1 s2.0 S0960148119314764 Main
1 s2.0 S0960148119314764 Main
1 s2.0 S0960148119314764 Main
Renewable Energy
journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/renene
a r t i c l e i n f o a b s t r a c t
Article history: In the current study, the n-heptanol is mixed with methyl oleate biodiesel fuel at different blends which
Received 25 May 2019 are 10%, 20% and 40% (by volume) n-heptanolþ90%, 80%, 60% methyl oleate fuel (H10B, H20B, and H40B)
Received in revised form to examine the combustion and exhaust emission characteristics of a rapid compression-expansion
18 August 2019
machine (RCEM). The RCEM is operated under diesel engine condition with fixed inlet air properties.
Accepted 29 September 2019
The findings for methyl oleate show that the peak pressure is slightly reduced, while soot and NOx
Available online 3 October 2019
emissions are reduced by about 60% and 3% respectively compared to pure diesel fuel. Furthermore, the
blending of n-heptanol with methyl oleate fuel leads to a considerable reduction in the soot emission by
Keywords:
Methyl oleate
about 75% and the NOx emission is reduced by 6% compared to pure methyl oleate fuel. The flame images
N-heptanol confirm that there is a reduction in flame temperatures for methyl oleate compared to pure diesel fuel.
Rapid compression-expansion machine Additionally, the combustion process is retarded with increasing the blending ratio of n-heptanol in the
Combustion and emission characteristics fuel mixture. Based on the combustion and emission characteristics, the recommended blending ratio of
Flame images n-heptanol and methyl oleate fuel is H20B.
© 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2019.09.132
0960-1481/© 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
A.I. EL-Seesy et al. / Renewable Energy 147 (2020) 2064e2076 2065
composition in a biodiesel blend. Altaie et al. [1] examined the ef- compared to ethanol or methanol and also due to the fact that it can
fects of blending palm oil methyl ester (PME) with methyl oleate on be produced from common sources. Table 1 shows a comparison of
the diesel engine performance. They found that the enrichment of physicochemical properties of diesel, methanol, ethanol and some
palm biodiesel was achieved by using methyl oleate and accom- type of higher alcohols. It can be concluded from the analysis of
plished lower soot emissions as well as enhanced brake specific fuel these properties that higher alcohols have some interesting fea-
consumption. This result was attributed to the lower oxygen con- tures that indicate their potential to overcome some drawbacks of
centration and lower reactivity of neat PME. Additionally, they re- lower alcohols used as fuel or fuel additives. The drawbacks include
ported that there was a significant reduction in exhaust gas ignition difficulties in cold weather, higher fuel consumption, low
temperature and exhaust emissions with improved saturated lubricity, and corrosion. Those features of higher alcohols make
methyl esters, though with increased fuel consumption [1]. Like- them promising fuels for compression ignition engines, for
wise, an investigation has been reported on the effect of the addi- example, their densities and boiling points are similar to diesel fuel
tion of methyl esters to alcohol-diesel mixtures on a diesel engine [11]. The longer chain alcohols have the benefit of a higher cetane
performance [4]. The study reported that the utilization of about number compared to shorter chain alcohols such as methanol and
15% of FAME was satisfactory to achieve lubricity standards and ethanol. The lower alcohols (C1eC3) have remarkable lower calo-
avoid phase separation of the mixtures. The study also stated that rific values than diesel fuel, owing to their higher oxygen contents
the unsaturation degree of methyl oleate was advantageous for and consequently leads to a decrease in fuel economy [12e14]. On
decreasing UHC and CO compared to methyl stearate and methyl the other hand, alcohols with four or more carbons have calorific
esters with a comparable carbon chain. Additionally, soot levels and value comparable to that of diesel fuel and are therefore advanta-
lower NOx were achieved for C18:1 in contrast to rapeseed bio- geous for enhancing fuel economy [11]. The higher alcohols can also
diesel. Soloiu et al. [4] examined the blending of methyl oleate with be mixed with diesel fuels at greater concentrations with minimum
diesel fuel in a compression ignition engine at different speeds. influence on the fuel distillation curve. The latent heat of vapor-
They found that the methyl oleate mixtures had reduced the igni- ization of lower alcohols is remarkably higher than those of diesel
tion delay by 20% compared to diesel fuel, reducing peak pressures fuel, which has negative influences on the capability of engine cold
and peak gross heat release. NOx emission was reduced by 20% start, especially in the cold regions. However, the higher alcohols
compared to diesel fuel whereas brake specific fuel consumption have the lower latent heat of vaporization compared to that lower
was increased by about 10% for the methyl oleate mixture possibly alcohols and therefore they have less struggle with a cold-start
due to lower heating value. Moreover, the impacts of the addition of operation. Meanwhile, cutting-edge technology in fuel delivery
methyl oleate to n-butanol on combustion characteristics of com- systems is mostly able to deal with this issue.
