Police Administration A Leadership Approach
Police Administration A Leadership Approach
Police Administration A Leadership Approach
Police Administration: A Leadership Approach sends the clear message that all police officers—regardless
of rank—must be courageous, self-contained, leadership agents who think and act ethically to assume
control, to influence and motivate others, and to address crime and disorder.
Davis
Ortmeier
P.J. Ortmeier
Joseph J. Davis
Police Administration
A Leadership Approach
P. J. Ortmeier
Grossmont College
Joseph J. Davis
Roberts Wesleyan College
This book is printed on recycled, acid-free paper containing 10% postconsumer waste.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 QDB/QDB 1 0 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1
ISBN 978-0-07-338000-1
MHID 0-07-338000-8
Vice President & Editor-in-Chief: Michael Ryan
Vice President EDP/Central Publishing Services: Kimberly Meriwether David
Publisher: Katie Stevens
Senior Sponsoring Editor: William Minick
Executive Marketing Manager: Pamela S. Cooper
Managing Editor: Meghan Campbell
Senior Project Manager: Jane Mohr
Design Coordinator: Brenda A. Rolwes
Cover Designer: Studio Montage, St. Louis, Missouri
Senior Photo Research Coordinator: Natalia Peschiera
Buyer: Nicole Baumgartner
Media Project Manager: Sridevi Palani
Compositor: Glyph International
Typeface: 10/12 Sabon
Printer: Quad/Graphics
All credits appearing on page or at the end of the book are considered to be an extension of the
copyright page.
www.mhhe.com
Joseph J. Davis is a retired police captain from the Rochester, New York, Police
Department where he served for 38 years. He holds a bachelor’s degree in math-
ematics from St. John Fisher College, Rochester, New York, and a master’s degree
in strategic leadership from Roberts Wesleyan College, Rochester, New York. As a
police commanding officer and through extensive work in the Rochester community,
Davis gathered extensive experience in supervision, management, and leadership
in organizations. His experience includes program operations, professional devel-
opment (training), problem analysis, program development, budget development,
grant management, and capital improvement projects, and significant work with
community organizations, not-for-profit organizations, and diverse populations.
Davis developed and managed numerous programs that included a Tri-
level Stress Management Program and resultant organizational unit, a language
development program and training course in Spanish language, a sign language
program, a cultural program for each language studied, and a recruitment and hir-
ing process for new police officers. He managed the conceptualization and building
of a new indoor and outdoor police firing range and managed the redevelopment of
a police media productions unit that included a video/television production unit.
Davis’s experience as a police captain includes the positions of director of train-
ing, commanding officer of professional development, patrol section commander,
and commanding officer of the Field Investigations Section, Criminal Investigation
Division. He is a past president of the Law Enforcement Training Directors
Association of New York State.
Davis has also been involved in numerous developmental projects including
the New York State Police Supervisor Mandated Training Course for New Police
Sergeants; the development of mental health training and confidentiality proto-
cols and policies for police officers; and the conceptualization, development, and
implementation of a Police Officer Anger Management Program. In addition, he
was a steering committee member for the reorganization of the Rochester Police
Department.
Davis is the author or coauthor of numerous presentations for the Academy
of Criminal Justice Sciences. He is currently a member of the Academy, the
International Association of Chiefs of Police, and the Law Enforcement Training
Directors Association of New York State.
Davis serves as an adjunct professor with Roberts Wesleyan College, Rochester,
New York, and is a self-employed consultant/trainer for police and government enti-
ties, educators, and security personnel.
The authors encourage and solicit comments regarding this book as well as sugges-
tions for future editions. They are also available to provide technical assistance to
anyone who adopts this text for a course. The authors may be contacted directly at:
P. J. Ortmeier, PhD
Chair/Professor, Administration of Justice
Grossmont College
8800 Grossmont College Drive
El Cajon, CA 92020
Preface xix
Bibliography 433
Glossary 445
Photo Credits 453
Index 457
2 Policing Strategies 28
Learning Outcomes 28
Introduction 28
Traditional Policing 29
Historical Context 30 • Defining Characteristics 30 • Advantages
and Disadvantages of Traditional Policing 31
Community Policing 32
Connections to Peel’s Principles 32 • Defining Characteristics 32
• Praise for Community Policing 34 • Criticism and Resistance 34
Problem-Oriented Policing 36
Defining Characteristics 36 • The SARA Problem-Solving
Model 36 • Strengths and Challenges of Problem-Oriented
Policing 39
Team Policing and Neighborhood Policing 39
Defining Characteristics 39 • An Assessment of Team and
Neighborhood Policing 40
Zero-Tolerance Policing 40
Defining Characteristics 40 • Roots in the Broken Windows
Theory 41 • Questions about Zero-Tolerance Policing 41
Intelligence-Led Policing 43
Defining Characteristics 43 • Pros and Cons of Intelligence-Led
Policing 44
Strategic Policing 45
Defining Characteristics 45 • Requirements for Effective Strategic
Policing 46 • Pluses and Minuses of Strategic Policing 47
Summary 48
Key Terms 49
Discussion Questions 49
What Would You Do? 49
Summary 80
Key Terms 81
Discussion Questions 82
What Would You Do? 83
Summary 179
Key Terms 180
Discussion Questions 181
What Would You Do? 181
Summary 428
Key Terms 430
Discussion Questions 430
What Would You Do? 431
Bibliography 433
Glossary 445
Photo Credits 453
Index 457
The book is intended as a core or primary text for courses in police administration
and similar topics at the second-year, upper-division, and graduate levels, a resource
for police officers who are preparing for promotion exams and interviews, and a
comprehensive reference source for police practitioners.
This book differs from other books on police administration in several key respects:
• It weaves ethics and leadership concepts and practices throughout the
chapters. True leadership does not exist without courageous, ethical behavior
to accompany it. As courageous, self-contained, ethical leadership agents,
all police officers must overcome the fear of being disliked and function as
self-starters who persevere and commit to engage in actions that lead to the
successful completion of ethical goals.
• It addresses the essential elements of the administrative process in a logical,
practical sequence, covering planning and budgeting before other steps in the
process to reflect how police administrators actually work.
• It emphasizes critical thinking, creativity, and flexibility with respect to
policing principles, philosophies, and strategies. For instance, in Chapter 2,
readers gain exposure to a multitude of policing strategies, including
traditional policing, community policing, problem-oriented policing, and
intelligence-led policing, to name just a few. And they are introduced to the
notion that the blend of strategies a particular police agency chooses to adopt
depends on local circumstances.
• It discusses the process of change leadership, current models of change
management, and ways in which police administrators can formulate and
execute change initiatives while taking into account their agency’s culture,
internal and external politics, and technology.
• It presents information, concepts, best practices, and case studies in a clear
and concise manner that enables readers to acquire and retain new knowledge
and skills. Characterized by an accessible and engaging writing style, the book
presents theories but focuses on their practical application.
• It addresses the numerous challenges, such as political correctness, diversity,
and politics, that face today’s police.
• It emphasizes strategies and tactics that can help police administrators to:
• Reduce lawsuits, liability, citizen complaints, and police misconduct.
• Generate a positive image of the police in the public’s mind.
• Improve the quality of life for all citizens served by a police agency.
• Increase citizen satisfaction and improve employee morale.
This book offers a wealth of pedagogical features designed to help readers acquire
and strengthen their critical thinking, decision-making, and problem-solving skills.
Each chapter contains:
• Learning outcomes (objectives)
• Key terms highlighted and defined in the chapter
• Ethics in Action and Leadership on the Job boxes for critical thinking
• Case studies
• Discussion questions
• Problem-solving exercises, including realistic scenarios that present dilemmas
that readers must resolve
• Checklists and step lists for important procedures and processes
• Websites and other sources of information, tools, and guidelines regarding
best practices for vital activities such as pre-employment screening, training,
and program development
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
The authors wish to thank the many family members, friends, colleagues, support-
ers, sources, and acquaintances who helped make this book possible. Gratitude
is extended to the editors and staff at McGraw-Hill for their guidance, insights,
and helpful suggestions: Katie Stevens, Bill Minick, Kate Scheinman, Jane Mohr,
and Amy Mittelman. We also wish to thank our associate project manager Tania
Andrabi, our copyeditor Sharon O’Donnell, and our proofreader Virginia Bridges
for their keen eyes and diligence.
Special thanks are also extended to our editorial consultants Lauren Keller
Johnson and Rodine Dobeck, as well as our assistants Gloria Aldaba, Caitlin Wion,
and Deanna Hook for their help with the preparation of the manuscript.
Thank you to the members of the Rochester Police Department and the mem-
bers of the Law Enforcement Training Directors Association of New York State
for your support of courageous leadership. A special thank you to Lt. Michael
VanRoo, Rochester Police Department and Chief Charles Koerner, Clyde, New
York, Police Department for your helpful suggestions, insights, and observations
regarding police agency processes, procedures, and operational practices. Thanks
for the contributions provided by the staff and students at Roberts Wesleyan
College including Gary Prawel and Leonard Wildman. A special thanks to
Dr. Frank Colaprete for his mentorship, scholarship, and continuous support and
constant pursuit of excellence.
We are deeply indebted to the following reviewers for their valuable contribu-
tions: Rulette Armstead, San Diego State University; Rodney W. Brewer, University
of Louisville; John Hill, Salt Lake Community College; Harry Hueston, West
Texas A&M University; Stephen F. Kappeler, Eastern Kentucky University; Richard
Kuiters, Bergen Community College; Juli Liebler, Michigan State University;
Tom O’Connor, Austin Peay State University; Michael D. O’Donovan, Bergen
Community College; Jerome Randall, University of Central Florida; and Morag
(Scottie) Walls, Delta College.
SUPPLEMENTS PACKAGE
CourseSmart is a new way to find and buy eTextbooks. At CourseSmart you can save
up to 50 percent off the cost of a print textbook, reduce your impact on the envi-
ronment, and gain access to powerful Web tools for learning. CourseSmart has the
largest selection of eTextbooks available anywhere, offering thousands of the most
commonly adopted textbooks from a wide variety of higher education publishers.
CourseSmart eTextbooks are available in one standard online reader with full text
search, notes and highlighting, and e-mail tools for sharing notes between classmates.
For further details contact your sales representative or go to www.coursesmart.com.
Tegrity Campus is a service that makes class time available all the time by automati-
cally capturing every lecture in a searchable format for students to review when they
study and complete assignments. With a simple one-click start and stop process, you
capture all computer screens and corresponding audio. Students replay any part of
any class with easy-to-use browser-based viewing on a PC or Mac.
Educators know that the more students can see, hear, and experience class
resources, the better they learn. With Tegrity Campus, students quickly recall key
moments by using Tegrity Campus’s unique search feature. This search helps stu-
dents efficiently find what they need, when they need it across an entire semester
of class recordings. Help turn all your students’ study time into learning moments
immediately supported by your lecture.
To learn more about Tegrity watch a two-minute Flash demo at http://
tegritycampus.mhhe.com.
1
The police fulfill many
functions, one of which is
education of the public. Here,
a Santa Ana, California, police
officer speaks with a high
school class.
Police Administration:
A Perspective
learning outcomes
Introduction
Congratulations—by opening this book you have taken a crucial first step toward
understanding the realities and value of police administration, the process, art, Police
and science of the management, supervision, and ethical leadership of a police administration:
agency. The concepts, principles, and practices of police administration discussed the process, art,
and science of
in this book may be applied in a wide variety of public safety settings (for example,
the management,
police, courts, corrections, security management, and forensic science). supervision, and
Without effective administration, no organization—including a police agency— ethical leadership
can function and fulfill its mission. Whether you are a criminal justice undergradu- of a police agency.
ate major, a police academy student, an officer working toward a promotion, a mid-
level manager, or a chief executive officer, this book will be a valuable companion
as you learn what police administration is, why it is important, and how effective
administrators and managers operate and how they function as courageous ethi-
cal leaders.
In deciding which textbook to assign for the course or training program you
are participating in now, your instructor had several choices. Why did the instruc-
tor select Police Administration: A Leadership Approach? The reason is that this
book differs in significant ways from other textbooks on police and criminal justice
administration and management. Specifically, unlike other texts, this one presents
elements of the police administration process in a logical sequence reflecting
how effective agency managers actually work. For instance, real police manag-
ers engage in planning and budgeting before making major decisions related to
other administrative activities such as assessing agency performance, hiring,
leading change, or procuring needed equipment or facilities. To reflect that logi-
cal process, this book discusses planning and budgeting before covering other
administrative activities. (Many other textbooks give short shrift to planning and
budgeting, or cover them late in the book, seemingly as an afterthought.)
Equally important, this book presents ethics and leadership as critical threads
running through every step in the administration process. As you will see, leading
is not the same as supervising or managing. All three activities are important, but
they deliver different forms of value for a police agency. The key point we make
in this book is that anyone can—and should—be a leader. And when every police
administrator and manager shoulders responsibility for leading, the administration
process dovetails with all other efforts in the agency to produce stellar public ser-
vice. Further, true leadership does not exist without ethical behavior to accompany
it. As you work through each chapter of this book, you will find a wealth of ideas
and practices for strengthening your ethical leadership abilities—no matter what
role you eventually occupy in a police organization.
This book also traces the evolution of assumptions regarding what role polic-
ing should play in society and what strategies police agencies should use to fulfill
their mission. In the past 100 years, definitions of core police responsibilities have
bounced between assisting the community and enforcing public safety to fighting
crime and back again to helping the community. Of course, in actual police work,
most line officers have juggled both—improving quality of life in their community
while also battling crime as it arises. As any “real-life” police officer can tell you,
during the course of one day, an officer might help a homeless person find shelter
and food, rescue a treed cat, and put a drug dealer behind bars. This textbook—
unlike others—makes it clear that the two functions of community assistance and
crime fighting are not mutually exclusive.
The themes that make this textbook unique—including the principles of policing
attributed to Robert Peel, ethics, leadership, and the disciplined application of admin-
istration principles—all reflect a viewpoint we hold dear: that any police agency’s
greatest assets are the human beings who work there. Our intent is to help prepare
you to enter the public safety profession equipped with the knowledge, skills, and
abilities necessary to survive, to lead, and to serve the public well. As the presti-
gious United States Army War College explains, there are three pillars of success for
anyone seeking to become a leader: formal education, operational experience, and
self-development. We believe that this book will help you erect all three pillars as you
build your own leadership talents. Another expert maintains that effective leaders
know themselves, know their followers, and know their organization (Lutz, 2010).
Again, this book will help you master all three of these knowledge areas and become
Self-contained ethical a self-contained ethical leadership agent who can motivate others to deliver their
leadership agent: best performance and who can garner their trust, respect, and admiration.
an individual with But before you can develop your leadership ability, you must first gain familiar-
the knowledge,
ity with the core elements of police administration. This chapter sets you on that
skills, and abilities
to motivate others path. We begin by examining principles of policing that have been attributed to the
to deliver their best nineteenth-century British home secretary Sir Robert Peel; much of today’s polic-
performance and ing strategy and procedure derive from these tenets. We then trace the history of
who can garner their police administration, examining how police have organized themselves and how
trust, respect, and they have viewed themselves over time. We also consider the development of ethics
admiration.
and professionalism in policing and pose the question, “Is policing a profession?”
The chapter next discusses the role of leadership in policing and other public safety
arenas, including a preview of how management and supervision differ from leader-
ship. Finally, we introduce common activities making up the police administration
process, activities that subsequent chapters will cover in depth. With this broad
scope in mind, let’s turn now to examining principles of policing attributed to Peel.
PRINCIPLES OF POLICING
to preventing crime and disorder. To support this vision—which was unique for
Principles of nineteenth-century London—Peel reputedly established the following principles of
policing: policing:
principles regarding
1. The basic mission for which police exist is to prevent crime and disorder as an
the mission and
alternative to repressing crime and disorder by military force and severity of
acceptable behavior
legal punishment.
of police, attributed
to Sir Robert Peel. 2. The ability of the police to perform their duties depends on public approval
of police existence, actions, and behavior, as well as the ability of the police to
secure and maintain public respect.
3. The police must secure the willing cooperation of the public in voluntary
observance of the law to be able to secure and maintain public respect.
4. The degree of cooperation that can be secured from the public diminishes,
proportionately, with the need to use physical force in achieving police objectives.
5. The police seek and preserve public favor not by catering to public opinion
but by constantly demonstrating absolutely impartial service to the law, in
complete independence of policy, and without regard to the justice or injustice
of the substance of individual laws; by ready offering of individual service and
friendship to all members of the society without regard to their race or social
standing; by ready exercise of courtesy and friendly good humor; and by
ready offering of individual sacrifice in protecting and preserving life.
6. The police should use physical force to the extent necessary to secure
observance of the law or to restore order only when the exercise of
persuasion, advice, and warning is found to be insufficient to achieve police
objectives. Moreover, police should use only the minimum degree of physical
force necessary on any particular occasion to achieve a police objective.
7. The police at all times should maintain a relationship with the public that
gives reality to the historic tradition that the police are the public and the
public are the police. The police are the only members of the public who are
paid to give full-time attention to duties that are incumbent on every citizen in
the interest of the community’s welfare.
8. The police should always direct their actions toward their functions and never
appear to usurp the powers of the judiciary by avenging individuals or the
state or by authoritatively judging guilt or punishing the guilty.
9. The test of police efficiency is the absence of crime and disorder, not the
visible evidence of police actions in dealing with them (Lee, 1901).
Research indicates that no single set of policing principles attributed to Peel can be
definitively shown as originating with him. The research findings indicate that “Peel’s
principles,” as they are generally presented today, were actually invented by authors of
twentieth-century policing textbooks. However, the fact that the principles cannot be
traced directly to Peel does not necessarily make them fiction; nor does it mean they have
no relevance for aspiring police administrators and leaders (Lentz & Chaires, 2007).
state militia than a uniformed state-level police force. And the first federal law
enforcement agency in America had been created a century earlier, in 1789, when
President George Washington appointed eight United States marshals. Much later,
in 1908, the development of national-level law enforcement organizations took a
large step with the creation of the Bureau of Investigation (subsequently renamed
the Federal Bureau of Investigation, or FBI) in the U.S. Department of Justice.
As local, state, and federal law enforcement organizations evolved, so did the
notion that police should have the right to collective bargaining. As early as 1893, the
National Chiefs of Police Union, forerunner of the International Association of Chiefs
of Police (IACP), was established, largely through the efforts of progressive Omaha,
Nebraska, police chief Webber Seavey. Each year, the IACP sponsors the Webber
Seavey Award, presented to agencies that have made innovative accomplishments.
1850–1930: From Community Ser vice to Crime Fighting From the mid-
nineteenth century to about 1930, policing was about community service. Officers
O. W. Wilson,
Vollmer’s protégé, is
shown while serving as
police superintendent
in Chicago. Wilson
is holding a photo of
Richard B. Speck, 25,
sought in connection
with the deaths of
eight student nurses.
enforcement agencies, including the FBI under J. Edgar Hoover, focused on catching
criminals.
August Vollmer: The person considered one of the founders of modern policing was August
chief of police in Vollmer, who served as chief of police in Berkeley, California, from 1902 to 1932. In
Berkeley, California, the early 1920s, Vollmer initiated the use of the police car as a patrol device and the
from 1902 to 1932; two-way radio as a means for rapidly answering calls-for-service. He also introduced
considered a founder the polygraph as an investigative tool and helped establish college-level courses for
of modern policing. police officers. Vollmer also promoted the use of other forensic science technologies,
such as fingerprinting, as well as crime laboratories. Moreover, he strongly advo-
cated professionalism in policing.
O. W. Wilson: Vollmer’s protégé O. W. Wilson worked in Wichita, Kansas, and Chicago,
August Vollmer’s Illinois. Wilson introduced a merit system for promotions, rotated officers’ patrol
protégé; introduced assignments to reduce the chance for corruption, and insisted on higher salaries for
a merit system for officers to help agencies recruit higher-quality candidates.
promotions and
other innovations 1930–1980: A Widening Array of Policing Strategies From the 1930s to about
influential in 1980, many police executives and politicians moved to separate policing more
modern policing. completely from politics to create a more professional model of policing. The social
function of policing gave way to a war-on-crime model. Police chiefs and sheriffs
stepped up pressure on officers to respond to calls-for-service as quickly as possible,
and pushed intensive coverage of communities by patrol cars. Unfortunately, crime
escalated despite these measures.
This era also saw a widening of the strategies police considered adopting to
address the challenges they had been experiencing. During the 1960s, massive social
unrest erupting throughout the United States forced police executives to confront
the fact that traditional policing (the professional “command and control” model)
was not working well. The chasm between citizen and police officer was wider
than at almost any other time in history. Several commissions—most notably
the President’s Commission on Law Enforcement and Administration of Justice
(1967), the National Advisory Commission on Civil Disorders (1968), and the
National Advisory Commission on Criminal Justice Standards and Goals (1973)—
recommended major improvements in policing and the administration of justice
(Inciardi, 2005; Kerlikowske, 2004). To be sure, many experts felt certain that the
police alone could not control crime and that social unrest stemmed from factors such
as social inequality, lack of jobs, and the deterioration of the family. Nevertheless, the
stage was set for a change in policing strategies.
Interestingly, the “new” strategies integrated many of the tenets associated with
Sir Robert Peel, such as police responsibility for maintaining peace while strength-
ening connections to the citizens they serve. For example, these newer strategies
include community-oriented policing, community-oriented problem-solving polic-
ing (COPS), statistics-oriented policing (which includes community mapping and
real-time crime analysis approaches such as CompStat), intelligence-led policing,
and strategic policing. Many of these are discussed in Chapter 2 as well as in other
sections of this book.
you will find a compelling argument that policing has, in fact, become a profession
(Champion & Hooper, 2003; Kelling & Sousa, 2001; Leonard & More, 2000;
Ortmeier, 2006).
Discretion
A police officer will use responsibly the discretion vested in his position and
exercise it within the law. The principle of reasonableness will guide the
officer’s determinations, and the officer will consider all surrounding circum-
stances in determining whether any legal action shall be taken. Consistent
and wise use of discretion, based on professional policing competence, will do
much to preserve good relationships and retain the confidence of the public.
There can be difficulty in choosing between conflicting courses of action. It
is important to remember that a timely word of advice rather than arrest—
which may be correct in appropriate circumstances—can be a more effective
means of achieving a desired end.
Use of Force
A police officer will never employ unnecessary force or violence and will use
only such force in the discharge of duty as is reasonable in all circumstances.
The use of force should be used only with the greatest restraint and only after
discussion, negotiation, and persuasion have been found to be inappropriate
or ineffective. While the use of force is occasionally unavoidable, every police
officer will refrain from unnecessary infliction of pain or suffering and will
never engage in cruel, degrading, or inhumane treatment of any person.
Confidentiality
Whatever a police officer sees, hears, or learns of that is of a confidential
nature will be kept secret unless the performance of duty or legal provision
requires otherwise. Members of the public have a right to security and pri-
vacy, and information obtained about them must not be improperly divulged.
Integrity
A police officer will not engage in acts of corruption or bribery, nor will an
officer condone such acts by other police officers. The public demands that
the integrity of police officers be above reproach. Police officers must, there-
fore, avoid any conduct that might compromise integrity and thus undercut
the public confidence in a law enforcement agency. Officers will refuse to
accept any gifts, presents, subscriptions, favors, gratuities, or promises that
could be interpreted as seeking to cause the officer to refrain from performing
official responsibilities honestly and within the law. Police officers must not
receive private or special advantage from their official status. Respect from
the public cannot be bought; it can only be earned and cultivated.
(continued)
Personal-Professional Capabilities
Police officers will be responsible for their own standard of professional per-
formance and will take every reasonable opportunity to enhance and improve
their level of knowledge and competence. Through study and experience, a
police officer can acquire the high level of knowledge and competence that is
essential for the efficient and effective performance of duty. The acquisition
of knowledge is a never-ending process of personal and professional develop-
ment that should be pursued constantly.
Private Life
Police officers will behave in a manner that does not bring discredit to their
agencies or themselves. A police officer’s character and conduct while off duty
must always be exemplary, thus maintaining a position of respect in the com-
munity in which he or she lives and serves. The officer’s personal behavior
must be beyond reproach.
Source: Reprinted with permission of the International Association of Chiefs of Police, 515 North
Washington Street, Alexandria, VA 22314 USA, 2010b. Further reproduction without express written
permission from IACP is strictly prohibited.
and retain citizens’ trust, an essential ingredient for effective police work (Allen &
Sawhney, 2010; Gaines, Worrall, Southerland, & Angell, 2003). Loss of trust due
to unethical behavior on the part of any police agency personnel can also damage
hard-won perceptions of policing as a profession.
You may be wondering whether formal training is available to help police
personnel at all levels acquire ethical leadership skills. The answer is not encourag-
ing. Police leadership development programs endorsed, certified, and/or presented
through state commissions on peace officer standards and training as well as col-
leges and universities, where such development programs exist, focus primarily on
the promotion of police officers to mid- or upper-level management positions. Very
few focus on ethical leadership development at all ranks, including police recruits
(“Leadership Development around the States,” 2009). We strongly suggest that ethi- Profession:
cal leadership training and development are essential for all police officers, regard- an occupation
less of rank. or discipline that
requires its members
Policing as a Profession to adhere to
prescribed standards
A profession is an occupation or discipline that requires its members to adhere of behavior and
to prescribed standards of behavior and competence. All professions—including competence and that
policing—share the following characteristics: has characteristics
• A recognized body of knowledge specific to the profession including common
goals and principles,
• Common goals and principles
a common
• A code of ethics and standards of conduct language, a system
• A public service orientation for licensing or
• Common language and vocabulary credentialing
members, and
• A system for licensing or credentialing members
an association
• An association that promotes the profession’s standards and interests (in that promotes
the case of policing, such associations include the International Association the profession’s
of Chiefs of Police, or the IACP, and the Police Executive Research Forum, standards and
or PERF). interest.
Graduates of a NYPD
Police Academy
class during their
commencement at
Madison Square
Garden.
Leadership on t h e job
Police Academies for All
In a large city on the U.S. East Coast, a police captain create a personal connection: police work is demys-
coordinates an innovative program: a police academy tified for the average citizen, and the police gain
for local senior citizens. Components of the program supporters in the community. The more people know
include a ride-along with patrol officers and the about how police do their job, the more likely citizens
chance to use the computerized firearms simulator will be to support their efforts.
that is used in the recruit academy.
1. What other community groups might benefit from
“If we gave them a gun and a badge, they would
attending an academy like the one described in
do it,” the captain reports. He describes the real pur-
this scenario?
pose of the academy: “Seniors are home during the
day, they see a lot, they’re the staples in their com- 2. What other citizen–police activities might increase
munity. . . . They’re the ones who can bring back that the bond between the police and the community
‘it takes a village’ kind of [mentality]. . . .” they serve?
The program underscores a phenomenon that
occurs every time police and community residents
ETHICS IN ACTION
Technology Exposes Officer’s Unethical Behavior
hen a 17-year-old male was arrested for a shooting that occurred
W six days earlier, he was listening to music on his MP3 player. The
detective who arrested him questioned the young man for over an
hour with neither a lawyer nor his parents present. Unknown to the detec-
tive, the young man taped the interrogation using his MP3 player.
During the young man’s subsequent trial, the detective denied that an
interrogation had taken place. When the defense presented the MP3 tape
as evidence, the detective was charged with three felony counts of perjury
and terminated by the police department after his conviction. The young
man received seven years in prison on a weapons charge, but the charge
of attempted murder was dropped after the detective’s perjury conviction.
1. What implications does this case have for any other trials at which the
detective testified in which the defendant was convicted?
2. What are the implications for public safety when officers manipulate
the truth to gain convictions or “not guilty” verdicts?
Without strong leaders, any organization can fail. Every member of every police
agency thus has the opportunity and responsibility to become a leader. Leadership
should begin with the chief executive of the agency and spread throughout all
levels of the organization, including the line officer level. Line officers have the
most direct contact with citizens and possess broad discretionary powers. For these
reasons, they must function as leaders whenever they answer a call-for-service—
demonstrating skills such as communication, critical thinking, and problem solv-
ing. Indeed, every time a patrol officer responds to a call-for-service, a leadership
opportunity presents itself. Patrol officers become the stabilizing influence in a crisis
situation and have the potential to affect a citizen’s life in a positive way, even if the
call is nothing more serious than a barking dog.
Choosing to Lead
Police officers at other levels must also demonstrate leadership. Whether working
alone or with partners, all officers must identify and solve problems quickly, and
communicate effectively with a diverse array of individuals who may differ in terms
of age, race, ethnicity, gender, and lifestyle. Whether they wish to be or not, all offi-
cers are problem solvers, and problem-solving ability is a leadership skill.
But merely knowing what skills constitute effective leadership is not enough.
Police personnel, no matter what rank they hold, must also have the courage
(a leadership quality) to put those skills into action—within their agency as well as
with community members and partners from other private and public agencies (such
as schools, other police agencies, fire departments, and businesses). Without that
courage, an officer is just another person in the crowd of badges. Demonstrating
courage takes practice. Many police professionals have the knowledge and ability
to lead. Yet, they may choose not to exercise their leadership skills—not to do the
right thing—because they fear losing the rewards that conformity provides (such as
promotion and the preservation of friendships with colleagues). Indeed, a common
saying in the field is, “To get along, you have to go along.”
Sources: Davis & Prawel, 2008; Derrick, 2009; Northouse, 2009; Ortmeier, 1997; Townsend, 1970.
this book, you will learn more about leadership, how it applies in the administration
of a police organization, and how you can develop and practice leadership skills.
Most large organizations have many complex administrative activities that must
be completed on a regular basis. These include (but are not limited to) planning,
budgeting, hiring and training employees, and purchasing and maintaining equip-
ment and facilities. Police agencies must carry out these activities, too. Large police
agencies have single departments devoted to specific administrative activities, such
as a budgeting department or a facilities management team. In smaller agencies,
the responsibility for each process may rest on the shoulders of the chief executive,
whether that person is a police commissioner, chief, or sheriff.
We can think of a police agency’s administrative activities as falling into three
broad categories: line operations, administrative support, and auxiliary services.
Line Operations
Activities that serve the public and the goals of the organization directly are usually
lumped under a title such as line operations. They can include patrolling, traffic
management, criminal investigation, communication with the public, organized-
crime control, juvenile and community services (such as bicycle inspections and
security at sporting events), controlled substance (drug) law enforcement, and
school services (for example, drug-abuse prevention programs).
A man is handcuffed
and arrested by Aspen,
Colorado, police
outside the Cannabis
Crown 2010 Expo on
April 18, 2010. The
man was detained by
hotel security after
carrying a large jar of
marijuana out of the
marijuana trade show
in the basement event
space downstairs.
Aspen police then
found the man had
no medical marijuana
license and was
carrying a set of brass
knuckles, which are
illegal in Colorado.
Administrative Support
Activities that serve the agency’s needs and that have very little direct impact on
the community or its residents come under the title administrative support. These
include hiring and training, budgeting, and internal affairs.
Although these activities are not typically outsourced, smaller jurisdictions have
found it cost-effective to outsource some training support by collaborating with
other agencies, and may engage outside consultants for such activities. However,
outsourcing of other activities may be frowned upon. These include the storage of
unclosed case files, property, and evidence. Unclosed case files could contain sensi-
tive and confidential material that, if revealed outside the agency, might compromise
the case resolution. The storage of property and evidence must follow certain proto-
cols imposed by the law and the courts. For instance, if a piece of physical evidence
found at a crime scene is contaminated or lost, the prosecution and defense in a
court case cannot do their jobs effectively.
Auxiliary Services
Activities that support line operations are sometimes known as auxiliary services.
These typically include records maintenance, property and evidence management,
forensic laboratory services, detention, alcohol testing, facilities and equipment
maintenance, and coordination of volunteers. Some auxiliary services can be out-
sourced. For instance, prisoners may be detained at a centralized county facility.
And an agency may hire a private company to provide laboratory services or facili-
ties maintenance services.
As you progress through this book, you will learn about these and other activi-
ties essential to police administration.
summary
• Principles of Policing. Passage of the Metropolitan Police Act in London in
1829 established the world’s first recognizable local police department, and
came in response to an increase in crime in the city. The British home secretary
Sir Robert Peel envisioned a police firm comprising citizens paid by the
community to prevent (rather than merely repress) crime and disorder. A set
of principles, commonly attributed to Peel, arose to support this vision. These
principles emphasize the notion that police are peace officers first, rather than
crime fighters. The police motto “To protect and serve” reinforces this notion.
• Police Administration: A Brief History. Police administration has evolved in
terms of how police have been organized and what they consider their core
strategy for providing value to the communities they serve. The founding
of the London Metropolitan Police inspired the creation of other local
police departments in the United States. Many state and federal-level police
organizations (such as the Texas Rangers and the U.S. marshals), as well as
police unions, also had early origins. Since the 1850s, notions of policing
strategy have also evolved. During 1850–1930, ideas of policing shifted
from community service to crime fighting. August Vollmer and his protégé
O. W. Wilson laid the foundation for modern policing, by (among other
achievements) initiating the use of police cars as patrol devices and rotating
patrol assignments to reduce corruption. During 1930–1980, policing
strategies proliferated, many of them integrating principles associated with
Sir Robert Peel. Since 1980, police agencies have flexibly mixed traditional
policing with a range of other strategies, and the question of whether policing
constitutes a profession has continued to inspire debate.
• Ethics and Professionalism in Policing. Ethics is the philosophical study of
conduct that adheres to certain principles of morality, and centers on the
demonstration of behavior that reflects specific virtues. More than most
professions, policing presents its members with ethical dilemmas on a daily
basis. The Law Enforcement Codes of Ethics and Conduct, developed by
the International Association of Chiefs of Police, helps establish behavioral
standards to combat unethical behavior. Ethical leadership is ethical behavior
on display. Policing shares characteristics of all professions, including a
recognized body of knowledge specific to the profession, common goals and
principles, and a code of ethics and standards of conduct.
• Leadership versus Management and Supervision. Every member of a police
agency has the opportunity and responsibility to become a leader. Managers
and supervisors can and should be leaders, but management and supervision
are not synonymous with leadership. Managers direct subordinates in the
completion of tasks. Supervisors oversee subordinates’ work and provide
guidance. Leaders influence and motivate others. Managers and supervisors
thus focus on directing and maintaining current operations, while leaders
guide growth and change with an eye toward the future. Anyone can
take steps to cultivate leadership abilities, including knowing where one’s
organization is headed strategically and regularly communicating the
organization’s mission, values, and goals to others.
• Police Administration: Common Activities. Police administration activities
fall into three categories: (1) line operations (activities that serve the public
key terms
ethical leadership
ethics
Law Enforcement Code of Conduct
Law Enforcement Code of Ethics
leadership
Peel, Sir Robert
police administration
principles of policing
profession
self-contained ethical leadership agent
Vollmer, August
Wilson, O. W.
discussion questions
1. Nine principles of policing commonly attributed to Sir Robert Peel arose in the early
1800s. How did these principles reflect Peel’s vision of policing, and how are they
relevant in policing today?
2. What contributions to modern policing were made by August Vollmer and O. W.
Wilson? In your view, which of these contributions are still relevant and which are
not? Why?
3. Why was the decade of the 1960s a critical period for policing and society overall in
the United States? In your view, has there been another period just as critical in the
last 40 years? If so, what is that period, and why do you consider it as critical as the
1960s?
4. Why did the International Association of Chiefs of Police establish codes of ethics
and conduct for police officers? In your opinion, how effective are these codes?
5. Why is ethical leadership important in a police agency?
6. How do management and supervision differ from each other and from leadership?
Why are they not synonymous with leadership?
7. Which administrative activities do you consider most critical for a police agency?
(Consider examples of line operations, administrative support activities, and auxil-
iary services.) Explain your rationale.
The program has also helped the violence interrupters. Their employ-
ment with CeaseFire has provided them with meaningful work in their own
troubled communities when, as ex-offenders, they might have had trouble
finding work at all. They have received a second chance to build productive
lives and the opportunity to help their communities, where previously they
had been part of the problem (Gross, 2009; Ritter, 2009).
1. Analyze how the Aim4Peace and CeaseFire programs demonstrate the
tenet “The police are the people and the people are the police.”
2. If reformed violent criminals can successfully counsel at-risk persons to
avoid violence, what other criminal behavior might be stemmed by the
use of former offenders as counselors?
2
Police managers and officers,
discussing strategy at a weekly
meeting.
Policing Strategies
learning outcomes
Introduction
Many policing strategies have been introduced since the principles of policing
attributed to Robert Peel were formulated. A policing strategy is an approach
to delivering police services based on specific assumptions about matters
such as how police and community residents should interact, what causes crime Policing strategy:
to worsen, and how technology might be leveraged. Each strategy has unique an approach to
advantages and disadvantages. Some strategies are mutually exclusive, while delivering police
services based on
others complement or support one another.
specific assumptions
Regardless of which strategies a particular agency uses, most police manag- about matters such
ers agree that strategies should position an agency to deliver the best possible as how police and
performance. Yet proving whether a strategy serves this purpose is difficult, in community residents
part because some outcomes of effective performance—such as crime preven- should interact,
tion as well as quality of life for citizens—are difficult to measure. To complicate what causes crime
to worsen, and how
matters further, since the September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks, the increased
technology might be
emphasis on homeland defense has redirected police resources away from civilian leveraged.
policing innovations and toward counterterrorism and homeland security initia-
tives. As a result, many agencies now place less emphasis on policing strategies
designed to prevent local crime and disorder.
In this chapter, we examine several strategies in common use today—
specifically, traditional policing, community policing, problem-oriented policing,
team and neighborhood policing, zero-tolerance policing, intelligence-led policing,
and strategic policing. We do not strongly endorse a particular strategy; rather,
we maintain that police agencies should select strategies based on their situa-
tion and the environment in which they are operating. Modern-day police must
demonstrate flexibility—applying the strategies that best address their existing cir-
cumstances and being willing to shift strategies as conditions change. That being
said, we give special attention to community policing in this chapter, because it
appears to be the most comprehensive approach and encompasses some of the
other strategies described in the chapter.
We also present the policing strategies in an order designed to demonstrate
how policing has evolved—from the traditional twentieth-century, command-and-
control model to progressive models including community, problem-oriented, and
strategic policing. We lay out the defining characteristics of each strategy, explore
how different strategies relate to one another, and consider the strategies’ advan-
tages and disadvantages.
TRADITIONAL POLICING
Traditional policing:
Traditional policing is a highly authoritarian, paramilitary strategy that first took an authoritarian,
shape in the United States during the 1950s in response to rampant corruption in paramilitary strategy
the police service. To understand how this strategy evolved, we need to look further developed to
into the past—as far back as colonial America. mitigate corruption
in the police service.
Defining Characteristics
As the twentieth century progressed, police strategy in the United States became highly
authoritarian. The goal of this strategy was to deliver predictability in police officers’
performance. Advocates of traditional policing promote highly supervised field opera-
tions as well as prescriptive training for officers; for example, training that tells officers
what to do and how to do it rather than fostering individual initiative, leadership, and
creative problem solving. To combat possible corruption, they recommend an apoliti-
cal philosophy (meaning that officers should not succumb to political influence), cen-
tralized administration of police agencies, pinpointed rather than shared responsibility
for results, and strong discipline of errant officers. Through these practices, propo-
nents of traditional policing believe that officers’ behavior can be made “professional”
and “objective” (Goldstein, 2001; Meese & Kurz, 1993; Wilson, 1963).
and citizens do not develop any familiarity with the police personnel who patrol
their neighborhoods.
A number of studies have addressed the problems associated with tradi-
tional policing. These studies were conducted by several national commissions:
the President’s Commission on Law Enforcement and Administration of Justice
(1967), the National Advisory Commission on Civil Disorders (1968), the National
Advisory Commission on the Causes and Prevention of Violence (1969), the
President’s Commission on Campus Unrest (1970), and the National Advisory
Commission on Criminal Justice Standards and Goals (1973) (Goldstein, 1990).
The studies revealed that the basic practices used in traditional policing (for
example, motorized patrol, rapid response, and follow-up investigations) have little
use when it comes to the substantive problems facing neighborhoods, such as drug
trafficking and prostitution. In addition, the bureaucratic and autocratic nature of
police organizations that emphasize the traditional strategy appears to leave citizens
and officers alike unsatisfied. Citizens still fear crime, and officers lack the motiva-
tion to address chronic community problems (Couper & Lobitz, 1991; Ortmeier &
Meese, 2010; Travis & Langworthy, 2008).
COMMUNITY POLICING
Community Community policing reemerged in the 1980s as an alternative to traditional polic-
policing: ing, and emphasizes close interaction between police and the neighborhoods they
an alternative serve. This strategy draws extensively from the principles of policing attributed to
strategy to Robert Peel.
traditional policing
that emphasizes
close interaction Connections to Peel’s Principles
between police and Dissatisfied with traditional policing’s emphasis on separation of police and the
the neighborhoods public, citizens and police began to collaborate in seeking solutions to chronic com-
they serve. munity problems. The modern concept of community policing was born. Yet com-
munity policing is not new. It is what Robert Peel envisioned. As Dean Esserman,
chief of police in Providence, Rhode Island, stated in an interview for Communities
& Banking in 2005:
I worked as an intern with the New York City police department. I would have
never expected that in my first month, I would be delivering a baby in a tenement
with a police officer. Through this experience and others, I came to understand
that the police deliver more babies than they shoot bad guys. . . . We help people
deal with their landlords. We get them heat when they need it. We find children
when they are lost. . . . In many ways, the police are the agency of first and last
resort for people, especially people in poverty. (Esserman, 2005)
Defining Characteristics
The community policing strategy is based on the assumption that police and citizens
of a specific community share the same values. Thus, community policing may work
differently in different communities, depending on what those shared values are.
This diversity makes it difficult to define the strategy in formal terms. However, we
can still draw some common conclusions about community policing.
In an agency that uses this strategy, policing efforts are customized to the needs
of an individual community. Agency leaders emphasize decentralization of the
organization; for example, by allowing line-level officers to make decisions and to
help solve problems that directly affect citizens’ lives in a particular neighborhood.
And they recognize that crime control (law enforcement) is only one function of
the police. Officers and citizens work together to articulate the problems unique to
that particular community (such as graffiti, abandoned autos, or prostitution). To
identify problems, some agencies use citizen surveys, wherein residents of the com-
munity define the issues they believe the police should focus on. Demographic and
statistical information can also generate important insights, such as which areas
in the community contain more elderly or young people, and where income and
education disparities are widest. Finally, dialogues with community leaders (elected
or unofficial) can produce additional information. The agency and community then
develop solutions to the problems, implement them, and evaluate those solutions’
effectiveness.
Community policing can take many different forms, but key elements include
bonds of trust and collaboration between police and the public. Moreover, agen-
cies that get the most value from this strategy adopt its philosophy and practical
application throughout the organization, rather than merely promoting it in just
one or two parts of the agency (Ortmeier & Meese, 2010). Finally, community
policing occurs every time police officers meet with community members (in
groups or one-on-one) to discuss and resolve community-based concerns, and
every time solutions are customized to fit the unique needs and circumstances of
a community.
makes traditional policing more effective because calls-for-service are received from
the same citizens the officers regularly work with.
In some cases, excessive enthusiasm for community policing, coupled with
unrealistic expectations of what an agency can accomplish through it, leads to the
abandonment of the strategy. If police managers favor traditional gauges of police
performance, which value quantitative measurements such as number of arrests, an
agency might also decide to steer clear of community policing.
Some officers have suggested that community policing seeks to turn police into
social workers who take a “soft” line on crime. On the contrary, proponents of this
strategy maintain that individuals who commit crimes must bear the consequences.
However, the vast majority of people with whom the police come into contact are
not criminals. Even in the most crime-infested areas of a city, most residents are law-
abiding citizens. Community policing recognizes that responsible citizens should
not be viewed in the same light as chronic criminal offenders. In fact, the practical
application of community policing involves citizens and police working together to
be tougher on crime.
Another challenge presented by community policing is that it requires knowl-
edge and skills (such as leadership) that differ from those that line officers tra-
ditionally have acquired in their training (Gaines & Miller, 2005; “Leadership
Development around the States,” 2009; Ortmeier & Meese, 2010; Pelfrey, 2004;
Spelman & Eck, 1987). To be sure, fostering a sense of community between police
representatives and residents is no small feat. The fact that police are highly trained
in law enforcement tactics, wear distinctive uniforms, carry weapons, and possess
the authority to enforce laws and arrest people creates real distinctions between offi-
cers and those they serve. An understandable us versus them mentality may arise,
which often erodes communication between police and citizens and, in some cases,
sparks civil unrest.
To combat these problems, police agency members and citizens must strive to
cultivate a strong sense of community in which all share responsibility for reduc-
ing and preventing crime and disorder. As the most visible and readily available
Spotlight on Surveys
Internal and external surveys can generate insights that can help a police agency
strengthen its community policing efforts. Some agencies have circulated
internal surveys among their own personnel, asking for their perceptions of
community policing and their recommendations for improvements. Agencies
can also use external surveys to solicit comments from citizens concerning
their experience with officers who respond to calls-for-service. Many such
surveys ask citizens to rate responding officers on criteria including profes-
sional conduct, level of concern, effort to put the citizen at ease, helpfulness,
and subject-matter expertise. Yet managers must use care when evaluating
comments and data acquired through external surveys. Citizens may not nec-
essarily respond truthfully. And some line officers might worry that manage-
ment will use negative comments from the surveys as justification for denying
them promotions.
PROBLEM-ORIENTED POLICING
Problem-oriented The problem-oriented policing strategy represents the tactical implementation of
policing: community policing. Through this strategy, police and local citizens identify prob-
the tactical lems facing the community and, together, develop solutions to them.
implementation of
community policing.
Defining Characteristics
According to the problem-oriented policing strategy, problems differ from incidents.
An incident is a single occurrence (such as a shots-fired call) requiring a response
from police. A problem is the occurrence of two or more incidents of a similar
nature (for example, several shots-fired calls coming from the same neighborhood).
Some problems (such as a dog that keeps barking, a group of young people who
regularly insult passersby, or a homeless person who frequently sleeps in front of
an apartment building) do not necessarily require a police response. However, they
may still have great importance for the citizens reporting them. Problem-oriented
police officers and managers appreciate the significance of such issues to the com-
munity. They prioritize problems according to their importance to the community
(top priority), their importance to the police agency (next-level priority), and their
frequency of occurrence (next priority). They may also categorize incidents accord-
ing to crime type, nature, geography (neighborhood), time, or people involved
(suspects and victims). Categorizing is useful because it helps an agency identify hot
spots (and times) so it can deploy resources appropriately.
Herman Goldstein, the founder of the modern concept of problem-oriented
policing, suggests that police agencies interested in adopting this strategy should
shift from an inward orientation (using internal evaluation criteria such as number
of sworn officers) to an outward orientation (using external criteria such as the
agency’s impact on chronic problems in the community). Goldstein thus advocates
attention to effectiveness over efficiency. Indeed, agencies using the problem-
oriented policing strategy place less emphasis on statistics and more emphasis on
initiatives designed to eliminate problems (Goldstein, 1990, 2001).
SARA in Action
A city neighborhood struggled with several problems on a particular block.
According to community members, the problems included noise, large groups
of people obstructing sidewalks, illegal drug activity, and debris discarded in
the street. The local police department worked with neighborhood residents
to apply the SARA problem-solving model:
1. Scan. Through reviewing crime reports, field intelligence reports,
and citizen interviews, officers learned that the most visible con-
tributor to all the identified problems was an open-air illegal drug
market.
2. Analyze. While reviewing information about the drug market, police
and community leaders discovered that the illegal drug activity was
backed and assisted by people who owned a clothing store located
across the street from a high school. Analysis also revealed that the
undesirable activities began during the late morning hours and ended
around midnight each day.
3. Respond. Citizens requested an easily recognizable, visible tool that
the drug dealers, their customers, and neighbors would perceive as a
proactive community–police response to the problem. To that end,
the police allocated a van to the program and affixed a sign to its
side panel identifying it as a police–community partnership vehicle.
The sign read “ACT One,” which stood for Against Crime Together,
Precinct One. Neighborhood residents and business representatives
refurbished and equipped the van using a community business grant.
Corporate grant money was dedicated to outfit the van with video-
recording equipment. The city funded insurance for the vehicle. Next,
a local bus company trained and certified citizen volunteers to drive
the van. The volunteers parked it in front of the drug market each day
and videotaped all activity at the store and on the street in front of the
store.
4. Assess. The illicit drug activity emanating from the clothing store
ceased within three months of the ACT One initiative. Subsequently,
the building was leased to a legitimate food service operation. The
initiative was thus judged a success.
Defining Characteristics
In team policing, teams usually comprise
a supervisor, several patrol officers, a
detective, and a subject-matter expert
(for instance, an expert on gangs or
drugs). The team may be assigned to a
specific area with duties based on the
problems identified through the SARA
model. Through neighborhood policing,
police work directly with residents of a
small geographic area. Officers educate
residents on how to reduce opportunities
for particular types of crime in their area.
Neighborhood watch programs are the
most visible and widespread example of
such policing. Through these programs,
residents and police meet regularly to dis-
cuss concerns, crime prevention strategies,
and the status of crime in the neighbor-
hood. At the same time, police officers Neighborhood Crime
acquire information from residents about Watch sign.
activities and changes in the neighborhood (Jones-Brown & Terry, 2004; Ortmeier &
Meese, 2010).
ZERO-TOLERANCE POLICING
Zero-tolerance Zero-tolerance policing is based on the assumption that full enforcement of the laws
policing: will lead to a decrease in crime and disorder. In some areas, this strategy is referred
a strategy based on to as order-maintenance policing.
the assumption that
full enforcement
of the laws will
Defining Characteristics
ultimately decrease Zero-tolerance policing diminishes the discretionary authority of police officers
crime and disorder. (Henry, 2002). That is, advocates of this strategy expect that virtually every crime,
infraction, or other violation of the law observed by an officer will result in an
arrest or the issuance of a citation. In addition, zero-tolerance policing supposes
that underenforcement or nonenforcement of laws related to low-level crimes and
Graffiti, abandoned
buildings, and
vandalized property
contribute to
neighborhood
deterioration that can
lead to increases in
crime. The broken
windows theory
supposes that poor
enforcement of minor
offenses leads to more
serious crime.
violations spawns complacency on the part of offenders and officers and thus estab-
lishes an environment in which serious crime can flourish.
ETHICS IN ACTION
Zero Tolerance in New York City
rime statistics suggest that zero-tolerance policing in New York City
C during the 1990s significantly reduced the crime rate. However, crit-
ics of the zero-tolerance policing strategy argue that the decreasing
crime rate in New York City simply echoed declines in crime trends that were
occurring throughout the nation during the latter part of the twentieth cen-
tury. Critics also warn that zero-tolerance policing may lead to discrimination.
Targets of the strategy often include young people and persons who are men-
tally ill or homeless, largely individuals who are destitute with few advocates.
1. If evidence suggests that discriminatory law enforcement exists in
some cases (for example, the police target homeless persons because
of their status), how might such discrimination be prevented?
2. Can homeless persons and other “street people” be motivated to
assist in the prevention of crime and disorder? If so, how?
Zero-tolerance
One major disadvan-
policing and saturation tage of zero-tolerance polic-
patrol were used in ing is that it can destroy
New York City in the progress that an agency has
1990s. made in implementing com-
munity policing initiatives.
Zero-tolerance strategies can
distance police from citi-
zens, who may feel victim-
ized by police intolerance of
minor infractions. Residents
often complain that they are
not familiar with (and thus
cannot relate to) the offi-
cers patrolling their neigh-
borhoods (Gau & Brunson,
2010; Hosang, 2006; Hunter
& Barker, 2011; Pollard,
1998). Research also demon-
strates that saturation patrol
tactics often associated with
zero tolerance do not reduce
crime. They merely displace it.
Offenders simply relocate to
areas where zero tolerance
is not employed (Eterno &
Silverman, 2010; Marshall,
1999; Silverman, 2001).
INTELLIGENCE-LED POLICING
Intelligence-led
Intelligence-led policing integrates problem-oriented policing and zero-tolerance policing:
policing. Through this strategy, police continuously analyze incidents that occurred a strategy that
in the recent past (typically within the last few weeks) and develop action plans for integrates problem-
addressing the problem. oriented policing
and zero-tolerance
policing through
Defining Characteristics continuous analysis
Agencies that emphasize the intelligence-led policing strategy may use CompStat, of information
including Geographic Information Systems, or GIS (such as mapping software) and about problems
frequent meetings to analyze the resulting data. (See Chapter 4 for more detailed and development
of action plans to
resolve problems.
Geographic
Information System
(GIS) technology is
used by police agencies
to identify, analyze,
and respond quickly
to reported incidents
of crime and disorder.
GIS management
systems are used to
pinpoint responsibility
and accountability
for police efficiency,
effectiveness, and
overall performance.
STRATEGIC POLICING
Strategic policing is an ingredient of community policing and seeks to integrate Strategic policing:
proven private- and public-sector organizational management techniques—such an approach that
as SWOT (strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, threats) analysis and strategic seeks to integrate
planning—with public policing strategy. proven private-
and public-sector
management
Defining Characteristics techniques with
Agencies interested in adopting strategic policing start by establishing goals public policing
informed by crime and disorder trends, directives from a chief of police or mayor, strategy.
Detroit, Michigan,
Deputy Police Chief
Joyce Motley speaks
about crime and police
issues to residents of
Detroit’s Morningside
neighborhood during
the community group’s
monthly meeting.
or community input. The agency then develops strategies for achieving those
goals—strategies that are influenced by the priorities of key stakeholders such as
community residents, local government leaders, and area businesses. (See the box
“Strategic Policing Example.”)
Strategic policing can be an element of community policing—which (as we
have seen) allocates police resources in accordance with community priorities.
Community policing emphasizes high visibility of police in the neighborhood,
rapport with the community, fewer arrests due to the more proactive (preventive)
role assumed by the police, and decentralization of the police organizational com-
mand structure. Strategic policing calls for visionary incorporation of established
police operations into a broader mission focused on peacekeeping and the preven-
tion of crime and disorder (Oliver, 2008; Scheider, 2008).
key terms
community policing
intelligence-led policing
policing strategy
problem-oriented policing
SARA problem-solving model
strategic policing
SWOT analysis
team policing and neighborhood policing
traditional policing
zero-tolerance policing
discussion questions
1. What are the basic principles underlying the traditional policing strategy?
2. Describe the basic tenets of community policing. In what respects does this strategy
reflect the principles of policing attributed to Robert Peel?
3. How does problem-oriented policing relate to community policing?
4. How do team and neighborhood policing work, and how do these strategies relate to
community policing?
5. Describe zero-tolerance and intelligence-led policing and explain how they may com-
plement each other.
6. Describe the defining characteristics of strategic policing. Why is strategy important
to policing?
7. Can different policing strategies be applied simultaneously in the same neighbor-
hood? In the same city? Why or why not?
Challenges Facing
Police Organizations
learning outcomes
• appraise the technological advances affecting policing today and explain how
police agencies can leverage them.
• assess the forces resulting in resource constraints for police agencies and
name ways in which agencies can surmount these constraints.
• explain terrorism’s impact on policing and describe systems and processes
that the U.S. Department of Homeland Security has put in place to enable
police agencies to help combat terrorism.
• describe how the National Incident Management System and the
Standardized Emergency Management System work.
Introduction
U.S. society has experienced massive changes over the past several decades—
including an increase in ethnic and cultural diversity, rapid advances in informa-
tion and communication technologies, and intensifying feelings of vulnerability
owing to the September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks and a volatile economy. These
changes have presented new challenges to police organizations. For example,
to communicate with and serve citizens in increasingly diverse communities,
officers must familiarize themselves with a broad range of cultural norms and
perspectives. To extract value from technology, police personnel need to master
new information technology (IT) tools and systems. And to protect the people they
serve as well as ease the public’s fears, police must coordinate their efforts with
an expanding circle of public safety organizations, including the U.S. Department
of Homeland Security. All of this takes time, and most of it costs money—in an
age when many police organizations are operating under tighter-than-ever budget-
ary constraints.
Surmounting these and other challenges also requires an agility and openness
to change that many police organizations find difficult to achieve. Indeed, as a rule,
governmental agencies tend to lag behind private-sector entities when it comes to
altering their operations and processes to stay ahead of new developments and
deliver high-quality services to their constituents. This inability and unwillingness
to change may stem in part from the complex bureaucratic structure and culture
of entitlement that characterize many public service organizations: It is difficult
to nudge any large, complicated organization in a new direction. It becomes even
more daunting when managers and employees in the organization see no need
to change, because they feel (understandably) that their jobs are secure and that
their organization will continue to exist as it always has.
Yet, in today’s increasingly cost-conscious and demanding society, even the
most seemingly enduring public service organizations risk going out of existence
if they cannot show that they are delivering the best possible service in return for
the tax revenues they receive. Police agencies are no exception, and they cannot
afford to look the other way when confronted with change. A good first step toward
INCREASED DIVERSITY
The United States has long welcomed people of all faiths, ethnicities, and cultural
backgrounds. Such diversity has brought a richness of perspectives, skills, and cul-
tural traditions to American society. Yet diversity can also spark tensions, when
people from different religious, ethnic, gender, lifestyle, or cultural backgrounds
have difficulty understanding one another. Unfortunately, this lack of understanding
can spawn mistrust, stereotyping, prejudice, and even hatred between people. Such
problems have been hugely exacerbated by the 9/11 terrorist attacks, which have
heightened tensions particularly between non-Muslims and Muslims not only with-
in the United States but also around the globe. (See the box “Jihad or Crusade?”)
The in-depth report on diversity and the projected race and ethnic changes in
the United States for the years 1995 to 2050 (U.S. Census Bureau, 1999) point to the
need for police agencies to learn about other cultural backgrounds and understand
the perspectives and possible conflicts between races and ethnic values. Table 3-1
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 1996, Population Projections of the United States by Age, Sex, Race, and Hispanic Origin:
1995 to 2050, by Jennifer Cheeseman Day, Current Population Reports, P25-1130. Washington, DC.
1995 2050
American
Asian American Asian
Indian by Race
4% Indian 9%
1%
Black 1%
13%
Black
15%
Hispanic
White
9%
Hispanic
Non-Hispanic White
White 22% Non-Hispanic
(Nonminority) White
74% (Nonminority)
53%
by Hispanic Origin
Hispanic
Hispanic
(of any race)
(of any race)
10%
24%
Non-Hispanic
Non-Hispanic 76%
90%
highlights the projections of populations in the United States from the year 1995 to
2050. Particularly important in the table is the growth of the Hispanic population
relative to non-Hispanic populations.
Figure 3-1 sheds additional light on demographic changes in the United States.
It shows the percent distribution of the U.S. population and highlights projec-
tions of population by race. Note that in 1995, the nonminority population rep-
resented 74 percent of the nation’s total population, and minority populations
represented 26 percent of the total population. In 2050, the nonminority popula-
tion is expected to shrink to 53 percent of the total, while minority populations will
constitute 47 percent of the total. What is the implication for police agencies? The
demographic makeup of the communities they serve—as well as the personnel they
hire and develop—will grow ever more diverse.
Jihad or Crusade?
Since the 9/11 terrorist attacks, the word jihad has come to hold a sinister mean-
ing for most people in the United States. But what exactly does the word mean?
Experts agree that from the earliest days of Islam, jihad referred to a holy
war. According to some interpretations of the Koran, those who fight in holy
wars against nonbelievers will be richly rewarded, and those who do not fight
will be punished severely in the afterlife. Jihad allows Muslims (those who
practice Islam) to command good and combat evil in the name of Allah, or
God (Gould, 2005).
Today, most Muslims do not wish to fight in a holy war against Western
civilization. However, a few may wish to heed the call to jihad because of the
larger implication that Allah requires it and will reward it after death.
Some experts also point out a parallel between Islamic jihad and the early
Christian Crusades. In the year 1095, the pope declared that all European
Christians must embark on a crusade to liberate Jerusalem, which at that time
was under Muslim control. In return, the Christians would receive absolu-
tion for all of their sins. More than 60,000 people answered the call and they
killed thousands of people. By 1099, they had conquered Jerusalem, only to
lose it in 1187 to the legendary Saladin, the warrior sultan of Egypt and Syria.
Because of his lenient treatment of his defeated foes, Saladin was a respected
Muslim figure throughout Europe and the Middle East (Phillips, 2009).
After the Crusades, various Western leaders attempted to use the idea
of a crusade as justification for armed conflict with anyone not of their own
religious or political persuasion. Even as late as in 1936, General Francisco
Franco of Spain drew on his affiliation with the Catholic Church to legitimize
his “crusading” fight against rebels. And during World War I, the U.S. gov-
ernment produced a war film titled Pershing’s Crusaders, about General John
“Black Jack” Pershing.
The al-Qaeda leader Osama bin Laden called on all Muslims to fight
against the “Judeo-Crusader alliance” against Islam, and the 9/11 attacks
were one result of this call. Former U.S. president George W. Bush said in his
response to 9/11: “The United States is presenting a clear choice to every nation:
Stand with the civilized world, or stand with the terrorists” (Phillips, 2009).
