Amputaciones de La Ext Inferior
Amputaciones de La Ext Inferior
Amputaciones de La Ext Inferior
Lower limb amputations are the most common of all ampu- Younger patients with traumatic amputations or amputa-
tations. Despite advances in revascularization techniques, tions required for tumor treatment are more successful with
the most common indication for lower extremity amputation prosthetic use than are patients with amputations of dysvascu-
remains a dysvascular limb, including that caused by diabe- lar limbs; dialysis patients are even less successful with pros-
tes mellitus and peripheral vascular disease. Peripheral vas- theses. In dysvascular limbs, the level of amputation is critical
cular disease from all causes affects over 8 million Americans. because of poor wound healing. The most distal level should
The rate of lower extremity amputation in this population is be chosen where the wound will have the best chance of heal-
around 4 per 1000. Amputation of the contralateral limb is ing. This decision process can be augmented using clinical
necessary within 5 years in 30% to 50% of patients who have tools such as transcutaneous oxygen tension, determining the
an amputation of a dysvascular lower limb. Twenty percent of nutritional status of patients (albumin level of >3 g/dL, lym-
below-knee amputations are converted to above-knee ampu- phocyte count of >1500/mL) and preoperative medical frailty.
tations. Over 50% of nontraumatic amputations occur from Amputation should not be viewed as a failed limb sal-
diabetes-related pathology. In the diabetic population, first- vage or reconstruction. The amputation must be viewed as
year mortality rates after amputation are reported to be as high an opportunity to reestablish or enhance a patient’s func-
as 40%, while overall mortality rates range from 60% to 70%. tional level and facilitate a return to near-normal locomotion.
The number of amputations for causes other than diabe- Transtibial amputation after failed attempted limb preserva-
tes and vascular disease, such as tumors and infection, has tion can still be successful in improving pain, decreasing nar-
decreased in the United States because of surgical and medi- cotic use, and improving function. This is especially true in
cal advances. In war-torn countries, improvised explosive the young, highly active trauma population. Meticulous sur-
devices and land mines continue to be frequent causes of gical attention is necessary to provide an optimal base of sup-
traumatic amputations. Also, a high rate of combat-related port because the residual limb functions as a “sensorimotor
lower extremity amputations remains in the military popula- end organ” with tolerance requirements at the stump-pros-
tion. Current level I and II studies are underway to investigate thesis interface to meet the dynamic weight-bearing chal-
optimal lower extremity amputation techniques in this highly lenges of ambulation. Anesthesia pain specialty teams often
active population. are helpful in the management of postoperative pain.
We advocate a multidisciplinary approach to the medi- Developments in the prosthetic field range from early-stage
cal management of lower extremity amputations. Diabetic fitting techniques (computer-assisted stump contour scanning)
patients and those with vascular insufficiency who have had to the use of advanced prosthetic components (lighter materi-
lower extremity amputation demonstrate high rates of 30-day als, silicone gel liners, computer-assisted knee units, suspension
mortality, stump complications, and hospital readmissions. device alternatives, and ankle-foot accommodative and energy
Associated coronary artery disease and end-stage renal dis- storage systems). Osseointegrated prosthetic components have
ease are predictors for perioperative medical complications been investigated over the past several decades in transfemoral
and hospital readmissions. and transtibial amputees. Potential advantages include improved
The level of amputation is always a difficult decision and quality of life and body image, increased proximal joint range
has a major effect on a patient’s quality of life. Morbidity is of motion, greater prosthetic comfort, better osseoperception,
more frequent after transfemoral amputations than after trans- and improved walking ability. Minor complications include
tibial amputations. Energy expenditure is an important con- frequent superficial infections and stump irritation, and rare
sideration in choosing the level of amputation. The increased major complications include deep infection, osteomyelitis, peri-
energy consumption of bipedal locomotion for transtibial implant fracture, and failure of osseointegration. Tillander et al.
amputees ranges from 40% to 50%, compared with 90% to reported a 20% cumulative risk of developing osteomyelitis.
100% in transfemoral amputees. Patients with transfemoral
amputations are less likely to use a prosthesis successfully and
consistently than are patients with more distal amputations. FOOT AND ANKLE AMPUTATIONS
Higher-level amputations, even in children, are associated Amputations around the foot and ankle are discussed in
with a decline in physical function and quality of life. Chapter 15.
720
Descargado para Roberto Eljadue ([email protected]) en University of Cartagena de ClinicalKey.es por Elsevier en mayo 09, 2021. Para uso
personal exclusivamente. No se permiten otros usos sin autorización. Copyright ©2021. Elsevier Inc. Todos los derechos reservados.
CHAPTER 16 AMPUTATIONS OF THE LOWER EXTREMITY 721
Descargado para Roberto Eljadue ([email protected]) en University of Cartagena de ClinicalKey.es por Elsevier en mayo 09, 2021. Para uso
personal exclusivamente. No se permiten otros usos sin autorización. Copyright ©2021. Elsevier Inc. Todos los derechos reservados.
