Influence E-Wom On Customer Purchase Intention
Influence E-Wom On Customer Purchase Intention
Influence E-Wom On Customer Purchase Intention
INTRODUCTION
Nowadays, consumers especially teenagers are becoming more aware about products/services they purchase and
consume. Before making a purchase decision they are often looking for previous customer review, rather than rely
merely on the product advertisement itself. The fact today's consumers believe more on the customer word of mouth
as it is unpaid source and mostly it is an honest review based on their experience. In the past, word of mouth
(WOM) communication initially referred to the idea of conversation between people-to-people among consumers
about the product (Chatterjee, 2001). People share opinion among each other about the product and services in their
face-to-face conversation, and influence their friend to buy or to avoid the product or services.
As stated by Chatterjee, (2001), the Internet brought a form less personal but more extensive way of WOM
communication, called e-WOM communication. This new type of WOM communication has become an important
place for opinion score (Bickart and Schindler, 2001) and it is assumed to be more effective than in the offline world
73
International Academic Research Journal of Social Science 2(1) 2016 Page 73-80
WOM communication. It is due to greater and higher access (Chatterjee, 2001). Information can be obtained easily
anytime and everywhere when there is an Internet connection.
E-WOM become more reliable as the people who spread word of mouth about the product not being paid and
provided genuine experience, does not attached to any specific brand. After obtained the information from e-WOM
people tend to believe and have their own perception toward the product or services. As a result, E-WOM can affect
consumer purchase intention in a positive or negative way by influencing their purchasing decision either to
purchase or not to purchase.
A number of researches have been done on impact of e-WOM on customer purchase intention. A research
conducted by Jalilv and and Samiei (2011) examined the extent to which e-WOM among consumers can influence
brand image and purchase intention in the automobile industry. Besides that, ACNielson, (2007) and Rowley (2001)
indicated how great of a potential impact eWOM can have on the consumer decision process. The web has created
the opportunities for electronic word-of-mouth (eWOM) communication through electronic media, such as online
discussion forums, electronic bulletin board systems, newsgroups, blogs, review sites, and social networking sites
(Goldsmith, 2006).
Nonetheless, there are some of the importance areas that have not been covered. Thus, this study examines the four
elements of e-WOM namely relevance, accuracy, timeliness and comprehensive which affecting the customer
purchase intentions. The elements of e-WOM that affects the customer purchase intention. As suggested by Yayli
(2009), further researches investigate an eWOM effect model on cross-cultural basis. Considering that eWOM is
global, cross-cultural research on the eWOM effect would be an interesting issue.
Background of Study
In the past the practice of word of mouth (WOM) as the medium of reference is widely practiced by consumer.
Whereas in today's modern world there is more advanced WOM that the consumer can refer to before making a
purchasing decision know as e-Word of mouth (e-WOM). The e-WOM is the electronic type of WOM that has more
wide coverage rather than WOM. The advancement of the latest cutting edge technology has given a new dimension
in spreading the words of mouth. According to Harrison-Walker (2001), when the products or services are difficult
to be evaluated, customers prefer to adopt e-WOM as the standard experience. There are tremendous amount of
feedbacks or suggestion in the internet regarding any products or services. This kind of information often
disseminated by previous consumers and that information is very useful for prospective consumer. Moreover, that e-
WOM will be very beneficial to the sellers themselves as they can do development on their products or services
based on the information gathered through e-WOM by consumers. The concept of positive word of mouth has been
largely used by marketing professionals as it can serve both the purpose of measuring the effectiveness of the
marketing tools like advertising and also at the same time be used as a credible source for gaining information
relating to the product (Li and Zhan, 2011). Viewing online comments is helpful for consumers because it can make
consumers feel more confident on purchase decision (Lin, Wu and Chen, 2013).
