Explanation of the Recent "Strange Craft"

Sightings

Here is the breif introduction. I'm using the alias Isaac, and used to work in what was called the
CARET program in the 80's. During my time there, I worked with a lot of the technology that is
clearly at work in the recent drone/strange craft sightings, most notably the "language" and
diagrams seen on the underside of each craft. What follows is a lengthy letter about who I am,
what I know, and what these sightings are (probably) all about.

The appearance of these photos has convinced me to release at least some of the numerous
photographs and photocopied documents I still possess some 20 years later that can explain a
great deal about these sightings. On this site you will find some of these. They are available as
high resolution scans that I am giving away free, PROVIDED THEY ARE NOT MODIFIED
IN ANY WAY AND ARE KEPT TOGETHER ALONG WITH THIS WRITTEN
MATERIAL.

I am also trying to get in touch with the witnesses so far, such as Chad, Rajman, Jenna, Ty, and
the Lake Tahoe witness (especially Chad). I have advice for them that may be somewhat helpful
in dealing with what they've seen and what I would recommend they do with what they know. If
you are one of these witnesses, or can put me in touch with them, please contact Coast to Coast
AM and let them know.

My Experience with the CARET Program and Extra-terrestrial Technology

Isaac, June 2007

This letter is part of a package I've assembled for Coast to Coast AM to distribute to its audience.
It is a companion to numerous document and photo scans and should not be separated from them.

You can call me Isaac, an alias I've chosen as a simple measure of protection while I release what
would be called tremendously sensitive information even by todays standards. “Sensitive”is not
necessarily synonymous with “dangerous”, though, which is why my conscience is clear as I offer
this material up for the public. My government has its reasons for its continual secrecy, and I
sympathize with many of them, but the truth is that I'm getting old and I'm not interested in
meeting my maker one day with any more baggage than necessary! Furthermore, I put a little
more faith in humanity than my former bosses do, and I think that a release of at least some of
this info could help a lot more than it could hurt, especially in today's world.

I should be clear before I begin, as a final note: I am not interested in making myself vulnerable
to the consequences of betraying the trust of my superiors and will not divulge any personal
information that could determine my identity. However my intent is not to deceive, so
information that I think is too risky to share will be simply left out rather than obfuscated in some
way (aside from my alias, which I freely admit is not my real name). I would estimate that with
the information contained in this letter, I could be narrowed down to one of maybe 30-50 people
at best, so I feel reasonably secure.

Some Explanation for the Recent Sightings

For many years I've occasionally considered the release of at least some of the material I possess,
but the recent wave of photos and sightings has prompted me to cut to the chase and do so now.

I should first be clear that I'm not directly familiar with any of the crafts seen in the photos in
their entirety. I've never seen them in a hangar or worked on them myself or seen aliens zipping
around in them. However, I have worked with and seen many of the parts visible in these crafts,
some of which can be seen in the Q3-85 Inventory Review scan found at the top of this page.
More importantly though, I'm very familiar with the “language”on their undersides seen clearly
in photos by Chad and Rajman, and in another form in the Big Basin photos.

One question I can answer for sure is why they're suddenly here. These crafts have probably
existed in their current form for decades, and I can say for sure that the technology behind them
has existed for decades before that. The “language”, in fact, (I'll explain shortly why I keep
putting that in quotes) was the subject of my work in years past. I'll cover that as well.

The reason they're suddenly visible, however, is another matter entirely. These crafts, assuming
they're anything like the hardware I worked with in the 80's (assuming they're better, in fact), are
equipped with technology that enables invisibility. That ability can be controlled both on board
the craft, and remotely. However, what's important in this case is that this invisibility can also be
disrupted by other technology. Think of it like radar jamming. I would bet my life savings (since I
know this has happened before) that these craft are becoming visible and then returning to
invisibility arbitrarily, probably unintentionally, and undoubtedly for only short periods, due to
the activity of a kind of disrupting technology being set off elsewhere, but nearby. I'm especially
sure of this in the case of the Big Basin sightings, were the witnesses themselves reported seeing
the craft just appear and disappear. This is especially likely because of the way the witness
described one of the appearances being only a momentary flicker, which is consistent with the
unintentional, intermittent triggering of such a device.

It's no surprise that these sightings are all taking place in California, and especially the
Saratoga/South Bay area. Not far from Saratoga is Mountain View/Sunnyvale, home to Moffett
Field and the NASA Ames Research center. Again, I'd be willing to bet just about anything that
the device capable of hijacking the cloaking of these nearby craft was inadvertently triggered,
probably during some kind of experiment, at the exact moment they were being seen. Miles away,
in Big Basin, the witnesses were in the right place at the right time and saw the results of this
disruption with their own eyes. God knows what else was suddenly appearing in the skies at that
moment, and who else may have seen it. I've had some direct contact with this device, or at least a
device capable of the same thing, and this kind of mistake is not unprecedented. I am personally
aware of at least one other incident in which this kind of technology was accidentally set off,
resulting in the sudden visibility of normally invisible things. The only difference is that these
days, cameras are a lot more common!

The technology itself isn't ours, or at least it wasn't in the 80's. Much like the technology in these
crafts themselves, the device capable of remotely hijacking a vehicle's clacking comes from a
non-human source too. Why we were given this technology has never been clear to me, but it's
responsible for a lot. Our having access to this kind of device, along with our occasionally
haphazard experimentation on them, has lead to everything from cloaking malfunctions like this
to full-blown crashes. I can assure you that most (and in my opinion all) incidents of UFO crashes
or that kind of thing had more to do with our meddling with extremely powerful technology at an
inopportune time than it did mechanical failure on their part. Trust me, those things don't fail
unless something even more powerful than them makes them fail (intentionally or not). Think of
it like a stray bullet. You can be hit by one at any time, without warning, and even the shooter
didn't intent to hit you. I can assure you heads are rolling over this as well. If anyone notices a
brilliant but sloppy physicist patrolling the streets of Baghdad in the next couple weeks, I'd be
willing to guess how he got there. (I kid, of course, as I certainly hope that hasn't actually
happened in this case)

I'd now like to explain how it is that I know this.