722 PART VI AMPUTATIONS
mark the periosteum with a cut to establish a point for a level just proximal to the level of intended bone section.
future measurement. Exert gentle traction on the nerve and divide it proximally
n
mally as in the anterior incision (see Fig 16.2A). gin 1.9 cm proximal to the level of the bone section and
Deepen the posterior incision down through the deep fas-
n cut obliquely distalward to cross this level 0.5 cm anterior
cia, but do not separate the skin or deep fascia from the to the medullary cavity.
underlying muscle. Section the tibia transversely and section the fibula 1.2 cm
n
Reflect as a single layer with the anterior flap the deep fascia
n proximally.
and periosteum over the anteromedial surface of the tibia. Grasp their distal segments with a bone-holding forceps
n
Amputation 4 cm
level
Periosteum
marked
8 cm
Skin flap
incision
A 4 cm
B C
FIGURE 16.2 Amputation through middle third of leg for nonischemic limbs. A, Fashioning
of equal anterior and posterior skin flaps, each one half anteroposterior diameter of leg at level of
bone section. B, Fashioning of posterior myofascial flap. C, Suture of myofascial flap to periosteum
anteriorly. SEE TECHNIQUE 16.1.
Descargado para Roberto Eljadue ([email protected]) en University of Cartagena de ClinicalKey.es por Elsevier en mayo 09, 2021. Para uso
personal exclusivamente. No se permiten otros usos sin autorización. Copyright ©2021. Elsevier Inc. Todos los derechos reservados.
CHAPTER 16 AMPUTATIONS OF THE LOWER EXTREMITY 723
0.6 cm distal to the level of bone section so that they sected tibia; with a burr, create notches in the fibula and
retract flush with the end of the bone. This exposes the tibia for placement of the cut fibular autograft strut (Fig.
posterior tibial and peroneal vessels and the tibial nerve 16.3C,D).
lying on the gastrocnemius-soleus muscle group. Doubly Drill holes to accommodate heavy suture passage: two in
n
ligate and divide the vessels and section the nerve so that the medial tibia, two in the medial fibular autograft, two
its cut end retracts well proximal to the end of the bone. in the lateral fibular autograft, and two in the distal fibula
With a large amputation knife, bevel the gastrocnemius-
n (screw fixation may alternatively be used; Fig. 16.3E).
soleus muscle mass so that it forms a myofascial flap long Secure the autograft strut with heavy suture and sew the
n
enough to reach across the end of the tibia to the anterior tibial periosteal sleeve around the strut distally. Autogenous
fascia (Fig. 16.2B). bone graft may augment the distal bone bridge if necessary.
Smoothly round the ends of the tibia and fibula with a
n Release the tourniquet and achieve hemostasis.
n
rasp and irrigate the wound to remove all bone dust. Mobilize the peroneal musculature distally to cover the
n
of the bones and suture it to the deep fascia and the periosteum and close the subcutaneous tissues. Use non-
periosteum anteriorly (Fig. 16.2C). absorbable stitches in a mattress fashion to close the skin.
Place a plastic suction drainage tube deep to the muscle
n
flap and fascia and bring it out laterally through the skin
10 to 12 cm proximal to the end of the stump.
Fashion the skin flaps as necessary for smooth closure
n
without tension and suture them together with inter- REHABILITATION IN NONISCHEMIC LIMBS
rupted nonabsorbable sutures. Rehabilitation after transtibial amputation in a nonisch-
emic limb is fairly aggressive unless the patient is immu-
nocompromised, there are skin graft issues, or there are
concomitant injuries or medical conditions that preclude
early initiation of physical therapy. An immediate post-
operative rigid dressing helps control edema, limits knee
TECHNIQUE 16.2 flexion contracture, and protects the limb from external
trauma.
(MODIFIED ERTL; TAYLOR AND POKA) A prosthetist can be helpful with such casting and can
Place the patient supine on a radiolucent bed; a tourni-
n apply a jig that allows attachment and alignment for early
quet is used for hemostasis. pylon use. Weight bearing is limited initially, with bilateral
Make an anterior incision at the level of the intended tibial
n upper extremity support from parallel bars, a walker, or
resection and a posterior flap incision. The posterior flap crutches. The dressing is changed every 5 to 7 days for skin
should measure 1 cm more than the diameter of the leg care. Within 3 to 4 weeks, the rigid dressing can be changed to
at the level of bone division (Fig. 16.3A). a removable temporary prosthesis if there are no skin compli-
Sharply incise the anterior compartment fascia, transect
n cations. The patient is shown the proper use of elastic wrap-
the musculature of the anterior compartment, and ligate ping or a stump shrinker to control edema and help contour
the anterior neurovascular bundle. the residual limb when not wearing the prosthesis. The phys-
Identify the saphenous nerve, transect it proximally under
n iatrist and therapist can assist in monitoring progress through
tension, and allow it to retract. the various transitions of temporary prosthetics to the per-
Identify the tibial resection site and elevate an osteoperi-
n manent design, which may take several months. Endoskeletal
osteal sleeve proximal to the intended transection level designs have been more frequently used because modifi-
both anteriorly and posteriorly before making the tibial cations are simpler. Formal inpatient rehabilitation is brief,
cut (Fig. 16.3B). with most prosthetic training done on an outpatient basis.
Measure the medial-to-lateral distance between the tibia
n A program geared toward returning the patient to his or her
and fibula at the area of transection and transect the previous occupation, hobbies, and educational pursuits can
peroneal muscle and fibula at this distance distal to the be structured with the help of a social worker, occupational
transected tibia. therapist, and vocational counselor.
Transect the peroneal musculature and ligate the lateral
n
Descargado para Roberto Eljadue ([email protected]) en University of Cartagena de ClinicalKey.es por Elsevier en mayo 09, 2021. Para uso
personal exclusivamente. No se permiten otros usos sin autorización. Copyright ©2021. Elsevier Inc. Todos los derechos reservados.