Dellarocas (2006) pointed out that online consumer reviews have become an important means of marketing
communication because many consumers search for online reviews as the first step in shopping. There are several
benefits of using e-WOM. As compare with verbal WOM, rumours spread more fast and within short period of time
through e-WOM. Besides than that, e-WOM also can act as another medium for advertisements for any products
and services. Typically, sellers or marketers will spent a lot of money in doing advertisement for their respective
products and services. For instance, they always come up with big banners across the roads, buildings or even
brochures. However, these methods are not working out these days because of the existence of new technology. Let
say, a seller put up banners across the road but if you think rationally, who will have time to read those banners
when they are driving that requires full concentration? Even if they had the chance to read those banners, they are
unable to read every single detail written on it. That is why e-WOM is used widely these days as they can take their
time in analysing what previous consumers have said. It is better saving the money spent in doing verbal
advertisement to be used for development of the products and services.
From the managerial perspective, e-WOM among customer is very important as e-WOM can affect them either in a
positive or negative way. A positive e-WOM will influence customer, and may be influence them to purchase, as the
positive e-WOM an honest unpaid opinion from previous customer. Therefore, the future customers perceive it is
more reliable and trustable than the product or services advertisement itself. Rowley (2001) also suggested that
commercial enterprises should try to organize online communities and not to just advertise on the Internet.
Meanwhile, the negative e-WOM will bring a very large impact, not only for future customer, but the existing
74
International Academic Research Journal of Social Science 2(1) 2016 Page 73-80
customer might switch to other product or services. Wee, (2002) showed that negative word-of-mouth have much
more impact than positive ones due to the negative commentaries attracting more attention and will raise up the
consumers’ bad experience.
From the educational perspective view, e-WOM is one of the consumer behaviour, which is a learning behaviour,
learning from previous consumer experience before purchasing the product or services. Wangenheim and Bayon
(2004) indicated that when consumers perceive high social or psychological risk of a purchase, they would search
for credible information that is more diagnostic or referential, such as e-WOM information; from a source that they
believe to be reliable. This research will help to make the consumer more clearly about the e-WOM and its usage.
Undeniable e-WOM is one of powerful methods to gather honest customer review before making a purchasing
decision either to purchase or not to purchase. In fact, today's marketers are spreading e-WOM from their customer
through their online advertisement. However, people tend to question the reliability of e-WOM as some parties
might spread false information for their own benefit and there would be some people tried to spread false rumours in
the effort of condemning others. Thus it is important to examine the impact of eWOM on customer purchasing
intention.
LITERATURE REVIEW
e-WOM
Word of mouth (WOM) is verbal type of communication of person-to-person between the receiver and the
transmitter, which involves a product, service, or brand. To the receiver, the message does not have strong
commercial intent (Anderson, 1998), which is why consumers trust the credibility of WOM is higher than
commercial advertisements (Herr et al., 1991). WOM is a non-commercial source of information is widely accepted
those have a significant effect on the formation of consumer proposals and purchase decisions (Richins, 1983). This
type of interpersonal communication affects decisions marketers (Hennig-Thurau et al., 2004).
As the technology are getting more advance, most user nowadays are browsing the Internet to dig for some
information about the product or company, and e-WOM has emerged as a result. As defined by Hennig - Thurau et
al., (2004), "e-WOM is any positive or negative statement made by potential, actual, or former customers about a
product or a company that is available to large groups of people and institutions through the Internet". A recent
survey found that most consumers look for online opinion to be as reliable as the brand's website (ACNielsen,
2007). Rowley (2001) also suggested that commercial enterprises should try to organize online communities and not
to just advertise on the Internet. These studies show how great the potential impact of e-WOM can have on
consumer decision process. Senecal and Nantel (2004) examined how the choice of e-WOM influence product using
experimental studies proposed the use of an online resource guide. Own multiple platforms that facilitate e-WOM,
such as discussion boards and other online communication tools that also increasingly recognized for how they
influence the acceptance and use of products and services (Subramani and Rajagopalan, 2003).