The CARET Program

My story begins the same as it did for many of my co workers, with graduate and post-graduate
work at university in electrical engineering. And I had always been interested in computer
science, which was a very new field at the time, and my interest piqued with my first exposure to
a Tixo during grad school. In the years following school I took a scenic route through the tech
industry and worked for the kinds of companies you would expect, until I was offered a job at the
Department of Defense and things took a very different turn.

My time at the DoD was mostly uneventful but I was there for quite a while. I apparently proved
myself to be reasonably intelligent and loyal. By 1984 these qualities along with my technical
background made me a likely candidate for a new program they were recruiting for called
“CARET”.

Before I explain what CARET was I should back up a little. By 1984, Silicon Valley had been a
juggernaut of technology for decades. In the less than 40 years since the appearance of
Shockley’s transistor this part of the world had already produced a multi billion dollar computer
industry and made technological strides that were unprecedented in other fields, from hypertext
and online collaboration in '68 to the Alto in '73.

Private industry in Silicon Valley was responsible for some of the most incredible technological
leaps in history and this fact did not go unnoticed by the US government and military. I don’t
claim to have any special knowledge about Roswell or any of the other alleged early UFO events,
but I do know that whatever the exact origin, the military was hard at work trying to understand
and use the extra-terrestrial artifacts it had in its possession. While there had been a great deal of
progress overall, things were not moving as quickly as some would have liked. So, in 1984, the
CARET program was created with the aim of harnessing the abilities of private industry in silicon
valley and applying it to the ongoing task of understanding extra-terrestrial technology.

One of the best examples of the power of the tech sector was Xerox PARC, a research center in
Palo Alto, CA. XPARC was responsible for some of the major milestones in the history of
computing. While I never had the privilege of working there myself I did know many of the
people who did and I can say that they were among the brightest engineers I ever knew.

XPARC served as one of the models for the CARET program’s first incarnation, a facility called
the Palo Alto CARET Laboratory (PACL, lovingly pronounced “packle”during my time there).
This was where I worked, along with numerous other civilians, under the auspices of military
brass who were eager to find out how the tech sector made so much progress so quickly. My time
at the DoD was a major factor behind why I was chosen, and in fact about 30+ others who were
hired around the same time had also been at the Department about as long, but this was not the
case for everyone. A couple of my co-workers were plucked right from places like IBM and, at
least two of them came from XPARC itself. My DoD experience did make me more eligable for
positions of management, however, which is how I have so much of this material in my
possession to begin with.

So in other words, civilians like myself who had at--at most--some decent experience working for
the DoD but no actual military training or involvement, were suddenly finding ourselves in the
same room as highly classified extra-terrestrial technology. Of course they spent about 2 months
briefing us all before we saw or did anything, and did their best to convince us that if we ever
leaked a single detail about what we were being told, they’d do everything short of digging up our
ancestors and putting a few slugs in them too just for good measure. It seemed like there was an
armed guard in every corner of every room. I’d worked under some pretty hefty NDAs in my
time but this was so far out of my depth I didn’t think I was going to last 2 weeks in an
environment like that. But amazingly things got off to a good start. They wanted us, plain and
simple, and our industry had shown itself to be so good at what it did that they were just about
ready to give us carte blanche.

Of course, nothing with the military is ever that simple, and as is often the case they wanted to
have their cake and eat it too. What I mean by this is that despite their interest in picking our
brains and learning whatever they could from our way of doing things, they still wanted to do it
their way often enough to frustrate us.

At this point I'm going to gloss over the emotional side of this experience, because this letter isn't
intended to be a memoir, but I will say that there's almost no way to describe the impact this kind
of revelation has on your mind. There are very few moments in life in which your entire world
view is turned forever upside down, but this was one of them. I still remember that turning point
during the briefing when I realized what he'd just told us, and that I hadn't heard him wrong, and
that it wasn't some kind of joke. In retrospect the whole thing feels like it was in slow motion,
from that slight pause he took just before the term “extra-terrestrial”came out for the first time, to
the way the room itself seemed to go off kilter as we collectively tried to grasp what was being
said. My reflex kept jumping back and forth between trying to look at the speaker, to understand
him better, and looking at everyone else around me, to make sure I wasn't the only one that was
hearing this. At the risk of sounding melodramatic, it's a lot like a child learning his parents are
divorcing. I never experienced that myself, but a very close friend of mine did when were boys,
and he confided in me a great deal about what the experience felt like. A lot of what he said
would aptly describe what I was feeling in that room. Here was a trusted authority figure telling
you something that you just don't feel ready for, and putting a burden on your mind that you don't
necessarily want to carry. The moment that first word comes out, all you can think about it is
what it was like only seconds ago, and knowing that life is never going to be as simple as it was
then. After all that time at the DoD, I thought I at least had some idea of what was going on in the
world, but I'd never heard so much as a peep about this. Maybe one day I'll write more on this
aspect, because it's the kind of thing I really would like to get off my chest, but for now I'll
digress.

