Maternal Obesity 2
Maternal Obesity 2
Maternal Obesity 2
Maternal obesity 2
Clinical management of pregnancy in the obese mother:
before conception, during pregnancy, and post partum
Ronald Ching Wan Ma, Maria Ines Schmidt, Wing Hung Tam, Harold David McIntyre, Patrick M Catalano
The global epidemic of obesity has led to an increasing number of obese women of reproductive age. Obesity is Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol 2016;
associated with reduced fertility, and pregnancies complicated by maternal obesity are associated with adverse 4: 1037–49
outcomes, including increased risk of gestational diabetes, pre-eclampsia, preterm birth, instrumental and caesarean Published Online
October 12, 2016
births, infections, and post-partum haemorrhage. The medical and obstetric management of obese women is focused
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/
on identifying, addressing, and preventing some of these associated complications, and is a daunting challenge given S2213-8587(16)30278-9
the high percentage of patients with obesity and few therapeutic options proven to improve outcomes in this See Online/Series
population. The UK’s National Institute for Health and Care Excellence guidelines and the American College of http://www.thelancet.com/
Obstetricians and Gynecologists recommend that all pregnant women follow a healthy diet, and consider at least half series/maternal-obesity
an hour of moderate physical activity per day during pregnancy. However, although obese women are often directed See Comment page 966
to seek the advice of a nutritionist and to limit gestational weight gain, guidelines for the management of pregnancy This is the second in a Series of
and delivery in this high-risk group are lacking. The post-partum period represents an important opportunity to four papers about maternal
obesity
optimise maternal health before the next pregnancy. As many of the physiological changes of pregnancy associated
Department of Medicine and
with maternal obesity are present from early pregnancy onward, reducing maternal obesity before conception is Therapeutics
probably the best strategy to decrease the health burden associated with maternal obesity. (Prof R C W Ma FRCP); Hong Kong
Institute of Diabetes and
Introduction metabolic health and fertility and decrease early Obesity (Prof R C W Ma);
Li Ka Shing Institute of Health
Maternal obesity, a nutritional and metabolic life-course pregnancy loss, as well as screening for medical problems Sciences (Prof R C W Ma); and
condition, has become an important public health such as diabetes. In early pregnancy, setting guidelines Department of Obstetrics and
problem, with consequences to the health and wellbeing for gestational weight gain through healthy eating and Gynaecology, The Chinese
of both mother and child (table 1).1–4 physical activity, and screening for fetal structural defects University of Hong Kong,
Hong Kong Special
Traditionally considered a problem of high-income is warranted. In mid-pregnancy, screening for obstetric Administrative Region, China
countries, maternal obesity has received greater attention conditions, such as gestational diabetes and pre- (W H Tam MD); Universidade
in low-income and middle-income countries (LMICs) in eclampsia, needs to be initiated in all pregnancies. As Federal do Rio Grande do Sul,
recent years. A systematic review and meta-analysis of gestation advances, preparation for delivery should Port Alegre, Brazil
(M I Schmidt MD); Mater Clinical
population-based cohort studies done in LMICs include assessment for fetal overgrowth, timing of School and Mater Research,
documents a double burden: maternal underweight is delivery, anaesthesia consultation, and assurance that the The University of Queensland,
associated with higher risk of preterm, low birthweight, delivery suite is appropriately staffed and equipped. Brisbane, QLD, Australia
and small for gestational age (SGA) birth, and by Intra-partum decisions regarding the course of labour, (H D McIntyre MD); and Center
for Reproductive Health, Case
contrast, maternal obesity increases the risk of caesarean delivery, and prophylactic antibiotics should be Western Reserve University and
gestational diabetes, pregnancy-induced hypertension, addressed. Post-partum attention in women who are MetroHealth Medical Center,
pre-eclampsia, caesarean delivery, and post-partum obese should be directed to the increased risk of Cleveland, OH, USA
(Prof P M Catalano MD)
haemorrhage.5,6 In 2008, there were almost three venous thromboembolism, difficulty with lactation,
overweight or obese women of childbearing age for each contraception, and depression. In addition to the need Correspondence to:
Prof Ronald C W Ma, Department
underweight woman in LMICs,7 which raises the for obstetric and medical expertise, very real practical of Medicine and Therapeutics,
question of whether maternal overweight is now more challenges exist in managing pregnancies in this ever- The Chinese University of
important than maternal underweight in influencing the increasing population, including involving occupational Hong Kong, Hong Kong Special
long-term chronic disease burden in these countries.8 health-care professionals in care delivery, and various Administrative Region, China
[email protected]
Table 2 classifies maternal overweight and obesity logistical challenges regarding the availability of
or
according to maternal BMI. appropriate facilities and equipment that could be
Prof Patrick M Catalano, Center
The optimal clinical management of the obese needed in providing care to this patient group.
for Reproductive Health, Case
pregnant woman involves care beyond that afforded to Western Reserve University and
the non-obese pregnant woman. Ideally, care should be Nutrition, lifestyle modification, and Metro Health Medical Center,
provided before, during, and after the pregnancy (figure). management of gestational weight gain Cleveland, OH 44109, USA
[email protected]
Although we believe that detailing routine obstetric Weight gain is an essential aspect of pregnancy, but
management is beyond the scope of this Review, we aim excessive gestational weight gain is associated with
to address issues that are of particular concern for the adverse pregnancy outcomes. Based on population-
obstetric management of obese women. These issues based studies, weight gain in pregnant adults is
include preconception weight management to improve inversely related to maternal pregravid BMI.9 An
per day, from at least 1 month before conception and Table 3: US Institute of Medicine recommendations for gestational weight gain depending on the before
continuing during the first trimester).23 pregnancy BMI
A systematic review on lifestyle interventions to
manage weight during pregnancy found a significant
reduction in gestational weight gain (mean difference Diagnosis and management of gestational
–1·42 kg; 95% CI –0·95 to –1·89 kg; I²=80%) compared diabetes and diabetes in pregnancy
with the control group, with some suggestion of Diagnosis of gestational diabetes is increased in women
improved pregnancy outcomes for pre-eclampsia, with class I obesity (BMI 30–34·9 kg/m²; odds ratio
shoulder dystocia, gestational hypertension, and preterm [OR] 2·6, 95% CI 2·1–3·4) and class II obesity
birth.24 However, two large-scale RCTs, LIMIT25 and (BMI ≥35 kg/m²; OR 4·0, 3·1–5·2) compared with
UPBEAT,26 reported modest or no improvements in women with a BMI less than 30 kg/m².32 Hyperglycaemia
pregnancy outcomes, such as frequency of gestational in women with gestational diabetes is a result of an
diabetes or large for gestational age (LGA) infants, inadequate insulin response relative to decreased insulin
despite improvements in maternal diet and physical sensitivity. In general, obese women have decreased
activity, highlighting the fact that initiating lifestyle insulin sensitivity before and during pregnancy
changes during the second and third trimester of compared with normal weight women, which partly
pregnancy could be too late to alter the course of explains the increased incidence of gestational diabetes
pregnancy outcomes.1 The results of the Finnish in this population.
