Assessing The Impacts of Climate Change On Road Infrastructure
Assessing The Impacts of Climate Change On Road Infrastructure
Assessing The Impacts of Climate Change On Road Infrastructure
net/publication/317767060
CITATIONS READS
7 2,549
3 authors, including:
Erwin Oh
Griffith University
160 PUBLICATIONS 1,186 CITATIONS
SEE PROFILE
Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:
Ground response of fiber reinforced polymer (FRP) tension micro-piles View project
All content following this page was uploaded by Erwin Oh on 25 April 2019.
*Corresponding Author, Received: 4 March 2017, Revised: 25 March 2017, Accepted: 10 April 2017
ABSTRACT: There is an increasing evidence that the earth’s climate is changing with some of the changes
attributable to transport infrastructure. Climate change can have impacts on road infrastructure. The direct
impacts can be due to the effects of environment. Temperature can affect the aging of bitumen resulting in an
increase in brittle failure of the surface seals that represent more than 90% of the rural sealed roads in
Australia. Further, rainfall changes can alter moisture balances and influence pavement deterioration. Brittle
failure of the bitumen causes the surface to crack, with a consequent loss of waterproofing of the surface seal.
The result is that surface water will enter the pavement causing potholing and will cause rapid loss of surface
condition. More frequent reseal treatments will overcome the problem, but this is at a higher cost to road
agencies. Road infrastructure is a long-lived investment. An understanding of the expected impacts of future
climate change by road designers, asset managers and planners, could produce considerable cost savings in
the long term. This research aims to provide an assessment of likely effects on climate change for South East
Queensland region in the next 90 years, and further identify and assess the likely effects of climate change on
road pavement. It can be concluded that, climate change in South East Queensland does play a role in lower
deterioration rates. The findings suggest that decreasing rainfall (decreasing TMI) will slow flexible
pavement deterioration. However, increases in temperature are likely to cause materials to expand to affect
pavement deterioration rates.
120
International Journal of GEOMATE, Oct., 2017, Vol.13, Issue 38, pp.120-128
121
International Journal of GEOMATE, Oct., 2017, Vol.13, Issue 38, pp.120-128
The simulated future MMP is not provided but environmental conditions, traffic loading, and
only the annual precipitation data so that the future pavement conditions respectively.
MMP is calculated by taking average of the annual Four QTMR LTPP sites located in the Gold
data. MTR is not provided by Climate Tool Coast and Brisbane have been chosen for
directly. It is calculated based on maximum mean pavement deterioration analysis as representatives
monthly temperature and minimum mean monthly of highway and arterial roads. In addition, twelve
temperature extracted from Climate Tool. LTPP sites within Gold Coast, seventeen LTPP
Firstly, the average of maximum monthly sites within Logan, fifteen LTPP sites within
temperature and minimum monthly temperature of Ipswich, nine LTPP sites within Redland, eight
12 months of every single year from 1960-2007 is LTPP sites within Caboolture, and seven LTPP
calculated respectively. Secondly, the difference sites within Caloundra have been selected as
between maximum and minimum monthly representatives of local roads throughout SEQ
temperature from 1960-2007 is calculated based region. Part of the information of all of these LTPP
on previous results. The final range of mean sites collected from QTMR and corresponding
monthly temperature is the average value of the local City Councils are summarized and shown
Second step. from Table 1 to Table 4 below.