Unlike traditional research in this area, we weren’t working on new toys for the air force. For
numerous reasons, the CARET people decided to aim its efforts at commercial applications rather
than military ones. They basically wanted us to turn these artifacts into something they could
patent and sell. One of CARET’s most appealing promises was the revenue generated by these
product-ready technologies, which could be funneled right back into black projects. Working with
a commercial application in mind was also yet another way to keep us in a familiar mind state.
Developing technology for the military is very different than doing so for the commercial sector,
and not having to worry about the difference was another way that CARET was very much like
private industry.

CARET shined in the way it let us work the way we were used to working. They wanted to
recreate as much of the environment we were used to as they could without compromising issues
like security. That meant we got free reign to set up our own workflow, internal management
structure, style manuals, documentation, and the like. They wanted this to look and feel like
private industry, not the military. They knew that was how to get the best work out of us, and they
were right.

But things didn’t go as smoothly when it came to matters like access to classified information.
They were exposing what is probably their single biggest secret to a group of people who had
never even been through basic training and it was obvious that the gravity of this decision was
never far from their minds. We started the program with a small set of extra-terrestrial artifacts
along with fairly elaborate briefings on each as well as access to a modest amount of what
research had already been completed. It wasn’t long before we realized we needed more though,
and getting them to provide even the smallest amount of new material was like pulling teeth.
CARET stood for “Commercial Applications Research for Extra-terrestrial Technology”, but we
often joked that it should have stood for “Civilians Are Rarely Ever Trusted.”

PACL was located in Palo Alto, but unlike XPARC, it wasn’t at the end of a long road in the
middle of a big complex surrounded by rolling hills and trees. PACL was hidden in an office
complex owned entirely by the military but made to look like an unassuming tech company. From
the street, all you could see was what appeared to be a normal parking lot with a gate and a guard
booth, and a 1-story building inside with a fictitious name and logo. What wasn’t visible from the
street was that behind the very first set of doors was enough armed guards to invade Poland, and 5
additional underground stories. They wanted to be as close as possible to the kinds of people they
were looking to hire and be able to bring them in with a minimum of fuss.

Inside, we had everything we needed. State of the art hardware and a staff of over 200 computer
scientists, electrical engineers, mechanical engineers, physicists and mathematicians. Most of us
were civilians, as I’ve said, but some were military, and a few of them had been working on this
technology already. Of course, you were never far from the barrel of a machine gun, even inside
the labs themselves (something many of us never got used to), and bi-weekly tours were made by
military brass to ensure that not a single detail was out of line. Most of us underwent extensive
searches on our way into and out of the building. There it was, probably the biggest secret in the
world, in a bunch of parts spread out on laboratory tables in the middle of Palo Alto so you can
imagine their concern.

One downside to CARET was that it wasn't as well-connected as other operations undoubtedly
were. I never got to see any actual extra-terrestrials (not even photos), and in fact never even saw
one of their compete vehicles. 99% of what I saw was related to the work at hand, all of which
was conducted within a very narrow context on individual artifacts only. The remaining 1% came
from people I met through the program, many of which working more closely with “the good
stuff”or had in the past.

In fact, what was especially amusing about the whole affair was the way that our military
management almost tried to act as if the technology we were essentially reverse engineering
wasn't extra-terrestrial at all. Aside from the word “extra-terrestrial”itself, we rarely heard any
other terms like “alien”or “UFO”or “outer space”or anything. Those aspects were only
mentioned briefly when absolutely necessary to explain something. In many cases it was
necessary to differentiate between the different races and their respective technology, and they
didn't even use the word “races”. They were referred to simply as different “sources”.

The Technology

A lot of the technology we worked on was what you would expect, namely antigravity. Most of
the researchers on the staff with backgrounds in propulsion and rocketry were military men, but
the technology we were dealing with was so out of this world that it didn’t really matter all that
much what your background was because none of it applied. All we could hope to do was use the
vocabulary of our respective fields as a way to model the extremely bizarre new concepts we
were very slowly beginning to understand as best we could. A rocket engineer doesn’t usually rub
elbows much with a computer scientist, but inside PACL, we were all equally mystified and were
ready to entertain any and all ideas.

The physicists made the most headway initially because out of all of our skills, theirs overlapped
the most with the concepts behind this technology (although that isn’t saying much!) Once they
got the ball rolling though, we began to find that many of the concepts found in computer science
were applicable as well, albeit in very vague ways. While I didn’t do a lot of work with the
antigrav hardware myself, I was occasionally involved in the assessment of how that technology
was meant to interface with its user.

The antigrav was amazing, of course, as were the advances we were making with materials
engineering and so on. But what interested me most then, and still amazes me most to this day,
was something completely unrelated. In fact, it was this technology that immediately jumped out
at me when I saw the Chad and Rajman photos, and even moreso in the Big Basin photos.

The “Language”

I put the word Language in quotes because calling what I am about to describe a “language”is a
misnomer, although it is an easy mistake to make.

Their hardware wasn’t operated in quite the same way as ours. In our technology, even today, we
have a combination of hardware and software running almost everything on the planet. Software
is more abstract than hardware, but ultimately it needs hardware to run it. In other words, there’s
no way to write a computer program on a piece of paper, set that piece of paper on a table or
something, and expect it to actually do something. The most powerful code in the world still
doesn’t actually do anything until a piece of hardware interprets it and translates its commands
into actions.

But their technology is different. It really did operate like the magical piece of paper sitting on a
table, in a manner of speaking. They had something akin to a language, that could quite literally
execute itself, at least in the presence of a very specific type of field. The language, a term I am
still using very loosely, is a system of symbols (which does admittedly very much resemble a
written language) along with geometric forms and patterns that fit together to form diagrams that
are themselves functional. Once they are drawn, so to speak, on a suitable surface made of a
suitable material and in the presence of a certain type of field, they immediately begin performing
the desired tasks. It really did seem like magic to us, even after we began to understand the
principles behind it.