mon rail engine run under reactivity controlled compression igni- Some earlier studies using higher alcohols blended with diesel
tion (RCCI) and conventional diesel combustion modes [7]. The fuels showed that they can be utilized to reduce engine exhaust
results showed that there was a significant reduction in NOx and emissions in diesel engines [11,17]. The comprehensive survey was
soot emission for RCCI mode compared to conventional combustion done by Kumar et al. [11], Zaharin et al. [16], and Vinod et al. [17] on
mode. The utilization of methyl oleate was also studied in a diesel the use of higher alcohols as a new fuel in diesel engines. They
engine and reported as a performance improver [8]. Bax et al. [9] reported that higher alcohols are considered as promising fuels for
examined the oxidation of n-decane-methyl oleate blends using a diesel engines due to their attractive futures such as high cetane
jet-stirred reactor at different temperatures. They reported that the number, high heating value, high miscibility and low latent heat of
comparison of reactant mole fractions showed that methyl oleate vaporization as compared to those of low alcohols. Table 2 sum-
seems to be slightly less reactive than methyl palmitate in the low marizes the impacts of the addition of alcohols to diesel fuel in
temperature region while the opposite trend is noticed in the zone diesel engines on the engine performance and emissions. It can be
following the negative temperature coefficient region. The impacts concluded that the peak cylinder pressure and maximum heat
of adding methyl oleate to engine oil were examined by Chen et al. release rate were increased with adding higher alcohols to diesel
[10]. They reported that the oxidation stability of n-hexadecane and fuel due to longer ignition delay. The brake specific consumption
the mineral base oil was significantly improved, and the viscosity was increased for alcohol-diesel blends, owing to lower heating
and acidity were appreciably increased, as well as detergency was value. Soot emission was improved with diesel-alcohols blends due
considerably reduced with the addition of methyl oleate. to oxygen content of alcohols while NOx, CO, and UCH, as well as
Additionally, in the current examination, normal heptanol was thermal efficiency, depend also on the operating condition.
selected as oxygenated fuel due to its higher calorific value Recently, there are a number of studies that have investigated
2066 A.I. EL-Seesy et al. / Renewable Energy 147 (2020) 2064e2076
Table 1
Properties of some alcohols and conventional fossil fuels [15,16].
the influences of the blending of higher alcohols with diesel- n-pentanol with Calophyllum inophyllum biodiesel on the engine
biodiesel mixtures, for example, Preub et al. [24] examined the performance and emissions. They found that there was a significant
engine performance and emissions characteristics of a diesel en- enhancement in engine emission, brake thermal efficiency and
gine operated with long-chain alcohols (n-octanol, 2-ethyl-hex- brake power.