Relevance
As suggested by Madu and Madu (2002), Internet users rarely read web pages they surf in detail, but they scan the
page to find out only for the information they need. They want to search the information they want faster, and with
little effort put on (Nah and Davis, 2002). Meanwhile, they are actually read what they feel important to them. So, it
is important to have only presented the most relevant information in the online community. Dunk (2004) also
suggests that the relevance is an important element in decision-making, as the relevance of the decision-making is
made based on the relevance of the information collected.
Accuracy
Wixom and Todd, (2005) said that, the accuracy of message concerns their reliability, and it also represents the
user's perception of the information is correct. According to Daft and Lengel, (1986), the quality, accuracy, and
reliability of information exchange are important across the medium, as the more accurate the message is, the more
useful it is by the customer.
Timeliness
The timeliness of the message concerns whether the messages are current, timely, and up-to-date. As suggested by
Madu and Madu (2002), when the online customer review that is not consistently updated, it cannot deliver the
desired results and therefore provide no added value to the user. The messages that are not up to date, will make the
customer that read the online review confuse, either the message is still valid to be referred or not.
75
International Academic Research Journal of Social Science 2(1) 2016 Page 73-80
Comprehensiveness
Comprehensiveness refers to the completeness of the message delivered. Sullivan (1999) suggests that, the more
detailed information brings a wider breadth of user categories and user orientation of the online customer review,
resulting the greater likelihood of user acquisition and user retention. More detail the messages; the more customers
would understand and satisfy their consciousness about the product or services. The comprehensiveness is also
important as the incomplete message also can bring to different interpretation by customers.
Purchase Intention
Morwitz and Schmittlein (1992) showed that purchase intentions could be a measure to predict the behavior of
consumers buying decision. The earliest definition of purchase intention is the subjective probability that users
perform certain behavior (Ajzen & Fishbein, 1972). If the users are interested to get the product or services, it means
that, there is a purchase intention in their mind; they wish to get the product or services, either in long term or short
term. When consumers have a positive attitude or expression toward brand products or services, purchase intentions
will happen, as they are influenced by their positive attitude towards the product or services. This is why word-of-
mouth will affect purchase intentions, as it gives the good example and manners.
e-WOM Affect Purchase Decision
In the real world, it is much more complicated than school world. Many firms hire experts to create commercial
information word-of-mouth. Customers’ nowadays also perceived fake e-WOM is more than before. The unpaid
word-of-mouth, which is not published by companies advertising and public relations are perceived to be more
trustworthy. But the most important thing that it is hard for the customer to distinguish which one is real or fake.
Bickart and Schindler (2001) discovered that customers have more interest about the product, which they search
online. When the products or services are difficult to be evaluated, customers prefer to adopt e-WOM as the
standard experience. (Harrison-Walker 2001). This is because; most of e-WOM is from previous customer
experience. It is hard to find the service related information, because of it intangibility. In addition, services are also
concerned as the experiential products. Under this kind of situation, e-WOM will change consumer-buying
behaviour, such as hotel accommodation, travel, or the meal (Jones, 2002). Moreover, some studies also showed that
negative word-of-mouth have much more impact than positive ones (Wee, 2002) due to the negative commentaries
attracting more attention and will raise up the consumers’ bad experience.
Using the e-WOM, customers can get much more interaction with other consumers and get faster response about the
product information. When the products or services information are not clear, consumers tend to seek more
information and references from other sources, apart from the official sources of product information. Isenberg
(1986) indicate that interpersonal interaction will change or revise consumers’ purchase decisions through collecting
information from others or Internet. Hence, this study considered the electronic word-of-mouth can spread much
more information to consumers that will give impact on their purchase intention.
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
This study aims to identify the relationship of e-WOM with customer purchasing decision and the impact of e-
WOM on customer purchasing intention. The primary data was obtained mainly from questionnaires. The
questionnaire were distributed to 361 respondents in Kota Samarahan, Sarawak, Malaysia. The total population for
Kota Samarahan town land is 6,142 people. Based on Krejcie & Morgan, (1970) the sample size should be n = 361.
