Capital Investment Decisions: Chapte R
Capital Investment Decisions: Chapte R
Capital Investment Decisions: Chapte R
3
Capital investment r
Decisions
Chapter Outline
Which of the net present value method and internal rate of return method is superior and
why?
Under what circumstances do the net present value and internal rate of return methods
involves decisions relating to the investment of current funds for the benefit
to be achieved in future.
1. “The capital budgeting generally refers to acquiring inputs with long- term
From the above decisions we can say that capital budgeting is the process of
The future benefits will be available to the firm over series of years.
methods of appraising an investment proposal are those which are objective, quantified
and based on economic costs and benefits. The methods of evaluating capital expenditure
A. Traditional Methods:
A. Traditional Methods: Traditional methods are pay back period (PBP) and average
rate of return (ARR). Although we would like to omit them, but we cannot. Since they
B. Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Methods: The DCF methods are theoretically
superior. The DCF methods are more popularly known as they take the time factor into
account.
The renowned economist, Professor Keynes argued that the level of investment
interest. If the value the discounted flow of expected earnings is greater than the
outflow, the investment is profitable. The measures of investment worth that use the
timing of the cash flows, in these measures the concept of the present value of a
future sum is utilized, they popularly known as discount cash flow (DCF) methods.
into account the time value of money and discounts the expected future earnings
3.03. Multiple IRR? Distinguish between multiple IRR and modified IRR.
IRR. One is Multiple IRR and the other one is the impractical assumption of
cash flows i.e. a mix of more than one positive and negative cash flow. It not only
Present Value of all Negative Cash Flows at the Financing Cost of the Firm) ^(1/n) – 1
Modified internal rate of return (MIRR) is an improved version of the internal rate
of return (IRR) approach to capital budgeting decisions. It does not require the
assumption that the project cash flows are reinvested at the IRR; rather, it
Decision rule: projects with MIRR greater the project's hurdle rate should be
accepted; while in case of mutually exclusive projects, the project with higher
then evaluating capital projects for the company. Capital projects are the ones
where the cash flows are received by the company over longer periods of time
which exceeds a year. Almost all the corporate decisions that impact future
earnings of the company can be studied using this framework. This process can be
used to examine various decisions like buying a new machine, expanding operations
at another geographic location, moving the headquarters or even replacing the old
asset. These decisions have a power to impact the future success of the company.
This is the reason the capital budgeting process is an invaluable part of any
company.
is the project’s expected cash flows in the future. Hence, all the project
Creating the Corporate Capital Budget: Once the profitable projects are
resources, timing of the cash flows of the project and the overall strategic
plan of the company. Some projects may be attractive on their own, but may
in the capital budgeting process. The analysts compare the actual results of
the projects to the projected ones and the project managers are
3.05. Comparison of the NPV and IRR Method. What method would
time adjusted methods of measuring investment worth. Two methods lead to same
cash flows.
6. Profitable If NPV is positive, the If IRR is greater than cost
method.
8. Easy It is so easy and usable. It is heard and critical.
2.In the calculation of NPV, both after cash flow and before cash flow over the
Long-term Applications:
Implies that capital budgeting decisions are helpful for an organization in the long
run as these decisions have a direct impact on the cost structure and future
any wrong decision can prove to be fatal for the organization. For example, over-
investment in various assets can cause shortage of capital to the organization,
Refers to the fact that an organization can plan its investment in various fixed
assets through capital budgeting. In addition, capital investment decisions help the
Cash Forecasting:
Implies that an organization needs a large amount of funds for its investment
required amount of cash, thus, ensures the availability of cash at the right time.
This further helps the organization to achieve its long-term goals without any
difficulty.
Maximization of Wealth:
invest in the organization. This helps in maximizing the wealth of the organization.
Other Factors. The following other factors can also be considered for its
significance:-
It assist in formulating a sound depreciation and assets replacement policy.
equipment.
The feasibility of replacing manual work by machinery may be seen from the
It studies the impact of capital investment on the revenue expenditure of the firm
Budgeting.