724 PART VI AMPUTATIONS
C
FIGURE 16.3 Modified Ertl technique. A, Skin incision marked to create long posterior flap.
B, Elevation of osteoperiosteal flap from the tibia. C, Provisional notch created in distal tibia and
fibula for fibular strut. D, Fibular strut placed into the tibial and fibular notches. E, Fibular strut
secured via sutures through bone tunnels. (A, B, and E, From: Taylor BC, Poka A: Osteomyoplastic
transtibial amputation: the Ertl technique, J Am Acad Orthop Surg 24:259, 2016. C and D, From Taylor BC,
Poka A: Osteomyoplastic transtibial amputation: technique and tips, J Orthop Surg Res 6:13, 2011.) SEE
TECHNIQUE 16.2.
as described by Persson, skew flaps, and long medial flaps to concerns of blood flow restriction. However, recent data
are being used. All techniques stress the need for preserving demonstrate that the Ertl procedure may be safe in these
intact the vascular connections between skin and muscle by high-risk patients.
avoiding dissection along tissue planes and by constructing Traditionally, tourniquets have not been used in the
myocutaneous flaps. Also, amputations performed in isch- amputation of dysvascular limbs to avoid damage to more
emic limbs are customarily at a higher level (e.g., 10 to 12.5 proximal diseased arteries. However, recent studies (includ-
cm distal to the joint line) than amputations in nonischemic ing randomized controlled trials) demonstrate decreased
limbs. Tension myodesis and osteomyoplasty, which may blood loss, decreased postoperative transfusion rates, and no
be of value in young, vigorous patients, historically have increased risk of vascular or wound complications with the
been contraindicated in patients with ischemic limbs due use of a tourniquet.
Descargado para Roberto Eljadue ([email protected]) en University of Cartagena de ClinicalKey.es por Elsevier en mayo 09, 2021. Para uso
personal exclusivamente. No se permiten otros usos sin autorización. Copyright ©2021. Elsevier Inc. Todos los derechos reservados.
CHAPTER 16 AMPUTATIONS OF THE LOWER EXTREMITY 725
higher, section the fibula. Dissect the soft tissues from the pos-
TRANSTIBIAL AMPUTATION USING terior aspect of the tibia and fibula distally to the level of the
LONG POSTERIOR SKIN FLAP posterior transverse skin division and separate and remove the
leg, ligating and dividing the nerves and vessels (Fig. 16.4B).
TECHNIQUE 16.3 Carefully round the tibia and form a short bevel on its
n
Tibial
amputation
8.8 to 12.5 cm level
Skin flap
incision
Fibular
amputation level
0.9 to 1.3 cm
A 12.5 to 15 cm
B C
FIGURE 16.4 Transtibial amputation in ischemic limbs. A, Fashioning of short anterior and
long posterior skin flaps. B, Separation and removal of distal leg. Muscle mass is tailored to form
flaps. C, Suture of flap to deep fascia and periosteum anteriorly. (Redrawn from Burgess EM, Zettl
JH: Amputations below the knee, Artif Limbs 13:1, 1969.) SEE TECHNIQUE 16.3.
Descargado para Roberto Eljadue ([email protected]) en University of Cartagena de ClinicalKey.es por Elsevier en mayo 09, 2021. Para uso
personal exclusivamente. No se permiten otros usos sin autorización. Copyright ©2021. Elsevier Inc. Todos los derechos reservados.
726 PART VI AMPUTATIONS
and accompanying medical conditions. Initial postoperative skin incisions allow greater use of this amputation level in
efforts are centered on skin healing. After transtibial amputa- patients with ischemia. In nonambulatory patients, addi-
tion, a soft dressing can be applied but a rigid dressing is pre- tional extremity length provides adequate sitting support
ferred and can be used regardless of whether early ambulation and balance. Knee flexion contractures and associated distal
is prescribed. If immediate or prompt prosthetic ambulation ulcers common with transtibial amputations also are avoided.
is not to be pursued, the stump can be dressed in a simple,
well-padded cast that extends proximally to midthigh and is
applied in such a manner as to avoid proximal constriction of
the limb. Good suspension of the cast is essential to prevent it
from slipping distally and impairing stump circulation. This KNEE DISARTICULATION
may require compressive contouring of the cast in the supra-
condylar area and a waist band, suspension strap, or both. The TECHNIQUE 16.4
cast should be removed in 5 to 7 days; and if wound healing is
satisfactory, a new rigid dressing or prosthetic cast is applied. (BATCH, SPITTLER, AND MCFADDIN)
If immediate or prompt prosthetic ambulation is pursued, a Measuring from the inferior pole of the patella, fashion
n
properly constructed prosthetic cast is best applied by a quali- a long, broad anterior flap about equal in length to the
fied prosthetist. Success of rehabilitation depends on multiple diameter of the knee (Fig. 16.5A).
variables, including cognitive status, premorbid functional Measuring from the level of the popliteal crease, fashion
n
level, condition of the upper extremities and contralateral a short posterior flap equal in length to one half of the
lower limb, and coexisting medical and neurologic condi- diameter of the knee. Place the lateral ends of the flaps
tions. Early rehabilitation efforts may be geared toward inde- at the level of the tibial condyles.