In addition to the above climate data, HDM-4
deterioration model also requires the number of Table1: QTMR LTPP Sites
days greater than 32ºC, the duration of dry season, LTPP Block Length
Road Name
and the percentage of time driven on water No. (m)
covered roads. These data are not provided by Pacific Motorway,
Climate Tool. By applying the extreme input data QTMP 1 Southbound (Gold 500
on these items, one can observe that these inputs Coast)
have very minor effects on deterioration rate. Samford Sub-
Therefore, a default value of 90 days greater than QTMP 2 Arterial Road 250
32 ºC, 6 months of dry season, and 5% of time (Brisbane)
driven on water covered roads are adopted for this Moggill Sub-Arterial
study. QTMP 3 280
Road (Brisbane)
Mount Cotton Road
3. HDM-4 DETERIORATION MODELLING QTMP 4 785
(Brisbane)
The HDM-4 model predicts pavement Table 2: Gold Coast City Council LTPP Sites
deterioration as a function of pavement condition, Block Length
traffic loading, environmental effects, and LTPP No. Road Name
(m)
maintenance impacts. In this study, the modelling GCCC 1 Helensvale Road 346
analysis is repeated for road sections with different GCCC 2 Johnston Road 270
traffic levels and various initial pavement
GCCC 3 Dudgeon Drive 650
conditions in South East Queensland (SEQ),
GCCC 4 Xanadu Court 435
therefore identifying the deterioration of
GCCC 5 Shaws Pocket Road 1320
pavements representing different level of road
GCCC 6 Robina Parkway 1520
hierarchy. The pavement condition is expressed in
terms of pavement strength. The traffic level is GCCC 7 Tallai Road 1214
expressed in terms of the annual average daily GCCC 8 Lords Avenue 340
traffic (AADT) and the composition of traffic. GCCC 9 Cheltenham Drive 941
GCCC 10 Studio Drive 860
3.1 Road Section Characteristics GCCC 11 Tallebudgera Drive 386
GCCC 12 Larch Street 400
A number of different flexible pavement road
sections within the SEQ region have been selected Table 3: Logan City Council LTPP Sites
for HDM-4 pavement deterioration modelling. LTPP No. Road Name Block Length(m)
There road sections are part of LTPP sites used by LCC 1 Chambers Flat 439
Queensland Department of Transport and Main LCC 2 Browns Plains 556
Roads (QTMR) and Local City Councils for their LCC 3 Middle 542
own management purposes. LCC 4 Station 674
These chosen LTPP sites represents a range of LCC 5 Watland 522
typical road hierarchy including highway, arterial LCC 6 Service 398
road and local road. They are defined by a unique LCC 7 Passerine 580
set of location, age, geometric characteristics, LCC 8 Lawnton 417
LCC 9 Vansittar 470
122
International Journal of GEOMATE, Oct., 2017, Vol.13, Issue 38, pp.120-128
Table 4: Ipswich City Council LTPP Sites 3.2.3 Input for Pavement Strength
Block
LTPP No. Road Name Pavement strength is a primary determinant of
Length(m)
many pavement structural condition indicators.
ICC 1 Aster 253
HDM-4 recognises this need through the use of the
ICC 2 Commercial 280
Adjusted Structural Number (SNP) as a modelled
ICC 3 Salsibury 385
measure of pavement strength, but a means is
ICC 4 Briggs 298 required for the derivation of SNP from FWD
ICC 5 Thagoona-Haigslea 295 deflection data [10].
ICC 6 Russells 300 The concept of Structural Number (SN) as a
ICC 7 Reif 400 parameter for estimating pavement strength was
ICC 8 Southern Amberley 350 developed from the American Association of State
ICC 9 Purga School 550 Highway and Transportation Official (AASHO)
ICC 10 Augusta 410 Road Test (Highway Research Board) for
ICC 11 Roland 605 pavement design and performance purposes. Then
ICC 12 Lawrie 255 SN parameter is based on the sum of each of the
ICC 13 Ash 304 pavement layer strength coefficients [11]
ICC 14 Peak Crossing 250 multiplied by its respective pavement layer
ICC 15 Duncan 255 thickness.
Modified Structural Number (SNC) is a
modification of the SN parameter to include the
3.2 HDM-4 Data Input and Initial Model Set-up subgrade contribution, SNsg, to pavement
strength. The SNsg component estimates a
3.2.1 Climate data input negative contribution to pavement strength when
the subgrade Californian Bearing Ratio (CBR) is
For modelling any of the above LTPP sites, a less than 3%, and a positive contribution when it
series of climatic data are required as the input of exceeds 3% and is therefore equal to the SN when
HDM-4. They are obtained by using Austroads the subgrade CBR is 3%. The SNC was used in the
Climate Tool based on specific GPS locations and HDM-III to represent the pavement strength in
periods of time as described in previous sections of predicting performance [12].