anol, 2-propyl-heptanol, and n-decanol) with diesel and biodiesel Modern diesel engines demand higher supercharging, exhaust
fuels. The findings for alcohols/diesel/biodiesel mixtures exhibited gas recirculation, higher temperature of combustion chamber sur-
that the soot and CO emissions were considerably decreased by faces and the use of various types of fuels. In experiments of these
about 47% and 40% respectively compared to those achieved with subjects using practical engines, durability and optical access for
pure diesel fuel. While UHC and NOx, emissions did not change for the observation of the combustion phenomena is required to test
the numerous fuel mixtures. The specific fuel consumption of the engines. But it is generally difficult to realize these targets. Thus, the
mixtures was increased by about 6% compared to diesel fuel. Nour rapid compression-expansion machine is commonly used to
et al. [25,26] and Damodharan et al. [27], Ghadikolaei et al. [28], simulate intake, compression, expansion and exhaust strokes in a
Yesilyurt et al. [29], Goga et al. [30], Pan et al. [31] and Yusri et al. single diesel cycle by an electrically controlled and hydraulically
[32] also examined the impacts of the addition of n-butanol, n- actuated driving system [34]. Its features include precise control of
heptanol, n-pentanol, n-hexanol and n-octanol with diesel and piston position at TDC, no influence of lubricant on UHC emission
biodiesel mixtures on the diesel engine performance and emis- due to the utilization of dry piston rings, independent control of
sions. They reported that there was a significant reduction in the local wall temperature, and high-power output to drive heavy
soot and NOx formation, as well as brake specific fuel consumption, piston at high frequency [34]. Furthermore, the in-cylinder gas
where they were reduced by approximately 77%, 10%, and 18%, condition at TDC can be changed widely by varying temperature,
respectively. Imdadul et al. [33] examined the impacts of blending pressure, density and gas composition in the gas reservoir which is
Table 2
Performance, combustion, and emission characteristics of diesel engines fueled with higher alcohols-diesel blends.
Engine Base Operating condition Alcohol type Percentage Performance Combustion results Emission results Reference
fuel results
Single Diesel Common rail with Butanol and ethanol 15% and Increasing
Increased cylinder pressure (p), Reduced NOx, and CO [18]
cylinder, fuel 160 MPa, EGR, Constant 40% vol. BTE Heat release rate (HRR) and
1080 cc speed with high load ignition delay (ID)
Single Diesel Constant speed with butanol, ethanol, and 10% vol. Reduced BTE Increased cylinder pressure (p), Reduced smoke opacity [19]
cylinder, fuel different loads methanol and Increased Heat release rate (HRR) and and CO, Increased NOx
349 cc bsfc ignition delay (ID)
Single Diesel Constant speed with 1-pentanol 5, 10, 20, Increased e Increased NOx, UHC and [20]
cylinder, fuel different loads 25 and 35% bsfc CO
661.5 cc vol.
Single Diesel different speed and loads iso-butanol 10, 20, Decreased e e [21]
cylinder, fuel 30 and 40% BTE and
1433 cc vol. Increased
bsfc
Six-cylinder, Diesel Common rail with n-butanol 40% vol. Decreased Increased cylinder pressure (p), Increased NOx, CO, [22]
1080 cc fuel 140 MPa, EGR, constant BTE Heat release rate (HRR) and Decreased Smoke
speed and load ignition delay (ID) opacity
Six-cylinder, Diesel Constant speed and load n-butanol, 10 and 20% Increased BTE Constant cylinder pressure, Reduced the total [23]
6500 cc fuel isobutanol, 2- HHR, and ID particulate matter and
ethylhexanol, and n- soot, Increased NOx.
octanol
Single Diesel Constant speed with Butanol and pentanol Different Increased BTE Increased cylinder pressure (p), Increased NOx, Reduced [17]
cylinder fuel different loads blends Heat release rate (HRR) and UHC, CO, and smoke
and multi- ignition delay (ID) opacity
cylinder
Single Diesel Constant speed with Butanol Different Increased BTE Increased cylinder pressure (p), Reduced NOx, UHC, CO, [15]
cylinder fuel different loads blends and bsfc Heat release rate (HRR) and and smoke opacity
and multi- ignition delay (ID)
cylinder
A.I. EL-Seesy et al. / Renewable Energy 147 (2020) 2064e2076 2067
Table 4
Properties of D100, Methyl oleate, n-heptanol,H10B, H20B, and H40B samples.