pendence in a wheelchair, stump care education, skin care Deepen the anterior incision through the deep fascia to
n
techniques to avoid decubitus ulcers, care of the contralateral the bone and dissect the anterior flap from the tibia and
intact lower limb, and preprosthetic general conditioning. adjacent muscle. Include in the flap the insertion of the
Weight bearing on the residual limb is usually delayed until patellar tendon and the pes anserinus (Fig. 16.5B).
skin healing has progressed. If a more aggressive approach is Expose the knee joint by dissecting the capsule from the
n
taken toward prosthetic training, more frequent rigid dress- anterior and lateral margins of the tibia; divide the cruci-
ing changes are recommended and possibly the use of clear ate ligaments, and dissect the posterior capsule from the
sockets to allow monitoring of the skin. Some patients may tibia (Fig. 16.5C).
require further medical evaluation and clearance (e.g., chemi- Identify the tibial nerve, gently pull it distally, and divide it
n
cally induced cardiac stress test or echocardiogram or vas- proximally so that it retracts well proximal to the level of
cular studies of the contralateral limb) to evaluate tolerance amputation (Fig. 16.5D).
for prosthetic training. A pain management specialist may be Identify, doubly ligate, and divide the popliteal vessels.
n
needed to help treat postoperative phantom limb pain. Many Free the biceps tendon from the fibula, complete the am-
n
patients receive inpatient rehabilitation training with subse- putation posteriorly, and remove the leg.
quent therapy on an outpatient basis or in an extended-care Do not excise the patella or attempt to fuse it to the
n
facility or home health setting. Proposed rehabilitation goals femoral condyles. Do not disturb the articular cartilage of
also dictate which prosthetic components would be approved the femoral condyles and patella. Perform a synovectomy
by insurance carriers. only if specifically indicated.
Suture the patellar tendon to the cruciate ligaments and
n
stump. Newer socket designs and prosthetic knee mechanisms Close the deep fascia and subcutaneous tissues with
n
that provide swing phase control have improved function in absorbable sutures and the skin edges with interrupted
patients with knee disarticulation. Although the benefit of its nonabsorbable sutures.
use in children and young adults has been proven, its use in If sufficient skin for a loose closure is unavailable, resect the
n
the elderly and especially in patients with ischemia has been posterior part of the femoral condyles rather than risk loss
limited in the United States. Knee disarticulations are more of the skin flaps. The wound usually heals quickly, how-
commonly used in cases of trauma. Based on published data, ever, and a permanent prosthesis usually can be fitted in 6
it remains unclear if knee disarticulation provides additional to 8 weeks because shrinkage of the stump is not a factor.
functional benefit and improved complication rates com- If the wound fails to heal primarily, there is no reason for
pared to transfemoral amputation. apprehension or reamputation because it usually granu-
Potential advantages of knee disarticulation include (1) lates and heals satisfactorily without additional surgery.
preservation of the large end-bearing surfaces of the distal
femur covered by skin and other soft tissues that are natu-
rally suited for weight bearing, (2) creation of a long lever arm
controlled by strong muscles, and (3) stability of the prosthe- KNEE DISARTICULATION
sis. Techniques have been described for reducing the bulk of Mazet and Hennessy recommended a method that fea-
bone at the end of the stump to allow more cosmetic pros- tures resection of the protruding medial, lateral, and
thetic fitting while still retaining the weight-bearing, suspen- posterior surfaces of the femoral condyles for creating
sion, and rotational control features of the stump. Modified a knee disarticulation stump for which a more cosmeti-
Descargado para Roberto Eljadue ([email protected]) en University of Cartagena de ClinicalKey.es por Elsevier en mayo 09, 2021. Para uso
personal exclusivamente. No se permiten otros usos sin autorización. Copyright ©2021. Elsevier Inc. Todos los derechos reservados.
CHAPTER 16 AMPUTATIONS OF THE LOWER EXTREMITY 727
Skin flap
10 cm incision
Patellar
tendon
A
5 cm
Right leg
(medial view) Infrapatellar
fat pad
Anterior cruciate
ligament
Lateral head of
gastrocnemius
muscle
Patellar
tendon
Pes
anserinus
B
C
Tibial nerve
D E
FIGURE 16.5 Disarticulation of knee joint. A, Skin incision. B, Anterior flap elevated, including
insertion of patellar tendon and pes anserinus. C, Cruciate ligaments and posterior capsule divided.
D, Tibial nerve divided high. E, Patellar tendon sutured to cruciate ligaments. SEE TECHNIQUE 16.4.
Descargado para Roberto Eljadue ([email protected]) en University of Cartagena de ClinicalKey.es por Elsevier en mayo 09, 2021. Para uso
personal exclusivamente. No se permiten otros usos sin autorización. Copyright ©2021. Elsevier Inc. Todos los derechos reservados.
728 PART VI AMPUTATIONS
Lines of Line of
condylar condylar
remodeling remodeling
Posterior
Skin Skin
incision incision
Anterior
A B
FIGURE 16.6 Mazet and Hennessy disarticulation of knee. A, Anterior view. B, Lateral view.
