2018-2027 Marelco PSPP
2018-2027 Marelco PSPP
2018-2027 Marelco PSPP
TABLE OF CONTENTS
I INTRODUCTION
II ENERGY AND DEMAND FORECAST (10 YEAR HISTORICAL AND FORECAST)
III ENERGY SALES AND PURCHASE
IV DAILY LOAD PROFILE AND LOAD DURATION CURVE
V EXISTING POWER SUPPLY CONTRACT
CURRENTLY APPROVED SAGR
CURRENT SUPPLY AND DEMAND
INTRODUCTION
MARELCO'S PROFILE
MARELCO's Franchise MAP
The total length in kilometers of overhead distribution line per type of configuration for the entire distribution
system of MARELCO is composed of the following:
Kms of Line
Three Phase 453.5370 kms.
V-Phase 20.54 kms.
Single Phase 383.03 kms.
Open Secondary 431.965 kms.
Underbuilt 352.58 kms.
Total 1,641.6520 circuit kms
MARELCO was categorized by NEA as “AA” in 2015, 2016 and 2017 respectively from D in 2012 and B
in 2013 and 2014. In 2016, it was classified as Extra Large cooperative. Just recently, the coop was
categorized AAA for its 2017 performance.
The Sitio Electrification Program (SEP) which started in 2011 has provided a total subsidy amounting to
P125,619,156.85 as of 2017 and afforded energization of 223 Sitios. It also allowed construction of
additional 201.9323 circuit kms of lines and additional 2,495 household connection including barangays
Boi and Bayuti. Energization of Bgys. Boi and Bayuti thru SEP marked the 100% energization of the
coverage area in December 2012.
The electrification of the three Islets in Sta Cruz namely, Polo, Maniwaya and Mongpong took place in
March 1999 through a Memorandum of Undertaking among the National Power Corporation (NPC),
MARELCO and the Marinduque Provincial Government. The Memorandum of Undertaking was adopted by
the Board of Directors through Resolution No. 99-012. NPC supplies power through generating units while
MARELCO is in charge of operation and maintenance of distibution system. However, on February 9, 2018,
the Polo islet was connected to the Marinduque Main Grid through a 2.2 kms submarine cable funded through
Barangay Line Enhacement Program (BLEP).
TECHNICAL & FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS
From year 2000 to 2012, MARELCO’s system loss had been consistently high as compared to the
standard cap of 13%. The high system loss greatly affected the financial operations of the coop that
resulted to huge financial losses. However, a great turnaround of events happened when a new
management took over in December 2012. Various programs and activities on the reduction of system loss
were extensively implemented which resulted to a dramatic decline of system loss starting year 2013.
The coop's average system loss in 2013 was 11.19%, 9.27% in 2014, 11.11% in 2015, 12.79% in
2016 and 12.49% in 2017. Efficient financial strategy was employed by the present management, which
included among others strict implementation of collection and disconnection policy, availment of additional
loans from NEA to improve its working capital and judicious use of funds. Marelco was able to alleviate
from financial burdens and is now gaining sound financial performance.
Number of FORECAST
ACTUAL
Customer
Connections in 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027
Residential 45212 47745 48799 49752 50621 51419 52157 52844 53486 54090 54659
Commercial 3027 3229 3435 3647 3861 4078 4296 4516 4738 4960 5184
Industrial 208 211 216 221 226 232 237 243 248 254 259
Public Bldg 1154 1180 1204 1227 1250 1272 1294 1316 1336 1356 1376
Street Light 160 139 142 145 147 150 152 155 158 161 163
Water System 96 175 190 205 221 236 251 266 282 297 313
Total (Captive Customers)
49857 52679 53986 55197 56326 57387 58387 59340 60248 61118 61954
DEMAND
HISTORICAL
Demand
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
Coincident Peak
Demand (MW) 7.334 7.66 8.132 8.1 7.92 8.19 8.4 8.566 9.829 9.92
FORECASTED
Demand
2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027
Coincident Peak
10.77 11.34 11.91 12.47 13.03 13.59 14.15 14.72 15.288 15.8623
Demand (MW)
Off Peak Demand
(MW) 5.604 5.899 6.192 6.484 6.776 7.068 7.361 7.655 7.9509 8.24934
15.86226163
15.28832102
14.71908893
14.15357648
13.59074222
13.02948242
12.46861333
11.90685466
11.3428062
10.774929
MW
7.950851629 8.249335457
7.360715831 7.654816509
6.484433082 6.776118931 7.068007975
6.192284594
5.603614789 5.898945281
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
HISTORICAL
Years
Brief highlight of historical demand and forecasting methodology and result. The Historical
demand in the last five years has an average growth rate of 5.05%. In 2015 to 2016 the peak demand
had a growth rate of 14.75% in view of the influx of several commercial establishments in the
province. In forecasting the demand we used the forecasted energy sales and converted the energy
purchased by using the 12.49% system loss. Based on the 2017 load factor we computed the 10 year
forecasted energy demand with an annual increase of 4.39%.
