2020-Article Text-26475-1-10-20200523
2020-Article Text-26475-1-10-20200523
2020-Article Text-26475-1-10-20200523
Sayu Putu Yuni Paryati1*, Siska Telly Pratiwi1, Evi Apriani Sitorus1, Dianti
Nursafitri Sundarti1, Susanti Ratunanda2, Indarti Trimurtini3 and Eka Noneng
Nawangsih1
1
Department of Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Jenderal Achmad
Yani, Cimahi, West Java, Indonesia
2
Department of Clinical Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Jenderal
Achmad Yani, Cimahi, West Java, Indonesia
3
Department of Anatomy, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Jenderal Achmad Yani,
Cimahi, West Java, Indonesia
*[email protected]
Abstract
Probiotics commonly are produced from Lactic Acid Bacteria (LAB). Lactobacillus
acidophilus and Streptococcus thermophilus are known to grow well in soy milk media.
Probiotics conferred many benefits, one of them is as an immunomodulator. Many studies
have shown that probiotics can stimulate the immune system, either non-specific or
specific immune responses, such as stimulating increased activity of macrophage
phagocytosis and antibody titer. This study aimed to examine the effects of
immunomodulatory L. acidophillus and S. thermophillus as bacteria fermenter in soygurt.
Twenty four of mice were divided in four groups: control negative, mice that treated the
soygurt L. acidophillus, mice that treated the soygurt S. thermophillus, and mice that
treated the combination soygurt. Mice were given the soygurt in 10 days and induced E.
coli on days 9. The mice immune response was measured by observing the activity of
phagocytosis and antibody titer. The study did not show activity of phagocytosis. The
result of study showed that of monocyte numbers increased in peritoneum liquid. It
indicated the enhancement of immune response in mice. There was significant difference
between control group and treated group (p≤0,05) but no significant difference (p≥0,05)
among the treated groups. There are significant differences in antibody titres by treating
soygurt L. acidophilus (p = 0.030) and soygurt combination (p = 0.031) compared to the
control group. The mice grouptreated S. thermophilus yield an increase in antibody titer
but not significant (p≥0,05) compared with the control group.
1. Introduction
Probiotics are live microorganisms that can provide beneficial effects for the health of
the host body when consumed in sufficient quantities by improving the balance of
intestinalmicroflora [1], [2]. Generally, probiotics derived from lactic acid bacteria (LAB),
for example, Lactobacillus acidophilus and Streptococcus thermophilus [3], [4]. The
bacteria L. acidophilus able to survive in the acidic conditions of the gastrointestinal tract,
resistant to bile salts, stick to the epithelium of the gastrointestinal tract and produce
compounds antimicrobial [5]. S. thermophilus bacteria is often used as a starter in the
production of fermented milk and play a role in the early stages of the fermentation
process. Lactic acid bacteria stimulate the growth of other bacteria on fermented
2. Procedure
The materials used in this research are mice, soygurt with L. acidophilus, S.
thermophilus and mixed of L. acidophilus and S. thermophilus fermenter, deMann
Rogosa and Sharpe Agar (MRSA), Eosin Methylene Blue Agar (EMBA), sucrose, water,
soybean varieties bromo, NaCL 0.9%, Polyethylene Glycol (PEG), agarose, aquadest,
Phosphate Buffer Saline (PBS), feed and drink for mice.
using Total Plate Count method. Calculations performed on soygurt that has been through
the process of dilution. The result of soy milk dilution was then inoculated in MRS-A
medium and incubated for 48 hours at 37oC. Colonies formed in MRS-A media were
calculated using the TPC method.
Figure 1. AGPT media with 7 holes. The hole in the center is inserted E. coli, while in
the other 6 holes are filled with serum in each dilution
In this study, serum was diluted 5 times serially using PBS pH 7.4. The diluted serum
is poured into each well that has been numbered. The AGPT medium containing serum
and E. coli antigens was then given a damp cotton pad and incubated at 35°C for 48 hours
and then observed. The positive results of this examination are illustrated by the
formation of white precipitation lines between the antigen and serum holes.
