Maynilad 2016 Financial Statements
Maynilad 2016 Financial Statements
Maynilad 2016 Financial Statements
and Subsidiaries
(A Subsidiary of Maynilad Water Holding
Company, Inc.)
and
Opinion
We have audited the consolidated financial statements of Maynilad Water Services, Inc. and Subsidiaries
(the Group), a subsidiary of Maynilad Water Holding Company, Inc., which comprise the consolidated
statements of financial position as at December 31, 2016 and 2015, and the consolidated statements of
income, consolidated statements of comprehensive income, consolidated statements of changes in equity
and consolidated statements of cash flows for the years then ended, and notes to the consolidated financial
statements, including a summary of significant accounting policies.
In our opinion, the accompanying consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects,
the consolidated financial position of the Group as at December 31, 2016 and 2015, and its consolidated
financial performance and its consolidated cash flows for the years then ended in accordance with
Philippine Financial Reporting Standards (PFRSs).
We conducted our audits in accordance with Philippine Standards on Auditing (PSAs). Our
responsibilities under those standards are further described in the Auditor’s Responsibilities for the Audit
of the Consolidated Financial Statements section of our report. We are independent of the Group in
accordance with the Code of Ethics for Professional Accountants in the Philippines (Code of Ethics)
together with the ethical requirements that are relevant to our audit of the consolidated financial
statements in the Philippines, and we have fulfilled our other ethical responsibilities in accordance with
these requirements and the Code of Ethics. We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is
sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our opinion.
Other Information
Management is responsible for the other information. The other information comprises the information
included in the Annual Report for the year ended December 31, 2016, but does not include the
consolidated financial statements and our auditor’s report thereon. The Annual Report for the year ended
December 31, 2016 is expected to be made available to us after the date of this auditor’s report.
Our opinion on the consolidated financial statements does not cover the other information and we will not
express any form of assurance conclusion thereon.
In connection with our audits of the consolidated financial statements, our responsibility is to read the
other information identified above when it becomes available and, in doing so, consider whether the other
information is materially inconsistent with the consolidated financial statements or our knowledge
obtained in the audits, or otherwise appears to be materially misstated.
*SGVFS023949*
A member firm of Ernst & Young Global Limited
-2-
Responsibilities of Management and Those Charged with Governance for the Financial Statements
Management is responsible for the preparation and fair presentation of the consolidated financial
statements in accordance with PFRSs, and for such internal control as management determines is
necessary to enable the preparation of consolidated financial statements that are free from material
misstatement, whether due to fraud or error.
In preparing the consolidated financial statements, management is responsible for assessing the Group’s
ability to continue as a going concern, disclosing, as applicable, matters related to going concern and
using the going concern basis of accounting unless management either intends to liquidate the Group or to
cease operations, or has no realistic alternative but to do so.
Those charged with governance are responsible for overseeing the Group’s financial reporting process.
Our objectives are to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements as a
whole are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error, and to issue an auditor’s report
that includes our opinion. Reasonable assurance is a high level of assurance, but is not a guarantee that an
audit conducted in accordance with PSAs will always detect a material misstatement when it exists.
Misstatements can arise from fraud or error and are considered material if, individually or in the
aggregate, they could reasonably be expected to influence the economic decisions of users taken on the
basis of these consolidated financial statements.
As part of an audit in accordance with PSAs, we exercise professional judgment and maintain
professional skepticism throughout the audit. We also:
∂ Identify and assess the risks of material misstatement of the consolidated financial statements,
whether due to fraud or error, design and perform audit procedures responsive to those risks, and
obtain audit evidence that is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our opinion. The risk of
not detecting a material misstatement resulting from fraud is higher than for one resulting from error,
as fraud may involve collusion, forgery, intentional omissions, misrepresentations, or the override of
internal control.
∂ Obtain an understanding of internal control relevant to the audit in order to design audit procedures
that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the
effectiveness of the Group’s internal control.
∂ Evaluate the appropriateness of accounting policies used and the reasonableness of accounting
estimates and related disclosures made by management.
∂ Conclude on the appropriateness of management’s use of the going concern basis of accounting and,
based on the audit evidence obtained, whether a material uncertainty exists related to events or
conditions that may cast significant doubt on the Group’s ability to continue as a going concern. If
we conclude that a material uncertainty exists, we are required to draw attention in our auditor’s
report to the related disclosures in the consolidated financial statements or, if such disclosures are
inadequate, to modify our opinion. Our conclusions are based on the audit evidence obtained up to
the date of our auditor’s report. However, future events or conditions may cause the Group to cease
to continue as a going concern.
*SGVFS023949*
A member firm of Ernst & Young Global Limited
-3-
∂ Evaluate the overall presentation, structure and content of the consolidated financial statements,
including the disclosures, and whether the consolidated financial statements represent the underlying
transactions and events in a manner that achieves fair presentation.
∂ Obtain sufficient appropriate audit evidence regarding the financial information of the entities or
business activities within the Group to express an opinion on the consolidated financial statements.
We are responsible for the direction, supervision and performance of the audit. We remain solely
responsible for our audit opinion.
We communicate with those charged with governance regarding, among other matters, the planned scope
and timing of the audit and significant audit findings, including any significant deficiencies in internal
control that we identify during our audit.
Johnny F. Ang
Partner
CPA Certificate No. 0108257
SEC Accreditation No. 1284-AR-1 (Group A),
June 9, 2016, valid until June 9, 2019
Tax Identification No. 221-717-423
BIR Accreditation No. 08-001998-101-2015,
November 25, 2015, valid until November 24, 2018
PTR No. 5908662, January 3, 2017, Makati City
*SGVFS023949*
A member firm of Ernst & Young Global Limited
MAYNILAD WATER SERVICES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
(A Subsidiary of Maynilad Water Holding Company, Inc.)
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF FINANCIAL POSITION
(Amounts in Thousands)
December 31
2016 2015
ASSETS
Current Assets
Cash and cash equivalents (Notes 4, 24 and 25) P
=5,024,754 =3,093,012
P
Short-term investments (Notes 4, 24 and 25) 3,041,000 6,088,541
Trade and other receivables (Notes 5, 24 and 25) 2,492,645 2,428,812
Other current assets (Notes 6, 10, 24 and 25) 3,470,767 3,216,752
Total Current Assets 14,029,166 14,827,117
Noncurrent Assets
Service concession assets (Notes 7, 10, 12, 14 and 22) 69,297,460 62,488,321
Deferred tax assets - net (Notes 15 and 20) 1,032,194 2,139,574
Property and equipment (Note 8) 1,254,339 833,821
Goodwill (Note 2) 288,082 288,082
Available-for-sale financial assets (Notes 9, 24 and 25) 132,387 132,387
Other noncurrent assets (Notes 2, 5, 24 and 25) 1,145,282 643,548
Total Noncurrent Assets 73,149,744 66,525,733
P
=87,178,910 P
=81,352,850
Current Liabilities
Trade and other payables (Notes 11, 14, 16, 23, 24 and 25) 10,892,909 11,327,222
Current portion of interest-bearing loans (Notes 7, 10, 24 and 25) P
=1,808,101 =1,742,164
P
Current portion of service concession obligation
payable to MWSS (Notes 7, 12, 24 and 25) 1,328,978 1,357,705
Total Current Liabilities 14,029,988 14,427,091
Noncurrent Liabilities
Interest-bearing loans - net of current portion
(Notes 7, 10, 24 and 25) 24,879,755 23,337,175
Service concession obligation payable to MWSS
- net of current portion (Notes 7, 12, 24 and 25) 6,500,131 6,737,157
Deferred credits (Notes 2, 7, 24 and 25) 631,975 583,643
Customers’ deposits (Notes 2, 24 and 25) 279,363 244,434
Pension liability (Note 16) 317,329 416,234
Deferred tax liabilities - net (Notes 15 and 20) 28,885 –
Other noncurrent liabilities (Note 16) 249,830 68,461
Total Noncurrent Liabilities 32,887,268 31,387,104
Total Liabilities (Carried Forward) 46,917,256 45,814,195
*SGVFS023949*
-2-
December 31
2016 2015
Equity
Capital stock (Notes 1 and 13) 4,546,982 4,546,982
Additional paid-in capital (Note 13) 10,021,200 9,979,786
Treasury shares (Note 13) (32,672) (104,654)
Other comprehensive income (Notes 9 and 16) 34,718 27,219
Other equity adjustments (Note 13) (309,220) (163,152)
Retained earnings (Note 13)
Unappropriated 14,500,646 13,752,474
Appropriated 11,500,000 7,500,000
Total Equity 40,261,654 35,538,655
P
=87,178,910 P
=81,352,850
*SGVFS023949*
MAYNILAD WATER SERVICES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
(A Subsidiary of Maynilad Water Holding Company, Inc.)
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
(Amounts in Thousands, Except Earnings per Share Value)
*SGVFS023949*
MAYNILAD WATER SERVICES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
(A Subsidiary of Maynilad Water Holding Company, Inc.)
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
(Amounts in Thousands)
NET INCOME P
=6,748,172 P
=9,550,627 P
=8,255,288
*SGVFS023949*
MAYNILAD WATER SERVICES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
(A Subsidiary of Maynilad Water Holding Company, Inc.)
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN EQUITY
FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2016, 2015 AND 2014
(Amounts in Thousands)
Additional Other
Paid-in Treasury Comprehensive Other Equity
Capital Stock Capital Shares Income (Loss) Adjustments Retained Earnings (Note 13)
(Notes 1 and 13) (Note 13) (Note 13) (Notes 9 and 16) (Note 13) Unappropriated Appropriated Total
At December 31, 2015 =4,546,982
P =9,979,786
P (P
=104,654) =27,219
P (P
=163,152) =13,752,474
P =7,500,000
P =35,538,655
P
Total comprehensive income
for the year – – – 7,499 – 6,748,172 – 6,755,671
Issuance of ESOP shares
(Note 13) – 41,414 104,654 – (146,068) – – –
Treasury shares (Note 13) – – (32,672) – – – – (32,672)
Reversal of appropriation
(Note 13) – – – – – 4,000,000 (4,000,000) –
Appropriation for capital
expenditures (Note 13) – – – – – (5,000,000) 5,000,000 –
Appropriation for dividends
(Notes 13 and 27) – – – – – (3,000,000) 3,000,000 –
Dividends declared (Note 13) – – – – – (2,000,000) – (2,000,000)
At December 31, 2016 =4,546,982
P =10,021,200
P (P
=32,672) =34,718
P (P
=309,220) =14,500,646
P =11,500,000
P =40,261,654
P
*SGVFS023949*
Additional Other
Paid-in Treasury Comprehensive Other Equity
Capital Stock Capital Shares Income (Loss) Adjustments Retained Earnings (Note 13)
(Notes 1 and 13) (Note 13) (Note 13) (Notes 9 and 16) (Note 13) Unappropriated Appropriated Total
*SGVFS023949*
MAYNILAD WATER SERVICES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
(A Subsidiary of Maynilad Water Holding Company, Inc.)
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Amounts in Thousands)
*SGVFS023949*
MAYNILAD WATER SERVICES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
(A Subsidiary of Maynilad Water Holding Company, Inc.)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Amounts in Thousands, Except Number of Shares, Earnings per Share Value
and Unless Otherwise Specified)
General
Maynilad Water Services, Inc. (Maynilad or Parent Company) was incorporated on
January 22, 1997 in the Philippines primarily to bid for the operation of the privatized system of
waterworks and sewerage services of the Metropolitan Waterworks and Sewerage System
(MWSS) for Metropolitan Manila.
On October 26, 2011, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) approved the amendment
of the Articles of Incorporation to amend its primary purpose to include the provision of allied and
ancillary services and undertaking such other activities incidental to its secondary purposes.
As at December 31, 2016 and 2015, Maynilad is a 92.85% owned subsidiary of MWHCI.
In addition, MPIC directly owns 5.19% of Maynilad thereby having effective ownership interest
of 52.80%.
Metro Pacific Holdings, Inc. (MPHI) owns 41.9% of the total issued common shares (or 42.0% of
the total outstanding common shares) and 52.1% of the total issued and outstanding common
shares of MPIC as at December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively. The reduction in the ownership
interest resulted from GT Capital Holdings, Inc.’s (GTCHI) acquisition of 1.3 billion MPIC
common shares from MPHI on May 27, 2016. On the same date, MPIC entered into a Share
Subscription Agreement with GTCHI for the subscription by GTCHI of 3.6 billion common
shares in MPIC. As sole holder of the voting Class A Preferred Shares, MPHI’s combined voting
interest as a result of all of its shareholdings is estimated at 55.0% as at December 31, 2016.
MPHI is a Philippine corporation whose stockholders are Enterprise Investment Holdings, Inc.
(EIH; 60.0% interest), Intalink B.V. (26.7% interest) and First Pacific International Limited (FPIL;
13.3% interest). First Pacific Company Limited (FPC), a company incorporated in Bermuda and
listed in Hong Kong, through its subsidiaries, Intalink B.V. and FPIL, holds 40.0% equity interest
*SGVFS023949*
-2-
in EIH and an investment financing which under Hong Kong Generally Accepted Accounting
Principles require FPC to account for the results and assets and liabilities of EIH and its
subsidiaries as part of FPC group companies in Hong Kong.
The registered office address of the Parent Company is MWSS Compound, Katipunan Road,
Balara, Quezon City.
The accompanying consolidated financial statements were approved by the Audit Committee on
February 27, 2017 as authorized by the Board of Directors (BOD) in accordance with its
resolution.
Concession Agreement
On February 21, 1997, the Parent Company entered into a Concession Agreement with the
MWSS, a government-owned and controlled corporation organized and existing pursuant to
Republic Act (RA) No. 6234 (the Charter), as clarified and amended, with respect to the MWSS
West Service Area. The Concession Agreement sets forth the rights and obligations of the Parent
Company throughout the concession period. The MWSS Regulatory Office (RO) acts as the
regulatory body of the Concessionaires [the Parent Company and the East Concessionaire - Manila
Water Company, Inc. (Manila Water)].
Under the Concession Agreement, MWSS grants the Parent Company (as contractor to perform
certain functions and as agent for the exercise of certain rights and powers under the Charter),
the sole right to manage, operate, repair, decommission and refurbish all fixed and movable assets
required (except certain retained assets of MWSS) to provide water and sewerage services in the
West Service Area for an extended period of 40 years commencing on August 1, 1997
(the Commencement Date) to May 6, 2037 or the early termination date as the case may be.
The 15-year extension of the expiry of the Concession Agreement was approved by the MWSS in
2009 (see Notes 7, 12 and 22).