Gestational Diabetes Prevention Study (RADIEL),27 of An international consensus regarding the process and
269 obese women with a history of gestational diabetes, criteria for diagnosis of gestational diabetes remains
found that improvements in physical activity and dietary elusive, although the updated WHO criteria33 are the
quality reduced gestational diabetes incidence, but again most widely accepted worldwide. Table 4 shows the major
had no effect on maternal (eg, pre-eclampsia, gestational approaches for screening and diagnosis. One point of
hypertension) or neonatal (eg, birthweight) outcomes. agreement is that all obese women should be tested.
Interventions that are initiated before conception or Screening for gestational diabetes is generally recom-
during the first trimester might be more effective.27–30 mended at 24–28 weeks’ gestation, and screening for
Further discussions of the effect of lifestyle interventions both gestational diabetes and overt diabetes in early
during pregnancy can be found in a comment gestation should be considered among obese women,
accompanying this Series.31 women with impaired glucose tolerance, or those with a
Early pregnancy testing Standard gestational diabetes Criteria for diagnosing gestational diabetes
test (second to third trimester)
WHO* (global) Yes. Diabetes and gestational 75 g OGTT Any of the following: fasting glucose concentration
diabetes ≥5·1 mmol/L; 1 h OGTT concentration ≥10·0 mmol/L;
2 h OGTT ≥8·5 mmol/L
ACOG* (USA) Yes in presence of risk factors, Two step: non-fasting 50 g glucose Fasting glucose concentration ≥5·3 mmol/L; for OGTT:
including maternal BMI ≥30 kg/m², challenge test, followed by 100 g 1 h glucose ≥10·0 mmol/L; 2 h glucose ≥8·6 mmol/L;
history of gestational diabetes OGTT if glucose challenge test 3 h glucose ≥7·8 mmol/L (two values ≥ threshold for
≥7·8 mmol/L diagnosis)
ADA (USA) Not specified WHO or ACOG approach* WHO or ACOG criteria*
Endocrine Society Yes. Aimed at detection of overt 75 g OGTT Any of the following: fasting glucose concentration
(USA) diabetes ≥5·1 mmol/L; 1 h OGTT ≥10·0 mmol/L; 2 h OGTT ≥8·5 mmol/L
NICE (UK) Only if previous gestational 75 g OGTT Either of these values: fasting glucose concentration
diabetes ≥5·6 mmol/L; 2 h OGTT ≥7·8 mmol/L
EBCOG (Europe) Yes. Aimed at detection of overt Either WHO or ACOG approach* Fasting glucose concentration* ≥5·1 mmol/L; 1 h OGTT
diabetes ≥10·0 mmol/L; 2 h OGTT ≥8·5 mmol/L
OGTT=oral glucose tolerance test. ACOG=American College of Obstetrics and Gynecology. ADA=American Diabetes Association. NICE=National Institute for Health and Care
Excellence. EBCOG=European Board and College of Obstetrics and Gynaecology. *Using the approach or criteria defined by WHO and ACOG.
history of gestational diabetes. The need to detect pre- maternal and neonatal outcomes,43 and thus the specific
existing diabetes in pregnancy is highlighted in contribution of each is difficult to disentangle.
guidelines from the UK, Europe, USA, and WHO Two large RCTs41,42 and a subsequent systematic
(table 4).34–37 Whether screening or management of review44 demonstrated that in women with gestational
gestational diabetes in early pregnancy is of clinical value diabetes, interventions based primarily on dietary
or is cost-effective is unclear;38 however, studies using the modification (with addition of insulin therapy if
Gestational Diabetes Formulas for Cost-Effectiveness glycaemic goals were not achieved) reduced the
(GeDiForCE) model suggest that standard screening prevalence of LGA infants, pre-eclampsia, and shoulder
(between the second and third trimester) and treatment dystocia. A secondary analysis of one study45 reported
is highly cost-effective in both an Indian and Israeli that reduction in excess fetal growth was related to
setting, especially if long-term effects are taken into maternal BMI, with greater reductions reported in
account.39 Studies to examine the benefit of early women in the overweight and obese class I and II BMI
gestational diabetes diagnosis and treatment are categories and no reduction in women of normal weight
underway (eg, NCT01926457, NCT01864564, and or with class III obesity. However, long-term follow-up
NCT02708758). of these studies has not shown any benefit in terms of
Hyperglycaemia in pregnancy requires immediate action the reduction of childhood obesity.46,47 A multicentre
for its control and for the detection of possible chronic cohort study from Japan48 reported lower rates of LGA
complications.36,40 The primary maternal management infants in obese women than in normal weight or
outcome in all women with gestational diabetes is to overweight women with gestational diabetes treated by
maintain normoglycaemia. However, little evidence exists dietary intervention with or without insulin. However,
to support key accepted practices in the treatment of hypertensive disorders, caesarean section, and induction
gestational diabetes, and even less to support specific of labour were more common in the obese group than
treatment regimens in obese women with the disease. the normal weight group.
Clinical practice varies substantially within and between Optimising maternal nutrition is the cornerstone for
countries partly because of the scarcity of the evidence good maternal and offspring outcomes, although this
base.36,40 For example, glibenclamide remains the approach becomes even more important in the presence
recommended oral drug in the USA,36 whereas metformin of maternal obesity or gestational diabetes, for which
appears to be much more commonly prescribed in the medical nutritional therapy is the first-line treatment.23,40
UK.34 Normalisation of maternal glucose in pregnancies Information regarding the ideal diet for treatment of
complicated by gestational diabetes has been shown to gestational diabetes has been reviewed in detail.49
decrease the incidence of pre-eclampsia and prevent Comparisons of low versus high glycaemic index (GI)
neonatal outcomes such as stillbirth and fetal over- diets50–52 or a low GI versus a conventional high fibre,
growth.41,42 No evidence exists with regard to the recom- moderate GI diet53 showed no differences in LGA infants,
mended weight gain specific to pregnancies complicated macrosomia, or other key outcomes, although Moses and
by diabetes. However, although insulin resistance is a colleagues52 reported that a low GI diet might reduce the
common feature, maternal obesity and gestational need for insulin therapy. Other dietary options, including
diabetes have both independent and additive effects on energy restriction,54,55 low carbohydrate intake,56 and high
monounsaturated fat intake,57 have also not shown world, and local practice often varies depending on
specific benefits. A general recommendation for available resources and reimbursement policies. In our
medical nutritional therapy in gestational diabetes is a opinion, all obese patients should be considered to have
“carbohydrate-controlled meal plan that promotes a detailed fetal anatomy ultrasound scan to screen for
adequate nutrition with appropriate weight gain, anomalies in the mid-second trimester. Routine
normoglycaemia, and the absence of ketosis”,58 although ultrasound detects 46·2% of structural anomalies with
data to provide evidence-based recommendations for a normal karyotype, but detection rates decreased
most of the nutrition interventions are insufficient.40 significantly with an increasing maternal BMI
Despite not being specifically outlined as a therapy (p=0·007).76 The odds of detection of any anomaly were
intervention in the two RCTs previously mentioned,41,42 lower in obese women than those with a normal BMI
exercise is frequently recommended as a mainstay of (adjusted OR 0·77, 95% CI 0·60–0·99; p=0·046).76
treatment in gestational diabetes for pregnant women, Factors associated with the decreased ability to diagnose
with a general recommendation of 30 min of exercise per congenital anomalies include distance from the skin
day.36,40,59,60 But again, evidence is sparse, with the few surface to the fetus, resolution or penetration of
published clinical trials focusing on glycaemic control sonographic equipment, prolonged time to complete
rather than on pregnancy outcomes.61–63 the examination, and experience of the sonographer.77
Insulin was the only drug used in these two RCTs,41,42 Potential ways to optimise image quality include a
and is clearly the most established drug in women with vaginal approach in the first trimester, use of the
gestational diabetes who do not meet glycaemic goals maternal umbilicus as an acoustic window, tissue
after lifestyle modification. The potential use of the oral harmonic imaging, compound imaging, and speckle
antidiabetic drugs glibenclamide and metformin in reduction filters.77,78 Accuracy of fetal weight estimates
gestational diabetes has been systematically reviewed.64 using ultrasound increases with advancing gestation
Glibenclamide was reported to increase risks of LGA and is greater in women with a BMI less than
infants, macrosomia, and neonatal hypoglycaemia 25 kg/m².79 Referral of obese women to tertiary centres
compared with insulin.65–67 In a retrospective analysis of for expert scans might be helpful, if available.
