Case Studies of Sustainable Housing in The East Midlands1
Case Studies of Sustainable Housing in The East Midlands1
Case Studies of Sustainable Housing in The East Midlands1
18 case studies have been identified in the East Midlands – information on the following are
set out below:
Summary
The development consists of seven dwellings incorporating elements of passive solar
design, high levels of insulation and mechanical heat recovery ventilation. It was designed
and built by the East Midlands Housing Association for older clients.
Extensive monitoring and analysis was carried out by the Energy Technology Support Unit
(ETSU) as part of the project, and much of the information presented here draws on this
report.
The project demonstrates how more attention and research at the design stage can enhance
the benefits that may be derived from such energy saving features. It also shows how the
perspectives of success or failure of a design differ between building professionals and
residents.
Project Objectives
To create a high-quality flagship sheltered housing development for older people that is
highly energy efficient and incorporates the principles of passive solar design.
History of Concept
The development, which was constructed in 1990, consists of seven dwellings (three two
bedroom and four one bedroom bungalows) and is a memorial to a former member of the
housing association, Albert Hall. The association wanted an energy efficient scheme that
used electricity as its main heat source. The energy consultants decided on a highly
insulated design with controlled ventilation that would meet the regional electricity company’
s
Civic Shield 2000 standard.
The passive solar element of the design was in addition to this specification and came about
as a result of the Housing Association’
s interest in this area.
Construction Details
Built form Detached bungalow with integral unheated sunspace. The building is
orientated northeast –southwest along its longest axis.
Walls The external walls are of a cavity wall construction, with a brick outer leaf and
a lightweight aerated concrete block inner leaf, separated by a 100mm cavity
fully filled with mineral wool.
The wall construction is the same for the internal wall of the integral
sunspace, effectively thermally isolating this area from the rest of the dwelling.
The external facade of the sunspace comprises single glazed windows and
doors set into laminated timber frames.
Roof Clay tiles upon conventional sarking and trussed rafters. Insulated with
200mm of mineral wool on the loft floor.
The roof above the sunspace is mainly single glazed with toughened glass. A
double glazed, Velux, opening rooflight is fitted to prevent this area from
overheating during the summer.
Floors Jetplus suspended beam and slab system. 140mm thick polystyrene slabs
are fitted between suspended concrete beams that span between the walls.
This is covered by 18mm chipboard fitted on top of a polythene damp proof
membrane.
The sunspace floor is formed from concrete paving slabs laid on sand blinding
over hardcore. A damp proof membrane is installed within the blinding.
Windows With the exception of the sunspace, all external windows along with the
glazed internal doors and the windows between the sunspace and the
dwelling are low-emissivity, argon gas filled, double glazed units. These are
set into laminated softwood frames.
Figure 1.Internal
layout of two
bedroom bungalow
All of the dwellings are orientated northeast - southwest. The main living areas are located
in the southern side of the dwelling, with the bathroom and bedrooms located on the cooler
northwest side. The kitchen and sunspace face southeast, allowing them to be warmed by
the sun in the morning, but preventing them from overheating in the afternoon sun.
U-Values ( W/m2.K )
Walls: 0.3
Internal Floor: 0.3
Roof: 0.2
Windows: (double) 1.6
(single) 5.6
Resource Conservation
Heating The following electric heating units and controls were used in the
dwelling:
Hall and living room: Creda night storage fan heaters with an output of
2.36kW and 3.56kW, respectively. A ‘ Meterminder’ controller that
matches the charge rate to the external temperature controls the night
time charging. The heaters are fitted with a thermostatic control that
varies the output of the two-speed fan.
Kitchen and bathroom: Creda 2kW plinth fan heater and Dimplex 1kW
fan heater respectively, controlled by manual on-off switches.
Data collected during the first year of occupancy showed that the
annual energy consumption for heating was 99 kWh/m2/year 1, while
domestic hot water consumed 2,307 kWh over the same year.
Monitoring during the first year of use showed that 64 percent of this
electricity was consumed at the off-peak rate. The same monitoring
also showed that the storage heaters used 96 percent of the energy
consumed for heating. The remaining 4 percent was for the kitchen
fan heater. The heaters in the bedroom and bathroom were not used
at all.
Monitoring also revealed that the sunspace had made only a very
small contribution to offsetting the heating load. This is mainly due to
the thermal isolation of this space, with highly insulated walls, high
specification glazing and a separate floor reducing the opportunity for
heat to move from the sunspace into the dwelling. However, the
1
Due to the nature of the residents, who are retired older people, the heating was operated continuously throughout the day.
Temperatures in all rooms were high, averaging around 25°C. As no mention was made by the residents of overheating it can
only be assumed that they choose to operate the heating system at these temperatures.
Transport
The development is located approximately 1½ miles from Coalville town centre and is
situated on a main bus route that serves the town centre.
Social Aspects
As part of the monitoring programme, a post-occupational attitudes survey was conducted to
assess the residents’feelings about the design of the dwellings. The main results are shown
in Table 1 and reveal a high level of satisfaction with the design. The resident interviews
revealed in particular the satisfaction that they felt with regard to the sunspace and the
amount of light that it lets into the building. They also enjoyed using this space as an
extension of their home during the summer months.
Sustainable housing in the East Midlands - 123
Section 4: Case Studies
They learnt how to control the temperature inside the sunspace to extend their use of it
during the summer months and how to use it to provide warm air to the dwelling during the
spring and autumn. This area featured as the most aesthetically pleasing aspect of living in
the dwelling for the residents.
Well-Being
Health and The high thermal performance of the building envelope, the building’ s
Affordability orientation to maximise solar gains to the main living areas, and the
efficient heating system installed should protect the residents from the
effects of fuel poverty. The post-occupational attitudes survey
revealed that the residents believe that the fuel costs are value for
money for the comfort they experience.
Economic Issues
The cost of development was £430/m2, including the sunspace. At the time of development
(1990) this was 46 per cent more expensive than a traditional dwelling without a sunspace.
• The building incorporated two energy saving strategies, the mechanical heat recovery
ventilation (MHRV) system and the sunspace. Due to the building design they were not
complementary to one another. The MHRV system is a climate exclusive strategy that
benefits from a well-sealed building envelope during the winter, whereas the sunspace is
a climate inclusive strategy that benefits from the controlled passage of heat across the
building envelope during sunny periods. The report recommended that contradictions
between various energy strategies needed to be resolved at the design stage.
• The building fabric needed to be better sealed to enhance the performance of the MHRV
system.
• MHRV is not cost effective when considered purely in terms of the energy it saves.
• The primary heating system installed in the dwelling (electric storage) is too slow to
respond to the solar gains entering the building and therefore negated possible energy
savings. Had the sunspace not been so thermally isolated from the rest of the dwelling, it
may have also led to instances of overheating. A computer model of the dwelling
showed that substituting a more responsive, well controlled, wet system for the electric
storage heating system would produce better energy savings than were being realised in
practice.
• Due to the thermal isolation of the sunspace, the contribution that it made to offset the
space heating needs of the dwelling were negligible and could not be justified in cost
terms. However, 12 per cent of the space heating need was provided by solar gain,
mainly due to the building’
s orientation, the placement of larger windows on the southern
facades and the use of high specification glazing.
• The sunspace was highly valued by the residents for its amenity value, providing a
seasonal living area and adding to the enjoyment of adjoining spaces because of its
effect on daylighting and visual interest.
The report concluded that “The dwelling fulfilled in nearly every way the requirements of its
older residents… [and used] less energy than an equivalent building of standard
construction, due more to its high level of insulation and heat recovery system than to solar
gain… The amount of electric heating displaced by solar gain does not justify the capital cost
added to the building by the passive design. The design’ s inherent solar potential might be
more fully realised if a more responsive heating system were installed, and if the existing
solar gains to the sunspace could be ventilated to the habitable areas of the building.”
(ETSU, 1992)
Bibliography
ETSU: Solar Building Report: Summary Report: Albert Hall Memorial Housing. 1992.
Oxfordshire. ETSU S 1163/SBS/29
Project Partners
East Midlands Housing Association
Centre for Alternative Technology
East Midlands Electricity
John Willoughby (energy consultant)
Summary
Ashton Green is a project being developed by Leicester City Council. It is still in the planning
stages but is intended to be a high quality development incorporating current best practice
relating to urban design and sustainable development. The entire development will
eventually contain 3,500 dwellings and will be built in five phases over the next 15 – 20
years. Phase 1, with 500 dwellings on 20.28 hectares is currently at the advanced planning
stage. In addition to housing, the development will also incorporate community facilities,
shops and two new primary schools.
Leicester City Council wishes to deliver a sustainable development that has a clear sense of
place and identity. In December 2001, the Council formally adopted a supplementary
planning guidance (SPG) specifically for Ashton Green. This SPG sets out the planning,
design, development guidance and requirements that the council wish to see met by any
developers who become involved with the scheme. Although relating primarily to Phase 1, it
is anticipated that this SPG would set the tone for the remainder of the site. The Council is
the owner of the land and cannot enter into a S.106 Agreement with itself. Any desired
elements that cannot be met via a planning condition will therefore be incorporated into the
development agreements between the Council and the selected project partners. The
success of the scheme will depend upon the project partners collaborating with one another,
to share the risks and overcome the barriers that this form of development brings. At the
time of writing the council is in negotiation with several potential partners.
Project Objectives
“It is intended that Ashton Green will demonstrate best practice in new housing development,
in both the production of high quality in … the final layout and built form and also in
sustainable development practice.” SPG Ashton Green, Leicester City Council, December
2001.
History of Concept
The site of the proposed development was allocated for residential development in the mid-
1970s and formed part of the Beaumont Leys extension of Leicester city. It is currently
allocated in the Local Plan for residential development and a small local centre. It is
Special Policy Area’in the draft replacement local plan, in recognition of the
identified as a ‘
City Council’s ambitions for the scheme.
Inspiration for the layout of the development and the sustainability features to be included is
drawn from current government guidance and best practice as well as built examples such
as Poundbury in Dorset (road layout, building and space design, etc) and the Beddington
Zero Energy Development (BedZED) project in Sutton.
In 2000, planning consultants EDAW Ltd. were commissioned by the Council to develop both
a master plan and a land release strategy for the site. The Council went out to tender for
Phase 1 of the development and received approximately 25 expressions of interest from
developers. Unfortunately, nearly all of these expressions were devoid of any reference to
the energy / sustainability aims of the development, even though the importance of these
issues was underlined by the Council in the tender document. The Council intends to issue
a questionnaire that addresses the issues relevant to sustainable development in order to
develop a shortlist of developers who have the potential to deliver such a project.
Once this shortlist has been devised, a seminar will take place with guest speakers from
other similar schemes. The purpose of this is to build capacity and share experiences both to
inspire the potential partners and to reassure them of the scheme’ s feasibility.
More successful have been the council’ s attempts to attract an Energy Service Company
(ESCo) that can act as an energy utility to the site’
s commercial and residential customers.
More than five suitable organisations were identified. More information concerning the
energy systems is included under the Resource Conservation section.
Many hurdles have to be cleared before construction work can commence onsite. Amongst
these is the need for the Council’
s cabinet members to be convinced that the benefits of the
scheme will outweigh the initial loss in potential revenue from the sale of Phase 1 land.
Members have so far been supportive of the ideals of the development; however they have a
duty under Best Consideration to ensure that the Council achieves the maximum revenue
from the sale of the land. This will create a possible point of conflict between the ideals of
the planning and urban landscape departments on the one hand and the finance department
on the other.
The Council commissioned a survey from the Institute of Energy and Sustainable
Development (IESD) at De Montfort University to compare the difference in attitudes
between developers and financiers from the private sector with those of key staff at the
Council. This revealed that the private sector believed that developing the site in a more
sustainable manner would lead to both increased construction costs and lower land values.
The developers suggested that higher standards could only be achieved in one element of
the scheme by compromising on another element.
The Council will have to be very pro-active to get their private sector partners to see the
project in more long-term and holistic way. It may also have to encourage this philosophy
amongst its own members when it comes to making the final decisions concerning the trade-
off between the value of the land and the additional value that such a project could bring to
the residents of the city.
One financial objective set by the scheme’ s managers, in order to alleviate this potential
conflict, is to see the value of the land increase across the project build phases when Ashton
Green becomes perceived as a desirable place to live by house purchasers. The Council
Sustainable housing in the East Midlands - 128
Section 4: Case Studies
intends to create an agreement with its private sector partners to share this benefit in
exchange for their sharing the risks and uncertainties of the earlier phases. If the first phase
is successful, the Council aims to raise the sustainability standards as each of the individual
phases are released.
In addition to the above issues, PPG3: Housing, published in March 2000, states the position
of the national government with regard to new build housing. By 2008, 60 per cent of all new
housing should be provided on previously developed land and through the conversion of
existing buildings. Leicester City Council is currently undertaking its Urban Capacity study
and is presently unable to grant permission to develop any further greenfield sites until this is
completed and they can prove that they are meeting their land reuse targets. The Council’ s
development plan has identified that there will be a need for an additional 19,000 dwellings
within the city by 2015. It is extremely unlikely that this need will be met unless the City
expands onto what is presently greenfield land, but the process that the council must go
through to prove it necessary will delay the development of Ashton Green.
At the time of writing, individual designs for the buildings that will eventually form Ashton
Green had not been undertaken. The standards to which the dwellings will be built are to
some extent covered in the Resource Conservation section.
One of the principle challenges for the developers is to provide a central focal point, similar
to the traditional market square, for the whole of the Phase 1 development. It is envisaged
that most of the buildings within this area will be of three storey, terrace type construction.
This will provide an adequate level enclosure to form the desired space and is referred to in
the SPG as “Market Street”. This area will be the epicentre of the transport system for the
scheme and most of the main community services (shops, health care, community centre,
etc.) will be provided here. A range of construction materials and building styles will be
developed to engender a sense of place and identity for this area, as well as providing
landmark buildings to aid navigation around the site.
In order to ensure that a range of shops and services can be supported within the
development, a density of 30-50 dwellings per hectare is proposed for the scheme. This will
allow people to have access to a range of resources without the need to travel by car. To
allow the buildings to be adaptable to the changing needs of the community, the SPG calls
for the design of “robust”buildings around the central area of Phase 1. The term “robust”
refers to buildings whose ground floor level is adaptable, i.e. it could be used for residential
accommodation in the early phase of the development and converted to commercial uses
(shops, offices, bars, etc.), when the community expands as a result of new phases being
released for development.
Resource Conservation
Energy One of the principle aims of the development is that the scheme
should provide low energy homes that meet the zero carbon dioxide
(CO2) emissions standard. This standard means that the housing will
create zero net emissions of CO2 on an annual basis. It therefore
must meet all of its energy requirements for space and water heating,
lighting, appliances, etc. from sustainable energy sources.
Sustainable housing in the East Midlands - 129
Section 4: Case Studies
The city council and De Montfort University secured funding from the
E.U.’s Alterner program to produce an energy strategy for the site.
This showed how it was technically feasible to generate 100 percent of
Ashton Green’ s energy needs using sustainable sources using a
combination of technologies placed both on and offsite.
Water Best practice with regard to both water use in the home and surface
runoff will be incorporated into the site. The Council requires any
potential developer to investigate the feasibility of developing a
sustainable urban drainage system (SUDS) to handle surface runoff
from Phase 1. This system must be capable of eventual integration
into the rest of the development.
Landscaping
Full surveys of the existing ecology of the site had not been undertaken at the time of writing.
It is anticipated that the existing trees, hedgerows and ponds will be incorporated into the
scheme and complemented with plant species appropriate to the local environment and that
reflect local species.
Landscaping will be used to enhance the energy efficiency of the buildings by creating
shelterbelts that will reduce the heat loss caused by winds.
Transport
The following transport measures will be incorporated into the master plan to ensure that
they are delivered as an integrated part of the development:
• A high quality, high frequency bus service is specified. The specification includes the
frequencies required for different times of the day, low-emission or alternative energy
vehicles, minimum seating capacities and ensures access for people with disabilities.
• All dwellings within Phase 1 must be within 400m of a formal bus stop.
• These bus stops will provide seating and have the potential for connection to real time
information systems.
The Council are encouraging the use of Design Bulletin 32 (residential road and footpaths –
1992) and “Places, Streets & Movement” (DETR 1998), which provide a source of good
practice for the layout of the development. The main design principles that will be
incorporated into Phase 1 are:
• A transport network that ensures that people, cyclists and public transport have priority
over motor vehicles will be created.
• Emphasis was placed on designing for public transport at an early stage. At least 75 per
cent of the site will be within 250m of a formal bus stop.
• A street network that includes restricted connectivity for motor vehicles along some
streets will be used, to prevent ‘rat running’.
• All public parts of Phase 1 will be fully accessible to disabled people.
• The development will be well connected to the existing developments at Glebelands and
Benskins Croft. This will allow the commercial area of Ashton Green to become a focal
point for these existing communities, enhancing its economic sustainability.
• Building and space arrangements will restrict the speeds of motor vehicles to create an
environment within which vehicles will travel below 20mph.
• Standard traffic calming measures such as speed bumps and chicanes will be used only
as a last resort.
Social Aspects
It is hoped that a mechanism, such as the formation of a local management company, will be
created through which residents can have an input into the day-to-day management of the
key spaces and open places created as part of the Phase 1 development.
The chosen developer will be expected to provide funding to enable active community
participation in the various stages of the development of Ashton Green, for example
“Planning for Real”exercises, etc.
Community consultation exercises have been carried out with the residents of Glebelands
and Benskins Croft. Initially there was resistance to the proposals, and the residents formed
an action group. They have since developed a dialogue with the Local Authority’ s officers
however, and see the value of working with the Council on the development plans to ensure
that they complement their existing communities.
Communal Facilities
The Council realise that a key factor in ensuring a more sustainable form of development is
the early provision of a range of shops and services that meet the immediate needs of the
incoming residents, so that they do not form the habit of going elsewhere. The following
developments are therefore to be included within the planning obligations for the site:
• The built form of the village centre will have to be completed following the occupation of
the first 400 dwellings of the development.
• A community shop, providing convenience goods, with a floor area greater than 40m2
must be provided. This must be open at least five hours a day following the occupation
of the first 100 dwellings. It will be operated continuously for at least five years after
opening.
• An increase in capacity at Glebelands Primary School for the anticipated 84 extra places
needed as a result of Phase 1. This will entail the construction of an extra three
classrooms and associated facilities.
Quality of Life
Health and Through the provision of highly energy and water efficient housing,
Affordability local residents will be protected from the effects of fuel and water
poverty.
Accessibility At least 20 per cent of the dwellings within Phase 1 will be accessible
to disabled people.
Crime It is the aim of the Council to see the opportunities for crime in the
Phase 1 area reduced by the use of features such as designing all
properties around public spaces to look out onto them. This will allow
natural surveillance of the area and encourages resident activity,
therefore making the area feel safer.
Other A great deal of emphasis in the SPG is placed upon the “public realm”
to ensure that this is designed to a very high standard and raises the
perceived quality of the entire development. Developers are required
to develop a “memorable place” that is easy to navigate due to the
presence of “landmark buildings”. A sense of community identity is to
be created by paying careful attention to issues such as paving,
planting, lighting, street furniture, signage, orientation, etc. and
incorporating these into a common design theme for the whole of
Phase 1.
Summary
Two semi-detached houses were built using factory-based, timber-framed construction
methods in Sweden and then imported in completed sections to the UK for final assembly by
Greenfield Way Ltd. who are based in the Midlands and specialise in this form of housing.
These were the first houses to be built by South Holland District Council (SHDC) in over
twelve years and are the first of their kind in the UK.
The site was chosen by the council because of its exposed position. This provided an
opportunity to fully test the fabric of the buildings, the triple glazing, the heating systems and
the heat recovery ventilation system. East Midlands Electricity carried out monitoring of the
fuel consumption of the property on behalf of the project partners.
The houses aim to demonstrate sustainable social housing design and incorporate high
levels of insulation and air tightness along with careful sourcing of components to reduce
their environmental impact. The design also aims to contribute to the health of the tenants by
incorporating measures such as whole house mechanical heat recovery ventilation and
natural internal paints and finishes.
Project Objectives
South Holland District Council obtained funding to assess the benefits of highly insulated,
low energy, timber-framed dwellings. The aim of the trial was to establish the viability of
factory constructed, Swedish-style properties for the UK social housing sector.