The Parent Company is also tasked to manage, operate, repair, decommission and refurbish certain
specified MWSS facilities in the West Service Area. The legal title to these assets remains with
MWSS. The legal title to all property, plant and equipment contributed to the existing MWSS
system by the Parent Company during the concession period remains with the Parent Company
until the Expiration Date (or on early termination date) at which time, all rights, titles and interest
in such assets will automatically vest in MWSS.
On December 17, 2013, the Regulatory Office released Resolution No. 13-011-CA regarding the
implementation of a status quo for Maynilad’s Standard Rates and FCDA for any and all its
scheduled adjustments until such time that the Appeals Panel has issued the Final Award.
On January 5, 2015, Maynilad officially received the Appeals Panel’s award dated
December 29, 2014 (the “Arbitral Award”) upholding Maynilad’s alternative Rebasing
Adjustment for the Fourth Rate Rebasing Period of 13.41% or its equivalent of P =4.06 per cu.m.
This increase has effectively been reduced to P
=3.06 per cu.m., following the integration of the
*SGVFS023949*
-3-
=
P1.00 Currency Exchange Rate Adjustment (CERA) into the basic water charge. To mitigate the
impact of the tariff increase on its customers, Maynilad offered to stagger its implementation over
a three-year period.
With the Arbitral Award being final and binding on the parties, Maynilad asked the MWSS to
cause its Board of Trustees to approve the 2015 Tariffs Table so that the same can be published
and implemented 15 days after its publication.
However, the MWSS and the RO have chosen, over Maynilad’s repeated objections, to defer the
implementation of the Arbitral Award despite it being final and binding on the parties. In its letter
dated February 9, 2015, the MWSS and RO, who received their copy of the Arbitral Award on
January 7, 2015, informed Maynilad that they have decided to await the final outcome of their
arbitration with the other concessionaire, Manila Water, before making any official
pronouncements on the applicable resulting water rates for the two concessionaires.
On February 20, 2015, Maynilad wrote the Philippine Government, through the Department of
Finance (DOF), to call on the undertaking which the Republic of the Philippines (the “Republic”)
issued in favor of Maynilad on July 31, 1997 and March 17, 2010 (the “Undertaking”).
The Undertaking provides, among other things, that the Republic shall indemnify Maynilad in
respect of any loss that is occasioned by a delay caused by the Republic or any government-owned
agency in implementing any increase in the Standard Rates beyond the date for its implementation
in accordance with the Concession Agreement.
On March 9, 2015, Maynilad again wrote the Republic, through the DOF, to reiterate its demand
against the Undertaking. The letters dated February 20 and March 9, 2015 are collectively
referred to as the “Demand Letters”. Maynilad demanded that it be paid, immediately and without
further delay, the =
P3.4 billion in revenue losses that it had sustained as a direct result of the
MWSS’ and the RO’s refusal to implement its correct Rebasing Adjustment from January 1, 2013
(the commencement of the Fourth Rate Rebasing Period) to February 28, 2015.
On March 27, 2015, Maynilad served a Notice of Arbitration and Statement of Claim upon the
Republic, through the DOF. Maynilad gave notice and demanded that the Republic’s failure or
refusal to pay the amounts required under the Demand Letters be, pursuant to the terms of the
Undertaking, referred to arbitration before a three-member panel appointed and conduct
proceedings in Singapore in accordance with the 1976 United Nations Commission on
International Trade Law (UNCITRAL) Arbitration Rules.
On April 21, 2015, the MWSS Board of Trustees in its Resolution No. 2015-004-CA dated
March 25, 2015 approved to partially implement the Arbitral Award of a tariff adjustment of
=
P0.64 per cu.m. which, net of the =
P1.00 CERA, actually translates to a tariff adjustment of
negative =
P0.36 per cu.m. as opposed to the Arbitral Award of P
=3.06 per cu.m. tariff adjustment,
net of CERA. For being contrary to the Final Award as well as the provisions of the Concession
Agreement, Maynilad did not implement this tariff adjustment.
On May 14, 2015, the MWSS Board of Trustees in its Resolution No. 2015-060-RO approved a
7.52% increase in the prevailing average basic charge of =
P31.25 per cu.m. or an upward
adjustment of =
P2.35 per cu.m. as partial implementation of the Arbitral Award. With the
discontinuance of CERA, the net adjustment in average water charge is 4.32% or P =1.35 per cu.m.
In the fourth quarter of 2015, the Arbitration Tribunal was constituted. On February 17, 2016,
Maynilad again wrote the Republic, through the DOF, to reiterate its demand against the
*SGVFS023949*
-4-
Undertaking and to update its claim. Evidentiary hearings were completed in December 2016.
As at February 27, 2017, the decision from the Arbitration Tribunal is still pending.
As at December 31, 2016 and 2015, Maynilad’s revenue losses due to the delayed implementation
of the Arbitral Award were estimated at =
P8.2 billion and P
=6.1 billion, respectively.
Basis of Preparation
The consolidated financial statements have been prepared on a historical cost basis.
The consolidated financial statements are presented in Philippine peso, which is the Parent
Company’s functional and presentation currency, and all amounts are rounded to the nearest
thousand (P
=000), except when otherwise indicated.
Statement of Compliance
The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with
Philippine Financial Reporting Standards (PFRS). PFRS include statements named PFRS and
Philippine Accounting Standards (PAS), including Philippine Interpretations from International
Financial Reporting Interpretations Committee (IFRIC) issued by the Financial Reporting
Standards Council (FRSC) and Philippine Interpretations Committee (PIC).
Basis of Consolidation
The accompanying consolidated financial statements comprise the financial statements of the
Parent Company and all of its subsidiaries (collectively referred to as the “Company”).
Control is achieved when the Company is exposed, or has rights, to variable returns from its
involvement with the investee and has the ability to affect those returns through its power over the
investee. Specifically, the Company controls an investee, if and only if, the Company has:
ƒ power over the investee (i.e., existing rights that give it the current ability to direct the relevant
activities of the investee);
ƒ exposure, or rights, to variable returns from its involvement with the investee; and
ƒ the ability to use its power over the investee to affect its returns.
The Company re-assesses whether or not it controls an investee if facts and circumstances indicate
that there are changes to one or more of the three elements of control. Consolidation of a
subsidiary begins when the Company obtains control over the subsidiary and ceases when the
Company loses control of the subsidiary. Assets, liabilities, income and expenses of a subsidiary
acquired or disposed of during the year are included in the consolidated statement of
comprehensive income from the date the Company gains control until the date the Company
ceases to control the subsidiary.
A change in the ownership interest of a subsidiary, without loss of control, is accounted for as an
equity transaction. If the Company loses control over a subsidiary, it:
*SGVFS023949*
-5-
The financial statements of Maynilad and the following subsidiaries that it controls comprise the
consolidated financial statements.
Phil Hydro. On August 3, 2012, the Parent Company through a Share Purchase Agreement with a
third party acquired 100% ownership interest in Phil Hydro for a net consideration of
P
=526.9 million. Goodwill arising from the acquisition amounted to P =288.1 million.
Phil Hydro has existing 25-year Bulk Water Supply Agreements with various provincial
municipalities outside the West Service Area and a Memorandum of Agreement with certain
provincial municipality for the construction and operation of water treatment facilities for water
distribution services.
Amayi. Amayi is incorporated for the purpose of operating, managing, maintaining and
rehabilitating waterworks, sewerage and sanitation system and services outside the Concession
Area.
The financial statements of the subsidiaries are prepared for the same reporting year as the Parent
Company using consistent accounting policies. All significant intercompany balances,
transactions, income and expense and profits and losses from intercompany transactions are
eliminated in full upon consolidation.
ƒ PFRS 10, Consolidated Financial Statements, PFRS 12, Disclosure of Interests in Other
Entities, and PAS 28, Investments in Associates and Joint Ventures – Investment Entities:
Applying the Consolidation Exception (Amendments)
ƒ PFRS 11, Joint Arrangements – Accounting for Acquisitions of Interests in Joint Operations
(Amendments)
*SGVFS023949*
-6-
ƒ PAS 16, Property, Plant and Equipment, and PAS 38, Intangible Assets – Clarification of
Acceptable Methods of Depreciation and Amortization (Amendments)
ƒ PAS 16, Property, Plant and Equipment, and PAS 41, Agriculture – Bearer Plants
(Amendments)
ƒ PAS 27, Separate Financial Statements – Equity Method in Separate Financial Statements
(Amendments)
ƒ PFRS 5, Non-current Assets Held for Sale and Discontinued Operations – Changes in
Methods of Disposal (Amendments)
ƒ PAS 19, Employee Benefits – Discount Rate: Regional Market Issue (Amendments)
ƒ PAS 34, Interim Financial Reporting – Disclosure of Information ‘Elsewhere in the Interim
Financial Report’ (Amendment)
Effective 2017
ƒ PFRS 12, Disclosure of Interests in Other Entities – Clarification of the Scope of the Standard
(Part of Annual Improvements to PFRSs 2014 - 2016 Cycle) (Amendments)
The amendments to PAS 7 require an entity to provide disclosures that enable users of
financial statements to evaluate changes in liabilities arising from financing activities,
including both changes arising from cash flows and non-cash changes (such as foreign
exchange gains or losses). On initial application of the amendments, entities are not required
to provide comparative information for preceding periods. Early application of the
amendments is permitted.
ƒ PAS 12, Income Taxes – Recognition of Deferred Tax Assets for Unrealized Losses
(Amendments)
*SGVFS023949*
-7-
Effective 2018
PFRS 9 reflects all phases of the financial instruments project and replaces PAS 39,
Financial Instruments – Recognition and Measurement, and all previous versions of PFRS 9.
The standard introduces new requirements for classification and measurement, impairment,
and hedge accounting. PFRS 9 is effective for annual periods beginning on or after
January 1, 2018, with early application permitted. Retrospective application is required, but
providing comparative information is not compulsory. For hedge accounting, the
requirements are generally applied prospectively, with some limited exceptions.
The adoption of PFRS 9 will have an effect on the classification and measurement of the
Company’s financial assets and impairment methodology for financial assets, but will have no
impact on the classification and measurement of the Company’s financial liabilities.
The Company is currently assessing the impact of adopting this standard.
PFRS 15 establishes a new five-step model that will apply to revenue arising from contracts
with customers. Under PFRS 15, revenue is recognized at an amount that reflects the
consideration to which an entity expects to be entitled in exchange for transferring goods or
services to a customer. The principles in PFRS 15 provide a more structured approach to
measuring and recognizing revenue.
The new revenue standard is applicable to all entities and will supersede all current revenue
recognition requirements under PFRS. Either a full or modified retrospective application is
required for annual periods beginning on or after January 1, 2018. The Company is currently
assessing the impact of adopting this standard.
ƒ PAS 28, Investments in Associates and Joint Ventures – Measuring an Associate or Joint
Venture at Fair Value (Part of Annual Improvements to PFRSs 2014 - 2016 Cycle)
(Amendments)
The interpretation clarifies that in determining the spot exchange rate to use on initial
recognition of the related asset, expense or income (or part of it) on the derecognition of a
non-monetary asset or non-monetary liability relating to advance consideration, the date of the
transaction is the date on which an entity initially recognizes the nonmonetary asset or
nonmonetary liability arising from the advance consideration. If there are multiple payments
or receipts in advance, then the entity must determine a date of the transactions for each
payment or receipt of advance consideration. The interpretation may be applied on a fully
*SGVFS023949*
-8-
retrospective basis. Entities may apply the interpretation prospectively to all assets, expenses
and income in its scope that are initially recognized on or after the beginning of the reporting
period in which the entity first applies the interpretation or the beginning of a prior reporting
period presented as comparative information in the financial statements of the reporting period
in which the entity first applies the interpretation.
Effective 2019
Under the new standard, lessees will no longer classify their leases as either operating or
finance leases in accordance with PAS 17, Leases. Rather, lessees will apply the single-asset
model. Under this model, lessees will recognize the assets and related liabilities for most
leases on their balance sheets, and subsequently, will depreciate the lease assets and recognize
interest on the lease liabilities in their profit or loss. Leases with a term of 12 months or less
or for which the underlying asset is of low value are exempted from these requirements.
The accounting by lessors is substantially unchanged as the new standard carries forward the
principles of lessor accounting under PAS 17. Lessors, however, will be required to disclose
more information in their financial statements, particularly on the risk exposure to residual
value.
Entities may early adopt PFRS 16 but only if they have also adopted PFRS 15. When
adopting PFRS 16, an entity is permitted to use either a full retrospective or a modified
retrospective approach, with options to use certain transition reliefs. The Company is
currently assessing the impact of adopting this standard.
Deferred Effectivity
ƒ PFRS 10, Consolidated Financial Statements, and PAS 28, Investments in Associates and
Joint Ventures – Sale or Contribution of Assets between an Investor and its Associate or Joint
Venture (Amendments)
When the Company acquires a business, it assesses the financial assets and liabilities assumed for
appropriate classification and designation in accordance with the contractual terms, economic
circumstances and pertinent conditions as at the acquisition date. This includes the separation of
embedded derivatives in host contracts by the acquiree.
Any contingent consideration to be transferred by the acquirer will be recognized at fair value at
the acquisition date. Subsequent changes to the fair value of the contingent consideration which is
deemed to be an asset or liability, will be recognized in accordance with PAS 39 either in profit or
loss or as a change to other comprehensive income. If the contingent consideration is classified as
equity, it is not remeasured until it is finally settled within equity.
*SGVFS023949*
-9-
Goodwill is initially measured at cost being the excess of the aggregate of the consideration
transferred and the amount recognized for non-controlling interest over the net identifiable assets
acquired and liabilities assumed. If this consideration is lower than the fair value of the net assets
of the subsidiary acquired, the difference is recognized in the consolidated statement of income.
After initial recognition, goodwill is measured at cost less any accumulated impairment losses.
For the purpose of impairment testing, goodwill acquired in a business combination is, from the
acquisition date, allocated to each of the Company’s cash-generating units that are expected to
benefit from the combination, irrespective of whether other assets or liabilities of the acquiree are
assigned to those units.
Where goodwill forms part of a cash-generating unit and part of the operation within that unit is
disposed of, the goodwill associated with the operation disposed of is included in the carrying
amount of the operation when determining the gain or loss on disposal of the operation.
Goodwill disposed of in this circumstance is measured based on the relative values of the
operation disposed of and the portion of the cash-generating unit retained.
Fair value is the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an
orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. The fair value
measurement is based on the presumption that the transaction to sell the asset or transfer the
liability takes place either:
The principal or the most advantageous market must be accessible by the Company.
The fair value of an asset or a liability is measured using the assumptions that market participants
would use when pricing the asset or liability, assuming that market participants act in their
economic best interest.
A fair value measurement of a non-financial asset takes into account a market participant's ability
to generate economic benefits by using the asset in its highest and best use or by selling it to
another market participant that would use the asset in its highest and best use.