SEE TECHNIQUE 16.5. (Redrawn from Mazet R Jr, Hennessy CA: Knee disarticulation: a new technique and
a new knee-joint mechanism, J Bone Joint Surg 48A:126, 1966.)
cally acceptable prosthesis can be constructed. With this to the midpoint of the distal articular surface posteriorly
technique, tolerances within the socket are greater, more (the condyle is wider posteriorly). Discard the medial half
adduction of the stump is permitted in the alignment of of the condyle.
the prosthesis, and the decreased bulk of the stump per- Resect the lateral part of the lateral femoral condyle in
n
mits greater ease in the application and removal of the a similar manner, starting at the junction of the medial
prosthesis. The debulked stump requires smaller skin two thirds and lateral one third of the distal articular
flaps, which may be beneficial for wound healing in dys- surface.
vascular limbs. These patients may use a suction type Direct attention to the posterior aspect of both condyles.
n
prosthesis, which is less cumbersome to apply than a tra- Resect the posterior projecting bone by a vertical oste-
ditional above-knee amputation prosthesis and does not otomy in the frontal plane, starting at the point where
require removal for toileting needs. the condyles begin to curve sharply superiorly and pos-
teriorly.
TECHNIQUE 16.5 Smoothly round all bony prominences with a rasp, but
n
(Fig. 16.6). condylar notch under slight tension. Insert drains at each
Reflect the skin and deep fascia well proximal to the fem-
n end of the wound, and close the deep fascia and the skin
oral condyles. in separate layers.
Divide the patellar tendon midway between the patella
n
and the tibial tuberosity.
Flex the knee and section the collateral and cruciate liga-
n
ments.
Increase flexion of the knee to 90 degrees, identify and
KNEE DISARTICULATION
n
ligate the popliteal vessels, and isolate and divide the tibial
nerve.
Detach the hamstring muscles from their insertions and
n
TECHNIQUE 16.6
remove the leg.
(KJØBLE)
Dissect the patella from its tendon and discard it.
n
n With the patient prone on the operating table, outline a lat-
Remodel the femoral condyles in the following manner.
n
eral flap that is one half the anteroposterior diameter of the
Drive a wide osteotome vertically in a proximal direction
knee in length and a medial flap that is 2 to 3 cm longer to
through the medial femoral condyle to emerge at the
allow adequate coverage of the large medial femoral condyle
level of the adductor tubercle. Start this cut along a line
(Fig. 16.7). By constructing shorter medial and lateral flaps,
that extends from the medial articular margin anteriorly
Descargado para Roberto Eljadue ([email protected]) en University of Cartagena de ClinicalKey.es por Elsevier en mayo 09, 2021. Para uso
personal exclusivamente. No se permiten otros usos sin autorización. Copyright ©2021. Elsevier Inc. Todos los derechos reservados.
CHAPTER 16 AMPUTATIONS OF THE LOWER EXTREMITY 729
Short
transfemoral
Medial
transfemoral
Long
transfemoral
Descargado para Roberto Eljadue ([email protected]) en University of Cartagena de ClinicalKey.es por Elsevier en mayo 09, 2021. Para uso
personal exclusivamente. No se permiten otros usos sin autorización. Copyright ©2021. Elsevier Inc. Todos los derechos reservados.
730 PART VI AMPUTATIONS
Amputation
level Skin flap
incision
B C
FIGURE 16.9 Amputation through middle third of thigh. A, Incision and bone level. B, Myofas-
cial flap fashioned from quadriceps muscle and fascia. C, Adductor and hamstring muscles attached
to end of femur through holes drilled in bone. SEE TECHNIQUE 16.7.
Descargado para Roberto Eljadue ([email protected]) en University of Cartagena de ClinicalKey.es por Elsevier en mayo 09, 2021. Para uso
personal exclusivamente. No se permiten otros usos sin autorización. Copyright ©2021. Elsevier Inc. Todos los derechos reservados.
CHAPTER 16 AMPUTATIONS OF THE LOWER EXTREMITY 731
Descargado para Roberto Eljadue ([email protected]) en University of Cartagena de ClinicalKey.es por Elsevier en mayo 09, 2021. Para uso
personal exclusivamente. No se permiten otros usos sin autorización. Copyright ©2021. Elsevier Inc. Todos los derechos reservados.
732 PART VI AMPUTATIONS
Bosse MJ, Morshed S, Reider L, et al.: Transtibial amputation outcomes study Reichmann JP, Stevens PM, Rheinstein J, Kreulen CD: Removal rigid dress-
(TAOS): comparing transtibial amputation with and without a tibiofibu- ings for postoperative management of transtibial amputations: a review
lar synostosis (Ertl) procedure, J Orthop Trauma 31(Suppl 1):S63, 2017. of published evidence, PM R 10(5):516, 2018.
Brown BJ, Iorio ML, Klement M, et al.: Outcomes after 294 transtibial amputations Rosen N, Gigi R, Haim A, et al.: Mortality and reoperations following lower
in the posterior myocutaneous flap, Int J Low Extrem Wounds 13:33, 2014. limb amputations, Isr Med Assoc J 16:83, 2014.
Czerniecki JM, Thompson ML, Littman A, et al.: Predicting reamputa- Ryan SP, DiLallo M, Klement MR, et al.: Transfemoral amputation following
tion risk in patients undergoing lower extremity amputation due to the total knee arthroplasty: mortality and functional outcomes, Bone Joint J
complications of peripheral artery disease and/or diabetes, Br J Surg 101-B(2):221, 2019.
106(8):1026, 2019. Schuett DJ, Wyatt MP, Kingsbury T, et al.: Are gait parameters for through-
Easterlin MC, Chang DC, Wilson SE: A practical index to predict 30-day knee amputees different from matched transfemoral amputees? Clin
mortality after major amputation, Ann Vasc Surg 27:909, 2013. Orthop Relat Res 477(4):821, 2019.