POWER SUPPLY PROCUREMENT PLAN
Energy Purchase (MWh) 28,977.30 31,160.99 35,728.46 33,929.00 36,767.72 37,926.00 38,820.01 42,850.17 48,377.32 46,934.68
System Loss (MWh) 5,859.30 5,062.99 6,536.32 6,039.91 6,270.93 5,968.20 6,041.92 6,919.05 6,087.10 5,863.62
Energy Purchase (MWh) 51,517.57 54,232.72 56,929.58 59,615.48 62,297.14 64,980.66 67,671.70 70,375.56 73,097.19 75,841.34
System Loss (MWh) 5,720.10 6,021.57 6,321.01 6,619.23 6,916.98 7,214.94 7,513.73 7,813.95 8,116.13 8,420.82
2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027
FORECAST
YEARS
The Historical energy sales and purchased in the last five years has an average growth rate of 6.75%. In
2015 and 2016, the recorded growth rate of 17.7% can be attributed to the influx of several business
establishments such as supermarkets, restaurants and hotels among others. In forecasting the energy sales
and purchases, we used the 7 year- historical data covering 2011-2017. To determine the yearly average
growth rate, spot load was excluded to the data, then we normalized the data of January and February 2017
that was affected due to Typhoon Nina on December 2016, and right after, we forecasted individualy the
load growth per type of customer . After that we added the excluded spot load to the forecasted data. The 10
year Development Plan per municipality of Marinduque was considered including the proposed connection
of the 2 remaining islets (Maniwaya & Mongpong) to the Marinduque Mainland which will result to 24
hours operation.
POWER SUPPLY PROCUREMENT PLAN
10000
8000
6000
4000
2000
0
232
463
694
925
1
2311
4390
6469
6931
1156
1387
1618
1849
2080
2542
2773
3004
3235
3466
3697
3928
4159
4621
4852
5083
5314
5545
5776
6007
6238
6700
7162
7393
7624
7855
8086
8317
8548
2017 MARELCO LOAD CURVED (MW)
12000
10000
8000
6000
4000
2000
0
233
465
697
929
1
1857
2089
6033
6265
1161
1393
1625
2321
2553
2785
3017
3249
3481
3713
3945
4177
4409
4641
4873
5105
5337
5569
5801
6497
6729
6961
7193
7425
7657
7889
8121
8353
8585
10000
8000
6000
4000
2000
0
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24
MW 6298 6091 5789 6697 6189 5888 5159 5970 7310 7780 7690 7810 8030 8300 8342 8121 7255 7459 9689 9923 9555 7987 7219 6580
POWER SUPPLY PROCUREMENT PLAN
Brief highlight:
MARELCO peak and average demand for the year 2017 is 9.92MW and 8.840MW . The connected
loads of government agencies and other economic activities of business establishments dominate the
shape of the daily load curve to bring its peak of 8.840 MW at about 2:00 o’clock in the afternoon.
Night peak of 9.92 MW comes at around 7:00 o’clock in the evening. With the prevailing conditions in
the area where the day peak is lower by 10.88% than the night peak level, a 62% load factor is
constantly experienced in the coverage area .