The lesson? Whether it is called “jihad” or “crusade,” conflict among
Jews, Christians, and Muslims has a long history. During times such as today,
when tensions between these religions has escalated to unprecedented heights,
citizens and police alike are finding it increasingly difficult to appreciate even
innocuous differences between Judaism, Christianity, and Islam.
has grown up in a country where it is common and accepted for men to beat their
wives and children. If this man and his family immigrate to a country (such as the
United States) where such behavior violates a basic human right, the man cannot
express this aspect of his culture without being subject to that host nation’s law.
Rather, the right to a cultural identity includes engaging in any activities that do not
violate human rights—such as enjoying art and food ways notable in one’s culture,
practicing one’s religion, and celebrating holidays meaningful in one’s culture (Adler
& Proctor, 2011; Ayton-Shenker, 1995).
A Tucson, Arizona,
police officer questions
a woman following a
domestic disturbance.
how much eye contact people make with authority figures. They can even acquire a
working knowledge of another language, so they can converse with citizens them-
selves rather than through interpreters.
However, in the area of cultural diversity (as in so many other aspects of police
work), there is no substitute for personal contact between citizens and officers. Direct
interaction with actual members of the community (for instance, through foot patrols
and community policing efforts) are invaluable for assuring citizens that the officers
in their neighborhoods know and respect them. Thus assured, citizens are much more
open to collaborating with police in making their streets safer (Hunter & Barker, 2011;
Ortmeier, 2006; Shusta, Levine, Wong, Olson, & Harris, 2011).
sincerity on the part of a leader. Ethics demands that leaders be sincere and
credible, and be able to deliver on the promises they make (Orrick, 2008).
With these three skills in mind, let’s now take a closer look at the three types of
political dynamics police personnel must navigate.
Intra-Agency Politics
Intra-agency politics: Intra-agency politics manifest themselves in the working relationships between
political dynamics individuals, units, and sections (such as investigative services, patrol services, and
taking place within a administrative groups) within a police agency. These dynamics are also expressed
police organization. in the negotiations that take place between those in authority within an agency
over issues such as who should be in charge of which activities or responsibilities
or what goals the agency should be striving toward (Champoux, 2000; Dabney,
2010).
When it comes to intra-agency politics, many people believe that they should be
able to do their job without having to “get political” or “play power games.” But as
we noted earlier, politics are unavoidable in any organization—especially in a police
agency. Why? Police agencies answer to elected officials who represent the people
served by the agency. They are also funded primarily by taxes paid by the public.
Therefore, politics cannot be separated from policing. Managers and officers alike
must learn how to exert political influence within their agency to get work done and
deliver the service that citizens expect.
As first responders,
police officers,
firefighters, and
emergency medical
personnel treat an
accident victim.
Political influence is different from political power and therefore must be wielded
differently. See Chapter 11 for a detailed examination of the differences between
power and influence and the sources that police personnel draw on to exert each.
Interagency Politics
Interagency politics express themselves as the relationships between a police agency Interagency politics:
and other public safety organizations—such as fire departments, emergency medical political dynamics
teams, and corrections facilities—serving the schools, residents, and businesses in taking place in the
a particular jurisdiction. All these organizations share a common duty to address interactions between
crises and emergencies quickly and effectively as first responders. As such, personnel a police agency and
in such organizations are trained to do what most people avoid: run toward danger. other public safety
organizations in the
Partnering, Not Posturing To provide high-quality public safety service, per- same jurisdiction.
sonnel from all these organizations must perform the specialized tasks they are
responsible for—without quibbling over questions or concerns such as “Who has
the highest status here?” or “How can I be sure my agency will get the credit for a
job well done?” For example, at the scene of a vehicle collision, police must respond
to the victims, secure the scene, gather evidence, and interview witnesses. Emergency
medical technicians (EMTs) must take care of the injured, and firefighters must
prevent the vehicles from igniting and extricate any victims who may be trapped
inside a vehicle. Given this intimate relationship among public safety agencies and
the urgency under which these specialists routinely operate, a sense of partnership
and collaboration is essential for the delivery of exceptional service.
To foster cooperation between their agency and other public safety entities,
police leaders must train all levels of personnel in critical incident response pro-
cedures, encourage frequent interaction between the various public safety service
Turnover at the Top Cooperation between and among public safety agencies
begins with these organizations’ chief executive officers. The individuals in charge
of fire safety, emergency medical services, and police services must communicate
regularly about incidents, mutual aid, and future needs so they can collaborate and
coordinate their efforts. But frequent communication becomes difficult when turn-
over among these individuals increases; that is, executive officers vacate roles and
are replaced. For example, as is true of other public safety agencies, police chiefs
are often appointed by the mayor or city manager and must be approved by the
city or town council. And as with many corporate chief executives, there is a high
turnover rate among police chiefs; average tenure of chiefs is three years. Why the
higher rate? Owing to shifts in city or town politics or claims of corruption, a newly
appointed police chief may fall out of favor and be replaced by someone else.
High turnover among police chiefs is problematic (Coleman, 2007) because
every time a chief departs an agency, the relationships formed with other public
safety agency chiefs evaporate, which makes it harder for the agencies to collaborate
on public safety calls. For this reason, a few states have enacted civil service policies
prohibiting agencies from firing chiefs without clear cause.
collaborations in which police and volunteers develop safety programs for school-
children, elders, business owners, and other stakeholders. (See Chapter 6 for more
information on such partnerships.)
Intergovernment Politics
Intergovernment politics are expressed in a police agency’s relationships with Intergovernment
other governmental agencies that serve or affect the same jurisdiction. These politics:
dynamics also include relationships between a police agency’s personnel and political dynamics
elected or appointed officials who approve funding for police agency initiatives taking place in
and who help define an agency’s goals. Such government agencies and officials interactions between
include the mayor’s office; city, village, or town councils; county and parish a police agency and
boards; state and federal agencies including offices of emergency services (such as other governmental
the Federal Emergency Management Agency [FEMA] and grant providers); over- agencies serving or
sight bodies including state commissions on peace officer standards and training; affecting the same
and significant bureaucrats. jurisdiction.
Building Bridges To create a win–win situation for itself and the other govern-
mental agencies serving the same jurisdiction, a police agency may act as a bridge
or go-between for funding initiatives that a state agency or funding source awards
to a community organization. As an example, a state grant for civilian volun-
teer and police bicycle patrol
was awarded to a commu- A Cascade, Idaho,
police officer on
nity organization that had
bicycle patrol during a
exhibited questionable fund-
Fourth of July parade.
accounting practices. State
leaders asked the affected
police agency precinct leader
to control the funds through
the government entity’s finan-
cial department. (A govern-
ment entity is a town, village,
county, or city government
that has specific offices that
address areas of need in the
community. In this case, the
government entity was a city.)
The police facilitated purchas-
ing of police and volunteer
bicycles and supplies, follow-
ing the government entity’s
purchasing requirements and
processes. All funding had to
be approved by the state and
police agency in consultation
with the community orga-
nization. The entire funding
appropriation was expended
and properly accounted for,
the neighborhood. Neighbors lobbied for more police personnel. The police man-
ager was reprimanded for undermining citizen confidence in the police agency and
elected government officials. No one was happy with the end result of the police
manager’s interaction with the community.
Being politically correct may help police leaders keep the peace by not “ruffling
feathers.” But as we read earlier, that benefit comes at a cost. Under pressure to
avoid giving offense, police hesitate to state their true thoughts about a situation or
provide all the relevant facts (Atkinson, 2009).
To offer another illustration, a police precinct captain and the agency’s manage-
ment staff were reluctant to address an urban high school principal regarding the
high level of calls-for-service at the school during school hours. Although the school
had two assigned school resource officers, those officers and additional police per-
sonnel were constantly addressing fights, auto thefts, disruptive student behavior,
and trespassing complaints. The police command was gently reminded that openly
voicing their frustration to school officials about the school’s problems would hurt
the high school and school districts’ image. Calls-for-service escalated, a stolen vehi-
cle chop-shop operated on the high school campus, arrests of students for assault
and weapons charges rose, and additional police personnel had to be assigned to
the school for student arrival, student dismissal, and special occasions. Because the
agency did not address the problem in a timely manner, the police captain and staff
deployed critical staff to the school from other vulnerable geographic areas. The
captain and precinct management staff finally discussed the problem with the school
principal and respective school staff. Together, they gathered facts about the school’s
problems, analyzed the data, and implemented solutions that garnered some good
results. However, the negative image of the high school remains a significant issue
for the school and the school district.
A CHANGING ROLE
Police officers have always been charged with maintaining public safety, but over
time, their role has expanded to include additional responsibilities. For example,
as crime rates increased during the middle of the twentieth century, the media, the
public, and politicians began viewing police officers as primarily crime fighters
rather than public safety officers. In later decades, definitions of police officers’ role
expanded further to include solving community problems.
Police officers
mounted on horses are
helpful with crowd
control and enhancing
police–community
relations.
But the truth is, no one group can do it all because the problems facing commu-
nities today are bigger than any one group. Only by cooperating for the public good
can police and other experts—social workers, medical personnel, public defenders,
district attorneys—collectively provide the public safety citizens are paying for with
their taxes. For example, police can collaborate with social workers to help address
issues related to homelessness. Police can also work with city or county building-
code departments to condemn and demolish abandoned buildings that function as
drug-use houses or otherwise pose a threat to public safety.
given situation. While today’s officers understand that responding quickly to calls-
for-service is a significant part of their role, they also want to find solutions to the
problems confronting the communities they serve. Enlightened officers see the arrest
of an offender as just part of the solution to the problem of crime. They understand
that their role must constantly evolve in response to a myriad of new developments
(such as increasing crime) and emerging political realities (including lack of fiscal
resources) (Stojkovic, Kolinich, & Klofas, 2008).
In Chapter 1, we discussed ethics and its role in professional policing. In the pages
that follow, we examine the challenges inherent in providing ethical leadership in a
police agency—including aligning one’s actions with one’s words, combating bias-
based policing, preventing misuse of force, and eradicating police misconduct.
A Homeland Security
Officer and a Border
Patrol Agent at a
checkpoint searching
for weapons and
verifying immigration
status. Racial profiling
is a key concern for
police agencies.
Racial Profiling The most blatant example of bias-based policing today is known
as racial profiling. Through this type of profiling, law enforcement representatives
stop or detain people based on their race as a reason for suspicion that the individu-
als have, are currently, or will engage in criminal activity (Amnesty International
USA, 2009). For example, an officer stops particular drivers or questions cer-
tain pedestrians solely because they belong to a specific group (such as African
American, Hispanic, Asian, and Middle Eastern), because the officer believes that
all members of that group cannot be trusted. Racial profiling is unethical because it
is based on prejudice—adverse opinions about members of specific group that are
formed without sufficient knowledge of those individuals.
To understand the harm that racial profiling inflicts, imagine driving your car and
being pulled over by a police officer for no apparent reason: You have not done any-
thing wrong. Yet the officer clearly suspects you of wrongdoing. You gradually realize
that it is the color of your skin that has triggered the stop. How do you feel? Profiling
is an assault on people’s humanity. If you are like most people, you likely feel anger,
perhaps even rage, and you probably lose any trust you once placed in police.
Familiarity: The Antidote to Profiling Racial profiling has fallen out of favor,
and police agencies across the nation have issued formal statements that its practice
will not be tolerated. Experts agree that preventing such bias-based policing begins
and ends with communication between police and citizens. The more citizens know
about how the police do their jobs, the less likely it is that citizens will formulate
misconceptions that distance police from those they serve. And the more officers
interact with citizens, the more they will come to know and appreciate the similari-
ties and differences among them. We are all people, and familiarity with people—
how they live, how they interact with one another, how they feel—fosters harmony
not only in neighborhoods but also within and between nations (Graziano, Schuck,
& Martin, 2010; Jones-Brown & Terry, 2004; Ortmeier, 2006; Shusta et al., 2011).
Use-of-Force Rules Today, police agencies have strict rules governing officers’
behavior. Aggressive investigations of allegations of abuse, along with severe pun-
ishments, have reduced complaints about misuse of force. In the recruit academy
and during in-service training, new officers are taught, in no uncertain terms, what
they can and cannot do to citizens. For example, during the arrest of a suspected
offender, an officer may use whatever force is reasonably necessary to overcome
resistance but cannot use excessive force. Use of force, especially deadly force, is
strictly governed by laws, policies, and procedures designed to keep officers and
suspects safe. In some jurisdictions, the use of deadly physical force has been supple-
mented by the use of less-than-lethal bean-bag rounds, rubber bullets, or Tasers.
The Use-of-Force Continuum The best way to ensure that an officer does not
“cross the line” regarding use of force is through training from day one. When offi-
cers are aware of alternative methods of handling potentially dangerous situations,
they are more likely to maintain control of themselves as well as others. Effective
tactical communication to reduce conflict is the best alternative. Many police agen-
cies train officers to envision use of force as on a continuum: The type of force an
officer may use depends on the level of resistance presented by the other person.
For example, suppose that an officer responding to a domestic violence call
encounters one person physically threatening another. The officer commands the
person to stop the threat-
ening behavior. The per- Less-than-lethal
son either complies with weapons, such as a
the request or continues Taser device, should be
the threatening behav- considered as a viable
ior. If the person does less-lethal option in
not comply, the officer subject resistance
may use a physical force situations.
hand-to-hand technique
to stop the threat or
restrain the individual, or
deploy a chemical spray
agent to gain compli-
ance. Training and con-
sistent and continuous
mentoring of recruits and
less experienced officers have reduced the number of complaints of not only misuse
of force but also bias-based policing and other misconduct (Kelling & Sousa, 2001;
Michelson, 1999; Peak, 2007; Whisenand & Ferguson, 2005).
Liability Lawsuits According to the law—42 U.S.C. § 1983—if police officers deprive
a person of the rights the individual is guaranteed under the U.S. Constitution and
other federal law, that person can seek redress through filing a lawsuit, or a “civil
action for deprivation of rights” (U.S. House of Representatives, Office of the Law
Revision Counsel, 2008). Over time, a segment of law has sprung up that specializes in
liability lawsuits—and not just those where police are involved. For instance, since the
Constitution states that citizens are entitled to “life,” any entity that deprives a citizen
of life is liable for that loss. Not surprisingly, lawyers handling wrongful-death suits
have proliferated. The fear of lawsuits against police agencies has prompted local gov-
ernment and police leaders to analyze agencies’ vulnerabilities with respect to arrest-
and nonarrest-related deaths. Agency training, supervision, policies, officer actions,
and officer assignments all come into question in wrongful-death lawsuits. During the
years 1995 through 2005, the police in the states of California and New York were
involved in 66 wrongful-death lawsuits (Fishel, Gabbidon, & Hummer, 2007).
No police agency can afford to neglect assessing its vulnerability to liability
lawsuits over arrest-related deaths. As highlighted in the U.S. Bureau of Justice
Statistics Special Report, 2007, the number of arrest-related deaths in the United
States increased from 622 in 2003 to 703 in 2005. The total number of these deaths
from 2003 to 2005, including homicide by law enforcement, is 2,002. As shown
in Table 3-2, homicide by law enforcement accounts for 54.7 percent of the total
number of deaths for all causes.
Note: See Methodology for information on missing data by state for each reporting year.
constitutes misconduct during their training on federal, state, and local laws;
and from their agency’s specific policies and procedures known as general orders,
special orders, and rules and regulations. Some common examples of misconduct
include untruthfulness, discourtesy, use of excessive force, theft, accepting of
gratuities, and impaired driving (by alcohol or drugs) (Graziano et al., 2010;
Ross, 2006).
The Need for Training and Mentoring Discipline of the previously identified
misconduct is covered in Chapter 12, but the best and most proven way to pre-
vent misconduct is through thorough training at the beginning of an officer’s
career, and through ongoing mentoring and in-service training during an officer’s
employment with the agency. Senior officers entrusted with mentoring junior offi-
cers must exhibit the highest standards of ethical behavior themselves. Agencies
should avoid assigning a new officer to any senior or field training officer who
has generated complaints of misconduct in the past. Additionally, mentors and
trainers should monitor officers throughout their careers to identify and address
symptoms of chronic stress or burnout (such as increased absenteeism and dif-
ficulty concentrating on work), which may lead to misconduct. By preventing
misconduct, an agency avoids embarrassing and costly lawsuits (Crowder, 1998;
Morreale, 2002).
TECHNOLOGICAL ADVANCES
The biggest technology-related challenges facing police agencies today are plan-
ning for technological advances, anticipating these advances’ effects on the agency,
and keeping the agency current with new and proven technology. Agencies can
best overcome these challenges by keeping abreast of technological advance-
ments and ensuring appropriate financial planning to acquire new technologies.
Performance is mixed on this front: Some agencies have state-of-the-art systems
and have automated everything from report writing and record keeping to forensic
sciences applied to crime scene investigation. In others agencies, officers still take
notes on a lined pad and then use those notes to handwrite their reports back at
the office.
relatively current computer system. And they must acquire it, as such technology is
vital to fulfilling their mission.
Moreover, many criminals are using technology for nefarious purposes. For
example, child molesters may pose as harmless “friends” on social media sites
such as Facebook to attract victims. Police agencies that are not current with such
technologies—or that remain unfamiliar with how criminals are using them—
cannot hope to provide high-quality policing services.
ETHICS IN ACTION
How Deep Should They Go?
any police agencies regularly investigate the online activities of job
RESOURCE CONSTRAINTS
As in many organizations, the hard truth about public agencies’ budgets is that one
department, one agency, or one program will always get the bulk of the money.
Resource constraints for a police agency stem from forces unique to the public
agency arena. But police agencies can still take steps to manage such constraints.
all the services on which the government spends taxpayers’ money. Police agencies must
continually provide statistical data to prove that they are delivering excellent service; for
example, by reducing and preventing crime. Citizens may believe that they have to pay
twice for police services when they have their own town, village, or city police agency
as well as the law enforcement services of the county sheriff’s department.
Meanwhile, other institutions in a jurisdiction are also clamoring for financial
help from their local governing bodies. School systems are demanding more revenue
to pay for teacher salaries; new or renovated facilities; upkeep of buses and computers;
and special education services. Business owners at the local city, town, or village level
are asking for tax relief so they can build their enterprises and enhance their facilities.
Public safety providers including firefighters and emergency medical services teams are
demanding updated equipment and facilities. Many suburban and rural public safety
providers previously had plenty of volunteers to help out. But volunteerism ebbs dur-
ing tough economic times because people need to work longer hours to pay their bills
and feed their families. Indeed, in many jurisdictions, fire and ambulance services are
transforming from all-volunteer services to part-time and full-time paid positions.
TERRORISM
A hundred years ago, most police agencies across the United States operated in a
vacuum, confined to their own jurisdictions. To deal with cross-jurisdictional crime,
they often had to get assistance from private police. (Eventually, the Federal Bureau
for victims at the Superdome, in temporary trailers, and on cruise ships. But these
efforts lacked coordination. Responders learned that management of those resources
should fall under a specific agency and be responsible to DHS (“Federal Response
to Hurricane Katrina: Lessons Learned,” 2006).
• A Changing Role. Police officers’ role has expanded over the years to include
not only maintaining public safety but also fighting crime and solving
community problems. Today’s police officer wears many “hats” and must
learn how to function in each type of role.
• The Need for Ethical Leadership. In providing ethical leadership, police
personnel must grapple with four challenges: aligning one’s actions with one’s
words, combating bias-based policing (including racial profiling), preventing
misuse of force by officers, and eradicating police misconduct. Many of these
problems can be surmounted through proper training as well as modeling of
proper and expected behavior by leaders.
• Technological Advances. Improvements in technology have presented police
agencies with new opportunities to provide better service. But it can be
difficult for some agencies to adopt new technology if personnel are resistant
to changing the way they work, or if an agency has serious budget restrictions.
Keeping abreast of technology and acquiring and using those technologies most
critical to delivering services are two steps agencies must take.
• Resource Constraints. Numerous forces (including competition for tax
revenues) can subject a police agency to resource constraints. To ensure that
they get the funding they need to provide high-quality services, police agencies
must demonstrate that they are providing value in return for taxpayers’
money and make a compelling business case for the funding they need.
• Terrorism. The terrorist attacks of 9/11 made it clear that police agencies could
no longer operate in isolation from one another and from other public safety
organizations at the local, state, and federal levels. In response to the attacks,
the U.S. Department of Homeland Security was created. Its vision is to preserve
freedom through defense of the homeland. DHS requires local, county, and state
police agencies to maintain a heightened state of readiness regarding security
threats through training and emphasizes four phases of emergency management
(mitigation, preparedness, response, and recovery). Police agencies have two
tools for achieving these goals: the National Incident Management System and
the state-level Standardized Emergency Management System. key terms
bias-based policing
homeland security
interagency politics
intergovernment politics
intra-agency politics
National Incident Management System (NIMS)
police misconduct
political correctness
Standardized Emergency Management System (SEMS)
1. In what ways are the demographic and cultural makeup of the U.S. population
changing? What challenges do these changes present for police agencies, and how
can police personnel best surmount those challenges?
2. What are the three types of political dynamics managers and officers of a police
agency must learn to navigate? Of all the skills you read about in this chapter for
navigating such politics, which would you personally want to strengthen most? What
steps could you take to strengthen your skills in these areas?
3. Of the many different “hats” today’s police officer must wear (including public safety
provider, crime fighter, and social worker), which would you find most challenging
to wear? Why? What actions could you take to enhance your ability to fill this aspect
of your role as a police manager or officer?
4. Cite examples of practices that constitute bias-based policing. Why are such practices
unacceptable? How might a police agency discourage such practices among officers?
5. Cite examples of behaviors that constitute misuse of force and police misconduct. In
what respects does each of these problems hurt a police agency and the community it
serves? What steps can an agency take to prevent misuse of force and police misconduct?
6. What types of technological advances do you consider the most promising for police
agencies? Why? If an agency has severe resource constraints, how should it prioritize
its investments in technology?
7. Imagine a new service you would like to see your police agency provide. Funding is tight.
How would you build a compelling business case to persuade your local or state govern-
ment to allocate funding to support development of the service you have in mind?
8. Summarize how NIMS and SEMS work and explain why they are both important to
helping fulfill DHS’s mission.
4
Newark, New Jersey, police
personnel use the latest
communications and
surveillance technology to
help plan police activities.
Introduction
Policing activities alone (patrolling, writing tickets, arresting suspects) are not
enough to ensure that a police agency achieves its mission and serves its stake-
holders. Like any organization, the agency must also engage in planning —a Planning:
process, formulation, or design used to achieve an intended result. Planning a process,
counts among managers’, supervisors’, and leaders’ core responsibilities. And formulation, or
design used to
because police agencies also interact closely with the communities they serve,
achieve an intended
planning is a key responsibility of citizens and community leaders as well. result.
Effective planning requires a complex mix of skills. Police managers must take
into account available resources, the concerns of agency employees and community
members, and any training and development investments needed for personnel to
carry out the agency’s plans. In addition, planning calls for a balance between short-
and long-term views of the agency’s objectives and future. Managers must ask ques-
tions such as, “How well does the plan we are considering support our values, vision,
and mission? Will this plan get us to where we want to be six months from now? A
year from now? Five years from now?” (See Figure 4-1.) To develop and execute plans,
managers must also avoid common planning pitfalls as well as understand the differ-
ent types of plans available to choose from—and know when to use each type. They
need to take a disciplined approach to carrying out the steps in the planning process.
And they must master the art of self-management, which includes demonstrating
flexibility and calm when the inevitable happens: things do not go according to plan.
In this chapter, we take a close look at all these aspects of effective
planning—starting with the need for a long-term, big-picture view when police
managers are developing plans for their agency.
Many organizations have formally defined values, vision, and mission. For a cor-
porate entity, these might all revolve around how the company intends to treat
customers and employees fairly as well as conduct its business ethically. For police
organizations, values, vision, and mission usually center on demonstrating integrity,
equality, and fairness; making a commitment to safe neighborhoods; being open
to community issues; responding quickly and effectively to community needs; and
providing a level of service the community expects.
But terms like values, vision, and mission can sometimes seem abstract and
high level. What do they mean, exactly? In the following text we examine possible
answers to this question as well as explain how values, vision, and mission can serve
as guideposts for a police agency’s plans.
Values
Values are fundamental beliefs, principles, or standards that an individual or Values:
members of an organization regard as desirable or worthwhile. Examples include fundamental
honesty, integrity, compassion, respect, and professionalism. Values can be organi- beliefs, principles,
zational or individual. or standards that
In a police agency, organizational values are the ideals that the agency incorpo- an individual or
rates into its basic belief system—those convictions that are reflected in the agency’s members of an
formally expressed value statement and that all members of the department seek to organization regard
demonstrate through their daily actions. Individual values are personal standards as desirable or
that officers hold based on their own beliefs, preferences, faith, or principles (Hitt, worthwhile.
1988; Johnson, 2004; Meese & Ortmeier, 2004).
A NYPD officer
demonstrates
compassion on 9/11.
Values are most powerful when their organizational and individual forms
align—and when actual behaviors reflect the values. For example, if the agency
and the individual officer publicly state that they value honesty and integrity, daily
police activities should demonstrate correct behavior and honor for all to see. If the
agency has defined honesty as a value but appears manipulative and immoral in its
daily interactions with the community, the resulting dissonance may cause citizens
to view the agency as untrustworthy.
Vision
Vision: A vision is the image an organization or individual has in mind for a desired future
the image an state. A vision is long range and should be so compelling that members of a police
organization or agency will strive to make the vision real through their everyday activities (Hitt,
individual has in 1988). Like other organizations, many police agencies publish a vision statement—a
mind for a desired written expression of the future that the agency wants to realize.
future state. An effective vision statement has numerous defining characteristics. It is clear
and persuasive—inspiring a yearning for that future within all managers and
employees. It expresses an attractive future that members view as achievable, not an
out-of-reach picture that everyone knows will never be real. Finally, it is memorable,
easy to communicate, and can be explained and understood quickly (Kotter, 1996).
(See the box “Sample Vision Statement.”)
Mis sion
Mission: A mission is a short-range task or assignment a police agency wishes to achieve. As
a short-range task with values and vision, a police agency might express its mission in a written statement.
or assignment an The statement may mention values, and it serves as a guide for police managers to
organization wishes develop and implement initiatives that create value for the department’s stakeholders.
to achieve. Agency managers can use the mission statement to direct the agency’s resources toward
its strategic goals (Wood, 2005). An example of a mission statement might be:
“Through a coordinated police–community effort, public order and safety will be
achieved and maintained. We actively encourage community support and partici-
pation in a collaborative effort to achieve a safe community.”
figure 4-2 The Role of Values, Vision, and Mission in the Planning Process
Values
Assessment/
Vision
Evaluation
Outcomes Mission
(tied to goals and objectives)
plans. Goals are long-range achievements that are desired by the agency and that Goals:
reflect its values, vision, and mission. An example of a goal might be “Reduce long-range
violent crime.” Objectives are the short-term accomplishments that an agency must achievements desired
reach to achieve a particular goal. For example, to achieve the goal of reducing vio- by an organization.
lent crime, an agency might define objectives involving analyzing violent-crime rates
in the community served and launching crime-prevention initiatives (Wood, 2005). Objectives:
Managers translate statements about the agency’s values, vision, and mission short-term
into the goals and objectives that (if achieved) would express the agency’s values, accomplishments
realize its vision, and fulfill its mission (T. E. Baker, 2006). A plan that lays out clear that lead to
goals and objectives thus serves as a road map for action for the agency. achievement of a
Figure 4-2 shows how values, vision, and mission are all parts of an ongoing, particular goal.
iterative process by which a police agency establishes goals, generates outcomes,
assesses and evaluates those outcomes, and plans changes as needed to produce bet-
ter outcomes.
Police managers and officers plan all the time: Managers make decisions such as
how many new officers to hire, what technology the agency should incorporate,
and what crime trends to respond to. Officers plan how they will patrol an area,
stop a traffic-law violator, prepare for their next promotion exam, or help train a
new recruit. While engaging in planning, however, police personnel can fall prey to
some common pitfalls.
For example, some police managers treat planning as merely an intellectual
exercise, wherein they think about possible courses of action but never document
their thoughts or put their ideas to actual use. Still others participate in incre-
mental planning: the plan proceeds one small element at a time, especially when
resources are limited. For instance, a police agency’s current budget stipulates only
two upgraded computers. If the agency needs more than two, managers delay the
purchase until funds become available.
Managers may also neglect to assemble a planning task force—which is essen-
tial for all but the simplest of plans. Task forces are particularly crucial for plans
Single-use plan:
TYPES OF PLANS
a plan for a one-
time event or special Police agencies use several types of plans that we can think of falling into the major
circumstance. categories of nonstrategic and strategic. Nonstrategic plan types include single-use,
repeat-use, tactical, operational, and contingency. (See Table 4-1.) Such plans are
Repeat-use plan: intended to handle a police agency’s day-to-day responsibilities and are usually
a plan that may be developed by and for specific functions within the agency.
replicated for similar
events or tactical
situations.
In contrast to nonstrategic plans, strategic plans are long-term intended courses Strategic plans:
of action designed to apply to the entire police organization. Agencies develop long-term courses of
such plans to execute police activities directed toward high-level, overarching goals action intended to
such as enhancing police professionalism, fighting crime, and improving citizen or apply to the entire
community satisfaction with quality of life and policing services (Goldstein, 1990; police organization.
Ortmeier & Meese, 2010).
Strategic plans must not be confused with small, finite series of activities intended
to produce a narrowly defined desired result—such as reducing a particular type of
crime in a specific part of a city. Instead, strategic plans are the result of a more com-
plex and lengthier process through which police use critical thinking, acquire new
knowledge, and execute desired activities to achieve high-level, long-term goals. Like
all plans, strategic plans have no value unless they produce action (Bryson, 2004).
Strategic planning is also an ongoing process. To develop strategic plans, police
managers progress through a series of steps—including defining where the agency
currently is in terms of its operations and performance, establishing what its future
state will be, and designing and implementing the activities needed to produce the
future state—that are repeated over time. They may use frameworks such as SWOT
(strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, threats) analysis (see Chapter 2) to define
overarching strategic goals for their agency and then to articulate the initiatives
needed to achieve those goals and the resources required to execute the initiatives
(Bryson & Alston, 2005). They also take into account the agency’s values, vision,
and mission, as well as the priorities of stakeholders such as community members
and local business leaders.
The U.S. Department of Homeland Security Strategic Plan for fiscal years
2008–2013 is an example. The plan calls for “One Team, One Mission, Securing
Our Homeland.” Though it is a five-year plan, the department revisits it yearly,
assessing core values and guiding principles, defining new goals and objectives, and
implementing activities as needed to ensure achievement of the goals and objectives
(One Team, One Mission, Securing Our Homeland, 2008).
Two especially important planning approaches are Crime Prevention Through
Environment Design (CPTED) and CompStat, an approach that has enabled police
agencies to reduce crime.
Technology, such
as surveillance
equipment, is being
used to enhance police
knowledge of potential
and actual criminal
activity.
CPTED Planning Strategies Four strategies lie at the core of CPTED plans:
• Natural surveillance refers to the use of physical features that increase people’s
visibility in an area. Examples include doors and windows facing streets and
parking areas, night-time lighting, and a willingness among residents to keep
their window coverings open to observe activity in the area.
• Territorial reinforcement emphasizes the use of physical characteristics to
differentiate private and public spaces, and to emphasize the ownership of
private places while discouraging encroachment. Fences, pavement designs,
gates, and landscape architecture can all be used for this purpose.
• Natural access control focuses on ensuring that streets and sidewalks are
in full view of the community; for example, through removal of tall hedges
and solid fences. This openness discourages would-be offenders who prefer
to conceal themselves behind opaque barriers. Prominent video cameras on
buildings can act as additional deterrents.
• Target hardening involves the use of hardware, lighting, and other elements
(such as alarm systems and guard or pet dogs) designed to make a home
or business less vulnerable to physical intrusion. For example, high-quality
window locks and stout deadbolt locks for doors (rather than flimsy door
chains) can discourage intrusion. Recessed interior door hinges can make it
nearly impossible for burglars to remove hinges and pull a door from its frame.
Pros and Cons of CPTED One important benefit of CPTED as a type of plan-
ning is that it promotes community cohesion. To develop an effective CPTED plan,
neighbors must remain alert to what is happening in their community, and every-
one needs to shoulder responsibility for residents’ overall well-being. But like other
forms of planning, CPTED also has its limitations. In particular, executing CPTED
plans can be expensive if it requires retrofitting existing buildings and neighbor-
hoods with crime-prevention features (Book & Schneider, 2010).
CompStat
CompStat: CompStat is a strategic planning approach that has proven useful for reducing crime
a policing approach as well as enhancing the quality of life in neighborhoods, the most dramatic suc-
involving the cess being demonstrated in New York City during the 1990s (Henry, 2002). (See
generation of as Chapter 2 for more information on New York City’s use of CompStat.) Through
much real-time the CompStat approach, police agencies can use tools including computer software
data as possible applications to track crimes and criminal activity and generate real-time data valu-
about crimes able for reducing crime. The data include offender information, details about guns
and the frequent and other weapons involved in crimes, mapping to discover where criminal activity
evaluation of the has been clustering, and other important intelligence. Crime-coordination personnel
data to develop (civilian or sworn) may input data into the system, using preliminary crime reports
strategies to reduce submitted by reporting officers. Depending on the information technology used by
crime as quickly the agency, officers may also input data from crime reports into a database applica-
and effectively as tion, which automates sorting of the data into categories useful to agency personnel
possible. (such as trends in weapons used or locations of particular types of crimes).
A key element in the CompStat approach is frequent evaluation of the intel-
ligence collected, so police can develop plans for moving quickly and effectively to
reduce crime. Before CompStat, statistical crime reports were available at the end of
each month instead of in real time. By the time commanders read about and reacted
to the statistics, crime trends were days or weeks old. By gathering real-time infor-
mation, police agencies can deploy personnel and resources rapidly to areas where
crimes are occurring. As such, this approach has helped create a sense of urgency
for suppressing crime and apprehending suspects, and it has enabled police agencies
to focus their resources more sharply on where those resources are needed most.
Relentless follow-up and assessment are additional vital elements of CompStat
and help agencies ensure that a crime problem has been solved. For police officers,
this can lead to a sense of accomplishment or closure; for citizens, it demonstrates
an attention to detail that is often lacking in today’s police agencies. Many commu-
nity residents and business owners feel safer and view the police as more competent,
effective, and caring.
CompStat can be
a great help when
making decisions to
deploy police resources
to locations where
they are most needed.
There are several models proposing steps in the planning process. Some of these
models are simple (containing a few steps), while others are more complex (con-
taining numerous steps) (Anderson, 2006; Wilson, 1952). Consider this planning-
process model a police agency could use:
1. Establish a sense of urgency by stating publicly that the agency needs a plan
to move toward its future.
2. Identify a facilitator and group to drive the planning process, and ask
everyone to cooperate with them.
3. Define or adjust the agency’s vision as needed to clarify where the agency
wants to go.
4. Establish or appraise the agency’s mission statement to reflect how the agency
wants to operate.
5. Conduct a SWOT (strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, threats) analysis. (See
Chapter 2.)
6. Articulate the results the agency wants to achieve and pinpoint the steps that
will produce that result.
7. Create a step-by-step outline of how to accomplish the plan.
8. Share the plan with key agency managers and request permission to execute it.
9. While executing the plan, regularly examine results and adjust the plan as
needed to improve outcomes (Hellriegel, Jackson, & Slocum, 2005; Hitt,
1988; Meese & Ortmeier, 2004).
Regardless of the number of steps a particular planning-process model contains,
they can be organized into three steps essential to all planning: assessing needs and
risks, developing alternative courses of action, and selecting a course of action. We
Needs assessment: take a closer look at each of these.
the process an
organization uses to Step 1: Assessing Needs and Risks
determine whether
a need (or problem) A police agency assesses needs and risks to create awareness that a plan of action
exists that could is required. These assessments powerfully shape the rest of the planning process.
be addressed by a
particular course of Needs The agency conducts a needs assessment to determine whether a need (or
action. problem) exists that could be addressed by a particular course of action. Children
A needs assessment
may reveal that safe
places for children to
play are not available.
playing in the street because recreational facilities and parks are not available is an
example of a need.
A needs assessment generates information that guides the actions an agency
might take to achieve a stated goal. To illustrate, if an agency has defined a goal of
reducing crime, it would likely review crime statistics for the past year as part of
its needs assessment. Rising crime rates might suggest the need for a plan to bring
down the rates.
Agency leaders might also use a needs assessment to determine whether manag-
ers and officers must strengthen particular knowledge, skills, or abilities (KSAs) to
meet certain goals—such as satisfying operational and ethical standards, achieving
new efficiencies, or improving the agency’s effectiveness. Leaders can make this
assessment through interviews or casual conversations, or through more formal-
ized information-gathering processes, such as surveys. (The box “Needs Assessment
Tools” offers additional information.) This type of needs assessment yields infor-
mation that can help the agency design or revise training programs to strengthen
Risk assessment:
specific KSAs. It also enables agency leaders to identify trends, clarify priorities,
the process an
and ensure that the agency is adhering to accreditation standards or legislatively
organization uses
mandated standards. to determine
whether a known or
Risks A risk is an undesirable circumstance that has not yet occurred but that
foreseeable threat
a police agency should identify and develop plans for mitigating (Hellriegel et al.,
exists, how likely
2005). An agency conducts a risk assessment to determine whether a known or
it is that the threat
foreseeable threat exists, how likely it is that the threat will materialize, and how
will materialize,
severe the consequences would be if the risk did materialize.
and how severe
Police agencies face numerous types of risks, including the following:
the consequences
• Internal organization risks such as computer network breakdowns or the loss would be if it did
of valued employees to rival agencies materialize.
its jurisdiction. Agency managers decide that failing to address the problem could
present several risks—including an exodus of citizens and businesses from the
neighborhood. Managers and officers meet to discuss the problem and to generate
possible courses of action for solving it.
Through brainstorming, they generate ideas for potential solutions. To ensure
that they do not limit themselves to just the first idea that comes to mind or to
ideas that seem most familiar, they freely suggest and list ideas without judging any
of them. The meeting leader encourages participants to continue offering ideas until
the “well” seems to have run dry. The result is a long list of possible courses of
action, including the following:
• Increase the number of officers and patrols in the neighborhood.
• Establish a Neighborhood Watch program.
• Implement a comprehensive community policing program, with the goal of
reducing crime permanently in the neighborhood.
ETHICS IN ACTION
Community–Police Partnerships
police agency located in the northeastern part of the United States
1 Increase the number of officers and patrols Can be done quickly Expensive
2 Form Neighborhood Watch program Least expensive Takes time
3 Implement a comprehensive community Most effective in Takes time; officers must
policing program the long term develop leadership skills
and citizen–partnership skills
to implement the selected solution? Will those responsible for putting the plan into
action approach the task with the required urgency?
In choosing a final action plan, police managers may take a number of different
approaches. Several examples include:
• Accommodating stakeholder priorities. In police agencies, the loudest or
most persistent stakeholder usually captures the most attention, and agency
managers often feel pressured to appease that person or group while selecting
plans of action. For instance, perhaps an agency chooses a plan that satisfies
a politically powerful neighborhood group leader who wants the agency to
build a visible citizen–police substation, even though the substation requires
additional resources that will be difficult to obtain.
• Making innovative change. Agency managers may select a final plan based on
its opportunity to effect innovative change. For example, an agency selects an
action plan that includes officers’ use of a Taser electronic device to subdue
agitated or violent subjects without causing injury. A Taser delivers electrical
pulses that affect the suspect’s motor and sensory functions and can reduce
injuries to suspects and officers, which can in turn reduce liability claims
against police (Taser International Inc., 2008).
• Using intuition. Some managers make decisions by drawing on their past
experiences, expertise, knowledge, and intuitive sense for what might
constitute the best course of action for solving a particular problem. This
“sixth sense” approach hinges on the ability to blend information from both
personal and outside sources while arriving at a decision (Angelfire.com,
2009; Casto, 2009; Decision-Making-Confidence.com, 2008; Vaknin, 2006).
• Clarifying decision roles. Managers define what role each participant in the
decision will play. To illustrate, will everyone involved in selecting a final plan of
action provide input and have a say in the ultimate decision? Will the leader of
the planning process consult others and solicit their opinions but then make the
final choice alone? Will the individuals involved need to arrive at a consensus
before the decision is deemed final? Or will they vote on the various alternative
plans proposed, and the plan with the most votes will be implemented?
So, what course of action did the police agency seeking to reduce crime in a par-
ticular neighborhood select from its list of working alternatives? Ultimately, manag-
ers and officers selected Solution 3—implement a comprehensive community polic-
ing program—because they believed it would prove most effective in the long run.
While other choices were faster or cheaper to implement, those alternatives would
not generate the enduring results promised by the community policing alternative.
No matter how carefully a police agency has assessed its needs and risks, developed
a full set of alternative plans for addressing those needs and risks, and selected a final
course of action to implement, events still may not unfold as expected once the plan is
implemented. For example, an unexpected emergency—such as a fire or hurricane or
a raft of gang-related shootings—might consume resources that had been set aside for
summary
• Adopting a Long-Term, Big-Picture View. Police agencies must develop plans
for addressing not only small, short-term problems but also major, long-term
issues. But in most agencies, planning centers entirely on the former.
• Aligning Plans with Values, Vision, and Mission. A police agency’s values
(fundamental beliefs, principles, or standards), its vision (image of a desired
future state), and its mission (a short-range task or assignment it wishes to
achieve) guide the definition of the goals (long-range desired achievements)
and objectives (short-term accomplishments that lead to achievement of a
goal) that the agency’s plans contain.
• Common Planning Pitfalls. Pitfalls include failing to put proposed ideas into
action, moving a plan forward one small step at a time owing to lack of
resources, and failure to assemble a task force for plans that call for major
change, numerous objectives, and the efforts of many different people.
• Types of Plans. Plan types include single-use, repeat-use, tactical, operational,
and contingency. Strategic plans are long-term intended courses of action
designed to apply to the entire police organization. Crime Prevention Through
Environmental Design (CPTED) is a type of planning that entails constructing
or modifying the physical environment to discourage criminal activity.
• Key Steps in the Planning Process. Steps include assessing needs and risks
(using tools including community mapping and crime analysis), developing
alternative courses of action for addressing a need or risk (using techniques
such as brainstorming), and selecting a final course of action by comparing
alternatives’ advantages and disadvantages based on criteria such as
cost, efficiency, and ability to deliver sustained results. To select a final
course of action, agency personnel can use additional approaches, such as
accommodating stakeholder priorities, making a selection based on its ability
to effect innovative change, using intuition, and clarifying decision roles.
• Mastering the Art of Self-Management. If a plan does not deliver its intended
result or cannot be implemented as intended (for example, there are fewer
resources or less political support than expected), agency personnel must
practice self-management—monitoring and controlling their emotions
and remaining flexible and balanced. Self-management techniques include
remaining focused on the agency’s goals, playing to one’s strengths while
compensating for one’s limitations, learning continually from experience, and
assessing the planning process itself.
key terms
needs assessment
objectives
operational plans
planning
repeat-use plans
risk assessment
self-management
single-use plans
strategic plans
tactical plans
values
vision
discussion questions
1. Go to your local police agency and ask what its vision and mission are. Then identify
several goals to which the vision and mission might align. For each goal you have iden-
tified, what are several objectives that could help lead to achievement of the goal?
2. What event can force a plan to be implemented in an incremental manner? If you
had to develop an incremental plan for adding computer laptops to patrol cars, what
would your plan consist of?
3. Give an example of a single-use plan, a repeat-use plan, a tactical plan, and an
operational plan.
4. What kinds of events would necessitate a contingency plan for a police agency?
5. How do strategic plans differ from other types of plans in a police agency?
6. What is Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design? How might you use this
type of planning to improve quality of life in your neighborhood, town, or city?
What challenges might using CPTED present?
7. How would you develop a needs assessment process to examine morale in a police
agency?
8. Describe a situation that would require a police agency to conduct a risk assessment.
9. Visit your local police agency to learn whether and how it is using needs assessment
tools such as community mapping and crime analysis. What do personnel at the
agency see as the advantages and disadvantages of these tools?
10. Using the planning process, formulate a solution to address the following problem:
A series of residential burglaries have been perpetrated by at least three persons who
enter the homeowner’s car to obtain and use the garage door opener to gain entry to
the residence.
11. How do you typically react when a plan does not produce the intended outcomes
or cannot be implemented as you had hoped? What steps might you take to manage
any frustration or anger you experience when this happens?
5
A Hackettstown, New Jersey,
middle school student and a
Hackettstown police officer
engage in a fund-raising
basketball event to benefit the
school and the Hackettstown
Police Benevolent Association.
Introduction
Responsible police managers and line personnel know that public safety is impor-
tant to the average citizen. Safe communities are also fiscally healthy communi-
ties. They stimulate commerce and economic growth, stabilize or grow the popula-
tion, and increase the community’s tax base. To make neighborhoods safe, police
agencies need to partner with community teams to create and sustain a civil and
livable environment.
Public safety thus requires resources, especially financial ones. Police depart-
ments and other law enforcement agencies depend on financial resources—gained
primarily through the taxes that citizens pay—to acquire and maintain equipment
and facilities, and to hire, train, deploy, and retain the right personnel. Typically,
police managers use the budgeting process to determine how much money they
need to build and maintain safe neighborhoods. They present the budget to com-
munity leaders, who then work those funding requests into their own budgets.
Yet police managers often rush through the budgeting process because it
seems to detract from their publicly stated mission of keeping the streets safe.
Indeed, many police personnel, no matter what their level in the organization, view
budgeting as a task that should be done by “bean counters.” However, without a
budget, a police agency cannot allocate financial resources appropriately and use
them wisely. Just as a family budget enables household members to plan for the
future and ensure the family’s financial health, a police agency’s budget positions
the agency to plan for and to safeguard the community’s well-being.
In this chapter, we take a close look at the budgeting process—how it works,
how it relates to the sound fiscal management and administration of police agen-
cies, and what leadership skills it requires.
WHAT IS A BUDGET?
Budget: A budget is a plan expressed in financial terms. Budgeting is the thread that weaves
a plan expressed through a sound fiscal management strategy. You may maintain a personal budget to
in financial terms. compare your income with your expenses on a regular basis (monthly, quarterly, yearly)
and to determine when you are spending more than you are earning. A family keeps
a household budget to do the same. Companies large and small also use budgets—to
identify revenue streams and estimate expenses for specific time periods. (Large organi-
zations’ budgets can be highly complex, often containing details that relate specifically
to individual business-unit, division, and department levels.) Government entities—
such as police agencies—also use budgets to forecast revenue and expenditures for a
fiscal period (usually 12 months beginning January 1, July 1, or October 1).
Public Budgeting
Any public organization seeking to develop a budget should take into account its
intended strategy, its existing personnel and the services it offers, initiatives in the
pipeline (such as projects aimed at developing new services), the resources these efforts
will need, and capital investment that will be required to achieve strategic objectives.
A budget, in short, shows how the organization plans to make its vision real.
Effective police agencies also use the budgeting process to make and enforce
decisions about how community resources will be allocated to meet civic needs. To
that end, the public budgeting process must also ensure that projected revenue will
cover all authorized expenditures.
Public budgets—such as those used in police agencies—strongly reflect the pri-
orities of the stakeholders served by the organization. For example, a town or city
budget reveals citizens’ preferences regarding how much taxes will be paid and where
the money will be invested. In addition, public budgets reflect the relative power of
individuals and groups to influence how an organization or community allocates its
resources. Finally, public organizations’ budgets can be used as a tool for stakeholders
to determine whether the organization is fulfilling its responsibilities. Unlike personal
households or private businesses, government entities spend the public’s money. Thus,
their budgets are subject to public scrutiny, debate, and accountability.
Members of the
Chicago Police
Department on patrol.
While expensive, foot
patrol can enhance
police–community
relations and reduce
citizen fear of crime.
prepare recommendations for their department’s budget, which then becomes part of
the larger budget document. The chief of police assumes the role of ultimate decision
maker in the final budget approval (Jurkanin, Hoover, Dowling, & Ahmad, 2001).
In large police agencies, bureau chiefs typically get involved in the budgeting
process. Many of them want to promote growth in the agency’s revenue while main-
taining existing services. The agency may also employ an executive-level budget
officer to monitor expenditures, prevent waste, and accomplish policy and political
goals. Executives most involved in budgeting may be those with the most personal
charisma or political “capital.” Or they may have the most obvious problems in
their departments—an example of “the squeaky wheel gets the grease” principle.
Legislators, meanwhile, may make compromises with other legislators to estab-
lish budgets, while seeking to also meet demands from constituents and special-
interest groups as well as solve specific problems plaguing their community. Special-
interest groups may get involved in the budgeting process in numerous ways as well;
for instance, demanding that taxes be earmarked for certain spending priorities. The
courts may also enter the picture, usually after an aggrieved party sues a jurisdiction
or government entity over a disputed current practice, such as the level of taxes a
community levies or a disciplinary fine levied because of inappropriate use of police
powers. Honoring these legal priorities often takes precedence over creating a bal-
anced budget. For example, the judgment of a court may require a jail facility to
maintain a specified level of healthcare for inmates, even if the funds for doing so
are not provided in the budget. The voices of individual citizens are rarely heard
while a large police agency is working out its budget.
TYPES OF BUDGETS
There are many types of budgets that public organizations can use, including tradi-
tional, line item, performance based, zero based, program, balance based, operating,
and capital. A single police agency might use several of these types of budgets during
a fiscal year, often simultaneously, depending on how well the different types meet
the needs of the agency and the community as well as fiscal constraints (Rubin,
2006). In the following text we examine each type and consider when and why an
agency might use each.
Traditional Budget
In its most elementary form, a traditional budget reflects a simple percentage Traditional budget:
increase in funding over the most recent budget. A traditional budget for a police a budget that reflects
agency illustrates detailed costs of items by using item accounts. The budget shows a simple percentage
the cost of a class of labor or type of material, along with the organizational unit increase in funding
(for example, the department or division within the agency). Whereas a traditional over the most recent
budget might provide workload information (personnel hours), it does not typically budget.
contain efficiency data (production of services per hour worked) or effectiveness
data (quality of results). Rather, the overall objective of a traditional budget is
control of financial resources. Budget decisions are based on item costs per unit of
contracted service or products being purchased. For instance, police agencies may
purchase a trainer’s services by hours of training rendered or purchase firearms
based on the cost of each weapon (Sunnyvale, 2008).
A major advantage of traditional budgeting is that it is widely used and easily
understood. Moreover, managers can transfer funds among accounts easily and
increase or decrease item accounts as the need arises. Indeed, many managers con-
sider it perfectly acceptable to reformulate the budget throughout the fiscal year.
A key disadvantage of traditional budgeting is that it does not account for spe-
cific policing activities or the outcomes associated with those activities. It thus does
not generate insights about an activity’s efficiency or effectiveness.
Line-Item Budget
Line-item budget: A line-item budget (also called an object-of-expenditure budget) counts among the
a budget in most commonly used of all budget types for most organizations, including police
which each item and other public safety agencies. Each item is described and assigned a place (line)
is described and in the budget with a corresponding dollar value. Line-item budgeting offers a level
assigned a place of detail and clarity that facilitates planning and cost control (Dossett, 2005).
(line), with a Line-item budgeting also promotes strict accountability by forcing decision
corresponding dollar makers to allocate a dollar value to each item on the budget, creating an item-by-
value. item spending schedule. Line-item budgets are easy to audit—another key advan-
tage. The biggest disadvantages of line-item budgeting are its inflexibility (the bud-
get is not updated throughout the fiscal year) and lack of connection to performance
objectives. A line-item budget thus does not show whether policing services called
for in an agency’s strategy have in fact been delivered—or whether they have gener-
ated the intended results.
Program Budget
Program budget: A program budget is a variation of the line-item budget. Programs such as busi-
a budget that ness crime prevention or drug-abuse resistance education (DARE) are presented
presents programs separately in categories very similar to those listed in the line-item budget format.
and services A program budget also focuses on the services an organization provides to its cus-
separately in tomers. For a police agency and the various units within it, “customers” can be
categories. external individuals (citizens) or internal entities (agency units) in need of services.
A program budget enables decision makers to compare and analyze the effec-
tiveness of different programs. This analysis minimizes competition for resources
among programs and prevents duplication of effort. However, the process of
building a program budget may lead unit managers to offer exaggerated expla-
nations for their budget requests to justify how they spend their time and other
resources.
Performance-based
budget:
Performance-Based Budget
a budget that links A performance-based budget focuses on the activities needed to deliver policing ser-
measurable activities vices, with the measurable activity as the basic budgeting unit. Measurable activities
to established are linked to established strategic objectives. For example, suppose an objective calls
strategic objectives. for improving response time to calls for service. Measurable activities associated
Measurable activities
for police include
traffic citations
issued, arrests made,
vehicles towed, and
vehicle-collision scenes
processed.
with that goal might include increasing the number of patrol officers available.
Likewise, suppose an objective calls for improving relations with a neighborhood
action committee that is concerned about the enforcement of a noise ordinance
regarding loud stereos in motor vehicles. Measurable activities associated with that
goal might include identifying problem locations, tracking the number of noise
ordinance tickets issued, and monitoring the number of vehicles towed owing to
violations of the noise ordinance.
Managers can use this type of budget to assess efficiency of these activities, by
comparing their cost with their results. To illustrate, consider the noise ordinance
example introduced earlier. To enforce the noise ordinance, a police agency must
use a noise meter to measure the volume of noise and distance noises can be heard.
To accomplish this task, the agency establishes a noise ordinance detail and an
area check point. It measures distances, and assigns personnel to various tasks to
adequately establish whether violations of the ordinance have occurred. This is all
costly, and the costs may outweigh any quantifiable benefits gained. Still, the agency
may decide to continue the program because citizens’ perceptions that the police
care about their concerns creates valuable goodwill in the community.
Performance-based budgets usually place emphasis on planning to achieve spe-
cific service objectives rather than basing decisions solely on costs. A major disad-
vantage of performance-based budgeting is that some types of performance (such as
crime prevention) can be difficult to define in quantifiable terms (Dossett, 2004).
Zero-based budget:
a budget in which
Zero-Based Budget all available revenue
In a zero-based budget, all available revenue is allocated to expense categories, is allocated to
resulting in a net zero budget balance. The major advantage to zero-based budgeting expense categories.
is the high degree of control it provides to decision makers. Police managers can
use this type of budget to examine current programs and rank them according to
how well they support the agency’s goals and to develop new programs that directly
support important goals. Advocates of zero-based budgeting emphasize its ability to
promote innovation, effectiveness, and efficiency.
The disadvantages of zero-based budgeting include its focus on controllable
elements of the budget and the subjective decision making often associated with its
use. Evaluating the results of budgeted programs is difficult and expensive, and the
budget doesn’t take into account interrelationships among organizational programs.
Also, many people find using the type of budget to be cumbersome.
Balanced-Based Budget
Balanced-based A balanced-based budget is often used when a reduction in revenues forces decreases
budget: in expenditures. The budget is based on an estimate of future revenues. Managers
a budget based on allocate funds according to the agency’s needs and the community’s priorities.
an estimate of future Planned programs and activities are clustered together in the budget based on their
revenues. connection to common organizational objectives.
Managers use three processes to determine expenditure levels for a balanced-
based budget: reduction in funding, base level for a balanced budget, and additional
funds and explanation of services at each level. This budget method focuses on long-
range planning, goals, and outcomes of activities. For example, managers may sub-
mit a budget request calling for a 5 percent reduction in funds requested, no change,
or a 5 percent increase. They are expected to justify any increases in expenditures
they request.
Many jurisdictions use balanced-based budgeting to solicit input from agency
personnel regarding which expenditures could be cut, what the costs of maintaining
the same level of services might be, what cost-of-living increases they might need,
and which new initiatives need to be implemented. Police agencies are especially
vulnerable to funding reductions with balanced-based budgets during taxpayer
revolts and periods of financial retrenchment. During such times, agencies may be
forced to reduce workforce headcount, leave some vacant positions unfilled, or even
shut down if elected officials decide to contract with another jurisdiction to provide
police services.
Activity-Based Budget
Activity-based An activity-based budget defines and analyzes all activities that consume financial
budget: resources (such as officers’ responding to calls for service in a particular neighbor-
a budget that defines hood, or police vehicles’ getting into accidents)—not just those activities directly
and analyzes all the required to deliver specific policing services. Managers compare the activities to the
activities consuming agency’s strategic goals, and allocate funds in the budget for any activities relevant
an organization’s to the goals. Unlike a traditional budget, an activity-based budget is not adjusted to
financial resources. reflect inflation or unexpected increases in revenue.
This type of budget enables decision makers to analyze the potential and actual
impact of the agency’s services. It thus provides a formula for calculating return on
investment. Managers can improve efficiency of activities by consolidating several
that support the same strategic goal or by reconfiguring them. Activity-based bud-
geting thus focuses agency personnel’s attention on activities that produce intended
results (Garrison, Noreen, & Brewer, 2006).
Capital Budget
A capital budget is used for projects and expenses that are designed to yield benefits Capital budget:
well into the future. Capital budget items therefore tend to include fixed assets such a budget that
as land, structures, buildings, streets, bridges, and other infrastructure, as well as shows projects and
police vehicles and other equipment—items of major value with life expectancies in expenses designed
excess of one year. to yield benefits well
The capital budget usually shows expected expenditures on such assets five to into the future.
seven years into the future. This type of budgeting ensures that funding for capital
expenditures is not diverted to the purchase of other shorter-term items or services.
It also helps police agencies replace public safety equipment and structures in an
orderly way. The capital budget process usually comprises three steps:
1. Planning. Managers classify and analyze budget requests, rank the requests
according to how well they support the agency’s strategic objectives, prepare
capital-improvement-plan (CIP) schedules, and forecast necessary and
predictable resources.
2. Budgeting. Managers evaluate projects under consideration, select some for
financing, obtain approval for capital requests from authorizing sources, and
appropriate the approved funding.
3. Implementing. The agency designs or acquires (through purchase or lease)
approved equipment and facilities, or contracts for the construction of such
assets (Rabin et al., 1996).
Construction of a
firearms range is
an example of a
capital expenditure.
Here recruits use the
Worcester County
Firearms Training
Center in Newark,
Maryland.
To build a budget, police agencies draft specific sections with an eye toward the
expenditures the budget must cover and the revenue needed to fund those expen-
ditures. While deciding how to allocate financial resources across the budget, man-
agers must make tough decisions. Next, we examine the sections that make up a
typical budget, the expenditure categories most agencies will show in their budgets,
typical sources of revenue for police agencies, and analyses that can help police
managers make budget decisions.
Anatomy of a Budget
Most budgets contain four sections: the budget message, the summary schedule,
detailed schedules, and supplemental data.
• The budget message contains a description of the economic situation of the
jurisdiction (municipality, county, state), community priorities, the existence
of special circumstances (such as anticipated special events or a wave of
Expenditure Categories
A central function of a budget is to show planned expenditures for the fiscal year
covered by the budget. A typical budget contains at least five basic budget categories Budget categories:
related to expenditures: categories in a
budget representing
• Personnel expenses include all spending associated with agency employee
types of expenses.
payroll (such as wages, salaries, benefits, and state and federal payroll taxes).
This expenditure category usually represents the largest within any police
agency’s budget, consuming as much as 85 percent of the budget.
• Operating expenses are associated with nontangible expenditures; for
example, training and maintenance.
• Supplies and material expenses include tangible objects with a life expectancy
of a year or less, such as fuel and ammunition.
• Capital expenses include tangible depreciable objects with a life expectancy of
more than one year, for instance, buildings and computers.
• Miscellaneous expenses include any expenditures that are not more
appropriately placed in one of the other four basic budget categories, such as
travel to professional conferences (Ortmeier & Meese, 2010).
Table 5-1 illustrates expenditure categories, with examples of the items typically
included within these budget categories. Figure 5-1 shows how expenditures are
allocated in many police agencies.
Sources of Revenue
All police agencies have sources of revenue that are reflected in their budgets. These
sources include taxes, fines, and fees; grants; and donations, fund-raisers, IRS reim-
bursements, and forfeitures. Let’s look at each of these.
Taxes, Fines, and Fees Taxes are a primary source of revenue for most government
entities, including police agencies. Not surprisingly, government officials often want
to raise taxes to increase money flowing into public entities—while citizens want
their taxes reduced. But unless a policy agency can achieve efficiencies that reduce
its expenses, it is virtually impossible to refrain from raising taxes, for several rea-
sons. First, as the cost and standard of living escalate in a community, agencies need
more financial resources to maintain policing services. Second, external forces such
as the termination of a grant, an economic recession, natural disasters, and war can
reduce the revenue flowing into a police agency. Therefore, there’s a constant need
to increase tax revenue while also recognizing that resistance to raising taxes will
persist.
The main sources of tax revenue for a police agency are local sales and property
taxes and those collected and shared by the state. In some states, police agencies
can generate additional revenue from permit fees (for example, for burning brush),
motor-vehicle violation fines, court fines, parking fees and citation payments, and
pet licensing fees. However, in several states, fine revenue does not flow to the
agency but to the state’s general fund.