The data obtained were tested using analysis of Kruskal-Wallis-test non-parametric
aimed to determine whether there is a difference between groups and followed by Post
Hoc Mann-Whitney test to determine in which group the differences were significant.
3.2. Soygurt
According to the Indonesian National Standard (SNI), number of starter bacteria
(probiotics) is at least 107cfu/mL, the other criteria of soy milk as fermented beverages or
probiotics, i.e. the appearance, odor and pH were also observed in this study. The soygurt
has a thick texture, colored white, and produces a characteristic odor soygurt acid.
Soygurt L. acidophilus has a pH of 5.71, S. thermophilus and soygurt combination has pH
of 5.61 and 5.34. The number of bacteria starter is at least 10 7 cfu/mL, and in this study,
soygurt L. acidophilus has 48x1018cfu/mL, soygurt S. thermophilus has 3x1017cfu/mL and
the amount of bacteria on soygurt combination starter is 37x1020 cfu/mL. In the
calculation of the number of bacterial fermenter colonies, obtained amount of bacteria in
soy milk media between 1017-1020 cfu/mL. The amount is more than the standard of
probiotics according to WHO, which is 106-108 cfu/mL. This shows that with the
composition, the growth still meets the standard bacteria as probiotic.
In this study, the result showed the increase of the number of monocytes in the
peritoneal fluid. An increasing number of monocytes may indicate the body's immune
response in mice, which monocyte is an early form of macrophages before entering into
the tissue of body [13]. Monocytes have the same function with macrophages in terms of
phagocytosis of foreign microorganisms that enter the body, but monocytes circulating in
the blood and perform its functions in the blood [13], [18].
The increase in the number of monocytes in the peritoneal fluid caused by the
proliferation and migration of monocytes from the blood vessel to the peritoneum as
phagocytic cells that produce the cytokines secrete in the peritoneum such as chemotaxis
factors called chemokines or chemotaxins [17], [20]. The number of monocyte for each
treatment group are described in Table 1.
Table 1 showed that the administration soygurt can increase the number of monocytes
significantly (p<0.05). Giving soygurt in mice proved to boost the immune response. The
immune response was initiated by the attachment of probiotic bacteria to intestinal
mucosa. Homeostatically, epithelial cells are unresponsive to bacterial flagella, whereas
flagellin that has entered the basolateral generates an inflammatory response that depends
on TLR5 [21]. The ingestion of the probiotic however, has been linked to a dampening
down of this response, reducing IL-8 secretion even in the presence of pathogenic
Salmonella dublin [22].
Control 6 16 ± 12,43
0,003
P1 6 33,83 ± 30,36
P2 6 31,17 ± 21,30
P3 6 31 ± 31,52
Description: P1 = Soygurt Lactobacillus acidophilus, P2 = Soygurt Streptococcus
thermophilus, P3 = combination soygurt
The increase in the number of monocytes peritoneal fluid in the group of soygurt L.
acidophilus because the ability of these bacteria to grow and survive at pH 3.5 to 6.8. L.
acidophilus ability to grow at acid condition makes the bacteria are able to survive in the
stomach acid when passing through the digestive tract, reach the intestine and colonize in
the intestines. This suggests that L. acidophilus qualify as probiotic bacteria and is very
good to be probiotic [1], [5]. Colonization of L. acidophilus in large numbers in the colon
can increase its activity in terms of providing health benefits to the body, one of which
boost the immune response. Gill et al. in 2000 showed that administration of lactic acid
bacteria can increase some indexes of natural and adaptive immunity including
phagocytic activity of mononuclear cells (monocytes and macrophages) and
polymorphonuclear cells, NK cell activity, production of IFN γ, an antibody response
against oral and systemic antigens [23].