The respondents are selected on a random basis, as everyone is a potential customer.
Cross-sectional design is employed in this study, which involved the collection of information from any given
sample of population elements only once. In the single cross-sectional design, only one sample of respondents is
drawn from target population, and information is to be obtained and concluded from this sample only. In this study,
the data are collected from the respondent from Kota Samarahan area.
The questionnaire was adapted from previous researches and studies. The questionnaire consists of Rating Scales,
which include Nominal and Ordinal Scale.
In section A respondents were asked six questions on background information whereby they need to select their
gender, range of age, what race, income level, marital status and education.
In section B, construct being measured by a few items for construct validity and reliability. Measurement of
Relevance, Accuracy, Timeliness, and Comprehensiveness will be carrying out by a five-point Likert scales, ranging
from strongly agree (1), agree (2), neutral (3), disagree (4), and strongly disagree (5). The measures are presented in
the operational definition table.
76
International Academic Research Journal of Social Science 2(1) 2016 Page 73-80
In section C, there is one question on identifying the customer purchase intention. Five point Likert scales, ranging
from strongly agree (1), agree (2), neutral (3), disagree (4), and strongly disagree (5) used to measure the customer
purchase intention. Data was analyzed using correlation analysis to test the relationship between elements of e-
WOM and further multiple regression was employed to identify the impact of e-WOM on customer purchasing
decision.
Correlation Analysis
Table below shows the relationship between the elements of e-WOM namely relevance of e-WOM, Accuracy of e-
WOM, timeliness of e-WOM, comprehensiveness of e-WOM and customer purchase intention.
It was found that Accuracy and Purchase Intention has the highest score of Correlation which is 0.759, this shows
that this relationship is the strongest relationship among all the elements of e-WOM. The lowest score is between
Timeliness and Purchase Intention with the score of 0.565. It shows that the relationship is least affecting each other.
This is similar with the study conducted by Fu et. Al (2011), whereby information timeliness on purchase intention
is significant. However, the result is contradicted findings by Zheng (2008) where the influence of eWOM
information timeliness on consumer purchase decision is insignificant.
Regression Analysis
Std. Error
R Adjusted R
Model R of the
Square Square
Estimate
1 .854a .730 .727 .387
Table 2 above is the result of regression analysis model summary. The R² is 0.730, indicates that 73 per cent of the
IV, the e-WOM relevance, accuracy, timeliness and comprehensiveness give impact on the DV, which is purchase
intention. This result is similar with the studies conducted by Cheung, Lee, and Rabjohn (2008),where theoretical
model account for only about 46 per cent of the variance of information adoption.
TABLE 3. COEFFICIENT
Unstandardized Standardi-zed
Model Coefficients Coefficien-ts t Sig.
B Std. Error Beta
(Constant) -.314 .079 -3.966 .000
TOTAL ACC .199 .017 .496 11.955 .000
TOTAL TIM .100 .009 .325 10.872 .000
TOTAL COM .098 .013 .286 7.321 .000
TOTAL REL -.016 .015 -.045 -1.072 .285
77
International Academic Research Journal of Social Science 2(1) 2016 Page 73-80
Table 3 above is the result of coefficient analysis. Purchase Intention is linearly related to the e-WOM’s accuracy,
timeliness and comprehensiveness. The strongest impact on the purchase intention is on total accuracy, with the beta
value of .496, highly significant with 0.000 significant values, which the same result as the pearson’s correlation test
that indicates the strongest relationship is between accuracy and purchase intention. According to media richness
theory (Daft and Lengel, 1986), quality, accuracy, and reliability of the information exchanged are important across
a medium. The result support findings on Fu et.al.,(2011), where timeliness has found to have significant impact
towards purchase intention. However, the result is contradicted with Zheng Xiaoping (2008) findings where the
influence of eWOM information timeliness on consumer purchase decision is insignificant. Although Dunk (2004)
suggested that relevance is an important element in consumer decision making, this research have different findings,
as the total relevance has no significance impact of the purchase intention, as the beta value is -0.045, not significant
with significant value of .285.