15%
Personnel Expenses
Operating, Supplies and
Materials, Capital, and
Miscellaneous
Expenses
85%
Some police agencies also charge for services or initiate a special fee structure
for traffic control and officer presence at special community events such as baseball
and soccer games, bicycle races, and neighborhood block parties. Several agencies
charge a fee when they detain an arrestee from another jurisdiction. Other agencies
charge fees after a specified number of responses to house and business false alarms.
During times of fiscal belt-tightening, agencies use volunteers wherever practicable
and reduce overtime expenses by assigning regular on-duty personnel to perform
tasks whenever possible (Rabin et al., 1996).
5%
95%
Contraband seized
by investigators. The
contraband is forfeited
and destroyed.
improve neighborhoods in the long term or does it simply (and temporarily) reduce
the availability of drugs or decrease the number of calls for service?
As the next step in the budget process, one or more high-ranking police officials present
the completed documents to those responsible for approving the budget. Those who
approve the budget may include the mayor, city council members, city manager, county
supervisors, legislators, or other government officials. Approvers scrutinize budget
categories, and presenters explain the rationale behind each entry in the document.
The process resembles that used by sales representatives making presentations
to potential customers. The police officials presenting the budget must be prepared
to defend it and to discuss budget balances, expenditures, impact on citizens, pro-
gram changes, anticipated personnel reductions or additions, and performance
indicators (Rabin et al., 1996).
To win support for the budget, presenters should also inform approvers of
the budget’s ROI and VAC. This information helps approvers see the intended
payoff from requested budget increases for personnel, supplies, equipment, or
facilities. The agency’s customers want to know what they will receive in return
for the taxes and user fees they are paying. To secure the revenue requested in the
budget, police officials must convince stakeholders that the requested resources
are necessary. In effect, they must “sell” the agency’s service and even its brand
image—perceptions of the agency’s worth in the eyes of its customers. For exam-
ple, a recent research report asserted that DARE programs are more effective
when presented by police officers. By pointing out this finding, an agency could
enhance citizens’ positive perceptions of the local police (Hammond et al., 2008).
Presenting a budget calls for a full range of leadership skills. The police must be
knowledgeable about all aspects of their agency’s financial situation—as well as skilled
in the art of persuasion. Selling the budget successfully calls for persistence and a knack
for achieving consensus. Police officials should not come across as risk takers. Rather,
they should demonstrate that they plan to dedicate resources to agreed-upon purposes
that will create value for citizens now and in the future (Kotter, 1996; Rubin, 2006).
If a budget wins approval from stakeholders, the police agency moves to the final
stage in the budget process: putting the financial plan into action, or executing it.
Execution calls for three additional leadership skills: managing the projects pro-
posed in the budget, calculating what is known as maintenance of effort, and audit-
ing. We examine each of these next.
Managing Projects
A project is a major undertaking or initiative, stipulated in a police agency’s bud-
get, that is intended to create value for the organization and its customers. For an
agency, a project may be an innovative program designed to improve service to the
public, a new process intended to achieve efficiencies, or an initiative aimed at pre-
paring for future service requirements.
A project may be a new initiative or an expansion of a current program to improve
service. A project may also call for replacement of a current resource to increase service
capabilities (Brigham & Ehrhardt, 2005). To illustrate, the police may replace computer
hardware with new equipment to make it compatible with new software applications.
Every project requires management. Simply stated, project management is the Project management:
process of planning and guiding an initiative from inception to completion. A proj- the process of
ect might be managed by a single person or a team. In the case of a single account- planning and
able project manager, the individual plans the project, organizes the tasks necessary guiding an initiative
to accomplish the project’s goals, develops timelines, obtains support from skilled from inception to
people who can move the project forward, and reports on the project’s progress at completion.
predetermined intervals. When more than one person manages a project, the various
tasks can be divided among the team members.
Auditing
An audit is an evaluation of a process, system, or project. A police agency might Audit:
conduct an audit to determine the reliability and validity of information gener- an evaluation of a
ated by a process, to assess a system’s internal controls, or to examine a project’s process, system, or
effectiveness. An audit is intended to provide reasonable assurance that a process, project.
system, or project is free of significant errors or other problems.
ETHICS IN ACTION
Audit Uncovers Unethical Behavior?
n audit of a major U.S. police agency led to the discovery of sev-
miscellaneous expenses
operating budget
operating expenses
performance-based budget
personnel expenses
program budget
project management
return on investment (ROI)
supplies and materials expenses
traditional budget
value-added contribution (VAC)
zero-based budget
discussion questions
1. The budget process is critical to the viability and economic health of a com-
munity. Define the term budget and describe what the budget process attempts
to achieve. Who may be involved in the creation of an acceptable budget for a
police agency?
2. Budgets are generally divided into numerous sections or categories. Describe these
sections. What basic expense categories are typically contained in a budget?
3. Numerous types of budgets are used by police agencies. Most agencies gravitate
toward the traditional budget model. Why?
4. How does the line-item budget compare to the zero-based budget? The activity-based
budget? The performance-based budget? Discuss the strengths and weaknesses of
each type.
5. Describe an operating budget, its importance, and duration.
6. Define and explain capital budgeting process.
7. Articulate sources of revenue for a police organization.
8. Describe the concepts of cost–benefit analysis, return on investment, and value-added
contribution and how they assist with the budget process.
9. Why is selling the budget important to a police agency?
10. How does an auditing procedure help maintain the integrity of a police agency’s
budgeting process?
6
More and more police
agencies are engaging in
a participatory management
style. Here officers of the
North Miami Beach, Florida,
Police Department engage in
a strategy meeting.
Organizational Design
learning outcomes
• differentiate the customers whom a police agency serves and explain how
police serve customers and discern their changing needs
Introduction
Humans have been organizing themselves for specific purposes for thousands
of years. For example, the administrative organizations that Egyptian pharaohs,
Alexander the Great, and Julius Caesar used to operate their vast realms still have
the power to astound, especially considering the lack of sophisticated technol-
ogy at the time. Today, most formal organizations are designed to fulfill specific
purposes as well: Hospitals are designed to serve patients; corporations, to
make money; and police agencies, to protect and serve the jurisdictions they are
responsible for.
But what is organizational design, exactly? An organization’s design derives
from decisions managers make about (1) how relationships are structured (for
example, who reports to whom), (2) what kind of culture the organization will have
(for instance, formal command-and-control or informal bottom-up), and (3) what
behavioral standards (e.g., standards or codes of conduct) are considered accept-
able and unacceptable. Structure, culture, and behavioral standards are all tightly
interwoven and strongly affect one another. To illustrate, a police agency that has
a rigid reporting structure will likely also have a formal culture and behavioral
standards that emphasize the importance of obedience to authority figures.
The way police agencies have been designed has changed over time. For
example, in the past, they were structured along relatively simple lines, consisting
of patrol officers, command personnel, detectives, and civilian (nonsworn) workers
such as secretaries. But today’s large agencies are multilayered organizations
that might contain as many as several thousand full- or part-time male and female
sworn officers, with separate divisions for patrol, criminal investigations, drug
enforcement, crime scene technology, marine patrol, internal investigations, and
budget management.
Many large police agencies are bureaucracies. A bureaucracy (as defined by
Max Weber, the founder of the modern science of sociology) is a tiered arrange-
ment of management positions and labor devised in such a way as to encourage
specialization. Still, there is an increasing movement to design police agencies in
the same manner as corporations—including adopting policies designed to enhance
employees’ job satisfaction, using performance-improvement methodologies such
as total quality management (TQM), and making customer service a top priority.
In this chapter, we take a closer look at the key elements of organizational
design in a police agency. We begin by examining structure (how the vertical,
horizontal, and community relationships are configured in an agency). We then
explore culture (defined as the thoughts, speech, actions, values, and beliefs held
by everyone who works in the organization). Finally, we consider the behavioral
Chief of Police
Narcotics Investigations
Section
Field
Investigations
Criminal
Investigations
the agency’s size. Most experts agree that a wider span of control renders a
supervisor or manager less effective. That is because managers have greater
difficulty supervising many people, owing to the increased number and
complexities of tasks and the demand for high-quality results (Iannone, 1987;
Robbins & Judge, 2008).
An incident
commander
communicating at a
crisis situation.
Horizontal Relationships
An agency’s structure is also determined by its horizontal relationships—collabora-
tions and communication across its various functions or departments (Hellriegel,
Jackson, & Slocum, 2008; Meese & Ortmeier, 2004). For example, Figure 6-2
shows the criminal investigations section from one agency’s organizational chart.
The section is part of the agency’s criminal investigation division and consists of
three same-level units: warrants, violent crimes, and missing persons. Each unit is
supervised by a sergeant or lieutenant. While these unit supervisors do not have
formal authority over one another (rather, each reports to the division head), they
communicate regularly across unit lines to achieve the division’s goals. To illustrate,
the manager of the missing persons unit might meet with the violent-crimes lieuten-
ant to discuss how to determine whether a missing person is a kidnap or murder
victim with the suspect still at large.
Community Relationships
In addition to vertical and horizontal relationships, police agencies have com-
munity relationships—partnerships forged with citizens and volunteers to solve
particular problems. One of the ways police managers form collaborative rela-
Volunteerism: tionships with community members is through volunteerism. If citizens are con-
the process by cerned enough to volunteer for Neighborhood Watch and other civic-minded
which community groups, an effective police organization will involve these community members in
members donate its initiatives. Volunteers on the streets in citizen patrols, acting as eyes and ears
their time and effort for the police, can and do make a contribution to the health and safety of their
to a police agency’s neighborhoods.
operations. Yet many police officers resist the notion of working as partners with citizens.
Police officers tend to operate in a culture that has specific formal and informal
rules governing entry and inclusion. Police and citizens alike often assume that
citizens can never be members of this officer group—for good reason. A police
officer becomes acculturated to a certain way of thinking and acting through atten-
dance at the police academy and through job experience. Citizens have no such
opportunity.
However, when citizens volunteer, they are reaching out to officers and trying to
establish a connection. Officers should make every effort to demonstrate receptivity
to these encounters and to seize advantage of the value that can come with having
more “eyes and ears on the street.” Likewise, citizens who are invited to volunteer
will feel they are “taking back” their streets and sharing with police the burden of
keeping their neighborhoods safe.
Criminal Investigations
Section
To welcome citizens into volunteer work, officers must reduce or eradicate what
is known as “occupational arrogance”—the attitude that police are untouchable,
have unassailable authority, and are not to be questioned or challenged in any
way by citizens. In an agency that chooses to orient itself toward its customers,
occupational arrogance will dissipate as officers become flexible and learn how
valuable volunteer citizens can be (O’Hara, 2005). The box titled “Engaging
Volunteers in Baltimore County, Maryland” shows an example.
Use of information provided by citizens has become common practice in such
large cities as Fort Worth, Texas, Los Angeles, California, and Rochester, New
York. There is even a national organization—Volunteers in Police Service (VIPS)—
that helps police departments organize and train volunteers. VIPS provides a broad
scope of assistance, including the preparation of agency personnel to conduct vol-
unteer training and what to teach how to pay volunteers’ out-of-pocket expenses,
and how to manage volunteers once they become active (www.policevolunteers.
org, 2008).
To work with volunteers, police managers must make decisions about a wide
range of matters:
A police agency that elects to use volunteers should be committed to giving the
effort the same commitment it gives to other programs—by clearly establishing the
volunteer values, vision, mission, and goals (Citizens Information Board, 1999).
Officer Unity
As a consequence of the command-and-control culture characterizing most police
agencies, many police officers feel isolated from those who do not work in law
enforcement. In addition, they tend to distrust their superiors within the department,
and they often feel comfortable only in the company of other officers who are closely
associated in rank. Moreover, most of them believe that any person who is not a police
officer cannot understand the pressures and unwritten rules inherent in police work.
For instance, there is an almost universal understanding among many police
officers that one does not inform police administrators if a fellow officer’s actions
may be considered unethical or immoral or possibly even illegal. To illustrate, an
officer who assaults an unruly subject after a brief chase and traffic stop expects that
the backup officer or partner will support the individual and not advise a superior
officer of the “street justice” occurrence. Officers who violate this unwritten rule
about not informing on one another may end up being ostracized by their peers.
This can place the reporting officers in real danger if peers refuse to “watch their
backs” in perilous situations on the job.
Adapting to Change
Like other organizations, police agencies are constantly subjected to change—in the
form of new challenges, new theories and practices about how to better serve com-
munities, new technologies, and so forth. Change can be triggered by both internal
and external events. For instance, when a new police chief is appointed, this internal
change may lead to other management personnel changes as well as modifications
in the agency’s strategies and the day-to-day activities carried out by line officers.
An example of an external change is the election of a new governor or mayor
Spotlight on MCI
MCI has helped introduce three valuable innovations in processes for police
agencies:
• Improved use of resources. Patrol officers consider several “solvability
factors” while deciding whether to recommend that a case they have
investigated should be closed or referred for follow-up investigation.
Solvability factors might include known witnesses, fingerprints, video
depicting criminal intent, serial numbers on stolen property, and
known suspects. If solvability factors are numerous and significant,
and agency follow-up investigative policy allows, the patrol officers
may recommend that they solve the case themselves. Otherwise, they
might suggest that police detectives or investigators conduct a follow-
up investigation. Additionally, the case may be continued for follow-
up investigation if officers believe that the case would cause consider-
able concern in the community or is part of a current crime pattern.
• Better collaboration. Police officers and investigators collaborate
with prosecutors by seeking legal guidance on cases being presented.
Officers ensure that written documentation offered to prosecutors is
meticulous and provides comprehensive information on events and
investigative resources. Prosecutors may assist police investigators
by monitoring ongoing investigative efforts and suggesting addi-
tional investigative initiative to anticipate successful case prosecution
(Rochester Police Department, G.O. 409, 1996).
• More effective training. Agencies train all patrol officers in the
primary investigation process with the intent that they will become
responsible for this process rather than merely taking reports.
Eventually, patrol supervisors could become investigation supervisors
with the knowledge and skills necessary to assign cases for closure or
follow-up (Greenwood, 1979).
Incremental change:
a police agency’s By contrast, through incremental change, a police agency adapts slowly, over
gradual adoption time, to new or tested approaches. An example might be an agency that agrees to
of new ways of begin participating in emergency communications (9-1-1) arrangements or drug
operating designed enforcement task forces with other agencies to serve communities more efficiently
to improve (Hellriegel et al., 2008).
community service
over time. Directed and Nondirected Change In addition to taking radical or incremental
form, change in a police agency can be directed or nondirected. Directed change is
Directed change: a carefully planned, strategic process designed to improve every area of the agency,
a carefully planned, with progress formally evaluated during and after the change is implemented.
strategic process Directed change is agency-wide, comprehensive, and formal.
designed to improve A good example of directed change is a police agency’s installation of a new
every area of a computer system. This type of change must not be implemented in a disjointed, ran-
police agency. dom manner but must be planned for and executed carefully, step by step. Ideally,
Information
technology has
dramatically changed
the way police gather,
store, analyze, and
retrieve information.
one person will take charge of the overall implementation, delegating various stages
(such as selecting the system, installing it, troubleshooting, and training personnel to
use it) to subordinates. Without careful planning, the installation of a new computer
system or software may simply speed up the mess, leading to confusion as well as
expensive downtime and repairs.
Nondirected change is a less formal process and affects only those individuals Nondirected change:
who implement it. For example, in an area suffering from high crime rates and drug- an informal process
related problems, command officers might direct their crime-prevention personnel of altering the
to make early-morning stops of all pedestrians to ascertain the identity and purpose way tasks are
of the individuals’ presence. The goal of this change is to stop violence related to accomplished,
the drug culture. affecting only those
individuals who
Opportunities and Challenges Presented by Change For a police agency, change will implement the
presents both opportunities and challenges. For example, during the 1980s and change.
in response to changes in society at large, police experts introduced new leader-
ship concepts and reexamined the policing principles attributed to Sir Robert Peel.
These developments inspired some police agencies to experiment with new ways
of operating. Many agencies began emphasizing the importance of strengthening
relationships with the communities they served. This transformation was further
fueled by several pivotal developments—namely, the advent of community policing,
technology advances such as CompStat (computer or comparative statistics) and
communities’ demand for new standards of professionalism and accountability
from police. These developments demand a new style of police leadership that
promises to extend from the top level of agency management down to line officers
on the street (Meese & Ortmeier, 2004).
However, police officers are notoriously resistant to change. As evidence of this,
consider the massive changes that U.S. society experienced from 1950 through the
residents who embrace the vision of the better future promised by the change.
These stakeholders can help drive change by convincing skeptics of its value
and reassuring resistors that the change will generate important benefits.
• Develop a plan for implementing the change. To illustrate, define when the
new IT system will be installed and how and when people will receive training
on how to use it (Kotter, 1996).
• Continually communicate the change effort’s status to everyone in the agency
(Bryson, 2004; Kotter, 1996).
Learning
An openness and ability to learn is another highly desirable behavior in a police
agency—in part because learning enables people to adapt to change. In the past,
leaders often drove change by having subordinates engage in training. Taking part
in training is no longer sufficient, given the complexity of changes facing police
agencies today. To position agency personnel to adapt to change, leaders must
now create an environment that fosters what is known as organizational learn- Organizational
ing. In such an environment, individuals throughout a police agency—from top learning:
to bottom, and across all functions and units—are constantly strengthening their a social process in
knowledge, skills, and abilities to adapt to change (Greer & Plunkett, 2007; Meese which individuals
& Ortmeier, 2004). interact with one
Organizational learning is a social process in which individuals interact with one another to exchange
another to exchange information that enables them to make well-informed decisions. information that
An organization in which people can learn and adapt as part of standard operating enables them to
procedure is remarkably effective. Individuals excel at absorbing ideas they encoun- make well-informed
ter in one field of endeavor and using those ideas to excel in another field. decisions.
For instance, town meetings have traditionally been used to enable residents to
express their opinions about such matters as how tax money is to be allotted for town
improvements or whether a traffic light would be beneficial at an intersection where
many car accidents have occurred. However, at some point, an enterprising person
may decide to use this venue to also discover how town or city residents view the qual-
ity of life in their community, as well as the performance of their police department.
Learning Processes In mastering the ability to change, people use several types
of learning processes: adaptive learning, proactive learning, and experimentation.
• Through adaptive learning, people make changes in reaction to alterations in
their environment. To illustrate, if people drive over an unexpected pothole
that jars their vehicles, the next time they drive down that street they will
swerve to avoid the pothole.
• Through proactive learning, they modify their behavior and work processes
more deliberately, by anticipating what might change in their environment
and then deciding how to prepare. An example might be the appointment of a
new police chief. Those who wish to be ready for the new chief might review
information about the other agencies where the chief worked, what changes
were made there, and what changes were promised and not made. Because
learning proactively goes beyond simply reacting to an environmental change
(Robbins & Judge, 2008), it positions people to prepare for the future.
Both adaptive and proactive learning have their place, as there are
situations in which people cannot prepare for a change (such as the September
11, 2001, terrorist attacks) and other situations in which people can prepare
(for example, a job offer that necessitates relocation to another state).
• Through experimentation, people try something new and then use the
information and insights gained from the effort to effect change. For instance,
one police agency conducted an experiment that involved establishing a
Community Volunteer Response Team (CVRT), a police-trained staff of
volunteers who responded to calls from neighborhoods when homicides
occurred. The team’s job was to debrief residents after a homicide, to help
citizens process the event emotionally, and to demonstrate the police’s concern
for the community. But the debriefing process had another important benefit
as well: it generated information that the police, the district attorney’s office,
and homicide investigators could all use in their efforts to solve the crimes.
The experiment with creating a new kind of team thus generated valuable
lessons that enabled the agency to operate more effectively.
Organizational
learning cannot occur
unless leaders create
conditions that foster
the learning such as
systems for generating
and exchanging
information. Here is a
view of the Real Time
Crime Center at police
headquarters in New
York City.
agencies must groom personnel for this role through an organized leadership pro-
gram (Wuestewald, 2006). The best leadership programs:
• Acknowledge the challenges of transforming an organization’s culture into one
of learning.
• Familiarize aspiring leaders with the change process.
• Explain how continual learning supports an agency’s mission and objectives.
• Provide support for learning in the form of learning teams and executive
coaching (Goleman, Boyatzis, & McKee, 2002).
Still, most police agencies only scratch the surface of organizational learning
by providing in-service training programs that merely refresh topics recruits have
already encountered in school or through other training experiences. To support
organizational learning, leadership programs must go beyond these topics and
cover areas such as organizational change processes and proactive learning, includ-
ing the value of conducting research. These programs also need to teach aspiring
leaders how to make continual learning a core value in their agency; for example,
by rewarding personnel for sharing information, viewing and using mistakes as
opportunities for improvement, and experimenting with promising ideas.
respect. And they help their agency avoid the expenses (such as lawsuits) and criti-
cism that accompany police misconduct.
Ethical leadership is a willingness and an ability to do what “ought” to be done
in any given situation and to encourage, motivate, and influence others to behave
ethically. A leader who is struggling to determine whether a particular behavior is
ethical or unethical can ask three questions:
• Does the behavior in question adhere to laws and government codes?
• Does the behavior adhere to standards of ethical behavior defined by my agency?
• Does the behavior adhere to stated professional standards of what is considered
ethical behavior (Mathis & Jackson, 2005; Ortmeier, 2006; Souryal, 2003)?
If a leader can answer “yes” to all three of these questions, then the behavior in
question is likely ethical.
Of course, it is relatively easy to consult laws, organizational codes of conduct,
and professional standards of ethics to determine which kinds of behaviors are
allowed and which are not. However, these reference sources may not cover situ-
ations where there are many acceptable courses of action but choosing one means
making a trade-off. For example, suppose that Paul, a police supervisor, discovers
that Tonya, one of his best officers, lied about her education credentials. Should he
fire her—and lose the skills and value she brings to the agency? Should he ignore
the lie and keep Tonya on staff—and risk sending a message to other officers that
the agency does not value education credentials as much as it says it does? Paul
ETHICS IN ACTION
How Long before Reporting a Problem?
ewly promoted Sergeant Gina Harris has been assigned to the midnight
N shift. She loves the work. The officers under her command are informal
and experienced, and they appear to accept her without reservation. In
the eight weeks since she assumed her new position, she has encountered
only one real problem: Officer Walter Johnson has appeared at times to be
under the influence of alcohol or drugs. He has called in sick on two occa-
sions and, once, he asked a fellow officer to drive him home after he “fell ill.”
Gina is not eager to make waves, especially since she has no concrete
proof that Walter is abusing alcohol or drugs. Then, one night when Walter
is off duty, the agency receives a call about a hit-and-run accident. Gina
drives to the scene, where she finds an abandoned car that she recognizes
as Walter’s. In the other car involved in the accident, a pregnant woman is
writhing and bleeding in the driver’s seat. She has gone into labor following
the collision. A subsequent investigation reveals that Walter was driving his
car when the collision occurred.
1. At what point should Gina have confronted Walter and then (if neces-
sary) reported his alleged misconduct to a superior officer?
2. What sort of discipline (if any) should she receive for not addressing
Walter’s alleged drinking or drug use sooner?
could make a reasonable case for either course of action, but each would come with
a price (a true ethical dilemma). To resolve such dilemmas, police personnel cannot
rely solely on documented codes of conduct. They must augment those resources by
learning how to weigh the complex ramifications of each proposed course of action
and make informed judgment calls.
Medical examiners
work with the police,
such as these King
County, Washington,
sheriff’s deputies, at
crime scenes.
• Internal customers. These are groups or individuals within the police agency
that are served by other groups. To illustrate, a team provides in-service
training to sworn officers, and the medical examiner’s office works closely
with the agency’s crime-investigation unit.
How Do Police Agencies Ser ve Their Customers? Police agencies offer a variety
of services to their customers. Of course, these services comprise the primary activi-
ties police perform, such as patrolling neighborhoods, explaining how residents can
make their homes burglar-resistant, apprehending offenders, and solving crimes.
But an agency’s services also include providing information to customers, such as:
• Crime statistics or motor vehicle-accident reports.
• Written overviews of public safety initiatives launched by the agency.
• Driving directions to individual citizens who request them.
With any of these services, customers generally expect timely, complete, respon-
sive, and empathetic service that is of a higher quality than they may provide for
themselves.
A police organization may also want to offer services that differ from what its
customers are saying they need. For example, the agency may wish to place patrol
cars at strategic locations around schools during the hours that students are arriving
at and departing from school to control potential rowdy behavior and provide for
safe passage.
How Can Police Know Customers’ Changing Needs? Like managers in other
occupations, many police managers have a tendency to focus more on completing
tasks (such as writing reports and responding to calls for service) than on knowing
and meeting customers’ changing needs (Bossidy & Charan, 2002). Like all cus-
tomers, those served by a police agency have constantly evolving needs. To deliver
consistently high-quality service, agency personnel must know how those needs are
shifting. They can do this by gathering information and then using it to modify the
services they provide. For example, an agency may use data to identify seasonal
patterns in convenience store robberies, then design a patrol strategy to ensure that
police are positioned near the most vulnerable stores during times when robberies
are most likely to occur. By knowing how customers’ needs change, police managers
can more effectively allocate their agency’s resources to efforts that will produce the
best possible service for the community.
In monitoring customers’ changing needs, police administrators must determine
not only what each customer wants but also when the service will be provided, why
the particular service is needed, how long it will last, and what other services may be
attached to the request. To illustrate, suppose a town’s citizens ask the police depart-
ment to help discourage high school seniors from drinking and driving on a special
event (e.g., a sports event or a dance) night. To serve this need, the department might
design some public awareness communication campaigns (such as “Don’t drink
and drive!” ads in the local paper). It might also assemble a team of experts and
volunteers to put on a staged “accident” depicting the tragic realities that can come
with drunk driving. Some agencies have even placed a crushed vehicle on the front
lawn of high schools to demonstrate how a car looks after a drunk driver has been
involved in a collision.
To further determine and fulfill customers’ service needs, police managers can
segment customers into groups based on similar needs, expectations, conduct,
and other variables that affect how a police agency delivers its services and what
kinds of resources will need to be deployed (Wood, 2005). An example of a cus-
tomer segment might be residents who schedule neighborhood gatherings. Police
routinely provide traffic-regulation services such as road-closure assistance and
traffic direction to neighborhood events. But if neighborhood events expand from
simple block parties (requiring limited police resources) to larger events featuring
outside entertainment, the police may have to provide additional services, such
as parking, traffic and crowd control, and security. To anticipate escalations in
these and other needs, police should maintain ongoing contact with neighborhood
customers.
Satisfied customers are crucial to any police agency’s success, if not its very
survival. By working to anticipate and satisfy customers’ needs, “customer-oriented
cops” can help ensure that their agency receives the resources it needs to serve the
communities in its jurisdiction well (Hellriegel et al., 2008). (See Chapter 7 for more
on customer service and satisfaction.)
summary
• Structure: How Are Relationships Configured? A police agency’s structure
is reflected in its vertical relationships (who has authority over whom;
who reports to whom), its horizontal relationships (who collaborates and
communicates with whom), and its community relationships (how agency
personnel work with citizens and community leaders to deliver better
service). An organizational chart depicts an agency’s vertical and horizontal
relationships. The policing strategy that an agency adopts strongly influences
the agency’s structure.
• Culture: What Do Personnel Think, Say, Do, and Believe? A police agency’s
culture is shaped by the thoughts, speech, actions, values, and beliefs held
by everyone who works in the organization. Many police agencies have
a command-and-control culture, characterized by rigid lines of authority
and rules governing communication and officer unity. This culture enables
officers to respond quickly to calls-for-service and to resolve crises. Thus
elements of this culture will always exist in every agency. The command-and-
control culture has been shaped by several factors: law, bureaucracy, safety,
competence, morality, and an emphasis on individual courage.
• Behavioral Standards: What Is Considered Acceptable? Police agencies establish
standards of acceptable behavior and ensure compliance with these standards
through training and written polices and procedures (including codes of
conduct). Failure to meet these standards triggers a disciplinary process. Four
behavioral standards especially important for police personnel are the ability to
adapt to change (whether radical or incremental, or directed or nondirected),
the ability to learn continually (whether through adaptive learning, proactive
learning, or experimentation), the ability to demonstrate ethical leadership, and
the willingness and ability to put customers first (including understanding who
a police agency’s customers are, seeking to improve services delivered to them,
and striving to understand their changing needs).
key terms
behavioral standard (standard of conduct)
chain of command
directed change
incremental change
nondirected change
organizational culture
organizational learning
organizational structure
radical change
span of control
unity of command
volunteerism
discussion questions
1. What are the three types of relationships that make up a police agency’s structure?
Provide an example of each type of relationship that is different from those provided
in the chapter. Which of these relationship types are depicted on a police agency’s
organizational chart?
2. What are chain of command, unity of command, and span of control? How do they
affect communication and authority relationships in a police agency? What chal-
lenges do they present?
3. Provide an example of how a policing strategy that an agency adopts affects its orga-
nizational structure.
4. What characterizes a command-and-control culture? How did such a culture arise?
What are its advantages and disadvantages? What factors have shaped the command-
and-control culture?
5. What is officer unity? How did it arise, and what challenges does it present?
6. What are leader officers and how do they differ from street officers? Can one be a
leader officer as well as a street officer?
7. Cite examples of common behavioral standards established by police agencies. How
do police organizations ensure compliance with the behavioral standards they have
established?
8. Why is the ability to adapt to change an important behavioral standard for police
personnel? Give an example of radical change, incremental change, directed change,
and nondirected change.
9. What are some practices that can help police leaders successfully drive a change ini-
tiative in their agency?
10. What is organizational learning? How does it benefit a police agency? What are
some processes police personnel can use to foster a culture of continual learning in
their agency?
7
Police recruit knowledge,
skills, and abilities are
measured against performance
standards.
Organizational Performance
Assessment and Evaluation
learning outcomes
Introduction
If you are like most people, you regularly assess your performance in many dimen-
sions of your life—work, school, sports, and so forth. For instance, suppose you
train for and run road races. You probably keep track of your pace (minutes per
mile) during every training run to spot patterns, such as whether your pace is
increasing or decreasing overall, whether you run better or worse under certain
weather conditions, and how the terrain affects your performance. Your assess-
ment then leads to an evaluation—a summary of what you have observed and
a statement about the quality of your performance. For instance, your evaluation
might be: “I’m having a lot more trouble with hilly terrain than I thought. It looks
like I need to do more endurance training.” You assess and evaluate your perfor-
mance because you want to identify problems, address them, and improve.
Like individuals, all organizations, including police agencies, can benefit from
regularly assessing and evaluating their performance. These processes enable them
to determine how well they are fulfilling their missions and achieving their goals. For
example, a police agency should periodically take stock of how effectively it is serving
its customers and how efficiently it is allocating key resources such as personnel,
revenue, supplies, and equipment to achieve important objectives. By assessing and
evaluating these and other aspects of its performance, the agency can identify and
address problems—which could range anywhere from inefficient use of resources to
lack of understanding of customers’ needs to errors in core processes such as gath-
ering evidence or interviewing witnesses to a crime. Assessment and evaluation are
thus critical tools for any police agency seeking to continually improve its performance.
In this chapter, we examine key aspects of organizational performance
assessment and evaluation. We begin by looking more closely at why it is impor-
tant to assess and evaluate performance. We then examine two particularly cru-
cial performance measures: efficiency and effectiveness. Next we consider two
performance management frameworks that many organizations use to assess,
evaluate, and improve their performance. We take a closer look at customer ser-
vice, since it constitutes such a prominent theme in any assessment, evaluation,
and improvement effort. Finally, we consider the role of accreditation in police
agencies’ performance-improvement efforts.
Assessment:
WHY ASSESS AND EVALUATE? the completion of an
appraisal with respect
to an object or an
Assessment and evaluation are powerful tools that can help police agencies con-
activity.
tinually enhance their performance and adapt to the inevitable changes that make
their work more challenging. Yet assessing and evaluating are different in impor- Evaluation:
tant respects. In the following text we examine their differences, discuss how these an examination or
processes support continuous performance improvement, and examine how police deliberation to decide
agencies use these tools. the quality, value,
criticalness, scope,
or necessity of a
Defining Assessment and Evaluation service or activity;
Assessment is the completion of an appraisal with respect to an object (for example, a summary of an
the condition of a police vehicle) or an activity (such as the way a police officer assessment’s findings
conducts a traffic stop of a speeding driver). Through assessment, police agencies and assignment
observe the object or activity in question and offer a value-neutral description of it; of a value to the
for instance, “Two-thirds of the vehicles in our fleet have signs of rust.” performance assessed.
Evaluation is an examination or deliberation to decide the quality, value, criti-
Continuous
calness, scope, or necessity of a service or activity (Ortmeier, 2006). For example,
improvement:
“Our fleet is in poor condition overall, and we need to improve maintenance of our
a process through
vehicles.” An evaluation thus summarizes the assessment’s findings and assigns a
which an organization
value to the performance assessed.
repeatedly assesses
the effectiveness
Supporting Continuous Improvement of the policies
and procedures
To meet and exceed the demands of their internal and external customers, police
it has established
agencies must be committed to continuous improvement—a process through which
for achieving key
objectives.
the organization repeatedly assesses the effectiveness of the policies and procedures
it has established for satisfying customers. Because police agencies exist to serve
customers, customer satisfaction ought to be a key agency objective and should be
the driving force behind the agency’s goals and objectives (Toolingu, 2008) as well
as its performance-improvement efforts.
Continuous Continuous evaluation complements continuous improvement by enabling
evaluation: agency leaders to identify gaps between desired and actual performance—with an
the process by which eye toward changing behaviors, policies, or procedures as needed to close those
an organization, gaps. Through continuous evaluation, a police agency, on an ongoing basis (such as
on an ongoing monthly, quarterly, or annually), measures actual outcomes (for instance, percentage
basis, measures reduction in violent crime in the agency’s jurisdiction) against intended outcomes. If
actual performance actual outcomes fall short of intended outcomes (“Violent crime decreased by only
outcomes against 2 percent, and our goal was to decrease it by 5 percent”), agency personnel launch
intended outcomes change initiatives to close the gap.
to identify and
close gaps.
Effecting Needed Change
Continuous improvement through assessment, along with continuous evaluation,
positions a police agency to make the changes needed to improve its performance.
Through assessment and evaluation, managers identify operations that must be
implemented, altered, or discarded to enhance performance.
But agency managers must always keep in mind that improving performance
means delivering better service to customers—the residents, business owners, and
other individuals who rely on the police for service. It does not mean making
changes just to produce outcomes that satisfy internal notions of good perfor-
mance or that alleviate political pressures on the police. For instance, skipping
steps in the crime-investigation process so officers can close crime cases faster may
make an agency’s “numbers” look better and may please a jurisdiction’s political
leaders. But it does not make the community safer if it leads to mistakes such as
those that result in dismissal of criminal cases in court or arresting the wrong
individuals.
ETHICS IN ACTION
To Tell the Truth
ose, a police lieutenant, has been given the task of spearheading the
Agency personnel demonstrate that they value citizens’ input, and no person’s opin-
ion is discounted, dismissed, or derided.
How do police gather information about citizens’ opinions and suggestions for
change? The process does not necessarily have to be complex or formal. Foot- or
beat-patrol officers can simply converse with business owners and residents during
the course of a shift. Other methods may be more formal, such as surveys as well as
meetings at which citizens and officers discuss the community’s problems and develop
Efficiency: solutions (Haberfeld, 2002; Michelson & Maher, 1993; Ortmeier & Meese, 2010).
a comparison of
what is actually
produced or EFFICIENCY VERSUS EFFECTIVENESS:
performed with
what can be STRIKING A BALANCE
achieved with the
There are many ways to evaluate a police agency’s performance. However, managers
same consumption
must identify desirable outcomes before they can begin. Two outcomes considered
of resources (money,
desirable by many police organizations are efficiency and effectiveness. These are
time, and labor).
very different manifestations of performance, and agency managers must determine
Efficiency is an
whether they want to strive for both, or whether one or the other is more important
important factor in
at a particular time or under certain conditions.
determination of
productivity.
Efficiency
Effectiveness: Efficiency is a comparison of what is actually produced or performed with what
the degree to which can be achieved with the same consumption of resources (such as money, time, and
objectives are labor). It is thus an important factor in determination of productivity. In a police
achieved and the agency, efficiency is often measured in terms of response time, number of callbacks
extent to which (returns by a police officer to a location or incident), number of service minutes
targeted problems allotted per call, and crime statistics. As in many organizations, efficiency in a police
are resolved. agency may also manifest itself as “doing more with less”; for example, speeding
up response time even after
Efficiency is reductions in staff or other
measured against the resources. Efficiency is almost
consumption of labor, always about numbers and
money, and time. easily measurable results, such
as number of citations issued
or number of cases solved.
Effectiveness
Effectiveness is the degree to
which objectives are achieved
and the extent to which tar-
geted problems are resolved.
Because effectiveness is often
subjective, it is more difficult
to measure than efficiency. In
for-profit companies, effective-
ness is often gauged by levels
of customer satisfaction. One
Police performance
should be measured
by several criteria, not
just the number of
arrests.
can measure customer satisfaction by asking customers how satisfied they are. But
different customers may rate their satisfaction in different ways, using different
criteria. By contrast, the time it takes to respond to a call for service (a measure of
efficiency) can be easily and objectively measured. Unlike efficiency, effectiveness is
determined without reference to costs. Whereas efficiency means “doing the thing
right,” effectiveness means “doing the right thing.”
Another reason that effectiveness in policing is more difficult to assess than effi-
ciency is the existence of conflicting desires among stakeholders. For instance, people
walking on the street may view the police as effective if officers restrain a highly
agitated emotionally disturbed person and take the individual into custody and
transport them to a detention facility to prevent the possibility of violence. But the
family of the mentally ill individual may judge the officers as ineffective because they
believe that the person should have been taken to a mental health facility instead.
Achieving a Balance
Efficiency and effectiveness are important measures of performance for any police
agency. To create a formula for achieving both, police agencies and their custom-
ers must work together to measure agency outcomes according to three criteria:
outstanding performance, unique impact, and persistent durability (Collins, 2005).
As a first responder,
a police officer may
perform CPR on a
heart attack victim
before emergency
medical personnel
arrive.
Unique Impact A unique impact (best practice) is evidenced by pride in the agency
on the part of officers and customers, and by the desire in other police organizations
to emulate the agency’s programs or initiatives. Police managers constantly seek the
next innovation in the day-to-day performance of police work. When successful new
programs are highly publicized, decision makers across the nation may recommend
that their own agencies adopt them. A good example is the CompStat program
initiated in New York City in the mid-1990s (Dabney, 2010; Eterno & Silverman,
2010; Silverman, 2001). CompStat was replicated in many jurisdictions.
Persistent Durability With persistent durability, a police agency sustains its effi-
ciency and effectiveness even after its management changes or new developments
and challenges emerge in the communities it serves. Agency administrators foster
persistent durability by creating structures, processes, and systems for transferring
knowledge between seasoned and new personnel. They also put in place a suc-
cession plan to ensure that all sworn officers have the opportunity to rise in the
ranks and assume administrative roles. When such officers are promoted in these
ways, they share their knowledge with lower-level officers—further preserving the
approaches that previously enabled the agency to succeed.
PERFORMANCE-MANAGEMENT FRAMEWORKS
Assessing and evaluating performance with an eye toward improving efficiency and
effectiveness is no small feat. For that reason, frameworks have been developed that
can help a police agency manage these processes. Two of these frameworks are the
balanced scorecard (BSC) and total quality management (TQM).
With persistent
durability, a police
agency sustains
its efficiency and
effectiveness even after
management changes.
Here a senior officer
discusses a report with
a junior officer in
Dubuque, Iowa.
Building a Scorecard Many policing, public safety, and public utility organiza-
tions (along with corporations and educational and health care institutions) have
used the balanced scorecard to improve their performance. To use the scorecard, a
police agency follows this process:
1. Articulate the strategy: For example, an agency might define its strategy
as “Leveraging leading-edge technology to collaborate with partnering
organizations and deliver outstanding service to our community.”
2. Define strategic objectives: Managers work together to define strategic
objectives that must be met in order to carry out the strategy. They define
objectives for all dimensions of performance: financial, customer, processes,
and workforce. For example, objectives for the strategy described in Step 1
might include “Update IT system” (the process dimension of performance),
• Train and improve police officers’ knowledge and skills regarding problem-oriented policing
• Teach the concept of teamwork and how to communicate persuasively with police, government,
business, and community participants
• Establish an environment of enthusiasm
Total Quality
Management (TQM)
Many police agencies also use the total quality management (TQM) performance- Total quality
management framework to take a disciplined approach to quality control and assur- management
ance. Sometimes used in combination with the balanced scorecard, TQM enables an (TQM):
organization to further assess, evaluate, and improve its performance. a performance-
To understand how the TQM framework operates, we need first to define what management
quality means in the context of policing and then consider several processes (quality framework that can
control and quality assurance) an agency might use to manage its performance. help a police agency
take a disciplined
Defining Quality In the realms of public service and policing, quality means spe- approach to
cific things: quality control and
• Excellent service that satisfies customers assurance.
• Efficient and effective results that support the agency’s mission and that
extract the most value from its available resources
• Outstanding group and individual performance that is applauded by citizens,
makes an obvious impact on neighborhoods, and produces long-term positive
results, not simply news-media headlines (Collins, 2005)
• Performance that is sustained through successive command changes
Using Quality Control Through quality control, police managers verify that an activ- Quality control:
ity is completed correctly (efficiently and effectively) the first time (American Society verifying that an
for Quality, 2008; Wideman, 2001). For example, suppose a police officer responds activity is completed
to a call for service from a citizen who says that someone has broken into her home. correctly (efficiently
The officer resolves the incident by quickly confirming that the home has been bur- and effectively) the
glarized, making sure the burglar is not on the premises, helping the woman secure first time.
Quality assurance: Achieving Quality Assurance Quality control helps a police agency achieve quality
ensuring that service assurance—the confidence that service actions comply with agency directives
actions comply with and that they support the agency’s mission (American Society for Quality, 2008).
agency directives Whereas quality control is about taking measurements during delivery of a service,
and that they quality assurance is the outcome gained through “QC.”
support the agency’s In an agency that has achieved quality assurance, initiatives are focused on pro-
mission. viding excellent services that solve customers’ problems and that deliver long-term,
positive impacts. Agency personnel assess not just the quantity of services delivered
but also their quality. Quality assurance indicates that the agency has continuously
improved its performance (Ortmeier & Meese, 2010).
Quality assurance was first used in manufacturing companies to ensure the qual-
ity of products—measured by criteria such as minimum number of product defects.
“QA” was designed to instill confidence in the products consumers purchased.
Through attention to internal processes and operations, coupled with input from cus-
tomers themselves (such as data on defective products), managers tailored their orga-
nization’s operations to provide the best product. But recently, not-for-profit orga-
nizations and service organizations such as police agencies have begun using quality
assurance to enhance the efficiency and effectiveness of the services they deliver.
Quality assurance
through observation
is used to enhance
efficiency and
effectiveness.
A gun buy-back
program can
increase safety in a
neighborhood and
improve its quality
of life.
The theme of customer service runs through the examination of assessment, evalu-
ation, efficiency versus effectiveness, and performance-management methodologies
we have just completed. For this reason, it is valuable to take a closer look at cus-
tomer service in the context of policing.
As we have seen, in a police agency, serving customers means meeting public
needs. Police agencies provide services for the public benefit while ensuring peace-
ful and safe communities (Jurkanin et al., 2001; Stillman, 2005). Failing to provide
good service can carry a high price.
elsewhere. And people who shop at those companies may start buying from enter-
prises located in areas perceived as safer.
Such migrations out of an unsafe area carry high costs for everyone. For the
jurisdiction, it can mean a shrunken tax base and thus fewer funds allocated to
police. In addition, if people abandon buildings to move to safer places, the aban-
doned structures become eyesores as well as neighborhood hazards when unsuper-
vised children play in them or drug users and dealers congregate in them.
Segmenting Services
Segmenting police services—putting them into groups based on specific criteria—
can help police agencies improve the quality of those services. An agency can group
its services according to the following criteria:
• Customer type served: Customer types include private homeowners, business
owners, citizen volunteers, neighborhood organizations, and schools.
Leadership on t h e job
Unhappy Citizens
Community meetings are not always comfortable for that the citizens want something done now about
police officers to attend, given the unresolved neigh- the thefts.
borhood issues that can stir up unrest among resi-
1. As a leader, how would you decide which officers
dents. Though meetings can be emotionally charged,
are best equipped to accompany the sergeant
they are an important part of policing in today’s
and participate in this community meeting?
world. Suppose that you, a police manager, have
been invited to take part in a neighborhood meeting 2. How would you prepare the officers to attend the
where citizens are complaining about a recent rash meeting?
of vehicle thefts. You cannot make the meeting and 3. What kind of feedback would you expect the
decide to delegate this activity to the evening ser- officers to return from the meeting with?
geant in the precinct. You are advised through neigh- 4. How would you use the information gathered at
borhood gossip that the meeting may be volatile, and the meeting?
Disadvantages include the possibility that some officers will view accreditation
as a threat. For example, an agency requires line officers to upgrade their skills
through training so that the agency can meet a minimum standard. Officers must
complete the new training but do not receive additional compensation for their time
or upgraded skills. Another disadvantage is the cost of the accreditation process
which may strain an agency’s budget.
summary
• Why Assess and Evaluate? Through assessment, police agencies describe in
neutral terms an activity or object important to its performance. Through
evaluation, agencies summarize an assessment’s findings and assign a value to
the performance assessed. Assessment and evaluation help agencies identify
and address problems, and thus continually improve performance by making
needed changes. In agencies using the community policing strategy, customers
provide input into the assessment and evaluation processes.
• Efficiency versus Effectiveness: Striking a Balance. Efficiency is a comparison
of what an activity actually produces or how a person performs with what
can be achieved with the same consumption of resources. Effectiveness is
the degree to which an agency achieves its objectives and resolves targeted
problems. Efficiency and effectiveness are important measures of performance
for a police agency. Police leaders know that their agency has achieved both
when the outcomes generated by the agency meet three criteria: outstanding
performance, unique impact, and persistent durability.
• Performance-Management Frameworks. The balanced scorecard framework is
based on the assumption that to improve performance, a police agency must
execute the strategy it has defined for generating desired results. To build
a balanced scorecard, an agency articulates its strategy, defines objectives
that must be met to execute the strategy, selects performance measures for
each strategic objective, sets targets for each measure, and defines strategic
initiatives needed to reach the targets. The agency reports and tracks actual
performance on each measure against targeted performance, identifies gaps,
and selects actions to close the gaps.
assessment
balanced scorecard
continuous evaluation
continuous improvement
effectiveness
efficiency
evaluation
quality assurance
quality control
total quality leadership
total quality management (TQM)
discussion questions
1. What is the difference between organizational performance assessment and evalua-
tion? What benefits does a police agency gain by assessing and evaluating its perfor-
mance continually?
2. How do assessment and evaluation differ in a police agency that uses the community
policing strategy, as compared with agencies that use the traditional policing strategy?
3. What is the difference between efficiency and effectiveness? Give an example of each.
4. Why is it important that a police agency demonstrate both efficiency and effective-
ness in its performance? What three criteria are essential for balancing efficiency with
effectiveness?
5. What is the balanced scorecard? How does it help a police agency improve perfor-
mance? If you wished to introduce the balanced scorecard in a police agency, what
steps would you advise agency personnel to follow?
6. What is total quality management (TQM)? How does it relate to quality control and
quality assurance? If you were tasked with implementing TQM in a police agency,
what knowledge would you need to possess, and what behaviors would you have to
demonstrate? If you were tasked with leading a TQM effort in an agency, what per-
sonal qualities would you need to exhibit, and what actions would you need to take?
7. What are some costs of providing poor service to a police agency’s customers?
8. What does “delivering service ethically” mean? Cite an example not provided in this
chapter.
9. What are some criteria by which a police agency can segment its services? Propose an
example (not the one provided in this chapter) of how segmentation of services can
help a police agency improve the quality of its services.
10. What is accreditation? How can it benefit a police agency? If you wished to initiate
the accreditation process in a police agency, what is the first step you would take?
8
Police agencies should strive
to hire individuals who are
attracted to policing because
it gives them an opportunity
to support and serve
communities.
Introduction
If you are considering a career in policing, what has drawn you to this line of work?
A study released by the U.S. Department of Justice in 2008 suggests that your
goals in building such a career may affect your effectiveness on the job—and your
satisfaction with the work. The study revealed that individuals who are attracted
to a police career because it gives them the opportunity to support and serve
communities are better suited for police work than people who are drawn to the
profession in pursuit of adventurous activities often associated with criminal law
enforcement.
These findings support the contention that people with a predisposition
toward service to the community are better prepared to face the challenges
and meet the demands placed on today’s police officers. Further, the quality of
police services correlates directly with the behavior of individual officers (U.S.
Department of Justice, Office of Community Oriented Policing Services, 2008).
The study lends credibility to the notion that police officers should possess and
demonstrate strong ethical leadership and interpersonal skills—which are essen-
tial for community service.
Staffing an agency with such officers begins with recruiting and selecting the
right people to wear a badge—people who demonstrate the skills and attitudes
required to fulfill policing’s increasingly complex mandate. Like any organization
that provides services, a police agency is only as good as its people. A well-
trained, respectful police officer is a credit to the community served, while an
officer with poor training and a cynical attitude can inflict enormous damage on
the community, the reputation of the agency, and the officer.
In this chapter, we focus on how police agencies can hire in the spirit of ser-
vice. We begin by examining the challenges characterizing hiring today and then
consider how police agencies can set the stage for smart recruiting, formulate
effective recruiting strategies, and select the best new hires from candidate pools.
We close the chapter by taking a close look at two additional keys to hiring for
service: designing the right compensation and benefits packages, and fostering a
culture of civility.
Effective agencies develop hiring strategies with an eye toward ensuring that the
organization has the right people doing the right things at the right time to achieve
stated goals and objectives. To make sure all this happens, an agency’s human
resource function must manage several vital activities: recruiting and selecting
people with the best capabilities; training; assessing recruits’ learning and skill
period. Recruits are evaluated at the end of the probationary period to determine
whether they meet the minimum performance standards. They are seldom evalu-
ated on their commitment to helping and serving others in their capacity as police
officers. Lacking these and other people skills, they may ultimately deliver mediocre
performance and find little satisfaction in police work.
Despite the challenges, an agency can still hire a diverse workforce if qualified men
and women—from a variety of backgrounds, cultures, and life experiences—view
employment with the agency as a worthwhile and rewarding endeavor. To foster
that view and attract qualified candidates, an agency can take steps that set the stage
for smart recruiting. These include conducting a human resource needs assessment
and looking beyond minimum hiring standards.
must carry out. A well-prepared job task analysis also defines the physical, emo-
tional, and character elements of the job: the “who, what, why, where, when, and
how” associated with a task to be successfully accomplished. (See the “Deployment:
Putting Human Resources to the Best Use” section in Chapter 10 for additional
information on conducting a human resource needs assessment.)
A police officer
candidate engaged in
an interview in Santa
Ana, California.
Many managers make little effort to determine whether the recruits have a philoso-
phy and passion for service to people. They also neglect to assess whether candi-
dates have an inclination toward policing as a profession and the ethical values that
law enforcement professionals must demonstrate.
Agencies must look beyond minimum hiring standards and seek candidates who
not only meet those standards but also demonstrate the personal qualities (such as
integrity, collegiality, and a desire to learn and to serve) and the skills (including
communication, leadership, strategic thinking, and self-control) that lie at the core
of an excellent (not merely good) police officer. Agencies must measure every can-
didate against these qualities (T. E. Baker, 2006). Those that do so will stand a far
better chance of hiring individuals interested in community service than agencies
that use only minimal hiring standards as criteria for evaluating candidates.
Recruitment for a police agency is no different than recruiting for any position
of authority in an organization. The agency defines desired qualities and skills in
candidates and uses these as benchmarks of applicants’ suitability. A candidate who
embodies and rates high in the majority of the desired attributes, qualities, and skills
should have a reasonable expectation of being hired. However, developing effec-
tive recruitment strategies is more complex than it might appear on the surface. To
craft strategies that bring in the new hires an agency needs, managers must use the
right channels to reach candidates, develop a positive brand image that will attract
qualified candidates, recruit for diversity, and consider the education levels the ideal
candidate will bring to the table.
Police Officer
Anytown, USA
The City of Anytown is seeking men and women from all backgrounds and cultures to join
the Anytown Police Department and help maintain a police department that is responsive
to the needs of the community.
Besides patrol duty, the police department has numerous specialized units that offer the career-minded
professional unparalleled opportunities to grow with one of the most progressive police departments in
the country. A few of the specialized units available are the Mounted Equestrian Section, Bomb Squad,
Aviation Section, Harbormaster Section, and Canine (K-9).
Officers with specialized skills are encouraged by the department to use and develop their abilities by
instituting new programs and units within the department.
The Anytown Police Department is one of the best trained and most progressive departments in the
country. You are invited to join this outstanding department and begin your career in law enforcement.
Salary and Benefits
Competitive medical, dental, and optical plans
College tuition reimbursement
Twenty vacation days per year
Eight paid holidays per year
Twelve sick days per year
Pension plan/deferred compensation plan
Department-issued uniforms and equipment
Longevity pay/off-duty court appearances
Shift differential pay (afternoon/midnight shifts)
Uniform cleaning allowance
Required Qualifications (Basic Requirements)
1. Applicant must be at least 18 years old and a U.S. citizen.
2. Applicant’s vision must be 20/20, or corrected to 20/20, in each eye. Depth and color perception
must be normal.
3. Applicant must be a high school graduate or have earned a GED.
4. Applicant must possess a valid driver’s license (at time of application).
5. Applicant must not have been convicted of a felony or misdemeanor involving domestic violence.
Other misdemeanor arrests or convictions are subject to review on an individual basis.
6. Applicant must be capable of performing the essential functions of a police officer with or without
accommodation as determined by the hiring criteria.
Women and minorities are encouraged to apply!
Hiring Process
Applicants must successfully complete the Anytown Police Department’s selection process, as outlined
below. No applicants are guaranteed processing at any stage.
1. Complete an application and meet the basic requirements, including a check of the applicant’s
driving record and a criminal history check.
2. Pass a written examination.
3. Pass a physical agility examination.
4. Pass an initial preinvestigation interview.
5. Complete a background investigation.
6. Pass a final oral interview.
7. Pass a psychological examination and psychological interview.
8. Pass a medical examination.
Contact Information
See the top of this posting.
Among other
mechanisms, the police
use job fairs to recruit
new officers.
The diversity of a
police department
should reflect the
diversity of the
community it serves.
But managers must also take care to avoid common missteps in recruiting for
diversity: Recruiting minorities solely in an effort to ameliorate special interests
in the jurisdiction may lead to another kind of discrimination. For instance, con-
sider an agency that hires African American officers specifically to assign them to
prominently black neighborhoods. This can result in these officers’ being denied
regular promotions or reassignments. Why? They are so effective at dealing with
their own ethnic group that the agency wants to keep them in that role. Instead
of pigeonholing officers in this way, police managers must strive to make every
officer—regardless of race, gender, or ethnic origin—capable of dealing with every
person living in the communities the agency serves. Only then can an agency build
a truly diverse workforce (Cordner & Scarborough, 2007; Lord & Peak, 2005).
within a diverse population. Those with higher education generally possess the abil-
ity to apply their knowledge in a multitude of situations with a minimum of conflict.
In addition, studies indicate that officers with a college education are more adept at
dealing with people and are less likely to use excessive force. They demonstrate a
greater appreciation for diversity, and are better communicators. They also experi-
ence a much lower risk of disciplinary action than their high-school-educated coun-
terparts (Bohm & Haley, 2005; Vodicka, 1994).
However, at a time when our society has more college graduates than ever
before in our history, the police profession still lags behind in employing people
with higher education degrees. One reason may be that requiring a two- or four-
year degree can limit the pool of available candidates. When some police agencies
encounter difficulty recruiting enough college-educated people to fill vacant posi-
tions, they drop the educational requirements so they can attract a full complement
of officers. Another reason may be that many college-educated individuals believe
that they will earn more compensation in fields of endeavor other than police work.
Thus they gravitate toward those other career paths.
The debate continues, with each police agency making its own decision about
recruits’ education requirements. However, as officers without higher education
retire and are replaced by college-educated officers, the value of higher educa-
tion may become more evident (Meese & Kurz, 1993; Ortmeier & Meese, 2010;
“Pressed for Applicants,” 2000). When agencies begin to see that value, they may
step up efforts to seek recruits with college degrees.
Once a police agency has executed its recruitment strategies and attracted appli-
cants, it must determine which candidates to select for hiring. Like recruitment,
selection is challenging, and the stakes are high. Selecting the wrong people can
result in mistreatment of citizens and do long-term damage to the community and
the agency. Ultimately, all police actions are visible to the public. And in a high-tech
age, inappropriate police actions can be captured on video and broadcast around
the world within seconds. Once published, these images cannot be suppressed,
no matter how talented the police agency’s public relations people might be. The
videotaped image of the 1991 Rodney King incident in California illustrates how
police officers’ actions can attract international attention and accusations of police
violations of the public trust.
Other more recent cases provide additional evidence that a police agency must
be ever vigilant in protecting the public’s perception of the agency’s ethical stan-
dards and worthiness of public confidence. Selecting the wrong hires can lead to
disaster. For example, a medium-size agency in the northeastern part of the United
States has suffered significant damage to its image by the arrest and conviction
of two police sergeants in unrelated incidents. Both officers were hired as lateral
transfer officers from other police agencies and were subsequently promoted to
police sergeant. One sergeant was convicted of leaving the scene of an injury-
causing motor-vehicle collision. The other sergeant was convicted of coercing two
women to have sex with him. Both men are currently imprisoned for their actions.
The chief of police, the deputy chief of police, and other command personnel have
been suspended from their official duties because of these criminal cases. The
department is under investigation locally by the district attorney (prosecutor).
And public confidence in the agency is at stake even though the town where the
crimes occurred is rated as one of the safest places to live in the United States
(McDermott, 2009).
To improve the odds of selecting the right people, an agency can take the
Pre-employment
following steps: conduct a pre-employment screening, use the assessment center
screening process:
process, and swiftly correct any selection mistakes.
a sequence of steps
designed to help
a police agency Conducting a Pre-Employment Screening
compare job
applicants and select Most police officer candidates undergo a pre-employment screening process to
the most promising determine whether they possess the requisite physical, intellectual, and emo-
candidates. Elements tional abilities to become an officer. Minimum qualification for employment as
of the process include a police officer within the United States generally requires applicants to be an
an employment 18- to 21-year-old U.S. citizen who possesses a valid driver’s license and who has
application/ achieved a specific level of formal education. In addition, the applicant must be
questionnaire, free of any felony convictions or any misdemeanor convictions involving domestic
aptitude test, physical violence.
abilities test, and However, as we discussed previously, it is important for a police agency to
other assessments. look beyond these minimum qualifications in recruiting and selecting officers. A
pre-employment screening pro-
The pre-employment cess can help generate the addi-
screening process tional information needed to
typically begins compare candidates’ potential
with the completion and determine which individu-
of an employment als have the traits and skills
application/ required for community service.
questionnaire. The pre-employment screening
process typically includes many
or all of the following elements:
• Employment application/
questionnaire
• Aptitude test
• Physical abilities test
• Interview
• Background investigation
• Integrity testing
• Psychological evaluation
• Medical evaluation
Taken together, these ele-
ments generate a wide range
of information and data that
an agency can use to evalu-
ate a candidate’s potential and
determine whether to offer the
individual a position.
Physical Abilities Test The physical abilities test measures a candidate’s endurance,
physical agility, and strength for tasks that are associated with the job. The test consists
of specific job-related physical routines: for instance, running, climbing, and the ability
to move an object with the weight and mass equivalent to an adult person.
The physical abilities test has generated some debate. For example, because of
strength differences, particularly in the upper body, between men and women, some
agencies modify the test to reflect these differences. Modification enables them to admit
more females to the academy and thus increase the diversity of their workforce. At
times, observers have decried this practice as providing special treatment to female can-
didates. Agencies also complain that police officers who passed the test as recruits have
not remained physically fit. These officers would be unable to pass the physical abilities
test later in their careers. However, some experts maintain that these officers are still
effective in their jobs—raising doubts about whether the initial physical abilities test
is really effective or necessary. Whatever the physical abilities test or fitness require-
ments, they should relate to the actual physical tasks performed by police officers on
the job. Further, officers should be encouraged to maintain their fitness throughout
their careers. Fitness for duty is discussed extensively in Chapter 12.
Police recruiters
access databases to
conduct background
investigations on
applicants.
In some agencies,
applicants are required
to take a polygraph
test as part of the
pre-employment
screening process.
Integrity Test An agency should also administer an integrity test to verify infor-
mation provided by the candidate in the employment application and the personal
history statement, and to check for additional concerns. Integrity testing can be
accomplished through a written exam, a polygraph or voice stress analysis, and a
drug test. Agency managers can also phone references to confirm the information
(such as employment history and job performance) provided by the applicant.