Fang ZB, Hu FY, Arya S, et al.: Preoperative frailty is predictive of complica- Seker A, Kara A, Camur S, et al.: Comparison of mortality rates and func-
tions after major lower extremity amputation, J Vasc Surg 65(3):804, 2017. tional results after transtibial and transfemoral amputations due to
Fergason J, Keeling JJ, Bluman EM: Recent advances in lower extremity diabetes in elderly patients – a retrospective study, Int J Surg 33:78,
amputation and prosthetics for the combat injured patient, Foot Ankle 2016.
Clin 15:151, 2010. Shah SK, Bena JF, Allemang MT, et al.: Lower extremity amputations: factors
Fleming ME, O’Daniel A, Bharmal H, Valerio I: Application of the orthoplas- associated with mortality or contralateral amputation, Vasc Endovascular
tic reconstructive ladder to preserve lower extremity amputation length, Surg 47:608, 2013.
Ann Plast Surg 73:183, 2014. Singleton JA, Walker NM, Gibb IE, et al: Case suitability for definitive through
Goodney PP, Holman K, Henke PK, et al.: Regional intensity of vascular care knee amputation following lower extremity blast trauma: analysis of 146
and lower extremity amputation rates, J Vasc Surg 57:1471, 2013. combat casualties, 2008-2010, J R Army Med Corps 160(187):2014.
Hasanadka R, McLafferty RB, Moore CJ, et al.: Predictors of wound com- Spahn K, Wyatt MP, Stewart JM, et al.: Do Gait and functional parameters
plications following major amputation for critical limb ischemia, J Vasc change after transtibial amputation following attempted limb preserva-
Surg 54:1374, 2011. tion in a military population? Clin Orthop Relat Res 477(4):829, 2019.
Hsu AR: Transfemoral amputation adductor myodesis using FiberTape and Sumpio B, Shine SR, Mahler D, Sumpio BE: A comparison of immediate
knotless anchors, Foot Ankle Int 39(7):874, 2018. postoperative rigid and soft dressings for below-knee amputations, Ann
Jain A, Glass GE, Ahmadi H, et al.: Delayed amputation following trauma increases Vasc Surg 27:774, 2013.
residual lower limb infection, J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 66:531, 2013. Swaminathan A, Vemulapalli S, Patel MR, Jones WS: Lower extremity ampu-
Jones WS, Patel MR, Dai D, et al.: High mortality risks after major lower tation in peripheral artery disease: improving patient outcomes, Vasc
extremity amputation in Medicare patients with peripheral artery Health Risk Manag 10:417, 2014.
disease, Am Heart J 165:809, 2013. Taylor BC, Poka A: Osteomyoplastic transtibial amputation: technique and
Kahle JT, Highsmith MJ, Kenney J, et al.: The effectiveness of the bone bridge tips, J Orthop Surg Res 6:13, 2011.
transtibial amputation technique: a systematic review of high-quality Taylor BC, Poka A: Osteomyoplastic transtibial amputation: the Ertl tech-
evidence, Prosthet Orthot Int 41(3):219, 2017. nique, J Am Acad Orthop Surg 24(4):259, 2016.
Karam J, Shepard A, Rubinfeld I: Predictors of operative mortality following Theeven PJ, Hemmen B, Geers RP, et al.: Influence of advanced prosthetic
major lower extremity amputations using the National Surgical Quality knee joints on perceived performance and everyday life activity level of
Improvement Program public use data, J Vasc Surg 58:1276, 2013. low-functional persons with a transfemoral amputation or knee disar-
Kwah LK, Webb MT, Goh L, Harvey LA: Rigid dressings versus soft dressings ticulation, J Rehabil Med 44:454, 2012.
for transtibial amputations, Cochrane Database Syst Rev 6:CD012427, 2019. Tillander J, Hagberg K, Berlin Ö, et al.: Osteomyelitis risk in patients with
Leijendekkers RA, van Hinte G, Frölke JP, et al.: Functional performance transfemoral amputations treated with osseointegration prostheses, Clin
and safety of bone-anchored prostheses in persons with a transfemoral Orthop Relat Res 475(12):3100, 2017.
or transtibial amputation: a prospective one-year follow-up cohort study, Tintle SM, Keeling JJ, Shawen SB, et al.: Traumatic and trauma-related ampu-
Clin Rehabil 33(3):450, 2019. tations: part I: general principles and lower-extremity amputations, J
Lowenberg DW, Buntic RF, Buncke GM, Parrett BM: Long-term results and Bone Joint Surg 92A:2852, 2010.
costs of muscle flap coverage with Ilizarov bone transport in lower limb Tintle SM, Shawen SB, Forsberg JA, et al.: Reoperation after combat-related
salvage, J Orthop Trauma 27:576, 2013. major lower extremity amputations, J Orthop Trauma 28:232, 2014.