Capital budgeting plays a vital role in the future investment of a firm. Capital
years in advance to be sure of having the funds required for the expansion.
assets.
these types of projects are firstly whether the existing operations continue
maintained as such.
after a detailed analysis because these determine whether the obsolete, but
of uncertainty involved.
concerns. These projects will not generate any revenue, but they surely
Other Projects: Some projects that cannot be easily analyzed fall into this
that cannot be analyzed easily with typical assessment methods are included
in such projects.
3.09. Importants/Needs of Capital budgeting
that are consistent with the goal of the firm. The need and importance of capital
1. Long-term Implication
Capital expenditure decision affects the company's future cost structure over a
long time span. The investment in fixed assets increases the fixed cost of the firm
which must be recovered from the benefit of the same project. If the investment
turns out to be unsuccessful in future or give less profit than expected, the
company will have to bear the extra burden of fixed cost. Such risk can be
minimized through the systematic analysis of projects which is the integral part of
investment decision.
2. Irreversible Decision
Capital investment decision are not easily reversible without much financial loss to
the firm because there may be no market for second-hand plant and equipment and
their conversion to other uses may not be financially viable. Hence, capital
investment decisions are to be carried out and performed carefully and effectively
in order to save the company from such financial loss. The investment decision
which is undertaken carefully and effectively can save the firm from huge financial
Capital budgeting decision involves the funds for the long-term. So, it is long-term
investment decision. The long-term commitment of funds leads to the financial
risk. Hence, careful and effective planning is must to reduce the financial risk as
much as possible.
substantial amount of capital outlay. This underlines the need for thoughtful, wise
and correct decisions as an incorrect decision would not only result in losses but
also prevent the firm from earning profit from other investments which could not
be undertaken.
uncertain and full of risks. Longer the period of project, greater may be the risk
and uncertainty. The estimates about cost, revenues and profits may not come
true.
8. Cost of safety: The capital cost of improving working conditions or safety can
CAPITAL BUDGETING
Capital Budgeting Techniques
A) Traditional Method
Important Factors
# Tax Effect
Cash flows to be considered for purposes of capital budgeting are net of taxes.
Special consideration needs to be given to tax effects on cash flows if the firm is
incurring losses and, therefore, paying no taxes. The tax laws permit carrying
losses forward to be set off against future income. In such cases, therefore, the
# Effect of Depreciation
Companies Act for accounting purposes and by the Income Tax for taxation
purposes.
The amount of annual depreciation on an asset is determined by the actual cost of
the asset. The actual cost means the cost of acquisition of the asset and the
expenses incidental thereto which are necessary to put the asset in a useable
state, for instance – freight and carriage inwards, installation charges and
expenses incurred to facilitate the use of the asset like expenses in the training of
net sense, that is current assets minus current liabilities (Net Working Capital)
The increased WC forms part of the initial cash outlay (outflow). This will however,
be returned to the firm at the firm at the end of the project’s life. Therefore, the
recovery of WC becomes part of the cash flow stream in the terminal year.
The increase in the WC may not only be in the zero year, that is, at the time of
later years. This increase in WC should be considered as cash outflow of the year
# Project Classifications
1. Replacement:
2. Expansion:
3. Safety/environmental projects
Projects are normally analysis under the assumption that the firm will operate the
However, the above may not be the best course of action – it may be best to
terminate a project before the end of its potential life and this possibility can
Thus economic life is the life that maximizes the NPV and thus maximizes
shareholder wealth.
[ A1
NPV = ( 1 + K )
1
+
A2
(1 + K ) 2
+ ⋯⋯+
An
(1 + K ) n ] −C Here,
A = NCB of year 1 to N
C = NCO
= PV of
NCB S - NCO K = Cost of Capital/
Discount
rate
Internal Rate of Return (IRR)
C
A+ (B − A) Here,
IRR = C−D
A = Lower Discount Rate
B = Higher Discount Rate
C = NPV at LDR
D = NPV at HDR
Problem.1.
