronic Distance Measurement (EDM) Auto level, etc., are a necessity of
the day to expeditiously complete a road project to meet the requirements of high international
quality project preparation.
164
IRC : SP : 19-2020
i. Purpose:
To collect the quality ortho images and point data quickly in order to generate
three dimensional models and topographic map in minimum time period using
Aerial Photogrammetry for the Green Field / Existing Alignments
iii. Procedure:
• Establish the DGPS pillars at every 5 km, and TBM pillars at every 250 m.
• Mark the Ground Control Points (GCPs) on the ground in the survey corridor, at a
close interval
• Carry the Level to each pillar from GTS Benchmark with Digital/Auto Level.
• Connect all the GCPs by running traverse with RTK/Total Station.
• Attach visual camera to UAV.
• Place the UAV at take-off site.
• Power on the UAV and Remote Controller.
• Calibrate UAV compass, IMU and visual sensors.
• Load the required mapping corridor plan into GCS application.
• Draw a flight plan in GCS application.
• Set the flying height, GSD, camera view and overlap.
165
IRC : SP : 19-2020
iv. Precautions:
166
IRC : SP : 19-2020
•
B. Standard Operating Procedure to Carry out Topographical Survey with
Aerial LiDAR on UAV
i. Purpose:
To collect the quality point data quickly and accurately in order to generate
precise three dimensional models and topographic map in minimum time period
in green field projects.
iii. Procedure:
167
IRC : SP : 19-2020
iv. Precautions:
168
IRC : SP : 19-2020
i. Purpose:
To collect the quality point data quickly and accurately in order to generate
precise three dimensional models and topographic map in minimum time period
along the existing Highway Alignment.
iii. Procedure:
• Establish the DGPS pillars at every 5 km and TBM pillars at every 250 m.
• Mark the traverse points on the ground.
• Carry the Level to each pillar from GTS Benchmark with Digital/Auto Level.
• Connect all the traverse points with RTK/Total Station.
• Start the base/reference station observation on DGPS pillars
• Install the Ladybug Camera on vehicle
• Fix the LiDAR to the vehicle and place the GNSS antenna
• Connect the output cables to GCS.
• Power up the LiDAR and Ladybug.
• Turn on the LiDAR sensor.
• Calibrate the GNSS/IMU by making circular motions.
• Check the uncertainties in GCS.
• Start the LiDAR and Ladybug acquisition.
• Finish the Acquisition along required stretch.
169
IRC : SP : 19-2020
iv. Precautions:
170
IRC : SP : 19-2020
i. Purpose:
iii. Theory:
Based on the data collected from condition survey, the road length shall be
classified into sections of uniform performance. Identification of sections of
“good, fair and poor” performance may made separately for each lane and
shoulders separately. The length of each uniform section is kept at a minimum of
1 km except in the case of localized failures section length restricted to 0.3 km.
Sub grade samples for FWD purpose, also shall be collected at each of FWD
observation location. The entire project shall be analyzed for the calculation of
Modulus of Elasticity of existing Pavement using KGPBACK software.
Calibration of FWD
It is essential that load cell and geophones fitted in the FWD equipment are
properly calibrated for getting accurate and reproducible results.
171
IRC : SP : 19-2020
Static Calibration
Load Repeatability
As per IRC: 115-2014, in order to study the consistency and accuracy of the test
results obtained by FWD, load repeatability test shall be carried out before using
the FWD. In this test, deflection and load data were measured on a level
bituminous pavement surface, which is free from any cracks. The range of load
applied shall be taken in such a way that it generates peak deflections in the
range of 250µm to 600µm. The test shall be repeated for a minimum twelve
times. The standard deviation of the peak load in the load repeatability test
estimated should be less than 5 percent of the mean value of peak load which is
achieved in the load repeatability test. Deflection repeatability check also to be
conducted using the data collected in load repeatability test. The standard
deviation of the normalized deflections, shall be less than 5% of the mean value
of reading. Results of repeatability test shall be mentioned in the test report.
The interval at which data should be collected will depend on the length of
uniform section.
For example, if the length of section of uniform "fair" performance is 2.0 km, the
maximum spacing at which deflections should be measured is 2000/15 = 133m.
The spacing can be rounded off to convenient practical values.