Property Testing Method D100 Methyl oleate n-heptanol H10B H20B H40B
2. Experimental set-up and procedures data were recorded and displayed using an oscilloscope, Model
MEMORY HiCORDER, MR8827 with a sampling rate of 0.5 106
The rapid compression-expansion machine was used to study sample/s.
the combustion and emission characteristics of diesel fuel and The high-speed camera, Model NAC GX-1, was used to capture
methyl oleate-n-heptanol blends. the flame image at 10,000 frames per second (fps) at an exposure
time of 3 ms and a resolution of 464 464 pixels. The high-speed
camera was fitted with a lens, Model Nikkor 55 mm f/2.8, and an
2.1. Rapid compression-expansion machine
infrared filter, Model SIGMA KOKI-HAF-50Se15H. Before starting
the flame temperature measurements, it is essential to calibrate the
The schematic diagram of the RCEM is illustrated in Fig. 1 and its
high-speed camera for flame brightness measurement and
actual photo is shown in Fig. 2. The RCEM chamber specifications
and experimental conditions are shown in Table 3. The experi-
mental test steps began first by heating up the RCEM for approxi-
mately 60 min using a system of electrical heaters and
thermocouples with a control unit to adjust the heating rate. The air
was provided from the air-cylinder into the tank and heated up to
453 K, followed by filling the combustion chamber with the heated
air until the pressure inside it reached 2.5 bar. The air was com-
pressed by the piston from BDC to TDC within 30 ms and kept at
TDC for 150 ms to provide constant volume conditions, then the
tested fuel was injected according to the experimental program.
The combustion experiments were repeated twelve times in order
to increase confidence in measurements of combustion character-
istics, flame temperature, and exhaust gas emissions and averaged
values are reported in this study. All the results are compared with
those of the diesel base fuel. Additionally, for each test condition,
the polytropic index was calculated before the shot, and the initial
temperature was kept at 453 K the same as the wall temperature. A
static pressure transducer was installed to measure combustion
chamber pressure at BDC. The combustion pressure behavior was
measured using piezoelectric pressure transducer, Model AVL GU
22CK and amplifier Model Kistler 5010. The combustion pressure Fig. 4. Variation of the heat release rate with time for tested fuels.
2070 A.I. EL-Seesy et al. / Renewable Energy 147 (2020) 2064e2076
dQnet gT dV 1 dp
¼ xpx þ xVx (1)
dq gT 1 dq gT 1 dq
The peak pressure and HRR for methyl oleate are both reduced
by 1% compared to diesel fuel possibly due to its lower heating
value. However, the peak pressure and HRR for methyl oleate-n-
heptanol blends are both increased by 2% compared to pure
methyl oleate, owing to their lower heating value and higher
latent heat of vaporization.
Soot and NOx emissions are reduced by about 60% and 3%,
respectively, for pure methyl oleate compared to diesel fuel
while they are decreased by 75% and 6% when using n-heptanol-
methyl oleate mixtures compared to pure methyl oleate, owing
to their high oxygen content and high cetane number.
The ignition delayed for methyl oleate is lower than diesel fuel,
owing to its higher cetane number while the addition of n-
heptanol to methyl oleate leads to an increase in the ignition
delay.
The addition of n-heptanol to methyl oleate with high fuel in-
jection pressure leads to a significant improvement in the
combustion characteristics.
Fig. 10. The avarege of KL factor values for tested fuels. Combustion characteristics and flame images findings
confirmed that the blending of n-heptanol with methyl oleate
fuel increased the HRR and retarded its position.