Fin Corporation is planning to replace one of its exiting equipment. The book value
of the equipment is Tk. 1,50,000 and its net realized value is expected to be Tk.
20,000. Its annual operation expense is Tk. 65,000. A new and sophisticated
equipment is available at cost of Tk. 2,25,000. Its annual operating cost will be Tk.
33,000. After 5 years it can disposed of at Tk. 80,000 net at cost. The working
capital requirement will increase by Tk.10,000 if the existing equipment is replaced
by the new one. The cost of capital of the company is 15% and corporate tax rate
is 40%.
Using NVP method of evaluation, comment on whether FIN corporation will replace
Solution
Cost − S. V
Estimated life
Dep. of equipment =
1,50,000 − 20,000
5
=
= 26,000
2,25,000 − 80, 000
5
Dep. of new equipment =
= 29,000
= 3,000
29,000
EBT
( 29,000 × 40% )
Less. Tax 11,600
17,400
EBT
3,000
Add. Depreciation
20,400
CFAT / NCB
Calculation of NCO:
= 2, 25,000 – 1, 25,000
= 1, 00,000+10,000=1,10,000
Total 1,13,115
.2.
Problem
An Engineering company is considering an investment proposal to install new
equipment facility. The project will cost Tk. 50,000. The facility has a life
expectancy of 5 years and no salvage value. The company's tax rate is 40%. The
firm uses straight line method of depreciation. The estimate cash flows before tax
(ii) Average Rate of Return; (iii) Net Present Value at 10% discount rate;
Solution
Probability Statement
Dis.
CFAT Rat
Tax
40%
Dep.) 10
0 0 0 0 6 8
0 0 0 0 1
4(A) 15,00 10,00 5,000 2,00 3,00 13,000 48,400( .68 8879
0 0 0 0 C) 3
0 0 0 0 0 D) 1
14,400 47,955
Cost − S. V
Estimated Life
W-1 Cal. of Dep. :
50,000 − 0
5
=
= 10,000
NCO − C
D
Req (i) PBP = A + A=4
NCO = 50,000
C = 48,400
50,000 − 48,400 D = 16,000
16,000
=4+
= 4.1 Years
Average EAT
× 100
NCO + S . V
2
(ii) ARR (Average) : =
14 ,400 ÷ 5
× 100
50 ,000 + 0
2
=
2,880
× 100
25,000
=
= 11.52 %
(iii) NPV = PV of CFAT - NCO
= 47,955 – 50,000
= (2,045)
PV of Cash Inflow
PV of Cash Outflow
(iv) PI (at 10 %) =
47,955
× 100
50,000
= = 95.91 %
.3..
Problem
(ii) Compute NPV and IRR of each project when the firm's cost of capital is 12
percent.
Solution
Project ‘M’
Profitability Statement
DF DF
12 % 17 %
0 0
0 0
Cost − S. V
Life
W-1 Cal. of Dep. =
1 ,20 ,000 − 0
5
=
= 24,000
NCO − C
D A=2
1. PBP = A + NCO = 1,20,000
C = 1,10,000
D = 30,000
1,20,000 − 1,10,000
30,000
=2+
= 2.33 Year’s
Average EAT
× 100
NCO + S . V
2
3. ARR (Average) : =
40,000 ÷ 5
× 100
1,20,000 + 0
2
=
8 ,000
× 100
60,000
=
= 13.33 %
= 7,780
C
× (B − A)
C−D
Here,
4. IRR = A + A = 12 %
B = 17 %
7 ,780 C = 1, 27,780 – 1, 20,000
× ( 17% − 12% ) = 7,780
7 ,780 −(2,290)
D = 1, 17,710 – 1, 20,000
= 12 % + = (2,290)
7 ,780
× 5%
10,070
= 12 % +
= 15.86 %
Project ‘N’
Profitability Statement
Yea DF DF
r 12 % 15 %
Cost − S. V
Life
W-1 Cal. of Dep. =
1 ,20 ,000 − 0
5
=
= 24,000
NCO − C
D
Here,
1. PBP = A + A=2
NCO = 1,20,000
1,20,000 − 1,10,000 C = 1,10,000
80,000 D = 80,000
=4+
= 4.13 Years
Average EAT
× 100
NCO + S . V
2
3. ARR (Average) : =
70,000 ÷ 5
× 100
1,20,000 + 0
2
=
14,000
× 100
60,000
=
= 23.33 %
= 3,390
C
× (B − A)
C−D
Here,
4. IRR = A + A= Lower discount rate 12 %
B= Higher discount rate 15 %
3,390 C=NPV of lower discount rate 1,
× ( 15% − 12% ) 23,390 – 1,20,000=3,390
3,390 − (8 ,080)
D= NPV of higher discount rate
= 12 % +
3 ,390
× 3%
11,470
= 12 % +
= 12.88 %
Answer Table:
Decision : From above calculation we see that the Project ‘N’ should be selected,
because ARR, NPV and IRR is higher than the Project ‘M’.