I worked with these symbols more than anything during my time at PACL, and recognized them
the moment I saw them in the photos. They appear in a very simple form on Chad’s craft, but
appear in the more complex diagram form on the underside of the Big Basin craft as well. Both
are unmistakable, even at the small size of the Big Basin photos. An example of a diagram in the
style of the Big Basin craft is included with this in a series of scanned pages from the [mistitled]
"Linguistic Analysis Primer". We needed a copy of that diagram to be utterly precise, and it took
about a month for a team of six to copy that diagram into our drafting program!

Explaining everything I learned about this technology would fill up several volumes, but I will do
my best to explain at least some of the concepts as long as I am taking the time to write all this
down.

First of all, you wouldn't open up their hardware to find a CPU here, and a data bus there, and
some kind of memory over there. Their hardware appeared to be perfectly solid and consistent in
terms of material from one side to the other. Like a rock or a hunk of metal. But upon [much]
closer inspection, we began to learn that it was actually one big holographic computational
substrate - each "computational element" (essentially individual particles) can function
independently, but are designed to function together in tremendously large clusters. I say its
holographic because you can divide it up into the smallest chunks you want and still find a scaled-
down but complete representation of the whole system. They produce a nonlinear computational
output when grouped. So 4 elements working together is actually more than 4 times more
powerful than 1. Most of the internal "matter" in their crafts (usually everything but the outermost
housing) is actually this substrate and can contribute to computation at any time and in any state.
The shape of these "chunks" of substrate also had a profound effect on its functionality, and often
served as a "shortcut" to achieve a goal that might otherwise be more complex.

So back to the language. The language is actually a "functional blueprint". The forms of the
shapes, symbols and arrangements thereof is itself functional. What makes it all especially
difficult to grasp is that every element of each "diagram" is dependant on and related to every
other element, which means no single detail can be created, removed or modified independently.
Humans like written language because each element of the language can be understood on its
own, and from this, complex expressions can be built. However, their "language" is entirely
context-sensitive, which means that a given symbol could mean as little as a 1-bit flag in one
context, or, quite literally, contain the entire human genome or a galaxy star map in another. The
ability for a single, small symbol to contain, not just represent, tremendous amounts of data is
another counter-intuitive aspect of this concept. We quickly realized that even working in groups
of 10 or more on the simplest of diagrams, we found it virtually impossible to get anything done.
As each new feature was added, the complexity of the diagram exponentially grew to
unmanageable proportions. For this reason we began to develop computer-based systems to
manage these details and achieved some success, although again we found that a threshold was
quickly reached beyond which even the supercomputers of the day were unable to keep up. Word
was that the extra-terrestrials could design these diagrams as quickly and easily as a human
programmer could write a Fortran program. It's humbling to think that even a network of
supercomputers wasn't able to duplicate what they could do in their own heads. Our entire system
of language is based on the idea of assigning meaning to symbols. Their technology, however,
somehow merges the symbol and the meaning, so a subjective audience is not needed. You can
put whatever meaning you want on the symbols, but their behavior and functionality will not
change, any more than a transistor will function differently if you give it another name.

Here's an example of how complex the process is. Imagine I ask you to incrementally add random
words to a list such that no two words use any of the same letters, and you must perform this
exercise entirely in your head, so you can't rely on a computer or even a pen and paper. If the first
in the list was, say, "fox", the second item excludes all words with the letters F, O and X. If the
next word you choose is "tree", then the third word in the list can't have the letters F, O, X, T, R,
or E in it. As you can imagine, coming up with even a third word might start to get just a bit
tricky, especially since you can't easily visualize the excluded letters by writing down the words.
By the time you get to the fourth, fifth and sixth words, the problem has spiraled out of control.
Now imagine trying to add the billionth word to the list (imagine also that we're working with an
infinite alphabet so you don't run out of letters) and you can imagine how difficult it is for even a
computer to keep up. Needless to say, writing this kind of thing "by hand" is orders of magnitude
beyond the capabilities of the brain.

My background lent itself well to this kind of work though. I'd spent years writing code and
designing both analog and digital circuits, a process that at least visually resembled these
diagrams in some way. I also had a personal affinity for combinatorics, which served me well as I
helped with the design of software running on supercomputers that could juggle the often trillions
of rules necessary to create a valid diagram of any reasonable complexity. This overlapped quite a
bit with compiler theory as well, a subject I always found fascinating, and in particular compiler
optimization, a field that wasn't half of what it is today back then. A running joke among the
linguistics team was that Big-O notation couldn't adequately describe the scale of the task, so
we'd substitute other words for "big". By the time I left I remember the consensus was
"Astronomical-O" finally did it justice.

Like I said, I could go on for hours about this subject, and would love to write at least an
introductory book on the subject if it wasn't still completely classified, but that's not the point of
this letter so I'll try to get back on track.

The last thing I'd like to discuss is how I got copies of this material, what else I have in my
possession, and what I plan to do with it in the future.

My Collection

I worked at PACL from 1984 to 1987, by which time I was utterly burned out. The sheer volume
of details to keep in mind while working with the diagrams was enough to challenge anyone's
sanity, and I was really at the end of my rope with the military's attitude towards our “need to
know”. Our ability to get work done was constantly hampered by their reluctance to provide us
with the necessary information, and I was tired of bureaucracy getting in the way of research and
development. I left somewhere in the middle of a 3-month bell curve in which about a quarter of
the entire PACL staff left for similar reasons.

