HANOI PILOT LIGHT METRO LINE

Section Nhon - Hanoi Railway Station

COMMENT SHEET
Package: CP03 - Underground Section

Ref. No.: PIC-IMP-TCM-WSU-S09-07190-E-1A

Attached to Letter: PIC-MLT-02682-21-E
Comment sheet issues on: 21 May 2021
I. IDENTIFICATION OF THE REVIEWED DOCUMENT
Reviewed doc. Comments sheet CP03 supervision
Author HGU Written by team
CONSTRUCTION DESIGN DRAWINGS
Reviewed doc. Comments sheet
ITEM: EXTERNAL STRUCTURE AT S.PAPIN
Title Checked by
STATION 09
Reviewed doc.
HGU-IMP-GCM-WSU-S09-11810-B Revision N° 1A
Number
Transmittal No HGU-MTS-00477-20-B received on 07/05/2021

II. PREVIOUS COMMENT SHEETS RELATED TO THE REVIEWED DOCUMENT

Previous comment sheet number (if any) Revision No of the reviewed doc.

III. STATUS OF THE COMMENT SHEET

This submission is hereby: REJECTED

Status Legend: SONO = Statement Of No Objection

NOWC = No Objection With Comments

Comment sheet reference No: Page 1/6

PIC-IMP-TCM-WSU-S09-07190-E-1A
 HANOI PILOT LIGHT METRO LINE

Section Nhon - Hanoi Railway Station

IV. DETAILED COMMENTS

Location in the
document
No. Comments M/m Reply Status
(chapter, page,
article, section)
- PIC remind HGU that CDD of External structure at Station -Noted.
09 will be approved once CDR approved.
- Interfaces and combine service drawings for external
structure of Station 09 yet to fully development and finalize,
lead to input data for construction design such as openings,
embedment, layout arrangement and loading of
equipment... cannot be confirmed. HGU is strictly requested
to finalize all interfaces with other packages by ICD before
integrating to Construction design as Contract requirement.
- PIC remind HGU that externals structures are effected by -Noted.
1. the report (or letter) regarding the compliance QCVN Opened on
General M
1 regulation and has yet to be finalized, and any modifications 10/05/2021
that could be required at later.
- PIC remind that waterproof solution for external structure -Noted.
be considered parallel in CDD for structure, for example:
cover slab and entrances accesses shall be applied Class 1,
diaphragm wall applied Class 2, however there are some
structure will use diaphragm wall surface acting as structure
wall. It will be conflicted if Contractor are not clarify in this
step.

2. Sheet pile + Part I: Volume 1/2

Shoring system Design change:

Comment sheet reference No: Major (M) = Impact Proceed

PIC-IMP-TCM-WSU-S09-07190-E-1A minor (m) = For example: comment about the form
Only Major (M) comments can justify the rejection (R) of the submission
Page 2/6
 HANOI PILOT LIGHT METRO LINE

Section Nhon - Hanoi Railway Station

- HGU is to explain the depth of sheet pile design different to -Please be noted that the errors in TD had been
Technical design. For example: in Block 1+2 sheet pile have shown in TDA of this struc1``1, in CD the
bottom level -7.19m while in TD is -6.64m; Block 4 sheet pile geotechnical parameters are updated, and it
have bottom level -7.19m while in TD is -5.24m... It will lead leads to the change of design in comparison
to change quality (variation) with Technical design. A report with TD. The length of D-wall 13.95m in TD is
or assessment should be mentioned in CDR for acceptable not enough for safety (based on results of
before. calculation). This issue has been mentioned in
- HGU is to explain change type of strut, waler with Technical CDR.
design. It will lead to change quality (variation) with
approved Technical design. See more in description below: The types of struts and walers are chosen based
on:
TD CDD - The types HGU already had on the
Type of 323.9/10 406.4/9 construction site (for examples 323.9/8;
strut @=90 406.4/9, 508/10...)
Type of 323.9/14 H440x300 - The types that HGU can purchase in VN
strut @=45 market (the waler type HEB is difficult
Type of H 400 Double H 440x300 to purchase in VN)
waler - The material requirements.
The comparison table has been supplemented
Thus, HGU is supplement comparison table for clarify in CDR
variation with Technical design.

- Totally, PIC has no basis to review design changes as per

HGU’ proposal in Construction design stage. To note that in
Technical design change of S09 HGU did not propose change
relating item of external structure; in the Technical design It’s difficult to cover all the technical issues in
assessment report of External structures at Station 09, HGU TDA. The reviewing methodology of TDA is
confirmed “HGU’s reviewed with other temporary work and mainly check the input data, conformity of
related calculation report (sheet pile, strut, waler...) and no related documents. All the change or modified
more issue in General recommendation for this one. details have been added in CDR.

