Workshop Constructivism Introductory Unit

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 8

CONSTRUCTIVISM

FROM THEORY TO PRACTICE

INTRODUCTORY UNIT
MAP OF THE COURSE

OBJECTIVES

By the end of this course, you will:

Understand the general principles of constructivism


Be aware of the differences between a traditional class and a student-centred
class
Acknowledge the role of the students and the teacher in a student-centred
classroom and identify them in a video
Identify main exponents and their models
Be acquainted with the strategies used in a student-centred class
Reflect upon evaluation in a constructivist class
Discover features of the constructivist approach in a video
Design activities consistent with constructivist evaluation principles

CONTENTS

In order to achieve the objectives above, we will discuss:

Unit I Constructivism.
1.1. Definition and principles
1.2. The constructivist teacher
1.3. Instructional strategies

Unit II The Constructivist approach. Main models and exponents


2.1. Piaget’s developmental learning theory
2.2. Vygotsky’s socio-cultural learning theory
2.3. Bruner’s discovery learning theory
2.4. Ausubel’s meaningful learning theory
2.5. Novak’s concept mapping theory

Unit III Teaching contexts


3.1. The traditional class
3.2. A student-centred class
3.3. The role of the teacher and the students
3.4. Interactions in the class

Unit IV. Evaluation of the learning process in constructivist settings


Pre-assessment techniques
Strategies and tools to evaluate the students’ performance
CONCEPT MAP
CONSTRUCTIVISM
POSITS THAT

LEARNING
IS AN

CONSTRUCTIION
ACTIVE
PROCESS OF

IN WHICH

LEARNERS BRING

THEIR
UNIQUE PRIOR EXPERIENCE
KNOWLEDGE AND BELIEFS

TO A
LEARNING
SITUATION

CREATED BY MEANS OF

TEACHING
STRATEGIES

THAT ENSURE
THE USE OF
DAILY
OBJECTIVES VISUAL
ADVANCE AIDS
ORGANIZERS HANDS ON
EXPERIENCE

IN THE PRESENTATION AND


DEVELOPMENT OF TEACHING
CONTENTS AND MATERIALS

AND

EVALUATION TOOLS THAT GUARANTEE PRINCIPLES


THAT ENCOURAGE MEANINGFULNESS, AUTONOMY
AND SOCIAL INTERACTION, AMONG OTHER
CONSTRUCTIVIST BELIEFS
LINKS: The concepts covered in this unit will introduce you to the world of cognitive
learning, area of discussion that will be enlarged along the following units

KEY WORDS: Meaningful learning- prior knowledge- organizers- hands-on


experience-zone of proximal development-scaffolding-discovery learning-dialogical
learning

COMPULSORY BIBLIOGRAPHY

Agrawall, S. (2010) Constructivist Pedagogy in ELT Classroom. ELTWEEKLY.


Available at: http://www.eltweekly.com/elt-newsletter/2010/11/74-research-
article-constructivist-pedagogy-in-elt-classroom-by-dr-s-k-agrawal/

Paniagua, M. (2009).Introducción al enfoque constructivista: Conociendo a


Vigotsky, Piaget, Ausubel y Novak. [Video]. Available at:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-
YpCocmWxPA&playnext=1&list=PL2BA4CDCA6833CC30

Karagiorgi, Y., Street, I., & Tziambazi, E. (2005). Translating Constructivism into
Instructional Design : Potential and Limitations Constructivism – An overview of
the learning theory. Educational Technology & Society, 8(1), 17-27. Citeseer.
Retrieved from http://www.fmhs.auckland.ac.nz/faculty/ltu/pdfs/karagiorgi.pdf

SEDL (Southeast Educational Development Laboratory: Technology Assistance


Program). [s.f.] A Brief Introduction to constructivism. Available at:
http://www.sedl.org/pubs/tec26/intro2c.html

Serrano, D & Valero Borras, V.(2008). Strategies for meaningful learning in L2


writing. UAM-A. Available at
http://www.anupi.org.mx/PDF/08008_VidaSerrano.pdf

Bureau of Educational and cultural Affairs. Department of State, Washington DC.


[s.f.] Shaping the way we teach: successful practices around d the world.
Module 1: Contextualizing language .[video] Office of English Language
Programs
Edutopia.org.(2010) Five-Year-Olds Pilot Their Own Project[ video]
Learning.youtube
http://www.youtubedownloaderonline.com/?URL=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v
=_eyucHMifto

SUPLEMENTARY BIBLIOGRAHPY

Ausubel, P., & Ivie, S. D. (1998). Ausubel’s Learning Theory: An Approach To


Teaching Higher Order Thinking Skills.(educational psychologist David Paul
Ausubel). Stanley D. Ivie. High School Journal, 1(Oct).
Birbili, M. (2006) Mapping Knowledge: Concept Maps in Early Childhood Education
ECAP Available at: http://ecrp.uiuc.edu/v8n2/birbili.html

Boeree, G. (2006). Jean Piaget: Personality theories. Psychology Department


Shippensburg University. Available at :
http://webspace.ship.edu/cgboer/piaget.html

Bruner, J. (1960). The process of education. New York: Vintage Book

Charalambos,Vrasidas. (2000). Constructivism versus objectivism: implications for


interaction, course design and evaluation in distance education International
Journal of Educational Telecommunications. Available at:
http://www.cardet.org/vrasidas/pubs/continuum.pdf

Company, A. P. (2005). Beyond constructivism  : Exploring future learning


paradigms. Aries, (2), 1-11.