this chapter. The climatic inputs required by The SNC was further refined into the adjusted
HDM-4 are listed as follows: structural number, SNP, in the HDM-4 [13]. The
1. Thornthwaite Moisture Index (TMI) parameter SNP uses a weighting factor [14] that
2. Moisture classification & Temperature reduces the contribution to pavement strength of
classification based on TMI the sub-base and subgrade with their increasing
3. Duration of dry season in months depth. This weighting factor was introduced
4. Mean monthly precipitation (MMP) in because the strength contribution of each layer in
mm the pavement system is independent of depth, with
5. Mean annual temperature (MAT) in ºC the SNC parameter resulting in over-estimates of
6. Average monthly temperature range SNC.
(MTR) in ºC The SNP can be estimated from pavement
7. Number of days greater than 32 ºC surface deflection data measured by any of the
8. Freeze index (not applicable for SEQ) following typical pavement surface deflection
testing devices: Benkelman Beam (BB), Falling
3.2.2 Pavement structure and traffic data input Weight Deflectometer (FWD), and Deflectograph
(DEF). In HDM-4, pavement strength can be input
Input data is required to enable the definition of as three different forms including:
pavement structure. The data can be considered 1. FWD data
into two categories: pavement strength, and 2. SN and CBR
pavement configuration. Besides, several inputs 3. BB deflection
123
International Journal of GEOMATE, Oct., 2017, Vol.13, Issue 38, pp.120-128
Since pavement strength is described in terms of of 3 axle, 6axle and B-Double vehicles as heavy
SNP in HDM-4, inputs on any of the above forms vehicle.
will be adjusted into SNP by the system.
In this study, FWD central deflection at an FWD 3.2.5.2 AADT
load pressure of 700 Kpa is used for majority of In HDM-4 the traffic flow pattern is represented
the LTPP sites based on the available data. For in terms of the Average Annual Daily Traffic
those sites which do not have the FWD data, SN (AADT) which is defined as the amount or
and CBR data are used for analysis. percentage of traffic expected over a certain
amount of time per day. The collected AADT data
3.2.4 Input for Pavement Condition (IRI) involving multiple lanes were measured at
approximately 10 to 20 year after the construction
The pavement condition is expressed in terms of of the roads. For the purpose of this study, the
International Roughness Index (IRI). As an input AADT data need to be further processed based on
for HDM-4 deterioration modelling, the initial IRI the traffic growth rate and traffic lane distribution
are based on NAASRA roughness counts. This factor.
research referred to Yeaman’s guideline[20] for All of the chosen LTPP sites are located at the
pavement roughness which is shown in Table 5. outer lane of a road section while the AADT data
represent the total traffic of all lanes. Therefore,
Table 5: Guideline for pavement roughness [20] the AADT as an input of HDM-4 need to be
Roughness distributed into the traffic volume over the outer
Type of
Traffic (NAASRA lane according to the lane distribution factors.
pavement
counts) Table 6 shows the Lane Distribution Factor
New provided by Austroads [5] Pavement Design
Arterial < 50 Guide. Within which, the left lane data is adopted
construction
New as the outer lane traffic.
Residential < 60
construction
Table 6: Typical Lane Distribution Factors for
These NAASRA counts were then converted carriageways [5]
into the IRI values by using the following Lane Distribution Factor (LDF)
equation: Lanes
Left Centre Right
NAASRA = 26.49 × IRI – 1.27 (1) Location each
lane lane lane
Where, NAASRA = Roughness level measured by direction
NAASRA model (counts/km), IRI = International 2 lane 1.00* N/A 0.5
Rural
roughness index in m/km 3 lane 0.95 0.65 0.30
The initial roughness for this study adopted a 50 2 lane 1.00* N/A 0.5
NAASRA for arterial road and a 55 NAASRA for Urban
3 lane 0.65 0.65 0.5
residential road. They are calculated into IRI value *This value is the suggested limit for a lane and
as 1.93 and 2.13 respectively. may be reduced
3.2.5 Input for Traffic Moreover, the outer lane AADT have to be back
calculated to the initial AADT which represents
3.2.5.1Vehicle fleet the traffic volume when the road section was first
The vehicle fleet is a list of vehicles that could constructed. The initial AADT data are needed as
be expected to be found on a road network. the input for modeling the pavement deterioration