Assessment center How the Process Works An assessment center is not a physical place but rather a
process: means to determine a person’s suitability for employment, promotion, or special
a series of activities assignment. The assessment center process includes activities designed to mea-
designed to measure sure an applicant’s or officer’s knowledge, skills, and abilities (KSAs) as well as
an applicant’s or personal attributes and behavioral characteristics related to work-specific scenarios
officer’s knowledge, (All About Performance, 2005). Behavioral characteristics may include judgment,
skills, and abilities decision making, problem solving, initiative, oral and written communication, and
(KSAs) as well as creativity.
personal attributes Through a series of interviews, psychological tests, and job-related simulations,
and behavioral an assessment center can further help an agency detect problems a police recruit may
characteristics related experience with activities such as responding to domestic violence incidents or inter-
to work-specific viewing suspects. During assessment center simulations, the candidate participates in
scenarios. activities that simulate the critical tasks associated with the position for which the
who is alive today, including searches of a candidate’s criminal and credit his-
tory. Further, psychological tests contain key indicators of personality traits
indicative of positive police officer performance; serious psychological problems;
and potential positive, marginal, or negative behaviors. The findings from these
tests can help alert professional evaluators to desirable and undesirable traits in
candidates.
Unfortunately, a candidate may successfully pass all phases of the pre-
employment screening process, including the background investigation, and still
prove to be a problem employee. Although an agency may not be liable for negligent
hiring, it could be liable for negligent retention if it does not take swift, decisive
action after learning that the officer has behaved inappropriately. Action might
consist of remedial training, supervised work assignments, and coaching and coun-
seling sessions. An agency might also put an officer on administrative duty while the
person is under investigation, to prevent further incidents.
Police management may also be held liable for failing to take definitive action
against an officer who injures or otherwise abuses others before or after exhausting
all possible remedies to correct the officer’s actions and behaviors. The jurisdiction
and its management may be held liable if administrators and supervisors fail to
properly supervise problem officers.
The lesson? Agencies must avoid making selection mistakes in the first place. If
a mistake is made, managers should correct it immediately and effectively.
ETHICS IN ACTION
Due Diligence in Hiring
rank, a police officer from a small jurisdiction, transferred to another
F jurisdiction in the same state. Jan, the chief of police of the new juris-
diction, hired Frank without performing a background check or calling
his former supervisor.
One day when he was off duty, Frank observed a young woman driving
on a country road. Frank was in his personal vehicle, a pickup truck that he
had outfitted with blue and red flashing lights on the dashboard. He turned
on the lights and pulled the woman over.
The woman was clearly confused by the stop because she was obey-
ing all traffic laws. When Frank asked questions about her marital and
relationship status, she became suspicious and telephoned 9-1-1. Frank
was arrested and later fined and jailed for acting outside a police officer’s
scope of authority.
1. Do you think that laterally transferring police officers should be sub-
ject to the same background check and psychological reviews as new
recruits? Why or why not?
2. Is the agency that employed Frank subject to a negligent hiring or
retention civil lawsuit by the offended party? Why or why not? If you
do not know, where might you look for information to answer this
question?
Direct compensation:
DESIGNING COMPENSATION AND BENEFITS PROGRAMS compensation that
includes base pay
(hourly wages
As another key to hiring police officers who are committed to service, agencies must
or salaried) plus
design compensation and benefits programs that will attract them and keep them
overtime pay for
committed to the agency and the work. Compensation for police officers must be
hourly employees.
fair, reasonable, equitable, and tied to what the organization wishes to accomplish—
but also competitive enough to attract and retain valued employees. Variable
Compensation in a police organization includes items such as salary and compensation:
benefits (specifically, medical, dental, life, and disability insurance; vacation and compensation
sick leave; pensions; and uniform allowances) and many other personnel-related that is tied to
expenses (Collins, 2002). Compensation can take numerous forms: personal, team,
• Direct compensation includes base pay (hourly wages or salaried) plus or organizational
overtime pay for hourly employees. performance and
that may include
• Variable compensation is tied to personal, team, or organizational bonuses and
performance and may include bonuses and incentives for special assignments incentives for special
as well as shift differentials. assignments as well
• Rewards-based compensation (merit pay) enhances the earnings of top as shift differential.
performers and places value on people rather than job categories (Hitt, 1988).
• Indirect compensation includes items such as medical and life insurance, paid Rewards-based
time off, pensions, flexible schedules, and education incentives (such as higher compensation:
pay for officers who obtain a college degree) (Mathis & Jackson, 2005). also known as merit
Indirect benefits may also include a take-home police vehicle. (See the box pay; compensation
“A Closer Look at Incentives” for additional information.) that enhances the
earnings of top
In most agencies, compensation packages are powerfully influenced by forces performers and
such as market trends (including changes in labor supply and demand), union con- places value on
tracts, and structured civil service salary schedules. Moreover, agencies may have dif- people rather than
ferent compensation philosophies and practices. Entitlement-oriented compensation job categories.
denotes automatic pay increases for employees, along with increases in benefits. This
philosophy and practice helps reduce personnel complaints, is easy to implement, and Indirect
compensation:
compensation that
includes items such
A Closer Look at Incentives as medical and life
An “incentive” may be defined as that which motivates an individual to action insurance, paid time
or encourages effort (American Heritage Dictionary, 2005b). Incentives are off, pensions, flexible
not generally included as part of a police officer’s base salary. Formal incen- schedules, education
tives include hiring bonuses and bilingual pay, as well as pay incentives linked incentives, and a take-
to special assignments, housing, utility bills, child care, flexible work sched- home police vehicle.
ules, maintenance of uniforms, and paid time off based on length of service.
Indirect incentives may take the form of items in or characteristics of the phys- Entitlement-oriented
ical working environment as well. Police facilities that are modern, well lit, free compensation:
of particulates, and a comfortable temperature will be far more motivating than automatic pay
facilities that lack these qualities. Police vehicles, which serve as police officers’ increases for
mobile offices, should also be in good condition and contain the latest technology employees, along
(Police Officer Incentives, 2009; U.S. Police Officer Compensation Survey, 2004). with increases in
benefits.
To hire in the spirit of service, a police agency must demonstrate civility during
every phase of the hiring process and while new hires are being acculturated. The
goal is to create a civil work environment, which further encourages excellent
service to the community. Civility does not mean tolerance of unethical or criminal
conduct demonstrated by police officers. Unethical behavior should be confronted,
and criminal offenders must receive treatment according to established laws,
policies, and procedures. Rather, a civil work environment is characterized by Civil work
positive interactions, optimism, and the dismissal of cynicism and pessimistic beliefs environment:
(Souryal, 2003). a workplace
Until recently, civility in the workplace received little attention. However, the characterized by
emergence of casual or undisciplined work environments in many industries over the positive interactions,
last few decades has spawned a culture of incivility in too many organizations. This optimism, and the
culture’s defining characteristics include discourtesy, constant unapologetic inter- dismissal of cynicism
ruptions, and vulgar language and gossip, as well as rude and distracting emails. and pessimistic
In any business or service environment, such an atmosphere will negatively impact beliefs.
individual, unit, section, or agency performance (Tytel, 2007) as well as customer
satisfaction and loyalty.
Civility matters because it powerfully shapes the culture of a police agency, its
employees, and the community it serves. Civility determines how people interact,
perform, solve problems, and interact within a common work environment. In
policing, life and death situations abound. When people treat each other civilly in
these situations, they are more likely to survive.
Throughout a new officer’s training and probationary period, supervisors, instruc-
tors, counselors, and field training officers must teach civility by demonstrating civil
behavior themselves and by mentoring those who are just starting out in their police
career. Trainers can model civil behavior by showing respect for others and projecting
a positive, can-do attitude; by demonstrating genuine concern for and acceptance of
others; by acknowledging kindnesses and potential; and by actively listening to others’
concerns rather than talking incessantly. Finally, trainers and mentors can demonstrate
anger management (Gulf Coast Community Foundation, 2007a).
A culture of civility during pre-employment screening, basic police academy, and
probationary periods creates productive, service-focused, and satisfied employees.
Officers who are content with and positive about their careers and their agency deliver
excellent service, which in turn produces satisfied citizens. In a civil work environment,
police officers also have more
emotional energy available to Civil work
tend to their personal lives as environments
well as their careers (an uncivil improve morale and
environment saps their energy productivity.
and morale). High morale, open
communication, and productiv-
ity are positive byproducts of a
civil work environment (Gulf
Coast Community Foundation,
2007b).
Despite the benefits of
civility, some trainers and
supervisors subject new
recruits in the academy,
field training period, or final
stages of probation to verbal
abuse. This behavior often
stems from an antiquated belief that the person in charge must demonstrate
aggressive and dominating behavior. Such individuals often view empathy,
respectfulness, and kindness as weaknesses, and dominance as a sign of strength
(Hartt, 1999).
Although officers should learn to be assertive, the aggressive and dominating
behavior associated with obedience-oriented, military-style police training can be
dangerous. Militaristic training and attitudes produce arrogant officers who may
disregard laws and policies designed to protect citizens as well as the officers them-
selves (City of Los Angeles, 2003; Goldstein, 2001; Kelling, 1999; Ortmeier &
Meese, 2010).
summary
key terms
assessment center process
background investigation (BI)
brand image
civil work environment
competency-based compensation
direct compensation
diversity
entitlement-oriented compensation
indirect compensation
negligent hiring and retention
pre-employment screening process
rewards-based compensation
variable compensation
discussion questions
1. What are minimum hiring standards a police agency might consider when reviewing
job candidates? Why is it important for an agency to look beyond these minimum
standards while evaluating applicants?
2. When hiring officers, police agencies must identify the qualities and skills they desire
in candidates. Identify five qualities or skills that a police officer candidate should
demonstrate. Why is each important to a police agency and the community it serves?
3. Select two recruiting channels a police agency might use to seek the right job appli-
cants. Decide how you would use those channels most effectively.
4. Police agencies use the pre-employment screening process to identify highly qualified
candidates. What are the elements of this screening process, and why is each element
important?
5. The background investigation (BI) is a crucial part of pre-employment screening.
What are the most important dimensions of the BI? Why are these dimensions criti-
cal to a police agency? How can a thorough BI help the agency defend itself against a
claim of negligent hiring or retention?
6. The question of whether police agencies should emphasize a college education in
their recruitment efforts has stimulated debate. Where do you stand on the issue? Do
you think agencies should step up recruitment of officers with a college education?
Why or why not?
7. Civility is critical for hiring in the spirit of service. Describe the elements of a civil
work environment. How can the lack of civility negatively impact the service a police
agency delivers to a community?
• assess the quality of a police agency’s relationships with the news media
and other agencies, and explain how to improve those relationships.
• use four important communication skills: facilitation, persuasion, feedback,
and conflict management.
Introduction
Police personnel must demonstrate many different technical skills to do their
job—including knowing how to use a police vehicle mobile data terminal (MDT)
and various speed-measurement radar and laser devices. But technical skills are
just part of the picture; police managers and officers also need to master a set
of nontechnical skills to serve their community and agency. In fact, in a relatively
recent study (Ortmeier, 1996) experts on policing cited effective communication
as the most important nontechnical skill required of officers. The study’s respon-
dents agreed on several additional points as well: Effective communication skills
are critical to success in policing. And police personnel spend more time commu-
nicating with others than they do in any other activity.
Communication is a powerful human activity with wide-ranging impact. For
example, it not only enables us to exchange ideas, it also fulfills a deep social
need to connect with others. (Indeed, studies have shown that people who are
prevented from communicating with others are at greater risk of experiencing men-
tal and physical illness.) Finally, communication is irreversible: Once you convey a
message to someone else—through the spoken or written word, or through some
other medium—you cannot take it back.
Communication also has strong links to leadership. Excellent police leaders
are effective communicators. They use communication to build and sustain trust,
to promote understanding of the agency’s mission, and to empower others to
deliver their best performance on the job. They listen attentively, facilitate interac-
tion between agency members and between police and community residents, and
maintain cohesion among all stakeholders—despite the diversity of views and
priorities that stakeholders often have.
The benefits accrue even further: In police work, exceptional communicators
reduce victim distress and gain compliance from others without having to resort
to force. Moreover, they de-escalate conflict and emotion, and inspire citizens to
participate in solving their community’s problems. In short, they improve quality
of life in the communities they serve and motivate all stakeholders to work toward
realizing a compelling vision of a better future (Ortmeier, 1996).
In this chapter, we examine the art and science of communication. We look at
what communication is and how it functions in a police agency. We consider bar-
riers to effective communication as well as the wide variety of channels through
WHAT IS COMMUNICATION?
A Distinctive Process
Communication is a process, not an event. The process involves an exchange of Communication:
information between a sender and a receiver and includes the transmittal, receipt, a process involving
and sharing of problems, ideas, facts, beliefs, feelings, and values. Communication the exchange of
is also a reciprocal interchange between the parties involved: Through encoding (the information between
translation of information into a communication medium), the sender transmits a sender and a
symbols (characters, letters, words, images) through a channel (such as an e-mail or receiver.
a comment made at a meeting) to a receiver. The receiver then decodes (interprets)
the message. How the receiver responds to the message is strongly determined by
how the person interpreted the message (de Janasz, Dowd, & Schneider, 2006;
Hellriegel, & Slocum, 2009).
For example, suppose that Daniel, a police supervisor, sends an e-mailed request
for information to Paula, an officer. The e-mail goes unacknowledged. Daniel inter-
prets the lack of acknowledgment as evidence that Paula has not taken the request
seriously. Offended, he shows annoyance during his next encounter with her. Now
suppose that Daniel had interpreted the lack of acknowledgment differently—for
instance, as a signal that the agency’s server may have crashed, and that Paula sim-
ply did not receive the message. With this interpretation, his response would likely
have been entirely different, and probably not as negative.
Complex Purposes
Communication serves complex purposes for human beings. Every time we com-
municate with others, we may have several goals in addition to merely exchanging
information. For example, we might seek to fulfill the following goals:
• Be understood. Terry, a police officer, explains to Meredith, his supervisor,
why he handled a shots-fired call as he did.
Communication is a
process rather than
an event.
• Understand others. Meredith listens to Terry and then asks questions to gain
additional information about how Terry handled the call and why he handled
it as he did.
• Persuade others to take a particular action or embrace a particular idea. Meredith
suggests to Terry how he might handle the next shots-fired call more effectively.
Vertical Between people who are at different A field training officer sends an e-mail to a new recruit
levels in the reporting hierarchy but whose training he is overseeing, laying out possible
who work in the same function goals for the next training session. The recruit asks the
FTO several questions about the proposed goals.
Horizontal Between people who are at the same The head of IT and the facilities manager in a police
levels in the reporting hierarchy but agency meet to discuss how the agency’s computer
who may work in different functions network should be changed to accommodate facilities
that are being constructed for the agency.
Diagonal Between people who are at different A member of a police agency’s special weapons and tac-
levels in the organizational hierarchy tics (SWAT) team talks with the leader of the hazardous-
but who work in different functions materials team to share best practices (such as specific
safety procedures) that could benefit both teams.
Communication can
flow through informal
or formal channels,
such as an “all-hands”
meeting requested by
the chief of police.
1 Location 3M D Y R 4 CR #
5 Context of FIF 4. Robbery 8. Weapons 12. Public order 16. Known offender Context #
1. Drugs 5. Sex offense 9. Officer safety 13. Gambling 17. Suspicious person
2. Intelligence 6. Gang activity 10. Arson 14. Organized crime 18. Suspicious vehicle
3. Burglary 7. Forgery 11. Murder 15. Alcohol offense 19. Other
6 Source Source #
1. Informant 3. First hand 5. Police officer 7. Phone
2. Relative 2. Hearsay 6. Other agency 8. Other
7 Evaluation of information
1. Confirmed 2. Probable 3. Doubtful 4. Improbable 5. Unknown
8 Status of information
1. Founded 2. Unfounded 3. Undetermined
10 Address DOB
• Name
Sex Race Height Weight Hair color Hair length Eye color Facial hair Ethnicity Record #
Address DOB
• Name
Sex Race Height Weight Hair color Hair length Eye color Facial hair Ethnicity Record #
12. Narrative
XC to:
Background Differences
For each of us, our experiences,
biases, prejudices, lack of
understanding of cultural dif-
ferences, and personal beliefs
influence how we receive and
interpret a message coming
from someone else. When
people from different back-
grounds try to communicate,
misunderstandings can result.
Consider this exchange
between two new recruits,
David and Antonio, at a police
agency. David grew up in a
neighborhood with little eth-
nic diversity, and was the only
Noncredible Source
In some communication situ-
ations, the sender lacks cred-
ibility because the person
delivered false or inaccurate
information in the past. Even
if the most recent information
is accurate, the receiver may
still discount it and react to it
inappropriately.
For instance, Hank, a reclu-
sive elderly man living alone in
a small town, has phoned the
police department many times
complaining about a “suspi-
cious” person he sees walking
by his house. Each time the
police have sent a patrol car
out to investigate, there was
either no one walking down the street, or the person Hank had seen turned out to
be a neighbor out for a stroll or visitors of neighbors exploring the area. One night,
Hank phones the police yet again about a suspicious person. The police, distracted by
a shots-fired call and assuming that (as in the past) Hank has nothing to worry about,
take longer than usual to send a car out to Hank’s street. Before the patrol car arrives,
a burglar has broken into Hank’s truck, hot-wired it, and driven off.
As part of ongoing training, police officers should be encouraged to exhibit sen-
sitivity to people who are vulnerable like older persons, many of whom are fearful of
strangers or may misinterpret what they are observing. Although calls-for-service are
prioritized as to urgency (shots-fired calls are higher on the list than suspicious person
calls), no call should be devalued because it comes from someone with a history of
calls that yield no or limited results.
Denial
Messages that conflict with information that a receiver has already accepted as
fact may cause the person to reject them. For instance, suppose that Lewis, the
recruitment director at a large police agency, believes that new recruits who have
a college degree will eventually get bored with police work and leave—costing the
agency heavily in terms of time and money invested in training. Beth, a supervisor,
believes that new officers with a college education would bring more value to the
agency. She suggests to Lewis that he expand his criteria for hiring to include a col-
lege degree. He ignores her recommendation.
To counteract Lewis’s denial, Beth could cite studies about the value of college-
educated police officers. However, she would likely get better results by encouraging
Lewis to talk with those officers who have college experience or a degree. Getting
to know such officers firsthand would probably help Lewis understand that many
police officers enter the profession for more than just exciting car chases and oppor-
tunities to arrest perpetrators.
Unfamiliar Language
The language a sender uses to convey a message may contain jargon—terminology
specific to a profession. To a receiver who is unfamiliar with the language, the message
may be confusing or irritating. Police work is characterized by extensive use of jargon
because officers are taught by academy trainers, field training officers, or supervisors
to speak and write in a legalistic, investigative, and precise way. The resulting lan-
guage can confuse citizens who are not familiar with it. For example, an officer inter-
viewing witnesses to a vehicle collision that injured the occupants may ask a question
using technical language, such as “Did you observe massive hematoma?”
To bridge this barrier, officers can learn to use simpler, more ordinary language
when speaking with citizens. In the previous example, the officer could instead ask,
“Was the person bleeding a lot?”
Lack of Motivation
Lack of motivation on the part of the sender or receiver can act as another barrier to
effective communication. For instance, a police supervisor who must deliver critical
feedback during a performance review for a new recruit may worry about upsetting
the recruit, and so is not motivated to present the feedback in clear, candid terms.
A receiver may also lack the motivation necessary to listen to the message. For
example, the new recruit in the prior example might truly believe she is delivering
adequate performance. She therefore discounts her supervisor’s critical feedback.
The remedy for this barrier when you are a sender is to deliver concise,
to-the-point messages. By using livelier language and pointing out how listening to
your message can benefit your listener, you stir up enthusiasm for your message in
the other person. When you are a receiver, practice paying attention to the content
Organizational Culture
As in any organization, the culture in a police agency can have characteristics that
constitute barriers to good communication. For example, in an agency where dis-
tractions and disruptions occur frequently throughout the workday, people may
have difficulty communicating. Consider two officers who have started talking
about how to provide security for an upcoming fund-raising activity in their com-
munity. Their colleagues and supervisors freely stop by and interrupt them with
questions or comments about various topics. The officers will likely find it difficult
to stay focused on their conversation and arrive at agreed-upon strategies.
To reduce distractions and disruptions in their agency, police managers can
provide a separate place for officers to meet to discuss matters such as security for
upcoming events. There are usually conference rooms available. If none happens
to be available, personnel can use an interrogation room that is not needed at the
moment.
The culture at a police agency might also discourage open communication, if the
agency takes a command-and-control approach to policing. When people lower down
in the chain of command learn that their input is not welcome during decision mak-
ing, they stop offering it. Communication dries up and morale erodes. Altering such
a culture requires establishing new rules promoting sharing of opinions and ideas as
well as opening lines of communication (Stojkovic, Kalinich, & Klofas, 2008).
COMMUNICATION CHANNELS
Verbal Channels
Verbal channels include face-to-face talking, telephone conversations, and trans-
missions over a radio—any channel through which people use the spoken word.
Communication through verbal channels can occur in numerous settings, such as
during one-on-one conversations, team or task force meetings, interviews, interro-
gations, news conferences, and public-speaking events.
To communicate effectively through verbal channels, police personnel—through
their words—must demonstrate respect, cooperativeness, and a willingness and
ability to understand another person’s position (empathy). They should also strive
to minimize differences in social status, authority, or power; to accept others’ view-
points; and to candidly express their own beliefs. By contrast, words that convey
a desire to control, manipulate, or judge; insincerity; aggression; or an air of supe-
riority will only spark defensiveness within listeners (Hellriegel & Slocum, 2009).
Much of police
work involves
communicating
face-to-face during
an interview or
interrogation.
• Strive to be objective about what the speaker is saying, rather than judging
what you are hearing.
• Paraphrase or ask for confirmation (“So, what you’re saying is …” “Do I
understand you correctly?”) to ensure that you are hearing what the speaker
intends to say.
Nonverbal Channels
Nonverbal channels of communication—such as body language, facial expression,
and tone of voice—have just as much impact as words during any exchange between
a sender and receiver. In fact, there is an entire science—known as kinesics—
devoted to how people interpret nonverbal cues such as facial expressions, eye
movement, posture, stance, gestures, and other human physiological behaviors and
presentations while communicating (Ottenheimer, 2007). Not surprisingly, police
have long strived to read others’ body language during interviews and interrogations.
Nonverbal communication involves the use of body movements as well as (in some Nonverbal
cases) clothing, hairstyle, physical attractiveness, and speaking style to communicate a communication:
message. Nonverbal cues can be expressed consciously or unconsciously, depending on the use of voluntary
the sender’s intentions and interests. For example, a criminal who is being interrogated and involuntary body
at a police station and who wants to convince the police that he is innocent might movements and, in
consciously strive to sit up straight and maintain a calm tone of voice—behaviors some cases, clothing,
that suggest honesty and credibility. However, the criminal might also unconsciously hairstyle, physical
demonstrate some nonverbal behaviors (such as an inability to maintain eye contact attractiveness, and
or an occasional nervous tapping of fingers on the desk) that reveal his guilt. speaking style, to
Nonverbal communication is often subtle. The meaning of a specific form of non- communicate a
verbal communication can also be ambiguous, depending on the culture, relationship, message.
and gender of the participants. For instance, in some cultures, people show respect by
Nonverbal
communication
includes the use of
body language, facial
expressions, tone of
voice, and gestures.
making eye contact with a person they are communicating with. In other cultures, mak-
ing direct eye contact with an authority figure is considered disrespectful. A police offi-
cer who is not aware of such differences might incorrectly interpret a witness’s unwill-
ingness to make eye contact as a sign of disrespect or dishonesty. The misunderstanding
could lead the officer to express anger or frustration—causing tensions to escalate.
Oftentimes, receivers pay more attention to a sender’s nonverbal communication
than to the sender’s words. If the two types of communication send conflicting mes-
sages, the receiver will likely consider the nonverbal message more credible than the
verbal one. For example, suppose a police manager says he values officers’ input in
decisions but acts distracted when officers present their ideas. In this case, the officers
will likely conclude that the manager in fact does not want to hear their ideas.
Written Channels
Written channels of communication include everything from interoffice memos,
incident reports, performance evaluations, and motivational posters tacked to a
police agency’s wall to e-mails, text messages, and job postings published in a news-
paper. All officers and civilian employees of a police agency, regardless of rank or
position, must demonstrate the ability to communicate effectively in writing. For
instance, line-level officers must document facts surrounding an incident, an inter-
view, or an interrogation as well as criminal activity occurring in the community.
Many police reports are scrutinized by the judiciary and by journalists, so these
ETHICS IN ACTION
Special Treatment for Business Owners?
any people believe that police officers often give special consid-
Meetings
A meeting is a formal gathering to exchange information. In part due to the imple-
mentation of CompStat (see Chapter 2), many police agencies organize meetings on
a regular basis to review crime statistics, discuss new initiatives, and communicate
changes to policies or procedures. However, to generate useful information and
outcomes (and to make effective use of time), meetings must be properly planned
and executed. For example, a meeting with a clear agenda and dedicated facilitator
can result in increased agreement among participants on what problems need to be
addressed and how the agency can best solve them.
Before the Meeting The agenda for a meeting should be prepared and distrib-
uted in advance by the person who will facilitate the meeting. An agenda can be
as simple as a list of topics to be covered, or as complicated as a formal multilevel
outline that will be distributed ahead of time to participants. Following are some
tips for developing an effective meeting agenda:
• Time frame: Indicate precisely when the meeting will start and end. When
determining an ending time, consider selecting a time that is difficult to
extend, such as the end of a work shift. A time limit for discussion of each
agenda item may be indicated as well.
• Order: Position the most important items to be covered in the meeting at the
top of the agenda and the remaining items in descending order of importance.
That way, participants will be able to deal with the most demanding items
early in the meeting—when they are freshest.
• Announcements: If appropriate and if time will allow, list announcements
such as promotions or transfers at the end of the meeting agenda.
After the Meeting End the meeting with a summary of the key points covered
and a review of tasks that were assigned during the meeting and their deadlines.
Prepare minutes of the meeting (notes about what happened and what was decided)
as soon as possible afterward, and distribute them promptly to all interested parties.
Keep a copy of the minutes in a file so people can refer to them readily if needed.
Newsletters
Newsletters can be brief (1 or 2 pages) or relatively long (10 or 12 pages), depend-
ing on the subject matter they cover, the goals of the entity publishing them, and
the publication schedule. (For instance, a newsletter that is published monthly may
be shorter than one that is published only twice a year.) Newsletters may also be
published in print or digital form. Online newsletters (often called e-newsletters or
e-zines) are cheaper and faster to publish than their printed versions, and can be dis-
tributed more widely through e-mail or through access of websites where each issue
may be posted. Electronic newsletters may also contain video attachments or links
to other sources of information, advantages that print-only newsletters cannot offer.
Most newsletters published by police agencies are directed to agency personnel,
both sworn and civilian. Topics covered may include acknowledgment of newly hired
employees; advertisements for community activities; and notices of weddings, births,
deaths, and other events of interest to agency personnel. Each issue of the newsletter
can also be used as an educational tool, offering regular columns about topics such as
police ethics or practical skills (for example, report writing or vehicular safety).
The Grapevine
Some people call it gossip. In the Navy, it is known as scuttlebutt. But in most police
agencies, the channel through which people exchange information verbally and
informally is referred to as the grapevine. Through the grapevine, peers as well as
supervisors and direct subordinates may share accurate information as well as rumors
and other unsubstantiated information in an effort to determine what is happening.
The wise police manager pays as much attention to the grapevine as to formal
communication channels (Moore, 2004), because the content of the grapevine
can strongly affect morale—especially if the content is inaccurate. For instance, if
unfounded rumors that an agency will be shutting down its mounted division are
racing through the grapevine, people worried about losing their jobs may panic and
take unnecessary and disruptive action (such as launching a job search). Or they
may obsessively discuss the rumor instead of doing their jobs, eroding productivity.
Yet the grapevine is so deeply embedded in most organizations’ culture that
managers and supervisors should not try to forbid it or discount the information
circulating through it. When a police manager admonishes subordinates not to talk
about something, it is akin to a parent telling a small child not to touch something—
few people can resist doing precisely what has been forbidden to them.
Cross-gender This scenario illustrates the difficulties that can arise during cross-gender
communication: communication. Differences in how women and men communicate and what their
a process that occurs goals are during communication can lead to misunderstanding and conflict in per-
anytime a person sonal as well as professional relationships. For example, some linguists maintain
of one gender sends that women use communication to build relationships, while men use it to accom-
a message to, or plish tasks and to determine where individuals fit in a hierarchy of relationships (de
receives a message Janasz et al., 2006; Githens, 1991; Tannen, 1990). In the previous scenario, Maria
from, a person of used an invitation to coffee to begin building a working relationship with Tim. He
another gender. declined her invitation simply because he had already had coffee and saw no need to
have more. Because both parties had different purposes in mind during the exchange
and used different styles, the exchange failed to generate a positive outcome.
One way to accommodate cross-gender communication differences is to treat them
the same way you would treat cross-cultural communication differences: Acknowledge
the differences, gain familiarity with gender communication styles that differ from your
own, and practice speaking the other gender’s language when you can. For instance,
Maria could try accepting the idea that someone declining her invitation for coffee
might simply not want any coffee—and is not rejecting her personally. And Tim could
consider the possibility that an invitation for coffee might really be a suggestion for
a meeting to discuss career issues. Role playing during cross-gender communication
sensitivity training can also help people master these skills.
Many situations
provide special
communications
challenges for the
police, especially when
a subject is mentally ill
or suicidal.
Communicating with the Person After gauging the situation, the primary offi-
cer can engage the person verbally. The officer should initiate conversation with
an introduction and, in a respectful manner, state the reason for the police pres-
ence. Officers should present a calm, confident demeanor demonstrating that the
police are in control of the situation. While engaging the person in conversation,
they should attempt to remove any dangerous objects from the individual’s reach
while maneuvering the person into a safe area. Officers should seek to avoid a
physical confrontation. If the person refuses to communicate, the primary officer
should encourage a response by using simple language; for example, “You must be
very upset that someone stole your car” or “You look as if you need to speak with
someone.” If the person begins to speak, the officer can maintain a dialog by using
leading statements such as “Go on” or “And, then?”
The officer should acknowledge the individual’s emotions yet avoid expressing
agreement with any delusions or hallucinations that the person is experiencing.
The officer should never whisper, laugh, or joke with the individual; minimize the
person’s concerns; or unnecessarily touch the person. Introducing additional stimuli
to the situation may only confuse or upset the individual and escalate any agitation
the person may be experiencing (Wildman & Morschauser, 2007).
Concluding the Incident Hopefully, the person will be taken into custody in a
calm, respectful, and nonviolent manner. A successful conclusion may include a criminal
arrest or a mental hygiene detention, physical transport to and a medical examination
at a local hospital, or an intervention with professionals at a local mental health facility.
Communicating effectively with special populations requires knowledge,
patience, and maturity—all of which officers can develop through experience and
appropriate training. Each encounter and follow-up debriefing with command staff
and colleagues can further help officers strengthen these important skills.
Le adership on the j ob
The Newsgroup
Police agencies offer citizens several methods of com- officers and sergeants who originally feared that the
munication with the agency: face-to-face discussion, newsgroup would merely become another means for
9-1-1 calls for emergency service, 3-1-1 calls for less citizens to complain about police behavior report that
urgent matters, and written communications (such the newsgroup was not a complaint vehicle. A council-
as letters and e-mail). One police lieutenant in a woman for the city says that the newsgroup has taken
California city, however, brought the agency in that city the mystery out of police work for most residents.
into the twenty-first century by establishing a website The lieutenant’s idea spurred a high-ranking
to foster communication between the agency and the official in the agency to note, “This is real community
citizens it serves. The site featured a live newsgroup policing, citizens and police in real-time, constant con-
that was made available to citizens 24 hours a day tact about real problems and solutions. Now we really
and was monitored by police personnel. belong to the same team; some of us wear uniforms
Through the newsgroup, citizens began communi- and some do not.”
cating in real time with police officers who responded
1. You are a police supervisor in a small agency.
to citizen nonemergency concerns. For instance, one
Your chief approaches you with a journal article
woman sent a message to the agency that vehicles
describing the electronic messaging system just
were speeding out of control on the street where she
described. The chief wishes to implement a
lived. She was reluctant to let her child play in the front
similar newsgroup. How would you respond to the
yard. Within hours an officer responded to her, stating
chief’s request?
that several citations for speeding on that street had
been issued that day. The officer thanked the woman 2. What are some of the communication challenges
for notifying the police and assured her that the area that could arise in a newsgroup system like the
would remain a target of future patrols. one described? For example, could messages
Citizens of this city report that the newsgroup between citizens and police be misunderstood
has given them a better idea of what is happening because of cultural or gender differences? What
in their neighborhoods. They receive information in steps would you suggest the agency take to pre-
a more timely and personal way than before. Patrol vent or surmount any such challenges?
Police communicate not only with one another and with members of the communi-
ties they serve, but also with the news media. Because of their central role in commu-
nity life, police personnel—especially those in managerial and supervisory roles—are
often interviewed by the press. Of course, like anyone else, police prefer to receive
favorable treatment from the news media. They would much rather see newspapers
and television news programs report stories about officers’ courage and low crime
rates than stories revealing problems or scandals associated with the police.
Yet favorable news coverage of the police is rare. Instead, news stories tend
to focus on the negative—because that is what “sells.” For instance, if an officer
is cited for use of excessive force or other misconduct, the story usually makes
the front page of local and even national newspapers. Stories of horrific crimes,
officer-involved shootings, and high-speed vehicle pursuits also attract the attention
of print and broadcast news media. The adage “If it bleeds, it leads” reflects the
media’s awareness of the public’s hunger for drama and gore.
The police often criticize the media for publishing more unfavorable than favor-
able stories about police behavior and operations. Meanwhile, many broadcast and
print journalists—immersed in mostly sensational stories—accuse the police of being
insensitive to citizens’ concerns and rights and even downright brutal to those they
suspect of having committed a crime. Such criticisms, from both sides, erode trust
between police and the media. Moreover, a preponderance of negative news stories
about the police causes citizens to conclude that life is more dangerous than it actually
is—instilling unnecessary fear. It also jeopardizes police agencies’ chances of receiving
Communications with
the news media should
be truthful and viewed
as opportunities
to develop positive
relationships with the
press.
funding because it gives the impression that police are not doing their job effectively.
Finally, police operations should be transparent, visible, and accessible to the common
citizen, and the news media provide the best avenue for creating those conditions. For
all these reasons, police agencies should strive to cultivate positive relationships with
the media. Indeed, the quality of an agency’s relationship with the press can strongly
determine how positive or negative news accounts of police activities will be.
In addition to communicating with the news media, police communicate with people
from other agencies, such as the local corrections department, the prosecuting attor-
ney’s office, fire safety agencies, emergency medical services, social services, security
organizations, hospitals, and nursing homes. But they tend to do so only when it is
necessary, such as when a suspect crosses jurisdictional lines and officers in adjacent
jurisdictions must be informed. However, regular communication among agencies
can increase the effectiveness of each agency involved, because such communication
facilitates the exchange of valuable information and the cooperation agencies need
to make decisions (Estey, 2005).
Technology advances have made interagency communication easier than ever.
One example of a program that uses technology to improve interagency commu-
nication is SAFECOM, instituted in 2004 by the U.S. Department of Homeland
Security’s Office of Interoperability and Compatibility (OIC). According to program
managers, “SAFECOM . . . provides research, development, testing and evaluation,
guidance, tools and templates on interoperable communication-related issues to
state, local, tribal, and federal emergency response agencies” (U.S. Department of
Homeland Security, SAFECOM Program, 2004).
The primary purpose of SAFECOM is to enhance “communication interoper-
ability” among more than 50,000 public safety agencies (for example, police, fire,
and medical emergency services) across the United States. In general, “interoper-
ability” refers to the ability of emergency responders to work seamlessly with other
systems or products without any special effort. Wireless communications interop-
erability specifically refers to the ability of emergency response officials to share
information via voice and data signals on demand, in real time, when needed, and
as authorized. For example, when communications systems are interoperable:
• Police and firefighters responding to an incident can speak with one another
to coordinate efforts.
• Emergency response agencies can respond to catastrophic accidents or
disasters to work effectively together.
• Emergency response personnel can maximize resources in planning for major
predictable events such as the Super Bowl or an inauguration, or for disaster
relief and recovery efforts.
Fostering good working relationships with people from other agencies is essen-
tial to providing optimum service to citizens. Communication can help build such
relationships. For example, police officers should converse with these profession-
als to gain familiarity with how personnel work in each of these settings, what
Various types of
public safety personnel
(police, fire, emergency
medical, corrections)
must communicate
well among one
another, especially in
emergency situations.
Here, Clearwater,
Florida, rescuers work
to save a small child.
resources the various entities offer, and the limitations of each entity. Informed by
this knowledge, officers can direct a citizen in need of assistance to the agency that
can best satisfy the need.
In any communication situation, with any audience, there are several essential skills
that can help police personnel enhance their effectiveness—whether they are seek-
ing to solve a problem, arrive at a decision, or improve their agency’s performance.
These skills include facilitation, persuasion, feedback, and conflict management.
Facilitation
People use facilitation to effectively and agreeably develop solutions to problems. Facilitation:
Facilitation comprises a range of specialized functions that help a group deliber- a communication
ate (Bostrom, Anson, & Clawson, 1993). Although difficult to accomplish in a skill through which
traditional command and control environment, facilitation can motivate others to police personnel
develop and implement new ideas and initiatives by promoting transparency and develop solutions to
synergistic efforts (Eastman Kodak Company, 1995). problems.
Police leaders incorporate facilitation into their daily encounters, whether at a
staff meeting or during spontaneous conversations or encounters with colleagues,
subordinates, or citizens. Hallmarks of facilitation include the following:
• Creating a safe, receptive, and nonthreatening environment in which people
can share ideas and challenge one another’s thinking
Persuasion
Persuasion: The ability to persuade is another essential communication skill. Persuasion is
the ability to the ability to influence outcomes, using methods other than the issuance of direct
influence outcomes, orders. In a police agency, everyone can benefit from mastering the art of persua-
using methods other sion. For example:
than the issuance of
• Paul, an officer, is called to the scene of a domestic dispute and finds a
direct orders.
man holding a woman at gunpoint. By demonstrating calm and helping the man
see how his behavior could lead to devastating consequences for himself and the
woman, Paul persuades the man to drop the gun and give himself up.
• Karla, a new police recruit, is convinced that the agency where she works
could deliver even better service to the community if it updated its computer
systems. She presents the relevant facts to her chief, including information
on the costs of the upgrade and the potential gains, and persuades him to
approve funding for the project.
In the private as well as the public sectors, persuasion has emerged as the
preferred method for fostering change and achieving valued results. That is
because enabling change and achieving results often require collaboration among
people who do not have formal authority over one another. Whenever possible,
police officers should seek to persuade others to take action, rather than dictate
outcomes. Using persuasion more than command and control helps create a more
participatory work environment—which in turn enhances productivity and job
satisfaction.
Effective persuaders exhibit distinctive personal characteristics, including
empathy, credibility (by being knowledgeable about the subject matter at hand),
reliability, humility, confidence, and calmness. They also demonstrate the following
behaviors:
• Readily soliciting and providing feedback
• Thinking creatively about what might be the best solution for all parties
• Presenting information in a manner that facilitates comprehension by others
• Presenting a positive impression through good grooming and dress,
enthusiasm, and impeccable personal credentials
• Connecting with diverse audiences and building consensus
• Inviting alternative approaches to resolving problems
• Articulating and promoting a compelling vision of a desirable future
• Using relevant facts and evidence to make their points
Communication is
a process that may
involve several goals,
including persuading
others to take action
or embrace an idea.
Feedback
Feedback is a special kind of communication through which a sender gives specific Feedback:
information (a response) to a receiver. Feedback can be given in all types of commu- a special kind of
nication channels—verbal, nonverbal, and written. It can result from a question; for communication
example, a firearms-safety trainer asks learners to rate the training’s value to them. through which
Feedback can also be personal; for instance, after a subordinate completes a project, a sender gives
the supervisor gives an impression of the person’s performance. specific information
Within a police agency, supervisors and managers offer feedback to (a response) to a
subordinates—such as giving praise or offering instruction—on a daily, informal receiver.
basis, over and above what may be given during performance reviews. In all types of
work (including police work), giving immediate feedback can be far more effective
than waiting for a less frequent occasion (such as a quarterly or annual performance
review). Why? When people receive feedback while their action or performance is
fresh in their minds, they learn more from that information.
In some police agencies, supervisors can also ask subordinates to provide
feedback on management’s performance and policies. However, this is not the
norm in such settings. Many supervisors may be reluctant to ask for feedback
from anyone, because it could turn attention to areas where they are lacking
while ignoring their strengths (Cordner & Scarborough, 2007). Moreover, sub-
ordinates may be reluctant to give their superiors honest feedback because they
fear it will spark retaliation (in forms such as demotions or withholding of valued
professional opportunities).
Feedback can flow not only between personnel in a police agency but also
between the agency and the communities it serves. For instance, an agency might
distribute a written or online survey to citizens asking them to assess the quality of
police services provided. The responses to such surveys can help police managers
modify procedures (for example, providing more frequent patrols of a neighbor-
hood plagued by increasing crime rates) and design needed new initiatives (such as
establishing a mounted equestrian unit to provide better crowd control).
Conflict Management
Conflict is inevitable—part of human nature. It arises when people believe they have
incompatible goals, compete over scarce resources, or interfere with each other’s
efforts. Knowing how to manage conflict through effective communication is a core
skill for all police personnel.
The first step is to understand the difference between productive and destructive
conflict. In a productive conflict, participants balance cooperation with competi-
tion, resulting in a gain for all parties. They also keep the discussion centered on
the issues at hand, rather than allowing it to devolve into personal and character
attacks. In a destructive conflict, disputants often seek to win for themselves rather
than achieve a collective gain, and they resort to personal attacks instead of resolv-
ing the issues at hand.
For example, after learning about an impending budget cut, managers at a
police agency discuss ways to deliver the same services with less funding for the
forthcoming fiscal year. Tension escalates initially, as people lobby to get a signifi-
cant share of the available funding for their own departments and teams. Yet the
participants are then able to move from destructive to productive conflict by keep-
ing the bigger picture in mind: sustaining high quality in the agency’s services. By
looking beyond their individual interests to the larger goal, they arrive at a solution
for allocating funds that benefits the agency overall.
When it comes to managing conflict, effective police managers and front-line
officers seek to de-escalate destructive conflict by watching for and correcting symptoms
of unproductive conflict. These symptoms include participants ridiculing or threatening
one another, impugning each other’s character, refusing to express their thoughts, and
harboring resentments (Adler & Proctor, 2011). For instance, if a police manager lead-
ing a meeting notices that one person is uncharacteristically silent, the manager might
call on that person and encourage sharing of thoughts, concerns, and ideas. Or if the
manager observes several participants making character attacks (“You really don’t seem
to care about this department!” “Can you actually be that ignorant?”), the manager
refocuses the conversation away from personalities and back onto the issues (“Let’s set
aside the personal attacks and return to the decision facing us.”)
Adroit communicators also adapt their communication style to the situa-
tion. For instance, when arresting a suspect, an officer may use an assertive,
task-oriented, and decisive communication style (“Put your hands on your head
and face the wall”). That same officer may use a collaborative communication
style when facilitating a meeting in which task force members will generate ideas
for reducing speeding in a neighborhood (Ortmeier & Meese, 2010; Wallace &
Roberson, 2009). (“Viktor, we haven’t heard from you yet. What are your thoughts
about the strategy currently on the table?”)
summary
• What Is Communication? Communication is a process involving an exchange
of information between a sender and a receiver. It serves several purposes
including being understood, understanding others, and persuading others.
Communication in a police agency can flow in vertical, horizontal, and
diagonal directions, and through formal and informal channels.
• Barriers to Effective Communication. Barriers include poor communication
skills, background differences, lack of credibility in a message source,
complex communication channels, denial in a message receiver, unfamiliar
language, lack of motivation in senders or receivers, and an organizational
culture that stifles communication.
• Communication Channels. Channels may be verbal, nonverbal, or written.
• A Closer Look at Meetings, Newsletters, and the Grapevine. Before a meeting,
the meeting leader should prepare and distribute a clear agenda. During the
meeting, the leader must clarify rules about interruptions, invite and manage
input from participants, and ensure that the discussion stays focused on agenda
topics and that disagreements do not take a personal turn. After the meeting,
the leader should distribute minutes and keep a copy of minutes in a file. Police
agencies can also use newsletters as a tool for communication with internal and
external constituencies. Police managers can take a productive approach to the
grapevine (the informal verbal communication channel among agency personnel)
by encouraging open communication at all levels and tap into the grapevine to
learn employees’ opinions and feelings about changes or conditions in the agency.
• Special Communication Challenges. Communicating with people from
different cultures, different genders, and special populations (such as persons
who are mentally or physically disabled) presents unique challenges for police
officers. Police can surmount these challenges by, for example, learning as
much as possible about cultures different from their own; acknowledging
and accommodating differences in communication styles between men and
women; and learning how to gauge an incident in which a member of a special
population is involved, engage the person, and conclude the incident effectively.
• Communicating with the News Media. News media and police often have an
antagonistic relationship. This erodes trust between both sides, instills fear in
citizens when news media publish a preponderance of negative stories about
police, and prevents police agencies from making their activities transparent
and accessible to the public. To address this problem, police must improve their
communication with the news media (including controlling information leaks
and managing media conferences strategically) and strengthen their relationship
with the media (for example, by including media representatives in police
briefings and demonstrating professionalism while interacting with journalists).
• Communicating with Other Agencies. Police can improve collaboration with
other agencies by communicating frequently with them and taking advantage
of technological advances such as SAFECOM.
• Four Essential Communication Skills. Four skills that can further help police
enhance their effectiveness are facilitation of problem solving, persuasion to
influence people over whom they have no formal authority, giving feedback
to guide subordinates’ performance-improvement efforts and gathering
feedback from community members, and conflict management.
key terms
barriers to effective communication feedback
communication nonverbal communication
cross-cultural communication persuasion
cross-gender communication special populations
facilitation
discussion questions
Training, Development,
and Deployment of
Human Resources
learning outcomes
Education:
TRAINING: DEVELOPING SKILLS AND the learning of
PREPARING FOR POLICE WORK concepts and
development of
Some people argue that the terms training and education are synonymous, but those problem-solving and
who train and educate may disagree. As a rule, training encompasses knowledge and critical thinking skills
skill development and the kind of on-the-job preparation found in policing. Education through a school,
involves learning and comprehending concepts as well as developing problem-solving college, or university
and critical thinking skills through a school, college, or university experience. experience.
Firearms training is
a regular part of an
officer’s in-service
training regimen.
Most police academies strive to blend training with education, since police officers
use job-related as well as critical thinking skills during the course of their employment.
For instance, training in firearms usage and safety is skill based, conducted at a location
(a firing range) specifically designed for this purpose. But officers can gain an educa-
tion in firearms usage and safety (as well as other knowledge areas crucial to their jobs)
through college-level courses, seminars, and other educational opportunities.
Much of a police
officer’s training is skill
and abilities oriented.
Types of Training
Police officers undergo extensive training before they become tenured officers and
they continue their training while they are on the job. Training can take numer-
ous forms. In the following pages, we examine the most common and important Basic preservice
types of training, including basic preservice training, on-the-job (field) training, and training:
in-service (continuous professional) training. academy-based
training that
Basic Preservice Training Recruits who are assessed and hired (see Chapter 8) introduces recruits
begin basic preservice training. This training, usually provided at a police academy, to police work,
introduces recruits to police work and provides an overview of the justice system, provides an
including the roles of the police, courts, and corrections agencies. The curriculum overview of the
also includes physical fitness, report writing, criminal and motor vehicle laws and justice system, and
procedures, rules of evidence, search and seizure, communications, patrol strategies, includes classes on
arrest procedures, firearms training, and basic investigations. (See Table 10-1.) specific skills and
Some police jurisdictions provide basic preservice training through an acad- knowledge areas
emy serving that one jurisdiction. Others have a different academy structure. For related to police
instance, many states and rural areas have centralized academy facilities that serve work.
Although the length and subject areas of preservice training programs may vary, all such programs address the basic knowledge, skills,
and abilities (KSAs) a police officer should possess and demonstrate. As an example of preservice training, the state-established
minimum requirements for California police academy content (learning domains) and hourly requirements are presented below. Most
California police academies exceed the minimum content and hourly requirements.
numerous agencies in the region. Small jurisdictions send their recruits to one of
these centralized academy facilities.
The curriculum of most police academies falls into two categories: conceptual
and practical. Conceptual courses may cover topics such as leadership, ethics, the
writings of Sir Robert Peel, and the use of force. Courses focused on practical appli-
cation may concentrate on skill areas such as firearms use, defensive tactics, vehicle
operations, and conflict management. (See Table 10-2.)
In 2006, the U.S. Bureau of Justice Statistics (BJS) conducted a census of state and local law enforce-
ment training academies. The 2006 BJS Census of Law Enforcement Training Academies findings
included the following:
ETHIC S I N ACT I ON
Is Ethics Training Necessary?
ne autumn morning, Sergeant Philip Ross placed his 9mm handgun
O into his waist band and walked into the woods behind his home.
Ross thought of his wife, his daughter, and a close family of fel-
low officers he was leaving behind. A note in his pocket read, “I’m sorry,
please forgive me.” A New Jersey grand jury indictment bearing his name
was attached to the note.
Ross had been indicted for lying to strengthen a criminal case against
a major drug dealer. He lied by claiming in an investigative report that drugs
found in the dealer’s home were the fruit of a search warrant. In fact, the drugs
were uncovered during a protective sweep before the search warrant was
issued, rendering the search illegal and the drugs inadmissible as evidence.
Ross’s wife discovered that her husband had left the house. She ran
into the woods and found Ross in time to stop him from committing suicide.
The two returned home and drove to the courthouse so Ross could face his
criminal charge. Later, Ross said, “For years I trained . . . firearms, tactics,
officer safety, and in the end I destroyed my own career and almost my
life with one stupid decision” (Sutton, 2006). Sergeant Ross’s statement
implies that he received training to prepare him for the physical dangers of
police work, but not the dangers that come with ethical dilemmas.
1. Why might ethics training in police work be as important as skills training?
2. Using what you have learned about ethics in previous chapters, design
an ethics curriculum for police recruits.
Officers engaged in
a refresher in-service
training course in
the use of force and
defensive tactics.
Career Planning
Career plan: The career plan for every police officer begins when the candidate completes an
a document employment application and ends with each individual’s retirement from the law
describing a police profession. A police officer’s career plan may result from a formal department
officer’s personal protocol or an informal process through which the officer creates the plan with or
career vision; without assistance. (See the box “Career Planning for an Aspiring Police Sergeant.”)
a timetable for Regardless of how it comes about, the plan should include a personal career vision;
action; and detailed a timetable for action; and detailed descriptions of any training, education, and
descriptions of any career steps necessary to carry out the plan.
training, education, In-service training is a useful place to begin planning for an officer’s career
and career steps because it focuses the officer’s and supervisors’ attention on the KSAs the individual
necessary to must develop to handle critical job areas such as firearms, defensive tactics, ethics,
complete the plan. leadership, and legal updates. To strengthen particular KSAs through in-service
Miami, Florida,
officers take part in a
certification program
graduation ceremony
of the Canine (K9)
Academy in 2007.
the officer can expect a review and update to the plan (Gravenkemper, 2008). However,
no officer should leave a career plan to fate. Officers must take ownership of their plans
and shoulder the responsibility for creating and regularly updating their plans.
caused the behavior. (For instance, did the motorist simply not see the red light?
Is there an emergency that caused the person to ignore the light?) She will also
need to radio in his license and registration information to see whether he has a
record of criminal activity or whether the vehicle he is driving has been stolen.
While she is doing all this, Pauline will be gathering additional information, such
as whether the vehicle’s inspection sticker is up-to-date. At each point during
this process, Pauline will need to exercise judgment, communicate effectively,
and make decisions based on the information she is collecting—all activities that
require strong leadership skills.
Leadership development in a police environment may take the form of classes
or seminars that help people identify leadership attributes based on personalities
or master leadership behaviors through role plays and other exercises. Supervisors
can also coach employees in the improvement of traits and skills that characterize
excellent leadership—such as the ability to attract followers, to provide focus and
direction, and to strengthen their organization through their efforts (Monteith,
2007). (See Chapter 11 for a focused analysis of leadership.)
Line-level officers who develop their leadership competencies will begin dem-
onstrating specific new behaviors and attitudes. They will earn citizens’ respect
and loyalty, so people want to follow them. They will communicate effectively,
persuasively, and with empathy to colleagues and community members. They will
know what the agency’s mission is and how officers’ everyday activities can support
fulfillment of that mission. If the police agency is committed to community partner-
ing and problem solving, police officer-leaders will understand what these concepts
mean, how they inform their interactions with community residents, and how to
motivate citizens to participate in addressing the problems affecting them.
Leadership on t h e job
Training versus Action
On September 3, 2006, a 23-year-old off-duty rookie settle a lawsuit initiated by the player. During the civil
police officer shot and wounded a professional foot- trial leading to the “no-fault” settlement, the officer
ball player after an early-morning vehicle chase. The conceded that his actions (pursuing a suspect while
officer, out of uniform and driving his own car, fol- off duty in his own vehicle) during the incident were
lowed the player, suspecting that he was driving under inconsistent with the training he had received in the
the influence of alcohol or drugs. During the pursuit, police academy.
the officer notified on-duty colleagues while flashing
1. How can agency leaders ensure that police
his headlights in an attempt to stop the other driver.
actions will be consistent with the training that
When the pursuit ended in a residential cul-de-sac,
recruits receive?
the athlete left his vehicle and approached the off-
duty officer—who shot him twice, wounding him in the 2. Describe how the off-duty officer did or did not
back of the left knee and hip. In July 2008, the city use leadership skills effectively. What would you
that employed the officer agreed to pay $5.5 million to have done differently in this situation?
Succession Planning
In addition to providing career planning and leadership development programs,
police agencies must engage in succession planning to further develop employees’
competencies and ensure that the right talent can be deployed when it is needed.
Succession planning: Succession planning ensures that adequate qualified personnel are available to
activities intended to replace those who vacate positions through promotion, transfer, retirement, termi-
ensure that adequate nation, or agency expansion.
qualified personnel Through succession planning, an agency identifies and grooms people to fill
are available to vacant positions within the organization, taking into account how well a prospect’s
replace those who personality, knowledge, skill level, and attitudes render the individual suitable for
vacate positions the position (Human Capital Advisor, 2005). Agencies skilled at succession plan-
through promotion, ning hire, promote, and transfer employees to new assignments or temporary posi-
transfer, retirement, tions in a manner consistent with the agency’s vision, mission, and goals. Almost
termination, or continuously, they fill positions from inside the organization through promotion or
agency expansion. reassignment or externally through hiring. For example, an agency might fill vacant
positions through promotional testing or appointment by the hiring authority, often
the chief, commissioner, or sheriff. It may also staff special assignments and short-
term projects by using an internal selection process. For example, managers might
know that an officer has experience with or education in public relations and thus
might function well as the agency’s public information officer.
For key positions and assignments, an agency should develop a three- to five-
year succession plan. Thus, this kind of planning requires patience and care. To
ensure successful staffing of critical positions, agencies must select and retain the
right people for these positions; identify and promote the best performers; motivate
and train employees; help them acquire or strengthen the skills needed to achieve
desirable results; and prepare employees to move into new, more challenging posi-
tions (Succession Planning 101, 2007).
To do all this, agency managers assess the behaviors and attitudes required of
potential candidates for specific positions and then determine which candidates fulfill
or have the potential to meet those requirements. An effective succession plan paves the
way for the agency to promote people with the KSAs needed for particular roles (LaPla
& Gravenkemper, 2007) and to groom promising individuals to take on new roles.
To groom individuals to assume specialty, supervisory, and command assign-
ments, an agency provides developmental opportunities, educational incentives,
Deployment of and leadership skills training. For example, officers take on increasingly challeng-
human resources: ing responsibilities through job rotation, community service, and special project
the process of assignments (AME Info, 2007). By developing their personal and professional skills
placing the right through these experiences, officers ready themselves to move into roles where they
person in the right will provide the most value for the community the agency serves.
job or on the right
tasks or projects,
according to a DEPLOYMENT: PUTTING HUMAN
candidate’s strengths, RESOURCES TO THE BEST USE
weaknesses,
knowledge, skills, Deployment of human resources is the process of placing the right person in the right
and abilities job or on the right tasks or projects, according to a candidate’s strengths, weaknesses,
(KSAs)—as well as and KSAs—as well as interests. A police agency can determine how best to deploy
interests. its human resources by using three processes: strategic project or task assignments,
Strategic Project or
Task Assignments
Through strategic project or
task assignments, a police
agency determines its needs and
matches the right personnel—
based on KSAs as well as
interests—to projects and job
assignments so needs are met.
For example, agency leaders
determine who is most suitable
for the SWAT team and who
is best suited for a project that
involves extensive collabora-
tion with community leaders.
Or they identify officers who
excel at and enjoy interacting
with members of the community, and assign them to efforts that require relationship
building. Meanwhile, they assign officers with a strong desire to combat crime to initia-
tives emphasizing law enforcement.
When an agency makes a good match between a person’s KSAs and interests
and a job or project, employees are more motivated and productive, and they derive
greater satisfaction from their work. All this translates into better performance and
stronger loyalty to the agency. These benefits in turn lead to more satisfied com-
munity residents and lower costs for the agency, as managers do not have to recruit
and train new hires to replace defectors.
Yet proper placement of a deserving individual is not always easy. Seniority
rules and union contracts often prescribe who is eligible for special assignments
or promotions. Agency leaders must work within those constraints in seeking to
match the right people to the right types of work. For example, progressive agen-
cies generally negotiate with their police representative bodies to agree that seniority
will be the deciding factor if all other requirements for a position are equal between
employees interested in the job. Those requirements may include physical fitness
standards and a positive disciplinary record for entrance to (for instance) a SWAT
or K9 handler position. Requirements for a firearms police instructor position may
include an above-average score on past qualifying firearms tests, demonstrations
of necessary standards of physical fitness, a firearms instructor certification, and a
history of assisting or instructing classes or individuals in various topics (such as
training volunteers for organizations like the Red Cross).
Workforce Scheduling
In addition to knowing whom to assign to which projects and tasks, agency manag-
ers must also engage in smart workforce scheduling. Through workforce scheduling,
the agency determines how many people are required for particular assignments
and how much time they should devote to the work. A needs assessment can help
managers develop a workforce schedule. For instance, if an assignment (area or post)
requires continuous patrol or staffing (24 hours per day, 7 days per week), about 4.5
full-time equivalent (FTE) officers will be required to cover that assignment. This
estimate accounts for vacations, holidays, and sick leave, but not overtime.
A needs assessment should also reveal an assignment’s estimated workload. For
example, information on the number of calls for police service, types of calls, time
requirement per call, and backup officer requirement frequency can help the agency
determine how many officers are needed to adequately staff a service area (such as
a beat or a district). The most effective workforce scheduling maximizes coverage
and service quality while minimizing resources required.
Agencies typically schedule three 8-hour shifts to ensure 24-hour coverage.
Managers may add a fourth shift to cover daily peak activity periods. The resulting
schedule will take into account meal breaks and roll calls. (See Table 10-3.)
To improve morale and reduce overtime and sick-leave abuse, some agen-
cies schedule three 10-hour shifts designed to overlap during peak periods. Fewer
officers are required for each shift, yet a greater number are available during peak
periods. Officers work four 10-hour shifts, with three days off. (See Table 10-4.)
A few agencies schedule 12.5-hour shifts. With this arrangement, officers work
three or four days each week, alternating every seven-day period. The 12.5-hour
shift arrangement necessitates only two shift changes every 24 hours. Decreasing
the number of shift changes typically reduces personnel costs. However, some
might also argue that long shifts introduce inefficiency because officers tire and
therefore become less productive toward the end of the shift. Further, tired officers
can become careless, and with carelessness comes the risk of poor judgment and
mistakes, which can lead to use of excessive force, mistreatment of citizens, and
even officer injuries or fatalities (Ortmeier, 1999, 2009; Payton & Amaral, 2004).
Scheduling personnel in policing and other public safety environments can be
extremely complex and labor intensive. Collective bargaining rules, seniority systems,
*Shift D optional.
Working Groups
A third valuable deployment practice is the assembly and use of working groups.
Such groups are assigned to meet specific needs and can be permanent or temporary
(existing for a specified number of days, weeks, or months.) Working groups can
take three forms: teams, task forces, and police–community partnerships.
Teams A team consists of a group of people who receive specialized training and Team:
use that training to address a specific incident. Teams are relatively permanent. For a group of people
instance, an agency summons its SWAT team to respond to a situation in which who receive
an armed suspect has seized several hostages and is barricaded in a building. The specialized training
agency charges the scuba team with recovering a body or a vehicle submerged in and use that training
water. It calls on the bomb squad or hazardous-materials disposal team to investi- to address a specific
gate and dispose of a suspicious package or toxic substance. It deploys the emotion- incident.
ally disturbed person response team (EDPRT) to help a citizen who is threatening
suicide. Or it calls on the gang unit to investigate and address the escalation of
gang-related violence in a particular neighborhood.