a population-based cohort of 110 879 women with Different options of screening for aneuploidy are
gestational diabetes from a nationwide insurance now available,80 and first trimester screening in all
database from the USA, newborn babies of mothers pregnancies includes nuchal translucency measurement,
treated with glibenclamide had an increased risk for serum-free β-human chorionic gonadotrophin, or
neonatal intensive care unit admissions, as well as total human chorionic gonadotrophin coupled with
respiratory distress, hypoglycaemia, birth injury, and pregnancy-associated plasma protein A levels, although
LGA infants compared with those treated with insulin.68 cell-free DNA (cfDNA) screening is increasingly being
Metformin was associated with lower maternal weight used.80 Obesity affects the measures of serum analytes
gain, more preterm births, less pregnancy-induced used to screen for aneuploidies because of the increased
hypertension, and less severe neonatal hypoglycaemia plasma volume in obese women. Although weight
compared with insulin.69–73 The retrospective analysis adjustment for analytes related to neural tube defects
concluded that glibenclamide was clearly inferior to and trisomy 18 improves detection, this is not the case
both insulin and metformin in the treatment of for Down’s syndrome.81 In a general population with
gestational diabetes.68 Detailed studies of antidiabetic prenatal testing for trisomies 21 and 18, the false-positive
drugs to inform future clinical practice would be rate with cfNDA was significantly lower than with
extremely valuable. standard screening. The positive predictive value for
cfDNA was also better for trisomy 21 and trisomy 18.80
Surveillance of congenital malformation
Offspring of obese mothers have an increased risk of Coexisting medical problems
congenital anomalies including neural tube defects and Obese women should be screened for pre-existing
cardiovascular anomalies compared with offspring born hypertension and proteinuria at their initial antenatal visit,
to mothers of a normal weight.74 The underlying which is recommended for all women. An appropriate size
metabolic factors that account for this increased risk are of arm cuff should be used and the cuff size used should
not well understood. Although maternal folate status and be documented in the medical records.20 Women with
preconception glucose intolerance have been primary suspected obstructive sleep apnoea (snoring, excessive
theories, no definitive mechanism has been identified.75 daytime sleepiness, witnessed apnoea, or unexplained
A multidisciplinary approach before conception is hypoxia) should be referred for assessment.82 Obstructive
therefore necessary, since many women do not initiate sleep apnoea can be a problem at delivery because of the
antenatal care until after fetal organogenesis is potential complications associated with anaesthesia with
completed.31 caesarean delivery. Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease is the
No general guidelines are available on the use of most common liver disorder in developed countries,
ultrasound during pregnancy for most parts of the usually presenting as elevated liver function tests.83 This
diagnosis is important because unless recognised early in potential indication for induction of labour. Induction of
gestation, abnormal liver function tests later in gestation labour for suspected LGA infants does not increase the
might be confused with complications of pre-eclampsia— risk of caesarean delivery, but reduces the risk of
ie, HELLP syndrome (haemolysis, elevated liver enzyme shoulder dystocia and associated morbidity compared
scores, and low platelet counts). with expectant management.91 Unfortunately, the ability
The risk of pre-eclampsia is twice as high in pregnant of ultrasound to accurately estimate fetal weight at the
women who are obese compared with those of healthy upper limits of fetal growth is poor, and the reported
weight.84 Although no proven methods to prevent pre- accuracy range is between 47% and 64%.92 Mothers
eclampsia are known, avoiding excessive gestational should be informed about the increased risks involved
weight gain and tight control of diabetes in obese women with induction of labour, including caesarean section,
could be beneficial.24 WHO has recommended that decreased ability to monitor the fetal heart-rate pattern
women at a high risk of pre-eclampsia (including those (which reflects fetal metabolic status), wound infection,
with previous pre-eclampsia, diabetes, or obesity) from and primary post-partum haemorrhage.
areas with low dietary calcium intake should take calcium Infants of obese women are at an increased risk for
supplements during pregnancy, and low-dose aspirin at fetal macrosomia, specifically increased body fat
75 mg per day should be considered for prophylaxis.85 compared with infants of normal weight women.93,94
Obese women are at increased risk of venous thrombo- Although the assessment of macrosomia by clinical
embolism,86 and thus thromboprophylaxis assessment examination or ultrasound-based estimates of fetal
should be done in obese pregnant women at clinical en- weight lacks precision, prophylactic caesarean section
counters throughout the pregnancy and after. Although can be considered for suspected fetal macrosomia with
detailed description of the management of different estimated fetal weight greater than 5 kg in women
obstetric complications is beyond the scope of this without diabetes or greater than 4·5 kg in women with
Review, it is important to note that obstetric complications diabetes to avoid obstructed labour.95
are more common in obese women, and need to be Obese women have an increased risk of stillbirth,
screened for with greater vigilance, and managed shoulder dystocia, peri-partum or post-partum haemor-
according to established guidelines. rhage, and of late complications including pelvic floor
prolapse and fistulae. The length of labour in nulliparous
Preterm delivery women is also correlated to maternal BMI;96 in a study
Indicated preterm deliveries in overweight and obese adjusting for appropriate covariates, the median duration
women are more common (relative risk [RR] 1·30, of labour from 4 cm to 10 cm was significantly longer in
95% CI 1·23–1·37) than in women of normal weight87 obese women compared with women of normal weight
because of ante-partum complications. Many studies do (7·5 h vs 6·2 h).97 However, the second stage of labour
not differentiate between indicated and spontaneous was not different between normal, overweight, and obese
preterm delivery, but this distinction is important women. The underlying cause of increased length of
because of the 2·7 times increased risk of spontaneous labour in obese women is unknown.