The recommended methyl oleate-n-heptanol mixture to ach-
engine emissions of methyl oleate and n-heptanol -methyl oleate ieve the maximum considerable enhancement in combustion
blends. Compared to diesel fuel, it can be concluded that the NOx and emission characteristics is H20B.
and soot formation are reduced by up to 8% and 80% respectively,
while they are decreased by up to 5% and 70% respectively for n- Using n-heptanol-methyl oleate blends as a renewable fuel
heptanol-methyl oleate mixtures compared to pure methyl oleate. showed that there are significant enhancements in combustion and
Among the n-heptanol-methyl oleate mixtures, H40B blend has the emission characteristics. We postulate that these enhancements
highest reduction percentages in soot formation, whereas the H20B will also be achieved when using n-heptanol-methyl oleate blends
blend has the maximum reduction proportion in NOx emission in diesel engines. However, before commercial application of these
compared to other fuel mixtures. fuels, the following investigations are needed to ensure their im-
pacts on the diesel engine operation:
Fig. 11. The reduction percentage of NOx and soot formation for different tested fuels.
A.I. EL-Seesy et al. / Renewable Energy 147 (2020) 2064e2076 2075
Investigation of the spray characteristics of n-heptanol-methyl [20] N. Yilmaz, A. Atmanli, Experimental evaluation of a diesel engine running on
the blends of diesel and pentanol as a next generation higher alcohol, Fuel 210
oleate mixtures under variables conditions.
(2017) 75e82, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2017.08.051.
[21] M.I. Al-Hasan, M. Al-Momany, The effect of iso-butanol-diesel blends on en-
Acknowledgments gine performance, Transport 23 (2008) 306e310, https://doi.org/10.3846/
1648-4142.2008.23.306-310.
[22] Z. Chen, Z. Wu, J. Liu, C. Lee, Combustion and emissions characteristics of high
The author would like to thank Kosaka-Sato Lab, Tokyo Institute n-butanol/diesel ratio blend in a heavy-duty diesel engine and EGR impact,
of Technology for offering the funding and facilities used in this Energy Convers. Manag. 78 (2014) 787e795, https://doi.org/10.1016/
j.enconman.2013.11.037.
research work. The author would also like to thank Dr. Susumu € rkholtz, K. Munch, I. Denbratt, Effect of using
[23] T. Zhang, L. Jacobson, C. Bjo
Sato, Dr. Tsuyoshi Nagasawa and all Kosaka-Sato Lab members for butanol and octanol isomers on engine performance of steady state and cold
their immense technical support this study. start ability in different types of Diesel engines, Fuel 184 (2016) 708e717,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2016.07.046.
[24] J. Preuß, K. Munch, I. Denbratt, Performance and emissions of long-chain al-
References cohols as drop-in fuels for heavy duty compression ignition engines, Fuel 216
(2018) 890e897, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2017.11.122.
[1] N.M. Adam, R. Yunus, R.B. Janius, Y.H. Taufiq-Yap, R. Zakaria, U. Rashid, [25] M. Nour, A.M.A. Attia, S.A. Nada, Combustion , performance and emission
M.A.H. Altaie, Performance and exhaust emission characteristics of direct- analysis of diesel engine fuelled by higher alcohols (butanol , octanol and
injection diesel engine fueled with enriched biodiesel, Energy Convers. heptanol)/diesel blends, Energy Convers. Manag. 185 (2019) 313e329,
Manag. 106 (2015) 365e372, https://doi.org/10.1016/ https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2019.01.105.
j.enconman.2015.09.050. [26] M. Nour, A.M.A. Attia, S.A. Nada, Improvement of CI engine combustion and
[2] M. Suresh, C.P. Jawahar, A. Richard, A review on biodiesel production, com- performance running on ternary blends of higher alcohol (Pentanol and
bustion, performance, and emission characteristics of non-edible oils in var- Octanol)/hydrous ethanol/diesel, Fuel 251 (2019) 10e22, https://doi.org/
iable compression ratio diesel engine using biodiesel and its blends, Renew. 10.1016/j.fuel.2019.04.026.