Construction Details
Entire panel sections of the dwellings were prefabricated in factory conditions in Sweden and
imported to the UK with all windows, doors and insulation already fitted. The sections were
delivered to the site and lifted into place by a crane. They were then fixed together and the
property was completed by a specially trained British workforce. A prefabricated bathroom
‘pod’complete with all internal fittings including the shower and toilet was simply lifted into
place. The two timber-framed houses were built in just over ten weeks, minimising the impact
that the construction had on local residents.
The buildings are two-bedroom, semi-detached units of 70.63m2 floor area. The homes are
expected to last for 110 years and all materials used as part of the construction are
recyclable at the end of their life.
Walls 120mm timber studs faced on the first floor with 22mm pre-strained timber
cladding fixed to 13mm Bitumen impregnated fibreboard. The inner face is
lined with 13mm plasterboard. The cavity is filled with 120mm rockwool
insulation slabs. The ground floor walls are rendered with 30mm Heraklith
board instead of the timber cladding. The partition walls between the houses
are also prefabricated and are filled with 95mm of insulation to reduce
acoustic transmission.
Floor The ground floor structure is a floating floor upon a concrete base. A 22mm
Kährs parquet wooden floor is underlined with 70mm of Styrofoam insulation
that in turn is underlined with a 0.20mm vapour barrier foil. The intermediate
floor is finished with 15mm Kährs wooden flooring and includes 95mm of
insulation for acoustic purposes. Tongue and grooved pine is used to finish
the lobby floor.
Waste The nature of the Swedish based factory production system is extremely
Minimisation accurate and therefore reduces waste to a minimum at this stage of the
process. The “Fast-Track” assembly method used on site also reduces the
amount of transport movements needed to deliver all the component sections.
Additional
• Allergen-free painted surfaces.
• Simple profiled second fix timbers are used to limit the trapping of dust.
U-Values ( W/m2.K )
Resource Conservation
Heating There is no supply of mains gas to the site. Norwegian “Nobo”electric
panel heaters are fitted throughout the properties. These are
thermostatically controlled, with a programmable timer, and operate on
peak-rate electricity. Due to the low heat loss rate of the properties, it
was believed that storage heaters would be unsuitable and prone to
causing the buildings to overheat.
Ventilation The property is fitted with an ADM Baxi whole-house mechanical heat
recovery system. Pressure testing undertook by East Midlands
Electricity of one of the units showed an air change rate of 3.21ac/h at
50Pa.
Water Conservation Aerating taps have been installed in both the bathroom and the kitchen
to reduce hot and cold water demand. This results in energy saving as
well as water saving as less hot water is used.
Social Aspects
The residents of the properties have undergone several training sessions from both SHDC
and East Midlands Electricity in order for them to fully understand the use of the heating
system controls. This has had a noticeable effect in reducing the energy demand of the
properties and has also led to a more appropriate control system being installed in one of the
houses.
Residents took part in the monitoring process by submitting weekly meter readings to SHDC.
East Midlands Electricity verified these readings with ad-hoc visits to the property. The
residents have always been very helpful and positive about living in an ‘ experimental’
property.
Well-Being
Various aspects of the project contribute towards a healthy internal living environment for the
residents. These are:
• A well controlled, mechanical ventilation system with heat recovery that continuously
provides fresh air to the internal space of the properties and removes stale, moist air to
the outside.
• The use of allergen-free paints and finishes reduces the indoor air pollution often caused
by the gassing-off of modern building finishes.
• Features such as the hardwood floor and profiled second fix timbers limits the amount of
dust traps within the property.
Costs
Each property cost £45,000 to construct. SHDC already owned the land so there was no cost
for this.
The properties are designed to be low maintenance and therefore cheap to maintain. No
figures validating this were available from SHDC.
Energy rating software used during the design phase of the project estimated the average
annual space heating costs to be £63 per annum. The estimates for water heating were the
same.
A 92-day trial conducted by the Council and East Midlands Electricity as part of their
monitoring program covering December 1998 – February 1999 showed that the actual space
heating costs for one property were £2.87 per week and, £5.18 per week for the other. Water
heating costs for both properties were lower than originally predicted at £0.83p per week.
This is some 30 per cent lower than the norm for this property and household type. The
differences between the properties can be attributed to different occupancy and heating
regimes adopted by the tenants. The same reason can be given for the costs being higher
than predicted by the modelling software.
Additional Information
These were the first two dwellings of their type to be imported and assembled within the UK.
Since their construction, the design and build company Greenfield Way Ltd. has worked in
partnership with its suppliers both in Sweden and in the UK to improve the quality of its
products and to adapt the overall design to complement the UK housing market.
The current products have 170mm filled cavities, use timber composite internal wall linings
and incorporate specialist plumbing and rainwater materials to reduce the use of plastics
used in the construction.
A formal Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) process has been adopted which investigates the
impact of every component used in the buildings. The companies CONCEPT 2/3 design has
achieved Local Authority National Type Approval Certificate (LANTAC) approval which
assures its suitability for social housing throughout the UK.
The company now specialises in the social housing sector and has completed builds for
several housing associations within the UK.
Project Partners
South Holland District Council (Project initiators and managers)
Greenfield Way Ltd (Design and build)
East Midlands Electricity (Monitoring and technical support)
Summary
The David Wilson Millennium Eco-House is a four bedroom detached property situated on
the University Park campus of Nottingham University. It is occupied continuously by a group
of researchers working at the School of the Built Environment who monitor and appraise the
environmentally friendly energy features that are built into the property.
The house is of traditional construction using traditional building materials. In this way the
project can provide a true appraisal of the technologies that are incorporated into it, and their
relevance to the general housing stock. The design of the property is such that new
technologies, techniques and building systems can be easily assimilated into the structure.
They are connected to the existing systems and services, monitored and appraised by the
researchers, and then removed or replaced if necessary.
The house also provides an educational resource to university students, to industry and to
local schools and colleges. The university sees this as an essential role in inspiring future
generations of engineers, architects and builders in the possibilities of sustainable
technology.
Project Objectives
To provide a fully instrumented, occupied test house, to demonstrate and evaluate energy
efficiency and sustainable energy systems, and to provide a test bed for new domestic scale
systems.
Construction Details
The Eco-House is built using traditional brick and block construction techniques. It was
designed deliberately to meet the 2000 Building Regulation requirements, which permits
research to be carried out on novel techniques for upgrading the thermal performance of
standard new build homes. The house is orientated to maximise solar gains in the winter.
It has a prominent location on the University Park campus.
Flexibility of the structure was an important design criterion for the project. The integration of
a steel frame (see Figure 1) into the structure of the house means the fabric that makes up
the rear of the property can be individually removed and replaced with other test materials.
The frame also provides a convenient mounting for the rapid testing of new sustainable
energy systems such as solar thermal tubes and wind generators.
A solar chimney (see Figures 1 & 2) is integrated into the south facing facade. Air within the
chimney is warmed by the sun and circulated into the property. The summer operation of the
chimney is modified to vent warm air from inside the house and replace it with cooler air from
a void beneath the concrete ground floor slab.
Monitoring sensors and data logging equipment are located throughout the property. Access
for installing the required sensors and pipe and cable runs has been provided by a half
basement below the ground floor slab, integrated conduit runs throughout the building and a
clear span attic space.
Walls The 280mm thick external walls comprise of an outer leaf of either 103mm
facing brickwork or a two coat sand cement render on 100mm thick 7N
blocks. The inner leaf is 100mm thick 7N blocks and the 77mm cavity is fully
filled with blown mineral fibre. The walls are lined internally with 9.5mm
plasterboard.
Figure 1
The steel frame in the southern half of the
house, supporting two solar thermal collectors
either side of the central solar chimney. Top-
left is the vertical-axis wind turbine. The
southern face of the roof features integrated
PV tile arrays
Figure 2
Floors The ground floor above the half basement consists of 150mm deep beam and
block flooring finished with 16mm levelling screed, 40mm expanded
polystyrene insulation and 19mm of moisture resistant grade chipboard.
Windows The double glazed units are set in wood grain finished uPVC frames.
U-Values ( W/m2.K )
Walls 0.45
Roof 0.35
Floor 0.45
Windows 3.30
Resource Conservation
The house is designed to test a wide and changing range of resource conservation
technologies within its envelope. The following systems are, at the time of writing, installed
within the property for tested:
Space heating Space heating for the property is provided by a variety of novel
systems that include both passive and active heating methods.
Passive solar gain is supplied through the south-facing facade and
solar chimney. The principle behind the chimney is outlined above.
Active heating includes
1. A WhisperTech microCHP unit has been supplied by Powergen so
that its performance can be evaluated in a domestic building, as
part of a trial program. The unit is rated to supply 8kW of heat and
1.2kW of electricity at the maximum burner firing rate. A
comprehensive monitoring system has been installed alongside
the unit, although no findings were available at the time of writing.
2. Two Solel, evacuated tube, solar water heating units are bolted to
the steel frame on the southern facade of the building.
Lighting Through good use of glazed elements, including external glass brick
walls, the property is naturally well lit during daylight hours. Daylight is
delivered deeper into the property through the use of Monodraught
lightpipes (see Figure 3). These are highly reflective sealed ducts that
transfer daylight from a clear dome on the rooftop to enclosed areas
such as the downstairs cloakroom and the first floor landing. Low
energy compact fluorescent lights (CFLs) were installed elsewhere
throughout the property. These are currently being replaced by
superbright LED installations from LED Lamps, which feature 80-90
percent energy savings on incandescent bulbs and a typical lifespan of
100,000 hours.
Figure 3.
Ventilation and Natural ventilation is provided throughout the property via the solar
Cooling chimney, the Monodraught wind-catcher installed on the roof and by
occupants opening and closing windows and doors. Additional
mechanical extract ventilation is provided to the kitchen and bathroom.
During the summer months the operation of the ground source heat
pump is reversed so that it extracts excess heat from the property and
passes it into the ground outside the building. The solar chimney also
passively cools the building as mentioned previously. Both of these
systems have undergone testing during which they were monitored
continuously by University researchers.
Energy generation The south-facing section of the roof features Atlantis Sunslates; mono-
crystalline photovoltaic tiles that replace the conventional roof
covering. This integrated system has been designed to deliver
approximately 1250kWh of electricity per annum; roughly one third of
the building’ s estimated need. An inverter converts this electrical
energy into conventional mains current. Any excess energy generated
is stored in batteries that power the School’
s electric van.
Figure 4
The two sun-tracking PV arrays
situated nearby the Eco-House.
Inset is an image taken during
the laying of the PV tiles that
replace the conventional roof
slates.
Water Conservation Rainwater from the roof of the house is stored in an underground tank
and used by the property’ s residents. A processing unit located below
the kitchen sink filters and purifies the water before it reaches the
appliances. Filtered water is used for flushing the toilets in the house.
Water receiving an additional sterilising treatment can be used for
wash hand basins, washing machines, etc.
Economic Aspects
The cost of designing and building the Eco-House was approximately £200,000, not
including monitoring renewable energy technology.
Source of Funding:
House construction David Wilson Homes
Special Technology Funding for the technology under test within the property is ongoing
and delivered from various UK and European government sources, as
well as industry.
Additional Information
Although there are no plans to replicate the project as a whole, it is hoped that many of the
systems tested on the building over the coming years will one day become common
specification for all new build and appropriate retrofit properties.
Project Partners
Nottingham University School of the Built Environment
David Wilson Homes
Maber Associates Architects
Summary
This is a refurbishment project of 71 flats on an estate in Derby that was experiencing
serious problems of fuel poverty, high tenant turnover, vandalism and was rapidly becoming
a sink estate at great financial cost to the housing association.
In 1997 the Association contracted an energy consultant to develop a scheme that would
provide affordable warmth to tenants, reduce tenant turnover and be cost effective with a six
year payback period.
These measures were delivered cost effectively by combining the energy efficiency upgrade
with the standard refurbishment of the flats. The cost of the project was also offset against
revenue gains from a reduction in tenancy voids. Together, these measures made the
project financially feasible.
The result was a 50-60 per cent reduction in fuel costs for the tenants, and a tenant turnover
rate of five per cent per year, down from 50 per cent before the works were carried out. The
improvement in tenant turnover is due mainly to the improved living conditions of the flats
and the improved affordability of keeping them warm.
Project Objectives
To provide affordable warmth to residents living in electrically-heated 1970s flats and reduce
tenant turnover. The payback time for investment had to be kept as short as possible.
History of Concept
The Littleover estate consists of seventy one flats of one-bedroom and three-bedrooms. All
units were designed in the 1970s and are heated by electricity, which resulted in tenants
spending up to £25 per week on electricity bills during the winter. Consultation with the
tenants revealed that most were heating only the lounge and one bedroom, and often to an
inadequate temperature. Tenant turnover was running at a rate of 50 per cent per year, and
they often left the flats in a state of disrepair when they vacated. The costs of repairs, along
with the lost revenue from frequent voids, meant that the estate was a financial liability to the
housing association. Socially, it was becoming a ‘ sink’estate, with a high incidence of crime
and social exclusion.
The standard heating system installed in the flats up to this point had been four storage
heaters and four panel heaters. These were often vandalised by the tenants when they
vacated the units. The refurbished scheme achieved adequate internal temperatures using
just one or two storage heaters and one panel heater. This reduced both the running costs
to the tenants and the capital costs to the Housing Association. It also reduced the value of
equipment that could be vandalised.
In 1999, based on the results of the first year of monitoring, Derwent Housing Association
embarked on a programme to upgrade all the flats to the same specification over the next
five years. The kitchen, bathroom and window replacement programme was brought
forward, which made internal lining with insulation boards economically viable. Three or four
flats were upgraded at the same time, which reduced unit costs. A cost analysis was
undertaken, setting the void cost savings against the costs of the energy efficiency upgrade.
This suggested that the measures installed would pay for themselves within six years if the
void rate could be reduced to five per cent per year.
Construction Details
Built form Refurbishment of seventy one flats of one to three bedrooms on two to three
storeys, originally constructed in the 1970
Roof Traditional 1970s pitched roof construction with tile over felt. The loft floor
(ceiling of the top floor flats) was insulated with 250mm of mineral wool
insulation.
Walls The walls are of cavity construction that was originally filled with expanded
polystyrene granules. These were dry-lined using Rockwool mineral wool
slab under plasterboard as part of the refurbishment scheme.
Floors The traditional concrete slab floors were maintained, as there was no
economically viable method to upgrade their thermal performance within this
project
U-Values ( W/m2.K )
Walls: 0.30
Floor: 0.50
Roof: 0.15
Windows: 2.70
Resource Conservation
Heating After refurbishment, the heating system in each flat consisted of one to
two storage heaters and one panel heater. No gas is available onsite.
Lighting Dedicated low energy fittings are installed in the circulation areas of
the flats. Low energy light fittings were also installed in high use areas
such as hallways.
Ventilation Mechanical heat recovery ventilation is installed in all flats and set
permanently to the ‘
trickle ventilation’mode.
Resident training A tenant’s user manual was developed, which explained to tenants
how they could maximise their energy savings in the refurbished flats.
Monitoring of the tenants attitudes to energy over the last few years
has revealed an increased awareness of energy efficiency issues.
SAP / Eco-ratings The refurbishment achieved an increase in the units’SAP ratings from
42-47 to 66-91, depending on the external exposure of the individual
units.
Social Aspects
The residents of all the flats were invited to a ‘
Show-house’open day of the pilot flat.
A tenant questionnaire has been devised to gain feedback on the project. At the time of
writing, no details were available for analysis.
Economic Aspects
The cost of development for the energy efficiency measures in a three bedroom flat was
£4,400. Subsidy of £10,000 was received from Powergen through the Energy Efficiency
Standards of Performance scheme (ESSOP). For the total project
Monitoring revealed that total fuel costs were on average between six and eight per cent of
the tenants’income after the refurbishment.
Additional Information
The project team achieved their objectives in finding a cost effective solution to some of the
problems experienced by the tenants of these units. Many tenants have experienced fuel
cost savings of between 50-60 per cent, and tenant turnover in the converted flats reduced to
the target of five per cent per year.
• The cost of the works. At £4,400 per unit the cost of the new energy efficiency and
heating products was very expensive. The project was able to proceed only by
embedding the energy efficiency program within the maintenance department’ s kitchen,
bathroom and window replacement programme. The other key factors in achieving
financial success were a reduction in the capital costs of the heating system, by installing
a smaller system, and reducing the loss of revenue through tenancy voids. Combined,
these factors gave a 5.9 year payback period for the initial investment.
• Reducing the energy costs of the units was dependent upon tenant behaviour. It was
therefore essential for the Housing Association to develop an operating manual for the
tenants, and to talk them through the concept of the flat and the way in which the heating
and ventilation worked.
• A small minority of tenants refused to use the mechanical heat recovery ventilation
system and turned it off against the advice of the housing association. Overcooling by
the ventilation system was noted in some flats and the specification has since been
revised. The system has been scaled down to ventilate just the bathroom, kitchen and
bedroom. This has reduced the capital cost of the units and the noise problems
experienced by some of the tenants.
As the project is ongoing over five years, lessons have been learned and changes have
been made to the project’ s specification. For example, fanned storage heaters have now
been introduced for improved efficiency and heat distribution.
Resident’s Comments
Information from the housing association suggests that the tenant of the pilot project flat
became very enthusiastic about the project. Many tenants have expressed their appreciation
of the work that has been carried out, and some have given positive comments to newspaper
journalists and on television programmes when the scheme has attracted media attention.
There has been resistance from some tenants however to providing the housing association
access to their homes to allow the refurbishment program to take place ahead of schedule.
At the time of writing, approximately 25 per cent of the flats are yet to be upgraded.
Two or three of the tenants have made complaints about the comfort levels or fuel costs of
the flats, but the problems have usually been found to be more about the individual tenant’
s
lifestyle than about the energy performance of the dwellings.
Project Partners
Derwent Housing Association
Martin Gamble (energy efficiency consultant)
Summary
This project developed five units, with the aim of demonstrating how low-energy design can
be delivered for the same cost as ‘ standard’housing, which was being developed in parallel
on the same sites. The units were three adjoining terraces at Sinfin and one pair of semi-
detached dwellings at Mapperley. The dwellings were extensively monitored over a two year
period and were found to provide affordable warmth to residents while costing on average
just £49 more per dwelling to build than ‘standard’housing.
The dwellings incorporate high levels of thermal mass through the use of dense blockwork in
the wall construction. Other features of the project include mechanical heat recovery
ventilation, high levels of insulation, high air-tightness, locally sourced materials, timber
windows and doors and experimentation with different heating systems.
The project has led to the Housing Association revising its housing specification and onsite
working practices, as well as the development of a new gas wall heater by a commercial
manufacturer.
The additional build costs for the project were offset by the exclusion of gas central heating
from all dwellings within the project. Total fuel costs to the residents average £307 per year,
about six per cent of the average annual income of the residents.
Project Objectives
To demonstrate that energy-efficient housing can be built at a similar cost to ‘
standard’
construction.
History of Concept
Following the success of the Littleover refurbishment project (see separate case study), an
energy-efficiency design consultant was invited to look at the standard housing types being
constructed under Derwent Housing Association’ s development programme. It was felt that
the thermal specification of the ‘ standard’design could be substantially improved, creating
homes that were more energy efficient for the same construction budget. This would be
achieved by trading the savings gained by removing the central heating system against the
additional cost of the energy efficiency products. This approach was based on prior research
conducted by the energy consultant.
Construction Details
Built form Terrace row of three two bed units (Sinfin) and two semi-detached two bed
units (Mapperley).Both developments were on greenfield land adjacent to
existing housing.
Roof Traditional pitched roof construction with the loft floor insulated using 250mm
of mineral wool.
Walls Brick and dense blockwork with a 150mm cavity fully filled with batons of
mineral wool insulation. High thermal mass is gained from the use of the
high-density blockwork for the inner wall skin. The walls are wet-plastered
internally to improve the air-tightness of the buildings.
Windows Timber-framed double-glazed units with a 20mm air gap. The timber frames
were sourced from a local manufacturer
.
Doors Timber construction, sourced from a local manufacturer.
Internal The dwellings are arranged internally so that passive solar gains can be used
Layout to offset the need for heating. The lounges are on the southern side of the
units and the kitchens are on the northern side.