A Washington State
Green River Task
Force member ponders
investigative strategy.
summary
• Training: Developing Skills and Preparing for Police Work. Proper training
enhances police personnel’s skills and prepares them to deliver excellent
performance on the job. Types of training include basic preservice training
(academy-based training that introduces recruits to police work, provides
an overview of the justice system, and offers classes on specific skills and
knowledge areas related to police work), on-the-job or field training under
the direct supervision of a senior officer or designed field training officer
(FTO), and in-service or continuous professional training, which enables
police practitioners to maintain and periodically update their skills. Many
police agencies are augmenting training with higher education; for example,
by offering incentives to officers for advancing their formal education after
beginning their careers.
• Development: Enhancing Officers’ Knowledge, Skills, and Abilities (KSAs).
Development contributes to officers’ lifelong learning and growth. It can take
several forms, including career planning (articulating an officer’s career vision,
developing a timetable for action, and describing any training, education, and
career steps needed to complete the plan); leadership development programs
(which teach officers how to influence, motivate, guide, direct, and make
decisions; and succession planning (which comprises activities intended to
ensure that adequate qualified personnel are available to replace those who
vacate positions through promotion, transfer, retirement, termination, or
agency expansion).
1. The training process for new police officers consists of more than classroom lectures
and tests. How do the three types of training described in this chapter (basic pre-
service, on-the-job or field, and in-service or continuous professional) differ in their
focus and purpose?
2. Basic preservice training is a crucial part of a new police officer’s learning. What are
some examples of the subject areas traditionally covered in police academy curricula?
What are some special topics now covered during basic preservice training because of
changes in regulations, American culture, and politics?
3. How does development differ from training? Select one of the three forms of devel-
opment described in this chapter (career planning, leadership development programs,
and success planning). What are the key defining elements of the development form
you selected? How does the form differ in its purpose from the other two forms?
4. Why is it important for line officers to develop leadership skills? Think of a scenario
(not one of the scenarios presented in this chapter) in which an officer would need to
demonstrate leadership. What skills would the officer need to exercise in the scenario
you have chosen? What risks would arise if the officer failed to lead? In what ways
would strong leadership by the officer in this scenario help produce desirable outcomes?
5. What is meant by deployment in a police agency? How does deployment differ from
development and training in its processes and purpose?
6. What considerations do police agencies weigh while seeking to match personnel to
project or task assignments?
7. What decisions must a police agency make while developing a workforce schedule?
In addition to trying to maximize coverage and service quality through effective
workforce scheduling, what else does an agency seek to do regarding resources?
8. The assembly and use of working groups are key processes in deployment of human
resources at a police agency. What are the three types of working groups described
in this chapter, and how do they compare and contrast in terms of their purpose,
composition, and length of duration?
Leadership and
Supervision
learning outcomes
LEADERSHIP THEORIES
Theories about leadership have evolved over the past century. For example,
researchers in the early twentieth century suggested that leaders had inherent traits
that differentiated them from followers. Later in the twentieth century, researchers
theorized that characteristics of the situations (not a person’s inborn traits) most
strongly determined whether leadership occurred. Still later, researchers began con-
sidering not only how specific situations affected leaders’ and followers’ behavior
but also how such behavior affected situations. Today, many scholars emphasize
leaders’ ability to motivate, influence, and persuade over their ability to control and
direct others. And they argue that with the right training and experience, anyone
can learn to become a leader (Ortmeier, 1995; Ortmeier & Meese, 2010). This is
the stance we take in this book.
Examining the major leadership theories that have evolved over time can pro-
vide you with a foundation of knowledge useful for developing leadership skills
in yourself and others in your agency. It can also help you construct and imple-
ment a leadership style appropriate to your circumstances. To that end, we briefly
describe several types of theories that are categorized based on whether they center
on leaders, followers or situational context, or leader–follower interactions. (See
Table 11-1.) We do not endorse a single leadership theory or approach. Rather, we
encourage you to evaluate them all and to consider how they might best serve you
in your own circumstances.
Personal–Situational Theory
The personal–situational the-
ory was the first to address
leadership’s full complexity.
The theory supposes that a
mix of personal characteris-
tics (an individual’s thoughts, Personal–situational
emotions, and actions) inter- theory:
act with specific conditions in theory proposing that
the person’s environment to a mix of personal
create successful leadership. characteristics
Effectiveness depends on the leader’s ability to understand followers and the environ- interact with
ment in which the followers function, and to react appropriately as followers and the specific conditions
situation change (Bennis, 1961). in an individual’s
environment to
Interaction–Expectation Theor y Interaction–expectation theory proposes that produce leadership.
leadership is the act of initiating a structure (such as a process for accomplishing a
particular task, or an approach to resolving a specific type of problem) that group Interaction–
members support. Members support a structure if it helps solve their problems and expectation theory:
it conforms to group norms, and if they believe that success will result if they follow theory proposing
the leader. Thus, leadership involves initiating as well as fulfilling others’ expecta- that leadership is the
tions (Adler, 2007; Stogdill, 1959). act of initiating a
structure that group
members support.
Theories Centering on Followers and Situational Context Motivation–hygiene
Motivation–Hygiene Theor y Motivation–hygiene theory was developed by theory:
Frederick Herzberg in the 1950s. Herzberg conducted studies to determine which theory proposing
factors in an employee’s work environment caused satisfaction or dissatisfaction. which factors increase
According to Herzberg, job satisfaction, and presumably motivation, and job satisfaction and
dissatisfaction acted independently of each other. He referred to satisfiers (such dissatisfaction among
as achievement, recognition, and advancement) as “motivators” and dissatisfiers employees in an
(including supervision, working conditions, and salary) as “hygiene factors.” organization.
Situational theory: Situational Theor y Situational theory—developed, refined, and revised between
theory proposing that the late 1960s and 1990s by Paul Hersey and Ken Blanchard (1982)—counts among
different situations the most widely recognized theories of leadership. According to situational theory,
demand different different situations demand different styles of leadership. To be effective, leaders
styles of leadership. must adapt their leadership style to specific characteristics of a situation, such as
a follower’s skill level or degree of motivation for completing a particular task or
working toward a goal.
Situational leadership theory is practical, easily understood, and prescriptive (it tells
one what to do) rather than descriptive. It emphasizes leaders’ flexibility, and under-
scores the importance of adapting to followers’ unique needs. However, as with other
theories, critics have pointed out shortcomings. Specifically, few studies have been con-
ducted that justify the assumptions underlying the theory. Moreover, situational lead-
ership questionnaires force respondents to choose predetermined responses that favor
situational theory rather than other leadership behaviors not described in the theory.
Contingency theory: Contingency Theory Similar to situational theory, contingency theory, developed
theory that attempts in the 1960s, reinforces the notion that effective leaders demonstrate styles that fit
to match leaders the situation. Rather than focusing on a person’s ability to adopt a style that fits a sit-
to specific types of uation, contingency theory attempts to match leaders to specific types of situations.
situations. Research suggests that contingency theory is a valid and reliable approach to
explaining effective leadership. Moreover, this theory recognizes that leaders cannot
Path–goal theory: be effective in all situations. However, its critics maintain that contingency theory
theory suggesting that does not fully explain why certain leadership styles may be effective in some situ-
a leader’s role is to ations but not in others. Critics also point out that the theory fails to support the
enhance followers’ notion that leaders can be taught adaptive skills necessary in changing situations
performance by (Fiedler, 1967; Northouse, 2007).
motivating them
Path–Goal Theor y Path–goal theory, proposed in the early 1970s, suggests that a
and by rewarding
leader’s role is to enhance followers’ performance by motivating them and by reward-
achievement of goals.
ing achievement of goals. Unlike situational theory, which suggests that leaders must
adapt to followers’ developmental level, and contingency theory, which supposes a
Meta-leadership: match between a leader’s style and situational variables, the path–goal approach sug-
overarching leadership gests that leaders should use a style that eliminates barriers to achievement of goals
framework designed and meets followers’ motivational needs (House, 1971; Ortmeier & Meese, 2010).
to link organizational
units or organizations; Meta-Leadership Theor y Meta-leadership theory, a recent development, incor-
attempts to transcend porates findings from the research of such theorists as Warren Bennis and Ronald
usual organizational Heifetz. Meta-leadership is an overarching framework designed to link the efforts
confines. of different organizational units or different organizations. Meta-leaders wish to
transcend usual organizational confines and influence, motivate, and activate change
above and beyond the established lines of their dominion and control. According to
the theory, meta-leaders are driven and motivated by purposes broader than those pre-
scribed by their formal roles (Marcus, Dorn, & Henderson, 2006). However, meta-
leadership theorists tend to define leadership in terms of a recognized span of author-
ity a person holds in a formal role, rather than in informal as well as formal roles.
Psychodynamic The Psychodynamic Approach The psychodynamic approach can trace its origin
approach: to the work of Sigmund Freud in his development of psychoanalysis in the 1930s.
an approach It represents an approach to leadership rather than a coherent theory, because it
suggesting that adapts ideas from several behavioral theorists, scholars, and practitioners.
leaders are more According to this approach, leaders are more effective if they have insight into the
effective if they psychological makeup of themselves and their followers. This approach makes none
have insight into the of the assumptions that underlie trait, behavioral, and situational leadership theories.
psychological makeup It does not presume that a particular personality type is best suited for leadership,
of themselves and nor does it attempt to match leadership styles to followers or to particular situations.
their followers. Instead, it emphasizes the importance of leaders’ and followers’ awareness of their own
personality characteristics, and of their understanding of why and how they respond
to each other as they do. According to this approach, effective leaders work to gain
insights into their own tendencies and needs, and they help followers do the same.
Critics of this approach are uncomfortable with the subjective nature of insight
development. They also point out that research on the approach relies primarily on
the clinical observations of psychologists and psychiatrists, whose opinions may
be biased in favor of the approach because it focuses on individuals. Finally, the
approach does not account for organizational variables (such as a company’s cul-
ture, power structure, challenges, tasks) that might influence leaders’ and followers’
behavior (Meese & Ortmeier, 2004; Northouse, 2007; Stech, 2001).
ETHIC S I N ACT I ON
Demotion without Honor
ne skill essential to leaders in a police agency is the ability to decide
Training of Federal
Air Marshals at
the Federal Law
Enforcement Training
Center.
LEADERSHIP SKILLS
Leadership skill:
A leader is someone others wish to follow, rather than someone who simply issues an ability that can be
commands or coerces others into action (Ortmeier, 2006). As an unknown, ancient measured objectively.
Chinese philosopher is cred-
ited with stating, “When the
best leader’s work is done, the
people will say ‘We did it our-
selves.’” Anyone in a police
agency can be a leader, regard-
less of rank, position, or title.
But leadership requires mas-
tery of specific skills, rather
than possession of particular
qualities (such as inborn per-
sonal traits).
A leadership skill is an
ability that can be measured
objectively; that is, there are
clear metrics for assessing its
results and for determining
whether a person has exhib-
ited the skill. Leadership skills
can be learned and developed An officer of the
through experience, training, Royal Canadian
and education (see the box Mounted Police.
“Training for Ethical Leadership”). But while anyone can become a leader, most
studies on leadership skills focus on supervisory-level leadership. For example, in
1996, Anderson and King conducted studies to identify leadership skills neces-
sary for police supervisors and managers in British Columbia (Anderson & King,
1996a, 1996b). A few studies address leadership skills required of front-line officers.
Ortmeier (1996) is one such study—and is believed to be the first. Another such
study was completed in 1997, when the Federal Law Enforcement Training Center
(FLETC), in conjunction with the Royal Canadian Mounted Police (RCMP), devel-
oped a list of leadership skills for police officers.
Spotlight on
Communication
Modern policing requires skills
beyond those traditionally
taught in police academies
and college classrooms (Meese
& Ortmeier, 2004). Communi-
cation, for example, must be
nurtured and encouraged with
staff, other people in the organization, and the community at large. Residents in
the community served by a police organization may express concern about issues
plaguing their community, such as crime or poverty. All police officers must listen,
understand the issues from residents’ perspective, and reassure residents that action
will be taken. By acknowledging the presence of a concern or problem, officers forge
a connection with community members. And once citizens realize police want to
join with them, change can occur (Davis, Givens, Perez, Bialaszewski, & Wiliams,
2004).
It is thus essential for officers to keep lines of communication open. Effective
police-officer leaders interact daily with other officers, with administrative person-
nel, and with elected or appointed officials. They also regularly encounter people
in the community—citizens as well as residents who are perceived as unofficial
leaders—and ask for their opinions regarding the agency’s performance. Finally,
they encourage fellow officers to follow up with concerned community members.
The best police leaders also take a participatory rather than an authorita-
tive approach to establishing and managing interpersonal relationships. They are
empathetic—able to appreciate other people’s feelings and needs. And they excel at
persuasion and negotiation (de Janasz et al., 2006). All of these abilities hinge on a
talent for communication.
Spotlight on Motivation
Like communication, motivation is a critical skill category for all officers seeking to
strengthen their leadership skills. But motivation is a subjective phenomenon. What
Police executive
speaking with public
officials.
motivates one person to work toward a goal or to effect needed change may not moti-
vate another. To lead, police officers must understand what motivates others—their
subordinates, their superiors, politicians, and community members. And they must
avoid trying to motivate through fear and control. Great leaders embrace the notion
that people are motivated by different needs, whether for social connection, achieve-
ment, monetary reward, or some other form of value important to them (Hellriegel
et al., 2005). For example, overtime pay may be one officer’s primary motivation,
while another’s may be the opportunity to work on a special project and enjoy the
resulting job satisfaction and pride in improving the way the agency operates.
How can aspiring leaders learn to identify what most motivates another person?
They must become students of human nature—taking time to get to know others
and appreciating others for who they are. At the same time, leaders must recognize
that motivators change: What inspires one person to action today may not moti-
vate that same person tomorrow. For example, a new police officer may initially be
motivated primarily by the opportunity to learn new skills on the job. If the officer
later becomes a parent, monetary rewards or a more manageable work schedule
may become more motivating.
As we have noted, leadership is not the same as supervision (also called manage-
ment). Although the two are interrelated, they represent very different ways of
operating. A leader may also be a supervisor—but not every supervisor is a leader.
Leadership is thus broader than supervision, and it occurs anytime a person moti-
vates another person or a group to produce change. In contrast, supervision occurs
when someone directs others toward organizational goals (Hersey & Blanchard,
1982). Leadership is thus about creating a better future, while supervision is about
maintaining order and consistency (Kotter, 1990). (Table 11-3 shows how one
expert distinguishes between these two ways of operating.)
Crisis Management Police leader-supervisors also deftly handle crises. They may
make swift decisions on the street or intervene in conflicts between peers, subordi-
nates, or citizens. They always consider the moral, ethical, and legal implications of
any decision, and they function as advisors to others in the agency—whether direct
reports, peers, or superiors.
Authority can also be the formal acknowledgment of power granted by the orga-
nization to a command or supervisory officer. Yet this does not automatically mean
that a person with authority will be followed. Some followers might still subvert,
reject, or refuse to comply with written or verbal directives. Leaders in a police agency
can use formal disciplinary options (including verbal counseling and other protocols)
to correct such behavior. However, the use of formal or coercive power may spawn
resentment and resistance, which can erode morale, performance, and the agency’s
ability to achieve its mission and objectives (T. E. Baker, 2006; Iannone, 1987).
Clearly, formal authority—even when symbolized by a person’s title or rank—is
not enough to ensure that an individual will be considered a leader. Indeed, in addi-
tion to those granted formal authority, unofficial or informal leaders may emerge
in an agency and ultimately exert more influence and power than those with a
high rank, an executive-level position, or an impressive title. Often, such unofficial
leaders derive their authority from charisma and from social norms. (For instance,
in some organizations, someone who is highly regarded and respected attracts fol-
lowers.) Wise police managers leverage informal leaders, acknowledging them and
enlisting their support in promoting the agency’s vision, mission, and goals.
Power
Power and authority may go hand in hand—or they may not. A person may exer-
cise power yet have no authority. An armed robber, for example, exercises power
over a victim but does not have authority (formal or informal legitimacy) to enforce
the victim’s compliance. In a police agency, power and authority often overlap.
Moreover, there are several sources of power. Next, we examine five sources.
Rank Some power derives from a person’s rank in the organization. For example,
police chiefs have both the formal authority (the right) and the power (the ability)
to hire, discipline, and transfer personnel, and to define goals for the organization.
Police officers have the authority and power to enforce laws, make arrests, and
direct others’ actions.
Fear Some people acquire power by evoking fear in others—by coercing or com-
pelling others through the threat of punishment or negative sanction (T. E. Baker,
2006). People whose power comes from this source may have high rank; a special
affiliation with a higher, more influential person or group; or a personal attribute
such as the ability to play on people’s fears or an imposing physical size. An example
of what this type of power looks like in action is a police union president who
pressures union members to protest a change initiative being advocated by a police
agency by playing on union members’ fears that the initiative will cost jobs or result
in wage cuts.
Rewards Some people have power because they have the capacity to distribute
valued rewards (such as recognition, promotions, and special assignments) within an
organization. These rewards may be used to recognize an individual’s or a group’s
accomplishment. Rewards-based power is valuable because timely and personal rec-
ognition engenders a sense of loyalty in others and a willingness to follow. However,
rewards-based power is also subject to abuse if the person with the power discrimi-
nates against a person or group.
A forensic technician
at work.
Expertise Other individuals are powerful because they have special skills or exper-
tise valued and needed by the police agency. Examples include crime scene technicians,
auto collision reconstruction specialists, homicide investigators, and detectives.
Charisma Some people have power because they are charismatic. Their com-
munication style, personal philosophy, ethical standards, physical attributes, like-
ability, personality, or reputation make others want to follow them (Charisma, n.d.;
Cordner & Scarborough, 2007). Charismatic leaders may appear as saviors to an
organization, especially during times of uncertainty and confusion.
Charisma does not necessarily translate into successful leadership. For example,
Adolf Hitler was a charismatic person who accumulated immense power. Yet he also
became one of the most destructive dictators in human history. He had so much
charisma that his followers accepted his directives unquestioningly and embraced
the horrific values and goals he promoted. True leaders use their power to inspire
followers to new heights of performance on appropriate goals, are humble rather
than highly charismatic, and have a strong will (Collins, 2005).
friend rather than a superior. Finally, an individual who lacks sufficient degrees of
authority and power may try to command authority that the agency has not granted
to the person’s current position. The individual cannot influence others owing to
the lack of position or special circumstance, and will likely disappear within the
organizational structure.
LEADERSHIP STYLES
Leadership styles derive from the practice of leadership skills and may reflect several
leadership theories. There are numerous styles that a police leader-supervisor can
choose to adopt and demonstrate. A particular style derives from how a leader com-
municates and acts to influence followers to give their best on the job. Indeed, effec-
tive leaders adapt their style as needed to get optimal results from their followers.
In the pages that follow, we examine several of these styles (some drawn from
theories discussed earlier in the chapter) and consider when a leader might choose
to adopt them. Again, we do not suggest that one style is better than others. In a
real-world situation, the style (or integration of several styles) a person selects will
depend on the circumstances surrounding the situation.
Self-
actualization
Esteem
Affiliation
Security
Physiological
satisfying their security needs—for stability, safety, good health, and the absence of
threats or pain. Likewise, when people feel secure, they next attend to their affiliation
needs, for friendship, belonging, and love. If affiliation needs are met, people take
care of their esteem needs, for self-respect, personal achievement, and recognition
from others. Finally, only after all lower-level needs are met, people strive to fulfill
their self-actualization needs, for personal growth, self-fulfillment, and the realiza-
tion of their full potential (Hellriegel, Jackson, & Slocum, 2005; Maslow, 1970).
How might police personnel demonstrate a leadership style based on Maslow’s
framework? They cannot assume that subordinates’ basic needs (such as for physi-
cal survival and security) are met simply because the employees receive a paycheck.
Effective leaders attempt to determine whether a subordinate is struggling economi-
cally and arrive at solutions if the answer is yes. For example, they may take steps to
reassure a subordinate who is worried about job security during periods of budget-
ary constraints and rumors of impending layoffs.
For subordinates who require recognition and personal achievement, leader-
supervisors can assign projects that will present new challenges and offer recogni-
tion and other rewards for completion of goals. For subordinates who are at the
highest level of need (self-actualization), police leader-supervisors can offer assis-
tance with promotion or transfer to a more challenging position that will provide
opportunity for personal and professional growth.
Line-level officers can practice this style of leadership as well. For example,
they can appreciate that community members who live at or below the poverty
level often feel hopeless as they struggle to keep themselves and their children safe.
Police officers who know that such residents are at the most basic level of need
can help connect people with vital resources such as food banks and organizations
that provide housing assistance. In neighborhoods where residents’ basic needs are
satisfied, police officers can help satisfy the next level of need—for friendship and
self-respect—by communicating respectfully to residents, learning their names, and
listening when they speak. Officers who demonstrate respectful behavior enrich the
community, become role models for young people and others, help ensure their own
safety, and encourage citizen cooperation with the police.
Frustration–Regression Satisfaction–Progression
Growth needs
Relatedness needs
Existence needs
Source: Reprinted with the permission of The Free Press, a Division of Simon & Schuster, Inc., from EXISTENCE,
RELATEDNESS AND GROWTH: Human Needs in Organizational Settings by Clayton P. Alderfer. Copyright © 1972 by The
Free Press. All rights reserved.
Effort
Expectancy
Performance
Instrumentality
Outcomes: Rewards
Valence
demonstrate this style identify outcomes that followers and community residents
truly value (such as safe streets) and encourage the delivery of job performance that
will produce those outcomes. For example, police officers who place a high value
on safe streets will partner with community residents to encourage and assist with
neighborhood watches. They might also explain to city council members why such
initiatives might generate more value than merely racking up more arrests.
High
(1,9) (9,9)
9 Country Team
club style style
8
7
Concern for people
6
5
(5,5)
4 Middle-of-the-road style
2
(1,1) (9,1)
1 Impoverished Produce or
style perish style
Low
Low 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 High
Concern for production
high morale and loyalty and hope that their subordinates will perform at a
high level without further involvement from them.
• Low concern for people and high concern for production characterize the
produce-or-perish management style. Managers practicing this style use
coercion and rule enforcement to achieve high production. (If this style sounds
familiar, that’s because it strongly resembles Theory X behavior as defined by
McGregor.)
• Through the middle-of-the-road style, managers strive to balance follower
needs with a concern for production. They try to maintain employee morale
at a level just high enough to ensure that minimal performance goals are met.
• Through the team style, managers demonstrate high concern for people as
well as production by fostering inclusion, agreed-upon goals, and commitment
among members of the organization. Blake and Mouton saw this as the
optimal management style. It is consistent with McGregor’s Theory Y.
(Supportive
behavior) S3 S2
Relationship
S4 S1
behavior
Low High
task and low task and low
relationship relationship
Low
Task behavior
Low High
(Directive behavior)
Source: Adapted and printed with permission from Dr. Paul Hersey, Management of Organizational Behavior:
Leading Human Resources, 9th ed. (Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Pearson Education, Inc., 2008), p. 134.
who are even less ready (perhaps they are confused about their role, unmotivated,
or skeptical about what they are being asked to do), leaders might adopt the selling
style—providing some direction, encouraging communication, building confidence,
and motivating these followers. Finally, with followers who are not at all ready (they
have no experience with or knowledge of the tasks they are being asked to do), lead-
ers might select the telling style, supplying clear and specific instructions (Hersey &
Blanchard, 1982).
A leader can (and often must) blend all four styles at once, especially in complex
situations. To illustrate, when a community expressed concern about rising auto
theft, police managers assembled a team comprising officers and members of the
community as well as an outside consultant. Together, they developed a plan that
called for police managers to use the selling style to enlist subordinate’s commitment
to solving the problem. Managers used the supportive style with community resi-
dents who favored the project and were motivated to get involved. They delegated
tasks to police-team members with experience and an interest in confronting the
Vroom–Jago Time– auto-theft problem. And they used the telling style to train citizens on auto-theft
Drive Leadership prevention who were not familiar with the strategies. The effort paid off: Within
Model: one year, auto thefts had decreased by 48 percent.
Victor Vroom’s model
postulating that time
constraints drive a
Weighing Contingencies
leader’s decision- Police leader-supervisors can also decide on a leadership style using the Vroom–Jago
making process. time–drive leadership model. (See Figure 11-6.) This model postulates that time
A Long Beach,
California, police
officer explaining a
situation to a group of
citizens.
constraints drive a leader’s decision-making process. The model also identifies con-
tingency variables (including team support and goal sharing, likelihood of follower
commitment, and significance of a decision) that a leader should consider when
selecting a leadership style. Victor Vroom created a Windows-based computer pro-
gram that enables supervisors to record the strength of presence of each contingency
variable in a given situation.
The model also identifies five leadership styles leaders can select from, depend-
ing on how strongly present the contingency variables are:
• Decide: The leader decides on the best course of action and then directs followers.
• Consult individually: The leader makes a decision after consulting with
followers individually.
• Consult team: The leader makes a decision after holding an open meeting
with all followers.
• Facilitate: The leader facilitates problem solving and decision making by
building consensus for a potential course of action within the team.
• Delegate: The leader allows followers to arrive at a decision within limits
prescribed by the leader (Vroom, 1964, 2000).
Owing to the complexity of the Vroom–Jago model, it works best when a police
organization is trying to drive massive change or is experiencing a problem the
resolution of which requires extensive analysis and teamwork. For instance, if an
agency is committed to moving from a traditional (professional) model of policing
to a more community-oriented style, managers must solicit opinions from all levels
of the organization and enlist the commitment of every person—from line officers
Importance of
Likelihood of
commitment
commitment
competence
significance
expertise
expertise
Decision
Problem
support
Leader
Team
Team
Team
Suggested style
H ..... ..... ..... Decide
H Delegate
H H H
H L
L L ..... Consult
L ..... ..... team
H Facilitate
H H
H L
H H ..... Consult
L
L ..... ..... individually
H H Facilitate
H H L
L H
L ..... Consult
L ..... ..... team
H ..... ..... ..... ..... Decide
H H Facilitate
L ..... H H L
L ..... Consult
L ..... ..... individually
H ..... ..... ..... Decide
H ..... H Delegate
L L ..... .....
L Facilitate
L ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... Decide
Note: An “H” indicates a high level of importance with that contingency variable, an “L” indicates a low
level of importance, and a dashed line (.....) indicates “not a factor.”
to the chief. In this scenario, change leaders conduct meetings, define goals and
communicate them to all parties, and establish a detailed timeline. Because a major
organizational transformation can take years, constant open communication and
complete dedication to the goal is critical.
Path–goal
motivational
leadership model:
Tapping into Followers’ Motivation
R. J. House’s Another model—R. J. House’s path–goal motivational leadership model—calls for
framework suggesting tapping into followers’ level of motivation in determining a leadership style. (See
that followers will Figure 11-7.) The assumption underlying this model is that followers will be moti-
be motivated to vated to give their best if they believe that they are capable of performing the tasks
give their best if assigned, that their efforts will produce certain results, and that the rewards for
they believe that completing tasks are worthwhile. The leader-manager’s challenge is to demonstrate
they are capable of the behaviors that best motivate a particular follower to accomplish a specific goal.
performing the tasks The model identifies eight possible behaviors: directive, supportive, participa-
assigned, that their tive, achievement-oriented, work facilitation (helping followers achieve tasks),
efforts will produce group-oriented decision processes, work-group representation of stakeholders
certain results, and and networking, and leadership behaviors based on organizational values (House,
that the rewards for 1996). The model reminds leaders/managers that their central purpose is to moti-
completing tasks are vate and assist followers with goal achievement in the most efficient manner pos-
worthwhile. sible (Meese & Ortmeier, 2004; Northouse, 2007).
Obstacle
Followers/ Goal(s)
Path Path
group members (productivity)
Path–goal leadership
Source: “Path-goal theory of leadership: Lessons, legacy and a reformulated theory” by Robert J. House from
THE LEADERSHIP QUARTERLY, Autumn, 1996, Vol. 7, No 3, p. 30. Reprinted by permission of Elsevier Ltd.
Serving Followers
Some leaders adopt a style that emphasizes sensitivity, awareness, and empathy, per
Robert K. Greenleaf’s servant leadership concept, which he introduced in a 1970 Servant leadership:
essay titled The Servant as Leader. This essay made a lasting impression on leaders, Robert K. Greenleaf’s
educators, and others around the world. More than a theory, the concept of the approach to leadership
leader-as-servant is a way of life that encourages those in management positions to emphasizing
discover how they can best serve the people they lead (Greenleaf, 1991). sensitivity, awareness,
Since the Industrial Revolution, many managers have viewed subordinates as and empathy toward
tools to be used or as parts in a well-oiled machine. If one of these “tools” or “parts” followers.
wears out, managers simply replace “it” with no loss of productivity. Servant leader-
ship returns humanity to the workplace by assuming a symbiotic relationship (one
of mutual dependence) between worker and supervisor. The concept thus blurs the
line between leader and follower, and requires both to hold themselves and one
another to a higher standard of behavior and understanding.
Here is an example of servant leadership in action: In a particular community,
reducing auto theft is a high priority for community members but not for the police.
Nevertheless, police servant-leaders demonstrate appreciation for the community’s
concern and commit to reducing auto theft. Police and community leaders then
work together to develop solutions, implement those solutions, and evaluate the Level 5 leadership:
results. Jim Collins’s concept
proposing that
leaders channel their
Building the Best Possible Organization ambition toward
Police leaders who adopt a style that emphasizes the organization’s interests over building a better
their own interests are drawing from management expert Jim Collins’s concept of organization rather
Level 5 leadership, which he described in his book Good to Great and the Social than promoting
Sectors. Simply stated, Level 5 leaders channel their ambition toward building a themselves and their
better organization rather than promoting themselves and their personal agendas. personal agendas.
Level 5 leaders are humble; they credit their organization’s success to factors other
than themselves, but they take responsibility for poor results. Though modest,
they are driven to produce long-lasting change. They groom peers and subordi-
nates for leadership, ensuring the organization’s future success. Although Level 5
leaders may not occupy the spotlight, they exist in almost every organization
(Collins, 2001).
One Level 5 leader was a police chief who took the job knowing that the agency
was mediocre. He set out to improve the situation. The chief gathered the right staff
and designed various projects and activities based on ideas from all. He allocated
funds to complete the projects and activities, asking only to be kept informed on
progress. The chief communicated a compelling vision of a better future for the
agency and guided staff to take the steps needed to make that vision real. As a result
of this leader’s style, the agency established successful canine patrols; family crisis-
intervention teams; criminal-investigation management strategies; indoor and out-
door firearms training ranges; and programs supporting police-citizen partnership,
stress management and field training for officers, victims’ assistance, and officers’
use of Spanish and sign language.
TOXIC MANAGEMENT
Within many police organizations, certain barriers can prevent individuals from
practicing leadership and effective supervision—no matter how many theories and
styles are available to draw from. Understanding these barriers and the problems
they present can bring the contrast between good and poor supervision into sharper
relief for aspiring police leader-supervisors. In the following text we examine several
barriers:
• Nepotism. Nepotism is the promotion and preferential treatment of a
manager’s close friends or relatives whether they deserve it or not. Nepotism
in an organization breeds mediocrity in the favored employees and cynicism in
workers who witness it (Collins, 2001).
• Paramilitary culture. Many police organizations are characterized by a
paramilitary culture. In such agencies, upper management does not tolerate
differences of opinions among employees and lower-level managers (Davis
& Colaprete, 2005). Sensing the intolerance, people stop contributing their
ideas, depriving the agency of the fresh and diverse thinking needed to provide
excellent service to the community.
• Misguided assumptions. One of the most insidious barriers to effective
leadership consists of misguided assumptions among leaders or supervisors
themselves. Unfortunately, many police managers literally point at
subordinates and tell them what to do, assuming that employees are unwilling
or unable to carry out needed tasks. Others threaten employees with
punishment, believing that people consistently do whatever it takes to avoid
unpleasantness or pain (Beauchamp, Bowie, & Arnold, 2009).
• Fadishness. In some policing organizations, supervisors and commanders
promote whichever management fad is currently occupying the headlines,
without considering whether the advocated approach is right for their
organization. They may try to force people to adopt the latest fad, only
to activate intense resistance that blocks progress. Ultimately, they waste
significant time, effort, and even financial resources.
• Hypocrisy. In other policing organizations, managers pay lip service to well-
regarded leadership theories that emphasize eliciting ideas and opinions from
subordinates. But when employees offer their input, managers do not value or
use them. As a result, employees feel disfranchised. They also grow cynical,
realizing (correctly) that their managers do not trust employees’ ideas or
respect their opinions.
These and other barriers can create organizations characterized by toxic man- Toxic management:
agement (Davis & Colaprete, 2005). Toxic managers exhibit poor judgment and a situation in which
negative behaviors, have no skill at building rapport and positive relationships, and a manager exhibits
cannot cultivate an environment of mutual respect. Such supervisors and managers poor judgment and
will damage the human resources of any organization, especially in a police agency negative behaviors,
(Reed, 2004). They alienate staff and project an image of weakness. They also has no skill at
spawn an atmosphere in which people refuse direction and contradict management. building rapport and
Simply put, toxic managers create a poisonous environment. positive relationships,
In some organizations, if a toxic manager cannot be removed, an effective leader and cannot cultivate
(toxic handler) may emerge to minimize the manager’s destructive impact on people. an environment of
Sometimes this takes the form of serving as a buffer between the manager and the mutual respect.
workforce. For example, the toxic handler may translate the ineffective manager’s
harsh language or autocratic dictates into more palatable terms for employees. Or
the toxic handler might urge people not to take the manager’s tirades personally.
The danger with relying too much on toxic handlers is that they can eventually burn
out (Frost, 2003; Toxic Bosses and Toxic Handlers, 2004).
Le adership on the j ob
A Lesson Learned Early
Over 20 years ago, young police officer Ricardo I needed it.” The experience helped shape Captain
Alvarez was wrestling with a belligerent drunk on a Alvarez’ management style.
dark street corner. Alvarez radioed for backup just Today, Alvarez manages 160 police officers and
in case. Within moments, as Alvarez handcuffed 40 civilian employees. He spends a lot of time in
the drunk, a police car arrived. The driver yelled: the field, often responding to radio calls himself. He
“Ricardo, you need my help?” Officer Alvarez looked listens to his officers and does not micromanage.
up in amazement, recognizing the driver as his Captain Alvarez is quick to exclaim: “It’s not about me.
captain. “No sir,” Alvarez replied. “I’m OK, but thank It’s about the team.”
you.”
1. What leadership style did Captain Alvarez (and
Over two decades later, Alvarez is a police
his captain before him) demonstrate?
captain himself, having risen through the ranks of
his 2,000-officer agency. He recalls the backup and 2. Should high-ranking officers in large police agen-
personal presence provided by his captain years cies engage in line-level (operational) police
earlier. “I can’t tell you how great that felt, knowing activities, as Alvarez and his former captain have
my captain knew my name and was there to help if done? Why or why not?
summary
• Leadership Theories. Theories about what distinguishes leadership and what its
defining principles are have evolved over time. Major theories focus on leaders’
inborn traits, their behaviors (such as facilitating task accomplishment or
relationship building), the interaction of a leader’s personal characteristics with
situational characteristics, the impact of followers’ expectations, the importance
of adapting leadership style to situations and to followers’ motivational needs,
ramifications of the quality of relationships between leaders and followers,
distinctions between merely transactional interactions between leaders and
followers and transformational interactions, and the importance of leaders’
understanding their own and their followers’ psychological makeup.
• Leadership Skills. Whereas theories attempt to identify leadership’s defining
principles, skills are the abilities needed to exercise leadership. These skills
can be acquired through education, experience, and training. Five categories
of skills are suggested as indispensable for police officer effectiveness:
communications and related interpersonal skills, motivational skills,
problem-solving skills, planning and organizing skills, and actuation and
implementation skills.
• Leadership versus Supervision. Leadership differs from supervision in
numerous ways. Leadership is broader than supervision: While a leader may
also be a supervisor, not all supervisors are leaders. Police leader-supervisors
exhibit a valuable blend of talents, including mentoring and role modeling,
crisis management, resource management, and personnel development.
authority
key terms
behavior theory
contingency theory
ERG theory
expectancy theory
hierarchy of needs model
interaction–expectation theory
leader–follower exchange theory
leadership skill
learned needs theory
Level 5 leadership
meta-leadership theory
managerial grid
motivation–hygiene theory
path–goal motivational leadership model
path–goal theory
personal–situational theory
power
psychodynamic approach
role model
servant leadership
situational leadership model
situational theory
Theory X
Theory Y
Theory Z
toxic management
trait theory
transactional theory
transformational theory
Vroom–Jago time–drive leadership model
discussion questions
Introduction
In the world of policing, many challenges that arise have less to do with actual
policing and more to do with human relations. For example, how can a police
agency develop and communicate clear policies and procedures, so officers and
other personnel know what behaviors and attitudes are expected of them? How
might police managers and supervisors appraise individual officers’ job perfor-
mance to strengthen their knowledge, skills, and abilities as well as help them
develop their careers? Speaking of career development, through what means
should an agency manage the succession of officers and other individual contribu-
tors into managerial and supervisory roles—or lateral roles for those who are not
interested in or are not ready for management?
Once an agency has deployed talented individuals into key roles throughout
the organization, how can it keep them there to avoid the high costs of replacing
departing employees and training newcomers? Moreover, if officers and other per-
sonnel break the rules laid out by the agency in its policies, procedures, and other
behavioral mandates, how should agency leaders respond? What recourse do the
civilians served by the agency have?
Of course, even under the best conditions, police officers have one of the
toughest jobs around, and many of them suffer from job-related stress. How can
agencies design stress-management programs to protect officers’ health and
enable them to consistently deliver top-notch performance on the job? Finally,
while officers know all about how to survive the physical perils of police work, most
know much less about how to survive the political machinations swirling within the
organization that employs them. How can an agency help them understand and
navigate the political terrain so they master the art of exercising power and influ-
ence appropriately—a defining competency of ethical leadership?
In this chapter, we address each of these questions in turn. We closely exam-
ine the human relations challenges at hand and offer suggestions for how police
organizations can surmount them. Tackling the complexities of human relations
will never be easy, but by putting the right systems and practices in place, agency
leaders stand a better chance of ensuring that officers and other personnel are
motivated to excel, loyal, effective, and physically and mentally healthy.
Policies (how a police agency intends to operate) and procedures (the steps
needed to put policies into action) form the backbone for employees’ behavior. In
most policing organizations, documented policies and procedures are known as
General orders: general orders, modeled on those found in the U.S. military services (Delattre &
a police agency’s Behan, 2003).
documented policies
and procedures.
Developing General Orders
Policies:
Ideally, a police agency develops its policies—its basic principles directing and
the basic principles
limiting its actions in pursuit of long-term goals—first and then defines the cor-
directing and limiting
responding procedures, or the sequence of activities or courses of action that must
a police agency’s
be followed to correctly perform tasks. The agency’s chief executive officer (for
actions in pursuit of
example, the chief of police, sheriff, or commissioner) typically writes the policies
long-term goals.
or directs their creation. Policies might relate to a broad range of topics—including
Procedures: the agency’s general goals and objectives, press relations, public relations, employee
the sequence of conduct, administrative matters, and community relations, among others. Once
activities or courses an agency establishes its policies, it can develop procedures, which help embed the
of action that must be policies into the agency’s culture and into officers’ everyday behavior (National
followed in a police Advisory Commission on Criminal Justice Standards and Goals, 1973; Stohr &
agency to correctly Collins, 2009). National and state accreditation standards may provide additional
perform tasks. guidance for agencies seeking to develop or modify their general orders.
Leadership on the j ob
Work-Prep Overtime Policies
Several police officers filed a lawsuit against the city decided to carry out routine tasks (such as loading
that employed them, contending that certain tasks equipment into patrol cars) before their work shift for
they performed as preparation for duty constituted specific reasons (for instance, so they could lay claim
uncompensated “work” as defined by federal law. The to their favorite vehicles) (Bernstein, 2009).
officers claimed that they were owed back pay and
1. In your view, did the officers have a legitimate
overtime pay because city policy required them to
case regarding their back pay and overtime
load equipment into their police vehicles and review
claim? Why or why not?
e-mail before their shifts officially began at roll call.
The city’s attorney contended that the tasks for 2. Do you see this lawsuit as frivolous or as impor-
which the officers claimed extra compensation could tant regarding employment conditions and the
be performed after the work shift officially began. provision of public safety services? Explain your
During the trial, a few officers testified that they reasoning.
Police officers do not need to know every detail of their agency’s general orders.
Nevertheless, they should familiarize themselves with those policies and procedures
that apply most closely to their job responsibilities, whether their responsibilities cen-
ter on firearms usage, arrest and detention practices, or crime scene investigations.
In Chapter 7, you learned how a police agency assesses and evaluates its overall
Performance performance as an organization. But a performance appraisal—an assessment of
appraisal: an individual’s job performance—is also important for each employee working
assessment of an within a police agency. In traditional police agencies, performance evaluations for
individual’s job officers typically center on quantifiable outcomes, such as number of arrests made
performance in an or number of citations issued. However, in agencies that have adopted the com-
organization. munity policing strategy (see Chapter 2), appraisals also consider more qualitative
results, such as citizens’ perceptions of their safety and the quality of life in their
neighborhood. The ideal performance evaluation addresses an officer’s quantitative
and qualitative impact on the community the agency serves (Michelson & Maher,
1993; Ortmeier & Meese, 2010).
that evaluation suggests that the supervisor and other superiors responsible for that
officer have effectively guided and developed the individual (Whisenand & Rush,
2007).
Performance evaluations are also typically structured on the job description and
specifications for the positions in question. Of course, police officers must thor-
oughly understand the details of their job to fulfill its requirements. During perfor-
mance appraisals, supervisors evaluate officers according to how well they have met
their job responsibilities, how much effort they have extended, how knowledgeable
and skillful they are in carrying out their duties, and how appropriate their conduct
has been. A positive evaluation in these areas indicates that the officer’s level of
performance is acceptable (Crowder, 1998; Haberfeld, 2002).
the organization will have difficulty operating as it should. Imagine trying to manage
a police agency that has no one to head the crime investigation unit or the informa-
tion technology (IT) department. In police agencies that successfully orchestrate suc-
cession management, leaders anticipate vacancies in key positions long before they
occur; identify employees who have the skills, ability, interest, and potential to fill the
vacancies; and recruit, prepare, or promote promising talent to move into those posi-
tions. By staying ahead of anticipated vacancies, leaders help create a pool of talent
they can tap to ensure that the right people move into the right roles when needed.
An assessment panel
is typically used to
decide whether to
promote an officer.
TALENT RETENTION
Police officers who resign or retire early from an agency may cause high attrition
(turnover) among remaining personnel. Turnover raises daunting challenges for the
agency. Specifically:
Morale: • High turnover levels can erode morale—defined as the state of the spirit of
the state of the a person or group as exhibited by confidence, cheerfulness, discipline, and
spirits of a person or willingness to perform assigned tasks—in those who remain at the agency.
group as exhibited Employees begin wondering why so many of their colleagues are leaving, and
by confidence, their own commitment to the agency may waver.
cheerfulness, • If the next class of recruits is unable to assume their positions for several
discipline, and months, the agency risks being unable to provide the public safety so crucial
willingness to to its mission.
perform assigned
• Screening, hiring, and training new officers are expensive.
tasks.
• It often takes time for inexperienced officers to begin performing at acceptable
levels (Haarr, 2005). If an agency loses experienced officers on a regular basis,
its overall effectiveness will diminish.
In all these respects, high turnover is costly for an agency.
Despite turnover’s high price tag, police and other public safety agencies often
devote enormous resources to recruiting and selecting employees—and then neglect
to retain their best performers. To keep valued employees onboard, an agency
can take several powerful steps—including communicating values and policies
clearly, bringing in new people with fresh perspectives, and sustaining talented
professionals’ motivation to excel on the job.
Cleveland, Ohio,
police recruits during
their first week on the
job in October 2006.
those who have earned a promotion, they can further explain values and policies as
well as the behaviors and results expected in the new position. Finally, by providing
proper training, including remediation of skill deficiencies, agencies can reinforce
messages about values and policies. Training also helps officers improve their
performance—which often strengthens loyalty to the agency.
achievement and offer incentives that people see as attainable and worth the effort.
Leaders also motivate sub-ordinates by empowering them to make decisions central
to their jobs. In turn, empowerment breeds self-confidence and well-being, essential
ingredients for accomplishing goals. And when people accomplish goals, they feel
motivated to achieve even more.
Another way to motivate officers is to offer stimulating experiences, such as
job rotations, new and challenging responsibilities, and assignments that stretch
people beyond their comfort zone. Job rotation can be as simple as changing an
officer’s shift; every shift offers unique problems and challenges. When an officer
makes a more significant change, such as moving from gang intelligence inves-
tigations and surveillance to drug enforcement, the challenge can prove equally
motivating.
Increasing officers’ responsibilities within their current job posting is also
a potent motivational tool. For example, an officer can participate in a special
community project or prepare a statistical report. Such experiences can constitute a
refreshing change from “business as usual.” To help officers embrace new respon-
sibilities, supervisors can explain that such projects generate important results
for the agency and the community, as well as supporting the officer’s own career
development.
Job challenges related to community policing and problem solving are particu-
larly useful for enhancing morale and officers’ job satisfaction. After tackling such
challenges successfully, officers feel they are making a real difference in the commu-
nities they serve (Orrick, 2008). Such experiences—for instance, working with citi-
zens to make their homes and businesses more resistant to burglars or strengthening
relationships between citizens and the police—also help develop officers’ critical
thinking skills. And they give officers opportunities to learn new ways of analyzing
problems and crafting solutions.
Executing challenging assignments helps make officers feel empowered to gener-
ate results for the agency and shape their own careers. Supervisors and managers who
fail to provide such empower-
Police officers must ment risk seeing their direct
be sensitive to the reports develop a negative atti-
racial and ethnic tude toward the job and an
backgrounds of others. unwillingness to do anything
beyond the minimum require-
ments for the patrol officer role.
Minimum job performance or
job effort becomes the new stan-
dard. If one officer develops this
attitude, it can spread through-
out the agency, leading to poor
morale in others. In the worst
cases, officers may even fear
taking any initiative, because
they believe that the agency will
not support them in their efforts
to grow (T. E. Baker, 2006;
Shusta et al., 2011).
ETHICS IN ACTION
ICE 287(g): Controversial Crime-Prevention Program
he U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agency, a part
In many jurisdictions,
citizen review boards
are used to review
complaints made
against police officers.
and the indignity (according to police) of being reviewed by someone outside the
agency (Peak et al., 2010). Police who resist civilian oversight assert that such
oversight is politicized and destroys the credibility of the police as a group and
that police misconduct is not as pervasive as citizen review boards would have the
public believe.
Those who support such boards maintain that police officers cannot be objec-
tive about one another’s behavior and that police subculture pressures officers to
support each other even if a fellow officer commits illegal behavior. Supporters
further contend that a greater number of officers are found guilty and disciplined
through civilian oversight than through their agency’s internal processes or the
formal justice system, that the punishment serves as a powerful deterrent, and that
civilian oversight improves an agency’s image by demonstrating its willingness to
work with the community to prevent abuse of police power.
Words versus Deeds Numerous police agencies say they are committed to the
complaint procedure and to taking action against officers found guilty of miscon-
duct. However, police agencies in many jurisdictions have managed to stall or even
halt the complaint process by responding slowly to complaints. In some instances,
agencies have even “lost” a complaint altogether. But even if an agency processes a
complaint appropriately, there is no consistent form of discipline.
For instance, in San Francisco, 70 percent of officers who were accused of using
excessive force between 1996 and 2004 received only a reprimand or perfunctory
intervention (such as verbal counseling or a written memorandum of record). Even
though voters established the Office of Citizen Complaints to remedy the situation,
the office was understaffed, lacked effective leaders, and met with fierce opposition
from the police agency itself and its union, the Police Officers Association (Sward,
Wallace, & Fernandez, 2006).
The Importance and Limits of Civilian Review No police agency can afford to
ignore citizen complaints about police conduct, agency policy and procedure, and
service quality. Such complaints may signify serious problems with an agency’s
management of personnel or its ability to fulfill its mission. Complaints also shed
light on where citizens may lack understanding of current laws, enforcement
practices, police procedures, and service priorities. For these reasons, agencies
must handle all citizen inquiries and grievances swiftly and thoroughly. The right
response can help the agency build trust and strengthen its credibility with its
customers.
Of course, the possibility exists that some citizens will make false allegations
against the police. In most states, it is a criminal offense to file a false allegation of
police misconduct. In some situations, video cameras mounted on police-vehicle
dashboards and on light poles at city intersections have helped police agencies
prove that an officer has acted properly—thus exposing a false allegation. In
other cases, analysis of a complainant’s medical condition has proved that the
person’s injuries could not have been caused by police behavior cited in the
complaint.
the agency as having chronic performance problems. Such problems may manifest
themselves as work that is below or at minimum performance standards, question-
able arrest practices, lack of performance documentation, and high-risk behaviors
such as substance abuse or dangerous leisure-time activities (Ortmeier & Meese,
2010; Walker, Alpert, & Kenney, 2001).
STRESS MANAGEMENT
The second most stressful job in the United States is police officer (the first is
inner-city high school teacher) (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2006).
Officers are the first people exposed to situations in which human beings have
behaved badly toward one another. Death scenes, domestic abuse injuries, drug
overdoses, fatal car collisions, child molestation, and other incidents are regular
parts of a police officer’s life. The average citizen may see no more than one or two
dead bodies or seriously injured people in a lifetime; an officer who works in a large
city may see one or two dead bodies weekly and often encounter people who have
suffered horrific injuries.
While officers may become conditioned to viewing horrible sights and may
not be shocked by these tragedies after a few years’ experience, the scenes can still
leave their mark on their psyche. Officers learn that life is fragile, and many feel
frustrated by the limitations of the help they can give. Given these harsh realities, it
is easy to understand how the effects of stress can build within a person. As physi-
cal, emotional, and spiritual
Police officers witness damage from stress accumu-
disturbing scenes lates, the officer may become
such as this scene of a cynical, depressed, and angry.
fatally injured Dallas Stress can also shorten life
Police Department spans. In the United States,
motorcycle officer average life expectancy for
resulting from a men is a little over 74 years; a
collision while little over 80 years for women.
escorting Hillary For police officers with 10 to
Clinton’s motorcade. 19 years on the job, life expec-
tancy is just 53 to 66 years
(Aveni, 1999; Lindsey & Kelly,
2004; Violanti, 2002).
What is cutting so many
officers’ lives short? More
than one hundred police offi-
cers die in the line of duty
each year. Stress-related dis-
eases associated with cancer
and heart ailments also take
their toll. In addition, active-
duty and retired police offi-
cers commit suicide at a rate
nearly three times the national
average. Evidence suggests that police officers are eight times more likely to take
their own lives than they are to be killed by a criminal while on duty (National
Law Enforcement Officers Memorial Fund, 2010; National P.O.L.I.C.E. Suicide
Foundation, 2010).
had a positive effect on the way they handled on-the-job and personal/relationship
concerns.
In this program, primary level referred to training-based offerings intended
to support personal growth and professional development. This training included
group presentations as well as practice exercises on stress awareness and stress-
management techniques (such as relaxation exercises, breath control, and muscle
relaxation). Secondary level provided for early intervention for those officers expe-
riencing stress-related problems. Traumatic incident debriefing was mandatory for
all officers involved in deadly physical force occurrences such as police shootings—
whether an officer was the one who used deadly physical force, was the victim of
a gunshot, or witnessed a police shooting incident. Through the peer counseling
intervention part of this level, trained officers diplomatically approach and address
officers who appear to be experiencing negative stress in their lives or for whom
stress seems to be affecting job performance. Finally, the tertiary level provided
agency-paid confidential psychiatric visits, in-hospital care, and alcohol or drug
abuse inpatient or outpatient treatment for agency personnel in need. All three levels
in the program emphasized positive health and personal well-being for officers, not
discipline. All treatment remained confidential and was not documented in officers’
personnel records.
The best stress-management programs cover the topic of how to recognize the
behaviors, emotions, and verbal statements suggesting that a person is suicidal.
Through peer counseling programs, officers can learn when and how to approach
and offer assistance to a fellow officer who may be at risk of suicide. Stress-
management programs should also include a written policy on confidentiality for
training sessions, peer counseling, traumatic incident debriefing, and tertiary care
services. Without confidentiality, officers may be reluctant to take advantage of
these much needed services, for fear that their problems will be made public.
Strategies for Easing the Transition Stress cannot be totally eliminated from
police work. However, fortunately, many police academies and agencies have begun
offering educational programs that teach officers not only how to cope with the
demands of the job but also how to disconnect from the job after hours so their
home lives are not negatively affected. Techniques for disconnecting from the job
at the end of a shift include “leaving the job behind” by making personal respon-
sibilities and commitments a priority. Many officers also learn to manage stress
effectively themselves; for instance, by following a vigorous exercise regime, eating
a healthy diet, and developing interests that have nothing to do with policing. These
practices require a firm commitment and a conscious effort to separate professional
from private life (Haberfeld, 2002; Ortmeier, 2006; Stress and the Police, 2007).
Many police academies’ curricula also now include training for family members
as well. Known variously as “family programs,” “significant-other training,” or
“police-spouse seminars,” these programs aim to educate police officers’ families
about the nature of police work: how shifts work, what police jargon means, what
salaries and benefits their loved ones have, and what types of incidents, individuals,
and equipment officers deal with. Some offer ride-along programs, which enable
family members to observe police officers in action. Developers of such pro-
grams hope that by demystifying the police profession, the programs help families
understand what officers face on a daily basis. Informed by this understanding,
spouses and significant others may work with their officer life partners to overcome
Police officers face two survival challenges: how to stay alive on the street while
they are on and off duty (with or without family members), and how to navigate the
political and ethical terrain within the agency that employs them. Many officers are
more comfortable with the former challenge, because much of their training focuses
on strengthening their on-the-street survival skills. Through such training, officers
learn how to rely on verbal adeptness, unarmed defense tactics, and (if necessary)
deadly physical force to stay alive in the face of peril, whether they are on duty or
off duty. But training says little about how to survive agency politics—the political Agency politics:
machinations, ambitions, and personal agendas that shape interpersonal dynamics political
within a police agency, and that can “kill” an officer’s career. machinations,
ambitions, and
personal agendas that
Navigating the Political Landscape shape interpersonal
Although officers may personally loathe internal politics and agency managers may dynamics within a
insist that “politics has no place in policing,” agencies are organizations made up police agency.
of human beings. Thus, politics is a fact of life in all police agencies—like it or not.
Navigating the political terrain can be difficult for some people, but officers can still
learn how to survive and even thrive politically in their agency.
key terms
agency politics
citizen review board
discipline
early warning system
general orders
immoral political power
morale
moral political power
performance appraisal
policies
procedures
stress management
succession management
succession planning
discussion questions
1. Why should an agency’s chief of police or sheriff be inherently involved in the devel-
opment of the agency’s policies and procedures? Should police personnel also provide
input? Why or why not?
2. If performance appraisals are used for the development of the employee, what areas
should the supervisor document to ensure that each appraisal produces meaningful
insights?
3. Most police agencies have not established a formalized approach to succession
management. What challenges might this raise for an agency?
4. How might poor morale affect the performance and retention of quality police
officers?
5. In what respects are citizen review boards valuable to police agencies? In what ways
have they generated controversy?
6. Why is discipline necessary in a police agency, and what are the benefits of a progres-
sive disciplinary model?
7. Police officers are affected by stress in numerous ways. Outline an effective stress-
management program for an agency in your geographical area. What components do
you believe would be absolutely necessary for your program?
8. Being a police officer is like being a doctor, in that officers are never really off duty.
Discuss how this situation may have a negative effect on police officers’ professional
and private lives.
9. How would you advise police officers to navigate the complex political environment
characterizing police agencies?
13
Courtroom trial in session.
Introduction
All organizations with employees—including police agencies—are subject to laws
concerning whom they employ, what they can ask during the hiring process, the
minimum wages they must pay employees, and additional human resource and
management concerns. While police officers must obey laws governing how police
provide services to the public, police agency managers and supervisors must also
adhere to laws concerning the employment of police officers. These laws include
how police management and government entities work and negotiate with labor
unions or other representative groups.
This chapter addresses employment law that applies to police administration,
as well as general labor laws in the United States. The chapter also discusses
laws regarding managers’ interaction with labor unions. In addition to federal
hiring laws, police administrators must also be knowledgeable regarding state
employment laws mandating what public safety employees can and cannot do.
For instance, almost all police officers are prohibited by law from going on strike.
Because the states vary so widely in their employment laws, it is not possible to
explore state laws in detail in this book. If you are interested in learning more
about a particular state’s laws, you can locate this information at your nearest
physical or online library.
After examining national employment law, this chapter discusses police
unionization, including the emergence of unions, labor laws affecting unions,
unfair labor practices, management rights, reasons for joining a union, the labor
negotiation and grievances processes, and other relevant topics. We then examine
five areas of law with which police administrators should be familiar: contract law,
administrative law, property law, tort law, and privacy law. We conclude the chapter
with a section on how police agencies can mitigate their legal liability.
Over the years, the U.S. government has enacted numerous employment laws
intended to foster fairness in the workplace. All organizations are subject to such
laws in some fashion. These federal mandates have a common theme: protecting
employees against discrimination based on characteristics such as gender, age, sex-
ual orientation, race, ethnicity, religion, and ability. Theoretically, if an individual
has the skills, education, and physical and mental abilities required to perform the
activities and tasks entailed by a particular job, that individual should be seriously
considered and possibly hired for the position.
If a police recruit applicant can adequately pass the written and physical agility
tests, as well as the medical screening, psychological tests, psychiatric interview, and
any other criteria developed by a police agency (including the background investiga-
tion), the applicant should be considered for employment. If the person is not hired
but believes that all the required testing was satisfactorily completed, then the appli-
cant may individually or upon consultation with an attorney appeal the decision.
The person may also initiate a lawsuit against the department citing hiring practices
that do not conform to labor laws. See the box “Federal Employment Laws” for a
sampling of laws enacted in the United States since the 1960s.
Legislative efforts to ensure fair employment in the workplace have inspired
public dialogue about how organizations might achieve diversity in their workforces.
In the United States, a concept known as affirmative action arose in the public dis-
course as a path to workforce diversity. For police agencies, efforts to build a diverse
workforce have faced unique challenges. We discuss affirmative action and diversity
in police agency workforces in more detail in the following pages.
The Constitution of
the United States.
closings and mass layoffs. Workers covered under this act include hourly
workers, salaried employees, managers, and supervisors.
Employee Polygraph Protection Act (EPPA) of 1988
The EPPA generally prevents private-sector employers from using a truth veri-
fication or similar test for pre-employment screening or during an employee’s
tenure with an organization. The act reads that an employer may not require
or request any employee or applicant to take the test and cannot discipline
or discharge an employee or applicant for refusing to take a polygraph test.
There are exemptions for certain private organizations (such as drug and secu-
rity companies) and public safety agencies (for example, police organizations).
Some police agencies administer a polygraph test during the pre-employment
screening process to verify information provided by the applicant but rarely
use the polygraph with current employees.
Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) of 1990
Employers who have 15 or more employees may not discriminate against
individuals who have a physical, medical, or emotional disability. The ADA
forbids discrimination against persons who are disabled with respect to
employment and forbids testing or questioning applicants for physical or
medical disability until after a conditional offer of employment is made.
The job offer may be conditional on the successful completion of a medical
(continued)
have filed petitions to the federal courts for legal remedy or have filed liability law-
suits against employers for such violations. Police agencies perceived as violating
equal opportunity standards for hiring may be subjected to a judicially mandated
decree dictating the ratio of minorities and underrepresented genders to majorities
for an academy class. One police agency in the northeastern part of the United States
is currently under a decree reading that it must employ one minority candidate for
every three majority candidates it hires.
UNIONIZATION
by receiving charters from the established traditional trade unions. Many of these
efforts faltered because states passed laws forbidding public employees (such
as police, fire, and corrections) from going on strike. As a result, police officers
forged their own worker-support groups in the form of fraternal organizations. An
example is the Fraternal Order of Police (FOP), a national organization founded in
1915. The FOP works to advance the health and welfare of police officers, including
providing death benefits for the families of officers who have lost their lives in the
line of duty. At the state level, similar organizations were formed, such as the Police
Officers Research Association of California (PORAC) and local police associations.
created a pension system for the police, and the agency provided officers with uni-
forms instead of insisting that they buy their own. Police officers began demanding
that they be treated as professionals and that they have a voice in their working
conditions (Allen & Sawhney, 2010; Peak et al., 2010).