I was also starting to disagree with the direction the leadership wanted to take as far as the subject
of extra-terrestrials went. I always felt that at least some form of disclosure would be beneficial,
but as a lowly CARET engineer I wasn't exactly in the position to call shots. The truth is, our
management didn't even want us discussing non-technical aspects of this subject (such as ethical
or philosophical issues), even among ourselves, as they felt it was enough of a breach of security
to let civilians like us anywhere near this kind of thing in the first place.

So, about 3 months before I resigned (which was about 8 months before I was really out, since
you don't just walk out of a job like that with a 2 week notice). I decided to start taking advantage
of my position. As I mentioned earlier, my DoD experience got me into an internal management
role sooner than some of my colleagues, and after about a year of that kind of status, the outgoing
searches each night became slightly less rigorous. Normally, we were to empty out any
containers, bags or briefcases, then remove our shirt and shoes and submit to a kind of frisking.
Work was never allowed to go home with you, no matter who you were. For me, though, the
briefcase search was eventually enough.

Even before I actually decided to do it, I was sure that I would be able to sneak certain materials
out with me. I wanted to do this because I knew the day would come when I would want to write
something like this, and I knew I'd regret it until the day I died if I didn't at least leave the
possibility open to do so. So I started photocopying documents and reports by the dozen. I'd then
put the papers under my shirt around my lower back, tucked enough into my belt to ensure they
wouldn't fall out. I could do this in any one of a few short, windowless hallways on some of the
lower floors, which were among the few places that didn't have an armged guard watching my
every move. I'd walk in one end with a stack of papers large enough that when I came out the
other end with some of them in my shirt, there wouldn't be a visible difference in what I was
holding. You absolutely cannot be too careful if you're going to pull a stunt like this. As long as I
walked carefully they wouldn't make a crinkling noise. In fact, the more papers I took, the less
noise they made, since they weren't as flimsy that way. I'd often take upwards of 10-20 pages at
once. By the time I was done, I'd made out with hundreds of photocopies, as well as a few
originals and a large collection of original photographs.

With this initial letter I have attached high resolution scans of the following:

1. A page from an inventory review with a photo that appears to depict one of the parts found
in the Rajman sighting and parts very similar to the Big Basin craft
2. The first 9 pages of one of our quarterly research reports
3. Scans of the original photographs used in that report, since the photocopies obscure most of
the details
4. 5 pages from a report on our ongoing analysis of the “language”(inappropriately titled
“linguistic analysis”), depicting the kind of diagram just barely visible on the underside of
the Big Basin craft

This material is the most relevant and explanatory I could find on short notice. Now that these are
up, IF I decide to release more in the future, I'll be able to take my time and better search this
rather large collection of mine that I've sadly never organized. I'm not sure what I'll be doing with
the rest of the collection in the future. I suppose I'll wait and see how this all plays out, and then
play it by ear. There are certainly risks involved in what I'm doing, and if I were to actually be
identified and caught, there could be rather serious consequences. However, I've taken the proper
steps to ensure a reasonable level of anonymity and am quite secure in the fact that the
information I've so far provided is by no means unique among many of the CARET participants.

Besides, part of me has always suspected that the government relies on the occasional leak like
this, and actually wants them to happen, because it contributes to a steady, slow-paced path
towards revealing the truth of this matter.

Since Leaving CARET

Like I said, I left PACL in '87, but have kept in touch with a great many of my friends and
coworkers from those days. Most of us are retired by now, except of course for those of us that
went on to get teaching jobs, but a few of us still hear things through the grapevine.
As for CARET itself, I'm not sure what's become of it. Whether it's still known by the same name,
I'm quite sure it's still active in some capacity, although who knows where. I heard from a number
of people that PACL closed up shop a few years after I left, but I've still yet to get a clear answer
on why exactly that happened. But I'm sure the kind of work we did there is still going strong.
I've heard from a lot of friends that there are multiple sites like PACL in Sunnyvale and Mountain
View, also disguised to look like unremarkable office space. But this is all second-hand
information so you can make of it what you will.

Around 2002 or so I came across Coast to Coast AM and have been hooked ever since. I admit, I
don't take most of the show's content as anything more than entertainment, but there have been
occasions when I could be sure a guest was clearly speaking from experience or a well-informed
source. For me, there's just something very surreal about hearing all this speculation and so-called
inside information about UFOs and the like, but being personally able to verify at least some of it
as being true or false. It's also a nightly reminder of how hectic things were in those days, which
helps me enjoy my retirement all the more. Knowing I'm not part of that crazy world anymore
really is something I enjoy on a daily basis, as much as I miss some of it.

Conclusion

What I've shared so far is only a very small portion of what I have, and what I know. Despite the
very sheltered and insulated atmosphere within CARET, I did ultimately learn a great deal from
various colleagues, and some of what I learned is truly incredible. I'd also like to say that for what
it's worth, during my time there I never heard anything about invasions, or abductions, or many of
the more frightening topics that often pop up on Coast to Coast AM. That's not to say that none of
it is true, but in my time working alongside some of the most well-connected people in this field,
it never came up. So at the very least I can say my intent is not to scare anyone. My view on the
extra-terrestrial situation is very much a positive, albiet still highly secretive one.

One thing I can definitely say is that if they wanted us gone, we would have been gone a very,
very long time ago, and we wouldn't even have seen it coming. Throw out your ideas about a
space war or anything silly like that. We'd be capable of fighting back against them about as
much as ants could fight back against a stampede of buffalo. But that's OK. We're the primitive
race, they're the advanced races, and that's just the way it is. The other advanced races let them
live through their primitive years back in their day, and there's no reason to think it will be any
different for us. They aren't in the market for a new planet, and even if they were, there are way
too many planets out there for them to care about ours enough to take it by force.