.4.
Problem
cost of Tk. 50,000. The facility has a life expectancy of 5 years and no salvage
value. The tax rate is 35%. Assume the firm uses straight line depreciation and the
same is allowed for tax purposes. The estimated cash flows before depreciation
Solution
Profitability Statement
r 35 (EAT+De T Rat 5%
% p.) e
10
%
1 - - - 10,000
0 0 0 9 0 2 0
2 0 0 6 2 7 8
3 969 11,800
9 0 9 0 0 1 2 4 5
13,46 10,00 3,46 1,21 2,25 44,50 .68 8,36 .82 10,08
4 12,250
2 0 2 2 0 0 3 7 3 2
20,38 10,00 10,38 3,63 6,75 61,25 .62 10,40 .78 13,13
5 16,750
5 0 5 5 0 0 1 2 4 2
11,250
52,407
45,353
Cost − S. V
Life
W-1 Cal.of Dep. =
50 ,000 − 0
5
=
= 10,000
NCO − C
D
Here,
Req: (a) PBP = A + A=4
NCO = 50,000
50,000 − 44 ,500 C = 44,500
16,750 D = 16,750
=4+
= 4.33 Year’s
Average EAT
× 100
NCO + S . V
2
(b) ARR (Average) : =
11 ,250 ÷ 5
× 100
50 ,000 + 0
2
=
2,250
× 100
25,000
=
=9%
C
× (B − A)
C−D
(c) IRR = A + Here,
A= Lower discount rate 5%
B= Higher discount rate 10%
2,407
× ( 10 % − 5 % ) C=NPV of lower discount rate 52,407 –
2,407 − (4 ,647) 50,000=2,407
D= NPV of higher discount rate45,353
=5%+ – 50,000 = (4,647)
2,407
×5 %
7 ,054
=5%+
= 5 % + 1.71
= 6.71 %
= 45,353– 50,000
=(4,647)
.5.
Problem
costing Tk. 60,000. The facility has life expectancy of five years and has no
salvage value. Assume that the company uses straight line depreciation. The tax
rate is 35 percent. The cash-flows before depreciation and tax (CFBTD) from the
Year CFBTD
1 10,000
2 12,000
3 15,000
4 20,000
5 25,000
Requirement:
(i) Pay back period; (ii) Average rate of return; (iii) Internal rate of return;
Solution
Profitability Statement
Yea CFBT Dep. EBT Tax EAT CFAT CCFA Dis PV Dis PV
r D 35% (EAT+De T . .
Rat Rat
e e
p.)