The Company uses valuation techniques that are appropriate in the circumstances and for which
sufficient data are available to measure fair value, maximizing the use of relevant observable
inputs and minimizing the use of unobservable inputs.
All assets and liabilities for which fair value is measured or disclosed in the financial statements
are categorized within the fair value hierarchy, described as follows, based on the lowest level
input that is significant to the fair value measurement as a whole:
Level 1 – Quoted (unadjusted) market prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities
Level 2 – Valuation techniques for which the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value
measurement is directly or indirectly observable
*SGVFS023949*
- 10 -
Level 3 – Valuation techniques for which the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value
measurement is unobservable
For assets and liabilities that are recognized in the financial statements on a recurring basis,
the Company determines whether transfers have occurred between levels in the hierarchy by
re-assessing categorization (based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value
measurement as a whole) at the end of each reporting period.
The Company’s management determines the policies and procedures for both recurring and
nonrecurring fair value measurements.
For the purpose of fair value disclosures, the Company has determined classes of assets and
liabilities on the basis of the nature, characteristics and risks of the asset or liability and the level
of the fair value hierarchy as explained above.
Short-term Investments
Short-term investments are investments with maturities of more than three months to one year.
Date of Recognition. The Company recognizes a financial asset or a financial liability in the
consolidated statement of financial position when it becomes a party to the contractual provisions
of the instrument. In the case of a regular way purchase or sale of financial assets, recognition and
derecognition, as applicable, are done using trade date accounting.
Initial Recognition. Financial assets and financial liabilities are recognized initially at fair value.
Transaction costs are included in the initial measurement of all financial assets and liabilities,
except for financial instruments measured at fair value through profit or loss (FVPL).
Categories of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities. Financial assets are classified into the
following categories: financial assets at FVPL, loans and receivables, held-to-maturity (HTM)
investments, and available-for-sale (AFS) financial assets. Financial liabilities are classified as
financial liabilities at FVPL or other financial liabilities. The Company determines the
classification at initial recognition and, where allowed and appropriate, re-evaluates this
designation at each reporting date.
The Company has no financial assets classified as financial asset at FVPL and HTM investments,
and has no financial liabilities classified as financial liabilities at FVPL as at December 31, 2016
and 2015.
‘Day 1’ difference. Where the transaction price in a non-active market is different from the fair
value of other observable current market transactions in the same instrument or based on a
valuation technique whose variables include only data from observable market, the Company
recognizes the difference between the transaction price and fair value (a ‘Day 1’ difference) in the
*SGVFS023949*
- 11 -
consolidated statement of income unless it qualifies for recognition as some other type of asset.
In cases where use is made of data which is not observable, the difference between the transaction
price and model value is only recognized in the consolidated statement of income when the inputs
become observable or when the instrument is derecognized. For each transaction, the Company
determines the appropriate method of recognizing the ‘Day 1’ difference amount.
Loans and Receivables. Loans and receivables are non-derivative financial assets with fixed or
determinable payments that are not quoted in an active market. They are not entered into with the
intention of immediate or short-term resale and are not classified or designated as AFS financial
assets or financial assets at FVPL. After initial recognition, loans and receivables are carried at
amortized cost in the consolidated statement of financial position using the effective interest
method, less allowance for impairment. Amortization is calculated by taking into account any
discount or premium on acquisition and fees that are an integral part of the effective interest rate.
Gains and losses are recognized in the consolidated statement of income when loans and
receivables are derecognized and impaired, as well as through the amortization process.
Loans and receivables are included in current assets if maturity is within twelve months from the
reporting date. Otherwise, these are classified as noncurrent assets.
This category includes the Company’s cash and cash equivalents, short-term investments, trade
and other receivables, sinking fund, deposits, and miscellaneous deposits shown as part of
“Other noncurrent assets” account in the consolidated statements of financial position
(see Notes 4, 5 and 6).
AFS Financial Assets. Available-for-sale financial assets are non-derivative financial assets that
are designated as AFS or are not classified in any of the three preceding categories. These are
purchased and held indefinitely, and may be sold in response to liquidity requirements or changes
in market conditions. After initial recognition, AFS financial assets are measured at fair value
with unrealized gains or losses being recognized in the consolidated statement of comprehensive
income and presented as a separate component of equity until the investment is derecognized or
until the investment is determined to be impaired at which time the cumulative gain or loss
previously reported in equity is included in the consolidated statement of income. Investments in
equity instruments that do not have a quoted market price in an active market and whose fair
values cannot be reliably measured are carried at cost, net of impairment, if any. Assets under this
category are classified as current assets if the Company intends to hold the assets within 12
months from financial reporting date and as noncurrent assets if it is more than a year from
financial reporting date.
Other Financial Liabilities at Amortized Cost. Financial liabilities are classified in this category if
these are not held for trading or not designated as at FVPL upon the inception of the liability.
These include liabilities arising from operations or borrowings.
After initial recognition, interest-bearing loans and borrowings are subsequently measured at
amortized cost using the effective interest method.
Gains or losses are recognized in the consolidated statement of income when the liabilities are
derecognized as well as through the amortization process.
Debt issuance costs are amortized using the effective interest method. The unamortized debt
issuance costs are netted against the related carrying value of the debt instrument.
*SGVFS023949*
- 12 -
This category includes trade and other payables (excluding statutory liabilities), interest-bearing
loans, service concession obligation payable to MWSS and customers’ deposits (see Notes 10, 11
and 12).
If the Company does not have an unconditional right to avoid delivering cash or another financial
asset to settle its contractual obligation, the obligation meets the definition of a financial liability.
The components of issued financial instruments that contain both liability and equity elements are
accounted for separately, with the equity component being assigned the residual amount after
deducting from the instrument as a whole the amount separately determined as the fair value of the
liability component on the date of issue.
Financial Assets Carried at Amortized Cost. If there is objective evidence that an impairment loss
on loans and receivables carried at amortized cost has been incurred, the amount of the loss is
measured as the difference between the asset’s carrying amount and the present value of estimated
future cash flows (excluding future credit losses that have not been incurred) discounted at the
financial asset’s original effective interest rate (i.e., the effective interest rate computed at initial
recognition). The carrying amount of the asset shall be reduced either directly or through use of
an allowance account. The amount of the loss shall be recognized in the consolidated statement of
income.
The Company first assesses whether objective evidence of impairment exists individually for
financial assets that are individually significant, and individually or collectively for financial
assets that are not individually significant. If it is determined that no objective evidence of
impairment exists for an individually assessed financial asset, whether significant or not, the asset
is included in a group of financial assets with similar credit risk characteristics and that group of
financial assets is collectively assessed for impairment. Assets that are individually assessed for
impairment and for which an impairment loss is or continues to be recognized are not included in
a collective assessment of impairment.
If, in a subsequent period, the amount of the impairment loss decreases and the decrease can be
related objectively to an event occurring after the impairment was recognized, the previously
*SGVFS023949*
- 13 -
Financial Assets Carried at Cost. If there is objective evidence that an impairment loss on an
unquoted equity instrument that is not carried at fair value because its fair value cannot be reliably
measured, or on a derivative asset that is linked to and must be settled by delivery of such an
unquoted equity instrument has been incurred, the amount of the loss is measured as the difference
between the asset’s carrying amount and the present value of estimated future cash flows
discounted at the current market rate of return for a similar financial asset.
AFS Financial Assets. The Company assesses at each reporting date whether there is objective
evidence that an investment or a group of investments is impaired. The evidence of impairment
for equity securities classified as AFS financial assets would include a significant or prolonged
decline in fair value of investments below its cost. Where there is evidence of impairment, the
cumulative loss – measured as the difference between the acquisition cost and the current fair
value, less any impairment loss on that financial asset previously recognized in the other
comprehensive income – is removed from other comprehensive income and recognized in profit or
loss in the consolidated statement of income. Impairment losses on equity investments are not
reversed through the profit or loss in the consolidated statement of income. Increases in fair value
after impairment are recognized directly in other comprehensive income in the consolidated
statement of comprehensive income.
Financial Assets. A financial asset (or, where applicable, a part of a financial asset or part of a
group of similar financial assets) is derecognized when:
ƒ the Company’s right to receive cash flows from the asset has expired; or
ƒ the Company retains the right to receive cash flows from the asset, but has assumed an
obligation to pay them in full without material delay to a third party under a “pass-through”
arrangement; or
ƒ the Company has transferred its right to receive cash flows from the asset and either (a) has
transferred substantially all the risks and rewards of the assets, or (b) has neither transferred
nor retained substantially all the risks and rewards of the asset, but has transferred control of
the asset.
When the Company has transferred its right to receive cash flows from an asset and has neither
transferred nor retained substantially all the risks and rewards of the asset nor transferred control
of the asset, the asset is recognized to the extent of the Company’s continuing involvement in the
asset. Continuing involvement that takes the form of a guarantee over the transferred asset is
measured at the lower of original carrying amount of the asset and the maximum amount of
consideration that the Company could be required to repay.
Financial Liabilities. A financial liability is derecognized when the obligation under the liability
is discharged, cancelled or has expired.
When an existing financial liability is replaced by another from the same lender on substantially
different terms, or the terms of an existing liability are substantially modified, such an exchange or
modification is treated as a derecognition of the original liability and the recognition of a new
liability, and the difference in the respective carrying amounts is recognized in the consolidated
statement of income.
*SGVFS023949*
- 14 -
Parent Company. The Parent Company accounts for its concession arrangement with MWSS in
accordance with IFRIC 12, Service Concession Arrangement under the Intangible Asset model as
it receives the right (license) to charge users of public service. Under the Concession Agreement,
the Parent Company is granted the sole and exclusive right and discretion during the concession
period to manage, occupy, operate, repair, maintain, decommission and refurbish the identified
facilities required to provide water services. The legal title to these assets shall vest in MWSS at
the end of the concession period.
Phil Hydro. Phil Hydro accounts for its Bulk Water Supply Agreements in accordance with
IFRIC 12 under the Intangible Asset model as it receives the right (license) to charge users of
public service.
Service concession assets are recognized to the extent that the Company receives a license or right
to charge the users of the public service. The service concession assets pertain to the fair value of
the service concession obligations at drawdown date and construction costs related to the
rehabilitation works performed by the Company. The Parent Company’s service concession assets
is amortized using unit of production (UOP) method over the projected total billable water volume
during the remaining term of the service concession arrangement. Phil Hydro amortizes its service
concession assets using straight-line method over the terms of the Bulk Water Supply Agreements.
The Company recognizes and measures revenue from rehabilitation works using the percentage-
of-completion method. Under this method, revenue is recognized as the related obligations are
fulfilled, measured principally on the basis of the estimated physical completion of the contract
work.
Cost of rehabilitation works, which includes all direct materials, labor costs, and those indirect
costs related to contract performance, is recognized consistent with the revenue recognition
method applied. Expected losses on contracts are recognized immediately when it is probable that
the total contract costs will exceed total contract revenue. Changes in contract performance,
contract conditions and estimated profitability including those arising from contract penalty
provisions and final contract settlements which may result in revisions to estimated costs and
gross margins are recognized in the year in which the revisions are determined.
Subsequent costs and expenditures related to the concession agreement are recognized as additions
to service concession assets at fair value of obligations at drawdown date and cost of rehabilitation
works.
*SGVFS023949*
- 15 -
The initial cost of property and equipment comprises its purchase price, including import duties,
taxes and any directly attributable costs in bringing the asset to its working condition and location
for its intended use. Expenditures incurred after the property and equipment have been put into
operation, such as repairs and maintenance, are normally charged to income in the period such
costs are incurred. In situations where it can be clearly demonstrated that the expenditures have
resulted in an increase in the future economic benefits expected to be obtained from the use of an
item of property and equipment beyond its originally assessed standard of performance,
the expenditures are capitalized as additional costs of property and equipment.
Depreciation is calculated on a straight-line basis over the following estimated useful lives:
The Company computes for depreciation charges based on the significant component of the asset.
The useful lives and depreciation method are reviewed periodically to ensure that the periods and
method of depreciation are consistent with the expected pattern of economic benefits from items
of property and equipment.
Fully depreciated property and equipment are retained in the accounts until they are no longer in
use and no further depreciation is charged to current operations.
An item of property and equipment is derecognized upon disposal or when no future economic
benefits are expected to arise from the continued use of the asset. Any gain or loss arising on
derecognition of the asset (calculated as the difference between the net disposal proceeds and the
carrying amount of the asset) is included in the consolidated statement of income in the year the
item is derecognized.
An impairment loss is recognized only if the carrying amount of an asset exceeds its recoverable
amount. An impairment loss is charged to operations in the year in which it arises.
A previously recognized impairment loss is reversed only if there has been a change in the
estimates used to determine the recoverable amount of an asset, however, not to an amount higher
than the carrying amount that would have been determined (net of any depreciation and
*SGVFS023949*
- 16 -
amortization) had no impairment loss been recognized for the asset in prior years. A reversal of
an impairment loss is credited to current operations.
Goodwill
Goodwill is initially measured at cost being the excess of the aggregate of the consideration
transferred and the amount recognized for controlling interest over the net identifiable assets
acquired and liabilities assumed. If this consideration is lower than the fair value of the net assets
of the subsidiary acquired, the difference is recognized in the consolidated statement of income.
After initial recognition, goodwill is measured at cost less any accumulated impairment losses.
For the purpose of impairment testing, goodwill acquired in a business combination is, from the
acquisition date, allocated to each of the Company’s cash-generating units that are expected to
benefit from synergies of the combination irrespective of whether other assets or liabilities of the
acquiree are assigned to those units. Each unit or group of units to which the goodwill is so
allocated:
ƒ represents the lowest level within the Company at which the goodwill is monitored for internal
management purposes; and
ƒ not larger than an operating segment determined in accordance with PFRS 8, Operating
Segments.
Where goodwill forms part of a cash-generating unit and part of the operation within that unit is
disposed of, the goodwill associated with the operation disposed of is included in the carrying
amount of the operation when determining the gain or loss on disposal of the operation.
Goodwill disposed of in this circumstance is measured based on the relative values of the
operation disposed of and the portion of the cash-generating unit retained.
Transfers of assets between commonly-controlled entities are accounted for under historical cost
accounting.
If the business combination is achieved in stages, the acquisition date fair value of the acquirer’s
previously held equity interest in the acquiree is remeasured to fair value at the acquisition date
through profit or loss.
When subsidiaries are sold, the difference between the selling price and the net assets plus
cumulative translation adjustments and goodwill is recognized in the consolidated statement of
income.