Construction Existing hedges on the sites were retained during the development.
Impact
U-Values ( W/m2.K )
Walls: 0.21
Floor: 0.25
Roof: 0.15
Windows: 2.70
Resource Conservation
Heating The dwellings are heated by the following means:
The Sinfin units were monitored for two years (1998 and 1999) using
spot internal temperatures, air-tightness and thermal imaging
techniques. It was found that the mid-terrace performed best, with an
energy consumption figure of 23 percent below SAP estimates. The
end terrace with the fanned gas wall-heater achieved 3 percent below
SAP estimates, and the end terrace with the electric panel-heater was
20 percent over the SAP estimate. Average annual recorded running
costs for the dwellings were £307 per year (gas and electricity for all
uses). This equates to 6 percent of the average household income for
residents in the scheme, and therefore below the 10 percent
affordable warmth target. Consistent background temperatures of
20°C were recorded with the heating switched off, demonstrating the
effectiveness of the thermal mass.
The monitoring results for Mapperley were not available at the time of
writing.
SAP / Eco-ratings Data only exists to provide ratings for the two end terrace units, which
achieve a SAP of 102 (22.08 GJ/yr.) for one unit, and a SAP of 92
(24.71 GJ/yr) for the other unit.
Transport
The dwellings are located within existing housing estates that are well served by a variety of
shops and local supermarkets. Public transport is available locally from both sites, with
regular buses into the town centres.
Social Aspects
A handbook explaining the concept behind the houses and giving details on the efficient
operation of the heating and ventilation systems is provided to all the housing association’
s
tenant advisers, who pass this information onto the tenants. Residents took part in the
monitoring of the dwellings for two years after their completion.
Communal Facilities
A new play area for the residents’children was created as part of the project.
Well-Being
Health and The use of a highly insulated structure reduces the cost to the
Affordability residents of heating the dwellings, and therefore reduces their risk of
suffering from fuel poverty.
Crime All dwellings built as part of the scheme meet the national ‘
Secure by
Design’standard.
Adaptability All dwellings built as part of the scheme meet with the national
‘
Lifetime Homes’standard.
Economic Aspects
The cost of development on average, the dwellings cost £49 more to build than the
‘
standard’units on the site. Funding was provided by the housing Corporation and the
housing association’
s own resources.
Additional Information
Members of the project team made the following points concerning this project and its
relevance to future projects:
• The project team had difficulty in locating appropriate gas heaters for the project. The
maximum heating requirement per home is 2.5kW, and the ideal solution would therefore
have been to provide 2kW of heating to each floor. At the time, no manufacturers were
supplying a gas heater of this size that incorporated thermostatic control. Less effective
units therefore had to be used, which had a negative effect on the SAP rating of the
dwellings. A 2kW unit with thermostatic control has since developed by the project team
in partnership with a manufacturer, and is being used in similar schemes as well as being
commercially available.
• The initial ‘ warming-up’period of the large thermal mass led to higher fuel costs than
anticipated during the first quarter of the year. This was due mainly to the time of arrival
of the first residents, which was in December. Complaints concerning the additional fuel
costs were received from the tenant whose property did not perform as well as
anticipated by the SAP analysis.
• Due to the success of this scheme, the Housing Association revised their standard
specification to include dense blockwork on the internal partition walls, in addition to the
external walls, as a way of creating greater thermal mass. They have since incorporated
this idea, in conjunction with the new gas wall heaters, into a recent scheme of flats.
They encountered problems with drying out the wet plaster used on the partition walls
however, and some mould growth occurred on these surfaces. The problem is believed
to be due to the contractors treating wet-plaster in the same manner as dry-lining and not
giving the plaster time to dry out before fixing cupboards, etc. to it.
• Problems were encountered with the mechanical heat recovery ventilation (MHRV)
system. The system on the upper floor of the dwellings was overcooling, leading to an
increase in the heating load. The ‘ through-the-wall’units fitted in the kitchen appeared to
be causing the water vapour to migrate around the lower floor of the house. This initially
led to MHRV systems being omitted from all future schemes, although recent projects
that utilise a smaller multi-room MHRV have been more successful.
• During the monitoring period, it was found that the dwellings at Sinfin demonstrated poor
envelope air-tightness. The project team have revised their onsite checks to ensure that
air-tightness and the installation of insulation are checked more thoroughly during future
constructions.
• The two properties in Mapperley were constructed as part of a development designed for
shared ownership. No additional marketing was required to encourage buyers to
purchase a share of these properties compared to standard properties within the
scheme.
Project Partners
Derwent Housing Association
Martin Gamble (energy efficiency consultant)
Robinson Willey (gas appliance manufacturer)
Summary
A‘lived-in’environmentally friendly show-home that is open to the public and incorporates
many of the features of environmentally sustainable construction.
Project Objectives
The EcoHouse project’ s objective is to demonstrate to the public that often the best option
for the environment is also what’ s best for the people living within that environment. It aims
to inspire its visitors to implement practical changes in their homes and gardens to make
their lifestyles more sustainable.
History of Concept
Originally built in the 1920s as a park-keeper’s cottage, Environ took control of what is now
the EcoHouse and opened it to the public in 1989 after a ‘ green’retrofit. Ten years later,
after over 100,000 people had visited the project, the EcoHouse was re-launched following
the completion of an extension and refit programme.
The project is now two houses in one; the original 1920s dwelling and an extension built to
1999 best practice specification with regard to construction materials and energy saving
techniques. The project provides a valuable source of information for people wishing to
undertake a green retrofit of their homes, those building extensions to their homes, and
those building a new home.
The design of the extension is in keeping with the original house and with other housing in
the surrounding area. It was designed to be acceptable in style to as wide an audience as
possible, ensuring that a majority of visitors see it as desirable.
The project team wanted to employ an architect and a firm of builders who had an interest in
environmental issues but who had no real ‘ green’building experience. This was so that a
learning element was included in the process, and to prove that it is possible to construct a
low-energy dwelling without any previous expertise.
Construction Details
The original building is of standard 1920s construction, i.e. brick cavity walls, timber and
slate roof, etc.
The extension, which effectively doubles the floor area of the house, is traditional in
appearance, but the individual components are more novel in design. Since the EcoHouse
aims to be of a demonstrative nature, as many different products as possible were used in
order to test their performance and to raise public awareness of the range of products
available from different manufacturers. This report does not have the scope to cover all of
the products installed at the house. Rather, an overview is presented of what the project
attempts to achieve. More detailed information can be obtained from visiting the house or
contacting Environ directly.
Walls In keeping with the original building, the new build walls are of brick and block
construction, but all the bricks used are recycled colour-damaged stock that
were due to go to landfill. The interior block leaf is made from compressed
power station ash. Cavities of 150mm allow extra mineral wool insulation to
be inserted between the inner and outer leaves. Mineral wool does not leech
the toxic fumes associated with urea-formaldehyde based insulating foams.
Roof Many of the roof tiles used were from recycled sources and the loft is
insulated to a depth of 200mm with Rockwall (mineral wool).
Other The amount of PVC used in the construction was kept to a minimum. All of
the electrical cabling is PVC-free ‘
low smoke and fume cabling’, the guttering
is galvanised steel, the window frames are FSC certified timber, the heating
and plumbing pipes are polypropylene, and the underground rainwater and
waste pipes are made of clay.
Finishes within the house have been selected for their low environmental
impact. They include nine types of environmentally friendly paint, recycled
wallpaper, recycled wool carpets, carpet underlay made from recycled car
tyres and rubber floor mats made from recycled aircraft tyres.
Internal The nature of the development is that of a visitor centre, and the internal
Layout layout is designed around this purpose. However, the project designers have
still been able to simulate the effect of bringing the main living areas of the
house to the south-facing side of the property. This helps to offset both the
winter heating load and the lighting electrical load. Areas such as the kitchen
and bathrooms are located against the north facing facade.
Impact The property’ s site is compact with relatively poor access. The only way
construction traffic could access the site was to cross the organic vegetable
garden. The topsoil from the garden, which had been created over at least
ten years of organic gardening, had to be removed from the site, stored and
replaced after the construction was completed, in order to avoid its
compaction and degradation.
Waste produced during the development was divided between different skips
(wood, metal, etc.) so that as much as possible could be recycled or reused
onsite.
Resource Conservation
Heating The EcoHouse demonstrates two types of heating systems; one for
the original building and another for the extension.
The extension is much more thermally efficient than the original house
and does not have the heat load to require a condensing boiler. Solar
water heating panels mounted on the roof of the south facing facade
supplement a high-efficiency non-condensing boiler, to heat the water
in a 300 litre thermal store. A heat exchange coil runs through the
store and feeds into an underfloor heating system. Domestic hot
water is directly drawn off from the store.
Water conservation Many water-saving features are on display both in the house and in its
garden.
Recycling facilities Recycling facilities are built into the kitchen to encourage the residents
to recycle glass, aluminium, paper, some plastics and organic waste.
Transport
The house is close to local bus stops and is easily reached from the centre of Leicester city.
Cycle locking facilities and a car park are available onsite.
Landscaping
The third of an acre site is managed organically and integrates some principles of
permaculture. The idea is to demonstrate many different techniques of maintaining a garden
for people, wildlife and for growing food. A range of courses are offered each year to the
public, operating from one day to a whole year (at weekends) and covering different aspects
of sustainable gardening and food growing.
Examples of composting and grey water recycling (using marginal plants) and rainwater
recycling are presented. Landscape plantings provide visual and acoustic barriers for the
house as it is close to a major road. In addition, the planting of thorny shrub species such as
quickthorn on the boundaries provides an additional security deterrent for the property, which
has encountered problems in the past with vandalism.
A pond and a wetland area have been created as part of the new project. These handle the
overflow from the property’ s grey and rainwater systems, and form part of the organic
gardening strategy by providing a habitat for species that are beneficial for pest control, such
as frogs.
Well-Being
Health and The importance of a healthy indoor environment is recognized by
affordability the use of natural materials that do not leach solvents, formaldehyde,
etc. into the air. An efficient and affordable heating and ventilation
system keeps the house warm and reduces internal moisture levels.
Water is made affordable to the residents by conserving and reusing
water; etc.
Accessibility The EcoHouse is designed to be accessible for all and a lift can be
used to reach the first floor. A disabled toilet and baby changing
facilities are also available.
Economic Aspects
The house is leased to Environ by its owners, Leicester City Council, for a 99-year period for
a peppercorn rent. The development cost was in the region of £410,000. This was funded
by an award of £229,000 from the National Lottery Charities Board, £120,000 from an Article
10 bid, and over £60,000 in kind from various product manufacturers and suppliers.
Approximately £213,000 was used for the building construction. The remaining funds were
used to develop the interpretation elements of the project such as displays, literature,
marketing, etc., and to provide a project worker.
The barriers encountered during the redevelopment phase were primarily financial. Finding
a building company who could build it for the estimated price presented major problems, with
the tenders being over twice that of the initial cost estimates. Errors in quantity surveyor
costing meant that many of the more innovative environmental features had to be omitted in
order for the project to be completed on budget. These included a living roof, a workshop for
various training courses, and the building energy monitoring system to validate the project’s
claims. Environ have been involved as consultants on several other ‘ green-build’projects,
and find that this is a common experience, with quantity survey estimates often being 50 to
100 per cent too low.
Obtaining a contract with the local Regional Electricity Company (REC), to sell surplus
energy generated by the photovoltaic panels to the grid, was a long and complicated
process. The project manager believes that this was more to do with the mindset of
individuals within the REC than with any political or regulatory issues.
Project Partners
Environ
The National Lotteries Charity Board
Leicester City Council
De Montfort University (Leicester)
YMD Architects (Leicester)
Various product manufacturers and installers
Summary
Hockerton Housing Project (HHP) consists of a row of five terrace dwellings designed to
incorporate the principles of passive solar design with the techniques of earth sheltering.
The dwellings were built, to a large degree, by the residents themselves. The construction is
super-insulated, with a high thermal mass, and covered on three facades with a layer of soil
at least 400mm thick. This lessens the visual impact of the construction and reduces heat-
loss.
The south facade is heavily glazed using high specification windows and is buffered from the
outside by a timber conservatory. The conservatory acts as a solar collector, providing
heating to the homes by natural convection, and heating the domestic hot water supply via
an air-to-water heat pump. To provide good daylighting, all the main living rooms have
windows that open onto the conservatory, which offsets the need for artificial lighting.
The project aims to develop working opportunities onsite. All residents contribute an agreed
number of hour’s work each year towards community purposes, such as land management,
food growing and onsite cooperative business.
A communal office facility has recently been built, which will serve also as a resource centre
for visitors. A number of research and networking projects are underway, through which the
group hopes to stimulate more projects of this type around the country.
Project Objectives
To create one of the most energy efficient, purpose-built developments in Europe that
demonstrates a zero-energy design by reducing life cycle energy to a minimum. The houses
are earth covered and have passive solar heating without a space heating system. The
project aims to be as autonomous as possible in terms of energy and water, and provides
homes that offer financial savings in the medium to long term, with no loss of comfort or
modern amenities.
History of Concept
Nick Martin, whose family owned the original 25 acre site, initiated the project by getting the
group members together in 1993. As a builder, Nick had built the UK’ s first autonomous
house at Southwell (see separate entry). During that project, he had become increasingly
convinced that combining resource conserving elements with the principles of earth-
sheltering was a way forward for developing even more energy-efficient housing. He hired
Dr. Robert Vale to design what has since become one of the UK’ s most famous housing
projects.
The planning application for a terrace of five dwellings was approved, subject to a S. 106
Agreement, in May 1994. This delayed construction for two years; however, the first family
took occupancy in February 1998, followed by the remaining four over the course of the year.
A similar agreement was used to secure planning permission for a further two earth-
sheltered properties in an adjacent field, which are approaching completion at the time of
writing.
Construction Details
Built form The initial development consists of a terrace of five earth-sheltered dwellings.
Two further dwellings have been constructed on an adjacent field, as well as a
Sustainable Resource Centre. The site is whitefield and planning permission
was only approved subject to a S. 106 Agreement.
Approach The dwellings are designed to be heated purely from passive solar gains and
incidental internal gains. The structure’s high thermal mass moderates the
internal temperature against external variations, as heat gains are stored and
released over long periods of time.
Walls The front wall (conservatory rear wall) has a 150mm Drytherm filled cavity.
The conservatory and entrance porch act as thermal buffer zones on the
exposed south facade. The design allows the conservatory to be completely
isolated from the main house during winter.
Roof The soil on the roof acts as a thermal flywheel, as the temperature of the soil
lags weeks behind seasonal changes in air temperature. During the summer,
the winter/spring temperature soil draws heat from the structure and provides
cooling. Conversely, during the winter, the summer/autumn temperature soil
Sustainable housing in the East Midlands - 159
Section 4: Case Studies
lessens the temperature difference between inside and out, therefore reducing
heat loss.
Floors The internal structure is kept as exposed as possible, which maximises its
ability to absorb and emit heat. Carpets have an insulating effect on the
floor’s heat transfer capability, therefore clay tiles have been used for most of
the floor coverings.
The floor slab extends three metres in front of the main living space to
accommodate the conservatory floor. This is thermally broken from the house
floor slab to reduce heat loss to the conservatory space during cold weather.
Windows Two layers of high specification glazing are used across the south facade.
Between the bays and the conservatory, triple glazed windows with two layers
of low-emissivity coating, insulated spacers and argon gas filling are used.
The outer conservatory glazing is double glazed with a low-e coating. All
window frames and doors are imported by Swedhouse Ltd. and are made of
timber from a sustainable Swedish redwood source. There are no glazed
elements on any other facade.
Internal All paints, varnishes, sealants, etc. were chosen for their low environmental
Decoration impact and low toxic content to provide a healthier indoor environment.
Rainwater, The project avoided using PVC for windows, conservatory structure and
Plumbing electrical wiring. Copper was used for all rainwater goods from the
conservatory roof, again to avoid PVC.
Construction The onsite environmental impact of the construction process was limited
Impact through the careful choice of materials and the reduction of construction
waste, including packaging. The self-build nature of the construction meant
that waste produced from a particular operation was often incorporated into
another aspect of the project.
The concrete used was quarried locally to reduce transport energy use, and
the project has planted over 4000 trees on the land to offset the CO2
generated by the energy embodied in the construction materials. The facing
bricks used on the south-facing facade were supplied by a local company that
uses landfill gas (methane) to fire them.
The earth covering significantly lessens the visual impact of the houses from
the surrounding roads.
Conservatory
Figure 1. Internal
layout of six bay
dwelling. Note the use
of an extended porch
wall (top right) to form
the conservatory
sidewalls.
U-Values ( W/m2.K )
Excluding the effect of the earth covering
Resource Conservation
Heating Energy conservation was a primary objective of the design process,
and a space heating system is not required due to the passive solar
design and super-insulation. A wood stove is occasionally lit in the
conservatory for aesthetic purposes rather than heating.
Lighting All the main living areas are well day lit, and compact fluorescent lights
(CFLs) are used throughout.
Ventilation Each dwelling has its own Baxi mechanical heat recovery ventilation
system to provide fresh air. Air extracted from the moist areas (the
kitchen, bathroom and toilets) is passed across an in-line heat
exchanger before being exhausted from the building. This transfers
heat from the extracted air to the incoming fresh air. The two air
streams are completely separate to prevent stale air re-entering the
home.
The air-tightness of the dwellings was tested in 2003 and the results
showed that the mean air permeability was between 0.95 and
A Proven wind turbine with a blade diameter of 5.6m and rated at 5kW
was erected in December 2001. The generator is gearbox free, which
reduces the noise output. The turbine was expected to generate
12MWh of power annually. It is currently underperforming, but
research and improvements are ongoing.
Planning permission has been granted for a second wind turbine from
Iskra Wind Turbines, based in Nottingham. It is of a similar
specification to the first.
Excesses and shortfalls in power are compensated for by the local grid
via an import / export meter.
Water Water conservation is a major part of the project. All of the water used
Conservation by the residents is both captured and treated onsite. There is no
external mains water supply or sewerage treatment system.
Two rainwater collection systems are featured. The first provides the
residents with drinking water. Runoff water is collected from the
conservatory roof and stored in large 25m3 underground tanks where it
naturally remains cool. It is pumped on demand to the houses,
passing through a 5 micron string filter to remove small debris, then
through a charcoal filter to neutralise any dissolved chemicals, and is
finally exposed to ultra-violet light to kill any bacteria or viruses
present. When full, the rainwater tanks hold enough water to provide
twenty residents with ten litres of drinking water each for 250 days.
The second system provides water for washing, bathing, toilet flushing,
etc. The water for this system is collected from the turf roof of the
house and the land adjoining it. This is channelled into a sump and
pumped to a reservoir behind the homes. The reservoir is capable of
storing up to 150m3 of water, which is at least 100 days use for the
residents. When this is pumped to the houses it passes through a
sand filter to remove any suspended matter.
All the dwellings are fitted with low-flush toilets and some flow
restrictors in showerheads. Showers are taken rather than baths, and
Resident Training As it is a self-build project, the residents have trained themselves using
the expertise that exists within the group. New project members are
actively encouraged to share and use their know-how to benefit the
group.
Recycling The group compost all organic waste material produced on the land or
in the homes. Domestic scale recycling facilities have been built into
each house, and the material gathered is either reused onsite or taken
in bulk to local recycling facilities. The municipal waste bins are
emptied less than once a month.
Transport
The number of residents working from home at least part time is steadily increasing,
therefore reducing the pollution attributable to commuting.
The project’s rural location means that it is not well sited with regard to access to public
transport. Hockerton, the nearest village, is not well equipped for shops or other facilities, so
frequent visits to the village of Southwell, 2½ miles away, have to be made. Walking and
cycling are encouraged, and part of the tenancy covenant is that each house is allowed to
own only one fossil fuel powered vehicle. Car sharing and multiple purpose journeys are
common.
An electric Peugeot 106 has been made available to residents using a grant from Powergen.
The car has a 60km range, which is enough for round trips to schools, supermarkets and the
city of Nottingham. The vehicle’ s batteries are charged using surplus power from the wind
turbines and photovoltaic array.
