Pil Ii
Pil Ii
Pil Ii
1. The Court, whose function is to decide in accordance with international law such disputes as are submitted to
it, shall apply:
d) subject to the provisions of Article 59, judicial decisions and the teachings of the most highly
qualified publicists of the various nations, as subsidiary means for the determination of rules of law;
2. This provision shall not prejudice the power of the Court to decide a case ex aequo et bono, if the parties
agree thereto.
Ex aequo et bono is a legal concept that confers on arbitrators the power to decide a dispute in accordance with
their sense of fairness and good conscience, instead of rigorously applying terms of a specific body of law.
The decision of the Court has no binding force except between the parties and in respect of that particular
case.
Strictly speaking, the Court does not observe the doctrine of precedent or stare decisis but strives nevertheless
to maintain judicial consistency.
1. Primary Sources
International convention is often used interchangeably with terms like "international treaty," "international
agreement," "compact," or "contract between states."
Conventions may be of a general or specific nature and between two or multiple states.
In the majority of instances, the repetition of specific actions in analogous situations can lead to the
consolidation of such practice as a rule of conduct.
In the formation of international law norms through custom, States create law by what they do in practice or by
their conduct.
Opinio juris means that in doing so, they must believe that the practice or conduct is OBLIGATORY. They do so
for the reason that the practice is required by law, and not merely of courtesy or political expediency.
JUS COGENS
-Customary international law which has the status of a peremptory (absolute, uncompromising, certain) norm of
international law.
A peremptory norm is a norm accepted and recognized by the international community of states as a rule, from
which no derogation is permitted and which can be modified only by a subsequent norm having the same
character.
It is a mandatory norm and stands on a higher category than a jus dispositivum norm (laws adopted by consent)
which States can set aside or modify by agreement.
-They are created by States through the definite norm-creating methodsaccepted or recognized by them as
means of expressing their consent as to the binding effect of those norms. Hence, International Law is based on
their normative consent.
2. Secondary Sources
a) Judicial decisions
-Generally, of international tribunals, the most authoritative being the International Court of Justice. They are
not really sources but “subsidiary means” for finding what the law is, and whether a norm has been accepted as
a rule of international law.
The decision of a national court may be used depending upon the prestige and perceived partiality of the
domestic court, not being in conflict with the decisions of international tribunals, and its admissibility in the
forum where it is cited.
b) Writings of publicists
-which must be fair and unbiased representation of international law by acknowledged authorities in the field.
A publicist is an international law scholar or a scholarly organization (e.g., American Law Institute). However,
Article 38 of the ICJ Statute indicates that only teachings (writings) of "the most highly qualified publicists" are
considered to be a source of international law. Thus, not every article or book about an international law topic
would be considered a source of international law.
G. Writings of Publicists