*SGVFS023949*
- 17 -
In view of the automatic reimbursement mechanism, the Parent Company recognizes deferred
FCDA (included as part of “Other noncurrent assets” or “Deferred credits” accounts in the
consolidated statement of financial position) with a corresponding credit (debit) to FCDA
revenues for the unrealized foreign exchange losses (gains) which have not been billed or which
will be refunded to the customers. The write-off of the deferred FCDA or reversal of deferred
credits pertaining to concession fees will be made upon determination of the new base foreign
exchange rate, which is assumed in the business plan approved by the RO during the latest Rate
Rebasing exercise, unless indication of impairment of deferred FCDA would be evident at an
earlier date.
Deferred FCDA and deferred credits are calculated as the difference between the drawdown or
rebased rate and the closing rate. These are presented as part of “Other noncurrent assets” and
“Deferred credits” accounts in the consolidated statement of financial position, respectively.
Customers’ Deposits
Customers’ deposits are initially measured at fair value. After initial recognition, these deposits
are subsequently measured at amortized cost using the effective interest method. Accretion of
customers’ deposits is included under “Interest expense and other financing charges” account in
the consolidated statement of income. The discount is recognized as deferred credits and
amortized over the remaining concession period using the effective interest method.
Amortization of deferred credits is included as part of “Other income” account in the consolidated
statement of income.
As at December 31, 2016 and 2015, the discount, shown as part of “Deferred credits” account in
the consolidated statements of financial position, amounted to =
P632.0 million and =
P583.6 million,
respectively.
*SGVFS023949*
- 18 -
Revenue Recognition
Revenue is recognized to the extent that it is probable that the economic benefits will flow to the
Company and the revenue can be reliably measured. Revenue is measured at the fair value of
consideration received or receivable, excluding discounts, rebates and value-added tax (VAT).
Water and sewerage are billed every month according to the bill cycles of the customers. As a
result of bill cycle cut-off, monthly service revenue earned but not yet billed at the end of the
month are estimated and accrued. These estimates are based on historical consumption of the
customers.
Revenue from water and sewerage services is recognized upon supply of water to the customers
and when the related services are rendered. Billings to customers consist of the following:
a. Water charges
ƒ Basic charges represent the basic tariff charged to consumers for the provision of water
services.
ƒ FCDA is the tariff mechanism that allows the Parent Company to recover foreign
exchange losses or to compensate foreign exchange gains on a current basis beginning
January 1, 2002 until the Expiration Date.
c. Sewerage charge represents 20% of the water charges, excluding maintenance service charge,
for all consumers connected to the Company’s sewer lines. Effective January 1, 2012,
pursuant to RO Resolution No. 11-007-CA, sewerage charge applies only to commercial and
industrial customers connected to sewer lines.
Interest income is recognized as the interest accrues, taking into account the effective yield on the
asset.
When the Company provides construction or upgrade services, the consideration received or
receivable is recognized at its fair value. The Company accounts for revenue and costs relating to
operation services based on the percentage of completion (shown as “Revenue from rehabilitation
works” and “Cost of rehabilitation works” accounts in the consolidated statement of income).
Leases
The determination of whether an arrangement is, or contains a lease, is based on the substance of
the arrangement at inception date, whether the fulfillment of the arrangement is dependent on the
use of a specific asset or assets or the arrangement conveys a right to use the asset.
*SGVFS023949*
- 19 -
A reassessment is made after the inception of the lease only if one of the following applies:
(a) There is a change in contractual terms, other than a renewal of or extension of the
arrangement;
(b) A renewal option is exercised or extension granted, unless the term of the renewal or
extension was initially included in the lease term;
(c) There is a change in the determination of whether fulfillment is dependent on a specified
asset; or
(d) There is a substantial change to the asset.
Where reassessment is made, lease accounting shall commence or cease from the date when the
change in circumstances gave rise to the reassessment scenarios (a), (c) or (d) and at the date of
renewal or extension period for scenario (b).
A lease where the lessor retains substantially all the risks and benefits of ownership of the asset is
classified as an operating lease.
Operating lease payments are recognized as expense in the consolidated statement of income on a
straight-line basis over the lease term.
Borrowing Costs
Borrowing costs are generally expensed as incurred. Borrowing costs are capitalized if they are
directly attributable to the acquisition or construction of a qualifying asset. To the extent that
funds are borrowed specifically for the purpose of obtaining a qualifying asset, the amount of
borrowing costs eligible for capitalization on that asset shall be determined as the actual
borrowing costs incurred on that borrowing during the period less any investment income on the
temporary investment of those borrowings. To the extent that funds are borrowed generally and
used for the purpose of obtaining a qualifying asset, the amount of borrowing costs eligible for
capitalization shall be determined by applying a capitalization rate to the expenditures on that
asset. The capitalization rate shall be the weighted average of the borrowing costs applicable to
the borrowings of the Company that are outstanding during the period, other than borrowings
made specifically for the purpose of obtaining a qualifying asset. The amount of borrowing costs
capitalized during a period shall not exceed the amount of borrowing costs incurred during that
period.
Capitalization of borrowing costs commences when the activities to prepare the asset are in
progress and expenditures and borrowing costs are being incurred. Capitalization of borrowing
costs ceases when all the activities necessary to prepare the asset for its intended use or sale are
substantially complete. If the resulting carrying amount of the asset exceeds its recoverable
amount, an impairment loss is recognized.
Equity
Capital stock is measured at par value for all shares issued. Incremental costs incurred directly
attributable to the issuance of new shares are shown in equity as a deduction from proceeds, net of
tax. Proceeds and fair value of consideration received in excess of par value are recognized as
additional paid-in capital.
Treasury shares, which represent own equity instruments that are reacquired, are recognized at
cost and deducted from equity. No gain or loss is recognized in the consolidated statement of
income on the purchase, sale, issuance or the cancellation of the Parent Company’s own equity
instruments.
*SGVFS023949*
- 20 -
Retained earnings represent the Company’s accumulated earnings, net of dividends declared.
ƒ when the VAT incurred on a purchase of assets or services is not recoverable from the tax
authority, in which case, the sales tax is recognized as part of the cost of acquisition of the
asset or as part of the expense item as applicable; and
ƒ receivables and payables that are stated with the amount of VAT included.
The net amount of current VAT recoverable from and payable to the tax authority is included as
part of “Other current assets” and “Trade and other payables” accounts in the consolidated
statement of financial position.
Income Taxes
Current Income Tax. Current tax assets and liabilities for the current and prior periods are
measured at the amount expected to be recovered from or paid to the taxation authority. The tax
rates and tax laws used to compute the amount are those that are enacted or substantively enacted
as at the financial reporting date.
Deferred Income Tax. Deferred income tax is provided, using the liability method, on all
temporary differences at the reporting date between the tax bases of assets and liabilities and their
carrying amounts for financial reporting purposes.
Deferred tax liabilities are recognized for all taxable temporary differences, except:
ƒ when the deferred tax liability arises from the initial recognition of goodwill or of an asset or
liability in a transaction that is not a business combination and, at the time of the transaction,
affects neither the accounting income nor taxable income or loss; and
ƒ with respect to taxable temporary differences associated with investments in subsidiaries,
associates and interests in joint ventures, when the timing of the reversal of the temporary
differences can be controlled and it is probable that the temporary differences will not reverse
in the foreseeable future.
Deferred tax assets are recognized for all deductible temporary differences, carryforward benefits
of unused tax credits from excess minimum corporate income tax (MCIT) over the regular
corporate income tax (RCIT) and unused tax losses from net operating loss carryover (NOLCO) to
the extent that it is probable that taxable income will be available against which the deductible
temporary differences and the carryforward benefits of MCIT and NOLCO can be utilized, except:
ƒ when the deferred tax asset relating to the deductible temporary difference arises from the
initial recognition of an asset or liability in a transaction that is not a business combination
and, at the time of the transaction, affects neither the accounting income nor taxable income or
loss; and
ƒ with respect to deductible temporary differences associated with investments in subsidiaries,
associates and interests in joint ventures, deferred tax assets are recognized only to the extent
that it is probable that the temporary differences will reverse in the foreseeable future and
taxable income will be available against which the temporary differences can be utilized.
The carrying amount of deferred tax assets is reviewed at each reporting date and reduced to the
extent that it is no longer probable that sufficient taxable profit will be available to allow all or
*SGVFS023949*
- 21 -
part of the deferred tax assets to be utilized. Unrecognized deferred tax assets are reassessed at
each reporting date and are recognized to the extent that it has become probable that future taxable
profit will allow all or part of the deferred tax assets to be recovered.
Deferred tax assets and deferred tax liabilities are measured at the tax rate that is expected to apply
to the period when the assets are realized or the liabilities are settled, based on the tax rates
(and tax laws) that have been enacted or substantively enacted as at the reporting date.
Deferred tax relating to items recognized directly in equity is recognized in equity and not in profit
or loss.
Deferred tax assets and deferred tax liabilities are offset only if a legally enforceable right exists to
offset current tax assets against current tax liabilities and the deferred taxes relate to the same
taxable entity and the same taxation authority.
Provisions
Provisions are recognized when the Company has a present obligation (legal or constructive) as a
result of a past event, it is probable that an outflow of resources embodying economic benefits will
be required to settle the obligations and a reliable estimate can be made of the amount of the
obligation. When the Company expects a provision to be reimbursed, such as under an insurance
contract, the reimbursement is recognized as a separate asset but only when the reimbursement is
virtually certain. The expense relating to any provision is presented in the consolidated statement
of income, net of any reimbursement. If the effect of the time value of money is material,
provisions are determined by discounting the expected future cash flows at a pre-tax rate that
reflects current market assessments of the time value of money and, where appropriate, the risks
specific to the liability. Where discounting is used, the increase in the provision due to the
passage of time is recognized as an interest expense.
Pension Cost
The Parent Company has a funded, noncontributory defined benefit plan. The cost of providing
benefits under the defined benefit plans is actuarially determined using the projected unit credit
method. This method reflects services rendered by employees to the date of valuation and
incorporates assumptions concerning employees’ projected salaries.
The net defined benefit liability or asset is the aggregate of the present value of the defined benefit
obligation at the end of the reporting period reduced by the fair value of plan assets (if any),
adjusted for any effect of limiting a net defined benefit asset to the asset ceiling. The asset ceiling
is the present value of any economic benefits available in the form of refunds from the plan or
reductions in future contributions to the plan.
Defined benefit costs comprise the following: (1) service cost; (2) net interest on the net defined
benefit liability or asset; and (3) remeasurements of net defined benefit liability or asset.
Service costs, which include current service costs, past service costs and gains or losses on non-
routine settlements, are recognized as part of “Salaries, wages and benefits” account in the
consolidated statement of income. Past service costs are recognized when plan amendment or
curtailment occurs. These amounts are calculated periodically by independent qualified actuaries.
Net interest on the net defined benefit liability or asset is the change during the period in the net
defined benefit liability or asset that arises from the passage of time, which is determined by
applying the discount rate based on government bonds to the net defined benefit liability or asset.
*SGVFS023949*
- 22 -
Net interest on the net defined benefit liability or asset is recognized as expense or income in
profit or loss.
Remeasurements comprising actuarial gains and losses, return on plan assets and any change in
the effect of the asset ceiling (excluding net interest on defined benefit liability) are recognized
immediately in other comprehensive income in the period in which they arise. Remeasurements
are not reclassified to profit or loss in subsequent periods.
Plan assets are assets that are held by a long-term employee benefit fund or qualifying insurance
policies. Plan assets are not available to the creditors of the Parent Company, nor can they be paid
directly to the Parent Company. Fair value of plan assets is based on market price information.
When no market price is available, the fair value of plan assets is estimated by discounting
expected future cash flows using a discount rate that reflects both the risk associated with the plan
assets and the maturity or expected disposal date of those assets (or, if they have no maturity,
the expected period until the settlement of the related obligations). If the fair value of the plan
assets is higher than the present value of the defined benefit obligation, the measurement of the
resulting defined benefit asset is limited to the present value of economic benefits available in the
form of refunds from the plan or reductions in future contributions to the plan.
The long-term employee benefit liability is determined based on the present value of the defined
benefit obligation (using discount rate based on government bonds) vested at the end of the
reporting period.
Share-based Payments
Employees of the Parent Company receive remuneration in the form of share-based payments,
whereby employees render services as consideration for equity instruments (equity-settled
transactions) under the Employee Stock Option Plan (ESOP).
The cost of equity-settled transactions is determined as the fair value at the date when the grant is
made using an appropriate valuation model. That cost is recognized, together with a
corresponding increase in other equity adjustments, over the period in which the performance
and/or service conditions are fulfilled, and is shown as part of “Salaries, wages and benefits”
account in the consolidated statement of income.
The cumulative expense recognized for equity-settled transactions at each reporting date until the
vesting date reflects the extent to which the vesting period has expired and the Parent Company’s
best estimate of the number of equity instruments that will ultimately vest.
No expense is recognized for awards that do not ultimately vest, except for equity-settled
transactions for which vesting is conditional upon a market or non-vesting condition. These are
treated as vesting irrespective of whether or not the market or non-vesting condition is satisfied,
provided that all other performance and/or service conditions are satisfied.
When the terms of an equity-settled award are modified, the minimum expense recognized is the
expense had the terms not been modified if the original terms of the award are met. An additional
*SGVFS023949*
- 23 -
expense is recognized for any modification that increases the total fair value of the share-based
payment transaction, or is otherwise beneficial to the employee as measured at the date of
modification.
Contingencies
Contingent liabilities are not recognized in the consolidated financial statements. They are
disclosed in the notes to consolidated financial statements unless the possibility of an outflow of
resources embodying economic benefits is remote. Contingent assets are not recognized in the
consolidated financial statements but are disclosed in the notes to consolidated financial
statements when an inflow of economic benefits is probable. Contingent assets are not recognized
unless virtually certain.
The preparation of the consolidated financial statements in accordance with PFRS requires the
Company to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities,
income and expenses and disclosure of contingent liabilities at the reporting date. In preparing the
Company’s consolidated financial statements, management has made its best estimates and
judgments of certain amounts, giving due consideration to materiality. The estimates and
assumptions used in the accompanying consolidated financial statements are based upon
management’s evaluation of relevant facts and circumstances as at the date of the consolidated
financial statements. Future events may occur which will cause the assumptions used in arriving
at the estimates to change. The effects of any change in estimates are reflected in the consolidated
financial statements as they become reasonably determinable.
Estimates and judgments are continually evaluated and are based on historical experience and
other factors, including expectations of future events that are believed to be reasonable under the
circumstances.
Judgments
In the process of applying the Company’s accounting policies, management has made the
following judgments, apart from those involving estimations, which have the most significant
effect on the amounts recognized in the consolidated financial statements:
Fourth Rate Rebasing. In September 2013, the MWSS released its resolutions on the rate rebasing
adjustment for the rebasing period 2013 to 2017 reducing Maynilad’s 2012 average all-in tariff.
Maynilad has formally notified its objection and filed its Dispute Notice before the Appeals Panel.