Mangan KI, Kingsbury TD, Mazzone BN, et al.: Limb salvage with intrepid Tsai CY, Chu SY, Wen YW, et al.: The value of Doppler waveform anal-
dynamic exoskeletal orthosis versus transtibial amputation: a compari- ysis in predicting major lower extremity amputation among dialy-
son of functional gait outcomes, J Orthop Trauma 30(12):e390, 2016. sis patients treated for diabetic foot ulcers, Diabetes Res Clin Pract
Nelson MT, Greenblatt DY, Soma G, et al.: Preoperative factors predict mor- 100:181, 2013.
tality after major lower-extremity amputation, Surgery 152:685, 2012. Tseng CL, Rajan M, Miller DR, et al.: Trends in initial lower extremity ampu-
O’Brien PJ, Cox MW, Shortell CK, Scarborough JE: Risk factors for early fail- tation rates among Veterans Health Administration health care system
ure of surgical amputations: an analysis of 8,878 isolated lower extremity users from 2000 to 2004, Diabetes Care 34:1157, 2011.
amputation procedures, J Am Coll Surg 216:836, 2013. Vallier HA, Fitzgerald SJ, Beddow ME, et al.: Osteocutaneous pedicle flap
Penn-Barwell JG: Outcomes in lower limb amputation following trauma: a transfer for salvage of transtibial amputation after severe lower-extremity
systematic review and meta-analysis, Injury 42:1474, 2011. injury, J Bone Joint Surg 94A:447, 2012.
Phair J, DeCarlo C, Scher L, et al.: Risk factors for unplanned readmission Wied C, Tengberg PT, Holm G, et al.: Tourniquets do not increase the total
and stump complications after major lower extremity amputation, J Vasc blood loss or re-amputation rise in transtibial amputations, World J
Surg 67(3):848, 2018. Orthop 8(1):62, 2017.
Plucknette BF, Krueger CA, Rivera JC, Wenke JC: Combat-related bridge Whitehead A, Wolf EJ, Scoville CR, Wilken JM: Does a microprocessor-con-
synostosis versus traditional transtibial amputation: comparison of mil- trolled prosthetic knee affect stair ascent strategies in persons with trans-
itary-specific outcomes, Strategies Trauma Limb Reconstr 11(1):5, 2016. femoral amputation? Clin Orthop Relat Res 472:3093, 2014.
Polfer EM, Hoyt BW, Bevevino AJ, et al.: Knee disarticulations versus transfem- Zayad M, Bech F, Hernandez-Boussard T: National review of factors influ-
oral amputations: functional outcomes, J Orthop Trauma 33(6):308, 2019. encing disparities and types of major lower extremity amputations, Ann
Prinsen E, Nederhand MJ, Olsman J, Rietman JS: Influence of a user-adaptive Vasc Surg 28:1157, 2014.
prosthetic knee on quality of life, balance confidence, and measures of
mobility: a randomised cross-over trial, Clin Rehabil 29:581, 2015. The complete list of references is available online at ExpertConsult.com.
Descargado para Roberto Eljadue ([email protected]) en University of Cartagena de ClinicalKey.es por Elsevier en mayo 09, 2021. Para uso
personal exclusivamente. No se permiten otros usos sin autorización. Copyright ©2021. Elsevier Inc. Todos los derechos reservados.
Kasabian AK, Glat PM, Eidelman Y, et al.: Salvage of traumatic below-knee
SUPPLEMENTAL REFERENCES amputation stumps utilizing the filet of foot free flap: critical evaluation
Aulivola B, Hile CN, Hamdan AD, et al.: Major lower extremity amputation: of six cases, Plast Reconstr Surg 96:1145, 1995.
outcome of a modern series, Arch Surg 139:395, 2004. KjØble J: The surgery of the through-knee amputation. In Murdock G, ed:
Ayoub MM, Solis MM, Rogers JJ, et al.: Thru-knee amputation: the operation Prosthetic and orthotic practice, London, 1970, Edward Arnold.
of choice for non-ambulatory patients, Am Surg 59:619, 1993. Kock HJ, Friederichs J, Ouchmaev A, et al.: Long-term results of through-
Batch JW, Spittler AW, McFaddin JG: Advantages of the knee disarticula- knee amputation with dorsal musculocutaneous flap in patients with
tion over amputations through the thigh, J Bone Joint Surg 36A:921, 1954. end-stage arterial occlusive disease, World J Surg 28:801, 2004.
Berlet GC, Pokabla C, Serynek P: An alternative technique for the Ertl osteo- MacKenzie EJ, Bosse MJ, Castillo RC, et al.: Functional outcomes following
myoplasty, Foot Ankle Int 30:443, 2009. trauma-related lower-extremity amputation, J Bone Joint Surg 86A:1636, 2004.
Burgess EM: Disarticulations of the knee: a modified technique, Arch Surg Malek F, Somerson JS, Mitchel S, Williams RP: Does limb-salvage surgery
112:1250, 1977. offer patients better quality of life and functional capacity than amputa-
Burgess EM, Matsen III FA: Determining amputation levels in peripheral tion? Clin Orthop Relat Res 470:2000, 2012.
vascular disease, J Bone Joint Surg 64A:1493, 1981. Mazet Jr R, Hennessy CA: Knee disarticulation: a new technique and a new
Burgess EM, Matsen III FA, Wyss CR, et al.: Segmental transcutaneous mea- knee-joint mechanism, J Bone Joint Surg 48A:126, 1966.
surements of Po2 in patients requiring below-the-knee amputation for Mazet Jr R, Schmitter ED, Chupurdia R: Disarticulation of the knee: a follow-
peripheral vascular insufficiency, J Bone Joint Surg 64A:378, 1982. up report, J Bone Joint Surg 60A:675, 1978.