preterm birth between 22 weeks and 27 weeks of 30% of obese women are at an increased risk of a
gestation88 in women with a BMI of 40 kg/m² or more. prolonged pregnancy (>290 days) compared with 17% of
The use of progesterone supplementation has been normal weight women, and obese women have an
shown to decrease the risk of preterm delivery in women increased rate of labour induction.98 Induction failure rates
with risk factors (such as previous preterm delivery or are associated with increasing obesity from 13% in normal
short cervical length). A secondary analysis of the weight women to 29% in class III obese women.99 In one
Maternal Fetal Medicine Units’ trial of 17-hydroxy- meta-analysis, the unadjusted OR of caesarean delivery
progesterone caproate showed a non-significant was 2·05 (95% CI 1·86–2·27) for women with class I
increased risk of preterm birth (RR 1·55, 95% CI obesity, and 2·89 (2·28–3·79) for women with class II
0·93–2·89) in women with a BMI over 30 kg/m².89 or III obesity compared with normal weight women.100
However, studies also support elective induction at term
Labour and clinical issues of delivery instead of expectant management in those presenting with
In pregnant women who are obese, the timing, method anticipated LGA neonates.91,101 Nonetheless, the association
of delivery, and the peri-partum management plan between induced labour and higher rates of emergency
should be discussed in light of any other obesity-related caesarean delivery should be discussed with the mother
obstetric complications, such as gestational diabetes and before elective induction of labour at term.
macrosomia.90 Because of the multiple medical and In view of a high risk of either elective or emergency
obstetric problems associated with obesity and caesarean delivery, obese women, especially those with
pregnancy, scheduled induction of labour is common in obstructive sleep apnoea, should have an anaesthetic
obese women. In addition to potential maternal assessment in late gestation. Epidural or spinal
conditions such as pre-eclampsia and gestational anaesthesia is recommended, although this procedure
diabetes, fetal conditions such as LGA are an additional might be technically difficult in an obese woman.
Delivery during subsequent pregnancies is also enough to rapidly move patients, power lifts to move
complicated by maternal obesity. Success rates of patients from the bed to the operating table, and
vaginal births after previous caesarean delivery are appropriately sized operating instruments to access
inversely related to BMI: less than 19·8 kg/m² (83·1%), proper tissue planes.
19·8–26 kg/m² (79·9%), 26·1–29 kg/m² (69·3%), and
more than 29 kg/m² (68·2%; p<0·001). Similarly, Management of peri-partum complications
gestational weight gain exceeding 18 kg is associated Obese women remain at increased risk of complications
with a decreased success rate of vaginal birth after after delivery. Because of the increased risk of venous
caesarean or trial of labour after caesarean (66·8% vs thromboembolism, pneumatic compression stockings
79·1%, p<0·001).102 BMI class III women undergoing before and after caesarean delivery should be considered
labour after caesarean had greater composite morbidity in obese post-partum women, in addition to early
(prolonged hospital stay, endometritis, rupture or ambulation. Weight-adjusted postnatal thromboprophy-
dehiscence, and neonatal injury including fractures, laxis is now recommended by the Royal College of
brachial plexus injuries, and lacerations) compared Obstetrics and Gynaecology for all women with class III
with class III women having elective caesarean delivery, obesity, and all other obese women with one or more
but absolute morbidities were low in both groups.103 additional risk factors—eg, advanced maternal age,
Class III obese women have a significantly increased history of caesarean section, preterm delivery, and post-
risk of post-partum atonic haemorrhage (>1000 mL) partum haemorrhage. The duration of thromboprophy-
after a vaginal delivery (5·2%) compared with normal laxis with low-molecular-weight heparin should be
weight women (4·4%), and it is more pronounced after extended if there are more than three risk factors, or if
instrumental delivery (13·6%) compared with normal the risk factors are persistent.86
weight women (8·8%).104 Successful breastfeeding in obese women has multiple
Women with a BMI of 45 kg/m² or more have a two to barriers, including the physical issues of large breast size
four times increased risk of postoperative wound and increased risk of caesarean delivery. The need for
infection.105 The choice of skin incision for primary neonates of obese women to be assessed in the intensive
caesarean section in class II and III obese women care nursuries represents an additional barrier to breast-
remains controversial. Although one study reported that feeding compared with normal weight women. Obese
a vertical skin incision was associated with a higher rate post-partum women can also have a decrease in their
of wound complications than a transverse incision,106 a first phase of milk production. Despite these obstacles,
multicentre registry study suggested that vertical skin breastfeeding should be encouraged in obese women,
incision was associated with a lower wound complication not only because of the potential benefits to neonates,
rate in class III obese patients after adjustment for but also potential maternal benefits relating to post-
confounding factors.107 To prevent postoperative wound partum weight reduction.112 This process can be facilitated
complications, closure of the subcutaneous layer is through appropriate specialist advice and support during
recommended when the fat layer is more than 2 cm.108 the antenatal and postnatal period to help overcome
Placement of a subcutaneous drain is not recommended.109 difficulties with breastfeeding, including early
The standard for prophylactic antibiotics after delivery termination.20
is 1 g of cefazolin to patients with a BMI less than During pregnancy, prevalence of depression was 33%
30 kg/m², but 2 g for those with a BMI of 30 kg/m² or among obese women and 23% among normal weight
more. The regimen was supported by a study showing women. Post-partum depression was present in 13% of
adequate antibiotic concentrations (above the minimum obese women compared with 10% in women of normal
inhibitory concentration) in adipose tissue.110 Clinical weight.113 ACOG recommends that all pregnant women
practice guidelines from Canada, for example, should be screened at least once for depression in the
recommend that clinicians consider doubling the post-partum period. When clinically significant
antibiotic dose in the setting of a maternal BMI more depression is diagnosed the care provider should either
than 35 kg/m².111 initiate treatment or refer the patient as needed.114
Finally, given the aforementioned risks, consideration The increased pregnancy complications associated
should be made for proper equipment, facilities, and with obesity are a harbinger of future metabolic
staff for the care and safety of obese pregnant women in dysfunction in these women. Weight gain in excess of
labour. These include, but are not limited to, large chairs, the IOM guidelines, which occurs in 63% of class I obese
blood pressure measuring devices, and birthing beds women,10,115 is a key risk factor for post-partum weight
capable of supporting 200–300 kg or more. Similarly, retention.116 In turn, weight gain increases the risk of
because of the increased need for caesarean delivery future metabolic dysfunction and increases pregravid
among obese pregnant women, operating tables should obesity with future pregnancies. Of note, although
accommodate weights up to 400 kg, yet allow surgeons gestational weight gain and pregravid obesity are
ready access to the operating field. Other considerations interrelated, only increased pregravid obesity is
for the care of obese woman include doors that are wide associated with early termination of breastfeeding.117
implement a transdisciplinary approach involving a 14 Hedderson M, Ehrlich S, Sridhar S, et al. Racial/ethnic disparities
in the prevalence of gestational diabetes mellitus by BMI.