On January 5, 2015, Maynilad officially received the Appeals Panel’s award dated
December 29, 2014. Maynilad already wrote the Philippine Government, through the DOF, to call
*SGVFS023949*
- 24 -
on the Undertaking after the MWSS and RO’s delayed approval of the adjusted rates.
Maynilad had subsequently served a Notice of Arbitration and Statement of Claim upon the
Republic, through the DOF.
On May 14, 2015, the MWSS Board of Trustees in its Resolution No. 2015-060-RO approved a
net adjustment of 4.32% to be applied to the prevailing average basic charge of P =31.25 per cu.m.
as partial implementation of the Arbitral Award. As at December 31, 2016 and 2015, Maynilad’s
cumulative revenue losses due to the delayed implementation of the Arbitral Award are estimated
at =
P8.2 billion and =
P6.1 billion, respectively (see Note 1). The consolidated financial statements
do not include any adjustments that might result from the decision of the Arbitration Tribunal and
approval by the MWSS and RO.
Amortization of Service Concession Assets. The Parent Company accounts for its concession
arrangement with MWSS in accordance with IFRIC 12 under the Intangible Asset model as it
receives the right (license) to charge users of public service.
The Parent Company amortizes its service concession assets using UOP method, given that the
economic benefit of these assets are more closely aligned with billed volume, which the Parent
Company can already estimate reliably. Service concession assets, net of accumulated
amortization of P
=21.1 billion and P
=18.7 billion, amounted to =
P69.3 billion and P
=62.5 billion as at
December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively (see Note 7).
Disputes with MWSS. Pending resolution of the dispute between the Parent Company and MWSS
on certain claims of MWSS, the disputed amount of P =5.1 billion as at December 31, 2016 and
2015, is considered as contingent liability (see Notes 7, 12 and 19).
Contingencies. The Company is currently involved in various legal and administrative proceedings.
The Company’s estimate of the probable costs for the resolution of these claims has been developed
in consultation with outside legal counsel handling defense in these matters and is based upon an
analysis of potential results. The Company currently does not believe these proceedings will have a
material adverse effect on the Company’s financial position. It is possible, however, that future
results of operations could be materially affected by changes in the estimates or in the effectiveness of
strategies relating to these proceedings (see Notes 12 and 19).
Fair Value of Service Concession Payable. The determination of the cost of service concession
payable requires management to make estimates and assumptions to determine the extent to which
the Company receives a right or license to charge users of the public service. In making those
estimates, management is required to determine a suitable discount rate to calculate the present
value of these cash flows. While the Company believes that the assumptions used are reasonable
and appropriate, these estimates and assumptions can materially affect the consolidated financial
statements.
Estimated Billable Water Volume. The Parent Company estimated the billable water volume, where
the amortization of service concession assets is derived from, based on the period over which the
Parent Company’s concession agreement with MWSS is in force. The Parent Company reviews
annually the billable water volume based on factors that include market conditions such as population
growth and consumption, and the status of the Parent Company’s projects and their impact on non-
*SGVFS023949*
- 25 -
revenue water. It is possible that future results of operations could be materially affected by changes
in the Parent Company’s estimates brought about by changes in the aforementioned factors.
A reduction in the projected billable water volume would increase amortization and decrease
noncurrent assets.
Allowance for Doubtful Accounts. The Company estimates the allowance for doubtful accounts
related to the trade receivables based on two methods. The amounts calculated using each of these
methods are combined to determine the total amount of allowance. First, the Company evaluates
specific accounts that are considered individually significant for any objective evidence that certain
customers are unable to meet their financial obligations. In these cases, the Company uses judgment,
based on the best available facts and circumstances, including but not limited to, the length of its
relationship with the customer and the customer’s current credit status based on third party credit
reports and known market factors. The allowance provided is based on the difference between the
present value of the receivables that the Company expects to collect, discounted at the receivables’
original effective interest rate and the carrying amount of the receivable. This specific allowance is
re-evaluated and adjusted as additional information received affects the amounts estimated. Second,
if it is determined that no objective evidence of impairment exists for an individually assessed
receivable, the receivable is included in a group of receivables with similar credit risk characteristics
and is collectively assessed for impairment. The provision under collective assessment is based on
historical collection, write-off, experience and change in customer payment terms. Impairment
assessment is performed throughout the year.
The amount and timing of recorded expenses for any period would therefore differ based on the
judgments or estimates made. Reversal of provision for doubtful accounts amounted to
P
=76.9 million, P
=232.0 million and nil in 2016, 2015 and 2014, respectively, while provision for
doubtful accounts amounted to nil in 2016 and 2015 and P =0.4 million in 2014. An increase in
allowance for doubtful accounts would increase the Company’s recorded expenses and decrease
trade and other receivables. Trade and other receivables, net of allowance for doubtful accounts,
amounted to = P2.5 billion and P
=2.4 billion as at December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively
(see Note 5).
Determination of Impairment of AFS Financial Assets. The Company determines that AFS
financial assets are impaired when there has been a significant or prolonged decline in the fair
value below its cost or where other objective evidence of impairment exists. The Company
determines that a decline in fair value of greater than 20% of cost is considered to be a significant
decline and a decline for a period of more than 12 months is considered to be a prolonged
decline. This determination of what is significant or prolonged requires judgment. In making this
judgment, the Company evaluates, among other factors, the normal volatility in share price for
quoted equities. AFS financial assets are considered impaired when the Company believes that
future cash flows generated from the investment is expected to decline significantly. The
Company’s management makes significant estimates and assumptions on the future cash flows
expected and the appropriate discount rate to determine if impairment exists. Impairment may
also be appropriate when there is evidence of deterioration in the financial health of the investee,
industry and sector performance. Impairment losses recognized in profit or loss for an investment
in an equity instrument classified as AFS are not reversed through profit or loss. Subsequent
increases in the fair value after the impairment are recognized directly in other comprehensive
income.
*SGVFS023949*
- 26 -
Impairment loss on AFS financial assets recognized in 2014 amounted to P =100.2 million while
reversal of impairment loss amounted to P
=22.0 million in 2015 due to the improvement in future
cash flows. No additional impairment loss on AFS financial assets was recognized in 2016.
The carrying value of AFS financial assets is disclosed in Note 9.
Estimated Useful Lives of Property and Equipment. The useful life of each item of the Company’s
property and equipment is estimated based on the period over which the asset is expected to be
available for use. Such estimation is based on a collective assessment of practices of similar
businesses, internal technical evaluation and experience with similar assets. The estimated useful life
of each asset is reviewed periodically and updated if expectations differ from previous estimates due
to physical wear and tear, technical or commercial obsolescence and legal or other limits on the use of
the asset. It is possible, however, that future results of operations could be materially affected by
changes in the amounts and timing of recorded expenses brought about by changes in the factors
mentioned above. A reduction in the estimated useful life of any item of property and equipment
would increase the recorded depreciation expense and decrease property and equipment.
There was no change in estimated useful lives of property and equipment in 2016 and 2015.
Property and equipment, net of accumulated depreciation and amortization of P =1.9 billion and
P
=1.7 billion, amounted to P=1.3 billion and P
=0.8 billion as at December 31, 2016 and 2015,
respectively (see Note 8).
Recognition of Deferred Tax Assets and Liabilities. The carrying amount of deferred tax assets is
reviewed at each reporting date and reduced to the extent that it is no longer probable that
sufficient taxable profit will be available to allow all or part of the deferred tax assets to be
utilized. However, there is no assurance that sufficient taxable profit will be generated to allow all
or part of the deferred tax assets to be utilized.
Starting 2016, the Parent Company is no longer under income tax holiday (ITH) and elected to use
Optional Standard Deduction (OSD) in computing its taxable income (see Notes 15 and 20).
The Parent Company’s assessment is based on actual gross income in the current year that is at a level
where it is favorable to use OSD method. The Parent Company expects to continue to use OSD
method in computing its taxable income each year up to the end of the concession period except for
certain years when the Parent Company expects that it would be more favorable to use itemized
deduction method. Accordingly, deferred tax assets and liabilities which were previously valued in
2015 using the itemized deduction method are now valued based on the forecasted gross and taxable
income and expected method of deduction more beneficial to the Parent Company.
The Company did not recognize deferred tax assets on deductible temporary differences where doubt
exists as to the tax benefits they will bring in the future.
Deferred FCDA and Deferred Credits. Under Amendment No. 1 of the Concession Agreement,
the Parent Company is entitled to recover (refund) foreign exchange losses (gains) arising from
MWSS loans and any concessionaire loans. For the unrealized foreign exchange losses, the Parent
Company recognized deferred FCDA as an asset since this is a resource controlled by the
Company as a result of past events and from which future economic benefits are expected to flow
to the Parent Company. Unrealized foreign exchange gains, however, are presented as deferred
credits and will be refunded to the customers.
*SGVFS023949*
- 27 -
Pursuant to MWSS-RO Resolution No. 2014-099-RO, the new base foreign exchange rate was
changed from P
=48.04 to =
P41.19 effective January 1, 2015 (see Note 7).
Deferred FCDA representing the net effect of unrealized foreign exchange losses on service
concession obligation payable to MWSS, and restatement of foreign currency-denominated
interest-bearing loans and related interest that are recoverable from the customers amounted to
P
=764.0 million and =P279.1 million as at December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively.
Asset Impairment. The Company assesses impairment on assets whenever events or changes in
circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. The factors
that the Company considers important which could trigger an impairment review include the
following:
The Company recognizes an impairment loss whenever the carrying amount of an asset exceeds its
recoverable amount. The recoverable amount is computed using the value in use (VIU) approach.
Recoverable amounts are estimated for individual assets or, if it is not possible, for the cash-
generating unit to which the asset belongs. Determining the recoverable amount of assets requires the
estimation of cash flows expected to be generated from the continued use and ultimate disposition of
such assets. While it is believed that the assumptions used in the estimation of fair values reflected in
the consolidated financial statements are appropriate and reasonable, significant changes in these
assumptions may materially affect the assessment of recoverable amounts and any resulting
impairment loss could have a material adverse impact on the results of operations.
Noncurrent nonfinancial assets carried at cost and subjected to impairment test when certain
impairment indicators are present are as follows:
2016 2015
Service concession assets (see Note 7) P
=69,297,460 =62,488,321
P
Property and equipment (see Note 8) 1,254,339 833,821
Goodwill (see Note 2) 288,082 288,082
Total P
=70,839,881 =63,610,224
P
The goodwill arising from the acquisition of Phil Hydro represents the fair value of expected
incremental economic benefits that the Parent Company expects to obtain. The impairment test of
goodwill is based on VIU calculations that used the discounted cash flow model. The VIU was based
on the cash flow projections on the most recent financial budgets and forecast of Phil Hydro.
The length of the projections is up to 2035 based on the existing Bulk Water Supply Agreements and
Memorandum of Agreement. The discount rate applied was 10.3%, which was based on the
weighted average cost of capital. Based on the impairment test, the Parent Company did not identify
any impairment loss. As at December 31, 2016 and 2015, no impairment loss on goodwill was
recognized.
The Company performs its annual impairment test close to year-end, after finalizing the annual
financial budget and forecast. The impairment test of goodwill is based on VIU calculation that uses
the discounted cash flow model. Cash flow projections are based on most recent financial budget and
forecast. Discount rate applied is based on market weighted average cost of capital with estimated
*SGVFS023949*
- 28 -
premium over cost of equity. The key assumptions used to determine the recoverable amount are
discussed below.
Based on the impairment test performed, management did not identify impairment loss on goodwill.
Management also believes that no reasonably possible change in any of the key assumptions would
cause the carrying value to materially exceed the recoverable amount.
2016 2015
Revenue growth rate* 3.0% 2.0%
Average forecast period 19 years 20 years
Discount rate 10.3% 8.7%
*Average growth represents average of year-over-year growth over the terms of the Bulk Water Supply Agreements and
Memorandum of Agreement
The forecasted period is greater than five (5) years as management can reliably estimate the cash flow
for the entire duration of Phil Hydro’s concession period covered by the Bulk Water Supply
Agreements and Memorandum of Agreement.
Computation of Pension Cost and Other Post-employment Benefits. The cost of defined benefit
pension plans and other post-employment benefits as well as the present value of the pension
obligation are determined using actuarial valuations. The actuarial valuation involves making
various assumptions. These include the determination of the discount rate, turnover rate, mortality
rate and salary increase rate. Due to the complexity of the valuation, the underlying assumptions
and its long-term nature, defined benefit obligations are highly sensitive to changes in these
assumptions. All assumptions are reviewed at each reporting date.
In determining the appropriate discount rate, management considers the interest rates of government
bonds that are denominated in the currency in which the benefits will be paid, with extrapolated
maturities corresponding to the expected duration of the defined benefit obligation. Turnover rate is
based on a 3-year historical information of voluntary separation and resignation by plan members.
The mortality rate is based on publicly available mortality tables for the specific country and is
modified accordingly with estimates of mortality improvements. Future salary increases and pension
increases are based on expected future inflation rates for the specific country.
Pension cost (income) presented as part of “Salaries, wages and benefits” account in the
consolidated statements of income amounted to P =104.0 million, =
P93.4 million and
(P
=155.1 million) in 2016, 2015 and 2014, respectively. Pension liability amounted to
317.3 million and =
P416.2 million as at December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively (see Note 16).
Computation of Share-based Payment Transactions. The Company measures the cost of equity-
settled transactions with employees by reference to the fair value of the equity instruments at the
date at which they are granted. Estimating fair value for share-based payments requires
determining the most appropriate valuation model for a grant of equity instruments, which is
dependent on the terms and conditions of the grant. This estimate also requires determining the
most appropriate inputs to the valuation model including the expected life of the option, volatility,
discount rates and dividend yield and making assumptions about them. The assumptions and
models used for estimating fair value for share-based payments are disclosed in Note 13.
Equity-based compensation expense presented as part of “Salaries, wages and benefits” account in
consolidated statements of income amounted to nil in 2016 and 2014 and =
P146.1 million in 2015
(see Note 13).
*SGVFS023949*
- 29 -
Determination of Other Long-term Incentives Benefits. The LTIP for key executives of MPIC and
certain subsidiaries, including the Parent Company, was approved by the Executive Compensation
Committee and the BOD of MPIC which is based on profit targets for the covered Performance
Cycle.
In 2013, the Parent Company has approved an LTIP for its managers and executives which is also
based on profit targets for the covered Performance Cycle of 2013 to 2015. Payments were made
on March 18, 2016 amounting to P =369.0 million.
In 2016, a proposal for new LTIP covering Performance Cycle of 2016 to 2018 for its managers
and executives which is also based on profit targets was prepared for approval by the Parent
Company’s BOD. The final terms and conditions are still not approved by the BOD and is still
pending as at February 27, 2017.