Based on this result, it is important for marketers to focus on their customer e-WOM’s accuracy, as the more
accurate the message are, the more customer purchase intention are influenced. They can set up a section on their
website, with their previous customer testimonial about the product or services they bought, with some evidence
such as a video or photo. This can boost up the future customer confidence about their product or services.
Accuracy is the most important element of e-WOM’s. So, the marketer has to be more sensitive on the e-WOM’s
accuracy issue, such as the false hoax separated by some irresponsible person to get their business down. The
marketer must be aware of all that inaccurate e-WOM’s as this situation will harm their business when the potential
customers simply believe the false hoax is true. So, the marketer must able to handle this situation such as by doing
conference to make the things clear.
REFERENCES
Aaker, D.A. (1991). Managing Brand Equity: Capitalizing on the Value of a Brand Name, The Free Press, New
York, NY.
ACNielsen (2007). Trust in Advertising: A Global Nielsen Consumer Report, October, ACNielsen, New York, NY.
Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1972). Attitudes and normative beliefs as factors influencing behavioral intentions.
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 21(1), 1-9.
Anderson, E.W. (1998), Customer satisfaction and word of mouth. Journal of Service Research, 1(3), 5-17.
Bambauer-Sachse, S. and Mangold, S. (2011). Brand equity dilution through negative online word-of-mouth
communication. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 18, 38-45.
Bickart, B. & Schindler, R.M. (2001). Internet forums as influential sources of consumer information. Journal of
Interactive Marketing, 15(3), 31-40.
Cervino, J., Sanchez, J. & Cubillo, J.M. (2005). Made in effect, competitive marketing strategy and brand
performance: an empirical analysis for Spanish brands. Journal of American Academy of Business, 6(2),
237-243.
Chatterjee, P. (2001). Online reviews: do consumers use them?. Advances in Consumer Research, 28(1), 129-133.
Cheung, C.M.K., Lee, M.K.O. & Rabjohn, N. (2008). The impact of electronic word-of-mouth: The adoption of
online opinions in online customer communities. Internet Research, 18(3), 229-247.
Chevalier, J.A. & Mayzlin, D. (2006). The effect of word of mouth on sales: online book reviews. Journal of
Marketing Research, 43(3), 345-354.
Daft, R.L. & Lengel, R.H. (1986), Organizational information requirement, media richness and structural design.
Management Science, 32(5), 554-571.
78
International Academic Research Journal of Social Science 2(1) 2016 Page 73-80
Dellarocas, C. (2006). Strategic manipulation of Internet opinion forums: Implications for consumers and firms.
Management Science, 52(10), 1577–1593.
Dunk, A.S. (2004). Product life cycle cost analysis: the impact of customer profiling, competitive advantage, and
quality of IS information. Management Accounting Research, 15(4), 401-414.
Farquhar, P.H. & Herr, P.M. (1993). Identifying brand image dimensionality and measuring the degree of brand
globalization: a cross-national study. Journal of International Marketing, 10(2), 46-67.
Fu Xiaorong, Zhang Bin, Xie Qinghong, Xiao Liuli, & Che Yu (2011). Impact of Quantity and Timeliness of
EWOM Information on Consumer’s Online Purchase Intention under C2C Environment. Asian Journal of
Business Research, 1(2), 38-48.
Gilly, M.C., Graham, J.L., Wolfinbarger, M.F. & Yale, L.J. (1998). A dyadic study of interpersonal information
search. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 26(2), 83-100.
Goldsmith, R.E. & Horowitz, D. (2006). Measuring motivations for online opinion seeking. Journal of Interactive
Advertising, 6(2), 1-16.
Hennig-Thurau, T., Gwinner, K.P., Walsh, G. & Gremler, D.D. (2004). Electronic word-of-mouth via consumer-
opinion platform: what motivates consumers to articulate themselves on the internet?. Journal of
Interactive Marketing, 18, 38-52.