Sustain. Energy Rev. 92 (2018) 38e49, https://doi.org/10.1016/ [27] D. Damodharan, A.P. Sathiyagnanam, D. Rana, S. Saravanan, B. Rajesh Kumar,
j.rser.2018.04.048. B. Sethuramasamyraja, Effective utilization of waste plastic oil in a direct in-
[3] C.W. Mohd Noor, M.M. Noor, R. Mamat, Biodiesel as alternative fuel for marine jection diesel engine using high carbon alcohols as oxygenated additives for
diesel engine applications: a review, Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 94 (2018) cleaner emissions, Energy Convers. Manag. 166 (2018) 81e97, https://doi.org/
127e142, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2018.05.031. 10.1016/j.enconman.2018.04.006.
[4] S. Davoud, C. Butts, H. Ochieng, J. Weaver, C. Jenkins, B. Vlcek, M. Duggan, [28] M.A. Ghadikolaei, C.S. Cheung, K.F. Yung, Study of combustion, performance
V. Soloiu, Experimental study of combustion and emissions characteristics of and emissions of diesel engine fueled with diesel/biodiesel/alcohol blends
methyl oleate, as a surrogate for biodiesel, in a direct injection diesel engine, having the same oxygen concentration, Energy 157 (2018) 258e269, https://
SAE Tech. Pap. Ser. 1 (2013), https://doi.org/10.4271/2013-01-1142. doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2018.05.164.
[5] G. Knothe, A.C. Matheaus, T.W. Ryan, Cetane numbers of branched and [29] M.K. Yesilyurt, T. Eryilmaz, M. Arslan, A comparative analysis of the engine
straight-chain fatty esters determined in an ignition quality tester, Fuel 82 performance, exhaust emissions and combustion behaviors of a compression
(2003) 971e975, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0016-2361(02)00382-4. ignition engine fuelled with biodiesel/diesel/1-butanol (C4 alcohol) and
[6] Q. Peng, Y. Deng, W. Zuo, J. E, Z. Zhang, M. Pham, Z. Yin, Effects of fatty acid biodiesel/diesel/n-pentanol (C5 alcohol) fuel blends, Energy 165 (2018)
methyl esters proportion on combustion and emission characteristics of a 1332e1351, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2018.10.100.
biodiesel fueled marine diesel engine, Energy Convers. Manag. 159 (2018) [30] G. Goga, B.S. Chauhan, S.K. Mahla, H.M. Cho, Performance and emission
244e253, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2017.12.098. characteristics of diesel engine fueled with rice bran biodiesel and n-butanol,
[7] G. Molina, J.T. Wiley, A. Knowles, M. Ilie, J.D. Moncada, R. Gaubert, S. Harp, Energy Rep. 5 (2019) 78e83, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyr.2018.12.002.
V. Soloiu, Reactivity Controlled Compression Ignition combustion and emis- [31] M. Pan, R. Huang, J. Liao, C. Jia, X. Zhou, H. Huang, X. Huang, Experimental
sions using n-butanol and methyl oleate, Energy 165 (2018) 911e924, https:// study of the spray, combustion, and emission performance of a diesel engine
doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2018.09.181. with high n-pentanol blending ratios, Energy Convers. Manag. 194 (2019)
[8] D. Nelson, A. Covington, V. Soloiu, J. Lewis, N. Schmidt, Oleic methyl ester 1e10, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2019.04.054.
investigations in an indirect injection diesel engine; stage one: combustion [32] I.M. Yusri, R. Mamat, M.K. Akasyah, M.F. Jamlos, A.F. Yusop, Evaluation of
investigations, SAE Int. J. Fuels Lubr. 4 (2011) 58e75, https://doi.org/10.4271/ engine combustion and exhaust emissions characteristics using diesel/butanol
2011-01-0616. blended fuel, Appl. Therm. Eng. 156 (2019) 209e219, https://doi.org/10.1016/
[9] S. Bax, M.H. Hakka, P.A. Glaude, O. Herbinet, F. Battin-Leclerc, Experimental j.applthermaleng.2019.02.028.