To reiterate my take on the recent sightings, I'd guess that experimentation done in the last couple
months on a device that, among other things, is capable of interfering with various crafts onboard
invisibility has resulted in a sudden wave of sightings. It may not explain all of the recent events,
but like I said, I'd bet my life that's exactly what happened at Big Basin at least, and it's probably
related in some way to the Chad, Rajman and Tahoe sightings. So, despite all the recent fanfare
over this, I'd say this doesn't mean much. Most importantly, they aren't suddenly “here”. They've
been here for a long time, but just happened to turn unintentionally visible for brief periods
recently.

Lastly, there are so many people selling books, and DVDs, and doing lectures, and all that, that I
would like to reiterate the fact that I am not here to sell anything. The material I'm sharing is free
to distribute provided it's all kept intact and unmodified, and this letter is included. I tend to
question the motives of anyone charging money for their information, and will assure you that I
will never do such a thing. And in the future, just to cover all the bases, anyone claiming to be me
who's selling a DVD or book is most certainly not going to be me.
Any future releases from me will come from the email address I've used to contact Coast to Coast
AM, and will be sent to them only. I'd like to make this clear as well to ensure that people can be
sure that any future information comes from the same source, although I must be clear: at this
time I do not have any future plans for additional information. Time will tell how long I will
maintain this policy, but do not expect anything soon. I'd really like to let this information “settle”
for a while and see how it goes. If I find out I'm getting an IRS audit tomorrow, then maybe this
wasn't too smart. Until then, I'm going to take it slow. I hope this information has been helpful.
C ommercial
A pplications
R esearch for
E xtraterrestrial
T echnology

Q4-86 RESEARCH REPORT

DECEMBER 1 9 8 6
PALO ALTO, CA

AND PACL SL

PALO ALTO CARET LABORATORY

PALO ALTO CARET LABORATORY Q 4 - 8 6 RESEARCH REPORT

1 . OVERVIEW

This document is intended as a primer on the tentative findings of the Q4 1986 research
phase (referred to herein as "Q4-86") at the Palo Alto CARET Laboratory (PACL). In
accordance with the CARET program mission statement, the goal of this research has
been achieving a greater u n d e r s t a n d i n g of extraterrestrial technology within the context
of commercial applications and civilian use. Examples of such applications, in no
particular order, include transportation, medicine, construction, energy, computing and
communication. The ultimate goal of this research is to provide a core set of advanced
technologies in a condition suitable for patent review.

2 . EXTRACTION

The process of converting raw artifacts of extraterrestrial origin to usable, fully-

d o c u m e n t e d h u m a n technology is termed extraction. The extraction process ultimately
consists of two phases: first is the establishment of a complete theoretical and operational
u n d e r s t a n d i n g of the artifact, and second is a distillation of the artifact's underlying
principles into a usable, product-oriented technology. Suggestions of specific product
applications on behalf of PACL have been encouraged, but are not considered m a n d a t o r y
or essential.

The results of a successful extraction are collected in what is termed an extraction package
(EP), which should include the following:

1. Complete theoretical and operational overview

2. Assessment and summary of compositional materials
3. At least three (3) working prototypes, demonstrating multiple instances of
successful, repeatable and reliable implementation
4. Assembly notes and BOM

At the time of this writing, a fully successful extraction has not yet been achieved,
although numerous threads of research are showing promise.

Comprehensive documentation of PACL's extraction process can be found in document PACL-

D0006, entitled "PACL Extraction Procedure Cuide".

3 . EXECUTIVE S U M M A R Y OF Q 4 - 8 6

Q4-86 focused on four key subjects, all of which were based on artifacts of extraterrestrial
origin obtained from crash site recovery operations conducted d u r i n g the last two decades
within the continental United States. These subjects are:

1. "Personal" antigravity generator (so-named for its small, portable size)

2. Three-dimensional image recorder/projector
PALO ALTO CARET LABORATORY Q4-86 RESEARCH REPORT

A complex system of symbols and geometric constructs capable of both defining

the functionality of certain artifacts as well as manipulating their behavior,
crudely analogous to a computer programming language but without the need
for a compilation or interpretation phase.

4 . RESEARCH SUBJECT: "PERSONAL" ANTIGRAVITY

Antigravity technologies are among the most ubiquitous recovered from extraterrestrial
crafts. While antigravity is most commonly associated with propulsion, the principles
underlying the technology extend into a far broader domain; indeed, virtually all aspects
of most extraterrestrial craft seem to incorporate its use in some way. A prominent example
is the seemingly impenetrable field, of controllable diameter and attenuation, s u r r o u n d i n g
the craft that protects it from weather conditions and the s u r r o u n d i n g environment,
as well as debris, and, unsurprisingly, ballistic weaponry. Additional examples include
d a m p e n i n g of G-force on passengers and on-board equipment, movement of doors and
hatches (or their closest equivalents), and even placement of fixtures (such as- control
consoles, or their closest equivalents) within a given space. Perhaps most startling is the
fact that the very components within a given extraterrestrial craft appear to be held in
place, in relation to one another, exclusively by antigravitational means. This is a partial
explanation for the commonly noted lack of rivets and adhesives in the construction of
these crafts.

PACL aims to translate this technology into a product-oriented EP capable of direct

application within the consumer market. However, since the sudden emergence of such
radically advanced technology would u n d o u b t e d l y yield destructive consequences, PACL
recommends a strategy of incremental dissemination in which deliberately d o w n g r a d e d
versions of the original technology are released over a period of years or decades to
soften the impact of integration with existing infrastructures, in technological, economic
and social terms.