POWER SUPPLY PROCUREMENT PLAN
Peak Demand, MW 9.92 10.77493 11.34281 11.90685 12.46861 13.02948 13.59074 14.15358 14.71909 15.2883 15.86226
Supply vs Demand
18
16
14
12
10
MW
8
6
4
2
0
2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027
ACTUAL FORECAST
YEARS
Supply Contracted, MW Supply for PSA Approval, MW Uncontracted Demand, MW Peak Demand, MW
MARELCO has an existing five-year Power Supply Agreement with the National Power Corporation covering the period from August 31, 2014 to August 31,
2019. NPC's current dependable capability is 12.8 MW composed of Boac DPP (4.7 MW), PB 120 (3.1 MW), Torrijos DDP (2.2 MW), Monark Rental
Units (2.8 MW). The SAGR is Php5.6404/kwh.
NPC and Marelco has established good working rapport to ensure continuity of electric service. In cases of power outages, close coordination is maintained so
that restoration is effectively and timely executed. However, it is a fact that NPC's generating units are already aging and frequent breakdown results to power
failures. Although, there is a 5 MW newly installed generating units in Bantad Power Plant, its dependability is still sometimes uncertain. Hence, Marelco is
fully determined to conduct a self-managed Competitive Selection Process to look for a power provider that will ensure reliable and efficient power supply for
the whole coverage area.
OPTIMAL MIX:
The energy demand requirement for the year 2022 is 13 MW however, MARELCO will need a 16 MW power plant to satisfy the n-2 contingency.
Based on the normalized load curved for the year 2017 the economic power supply mix for the year 2022 is 80.21% for base plant and 19.79% for peaking plant.
Considering the peaking plant will generate only 2.75% of annual requirements, this indicates that the base power plant, if equally capable of fast response
to the changing demand like the light Diesel power plant, can also provide the peaking energy. With the possibility that all contracted bunker power
plants will provide the reserve requirements in the future, it is best that they provide the full service requirement, i.e., both the baseload and peaking
supply and avoid the more costly light diesel plants. Furthermore based on the study, the cheapest in terms of initial investment and total generation cost in
Php per kilowatt-hour is by adding a power plant of two (2) generating units each rated at 1MW (2 x 1MW) and filling the 20 year demand requirement
of MARELCO from 2022 to 2041 by 2 x 1MW expansion pattern.
Note:
The MARELCO's 2018 DDP was prepared before the finalization of 2017 data and submitted thereafter long before the preparation of our Power Supply
Procurement Plan (PSPP). The data on the PSPP was revised to conform to the actual data or historical data of 2017.
POWER SUPPLY PROCUREMENT PLAN
SCHEDULE OF CSP
Proposed contract
For CSP Proposed schedule (MM/YYYY)
period (MM/YYYY)
Base / mid-merit / Submissio
Start Publication Joint
peaking Demand Energy End Month Pre-bid n and Bid PSA
Month and of Invitation Awarding Application
(MW) (MWh) and Year Conference Opening Evaluation Signing
Year to Bid to ERC
of Bids
Base with the 14 Feb 5 to
August 24 &
capability of (exclusive of 74,910.70 Jan 2022 Dec 2041 11-Sep-18 5-Feb-19 Feb 19, 12-Apr-19 19-Apr-19 20-Apr-19
31, 2018
peaking plant reserve) 2019
Additional
Contract 2 8,909.26 Jan 2024 Dec 2044
Note:
To augment additional load there will be a Competitive Selection process every two years thereafter starting 2022.