Comment sheet reference No: Major (M) = Impact Proceed

PIC-IMP-TCM-WSU-S09-07190-E-1A minor (m) = For example: comment about the form
Only Major (M) comments can justify the rejection (R) of the submission
Page 3/6
 HANOI PILOT LIGHT METRO LINE

Section Nhon - Hanoi Railway Station

- At drawing no.11091, please add a legend to clarify -Noted
information of each detail will be applied in diaphragm wall
drawing.

- HGU is to consider calculation of Diaphragm wall for -Noted

Ventilation Shaft 3, ventilation shaft 4 to integrate
reinforcement to drawings, it’s seems missing in CDR.

- HGU to clarify information of anchor bar in CDR to properly -Noted.

integrate to the drawing of diaphragm wall.

3. - During reviewing, PIC found that D-wall type 1C in drawing -Noted

Diaphragm wall
11230 is not in the diaphragm wall panel layout. HGU is
requested to check and confirm all D-wall drawing have
been properly represented and conform with calculation in
CDR.

- HGU is to clarify reason to change depth of d-wall of -The reasons for the changes of D-wall length
approved Technical design. For example: panel in shaft 3&4 have been mentioned above, and it has been
in the TD have bottom level is-5.84m and CDD change to updated in CDR
bottom level is -7.16m), lead to change design of d-wall. PIC
remind one more time that PIC have no basis to review
design changes as per HGU’ proposal in Construction design
stage.
4. General - Part II: - HGU is requested full integration sidewalk level of approval
Volume 2/2 road reinstatement, external and internal interfaces,
architectural design... into construction design drawing of
external structure. To note that some structure will effect by
change ground level, for example: in the Stair 1, sidewalk LV
+8.16m in TD; and +8.4 in CDD of road re-instatement, so

Comment sheet reference No: Major (M) = Impact Proceed

PIC-IMP-TCM-WSU-S09-07190-E-1A minor (m) = For example: comment about the form
Only Major (M) comments can justify the rejection (R) of the submission
Page 4/6
 HANOI PILOT LIGHT METRO LINE

Section Nhon - Hanoi Railway Station

that shorten the height of structure and losing 1 step of
stair, lead to non-compliance with the architectural design.

Besides, structure in CDD not yet integrated interface with

agreement of CPs. For example, the depth of Pit shaft and
opening of elevator, concrete outline for pit of escalator is
not satisfied with CP07 required in ICD 73-5, no CP07’s
confirmation for escalator support in drawing, openings for
external structure by interface not yet acceptable... PIC
request HGU strictly implement of input design data,
especially interfaces with Designated Contractor to integrate
Construction design drawings.

5. Concrete Vent Shaft 1:

structure outline Emergency Stair 1:
– General - HGU to clarify opening on Section B-B, it’s seem open to
comment the soil side. For other openings please clarify basis
documentation to develop in this CDD.
- HGU to indicate dimension of the structure above ground
level.
Block 2:
- HGU to clarify detail of drainage trench, pumping pit (refer
to CDD of plumbing and drainage system for your
information); size of elevator and escalator pit (ICD 73-5);
dimension of elevator shaft above ground level and so on.
Ventilation Shaft 2:
- HGU to clarify opening of shaft at Top slab, the opening not
shown on plan view so that to difficult to know this detail.
Ventilation shaft 3&4, 5&6:
- About structure d-wall as like permanent structure,

Comment sheet reference No: Major (M) = Impact Proceed

PIC-IMP-TCM-WSU-S09-07190-E-1A minor (m) = For example: comment about the form
Only Major (M) comments can justify the rejection (R) of the submission
Page 5/6
 HANOI PILOT LIGHT METRO LINE

Section Nhon - Hanoi Railway Station

waterstop of D-wall should extend up to finish level to
prevent water leakage as per Watertightness’s requirement.
- HGU to supplement general structure above ground level
of shaft on the plan view, (make same plan view of shaft 6)
- HGU is to add drawing for cooling tower + diesel room of
external structure in drawing. - Cooling tower and diesel room shall be
submitted as a separate document.

- Reinforcement of structures in drawing must to update

according calculation result in CDR. This comment can be
Reinforcement
closed once CDR approved.
drawing-
6. - HGU to show depth of drilling bar embedded d-wall on
General
drawing accordance to calculation report in CDR.
comment
- There are some structures (wall, slab) have no stirrup
arrangement in drawing. Please clarify it.
- HGU is to supplement summary comparison table between
CDD and TD for each component in CDD: sheet pile, strut,
7. Quality table waler, d-wall, retaining wall, concrete structure, rebar.... in
CDD.

Comment sheet reference No: Major (M) = Impact Proceed

PIC-IMP-TCM-WSU-S09-07190-E-1A minor (m) = For example: comment about the form
Only Major (M) comments can justify the rejection (R) of the submission
Page 6/6