Ethics in Advertising
Ethics in Advertising
Ethics in Advertising
Semester IV
Unit II
Ethics in Advertising
Dr. Bhavneet Bhatti
Assistant Professor
School of Communication Studies
Panjab University
The Advertising Standards Council of India
The sponsors of the ASCI, who are its principal members, are
firms of considerable repute within Industry in India, and
comprise Advertisers, Media, Ad. Agencies and other
Professional/Ancillary services connected with advertising
practice.
This section also includes the definitions of terms like Advertising Agencies , media
channels, media owners etc
CHAPTER-I.
• To ensure the Truthfulness and Honesty of Representations and Claims
made by Advertisements and to safeguard against misleading
Advertisements
CHAPTER II
• To ensure that Advertisements are not offensive to generally accepted
standards of Public Decency.
• Advertisements should contain nothing indecent, vulgar or repulsive
which is likely, in the light of generally prevailing standards of decency and
propriety, to cause grave or widespread offence
CHAPTER III
For example,
(a) Advertisements should not encourage minors to enter strange places or
to converse with strangers in an effort to collect coupons, wrappers, labels
or the like.
(b) Should not feature dangerous or hazardous acts which are likely to
encourage minors to emulate such acts in a manner which could cause harm
or injury.
(c) Should not show minors using or playing with matches or any
inflammable or explosive substance; or playing with or using sharp knives,
guns or mechanical or electrical appliances, the careless use of which could
lead to their suffering cuts, burns, shocks or other injury.
(d) Should not feature minors for tobacco or alcohol-based products.
(e) Should not feature personalities from the field of sports, music and
cinema for products which, by law, either require a health warning in their
advertising or cannot be purchased by minors.
3. Advertisements shall not, without justifiable reason, show or refer to
dangerous practices or manifest a disregard for safety or encourage
negligence.
• TVC modified.
PRODUCT: FAIR & LOVELY
COMPLAINT: The ad claims that, fair and lovely marketed in India gives better results than
other fairness creams marketed in Dubai, Singapore and Japan. The ad does not mention
the brands with which fair and lovely has been compared. While conceding it may not be
possible to name the competitor in a TVC due to ethical or legal reasons, the TVC appears
to create a misleading superiority point using this legal / ethical loophole. It is not clear
why fairness creams from Japan, Singapore and Dubai have been compared as the
majority of the native people living in these countries are a race with fair skin. Hence the
TVC may mislead the viewers to believe that the fairness creams marketed are in some
way responsible for the fairness of the people living in these countries. As Fair & Lovely
claims superiority over the creams in these countries, the consumers in India will be
made to believe that they too will get a similar fair skin.
DECISION: UPHELD
The CCC viewed the TVC and considered the Advertiser’s response. The basis of choice of the
products being compared as “the world’s best creams” was not substantiated with
volume sales/market data. The TVC makes comparison versus “some of the world’s best
products” whereas the Voice over names countries and therefore the Ad is likely to be
misleading by exaggeration and implication that the advertised product is unbeatable
with all the products in that country. Also the ad is likely to be misleading by ambiguity as
the comparison is only for instant whitening effect of the advertiser’s product. The
advertisement contravened Chapters I.1, I.4 and IV.1 (d) of the Code. The complaint was
UPHELD.
COMPANY: BHARTI AIRTEL LTD
PRODUCT: AIRTEL
COMPLAINT:
The advertisement runs on multiple TV channels and talks about Airtel 3G and video calling.
In particular, I would like to highlight Airtel's Boss Ad. The commercial shows that the
lady is able to call while being driven in an underpass. Similarly, the husband is able to
receive calls in his high rise office building, including a video call with uninterrupted
video streaming. My complaint is that I am on a 3G broadband plan where I barely
receive about 40%60% of 3G bandwidth availability. When I raised this issue with Airtel,
I was informed by customer support, to quote them "The coverage issues could be due
to either high rises, flyovers, population in your area and excessive distance between
two cell sites or a combination of all these." Per Airtel highrises, flyovers, population do
cause interference in signal, a disclaimer should have been added to each 3G
advertisement explicitly calling out this fact that can potentially impact the quality of
service for subscribers. The company is conveniently attempting to conceal from the
gullible public this shortcoming in their ability to provision service.
DECISION: UPHELD
The CCC viewed the TVC. In the absence of comments from the
Advertiser, the CCC concluded that the claim in the TVC of,
“human fat can be melted”, was not substantiated and was
misleading by exaggeration. The advertisement contravened
Chapters I.1 and I.4 of the ASCI Code. The complaint was
UPHELD.
COMPANY: Career spin Consulting India Private
Limited
COMPLAINT:
“100% Job Guarantee.”* - Super: *Conditions Apply
DECISION: UPHELD
In the absence of comments from the Advertiser, the
CCC concluded that the claim, “100% Job
Guarantee – Super Conditions Apply”, was not
substantiated. The Ad contravened Guidelines for
Advertising of Educational Institutions and
Programs as well as Chapter I.1 of the ASCI Code.
The complaint was UPHELD
References
Read the website
• https://www.ascionline.org/