Various detailed vehicle operating information is of road sections from the first year after they were
required for each vehicle which effectively opened to traffic. As the collected traffic volume
describe how the vehicle will behave and interact data are measured at some time after construction,
with the road [5]. In defining the vehicle fleet, four traffic growth per year is required for the back
categories are used in the HDM-4 analysis. That is: calculation. The provided traffic growth data for
1. 3 axle vehicles (trucks and buses) different LTPP sites are tabulated as below:
2. 6 axle vehicles (articulated trucks)
3. B-Double (road trains) Table 7: Traffic Growth Rate per year (%)
4. Passenger cars Other
Based on the fact that the number of heavy LTPP Mt
M1 Moggill local
vehicles is the most critical since they contribute Site Cotton
roads
much more to pavement deterioration than Traffic
passenger cars, the above categories could be 8.5 3.9 5.3 3
Growth
further classified into two traffic types: heavy
vehicles and passenger cars by combining the sum
124
International Journal of GEOMATE, Oct., 2017, Vol.13, Issue 38, pp.120-128
125
International Journal of GEOMATE, Oct., 2017, Vol.13, Issue 38, pp.120-128
Future Climate
15.84 21.93 71.38 8.17 10 1.25 1.22 1.2
(2008-2040) 11 1.32 1.28 1.26
Future Climate
7.21 23.39 50.94 8.17 12 1.39 1.34 1.33
(2041-2070)
Future Climate 13 1.47 1.41 1.39
-1.16 24.79 31.80 8.17 14 1.55 1.48 1.46
(2071-2099)
15 1.63 1.55 1.53
16 1.71 1.63 1.6
Table 12: Ipswich City Climate Summary Table 15: Mt Cotton sub-arterial road deterioration
TMI MAT MMP MTR
2008- 2041- 2071-
(°C) (mm) (°C) Year
Current 2040 2070 2099
62.37 19.89 124.95 9.84 1 1 1 1
(1960-2007)
Future Climate 2 1.1 1.1 1.1
41.07 21.13 93.84 9.84
(2008-2040) 3 1.25 1.24 1.23
Future Climate 4 1.33 1.33 1.3
20.15 22.65 62.72 9.84
(2041-2070)
5 1.42 1.42 1.38
Future Climate
-0.11 24.12 34.00 9.84 6 1.52 1.51 1.46
(2071-2099)
7 1.62 1.61 1.55
Table 13: Brisbane Climate Summary 8 1.74 1.72 1.64
TMI MAT MMP MTR 9 1.86 1.84 1.74
(°C) (mm) (°C)
10 1.99 1.97 1.85
Current
63.20 20.06 127.10 9.54 11 2.13 2.11 1.97
(1960-2007)
Future Climate 12 2.28 2.25 2.09
51.20 21.27 102.36 9.54
(2008-2040) 13 2.44 2.41 2.22
Future Climate 14 2.62 2.58 2.36
28.10 22.80 68.90 9.54
(2041-2070) 15 2.81 2.76 2.51
Future Climate
6.40 24.20 37.53 9.54
(2071-2099)
Table 14 and 15 show the trend of deterioration
rates under combined climate changes and traffic
7. FUTURE PAVEMENT DETERIORATION increases up to year 2099 for selected LTPP sites.
RATES The role of traffic increases on deterioration rates
is significant. For Pacific Motorway, the higher
The second analysis conducted will examine traffic volumes and high annual traffic growth lead
future pavement deterioration rates due to climate to traffic dominating deterioration rates in the
changes and increases in traffic. The analysis is future. The effect of climate change can be seen
run three times under future climate periods up to later in the century as drier climate reduces
the year 2099 by HDM-4 Modelling. deterioration rates; Mt Cotton sub-arterial road
shows almost a balancing of increasing
deterioration rates due to traffic and decreasing
Table 14: Pacific Motorway deterioration rates due to climate. It can be concluded that,
2008- 2041- 2071- while climate change does play a role in lower
Year deterioration rates, traffic will have the most
2040 2070 2099
impact of future deterioration rates for higher
1 0.67 0.67 0.67 trafficked roads.
2 0.74 0.74 0.74
3 0.84 0.84 0.83 8. CONCLUDING
4 0.89 0.88 0.88
5 0.94 0.93 0.92 There is an increasing body of evidence that the
6 0.99 0.98 0.97 climate is changing and climate change can have
7 1.05 1.03 1.03 impacts on road infrastructure due to the effects of
the changed environment [5]. The primary
8 1.12 1.09 1.08 objective of this project was to investigate the
9 1.18 1.15 1.14 impacts of projected climate changes in the next
126
International Journal of GEOMATE, Oct., 2017, Vol.13, Issue 38, pp.120-128
100 years of the South East Queensland region on rainfall (decreasing TMI) will slow flexible
flexible pavement performance. A number of pavement deterioration. However, increases in
preliminary works have been carried out according temperature are likely to cause materials to expand;
to the proposed research objectives. They are the bitumen binder to become more viscous; and
summarised as below: deformation susceptibility to increase i.e. rutting.
