Ciaa 1611
Ciaa 1611
Ciaa 1611
MAJOR ARTICLE
With the widespread use of anti–Pneumocystis jirovecii prophy- strategies for handling immunocompromised inpatients or out-
laxis for all solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients for at least patients with suspected or proven PCP have been elaborated
6–12 months posttransplantation following international guide- [5]. PCP incidence in SOT recipients ranges now from 0.3%
lines [1], the epidemiology of Pneumocystis pneumonia (PCP) to 2.5%. Moreover, PCP still leads to a high mortality rate of
has changed over the last decades. Nowadays this fungal infec- 14% in kidney transplant recipients as reported in the studies
tion occurs later, with an increased incidence during the second published after 2010 [2]. Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole
year posttransplantation [2], often during nosocomial outbreaks (TMP-SMX) is the drug of choice for PCP initial prophylaxis
in the hospital environment [3]. Indeed, interindividual trans- and is very efficient. However, it has become critical to define
missions have been well documented [4], and some practical conditions requiring an extension or a reinitiation of prophy-
laxis in order to avoid this life-threatening infection since re-
commendations are currently lacking on this issue. The overall
low incidence of PCP discourages a lifelong prophylaxis in all
kidney transplant recipients, yet a personalized approach based
Received 28 April 2020; editorial decision 23 September 2020; published online 23 October
2020. on individual risks could be an acceptable alternative.
Correspondence: P. Merville, Department of Nephrology, Transplantation, Dialysis and
Apheresis, Pellegrin University Hospital, Place Amélie Raba Léon, 33076 Bordeaux, France
In this retrospective case-control study, we described a co-
([email protected]). hort of 70 PCP and 134 matched-control kidney transplant
Clinical Infectious Diseases® 2021;73(7):e1456–63 recipients. We analyzed the risk factors and the outcomes asso-
© The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press for the Infectious Diseases Society
of America. All rights reserved. For permissions, e-mail: [email protected].
ciated with this opportunistic infection to individualize param-
DOI: 10.1093/cid/ciaa1611 eters that could guide long-term prophylaxis.
the respective case and were defined as such for showing no Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection was defined as a positive
clinical, radiographic, or microbiological signs of PCP during whole blood CMV quantitative nucleic acid testing [10], con-
the entire follow-up. For each case, controls were selected sistent with the American Society of Transplantation and the
among consecutive patients who had a functional graft on day CMV Drug Development Forum recommendations [11]. “All
0 of PCP and paired by (1) the type of induction treatment, that CMV events” were defined as occurring either before or after
is, rabbit antithymocyte globulin (rATG) or anti–interleukin 2 day 0. Allograft rejection was biopsy-proven. We defined al-
receptor antibody (anti-IL2RA); (2) and by transplantation date lograft failure as requirement to return to permanent dial-
(± 3 months). No patient presented a concomitant infection ysis. Glomerular filtration rate (GFR) was calculated with the
with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). Cases and con- Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) formula.
trols were followed up from the time of PCP (day 0) up to a All patients were similarly treated in each center with a
maximum of 3 years postinfection or death/graft failure. 6-month posttransplantation prophylaxis, either with oral
Data were collected for both cases and controls thanks to TMP-SMX or aerosolized pentamidine.
the local medical software for which all patients had signed a
Statistical Analyses
written informed consent. Both centers obtained local institu- 2
tional ethics board approval. Mann-Whitney and χ tests were used when appropriate.
Alternatively, Fisher exact test was used for a low number of pa-
Immunophenotyping tients. A P value <.05 was considered statistically significant.
Each kidney transplant recipient had yearly peripheral blood Comparisons of lymphocyte counts were performed at day 0
lymphocyte immunophenotyping at annual systematic visits. and every year, up to 4 years. For each date, comparison was per-
At Bordeaux University hospital, whole blood lympho- formed only with available values for both cases and their paired
cytes were stained with CD45, CD3, CD4 and CD8 antibodies controls. Assessment of PCP risk with receiver operating charac-
(Beckman Coulter, Marseille, France) and mixed with Flow- teristic (ROC) curve analysis as well as multivariable analysis was
Count Fluorospheres for the absolute count determination performed with total lymphocyte counts and CD4+ and CD8+
A
100
Patients without PCP (%)
80
60
40
20
0
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21
Time after transplantation (years)
B
100
Patients without PCP (%)
80
60
40
20
0
0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0 4.5 5.0 5.5 6.0 6.5 7.0
Time after rejection (years)
Figure 1. Development of Pneumocystis pneumonia (PCP) in transplant recipients after transplantation and acute rejection, over time. A, Proportion of transplant recipients
without PCP after transplantation over time (years). B, Proportion of transplant recipients without PCP after acute rejection over time (years). Dotted lines represent the limits
between 2 periods with different incidences of PCP.