In the combination of soygurt, there are two types lactic acid bacteria, i.e. L.
acidophilus and S. thermophilus with different abilities. Streptococcus thermophilus is not
resistant to acidic conditions, because the optimum pH for nature growth of these bacteria
is 6,5, [7] cause no resistance to acidic conditions of the stomach. Streptococcus
thermophilus plays a role in the early stages of fermentation (as a starter) and the presence
of these bacteria in fermented milk stimulates the growth of L. acidophilus [24]. The
combination of L. acidophilus and S. thermophilus theoretically could increase the
benefits of consumption of probiotics, one of which is to improve the immune response
[8]. This research shows the average number of monocytes in the combination group
lower than soygurt L. acidophilus, it is probably because their nutrient competition
between these two types of bacteria.
The average number of monocytes of P2 group (soygurtS. thermophilus) was 31.17
because this soygurt given after feeding, so that the stomach are not too acidic and
intestinal bacteria can survive and has an impact on the immune system in increasing the
amount of monocytes proliferation and migration into the peritoneal fluid. Statistically,
the Kruskal-Wallis test results showed a significant effect on the provision of soygurt to
the number of monocytes in mice (p≤ 0.05) compared with controls. Giving three types of
soygurt in mice proved to enhance the immune system that begins with the attachment of
probiotic bacteria in the intestinal mucosa. The application of some strains of LAB
produced enhanced activity of peritoneal and pulmonary macrophages and blood
leukocytes, and increased secretion of lysosomal enzymes [25].
The exact mechanism of how LAB stimulate the immune system are not fully
understood. LAB or their products can get access to the gut-associated lymphoid tissue,
especially the Peyer plaques and/or the sistemic immune system's [13], [18]. Peyer
plaques cells produce specific antibodies against the LAB and inhibit the proliferative
response improvement against mitogen B cells and T cells. Translocation of LAB with
mesenteric lymph nodes and Peyer plaques in mice given LAB oraly may support this
possibility. In addition, the intestinal epithelium contains a number of immunoregulatory
cells. Interaction between LAB or their products produced by immunocompetent cells
such as macrophages and T cells secrete (cytokines) that are known have a significant
effect on the functioning of the immune system. The existence of specific receptors of
peptidoglycan, a cell wall component of LAB on macrophages and lymphocytes also
supports this possibility [13], [20], [23], [26].
increasing the number of monocytes in mice given soygurt group with bacterial starter L.
acidophilus as a single bacteria compared with the group given soygurt with combination
bacterial starter of L. acidophilus and S. thermophilus. This is probably due to the
competition of nutrients between L. acidophilus and S. thermophilus, so that the average
increase in the number of monocytes soygurt L. acidophilus group and the combination
was not significantly different. Another possibility which cause no significant difference
between groups soygurt L. acidophilus and S. thermophilus combinations are mechanisms
that S. thermophilus play a role in the early stages of fermentation (as a starter) and the
presence of these bacteria in fermented milk stimulates the growth of L. acidophilus.
S. thermophilus 0,872
Combination
effect on B lymphocyte activity. These three interleukins cause increased growth and
stimulation of B lymphocytes in the formation of antibodies [8].
Control 0,00 0 1
S. thermophilus 1,00 0 32
0,042*
L. acidophilus 18,00 0 32
Combination 2,00 0 16
L. acidophilus 0,291
*p-value <0.05 there was a significant difference between the groups
S. thermophilus is known to have an optimum pH 6.5 [30]. The acidic acid pH is
thought to decrease the amount and activity of colonization of S. thermophilus in the
gastrointestinal tract. The low activity of S. thermophilus colonization in the
gastrointestinal tract can cause immunomodulatory effects by probiotic bacteria,
especially in increasing the formation of antibodies is not maximum. In combination
4. Conclusion
The results showed that administration of soygurt with L. acidophilus as fermenter
bacteria gave best immunomodulatory effect compared with S. thermophilus fermenter,
and combination of both, but there is no significant difference.