10 15
% %
10,00 12,0 (2,00 (70 (1,30 1070 .90 9,72 .98 9,29
1 10,700
0 00 0) 0) 0) 0 9 6 0 8
2 - - - 12,000
0 00 0 6 2 1 2
0 00 0 0 1 76 2 9
8,000 17,200
A) 00 00 0 0 0 (C) 3 8 4 8
25,0 12,0 13,00 4,55 8,45 20,450 7430 .62 12,6 .90 10,16
00 00 0 0 0 (D) 0 1 99 6 4
14, 4
63,561
Cost − S. V
300 3,561 (12,449)
Estimated life
w- 1 Calculation of Dep. =
60 ,000 − 0
5
=
= 12,000
60,000 − 53,850
20,450
=4+
= 4.30 Year’s
Average EAT
× 100
NCO + S . V
2
=
14 ,300 ÷ 5
× 100
60 ,000 + 0
2
=
2,860
× 100
30,000
=
= 9.533 %
3,561
× 5%
16,010
= 10 % +
= 11.11%
= PV of CFAT - NCO
= 63,561 – 60,000
= (3,561)
.6.
Problem
An Engineering company is Considering an investment proposal to install new
equipment facility. The project will cost $ 1,00,000. The facility has a life
expectancy of 5 years and no salvage value. The company's tax rate is 40%. The
firm uses straight line method of depreciation. The estimated gross cash inflow
($)
1 20,000
2 30,000
3 28,000
4 30,000
5 40,000
You are required to compute the followings :—
Solution
Probability Statement
Dis.
CFAT Dis.
Rat
r 40% + e
10
Dep.) 3%
%
1 20,00 20,00 - - - 20,00 .90 18,18 .97 19,420
0 0 0 9 0 1
2 30,00 20,00 10,00 4,00 6,000 26,00 .82 21,47 .94 24,518
0 0 0 0 0 6 6 3
3 28,00 20,00 8,000 3,20 4,800 24,00 .75 18,62 .91 22,692
0 0 0 0 1 5 5
4 30,00 20,00 10,00 4,00 6,000 26,00 .68 17,75 .88 23,088
0 0 0 0 0 3 8 8
5 40,00 20,00 20,00 8,00 12,00 32,00 .62 19,87 .86 27,616
0 0 0 0 0 0 1 2 3
28,800
95,910 1,17,33
1,00,000 4
(4 ,090
1,00,00
)
17,334
Cost − S. V
Life
W-1 Cal. of Dep. :
1,00,000 − 0
5
=
= 20,000
Average EAT
× 100
NCO + S . V
2
Req: (i) ARR (Average) : =
28,800 ÷ 5
× 100
1 ,00,000 + 0
2
=
5 ,760
× 100
50,000
=
= 11.52 %
= 95,910 – 1,00,000
= (4,090)
C
× (B − A)
C−D Here,
A= Lower discount rate 3%
(iii) IRR = A + B= Higher discount rate 10%
17,334 C=NPV of lower discount rate
× ( 10% − 3%)
17,334 − ( 4,090) 17,334
D= NPV of higher discount
=3%+ rate(4,090)
17,334
× 7%
21,424
=3%+
= 8.66 %
PV of Cash Inflow
PV of Cash Outflow
(iv) PI (at 10 % dis.) =
95,910
× 100
1,00,000
=
= 95.91 %
.7.
Problem
A company is considering the purchase of a new machine that cost Tk. 60,000. The
company uses straight line method of depreciation. The annual cash flows have the
following projections:
1 21,000
2 29,000
3 36,000
4 16,000
5 12,000
(i) If the cost of capital is 10%, what is the net present value?
Year CFAT PV PV
10 % 30 %
88,459
58,525
60,000
60,000
28,459 (1,475)
= 28,459
C
× (B − A)
C−D Here,
A= Lower discount rate 10%
IRR = A +
B= Higher discount rate 30%
C=NPV of lower discount rate
28,459 28,459
× (30% − 10% )
28,459 − (1,475) D= NPV of higher discount
rate(1,475)
= 10 % +
28,459
× 20%
29,934
= 10 % +
= 29.014 %
(iii) Here consideration of NPV. The project should be accepted because NPV is
positive.
.8.
Problem
(Tk.)