Table: Guidelines for Selection of Deflection Measurement Scheme (As per IRC
115-2014)
172
IRC : SP : 19-2020
i. Mark a point at a distance of 0.6 m from outer edge of outer lane for single-lane two-
way carriage way, 1 m from outer edge of outer lane for two-lane two-way carriage
way and for divided four lane highway, the measurements points should be 0.75m
from outer edge of outer lane.
ii. Repeat the process of marking points at an interval of (Based upon the Determined
spacing for each uniform performance section).
iv. Mark a point at a distance of 4.0 m from the outer edge of outer lane for multi-lane
single carriageway, 4.2 m from the outer edge of outer lane for divided
carriageways with two lanes in each direction and for divided carriageways with three
lanes in each direction 4.2 m from the outer edge of outer lane for central lane and at
5.2 m from the outer edge of outer lane for the lane adjacent to median.
v. Repeat the process of marking points at an interval of (Based upon the Determined
173
IRC : SP : 19-2020
Procedure: The following steps shall be followed for measuring the deflections at each
test point.
1. Mark the test point on the Pavement as per the interval obtained from the Pavement
condition survey.
2. Center the load plate of duly calibrated FWD over the test point.
3. Lower the load plate onto the pavement. There should be no standing water on the
pavement surface. The loading plate should be in proper contact with pavement
surface. If a non-segment plate is used the presence of rutting at test location Should
be noted if it affects the contact between plate and pavement surface. The
longitudinal and transverse slope of the pavement should not exceed 10 % at the test
location for accurate measurement of deflection.
4. Lower the frame holding the displacement transducers (geophones) so that the
transducers are in contact with pavement surface.
5. Raise the mass to a predetermined height for producing a target load of 40 KN.
6. Drop one seating load. Load and deflection data for seating load drop need not be
recorded.
7. Raise the mass and drop. Record load and deflection data into the computer through
data acquisition system. While peak load and peak deflections at different selected
radial positions must be recorded, complete time history of load and deflections shall
be stored for each load drop if feasible.
9. Check whether the measured deflection is less than 10 μm. In such case, the test shall
be repeated by changing the peak load.
10. Raise the geophones frame and load plate and move to the next test point.
11. Record air temperature at half hourly interval. Record pavement surface temperature if
non-contact temperature sensors are available.
12. Deflection measurements should not be made when the pavement temperature is
more than 450C. In colder areas and areas of altitude greater than 1000 m where the
average daily temperature is less than 200C for more than 4 moths in a year, the
standard pavement temperature of 35 0C will not apply. In such cases the ambient
temperature is greater than 200C. No temperature is applied for back calculated
moduli of bituminous layers.
Following corrections are to be applied to the FWD test observations during its analysis:
1. The pavement temperature and seasonal variation in Climate influence the deflections
measured by the Falling Weight Deflectometer.
174
IRC : SP : 19-2020
minutes. Correction shall be applied to the deflection measured in accordance with the
procedure described in IRC: 115-2014, if the observed temperature is different from
350C.
3. The back calculated modulus of bituminous layer obtained from deflection survey
conducted at a temperature "T2" °C can be corrected to estimate the modulus
corresponding to a temperature of "T1" °C using below mentioned equation
ET1=λET2
where,
175
IRC : SP : 19-2020
i. Purpose:
To determine the surface condition of the existing pavement and road assets
(Road Inventory) by Network Survey Vehicle (ROMDAS).
1. Laser Profiler
3. Geometry Unit
5. Camera
6. Odometer
iii. Theory:
176
IRC : SP : 19-2020
v. Procedure:
1. Conduct a test survey before start of the actual survey and check the individual
parts of the equipment for its firm position and ensure the data is recording.
2. Process the test survey raw file and the data shall be checked for its accuracy.
4. Start a new survey (from Romdas software and enter the start chainage,
direction of survey and section name).
5. Select the devices for survey that needs to be collected as per the project
requirement.
7. Open several popup windows relating to specific pre-selected tasks from survey
setup menu.
9. Make sure that Laser Profilers, Transverse Profile Logger (TPL), GPS, Geometry
and camera starts for collecting the data automatically with reference to the
odometer.
10. Record the road assets and visual condition using Inventory and Condition key
codes, simultaneously.
11. Make sure that, visual conditions are recorded as per the MoRTH guidelines and
is at an interval of every 500 m.
12. Conduct Lane based survey, i.e. if the project section is a four-lane corridor,
NSV records data on each lane and in both increment and decrement directions.
13. Take necessary precautions & care while conducting the survey, that the vehicle
177
IRC : SP : 19-2020
14. Similarly, make sure that the data is recorded till the section end and a Location
Referencing Post is provided and the data is saved.
15. The Raw data collected from survey section shall be processed using ROMDAS
Data Review software and the collected data is characterized as per the client
requirement.
Rating 1 2 3 4 5
Reference: Guidelines for Maintenance Management of Primary, Secondary and Urban Roads
(Ministry of Transport & Highways) Published by: Indian Road Congress – Year 2004.
178
IRC : SP : 19-2020
179
IRC : SP : 19-2020
180
IRC : SP : 19-2020
181