4 . 1 . WHAT IS PERSONAL ANTIGRAVITY?

Not all recovered extraterrestrial technologies are equal, and many previous experiments
on antigravity have been performed on cumbersome artifacts suffering from enormous
form factors and impractical weights. An ironic consequence of these previous generations
of experimentation is that many man-made aircraft that would be otherwise ideal for
antigravity propulsion models are incapable of supporting the weight of the device before
its gravity-canceling effects are activated. This has lead to many clumsy and accident-
prone solutions, such as using a second antigravity generator to load and position the
first within the aircraft before activation and takeoff, and then repeating the process in
reverse after landing but before deactivation. Despite some minor successes in narrowly-
defined domains, these approaches are obviously not acceptable in the long term.
PALO ALTO CARET LABORATORY Q4-86 RESEARCH REPORT

Recently, however, a rather different implementation of antigravity technology has

appeared, undoubtedly the product of a different, and presumably more advanced source.
MHHMRIHHHI BBsr1
produce gravity-canceling effects of magnitudes comparable to existing artifacts in a
package less than two feet across and weighing less than five pounds.

PACL has termed this technology "personal antigravity", as its virtually negligible
weight and dimensions suggest applications as focused as antigravity generation for
a single human user. Early experiments suggest, however, that despite its remarkable
precision and focus, this technology is equally effective when broadened to deal with
massive payloads of arbitrary scales.

4 . 2 . OVERVIEW OF RECOVERED ANTIGRAVITY ARTIFACTS

4 . 2 . 1 . KEY ARTIFACTS

PACL has conducted the brunt of its antigravity research on three key artifacts. The first
is what PACL considers to be an "antigravity generator" (seen in figure 4.1), a device
that appears to provide a "source" of antigravity that can then be projected onto or
harnessed by other components within the craft. The second two artifacts are curved I-
beam segments (seen in figure 4.2) that, when placed anywhere within a certain radius
of the generator during a specific mode of its operation, immediately fly into what is
presumed to be their relative positions within the original construction of the craft.

The generator artifact is assigned the identification code Al. The I-beam artifacts are
assigned identification codes A2 and A3.

4 . 2 . 2 . SECONDARY ARTIFACTS

Additionally, PACL has been provided with a small, jfl ^feevice

capable of controlling Al by activating and deactivating if, as well as switching between
its three primary modes of operation. This device, assigned the identification code SI,
is of particularly sensitive importance, a s i t i s the _pnlv known method of controlling
Al

4 . 2 . 3 . RIGID SPATIAL RELATIONSHIPS

Unlike the more general-purpose antigravity fields generated by implementations of this

technology obtained from other sources, Al is capable of multiple modes of operation
and varying levels of precision. Perhaps the most compelling aspect of Al's functionality
is its ability to focus its antigravitational effects on specific objects, rather than entire
spatial volumes, creating what PACL has termed a rigid spatial relationship (RSR).

An RSR can be thought of as creating an "implicit solid" between two or more constituent
parts separated by empty space. Once in effect, these constituent parts behave as if they
PALO ALTO CARET LABORATORY Q4-86 RESEARCH REPORT

Figure 4.1
The artifacts used by PACL during the antigravity research phase of Q4-86.

are directly and physically linked, and are completely i n s e p a r a b l e by p u l l i n g or p u s h i n g

them in o p p o s i n g directions. Only w h e n the effect of Al is deactivated will they once
again behave as s e p a r a t e objects.

As an example, imagine c u t t i n g a b r o o m s t i c k into two s e g m e n t s , each one foot in l e n g t h .

Once s e p a r a t e d , each segment is its o w n object, capable of being moved or r o t a t e d
i n d e p e n d e n t l y of the other. U n d e r the effect of an RSR, however, the s e g m e n t s m i g h t
behave as if they w e r e a three-foot rod consisting of both foot-long broomstick s e g m e n t s
s e p a r a t e d by an a d d i t i o n a l foot of e m p t y space. While the two rod s e g m e n t s w o u l d still
appear to be s e p a r a t e , to the point that an observer w o u l d be able to pass their h a n d
t h r o u g h the space that s e p a r a t e s them, they w o u l d be u n a b l e to move one of the r o d s
w i t h o u t the other b e h a v i n g as if it were directly a t t a c h e d .

4.2.4. OVERVIEW OF A l

Al consists of a t w o - s e g m e n t cylindrical core, 1 foot, 2.2 inches in length and 8.3 i n c h e s

in diameter, with needle-like a p p e n d a g e s e x t e n d i n g from each end. The total l e n g t h
of the device, w i t h needles i n c l u d e d , is 2 feet, 2,4 inches. Both core s e g m e n t s f e a t u r e
a t r i a n g u l a r array of three " a r m s " , e x t e n d i n g 7.6 inches from the center of the core,
PALO ALTO CARET LABORATORY Q4~86 RESEARCH REPORT

Figure 4.2
Close-up shot of the I-beam segments.

each of which end in a circular "pad" with a diameter of 2 inches. The device weighs
approximately 4 pounds, 3 ounces.