1 25,000
2 30,000
3 32,000
4 35,000
5 40,000
The project’s cost of capital is 10% and tax rate 45%. Depreciation will be on
straight line basis.You are required to calculate and comment on whether the
Solution
Profitability Statement
45% (EAT+D . .
e e
10 5%
1 25,0 18,0 7,00 3,15 3,85 21,850 .90 19,86 .95 20,801
00 00 0 0 0 9 2 2
2 30,0 18,0 12,00 5,4 6,60 24,600 .82 20,32 .90 22,312
00 00 0 00 0 6 0 7
3 32,0 18,0 14,00 6,3 7,70 25,700 .75 19,30 .86 22,20
00 00 0 00 0 1 0 4 5
4 35,0 18,0 17,00 7,6 9,35 27,350 .68 18,68 .82 22,50
00 00 0 50 0 3 0 3 9
5 40,0 18,0 22,0 9,9 12,10 30,100 .62 18,69 .78 23,56
00 00 00 00 0 1 2 3 8
00 84 85
Working-1
Cost−salvage value
Estimated life
Calculation of Depreciation=
1,00, 000−10,000
5
=
= 18,000
Working-2
Calculation of NCO:
Average EAT
Average investment
Req.(i)ARR(Average)=
39,600÷5
x100
75,000
=
= 10.56%
Initial investment +S .V
2
Average investment = W.C +
1 , 00 ,000+10 ,000
2
= 20,000+
= 75,000
= 1,15,484- 1,20,000
= (4,516)
C
×(B− A )
C−D
Req(iii) IRR=A+
14,885
×(10 %−5 %)
14 ,885−(4 ,516 )
=5%+
= 8.836%
PV of cash in flow
PV of cash out flow
Req(iv) PI=
1,15,484
1,20,000
=
= 96.236%
Decision: Consideration of NVP the project should not be accepted, because NPV is
A= Lower discount rate 5%
B= Higher discount rate 10%
C=NPV of lower discount rate=
negative. 1,34,885 -1,20,000= 14,885
D= NPV of higher discount rate=
1,15,484- 1,20,000 = (4,516)
.9.
Problem
If present value of future cash inflow of a project is equal to its present value of
cash flows at 10% cost of capital, what is the project's NPV and PI?
=0
.10.
Problem
A manufacturer has a proposal for production of high quality product. The cost of
the necessary equipment to produce the product is Tk 80000. The equipment would
last for 5 years Tk 10000 salvage value. The product can be sold at Tk 5 each.
2.5 per unit. The manufacturer estimates that it will sell about 75000 units per
year. The straight line depreciation method will be used. The corporate tax rate is
Solution
Year Sales Total Dep. EBT Tax EAR CFAT Dis. PV Dis. PV
1-5 3,75,00 2,17,50 14,00 1,43,50 43,05 1,0045 1,14,450 3.60 4,12,59 .679 77,712
0 0 0 0 0 0 5 2
5(SV 10,000 -------- ------ ------- ------ ------ 10,000 .567 5,670 .011 110
) - ----
4,18,26 77,822
(80,000 (80,000)
3,38,26 (2,178)
Decision: Proposed equipment should be purchased, because IRR rate is higher than
cost of capital.
.11.
Problem
A manufacturing company is considering an investment proposal to install a new
machine facility. The project will cost Tk. 85,000. The 'facility has a life
expectancy of 4 years and no salvage value. The company's tax rate is 35% and
cost of capital is 8%. The company uses straight line depreciation method. The
estimated gross cash inflows from the investment proposal are as follows :—
1 25,000
2 35,000
3 28,000
4 60,000
(iv) MIRR.
Solution
Probability Statement
Yea CFBT Dep. EBT Tax EAT CFAT Dis. PV Dis. P.V
Rat Rat
(EAT
e e
r 35% +
8% 16
Dep.)
