History and Memory AS1
History and Memory AS1
History and Memory AS1
AS1: 10/02/2023
Option 2: Write a response to one of the assigned films or plays Identify a specific scene/sequence
or a significant symbol/motif and critically evaluate it in the context of the entire
film/play/performance and in relation to its broader cultural and historical significance.
The film Yamato (2005) was one of the most successful films in Japanese cinematic history. It broke
the box-office record at the time of 5.11 billion Yen and won ten categories at the 2007 Japanese
Academy Awards. The film was released in 2005, amidst a proliferation of Japanese media seeking
to memorialise modern history in the context of Japan as a victim. The conservative and nationalist
fervour in the public media was reflected in politics with Shinzo Abe's prime ministerial election in
2006. The film caters for a broad range of interpretation but I believe, given the historical and social
contexts of it's release and public reception, that as a cultural event and document, the overall effect
of the film on Japanese memory of modern history is deeply conservative. I shall demonstrate how
the film expresses the symbolic motif of the unified, and exceptionally Japanese, fighting spirit. I
read the film as entreating the modern generation to both valorise their brave ancestors and inspire
The film explicitly seeks to justify its function as educating modern viewers about the events of the
time period it covers. The whole point of present day Makiko's narrative arc is to resolve her guilt
over the fact that she "never tried to get a sense of his (her father's) life." Makiko thus represents the
modern generation's ignorance about the wartime generation's plight. She laments that she "must
have been an ungrateful child," reinforcing the emotional guilt that modern Japanese, who enjoy
such high levels of modern material luxury, must watch the film and instil gratitude for their
ancestors who sacrificed their lives for the nation. The film seeks to establish its authority as a
reliable narrator by using a conventional form with "explanatory titles common to Japanese
television documentaries and historical dramas" (Gerow 2016: 203/4). Therefore, very early on in
the film, the parameters are set for the expected orientation that the audience ought to take in
The valorisation of Japanese unity is perhaps the central motif pervading the entire film. We see that
this propaganda has been instilled as the innocent and vital fifteen year old Kamio says that the
newspapers report that "the yanks are too individualistic to fight for long." This is one of the few
direct references to the USA and cultural values, drawing a crudely cliche juxtaposition between the
collective Japanese fighting for the Kokutai versus the individualistic Americans. In one sense this
functions as an implicit criticism of the ideological propaganda of the time that pushed so many
innocent young men into war on idealised false pretences. Nevertheless, Japanese exceptionalism,
The symbolic motif of the Japanese forces as unified against individualistic Americans is visually
expressed as the battles occur with the Yamato as one great battleship, with many individual
soldiers all working together, versus many individual American fighter planes flying separately. The
fact that the functioning of the ship is dependent upon the cohesive efforts of many individuals is
repeatedly emphasised throughout the film with drills taking place to practice the quick preparation
of the guns, group martial arts training sessions and even the kitchens giving a big joint effort to
feed all the soldiers in time before the final battle. The efficient and cohesive functioning of the
Yamato serves as a metaphorical microcosm for the efficient and cohesive functioning of the
The film presents characters spanning across the chain of command. We have young and innocent
greenhorns; brave and autonomous mid-level officers; stoic, bushido professing senior officers; and
cowardly, faceless Commanders and Chiefs who do not even join the forces aboard for the final
battle. The whole spectrum of interpretations is thus accommodated for. The director, Junya Sato,
apparently favours the interpretation that "these were young and innocent people sent to their
deaths, and that it is clear those who bore the responsibility for that were the political leaders"
(quoted in McCurry 2005). Although this argument is certainly expressed in the film, I personally
found the portrayal of the soldiers' bravery and fighting spirit the more impactful lasting impression.
The figure of Petty Officer First Class Moriwaki is central to this messaging. Sitting halfway along
the chain of command, he and the other mid-level officers embody the Japanese fighting spirit.
Moriwaki is a strong and confident figure who commands respect from the juniors. With his good
looks and confident demeanour I even found myself, as a young man, attracted to his masculine and
authoritative personality and could imagine being his junior and wanting to impress him with my
commitment to the war effort. Moriwaki also represents the compromise between absolute and
blind commitment to war and death with a reasonable extent of self-dignity and the sanctity of life.
He implores the juniors to jump ship and swim away if it becomes clear, as it inevitably will, that
the ship will be sunk. He says, "if no one is willing to survive then our dying is in vain." I read this
once more as directly placing the onus on the modern generation to venerate their ancestors and
To conclude, the film placates a wide range of interpretations that viewers might be inclined to take
on the hugely significant and contentious issue of memorialising national identity. Certainly the
young soldiers are presented as innocent victims and the war is thus implicitly criticised. However,
the stylistic display of masculine camaraderie and the valorisation of the fighting spirit is
undeniable. From my positionality, I view the film as propaganda for the current young generation
to reinvigorate their national pride and trust in the nation rather than criticise the state apparatus as a
mechanism of subjugating innocent citizens. War responsibility is barely addressed and the
documentary style presentation heavily favours portrayals of America as the aggressor. The social
implications of this film, as a zeitgeist of the so-called 2005 memory boom, is encapsulated by the
producer Kadokawa's desire for "people to start thinking again about how to live with self-
Bibliography
Gerow, Aaron. 2016. “War and Nationalism in Recent Japanese Cinema: Yamato Kamikaze, Trauma
and Forgetting the Postwar." In: Michael Berry, Chiho Sawada (ed.): Divided Lenses: Screen
Memories of War in East Asia, pp. 196-219. Honolulu: University of Hawai’i Press.
McCurry. Justin. 2005 "Guardian Battleship epic reignites anger over Japan's wartime excesses."