The cost of LTIP is determined using the projected unit credit method based on prevailing
discount rates and profit targets. While management’s assumptions are believed to be reasonable
and appropriate, significant differences in actual results or changes in assumptions may materially
affect the Company’s other long-term incentive benefits.
2016 2015
Cash on hand and in banks P
=977,357 P982,791
=
Cash equivalents 4,047,397 2,110,221
P
=5,024,754 =3,093,012
P
Cash in banks earn interest at the respective bank deposit rates. Cash equivalents are made for
varying periods from one day to three months depending on the immediate cash requirements of the
Company and earn interest at the respective short-term deposit rates.
Interest income earned from cash in banks, cash equivalents and short-term investments, net of
applicable final tax, amounted to =
P119.9 million, P
=134.9 million and =
P81.3 million in 2016, 2015 and
2014, respectively.
*SGVFS023949*
- 30 -
2016 2015
Customers:
Residential P
=1,776,481 =1,908,889
P
Semi-business 271,113 241,700
Commercial 856,010 721,963
Industrial 226,938 155,901
Bulk water supply 56,777 42,362
3,187,319 3,070,815
Employees 45,897 39,899
Others 213,201 348,722
3,446,417 3,459,436
Less allowance for doubtful accounts 953,772 1,030,624
P
=2,492,645 =2,428,812
P
ƒ Residential – pertains to receivables arising from water and sewer service use for domestic
purposes only.
ƒ Semi-business – pertains to receivables arising from water and sewer service use for small
businesses.
ƒ Commercial – pertains to receivables arising from water and sewer service use for commercial
purposes.
ƒ Industrial – pertains to receivables arising from water and sewer service use for industrial
purposes, including services for manufacturing.
ƒ Bulk water supply – pertains to receivables arising from water service to water districts outside
the West Service Area.
Receivables from customers and bulk water supply are non-interest bearing and generally have
60-day term.
Other receivables consist mainly of receivables from collecting agents normally received within
30 days and advances for construction and installation of water reticulation systems for
subdivisions in the West Service Area payable on installment basis over a period of 3-5 years.
Portion of advances for water reticulation systems expected to be collected beyond one year
amounting to = P61.3 million and P
=144.6 million as at December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively,
is presented as part of “Other noncurrent assets” account in the consolidated statements of
financial position.
2016
Receivables from Customers Other
Residential Semi-business Commercial Industrial Receivables Total
At January 1 P=450,773 P
=120,234 P
=276,971 P
=106,076 P
=76,570 P
=1,030,624
Reversal during the year (36,292) (9,690) (22,321) (8,549) – (76,852)
At December 31 P=414,481 P
=110,544 P
=254,650 P
=97,527 P
=76,570 P
=953,772
*SGVFS023949*
- 31 -
2015
Receivables from Customers Other
Residential Semi-business Commercial Industrial Receivables Total
At January 1 P
=566,133 P
=149,377 P
=344,104 P
=131,787 P
=76,570 P
=1,267,971
Reversal during the year (109,991) (29,143) (67,133) (25,711) – (231,978)
Write-off (5,369) – – – – (5,369)
At December 31 P
=450,773 P
=120,234 P
=276,971 P
=106,076 P
=76,570 P
=1,030,624
2016 2015
Sinking fund (see Note 10) P
=1,777,626 =1,773,843
P
Advances to contractors 1,020,883 987,035
Input VAT 332,683 191,749
Deposits 150,549 140,250
Prepayments (see Note 22) 112,977 59,311
Others 76,049 64,564
P
=3,470,767 =3,216,752
P
Sinking fund represents the amount set aside to cover semi-annual principal and interest payment
of loans, and unutilized proceeds from the US$137.5 million loan drawdowns for the Metro
Manila Wastewater Management Project maintained in a designated bank account (see Note 10).
Advances to contractors are normally applied within a year against progress billings.
Input VAT is an indirect tax on the goods and services which the Company uses in its operations.
The Company recovers its input VAT by offsetting it against the output VAT. Management
believes that the amount of recorded input VAT is fully realizable in the future.
Prepayments mainly pertain to insurance, performance bond, and taxes (see Note 22).
2016 2015
Cost:
Balance at beginning of year P
=81,233,098 =73,633,419
P
Additions 9,153,108 8,232,006
Effect of change in rebased rate − (632,327)
Balance at end of year 90,386,206 81,233,098
Accumulated amortization:
Balance at beginning of year 18,744,777 16,707,093
Amortization 2,343,969 2,037,684
Balance at end of year 21,088,746 18,744,777
P
=69,297,460 =62,488,321
P
*SGVFS023949*
- 32 -
Service concession assets consist of the present value of total estimated concession fee payments
pursuant to the Concession Agreement and the costs of rehabilitation works incurred.
The aggregate Concession Fees pursuant to the Concession Agreement is equal to the sum of the
following:
a. 90% of the aggregate peso equivalent due under any MWSS loan which has been disbursed
prior to the Commencement Date, including MWSS loans for existing projects and the raw
water conveyance component of the Umiray-Angat Transbasin Project (UATP), on the
relevant payment date set forth on the pertinent schedule of the Concession Agreement;
b. 90% of the aggregate peso equivalent due under any MWSS loan designated for the UATP
which has not been disbursed prior to the Commencement Date on the relevant payment date
set forth on the pertinent schedule of the Concession Agreement;
c. 90% of the local component costs and cost overruns related to the UATP in accordance with
the pertinent schedule of the Concession Agreement;
d. 100% of the aggregate peso equivalent due under any MWSS loan designated for existing
projects, which have not been disbursed prior to the Commencement Date and have been
either awarded to third party bidders or been elected by the Parent Company for continuation
in accordance with the pertinent sections of the Concession Agreement;
e. 100% of the local component costs and cost overruns related to the existing projects in
accordance with relevant schedule of the Concession Agreement; and
f. Maintenance and operating expenditure (MOE) representing one-half of the annual budget for
MWSS for that year, provided that such annual budget shall not exceed =
P200.0 million
(as at 1997), subject to annual CPI adjustment (see Note 22).
Service concession assets also include Tranche B Concession Fees, which pertain to additional
concession fees charged by MWSS to the Parent Company representing the cost of borrowings by
MWSS as at December 2004. In 2005, pursuant to the Debt and Capital Restructuring Agreement
(DCRA), the Parent Company had recognized and fully paid Tranche B Concession Fees
amounting to US$36.9 million and the related accrued interest thereon (see Note 12).
Pursuant to the recommendation of the Receiver under the DCRA, the disputed amount being
claimed by MWSS of additional Tranche B Concession Fees of US$18.1 million is considered as
contingent liability of the Parent Company, as discussed in Note 19.
The Parent Company recognized additional concession fees amounting to P =188.4 million and
P
=503.5 million in 2016 and 2015, respectively, mainly pertaining to various rehabilitation projects
and UATP-related local component costs (see Note 12).
Specific borrowing costs capitalized as part of service concession assets amounted to
P
=198.8 million and =
P99.4 million in 2016 and 2015, respectively (see Note 10).
On March 11, 2015, the MWSS Board of Trustees approved and confirmed the recommendation
of the MWSS-RO to set aside the status quo of the FCDA and resume its normal operation starting
first quarter of 2015. Under MWSS-RO Resolution No. 2014-002-CA, the MWSS-RO approved
an FCDA equivalent to 1.12% of the 2015 basic charge of =
P33.97 per cu.m. or P
=0.38 per cu.m.,
effective January 1, 2015. The said FCDA adjustment was determined using the new rebased rate
of P
=41.19 approved by the MWSS-RO, applicable to concession fee payments starting
January 1, 2013.
*SGVFS023949*
- 33 -
2016
Instrumentation, Office
Land Tools and Furniture,
and Land Other Fixtures and Transportation
Improvements Equipment Equipment Equipment Total
Cost
At January 1 P
= 41,275 P
= 1,290,735 P
= 887,574 P
= 297,180 P
= 2,516,764
Additions 5,180 253,075 189,936 266,767 714,958
Disposals − (10,804) (406) (58,304) (69,514)
At December 31 46,455 1,533,006 1,077,104 505,643 3,162,208
Accumulated Depreciation
and Amortization
At January 1 3,623 793,353 701,707 184,260 1,682,943
Depreciation and amortization 705 120,668 112,558 57,560 291,491
Disposals − (10,804) (390) (55,371) (66,565)
At December 31 4,328 903,217 813,875 186,449 1,907,869
Net Book Value at December 31 P
= 42,127 P
= 629,789 P
= 263,229 P
= 319,194 P
= 1,254,339
2015
Instrumentation, Office
Land Tools and Furniture,
and Land Other Fixtures and Transportation
Improvements Equipment Equipment Equipment Total
Cost
At January 1 P
=41,275 P
=1,177,403 P
=773,756 P
=259,111 P
=2,251,545
Additions – 114,659 124,858 46,800 286,317
Disposals – (1,327) (11,040) (8,731) (21,098)
At December 31 41,275 1,290,735 887,574 297,180 2,516,764
Accumulated Depreciation
and Amortization
At January 1 2,876 677,662 606,032 155,257 1,441,827
Depreciation and amortization 747 117,018 106,677 35,732 260,174
Disposals – (1,327) (11,002) (6,729) (19,058)
At December 31 3,623 793,353 701,707 184,260 1,682,943
Net Book Value at December 31 P
=37,652 P
=497,382 P
=185,867 P
=112,920 P
=833,821
Net gain on disposals of property and equipment amounting to P =13.3 million, =P0.2 million and
=
P3.1 million in 2016, 2015 and 2014, respectively, is presented as part of “Others - net” account
under “Other income (expenses)” in the consolidated statements of income. The company sold
items of property and equipment for a total consideration of P
=16.2 million, =
P2.3 million and =P11.1
million in 2016, 2015 and 2014, respectively.
No property and equipment as at December 31, 2016 and 2015 have been pledged as security or
collateral.
The Company’s AFS financial assets consists of its 10% ownership investment in the unquoted
equity shares of Subic Water and Sewerage Co., Inc. The carrying amount of the AFS Financial
asset, net of allowance for impairment loss of =
P88.7 million, amounted to =
P132.4 million as at
December 31, 2016 and 2015.
*SGVFS023949*
- 34 -
Dividend income on AFS financial assets presented as part of “Others – net” account under “Other
income (expenses)” in the consolidated statements of income amounted to P=10.0 million,
P
=14.5 million and nil in 2016, 2015 and 2014, respectively.
2016 2015
P21.2 billion Term Loan
= P
=15,229,475 =16,921,639
P
=5.0 billion Corporate Notes
P 4,950,000 5,000,000
US$137.5 million Loan 3,357,711 2,016,649
=5.2 billion Corporate Notes
P 3,000,000 1,000,000
Peso-denominated Bank Loan 255,000 255,000
26,792,186 25,193,288
Less unamortized debt issuance costs 104,330 113,949
26,687,856 25,079,339
Less current portion 1,808,101 1,742,164
P
=24,879,755 =23,337,175
P
P
=21.2 billion Term Loan
On March 22, 2013, the Parent Company entered into several loan agreements for the refinancing
of all of its existing loans under the 2008 and 2011 Omnibus Notes Facility and Security
Agreements (ONFSA) (collectively referred to as “Corporate Notes”), whereby the Parent
Company was granted a Term Loan Facility (the “Term Loan”) in the aggregate amount of
=
P21.2 billion. Under the new terms, the loans shall be payable in semi-annual installments within
ten years to commence at the end of the 6th month after the initial issue date and bears an interest
rate per annum equal to the higher of (i) the applicable benchmark rate plus 0.75% per annum, or
(ii) 5.75% per annum. The benchmark rate shall be determined by reference to the PDST-F rate.
The Term Loan is secured by a negative pledge. The change in the terms of the loan contracts was
assessed as substantial modification of the Corporate Notes and thus, resulted to derecognition of
the old loan and recognition of new financial liability.
P
=5.0 billion Corporate Notes
On April 29, 2013, the Parent Company entered into a Loan Agreement (Corporate Notes) with a
local bank. The loan shall be payable in semi-annual installments within ten years to commence at
the end of the 42nd month, and bears a fixed rate per annum equal to the higher of (i) the
applicable benchmark rate plus 0.75% per annum, or (ii) 5.75% per annum. The benchmark rate
shall be determined by reference to the PDST-F rate. The P=5.0 billion Corporate Notes is secured
by a negative pledge.
Debt Issuance Costs. All legal and professional fees incurred in relation to the debt totaling
=
P42.8 million were capitalized in 2013. Debt issuance costs are amortized using the effective
interest method. Amortization of debt issuance costs attributed to this loan amounting to
=
P4.0 million, =P3.9 million and =
P3.6 million in 2016, 2015 and 2014, respectively, is presented as
part of “Interest expense and other financing charges” account in the consolidated statements of
income (see Note 17).
*SGVFS023949*
- 35 -
The WB and the LBP signed the Loan Agreement on May 31, 2012 while the Subsidiary Loan
Agreement between LBP and Maynilad was executed on October 25, 2012.
The loan shall be payable in semi-annual installments within 25 years, inclusive of seven years
grace period. The interest shall be paid semi-annually based on the same rate of interest payable
by LBP under the WB Loan Agreement, plus fixed spread of 1.25% per annum. The loan is
secured by a negative pledge.
2016 2015
Balance at beginning of year US$6,222 US$4,862
Amount received during the year 24,680 28,029
Net amount 30,902 32,891
Expenditures during the year (26,343) (26,669)
Balance at end of year US$4,559 US$6,222
The proceeds of the World Bank loan have been expended in accordance with the intended
purposes as specified in the Loan Agreement.
Debt Issuance Costs. All legal and professional fees incurred in relation to the debt totaling
P
=42.8 million were capitalized in 2013. Debt issuance costs are amortized using the effective
interest method. Amortization of debt issuance costs attributed to this loan amounting to
*SGVFS023949*
- 36 -
=
P2.6 million, =P2.5 million and =
P3.0 million in 2016, 2015 and 2014, respectively, is presented as
part of “Interest expense and other financing charges” account in the consolidated statements of
income (see Note 17).
P
=5.2 billion Corporate Notes
On February 24, 2014, the Parent Company entered into a Loan Agreement (Corporate Notes)
with the Development Bank of the Philippines. The loan proceeds shall be used to finance the
first stage of the Parañaque-Las Piñas STP and associated wastewater conveyance system.
The loan shall be payable in semi-annual payments within fifteen years to commence at the end of
the fifth year, which bears a fixed rate per annum equal to 6.0%. The first and second drawdowns
amounting to P =1.0 billion and =
P2.0 billion were made on March 2, 2015 and October 4, 2016,
respectively. Undrawn amount from this facility amounting to = P2.2 billion as at
December 31, 2016 is available until February 2017. On January 17, 2017, Maynilad proposed to
amend further the schedule of borrowing under the Loan Agreement as follows: (i) the third
borrowing date be rescheduled (August 1, 2017), (ii) a fourth borrowing date be added in the
schedule of borrowing (March 5, 2018), and (iii) the total borrowing be reduced to P=4.8 billion.