Burgess EM, Zettl JH: Amputations below the knee, Artif Limbs 13:1, 1969. Mohler DG, Kessler JI, Earp BE: Augmented amputations of the lower
Buzato MA, Tribulatto EC, Costa SM, et al.: Major amputations of lower leg: extremity, Clin Orthop Relat Res 371:183, 2000.
the patients two years later, Acta Chir Belg 102:248, 2002. Morse BC, Cull DL, Kalbaugh C, et al.: Through-knee amputation in patients
Catre MG, Liebermann IH: Laterally based skin flap for below-knee amputa- with peripheral arterial disease: a review of 50 cases, J Vasc Surg 48:638, 2008.
tion: case report, J Trauma 43:869, 1997. Nehler MR, Coll JR, Hiat WR, et al.: Functional outcome in a contemporary
Centers for Disease Control: Diabetes surveillance system: nontraumatic series of major lower extremity amputations, J Vasc Surg 38:7, 2003.
lower extremity amputation with diabetes by level, Diabetes Public Health Persson BM: Sagittal incision for below-knee amputation in ischemic gan-
Resource 2003. grene, J Bone Joint Surg 56B:110, 1974.
Choksy SA, Lee Chong P, Smith C, et al.: A randomised controlled trial of the Pinzur MS, Beck J, Himes R, Callaci J: Distal tibiofibular bone-bridging in
use of a tourniquet to reduce blood loss during transtibial amputation for transtibial amputation, J Bone Joint Surg 90A:2682, 2008.
peripheral arterial disease, Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 31:646, 2006. Pinzur MS, Bowker JH: Knee disarticulation, Clin Orthop Relat Res 361:23, 1999.
Cruz CP, Eidt JF, Capps C, et al.: Major lower extremity amputations at a Pinzur MS, Gottschalk F, Pinto MA, Smith DG: Controversies in lower
Veterans Affairs hospital, Am J Surg 186:449, 2003. extremity amputation, Instr Course Lect 57:663, 2008.
Cull DL, Taylor SM, Hamontree SE, et al.: A reappraisal of a modified Pinzur MS, Gottschalk F, Smith D, et al.: Functional outcome of below-knee
through-knee amputation in patients with peripheral vascular disease, amputation in peripheral vascular insufficiency: a multicenter review,
Am J Surg 182:44, 2001. Clin Orthop Relat Res 286:247, 1993.
Decoster TA, Homedan S: Amputation osteoplasty, Iowa Orthop J 26:54, Rayman G, Krishnan ST, Baker NR, et al.: Are we underestimating diabetes-
2006. related lower-extremity amputation rates? Results and benefits of the first
Dillingham TR, Pezzin LE, MacKenzie EJ: Limb amputation and limb defi- prospective study, Diabetes Care 27:1892, 2004.
ciency: epidemiology and recent trends in the United States, South Med Saleh M, Datta D, Eastaugh-Waring SJ: Long posteromedial myocutaneous
J 95:875, 2002. flap below-knee amputation, Ann R Coll Surg Engl 77:141, 1995.
Ertl J: Über amputationsstümpfe, Chirurg 20:218, 1949. Sandnes DK, Sobel M, Flum DR: Survival after lower-extremity amputation,
Gottschalk F: Transfemoral amputation, Clin Orthop Relat Res 361:15, 1999. J Am Coll Surg 199:394, 2004.
Fergason J, Keeling JJ, Bluman EM: Recent advances in lower extremity Smith DG, Fergason JR: Transtibial amputations, Clin Orthop Relat Res
amputation and prosthetics for the combat injured patient, Foot Ankle 361:108, 1999.
Clin 15:151, 2010. Sonja MHJ, Jaegers MD, Arendzen JH, et al.: Changes in hip muscles after
Hagberg E, Berlin OK, Renström P: Function after through-knee compared above-knee amputation, Clin Orthop Relat Res 319:276, 1995.
with below-knee and above-knee amputation, Prosthet Orthot Int 16:168, Stokes R, Whetzel TP, Stevenson TR: Three-dimensional reconstruction of
1992. the below-knee amputation stump: use of the combined scapular/para-
Harrington IJ, Lexier R, Woods JM, et al.: A plaster-pylon technique for scapular flap, Plast Reconstr Surg 94:732, 1994.
below-knee amputation, J Bone Joint Surg 73B:76, 1991. Subramaniam B, Pomposelli F, Talmor D, et al.: Perioperative and long-term
Humzah MD, Gilbert PM: Fasciocutaneous blood supply in below-knee morbidity and mortality after above-knee and below-knee amputations
amputation, J Bone Joint Surg 79B:441, 1997. in diabetics and nondiabetics, Anesth Analg 100:1241, 2005.
Jain AS, Stewart CPU, Turner MS: Below-knee amputation using a medially Topper AK, Fernie GR: Computer-aided design and computer-aided manu-
based flap, Br J Surg 81:512, 1994. facturing (CAD/CAM) in prosthetics, Clin Orthop Relat Res 256:39, 1990.
Januszkiewicz JS, Mehrotra ON, Brown GE: Calcaneal fillet flap: a new osteo- Toursarkissian B, Shireman PK, Harrison A, et al.: Major lower-extremity
cutaneous free tissue transfer for emergency salvage of traumatic below- amputation: contemporary experience in a single Veterans Affairs insti-
knee amputation stumps, Plast Reconstr Surg 98:538, 1996. tution, Am Surg 68:606, 2002.
732.e1
Descargado para Roberto Eljadue ([email protected]) en University of Cartagena de ClinicalKey.es por Elsevier en mayo 09, 2021. Para uso
personal exclusivamente. No se permiten otros usos sin autorización. Copyright ©2021. Elsevier Inc. Todos los derechos reservados.