study of the oxidation of methyl oleate in a jet-stirred reactor, Combust. Flame [33] H.K. Imdadul, H.H. Masjuki, M.A. Kalam, N.W.M. Zulkifli, A. Alabdulkarem,
157 (2010) 1220e1229, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.combustflame.2009.12.008. M.M. Rashed, Y.H. Teoh, H.G. How, Higher alcohol-biodiesel-diesel blends: an
[10] H. Chen, X. Su, J. Li, X. Zhong, Effects of gasoline and polyoxymethylene approach for improving the performance, emission, and combustion of a
dimethyl ethers blending in diesel on the combustion and emission of a light-duty diesel engine, Energy Convers. Manag. 111 (2016) 174e185,
common rail diesel engine, Energy 171 (2019) 981e999, https://doi.org/ https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2015.12.066.
10.1016/j.energy.2019.01.089. [34] S. Kobori, T. Kamimoto, Development of a rapid compression-expansion
[11] B. Rajesh Kumar, S. Saravanan, Use of higher alcohol biofuels in diesel en- machine simulating diesel combustion, SAE Tech. Pap. Ser. 62 (1995)
gines: a review, Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 60 (2016) 84e115, https:// 392e397, https://doi.org/10.1299/kikaib.62.392.
doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2016.01.085. [35] S.S. Goldsborough, S. Hochgreb, G. Vanhove, M.S. Wooldridge, H.J. Curran,
[12] S.M. Sarathy, P. Oßwald, N. Hansen, K. Kohse-Ho €inghaus, Alcohol combustion C.J. Sung, Advances in rapid compression machine studies of low- and
chemistry, Prog. Energy Combust. Sci. 44 (2014) 40e102, https://doi.org/ intermediate-temperature autoignition phenomena, Prog. Energy Combust.
10.1016/j.pecs.2014.04.003. Sci. 63 (2017) 1e78, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pecs.2017.05.002.
[13] Y. Çelebi, H. Aydın, An overview on the light alcohol fuels in diesel engines, [36] J.M. Desantes, J.M. García-Oliver, W. Vera-Tudela, D. Lo pez-Pintor,
Fuel 236 (2019) 890e911, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2018.08.138. B. Schneider, K. Boulouchos, Study of ignition delay time and generalization of
[14] H. Venu, V.D. Raju, L. Subramani, Combined effect of influence of nano addi- auto-ignition for PRFs in a RCEM by means of natural chemiluminescence,
tives, combustion chamber geometry and injection timing in a DI diesel en- Energy Convers. Manag. 111 (2016) 217e228, https://doi.org/10.1016/
gine fuelled with ternary (diesel-biodiesel-ethanol) blends, Energy 174 (2019) j.enconman.2015.12.052.
386e406, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2019.02.163. [37] M. Nour, A.I. EL-Seesy, A.K. Abdel-Rahman, M. Bady, Influence of adding
[15] W.R. da S. Trindade, R.G. dos Santos, Review on the characteristics of butanol, aluminum oxide nanoparticles to diesterol blends on the combustion and
its production and use as fuel in internal combustion engines, Renew. Sustain. exhaust emission characteristics of a diesel engine, Exp. Therm. Fluid Sci. 98
Energy Rev. 69 (2017) 642e651, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2016.11.213. (2018), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.expthermflusci.2018.07.009.
[16] M.S.M. Zaharin, N.R. Abdullah, G. Najafi, H. Sharudin, T. Yusaf, Effects of [38] A.I. EL-Seesy, H. Hassan, Investigation of the effect of adding graphene oxide,
physicochemical properties of biodiesel fuel blends with alcohol on diesel graphene nanoplatelet, and multiwalled carbon nanotube Additives with n-
engine performance and exhaust emissions: a review, Renew. Sustain. Energy butanol-jatropha methyl ester on a diesel engine performance, Renew. Energy
Rev. 79 (2017) 475e493, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2017.05.035. 132 (2018) 558e574, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2018.08.026.