Landscaping
Encouragement The site was originally fit only for grazing sheep and cattle. As part of
of Biodiversity the project, the residents wanted to enhance the landscape; to
increase biodiversity and to provide additional resources for the
dwellings.
New habitats of woodland and water have been created as part of the
landscaping, which have provided habitats for local wildlife. The lake
forms part of a productive aquaculture scheme, being home to many
forms of fauna and flora, such as water-voles, frogs, toads, carp and
numerous reeds. It attracts birds such as coot, moorhen, mallard, little
grebe and tufted duck. Waders, geese, kingfisher and swans also visit
on occasions.
Landscape The residents have observed that the houses act as a wind and noise
structural Feature shelter for the area between the conservatories and the lake to the
south. They believe that it is the ramp shape of the earth-covered roof
that produces this effect, which can also be used to protect more
delicate plantings outside the conservatories.
Resource crops Food growing areas have been created to produce vegetables for the
(food/fuel) families, and livestock is grazed as part of the land management
strategy and to provide wool and meat. Chickens are kept to provide
eggs and manure.
Newly planted woodland of over 4,000 trees provides wood fuel for the
conservatory wood stove.
Economic Aspects
The residents drew up an internal contract that obliged each household to meet the financial
costs of the development up to a common stage. Each household had to separately fund
their share of the work. However, each household paid a unique amount for their dwelling.
An internal LET scheme offset labour contributions from capital contributions, therefore those
households that contributed more in labour had to contribute less in capital, and vice versa.
The group believe that they have met their initial objective of constructing a group of
autonomous, zero-CO2 emission dwellings. The development of the project is ongoing
however, and the group has received funding from various bodies to undertake research into
various aspects of sustainable housing development.
An award from the Environmental Action Fund (EAF) for 2000-1 aided the development of
the “Sustainable Communities”project, which promotes the group’ s knowledge and skills to
assist other individuals and groups to develop their own sustainable community. The project
includes the publication of a tool-kit that includes two publications to date, ‘
The Sustainable
Community - A Practical Guide’and ‘ Sustainable Housing Schemes in the UK - A guide with
details of access’ . Along with the website content and tours and talks at HHP, the group
hope to mentor fledgling groups through the various hurdles of project design, planning
application, etc. to aid the development of similar projects around the country.
The group led the establishment of the Zero Emission Network (ZEN), which operated from
October 2002 until April 2004, in collaboration with innovationONLINE. The aim of ZEN was
to assist designers and promoters of zero emission housing projects to identify and develop
markets for their products. It featured a network directory and helped establish links
between the various organisations who were keen to be involved in developing zero
emission housing (architects, consultants, product manufacturers, etc.). This project was
funded by over £26k from Biffaward (landfill tax credits scheme) and from the Pilkington
Energy Efficiency Trust.
Social Aspects
Resident The residents were completely involved with the design of their
involvement dwellings and the landscaping that surrounds them. This has led to an
increase in the skill base of the residents and an increase in their
confidence as individuals to take control of very important aspects of
their lives.
Weekly meetings are held where issues and plans are discussed and
tasks are agreed. These are important as social gatherings, taking
part on Friday nights, as well as to the business of the group.
Social support is provided, often on an informal basis, through shared
childcare activities, car sharing, communal working and skill sharing,
and through the friendships that have come about as the project has
developed.
Methods of It has long been an ambition of the group to better demonstrate its
Community achievements in sustainability to the wider community. As outside
Engagement interest steadily grew, it became apparent that a dedicated
‘Sustainable Resource Centre’(SRC) onsite would be an effective way
of involving local communities, schools and agencies in the project,
and act as an added catalyst for sustainable action in the region.
Communal Facilities
The main “communal”areas at the moment are the gardens and the orchards that provide
vegetables and fruit to the community.
The SRC incorporates a communal office that will provide computing, e-mail and Internet
facilities. This will further enhance the onsite business opportunities. Food processing,
workshops, seminar and office space are also to be incorporated into the building.
Well-Being
A healthy living environment has been provided to the residents by the following factors:
• The energy efficient and water conservative design means that the residents are at no
risk of suffering from either fuel or water poverty.
• The indoor thermal climate is always maintained in the comfort zone, reducing the risk of
extreme temperatures exacerbating any health problems.
• A constant supply of fresh air is provided by the mechanical heat recovery ventilation
systems, which maintain a low relative humidity and reduce the risk of damp related
illnesses.
• The opportunities of communal working, skill sharing and mutual support, and the
challenges of moving the project forward, should contribute to a sense of mental well-
being to group members.
Accessibility Issues of old age and disability have not yet been addressed; mainly
because none of the present members fall into these categories. The
site could present a challenge to people with mobility problems,
although the group has coped with both motorised and manual
wheelchairs during their guided tours. It is envisaged that the situation
will improve over time.
Adaptability The group is currently composed of family units and single people.
However, formations such as single parents or house sharers can
happily be accommodated to live and become integrated into the
project.
Economic Aspects
The Costs of development for a three-bed (171m2) home are as follows:
Basic house construction £51k
Conservatory £12k
Landscaping, water systems and amenities £ 9k
Set-up costs £20k
The cost of each individual household mortgage is met through a mixture of offsite
employment and onsite income generating activities. The equivalent of three members fully
earn their living working on the group’ s onsite trading projects, although most obtain some
additional income through part-time onsite work. Several members have full-time
employment offsite. There is no sharing of any externally gained income, but each resident
gets a share of any revenue generated by co-operative business activities such as tours,
sale of publications etc. A peppercorn rent of £25 per year is paid by each household to the
landowner of the site in lieu of a 999-year lease.
Additional funding was provided with an award of over £11,000 from Scottish Power’s Green
Energy Fund for the first wind generator. Funding for the second turbine has come from the
Clear Skies programme (50per cent) and Scottish Power (25per cent). The photovoltaic
array was funded by £60,000 from the DTI’ s Domestic PV Roof Trial programme.
Two Lottery grants from the Social, Economic and Environmental Development (SEED)
Programme, funded both the feasibility study (£4,799) and the construction costs (£49,619)
of the Sustainable Resource Centre.
Visiting
Contact the group directly or visit the project website for details, pricing and to book a place
on the regular guided tours. A fee is charged that varies depending on the nature of the
visiting group.
Additional Information
The group identified two main barriers to the realisation of the project:
1. The local planning authority did not want to set any sort of precedent for a building
outside village envelopes. They attached a landmark 106 agreement to the planning
consent that included, amongst other things, issues around development of onsite, low-
impact sustainable employment and working towards self-sufficiency. Being low-energy
was not enough. The group had to demonstrate that the project would be a positive
move towards sustainable development and that it would complement the Council’ s own
policies in this area.
2. The group had difficulty in locating additional skilled labour / contractors who understood
the aims of the project.
Summary
Hollies Barn is a private development that sees the refurbishment of a former Victorian barn
into a large, four-bedroom dwelling. The original solid brick walls have been upgraded
internally to provide a highly insulated and airtight envelope, which incorporates a high level
of internally exposed thermal mass. The methodology is very similar to that employed by the
Hockerton Housing Project, which to a large extent inspired the current owner to take this
route. Other technologies and methods used in the development have also been chosen as
a result of the influence and availability of local expertise and systems that now exist within
this area of Nottinghamshire. Hockerton’ s earth sheltered scheme, the Vale’ s Autonomous
House and Gusto Construction Ltd are all within easy reach and appear to be having a
positive influence on other developments within the region.
The project also includes high specification glazing, rainwater harvesting and reed-bed grey
water treatment, space for home-working and good accessibility features. Passive Solar
Design (PSD) has been considered in the internal layout of the dwelling and the finished
design will provide a high quality and contemporary home for the residents.
Project Objectives
To create a comfortable home that is CO2 neutral in its day-to-day energy consumption and
that can be used to inspire other people to do the same.
History of Concept
The owner / developer has had a long interest in alternative energy systems, low energy
design, etc. After making the decision to leave London and return to the area where he grew
up, he sees this barn conversion as the ideal opportunity to put his ideas into practice.
With a strong background in product design and with Nick Martin, a builder and a resident of
the Hockerton Housing Project contracted as a consultant, he set about designing a virtual
model of the barn conversion in order to create a large four bedroom family home that
benefits from high thermal mass.
Although the building has been habitable since early in 2003, the project is ongoing, with
advancements being made as the finances required become available. At the time of
writing, efforts have been focused on the landscaping of the garden and pond, with the
completion of the rainwater collection system due to follow.
Construction Details
Built form A detached, U-shaped, barn conversion.
Roof Clay-pantiles fixed to wooden battens upon 40mm Kingspan insulated sarking
board. The space between the rafters is filled with either 100mm of rigid
polystyrene, or 100mm of fibreglass. A further 40mm of insulated Kingspan
plasterboard is attached to the underside of the rafters to reduce thermal
bridging.
Walls The wall construction comprises 300–350mm original solid brick wall, lined
internally with 150mm polystyrene sheet, and enclosed by 100mm dense
concrete block (see Figure 1), to provide a large amount of thermal mass.
This is then faced with wet plaster, to increase the air-tightness of the
structure.
300 - 350mm
original solid
brickwork
150mm expanded
polystyrene sheet Figure 1. Cross
section of wall
construction
100mm dense
concrete block
5mm wet
plaster finish
Floors A 100mm concrete slab is used to tie the walls together at ground level. On
top of this is laid a 300mm EPS slab, upon which a 200–300mm concrete raft
is laid, giving the internal room area a very large amount of exposed thermal
mass.
Windows Bespoke double glazed units with oak timber frames, low-emissivity coated
glass and a 28mm gap filled with argon gas.
Doors The doors are bespoke units made from English oak.
Rainwater The owners have chosen to use galvanised steel for the guttering and
Goods downpipes. This represents an economically viable and environmentally
better alternative to using PVC, and because the collected water will be used
for drinking, it is healthier than iron.
Waste During construction No ‘waste’left the site during completion of the major
Minimisation construction works. ‘ Leftovers’arising from the development were either
recycled on site, or traded with other builders, members of the village
community, etc., for other goods or services. Three lorry loads of hardcore
were taken to a recycling facility to be processed to form road surface fill
material. Just one skip of rubbish has been removed to landfill in the course
of the project.
Internal The basic principles of passive solar design have been applied, wherever
Layout possible, to the internal layout of the dwelling. The main living area contains a
large amount of south-facing glazing; and the kitchen, recycling and food
storage areas are situated on the cooler northwest side of the property. The
downstairs guest bedroom receives sunlight in the afternoon due to its
westerly location.
U-Values ( W/m2.K )
Resource Conservation
Heating The heating system consists of electric panel heaters in most rooms of
the dwelling. These run off a tariff that provides 10 hours of off-peak
electricity throughout the day and night. No gas is available at the site.
In addition, a wood burning stove has been installed in the sitting room
to provide supplementary heating when required during the colder
months.
Ventilation Individual Ventaxia heat recovery ventilation units are located in the
kitchen and bathrooms of the dwelling. Due to the narrow floor plan of
the structure, opening windows naturally ventilate the rest of the
dwelling
.
Energy Generation The design of the refurbishment allows for the easy integration of
photovoltaics at a future date. At present, their cost is prohibitive for
this development.
Water Conservation Rainwater collected from the roof of the dwelling will be stored and
utilised by the owners for all domestic purposes. The owners have
chosen to use the FREERAIN system, when the required finance
becomes available, developed by Gusto Construction in nearby
Collingham (see entry on Millennium Green for further details). The
household water will be filtered before use, and the drinking water will
be treated by ultra-violet light to destroy any water-borne bacteria.
The system has a mains water backup in the event of component /
power failure or lack of rainfall.
Recycling Facilities A dedicated area for separating and storing recyclable materials has
been designed into the dwelling.
Transport
The property is situated close to a local village shop that provides day-to-day necessities.
The owners of Hollies Barn both work from home and are therefore not dependent on
transport for commuting. There is a regular bus service from the village to other local town
and village centres.
Landscaping
The owners have created a pond and an organic vegetable patch which have already
noticeably increased the biodiversity of the project site. The creation of reed-beds in future
will further promote biodiversity.
Well Being
Accessibility The dwelling has level access at several points allowing for ease of
entry for those people who are mobility impaired. The ground floor of
the property incorporates a double bedroom and a bathroom, mainly
for the use of guests, but it could also provide for residents who are
not able to negotiate the stairs to the first floor facilities.
Adaptability A single step, soon after the entrance, does exist on the ground floor
level, but the design allows for a ramp to be built into this should it
become necessary at a future date.
Health and Both the high levels of insulation and thermal mass will reduce the
Affordability possibility of the residents suffering from fuel poverty. The rainwater
collection system and reed-bed sewerage system will reduce the
tenants’water costs.
Economic Aspects
The cost of the conversion to date has been £295,000. An evaluation of the heating energy
and utility bill savings is to be conducted once the creation of the internal buffer zones has
been completed. As both owners work mainly from home the design for the refurbishment
incorporated a dedicated office space. An ICT network has also been installed throughout
the house, making it possible to connect to the Internet from various locations within the
dwelling.
Additional Information
The owners / developers encountered the following problems when attempting to bring the
project to fruition:
• The building ‘industry’ appeared to be very busy and it was difficult to locate the
appropriate amount of labour within the desired timescales.
• Accessing the appropriate skills and knowledge needed for the development proved to
be very difficult and the owner feels that the success of the project is mainly due to the
good contacts at the Hockerton Housing Project and Newark and Sherwood District
Council, which they had already established.
• A conflict arose between the properties owners and the local authority’ s building
conservation officer over the issue of the galvanised steel guttering. The property lies
within a conservation area and the local authority officer held the belief that only cast iron
guttering should be used. The issue was resolved when it was made clear to the officer
that the rainwater was to be used for drinking and that iron guttering could have a
negative effect on the residents’health.
Summary
This scheme demonstrates the ability of a local planning authority to work with a mainstream
developer, to produce a scheme that is more sustainable than a traditional new-build
development.
By utilising the Building Research Establishment’s (BRE) EcoHomes rating system, the
developer, Bellway Homes, was required to meet a defined set of national criteria that are
assessed by an impartial, independent body and are quality assured. With guidance from
the EcoHomes scheme assessor, a ‘ Very Good’rating was achieved, as had been stipulated
beforehand by the Council.
Project Objectives
To develop a mixed use site consisting of 114 dwellings, a hotel, a day-nursery and a light
industrial unit that meets or exceeds the Building Research Establishment Environmental
Assessment Method (BREEAM) rating of ‘ Very Good’. After achieving this rating on this site,
Sutton in Ashfield District Council is working to encourage all developments in the area to
meet the same standards.
History of Concept
In a previous housing development, the Council had used its position as the planning
authority and owner of the land, to secure a greater amount of public amenity space than is
generally provided, doubling the amount of space from ten to twenty per cent of the gross
development area.
The Council wished the focus of this new development to be on sustainability, and so a set of
sustainability indicators were required to judge proposals submitted by developers in an
impartial and objective manner. The decision was made to adopt the BREEAM standards for
the non-domestic developments on the site and the EcoHomes rating system (the domestic
version of BREEAM) for the dwellings. This standard categorises developments as Pass,
Good, Very Good and Excellent. The standard that the Council decided to aim for was a
‘Very Good’rating for all types of development.
B&Q, the DIY warehouse chain, were the first to accept the challenge of meeting the
standard and now operate their flagship environmental store from the site. The building
Sustainable housing in the East Midlands - 173
Section 4: Case Studies
The Council worked with Bellway Homes to assist them in delivering a residential
development that achieves the EcoHomes rating of ‘Very Good’ . The developer was initially
sceptical about the rating scheme and they found upgrading their standard housing
specification to achieve the ‘ Very Good’ rating difficult and time consuming. Having
completed the process however, they are now very positive about the experience, and the
EcoHomes ‘ Very Good’rating has been achieved in a similar fashion at their Earlswood
development on what used to be the site of the Sherwood Colliery. Bellway Homes have
also since received approaches from other housing organisations, with regard to generating
further developments to a similar high standard.
Construction Details
Built form A mixture of semi-detached and detached two-storey dwellings.
Construction The construction is brick and block insulated cavity walls, with timber rafter
Type and tile roofs. The floors are concrete slab and the windows are double-
glazed uPVC units. The U-values exceed the 2002 Part L of the Building
Regulations by an average of 19 per cent, giving an average carbon dioxide
emission for the development of 29.5kg/m2/yr.
Resource Conservation
Heating Gas condensing boilers are fitted in all dwellings as standard, and
meet the European Class 5 standard for NOx emissions. The listed
SEDBUK figure for the model used is 90.2 per cent.
Lighting Compact fluorescent lights (CFLs) are installed in all habitable rooms
within the dwellings. All external lighting is provided by CFLs or
fluorescent strip lighting.
Resident Training White goods are provided as an optional extra for residents within the
development. When this option is chosen, the contractor provides
white goods that have an energy rating of ‘
A’. Alternatively, advice is
given to the residents that encourages them to purchase items that
have a rating of ‘
A’.
Recycling Facilities Space is provided within each dwelling for three recycling bins to be
installed either in the kitchen or the under-stair storage area, to
encourage residents to sort and recycle their waste. Additional space
is provided within the grounds of each dwelling that facilitates storage
of recycled waste awaiting transport to a local recycling amenity.
Transport
The development is within a safe walking distance of nearby shops and amenities. All
dwellings within the development are within 200m of a local bus stop, which operates a
service into the nearby town centre at least once an hour between 07:30 and 20:00hrs.
Well-Being
Health and By providing a well-insulated structure and an efficient central heating
Affordability boiler, the risk of the occupants suffering from the effects of fuel
poverty has been reduced.
Economic Aspects
At the time of writing, over 50 per cent of the dwellings had been built, with many being sold
in advance.
Suitable space for a home office is provided in all dwellings in the development. This
provides residents the opportunity to work from home and reduce the energy they expend on
commuting
Additional Information
The Council has put considerable effort into educating and influencing house builders in the
local area. A survey was carried out among residents in new housing schemes within the
area, as part of the planning department’s‘ Best Value’programme. One of the questions it
asked was “would residents have been prepared to pay five to ten per cent more for their
dwellings if they had contained sustainable features, particularly those that would have
resulted in lower running costs?” Over 60 per cent of the respondents said they would have
been prepared to pay such a premium for more sustainable features. In sharp contrast to
this however, the developer has found that sustainability falls low down on their own
customers’agendas, and that actual prospective homebuyers are much more concerned
with the capital cost of the home and qualities such as location and aesthetics. In fact, the
developer has been unable to place a premium on the homes to recoup the additional costs
incurred in the project.
The UK Government’ s “By Design”project2, that aims to inform local planners and architects
about the benefits of improved layout in urban design, has actually proved to be much more
difficult for the District Council to implement and understand than the issues of housing
sustainability. The Council’ s planning department believes that regulation will be crucial to
achieving the aims of sustainable housing at a national level.
2
For further information see Better places to live: by design. A companion guide to PPG 3. The Stationary Office, London,
2001.
A conflict between the EcoHomes rating system and the Council’ s planning department
came about when the Council looked at the issue of how best to deal with the surface
rainwater run-off from the site in a sustainable manner. The Environment Agency wanted
the surface water to run into the nearby reservoir in order to increase the flow rate of the
water passing through it. A greater throughput of rainwater would help to reduce the growth
of algae that was becoming a problem to the agency, and help to keep the reservoir in better
condition. This was believed by all partners to be the most environmentally sustainable
method, however potential points were lost with the EcoHomes rating system because the
rainwater was not stored and utilised on-site.
Project Partners
Sutton in Ashfield District Council
Bellway Homes PLC
Location Collingham,
Nottinghamshire
Type of Area Village
Tenure Owner-occupied
Built Form Various
Contact Name Gusto Construction Ltd.
Phone/e-mail (01636) 894 900
[email protected]
Visiting Possible By prior arrangement
Summary
This was the first development of its kind in the UK. A commercial housing developer, albeit
a small one, building conventionally-styled housing for the mass market that incorporates
environmentally beneficial features including:
A business centre has also been developed onsite, providing serviced office space for
residents of the development who wish to work from home. The developers provide
continuous support to residents who are also asked to give feedback about living in the
dwellings at annual evening gatherings.
The project has been a commercial success, with all 24 dwellings that form the development
being sold.
The company has won the following awards as a result of its project at Millennium Green:
Project Objectives
To build high-quality environmentally friendly homes for sale on the commercial property
market.