Still, the strike had some negative consequences as well for police. Boston had
suffered much damage while the police were striking. Bowing to political pressure,
the American Federation of Labor (AFL) revoked the charters it had granted to the
police. This action ended efforts for police unionism, until after World War II. Thus,
it was mandated that police officers could not legally go on strike.
subdivision, work project, or tour of duty; or the technology, methods, and means
of performing work. For instance, police management and a police union may nego-
tiate how many officers are assigned to a particular patrol area. This includes the
number of police lieutenants, police sergeants, and patrol officers assigned to each
eight-hour shift within that patrol area, as well as the types of patrols (such as foot,
vehicle, and bike).
Negotiable management rights in Title 5 also include the procedures that agency
managers will observe in exercising any authority and the appropriate redress
for employees adversely affected by the exercise of authority. To illustrate, police
managers and police employee organizations may negotiate how discipline will be
exercised in the agency. A police sergeant may commence the agreed-upon discipline
process by giving oral instructions and remedial training to an officer who has vio-
lated agency rules and regulations. Additionally, the police sergeant may be obliged
to document the disciplinary actions by issuing a counseling memorandum. Police
officers who believe that they were adversely affected by the supervisory action or
were directed to take an action that violates the contractual agreement have the
right to exercise the provisions of the grievance procedure mutually agreed on by
management and labor.
Unionized workers
in the early twentieth
century lobbying for
shorter workdays.
Another primary reason for joining a union may be dissatisfaction with job con-
ditions. However, workers must also believe that their demands will be met, in full
or in part if they join a union, and that their union representatives have the will and
power to effect change. For example, unionized workers lobbied for years from the
1800s to the early mid-1900s to have their workdays shortened to eight hours, with
overtime wages paid for any hours worked over the maximum eight hours (Kearney,
2009). Their efforts produced results: Today, the eight-hour day is still the norm for
most hourly employees. (See the box “A Police Agency Negotiates an Agreed-upon
Workweek.”)
Some individuals join a union because they feel there is a lack of communication
between management and line officers, and that management is generally uncon-
cerned about employees’ needs. Others join under peer pressure or because they
believe that management is unfairly favoring some employees over others. Groups
of employees may opt to join because they feel powerless against management. They
know that unions, owing to their strength in numbers, have a greater chance of
negotiating for change than an individual employee has.
Union Power
Despite national and state laws prohibiting public agencies (including police) from
going on strike, many police unions have considerable power in their jurisdictions.
In some cities, the union has succeeded in preventing the establishment of a citizen
review board. (See Chapter 12 for a full discussion of citizen review boards.) In
other cities, they have constrained the funding of the citizen review board so tightly
that the board is understaffed and cannot investigate complaints properly (Sward
et al., 2006). A strong police union can finance political advertising and thus influ-
ence the outcome of elections to key positions (such as mayor and judge), as well as
influence how officers are disciplined for misconduct.
Union membership in government organizations has been expanding beyond
such membership in the private sector. In 2009, for the first time in American his-
tory, union membership for public agencies stood at 7.9 million employees, while
7.4 million private-sector workers belonged to unions. Within the public sector,
police officers, teachers, and firefighters are highly unionized. That is, larger per-
centages of their workforces belong to unions, or their unions are more powerful, or
their unions deliver more benefits to members. The decline of private-sector union
membership has been especially apparent in the manufacturing and construction
industries, and has stemmed from the recession. Unionized employees who go on
strike are replaced with lower-paid nonunion workers. And as companies go bank-
rupt, they are replaced with companies that are not unionized.
Union membership strength in the public sector also varies across states.
For example, New York has the highest union membership rate at 25.2 percent,
while North Carolina has the lowest rate at 3.1 percent (Greenhouse, 2010; U.S.
Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics, 2010). These differences reflect the
differences in local culture and the history of unions in each area.
As another manifestation of their power, some police union members have
found ways to get around laws prohibiting officers from going on strike. For
instance, officers can slow their agency’s production when officers feign illness,
becoming afflicted with the so-called blue flu, calling in “sick” simply to make it
more difficult for managers to deploy officers effectively. If they do report for duty,
they may decline to write the usual number of traffic or parking citations or to
respond quickly to calls-for-service.
While police unions have been powerful in the past, many unions across the
nation have been weakened by economic downturns. For instance, some communi-
ties seeking to save money and balance their budgets have outsourced their entire
police department to county sheriffs’ offices or to the state police. Many cities have
initiated hiring and pay freezes for municipal employees. In some states, pension
benefits are also being reduced for new police recruits. In the face of such severe
lack of funding for law enforcement services, unions have far less power to bargain Collective bargaining:
for the interests of their members. Only time will reveal what these realities imply a series of steps
for unions in this country. through which
certified unions and
employers arrive at
Labor Negotiation collective agreements.
Labor negotiation is the process through which union leaders and managers create
or modify a labor contract. This process is also known as collective bargaining, Collective agreement:
which, according to the U.S. Department of Labor’s Employment Relations Service a labor contract that
(2009a), is a series of steps through which certified unions and employers arrive at covers two or more
collective agreements. A collective agreement is a labor contract that covers two or employees who are
more employees who are union members. union members.
Large police agencies may
have a union that represents
line officers, another union for
sergeants, a union for lieuten-
ants, and yet another union
for civilian employees. In such
agencies, labor contracts for
each union must be negotiated
individually. The collective
bargaining process can thus
become confusing for mem-
bers and management alike.
Collective bargaining is a
time-consuming and compli-
cated procedure even under the
best of conditions. According
to the Employment Relations People sitting at a
Act of 2000, such bargaining bargaining table and
must be exercised in good faith. negotiating.
Good faith: Good faith, as highlighted by the U.S. Department of Labor’s Employment Relations
bargaining behaviors Service (2009b), mandates that opposing parties:
required by the
• Use their best endeavors to agree to an effective bargaining process.
Employee Relations
Act of 2000. • Meet to consider and respond to proposals made by either side.
• Continue to bargain about any matters on which they have not reached
agreement, even if they have come to a standstill or deadlock.
• Respect the role of the other’s representative by not seeking to bargain directly
with those for whom the representative acts.
• Do nothing to undermine the bargaining process or the authority of the
other’s representative.
• Not undermine collective bargaining or collective agreements by automatically
passing on collectively bargained terms and conditions to employees not
covered by that collective bargaining or agreement.
• Conclude a labor negotiation, unless there is a genuine reason based on
reasonable grounds not to do so. A genuine reason does not include a party’s
opposition or objection to the principle of collective bargaining or being
covered by a collective agreement. It also does not include a dispute over
whether the collective agreement should include a bargaining fee clause.
The Collective Bargaining Process Where unions exist, the state determines
what method of collective bargaining the two sides can use. The steps generally
include gathering information on items to be negotiated, bargaining in good faith,
calling in a mediator if the parties reach an impasse, conducting binding arbitra-
tion, finding facts on matters such as finances, and arriving at a final decision by a
governing body such as a city council. The goal of the collective bargaining process
is to complete labor–management contract negotiations (Guild, 1998).
The process begins with each side developing a detailed list of what it wants. For
example, unionized police officers may cite wants such as a 5 percent pay increase,
full medical coverage, and additional compensatory time off in the form of vacation
days. The police agency’s management team might identify wants such as a wage
freeze, employees’ paying a higher percentage of health care costs, and elimination of
the seniority system. In most police agencies, the union and management can come to
agreement on many items on the list without dissension and therefore do not need to
negotiate these items. For example, perhaps a reserved parking space may be desig-
nated for the person who receives the officer of the month award. Some items are non-
negotiable, such as (as we have seen) agency management’s right to determine how
many officers to employ (Nowicki, 2003; U.S. Government Printing Office, 2008).
Other items (such as the amount that the government entity contributes to
employees’ retirement system) require more time and effort before labor and man-
agement arrive at agreement, with each side making a concession where possible.
Finally, the two sides may become mired in hotly contested issues that require the
intervention of an arbitrator, depending on the laws of the state. In police agencies,
these tough-to-resolve issues often center on salary and working conditions.
Police services are very difficult to negotiate, because (depending on an agency’s
size), these services may be impossible to provide through other means if officers stop
work to bargain for some desired gain. While an agency that employs one to five
officers may be supplemented by a sheriff’s department or state police agency, a large
A police officer
receiving an award
at an assembly in
Landover, Maryland.
In this instance, wise leaders will try to satisfy employee requests for the sake of
morale and agency efficiency while still pushing forward agency-wide goals and
objectives (Burke, 2009; Texas Municipal League, 2009).
The Content of a Labor Contract Most labor contracts forged through the
labor negotiation process begin by specifying who is covered by the contract and
ETHICS IN ACTION
To Rehire or Not
deputy of a large midwestern sheriff’s agency was driving drunk one
who is not. The contract also states the responsibility of union members and their
representatives, as well as the responsibilities of nonunionized managers. Important
provisions of the contract include wages, work hours, disposition of uniforms and
equipment, vacations, holidays, sick, bereavement, and personal leave time, and
other employment conditions.
Because the contract is a binding legal instrument, the language used to write it
must be precise and resistant to misinterpretation. Ambiguities in the language can
result in future grievances filed or the need for arbitration. For instance, if the con-
tract states that the agency will provide uniforms for officers, it should provide details
specifying exactly what the uniforms will consist of, such as “two pairs of pants, two
short-sleeve shirts, and two long-sleeve shirts.” The more explicit the language, the
less likely controversy or misunderstandings will arise.
After all concerned parties have ratified the labor contract, the parties are
bound to operate according to its terms. Therefore, union members and agency
managers should have a thorough knowledge of those terms. All parties will receive
a copy of the final contract.
While the average person might have difficulty wading through the legal lan-
guage in the contract, most police agencies augment contracts with explanatory
charts or summaries written in more ordinary language. Short excerpts of these
charts or summaries may be included in a contract; for example, a chart reflecting
different pay grades for different police officer ranks with expected pay increases
over a two- or three-year period. However, owing to the increased complexity
of labor negotiations, explanatory charts may soon be a thing of the past. For
example, a village in upstate New York is facing possible dissolution. The police
agency labor organization agreed to a 2 percent reduction in wages to help reduce
government spending in the village. In addition to the wage decrease, manage-
ment and labor also discussed an increase in educational benefits for employees,
changes in police pensions, and an increase in health expenses for different cat-
egories of police officers. It is possible that the complexity of the terms in the
resulting labor contract could not be adequately captured in explanatory charts
(Morrell, 2010).
Grievances
A grievance is an employee claim that a policy or contract provision has been misap- Grievance:
plied, interpreted incorrectly, or violated, thereby causing injury, loss, or inconve- an employee claim
nience to the employee. Examples of grievances include the following: that a policy or
contract provision
• A police agency does not compensate employees appropriately.
has been misapplied,
• Managers inflict unfair discipline on an employee. interpreted
• An agency does not promote an employee. incorrectly, or
violated, thereby
In all kinds of organizations, grievances can be filed by any employee—
causing injury, loss,
unionized or not—though individuals filing grievances may have more success if
or inconvenience to
they have the support of a union behind them. In a police agency, only employees
the employee.
covered by a union contract can bring grievances. For employees who are not union-
ized, grievances proceed through whatever formal or informal process the organiza-
tion has established. If an agency is not unionized, it should establish a mechanism
for handling grievances.
The Grievance Process Most police agencies’ grievance processes specify a series
of steps the employee must take to obtain redress of the grievance. For instance,
the employee usually has to document the grievance in writing and submit it to
the individual’s immediate supervisor. The supervisor has a certain time period to
respond to the grievance. If the employee is not satisfied with the supervisor’s resolu-
tion, the grievance may proceed to the next supervisory level, the chief of police or,
subsequently, the city manager or mayor.
There is always a time constraint placed on responding to grievances, because
failure to respond in a timely manner may constitute a grievance in itself. In union-
ized police agencies, an unresolved grievance may result in arbitration by a third
party to obtain a resolution.
If grievances are not contract based and do not concern salaries, benefits, or
conditions of employment that were negotiated during labor negotiations, they can
usually be resolved by the employee’s immediate supervisor. The individual (or indi-
viduals) bringing the grievance meets with the supervisor to discuss the situation,
explore alternative solutions, and arrive at an agreement for resolving the grievance.
In most cases, it is best if grievances can be addressed and resolved informally, with
all involved parties arriving at a mutually agreeable consensus.
A grievance meeting
between two parties
may be held with a
third-party arbitrator.
CONTRACT LAW
An implied contract is unwritten and unspoken but results from the actions of
the parties to the contract. For instance, a custom that permits senior officers to park
closer to the entrance to police headquarters may be construed as an implied contract.
ADMINISTRATIVE LAW
Administrative law: Administrative law is public law (rules and regulations) promulgated by administra-
public law tive agencies at the federal, state, and local levels—such as the U.S. Department of
promulgated by Homeland Security, the Internal Revenue Service, the OSHA, state-level departments
administrative of motor vehicles (DMVs), and municipal entities. The public law coming from such
agencies at the agencies affects police agencies in specific ways. To illustrate, federal law specifies
federal, state, and that anyone convicted of a felony or a misdemeanor involving domestic violence
local levels. cannot possess a concealable firearm. Further, with few exceptions, one cannot
board a commercial airline flight without being screened by U.S. Transportation
Security Administration personnel. The privilege to drive a motor vehicle is issued
through a state’s DMV.
Administrative agencies are created through passage of federal and state
laws. Because the legislative process is time consuming, state legislatures and the
A Transportation
Security
Administration (TSA)
screening checkpoint
at an airport.
PROPERTY LAW
In addition to contract and administrative law, property law directly affects police
agencies. The concept of property holds an eminent place in free societies. In
a democracy, property includes almost every right protected under law except
the right to personal liberty. Property can be tangible (physical), such as a vehicle
or building to which one holds a possessory title or right. Property can also be
intangible (nonphysical); for example, a possessory right contained in a copyright,
corporate stock, or proprietary information.
Personal property includes almost any form of tangible or intangible prop-
erty, excluding land and its permanent or semipermanent fixtures (for instance,
buildings). Real property (real estate) includes a building or landscaping (trees,
A vehicle is personal
property.
TORT LAW
Torts can be unintentional or intentional, and each type has specific implica-
tions for the individual or organization involved.
Unintentional Torts
An unintentional (accidental) tort may be committed when an individual fails to
act with ordinary, reasonable, and prudent care, and another person is injured as
a result. For example, a police officer improperly handcuffs a suspect, and the act
leads to injury. In such cases, the injured party can sue for damages. The accused
can be held civilly liable if the individual owes a duty of care to the plaintiff, was
derelict (breached) in the duty, the dereliction was the direct cause of the injury, and
there is legally recognizable injury (damages) to the plaintiff.
In such cases, the person who is civilly liable is deemed negligent for the wrong-
ful act or failure to act. Individuals as well as an entire organization may be held
civilly liable for negligence. For instance, if a police agency hires an officer who has
a tendency toward violence, and the officer uses excessive force on a crime suspect,
the agency is liable and may have to pay compensatory and punitive damages.
Invasion of privacy, false arrest, use of excessive force, and failure to protect confi-
dential personal information are other situations that can constitute unintentional
torts for which a police agency can be held liable.
Intentional Torts
An intentional tort (civil wrong) is a willful act that culminates in an injury such
as an assault, battery, wrongful death, or false imprisonment. Intentional torts may
also form the foundation for criminal liability. Torts are not limited to acts that
result in physical damage to someone; they also include defamation of character in
the form of libel or slander, as well as invasion of privacy.
PRIVACY LAW
Confidential
information: Privacy law involves confidential information—anything written or spoken that is
anything written intended only for the eyes and/or ears of the receiver. Confidential implies secret,
or spoken that is intended to be heard by a select few (Merriam-Webster’s, 2006b). According to
intended only for the privacy law, confidential communication privileges exist between an attorney and
eyes and/or ears of client, between members of the clergy when speaking to individuals under their
the receiver. spiritual care, and between physicians and patients.
and if an employer has given information about them to others; for example, per-
sonal history details (Mathis & Jackson, 2005). Police managers, supervisors, and
employment services personnel should be aware of these rights.
commercial airplane. If an accomplice of the drug suspect had overheard the same
conversation, the identity of the cell phone operator as an undercover police investi-
gator could have placed that officer in jeopardy. The investigation would have been
compromised as well.
To avoid such situations, officers should treat all police communications and
investigations as confidential—not to be discussed and analyzed in public.
LIABILITY MANAGEMENT
Civil Lawsuits
In a civil lawsuit, a complaint is filed by a plaintiff who alleges a civil wrong com-
mitted by the respondent (defendant). The respondent answers the complainant’s
allegation. Procedurally, a civil lawsuit is similar to but does not replicate a criminal
prosecution. Restrictions against the admission of hearsay evidence, testimonial privi-
leges, the burden of proof, and the rules of evidence are more relaxed in civil proceed-
ings. Further, unlike criminal cases that require unanimous verdicts for conviction,
civil court juries can rule for or against a plaintiff through a majority and a finding of
civil liability through a prepon-
derance of the evidence (over A judge presiding in a
50 percent certainty) rather courtroom.
than the more strict degree (or
standard) proof of guilt beyond
a reasonable doubt required in
criminal prosecutions (Mann
& Roberts, 2006; Ross, 2006;
Rutledge, 2000).
In recent years, it is not
uncommon for aggrieved par-
ties to bring a civil lawsuit
against a jurisdiction, the police
agency located in that jurisdic-
tion, police management, and
individual police officers for
events such as police motor-
vehicle and high-speed pursuit
collisions or wrongful death
or injury that occurs during an
encounter with the police. Besides naming the individual officer in the lawsuit, many
people filing lawsuits also name as many other individuals and parties as possible—
including supervisors, lieutenants, the chief, and the government entity involved.
Their strategy in naming all these defendants is to increase their chances of receiving
a larger settlement if they win the case. Such individuals subscribe to the deep pockets
theory: In an attempt to secure maximum remuneration or compensation for an
alleged wrongdoing, they target all in an attempt to secure a judgment against the
entity that is best able to pay because it has the most assets or capital. In the world of
policing, that entity is most likely the agency or jurisdiction.
To mitigate their agency’s vulnerability to such lawsuits, police personnel
should familiarize themselves with several legal concepts in addition to what has
been discussed so far in this chapter. These concepts include types of liability, negli-
gence, sexual harassment, and proximate cause. We examine each of these in more
detail next.
Types of Liability
There are several kinds of liability—direct, strict, and vicarious (indirect)—all com-
mon terms in lawsuits.
Direct liability: Direct Liability Direct liability is embodied in the person who commits the act in
liability that is question. For example, an officer who uses excessive force while arresting a suspect
embodied in the and injures the person as a result is directly liable.
person who commits
the act in question. Strict Liability Strict liability (liability without fault) makes a person responsible
for damages, injury, or loss regardless of the person’s culpability (blame or fault).
Strict liability: Strict liability is often imposed on those engaged in hazardous or inherently danger-
liability for damages, ous activities. A police officer making an arrest, for example, is engaged in an inher-
injury, or loss ently dangerous activity. The officer or agency may be held liable if injury occurs to
regardless of the the suspect after arrest and while the person is in custody. Claims that the officer
person’s culpability acted in good faith or took all reasonable precautions in conducting the arrest and
(blame or fault). putting the person in custody may not be valid defenses against a lawsuit.
Vicarious (indirect) Vicarious (Indirect) Liability Vicarious (indirect) liability refers to the legal
liability: responsibility for the actions or damages that have resulted from someone else’s
legal responsibility negligence. For instance, a police supervisor, manager, chief, or government entity
for the actions is indirectly liable if the individual or entity is held responsible for a subordinate’s
or damages that actions. (A supervisor cannot be held directly liable for a subordinate’s actions
have resulted from unless the supervisor participates in the act itself.)
someone else’s Vicarious liability is a form of strict secondary liability that arises from the
negligence. common law doctrine of respondent superior. This doctrine states that the superior
(supervisor) is responsible (liable) for actions that resulted in injury, wrongful death,
Negligence: and so forth (such as use of excessive force) that were committed by a subordinate
failure to exercise the within the scope of employment (American Heritage Dictionary—Dictionary of
degree of care that an Business Terms, 2009; Cheeseman, 2009; del Carmen, 1989; Michaels, 1999).
ordinary, reasonable,
and prudent person
would demonstrate
Negligence
under the same One of the broadest areas of liability is negligence, a subject we touched on earlier
circumstances. in this chapter. Negligence may be defined as a failure to exercise the degree of care
that an ordinary, reasonable, and prudent person would demonstrate under the
same circumstances. As we have seen, the consequence of the negligent action or
lack of action may be unintended injury, death, or loss of property. When a person
fails to exercise proper care according to the demands of a particular situation (for
example, driving while talking on a cell phone and being inattentive to traffic), the
failure is classified as simple negligence. Gross negligence is the deliberate lack of
care for life or property (for instance, driving while intoxicated).
Courts are more interested in holding supervisors liable in cases of gross neg-
ligence rather than simple negligence (Peak et al., 2010; West’s Encyclopedia of
American Law, 2008b). The concern regarding the negligence of police managers
regarding subordinates’ actions centers on whether the managers allowed, instigat-
ed, or turned a “blind eye” to (condoned) subordinates’ conduct. Police managers
must be mindful that negligence can also occur through the performance of every-
day administrative duties, if such performance leads to injury, wrongful death, and
so forth. For example:
• Hiring: A manager hires an officer who has psychological or behavioral
problems or a background of incompetence, and those problems result in the
officers’ injuring someone else.
• Retention: An agency continues to employ an officer even after the person has
demonstrated violent tendencies, and the officer hurts someone else.
• Training: The agency fails to adequately train officers to carry out their
duties properly, and the resulting incompetence leads to injury or death of a
community member.
• Supervision: A police supervisor fails to offer guidance, training, remediation,
and evaluation in a timely manner to subordinates. Consequently, one of
the supervisor’s direct reports mishandles investigation of a crime, and an
innocent person is sent to jail.
• Assignment: A police supervisor assigns an officer known for intolerance of
diverse opinions to a diverse neighborhood. The officer engages in uncivil
conduct or uses excessive force against a minority group member.
Sexual harassment:
Sexual Harassment touching, intimidation,
lewd remarks, and
Sexual harassment constitutes another area of concern for police managers seeking
other conduct or
to mitigate their agency’s vulnerability to lawsuits. The term applies to touching,
communication of a
intimidation, lewd remarks, and other conduct or communication of a sexual nature
sexual nature that is
that is offensive to a prudent and reasonable person. It involves actions or commu-
offensive to a prudent
nications motivated by hostility toward another’s gender or a desire to control the
and reasonable person.
other person, even someone of the same gender. For example:
• A male officer resentful of a female colleague’s promotion tells obscene jokes
to her as a way to make her uncomfortable. Learn more about
sexual harassment
• A female supervisor sexually interested in a subordinate makes it clear that
policies from the U.S.
the subordinate will receive a promotion only if he sleeps with her.
Equal Employment
Laws and court decisions generally read or hold that an employer is liable for Opportunity
sexual harassment if the communication or conduct is unreasonably condoned, Commission (EEOC)
improperly investigated, or left uncorrected. To avoid sexual harassment lawsuits, at www.eeoc.gov.
all organizations should have a clear, written antisexual harassment policy that is
communicated to all employees and enforced (Cheeseman, 2009).
High-speed vehicle
pursuits can lead to
collisions that result in
injuries, deaths, and
considerable liability
for the driver-officer
and the agency.
injured during a chase, charging that the officer was negligent in continuing the
chase. In many jurisdictions, an agency’s supervisors must monitor trends in
police-vehicle chases and approve all such chases. Supervisors may order an offi-
cer to stop a high-speed pursuit if the chase poses a danger to innocent bystand-
ers, other drivers, and any of the involved parties, including the officer and the
suspect. As a general rule, it is best to discontinue the pursuit when public safety
becomes an issue (foreseeable that person being pursued, officers, or other people
could be killed or injured) or environmental conditions (e.g., rain, ice) dictate that
the pursuit should be terminated.
complaints, take appropriate action; for example, assign them to desk duty for
a specified period of time while providing them with remedial training and/or
counseling.
• Document behavior and measures taken. Regularly observe, evaluate,
and document officers’ performance as well as actions taken to address
problematic behavior. When an agency can prove that it has made reasonable
efforts to improve a police officer’s knowledge, skills, and abilities, it will be
less vulnerable to lawsuits (Cheeseman, 2009; Hunter & Barker, 2011; Mann
& Roberts, 2006; Ortmeier, 2009; Ross, 2006).
summary
• National Employment Laws. The U.S. government has enacted numerous laws
intended to foster fairness and safety in the workplace. All organizations are
subject to these laws, which have the common theme of protecting employees
against discrimination and other forms of harm. Affirmative action is not
a law; it is an approach that some organizations use to ensure fairness in
hiring and employment and that has stirred some controversy. Some police
agencies are striving to hire a diverse workforce to reflect the diversity in the
communities they serve.
• Unionization. Unions have developed over several centuries. Unionization of
police experienced a setback with the Boston Police Strike of 1919, which
resulted in mandates prohibiting police officers from going on strike. Police
have unions today as well as other representative organizations (such as the
Fraternal Order of Police) that lobby for their interests. There are numerous
labor laws affecting unions. Such laws stipulate matters including unfair
labor practices and management rights. While individuals gain certain
advantages by joining a union, the relationships between union leaders, union
members, and management can be complex and tense, especially during labor
negotiations. To negotiate a labor contract, unionized workers engage in
collective bargaining with managers. Grievances filed by unionized employees
must also go through a specific process.
• Contract Law. In addition to labor contracts, a police agency may forge other
types of contracts; for example, to lease or purchase a facility or equipment.
Contracts can be expressed or implied and must meet specific criteria to be
considered valid.
• Administrative Law. Administrative law is public law promulgated by
administrative agencies at the federal, state, and local levels. Police agencies
are affected by administrative law at all three levels.
• Property Law. Laws governing property (whether it is tangle or intangible,
personal or real) are relevant to police agencies not only because their
responsibilities include protecting citizens’ property but also because agencies
may own or lease property themselves.
• Tort Law. A tort is a private wrong committed against a person or a person’s
property. Torts may be unintentional or intentional (including libel and
slander). Police may be held civilly liable for unintentional torts, including
key terms
actual cause
administrative law
affirmative action
binding arbitration
breach of contract
collective agreement
collective bargaining
confidential information
contract
direct liability
good faith
grievance
negligence
negotiable management rights
nonnegotiable management rights
proximate (legal) cause
sexual harassment
strict liability
tort
unfair labor practices
vicarious (indirect) liability
14
An entrance to a police building
should be well maintained.
Procurement and
Facilities Management
learning outcomes
• list the various duties of a facilities manager and some of the qualifications
for the job.
• describe the steps required to build or renovate a police facility.
• analyze why site surveys of police facilities are valuable, even when a new
project or renovation is not being performed.
• discuss how a site survey is conducted.
• explain the steps a police agency can take to acquire new technology and
ensure that it is installed and used correctly.
Introduction
The police would have a hard time doing their job without the equipment, tools,
supplies, services, and physical facilities that many officers take for granted—
everything from patrol cars, radios, evidence preservation kits, weapons, and
fleet-maintenance services to the squad rooms, detention cells, firing ranges, and
information technology (IT) systems so crucial to their work.
To ensure that essential equipment, supplies, services, and facilities are
available for police personnel to do their work, an agency must take a disciplined
approach to procurement (acquisition) of needed resources and services as well
as management of all facilities used by the agency. In this chapter, we take a
close look at these two crucial responsibilities. We examine several approaches
to procurement of equipment, supplies, and services—purchasing, leasing, and
outsourcing—and consider key tasks related to these procurement processes,
such as obtaining competitive bids and developing contracts. We then turn to
facilities management, with emphasis on the skills, experience, and personal attri-
butes that distinguish exceptional facilities managers; suggestions for how to plan
and execute construction or renovation of a police facility; and ideas for updating
facilities with needed law enforcement technologies.
Although procurement and facilities management may seem to take a back seat
to other more visible police functions, these two activities help lay a solid foundation
from which officers can carry out their mission and serve their community well.
PROCUREMENT
Purchasing
Purchasing: In the context of organizations, purchasing refers to the procurement of goods and
an organization’s services in the correct amounts, from the most appropriate source, for the best pos-
procurement of goods sible price. Once the good or service is purchased, the buyer owns it. Police agencies
and services in the use the purchasing process to:
correct amounts, from
• Obtain needed goods, services, and other supplies at the best price
the most appropriate
source, for the best • Obtain the materials, equipment, supplies, and facilities that are appropriate
possible price. for what the agency does
• Procure the correct quantities, and avoid underbuying or overbuying
• Arrange for necessary technical services or service agreements on purchased
equipment
• Ensure that materials purchased are delivered in a timely manner
• Avoid becoming overly dependent on too few suppliers, so goods and services
will be available at all times
• Dispose of unneeded items through trade-in, salvage, sale, or transfer to
another agency (Moak & Hillhouse, 2009)
Purchasing by a public entity, such as a police agency, differs markedly from
purchasing by a corporation because the money used comes from the public that the
agency serves, mostly in the form of tax revenues. Not surprisingly, most citizens
feel that their police agency has an obligation to maximize use of their tax dollars.
By developing specific policies and procedures for making purchases, a police
agency can help reassure community members that purchasing is being handled
ethically, correctly, and consistently—with an eye toward getting the most value in
return for tax dollars (Colorado Municipal League, 1996).
and centralized in a department that serves the purchasing needs of other local gov-
ernment agencies in addition to police, such as the fire service and environmental
services in the same jurisdiction. In very small police agencies, purchasing might be
the part-time responsibility of one administrator who has other responsibilities as
well. However purchasing is accomplished, it demands a certain expertise.
The purchasing agent need not be a police officer, although the person does
need in-depth knowledge of police equipment and supplies (including how they are
used and how much they cost). For example, the agent must be familiar with fire-
arms and other weapons, including less-than-lethal items used to subdue suspects
(such as chemical agents and police batons). In large agencies that possess a canine
or mounted equestrian unit, the purchasing agent should have at least a working
knowledge of how dogs or horses are selected, trained, purchased, housed, and
maintained for use by a police agency.
The person in charge of purchasing (variously known as the purchasing agent,
director, or manager) should have a thorough knowledge of not only equipment and
supplies but also the leading vendors of these items, as well as their pricing arrange-
ments. Vendors must typically undergo a process, including a credit check, to be
approved to supply to government agencies. Vendor representatives often meet with
purchasing individuals to establish good working relationships and add a personal
touch to the supply business.
irresistible. Some purchasing agents have even falsified documents to hide the fact
that they made certain purchases specifically to resell the goods for personal profit.
Others have used their agency’s gasoline (fuel) credit cards to fill the tanks in their
own personal vehicles. By clearly communicating the police agency’s codes of ethics
and behavior, and promptly addressing violations of the codes, agency managers can
help discourage unethical actions related to purchasing.
Leasing
In the past, there was only one way for an agency to obtain equipment or facilities:
purchase them outright. This meant the agency needed enough cash on hand to pur-
chase the necessary items or to arrange a line of credit through a financing source
(e.g., municipal comptroller or bank) for more significant purchases, including cars
and computers. But today, government agencies have an additional option that has
long been available to citizens and businesses who wish to have expensive equip-
ment without providing cash upfront: leasing.
Lease: A lease enables an individual or organization to obtain or secure the use of
a procurement items or property in exchange for payments made at agreed-upon intervals. There
arrangement that
enables an individual
or organization to
obtain or secure Spotlight on Police Vehicles
the use of items or While police agencies make the same use of photocopiers and computers as
property in exchange do corporations, their use of police vehicles differs dramatically from that of
for payments made other types of organizations. In some agencies, unmarked police vehicles are
at agreed-upon basically the same as cars driven by ordinary citizens. However, many police
intervals. agencies use uniquely built vehicles that possess special heavy-duty suspension,
brakes, and high-performance engines. Patrol cars may be driven by numer-
ous officers, and in many cases, used 24 hours a day, 7 days a week. Police
vehicles experience unpredictable types of demand, ranging from long periods
at idle to excessive speeds and sharp braking—all of which strain a vehicle’s
engine, brakes, suspension, and other systems. Many police agencies prefer
rear-wheel-drive vehicles because they tend to perform better (and longer) in
hilly or curved areas than do their front-wheel-drive counterparts. An agency
may also select white vehicles because they generally have a higher resale value
at auction after service use than other-colored vehicles.
Maintenance of an agency’s police-car fleet may be performed by two
different entities: experts within the government or police agency, or outside
providers. For instance, a large police organization may have a vehicle-
maintenance division headed by its own manager and staffed by full-time
mechanics. For any additional vehicle-related concerns that cannot be man-
aged by in-house personnel (including warranty service and collision repair),
the agency may contract with local reputable car dealers and repair special-
ists. In some jurisdictions, a police agency’s fleet is maintained entirely by an
outside provider (outsourced).
The Michigan State Police evaluated eight 2010 model year police vehicles
in six categories. The results of the agency’s evaluation can be viewed at www.
michigan.gov/msp/0,1607,7-123--16274--,00.html.
Fleet of police
motorcycles.
are two parties involved in the lease: the lessor, who owns (and continues to own)
the items or property, and the lessee, who pays for the use of the property (Brigham
& Ehrhardt, 2005). Leased equipment is often accompanied by a better service
contract than equipment that is purchased and can usually be replaced without cost
to the lessee if the item fails to function owing to a manufacturing or other defect.
However, misuse of leased equipment by the lessee usually negates the maintenance
or replacement portion of the contract. Photocopiers and fax machines, cellular
phones, computer equipment, buildings, vehicles, facility security systems, and vir-
tually any other item can be leased.
In response to increased budgetary constraints on police agencies, many sup-
pliers of equipment used by such agencies have instituted a leasing system through
which the agency can use the equipment while paying a monthly fee. Often, the
lease payments can be credited toward the agency’s eventual ownership of the equip-
ment. This process is referred to as a lease-purchase agreement. Moreover, agencies
can upgrade to newer, more technologically advanced equipment for only a slight
increase in their monthly lease payments. Outsourcing:
a process by which
a company or
Outsourcing government entity
When it comes to police equipment, supplies, and facilities, purchasing or leasing contracts with
are common approaches to procurement. To obtain needed products or services, another company or
more and more agencies are using another approach: outsourcing. (See the box government entity
titled “Spotlight on Police Vehicles.”) But what is outsourcing, exactly? And why to provide products
has it become increasingly popular? In simplest terms, outsourcing is a process or services that were
by which a company or government entity contracts with another company or formerly provided
government entity to provide products or services that were formerly provided or or performed by the
performed by the original entity. original entity.
A 9-1-1 emergency
communications
center.
County Sheriff’s
departments often
outsource their services
to municipalities.
Advocates of this change believe that a sheriff’s department can be just as effec-
tive at protecting life and property as the local police agency. Taxes will stabilize,
they maintain, as the government entity (for instance, the municipality) saves money
by dispensing with a separate police department. Opponents argue that the sheriff’s
department, even with the infusion of town or village police officers into its ranks,
cannot possibly cover the jurisdiction and the county as effectively or be as sensitive
and responsive to local needs as a local police department can.
was skeptical about the benefits of this initiative, expected to spend $3.4 million
for police services over the years 2009 to 2010. The citizens involved were sharply
divided as to whether the police are paid too little or too much (Sierra Madre
Divided over Possible Police Outsourcing, 2009).
Possibly the only form of outsourcing acceptable to most police officers is the
use of volunteers or reserve police officers or deputies. Still, police unions are often
reluctant to approve the use of volunteers or reserve police officers or deputies. A
very clear distinction must be made between strictly police duties and those that
can be performed by volunteers, and volunteer programs have been working well in
many jurisdictions. Volunteers and their uses are covered extensively in Chapter 6.
being offered, the terms of service or purchase, and the proposed costs. The person
or team in charge of hiring the vendor reviews all bids, may phone the vendors to
clear up any questions, and makes a final determination. In some cases, depending
on the dollar amount involved, a supervisor, the mayor, or the city council may give
final approval to the selected bid.
Like all government contracts, those signed with a police agency can be lucra-
tive. Vendors and suppliers often hope to work for other government entities once
they have established a relationship with a police jurisdiction. Therefore, agency
leaders must exercise caution to ensure that the bids submitted by vendors are
realistic and that the performance goals (deliverables) are not inflated. Budget, pur-
chasing, and agency personnel must verify that inferior products, materials, and/or
workers are not used on a job to cut a vendor’s expenses.
item being covered. Should the service company go out of business, a police agency
will have little recourse in activating the service contract. Therefore, before entering
into a service contract, agency managers should ensure that the service company is
reputable and financially solvent. They can do so by contacting the local or state
Better Business Bureau or a consumer protection office. They can also speak with
several of the company’s customers to gauge the firm’s service quality and reliability
before making a commitment.
Warranties can exist alongside service contracts. A warranty on a product is Warranty:
basically an insurance policy that comes with the product. It implies a promise by a promise by the
the manufacturer that it will repair any defects or replace the product if a major manufacturer that
malfunction occurs. Like service contracts, warranties exclude certain things, such it will repair any
as repairs needed as a result of misuse or abuse. In some cases, certain parts of defects or replace the
equipment may be excluded from the warranty. Thus agency personnel should product if a major
know what those exclusions are before purchasing the item. Usually, organizations malfunction occurs.
purchase service contracts immediately before the warranty on a piece of equipment
is about to expire.
To summarize these important concepts, a service contract is similar to a war-
ranty in that it provides for specified services. A warranty is usually included in the
price of the product whereas a service contract costs extra. A warranty is a promise
that the product will perform as specified if the buyer uses the product or service
according to specific terms and conditions of operation (Ellis-Christensen, 2003;
Facts for Consumers: Service Contracts, 2009).
Setting the Stage The following steps can help an agency establish an effective
agreement with a services provider:
1. Plan strategically for outsourcing functions and services. For example, if an
agency is considering outsourcing its canine (K9) service, managers should
assess the costs of the current service as to officer wages and benefits, dog
purchase and care, equipment needs, training, and calls for K9 service. They
should also conduct research to determine whether there is an existing K9
service to which the agency may have access (for instance, at a sheriff’s or
state police agency).
2. Determine which providers can best manage the outsourced services and what
specific tasks they must perform.
3. Identify the services to be outsourced—including physical location where the
work will be performed, times it will be performed, anticipated performance
on each task, and cost of the service.
4. Decide what roles the agency and the outsourcing company will fulfill.
5. Anticipate and mitigate any workforce morale problems that may arise
from the decision to outsource a particular process or activity. For instance,
Almost anything
can be outsourced,
including K9 services.
Covering All the Bases An outsourcing contract is best developed with the
assistance of legal counsel. The police agency’s counsel will draft the contract and
recommend approval of the contract to the respective governing body (such as the
mayor, city manager, city council, or county supervisors). The outsourcing contract
should include the following information:
• Work to be completed: The contract spells out the amount and quality of the
work to be completed, including training and performance standards. It may
include a clause stipulating that if the agency wants the outsourcing provider
to take on additional work not currently defined in the contract, both parties
must agree on the new work (which is usually indicated in an addendum to
the original contract).
• Fees to be charged: The contract defines the wage rates for contractor
employees, contingency fees (such as wage adjustments based on labor-
market fluctuations and inflation reviews), costs of any required materials,
and any additional expenses the police agency must bear. It may also include
a payment schedule (including the payment periods, invoicing schedule, and
when the first payment is due) and a notice of the contractee’s (agency’s) right
to have an independent party audit the contractor’s operations and records.
• Wage rates: If a premium wage rate (a rate above the prevailing wage) is
specified, the agency should audit the contractor to ensure that the premium
rate is paid.
• Adjustment to compensation clause: The agency (client) is allowed to reduce
fees charged (compensation) if the contractor fails to meet obligations
expressed in the contract.
• Liability of parties: The contract lays out the limits of liability for the
outsourcing provider and the agency regarding provider negligence, gross
misconduct, or intentional damage to the agency’s property or to its image
within the community. An indemnity (hold-harmless) clause should be
included, holding the agency harmless for any wrongful act of a contractor’s
employees.
• Screening of provider employees: Owing to the sensitive nature of police
agency information, processes, and the ability to access secure areas, the
contract should specify that the agency has a right to perform thorough
background checks on the outsourcing provider’s personnel and to reject
personnel whose background checks unearth information of concern to the
agency.
• Provider insurance coverage: The contract stipulates that the provider agrees
to secure and produce proof of adequate insurance coverage for its employees
and the work to be completed. Some contractors are underinsured and/or
underfinanced, and they may not have the necessary financial resources to
withstand a lawsuit.
• Proprietary or confidential information: Both parties agree that all
information gathered regarding each other’s business actions or task
completion shall remain confidential unless both parties agree otherwise.
• Information and significant work output: The contract describes the
significant work products and information the outsourcing provider will
produce and when it will be produced (for example, monthly, quarterly, or
yearly). It delineates the final work product (deliverables) desired and specifies
who will own any materials generated over the course of the contract after the
relationship is terminated.
• Letter(s) of authorization: Since an outside contractor is authorized to act
on behalf of the client (agency), letters of authorization should express the
contractor’s limits of authority.
• Audit rights: The agency should reserve the right to audit the contractor’s
operations to prevent unscrupulous activities and ensure adherence to
performance standards.
• Length of contract: The contract specifies the duration of the outsourcing
arrangement, including start-up and ending dates, termination, and defaulting
rights for each party (Ortmeier, 1999; Ortmeier & Meese, 2010; Sample
Business Contracts, Outsourcing Service Agreement, 2010).
FACILITIES MANAGEMENT
A county or city
jail typically houses
pretrial detainees
and those serving
short-term sentences of
less than one year.
management division that is part of the broader government entity overseeing the
agency. Small agencies may delegate responsibility for facilities to one person who is
employed by the agency while using service providers to carry out actual work such
as cleaning or repair of buildings used by the agency.
Monitoring the Condition of Agency Sites A basic role of a facilities manager is Facilities manager:
to ensure that all police property is maintained according to state and city building an individual
codes and safety standards, including those put forth by the Occupational Safety whose basic role
and Health Administration (OSHA). To fulfill this role, the manager must con- is to ensure that
stantly monitor the condition of all police property. Often, workers at each location all police property
will report ongoing conditions or problems with the facility, such as nonfunctioning is maintained
drains or toilets, broken locks on detention cells, or water leaks. according to state
While such reports are helpful, the facilities manager should still regularly visit and city building
the agency’s properties to review their condition. In some agencies, the manager or codes and safety
a staff member will then prepare a report describing the condition of each property, standards, including
including overall site condition, a detailed assessment of the building’s condition, those put forth by
estimated costs for repair or maintenance of a property, available upgrades for the Occupational
equipment such as computers or office furniture, an inventory of all current equip- Safety and Health
ment housed at the site, and photographs of the site’s exterior and interior (City of Administration
Tacoma, 2009). (OSHA).
After all, a police agency operates 24 hours a day, 7 days a week. Something as
seemingly minor as a flooded restroom or a broken lock on a firing-range door can
spawn extreme inconvenience (at best) or put officers’ safety at risk (at worst).
If a particular maintenance or repair project is beyond the expertise of the facili-
ties management team, the supervisor may decide to outsource the project, includ-
ing requesting bids from service providers or using previously approved providers.
Obviously, there is no need to ask for bids to repair one broken lock or leaky faucet.
However, the facilities manager should take responsibility for interacting with and
overseeing the work of any project that is outsourced, including communicating
with the site supervisor to monitor progress and address any problems that arise.
example, obtain interviewees’ thoughts about how the facility would fulfill
a clearly identifiable need. (Is an existing facility dysfunctional, or do long-
term maintenance or repair costs for the facility far exceed the cost of new
construction?) Simultaneously, conduct a space needs analysis and determine
what facility options are available, including renovation of an existing facility
or the building of a new one.
2. If the agency is building a new facility, contract for the services of an architect
or other building professional to create blueprints to specifications. If the
agency is renovating an existing facility, document all problems with the current
facility, drawing on feedback from agency personnel and building experts.
3. Assemble a team comprising police personnel and construction professionals to
prepare preliminary plans and to estimate costs. Contact appropriate individuals
in the government and the jurisdiction, and ask for their input, to begin winning
political support and, ultimately, financial support for the project.
4. Obtain the funding for the new or renovation project and identify a site for
construction (if a new facility).
5. Working with the professionals hired to complete the project, construct or
renovate the facility. As the work progresses, envision where occasional and
full-time occupants will reside. For an existing facility that is being renovated,
determine where people will work (an alternative site) while their usual area
is being renovated. For a new facility, the occupancy will probably be planned
in stages for patrol officers, secretarial and administrative staff, and volunteers
(International Association of Chiefs of Police, 2008).
Gaining the Proper Approvals When an agency wants to make a major change to
its facilities, the change must generally meet the approval of police administrators,
town or government administrators, and the city or town council or other governing
body/person of the jurisdiction. Agency managers should strive to arrange funding
for the project during the planning stage. If and when they solicit bids from local
contractors, they should emphasize strict adherence to the approved facility plans
and budget. Proposed plans must be submitted and approved with agreed-upon
necessary changes or modifications documented. Once the plans and the contractor
A police building
under construction in
Fairfax, Virginia.
have been approved by all responsible parties, work may begin. After renovation or
construction begins, modifications to plans can be very costly.
Regular inspections
of buildings should
take place.
ETHICS IN ACTION
Lead Poisoning versus Firearms Training
he department of health for a county conducted an audit of a police
T agency’s indoor firing range facility and discovered that the level of
lead particulate at the range exceeded maximum standards. Medical
tests for the range’s instructors revealed that lead levels in their blood were
above acceptable limits. However, under pressure to certify and recertify
recruit and in-service police officers, the range continued to operate with
the same instructors.
The department of health also tested the range’s air quality, and the
results strongly suggested that the facility’s ventilation system needed
repair. Still, training continued at the range, in part because the agency
lacked an alternative training site and funding to build another indoor range
or to make the needed heating, ventilation, and air conditioning (HVAC)
upgrades.
The officer responsible for the required police training and mainte-
nance of the range asked the department of health to conduct another,
more detailed inspection to assess air quality. The indoor range failed the
test, indicating that the level of lead particulate in the air being breathed by
affected personnel exceeded safety standards for trainers on the range as
well as police officer trainees. The officer then tried to persuade managers
at the police agency and the building/engineering department of the gov-
ernment entity to shut down the range and to authorize the needed repairs
for the existing range or build a new range that met the required air quality
safety standards. When his requests fell on deaf ears, the officer asked the
department of health to shut down the range and issue appropriate health
violation summons. The officer received a summons from the department
of health citing the code violations, the range was formally closed and
locked down, and firearms’ training was suspended.
Eventually, a new indoor range was constructed, and the old range was
closed and dismantled. Officers and trainers were no longer exposed to
lead poisoning and poor air quality.
1. What other courses of action could the facilities manager in this story
have taken to foster remediation of the range facility’s problems?
2. Was it ethical for the manager to involve the department of health as
a way to stimulate a renovation of the range facility? Why or why not?
3. Does the happy ending in this story justify the means the manager used
to produce that end, given the apparent inaction of the government
entity toward the range employees’ health? Explain your reasoning.
police agency struggling with rising labor costs and budgetary constraints, finding
ways to make technological upgrades or replacements may require some creative
thinking.
Police administrators might cite needed funds for technology in a proposed
budget, but those funds may not win approval by decision makers for the final bud-
get. Depending on the challenges facing the agency, funds earmarked for technology
updates may be diverted to another need that the agency’s constituents deem more
urgent. The hoped-for funding could be eliminated altogether to accommodate bud-
get constraints or political agendas. To achieve their technology goals, agencies may
need to seek other sources of funding. Grants can sometimes provide a solution to
this challenge. (See the box “Acquiring New Technology: A Three-Phase Process.”)
Identifying Potential Grant Providers Grants can constitute alternative sources To learn more
of funding for technology upgrades that are necessary but that cannot be included about which grant
in an ever-shrinking budget that depends heavily on tax revenues. (See Chapter 5 for providers fund which
more detailed information on grants.) Agency managers should familiarize them- types of needs,
selves with how different grant providers operate and in what types of resources visit the website
they specialize. For instance, new body armor for officers might be funded by a for the Bureau of
different grant provider than computers in patrol cars and software for tracking Justice Assistance
drug investigations. Private foundations and corporations may constitute additional (www.ojp.usdoj.gov/
sources of funding for needed technology (Labbe, 2008). bja; www.usdoj.gov)
or www.grants.gov.
Writing Grant Applications A police agency’s facilities manager may not be
required to write the actual grant application; in many agencies, people in the bud-
get division perform this specialized task. Alternatively, an agency may contract a
freelance grant writer for the project. However, the agency or contracted grant writ-
ers may not have time to research grants specific to facilities’ technology needs. In
such cases, the facilities manager should provide the grant writer with all pertinent
information concerning the grant. If grant writers are not available to write a spe-
cific application, managers may consider asking volunteers experienced in attaining
grants to handle the writing.
Sharing Grant Money Agencies seeking grant money for technology upgrades
may also partner with community and other affected groups to share funding.
Grant funding entities typically encourage and look favorably upon such partner-
ships. Consider a community group dedicated to controlling or eradicating gang
activity in its neighborhood. This group might be willing to partner with the local
police department to obtain a grant for the purchase of hardware and software that
monitor gang activity. The acquisition may generate valuable information such as
profiles of major players and the locations of their operations, and investigations
may lead to arrests and successful prosecutions. The police department and com-
munity group can work together to use the insights gained from the technology to
develop effective solutions to gang problems plaguing the neighborhood.
competitive bid
facilities manager
lease
outsourcing
purchasing
service contract
site survey
warranty
Introduction
No one can predict what the future will hold for individuals, organizations, nation-
states, or the world. Why then do we insist on trying? Every day, we strive to make
predictions about the weather, the stock market, the economy, the outcome of
sporting events—the list goes on.
Many predictions do not come to pass, but some do. One of the most notable
accurate futurists was the French apothecary Nostradamus (1503–1566), who
made a series of predictions that, his supporters claim, foretold the reigns of
Napoleon and Hitler, and even the September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks. Another
futurist, the French philosopher, mathematician, and political scientist Marquis
de Condorcet (1743–1794), foretold that in the New World there would someday
be social insurance and equality between men and women. British scholar and
clergyman Thomas Malthus (1766–1834) predicted (seemingly accurately) that
the global population would increase to the point where the food supply would
fail. And the Russian-American sociologist Pitirim Sorokin (1889-1968) insisted
that the world would grow more secular and immoral in its orientation (California
Commission on Peace Officer Standards and Training, 1976).
These seers all foretold large-scale, sweeping developments in human history.
But what about the future of police administration? To be sure, police administra-
tion is a much more sharply focused subject than, say, global population changes
or the reigns of dictators. Nevertheless, we believe that it merits a little fortune-
telling; that is, some thought and discussion about what police administration may
look like in the future. The shapes that police administration take in the coming
years, decades, and even centuries will play a pivotal role in how police interact
with the communities they serve and how police perform their jobs. And these
things, in turn, can powerfully mold entire societies.
For that reason, we devote this chapter to speculation about the future of
police administration. Of course, we will not be gazing into a crystal ball to “see”
this future. Rather, we will rely on a legitimate area of study that uses past and
present performance, expert opinion, and statistics to describe changes that may
occur in the near future and those that are harder to describe, many years ahead.
Futuristics: This study is called futures research, or futuristics.
an area of study that In seeking to envision the future of police administration, we focus our efforts
uses past and present on several key themes we have traced throughout this book. This chapter thus
performance, expert
serves as both a review of the book’s chapters as well as a bridge between what
opinion, and statistics
to describe changes you learned in those chapters and how you might use that knowledge to build a
that may occur in successful and safe career in policing. With these goals in mind, we first examine
the near and distant emerging developments in the areas of police ethics, leadership, professionalism,
future. and principles of policing—overarching themes that inform every chapter in this
book. In particular, we look at how public trust in police is at risk and how police
must respond.
We then shine a spotlight on two of the challenges you read about in
Chapter 3: counterterrorism and homeland security. We delve into how terrorists
become radicalized and organize themselves, and how new developments in these
areas are redefining the role of police and presenting fresh challenges.
Next we examine the question of how tomorrow’s police administrators will man-
age the budgeting process (covered in Chapter 5) to fulfill the mandate to do even
more—with even less. We look at trends in outsourcing, consider their implications
for police, and explore strategies for creatively addressing budgeting constraints.
The chapter then turns to emerging developments in organizational and indi-
vidual performance assessment and evaluation (discussed in chapters 7 and 12).
In particular, we reinforce the notion that police managers must help every officer,
regardless of rank, become an ethical leader, and we offer additional recommenda-
tions for doing so.
Tomorrow’s police administrator will not be able to foster stellar performance
at the organizational and individual level without the right hiring and training prac-
tices (examined in Chapters 8 and 10). Accordingly, these form the focus of the
next section in the chapter.
Further tracking the sequence of themes covered in this book, we then
address the question of how police in the coming years can master techniques
known as constructive engagement and constructive confrontation to communi-
cate effectively with a widening array of constituents. (You read about communica-
tion in Chapter 9.)
The chapter next moves to the subject of police leadership, which was covered
extensively in Chapter 11. We propose several ways in which police leaders of the
future will need to expand their boundaries in terms of how they work and how
they think. And because driving needed change is a vital aspect of leadership, we
devote a section to this subject as well. We wish to reinforce the need for all police
officers to be self-contained leadership agents. Further, true leadership does not
exist without courageous ethical behavior to accompany it.
The final three sections of the chapter focus on what police agencies in
the future might expect to encounter in the areas of unionization (discussed in
Chapter 13), facilities management (covered in Chapter 14), and technology and
crime fighting (also introduced in Chapter 14).
should view it through a lens that considers the totality of the circumstances. Can
the applicant be trusted or will the candidate dishonor the office?
Can people who break the law or who have engaged in questionable behavior
become effective, ethical police officers? Can ethical behavior and leadership skills
be learned? These questions have stirred intense debate. As police agencies gain
experience in hiring such individuals, only time will reveal how questionable pre-
service behavior affects a police officer’s performance on the job. Until then, we
cannot know whether such behavior indicates an orientation to unethical practices
while the person is working as a police officer (Schafer, 2007b; Shusta et al., 2011).
Captured on Video
With increased video recording of incidents involving police officers, ethical and
unethical behavior on the part of police has moved to the forefront of citizens’
minds. And most people today possess cell phones with video-recording capabil-
ity. Ethics training for recruits must include some reference to this phenomenon.
However, misconduct prevention and prompt disciplinary action after an unethical
incident will go much further toward restoring the public’s trust in police officers.
Remember: Each time a police officer performs an unethical act and people
learn about it, the public’s trust in the police diminishes. Unfortunately, one unethi-
cal act can lead citizens to believe that all officers behave in the same way, thus
tarnishing the reputations of blameless officers in the agency. Moreover, it is very
difficult to rebuild trust once you have done something to violate it. Even if you
offer a series of behaviors or statements to communicate your honest desire to
With today’s
technology, police
misconduct can easily
be captured on video.
“make things right,” the individuals whose trust you violated may never be able to
trust you again.
To avoid this scenario, police agencies must ascribe to and publish codes of eth-
ics and conduct for all employees. Besides formal ethics training during the recruit
stage and regular refresher sessions thereafter, agencies should begin using roll-call
sessions, case studies, and ethical-behavior modeling to reinforce the message about
what behavior is acceptable and what is not. Officers must also start demanding
ethical behavior from one another and addressing questionable behavior swiftly.
Line officers are in the perfect position to detect the possibility of unethical behavior
and to step in before it occurs. If every officer expresses the intent to hold other
officers accountable for their actions, while also modeling the correct behaviors,
police agencies will stand a good chance of restoring trust among the public. This is
part of being a courageous self-contained ethical leadership agent—one who earns
the respect of others and can respect oneself.
Counterterrorism Counterterrorism:
procedures adopted
Historically, many people believed that terrorists were more interested in capturing
by the military,
media and other attention rather than in killing large numbers of people. Now we
police, and
know better. And we have learned that small groups who are motivated by politi-
governments to
cal, ideological, or religious zeal and who can blend in with the general population
assist in preventing,
wreak the most havoc.
reacting to, and
The question of what shape terrorism will take in the future has generated
investigating acts
intense debate. Some experts suggest that the greatest threat of terrorism will come
or suspected acts
from a reconstituted al-Qaeda sheltered in places like Pakistan. Others contend
of terrorism.
that the worst threat will emanate from radicalized individuals who form terrorist
(NSW, 2007)
groups in the United States or Europe. In the coming years, police agencies will need
to focus their resources on both sources of terrorism: radicalization within a com-
munity and radicalization directed from foreign countries. With the former, police
must invest in intelligence gathering and sharing through community outreach and
interagency communication. With terrorism directed from abroad, intelligence
sharing becomes even more critical. Regardless of the source, police will need to Radicalization:
understand how terrorists are radicalized and how they organize themselves. the process by which
individuals align
The Radicalization Process Radicalization occurs when individuals (recruits) their ideology with
align their ideology with that of a group and commit themselves to achieving the that of a group and
group’s goals through violence. If radicals are recruited, organized, and trained in commit themselves
centralized clandestine facilities, police agencies might best track foreign-born or to achieving the
domestic radicals through intelligence fusion centers or similar interagency task group’s goals through
forces. Alternatively, if terror groups organize within local communities, the police violence.
Times Square is
seen blocked off as
NYPD bomb squad
units respond to a
suspicious package
on May 7, 2010. The
attempted bombing
was attributed to
Faisal Shazad.
Fighters participate
in military training in
this undated still frame
from a recruitment
video for Osama bin
Laden’s extremist
al-Qaeda network.
in May 2010. As difficult as it is for anyone to accept that U.S. citizens would wish
to inflict terror or harm on fellow Americans, police will need to face this harsh fact
to contribute to the fight against terror.
The Need for an All-Hazards Approach DHS should be more than a counterter-
rorism agency as it moves into the future. The department must take an all-hazards
approach—defining its mission as addressing any situation (such as the radicaliza-
tion of recruits or an immediate threat) that endangers U.S. citizens. The depart-
ment must develop mitigation and recovery programs for natural and technological
disasters as well as terrorist incidents. It must also train and leverage local, non-
governmental organizations, businesses, and volunteers in emergency management.
State and local response to threats must be honed, and first responders—police,
firefighters, emergency medical technicians—must receive training in handling disas-
ters (Waugh, 2005).
Leadership on t h e job
Line Officers Can Make a Difference
Two days before Christmas one year, a police officer in and he intended to sell them to gang members and
a southern U.S. city responded to a tip about a pos- other criminals.
sible bomb in a crowded mall. Although bomb threat The training that the officer received was geared
tips were fairly common in that city and almost always to making front-line police the predominant gatherers
proved a misunderstanding or empty threat, the officer of important intelligence. Developers of such training
reported it to a commanding officer, following a rule assume that officers are the best suited to recognize
the officer learned in a recent training exercise to treat unusual situations on their beats that could represent
every threat as real. In this case, the officer’s com- terrorist activity or a new criminal threat.
mitment to following this rule paid big dividends: The
1. This responding officer made several critical
Special Investigative Division located and arrested a
decisions regarding the investigation of the bomb
young man who was preparing to enter a restaurant
threat. What were those decisions, and how did
and detonate a bomb.
they lead to the averting of a tragic situation?
The perpetrator was not a foreign national or a
member of any extremist group, but an Army infantry 2. What lessons might other local police agencies
tank specialist recently returned from Iraq. Police and the communities they serve draw from this
found he was making improvised explosive devices event in their efforts to prevent terrorist acts?
(IEDs) similar to those he had encountered in Iraq,
Indeed, many resources devoted to community policing and problem solving were
diverted to counterterrorism after the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001.
Of course, gauging the likelihood of a terrorist attack can help community
members clarify their local police force’s priorities. Major ports of entry like New
York City and San Francisco will always be viewed as vulnerable, whereas it is dif-
ficult for most of us to imagine terrorists targeting places that offer few advantages
to terrorists, like Butte, Montana, or Circleville, Ohio.
Decisions about how to deploy local police for antiterrorist activities will
likely depend on the level of threat facing the jurisdiction. While DHS officials
have pledged to cover the additional costs associated with such deployment, there
is always the possibility that such assistance will fall through or that the govern-
ment will issue additional mandates without commensurate financial support (the
unfunded mandate). If this should happen, some police jurisdictions will have to
decide what portion of their resources will go to “conventional” crime control and
what portion will be spent on homeland security (Mastrofski, 2006).
Terrorism as a Global Threat Terrorism will continue to present a threat not just
to the United States but to the rest of the world as well. Evidence suggests that jus-
tice systems around the world are changing to address this reality, and are drawing
inspiration from one another. For instance, a court management system developed
in Europe has attracted interest in South Africa. And it is widely suspected that
American television programming that portrays trials by jury helped to introduce
this innovation in Russia (Ritter, 2006). Across the globe, national leaders are
debating how to incarcerate and adjudicate those suspected of terrorist activities.
A private security
officer checks cars
entering a gated
community in Palm
Desert, California.
they approach budgeting. Police leaders must recognize that economic downturns
and citizen resistance to paying higher taxes will continue to present tough chal-
lenges for government and police administrators everywhere. Balancing a police
budget during lean economic times demands more than just tactics such as hiring
freezes, delays in procuring needed equipment, and postponement of capital invest-
ments. The police administrator of the future must demonstrate leadership skills
and develop a comprehensive budget strategy that includes immediate measures for
reducing spending as well as proposals for expanding funding opportunities. If you
find yourself in this difficult position, the following guidelines can help:
• Commit to operating responsibly and frugally as a police agency during lean
and flush times.