POWER SUPPLY PROCUREMENT PLAN
2025 -
Jan 13.73 7.14 5,006.32 13.73 5,006.32 13.73 6,279.57
Feb 13.72 7.14 5,013.81 13.72 5,013.81 13.72 6,288.96
Mar 13.72 7.13 4,796.63 13.72 4,796.63 13.72 6,016.55
Apr 14.72 7.65 6,126.21 14.72 6,126.21 14.72 7,684.27
May 14.49 7.54 6,377.28 14.49 6,377.28 14.49 7,999.20
Jun 14.69 7.64 6,795.25 14.69 6,795.25 14.69 8,523.47
Jul 14.68 7.64 6,099.15 14.68 6,099.15 14.68 7,650.34
Aug 13.90 7.23 6,290.45 13.90 6,290.45 13.90 7,890.29
Sep 13.75 7.15 6,345.58 13.75 6,345.58 13.75 7,959.44
Oct 13.67 7.11 6,004.65 13.67 6,004.65 13.67 7,531.80
Nov 13.67 7.11 6,433.42 13.67 6,433.42 13.67 8,069.62
Dec 14.66 7.63 5,087.24 14.66 5,087.24 14.66 6,381.07
2026
Jan 14.26 7.42 5,199.89 14.26 5,199.89 14.26 6,596.45
Feb 14.25 7.41 5,207.66 14.25 5,207.66 14.25 6,606.31
Mar 14.25 7.41 4,982.08 14.25 4,982.08 14.25 6,320.15
Apr 15.29 7.95 6,363.07 15.29 6,363.07 15.29 8,072.03
May 15.05 7.83 6,623.85 15.05 6,623.85 15.05 8,402.85
Jun 15.26 7.93 7,057.98 15.26 7,057.98 15.26 8,953.57
Jul 15.25 7.93 6,334.97 15.25 6,334.97 15.25 8,036.38
Aug 14.44 7.51 6,533.67 14.44 6,533.67 14.44 8,288.44
Sep 14.28 7.43 6,590.93 14.28 6,590.93 14.28 8,361.08
Oct 14.20 7.38 6,236.81 14.20 6,236.81 14.20 7,911.86
Nov 14.20 7.38 6,682.16 14.20 6,682.16 14.20 8,476.82
Dec 15.23 7.92 5,283.93 15.23 5,283.93 15.23 6,703.06
2027
Jan 14.79 7.69 5,395.09 14.79 5,395.09 14.79 6,913.36
Feb 14.79 7.69 5,403.15 14.79 5,403.15 14.79 6,923.70
Mar 14.78 7.69 5,169.11 14.78 5,169.11 14.78 6,623.79
Apr 15.86 8.25 6,601.93 15.86 6,601.93 15.86 8,459.84
May 15.62 8.12 6,872.51 15.62 6,872.51 15.62 8,806.55
Jun 15.83 8.23 7,322.93 15.83 7,322.93 15.83 9,383.73
Jul 15.82 8.23 6,572.78 15.82 6,572.78 15.82 8,422.48
Aug 14.98 7.79 6,778.94 14.98 6,778.94 14.98 8,686.65
Sep 14.82 7.71 6,838.35 14.82 6,838.35 14.82 8,762.78
Oct 14.73 7.66 6,470.94 14.73 6,470.94 14.73 8,291.97
Nov 14.73 7.66 6,933.00 14.73 6,933.00 14.73 8,884.07
Dec 15.80 8.22 5,482.28 15.80 5,482.28 15.80 7,025.10
FORECASTING METHODOLOGY
Various forecasting models were used to have an almost accurate forecast that passed all the parameters.
However, to establish the most accurate forecast, Trend Models was developed using the last seven (7)
years historical and progressive data. Since Trend analysis was used, data has to pass the criteria of at
least 99% for Adjusted R2 statistic. The Mean Absolute Percentage Error (MAPE) was computed and
should not exceed 5%. Independent variables were also tested for their validity using at least the p-value
which should be lower than 0.1 and t-statistics which should be greater than 2 or less than -2 to be valid.
All the chosen models passed these criteria and were used for the technical evaluation of the future
system.
In the case that forecasting models formulated failed in terms of validity and accuracy, the historical data
were normalized and ignored the years that were identified as abnormal due to erratic trend of the data.
Megawatt demand forecast for Mainland and 3 islets were developed by bottom to top approach. First
the sales per customer type were forecasted and to compute the MWHr purchased, we used the average
system loss of 12.49%. After computing the Mwhr purchased we assumed the load factor of 56% to get
the megawatt demand.