[17] V.B.M. Vinod Babu, M.M.K. Madhu Murthy, G. Amba Prasad Rao, Butanol and [39] A.I. EL-Seesy, H. Kosaka, H. Hassan, S. Sato, Combustion and emission char-
pentanol: the promising biofuels for CI engines e a review, Renew. Sustain. acteristics of a common rail diesel engine and RCEM fueled by n-heptanol-
Energy Rev. 78 (2017) 1068e1088, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2017.05.038. diesel blends and carbon nanomaterial additives, Energy Convers. Manag. 196
[18] T. He, Z. Chen, L. Zhu, Q. Zhang, The influence of alcohol additives and EGR on (2019), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2019.05.049.
the combustion and emission characteristics of diesel engine under high-load [40] A.I. EL-Seesy, H. Hassan, Combustion characteristics of a diesel engine fueled
condition, Appl. Therm. Eng. 140 (2018) 363e372, https://doi.org/10.1016/ by biodiesel-diesel-n-butanol blend and titanium oxide additives, Energy
j.applthermaleng.2018.05.064. Procedia 162 (2019) 48e56, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2019.04.006.
[19] A.O. Emirog lu, M. Şen, Combustion, performance and emission characteristics [41] A.I. EL-Seesy, H. Hassan, H. Kosaka, in: Improving the Performance of a Diesel
of various alcohol blends in a single cylinder diesel engine, Fuel 212 (2018) Engine Operated with Jojoba Biodiesel-Diesel-N-Butanol Ternary Blends, En-
34e40, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2017.10.016. ergy Procedia, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2018.11.079.
2076 A.I. EL-Seesy et al. / Renewable Energy 147 (2020) 2064e2076
[42] M. Hawi, H. Kosaka, S. Sato, T. Nagasawa, A. Elwardany, M. Ahmed, Effect of [45] W. Fu, F. Li, K. Meng, Y. Liu, W. Shi, Q. Lin, Experiment and analysis of spray
injection pressure and ambient density on spray characteristics of diesel and characteristics of biodiesel blending with di-n-butyl ether in a direct injection
biodiesel surrogate fuels, Fuel 254 (2019) 115674, https://doi.org/10.1016/ combustion chamber, Energy 185 (2019) 77e89, https://doi.org/10.1016/
j.fuel.2019.115674. j.energy.2019.06.069.
[43] F. Li, B. Yi, W. Fu, L. Song, T. Liu, H. Hu, Q. Lin, Experimental study on spray [46] M.A.H. Altaie, R.B. Janius, U. Rashid, Y.H. Taufiq Yap, R. Yunus, R. Zakaria, Cold
characteristics of long-chain alcohol-diesel fuels in a constant volume flow and fuel properties of methyl oleate and palm-oil methyl ester blends,
chamber, J. Energy Inst. 92 (2019) 94e107, https://doi.org/10.1016/ Fuel 160 (2015) 238e244, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2015.07.084.
j.joei.2017.11.002. [47] J.B. Heywood, Internal Combustion Engine Fundamentals, McGrawHill series
[44] S.J.M. Algayyim, A.P. Wandel, T. Yusaf, S. Al-Lwayzy, Butanol-acetone mixture in mechanical engineering, USA, 1988.
blended with cottonseed biodiesel: spray characteristics evolution, combus- [48] H. Zhao, N. Ladommatos, Optical diagnostics for soot and temperature in
tion characteristics, engine performance and emission, Proc. Combust. Inst. 37 diesel engines, Prog. Energy Combust. Sci. 24 (1998) 221e255.
(2019) 4729e4739, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proci.2018.08.035.