variety of health-care providers, including nutritionists, Diabetes Care 2012; 35: 1492–98.
exercise physiologists, and behavioural scientists, will be 15 Farrar D, Fairley L, Santorelli G, et al. Association between
key to efforts to combat maternal obesity and its long- hyperglycaemia and adverse perinatal outcomes in south Asian and
term effect on non-communicable diseases and other white British women: analysis of data from the Born in Bradford
cohort. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol 2015; 3: 795–804.
associated complications. 16 Deputy NP, Sharma AJ, Kim SY. Gestational weight gain—
Contributors United States, 2012 and 2013. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2015;
RCWM and PMC conceived the project. All authors contributed to the 64: 1215–20.
literature search, data collection and interpretation, writing, and critical 17 Artal R, Lockwood CJ, Brown HL. Weight gain recommendations in
revision of the manuscript. All authors revised and accepted the final pregnancy and the obesity epidemic. Obstet Gynecol 2010; 115: 152–55.
version. 18 Kapadia MZ, Park CK, Beyene J, et al. Weight loss instead of weight
gain within the guidelines in obese women during pregnancy:
Declaration of interests a systematic review and meta-analyses of maternal and infant
HDM reports personal fees from Novo Nordisk, AstraZeneca Australia, outcomes. PLoS One 2015; 10: e0132650.
and Eli Lilly Australia, outside the submitted work. All other authors 19 Catalano PM, Mele L, Landon MB, et al. Inadequate weight gain in
declare no competing interests. overweight and obese pregnant women: what is the effect on fetal
growth? Am J Obstet Gynecol 2014; 211: 137.
Acknowledgments
20 Modder J, Fitzsimons KJ. CMACE/RCOG joint
RCWM acknowledges support from the Research Grants Council
guideline-management of women with obesity in pregnancy.
General Research Fund (CU471713, CU14110415), the European London: Centre for Maternal and Child Enquiries and the Royal
Foundation for the Study of Diabetes (EFSD)/Chinese Diabetes Society College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists, 2010.
(CDS)/Lilly Collaborative Research Programme, and the Research 21 Brownfoot FC, Davey MA, Kornman L. Routine weighing to reduce
Grants Council Theme-based Research Scheme (T12–402/13-N). excessive antenatal weight gain: a randomised controlled trial.
PMC acknowledges support from the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National BJOG 2016; 123: 254–61.
Institute of Child Health and Development (HD 11089). 22 WHO and Food and Agriculture Organization of the United States.
References Diet, nutrition and the prevention of chronic diseases. WHO
1 Catalano P, de Mouzon SH. Maternal obesity and metabolic risk to technical report series. Geneva: World Health Organization, 2003.
the offspring: why lifestyle interventions may have not achieved the 23 Hanson MA, Bardsley A, De-Regil LM, et al. The International
desired outcomes. Int J Obes (Lond) 2015; 39: 642–49. Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) recommendations
2 Ma RCW, Gluckman PD, Hanson MA. Maternal obesity and on adolescent, preconception, and maternal nutrition:
developmental priming of risk. In: Mahmood T, Arulkumaran S, “Think Nutrition First”. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2015; 131 (suppl 4): S213.
eds. Obesity: a ticking time bomb for reproductive health, 1st edn. 24 Thangaratinam S, Rogozinska E, Jolly K, et al. Interventions to
London: Elsevier, 2013: 193–212. reduce or prevent obesity in pregnant women: a systematic review.
3 Poston L, Caleyachetty R, Cnattingius S, et al. Preconceptional and Health Technol Assess 2012; 16:1–191.
maternal obesity: epidemiology and health consequences. 25 Dodd JM, Turnbull D, McPhee AJ, et al. Antenatal lifestyle advice
Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol 2016; published online Oct 12. for women who are overweight or obese: LIMIT randomised trial.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S2213-8587(16)30217-0. BMJ 2014; 348: 1285.
4 Godfrey KM, Reynolds RM, Prescott SL, et al. Influence of maternal 26 Poston L, Bell R, Croker H, et al. Effect of a behavioural
obesity on the long-term health of offspring. intervention in obese pregnant women (the UPBEAT study):
Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol 2016; published online Oct 12. a multicentre, randomised controlled trial.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S2213-8587(16)30107-3. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol 2015; 3: 767–77.
5 Rahman MM, Abe SK, Kanda M, et al. Maternal body mass index 27 Koivusalo SB, Rono K, Klemetti MM, et al. Gestational diabetes
and risk of birth and maternal health outcomes in low- and mellitus can be prevented by lifestyle intervention: the Finnish
middle-income countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Gestational Diabetes Prevention Study (RADIEL): a randomized
Obes Rev 2015; 16: 758–70. controlled trial. Diabetes Care 2016; 39: 24–30.
6 Marchi J, Berg M, Dencker A, Olander EK, Begley C. 28 Walsh JM, McGowan CA, Mahony R, Foley ME, McAuliffe FM.
Risks associated with obesity in pregnancy, for the mother and Low glycaemic index diet in pregnancy to prevent macrosomia
baby: a systematic review of reviews. Obes Rev 2015; 16: 621–38. (ROLO study): randomised control trial. BMJ 2012; 345: e5605.
7 Black RE, Victora CG, Walker SP, et al. Maternal and child 29 Simmons D, Jelsma JG, Galjaard S, et al. Results from a European
undernutrition and overweight in low-income and middle-income multicenter randomized trial of physical activity and/or healthy
countries. Lancet 2013; 382: 427–51. eating to reduce the risk of gestational diabetes mellitus:
8 WHO. Obesity: preventing and managing the global the DALI lifestyle pilot. Diabetes Care 2015; 38: 1650–56.
epidemic-report of a WHO consultation. WHO technical report 30 Song C, Li J, Leng J, Ma RC, Yang X. Lifestyle intervention can
series. Geneva: World Health Organization, 2000: 1–268. reduce the risk of gestational diabetes: a meta-analysis of
9 Chu SY, Callaghan WM, Bish CL, D’Angelo D. Gestational weight randomized controlled trials. Obes Rev 2016; published online
gain by body mass index among US women delivering live births, July 15. DOI:10.1111/obr.12442.
2004–2005: fueling future obesity. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2009; 31 Hanson M, Barker M, Dodd JM, et al. Interventions to prevent
200: 271. maternal obesity before conception, during pregnancy, and post
10 Rasmussen KM, Yaktine AL; Institute of Medicine and National partum. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol 2016; published online Oct 12.
Research Council Committee to Reexamine IOM Pregnancy Weight http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S2213-8587(16)30108-5.
