History and Memory AS1

Download as odt, pdf, or txt
Download as odt, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 4

Course name and code: History and Memory in East Asian Cultures, 155903015 A22/23

Tutor: Dr Griseldis Kirsch

AS1: 10/02/2023

Word count: 1,028

Option 2: Write a response to one of the assigned films or plays Identify a specific scene/sequence
or a significant symbol/motif and critically evaluate it in the context of the entire
film/play/performance and in relation to its broader cultural and historical significance.

Response paper: Yamato, 2005 director. Junya Satō

The film Yamato (2005) was one of the most successful films in Japanese cinematic history. It broke

the box-office record at the time of 5.11 billion Yen and won ten categories at the 2007 Japanese

Academy Awards. The film was released in 2005, amidst a proliferation of Japanese media seeking

to memorialise modern history in the context of Japan as a victim. The conservative and nationalist

fervour in the public media was reflected in politics with Shinzo Abe's prime ministerial election in

2006. The film caters for a broad range of interpretation but I believe, given the historical and social

contexts of it's release and public reception, that as a cultural event and document, the overall effect

of the film on Japanese memory of modern history is deeply conservative. I shall demonstrate how

the film expresses the symbolic motif of the unified, and exceptionally Japanese, fighting spirit. I

read the film as entreating the modern generation to both valorise their brave ancestors and inspire

them to continue this legacy into the future.

The film explicitly seeks to justify its function as educating modern viewers about the events of the

time period it covers. The whole point of present day Makiko's narrative arc is to resolve her guilt

over the fact that she "never tried to get a sense of his (her father's) life." Makiko thus represents the

modern generation's ignorance about the wartime generation's plight. She laments that she "must

have been an ungrateful child," reinforcing the emotional guilt that modern Japanese, who enjoy

such high levels of modern material luxury, must watch the film and instil gratitude for their
ancestors who sacrificed their lives for the nation. The film seeks to establish its authority as a

reliable narrator by using a conventional form with "explanatory titles common to Japanese

television documentaries and historical dramas" (Gerow 2016: 203/4). Therefore, very early on in

the film, the parameters are set for the expected orientation that the audience ought to take in

viewing this film.

The valorisation of Japanese unity is perhaps the central motif pervading the entire film. We see that

this propaganda has been instilled as the innocent and vital fifteen year old Kamio says that the

newspapers report that "the yanks are too individualistic to fight for long." This is one of the few

direct references to the USA and cultural values, drawing a crudely cliche juxtaposition between the

collective Japanese fighting for the Kokutai versus the individualistic Americans. In one sense this

functions as an implicit criticism of the ideological propaganda of the time that pushed so many

innocent young men into war on idealised false pretences. Nevertheless, Japanese exceptionalism,

based on strength in unity, is continuously affirmed throughout the film.

The symbolic motif of the Japanese forces as unified against individualistic Americans is visually

expressed as the battles occur with the Yamato as one great battleship, with many individual

soldiers all working together, versus many individual American fighter planes flying separately. The

fact that the functioning of the ship is dependent upon the cohesive efforts of many individuals is

repeatedly emphasised throughout the film with drills taking place to practice the quick preparation

of the guns, group martial arts training sessions and even the kitchens giving a big joint effort to

feed all the soldiers in time before the final battle. The efficient and cohesive functioning of the

Yamato serves as a metaphorical microcosm for the efficient and cohesive functioning of the

Japanese nation and people as a whole.

The film presents characters spanning across the chain of command. We have young and innocent
greenhorns; brave and autonomous mid-level officers; stoic, bushido professing senior officers; and

cowardly, faceless Commanders and Chiefs who do not even join the forces aboard for the final

battle. The whole spectrum of interpretations is thus accommodated for. The director, Junya Sato,

apparently favours the interpretation that "these were young and innocent people sent to their

deaths, and that it is clear those who bore the responsibility for that were the political leaders"

(quoted in McCurry 2005). Although this argument is certainly expressed in the film, I personally

found the portrayal of the soldiers' bravery and fighting spirit the more impactful lasting impression.

The figure of Petty Officer First Class Moriwaki is central to this messaging. Sitting halfway along

the chain of command, he and the other mid-level officers embody the Japanese fighting spirit.

Moriwaki is a strong and confident figure who commands respect from the juniors. With his good

looks and confident demeanour I even found myself, as a young man, attracted to his masculine and

authoritative personality and could imagine being his junior and wanting to impress him with my

commitment to the war effort. Moriwaki also represents the compromise between absolute and

blind commitment to war and death with a reasonable extent of self-dignity and the sanctity of life.

He implores the juniors to jump ship and swim away if it becomes clear, as it inevitably will, that

the ship will be sunk. He says, "if no one is willing to survive then our dying is in vain." I read this

once more as directly placing the onus on the modern generation to venerate their ancestors and

continue the national legacy.

To conclude, the film placates a wide range of interpretations that viewers might be inclined to take

on the hugely significant and contentious issue of memorialising national identity. Certainly the

young soldiers are presented as innocent victims and the war is thus implicitly criticised. However,

the stylistic display of masculine camaraderie and the valorisation of the fighting spirit is

undeniable. From my positionality, I view the film as propaganda for the current young generation

to reinvigorate their national pride and trust in the nation rather than criticise the state apparatus as a

mechanism of subjugating innocent citizens. War responsibility is barely addressed and the
documentary style presentation heavily favours portrayals of America as the aggressor. The social

implications of this film, as a zeitgeist of the so-called 2005 memory boom, is encapsulated by the

producer Kadokawa's desire for "people to start thinking again about how to live with self-

awareness and pride as Japanese" (quoted in McCurry 2005).

Bibliography

Gerow, Aaron. 2016. “War and Nationalism in Recent Japanese Cinema: Yamato Kamikaze, Trauma

and Forgetting the Postwar." In: Michael Berry, Chiho Sawada (ed.): Divided Lenses: Screen

Memories of War in East Asia, pp. 196-219. Honolulu: University of Hawai’i Press.

McCurry. Justin. 2005 "Guardian Battleship epic reignites anger over Japan's wartime excesses."

Guardian. 16th December.

You might also like