The = P5.2 Billion Corporate Notes is secured by a negative pledge. Amendment is not yet
approved as at February 27, 2017.
Debt Issuance Costs. All legal and professional fees incurred in relation to the debt totaling
P
=46.1 million were capitalized in 2015. Debt issuance costs are amortized using the effective
interest method. Amortization of debt issuance costs attributed to this loan amounting to
=
P2.8 million and =
P2.2 million in 2016 and 2015, respectively, is presented as part of “Interest
expense and other financing charges” account in the consolidated statements of income
(see Note 17).
Covenants. The loan agreements contain, among others, covenants regarding the maintenance of
certain financial ratios such as debt-to-equity ratio and debt service coverage ratio, and
maintenance of debt service reserve account (see Note 6). As at December 31, 2016 and 2015,
the Parent Company has complied with these covenants.
Under the terms of the loan agreements, the Parent Company may, at its option and without
premium and penalty, redeem the Corporate Notes in whole or in part, subject to the conditions
stipulated in the agreements. The embedded early redemption and prepayment options are clearly
and closely related to the host debt contract, and thus, do not require to be bifurcated and
accounted for separately from the host contract.
*SGVFS023949*
- 37 -
Debt Issuance Costs. All legal and professional fees incurred in relation to the debt totaling
P
=1.3 million were capitalized in 2015. Debt issuance costs are amortized using the effective
interest method. Amortization of debt issuance costs attributed to this loan amounting to
=
P0.2 million and =
P0.1 million in 2016 and 2015, respectively, is presented as part of “Interest
expense and other financing charges” account in the consolidated statements of income
(see Note 17).
Covenants. The loan agreement contains, among others, covenants regarding the maintenance of
certain financial ratios such as debt-to-equity ratio and debt service coverage ratio. As at
December 31, 2016 and 2015, Phil Hydro has complied with these covenants.
The movements in the balance of unamortized debt issuance costs related to all interest-bearing
loans are as follows:
2016 2015
Balance at beginning of year P
=113,949 =75,293
P
Additions during the year − 47,326
Amortization during the year (see Note 17) (9,619) (8,670)
P
=104,330 =113,949
P
In Original Currency
US Dollar- Total Peso
Year denominated* Peso Loans Equivalent*
(In Millions)
2017 $− =1,808.1
P =1,808.1
P
2018 − 1,824.0 1,824.0
2019 1.9 1,824.0 1,917.4
2020 3.7 1,924.0 2,110.7
2021 onwards 61.9 16,054.4 19,132.0
$67.5 =23,434.5
P =26,792.2
P
*Translated using the December 31, 2016 exchange rate of P
=49.72: US$1.
2016 2015
Accrued expenses (see Note 16) P
=5,586,916 =6,134,784
P
Trade payables 2,576,222 2,304,384
Accrued construction costs (see Note 14) 2,727,871 2,886,154
Due to a related party (see Note 14) 1,900 1,900
P
=10,892,909 =11,327,222
P
Accrued expenses mainly consist of provisions, salaries, wages and benefits, contracted services
and interest payable to the banks. Details of provisions required by PAS 37, Provisions,
Contingent Liabilities and Contingent Assets, are not disclosed as these may prejudice the
Company’s positions in relation to the cases pending before the courts or quasi-judicial bodies.
Trade and other payables are non-interest bearing and are normally settled within one year.
*SGVFS023949*
- 38 -
Trade payables include liabilities relating to assets held in trust (see Note 23) used in the
Company’s operations amounting to P =97.3 million each as at December 31, 2016 and 2015.
Accrued construction costs represents unbilled construction costs from contractors and normally
settled upon receipt of billings.
2016 2015
Concession fees payable (see Note 7) P
=7,221,892 =7,487,645
P
Accrued interest 607,217 607,217
7,829,109 8,094,862
Less current portion 1,328,978 1,357,705
P
=6,500,131 =6,737,157
P
The Parent Company reconciled its liability to MWSS with the confirmation and billings of
MWSS. The difference between the amount confirmed by MWSS and the amount recognized by
the Parent Company amounted to P =5.1 billion as at December 31, 2016 and 2015. The difference
mainly pertains to disputed claims of MWSS consisting of additional Tranche B Concession Fees
(see Note 7), borrowing cost and interest penalty under the Concession Agreement (prior to the
DCRA). The Parent Company’s position on these charges is consistent with the Receiver’s
recommendation which was upheld by the Rehabilitation Court (see Notes 7 and 19).
Following the issuance of the Rehabilitation Court’s Order on December 19, 2007 disallowing the
MWSS’ disputed claims and the termination of the Parent Company’s rehabilitation proceedings,
the Parent Company and MWSS sought to resolve the matter in accordance with the dispute
resolution requirements of the transitional and clarificatory agreement (TCA).
Prior to the DCRA, the Parent Company has accrued interest on its payable to MWSS based on
the terms of the Concession Agreement, which was disputed by the Parent Company before the
Rehabilitation Court. These already amounted to P =985.3 million as at December 31, 2011 and
have been charged to interest expense in prior years. The Parent Company maintains that the
accrued interest on its payable to MWSS has been adequately replaced by the Tranche B
Concession Fees discussed above. The Parent Company’s position is consistent with the
Receiver’s recommendation which was upheld by the Rehabilitation Court (see Notes 7 and 19).
With the prescription of the TCA and in light of the Parent Company’s current negotiation and
outstanding offer of US$14.0 million to fully settle the claim of MWSS, the Parent Company
reversed the amount of accrued interest in excess of the US$14.0 million settlement offer
amounting to P=378.1 million and charged to other income in 2012. The remaining balance of
*SGVFS023949*
- 39 -
P
=607.2 million as at December 31, 2016 and 2015, which pertains to the disputed interest penalty
under the Concession Agreement prior to DCRA, has remained in the books pending resolution of
the remaining disputed claims of MWSS.
The schedule of undiscounted estimated future concession fee payments, based on the term of the
Concession Agreement, is as follows:
In Original Currency
Foreign Peso Loans/
Currency Loans Project Local Total Peso
Year (Translated to US$)* Support Equivalent*
(In Millions)
2017 $14.3 =561.9
P =1,270.7
P
2018 14.2 543.1 1,250.8
2019 14.2 543.1 1,251.5
2020 13.8 543.2 1,228.2
2021-2037 45.1 9,219.2 11,459.7
$ 101.6 =11,410.5
P =16,460.9
P
*Translated using the December 31, 2016 exchange rate of P
=49.72: US$1.
Additional concession fee liability relating to the extension of the Concession Agreement
(see Note 1) is only determinable upon loan drawdown of MWSS and the actual construction of
the related concession projects.
13. Equity
a. The Parent Company’s authorized and issued shares as at December 31, 2016 and 2015 are
presented below:
Number of Shares
2016 2015
Authorized and issued - =
P1,000 par value
Common shares
Class A 4,222,482 4,222,482
Class B 236,000 236,000
ESOP 88,500 88,500
4,546,982 4,546,982
Class A shares, comprising sixty percent (60%) of the authorized common shares, may only
be subscribed by Filipino citizens or corporations or associations organized under the laws of
the Philippines with at least sixty percent (60%) of the capital owned by Filipino citizens.
Class B shares, comprising forty percent (40%) of the authorized common shares, may be
subscribed by, transferred to and owned by either Filipino citizens or by aliens.
b. ESOP
The employees of the Parent Company are allowed equity participation of up to six percent
(6%) of the issued and outstanding capital stock of the Parent Company upon the effective
date of the increase in authorized capital stock of the Parent Company pursuant to and in
accordance with the provisions of Clause 2.6 of the DCRA. For this purpose, a series of
*SGVFS023949*
- 40 -
88,500,000 nonvoting convertible redeemable shares (ESOP Shares) was created from
common Class A shares as reflected in the Parent Company’s amended Articles of
Incorporation. In 2008, the ESOP shares were effectively reduced to 88,500 shares due to
change in par value from =P1 to P
=1,000. The ESOP shares have no voting rights, except for
those provided under Section 6 of the Corporation Code and have no pre-emptive rights to
purchase or subscribe to future or additional issuances or disposition of shares of the Parent
Company.
Within thirty (30) days after the earlier of (i) the end of the fifth year from the creation of the
ESOP Shares, and (ii) the listing date for common shares in a recognized Philippine Stock
Exchange, the Parent Company may redeem the ESOP shares at a redemption ratio equal to
one common share for every ESOP share held and such common shares so exchanged shall
have the same rights and privileges as all other common shares.
Each ESOP Share will be convertible, at the option of the holder thereof, at any time during
the period commencing the earlier of (i) the end of the fifth year from the creation of the
ESOP Shares; or (ii) the listing date for common shares in a recognized Philippine Stock
Exchange into one fully-paid and non-assessable common share. Such common share shall
have the same rights and privileges as all other common shares. Conversion of the ESOP
Share may be effected by surrendering the certificates representing such shares to be
converted to the Parent Company common shares at the Parent Company’s principal office or
at such other office or offices as the BOD may designate, and a duly signed and completed
notice of conversion in such form as may from time to time be specified by the Parent
Company (a “Conversion Notice”), together with such evidence as the Parent Company may
reasonably require to prove the title of the person exercising such right. A Conversion Notice
once given may not be withdrawn without the consent in writing of the Parent Company.
In 2012, the Board and shareholders of the Parent Company approved the amendment of its
Articles of Incorporation to allow for the reissuance of ESOP shares that have been bought
back by the Parent Company from separated employees. Upon approval by the SEC of the
amendment on January 31, 2013, ESOP shares reacquired by the Parent Company from its
resigned employees were subsequently reissued to all qualified employees.
In 2014, ESOP shares reacquired by the Company from employees who availed of the Special
Opportunity Program (SOP) amounting to = P94.4 million were presented as part of “Treasury
shares” account shown under the equity section of the consolidated statements of financial
position.
ESOP shares reacquired by the Parent Company from its resigned employees amounting to
P
=32.7 million and =
P6.1 million in 2016 and 2015, respectively, were presented as treasury
shares.
c. Dividends
On February 24, 2014, during the regular meeting, the Parent Company’s BOD set and
approved the declaration of cash dividends of = P220.01 per common share amounting to
=
P1.0 billion to all shareholders of record as at February 24, 2014. Payments were made in
tranches from April 2, 2014 to June 25, 2014.
On February 23, 2015, during the regular meeting, the Parent Company’s BOD set and
approved the declaration of cash dividends of =
P442.09 per common share amounting to
*SGVFS023949*
- 41 -
P
=2.0 billion to all shareholders of record as at March 1, 2015. Payments were made on
March 17, 2015.
On January 25, 2016, during the regular meeting, the Parent Company’s BOD set and
approved the declaration of cash dividends of = P440.17 per common share amounting to
P
=2.0 billion to all shareholders of record as at February 9, 2016. Payments were made on
March 4, 2016.
On February 23, 2015, the Parent Company’s BOD approved the appropriation of its retained
earnings amounting to =
P3.5 billion for various water and sewerage projects expected to be
implemented in the next two years.
In 2016, the Parent Company reversed the appropriated retained earnings in 2013 amounting
to =
P4.0 billion. On February 27, 2017, the Parent Company’s BOD approved the
appropriation of its retained earnings amounting to P
=5.0 billion for various water and
sewerage projects expected to be implemented in the next two years and P =3.0 billion for cash
dividends.
e. Equity Adjustments
The Parent Company issued and redeemed preferred shares in 2008. Foreign exchange
fluctuation from date of issuance of the preferred shares to the date of issuance of notice of
redemption, amounting to P =351.0 million, is recognized as part of “Other equity adjustments”
account shown under the equity section of the consolidated statements of financial position.
On June 24, 2007, the shareholders of MPIC approved a share option scheme (the Plan) under
which MPIC’s directors may, at their discretion, invite executives of MPIC upon the
regularization of employment of eligible executives, to take up share option of MPIC to obtain
an ownership interest in MPIC and for the purpose of long-term employment motivation.
The scheme became effective on June 14, 2007 and is valid for 10 years. An amended plan
was approved by the stockholders on February 20, 2009.
As amended, the overall limit on the number of shares that may be issued upon exercise of all
options to be granted and yet to be exercised under the Plan must not exceed 5.0% of the
shares in issue from time to time.
The exercise price in relation to each option shall be determined by the Parent Company’s
Compensation Committee, but shall not be lower than the highest of: (i) the closing price of
the shares for one or more board lots of such shares on the PSE on the option offer date;
(ii) the average closing price of the shares for one or more board lots of such shares on the
PSE for the five business days on which dealings in the shares are made immediately
preceding the option offer date; and (iii) the par value of the shares.
MPIC allocated and set aside stock options relating to an additional 145,000,000 common
shares, of which, (a) 94,300,000 common shares were granted to its new directors and senior
management officers, as well as members of the management committee of certain MPIC
subsidiaries (includes 15,200,000 common shares granted to officers of the Parent Company)
*SGVFS023949*
- 42 -
On March 8, 2011, 1,000,000 common shares were granted at the exercise price of P
=3.53 to
senior management of the Parent Company.
The weighted average remaining term to expiry for the share options outstanding for the third
grant is nil and 0.1 year as at December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively.
The fair value of the options granted is estimated at the date of grant using Black-Scholes-
Merton formula, taking into account the terms and conditions upon which the options were
granted. The following tables list the inputs to the model used for the ESOP:
Grant dated July 2, 2010
30.0% 35.0% 35.0%
vesting on vesting on vesting on
July 2, 2011 July 2, 2012 July 2, 2013
Spot price =2.65
P =2.65
P =2.65
P
Exercise price =2.73
P =2.73
P =2.73
P
Risk-free rate 4.61% 5.21% 5.67%
Expected volatility* 69.27% 67.52% 76.60%
Term to vesting (in days) 365 731 1,096
Call price =0.73
P =1.03
P =1.39
P
Starting in 2012, no additional stock option activity was received from MPIC.
*SGVFS023949*
- 43 -
On November 23, 2015, the BOD approved the awarding of 23,777 ESOP shares to all
qualified Maynilad employees to be paid through stock purchase bonus (equity-settled
transaction). The ESOP covers employees who have met the following eligibility criteria:
a. The employee has completed a full year’s service, from November 2, 2014 to
November 1, 2015 (the “Period”);
b. The employee has obtained at least a satisfactory performance rating for the appraisal
period immediately preceding November 1, 2015;
c. The employee has not been suspended at any time during the Period;
d. The employee has not exceeded 10 days of absences without official leave during the
Period; and
e. The employee has not exceeded 20 days of leave without pay during the Period.