Driscoll, M. (2005). Psychology of Learning for Instruction. Toronto, ON: Pearson

Gotbeter, G. (2007). Vigotsky: aportes para pensar la enseñanza. Revista


12(ntes). # 17

Harmer, J. (1991) The practice of English language teaching. New York: Longman

Hein, G. (1991). Constructivist learning theory. Massachusetts. Lesley College.


Available at:
http://www.exploratorium.edu/IFI/resources/constructivistlearning.html

Learning Theories Knowledge base (2011). Constructivism at Learning-


Theories.com. Retrieved December 29th, 2011 from http://www.learning-
theories.com/constructivism.html

Kesal, F. (2003) An investigation on constructivist classroom characteristics in


ELT methodology II Course. In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the
degree od doctor of philosophy. Graduate School of Social Sciences Middle
East Technical University. Available at :
http://etd.lib.metu.edu.tr/upload/541417/index.pdf Downloaded in January 2012

Martínez, E. & Zea, E (2004) Estrategias de enseñanza basadas en un enfoque


constructivista. Revista Ciencias de la Educación. Vol 2 N° 24 pp. 69 -90
http://servicio.cid.uc.edu.ve/educacion/revista/a4n24/4-24-4.pdf

Meaningful Learning: Interview to Joseph Novak. (2010) [video] Available at:


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=agh6ZhW5zSM&feature=related

Novak, J and Gowin, D. (1984) Learning how to learn. Cambridge: CUP


Richards,J & Rodgers, T. (1990). Approaches and methods in language teaching.
Cambridge: CUP

Riddle Elizabeth M. [s.f.] Lev Vygotsky’s Social Development Theory. Available at:
http://www.balancedreading.com/vygotsky.html

Salkind, N. (2008) Encyclopaedia of Educational Psychology. California: Sage


Publications
SOME INTRODUCTORY WORDS:

Along this course you will be introduced to the principles of constructivism


and how this approach is used in a language classroom. You will read about
the main constructivist exponents, the way English is taught in a
traditional and in a student-centred class, as well as the different strategies
that can be applied to help the students develop their higher order thinking
abilities in an environment where they are the owners of their learning
process.

Many of you may wonder if constructivism could be put into practice in


crowded classes showing low levels of linguistic competence. The answer is
you can do it! And, in doing so, you will be not only helping your students
work autonomously but you will also ensure this will be a long-term
learning experience.

We hope you will enjoy this path of learning through a distance-learning


course to which you will contribute with your insight and your background
knowledge to find out how learning takes place in the minds of your
students, enlarging in this way your chances to be better students and
teachers! Throughout the development of this workshop, you will be guided
and supported by your tutor in whatever aspect you need. We wish you the
best in this enterprise!
INTRODUCTION

Although Constructivism as a philosophy of learning can be traced back to the


eighteenth century, the emergence of constructivism in the ELT field took place
later during the last decades of the nineteenth century with the advent of a new
paradigm in the English Language Teaching arena. This change demanded
the implementation of new roles in the relationship between the students and
the teacher as well as the use of methodologies that focused on the
development of skills rather than on the acquisition of grammar rules.

Constructivist theories maintain that learning takes place because of


psychological, affective and cognitive processes occurring in the human mind,
processes in which students acquire new meanings because of their interaction
with mates and teachers in the process of relating their prior knowledge and
experience to the new concepts presented.

This theory is often contrasted with the behaviorist approaches which entailed
the use of skill and drill exercises to foster repetition and the application of
question and answer exercises which were reinforced until they were “learnt”.
Evaluation was summative and highly objective, that is, items were evaluated
by means of tools such as dictations, fill in the gap, and multiple-choice kind of
exercises. These tools were replicated once and again so that the students had
little opportunities of showing their understanding on an area of study.

Constructivism caused radical changes within the English teaching field; the
rote learning that behaviourist approaches proposed, containing highly
structured grammar lessons, together with the demotivating nature of the
teaching techniques used to present the language exponents, had to be
gradually replaced by real-to -life activities through which the students used the
language in a natural way.

Accordingly, constructivist theorists highlight the idea that for learning to occur,
the use of authentic tasks carried out in collaborative environments, and in
meaningful contexts is a must, since learning is the product of experience and
social interaction. This change in the teaching paradigm demands a dramatic
shift in the use of materials, teaching techniques, and evaluation tools that
conceive learning as a productive process.

ACTIVITY 1 FORUM

Write about your experience as student in relation to the


application of the approaches mentioned above.

Based on your experience as a learner, describe how you


could have seen any of these teaching approaches reflected in
either English or Spanish classes. Post your comments on the
forum. Remember that your participation is important for your
peers.

You might also like