History of Concept
Gusto Construction initially commenced business as a small construction company building
conventional dwellings for sale on the commercial property market. In 1998 the company
purchased 3.6 acres of land in Collingham, Nottinghamshire.
The company’ s chief executive, Stephen Wright, wanted the organisation to change direction
and had been inspired by local housing projects such as the Autonomous House in
Southwell and the earth-sheltered dwellings at Hockerton, and by David Pickles, manager for
energy & eco-renovation at Newark & Sherwood District Council.
Initially the group hoped to attract some subsidy from national government or from the
European Union that would assist them to experiment with different building types on the
site. All such applications were rejected, but the company pressed ahead with its ideals of
creating more sustainable housing in a way that would be commercially viable in today’ s
property market.
The organisation realised that it had to find a balance between the achievements of the
Hockerton Housing Project and housing built to the current building standards. Thus the
concept for Millennium Green was born; housing that would be built to high quality
standards, incorporating many of the technologies and techniques of ‘ green’building, but
also architecturally acceptable to the ordinary house purchaser.
Construction Details
A majority of the dwellings are detached or link-attached and are situated on what was
formally a greenfield site. The site layout ensures that a majority of the dwellings have good
solar access on their southern elevation. A high proportion of the glazing is installed on this
elevation to enhance the contribution that solar gain makes towards heating the dwellings.
Heat loss from the individual building elements is half or less than half of that specified under
the 1995 Building Regulations.
Walls The external walls are of standard brick and block construction, but with a
150mm cavity filled with Drytherm insulation. These are sited upon 350mm-
wide insulating trench blocks. Internal load bearing walls are 100mm clinker
block.
Roof Clay or clay-faced concrete tiles sit above a breather membrane upon a roof
structure constructed from engineered timber I-beams. The roofs are
insulated with 240mm Warmcel recycled cellulose insulation, which is held
behind a 12.7mm foil-backed plasterboard internal lining.
Floor The ground floors of the dwellings are constructed from 100mm concrete sited
upon 150mm of extruded polystyrene or 80mm polyurethane Thermo floor.
This sits on top of a polythene damp proof membrane.
U-Values ( W/m2.K )
Walls: 0.20
Floor: 0.15
Roof: 0.15
Windows: 1.60
Resource Conservation
A great deal of effort has been made during the design stage to reduce the amount of non-
renewable resources consumed by the dwellings during occupation. In addition to the high
levels of insulation already mentioned, the following measures have been installed into each
property as standard features.
Heating Condensing gas boilers are fitted in all dwellings and are coupled to an
intelligent heating control system. In addition to an intelligent whole
house temperature control system, all radiators are fitted with
thermostatic valve controls.
Water Every property is fitted with a rainwater recovery system that collects
Conservation and stores rainwater in a collection tank to be used for flushing toilets,
providing water to washing machines and for irrigating the garden.
The developers tried several ‘ off the shelf’systems. Each presented
its own unique set of complications, which resulted in Gusto
developing its own “Freerain”system that is now installed as standard.
This system incorporates an underground storage tank, self-cleaning
in-tank filters and a submersible pump. The system is not designed to
provide drinking quality water but rather to provide water for the above
purposes with minimal maintenance. Overflow water from the system
passes into the local storm drains
.
The company offers three sizes of tank, with the standard unit capable
of holding 3,500 litres. The filters used are cleaned whenever the unit
overflows, and correct sizing of the storage tank ensures that this
occurs at least three times a year.
The systems have performed well and relatively rarely run dry during
periods of low rainfall. The homes’consumption of domestic mains
water has been cut by roughly 50 percent.
Aerated taps and showers are also fitted as standard to reduce water
consumption.
Resident Resident training in the use and environmental benefits of the energy
Training and water systems in the dwellings takes place when they move in.
This aims to optimise the benefits of these systems by ensuring the
residents are capable of operating them efficiently.
Landscaping
A communal green has been developed in the centre of the site for the residents’use. This
has been landscaped to include varieties of fruiting trees and shrubs. The stream that
adjoins the northern perimeter of the site has created a protected area. Water voles have
been spotted in this area and the developer has issued a leaflet informing residents about
this rare and disappearing species.
Stewardship of the common areas of the site rests with the developer. This ensures that
these areas are properly managed, and demonstrates the on-going commitment that the
developer has in the site. This has also allowed for a more exotic landscape than would
have been possible had responsibility been passed to the local authority in the conventional
way.
Sustainable housing in the East Midlands - 180
Section 4: Case Studies
Transport
The development is close to local shops, schools, a railway station and leisure facilities.
There are no specific measures to encourage people to walk or cycle; however, charging
points for electric vehicles can be provided as an option, and this has been taken up by a
number of residents.
Social Aspects
As part of the developer’ s commitment to continuous improvement, regular feedback
sessions are held with the residents to obtain information on the pros and cons of the various
systems installed in the dwellings. These are also seen as essential in developing a sense
of community, which is enhanced by the fact that all of the residents are living in a unique
development.
Communal Facilities
A business centre has been built onsite, with the intention of providing serviced office space
to residents who wish to work from home. The developer is actively seeking ways in which
this centre can provide a range of services to residents. Services such as key-holding,
parcel drop-off, etc. are being explored to ensure that they are useful to the community as
well as financially viable.
Well-Being
Health and The development of aspirational dwellings that can be heated and
Affordability lit at an affordable cost to the residents reduces the possibility of them
suffering from the negative effects of fuel poverty. The rainwater
recycling system ensures that none of the residents will suffer from
water poverty. The provision of a good ventilation strategy in all
dwellings should reduce the occurrence of damp and mould, as well
as reducing the cost of maintenance on the buildings. A pollen filter is
fitted as standard on the heat recovery ventilation units.
Accessibility Extra-wide doorways and low door thresholds on ground floor doors
makes the dwellings accessible to wheelchair users. These designs
pre-dated this requirement under Building Regulations.
Adaptability All dwellings are wired for ISDN and Internet connection as standard,
ensuring that all residents can access these communication
technologies.
Crime The layout of the site has incorporated good practice with regard to
crime reduction and multi-point locking. Pre-wired alarm systems are
fitted to all dwellings. The sense of community that the site inspires
also adds to the sense of security about living there.
Economic Aspects
The developer has found that a premium of approximately ten per cent has been added to
the cost of the development due to the additional features incorporated into the dwellings.
Twenty four dwellings have been built on the site and all costs were met by the developer.
There have been no external subsidies for this project.
Subsequent Developments
The commercial success of Millennium Green has allowed Gusto Construction to expand on
their ethos of providing homes that include many environmentally friendly technologies to the
upper end of the market. Three new projects have been developed:
The Beefield, Hawthorn Road, Lincoln is a nine house development on the outskirts of
Lincoln, with a similar specification to Millennium Green. Sustainable drainage was an
issue on this particular site, which led to the installation of a storm-water run-off
attenuation system, to complement the rainwater harvesting system.
Gusto is also to build 9 homes in the village of Reepham, close to Lincoln, where the
technologies introduced at Millennium Green will continue to be applied. A more
consultative approach with local residents has been taken by Gusto during the planning
stage of this development.
Additional Information
The developer encountered various regulatory problems during the development of
Millennium Green. These included conflicts with the Highways Agency with regard to the
design of the storm drains and resistance from the parish council with regard to setting a
precedent for a different style of development.
Resistance within the industry was also encountered with trade-people being unwilling to
adopt different working methods or to use different materials.
The massive shortage of skilled labour within the industry presented Gusto Construction with
problems of staffing the development. The developer invested heavily in staff training and
development and, through retaining these staff, a greater understanding of the technology
being employed has been achieved. This has led to reduced snagging during the design
stage of subsequent developments and more efficient problem resolution and maintenance
once the buildings are occupied and in use.
The trade-people have become more involved with the development of the projects and feel
that they have a vested interest in the success of the company. They often suggest new
methods and technologies themselves. Stephen Wright, the chief executive of Gusto
Construction believes that this type of approach is essential if the industry is to attract new
people. He sees it as part of giving people a sense of satisfaction and pride in the industry
that he feels is lacking in the UK when compared to countries such as Germany, Holland or
Australia, where being a builder has a higher social status.
The developer believes that legislation must drive the construction industry towards more
sustainable building methods, and cites the need for an aspirational set of Building
Regulations that the industry can work to over the next ten years. “Ten years is easily
enough time for this industry to change”(Stephen Wright, in interview 2001).
Sustainable housing in the East Midlands - 182
Section 4: Case Studies
The success of Gusto’s‘ Freerain’water harvesting system has led to the formation of a spin-
off company with the same name. In addition to receiving the Environment Agency 2003
Water Efficiency award, Freerain was a founding member of the UK Rainwater Harvesting
Association (UK-RHA).
Summary
Beaconsfield Street is a group of seven terrace dwellings providing energy efficient
accommodation to single people, couples and larger households.
The project incorporates a highly insulated timber frame construction, using timber from
sustainable sources, high-specification glazing, and passive stack ventilation to the kitchen
and bathroom, and the use of recycled insulation materials.
The Housing Association teamed up with a local training provider, Nottingham Environmental
Construction Training for All (NECTA), who employ local labour and provide training in
construction trades for long-term unemployed people. This was funded by the ‘ New Deal for
Communities’scheme.
Project Objectives
To create a group of energy efficient, 1 and 4-bed properties on an infill site in Nottingham.
Summary
Beaconsfield Street is a group of seven terrace dwellings providing energy efficient
accommodation to single people, couples and larger households.
The project incorporates a highly insulated timber frame construction, using timber from
sustainable sources, high-specification glazing, and passive stack ventilation to the kitchen
and bathroom, and the use of recycled insulation materials.
The housing association teamed up with a local training provider, Nottingham Environmental
Construction Training for All (NECTA), who employ local labour and provide training in
construction trades for long-term unemployed people. This was funded by the ‘ New Deal for
Communities’scheme.
Construction Details
Built form An ‘L’-shaped, two-storey terrace development that provides three one-
bedroom units and three four-bedroom units. The development took place on
an urban infill site between a school and a highway.
Roof Concrete tiles upon prefabricated timber trusses. The loft floor is insulated
with 200mm of mineral wool.
Interior To reduce the environmental impact of the interior furnishings, the association
finishes used low-solvent paints and varnishes throughout the scheme. Linoleum was
used in place of vinyl floor coverings in some areas of the scheme.
Impact of The soil removed for the foundations of the development remained onsite and
Construction was used to form a grassed over earth bank. This significantly reduced the
amount of waste that went to landfill as a result of the development.
U-Values ( W/m2.K )
Walls: 0.21
Floor: 0.35
Roof: 0.18
Windows: 2.50
Doors: 0.35
Resource Conservation
Heating Each dwelling within the development is fitted with a condensing gas
combination boiler controlled by a programmer, room thermostat and
thermostatic radiator valves (TRVs).
Lighting Compact florescent lights (CFLs) are provided to reduce the cost and
energy use of artificial lighting.
Resident Training It is the policy of the housing association that all residents receive
training in energy awareness to help them to reduce their fuel costs.
Transport
The development is already within an established residential area and is close to schools, a
supermarket, and public transport links, including the new Nottingham tram system.
Landscaping
Trees that were present at the site were maintained as part of the development.
Well-Being
Health and The low fuel costs incurred by the residents of this scheme will ensure
Affordability that they are at a greatly reduced risk of suffering from fuel poverty.
Accessibility All units have level access to facilitate entry for people with mobility
problems.
Additional Information
NECTA, the contractors chosen for this scheme, bid for and received European funding to
provide training in various building trades to local, unemployed people. The organisation
was very involved at the early stages of the project and with developing the specification.
Although this is a very worthy way of working and is to be encouraged, large delays were
experienced by the project due to the continuous onsite training of the workforce and the
workforce’s transience. Quite often the trainees would drift away from the project, leaving
the project manager with the responsibility of finding and training a replacement at very short
notice.
The following comments also relate to the other projects undertaken by Nottingham Community Housing
Association (NCHA) featured within this publication at Garendon Road (Eco-Life), Green Lane, and the Fosse
Estate.
1. The increased financial cost of producing dwellings with a high thermal efficiency. The
average premium experienced by the Housing Association for this type of construction is
about five per cent per development.
The housing association finds that many contractors require further education when
developing projects that are not of a traditional construction nature, which can be costly
in time and money.
3. Due to the increasing demand for ‘ green’products such as the Masonite stud wall
system, delays were experienced when attempting to get quotations and purchasing
such systems. This is mainly due to the few manufacturers producing them being unable
to supply their increasing demand.
Project Partners
Nottingham Community Housing Association
Nottingham Environmental Construction Training for All (NECTA)
Summary
The Corncroft development is one of the largest concentrations of PV in the UK, and
potentially the largest installation in social housing. It features 44 semi-detached bungalows
for older persons and young, disabled residents. 22 of the dwellings incorporate photovoltaic
panels on the south-facing roofs.
This £265,000 installation project was designed by Energy for Sustainable Development Ltd
(ESD), who helped to secure £238,000 from the DTI’ s Domestic Roof Trial funding
programme, launched in 2000. The project was co-funded by Powergen (£30,000). The
development was built by Westleigh Homes.
A total rating of 34 kWp has been installed on the site using BP 585L mono-crystalline units
attached to mounting frames from PV Systems Ltd that can accommodate up to six panels
each. The frames and panels replace the tiles that would normally form the rooftop, and lead
flashing provides a watertight seal.
The panels are linked to the national grid, allowing energy to be imported and exported
depending on the resident’
s demands and the panels’supply. It has been estimated that the
panels will reduce each dwelling’
s electricity demand by 30 per cent, saving the residents
about £60 per year.
A 24 month monitoring exercise of the development has been undertaken by ESD and the
results are to be made publicly available via their website.
Project Objectives
To investigate the potential of using rooftop integrated photovoltaic panels, as a means of
progressing towards sustainability in community housing development.
History of Concept
Nottingham Community Housing Association operates with a core philosophy of maximising
the energy efficiency and environmental sustainability of its affordable housing
developments. In 2000, the housing association used their planned development at
Corncroft to bid for funding from the DTI for a domestic photovoltaic field trial. This funding
was secured with the help of Energy for Sustainable Development Ltd (ESD), and the project
began onsite in late 2001.
Project Partners
Nottingham Community Housing Association
Energy for Sustainable Development Ltd
Powergen
Westleigh Homes
Location Newark,
Nottinghamshire
Type of Area Urban
Tenure Housing Association
Built Form Terrace Bungalows
Contact Name Nottingham
Community
Housing Association
Phone / e-mail (0115) 910 4444
Web Address www.ncha.org.uk
Visiting Possible By prior arrangement
Summary
This project was built in 1999 on a brownfield site and incorporates high levels of thermal
insulation, a covered street, level access to all properties and four units built for residents
with higher needs as a result of physical disabilities.
The dwellings are orientated to maximise solar gains and are arranged internally so that the
main living areas face south.
Communal space is provided internally by the covered street, and externally by communal
gardens.
Project Objectives
To create a group of energy efficient bungalows for older persons.
History of Concept
The Housing Association wished to use a covered street design to provide a communal
space in which residents could socialise. This would have the additional benefit of reducing
the residents’ space heating energy usage, due to the street’ s buffering effect on the
envelope of each dwelling, and its ability to store solar thermal gains. It was felt that this
type of design would be particularly appropriate for older people, who generally prefer higher
room temperatures and would benefit from the potentially lower fuel bills.
The buildings were designed as part of a competition to achieve weekly fuel bills of less than
£1 per week. These buildings achieved this when modelled by computer software using the
Standard Assessment Procedure (SAP) algorithms. From the actual fuel bills, the average
energy costs for the first 38 months from the date of construction of a sample of eight
properties on the site were found to be:
Figure 1.
Showing the
layout of
terrace rows
on either side
of the
covered
Construction Details
Built form This was a brownfield site, formerly occupied by three 5-storey blocks of flats
that were demolished. The development consists of 33 terrace dwellings
arranged in five groups around the site. The largest group consists of 20 units
while others contain three or four units each. The units are orientated to
maximise passive solar thermal gain, thereby reducing heating costs and
greenhouse gas emissions.
Figure 1 shows how the terraces are arranged on either side of a glazed
covered street. The use of a mono-pitched roof on the southern dwellings
provides shading to the covered street and prevents it from overheating
during the summer. The covered street encloses a peripheral wall of the
dwellings, thereby reducing heat loss by buffering this element from external
weather conditions. In the case of the largest group of dwellings, the covered
street is nearly 50 metres long and provides a valuable circulation space for
the residents.
Roof Concrete tiles upon prefabricated timber trusses. The loft floor is insulated
with 200mm of mineral wool insulation.
Rainwater Rainwater drainage from the site is achieved by the use of soakaways.
Internal The lounges are on the southern side of the dwellings, to maximise the
benefits
Layout of solar thermal gains.
The windows, walls and doors facing onto the covered street are of the same
construction as the external facade. This causes the covered street to be
thermally isolated from the dwellings, which is important for when the external
temperature falls particularly low during the winter.
Resource Conservation
Heating Each dwelling within the development is fitted with a condensing gas
combination boiler controlled by a programmer, room thermostat and
thermostatic radiator valves (TRVs).
Lighting Compact florescent lights (CFLs) are provided to reduce the energy
use and cost of artificial lighting.
Resident Training It is the policy of the Housing Association that all residents receive
training in energy awareness, to help them reduce their fuel costs.
U-Values ( W/m2.K )
Walls: 0.21
Floor: 0.35
Roof: 0.18
Windows: 2.50
Doors: 0.35
Transport
The project is within an existing housing estate. There are shopping facilities nearby and
good public transport links to the main town centre.
Communal Facilities
The glazed, covered street (see Figure 2) provides an area where tenants have the
opportunity to engage with each another and generate a sense of community. Many of the
residents have adopted the areas directly outside their homes and planted ornamental
plants, contributing to the aesthetics of the scheme.
The scheme also provides a mixture of communal garden/allotment space and a private
garden for each dwelling.
Well-Being
Special support Support is provided by the Housing Association to the residents
and integration of the four dwellings that are specially adapted for the needs of
registered disabled persons.
Health and The low fuel costs incurred by the residents ensure that they are at a
affordability greatly reduced risk of suffering from the symptoms of fuel poverty.
Accessibility All of the dwellings have level access from the covered street and four
units have been built to accommodate residents with high disability
needs.
Crime Access to all dwellings is via a lockable entrance into the covered
street. Each dwelling is then individually accessed via a conventional
front door. An intercom system is provided in each dwelling to enable
residents to question visitors before letting them into the covered
street area. This provides the residents with a greater sense of
security, as the only people who should be in the covered street are
other residents or their guests.
Additional Information
Details of barriers and other issues relating to NCHA’ s experience of developing a more
sustainable form of housing are included in the entry for “Beaconsfield Street”.
Location Loughborough
Type of Area Urban
Tenure Housing Association
Built Form Terrace bungalows and semi-
detached, two-storey housing
Contact Name Nottingham Community
Housing Association
Phone / e-mail (0115) 910 4444
Web Address www.ncha.org.uk
Visiting Possible By arrangement only
Summary
The sustainability features of the project include estate layout and internal building
arrangements that maximise passive solar gain to reduce the heating load. Rainwater
harvesting and storage for use in toilet flushing is included and car parking standards are set
at 50 per cent below local authority recommendations.
Project Objectives
To create a scheme of seventeen energy efficient dwellings incorporating ‘
Lifetime Homes’
standards.
History of Concept
Nottingham Community Housing Association (NCHA) has been working with low-energy
design since 1997. It was requested by Charnwood Borough Council to incorporate the
methodology of low-energy design with the features of ‘
Lifetime Homes’
.
Construction Details
Built form Seventeen dwellings have been built on this Greenfield site as a mixture of
terraced bungalows for elderly clients and semi-detached family houses.
Roof Concrete tiles on prefabricated timber rafters. The loft floor is insulated with
200mm of mineral wool.
Walls Timber frame construction with 100mm of mineral wool insulation and clad
with bricks.