Herr, P.M., Kardes, F.R. & Kim, J. (1991). Effects of word-of-mouth and product-attribute information on
persuasion: an accessibility-diagnosticity perspective. Journal of Consumer Research, 17(4), 454-462.
Hsieh, M.H. & Lindridge, A. (2005). Universal appeals with local specifications. The Journal of Product and Brand
Management, 14(1), 14-28.
Keller, K.L. (1993). Conceptualizing, measuring, and managing customer-based brand equity. Journal of Marketing,
57(1), 1-22.
Laroche, N., Kim, C. & Zhou, L. (1996). Brand familiarity and confidence as determinants of purchase intention: An
empirical test in a multiple brand context. Journal of Business Research, 37(10), 115-120.
Li, J. & Zhan, L. (2011). Online persuasion: How the written word drives WOM, evidence from consumer-
generated product reviews. Journal of Advertising Research, 51(1), 239- 257.
Lin, C., Wu, Y.S., & Chen, J.C.V. (2013). Electronic Word-of-Mouth: The moderating roles of product involvement
and brand image. Proceedings of 2013 International Conference on Technology Innovation and Industrial
Management, 2-14.
Madu, C.N. & Madu, A.A. (2002). Dimensions of e-quality. International Journal of Quality and Reliability
Management, 19(3), 246-258.
Mohammad Reza Jalilvand & Samiei N. (2012). The effect of electronic word of mouth on brand image and
purchase intention: An empirical study in the automobile industry in Iran. Marketing Intelligence &
Planning, 30(4), 460-476.
Morwitz, V.G. &. Schmittlein D.C. (1992). Using Segmentation to Improve Sales Forecasts Based on Purchase
Intent: Which “Intenders” Actually Buy?. Journal of Marketing Research, 29, 391-405.
Nah, F.F.-H. & Davis, S. (2002). HCI research issues in e-commerce. Journal of Electronic Commerce Research,
3(3), 98-113.
Richins, M. (1983). Negative word-of-mouth by dissatisfied consumers: a pilot study. Journal of Marketing, 47(1),
68-78.
Rowley, J. (2001). Remodelling marketing communications in an internet environment. Internet Research, 11(3),
203-212.
Senecal, S. & Nantel, J. (2004). The influence of online product recommendations on consumers’ online choices.
Journal of Retailing, 80(2), 159-169.
Subramani, M.R. & Rajagopalan, B. (2003). Knowledge-sharing and influence in online social networks via viral
marketing. Communications of the ACM, 46(12), 300-307.
Sullivan, C. (1999). Marketing the web in other media. Editor & Publisher, 132(9), 30.
Wangenheim, F.V. & Bayon, T. (2004). The effect of word of mouth on services switching: measurement
and moderating variables. European Journal of Marketing, 38(9/10), 1173-1185.
Webster, F.E. & Keller, K.L. (2004). A roadmap for branding in industrial markets. Brand Management, 11(5), 388-
402.
Wixom, B.H. & Todd, P.A. (2005). A theoretical integration of user satisfaction and technology acceptance.
Information Systems Research, 16(1), 85-102.
79
International Academic Research Journal of Social Science 2(1) 2016 Page 73-80
Wu, P.C.S., Yeh, G.Y.Y. & Hsiao, C.R. (2011). The effect of store image and service quality on brand image and
purchase intention for private label brands. Australasian Marketing Journal, 19, 30-39.
Yayli, A. & Bayram, M. eWOM: The Effects of Online Consumer Reviews on Purchasing Decision of Electronic
Goods. 6-14.
Yoo, B. & Donthu, N. (2001). Developing and validating a multidimensional consumer-based brand equity scale.
Journal of Business Research, 52(1), 1-14.
Zheng Xiaoping (2008). An Empirical Study of the Impact of Online Review on Internet Consumer Purchasing
Decision. China People’s University, 5.
80