Guidelines. Weight gain during pregnancy: reexamining the 32 Weiss JL, Malone FD, Emig D, et al. Obesity, obstetric
guidelines. Washington, DC: National Academies Press, 2009. complications and cesarean delivery rate—a population-based
11 Sewell MF, Huston-Presley L, Amini SB, Catalano PM. Body mass screening study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2004; 190: 1091–97.
index: a true indicator of body fat in obese gravidas. 33 Colagiuri S, Falavigna M, Agarwal MM, et al. Strategies for
J Reprod Med 2007; 52: 907–11. implementing the WHO diagnostic criteria and classification of
12 Berggren EK, Groh-Wargo S, Presley L, Hauguel-de Mouzon S, hyperglycaemia first detected in pregnancy. Diabetes Res Clin Pract
Catalano PM. Maternal fat, but not lean, mass is increased among 2014; 103: 364–72.
overweight/obese women with excess gestational weight gain. 34 NICE. Diabetes in pregnancy: management of diabetes and its
Am J Obstet Gynecol 2016; 214: 745. compliations from preconception to the postnatal period. NICE
13 WHO expert consultation. Appropriate body-mass index for Asian guideline 3. London: National Institute for Health and Care
populations and its implications for policy and intervention Excellence, National Collaborating Centre for Women’s and
strategies. Lancet 2004; 363: 157–63. Children’s health, 2015.
35 Benhalima K, Mathieu C, Damm P, et al. A proposal for the use of 56 Cypryk K, Kaminska P, Kosinski M, Pertynska-Marczewska M,
uniform diagnostic criteria for gestational diabetes in Europe: Lewinski A. A comparison of the effectiveness, tolerability and
an opinion paper by the European Board & College of Obstetrics safety of high and low carbohydrate diets in women with gestational
and Gynaecology (EBCOG). Diabetologia 2015; 58: 1422–29. diabetes. Endokrynol Pol 2007; 58: 314–19.
36 Committee on Practice Bulletins—Obstetrics. Practice bulletin 57 Lauszus FF, Rasmussen OW, Henriksen JE, et al. Effect of a high
number 137: gestational diabetes. Obstet Gynecol 2013; 122: 406–16. monounsaturated fatty acid diet on blood pressure and glucose
37 WHO. Diagnostic criteria and classification of hyperglycaemia first metabolism in women with gestational diabetes mellitus.
detected in pregnancy. Geneva: World Health Organization, 2013. Eur J Clin Nutr 2001; 55: 436–43.
38 Metzger BE, Gabbe SG, Persson B, et al. International association 58 American Dietetic Association. Medical nutrition therapy
of diabetes and pregnancy study groups recommendations on the evidence-based guides for practice: nutrition practice guidelines
diagnosis and classification of hyperglycemia in pregnancy. for gestational diabetes. Chicago, IL: American Dietetic
Diabetes Care 2010; 33: 676–82. Association, 2001.
39 Marseille E, Lohse N, Jiwani A, et al. The cost-effectiveness of 59 Padayachee C, Coombes JS. Exercise guidelines for gestational
gestational diabetes screening including prevention of type 2 diabetes mellitus. World J Diabetes 2015; 6: 1033–44.
diabetes: application of a new model in India and Israel. 60 Blumer I, Hadar E, Hadden DR, et al. Diabetes and pregnancy:
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2013; 26: 802–10. an endocrine society clinical practice guideline.
40 Hod M, Kapur A, Sacks DA, et al. The International Federation of J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2013; 98: 4227–49.
Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) initiative on gestational diabetes 61 Jovanovic-Peterson L, Peterson CM. Is exercise safe or useful for
mellitus: a pragmatic guide for diagnosis, management, and care. gestational diabetic women? Diabetes 1991; 40 (suppl 2): 179–81.
Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2015; 131 (suppl 3): S173. 62 de Barros MC, Lopes MA, Francisco RP, Sapienza AD, Zugaib M.
41 Landon MB, Spong CY, Thom E, et al. A multicenter, randomized Resistance exercise and glycemic control in women with gestational
trial of treatment for mild gestational diabetes. N Engl J Med 2009; diabetes mellitus. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2010; 203: 556 e1–6.
361: 1339–48. 63 Stafne SN, Salvesen KA, Romundstad PR, et al. Regular exercise
42 Crowther CA, Hiller JE, Moss JR, et al. Effect of treatment of during pregnancy to prevent gestational diabetes: a randomized
gestational diabetes mellitus on pregnancy outcomes. N Engl J Med controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol 2012; 119: 29–36.
2005; 352: 2477–86. 64 Balsells M, Garcia-Patterson A, Sola I, et al. Glibenclamide,
43 Catalano PM, McIntyre HD, Cruickshank JK, et al. metformin, and insulin for the treatment of gestational diabetes:
The hyperglycemia and adverse pregnancy outcome study: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ 2015; 350: h102.
associations of GDM and obesity with pregnancy outcomes. 65 Langer O, Conway DL, Berkus MD, Xenakis EM, Gonzales O.
Diabetes Care 2012; 35: 780–86. A comparison of glyburide and insulin in women with gestational
44 Falavigna M, Schmidt MI, Trujillo J, et al. Effectiveness of diabetes mellitus. N Engl J Med 2000; 343: 1134–38.
gestational diabetes treatment: a systematic review with quality of 66 Lain KY, Garabedian MJ, Daftary A, Jeyabalan A. Neonatal
evidence assessment. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 2012; 98: 396–405. adiposity following maternal treatment of gestational diabetes with
45 Casey BM, Mele L, Landon MB, et al. Does maternal body mass glyburide compared with insulin. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2009;
index influence treatment effect in women with mild gestational 200: 501 e1–6.
diabetes? Am J Perinatol 2015; 32: 93–100. 67 Anjalakshi C, Balaji V, Balaji MS, Seshiah V. A prospective study
46 Gillman MW, Oakey H, Baghurst PA, et al. Effect of treatment of comparing insulin and glibenclamide in gestational diabetes
gestational diabetes mellitus on obesity in the next generation. mellitus in Asian Indian women. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 2007;
Diabetes Care 2010; 33: 964–68. 76: 474–75.
47 Landon MB, Rice MM, Varner MW, et al. Mild gestational 68 Camelo Castillo W, Boggess K, Sturmer T, et al. Association of
diabetes mellitus and long-term child health. Diabetes Care 2015; adverse pregnancy outcomes with glyburide vs insulin in women
38: 445–52. with gestational diabetes. JAMA Pediatr 2015; 169: 452–58.
48 Sugiyama T, Nagao K, Metoki H, et al. Pregnancy outcomes of 69 Rowan JA, Hague WM, Gao W, Battin MR, Moore MP.
gestational diabetes mellitus according to pre-gestational BMI in a Metformin versus insulin for the treatment of gestational diabetes.
retrospective multi-institutional study in Japan. Endocr J 2014; N Engl J Med 2008; 358: 2003–15.