Other The layout of the development follows the guidelines laid out in GIR027
“Passive Solar Estate Layout”published by BRECSU. The principles of this
are to orientate as many houses as possible so that the elevation containing
the most glazing faces within 30° of south, whilst avoiding obstructions to
solar access through the windows. In addition to the layout of the housing
estate, maximising the benefits of passive solar layout also requires an
internal house design that places the main living areas to the south of the
Sustainable housing in the East Midlands - 193
Section 4: Case Studies
dwelling. Approximately half the potential energy saving from passive solar
design comes from correct estate layout and the other half from appropriate
internal layout. When combined, these two design methodologies can
produce energy savings of approximately 10 per cent over conventional
methods at no additional cost to the developer.3
Resource Conservation
Heating Gas condensing-combination boilers with room thermostats,
programmers and thermostatic radiator valves (TRVs).
Water Conservation Rainwater is collected from the roof, stored and used for flushing
toilets. All toilets fitted in the dwellings will consume four-litres or less
of water per flush.
Resident Training It is the policy of Nottingham Community Housing Association for all
tenants to receive training in energy efficiency awareness.
Transport
The development is in an urban area close to schools and with easy access to public
transport facilities. A cycle lane already passes next to the land where the development is
situated and is linked to it. Car parking provision within the development has been reduced to
25 per cent below local authority recommended standards.
Landscaping
The cycle lane that adjoins the development site contains verges that are home to a large
range of species of flora and fauna. The housing association is attempting to maintain and
enhance this area during the development of the project and is working with the borough
council’
s landscaping and wildlife departments to achieve this aim.
Well-Being
Health and The low-energy design of the dwellings in conjunction with rainwater
Affordability toilets should reduce the utility costs and protect the residents from
fuel and water poverty.
3
Figures from GIR027: Passive Solar Estate Layout, BRECSU, London, 1997.
Crime The homes all comply with the national ‘Secure by Design’standard.
Adaptability The dwellings all comply with the national ‘
Lifetime Homes’standard.
Additional Information
Details of barriers and other issues relating to NCHA’ s experience of developing a more
sustainable form of housing are included under the entry for “Beaconsfield Street”.
Project Partners
Nottingham Community Housing Association
Charnwood Borough Council
Summary
This is an owner-led project to renovate an Edwardian semi-detached property, which was
initially in very poor condition, in an environmentally friendly manner. The project is still in
progress, but to date includes features such as high levels of internal insulation, rainwater
harvesting, whole house composting toilets, low flush toilets, energy efficient white goods,
environmentally friendly construction materials, use of recycled construction materials, solar
water heating, heat recovery ventilation and a large range of environmentally benign
decorative finishes.
The need for a conventional central heating system has been avoided and the dwelling is
virtually CO2 neutral in use through the purchase of electricity from a company specialising in
renewable energy.
The owners have tackled the issue of housing density and converted their loft to provide
additional self-contained space for lodgers. The property is currently home to 3 family
members and two lodgers. This has the added positive effect of increasing the affordability
of the dwelling for everyone. Transport issues have also been taken onboard and a home
office has been created for one resident who works fulltime from home.
The dwelling is an expression of its owners’philosophy to minimise their impact upon the
environment and to assist others to do the same. To date it has featured in numerous
magazine and press articles, and local TV and radio reports. The owners have provided
tours to hundreds of interested individuals and groups, and their expertise is often sought
with regard to the performance of many of the products they have installed.
Project Objectives
To renovate an Edwardian semi-detached property using environmentally friendly materials,
improve its sustainability in use and increase the density of its occupancy whilst providing a
home that is comfortable and suitable to a modern lifestyle.
Construction Details
Built form Refurbishment of an Edwardian semi-detached property.
Walls The walls are of traditional 9-inch solid brick construction. The entire exterior
of the house, except the front wall, has been clad in 6 inches of ‘ Sto’rigid
polystyrene insulation board. This is reinforced with a glass fibre mesh and
acrylic rendered to provide weather protection and a better appearance. The
front wall of the dwelling has been insulated internally using two-layers of
‘Knauf’dry-lining board. This comprises a 40mm layer of rigid, zero ozone
depleting, phenolic foam bonded to 12.5mm of plasterboard. This approach
was chosen to ensure that the appearance of the house was in keeping with
neighbouring properties.
Roof Traditional Edwardian slate that has been completely overhauled, re-using the
original slate wherever possible and using reclaimed slate tiles where
replacement was necessary. A breather membrane was used as an
alternative to sarking felt, and the roof eaves were extended over the gable
wall to create an overhang that will accommodate the planned external wall
insulation. The roof is insulated with 300mm of recycled cellulose insulation in
the sloping sections and 400mm on the flat sections.
Floors The suspended timber ground floor has been insulated between the joists
using 75-100mm thick slabs of ‘ Thermafleece’ , made from British sheep’ s
wool, which is underdrawn using a ‘ Tyvek’breathing membrane, and held in
place by ‘Gutex’wood fibre insulation board, fastened to the underside of the
joists. This reduces the amount of thermal bridging through the joists. This
work was relatively easy to carry out due to the large basement that runs
under the main part of the house.
The solid ground floors were excavated and replaced with 150mm concrete
slabs upon 150mm Jablite polystyrene slab, insulated at the edges with 50mm
polystyrene to avoid thermal bridging between the floor and the walls. The
floor was then top dressed in Cornish slate.
Windows The previous owner had replaced the original wooden sash windows with
double-glazed uPVC units. As the finances become available, these will be
replaced with double or triple glazed units that incorporate a low-emissivity
coating and gas fill.
Triple-glazed ‘
French’windows have been installed at the rear of the dwelling.
These are wooden framed, sealed units using the Iplus system, with two
bismuth-based low-e coatings giving a performance about five times better
than conventional double-glazing.
Rainwater All rainwater goods are made from copper, as it has better environmental
performance than PVC, and because the rainwater is harvested and stored
for later use. Copper has a mild disinfecting effect on water, which improves
the quality of the stored rainwater.
Plumbing All replacement and new plumbing used in the dwelling is made from 100%
recycled polyethylene.
Wiring All replacement wiring within the dwelling is PVC free, low smoke - low fume,
rubberised sheathed cable.
Internal All paints, varnishes, floor coverings, etc. have been chosen for their low
Decoration impact, with regard to the internal and global environments. The owners have
chosen to experiment with as many different products as possible; including
Cornish slate (in preference to more expensive Welsh slate), low volatile
organic compound (low VOC) paint, mineral based paints, hardwax oil (in
preference to traditional varnishes), linseed oil, borate wood preservative (in
preference to pressure treated wood), zero formaldehyde MDF, etc.
U-Values ( W/m2.K )
Walls: 0.23
Roof: 0.10
Floor: 0.21
Windows: (double glass) 1.20
(triple glass) 0.60
Resource Conservation
Heating The heating demand was initially met using incidental heat gains
provided by the residents’activities, such as washing and cooking,
topped up by portable electric heaters using ‘ green electricity’from
Unit(e). Due to the poor electrical efficiency of these heaters however,
a 29kW wood-burning central heating system boiler has been installed
in the cellar with the help of two grants; from the New Energy
Foundation and the Clear Skies scheme. The boiler heats a super-
insulated, 1100 litre drum of water and has, to date, been fuelled using
softwood obtained for free from local timber merchants. Hardwood
logs would burn slower and therefore permit less frequent refuelling.
The water flow distribution around the house is controlled by a digital
thermostat and programmable timer.
Lighting Compact fluorescent lights (CFLs) are used throughout the dwelling.
Ventilation Individual ‘
through-the-wall’heat recovery fans are provided in the
kitchens and bathrooms. These are controlled by humidity sensors
and have a manual override, enabling them to be turned off during the
summer months, when ventilation is provided by opening windows.
length thereby reducing the amount of water needed to fill it and the
amount of space needed to accommodate it.
The dwelling also incorporates a ‘ whole-house’ toilet composting
system that separates the water from the solid waste for the dwelling’
s
three toilets. Water from the toilets passes through an Aquatron
Separator situated upon a bespoke composting chamber in the
basement (see Figure 1). The separator acts as a centrifuge;
separating the liquid portion of the waste, which passes into the main
drain, from the solid, which falls into the compost chamber. Once
inside the chamber, the solids lay on a raft composed of 150mm of
plastic pellets, netting and 50mm of coir compost. Efoetida worms
were introduced into the chamber to help speed up the digestion
process. They also reduce the volume of the solids by 90 percent so
that the chamber only needs emptying every 7 years (estimated,
based on 5 adults).
Figure 2. The
rainwater storage tanks
in the dwelling
basement.
Communal Facilities
The owners rent out the top floor of the dwelling, which has been converted into a self-
contained area for two lodgers. In this way the house and its facilities become shared
resources for a greater number of people. This ultimately saves resources compared to the
potential three households, with individual household goods, that may otherwise exist. It
also contributes to diversifying the economic base of the dwelling’
s owners and offsets some
of the costs of the renovation work.
Transport
The location of the dwelling is close to the city centre of Nottingham. Therefore its residents
enjoy easy access to all of the centre’ s facilities, and access to public transport including a
mainline station.
In keeping with the owners’philosophy, one member of the household works from home and
another has a three-minute walk to their place of work.
A bike shed will be provided in the backyard of the dwelling to enable safe and convenient
storage of bicycles. The residents are part of a large bike-trailer share scheme that operates
in the local area. This grant-funded scheme owns over 50 trailers, of various types, for
transporting children or other loads.
Landscaping
Resource Crops Although the garden belonging to the dwelling is relatively small, the
(food/fuel) owners have been growing as much of their own food as possible.
There is a particular emphasis on winter salad crops and this will
reduce the amount of energy expended on obtaining ‘ out of season’
vitamins.
Well-Being
Health and The reduced energy and water costs of the dwelling will reduce the
risk
Affordability of the owners suffering from the effects of fuel or water poverty. In
addition, the use of relatively environmentally benign materials during
Due to the shared nature of the house, and its proximity to local
facilities, residents should find it easily affordable to live in.
Crime The shared nature of the dwelling, and the fact that one resident works
from home, means that the dwelling is almost continuously occupied.
Therefore the risks of crime to the property are reduced.
Economic Aspects
The cost of the refurbishment to date is £100,000; this includes the renovation work that was
necessary to the structure of the dwelling as well as the environmental features. The amount
is higher than a traditional renovation, but should save the owners over £1000 per year in
utility costs, as they will be paying only for the electricity required to run the appliances in the
home.
One resident works from home as the co-ordinator for the local ‘ Eco-teams’project that
works with groups of households to educate them about reducing the environmental impact
of their lives.
Some members of the household actively support the Local Exchange and Trading System
(LETS).
Summary
Plane Tree Court is a group of ten bungalows for elderly people constructed using timber
frame techniques and providing energy-efficient dwellings for their residents. The dwellings
have been occupied since June 2002.
Apart from high levels of insulation, the main innovative feature of the development is the
use of geothermal energy to provide heating and hot water to the dwellings. By working in
partnership with a UK based heat-pump manufacturer, an affordable bespoke heat pump
system that is capable of delivering enough heating and hot water for the residents’needs
has been developed. This aspect of the project has been very successful and has been
replicated in developments since undertaken by the Association. Four of the dwellings are
currently being monitored by the Building Research Establishment (BRE), and the results of
this are to be disseminated to the wider housing community.
The Association wished to create a sense of community within the development. They
created a ‘ covered street’
, which provides a link between the dwellings and surrounds the
communal gardens that are maintained by the Association. The ten terraced dwellings are
set out in a U-shape, with the covered street following the internal edge of the ‘
U’, enclosing
the communal gardens on three sides.
Both of these innovations have proved popular with the residents, who enjoy the
opportunities for interaction that the design offers and the lower fuel bills that the heating and
construction systems deliver.
Project Objectives
To create a group of ten low-energy bungalows for older residents that creates a sense of
community through the use of communal space.
History of Concept
Metropolitan Housing Association (MHA) wanted to build on the experience of other projects
around the country that use communal space to create a sense of community within the
development.
They also wished to trial the use of geothermal energy as the main heating source for the
development. This was mainly driven by personal interest and experience of some of the
Association’s managers.
Sustainable housing in the East Midlands - 202
Section 4: Case Studies
Construction Details
Built Form The development of ten dwellings is on a brownfield site. Each dwelling has
two-bedrooms and is 65m2 in size.
Walls Timber frame construction with a 147mm cavity filled with mineral wool. The
outer leaf consists of a brick skin and internally the walls are lined with
plasterboard.
Roof Warm roof construction that extends from the dwelling on one side to form the
roof of the covered street. Motorised Velux rooflights are fitted into the roof of
the covered street to provide ventilation to and prevent overheating of this
area during the summer
.
Floors Suspended timber floor with ‘ Kingspan’phenolic foam board laid on top of the
joists. The pipes for the under-floor heating system are laid on top of this and
set into a 50mm screed.
Windows The windows are all uPVC units with a 20mm air gap and a single low-
emissivity coating to the inner surface of the outer pane. The use of uPVC
was dictated by the Association’ s maintenance policies; however, a review is
currently underway of alternative frame types (e.g. wood) as the Association
wishes to move away from the use of uPVC as its production involves no less
than six of the fifteen chemicals listed by European Governments for priority
elimination.
U-Values ( W/m2.K )
Walls: 0.27
Floor: 0.25
Roof: 0.19
Windows: 1.70
Doors: 0.60
Resource Conservation
Heating A bespoke geothermal heat pump system, developed and
manufactured for the Association by ‘ Calorex Heat Pumps’ , feeds an
under-floor heating system and provides domestic hot water. The
heat pump, which is the size of a conventional fridge, is situated in its
own plant room within the bungalow. Water is pumped into a 70m
borehole under the property where it is heated naturally by geothermal
energy to 12°C. The heat pump extracts and upgrades this heat
before storing it in a thermal store. The heat for the central heating
system and the domestic hot water is drawn directly from this store.
It also prevents air seeping into the pipe, a problem that may occur in
more porous, plastic pipes.
Water Dual-flush (four litre and two litre) toilets are fitted as standard to
Conservation reduce water use, and showers have been fitted in the dwellings in
preference to baths. The residents have not reacted negatively to this
approach to water conservation.
Resident Training All residents are given basic energy efficiency information from the
Housing Association that helps them to reduce their energy costs.
SAP / Eco-ratings The bungalows achieve a SAP rating of 100 and NHER rating of 10.
Transport
The development is located in an urban area close to shops and recreational facilities. A bus
route passes close to the development and provides easy access to the city centre and other
transport connections.
Landscaping
The landscaping of the development includes outside seating areas, a water feature and the
use of bamboos and herbs to create a pleasant and low maintenance environment for the
residents.
Social Aspects
Post-occupancy tenant surveys are used by the Association to gain feedback on the design.
Issues that arise from these surveys are fed into the design of future projects.
Communal Facilities
Communal areas have been provided for all residents in the form of the covered street and a
Japanese-style low maintenance garden. In addition, small private front gardens are also
provided for each dwelling. All the external space is managed on the residents’behalf by the
Housing Association.
The windowsills within the covered street have been designed to be wide enough to allow
the residents the opportunity of growing their own plants inside the covered space.
Well-Being
Health and The high levels of insulation, efficient heating system and the use of
Affordability low-water toilets and showers has reduced the utility costs for the
residents, and therefore reduced the likelihood of them suffering from
fuel poverty. CS
Accessibility All the dwellings within the development are built to the ‘
Lifetime
Homes’standard and have full disability access.
Crime ‘
Secure by Design’ techniques were used throughout the
development.
Economic Issues
The cost of development was £900,000 for a total of ten dwellings
Additional Information
One of the key features in the success of this project, and others undertaken by MHA, is the
ability to form long-term partnerships with building contractors. This is largely due to the
Association’ s implementation of the recommendations set out in the Egan report. The
methodology allows developers such as MHA to share the risks and uncertainties associated
with innovation with their partners.
One of the restrictive features of being a Registered Social Landlord (RSL) is having to work
within the development costs set down by the Housing Corporation. There is no doubt that
the increased costs of development and land acquisition, in conjunction with a Social
Housing Grant (SHG) regime which seeks to deliver the lowest amount of grant possible,
inhibits the ability of RSLs to be more innovative.
MHA also identified two other issues that have arisen directly from their experience with
highly-insulated buildings. The first is the need to fit external doors that have a high thermal
resistance. Some of the first developments undertaken by the Association using highly
insulated timber frame buildings resulted in condensation, and consequently mould, forming
on the door panel as this was the coolest exterior surface.
Secondly, the Association have abandoned the use of individual heat recovery fans in the
kitchen due to overheating problems. This is due to the combination of a highly insulated
envelope and high internal heat gains in the kitchen area. The Association now specifies
standard extract fans.
Project Partners
Metropolitan Housing Trust (Owners & Designers)
Westleigh Developments Ltd. (Builders)
Powergen / Calorex (Heat-pump design)
Summary
River Crescent will be an important first step towards the regeneration of the Riverside area
as a major waterfront urban quarter for the city.
Trent Park Developments have proposed a 128 luxury apartment scheme that incorporates a
number of well-proven eco-technologies. A solar photovoltaic roofing system and vertical
axis wind turbines will generate electricity to heat and light all the communal areas. The
River Trent is to be used as a heat source for a heat pump system that will provide the warm
water for the complex swimming pool. Landscaped terraces will reduce the rainwater runoff
from the rooftop. Most unique of the sustainable proposals however, is a fleet of
compressed air powered cars that are to be provided for residents to either hire or buy. The
air compressors will be powered using electricity generated by the PV roof, making this a
true fleet of eco-friendly vehicles.
The proposal followed consultation with Nottingham University’ s School of the Built
Environment and is seen by Trent Park Developments as the most effective means of
illustrating how seriously they accept the responsibility of tackling both global warming and
the UK’ s increasing dependence on imported energy. Their intention is to embrace the best
of the proven eco-technologies, in a way that will make the Riverside regeneration one of
real international prominence.
Project Objectives
To build a scheme of 128 luxury apartments, as part of the Riverside regeneration strategy,
that incorporates many of the best and well-proven eco-technologies.
History of Concept
The success of Nottingham City’ s economy during recent decades has led to the
transformation of many of its parts, particularly in the City Centre; however, not all parts have
fared equally well. The 100 hectare Riverside area, which currently serves industrial and
commercial uses, has suffered from being essentially isolated from its surrounding urban
areas by the heavily trafficked roads, the rail and canal networks and the River Trent. This
has led to a reduced quality and high level of vacancy in many of the existing buildings, and
an environment that is very much poorer than appropriate for this potentially prestigious
location.
In 1999, the British Waterways Board and Nottingham Regeneration Ltd established
Nottingham Waterside Limited (NWL) as a joint venture with the aims of:
• developing a detailed masterplan and regeneration strategy to bring about the
redevelopment of the Riverside area;
• formulating the strategic framework that would establish the long-term regeneration of
the wider Trent River Park region.
A series of consultations with local businesses, residents and landowners were held in July
2000, with the purpose of identifying the issues of greatest importance to them, and the
“Nottingham Riverside Masterplan”was published in March 2001.
The vision contained within the masterplan is one of a mixed-use, waterfront, urban quarter
that will provide an exceptional living and working urban environment in a desirable riverside
setting. One objective is to link the City Centre back to the River Trent, in a way that
encourages its use as a destination for waterfront and water-based activities, as it was until
the latter half of the 1900s. It is recognised that the extensive mix of residential, commercial,
office and leisure facilities proposed should fit around the major land uses that the Riverside
is home to at present, such as the Notts County Football Club stadium, the Lady Bay Retail
Park and the Eastcroft waste-to-energy incinerator.
A number of new waterside neighbourhoods are suggested, comprising over 4,000 homes in
total, each with the facilities required to support a sustainable community and with good links
to its neighbours, the river front and the City Centre. One such neighbourhood will be in the
Trent Basin area, which includes the existing Park Yacht Club site at the end of Trent Lane.
The masterplan suggests that residential development in this area should consist
predominantly of apartments at a minimum of 4 storeys high and a density of 200 units per
hectare. The developers, Trent Park Developments, are hopeful that the construction of
“River Crescent”will commence at this site in the autumn of 2004, with a 20 month build
program.
Construction Details
Built form 128 luxury apartments each with 2-4 bedrooms, in a 7-storey
scheme built around an in-situ concrete and lightweight steel
frame.
Walls The external cavity walls will consist of 102mm of facing brick, a
75mm air cavity, 50mm of Celotex insulation board, 100mm for a
lightweight steel inner leaf frame, and two 12.5mm layers of
Fermacell boarding for internal lining. Fermacell is a sound and
thermal insulation board consisting 80 percent of gypsum
recovered from desulphurisation plants and 20 percent of
recycled paper.
