Data Analysis Anthropology IA
Data Analysis Anthropology IA
Data Analysis Anthropology IA
For my piece of fieldwork I conducted a survey and sent it out to previous friends
who were/are international students as well. This allowed me to get surface level
information such as the correlation between the number of countries someone has
lived in and whether or not they had a nanny growing up. This data has allowed me
to conclude that people who have lived in more countries are more likely to have a
nanny and spend more time with them than their parents growing up. 75% of the
participants had a nanny growing up, 66.7% of those being children who lived in
more than one country. Participants who lived in five countries were also more likely
to have spent more time with nannies growing up and more of them see close friends,
partners, siblings partners and nannies to be a part of the family. With the
participants who lived in less countries not considering people who are not blood
related to be family. This supports my hypothesis that children who spent a lot of
time abroad and who spent more time with non-family members growing up have a
less traditional view on family relations. This can be linked to the idea of belonging as
children who were raised abroad are less likely to be surrounded by non-immediate
family members such as grandparents and cousins, therefore they tend to form these
family relations with those who they spend lots of time with such as friends and
nannies. There is also a correlation between the amount of countries a child has lived
in and the likelihood of them having nannies, this could be due to the international
Fieldwork 2: (Interviews)
I interviewed three different participants, two of which are children who grew up
internationally and the other was raised locally in the same area as his relatives.
Participant A was born abroad as well as living internationally for all of their lives, in
this interview I asked the participant to list all the people they view as family, along
with blood relatives she mentioned seeing her best friend of many years and au pair
as family. She spoke about how because she didn't see and speak to her relatives as
much she found comfort in people and they treated one another like family. She had
mentioned that she always had larger friend groups with one or two close friends
wherever she had moved. Participant A’s views on having a non-traditional family is
that “Surrounding yourself with a support network when you don't because you
don't have that support from your relatives is crucial to your mental health while
family in other people can link to the cultural idea of seeing people within your
life in Nigeria where it is courtesy to refer to adults around you as uncle/auntie and
people your age as sisters/brothers and believes this is where her perspective
towards family changed and she now sees non blood relatives to be family due to the
involvement they've had in her life. Participant B although born in their ‘home
country’ moved at the age of three and has lived in four countries since. He believes
that family is dependent on who you are around more. “Before moving I spent a lot of
time with my grandma and neighbour since my parents were at work for most of the
day so when I was in Italy (his ‘home country’) I would have said that my neighbour
was my brother and part of the family” he says that when he moved and stopped
seeing his neighbour he no longer saw them as family but they were at the time. His
views on family are that they change depending on who you are with at the time and
how they treat you. Participant C was born and raised in London. She grew up
around her cousins, aunts, uncles, grandparents etc. His beliefs on family are that
family are only the people that you are related to and no one else. “There is no one in
your life that will be as consistent as family”. She tends to keep his friends and family
separate, mentioning that you can tell your friends things you can’t tell your family
and vice versa. Although she admits to having a closer relationship with her friends
she still does not believe that family goes further than blood relation. This is
interesting because the other two participants who lived internationally have
completely different views on this which could be due to them seeking a family bond
whilst abroad and being able to form that bond with people that they are around a lot
Due to the fact that there are very few international students in my area I will be
collecting data through digital surveys and interviews. I have previously gone to
multiple International schools in which many of my friends had been moving about
for a lot of their lives which would allow me to get a better understanding of the
effect that it has had on them. Due to the fact that many of these people are still
international I will not be able to speak to them in person. The survey allows me to
get a lot of shallow information. That is why I have paired with semi-structured
interviews. Most of these take place digitally and others to be face to face. On the
survey I will ask participants if they feel comfortable having an interview with me
and if so to contact me as the survey responses will be anonymous in order for the
which being someone who has not previously migrated. This allows me to compare
the data. The interviews have a more in depth, emic understanding of the effect of
migration.
Ethical Considerations:
This study does not have very many ethical issues. The only one that I will be keeping
in mind is the emotional wellbeing of the participants. Although not all international
children have had bad experiences or suffered at the hands of migration there may be
certain participants who have had a more negative experience when it comes to
moving. Therefore, asking them to talk about this may cause them to relive the
trauma and hurt that came with it in the first place. Especially since one of the main
causes for hurt caused by migration is the inability to see the friends and family you
are no longer living near. Another ethical consideration that I will have to keep in
as they are friends of mine, meaning their answers might be affected by the
relationship they may have with me. The way in which I will try to minimise the
effects of this is by letting all participants know that the answers they give are
anonymous and will not be discussed anywhere else except for in relation to my
study itself. Furthermore, I will make them aware that the data is being collected for
a study meaning that it is a little bit more formal than an average conversation.
Finally I will try to keep the interview related to only the study instead of having side
conversations that are irrelevant to the study. The final practical or ethical
consideration that I will need to keep in mind is the personal connection that I have
to the subject. It will be necessary for me to remove my own ideas on the subject in
professional relationship with the participants; I predict that this may be difficult for
me as a lot of the people that I will be collecting data from and interviewing will be
with them. The reason why this could affect my data would be because of personal
bias towards the person and subject, as well as the fact that they may alter their
answers because I do know them. The way I will try to avoid this is by letting them
know before the interview that it is for a study and ask them to be as honest as
possible. I will also give them full anonymity and not release any personal
information.