1 25,00 21,25 3,750 1,313 2,437 23,68 .92 21,934 .86 20,41
0 0 7 6 2 8
2 35,00 21,25 13,75 4,813 8,937 30,18 .85 25,870 .74 22,42
0 0 0 7 7 3 9
3 28,00 21,25 6,750 2,363 4,387 25,63 .79 20,356 .64 16,43
0 0 7 4 1 3
4 60,00 21,25 38,75 13,56 25,18 46,43 .73 34,131 .55 25,63
0 0 0 3 7 7 5 2 3
Tot 40,94 1,02,2 84,91
al 8 91 3
Less, NCO - -
85,000 85,00
Working-1
Cost−salvage value
Estimated life
Calculation of Depreciation=
85 , 000−000
4
=
= 21,250
Average EAT
× 100
NCO + S . V
2
Req: (i) ARR (Average) : =
40,948 ÷ 4
× 100
85,000 + 0
2
=
10,237
× 100
42,500
=
= 24.08%
= 1,02,291– 85,000
= 17,291
C
× (B − A)
C−D
(iii) IRR = A +
17,291 Here,
× ( 16 % − 8% )
17,291 − (87) A= Lower discount rate 8%
B= Higher discount rate 16%
= 8% + C=NPV of lower discount rate 17,291
D= NPV of higher discount rate(87)
17,291
× 8%
17,378
= 8% +
= 15.96%
n
√ FV
PV of Cost
−1
(iv) MIRR=
4
√ 1,39,174
85,000
−1
=
∑ CIF t (1+r)n−1
FV=
23 , 687(1+. 08)4−1 +30 ,187(1+. 08)3−1 +25 , 637(1+. 08)2−1 +46 , 437(1+. 08)1−1
=
= 1,39,174
Questions
Suggested Questions
Which of the net present value method and internal rate of return method is
3.4.Under what circumstances do the net present value and internal rate of return
methods differ? What method would you prefer and why? (2007,2014)
3.5.What are the significance of capital budgeting?(2014)
3.8.What is multiple IRR? Distinguish between multiple IRR and modified IRR.
(2007)
Exercises
Exercise :1
Tanjim Company is thinking of investing in a new project. A machine costing
Tk.50,000 has to be procured to implement this project. The estimated life of this
machine would be 5 years having no salvage value. The tax rate of that company is
55% and does not get any investment allowance. The company charges depreciation
on straight line basis. Cash flow before tax (CFBT) would be as follows:
Tk.
1st
10,000
2nd
3rd
4th
5th
4. PV. PBP
5. P.I
Exercise 02:
bellow.
Details Amount
Year Tk.
1 6,000
2 3,000
3 2,000
4 5,000
5 5,000
The Company's cost of capital is 10% and pays tax at 50% rate. The project will be
1. Pay-back period;
Exercise 03:
Asad Ltd. is considering the purchase of a new machine at a cost of Tk. 4, 00,000.
The machine w| have an expected 7 year life and at the end of its salvage value will
be Tk. 15,000. The machine will req. an additional working capital of Tk. 1,00,000.
The company employs straight line method for charge depreciation. The net pre-
1 1,00,000
2 1,00,000
3 1,40,000
4 1,30,000
5 1,10,000
6 1,20,000
7 1,00,000
The target return on capital of the company is 15% and using that rate determine
the Net Present Value & profitability index of the machine. Assume a 50% tax
rate.
Exercise 04:
Brothers Ltd is considering a proposal to install! a new machine. The project will
cost Tk. 100,000 and expected life is five year. The estimated cash-inflows before
Year CFBT
1 25,000
2 30,000
3 35,000
4 40,000
5 45,000
The tax-rate of that company is 50% and charges depreciation on straight line
basis.
PBP
ARR
ROI
PER
IRR
Exercise 06:
Period A B
0 -20,000 -20,000
1 10,000 0
2 10,000 0
3 10,000 0
4 10,000 50,000
IRR
NPV at 15%
Exercise 07:
Brothers Ltd is considering a proposal to install! a new machine. The project will
cost Tk. 100,000 and expected life is five year. The estimated cash-inflows before
Year CFBT
1 25,000
2 30,000
3 35,000
4 40,000
5 45,000
The tax-rate of that company is 50% and charges depriciation on straight line
basis.
PBP
ARR
ROI
IRR
Exercise 08:
machine “A” & “B” to be used in its factory. Particulars of the two machines are
given below:
Machine A Machine B
Requried:
1.PBP
2. ARR
3. NPV