61: 373–80. 70 Ijas H, Vaarasmaki M, Morin-Papunen L, et al. Metformin should
49 Han S, Crowther CA, Middleton P, Heatley E. Different types of be considered in the treatment of gestational diabetes: a prospective
dietary advice for women with gestational diabetes mellitus. randomised study. BJOG 2011; 118: 880–85.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2013; 3: CD009275. 71 Niromanesh S, Alavi A, Sharbaf FR, et al. Metformin compared
50 Balas-Nakash M, Rodriguez-Cano A, Munoz-Manrique C, with insulin in the management of gestational diabetes mellitus:
Vasquez-Pena P, Perichart-Perera O. Adherence to a medical a randomized clinical trial. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 2012;
nutrition therapy program in pregnant women with diabetes, 98: 422–29.
measured by three methods, and its association with glycemic 72 Tertti K, Ekblad U, Koskinen P, Vahlberg T, Ronnemaa T.
control. Rev Invest Clin 2010; 62: 235–43 (in Spanish). Metformin vs. insulin in gestational diabetes. A randomized study
51 Grant SM, Wolever TM, O’Connor DL, Nisenbaum R, Josse RG. characterizing metformin patients needing additional insulin.
Effect of a low glycaemic index diet on blood glucose in women Diabetes Obes Metab 2013; 15: 246–51.
with gestational hyperglycaemia. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 2011; 73 Spaulonci CP, Bernardes LS, Trindade TC, Zugaib M, Francisco RP.
91: 15–22. Randomized trial of metformin vs insulin in the management of
52 Moses RG, Barker M, Winter M, Petocz P, Brand-Miller JC. gestational diabetes. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2013; 209: 34.
Can a low-glycemic index diet reduce the need for insulin in 74 Stothard KJ, Tennant PW, Bell R, Rankin J. Maternal overweight
gestational diabetes mellitus? A randomized trial. Diabetes Care and obesity and the risk of congenital anomalies: a systematic
2009; 32: 996–1000. review and meta-analysis. JAMA 2009; 301: 636–50.
53 Louie JC, Markovic TP, Perera N, et al. A randomized controlled 75 Correa A, Marcinkevage J. Prepregnancy obesity and the risk of
trial investigating the effects of a low-glycemic index diet on birth defects: an update. Nutr Rev 2013; 71 (suppl 1): S68–77.
pregnancy outcomes in gestational diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Care 76 Best KE, Tennant PW, Bell R, Rankin J. Impact of maternal body
2011; 34: 2341–46. mass index on the antenatal detection of congenital anomalies.
54 Rae A, Bond D, Evans S, et al. A randomised controlled trial of BJOG 2012; 119: 1503–11.
dietary energy restriction in the management of obese women 77 Weichert J, Hartge DR. Obstetrical sonography in obese women:
with gestational diabetes. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 2000; a review. J Clin Ultrasound 2011; 39: 209–16.
40: 416–22.
78 Walsh JM, McAuliffe FM. Foetal ultrasound in obese pregnancy.
55 Magee MS, Knopp RH, Benedetti TJ. Metabolic effects of 1200-kcal In: Mahmood T, Arulkumaran S, eds. Obesity: a ticking time bomb
diet in obese pregnant women with gestational diabetes. Diabetes for reproductive health, 1st edn. London: Elsevier, 2013: 213–22.
1990; 39: 234–40.
79 Paganelli S, Soncini E, Comitini G, Palomba S, La Sala GB. 104 Blomberg M. Maternal obesity and risk of postpartum hemorrhage.
Sonographic fetal weight estimation in normal and overweight/ Obstet Gynecol 2011; 118: 561–68.
obese healthy term pregnant women by gestation-adjusted 105 Stamilio DM, Scifres CM. Extreme obesity and postcesarean
projection (GAP) method. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2016; 293: 775–81. maternal complications. Obstet Gynecol 2014; 124: 227–32.
80 Anon. Practice bulletin no. 163: screening for fetal aneuploidy. 106 Wall PD, Deucy EE, Glantz JC, Pressman EK. Vertical skin incisions
Obstet Gynecol 2016; 127: e123–37. and wound complications in the obese parturient. Obstet Gynecol
81 Racusin D, Stevens B, Campbell G, Aagaard KM. Obesity and the 2003; 102: 952–56.
risk and detection of fetal malformations. Semin Perinatol 2012; 107 Marrs CC, Moussa HN, Sibai BM, Blackwell SC. The relationship
36: 213–21. between primary cesarean delivery skin incision type and wound
82 Louis J, Auckley D, Bolden N. Management of obstructive sleep complications in women with morbid obesity. Am J Obstet Gynecol
apnea in pregnant women. Obstet Gynecol 2012; 119: 864–68. 2014; 210: 319.
83 Page LM, Girling JC. A novel cause for abnormal liver function tests 108 Chelmow D, Rodriguez EJ, Sabatini MM. Suture closure of
in pregnancy and the puerperium: non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. subcutaneous fat and wound disruption after cesarean delivery:
BJOG 2011; 118: 1532–35. a meta-analysis. Obstet Gynecol 2004; 103: 974–80.
84 Anderson NH, McCowan LM, Fyfe EM, et al. The impact of 109 Machado LS. Cesarean section in morbidly obese parturients:
maternal body mass index on the phenotype of pre-eclampsia: practical implications and complications. N Am J Med Sci 2012;
a prospective cohort study. BJOG 2012; 119: 589–95. 4: 13–18.
85 WHO. WHO recommendations for prevention and treatment of 110 Young OM, Shaik IH, Twedt R, et al. Pharmacokinetics of cefazolin
pre-eclampsia and eclampsia. Geneva: World Health Organization, prophylaxis in obese gravidae at time of cesarean delivery.
2011: 38. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2015; 213: 541.
86 Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. Reducing the 111 van Schalkwyk J, Van Eyk N. Antibiotic prophylaxis in obstetric
risk of venous thromboembolism during pregnancy and the procedures. J Obstet Gynaecol Can 2010; 32: 878–92.
puerperium. London: Royal College of Obstetricians and 112 Gunderson EP, Hurston SR, Ning X, et al. Lactation and progression
Gynaecologists, 2015: 1–40. to type 2 diabetes mellitus after gestational diabetes mellitus:
87 McDonald SD, Han Z, Mulla S, Beyene J. Overweight and obesity a prospective cohort study. Ann Intern Med 2015; 163: 889–98.
in mothers and risk of preterm birth and low birth weight infants: 113 Molyneaux E, Poston L, Ashurst-Williams S, Howard LM.
systematic review and meta-analyses. BMJ 2010; 341: c3428. Obesity and mental disorders during pregnancy and postpartum:
88 Cnattingius S, Villamor E, Johansson S, et al. Maternal obesity and a systematic review and meta-analysis. Obstet Gynecol 2014;
risk of preterm delivery. JAMA 2013; 309: 2362–70. 123: 857–67.