• Expect the unexpected and craft contingency plans for unforeseen problems.
• Do not rest after solving a budget problem. Monitor your budgeting process,
and incorporate lessons learned from each budgeting cycle into the next cycle
(Rabin et al., 1996; Robbins & Judge, 2008).
Representatives of an
accrediting body will
visit a police agency
for evaluation and
assessment.
Hiring
Many police agencies experience difficulty recruiting new officers. At first glance,
the problem appears to stem from the widespread perception that policing is not
a “real” profession. This belief was aided by the notoriously low wages paid for
police work and the lack of applicants with diverse background or college educa-
tions. Over the years, the pay has improved considerably. However, at the same
time, police work has acquired a reputation for being a thankless job characterized
by impossible levels of stress and danger. Thus, people with a college education may
find other occupations more attractive and challenging.
To draw qualified and desirable candidates, police agency recruiters have begun
resorting to incentives like signing bonuses and advertising campaigns similar to the
U.S. Army’s “Be all that you can be.” They may need to step up such efforts in the
future to overcome recruitment challenges.
Numerous police agencies currently offer their own extensive, job-specific train-
ing to recruits. Therefore, in recruiting applicants with college educations, agencies
may choose to select college graduates with degrees in subjects other than criminal
justice, such as liberal arts and science. Candidates who are bilingual, trilingual, or
willing to master several languages in addition to their first language will prove even
more attractive in the future as American society continues to grow more diverse.
Training
In addition to adopting new hiring strategies, police agencies must develop fresh
approaches to training. Besides providing standard training for new recruits, which
includes weapons proficiency, knowledge of the law, and physical fitness, future
training must accomplish the following:
• Address societal and cultural changes. For example, younger generations have
been raised with technology, multitasking, and extensive external stimuli.
They thus learn differently than older generations.
• Focus on the actual types of problem-based situations officers encounter most
on the job.
• Offer classes in change management, customer relations, ethics, leadership,
and intensive cultural orientation.
• Discuss the use of new policing technologies and devices that may play
a crucial role in the future (such as DNA-sample collection tools and
nonconfrontational, less-than-lethal weaponry), as well as proficiency with the
Internet as a superior investigative tool.
Cross-training and virtual academies offer additional—and less expensive—
avenues for building recruits’ skills.
Cross-Training With police agencies under close scrutiny for financial account-
ability, cross-training—training in different types of tasks and job specifications—
will probably become the norm rather than the exception in the years ahead.
Administrators are finding it expedient to use personnel in creative ways to get
the job done, without having to employ additional people. Cross-training exposes
employees to knowledge about the workings of the agency and such specialized
tasks as investigations, and it positions the agency to deploy individuals where they
are needed most.
The ability to shift personnel seamlessly between and among job tasks not
Knowledge only saves money, but it also promotes knowledge management in a learning
management: organization—that is, the retention of knowledge most important to the police
the retention of agency. The premise is that if only a few individuals possess specific knowledge of a
knowledge most process or task (such as how to store crime scene evidence or how to extract a report
important to an from the agency’s IT system), that knowledge could be lost if those individuals
organization. leave the agency. Theoretically, cross-training ensures that expertise and knowledge
remain in-house. Moreover, if a person who possesses knowledge of an important
process is unavailable, another individual can temporarily step in and perform the
tasks proficiently.
How might cross-training work in a police agency? An apt example is the
assignment of any investigator to a number of diverse cases that normally would
have been handled by a specialized investigator, such as controlled substances, sex
crimes, arson, burglary, or homicide. A side benefit of this development could be
increased cooperation and collaboration among previously specialized personnel,
and closure of cases in a more timely manner as more people have access to and
information about the investigative process (Bandics, 1997; Haberfeld, 2002). The
synergistic effect of people working together often helps a police agency develop
more powerful solutions to problems.
is necessary, and officers in locations remote from the normal training site are no
longer required to travel long distances to receive the training. Some classes that
have been taught in this manner include hazardous materials handling, weapons of
mass destruction, and incident command (Boninfante, 2004). We expect the use of
virtual academies to increase in the future, especially as virtual reality and simula-
tors become more sophisticated.
Constructive Engagement
In addition to the practices presented in Chapter 9, police personnel can use con- Constructive
structive engagement—a coaching and mentoring rapport that encourages a genu- engagement:
inely warm relationship between individuals—to strengthen their communication a coaching and
with others. How do you know when someone is practicing constructive engage- mentoring rapport
ment? The person may compliment others and show a genuine interest in them; that encourages a
demonstrate attentive, noncritical listening; share thoughts and ideas; and gather genuinely warm
informally with people other than their peers, staff, or police officers. Merely by relationship between
saying hello and making eye contact with another person can help anyone engage individuals.
constructively and forge strong working relationships and trust with others (Davis
& Wildman, 2009). We are not suggesting that police officers become full-time
counselors or social workers (although they function as both), but that officers act
as human beings.
Constructive Confrontation
Effective communication also includes practicing constructive confrontation—
challenging one another’s ideas in a nonthreatening manner and supporting the
final outcome even if you do not agree with it. Constructive confrontation encour-
ages openness and discourages personal attacks, emotional outbursts, and bullying.
Learning how and when to disagree productively can help all members of a police
agency uncover fresh perspectives on problems and generate fruitful ideas for solv-
ing them. By actively participating in constructive confrontation, people commit to
implementing the solutions they have generated together (Sutton, 2007).
ETHICS IN ACTION
The Challenge of Prioritization
n elderly woman is arrested for neglecting her yard. (An overgrown
children left on the computer’s hard drive. By understanding how evidence of crimes
including child pornography can come in seemingly innocuous objects like comput-
ers, police will stand a much better chance of staying one step ahead of criminals.
To become net-centric, police executives must embrace the virtual world in
addition to the physical world. By doing so, they can become nimble enough
to anticipate and vanquish problems that arise in the dynamic environment of
cyberspace, in addition to those arising in the physical environment (Lewin, 2010;
Schafer, 2007a). For instance, the police must know how to process virtual as well
as physical crime scenes.
The virtual world can also help police master the art of toleration. Indeed, inter-
Virtual reality: esting developments are taking place with the use of virtual reality, a computer sim-
a computer ulation of a real or imaginary system that enables a user to perform operations on
simulation of a real the simulated system and illustrates the effects in real time. Police recruits will soon
or imaginary system be able to use virtual reality to experience life as a person of a different age, race,
that enables a user to gender, or cultural orientation. The program relies on a social psychology premise
perform operations that negative stereotyping decreases when an individual gains intensive experience
on the simulated as a member of a different group. In testing of such simulation, participants showed
system and shows the a significant reduction in elder stereotyping when they were placed in the avatars
effects in real time. (virtual persons) of elderly people (Yee & Bailenson, 2006).
their subordinates and others in the organization as full partners. This requires a
shift in mindset: Managers and supervisors must come to appreciate subordinates
as inherently valuable individuals who can offer insight, wisdom, and fresh perspec-
tives. To build such partnerships and extract value from them, police administrators
must get to know their subordinates as individuals, each with their own interests,
skills, and ability to contribute (International Association of Chiefs of Police, 1999;
Schulte, 1996; Stevens, 2011; Stohr & Collins, 2009).
police may master the art of change leadership in the coming years. Technological
advances, shifts in social mores, increased globalization—these and other changes
seem to be unfolding at an ever-faster pace. To surmount the problems and seize
the opportunities that such shifts will bring in the future, police agencies themselves
will have to change.
But altering how work is done in a police agency is difficult (just as it is in any
organization), and those seeking to effect change can expect to meet with resistance.
Most people in an organization would rather defend current ways of doing things
(the status quo) than open themselves to exploring other ways of operating—
whether the proposed change is a simple modification to a business process or a
large-scale transformation of a unit or division.
To lead change effectively, police administrators must craft and communicate a
compelling vision of the benefits that a proposed change can bring. They must also
take a disciplined approach to executing the change—by selecting and applying a
change-leadership model.
The Lewin Basic Change Model The Lewin basic change model proposes three
stages of change:
1. Unfreeze. Change leaders break down old habits in an attempt to create a
sense of urgency, modify cultural norms, and develop a vision of the better
future that change could bring. Leaders assess the problem or opportunity
that requires change and prescribe a change strategy.
2. Change. Leaders persuade people to begin using the proposed new processes
and provide any needed training. Role models, mentors, and benchmarking
help facilitate the change process. Some observers describe this phase as an
intervention, which requires intensive collaboration and cooperation among
all players in the organization.
3. Refreeze. Leaders help employees integrate the new behaviors and attitudes
into their everyday work lives, evaluate the effectiveness of the change
process, and drive further change if needed to improve the organization’s
performance (Lewin, 1951).
The Weisbord Six-Box Model The Weisbord six-box model starts with diagno-
sis of a problem or opportunity facing the organization. Based on the diagnosis, a
change leader or group decides what formal changes need to be made (for example,
in the organization’s policies and procedures) and what informal changes are
required (that is, how people carry out their work). To effect formal and informal
changes, change leaders must balance six interrelated “boxes”:
• Purpose: goal clarity and goal achievement
• Structure: elements of organizational architecture including role definition,
physical layout of offices, and reporting relationships
• Relationships: cooperation and conflict management
• Rewards: incentives to reinforce growth, responsibility, and achievement
• Leadership: efforts to keep the six boxes in balance
• Helpful mechanisms: coordinating technologies such as policies, procedures,
budgeting processes, and measurement protocols (Weisbord, 1978).
The Kotter Strategic Change Model The Kotter strategic change model rests
on the premise that successful transformations are very difficult, and that managers
and employees alike can be easily sidetracked away from the effort. Kotter (1996)
advocates an eight-step model of change leadership:
1. Establish a sense of urgency.
2. Create a guiding coalition to lead change.
3. Develop a vision and a change strategy.
4. Communicate the change vision.
5. Empower employees for broad-based action.
6. Generate short-term wins.
7. Consolidate change and produce more change.
8. Anchor new approaches in the organization’s culture.
In Chapter 13, you read about a variety of legal issues important to police work—
including employment law and the role of unions. In policing and other profes-
sions, unions are encountering serious difficulties, so we take the following pages to
explore the potential implications for police.
to serve as strong advocates and negotiators for workers, striving to ensure that
employees receive adequate wages and benefits in return for their skills, time, and
commitment. But unions must also transform themselves from demanding, unsat-
isfied ideologues to open, attentive, problem-oriented, responsive, and flexible
partners with management and the community at large. Unions can no longer be
the insular organizations of the past; instead, they should become connecting and
collaborative associations of the future. Union leaders must acknowledge the cur-
rently negative perceptions of labor organizations harbored by many members of
the public and reengineer their image and brand.
Unions must also recognize that continuing education and new learning are the
keys to jobs of the future, and all union members must have the opportunity for
education appropriate to those jobs. During contract negotiations, union leaders
and members can express their willingness to advance their own training, education,
and professionalism by paying (in full or in part) for college tuition or course fees.
Unions can also provide educational opportunities for their members in the form of
workshops, training exercises, and various other continuing-education mechanisms
(Dator, 1999; Hunter & Barker, 2011).
Mobile police
communications units,
community policing
offices, and command
posts are used in many
jurisdictions.
Surveillance Kites In California, a new high-tech kite may soon take the place
of police helicopters. The SkySeer is only three feet long and, when not in use, col-
lapses into a small bag. Any officer may possess and deploy the kite within minutes.
The camera in the SkySeer sends images to the officer’s laptop computer. The kite
flies at a speed of up to 30 miles an hour, and officers can track its position using a
Global Positioning System (GPS).
A SkySeer unmanned
aerial vehicle (kite)
is demonstrated by
members of the Los
Angeles Sheriff’s
Department.
One of the biggest advantages of the SkySeer is that it can go where helicopters
cannot, such as near trees, utility lines, and buildings. Moreover, it is silent and prac-
tically invisible. One police manager envisions using the device to find missing chil-
dren or lost hikers, to track fleeing criminals or suspects, or to provide visual details
of a fire zone. Touted as the wave of the future in law enforcement surveillance, the
device costs about $30,000, considerably less than the $3 to $5 million that police
agencies pay for helicopters (Staff, New Scientist Tech, 2006). Technology adapted
from military-type drones may also be used to replace some civilian police aircraft.
Gunshot Detection Sensors Another crime fighting device that is quickly com-
ing into its own is the gunshot detection sensor. Generally, within one second after
a firearm is discharged, microphones in the sensor detect the event, a camera zooms
in on the location, and authorities can view the situation on a computer screen
and deploy officers as needed. These sensors have been used to detect gunfire from
homicide suspects almost instantly (Lisaius, 2009).
Virtual Reality Virtual reality will be used someday to conduct police lineups. In
a computer simulation, police can reconstruct the conditions under which a witness
saw a suspect, including time of day or night, the scene, and other details that might
aid in eyewitness accuracy. Testing has demonstrated that accuracy improves when
the virtual scene containing the suspect replicates the actual conditions during the
incident (Bailenson, Davies, Blascovich, Beall, McCall, & Guadagno, 2008).
The Age of the “Robocop”? Although technological devices are excellent tools,
the police officer will never be replaced. Whatever else policing might be, it is an
intensely people-oriented profession that thrives on the human, personal approach.
Technology proponents might fully expect a robot police officer to make its debut
in the future, as in the 1987 film Robocop, where an injured police officer is fit-
ted with robotics that turn him into a crime fighting machine. However, such a
A phishing e-mail
attempting to
trick unsuspecting
individuals into
divulging personal my predicament !!!
Kate dfdf Y @gmail.com Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 7:59 AM
information. Reply-To: dfdf [email protected]
Hello,
I’am sorry for this odd request and I’am writing this with tears on my eyes due to the situation of things right now, I’am stuck in
London United Kingdom with my family, we came down here for vacation and we got Mugged at gunpoint worse of it was that
cash cell phone and credit cards were stolen, it’s such a crazy and terrifying experience for us, we need help sort out our hotel bill
and flying back home, the authorities are not being 100% helping, but the good thing is that we still have our passports, Our return
flight leave today, But we still have problem in sorting out the hotel bills. Please help.
Kate dfdf Y
security systems, IP phones, and the storage of financial forms such as those gener-
ated by personal-income-tax software programs. This represents a rich environment
for cybercriminals to target and exploit.
Online threats to vulnerable consumers take many forms, including e-mail cons
(phishing); viruses, worms, and other infections; spyware; and botnets. All of these
are unlawful invasions, and they affect numerous home and business computers.
Criminals use the large number of computers to send huge volumes of messages
to overwhelm and cripple the targeted computers. In a home user study conducted
by the National Cyber Security Alliance, Symantec, & Zogby International (2009),
about one-quarter of the respondents felt that their home computer systems were
secure from Internet infections. However, between 30 and 40 percent of respondents
stated they store bank and tax information on their computers, with over 50 percent
indicating that they have never learned how to secure their home computer systems.
Although consumers appear to have a peripheral awareness of computer security
threats, computer attacks from perpetrators occur over 70 percent of the time
through e-mail intrusions and approximately 35 percent via websites (Cyber Crime
Statistics, 2010).
Cross-Border Cybercrime Today’s criminals are more mobile than ever, and,
with the right technology, they can invade someone else’s private life without doing
so physically. This means that many crimes, including identity theft, are now affect-
ing people beyond the jurisdiction where the criminal is located. A person living in
one state can steal from others residing in another state or country thousands of
miles away.
This situation will make law enforcement cooperation across jurisdictional lines
crucial in the future. Those in policing must learn to set aside old prejudices against
working with other law enforcement entities. If police refuse to cooperate locally,
regionally, nationally, and globally, criminals will operate without much fear of
apprehension and punishment. However, if agencies at all levels of law enforcement
and in all locations collaborate more effectively today, they will open the door to
law enforcement cooperation on an international scale (International Association of
Chiefs of Police, 1999).
Levin highlights several specific areas of concern when it comes to cross-border
cybercrime. Many U.S. software developers are increasingly outsourcing develop-
ment of their products to other nations. This will create vulnerabilities for U.S.
computer users because of the difficulty of prosecuting someone who is located in
another country but commits a crime against a U.S. citizen. Investigators must pos-
sess and demonstrate different knowledge and skills to combat this kind of crime—
including broad-based knowledge of other nations and their cultures, as well as the
ability to communicate easily with people in other countries. Effective communica-
tion is a skill learned and practiced by the self-contained ethical leadership agent.
One of the biggest obstacles to fighting cybercrime will be the average person’s
resistance to investigative practices. Just as the use of surveillance technologies
has raised questions about citizens’ privacy, the notion that police should combat
cybercrime through access to people’s computers has many citizens asking where
the line between protection and privacy should go. The ongoing conflict between
security and U.S. citizens’ right to privacy will not be an easy one to resolve. And
unfortunately, it enables cybercriminals to flourish. It fragments the fight against
cybercriminals because citizens are not yet ready to give up some privacy in return
for some protection. Just as some people have objected to the idea that police cam-
eras may be watching them as they go about their daily routines, they will likely also
resist having officers gain ready access to their computers.
However, all is not lost. If experts are correct in their forecasts, cybercrime
units will play a critical role in tomorrow’s police agency. Why? Cybercrimes cross
all department divisions: sex crimes, fraud, identity theft, stalking, and intellectual
property crime, to name just a few. Divisional lines must blur if a police agency
hopes to tackle cybercrime with any effectiveness. Cybercrimes also cross jurisdic-
tional lines, further complicating the challenge. But while cybercriminals will even-
tually become no more remarkable than pickpockets as police gain proficiency in
prosecuting them, they will continue to hone their sophistication—and police will
need to keep pace (Levin, 2003).
summary
constructive engagement
counterterrorism
cybercrime
futuristics
knowledge management
radicalization
virtual reality
discussion questions
1. Are ethical standards for police officers changing? If so, how? How might future
standards jeopardize police agencies’ efforts to hire ethical police officers? What is
the link between ethics and leadership?
2. What unique strengths do local police possess that enable them to play a valuable
role in counterterrorism and homeland security efforts? In what respects might local
police combat radicalization of terrorists in their area? If police are channeling more
resources into counterterrorism and homeland security, what might this mean for
other services they provide their local communities?
3. What are the advantages and disadvantages presented by outsourcing of police
services? If you were responsible for preparing this year’s budget for a police agency,
how would you deal with the challenge of providing better services with fewer
resources?
4. What innovative approaches might a police agency use to assess and evaluate its own
overall performance as an organization? If you were a police supervisor deciding
whether to promote an officer who is under your command, what criteria would you
consider in making your decision?
5. What strategies do you think would best enable a police agency to hire a diverse
workforce and bring more officers onboard who have a higher level of education?
What innovative training approaches would you suggest to help a police agency
reduce costs and provide better community service?
6. In what respects have you demonstrated constructive engagement and constructive
confrontation with others? How might you strengthen these communication skills?
2007
• California: Lawmakers ban sales of carbonated soft drinks on school
campuses during school hours and put new limits on the sugar and fat
content in school lunches.
• South Dakota: Legislature requires repeat drunk drivers to check in at
jails twice daily for blood-alcohol testing.
• Georgia and Mississippi: Hospitals and clinics serving women who seek
to abort their fetuses must show women an ultrasound of the fetus and
force the women to listen to the heartbeat of the fetus before proceeding
with the abortion.
2008
• Canton, Ohio: Residents who neglect their lawns, allowing high grass
and weeds to grow unabated, face a fine of up to $250 and up to 30 days
in jail. This law was later amended to include the removal of dead trees
and the pruning of branches that might prove hazardous to people on
sidewalks and streets.
2009
• Illinois: First-time Driving Under the Influence (DUI) offenders must
install an ignition interlock device in their cars. If they want to drive
the car, they must exhale into the device so their blood-alcohol content
(BAC) can be tested. If the device detects alcohol in the person’s breath,
the vehicle cannot be started.
2010
• Texas: Teenagers who use a tanning salon must be accompanied by an
adult.
• Ohio: Anyone driving a vehicle without headlights illuminated during a
snowfall may be fined as much as $150.
• California: Media members may incur civil penalties up to $50,000 if
they buy or sell unlawfully obtained photos and/or videos.
1. What are the benefits of the so-called public-good laws at the federal,
state, and municipal levels?
2. In your view, what disadvantages do public-good laws pose for police?
For citizens?
3. If you were a police chief with concerns about a proliferation of public-
good legislation, how would you communicate your concerns to lawmak-
ers and citizens? How would you develop a case for limiting or expanding
such laws?
433
Beauchamp, T. L., Bowie, N. E., & Arnold, D. (2009). Ethical theory and Brigham, E. F., & Ehrhardt, M. C. (2003). Financial management:
business (8th ed). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall. Theory and practice (11th ed.). Mason, OH: Thomson
Behm, D. (2009, October). Judge won’t block police outsourcing; South-Western.
Pewaukee considers sheriff deal Monday. Milwaukee Journal Brigham, E. F., & Ehrhardt, M. C. (2005). Financial management:
Sentinel (Wisconsin). Retrieved January 4, 2010, from http:// Theory and practice (12th ed.). Mason, OH: Thomson
www.Allbusiness.com/government/government-bodies-offices- South-Western.
regional/13354345-1.htm Bryant, S. (2010). Chicago pd comes up with foolproof plan to hire
Bennett, W. J. (1993). The book of virtues. New York: Simon & Schuster. more minorities and keep the federal government off their
Bennett, W. W., & Hess, K. M. (2007). Management and supervision in law back? Retrieved February 27, 2010, from http://pafop38.
enforcement (5th ed.). Belmont, CA: Thomson Wadsworth. com/2010/01/07/chicago-pd-comes-up-with-fool-proof-plan-to-
hire-more-minorities
Bennis, W. G. (1961, January). Revisionist theory of leadership. Harvard
Business Review, 31(1), 26–36, 146–150. Bryson, J. M. (2004). Strategic planning for public and non-profit
organizations: A guide to strengthening and sustaining
Bennis, W. G. (1993). Managing the dream: Leadership in the 21st century. organizational achievement. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
In W. E. Rosenbach & R. L. Taylor (Eds.), Contemporary issues in
leadership (3rd ed., pp. 213–218). Boulder, CO: Westview Press. Bryson, J. M., & Alston, F. K. (2005). Creating and implementing your
strategic plan: A workbook for public and nonprofit organizations
Bernard, L. L. (1926). An introduction to social psychology. New York: (2nd ed.). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
Holt.
Buckingham, M., & Clifton, D. O. (2001). Now, discover your strengths.
Bernstein, N. (15, April 2009). Study says police misuse immigration inquiry New York: Free Press/Simon & Schuster.
rule. New York Times. Retrieved July 13, 2009, from http://www
.NYTimes.com/2009/04/150NYregion/15immigration.html Burke, K. (2009). Meet and confer ordinance. Retrieved March 10,
2010, from http://www.flagstaff.az.gov/DocumentView.
Bernstein, N. M. (2010). Norris-Laguardia Act (1932). Retrieved aspx?DID=10208
February 21, 2010, from http://www.enotes.com/major-acts-
congress/norris-laguardia-act Burns, J. M. (1978). Leadership. New York: Harper & Row.
Blake, R. R., & Mouton, J. S. (1965). A 9.9 approach for increasing Burress, G. W., Giblin, M. J., & Schafer, J. A. (2010, February). Threatened
organizational productivity. In E. H. Schein & W. G. Bennis (Eds.), globally, acting locally: Modeling law enforcement homeland security
Personal and organizational change through group methods practices. Justice Quarterly, 27(1), 77–101.
(pp. 169–183). New York: Wiley. Business Dictionary. (2007). Customer. Retrieved July 22, 2008, from
Blanchard, K., & Johnson, S. (1982). The one-minute manager. New York: http://www.businessdictionary.com/definition/customer.html
William Morrow. Cahn, S. (1995). Stephen Cahn on the history of affirmative action.
Bohm, R. M., & Haley, K. N. (2005). Introduction to criminal justice Retrieved February 21, 2010, from http://aad.english.ucsb.edu/
(4th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill. docs/Cahn.html
Boninfante, L. (2004, December 9). Virtual academy at public safety California Commission on Peace Officer Standards and Training. (1976).
training center: County unveils new virtual academy. Retrieved April The impact of social trends on crime and criminal justice. Cincinnati,
30, 2010, from http://www.co.cape-may.nj.us/Cit-e-Access/news/ OH: Anderson and Davis.
archnews.cfm?NID=3246&TID=5&jump2=0 California Emergency Management Agency. (2007). Be smart. Be
Book, E., & Schneider, R. (2010, January). Crime prevention through responsible. Be prepared. Get ready. Retrieved February 12, 2010,
environmental design: CPTED 40 years later. Police Chief, from http:/www.oes.ca.gov
77(1), 34–36. California Commission on Peace Officer Standards and Training. (2009).
Bossidy, L., & Charan, R. (2002). Execution: The discipline of getting things Regular peace officer basic course. Sacramento, CA: Commission
done. New York: Crown Random House. on Peace Officer Standards and Training.
Bostrom, M. D. (2005). The influence of higher education on police California State Department of Justice, Office of the Attorney General.
officer work habits. Retrieved March 16, 2009, from http:// (1996). Community oriented policing and problem solving:
policechiefmagazine.org/magazine/index.cfm?fuseaction=display_ Definitions and principles. Sacramento, CA: Commission on Peace
arch&article_id=722&issue Officer Standards and Training.
Bostrom, R. P., Anson, R., & Clawson, V. K. (1993). Group facilitation and Casto, M. L. (2009). Growth and leadership: What is intuition and how
group support systems. In L. M. Jessup & J. S. Valacich (Eds.), do I use it? Retrieved February 22, 2009, from http://www
Gmul! Support systems: New perspectives (pp. 146–168). .businessknowhow.com/manage/intuition.htm
New York: Macmillan. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2006). Helicobacter pylori
Braga, A. A. (2008). Police enforcement strategies to prevent crime in hot and peptic ulcer disease: Have a stressful job? Retrieved August 5,
spot areas. Crime Prevention Research Review No. 2. Washington, 2009, from http://www.cdc.gov/ulcer/myth.htm
DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Community Oriented Champion, D. H., Sr., & Hooper, M. K. (2003). Introduction to American
Policing Services. policing. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Brassard, M., & Ritter, D. (1995). The memory jogger II: A pocket guide of Champoux, J. E. (2000). Organizational behavior: Using film to
tools for continuous improvement & effective planning. Methuen, visualize principles and practices. Cincinnati, OH: Thomson
MA: Goal/QPC. South-Western.
Charisma. (n.d.). Retrieved July 4, 2010, from http://cbae.nmsu.edu/ Couper, D. C., & Lobitz, S. H. (1991). Quality policing: The Madison experi-
~dboje/teaching/338/charisma.htm ence. Washington, DC: Police Executive Research Forum.
Cheeseman, H. R. (2009). Business law (7th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Covey, S. R. (1991). Principle-centered leadership. New York: Free Press.
Pearson Prentice Hall. CPTED Watch. (2008). CPTED crime prevention. Retrieved December 15,
Citizens Information Board. (1999). Managing volunteers: A good 2008, from http://www.cpted-watch.com
practice guide. Retrieved July 16, 2008, from http://www Crank, J. P. (2004). Understanding police culture (2nd ed.). Cincinnati, OH:
.citiznsinformationboard.ie/publications/voluntary_sector/ Anderson.
managing_volunteers/index.html
Cronkhite, C. (1995, October–November). An eclectic approach to
City of Los Angeles. (2003). Training the 21st century police officer. policing: Applying past principles to community policing.
Santa Monica, CA: RAND Public Safety and Justice. CJ (Criminal Justice) in the Americas, 8(5), 9–11.
City of Scottsdale. (2007, December). Arizona police facilities manager. Crowder, W. S. (1998). Law enforcement accreditation: Has it
Retrieved January 25, 2010, from http://www.scottsdaleaz.gov/ professionalized American law enforcement? Unpublished doc-
assets/documents/jobs/job_desc/2089_1.PDF toral dissertation. Ann Arbor, MI: University Microfilms Dissertation
City of Tacoma. (2009, September 25). Condition assessment of city Services.
owned buildings: Police department facilities. Meng Analysis. Cyber Crime Statistics. (2010). Computer forensics recruiter.com.
Retrieved January 22, 2010, from http://cms.cityoftacoma.org/CRO/ Retrieved June 1, 2010, from http://www/computer-forensics-
TacomaPoliceDepartment.pdf recruiter.com-home-cyber_crime_statistics.html
City of West Palm Beach. (2001, October). Class description police
Dabney, D. (2010, February). Observations regarding key operational
facilities supervisor. Retrieved September 16, 2009, from
realities in a CompStat model of policing. Justice Quarterly,
http://www.wpb.org
27(1), 28–51.
Clark, K. E., & Clark, M. B. (1996). Choosing to lead (2nd ed.). Greensboro,
Dator, J. (1999). Bright future for unions? Retrieved May 5, 2010, from
NC: Center for Creative Leadership.
http://www.hawaii.edu/dator/unions/brightfut.html
Clarke, R. V. (2002). Burglary of retail establishments: Problem-oriented
Davis, J. J. (1994). Stress Management Program Development for
guides for police series no. 15. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of
the Rochester, New York Police Department. Rochester Police
Justice, Office of Community Oriented Policing Services.
Department, Rochester, NY.
Coffey, A. (1990). Law enforcement: A human relations approach.
Davis, J. J. (2006). Leadership survival techniques in the police
Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
organization. Unpublished master’s thesis, Roberts Wesleyan
Coleman, P. (2007). New ideas for solving police chief recruitment crisis. College, Rochester, NY.
Retrieved October 20, 2009, from http:www.cacities.org
Davis, J. J., & Colaprete, F. A. (2005). Achieving organizational excellence
Collins, J. (2001). Good to great: Why some companies make leaps and in policing: Model research and development. Academy of Criminal
others don’t. New York: Harper Business. Justice Sciences Panel Presentation, Chicago, IL.
Collins, J. (2002). Library discussion guide. Retrieved March 1, 2005, from Davis, J. J., Givens, D., Perez, A., Bialaszewski, M., & Williams, K. (2004).
http://www.jimcollins.com/lib/discussion.html Achieving organizational excellence. Unpublished professional
Collins, J. (2005). Good to great and the social sectors. Boulder, CO: research study, St. John Fisher College, Rochester, NY.
Author. Davis, J. J., & Prawel, G. J. (2008). Transformational leadership in criminal
Colorado Municipal League. (1996). Purchasing and bidding: Purchasing justice/public safety: Transitioning from good management to great
procedures, policies, and manuals; municipal purchasing. Retrieved leadership. Cincinnati, OH: Academy of Criminal Justice Sciences.
August 12, 2010, from http://www.mrsc.org/Subjects/PubWorks/ Davis, J. J., & Wildman, L. R. (2007). Personal and organizational
pb/purchasing.aspx effectiveness training. Rochester, NY: Authors.
Columbia Electronic Encyclopedia (6th ed.). (2007a). Landrum-Griffin Act. Davis, J. J., & Wildman, L. (2009). Constructive engagement. Rochester,
Retrieved February 21, 2010, from http://www.infoplease.com/ce6/ New York: Self-Published Instructional Guides.
bus/A0820769.html Decision-making-confidence.com. (2008). What is intuition? Retrieved
Columbia Electronic Encyclopedia (6th ed.). (2007b). Taft-Hartley Labor February 22, 2009, from http://www.decision-making-confidence.
Act. Retrieved February 21, 2010, from http://www.infoplease.com/ com/what-is-intuition.html
ce6/bus/A0847620.html de Janasz, S. C., Dowd, K. O., & Schneider, B. Z. (2006). Interpersonal
Commission on Accreditation for Law Enforcement Agencies. (2008). skills in organizations (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill Irwin.
Accreditationworks! Retrieved June 25, 2010, from http://www deKoning, G. M. J. (2005). Building your “bench strength”: Part 1. How
.calea.org the best organizations select and develop tomorrow’s leaders.
Concepts of leadership. (2010). Retrieved July 4, 2010, from http:// Retrieved June 28, 2010, from http://govleaders.org/gallup_bench_
NWlink.com/~donclark/leader/leadcon.htm strength1.htm
Cooke, J. (2003, February). Changing management’s ways. Training, Delattre, E. (1989). Character and cops: Ethics in policing. Lanham, MD:
pp. 14–15. University Press of America.
Cordner, G. W., & Scarborough, K. E. (2007). Police administration Delattre, E. J., & Behan, C. J. (2003). Practical ideals for managing in
(6th ed.). New Providence, NJ: Matthew Bender. the new millennium. In W. A. Geller and D. W. Stephens (Eds.),
Local government police management (4th ed., pp. 500–614). Federal response to Hurricane Katrina: Lessons learned. (2006,
Washington, DC: International City/County Management Association. February 23). Retrieved February 9, 2010, from www.au.af.mil/au/
del Carmen, R. V. (1989). Civil liabilities of police supervisors. American awc/awcgate/whitehouse/katrina/katrina-lesns-chaps.pdf
Journal of Police, 8(1), 107–136. Fiedler, F. E. (1967). A theory of leadership effectiveness. New York:
Delderfield, E. R. (1978). Kings and queens of England. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Weathervane Books. Fishel, J., Gabbidon, S. L., & Hummer, D. (2007). A quantitative analysis of
DeLord, R. G., & Sanders, J. (2006). Navigating the dangerous wrongful death lawsuits involving police officers in the United States.
waters in the real world of police labor-management relations: Police Quarterly, 10, 455. Retrieved February 6, 2010, from http://
Practical and principled solutions for implementing change, pqx.sagepub.com
making reforms, and handling crisis for police managers and Fournies, F. F. (2007). Why employees don’t do what they’re
police union leaders. U.S. Department of Justice. Retrieved March 5, supposed to and what you can do about it (2nd ed.).
2010, from http://www.cops.usdoj.gov/files/RIC/Publications/ New York: McGraw-Hill.
e07063417.pdf Freedom of Information Act/Privacy Act Team. (2010). What is the
Derrick, K. S. (2009). Management vs. supervisors vs. leadership. privacy act? USDA Forest Service. Retrieved March 13, 2010,
Retrieved February 22, 2010, from http://www.slideshare.net from http://www.fs.fed.us/im/foia/pa.htm
Dickson, E. (2008). FBI reports scams against senior citizens are Friedmann, R. R. (2006). University perspective: The policing
growing. Retrieved August 13, 2010, from http://www.bloggernews profession in 2050. Retrieved March 16, 2009, from http://
.net/115117 policechiefmagazine.org/magazine/index.cfm?fuseaction=display_
Dossett, J. C. (2004). Budgets and financial management in special arch&article_id=958&issue_id=82006
libraries. Retrieved April 9, 2008, from http://www.libsci.sc.edu Fridell, L. A. (2004). By the numbers: A guide for analyzing race data
Downton, J. V. (1973). Rebel leadership: Commitment and charisma in the from vehicle stops. Retrieved from http://policeforum.org/library.
revolutionary process. New York: Free Press. asp?MENU=229
Durant, W. (1966). The life of Greece. New York: Simon and Schuster. Frost, P. J. (2003). Emotions in the workplace and the important role
of toxin handlers. London, Ontario, Canada: Ivey Publishing, IVEY
Dwyer, K. P. (2008). How to win at office politics. BNET Crash Course. Management Services.
Retrieved August 12, 2009, from http://www.bnet.com/
2403-13070_23-93243.html Gaines, L. K., & Miller, R. L. (2005). Criminal justice in action (3rd ed.).
Belmont, CA: Wadsworth/Thomson Learning.
Eastman Kodak Company. (1995). Total quality management: Quality
coordinator’s guide. Rochester, NY: Author. Gaines, L. K., Worrall, J. L., Southerland, M. D., & Angell, J. E. (2003).
Police administration (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
Ellis-Christensen, T. (2003). What is a warranty? Retrieved January 22,
2009, from http://wisegeek.com/what-is-a-warranty.htm Garner, G. W. (2005, June). Putting on an effective news conference.
Law and Order, pp. 28–34.
eNotes. (2010). The Landrum-Griffin Act targets union corruption.
Retrieved February 21, 2010, from http://www.enotes.com Garrison, R. H., Noreen, E. W., & Brewer, P. C. (2006). Managerial
accounting (11th ed.) New York: McGraw-Hill Irwin.
Esserman, D. (2005, Winter). Community policing in Providence:
Combating crime and fear. Communities and Banking, pp. 20–23. Gary, C. (2003, December). How to . . . cope with the press. Police,
Retrieved July 3, 2010, from http://www.bos.frb.org/commdev/ pp. 24–29.
c&b/2005/winter.Esserman.pdf Gau, J. M., & Brunson, R. K. (2010, April). Procedural justice and order
Estey, J. G. (2005, April). Communication critical to law enforcement. maintenance policing: A study of inner-city young men’s perceptions
Police Chief, 72(3), 6. of police legitimacy. Justice Quarterly, 27(2), 255–279.
Eterno, J. A., & Silverman, E. B. (2010). Unveiling Compstat. Retrieved Gee, R. (2005). Managing change. Second Avenue Tools. Organizational
March 4, 2010, from http://unveilingnypdcompstat.blogstoto.com Management, MSM510. Rochester, NY: Roberts Wesleyan College.
Etheridge, J. (2008). Oswego police patrol officers join union. Geier, J. (2002). RF site survey steps. Retrieved January 25, 2010, from
Metropolitan Alliance of Police to bargain collectively for http://www.wi-fiplanet.com/tutorials/article.php/1116311
department’s 40 officers. Retrieved March 8, 2010, from George, S., & Weimerskirch, W. (1998). Total quality management:
http://www.ledgersentinel.com Strategies and techniques proven at today’s most successful
Examination announcement Montgomery County consortium of communi- companies (2nd ed.). New York: Wiley.
ties examination—police officer. Retrieved August 13, 2009, from Githens, S. (1991). Men and women in conversation: An analysis of
http://abingtonpd.org gender styles in language. Retrieved July 24, 2009, from http://
Facts for consumers: Service contracts. (2009, April 24). Federal Trade www9,georgetown.edu/faculty/bassr/githens/tannen.htm
Commission. Retrieved January 22, 2010, from http://www.ftc.gov Goldstein, H. (1977). Policing in a free society. Cambridge, MA:
Faherty, C. (2007). NYPD diversity-hire leader returns to oversee training. Ballinger.
Retrieved February 27, 2010, from http://www.NYSun.com/ Goldstein, H. (1990). Problem-oriented policing. New York: McGraw-Hill.
New-York/nypd-diversity-hire-leader-returns-to-oversee/60586 Goldstein, H. (2001, December 7). Address. Speech presented to the
Farrow, J. (2003). Citizen oversight of law enforcement: Challenge and annual International Problem-Oriented Policing Conference, San
opportunity. Police Chief, 70(10), 22–29. Diego, CA.
Goleman, D., Boyatzis, R., & McKee, A. (2002). Primal leadership: Realizing Hamm, M. S. (2007, December). Terrorist recruitment in American
the power of emotional intelligence. Boston: Harvard Business correctional institution: An exploratory study of non-traditional faith
School Press. groups. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, National Institute
Gorham, R. (2010). Leadership motivation: Three pillars for success. of Justice.
Retrieved March 2, 2010, from http://www.leadership-tools.com/ Hammond, A., Slobody, Z., Tonkin, P., Stephens, R., Teasdale, B., Grey, S. F.,
leadership-motivation.html et al. (2008). Do adolescents perceive police officers as cred-
Governor’s Office of Emergency Services. (2007). Standardized emergency ible instructors of substance abuse programs? Health Education
management system (SEMS) guidelines. Retrieved December 17, Research, 23, 682–696.
2008, from http://www.oes.ca.gov/Operational/OESHome.nsf/PDF/ Hartt, C. (1999). Sticks, stones and broken careers: Verbal abuse in the
SEMS%20Guidelines/$file/1INTRO_1.pdf workplace. Retrieved March 26, 2008, from http://www.verbalabuse
Graen, G. B., & Uhl-Bien, M. (1995, Spring). Relationship-based approach .com/page3/page3/page6.html
to leadership: Development of leader-exchange (LMX) theory of Harvey, L. R. (2000). Federal, state and local fiscal partnership. Retrieved
leadership over 25 years: Applying a multi-level multi-domain November 24, 2008, from http://www.aec.msu.edu
perspective. Leadership Quarterly, 6(2), 219–247. Hastings, T. F., & Rickard, T. (1976). Managing investigations in Rochester,
Gravenkemper, S. (2008). Leadership development: A new business New York. NCJRS. Retrieved from http://www.NCJRS.gov
imperative. Retrieved May 2, 2008, from http://www.plantemoran. Hellriegel, D., Jackson, S. E., & Slocum, J. W. (2008). Management: A com-
com/perspectives/articles/Pages/leadership-development-a-new- petency-based approach (11th ed.). Cincinnati, OH: South-Western
imperative.aspx Cengage Learning.
Graziano, L., Schuck, A., & Martin, C. (2010, February). Police misconduct, Hellriegel, D., Jackson, S. E., & Slocum, J. W., Jr. (2005). Management:
media coverage, and public perceptions of racial profiling: An A competency-based approach (10th ed.). Mason, OH: Thomson/
experiment. Justice Quarterly, 27(1), 52–76. South-Western.
Greenhouse, S. (2010). Most US union members are working for the Hellriegel, D., & Slocum, J. W. (2009). Organizational behavior
government, data shows. Retrieved March 9, 2010, from http:// (12th ed.). Cincinnati, OH: South-Western Cengage Learning.
www.NYTimes.com/2010/01/23/business/23labor.html
Hemphill, J. K. (1949). Situational factors in leadership. Columbus: Ohio
Greenleaf, R. K. (1991). The servant as leader. Westfield, IN: Robert K. State University, Bureau of Education Research.
Greenleaf Center.
Heniff, B., Jr. (2003). The federal fiscal year. Retrieved May 27, 2009, from
Greenwood, P. W. (1979). The Rand Criminal Investigation study: http://www.rules.house.gov/Archives/98-325.pdf
Its findings and impacts to date. Santa Monica, CA: Rand
Corporation. Henry, V. E. (2002). The COMPSTAT paradigm: Management accountability
in policing, business, and the public sector. Flushing, NY: Looseleaf
Greer, C. R., & Plunkett, W. R. (2007). Supervisory management Law Publications.
(11th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall.
Herbert, S. (1998). Police subculture reconsidered. Criminology, 36,
Gross, A. (2009, July 11). Ex-cons now help diffuse gang violence. Kansas 343–369.
City program a success, police say. Fox4kc.com Associated Press.
Retrieved August 30, 2010, from http://www.fox4kc.com/wdaf-story- Hersey, P. (2008). Management of organizational behavior: Leading
aim4peace-071109,0,1328799.story human resources (9th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson
Education.
Guffey, J. E. (2005). Report writing fundamentals for police and
correctional officers. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hersey, P., & Blanchard, K. H. (1982). Management of organizational
Hall. behavior: Utilizing human resources. Englewood Cliffs, NJ:
Prentice Hall.
Guild, K. (1998). New York State Taylor law: Negotiating to avoid strikes in
the public sector. Retrieved March 9, 2010, from http://govenment. Herzberg, F., Mausner, B., & Snyderman, B. B. (1959). The motivation to
cce.cornell.edu/doc/reports/labor-management/ny_civil_service_ work. New York: Wiley.
law.asp Hitt, W. D. (1988). The leader-manager: Guidelines for action. Columbus,
Gulf Coast Community Foundation. (2007a). Because it matters at work, OH: Battelle Press.
too. Retrieved March 26, 2008, from http://www.becauseitmatters Ho, T. (2005). Do racial minority applicants have a better chance to be
.net/workplace.cfm recruited in predominantly white neighborhoods? An empirical study.
Gulf Coast Community Foundation. (2007b). 10 keys to civility. Police Quarterly, 8(4), 454–475.
Retrieved March 26, 2008, from http://www.becauseitmatters. Hodge, B. J., & Anthony, W. P. (1979). Organizational theory: An
net/10keys.cfm environmental approach. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
Haar, R. N. (2005, December). Factors affecting the decision of Hosang, D. (2006). The economics of the new brutality. Retrieved June 1,
police recruits to “drop out” of police work. Police Quarterly, 2009, from http://www.black-collegian.com/african/archives/
8(4), 431–453. brutality1299.shtml
Haberfeld, M. R. (2002). Critical issues in police training. Upper Saddle House, R. J. (1971). A path-goal theory of leadership effectiveness.
River, NJ: Prentice Hall. Administrative Science Quarterly, 16(3), 321–328.
Haberfeld, M. R. (2006). Police leadership. Upper Saddle River, NJ: House, R. J. (1996). Path-goal theory of leadership: Lessons, legacy, and a
Pearson Prentice Hall. reformulated theory. Leadership Quarterly, 7(3), 323–352.
Hughes, F., & Andre, L. B. (2007). Problem officer variables and Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (2001). The strategy focused organization:
early-warning systems. Retrieved June 21, 2010, from http:// How balanced scorecard companies thrive in the new business
policechiefmagazine.org environment. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
Human Capital Advisor. (2005). Getting the right people on the bus: Karnow, C. E. A. (n.d.). Indirect liability on the Internet and the loss of
Assessment solutions for five critical business stages. Retrieved control. Retrieved March 2, 2010, from http://www.isoc.org/inet99/
May 2, 2008, from http://www.plantemoran.com proceedings/3e/3e/_2.htm
Hunter, D. H., & Barker, T. (2011). Police-community relations and the Kearney, R. (2009). Labor relations in the public sector (4th ed.). Boca
administration of justice (8th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Raton, FL: CRC Press.
Prentice Hall. Kearns, P. (2005). HR strategy: Business focused, individually
Iannone, N. F. (1987). Supervision of police personnel (4th ed.). centered. Burlington, MA: Elsevier Butterworth-Heinemann.
Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Kelling, G. L. (1999, October). “Broken windows” and police discretion:
Inciardi, J. A. (2005). Criminal justice (7th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill. Research report. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Office
Inn, A. (2000). A consultant’s casebook. Retrieved May 7, 2008, from of Justice Programs, National Institute of Justice.
http://internatlconsult.tripod.com/AssessmentCenters/Problems%20 Kelling, G. L., & Sousa, W. H., Jr. (2001). Do police matter? An analysis
with%20Assessment.htm of the impact of New York City’s police reforms. Retrieved April 18,
International Association of Chiefs of Police. (1999). Police leadership 2009, from http://manhattan-institute.org/huml/cr_22.htm
in the 21st century: Achieving & sustaining executive success. Kerlikowske, R. G. (2004). The end of community policing: Remembering
Retrieved March 31, 2010, from http://www.theiacp.org/ lessons learned. FBI Law Enforcement Bulletin.
PoliceServices/ExecutiveServices/ProfessionalAssistance/Ethics/
Kleinig, J. (1996). The ethics of policing. New York: Cambridge University
ReportsResources/PoliceLeadershipinthe21stcentury/tabid/190/
Press.
Default.aspx
Koerner, C. (2010). Police field interview incident report form. Clyde,
International Association of Chiefs of Police. (2005). Leadership styles.
New York, Police Department.
Leadership in Police Organizations Training Bulletins 1 and 2.
Washington, DC: Author. Korn, P. A., & Hastings, T. F. (1980). Rochester Police Department Rules &
International Association of Chiefs of Police. (2008). Police chiefs desk Regulations. City of Rochester, New York.
reference: A guide for newly appointed police leaders (2nd ed.). Kotter, J. P. (1990). A force for change. New York: Free Press.
New York: McGraw-Hill. Kotter, J. P. (1996). Leading change. Boston: Harvard Business School
International Association of Chiefs of Police. (2010a). Law enforcement Press.
code of ethics. Washington, DC: Author. Labbe, C. (2008). Introduction to funding resources. In International
International Association of Chiefs of Police. (2010b). Police officer code Association of Chiefs of Police, Police chiefs desk reference:
of conduct. Washington, DC: Author. A guide for newly appointed police leaders (2nd ed.). New York:
Internet Crime Complaint Center. (2010). 2009 Internet crime report. McGraw-Hill.
Retrieved June 1, 2010, from http://www.ic3.gov Lad, K. (2010). Characteristics of a role model. Retrieved July 4,
Ivers, T. (2008). Union squabbles more about power struggles. Retrieved 2010, from http://www.buzzle.com/articles/characteristics-of-
March 8, 2010, from http://www.newsherald.com/articles/police- a-role-model.html
4442-officers-union.html Lamm Weisel, D. (2002). Graffiti: Problem-oriented guides for police
Johnson, B. R. (2010, February). DHS Office of Intelligence and Analysis: series no. 9. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of
Supporting the front lines of homeland security. Police Chief, 77(2), Community Oriented Policing Services.
28–30, 32. LaPla, L., & Gravenkemper, S. (2007). The four myths of succession
Johnson, C. E. (2004). Meeting the ethical challenges of leadership: Casting planning: Developing your organization’s future leaders. Universal
light or shadow (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Advisor No. 3. Retrieved May 2, 2008, from http://www
.plantemoran.com
Johnson, J. W. (2003, February). Get the most from your guard force.
Security Management, 47(2), 73–74, 76, 79–80. Lawrence, P. R., & Lorsch, J. W. (1967). Organization and environment:
Managing differentiation and integration (pp. 213–218). Boston:
Jones-Brown, D. D., & Terry, K. J. (2004). Policing and minority
Division of Research, Graduate School of Business Administration,
communities: Bridging the gap. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson
Harvard University.
Prentice Hall.
Lawyers.com. (2010). Criminal law: Witnesses FAQs. Retrieved March 16,
Jurkanin, T. J., Hoover, L. T., Dowling, J. L., & Aymad, J. (2001). Enduring,
2010, from http://criminal.lawyers.com/Criminal-Law–Witnesses-
surviving, and thriving as a law enforcement executive. Springfield,
FAQ.html
IL: Charles C Thomas.
Justice dept. settles lawsuit regarding Delaware police hiring Leadership development around the states. (2009, May). Police Chief,
practices. (n.d.). Retrieved February 23, 2010, from http:// 76(5), 34–37.
www.minorityjobs.net Lectric Law Library. (2009). Fiscal year. Retrieved May 6, 2009, from
Kamb, L., & Galloway, A. (2004, May 26). Gregoire faces questions over http://www.lectlaw.com/def/f043.htm
shelved database. Seattle Post-Intelligencer. Retrieved January 4, Lee, W. L. M. (1901). A history of police in England. London: Methuen
2010, from http://www.seattlepi.com/Local/175016_smart26.html (Oxford University Press).
Lentz, S. A., & Chaires, R. H. (2007, January/ February). Invention of Peel’s McDermott, M. M. (2009). Greece inquiry putting pieces together.
principles: A study of policing textbook history. Journal of Criminal Democrat and Chronicle, p. A1.
Justice, 35(1), 69–79. McGregor, D. (1960). The human side of enterprise. New York:
Leonard, V. A., & More, H. W. (2000). Police organization and management McGraw-Hill.
(9th ed.). New York: Foundation Press. McNamara, C. (2008). Organizational culture. Retrieved August 25, 2009,
Levin, B. (2003). Cyber criminals and victims: The social context. from http://managementhelp.org/org_thry/culture/culture.htm
Proceedings of Confronting the Future Challenges of Cybercriminal Meese, E., III. (1993, January). Community policing and the police officer.
Behavior, FBI Academy, Quantico, Virginia. Retrieved March 16, National Institute of Justice, No. 15. Washington, DC: National
2010, from http://policefuturists.org/newsletter/webarticles/ Institute of Justice.
cybercriminals.htm
Meese, E., III, & Kurz, A. T. (1993, December). Community policing and
Lewin, K. (1951). Field theory in social science. New York: Harper. the investigator. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 9,
Lewin, T. (2010, March 21). Rethinking sex offender laws for youths 289–302.
showing off online. New York Times, pp. A1, A14. Meese, E., III, & Ortmeier, P. J. (2004). Leadership, ethics, and policing:
Lewis, P. V. (1975). Organizational communication: The essence of effective Challenges for the 21st century. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson
management. Columbus, OH: Grid. Prentice Hall
Lindsey, D., & Kelly, S. (2004, July). Issue in small town policing: Merriam-Webster ’s Dictionary and Thesaurus. (2006). Springfield, MA:
Understanding stress. FBI Law Enforcement Bulletin, 73(7), 1–7. Merriam-Webster.
Lisaius, S. (2009, November 9). Shot sensors: The future of crime-fighting? Michaels, A. C. (1999). Vicarious liability—vicarious liability and strict
KOLD News 13 [Television news broadcast]. Retrieved April 30, liability distinguished, why vicarious liability is disfavored, vicarious
2010, from http://www.kold.com/Global/story.asp?s=11410620&c liability for accomplices and co-conspirators—conclusion. Retrieved
lienttype=printable March 2, 2010, from http://law.jrank.org/pages/2255/Vicarious-
Londoño, E. (2006). For county police force, diversity is elusive. Numerous Liability.html
obstacles hinder minority hiring. Retrieved February 23, 2010, from Michelson, R. (1999). The California criminal justice system to
http://www.washingtonpost.com accompany introduction to criminal justice. New York: Glencoe/
Lord, V. B., & Peak, K. J. (2005). Women in law enforcement careers: A McGraw-Hill.
guide for preparing and succeeding. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Michelson, R., & Maher, P. T. (1993). Preparing for promotion: A guide to
Prentice Hall. law enforcement assessment centers. Blue Lake, CA: Innovative
Lutz, C. (2010). The three pillars of leadership. Retrieved March 2, 2010, Systems.
from http://ezinearticles.com/?experts=charles_lutz Moak, L. L., & Hillhouse, A. M. (2009). Purchasing and bidding:
Maguire, E., & King, W. (2004). Trends in the policing industry. Annals of Purchasing procedures, policies, and manuals. Retrieved
American Academy of Political and Social Sciences, 593, 15–41. September 25, 2009, from http://www.mrsc.org/Subjects/
PubWorks/pb/purchasing.aspx
Mann, R. A., & Roberts, B. S. (2006). Smith & Robertson’s business law
(13th ed.). Belmont, CA: Cengage. Montaldo, C. (2010). Frauds and scams used against the elderly:
Frauds vary widely in the means used to commit them. Retrieved
Manning, P. K., & Van Maanen, J. (1978). Policing: A view from the streets. June 1, 2010, from http://crime.about.com/od/elderabuse/a/
Santa Monica, CA: Goodyear. frauds.htm
Marcus, L. J., Dorn, B. C., & Henderson, J. H. (2006, February). Meta- Monteith, D. (2007). Leadership rises to the top through trust and
leadership and national emergency preparedness: A model to build purpose. Retrieved May 16, 2008, from http://www.leadership-
government connectivity. Biosecurity and Bioterrorism: Biodefense development.com/html/magazine2.php?page_id=5&sub_id=79
Strategy, Practice, and Science, 4(2), 128.
Montgomery, D. (2008). The engine of change. Reading, PA, has proven it’s
Marshall, J. (1999). Zero tolerance policing. Retrieved July 23, 2010, from deft at switching tracks. As residents head to the polls, the ques-
http://www.ocsar.sa.gov.au/docs/information_bulletins/lB9.pdf tion is: Where is next. Retrieved February 23, 2010, from http://
Martin, G. (2008). Essentials of terrorism: Concepts and controversies. www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/04/21/
Los Angeles: Sage. AR20080442103112.html
Maslow, A. H. (1970). Motivation and personality. New York: Harper & Moore, C. (2004, May). If there must be gossip, use it for good. Law
Row. Enforcement Technology, p. 110.
Mastrofski, S. D. (2006). Police organization and management issues Morgan, T. (2002). HITS/SMART Washington State’s crime-fighting tool. FBI
for the next decade. Proceedings at the National Institute of Law Enforcement Bulletin, 71(2), 1–10. Retrieved April 26, 2010,
Justice Policing Research Workshop: Planning for the Future, from http://www.fbi.gov/publications/leb/2002/dec2002/dec02/
Washington, DC. eb.htm
Mathis, R. L., & Jackson, J. H. (2005). Human resource management Morreale, S. A. (2002). Analysis of perceived leader behaviors in
essential perspectives (3rd ed.). Mason, OH: Thomson South- law enforcement. DPA dissertation, Nova Southeastern
Western. University,
McClelland, D. C. (1971). Motivational trends in society. Morristown, NJ: Morrell, A. (2010, May 17). Brockport officers’ cut in salary fails to please
General Learning Press. critics. Democrat and Chronicle, pp. B3, B4.
Mumola, C. J. (2007). Arrest-related deaths in the United States. Oliver, W. M. (2007). Homeland security for policing. Upper Saddle River,
Bureau of Justice Statistics Special Report. Retrieved February 12, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall.
2010, from http://www.bjs.ojp.usdoj.gov/content/pub/pdf/ Oliver, W. M. (2008). Community-oriented policing: A systematic
ardus05.pdf approach to policing (4th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson
Municipality of Anchorage. (2005). Appropriation from the U.S. Department Prentice Hall.
of Justice, Office of Justice programs for a Bureau of Justice assis- One team, one mission, securing our homeland. (2008). Retrieved
tance grant award 2005-VT-BX-1166 ($629,911). City of Anchorage, September 15, 2009, from http://www.dhs.gov/xlibrary/assets/
Alaska, No. AR 2005-266. DHS_StratPlan_FINAL_spread.pdf
National Advisory Commission on Civil Disorders. (1968). Kerner commis- Orrick, W. D. (2008). A best practices guide for maneuvering success-
sion. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office. fully in the political environment. In International Association of
National Advisory Commission on Criminal Justice Standards and Goals. Chiefs of Police, Police chiefs desk reference: A guide for newly
(1973). Police. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office. appointed police leaders (2nd ed., pp. 172–183). New York:
National Advisory Commission on the Causes and Prevention of Violence. McGraw-Hill.
(1969). Law and order reconsidered. Washington, DC: U.S. Ortmeier, P. J. (1995, July/August). Educating law enforcement officers for
Government Printing Office. community policing. Police and Security News, 11(4), 46–47.
National Commission on Law Observance and Enforcement. (1931). Ortmeier, P. J. (1996). Community policing leadership: A Delphi
Wickersham Commission. Retrieved March 17, 2010, from http:// study to identify essential competencies. Ann Arbor, MI:
legal-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/National+Commission University Microfilms International (Bell & Howell Information
and Learning).
National Cyber Security Alliance, Symantec, & Zogby International. (2009).
2009 NCSA/Symantec home user study. Retrieved June 1, 2010, Ortmeier, P. J. (1997, October). Leadership for community policing:
from http://www.staysafeonline.org/content/2009-cyber-security- Identifying essential officer competencies. Police Chief, 64(10),
study 88–91, 93, 95.
National Institute of Standards and Technology. (2001). Baldrige: Ortmeier, P. J. (1999). Public safety and security administration. Boston:
Recognizing role model practices of world class organizations. Butterworth-Heinemann.
Retrieved July 4, 2010, from http://www.quality.nist.gov/PDF_files/ Ortmeier, P. J. (2002). Policing the community: A guide for patrol opera-
Issue_Sheet_Model.pdf tions. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
National Law Enforcement Officers Memorial Fund. (2010). Officer deaths Ortmeier, P. J. (2006). Introduction to law enforcement and criminal justice
by year. Retrieved February 21, 2010, from http:www.nleomf.org/ (2nd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
facts/officer-fatalities-data/year.html
Ortmeier, P. J. (2009). Introduction to security: Operations and manage-
National P.O.L.I.C.E. Suicide Foundation. (2010). Police suicide ment (3rd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall.
reporting. Retrieved February 21, 2010, from http://www.psf.org/
reporting.html Ortmeier, P. J., & Meese, E., III. (2010). Leadership, ethics, and policing:
Challenges for the 21st century (2nd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ:
Neumeier, M. (2006). The brand gap: How to bridge the distance between Pearson Prentice Hall.
business strategy and design. A whiteboard overview. Berkeley, CA:
New Riders/Pearson Education. Ottenheimer, H. J. (2007). The anthropology of language: Introduction to
linguistic anthropology. Belmont, CA: Thomson Wadsworth.
Niederhoffer, A., & Blumberg, A. S. (1976). The ambivalent force:
Perspectives on the police (2nd ed.). Waltham, MA: Ginn. Ouchi, W. G. (1981). Theory Z: How American business can meet the
Japanese challenge. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
Northouse, P. G. (2007). Leadership: Theory and practice (4th ed.).
Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Our documents. (2010). National Labor Relations Act (1935), 2010.
Retrieved February 21, 2010, from http://www.ourdocuments.gov/
Northouse, P. G. (2009). Introduction to leadership concepts and practice. doc.php?flash=false&doc=67
Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Outsourcing—What is outsourcing? (2003). SourcingMag.com. Retrieved
Nowicki, D. F. (2003). Human resource management and development in January 25, 2010, from http://www.sourcingmag.com/content/
local government police management (4th ed.; what_is_outsourcing.asp
W. Geller & D. W. Stephens, Eds.). Washington, DC: International
City/County Management Association. Overton, J. P., & Bockelman, A. (1993, November 1). What is the impor-
tance of competitive bidding? Mackinac Center. Retrieved January
NSW. (2007). Counter terrorism arrangements in NSW. Retrieved August 22, 2010, from http://www.mackinac.org/825
13, 2010, from http://www.secure.nsw.gov.au/Resources-and-links/
Frequently-asked-questions/Counter-Terrorism-Arrangements-FAQ/ Parr, L. A. (1999). Police report writing essentials. Placerville, CA: Custom.