Acknowledgments
Further thanks to the Institute of Research and Community Service of Universitas
Jenderal Achmad Yani for financial support for this study through Unjani's competitive
research grant fund.
References
[1] Food and Agriculture Organization and World Health Organization, “Report of a joint FAO/WHO
expert consultation on evaluation of health and nutritional properties of probiotics in food including
powder milk with live lactic acid bacteria”, Food and Nutrition Paper, Rome: FAO/WHO, (2001).
[2] R. Fuller, “Probiotics in man and animals”, Journal Applied Bacteriology, vol. 66, no. 5, (1989), pp.
365-378.
[3] I. N. Sujaya, Y. Ramona, N. P. Widarini, N. P. Suariani, N. M. U. Dwipayanti, K. A. Nocianitri, N. W.
Nursini, “Isolation and characteristics of lactic acid bacteria from Sumbawa horse milk”, Jurnal
Veteriner, vol. 9, no. 2, (2008), pp. 1-10.
[4] W. H. Holzapfel, P. Haberer, R. Geisen, J. Bjorkroth, U. Schillinger, “Taxonomy and importante
features of probiotic microorganisms in food and nutrition”, Am. Soc. Clin. Nutr., vol. 73, (2001), pp.
365S-373S.
[5] M. Firdaus, D. Setijawati, Kartikaningsih, “The effect of lactobacillus acidophilus microcapsule which
encapsulated by kappa caragenan toward in vivo functional test”, Research Journal of Life Science, vol.
1, no. 1, (2014), pp. 27-36.
[6] Soeharsono, “Probiotik: Scientific basis, application, and practical aspects”, Bandung: Widya
Padjajaran, (2010).
[7] R. Sunarlim, H. Setiyanto, M. Poelohngan, “Effect of combination starter Lactobacillus bulgaricus,
Streptococcus thermophilus and Lactobacillus plantarum to fermented milk quality properties”, Nasional
Seminar Livestock Techology and Vet., (2007), pp. 270-278.
[8] Y. Ohashi, K. Ushida, “Health-beneficial effects of probiotics: Its mode of action”, Anim Sci J., vol. 80,
no. 4, (2009), pp. 361-371.
[9] Anonymous, “Characteristics of soy as a functional food ingredient”, eBook Pangan.com, (2006).
[10] L. V. Bolocan, F. Popescu, C. Bica, “Probiotics and their immunomodulatory potential”, Current Health
Science Journal, vol. 39, no. 4, (2013), pp. 204-209.
[11] D. D. Rosa, M. M. S Dias, M. Łukasz. G. Kowiak, A. Sandra. L.R. Lisiane. Conceição, M. C. G.
Peluzio, “Milk kefir: Nutritional, microbiological and health benefits”, Nutrition Research Reviews, vol.
30, no. 1, (2017), pp. 82-96.
[12] L. A. Lestari, M. Heparis, N. Ekandaru, S. Iravati, E. Harmayani, “The increase in phagocytic activity
and nitric oxide production in peritoneal macrophages Sprague Dawley rats were given Lactobacillus
plantarum Mut7 and extract fiber yams”, Jurnal Gizi Klinik Indo, vol. 9, no. 2, (2012), pp. 64-72.
[13] M. A. Wijayanti, “Phagocytic ability of peritoneal macrophages of mice were immunized during
Plasmodium berghei infection”, Berkala Ilmu Kedokteran, vol. 31, no. 4, (1999), pp. 213-218.
[14] T. Yulinery, N. Nurhidayat, “The use of fermented rice extracts of several types of Monascus purpureus
for in vitro activity of phagocytic cells of mice peritoneal macrophages and polymorphonuclear as an
immunomodulator, Jurnal Ilmu Hayati, vol. 11, no. 2, (2012), pp. 263-273.