Solar radiation increases are likely to increase
1. Conducted a comprehensive literature review surface degradation through asphalt oxidation,
on climate change science with a specific embrittlement and cracking.
focus on SEQ region, pavement performance
modelling, effects of climatic factors on 9. REFERENCES
pavement performance and previous similar
studies.
[1] IPCC (intergovernmental Panel on Climate
2. Extracted raw historical and projected future
climate data by using Austroads Climate Change) (2007). Climate change 2007:
Tool. Calculated and interpreted extracted contribution of working group I to the fourth
assessment report of the intergovernmental
climate data into proper forms as the input of
panel on climate change, IPCC, Geneva.
further study.
[2] Garnaut, R. (2008). The Garnaut climate
change review: final report, Cambridge
3. Collected data of targeted road pavement
sections according to the requirement of the University Press, Melbourne.
road pavement management analysis [3] Office of Economic and Statistical Research.
(2010). Queensland Regional Profiles: SEQ
software – Highway Development and
Region, The State of Queensland, Queensland
Management System (HDM-4).
Treasury.
[4] Department of Infrastructure and Planning.
Key findings of the climate data analysis at present
include: (2009). South East Queensland Regional Plan
2009-2031, The State of Queensland.
[5] Austroad. (2004). Impact of climate change on
1. Precipitation and temperature are the major
road infrastructure, Austroad Inc.
climatic factors affecting the pavement
[6] Carrera, A., Dawson, A. & Stegar, J. (2009).
deterioration.
Report Nr 1 – State of the art of likely effect
2. Analysis of the trends of climate change
based on seven typical locations of South of climate on current roads, ERA-NET ROAD
East Queensland indicates an average 1.1°C [7] McDonald, J., Baum, S., Crick, F., Czarnecki,
J., Filed, G., Low Choy, D., Mustelin, J., Sano,
increases in mean annual temperature from
M. & Serrao-Neumann, S. (2010). Climate
2007 to 2040, 2.4°C by 2070, and 3.7°C by
change adaptation in South East Queensland
2099.
3. Mean annual precipitation is projected to human settlements: Issues and context,
decrease by approximately 22% by 2040, unpublished report for the South East
Queensland Climate Adaptation Research
32% by 2070, and 42% by 2099.
Initiative, Griffith University.
4. Based on the HDM-4 calibration of LTPP
[8] Austroads. (2010). Impact of climate change
sites, a relationship between Thornthwaite
on road performance: updating climate
Moisture Index and average flexible
pavement deterioration rates in IRI/year has information for Australia. Austroads
been developed. This can be used for Incorporated, Sydney.
[9] Walsh, K., Cai, W., Hennessy, K., Jones, R.,
improving pavement performance prediction
Mclnnes, K., Nguyen., Page, C. and Whetton,
at a network level due to climate changes
P. (2002). Climate Change in Queensland
represented by changes in Thornthwaite
under Enhanced Greenhouse Conditions,
Moisture Index.
Due to the uncertainty about future human CSIRO.
behaviour and some aspects of climate science, [10] Loizos, A., Roberts, J. & Crank, S. (2002).
Asphalt pavement deterioration models for
precise predictions of climate change are uncertain
mild climatic conditions. Ninth International
and will remain so [5].To reduce uncertainty and
Conference on Asphalt Pavements.
improve confidence of future climate projections
for the purpose of this study, effort is made by Copenhagen, Denmark.
adopting a more reliable projection method. [11] AASHO. (1972). AASHO interim guide for
design of pavement structures, American
This project has examined the effects of long
Association of State Highway Officials,
term climate changes on pavement deterioration in
Washington DC, USA.
SEQ and presents the results of the general trends
[12] Watanatada, T., Harral, C. G., Paterson, W. D.
expected. The findings suggest that decreasing
O., Dhareshwar, A. M., Bhandari, A. &
127
International Journal of GEOMATE, Oct., 2017, Vol.13, Issue 38, pp.120-128
128