Pigafetta Did Not Explicitly Specify Where The Mass Took Place. The Only Clue of
Pigafetta Did Not Explicitly Specify Where The Mass Took Place. The Only Clue of
Pigafetta Did Not Explicitly Specify Where The Mass Took Place. The Only Clue of
SECOND CLAIM: The miracle on the process of converting the natives to Christianity, Magellan asked
the natives as to why they haven’t burned the artifacts of their idols, and haven’t stopped sacrificing
animals as they had promised. The natives replied that they were offering them for a sick man so he may
gain health. The sick man turned out to be the Prince’s brother. He’s so sick that he’s bedridden and
haven’t spoke for 4 days. Magellan told them that if he were to be baptized he would quickly heal.
After being baptized, the sick man spoke for the first time, and within days, could already walk.
CONTROVERSY: Magellan’s act caused the natives to strengthen their faith and to convert more
towards Christianity. However, there are many factors to consider as to how the sick man recovered.
According to Pigafetta, Magellan gives the sick man almond milk and food on a daily basis, which could
have aided his recovery. In today’s time, it is not entirely feasible that the sick man recovered through
being baptized through Christianity, like how Pigafetta presents it through his writing. The claim is more
likely a bias on the part of Pigafetta.
THIRD CLAIM: Who killed Magellan? Throughout taking history classes ever since I was elementary,
my teachers have always claimed that Lapu-Lapu was the one who killed Magellan. During the battle of
Mactan, Lapu-Lapu struck Magellan with a spear which caused him his death. That is why Lapu Lapu
was considered to be the first bayani.
CONTROVERSY: But according to the accounts of Pigafetta, it wasn’t said that Lapu Lapu was the one
fully responsible for the death of their Captain General. There were a battalion of soldiers, most
especially the forces of Cilapulapu and any one of them could have killed the Captain General.