FGI Complaint
FGI Complaint
FGI Complaint
Plaintiff,
v.
Defendant.
552, the Declaratory Judgment Act, and 28 U.S.C. §§ 2201 and 2202, for injunctive, declaratory,
and other appropriate relief. Plaintiff Functional Government Initiative (“FGI”) challenges the
failure of the United States Department of Education (“ED”) to disclose to FGI records that
generally pertain to student loan forgiveness or the extension of the moratorium on loan
repayments through the end of December 2022. The specific records sought are detailed below.
552(a)(6)(E), ED’s regulations, and 28 C.F.R. § 16.5(e), and for injunctive relief ordering ED to
immediately process and release to FGI the requested records in their entirety.
3. This Court has both subject matter jurisdiction over this action and personal
jurisdiction over the parties pursuant to 5 U.S.C. §§ 552(a)(4)(B) and 552(a)(6)(c)(i). This Court
Case 1:23-cv-00711 Document 1 Filed 03/16/23 Page 2 of 7
also has jurisdiction over this action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331, 2201(a), and 2202. Venue
Parties
improving the American public’s access to information about the officials, decisions, actions,
responsible for establishing policies on federal financial aid for education, and distributing and
monitoring those funds, collecting data on America’s schools and disseminating research,
focusing national attention on key educational issues, and prohibiting discrimination and
ensuring equal access to education. ED has possession and control of the requested records and
7. An agency must notify a party making a FOIA request within 20 working days of
the agency’s determination and the reasons therefor and of the requester’s right to appeal the
Factual Background
the forgiveness of those loans, is the subject of considerable legal debate, along with ethical and
moral concerns.
2
Case 1:23-cv-00711 Document 1 Filed 03/16/23 Page 3 of 7
9. Loan “forgiveness” by the Federal Government does not “eliminate” the loan;
rather, it merely shifts the obligation to repay the borrowers to the Federal Government, funded
10. Legally, the Administration’s decision to forgive certain student loans or portions
thereof is subject to a challenge that the Administration did not have congressional authorization
11. The program is also subject to criticism that it transfers the obligations of people
who incurred student loan debts to taxpayers whose debts—whether education-related or not—
12. Those legal and moral concerns would be heightened by any records
demonstrating that, for example, the program and the decision to forgive the loans was motivated
by political concerns as opposed to an effort to faithfully execute the laws passed by Congress.
13. In an effort to gain an understanding of the Administration’s basis for its decision
to implement the student loan forgiveness program, and to share that information with the
taxpaying public, the FOIA request at issue seeks records relating to whether the
Administration’s program was motivated by opinion polls, the timing of the midterm election,
and records regarding the Administration’s purported legal authority for implementing the
program.
3
Case 1:23-cv-00711 Document 1 Filed 03/16/23 Page 4 of 7
22-03507-F
14. On August 25, 2022, FGI sent the subject FOIA request1 to ED’s FOIA Service
Center seeking all records and communications regarding student loan forgiveness or the
extension of the moratorium on loan repayments through the end of December 2022. FGI
included certain key words to assist in the search for responsive records, as well as the names of
certain ED officials and staff they were requesting be subject to these searches. See id.
15. The subject FOIA request stated that it requested information from June 20, 2022,
16. FGI also sought a waiver of fees associated with processing its request and
explained in its request that the requested records would be of primary benefit to the public
interest and because the requested records contribute to the public’s understanding of the
17. On August 26, 2022, FGI received a response via email from the ED FOIA
Manager that its FOIA request had been received, was assigned tracking number 22-03507-F,
18. On September 14, 2022, FGI received, via email, a letter from ED’s Service
Center stating the subject FOIA request had been received August 25, 2022, and that FGI’s
19. On September 23, 2022, FGI received another letter from ED’s FOIA Service
Center stating it would not be able to respond to the subject FOIA request by the 20-day
1
Attached hereto as Exhibit 1.
2
Attached hereto as Exhibit 2.
3
Attached hereto as Exhibit 3.
4
Case 1:23-cv-00711 Document 1 Filed 03/16/23 Page 5 of 7
statutory requirement due to the scope of the request requiring ED to “conduct a vast search
across multiple program offices, which we anticipate will result in a large amount of responsive
records.”4 That letter did not indicate any anticipated date a response or documents would be
20. On November 4, 2022, FGI asked, via email, whether the search for responsive
documents had begun, and for an estimated date it could expect to receive responsive
documents.5
21. On November 7, 2022, FGI received an email response6 simply stating that 22-
03507-F was “In Process” and that the search for responsive records was still being conducted,
22. FGI responded that the “Check Status” link provided only re-stated that 22-
23. Having received no further communication or documents for nearly four months,
on February 28, 2023, FGI asked whether the search had progressed and when FGI could expect
to receive a response. FGI also noted that the “Check Status” link page still noted the vague “in
process” status, the same since August 26, 2022, as noted above. See id.
24. As of the filing date of this Complaint, FGI has received no documents or further
25. It is apparent that, without litigation, ED will not produce the requested
documents in a timeframe that allows for timely public disclosure regarding ED’s actions.
4
Attached hereto as Exhibit 4.
5
Attached hereto as Exhibit 5 (personal telephone number redacted).
6
Attached hereto as Exhibit 6 (personal telephone number redacted).
5
Case 1:23-cv-00711 Document 1 Filed 03/16/23 Page 6 of 7
Accordingly, FGI has now exhausted all applicable administrative remedies with respect to 22-
03507-F.
CLAIM ONE
(Wrongful Withholding of Non-Exempt Records
In Violation of FOIA by ED, 5 U.S.C. § 552)
27. FGI properly requested records within the custody and control of ED and/or its
subsidiary offices.
28. ED failed to comply with the statutory time limits for making a determination on
the FOIA request, and by withholding from disclosure records responsive to FGI’s FOIA request
to ED.
29. FGI is therefore entitled to injunctive and declaratory relief with respect to the
Requested Relief
(1) Order defendant ED to immediately and fully process Plaintiff FGI’s August 25, 2022
FGI;
(2) Issue a declaration that FGI is entitled to both immediate processing and disclosure of
the requested records and indexes justifying the withholding of all or any portion of
(3) Retain jurisdiction of this action to ensure no agency records are wrongfully withheld;
and
6
Case 1:23-cv-00711 Document 1 Filed 03/16/23 Page 7 of 7
(4) Grant such other relief as this Court may deem just and proper.
Counsel for FGI further requests that the Court award reasonable attorneys’ fees and