89 Heyborne KD, Allshouse AA, Carey JC. Does 17-alpha 114 Committee on Obstetric Practice. The American College of
hydroxyprogesterone caproate prevent recurrent preterm birth in Obstetricians and Gynecologists Committee opinion no. 630.
obese women? Am J Obstet Gynecol 2015; 213: 844. Screening for perinatal depression. Obstet Gynecol 2015;
90 Anon. Practice bulletin no 156: obesity in pregnancy. 125: 1268–71.
Obstet Gynecol 2015; 126: e112–26. 115 Deputy NP, Sharma AJ, Kim SY, Hinkle SN. Prevalence and
91 Boulvain M, Senat MV, Perrotin F, et al. Induction of labour versus characteristics associated with gestational weight gain adequacy.
expectant management for large-for-date fetuses: a randomised Obstet Gynecol 2015; 125: 773–81.
controlled trial. Lancet 2015; 385: 2600–05. 116 Nehring I, Schmoll S, Beyerlein A, Hauner H, von Kries R.
92 Sandmire HF. Whither ultrasonic prediction of fetal macrosomia? Gestational weight gain and long-term postpartum weight
Obstet Gynecol 1993; 82: 860–62. retention: a meta-analysis. Am J Clin Nutr 2011; 94: 1225–31.
93 Sewell MF, Huston-Presley L, Super DM, Catalano P. 117 Baker JL, Michaelsen KF, Sorensen TI, Rasmussen KM.
Increased neonatal fat mass, not lean body mass, is associated with High prepregnant body mass index is associated with early
maternal obesity. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2006; 195: 1100–03. termination of full and any breastfeeding in Danish women.
94 Hull HR, Dinger MK, Knehans AW, Thompson DM, Fields DA. Am J Clin Nutr 2007; 86: 404–11.
Impact of maternal body mass index on neonate birthweight and 118 NICE. Weight management before, during and after pregnancy.
body composition. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2008; 198: 416. Public health guidelines. NICE guidelines 27. Manchester, UK:
95 American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists; Society for National Institute for Health and Care Excellence, 2010.
Maternal-Fetal Medicine. Obstetric care consensus no. 1: 119 Nascimento SL, Pudwell J, Surita FG, Adamo KB, Smith GN.
safe prevention of the primary cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol The effect of physical exercise strategies on weight loss in
2014; 123: 693–711. postpartum women: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
96 Nuthalapaty FS, Rouse DJ, Owen J. The association of maternal Int J Obes (Lond) 2014; 38: 626–35.
weight with cesarean risk, labor duration, and cervical dilation rate 120 Institute of Medicine. Nutrition during lactation. Washington, DC:
during labor induction. Obstet Gynecol 2004; 103: 452–56. Institute of Medicine, 1991.
97 Vahratian A, Zhang J, Troendle JF, Savitz DA, Siega-Riz AM. 121 Lovelady C. Balancing exercise and food intake with lactation to
Maternal prepregnancy overweight and obesity and the pattern of promote post-partum weight loss. Proc Nutr Soc 2011; 70: 181–84.
labor progression in term nulliparous women. Obstet Gynecol 2004; 122 Amorim AR, Linne YM, Lourenco PM. Diet or exercise, or both, for
104: 943–51. weight reduction in women after childbirth.
98 Arrowsmith S, Wray S, Quenby S. Maternal obesity and labour Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2007; 3: CD005627.
complications following induction of labour in prolonged 123 Agha M, Agha RA, Sandall J. Interventions to reduce and prevent
pregnancy. BJOG 2011; 118: 578–88. obesity in pre-conceptual and pregnant women: a systematic review
99 Wolfe KB, Rossi RA, Warshak CR. The effect of maternal obesity on and meta-analysis. PLoS One 2014; 9: e95132.
the rate of failed induction of labor. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2011; 124 American College of Obstetrics and Gynecologists. ACOG
205: 128. Committee opinion no. 549: obesity in pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol
100 Chu SY, Kim SY, Schmid CH, et al. Maternal obesity and risk of 2013; 121: 213–17.
cesarean delivery: a meta-analysis. Obes Rev 2007; 8: 385–94. 125 Mamun AA, O’Callaghan M, Callaway L, et al. Associations of
101 Darney BG, Snowden JM, Cheng YW, et al. Elective induction of gestational weight gain with offspring body mass index and blood
labor at term compared with expectant management: maternal and pressure at 21 years of age: evidence from a birth cohort study.
neonatal outcomes. Obstet Gynecol 2013; 122: 761–69. Circulation 2009; 119: 1720–27.
102 Juhasz G, Gyamfi C, Gyamfi P, Tocce K, Stone JL. Effect of body 126 Robinson CA, Cohen AK, Rehkopf DH, et al. Pregnancy and
mass index and excessive weight gain on success of vaginal birth post-delivery maternal weight changes and overweight in preschool
after cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol 2005; 106: 741–46. children. Prev Med 2014; 60: 77–82.
103 Hibbard JU, Gilbert S, Landon MB, et al. Trial of labor or repeat 127 Magkos F, Fraterrigo G, Yoshino J, et al. Effects of moderate and
cesarean delivery in women with morbid obesity and previous subsequent progressive weight loss on metabolic function and
cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol 2006; 108: 125–33. adipose tissue biology in humans with obesity. Cell Metab 2016;
23: 591–601.
128 Maggard MA, Yermilov I, Li Z, et al. Pregnancy and fertility 133 van der Pligt P, Willcox J, Hesketh KD, et al. Systematic review of
following bariatric surgery: a systematic review. JAMA 2008; lifestyle interventions to limit postpartum weight retention:
300: 2286–96. implications for future opportunities to prevent maternal
129 American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. overweight and obesity following childbirth. Obes Rev 2013;
ACOG practice bulletin no. 105: bariatric surgery and pregnancy. 14: 792–805.
Obstet Gynecol 2009; 113: 1405–13. 134 WHO. Interim report of the commission on ending childhood
130 Despres JP, Lemieux I. Abdominal obesity and metabolic obesity. Geneva: World Health Organization, 2015: 1–30.
syndrome. Nature 2006; 444: 881–87. 135 International Diabetes Federation. IDF diabetes atlas, 7th edn.
131 Kramer CK, Zinman B, Retnakaran R. Are metabolically healthy Brussels: International Diabetes Federation, 2015.
overweight and obesity benign conditions?: A systematic review and 136 Keely E. An opportunity not to be missed–how do we improve
meta-analysis. Ann Intern Med 2013; 159: 758–69. postpartum screening rates for women with gestational diabetes?
132 Ruifrok AE, Rogozinska E, van Poppel MN, et al. Study protocol: Diabetes Metab Res Rev 2012; 28: 312–16.
differential effects of diet and physical activity based interventions 137 Venkataraman H, Sattar N, Saravanan P. Postnatal testing following
in pregnancy on maternal and fetal outcomes—individual patient gestational diabetes: time to replace the oral glucose tolerance test?
data (IPD) meta-analysis and health economic evaluation. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol 2015; 3: 754–56.
Syst Rev 2014; 3: 131.