Counter-terrorism-arrangements-in-NSW.aspx Parrish, G. (2006, May 1). Why May Day? TomPaine.commonsense.
NYPD working to improve its diversity. (2010). Retrieved February 27, Retrieved May 17, 2010, from http://www.tompaine.com/
2010, from http://wcbstv.com/local/nypd.diversity.nationalities. articles/2006/05/01/why_may_day.php
2.1403513.html Parrish, P. (2003). Media relations instructor at the FBI Academy: Personal
O’Hara, P. (2005). Why law enforcement organizations fail: Mapping conversation.
the organizational fault lines in policing. Durham, NC: Carolina Payton, G. T., & Amaral, M. (2004). Patrol operations and enforcement
Academic Press. tactics (11th ed.). San Jose, CA: Criminal Justice Services.
Peak, K. J. (2007). Justice administration: Police, courts, and correc- Ritter, N. M. (2006). Preparing for the future: Criminal justice in 2040.
tions management (5th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson National Institute of Justice Journal No. 255. Retrieved January 9,
Prentice Hall. 2010, from http://www.ojp.usdoj.gov/nij/journals/255/
Peak, K. J., Gaines, L. K., & Glensor, R. W. (2010). Police supervision and 2040_print.html
management: In an era of community policing (3rd ed.). Upper Robbins, S. P., & Judge, T. A. (2008). Essentials of organizational behavior
Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education. (9th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Pelfrey, W. V. (2004, September). The inchoate nature of community Rochester Police Department. (1981). Rules and regulations. City of
policing: Differences between community policing and traditional Rochester, New York.
police officers. Justice Quarterly, 21(3), 579–601. Rochester Police Department. (1996). Rochester police department gen-
Picarelli, J. T. (2009, November). The future of terrorism. National Institute eral order: Grand jury referral form, grand jury clearances, G.O. 409.
of Justice Journal, No. 264. Washington, DC: National Institute of City of Rochester, New York.
Justice. Rochester Police Department. (2001). Serious personal incidents, G.O.
Police Executive Research Forum. (2004). By the numbers: A guide for 280. City of Rochester, New York.
analyzing race data from vehicle stops. Available: http://www Rogers, D. (2009, March 5). Wallbridge refuses to outsource its
.policeforum.org/library.asp?MENU=229 police. BG Sentinel-Tribune. Retrieved January 5, 2010, from
Police facilities planning guidelines. (2008). In International Association http://www.foxToledo.com
of Chiefs of Police, Police chiefs desk reference: A guide for newly Rosenthal, R. (2003, October/November/December). Training in media.
appointed police leaders (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill. ILEETA Digest, p. 3.
Police officer incentives: Hiring ban uses. (2009). Retrieved May 28, 2009, Rosenthal, R. (2005, July/August/September). Yes, you do need a p.i.o.
from http://banning.ca.us ILEETA Digest, pp. 6–7.
Polisar, J. M. (2004). The IACP center for police leadership. Retrieved May Ross, D. L. (2006). Civil liability in criminal justice (4th ed.). Albany, NY:
12, 2008, from http://policechiefmagazine.org/magazine/index. LexisNexis/Anderson.
cfm?fuseaction=display&article_id=260&issue_id=42004 Rosser, C. (2010, May). Developing leaders through leadership in police
Pollard, C. (1998). Zero tolerance: Short-term fix, long-term liability? organizations (LPOs). Police Chief, 78(5), 38–41, 44.
Retrieved July 3, 2010, from http://www.civitas.org.uk/pdf/cw35.pdf Rubin, I. S. (2006). The politics of public budgeting: Getting and spending
(5th ed.). Washington, DC: CQ Press.
Pollock, J. M. (2007). Ethical dilemmas and decisions in criminal justice
(5th ed.). Belmont, CA: West/Wadsworth. Rutledge, D. (2000). California criminal procedure (4th ed.). Incline Village,
NV: Copperhouse.
President’s Commission on Campus Unrest. (1970). Scranton commission.
Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office. Sample business contracts, outsourcing services agreement. (2010).
Retrieved January 26, 2010, from http://contracts.onecle.com/
President’s Commission on Law Enforcement and the Administration of navisite/clearblue.outsource.2003.01.01.shtml
Justice. (1967). Task force report: Police. Washington, DC: U.S.
Government Printing Office. Say, R. (2007). 12 rules for self-management. Retrieved December
17, 2008, from http://www.sayleadershipcoaching.com/
Pressed for applicants, NYPD waives two-year college standard. (2000, slc/12RulesforSelfManagement.html
October 31). Law Enforcement News, 26(542), 1, 10. Retrieved
Schafer, J. A. (2007a). Exploring the future of crime, communities, &
June 23, 2010, from http://www.lib.jjay.cuny.edu/len/2000/10.31
policing. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Carbondale.
Privatizing the long arm of the law. (1998, November 16). Mackinac
Schafer, J. A. (2007b). The future of police image and ethics.
Center for Public Policy. Retrieved January 4, 2010, from http://
Police Chief, 74, 6. Retrieved January 26, 2010, from http://
www.mackinac.org/796
policechiefmagazine.org/magazine/index.cfm?fuseaction=print_
Quick, J. C., Quick, J. D., Nelson, D. L., & Hurrell, J. J., Jr. (2003). Preventive display&article_id
stress management in organizations. Washington, DC: American Scheider, M. (2008, March). The role of traditional policing in community
Psychological Association. policing. Community Policing Dispatch, 1(3), 1–3.
Quimby, M. (2009). Organizational politics: Using your power for good. Schulte, R. (1996). Which challenges will police managers have to meet
Systems Thinker, 20, 7–9. in the future? Retrieved December 29, 2008, from http://www
Rabin, J., Hildreth, W. B., & Miller, G. J. (1996). Budgeting formulation and .ncjrs.gov/policing/which9.htm
execution. Athens: University of Georgia, Carl Vinson Institute of Schultz, P. D. (2008). Lengthening tenure by following proven
Government. principles. Retrieved October 20, 2009, from http://
Reed, G. E. (2004, July–August). Toxic leadership. Military Review, policechiefmagazine.org
84(4), 67–71. Scott, M. S. (2001). Street prostitution: Problem-oriented guides for police
Ritchie, D. L. (2007, April 20). Speech titled The Future of Ethics pre- series no. 2. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of
sented at the Peterson Lectures by the International Baccalaureate Community Oriented Policing Services.
Organization. Scuro, J. E., Jr. (2004). Supreme Court redefines affirmative action. Law
Ritter, N. (2009). CeaseFire: A public health approach to reduce and Order, pp. 24–26.
shootings and killings. National Institute of Justice Journal No. 264. Section 11.45. Contract grievance procedure. (2008, February).
Retrieved August 31, 2010, from http://www.ojp.usdoj.gov/nij/ Retrieved March 10, 2010, from http://www.das.hre.iowa.gov/
pubs-sum/228386.htm html_documents/ms_manual/11-45.htm
Seo, M., Putnam, L. L., & Bartunck, J. M. (2003). Dualities and ten- Stech, E. L. (2001). Psychodynamic approach. In P. G. Northouse,
sions of planned organizational change. In M. S. Poole & A. V. Leadership: Theory and practice (2nd ed., pp. 189–213).
deVen (Eds.), Handbook of organizational change (pp. 73–107). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Retrieved May 5, 2010, from Stevens, D. J. (2011). Media and criminal justice: The CSI effect. Boston:
http://siteresources.worldbank.org/EXTGOVACC/Resources/ Jones & Bartlett.
ChangeManagementweb.pdf
Stillman, R. J. (2005). Public administration: Concepts and cases
Shahani, A., & Green, J. (2009). Local democracy on ice: Why state (8th ed.). New York: Houghton Mifflin.
and local governments have no business in federal immigration
law enforcement. Retrieved June 28, 2010, from http://www Stogdill, R. M. (1948). Personal factors associated with leadership: A
.justicestrategies.org/sites/default/files/JS-Democracy-On-Ice.pdf survey of the literature. Journal of Psychology, 25, 35–71.
Shane, J. M. (2007). What every chief executive should know: Using Stogdill, R. M. (1959). Individual behavior and group achievement: A
data to measure police performance. Flushing, NY: Looseleaf Law theory, the experimental evidence. New York: Oxford University Press.
Publications. Stohr, M. K., & Collins, P. A. (2009). Criminal justice management: Theory
Shane, S., & Mekhennet, S. (2010, May 9). From condemning terror to and practice in justice centered organizations. New York: Oxford
preaching jihad. New York Times, pp. A1, A14, A15. University Press.
Sharp, B. (2009, July 12). RPD fails to attract diversity in recruits. Stojkovic, S., Kalinich, D., & Klofas, J. (2008). Criminal justice organiza-
Democrat and Chronicle, pp. A1, A6. tions: Administration and management (4th ed.). Belmont, CA:
Sherman, L. (2010, April 21). Less prison, more police, less crime: How Cengage Learning.
criminology can save the states from bankruptcy. Speech presented Stolting, S., Barrett, S. M., & Kurz, D. (2008). The best practice guide for
at U.S. Office of Justice Programs, Washington, DC. acquisition of new technology. In International Association of Chiefs of
Sherman, L. W., Gottfredson, D., MacKenzie, D., Eck, J., Reuter, P., & Police, Police chiefs desk reference: A guide for newly appointed police
Bushway, S. (1996). Preventing crime: What works, what doesn’t, leaders (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
what’s promising. Retrieved December 15, 2008, from http://www Stress and the police. (2007). Retrieved June 29, 2010, from http://
.ncjrs.gov/works stresshealthsolutions.com/stress&police.htm
Shusta, R. M., Levine, D. R., Wong, H. Z., Olson, A. T., & Harris, P. R. Succession Planning 101. (2007). What is succession planning? Retrieved
(2011). Multicultural law enforcement: Strategies for peacekeep- from May 2, 2008, from http://www.successionplanning101.com
ing in a diverse society (5th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson
Sunnyvale. (2008). Operating budget: Comparison of traditional line item
Prentice Hall.
budget and performance based budget. Retrieved April 12, 2008,
Sierra Madre divided over possible police outsourcing. (2009, July from http://sunnyvale.ca.gov/NR/rdonlyres/1DAPCOE5-B621-4CFO-
28). Arcadia Weekly. Retrieved January 5, 2010, from http:// B5ED-98DE14671E21/0/0708roperatingbudgetguide.pdg
arcadiaweekly.com/latest-news/sierra-madre-divided-over-possible-
Survey design. (2009) Creative Research Systems. Retrieved January 25,
police-outsourcing
2010, from http://www.surveysystem.com/sdesign.htm
Silverman, E. B. (2001). NYPD Battles crime: Innovative strategies in
Sutton, R. (2006). Ethical survival: Officers must prepare for not only
policing. Boston: Northeastern University Press.
physical danger but ethical danger as well. Retrieved July 30,
Skogan, W. G. (2005). Evaluating community policing in Chicago. In K. R. 2009, from http://www.policeone.com/.../129744-Ethical-Survival-
Kerley (Ed.), Policing and program evaluation (pp. 27–41). Upper Officers-must-prepare-for-not-only-physical-danger-but-ethical-
Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall. danger-as-well
Skogan, W. G., Hartnett, S. M., DuBois, J., Comey, J. T., Kaiser, M., & Loving, Sutton, R. I. (2007). The no asshole rule: Building a civilized workplace
J. H. (1999). On the beat: Police and community problem solving. and surviving one that isn’t. New York: Warner Business Books.
Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
Swanson, C. R., Territo, L., & Taylor, R. W. (2008). Police administration:
Souryal, S. S. (2003). Ethics in criminal justice: In search of the truth Structures, processes, and behavior (7th ed.). Upper Saddle River,
(3rd ed.). Cincinnati, OH: Anderson. NJ: Pearson Education.
Spelman, W., & Eck, J. E. (1987, January). Problem-oriented policing.
Sward, S., Wallace, B., & Fernandez, E. (2006, February 8). The use of force
National Institute of Justice: Research in Brief, 2–3. Washington,
discipline’s obstacles: Few complaints against police upheld—even
DC: National Institute of Justice.
fewer bring serious discipline. San Francisco Chronicle, p. A1.
Staff, Associated Press. (2009, April 7). 911 operator didn’t tell
Taft, P. J., Jr. (1986). Fighting fear: The Baltimore County C.O.P.E. project.
Pittsburgh police about guns. Retrieved June 29, 2010, from
Washington, DC: Police Executive Research Forum.
http://www.cnsnews.com/news/print/46234
Tannen, D. (1990). You just don’t understand: Women and men in conver-
Staff, New Scientist Tech. (2006). The sky-drone: Is the eye in the sky
sation. New York: Ballantine Books.
the future of crime–fighting? Retrieved April 30, 2010, from http://
sixwise.com/newsletters/06/07/05/the_sky-drone_is_this_eye_in_ Taser International Inc. (2008). Law enforcement overview. Retrieved
the_sky_the_future_of_crime-fighting.htm February 22, 2009, from http://www.taser.com/Pages?lw_
Stanley, J. (2010, May 28). Reviving the Fourth Amendment and American overview.aspx
privacy. ACLU Blog of Rights. Retrieved June 3, 2010, from http:// Texas Municipal League. (2009). Cities use meet and confer authority to
www.aclu.org/blog/author/Jay-Stanley%2C-Speech%2C-Privacy-and- their advantage. Retrieved March 10, 2010, from http://www.tml.
Technology-Pr org/leg_updates/legis_update100908d_meet.html
Thacher, D. (2005). The local role in homeland security. Law and Society U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, National Institute of
Review, 39, 635–676. Justice. (2007). Public safety communications and interoperability.
Thompson, T. (2010, January 10). What is outsourcing? Retrieved Washington, DC: Author.
January 25, 2010, from http://www.wisegeek.com/what-is- U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency
oursourcing.htm Prevention. (2009). Statistical briefing book: Juveniles as victims.
Tichy, N. (1997, April). Bob Knowling’s change manual. Fast Company, Retrieved June 1, 2010, from http://ojjdp.ncjrs.gov/ojstatbb/
pp. 76–82. victims/overview.html
Tichy, N. M. (1977). Organizational design for primary healthcare. Praeger. U.S. Department of Labor. (2010a). Affirmative action. Retrieved
February 21, 2010, from http://dol.gov/dol/topic/hiring/
Tichy, N. M., & Bennis, W. G. (2007). Judgment: How winning leaders make affirmativeact.htm
great calls. New York: Penguin Group.
U.S. Department of Labor. (2010b). Employee polygraph protection act
Toolingu. (2008). What is the definition of continuous improvement?
(EPPA). Retrieved February 20, 2010, from http://www.dol.gov/
Retrieved August 20, 2008, from http://www.toolingu.com/
compliance/laws/comp-eppa.htm
definition-900130-12156-continuous-improvement.html
U.S. Department of Labor. (2010c). Equal employment opportunity age
Townsend, R. (1970). Up the organization. Greenwich, CT: Fawcett.
discrimination. Retrieved February 20, 2010, from http://dol.gov/
Toxic bosses and toxic handlers. (2004). Retrieved July 1, 2009, dol/topic/discrimination/agedisc.htm
from http://trainingconference.co.uk/skills/personal_development/
U.S. Department of Labor. (2010d). Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA).
toxic.htm
Retrieved February 21, 2010, from http://www.dol.gov/compliance/
Travis, L. F., III, & Langworthy, R. H. (2008). Policing in America: A balance of laws/comp-flsa.htm
forces (4th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall.
U.S. Department of Labor. (2010e). Uniformed Services Employment
Tytel, M. (2007). Develop a civil work environment. Retrieved March and Reemployment Rights Act of 1994 (USERRA 38 U.S.C. 4301-
28, 2008, from http://www.businesseeek.com/smallbiz/tips/ 4335). Retrieved February 20, 2010, from http://www.dol.gov/vets/
archives/2007/11/develop_a_civil.html programs/userra/userra_fs.htm
United University Professions. (2006). Know your contract—frequently U.S. Department of Labor. (2010f). Worker Adjustment and Retraining
asked questions. Retrieved March 10, 2010, from http://www Notification Act (WARN). Retrieved February 20, 2010, from http://
.uuphost.org/purchase/contact_faqs.html www.dol.gov/compliance/laws/comp-warn.htm
U.S. Census Bureau. (1999). Dynamic diversity: Projected changes U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2010, January).
in U.S. race and ethnic composition 1995 to 2050. Retrieved Union members summary. Retrieved March 9, 2010, from http://
February 12, 2010, from http://www.mbda.gov/documents/ www.bld.gov/news.release/union2.nro.htm
unpubtext.pdf
U.S. Department of Labor, Employment Relations Service. (2009a,
U.S. Department of Homeland Security. (2006). Communications and October). Collective bargaining. Retrieved March 9, 2010,
information management. Retrieved February 10, 2010, from http:// from http://www.ers.dol.govt.nz/bargaining
www.fema.gov/emergency/nims/CommunicationsInfoMngmnt.shtm
U.S. Department of Labor, Employment Relations Service. (2009b,
U.S. Department of Homeland Security, Office of Management and Budget. December). Good faith in collective bargaining. Retrieved
(2007). National strategy for homeland security. Retrieved February 10, March 9, 2010, from http://www.erc.dol.govt.nz/bargaining/
2010 from http://www.whitehouse.gov/infocus/homeland good_faith.html
U.S. Department of Homeland Security, SAFECOM Program. (2004). U.S. Department of Labor, Occupational Safety and Health Administration.
Welcome to SAFECOM. Retrieved July 24, 2009, from http://www (2010). Retrieved February 20, 2010, from http://www.osha.gov/
.safecomprogram.gov/SAFECOM pls/oshaweb/owasrch_search_form?p_doc_type=STANDARD&p_
U.S. Department of Justice Juvenile Accountability Block Grant. (2008). toc_level=o&p_keyvalue=
Juvenile accountability block grant. Retrieved November 25, 2008, U.S. Department of the Treasury, Internal Revenue Service. (2010).
from http://www.in/gov/cji/2660.htm Enforcement strategy—criminal investigation. Retrieved June 29,
U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Community Oriented Policing Services. 2010, from http://www.irs.gov/compliance/enforcement/article/
(2007). What is community policing? Retrieved July 3, 2010, from 0..id=107522.00.htm
http://www.cops.usdoj.gov/Default.asp?Item=36 U.S. Government Accountability Office. (2007). Department of Homeland
U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Community Oriented Policing Services. Security: Progress report on implementation of mission and man-
(2008). Resource Information Center. Retrieved from http://www agement functions. Retrieved from http//www.gao.gov/docsearch/
.cops.usdoj.gov/ric/resourceSearch.aspx abstract.php?rptno=GAO-07-1081T
U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Bureau of Justice U.S. Government Printing Office. (2008). U.S. Code Browse Title
Statistics. (2006). State and local law enforcement training acad- 5—Government organization and employees. Retrieved March 8,
emies, 2006. Retrieved March 16, 2009, from http://www.ojp.usdoj. 2010, from http://frwegate.access.gpo.gov/cgi-bin/usc.cgi?
gov/bjs/abstract/slleta06.htm ACTION=Browse&title=5usc&PDFS=YES
U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Bureau of Justice U.S. House of Representatives Committee on the Judiciary, the
Statistics. (2009). State and local law enforcement training academies, Republicans. (2009). 54 members of Congress to Obama: We sup-
2006, revised 02/09. NCJ222987. Retrieved March 16, 2009, from port 287(g) program. Retrieved December 17, 2009, from http://
http://www.ojp.usdoj.gov/bjs/abstract/slleta.06.htm republicans.judiciary.house.gov/News/Read.aspx?ID=255
U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement. (2009). Delegation of immi- Waugh, W. L., Jr. (2005). 2005 higher education conference: The future of
gration authority section 287(g) Immigration and Nationality Act: homeland security and emergency management. Emmitsburg, MD:
The ICE 287(g) program: A law enforcement partnership. Retrieved Emergency Management Institute.
December 18, 2009, from http://www.ice.gov/pi/news/factsheets/ Weisbord, M. R. (1978). Organizational diagnosis: A workbook of theory
section287_g.htm and practice. Cambridge, MA: Perseus Books.
U.S. Office of Personnel Management. (2010). Family and medical leave Welsh, W. N., & Harris, P. W. (2004). Criminal justice policy & planning
entitlement. Retrieved February 20, 2010, from http://www.opm. (2nd ed.). Cincinnati, OH: Anderson.
gov/ocal/leave/HTML/fmlafac2esp
West’s Encyclopedia of American Law (2nd ed.). (2008a). Binding
U.S. police officer compensation survey. (2004). Retrieved May 28, 2009, arbitration. Retrieved March 2, 2010, from http://legal-dictionary.
from http://www.theblueline.com.salaryl.html thefreedictionary.com/p/Binding%20arbitration
Vaknin, S. (2006). What is intuition? Retrieved February 22, 2009, from West’s Encyclopedia of American Law (2nd ed.). (2008b). Negligence.
http://www.globalpolitican.com/21917-sociology Retrieved March 11, 2010, from http://legal-dictionary.
Vaughn. R. G. (2003). Civil Service Reform Act (1978). Retrieved February thefreedictionary.com/negligence
20, 2010, from http://www.enotes.com/major-acts-congress/civil- West’s Encyclopedia of American Law (2nd ed.). (2008c). Proximate
service-reform-act cause. Retrieved March 10, 2010, from http://legal-dictionary.
Veale, S. (2009, July 7). “Johns” will face tougher sentences. Democrat and thefreedictionary.com/proximate+cause
Chronicle. Retrieved July 3, 2010, from http://pqash.pqarchive.com/ West’s Encyclopedia of American Law (2010). Forfeiture. Retrieved
democratand chronicle/access/1779551801.htm June 29, 2010, from http://www.answers.com/topic/forfeiture
Vikesland, G. (1998). The Family and Medical Leave Act: Balancing work Whisenand, P. M., & Ferguson, R. F. (2005). The managing of police
and family. Retrieved February 20, 2010, from http://employer- organizations (6th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson
employee.com/fmla.html Prentice Hall.
Vinzant, J. C., & Crothers, L. (1998). Street-level leadership: Discretion and Whisenand, P. M., & Rush, G. E. (2007). Supervising police person-
legitimacy in front-line public service. Washington, DC: Georgetown nel: The fifteen responsibilities (6th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ:
University Press. Pearson Prentice Hall.
Violanti, J.M. (2002). Dying from the job: The mortality risk for police offi- Wideman, M. (2001). Project management issues and considerations
cers. Retrieved October 21, 2010, from http://www.cophealth.com/ (Isaacons). Retrieved October 20, 2008, from http://www
articles/articles_dying_a.html .maxwideman.com/issacons1/iac1190/img002.gif
Vodicka, A. T. (1994). Educational requirements for police recruits. Law and Wildman, L., & Morschauser, P. (2007). Police mental health training
Order, 42, 91–94. program, officer’s guide. Albany, NY: NYS Office of Mental Health.
Vollmer, A. (1936). The police in modern society. Los Angeles: University of Wilson, J. Q., & Kelling, G. L. (1989, February). Making neighborhoods safe.
California. The Atlantic Monthly, 46–52.
Volunteers in Police Service. (2008). About VIPS: Origin of the volunteers in Wilson, O. W. (1952). Police planning. Springfield, IL: Charles C Thomas.
police service (VIPS) program. Retrieved July 18, 2008, from http:// Wilson, O. W. (1963). Police administration. New York: McGraw-Hill.
www.policevolunteers.org/about/
Wood, M. B. (2005). The marketing plan handbook (2nd ed.). Upper
Vroom, V. H. (1964). Work and motivation. New York: Wiley. Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall.
Vroom, V. H. (2000, Spring). Leadership and the decision-making process. Wuestewald, T. (2006). Shared leadership: An assessment of participative
Organizational Dynamics, 82–94. management in a police organization. Retrieved August 2, 2010,
Walker, S. (2001). Police accountability: The role of civilian oversight. from http://www.ou.edu/cas/psc/pa/Shared%20Leadership.pdf
Belmont, CA: Wadsworth/Thomson Learning. Yee, N., & Bailenson, J. N. (2006). Walk a mile in digital shoes: The impact
Walker, S., Alpert, G. P., & Kenney, D. J. (2001, July). Early warning systems: of embodied perspective—talking on the reduction of negative
Responding to the problem police officer. Research in brief. stereotyping in immersive virtual environments. Proceedings of
Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, National Institute of Presence 2006: The 9th Annual International Workshop on Presence,
Justice. Cleveland, OH.
Walker, S., Spohn, C., & Delone, M. (2004). The color of justice: Race. Young, T., & Ortmeier, P. J. (2011). Crime scene investigation: The forensic
Belmont, CA: Wadsworth/Cengage Learning. technician’s field manual. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice
Wallace, H., & Roberson, C. (2009). Written and interpersonal Hall.
communication: Methods for law enforcement (4th ed.). Upper Zalman, M. (2011). Criminal procedure: Constitution and society (6th ed.).
Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall.
Citizen review board an independent group comprising it provides (or may provide) to the organization and/or its
local citizens appointed by the mayor or other politicians constituents. (126)
that investigates complaints, decides whether a complaint Counterterrorism procedures adopted by the military, police, and
is justified based on the evidence at hand, and offers governments to assist in preventing, reacting to, and investigating
recommendations. (310) acts or suspected acts of terrorism. (NSW, 2007) (399)
Civil work environment a workplace characterized by positive Crime analysis analytical process used to define current and
interactions, optimism, and the dismissal of cynicism and predict future quality-of-life concerns, crime patterns, or
pessimistic beliefs. (205) trends. (99)
Closed-end grant limits fund expenditures to narrowly defined Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design (CPTED) the
products or services and typically includes highly detailed process of deciding how to construct or modify the physical
compliance requirements. (123) environment to deter or discourage criminal activity. (94)
Collective agreement a labor contract that covers two or more Cross-cultural communication a process that occurs anytime
employees who are union members. (343) a person of one culture sends a message to, or receives a
Collective bargaining a series of steps through which certified message from, a person of another culture. (227)
unions and employers arrive at collective agreements. (343) Cross-gender communication a process that occurs anytime
Communication a process involving the exchange of information a person of one gender sends a message to, or receives a
between a sender and a receiver. (211) message from, a person of another gender. (228)
Community mapping process of visually displaying specific Cybercrime criminal misconduct perpetrated through information
locations, addresses, or areas of noted concern. (99) technology. (424)
Community policing an alternative strategy to traditional
policing that emphasizes close interaction between police and
D
Deployment of human resources the process of placing the
the neighborhoods they serve. (32)
right person in the right job or on the right tasks or projects,
Competency-based compensation payment for competencies
according to a candidate’s strengths, weaknesses, knowledge,
acquired and exhibited by members of the organization. (204)
skills, and abilities (KSAs)—as well as interests. (256)
Competitive bid a vendor’s best estimate of what a specific
Direct compensation compensation that includes base pay (hourly
item, service, or combination of both will cost an organization
wages or salaried) plus overtime pay for hourly employees. (203)
seeking to purchase, lease, or outsource the item, service, or
Direct liability liability that is embodied in the person who
combination of both. (375)
commits the act in question. (358)
CompStat a policing approach involving the generation of
Directed change a carefully planned, strategic process designed
as much real-time data as possible about crimes and the
to improve every area of a police agency. (148)
frequent evaluation of the data to develop strategies to reduce
Discipline actions taken to correct problematic behavior. (313)
crime as quickly and effectively as possible. (96)
Diversity differences among people with respect to wealth,
Confidential information anything written or spoken that is
age, gender, culture, lifestyle, race, ethnicity, and sexual
intended only for the eyes and/or ears of the receiver. (354)
orientation. (193)
Constructive engagement a coaching and mentoring rapport
that encourages a genuinely warm relationship between E
individuals. (411) Early warning system a set of practices enabling a police
Contingency plan a plan activated during serious emergencies, agency to identify and address problematic behaviors before
critical events, or disasters that affect the agency and demand they can reach disastrous levels. (313)
immediate and/or prolonged response. (92) Education the learning of concepts and development of
Contingency theory theory that attempts to match leaders to problem-solving and critical thinking skills through a school,
specific types of situations. (268) college, or university experience. (243)
Continuous evaluation the process by which an organization, Effectiveness the degree to which objectives are achieved and
on an ongoing basis, measures actual performance outcomes the extent to which targeted problems are resolved. (166)
against intended outcomes to identify and close gaps. (164) Efficiency a comparison of what is actually produced or
Continuous improvement a process through which an performed with what can be achieved with the same
organization repeatedly assesses the effectiveness of the consumption of resources (money, time, and labor). Efficiency
policies and procedures it has established for achieving key is an important factor in determination of productivity. (166)
objectives. (163) Entitlement-oriented compensation automatic pay increases
Contract legally binding, voluntary promise between two or more for employees, along with increases in benefits. (203)
people. (349) ERG theory Clay Alderfer’s framework proposing that human
Cost–benefit analysis an analysis through which an organization beings need elements for physical survival, relatedness, and
compares the cost of a program or initiative to the benefit personal growth. (281)
Ethical leadership ethical behavior on display. (16) Homeland security public and private policies, procedures,
Ethics the philosophical study of conduct that adheres to tactics, strategies, equipment, facilities, and personnel
certain principles of morality. (12) designed or utilized to defend the homeland against domestic-
Evaluation an examination or deliberation to decide the quality, or foreign-initiated threats or hazards (for example, terrorism,
value, criticalness, scope, or necessity of a service or activity; natural or human-caused disasters, and pandemics). (76)
a summary of an assessment’s findings and assignment of a
value to the performance assessed. (163) I
Expectancy theory Victor Vroom’s framework holding that people Immoral political power manipulation of others for personal
will be motivated to deliver their best on the job if they believe gain. (320)
that a specific level of performance will lead to an outcome In-service continuous professional training (CPT) training
that they value highly. (282) designed to enable police practitioners to maintain and
periodically update their skills. (249)
F Incremental change a police agency’s gradual adoption of new
Facilitation a communication skill through which police ways of operating designed to improve community service over
personnel develop solutions to problems. (235) time. (148)
Facilities manager an individual whose basic role is to ensure Indirect compensation compensation that includes items such
that all police property is maintained according to state and as medical and life insurance, paid time off, pensions, flexible
city building codes and safety standards, including those put schedules, education incentives, and a take-home police
forth by the Occupational Safety and Health Administration vehicle. (203)
(OSHA). (381) Intelligence-led policing a strategy that integrates problem-
Feedback a special kind of communication through which oriented policing and zero-tolerance policing through
a sender gives specific information (a response) to a continuous analysis of information about problems and
receiver. (237) development of action plans to resolve problems. (43)
Field training officer (FTO) a knowledgeable, seasoned, and Interaction–expectation theory theory proposing that
competent officer trained in adult education and evaluation leadership is the act of initiating a structure that group
procedures, who supervises recruits’ on-the-job (field) members support. (267)
training. (248) Interagency politics political dynamics taking place in the
Field training program training that focuses on the knowledge, interactions between a police agency and other public safety
skills, and abilities (KSAs) required of a police officer on the organizations in the same jurisdiction. (59)
job. (248) Intergovernment politics political dynamics taking place in
Financial audit an examination of randomly selected accounting interactions between a police agency and other governmental
transactions in an organization with the goal of checking for agencies serving or affecting the same jurisdiction. (61)
accuracy, completeness, and timeliness. (130) Intra-agency politics political dynamics taking place within a
Fraud examination an examination of each accounting transaction police organization. (58)
in an organization in search of any discrepancy. (130)
Futuristics an area of study that uses past and present K
performance, expert opinion, and statistics to describe changes Knowledge management the retention of knowledge most
that may occur in the near and distant future. (396) important to an organization. (410)
G L
General orders a police agency’s documented policies and Law Enforcement Code of Ethics and Law Enforcement Code of
procedures. (298) Conduct codes developed by the International Association of
Goals long-range achievements desired by an organization. (91) Chiefs of Police (IACP) in its early years. (13)
Good faith bargaining behaviors required by the Employee Leader–follower exchange theory theory that examines the
Relations Act of 2000. (344) nature and quality of the relationships between leaders and
Grievance an employee claim that a policy or contract followers. (269)
provision has been misapplied, interpreted incorrectly, or Leadership the art and science of ethically using
violated, thereby causing injury, loss, or inconvenience to the communication, activities, and behaviors to influence, motivate
employee. (347) (not manipulate), or mobilize others to action. (16)
Leadership skill an ability that can be measured
H objectively. (271)
Hierarchy of needs model Abraham Maslow’s framework Learned needs theory David McClelland’s framework suggesting
proposing five needs that human beings attempt to meet in a that human beings have three key needs: affiliation,
specific sequence. (280) achievement, and power. (282)
Lease a procurement arrangement that enables an individual or Nonnegotiable management rights what the management of a
organization to obtain or secure the use of items or property in government agency may do without having to negotiate with a
exchange for payments made at agreed-upon intervals. (370) labor organization. (339)
Level 5 leadership Jim Collins’s concept proposing that leaders Nonverbal communication the use of voluntary and involuntary
channel their ambition toward building a better organization body movements and, in some cases, clothing, hairstyle,
rather than promoting themselves and their personal physical attractiveness, and speaking style, to communicate a
agendas. (289) message. (221)
Line-item budget a budget in which each item is described
and assigned a place (line), with a corresponding dollar
O
O. W. Wilson August Vollmer’s protégé; introduced a merit system
value. (116)
for promotions and other innovations influential in modern
M policing. (10)
Maintenance of effort the annual cost necessary to maintain a Objectives short-term accomplishments that lead to
police agency’s existing level of service for the fiscal operating achievement of a particular goal. (91)
year. (129) Operating budget a short-term budget that accounts
Managerial grid Robert Blake and Jane Mouton’s model for the agency’s current operating expenses as distinct
identifying five leadership styles that vary in concern for people from major financial transactions or permanent capital
and concern for productivity. (284) improvements. (119)
Meta-leadership overarching leadership framework designed to Operational plan a plan delineating functional activities and
link organizational units or organizations; attempts to transcend agency change processes. Drives an entire agency or units
usual organizational confines. (268) within an agency. (92)
Mission a short-range task or assignment an organization Organizational culture shaped by the thoughts, speech, actions,
wishes to achieve. (90) values, and beliefs held by people in the organization. (141)
Moral political power attempts to influence and motivate others Organizational learning a social process in which individuals
with an eye toward achieving organizational goals rather than interact with one another to exchange information that enables
satisfying one’s own interests. (320) them to make well-informed decisions. (151)
Morale the state of the spirits of a person or group as exhibited Organizational structure refers to the configuration of
by confidence, cheerfulness, discipline, and willingness to relationships within an organization. (136)
perform assigned tasks. (306) Outsourcing a process by which a company or government
Motivation–hygiene theory theory proposing which factors entity contracts with another company or government entity
increase satisfaction and dissatisfaction among employees in to provide products or services that were formerly provided or
an organization. (267) performed by the original entity. (371)
N P
National Incident Management System (NIMS) a nationwide Path–goal motivational leadership model R. J. House’s
program by which public safety agencies develop policies framework suggesting that followers will be motivated to give
and processes for collectively preventing and managing their best if they believe that they are capable of performing
emergencies. (77) the tasks assigned, that their efforts will produce certain
Needs assessment the process an organization uses to results, and that the rewards for completing tasks are
determine whether a need (or problem) exists that could be worthwhile. (288)
addressed by a particular course of action. (98) Path–goal theory theory suggesting that a leader’s role is to
Negligence failure to exercise the degree of care that an enhance followers’ performance by motivating them and by
ordinary, reasonable, and prudent person would demonstrate rewarding achievement of goals. (268)
under the same circumstances. (358) Performance appraisal assessment of an individual’s job
Negotiable management rights areas wherein nothing in Title 5 performance in an organization. (300)
precludes an agency or a labor organization from negotiating Performance-based budget a budget that links measurable
the numbers, types, and grades (ranks) of employees or activities to established strategic objectives. (116)
positions assigned to any organizational subdivision, work Personal–situational theory theory proposing that a mix of
project, or tour of duty; the technology, methods, and means of personal characteristics interact with specific conditions in an
performing work; or the procedures an agency uses to exercise individual’s environment to produce leadership. (267)
authority. (339) Persuasion the ability to influence outcomes, using methods
Nondirected change an informal process of altering the way other than the issuance of direct orders. (236)
tasks are accomplished, affecting only those individuals who Planning a process, formulation, or design used to achieve an
will implement the change. (149) intended result. (87)
Situational leadership model Paul Hersey and Ken Blanchard’s Theory Y Douglas McGregor’s description of a motivational
model suggesting four leadership styles delegating, management style in organizations. (283)
supportive, selling, and telling. (285) Theory Z William Ouchi’s adaptation of Theory Y emphasizing a
Situational theory theory proposing that different situations leadership style that advocates trusting followers and enabling
demand different styles of leadership. (268) them to feel they are part of the organization. (284)
Span of control the idea that each manager in a police agency Tort a private wrong committed against a person or a person’s
should supervise only a reasonable number of individuals or property. (352)
units. (136) Total quality leadership the commitment and behavior needed
Special populations populations that include people with to carry out and integrate TQM practices throughout a police
hearing or visual impairments, developmental disabilities, agency. (173)
mental illnesses or substance-abuse problems, and those who Total quality management (TQM) a performance-management
present an immediate danger to themselves or others. (228) framework that can help a police agency take a disciplined
Standardized Emergency Management System (SEMS) a approach to quality control and assurance. (171)
set of guidelines that aims to ensure that state-level Toxic management a situation in which a manager exhibits
agencies’ emergency management system comply with NIMS poor judgment and negative behaviors, has no skill at building
guidelines. (79) rapport and positive relationships, and cannot cultivate an
Strategic plans long-term courses of action intended to apply to environment of mutual respect. (291)
the entire police organization. (93) Traditional budget a budget that reflects a simple percentage
Strategic policing an approach that seeks to integrate proven increase in funding over the most recent budget. (115)
private- and public-sector management techniques with public Traditional policing an authoritarian, paramilitary strategy
policing strategy. (45) developed to mitigate corruption in the police service. (29)
Stress management a blend of prevention, training, and Training knowledge and skill development and on-the-job
intervention programs that a police agency puts in place to preparation. (243)
mitigate dangerous levels of stress among officers. (315) Trait theory theory that seeks to identify the individual traits
Strict liability liability for damages, injury, or loss regardless of distinguishing leaders from followers. (266)
the person’s culpability (blame or fault). (358) Transactional theory process in which the leader and follower
Succession management preparation of individuals in a police make simple exchanges or transactions (e.g., money for work
agency who are interested in leadership for higher-level completed). (269)
management and supervisory positions as well as specialized Transformational theory theory that proposes a process through
assignments. (302) which leaders engage others and create a connection that
Succession planning activities intended to ensure that enhances motivation and morality in themselves as well as
adequate qualified personnel are available to replace those followers. (269)
who vacate positions through promotion, transfer, retirement,
termination, or agency expansion; the identification of high- U
potential employees in a police agency and the provision of Unfair labor practices actions taken by unions or employers
training, coaching, and developmental opportunities needed to that violate the U.S. National Labor Relations Act
enable them to move into influential or specialized positions. (NLRA). (337)
(256 & 302) Unity of command the concept that each individual working
in the agency should report to only one supervisor and that
T each unit or situation should be under the control of a single
Tactical plan a plan for special events, unique or extraordinary individual. (136)
circumstances, or intra-agency or interagency operational
needs. (92) V
Task force a temporary working group assembled to address Value-added contribution (VAC) additional value (beyond basic
a specific problem or manage a particular event requiring requirements) that an activity contributes to a program or
specialized expertise. (260) service. (127)
Team a group of people who receive specialized training and use Values fundamental beliefs, principles, or standards that an
that training to address a specific incident. (259) individual or members of an organization regard as desirable
Team policing and neighborhood policing examples of how or worthwhile. (89)
community policing may be implemented to address problems Variable compensation compensation that is tied to personal,
on a small scale. (39) team, or organizational performance and that may include
Theory X Douglas McGregor’s model describing command-and- bonuses and incentives for special assignments as well as shift
control management style in an organization. (283) differential. (203)
Chapter 2
Page 28: © Spencer Grant/Alamy; 30: © North Wind Picture Archives/Alamy;
31: © Brand X Pictures; 33: © Peter Casolino/Alamy; 38: © Brand X Pictures;
39: © S. Meltzer/PhotoLink/Getty Images; 41: © The McGraw-Hill Companies,
Inc./John Flournoy, photographer; 42: © Robert Maass/Corbis; 43: © Joel Gordon;
45: © Jim West/Alamy; 46: © David McNew/Getty Images.
Chapter 3
Page 51: © Glow Images/Getty Images; 56: © Scott Olson/Getty Images; 59: © The
McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc./Rick Brady, photographer; 60: © Jeff Greenberg/
PhotoEdit; 61: © David R. Frazier Photolibrary, Inc.; 64: © Lars A. Niki; 66: ©
Gilles Mingasson/Getty Images; 67: © epa/Corbis; 69: © Mikael Karlsson/Arresting
Images; 73: © Thinkstock/PunchStock; 76: © David Allocca/Timepix/Time Life
Pictures/Getty Images.
Chapter 4
Page 86: © Jeff Zelevansky/Getty Images; 88: © Douglas Graham/Roll Call/Getty
Images; 89: © Lorenzo Ciniglio/Sygma/Corbis; 93: © Mikael Karlsson; 95: ©
imagebroker/Alamy; 97: © Robert Nickelsberg/Getty Images; 98: © Mike Powell/
Stone/Getty Images; 100: © Scott J. Ferrell/Congressional Quarterly/Getty Images;
101: © Spencer Platt/Getty Images; 103: © Skip Nall/Getty Images; 105: © Ryan
McVay/Getty Images.
Chapter 5
Page 109: © Nick Scalera/Express-Times/Landov; 111: © Reed Kaestner/Corbis;
112: © Michal Czerwonka/Getty Images; 113: © Michael Newman/PhotoEdit;
115: © Mario Tama/Getty Images; 117: © Gene Blevins/LA DailyNews/Corbis;
119: © Peter Cavanagh/Alamy; 120: © Ricky Carioti/Washington Post/Getty
Images; 123: © Dennis MacDonald/Alamy; 124: © Mikael Karlsson/Arresting
Images; 126: © Stephen Chernin/Getty Images.
Chapter 6
Page 134: © Jeff Greenberg/Alamy; 137: © Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images;
139: AP Photo/Prescott Courier, Jo. L. Keener; 140: © Bill Clark/Roll Call/Getty
Images; 142: © Tom Williams/Roll Call/Getty Images; 143: © Timothy A. Clary/
AFP/Getty Images; 144: AP Photo/Mary Altaffer; 145: AP Photo/John Bazemore;
453
Chapter 7
Page 161: © Vic Yepello/Star Ledger/Corbis; 163: © Robert W. Ginn/PhotoEdit;
165: © Bill O’Leary/The Washington Post/Getty Images; 166: © Manfred J. Bail/
Westend61/Corbis; 167: © Chris Hondros/Getty Images; 168: © Shout/Alamy;
169: © James Shaffer/PhotoEdit; 171: © Image Source/Getty Images; 172: © Jon
Feingersh/Blend Images/Getty Images; 174: © Reuters/Corbis; 175: © Bill Varie/
Workbook Stock/Getty Images; 176: © Ted Soqui/Ted Soqui Photography USA/
Corbis; 178: © Marjorie Kamys Cotera/BDP, Inc.
Chapter 8
Page 184: © Stephen Chernin/Getty Images; 186: AP Photo/Charles Bennett;
189: © Spencer Grant/PhotoEdit; 192: © Mark Ralston/AFP/Getty Images; 193:
© Annie Griffiths Belt/Corbis; 194: © Jahi Chikwendiu/The Washington Post/
Getty Images; 196: © David McNew/Getty Images; 198: © Jeff Greenberg/Alamy;
199: AP Photo/The Daily News-Record, Mike Tripp; 200: © Zuma/Newscom;
204: © Linda Davidson/The Washington Post/Getty Images; 205: © Tom Carter/
PhotoEdit.
Chapter 9
Page 209: AP Photo/Tom Gannam; 212: © Kayte Deioma/PhotoEdit; 213: © Ed
Kashi/Corbis; 215: © Art Directors & TRIP/Alamy; 216: © Mitch Wojnarowicz/
The Image Works; 218: © Jacksonville Journal/Robert Leistra/The Image Works;
220: © Benjamin Lowy/Corbis; 221: © John Moore/Getty Images; 225: AP Photo/
David Kohl; 226: © Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images; 229: © Tami Chappell/
Reuters/Corbis; 232: © Tom Carter/PhotoEdit; 233: © NY Daily News Archive via
Getty Images; 235: © St. Petersburg Times/Jim Damaske/The Image Works; 237: ©
David Greedy/Getty Images.
Chapter 10
Page 242: © David McNew/Newsmakers/Getty Images; 244: (top) © Linda
Davidson/Washington Post/Getty Images (bottom) © Mario Tama/Getty Images;
245: © Sandy Huffaker/Corbis; 249: © Stan Honda/AFP/Getty Images; 250: ©
Mario Tama/Getty Images; 252: © David McNew/Newsmakers; 253: © Joe Raedle/
Getty Images; 257: © Tim Sloan/AFP/Getty Images; 259: © KRT Photos/Newscom;
260: © Paul J. Richards/AFP/Getty Images; 261: © Matthew Mcvay/Corbis.
Chapter 11
Page 264: AP Photo/Mankato Free Press, Pat Christman; 267: © Tim Boyle/
Getty Images; 271: (top) © Jake Schoellkopf/Getty Images (bottom) © Robert
Wagenhoffer/Corbis; 272: © Dennis Brack/Bloomberg via Getty Images; 274: AP
Photo/Jim Cole; 277: © Rick Friedman/Corbis; 279: © Tomas Bravo/Reuters/
Corbis; 287: © Steven Georges/Press-Telegram/Corbis; 290: © David R. Frazier
Photolibrary, Inc./Alamy.
Chapter 12
Page 296: © Spencer Grant/Alamy; 299: © David McNew/Getty Images; 303: AP
Photo/Al Goldis; 304: © Spencer Grant/Alamy; 305: © Bob Daemmrich/The Image
Works; 307: AP Photo/The Plain Dealer, Roadell Hickman; 308: AP Photo/The
Guymon Daily Herald, Shawn Yorks; 310: © John Moore/Getty Images; 312: ©
Mikael Karlsson/Alamy; 314: © Irwin Thompson/Dallas Morning News/Corbis;
317: © Michael Newman/PhotoEdit; 318: © Marvin Joseph/The Washington Post/
Getty Images; 319: AP Photo/Reed Saxon.
Chapter 13
Page 326: © Ron Chapple/Taxi/Getty Images; 329: © Fotosearch/Stringer/Getty
Images; 331: © liquidlibrary/PictureQuest; 333: © Darrin Klimek/Getty Images;
335: © Lebrecht Music and Arts Photo Library/Alamy; 336: © Bettmann/Corbis;
340: AP Photo; 343: © Keith Brofsky/Getty Images; 345: © Tom Carter/Alamy; 348:
© Polka Dot Images/Jupiterimages; 349: © Stockbyte/Getty Images; 351: © George
Frey/Bloomberg via Getty Images; 352: © The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc./Gary
He, photographer; 353: © Photodisc/PunchStock; 356: © Benjamin Lowy/Corbis;
357: © Brand X Pictures; 360: © Steve Allen/Getty Images.
Chapter 14
Page 366: © Owaki/Kulla/Corbis; 369: © Chris Maddaloni/Roll Call/Getty Images;
371: © Gabriel Bouys/AFP/Getty Images; 373: © Syracuse Newspaper/John Berry/
The Image Works; 374: © The Washington Post/Getty Images; 376: © Spencer
Grant/PhotoEdit; 378: © Mandel Ngan/AFP/Getty Images; 380: © Alfredo Sosa/
The Christian Science Monitor via Getty Images; 381: © Richard A. Lipski/The
Washington Post/Getty Images; 384: © Tracy A. Woodward/The Washington
Post/Getty Images; 385: © Shepard Sherbell/Corbis Saba; 386: © Kayte Deioma/
PhotoEdit.
Chapter 15
Page 394: © Spencer Grant/PhotoEdit; 398: © Brian Bates/Getty Images; 400: ©
Shannon Stapleton/Reuters/Corbis; 401: © Al Rai Al Aam/Feature Story News/
Getty Images; 405: © David Butow/Corbis Saba; 407: © Michael Newman/
PhotoEdit; 409: © Mark Wilson/Getty Images; 420: © Ted Soqui/Corbis; 422: ©
Erik S. Lesser/epa/Corbis; 423: © Robyn Beck/AFP/Getty Images; 424: © Orion
Pictures Corporation/Photofest; 425: © Bob Daemmrich/PhotoEdit.
457
facilities manager, 380–383, 385–386 change leadership, 416–419 High-speed police vehicle pursuits,
future directions, 420–421 communication, 411–412 72, 360–361
maintaining agency sites, 381–383 counterterrorism/homeland security, High-speed pursuit simulation, 201
new/renovated facilities, 383–385 399–404 Higher education, 251
site survey, 385–386 cybercrime, 424–428 Hiring practices, 74, 184–208, 408
technology, 387–390 ethics and professionalism, 397–399 assessment center process, 200–201
types of police facilities, 380 facilities management, 420–421 brand image, 192–193
Facilities manager, 380–383, 385–386 famous prognosticators, 395 civil work environment, 204–206
defined, 381 hiring, 408 compensation and benefit packages,
Fadishness, 291 leadership, 413–416 203–204
Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA), 338 police unions, 419–420 diversity, 187, 193–194, 332–334
False imprisonment, 352 street crime technology, 422–424 educational level, 194–195
Familiarity, 66–67 training, 409–411 human resources needs assessment,
Family and Medical Leave Act, 332 Futuristics (defined), 396 187–188
Family program, 318 job posting, 190–191
Fear-based power, 278 G minimum hiring standards, 188–189
Federal Emergency Management Agency Gated community, 405 pre-employment screening, 196–200
(FEMA), 401 Gen Y recruits, 187 recruitment, 189–195
Federal employment laws, 328–332 General equivalency diploma (GED) selecting new hires, 195–204
Federal grant, 123 programs, 26 selection mistakes, 201–202
Feedback, 237–238 General orders, 298–300 underrepresented groups, 193
defined, 237 defined, 298 Historical overview
FEMA, 401 Geographic information system (GIS) 1850–1930 (from community service
Field training officer (FTO) (defined), 248 technology, 43 to crime fighting), 8–10
Field training program (defined), 248 GIS technology, 43 1930–1980 (widening array of policing
Final decision, 345 Giuliani, Rudy, 41 strategies), 10–11
Financial audit (defined), 130 Glossary, 445–451 1980–present (flexibility and
Fines and fees, 121–123 Goals (defined), 91 transition), 11–12
Firearms range, 120 Goldstein, Herman, 36 Boston police strike (1919), 336–337
Firearms training, 244 Good faith (defined), 344 emergence of formal police
Fiscal management. See Budgeting and Good to Great and the Social Sectors organizations, 7–8
fiscal management (Collins), 289 Metropolitan Police Act, 5
FLSA, 338 Grant, 123–125, 388–390 Peel’s principles, 6
Follow-up investigation, 148 Grant application, 389 traditional policing, 30
FOP, 336 Grantor, 123 unions, 335–337
Force, 67–68, 247 Grapevine, 225–226 Wickersham Commission, 9
Forensic latent fingerprint expert, 124 Green River killer, 260, 261 Hitler, Adolf, 279
Forfeiture laws, 125 Grievance, 347–349 HITS, 392–393
Formal authority, 278 defined, 347 Home computers, 426–427
Formal communication channels, 213 Gross negligence, 359 Homeland security
Formal incentives, 203 Guild, 335 all-hazards approach, 401, 402
Fraternal Order of Police (FOP), 336 Gun buy-back program, 174 defined, 76
Fraternal organizations, 336 Gunshot detection sensor, 423 DHS, 76
Fraud, 426 local police, 402
Fraud examination (defined), 130 H NIMS, 77–79
Freud, Sigmund, 270 Hasan, Nidal Malik, 400 phases of emergency management, 77
FTO, 248 Heifetz, Ronald, 268 SEMS, 79–80
Fuel costs, 114 Henry II, 7 Homicide investigation tracking system
Fund-raising program, 125 Hersey, Paul, 268, 285 (HITS), 392–393
Funding, 61 Hersey’s situational leadership model, Hoover, Herbert, 9
Funding a zero-tolerance initiative, 133 285–286 Hoover, J. Edgar, 10
Future of police administration, 394–432 Herzberg, Frederick, 267–268 Horizontal communication, 212
assessment and evaluation, 406–408 Hierarchy of needs, 280–281 Horizontal relationships, 138
budgeting, 404–406 defined, 280 House, R. J., 288
Legal considerations, 326–365 Media conference, 232–233 National Strategy for Homeland
administrative law, 350–351 Mediation, 348 Security, 76
affirmative action, 332–333 Medical evaluation, 199 Natural access control, 95–96
civil lawsuits, 357–358 Medical examiner, 155 Natural surveillance, 95
contract law, 349–350 Meese, Edwin, III, 272 Needed change, 164
how to minimize exposure, 361–362 Meet-and-confer, 345 Needs assessment, 98–99
labor organizations. See Unionization Meeting, 223–224 defined, 98
liability management, 357–362 Meeting agenda, 223–224 Negligence, 353, 358–359, 361
national employment laws, 328–332 Mental illness, 361 defined, 358
negligence, 358–359 Mentoring, 71, 276 Negotiable management rights, 339–340
privacy law, 354–357 Merit pay, 203 defined, 339
property law, 351–352 Meta-leadership theory, 268–269 Neighborhood block party, 94
proximate cause, 360–361 defined, 268 Neighborhood Crime Watch sign, 39
sexual harassment, 359–360 Metropolitan Police Act, 5, 7 Neighborhood deterioration, 41
tort law, 352–354 Middle-of-the-road management style, 285 Neighborhood policing, 39–40
Less-than-lethal weapons, 67 Military-style police training, 206 Neighborhood risk, 100
Level 5 leadership, 289–290 Military-style stress program, 248 Neighborhood Watch, 405
defined, 289 Minimum hiring standards, 188–189 Neighborhood watch program, 39
Levin, Bud, 425, 427, 428 Minutes (meeting), 224 Nepotism, 291
Lewin basic change model, 418 Miranda warning, 18 Net-centric, 414
Liability lawsuits, 68 Miscellaneous expenses, 121, 122 Networking, 57
Liability management, 357–362 Misguided assumptions, 291 New/renovated facilities, 383–385
Libel, 354 Mission (defined), 90 New York City, 41, 42
Licensing boards, 251 Mission statement, 90 New York City Police Department
Line-item budget (defined), 116 Misuse of force, 67–68 (NYPD), 334
Line operations, 22 Mitigating emergencies, 77 Newer strategies, 11
Listening, 220–221 Mobile police communications units, 422 News media, 231–234
Local police department outsourcing, Moral political power (defined), 320 Newsgroup, 230
372–374 Morale (defined), 306 Newsletter, 224–225
Long-range acoustic device, 144 Morality, 12, 143 NIMS, 77–79
Long-term, big-picture view, 88 Motivation–hygiene theory, 267–268 NIMS ongoing management and
Loyalty, 83 defined, 267 maintenance component, 79
LPO program, 415 Motivation skills, 273, 274–275 NIMS supporting-technologies
Motivational tool, 308–309 component, 79
M Motivators, 267 9-1-1 emergency communications
Maintenance of effort (defined), 129 Motley, Joyce, 45 center, 373
Malthus, Thomas, 395 Mouton, Jane, 284 9/11 attacks, 76
Management of police misconduct, Multi-agency coordination system, 78 “No comment” statement, 233
310–314 Multitasking, 64 Noncredible source, 216–217
Management rights, 339–340 Nondirected change (defined), 149
Manager, 21, 275 N Nonmonetary compensation, 204
Managerial grid, 284–285 National Advisory Commission on Civil Nonnegotiable management rights
defined, 284 Disorders, 11 (defined), 339
Managing criminal investigations (MCI), National Advisory Commission on Criminal Nonverbal communication, 221–222
147, 148 Justice Standards and Goals, 11 defined, 221
Managing projects, 129 National Chiefs of Police Union, 8 Norris-LaGuardia Act, 338
Mapping software, 43, 99 National Commission on Law Observance North Miami Beach Citizens Patrol
Maslow’s hierarchy of needs, 280–281 and Enforcement (Wickersham volunteers, 60
Matching resources, 123 Commission), 9 Nostradamus, 395
McClelland, David, 282 National employment laws, 328–332 NYPD, 334
McGregor, Douglas, 283 National Incident Management System
MCI, 147, 148 (NIMS), 77–79 O
McVeigh, Timothy, 400 defined, 77 Object-of-expenditure budget, 116
Media, 231–234 National Labor Relations Act, 338 Objectives (defined), 91
Safety laws, 431–432 Solvability factors, 148 SWAT team, 93, 257
SARA problem-solving model, 36–37 Sorokin, Pitirim, 395 SWOT analysis, 47
Saturation patrol tactics, 42 Sources of revenue, 121–125
Scuba team, 260 Span of control, 136–137 T
Scuttlebutt, 225 defined, 136 Tactical plan (defined), 92
Seavey, Webber, 8 Special assignments, 257 Tactical (SWAT) team, 93
Security needs, 281 Special populations, 228–229 Taft–Hartley Act, 338
Segmenting police services, 175–176 defined, 228 Taglines, 193
Selecting new hires, 195–204 Speck, Richard B., 10 Talent retention, 306–308
Selection mistakes, 201–202 Stakeholder priorities, 104 Tangible property, 351
Self-actualization needs, 281 Standardized emergency management Target, 170
Self-contained ethical leadership agent system (SEMS), 79–80 Target hardening, 96
(defined), 4 defined, 79 Taser, 67, 69, 104
Self-definition, 321 Standards of conduct, 145 Task assignment, 257
Self-directed learning, 253 Stanley, Jay, 424 Task behavior, 266
Self-management, 104–105 State-level emergency management, 79–80 Task force (defined), 260
defined, 105 Status quo, 415 Tax revenue, 121–122
Selling style, 286 Strategic initiatives, 170 Team (defined), 259
SEMS, 79–80 Strategic objective, 169 Team management style, 285
Seniority rules, 257 Strategic plan (defined), 93 Team policing and neighborhood policing,
Seniors on Patrol project, 159–160 Strategic policing, 45–48 39–40
Sense of urgency, 150 defined, 45 defined, 39
September 11 terrorist attacks, 76 Strategic project, 257 Technology, 72–73, 387–390, 422–424.
Servant as Leader, The (Greenleaf), 289 Strategy. See Policing strategy See also Cybercrime
Servant leadership (defined), 289 Strategy meeting, 134 Telling style, 286
Service contract, 376–377 Street crime technology, 422–424 Terminology (glossary), 445–451
defined, 376 Street intervention workers, 26, 27 Territorial reinforcement, 95
Service delivery location, 176 Street officer, 144–145 Terrorism, 75–76, 403–404. See also
Service delivery method, 176 Stress management, 314–319 Counterterrorism; Homeland security
Service deployment hours, 176 defined, 315 Terrorist groups, 401
Service process type, 176 Stress-related training, 248 Texas Rangers, 7–8
Sexual harassment, 359–360 Strict liability (defined), 358 Theory X (defined), 283
defined, 359 Structure, 136–141 Theory Y, 283–284
Shazad, Faisal, 400 Subdivision of police facilities, 421 defined, 283
Shift work, 258 Subject-matter certifications, 253 Theory Z (defined), 284
Sierra Madre, 374–375 Subject-matter expert (SME), 251 Title IX of 1972, Education Amendments,
Significant-other training, 318 Substance-abuse treatment, 26 330
Simple negligence, 359 Substation building, 380 Tort (defined), 352
Simulations, 200–201 Succession management, 302–306 Tort law, 352–354
Sincerity, 57–58 defined, 302 Total package decision, 345
Single-use plan (defined), 92 Succession planning (defined), 256, 302 Total quality leadership (defined), 173
Site survey, 385–386 Summary schedule, 121 Total quality management (TQM), 171–173
defined, 385 Supervision, 275. See also Leadership and defined, 171
Situational leadership model, 285–286 supervision Town meeting, 152
defined, 285 Supervision management and recidivist Toxic management (defined), 291
Situational theory (defined), 268 tracking (SMART), 392–393 TQM, 171–173
SkySeer, 422–423 Supervisor, 21 Traditional budget, 115–116
Slander, 354 Supplemental data, 121 defined, 115
SMART, 392–393 Supplies and material expenses, 121, 122 Traditional command-and-control culture,
SME, 251 Supportive style, 285 141–143
Social services approach, 38 Surveillance equipment, 95 Traditional policing
Social worker (police officer), 64 Surveillance kites, 422–423 advantages/disadvantages, 31–32
Socrates, 12 Survey, 35 defined, 29
Sole source, 368 Sutton, Randy, 321 defining characteristics, 30–31