Fermacell boarding is also to be used on the internal metal stud
walls for improved insulation properties. Sound insulation is to be
100 percent above what is required in the Building Regulations.
Floors The floor between the underground car park and the ground floor
of the scheme will consist of 300mm of reinforced concrete,
100mm of heavy duty, closed cell, thermal insulation, 100mm of
reinforced screed, and 19mm of upper surface finish.
Upper floors will consist of reinforced concrete with 50mm of
acoustic insulation.
Windows Double glazed units featuring solar reflective glass with a low-
emissivity coating and argon gas fill. The frames will be of
aluminium with thermal breaks.
The terraces of the two uppermost floors will not be shaded, as
the floors below are, by balconies above. Instead louvered,
aluminium, brise soleil will prevent overheating of the living area.
Internal Layout The apartments will been arranged so that the living spaces are
on the southern side, to take advantage of passive solar heat
gain as well as providing a view overlooking the river. The
bedrooms and bathrooms of most apartments will be on the
cooler, northern side.
Resource Conservation
Energy Generation The developers wish to demonstrate the seriousness with which
they view both global warming and the UK’ s increasing
dependence on imported energy, both of which will have the
effect of rising energy prices in the years to come. A variety of
sustainable systems are therefore to be integrated into the
scheme to generate energy for communal use.
A flexible PV laminate roofing system from Kalzip, in association
with Solar Century, will be integrated into the scheme’
s rooftop. It
is predicted that the 47.7kWp rated array will prevent the release
of approximately 17 tonnes of CO2 each year.
Five vertical axis wind turbines from Windside will line the rooftop
to give a visually striking roofscape. Each will be positioned
directly above one of the glass fronted stairwells on the northern
side of the building.
A heat pump system that uses coil pipes positioned in the River
Tent will provide free heating for the communal health centre and
swimming pool.
Research has also been conducted into the possibility of the
developers running their own biomass fuelled Combined Heat
and Power (CHP) plant. The plant would provide heat and power
to dwellings and businesses in the development area, using
locally sourced fuels such as waste wood and energy crops. The
developers are confident that this aspect of the regeneration plan
will progress once the end users of the generated heat and
electricity are established.
Recycling Facilities Two external bin areas are designated recycling zones.
SAP / Eco-ratings The intention is that the scheme shall achieve an EcoHomes
rating of Good.
Transport
One of the more unique sustainability features of the River Crescent scheme will be the
provision of seven vehicles from French firm Moteur Developpment International (MDI),
powered by compressed air and emitting nothing from the exhaust except chilled, clean air.
These cars carry two onboard air compressor tanks that enable them to travel a distance of
120miles at speeds of up to 68mph before refuelling is required. Refuelling of the tanks is
achieved by simply plugging the vehicle into a standard electrical power socket and a full
recharge takes approximately 4 hours from empty. By running the cars off the green
electricity produced by the solar roof and wind turbines, the residents will have access to a
truly environmentally friendly fleet of cars that they will be able to hire or buy for their own
use.
Twenty bicycles are to be provided free of charge for the residents. This will encourage
recreational use of the new cycle and foot paths that the developers are creating along the
riverfront to connect the development to Colwick Park and the City Centre.
Basement parking will exist for 165 cars, with approximately 10 percent of the spaces being
allocated for disabled drivers. Two cycle storage areas are also to be provided as part of this
scheme.
The need for commuting will be lessened by the provision onsite of a business centre,
featuring a meeting room, and a health club with swimming pool.
Landscaping
Resource crops (food/fuel) It is hoped that local and national farmers will be able to
provide the bio fuel for the proposed CHP plant.
Economics
Integration with existing economy An arrangement has been made with a local bakery to
supply the team during the construction phase, which
should continue once the residents move in. In
addition, it is hoped that agreements will be reached
with local farmers to regularly supply the residents with
fresh produce.
Communal Facilities
There will be a 24 hour concierge service available to all residents, on top of standard room
service. The concierge will obtain information and make bookings for local events for the
residents, assisting them to plan their leisure time however they can. The 24 hour presence
of these employees will also provide additional security to the scheme.
Well-Being
Health and affordability By lighting the communal areas, heating the complex
swimming pool and refuelling the fleet of air powered
vehicles using free energy from the sustainable
technologies, the developers will be able to reduce the
fees charged to all the residents.
Crime The developers are working with the local police force in
order to achieve the ‘
Secure by Design’standard.
It is intended that the scheme shall make use of radio
chipped access cards for enhanced security. The cards,
which the residents shall carry on their persons, will act
as a key to open the security gates and doors on the
development, without the residents having to physically
turn a key or punch in a code. Access to the
development will be automatically denied to anyone
without a card, unless they are invited in by a resident
via the intercom system provided every room. The use
of such radio cards will also permit the automation of
other manual processes, such as selecting the floor
when entering the lift, or adjusting the entertainment
Economic Issues
This luxury scheme of 128 apartments shall have a gross development value of £40 million.
It has been funded with a loan from the Royal Bank of Scotland.
The 47.7kWp rated photovoltaic array is being funded with a 40 percent grant from the DTI’
s
Photovoltaic Demonstration Programme.
Project Partners
Summary
The autonomous house was the first of its kind in the UK. It is free from the needs of mains
water and sewerage services and generates much of its own electrical energy needs onsite,
using the national grid as a storage system to compensate for differences in supply and
demand. The house incorporates high levels of thermal mass and insulation to offset the
need for a conventional heating system. Rainwater collection, onsite sewerage treatment,
photovoltaics and low energy lighting form the main elements of the building services
equipment.
The house was designed and lived in by architects Dr. Brenda and Robert Vale who already
had previous experience of low-energy building design and went on to design the earth-
sheltered dwellings at Hockerton a few miles away. The builder of the autonomous house
was Nick Martin who also constructed and now lives in the Hockerton Housing Project, which
incorporates many of the lessons learned from the Autonomous House.
Project Objectives
To create an environmentally friendly four-bedroom residence that is neither exotic in
appearance nor difficult to maintain.
History of Concept
The concept behind the development of the project has its roots in the writings of many
authors whose work concerned utopian, socialistic, environmental and ‘ future technology’
themes. The idea is that equity of global resources could, on some level, be achieved by
harnessing the appropriate household systems technology to provide for the residents a
‘sufficient’quota of warmth, water and waste disposal.
“An autonomous house has to depend on the resources that can be collected on its site, and
the technology that it uses to harvest these resources needs to be simple, robust and
controllable by the occupants. Only in this way will the inhabitants of the home gain that
sense of control which will allow them to use their share of the Earth’
s resources sensibly”
(Vale, 2000, p41). The house was also designed to complement the architecture of the area
in which it sits and to be easily perceived as desirable by a “non-architecturally trained
public”(Vale, 2000, p48).
Construction Details
The property is 15m long and 6m wide and orientated roughly north - south on its longest
axis. The internal layout of the dwelling comprises of a series of four repeated bays, each
spanning 3.5m of the length of the house and separated by 150mm load bearing wall. The
orientation of the house was imposed by the constraints of the site upon which it stands.
Whilst an orientation more in keeping with the ideals of passive solar design was possible,
the designers believed that the energy saving benefits did not outweigh the benefits that the
final orientation brings to ‘
fitting’the dwelling into the area that surrounds it. A conservatory
is fitted to the west side of the dwelling and covers the external wall for three bay-lengths.
The house has three real floors; a cellar, ground and first floor and a fourth mezzanine floor
forming the attic, which spans the most northern bay and the two most southern bays. It
does not cross the bay that contains the wood fuel heater on the ground floor.
The main living areas of the house are on the top floor with the bedrooms and bathrooms
underneath. This layout takes advantage of the thermal stratification within the building, with
the living areas kept slightly warmer than the sleeping and bathing areas. This strategy also
provides a greater amount of natural light to the living rooms, kitchen and study / studio and
avoids the overshadowing that the lower floor is exposed to from vegetation that screens the
property from the adjoining busy road. Additional natural light is provided to the main areas
by the use of skylights inserted into the roof.
Walls The walls are of cavity construction with a 100mm dense concrete block inner
leaf, a 250mm cavity filled with resin bonded glass fibre and a brick outer leaf.
The wall ties used to join the inner and outer leaves are made of glass-
reinforced plastic, which reduces thermal bridging between the elements. The
bricks for the outer leaf were sourced from a supplier who uses methane gas
obtained from landfill to fire their kilns, reducing the need for North Sea gas.
The cellar walls are composed of two leaves of Thermalite aerated concrete
block with a 100mm cavity, which was filled with reinforced concrete and in
turn tied into the reinforcing of the floor slab. The Thermalite is made from
pulverised fuel ash from a nearby coal-fired power station and is therefore a
recycled product. A damp-proof membrane of polyethylene reinforced with
nylon mesh lines the exterior of the cellar walls to avoid water penetration.
The cellar walls were not insulated as it was not designed to be heated or
used for habitation. The seasonal temperature variation of the external soil
was predicted to be only a few degrees around an average of 10°C, this
would make the area appropriate for the siting of the water storage containers
which need to be kept in a cool, dark area.
Floors The cellar floor is a 300mm thick flat-slab of reinforced concrete. It is under-
drawn by the same damp-proof membrane as used on the walls to avoid
water penetration. Again, no insulation is used underneath the slab, which
sits on a 50mm blinding layer of concrete. The remaining floors within the
dwelling are formed of pre-stressed inverted T-beams with standard concrete
blocks used to infill between them. The underside of the ground floor (cellar
roof) is insulated with 50mm of spray-on cellulose insulation to reduce heat
loss from the house to the unheated cellar.
Roof The roof is pitched at an angle of 55°. The inner surface is lined with
structural wooden decking which is untreated and exposed to the interior of
the dwelling. This is covered with a vapour barrier, above which sits 500mm
of cellulose fibre insulation followed by a breather layer (rigid bituminised
fibreboard) to reduce airflow through the insulation. The roof is finished with
Windows In order to provide good internal natural lighting the house is fitted with a
considerable number of windows, forming 21% of the area of the ground and
first floor walls and 5.6% of the attic wall surface area. All windows are triple
glazed with two low-emissivity coatings and filled with krypton gas.
Doors External doors are composite units insulated with CFC-free polyurethane and
glazed to the same standards as the windows. The Velux units fitted into the
roof are double-glazed with a single low-emissivity coating.
Conservatory The conservatory covers three of the four bays of the house and is on two
levels. The lower floor of the conservatory shares the same floor slab as the
cellar. This is used as a storage area and for growing tender plants. The
upper floor is at ground level and is formed of decking placed above the lower
floor. The decking does not span the entire length of the conservatory and
contains two gaps approx. 2.4m in width which allow daylight from the
conservatory to penetrate into the lower area. Stairs lead from the ground
floor level and provide access to the under-house cellar. The roof of the
conservatory is pitched at such an angle that it runs from ground floor ceiling
height to just below the eaves of the first floor (see Figure 1). All glazing
incorporated into the first and ground floor facades covered by the
conservatory can be opened to allow the air warmed by the conservatory to
circulate into the house.
Figure 1
Conservatory roof running from
ground floor ceiling level to just
under the roof eaves.
Figure 2
Perimeter vents in conservatory wall at
ground floor level, taken from the cellar
level.
The sides and roof of the conservatory are composed of double-glazed units with a single
low-emissivity coating set onto a softwood frame.
U-Values ( W/m2.K )
Resource Conservation
Space heating The levels of insulation built into the house were designed to allow the
property to be heated purely from internal incidental gains (heat from
people, appliances and lighting) and from passive solar gains. It was
therefore unnecessary to install a central-heating system within the
building. However, as a back up on particularly dull and cold days, a
4kW wood-burning stove was installed on the ground-floor hallway
between the main entrance door and the stairs. This is only used for
around 8 hours per week for fourteen weeks a year and is commonly
fuelled by scrap or windfall wood.
Water heating At present the water is heated by electrical energy either generated by
the photovoltaic panels or imported from the National Grid. This was
intended to be only a temporary measure. A heat-pump system was
to be developed that extracted heat from the ventilation system and
transferred it to the hot water cylinder.
Electricity The house is fitted with low-energy lighting and appliances to reduce
the electrical demand. Additional demand is incurred, however, by the
use of electric pumps to pressurise the water system and a 5W fan
that forms part of the sewerage system and operates continuously for
24-hours a day.
Ventilation The house makes use of heat-recovery ventilation for the kitchen and
bathrooms on an ‘as necessary’ basis. Otherwise, the house is
The output from the panels for the year 28th July 1994 - 28th July 1995
was recorded by a data-logger built into the inverter and showed that
1,616 kWh was generated during this period. A predicted
consumption for the house, based on the first six months of recorded
consumption, was 3,073 kWh of which 1,886 kWh is for water heating,
leaving 1,187 kWh for all other uses4. The PV system would therefore
have been capable of providing enough electricity for all lights,
appliances, cooking, etc. on its own during this period.
Water conservation The dwelling has no mains water connection and relies purely on
rainwater captured from the roof to supply all its needs. 20 ex-orange
juice concentrate shipping containers that are situated within the cellar
provide 30,000 litres of storage. This, at a rate of 2005 litres per day,
would provide the family with 150 days of water without the need for
further rain.
The toilet fitted within the dwelling is a waterless composting unit. The
main composting chamber of the unit is situated within the cellar. Two
chutes from the two bathrooms located directly above the cellar feed
into the top of the chamber. The two bathrooms are back to back on
the ground floor, one is an en-suite accessible from the parents’
bedroom and the other, separated from the first by a 70mm wooden
partition, is for the children and guests. The two toilets are back to
4
Figures from Vale, 2000, p226.
5
Based on the Vale’ s own tests and calculations for their family of five (39ltrs/head/day). Average consumption
for UK residents is 160ltrs/head/day (Vale, 2000, p178).
back within their respective bathroom, which allows their waste chutes
to drop directly to the composting chamber below.
A small 5W extractor fan continuously draws air through the toilet and
prevents odours from the compost chamber re-entering the property.
This airflow also aids the digestion process within the chamber and
carries away evaporated liquids. The products of the digestion
process are used to fertilise the fruit trees and bushes in the garden.
Landscaping
Great care has been taken to fit the property into the local environment both architecturally,
with respect to its effect on its neighbours’privacy, etc. and to provide as large a garden area
as possible. Care was also taken to maintain the tree plantings that were already present.
The house is situated behind a large hedge that was already in place. This screens the
house from the noise and visual intrusion of the road that runs parallel to the property. In
addition, an organic vegetable garden has been formed in one part of what is a fairly small
plot.
Transport
The site was initially chosen for its convenience to local amenities. Shops, schools,
recreational facilities and potential employment are all close by.
Well-Being
By eliminating the costs associated with the supply of services such a fuel and water, the
autonomous house will provide affordable warmth and water to its residents. In addition, by
selecting decorative finishes based on low toxicity materials and a well designed ventilation
system, the house provides a healthy internal environment.
A reasonable degree of manual labour is required for the house to function correctly. This
includes the chopping and storing of firewood in the cellar, transporting this to the ground
floor fire, manually emptying both liquids and solids from the composting toilet situated in the
cellar (60 litres of liquids every 3 - 4 weeks and about 200 litres of solids every 6 months for
a family of five), etc. Older or physically disabled residents may find it difficult to negotiate
the stairs to and from the cellar where most of the services are located.
Costs
The total cost of the development was £145,000. The land upon which the development is
situated cost £69,000. If the whole floor area of the house, including the conservatory and
the cellar are taken into account this equates to a cost of £500/m2. Subtracting these areas
and counting just the main internal living areas, the cost rises to £824/m 2.6 All funding for the
project was provided by Brenda and Robert Vale who designed and lived in the property.
They also undertook the internal decoration, for which the labour costs are not included in
the figures above.
6
Figures from Vale, 2000, p229.
• The amount of ventilation / shading / thermal mass incorporated into the conservatory is
inadequate to prevent overheating in this area. Temperatures in excess of 40°C are not
uncommon during the afternoon of a summer’ s day even when all the vents, windows
and doors are left open.
• The success of the compost toilet system is dependent on the continuous operation of
the small fan that ventilates the system. If this fan fails for any reason, as it has done
three times in the past three years, odours from the composting pit seep into the
dwelling.
None of the problems above are insurmountable, and the residents still wish to record that
the house is a very pleasant, sunny and spacious dwelling that they have enjoyed living in.
They feel that it achieves its aims as an energy-efficient dwelling, with running costs much
lower than previous dwellings they have rented.
Bibliography
A full and detailed account of the construction of the house, the reasons behind some of the
decisions made and afterthoughts of the designers / residents several years after its
completion are available in the book: “The NEW Autonomous House”, written by Brenda &
Robert Vale, published in 2000 by Thames & Hudson. This report has drawn extensively
upon the information contained in this publication and the authors are duly recognised.
Summary
Both dwellings are of highly-insulated masonry construction and incorporate different
examples of heating and ventilation strategies, including gas and electric heating systems
and solar water heating. Ventilation is achieved by mechanical whole-house heat recovery
in one unit and passive stack ventilation in the other. The dwellings also demonstrate water
conservation and rainwater harvesting techniques.
The wall construction of the dwellings differs between the ground and first floors in order to
demonstrate different insulation strategies for both cavity wall and solid wall constructions.
The dwellings have been used to inspire and inform both developers and residents within the
city as to the financial and social benefits of energy efficiency, and they are being used in an
attempt to set the standard for housing across the city.
Project Objectives
The project set out to replace existing social housing that had been damaged due to a gas
explosion. In addition, Derby City Council wanted to use the opportunity to:
History of Concept
The two eco-houses replace existing properties that were severely damaged by a gas
explosion in July 1995. The Council took this opportunity to replace them with something out
of the ordinary that demonstrated their commitment to energy efficiency, and from which
other house builders and residents could learn. The properties have been tenant occupied
since April 1997.
Construction Details
Built form Two semi-detached, four-bedroom dwellings.
Walls The ground floor wall (see Figure 1) consists of a brick outer leaf and 125mm
Durox Supabloc 400 inner leaf, with a 50mm cavity that is filled with a
Gypglas mineral wool slab. The inner leaf is lined internally with a 50mm
phenolic foam backed plasterboard.
50mm insulated
plasterboard
The first floor wall (see Figure 2) construction consists of a 150mm Durox
block externally insulated with a 50mm layer of Structherm phenolic foam
insulation finished with a scratch texture render. The wall is internally lined
with 9.5mm duplex plasterboard.
External render
9.5mm duplex
plasterboard
Roof Concrete tiles upon pre-fabricated timber roof trusses, and insulated with
250mm phenolic foam.
Floors The ground floor is comprised of concrete slab upon a polystyrene insulation
slab.
Windows The windows are uPVC framed, double-glazed units with a low-emissivity
coating for heat loss reduction.
Doors Fibreglass composite doors insulated with CFC-free polyurethane were fitted
to reduce heat loss and ensure adequate draught-proofing, as they do not
warp when exposed to varying external temperatures.
Other The damp-proof course used in the construction is made from recycled
plastic, thereby reducing the amount of material going into landfill and
reducing demand for virgin materials.
Linoleum was used in place of vinyl floor coverings as it has a lower impact on
the environment in both its production and disposal.
Impact of Local manufacturers and suppliers of materials were used wherever possible,
Construction which reduced the project’
s embodied energy from transportation mileage.
U-Values ( W/m2.K )
Walls: 0.2
Floor: 0.2
Roof: 0.1
Windows: 2.0
Resource Conservation
Heating Two different heating systems have been used, one in each house, to
demonstrate good practice with both gas and electric heating.
Water Heating Hot water is provided by an off-peak, dual immersion heater that
operates in tandem with an evacuated tube solar water heating
collector. These two systems are used to heat water stored in a 210-
litre insulated cylinder. In the summer months, the solar collector will
provide all of the hot water requirements of the dwelling but can be
topped up, if necessary, using the electric immersion system. In
winter, the majority of hot water will be provided by the immersion
system, using off-peak electricity. A mixing valve is installed to
prevent scalding if the water temperature gets too high during the
summer.
Lighting Compact fluorescent lights (CFLs) with standard fittings are used
throughout the properties to reduce the amount of energy used for
artificial lighting.