[15] J. G. Cappuccino, N. Sherman, “Microbiology: A laboratory manual. California: Benjami/Cummings
Publishing Company, Inc.”, (1987).
[16] N. Cheeptam, A. Lal, “Eosin-Methylene Blue Agar Plates Protocol”, Kuala Lumpur: ASM Science,
(2007).
[17] Jawetz, Melnick, Adelberg. Medical Microbiology. Jakarta: Penerbit Buku Kedokteran EGC, (2010).
[18] H. M. Ramadany, “Effect of three species of sea cucumber extract local Surabaya east coast of the liver
of mice (Musmusculus) after infection with Escherichia coli”, Surabaya: Universitas Airlangga, (2011).
[19] Akrom, A. Wijaya, T. Armansyah, “Ethanolic Extract of Black Cumin (Nigella sativa) Seed Increases
Macrophage Phagocytic Activity of Swiss Mice Infected with Lysteria monocytogenes”, Jurnal
Kedokteran Hewan, vol. 9, no. 2, (2015), pp. 94-100.
[20] A. K. Abbas, A. H. Lichtman, “Basic Immunology: Functions and Disorders of the Immune
System”, Amsterdam: Elsevier, (2006).
[21] S. H. Rhee. E. Im, M. Riegler, E. Kokkotou, M. O’Brien, C. Pothoulakis, “Pathophysiological role of
Toll-like receptor 5 engagement by bacterial flagellin in colonic inflammation”, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.
USA, vol. 102, (2005), pp. 13610–13615.
[22] J. M. Otte, D. K. Podolsky, “Functional modulation of enterocytes by gram-positive and gram-negative
microorganisms”, Am. J. Physiol. Gastrointest. Liver Physiol., vol. 306, (2004), pp. G613–G626.
[23] H.S. Gill, K. J. Rutherfurd, J. Prasad, P.K. Gopal, “Enhancement of natural and acquired immunity by
Lactobacillus rhamnosus (HN001), Lactobacillus acidophilus (HN017) and Bifidobacterium lactis
(HN019)”, Br. J. Nutr., vol. 83, no. 2, (2000), pp. 167-176.
[24] A. Dabija, G. G. Codină , A. M. Gâtlan, E. T. Sănduleac , L. Rusu, “Effects of some vegetable proteins
addition on yogurt quality”, Chemistry & Chemical Engineering, Biotechnology, Food Industry, vol. 19,
no. 2, (2018), pp. 181–192.
[25] R. Herich, M. Levkut, “Lactic acid bacteria, probiotics and immune system”, Vet. Med. Czech, vol. 42,
no. 6, (2002), pp. 169–180.
[26] A. G. Johnson, R. J. Ziegler, O. A. Lukasewycz, L. B. Hawley, ”Microbiology and Immunology”,
Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, (1996).
[27] Subowo, “Immunobiology”, Jakarta: CV Sagung Seto, (2009).
[28] G. A. Duque, A. Descoteaux, “Macrophage cytokines: Involvement in immunity and infectious
diseases”, Frontiers in Immunology, Molecular Innate Immunity, vol. 5, no. 491, (2014), pp. 1-12
[29] K. Suriasih, N. Sucipta, M. Hartawan, “Potential and characteristics of lactic acid bacteria (LAB)
isolates kefir and "seed" kefir as immunomodulators in experimental animals”, Bali: Udayana University
Press, (2015).
[30] H. Pyar, K. K. Peh, “Characterization and identification of lactobacillus acidophilus using biology rapid
identification system”, Pulau Pinang: Universiti Sains Malaysia, (2013).
[31] G. Perdigon, E. N. Macias, S. Alvarez, G. Oliver, A. A. P. R. Holgado, Enhancement of response in
mice fed with Streptococcus thermophilus and Lactobacillus acidophilus”, J. Dairy Sci., vol. 70, (1987),
pp. 919-926.