Research on the internal functionality of Al began late in Q4-86, and as such, little
is currently known. What is certain, however, is that the device contains no moving
parts whatsoever, does not feature any kind of control interface in the form of buttons,
switches, or levers, and, apparently, can only be manipulated by the technology contained
in SI. According to the limited data to which PACL has been given access in regards
to the placement and housing of Al within the original craft, Al was one of a pair of
identical generators, together responsible for all antigravity-related functionality, from
propulsion of the craft itself to placement of all components within the craft's internal
design. From this information, as well as experiments conducted with SI, it has been
discovered that Al operates in one of at least three modes of operation:

1. Field mode. Al generates a field of (presumably) arbitrary size and any shape
that can be expressed as a convex volume. Within this field, gravity is effectively
redefined with any desired strength and orientation. The parameters of this mode^
including the shape of the field itself, are defined by,
SI. Surprisingly, Al does not appear capable of generating
a neia with any degree of concavity, nor can the strength or orientation of the
artificial gravity within the field vary from one point to another. An example of
PALO ALTO CARET LABORATORY Q4-86 RESEARCH REPORT

field m o d e w o u l d be creating a controlled gravity e n v i r o n m e n t w i t h i n an aircraft

or spacecraft for p a s s e n g e r s and cargo.
Component mode. Rather than g e n e r a t i n g a g e n e r a l - p u r p o s e field of c o n s t a n t gravity
control, A l will m a n i p u l a t e the g r a v i t a t i o n a l effect on specific objects, a l l o w i n g
them to take any position or orientation relative to its own c e n t r o i d . C o m p o n e n t
mode a p p e a r s to be used c o m m o n l y for m a i n t a i n i n g the physical c o n s t r u c t i o n
of a craft's d e s i g n . Rather t h a n a t t a c h i n g a craft's c o m p o n e n t s to one a n o t h e r by
way of rivets, a d h e s i v e s , w e l d i n g or the like,.they are simply held in place, quite
precisely, by a n t i g r a v i t a t i o n a l m e a n s . Unlike field m o d e , PACL h a s not yet b e e n
successful in c o n t r o l l i n g the p a r a m e t e r s or data that drive this m o d e . SI does
not a p p e a r capable of controlling this m o d e b e y o n d activating or d e a c t i v a t i n g it.
Once in effect, the details of w h i c h c o m p o n e n t s are affected, and how, seem to
be p r o v i d e d by the c o m p o n e n t s t h e m s e l v e s . See the following section for m o r e
information. C o m p o n e n t m o d e is r e s p o n s i b l e for the RSR effect d e s c r i b e d in the
previous section and depicted in figure 4.4.
3. Multi mode. A l combines the functionality of the field and c o m p o n e n t m o d e s ,
p r o d u c i n g specific a n t i g r a v i t y effects on i n d i v i d u a l c o m p o n e n t s w h i l e also
g e n e r a t i n g any n u m b e r of g e n e r a l - p u r p o s e gravity control fields. The s a m e
limitations t h a t a p p l y to the field g e n e r a t e d in field m o d e a p p l y to fields
generated in this m o d e as well, but the ability to create m u l t i p l e fields of differing
p a r a m e t e r s allows those limitations to be effectively c i r c u m v e n t e d in m o s t
s i t u a t i o n s . It is believed that this m o d e was used most c o m m o n l y for m a n a g i n g
the a n t i g r a v i t a t i o n a l n e e d s of the original craft.

4 . 2 . 5 . OVERVIEW OF A2 AND A3

On their o w n , A2 a n d A3 a p p e a r to be completely non-functional s e g m e n t s of a c u r v e d

I-beam (seen in in figure 4.3). However, w h e n A l is switched into c o m p o n e n t m o d e , their
position a n d o r i e n t a t i o n in relation to A l ' s centroid are precisely enforced w i t h an RSR
(seen in figure 4.4).

A2 and A3 are p r i m a r i l y differentiated by their lengths, which are 7.2 inches and 9.1 inches,
respectively. Despite the difference in their lengths, both artifacts weigh a p p r o x i m a t e l y
2.6 ounces.

While initial e x p e r i m e n t a t i o n i n d i c a t e d that the artifacts w e r e c o m p o s e d of a consistent,

solid materia], e x p e r i m e n t s on A l ' s c o m p o n e n t m o d e suggest that the artifacts are m o r e
internally complex, s o m e h o w c o n t a i n i n g information that describes their p o s i t i o n a n d
orientation in r e l a t i o n to Al when the m o d e is in effect. W h e t h e r or not they p o s s e s s
additional functionality b e y o n d the storage of this information is c u r r e n t l y u n k n o w n ,
but is considered likely d u e to their o t h e r w i s e a m b i g u o u s p u r p o s e w i t h i n the craft's
design.
PALO ALTO CARET LABORATORY Q4-86 RESEARCH REPORT

Figure 4.3
Top-view shot of the I-beam segments.
PALO ALTO CARET LABORATORY Q4-86 RESEARCH REPORT

Figure 4.4
1-bearn segments linked to the antigravity generator in an RSR.
PALO ALTO CARET LABORATORY LINGUISTIC ANALYSIS PRIMER

^li-Q€

Figure 14.11
Full view of diagram D39-08-117c.

119
PALO ALTO CARET LABORATORY LINGUISTIC ANALYSIS PRIMER

#5Ï^*
Figure 14.12
Isolated view of a three-node AB-type semaphore cascade, extending from an exterior vertex of an octal junction.

120
PALO ALTO CARET LABORATORY LINGUISTIC ANALYSIS PRIMER

Figure 14.13
Rotary junction with orbital sub-junction connecting to an octal switch.

121
PALO ALTO CARET LABORATORY LINGUISTIC ANALYSIS PRIMER

Figure 14.14
Compound junction in a dual-link union with heavy-state tri-switch and diffuser

122
PALO ALTO CARET LABORATORY LINGUISTIC ANALYSIS PRIMER

?Ú&X *****

Figure 14.15
Parent junction with three non-orbital child junctions.

123
PALO ALTO CARET LABORATORY 03-85 INVENTORY REVIEW