Ventilation Again, two different strategies were employed, one for each house.
The electrically heated dwelling is fitted with whole-house mechanical
heat recovery ventilation, whilst the gas heated dwelling is fitted with
passive stack ventilation units in the kitchen and bathroom, and
traditional trickle ventilation in the window frames of all other rooms.
Water Conservation The dwellings are fitted with a rainwater harvesting system that stores
the water in a bulkhead behind the bathroom wall. The collected water
In addition, aerating taps are fitted in both the kitchen and the
bathroom to reduce the amount of water used by the dwelling’ s
residents.
Resident Training Residents are given training in the operation of the heating and
ventilation systems.
Recycling Facilities Compost bins are provided to reduce the amount of organic waste
going to landfill, and provide a useful resource of compost to the
residents.
Transport
The houses are in an existing neighbourhood already on an established bus route.
Well-Being
Health and By reducing energy and water demand within the dwellings, the
Affordability residents are protected from the negative effects of fuel and water
poverty.
Economic Aspects
Cost of development £115,000 for two semi detached two storey dwellings
Project Partners
Derby Homes Ltd.
Derby City Council
Derby City DLO
Summary
Wellingborough East is, at the time of writing, at the advanced master-planning stage. The
first on-site development is due to take place in 2005 and, over the next eleven years, the
project will deliver approximately 3000 new dwellings.
The total area of the site is 361 hectares. 82ha of this has been designated for housing,
110ha for employment, 14ha for community facilities, 9ha for leisure and 63ha for the town
park which is located in the flood plain.
The project is a partnership between a consortium of landowners, Bovis Homes Ltd and the
Council as the Community Leader. The Council has directed a lot of effort towards
maintaining a successful relationship with the consortium and developer, as well as
members of the existing community of Wellingborough. The aim of Council is to establish a
sustainable form of development upon the site and provide valuable guidance tools for this
and all future developments.
The scheme will potentially include: the provision of highly insulated dwellings, the use of
reclaimed and sustainable building materials, the on-site generation of heat and electrical
power, a Sustainable Urban Drainage System, and an integrated transport system with good
facilities for pedestrians, cyclists and public transport. The scheme will also incorporate
methodologies such as Home Zones, rainwater and grey water recycling schemes, and
water conservation systems.
Project Objectives
To create a sustainable urban extension, linking into the existing town of Wellingborough in a
complementary manner.
History of Concept
The Northamptonshire County Structure Plan for 1996 to 2016 was adopted in 2001. It
provides a framework for a more sustainable Northamptonshire, taking account of national
Sustainable housing in the East Midlands - 225
Section 4: Case Studies
and regional policies and the need to balance social, economic and environmental
considerations. This Structure Plan indicates Development / Growth Objectives of 6500
dwellings and 160 hectares of employment land during the plan period. A significant
proportion of both the housing and employment development is proposed in the Local Plan in
Wellingborough East.
The Local Plan sets out proposals and policies for the development and use of land and
buildings in the Borough. It is the starting point for all planning matters and explains what
type of development will be allowed and where. It is the Council's responsibility to keep the
Plan up to date, so in December 2000 it began a review to look at the housing and
employment requirements for the future.
The Local Plan, which was adopted in March 2004, was guided by a sustainability appraisal
that assessed, among other things, the most sustainable place for an urban extension in
Wellingborough. The Wellingborough East Site has a number of benefits over the other sites
assessed, which include the presence of brownfield sites and the proximity to the railway and
the town centre. The railway will provide good links to London for commuters and
businesses (45 minutes travel). Railtrack have recently invested in new rail sidings in
Wellingborough, which could potentially attract light rail related industry to the site.
In 1999 the Council began to approach the many varied landowners on the site, which was
partially identified within the Local Plan with an additional allocation provided for in the
County Structure Plan. The Borough Council of Wellingborough at this time commissioned a
feasibility study for the entire site and developed a vision statement.
A landowners' consortium was formed, and in 2000 BCW employed Nortoft Partnerships Ltd,
who are experts in public-private partnerships, to project manage the development on their
behalf. Nortoft have facilitated the link between the Council’ s internal Wellingborough East
Project Team, the landowner consortium and the landowners’preferred developer Bovis
Homes Ltd. The council are working with Bovis Homes Ltd to influence the design process
in order to achieve the planning authority’ s objectives of a sustainable development. The
council itself does not own any of the land within the designated area.
The consortium believes that the marketability of the development will increase if
sustainability issues are incorporated into it, and will improve the quality of life for those living
on the site. Bovis Homes Ltd has experience of working in partnership between landowners,
communities and planning authorities, and has undertaken research into more sustainable
methods of site development.
The local community has been actively involved in developing an illustrative masterplan to
influence the developers. Many individuals and organisations have taken part in a range of
consultation events including workshops, presentations, Technical Planning Events and
consultation in the local shopping centre as well as an “Enquiry by Design”event, held over 3
days and facilitated by the Prince’s Foundation.
The Council has committed resources, including the provision of a Project Manager, Project
Co-ordinator and Project Support Staff, as well as additional staff time, into guiding the
development, to enable the establishment of a more sustainable community, to which they
are fully committed. The Council adopted a Supplementary Planning Guidance in April 2003
entitled “Building Better Places: A Guide to Sustainable Development”. Along with the Local
Plan, this SPG provides advice on good design and improved quality of life achieved by
reducing energy usage and by the use of sustainable materials.
A Wellingborough East Development Framework SPG was adopted by the Council in
November 2003. This document provides a vision and design principles for WEAST and will
be used to coordinate and guide the more detailed Masterplans and individual site or
building-specific Development Briefs that will be prepared in due course. At the time of
writing, three draft Development Briefs were due to be adopted as SPG. The purpose of the
Development Briefs is to supplement the policies of the Local Plan and guidance in the
adopted Development Framework SPG by setting out the detailed planning and urban
design parameters and guidelines.
Other sustainability and development projects have been researched and best practice has
been fed into the masterplanning undertaken to date. The Council also has membership of
organisations such as the Prince’ s Foundation Urban Villages Forum and Forum for the
Future to ensure that current best practice is incorporated into the master planning design.
Construction Details
Approach Bovis Homes Ltd is researching different housing types for the
development, which will take place in three phases:
2005 – 2006 construction of 500 dwellings.
2006 – 2011 construction of 1185 dwellings.
2011 – 2016 construction of 1190 dwellings.
Communal Facilities Two new primary schools will be developed in the site to cater for
children growing up within the development and to provide
greater choice for children from Wellingborough, with a site
allocated for a secondary school or other facility if required.
Research is being undertaken into the type of community facility
and multi-faith centre for worship that is needed by the
community of Wellingborough East.
Recycling Facilities The existing recyclable goods roadside collection scheme that
operates within Wellingborough will be extended to cover the new
development. This covers all recyclable material except glass,
which needs to be taken by the residents to one of the Council’ s
local ‘
bring’centres. The Council is currently piloting a garden
waste collection service which, if successful, will eventually be
extended into the Wellingborough East area.
Feasibility Studies have also been undertaken to look at
alternative ways of dealing with waste and the possible
composting facilities that could be developed. Research will
continue into these and other schemes such as provision of
recycling bin provision in houses.
Transport
The development is close to the existing main-line railway service and its sidings; this will
service both the residential and commercial communities. Local bus provision will also be
extended into the site to provide a frequent and accessible bus services. The viability of
these services will be increased by the development of a transport inter-change adjacent to
the railway station to improve transport links into Wellingborough town centre and to other
towns within the region.
The provision of dedicated routes for buses, cyclists and pedestrians is being looked at by
the developers. The layout design itself will follow good-practice guidance, and will give
pedestrians and cyclists priority over the car. It will also follow the ‘
modified’grid-pattern,
rather than the cul-de-sac layout, which allows routes between places to be shorter, provides
a greater choice of routes, allows for higher density and provides more flexibility in
accommodating future change. The layout will also incorporate elements that ‘ naturally’
reduce road speeds and provide schemes such as Home Zones, which will reduce the
impact of private transport upon the residents.
The Council and its partners are currently engaged in an on-going discussion about the
levels of parking provision within the development. Current guidance states that 1.5 spaces
should be provided for each dwelling.
Landscaping
Economics
Integration with existing economy The development will aim to provide both existing
residents and the new community with easy access
to the new facilities provided in Wellingborough East,
reducing the need to travel and strengthening the
local economy. The aim is for the new development
to be complementary to the existing town centre and
to encourage residents from both the old and new
settlements to use facilities in both areas.
Social Aspects
Communal Facilities
Communal facilities The Town Park and the community centre will be
amongst the new community facilities provided for
residents of the area. Work is currently being
undertaken to identify the other facilities that the
community will need to thrive.
Well-Being
Special support and integration The community centre will play a major role in
integrating different groups of people from the
original Wellingborough settlement and the new
development.
Health and affordability By building highly energy efficient homes with high
thermal performance, the residents should be
protected against the negative effects of fuel poverty.
Additional Information
The main barriers and challenges that The Borough Council of Wellingborough and their
partners have faced thus far in the project include:
• Keeping the key sustainability ideas in the minds of all Stakeholders. The
developers have been keen to be involved in community consultation and
incorporating the issues raised in publications such as Better by Design,
Secure by Design, the WEAST Development Framework and the three
Development Briefs on the Neighbourhood Centre, Station Island and
East of Eastfield Road. It has been more difficult however, to get them to
take onboard issues such as waste minimisation and integrating
renewable energy systems;
• A lot of time and effort is expended on keeping all the interested parties
up to date with developments in the project, often involving the use of
different types of media for different groups;
• Additional time is spent by Council officers in locating, assessing and
applying for funding opportunities that may help to secure a more
sustainable development;
• Appropriate information is not always placed within the most suitable
publications to reach developers and construction companies, and so
they are not always ‘ naturally’aware of the opportunities and issues
pertaining to their particular projects.
Summary
West Beacon Farm presents a real world demonstration of how integrated renewable energy
systems, combined with other sustainable practices, can form a fully functional and reliable
energy network that vastly reduces dependence on fossil fuels and the nationwide
distribution infrastructure. The farmstead is located on an area of approximately 20 hectares
(50 acres) of outstanding rural countryside. It has been adapted with a vision of enhancing
the natural ecology of the area, along with expressing a much more sustainable lifestyle than
is led by the average UK citizen.
Along with being a family home, the farmstead provides local universities with a fully
operational complex for research into future sustainable technologies. The technologies
presently on display include various sustainable means of generating heat and electricity,
hydrogen energy storage, conservation of mains water and the embodied energy it contains,
and sustainable transportation.
Project Objectives
History of Concept
When the owners moved to the farmstead in 1969, the arable land was very open, with very
few trees or hedgerows. Their initial desire was therefore to improve the ecology of the land,
starting with the ploughing and seeding of 8 hectares of permanent natural pasture. 14,000
broadleaf and evergreen trees were later planted for natural ecology encouragement, carbon
dioxide uptake and to reduce the noise from surrounding roads. The formation of a 2 million
gallon lake was to follow, which has added greatly to the biodiversity of the site, as well as
being a source of drinking water and energy storage for a hydro system.
The farmstead is home to Professor Tony Marmont and his family. The Professor developed
an interest in sustainable energy during the 1980s when, as a pilot, he was able to visibly
recognise the damage that manmade pollution was causing to the environment all around
him. Combined with the growing prominence of environmental groups and the UK’ s reliance
on imported energy, he decided to replace the farmstead’ s oil fired boiler with a ground
source heat pump system. Shortly after, a 4kW wind turbine and a 3kW photovoltaic array
were installed to provide the electricity required to make the heat pump a totally
environmentally friendly and standalone system. From this honourable beginning, the
owner’s interest in sustainable energy grew, along with his involvement with the relevant
departments at several local universities. The Farm has become one of the world's best
examples of sustainable energy utilisation.
Construction Details
Walls The original walls consisted of a brick outer leaf and concrete
breeze block inner leaf with an air cavity between. When the
owners decided to fill the wall cavity with blown insulation, they
discovered that in many places it was filled with construction
rubble and could not be drilled into.
Roof The original roof, featuring steel I-beam trusses, has been
insulated between the timber rafters with 50mm of Kingspan
insulation board and 50mm of plasterboard.
Windows The original timber framed double glazed units are still in place.
Resource Conservation
Ventilation There is ducted flow of warmed air to and from the conservatory,
as described above.
Energy Generation West Beacon Farm is often described as being one of the world’s
best examples of sustainable energy utilisation, as it features
many different renewable technologies interlinked for maximum
effectiveness.
The primary generators of sustainable energy on the farmstead
are two fixed pitch, stall regulated, 2-bladed wind turbines (see
Figure 1). These are rated at 25kW each and were installed in
1990 at a total cost of £60,000. Over a typical year, these
turbines will generate 40 to 50MWh of electricity. Their
installation was followed in 1992 by the acquisition of their
American manufacturers, Carter Wind Turbines Inc.
Hydrogen Storage A further use for the surplus energy was found when the
owner chose to pioneer the use of hydrogen as an energy storage
medium in the UK. The development of hydrogen storage has
been heralded by many experts as being ultimately capable of
bringing about a pollution free future. Hydrogen presents a
method of longer-term and larger-scale energy storage than is
possible by batteries, and achievable at lower cost and with a
smaller footprint. It can be used as an intermediate medium that
balances the intermittent electrical generation of renewable
systems and the mismatched but regular pattern of demand on the
grid.
Whenever there is a surplus of electrical generation, water can be
split by electrolysis into its constituents, hydrogen and oxygen, with
the separated gasses being stored safely in pressurised tanks.
The oxygen offers a source of financial income, as it has uses in
many manufacturing industries, water treatment and healthcare.
The hydrogen meanwhile can be fed into a fuel cell at times when
the electrical demand exceeds generation, where it is recombined
with oxygen from ambient air, generating electricity and pure hot
water as a result. When a hydrogen storage system is integrated
into a renewable energy network, such as at the Farm, it
represents a large-scale and dependable electrical generation
solution, with an abundant supply of its primary fuels (solar, wind,
water) and zero CO2 emissions. In the medium to long term, the
‘Hydrogen Economy’ is predicted to revolutionise our energy
infrastructure, make a significant contribution towards greenhouse
gas reduction, and help counter the effects of oil depletion.
The equipment installed at the Farm consists of:
• 34kW alkaline electrolyser, manufactured by Vandenborre
Hydrogen Systems, which produces hydrogen from water at 25bar.
• Forty-eight storage cylinders, each of 475litre capacity (see Figure
4). These were manufactured by BOC and are filled by a
compressor to a total storage capacity of 2856Nm3 at a maximum
pressure of 137bar. This represents around 4MWh of stored
electricity, or three weeks of demand at the farmstead.
• There are two Proton Exchange Membrane (PEM) fuel cells
currently undergoing testing at the farm. The first is manufactured
by a Loughborough University spin-off company, Intelligent
Energy, and is capable of generating 2kW of electricity and 2kW of
heat. This heat is used for space heating, making this a form of
CHP unit. A larger 5kW unit from Plug Power, supplied by SiGEN,
is also under review, and it is intended that this model will also be
converted into a CHP operating unit.
Water Conservation The farmstead is completely disconnected from the mains water
network. Supply comes instead from two natural sources. The
first is a natural spring 50 metres below ground and the second is
via rooftop rainwater collection. The rainwater collected in the
original guttering passes through a Wisy/Coanda self-cleaning filter
to remove any coarse dirt before entering the 6,000 litre
underground storage tank. The water is pumped through a series
of 25, 15 and finally 5 micron filters before being delivered to an
intermediate tank. At this stage, the water is suitable for all needs
except drinking. To purify the water further, it circulates through an
SAP/Eco-rating The neighbouring Whittle Hill Farm buildings were assessed by the
National Energy Foundation and found to have a negative CO2
footprint under the Energy Efficiency Accreditation Scheme.
Transport
Two electric cars were purchased during the 1990s from the USA. Both cars are powered by onboard
batteries that are charged overnight from the farm’s sustainable network, and require about 0.5kW of
electric power per mile. The first car bought has a range of 50 miles and a top speed of 70mph. It
features a photovoltaic roof and bonnet, which supplement the battery power by around 10 percent.
The second car has a range of 120 miles and a top speed of 75mph, improvements made possible by
using nickel metal hydride batteries.
The next development planned is to integrate a small 1-2kW fuel cell into a vehicle, which has already
been shown to be technically feasible and increases performance, range and fuel economy.
Placement to local facilities The owner’ s business, Beacon Energy Ltd, is based at
the neighbouring Whittle Hill Farm. The electric cars
provide a truly sustainable means of travelling between
the two properties and to nearby towns. The local village
of Woodhouse Eaves is just 2km away.
Landscaping
Encouragement of Biodiversity When the land was acquired in 1969 it was arable but
very open, with little protection or cultivation. One of the
original aims of the owners was specifically to increase
the natural ecology of the site. They began by ploughing
and seeding 8 hectares of natural grassland pasture,
which provided an income as hay and silage.
Hedgerows were planted to divide the land and permit
cattle and sheep livestock to graze freely. The grasses
and hedgerows provide habitat for many rural species,
such as grey and French partridges and harvest mice.
Very few trees existed on the land when bought, and so
14,000 broadleaf and evergreen trees were planted
around the border for wildlife encouragement, carbon
dioxide uptake and to reduce the noise pollution from
surrounding roads. This was seen to have an immediate
effect, with birdlife activity increasing markedly; including
barn owls, great spotted and green woodpeckers, long
tail tits, crossbills and kestrels. It should be noted that
Sustainable housing in the East Midlands - 238
Section 4: Case Studies
Resource crops (food/fuel) Although the owners have ceased to farm the land
themselves, both the hay production and grazing of
livestock continue to this day under contract with a
neighbour farmer.
Dead wood from the planted trees is used as a biomass
resource in the lounge’
s wood burning stove.
Economics
Onsite projects The onsite use of electricity and heat generated by the
sustainable network brings immediate savings to the owners,
estimated as around £3,000 per year.
The exporting of surplus energy to the local electricity
provider supplied a regular stream of income that returned
some of the capital costs involved. Through the 1990s,
317MWh of wind generated power was exported offsite,
which brought in almost £35k.
Social Aspects
Methods of community engagement Much of the research carried out at the Farm is in
conjunction with three local universities, all of which
have benefited from the owners’generosity in the
past.
The School of the Built Environment at The
University of Nottingham
The Centre for Renewable Energy Systems
Technology (CREST) at Loughborough
University
The Institute of Energy and Sustainable
Development (IESD) at De Montfort University
Endowments from the owner have gone towards
establishing the facilities and Master Degree
programmes necessary to promote the growth of
sustainable technologies at home and abroad,
through high quality research and demonstration
projects. In 1996, the owner formed Midlands
Renewable Energy Technology Transfer (MRETT),
with the specific aim of facilitating links and
Economic Issues
Source of Funding The primary source of funding for the various renewable
energy systems in operation at the Farm came from the sale
in 1992 of the family business, Carters Gold Medal Soft
Drink Co. The sale made possible the acquisition of Carter
Wind Turbines Inc, the American manufacturer of the two
turbines erected at the Farm, and operator of a 10 turbine
wind farm near Carlisle. The wind farm was sold to Cumbria
Wind Farms Ltd, by which time Beacon Energy had been
established as a company in its own right, with the aim of
persuading home builders, architects, and industry figures in
general of the benefits and practicality of renewable energy
and sustainability.
Additional Information
The owners have encountered the following problems while bringing the projects to fruition:
• In 1992, the owners had to defend the wind turbines against the local District Council.
The Council were arguing for their dismantling on the grounds that the area is designated
as one of 'particularly attractive countryside' in the statutory County Structure Plan and is
therefore afforded special protection. With the assistance of Leicestershire Friends of
the Earth, the owners succeeded in making their case and the turbines continue to
generate free electricity to this day; however, the owners incurred disruption and
substantial legal fees in the process.
• The cessation of the Non-Fossil Fuel Obligation scheme (NFFO) and the introduction of
the New Electricity Trading Arrangements scheme (NETA) largely influenced the owner’ s
decision to cease supplying the national grid with the surplus electricity generated by the
turbines. The NETA requirement for power producers to predict the output for every half
hour in advance, and to buy any shortfall at premium prices, made most forms of
embedded renewable generation economically unfeasible, as the output literally depends
on the weather.