CD4 T cells
CD8 T cells
600
400
1000 450
300
300
500 200
150 100
0 0 0
-4
-3
-2
-1
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
Years before pneumocystis Years before pneumocystis Years before pneumocystis
Figure 2. Comparison of lymphocyte evolution over time from 4 years before to day 0 of Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia between cases and controls. A, Total lymphocyte
counts were compared between cases and controls every year from 4 years before to day 0 of Pneumocystis pneumonia (PCP). Comparisons were performed with Mann-
Whitney test for each time-point and only when data were available for both cases and their paired controls. B, CD4+ T-lymphocyte counts were compared between cases
and controls every year from 4 years before to day 0 of PCP. Comparisons were performed with Mann-Whitney test for each time-point and only when data were available for
both cases and their paired controls. C, CD8+ T-lymphocyte counts were compared between cases and controls every year from 4 years before to day 0 of PCP. Comparisons
were performed with Mann-Whitney test for each time-point and only when data were available for both cases and their paired controls. All panels: *P < .05 to < .01; **P <
.01 to < .001; ***P < .001. Abbreviation: ns, not significant.
the covariable “age,” as indicated by the poor value of the ROC or until 7 years following acute rejection. This reinforced the
curve analysis (AUC, 0.63 [95% CI, .65–.71]) (Supplementary need to identify easy-to-use parameters that can identify the pa-
Figure 2). tients at risk of late-onset PCP needing targeted prophylaxis. We
identified age, mTORi use, corticosteroid boluses, and chronic
Outcome of PCP on Patient and Graft Survival lymphopenia as independent risk factors associated with PCP.
PCP was associated with high incidence of graft loss and patient Age is often identified as a risk factor, with various thresholds
death (Figure 3A and 3B) in the 3-year cumulative incidence [13, 15], which probably reflects the mean age of the considered
curves. Indeed, 3-year graft loss was about 30% and 3-year cohort. However, in our cohort, no pertinent age threshold was
death was about 17%. isolated. As previously described, we also identified mTORi use
as an independent risk factor of PCP [16, 17]. This significant
DISCUSSION
positive association with mTORi could be either linked to their
In this study conducted in 2 French centers and including 70 immunosuppressive effect [18] or to the rapamycin-lung syn-
consecutive kidney transplant recipients with PCP, we analyzed drome provoked by PCP [19]. We did not isolate CMV infection
risk factors associated with PCP occurrence and its prognosis as a risk factor. Indeed, it has been recently described as a marker
with the aim to assess a strategy to target patients with high risk of severity of PCP rather than a risk factor [20, 21]. In our study,
of developing late-onset PCP and thereby to guide the prescrip- corticosteroid boluses were associated with a higher risk of PCP,
tion of PCP chemoprophylaxis toward a more individualized as previously described in non-HIV patients, transplanted or not
approach. The main finding of this study was that the 2 param- [2]. In our programs, we followed current recommendations to
eters that were the most associated with an increased risk of resume prophylaxis for 3–6 months [1], but we have shown that
PCP were a total lymphocyte count <1000/µL at annual system- the at-risk period can be longer.
atic visit and/or corticosteroid boluses, and these were found in Another important finding of this study was the independent
88.9% of our cases. Those criteria could be retained to extend association between chronic lymphopenia, for at least 4 years
or resume long-term prophylaxis. In addition, PCP in kidney before infection, and PCP onset. Lymphopenia has been de-
transplant recipients had a very poor prognosis and was associ- scribed in other studies in the days preceding infection only,
ated with high incidence of graft loss and patient death. and therefore this parameter cannot be used as a predictive
A 3- to 6-month routine prophylaxis for P. jirovecii has been marker to indicate prophylaxis after the first 6 months [13, 22].
shown to very efficiently prevent PCP either following trans- In the absence of CD4+ T cells, as in HIV infection, CD8
plantation or after the treatment of an acute rejection, as re- T cells’ influx into the lung plays an important role to resolve
commended in the current guidelines [1]. However, the time of PCP, notably through their interferon-γ secretion. Indeed, their
higher-risk period for infection has shifted within the 1- to 2-year depletion in the CD4-depleted mouse model of PCP exacer-
postprophylaxis period [13, 14]. We observed a peak occurring (1) bates infection [23], while generating a global lymphopenia,
between 12 and 24 months after transplantation, and (2) between as observed in our patients. Interestingly, in a model of
6 and 18 months after acute rejection treatment, but some occur- dexamethasone-treated Wistar rats, it was demonstrated that
rences remained even later, until 20 years after transplantation recovery from PCP was associated with the withdrawal of
steroid therapy and the recruitment into the lung of both CD4 implement, precisely because of this low incidence, and that is
and CD8 [24]. In transplanted patients, in comparison with why most studies on PCP in organ transplantation adopted a
HIV patients, therapeutic immunosuppression has a pleio- case-control design. Even though this study helped us to define
tropic inhibitory effect on CD4 and CD8 compartments and the criteria for restarting prophylaxis, further inquiry into the
also on other lymphocytic subsets [25], perhaps the reason why criteria of termination of prophylaxis is needed. Both centers
we identified lymphopenia as the most significantly associated performed 3-month universal prophylaxis for CMV prevention
lymphocytic marker to PCP. Finally, we observed a very poor after the diagnosis of rejection but no additional monitoring
prognosis of PCP, with 30% of graft failure and 17% of death following the complete course of CMV prophylaxis, which
in the 3 years following PCP. These results confirm a recent would decrease the number of detected CMV DNAemias [27]
multicenter case-control study reporting 38% of graft loss after but not the number of CMV diseases. Cases had significantly
PCP [26]. In the absence of systematic kidney graft biopsies, we less acute postrejection prophylaxis, but all PCP occurred after
could not analyze exhaustively the causes of graft failure after this prophylaxis period (median, 16.5 [quartiles, 11.5–27.2]).
PCP (see Supplementary Results for details). Consequently, one can suppose that PCP would still have oc-
The limitations of the present study are its retrospective and curred if those patients had received prophylaxis. The asso-
case-control design, inherent to the scarcity of this infection. ciation between rituximab and PCP risk has been difficult to
However, randomized prospective trials would be complex to analyze because no patients received rituximab as induction