The fair value of ESOP shares amounting to P=6,143.22 per share was determined based on the
Parent Company’s equity value at the date of grant using the discounted cash flows (DCF)
method.
The grant of shares under the ESOP does not require an exercise price to be paid by the
employees nor are there cash alternatives. All ESOP shares will be held in treasury until
issuance. On February 9, 2016, the ESOP shares were issued to qualified employees.
Carrying value of the ESOP recognized under “Other equity adjustments” in the equity section
of the consolidated statements of financial position amounted to P
=41.8 million and
P
=187.9 million as at December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively.
Parties are considered to be related if one party has the ability to control, directly or indirectly,
the other party or exercise influence over the other party in making financial and operating
decisions. Parties are considered to be related if they are subject to common control or common
significant influence.
Amount/ Outstanding
Volume of Receivable
Category Year Transactions (Payable) Terms Conditions
Subsidiary of a significant influence investor
DM Consunji, Inc.
Revenue from water and sewer services 2016 =
P17.9 million P
= 1.1 million Noninterest-bearing, Unsecured,
2015 15.2 million 1.6 million settlement in cash and not
payable on demand impaired
Construction costs (see Note 11) 2016 2.9 billion (102.4 million) Noninterest-bearing, Unsecured
2015 952.0 million 284.6 million settlement in cash and
payable on demand
Significant influence investees of FPC
Manila Electric Company
Revenue from water and sewer services 2016 4.7 million 1.0 million Noninterest-bearing, Unsecured,
2015 6.0 million 1.0 million settlement in cash and not
payable on demand impaired
*SGVFS023949*
- 44 -
Amount/ Outstanding
Volume of Receivable
Category Year Transactions (Payable) Terms Conditions
Electricity costs 2016 P
= 820.4 million (P
= 29.9 million) Noninterest-bearing, Unsecured
2015 776.8 million (29.6 million) settlement in cash and
payable on demand
Indra Philippines, Inc.
Commercial outsourcing of 2016 247.6 million (39.1 thousand) Noninterest-bearing, Unsecured
information technology and system 2015 170.8 million (26.0 thousand) settlement in cash and
services payable on demand
Total compensation and benefits of key management personnel of the Company consist of:
*SGVFS023949*
- 45 -
Provision for current income tax represents the total of RCIT for both Parent Company and Phil
Hydro in 2016 and 2014, and the combination of RCIT for the Parent Company and MCIT for
Phil Hydro in 2015. Prior to 2016, RCIT for the Parent Company is computed only for
miscellaneous income not covered by ITH (see Note 20).
The components of the net deferred tax assets of the Company as at December 31, 2016 and 2015
shown in the consolidated statements of financial position are as follows:
2016 2015
Deferred tax assets:
Accrued expenses P
=453,214 =836,519
P
Service concession assets - net 499,633 1,031,947
Pension liability and unamortized past service
cost 43,990 117,656
Unamortized debt issuance costs 31,318 119,280
Allowance for inventory obsolescence 6,885 19,049
Unearned revenue − 16,754
Allowance for doubtful accounts − 428
1,035,040 2,141,633
Deferred tax liabilities -
Unrealized foreign exchange gain (2,846) (2,059)
Deferred tax assets - net P
=1,032,194 =2,139,574
P
The components of the net deferred tax liabilities of the Phil Hydro as at December 31, 2016
shown in the consolidated statement of financial position are as follows:
2016
Deferred tax assets:
Unearned revenue =16,129
P
Accrued expenses 2,331
Pension liability and unamortized past service
cost 142
18,602
Deferred tax liabilities:
Service concession assets - net 47,189
Unamortized debt issuance costs 298
47,487
Deferred tax liabilities - net =28,885
P
In 2015, the Parent Company has the following deductible temporary differences for which no
deferred tax assets have been recognized since management believes that it is not probable that
these will be realized in the near future:
2015
Impairment loss on AFS financial assets =78,197
P
Pension liability and unamortized past service cost 40,953
Share-based payment 40,199
=159,349
P
*SGVFS023949*
- 46 -
Service concession assets consist of concession fees and property, plant and equipment.
For income tax purposes, concession fees are amortized using UOP method while property, plant
and equipment are depreciated on a straight-line basis over the estimated useful lives or remaining
concession period, whichever is shorter.
The reconciliation of provision for income tax computed at the statutory income tax rate to
provision for (benefit from) income tax as shown in the consolidated statements of income is
summarized as follows:
LTIP
In 2013, the Parent Company approved an LTIP for its managers and executives which is based on
profit targets for the covered Performance Cycle.
Pension Plan
Maynilad
The Parent Company has a funded, noncontributory and actuarially computed pension plan
covering all regular and permanent employees. The benefits are based on years of service and
compensation during the last year of employment.
In line with its strategic goal to improve operational efficiency, the Parent Company offered a
Redundancy and Right-Sizing Program in 2014. The redundancy program offered a separation
package based on the number of years, or fractions thereof, on a pro-rated basis, of service with
*SGVFS023949*
- 47 -
the Company plus monetary equivalent of some benefits. This resulted to a curtailment gain of
=
P257.3 million.
Present value of
defined benefit Fair value of Pension
obligation plan assets liability
At December 31, 2015 =1,020,456
P =604,880
P =415,576
P
Pension cost in the consolidated
statement of income:
Current service cost 88,530 – 88,530
Net interest cost 48,495 32,976 15,519
137,025 32,976 104,049
Benefits paid (17,735) (17,735) –
(192,000
Actual contributions – 192,000 )
Remeasurements in other comprehensive
income:
Interest income (excluding amount
included in net interest) – (15,003) 15,003
Actuarial changes due to experience
adjustment 25,517 – 25,517
Actuarial changes arising from changes
in demographic assumptions (2,252) – (2,252)
Actuarial changes arising from changes
in financial assumptions (48,981) – (48,981)
(25,716) (15,003) (10,713)
At December 31, 2016 =1,114,030
P =797,118
P =316,912
P
Present value
of defined
benefit Fair value of Pension
obligation plan assets liability
At January 1, 2015 =893,364
P =612,327
P =281,037
P
Pension cost in the consolidated statement of
income:
Current service cost 81,136 – 81,136
Net interest cost 39,576 27,126 12,450
120,712 27,126 93,586
Benefits paid (16,653) (16,653) –
Remeasurements in other comprehensive
income:
Interest income (excluding amount
included in net interest) – (17,920) 17,920
Actuarial changes due to experience
adjustment 64,226 – 64,226
Actuarial changes arising from changes
in financial assumptions (41,193) – (41,193)
23,033 (17,920) 40,953
At December 31, 2015 =1,020,456
P =604,880
P =415,576
P
*SGVFS023949*
- 48 -
The components of pension cost (income) included under “Salaries, wages and benefits” account in
the consolidated statements of income for 2016, 2015 and 2014 are as follows:
The fair value of plan assets by each class as at the end of the reporting period are as follows:
2016 2015
Investments in:
Government securities P
=386,404 =273,937
P
Equity securities 323,408 226,292
Unit trust funds 36,629 17,195
Cash and cash equivalents 46,903 2,110
Loans/notes receivable 960 2,970
Receivables and others 2,815 82,376
P
=797,119 =604,880
P
The plan asset’s carrying amount approximates its fair value since the plan assets are short-term in
nature or marked-to-market. Investments held have quoted prices in active market.
The remaining plan assets which are short term in nature, do not have quoted market prices in an
active market.
The plan assets have diverse investments and do not have any concentration risk.
ƒ Investments in government securities consist primarily of fixed-rate treasury notes and retail
treasury bonds that bear interest ranging from 2.13% to 9.5% per annum and have maturities
from 2017 to 2035.
ƒ Loans and notes receivables include unsecured fixed-rate notes of a related party and
unsecured notes of an unaffiliated company which bear interest at 6.26%.
ƒ Cash and cash equivalents include regular savings and time deposits, which bear interest
ranging from 1.60% to 5.50% per annum.
ƒ Receivables and others include certificate of deposit with a term of 7 years and bear interest at
5.25%.
*SGVFS023949*
- 49 -
The cost of defined benefit pension plans and other post-employment benefits as well as the
present value of the pension obligation are determined using actuarial valuations. The actuarial
valuation involves making various assumptions. The principal assumptions used in determining
pension cost and present value of defined benefit obligation are shown below:
2016 2015
Discount rate 5.40% 4.86%
Salary increase rate 4.00% 4.00%
Turnover rate 2.76% 0.78%
Sensitivity analysis below has been determined based on reasonably possible changes of each
significant assumption on the defined benefit obligation as at the end of the reporting period,
assuming all other assumptions were held constant:
2016
Increase Increase
(decrease) in (decrease) in
Basis Points Amount
Discount rate 100 (P
=80,812)
(100) 94,188
Salary increase rate 100 101,238
(100) (88,289)
Turnover rate 100 (3,465)
(100) 3,283
2015
Increase Increase
(decrease) in (decrease) in
Basis Points Amount
Discount rate 100 (P=86,880)
(100) 102,676
Salary increase rate 100 97,507
(100) (84,141)
Turnover rate 100 (10,293)
(78) 8,376
Shown below are the maturity analyses of the undiscounted benefit payments:
2016
Other than
Normal Normal
Retirement Retirement Total
Less than one year P
=43,086 P
=22,916 P
=66,002
More than one year to five years 458,152 112,280 570,432
More than 5 years to 10 years 641,177 124,361 765,538
More than 10 years to 15 years 267,538 116,683 384,221
More than 15 years to 20 years 214,022 152,688 366,710
More than 20 years 2,514,176 449,602 2,963,778
P
=4,138,151 P
=978,530 P
=5,116,681
*SGVFS023949*
- 50 -
2015
Other than
Normal Normal
Retirement Retirement Total
Less than one year =37,216
P =7,992
P P45,208
=
More than one year to five years 315,305 49,396 364,701
More than 5 years to 10 years 732,021 71,902 803,923
More than 10 years to 15 years 387,308 67,192 454,500
More than 15 years to 20 years 198,938 66,644 265,582
More than 20 years 3,137,143 258,263 3,395,406
=4,807,931
P =521,389
P =5,329,320
P
Phil Hydro
Phil Hydro recognized pension liability amounting to P =0.4 million and P=0.7 million in 2016 and
2015, respectively, in the consolidated statements of financial position determined in accordance
with Republic Act No. 7641. Pension cost (income) included under “Salaries, wages and benefits”
account in the consolidated statements of income amounted to nil, (P =0.1 million) and P=0.8 million
in 2016, 2015 and 2014, respectively.
*SGVFS023949*
- 51 -
Following are the significant contingent liabilities of the Company as at December 31, 2016 and
2015:
a. Additional Tranche B Concession Fees and interest penalty are being claimed by MWSS in
excess of the amount recommended by the Receiver. Such additional charges being claimed
by MWSS (in addition to other miscellaneous claims) amounted to P =5.1 billion as at
December 31, 2016 and 2015. The Rehabilitation Court has resolved to deny and disallow the
said disputed claims of MWSS in its December 19, 2007 Order, upholding the
recommendations of the Receiver on the matter. Following the termination of the Parent
Company’s rehabilitation proceedings, the Parent Company and MWSS sought to resolve this
matter in accordance with the dispute requirements of the TCA (see Note 12).
b. On October 13, 2005, the Parent Company and Manila Water (the “Concessionaires”) were
jointly assessed by the Municipality of Norzagaray, Bulacan for real property taxes on certain
common purpose facilities purportedly due from 1998 to 2005 amounting to P =357.1 million.
It is the position of the Concessionaires that it is the Republic of the Philippines that owns
these properties, and is therefore, exempt from real property taxes.
The supposed joint liability of the Concessionaires for real property tax, including interests,
amounted to about P
=1.0 billion as at December 31, 2016 and 2015.
After the Local Board of Assessment Appeals (LBAA) ruled in favor of the Municipality of
Norzagaray, Bulacan, the Concessionaires elevated the ruling of the LBAA to the Central
Board of Assessment Appeals (CBAA) by filing separate appeals. As at February 27, 2017,
the case is still pending resolution.
c. The Parent Company is a party to various civil and labor cases relating to breach of contracts
with damages, illegal dismissal of employees, and nonpayment of backwages, benefits and
performance bonus, among others.
*SGVFS023949*
- 52 -
The Parent Company is registered with the BOI under Executive Order No. 226, as amended, as a
new operator of water supply and sewerage system for the West Service Area on a pioneer status.
The registration entitles the Parent Company to incentives which include, among others, an ITH
for a period of six years beginning on Commencement Date or from actual start of commercial
operations, whichever comes first.
On April 16, 2008, the BOI granted the request of the Parent Company for the extension of the
period for the ITH availment from August 2001 - July 2007 to January 2003 - December 2008.
On October 20, 2008, the Parent Company filed an application for an ITH bonus year.
The application was for the extension of the availment of the ITH incentive by the Parent
Company for one (1) year or for the period January 1, 2009 to December 31, 2009. The BOI
approved the Parent Company’s application on December 22, 2008.
On December 3, 2009, the Parent Company was issued with BOI Certificate of Registration
No. 2009-171 as a new operator of the 200 million liters per day (MLD) Bulk Water Supply and
Distribution Project (Putatan, Muntinlupa). On December 16, 2009, Certificates of Registration
Nos. 2009-188 and 2009-189 as a new operator of the 1,500 MLD and 900 MLD Bulk Water
Supply and Distribution Projects pertaining to the La Mesa Treatment Plants 1 and 2, respectively,
were likewise issued by the BOI. The registrations entitle the Parent Company to incentives
which include an ITH for six years commencing on January 2010 or actual start of commercial
operations, whichever is earlier, but in no case earlier than the date of registration. Commercial
operations of the 1,500 MLD and 900 MLD Bulk Water Supply and Distribution Projects started
on January 1, 2010 while the 200 MLD Project started on January 1, 2011. The ITH for all these
projects has expired on December 31, 2015. The ITH incentives were limited to the sales/revenue
generated from the operation of the three plants which substantially covered the total capacity of
the Parent Company. ITH incentive enjoyed by the Company amounted to P =2,405.9 million and
P
=2,078.0 million in 2015 and 2014, respectively (see Note 15).
In relation to the Concession Agreement, the Parent Company entered into the following contracts
with the East Concessionaire:
b. Common Purpose Facilities Agreement that provides for the operation, maintenance, renewal,
and, as appropriate, decommissioning of the Common Purpose Facilities, and performance of
other functions pursuant to and in accordance with the provisions of the Concession
Agreement and performance of such other functions relating to the Concession (and the
Concession of the East Concessionaire) as the Parent Company and the East Concessionaire
may choose to delegate to the Joint Venture, subject to the approval of MWSS.
*SGVFS023949*
- 53 -
22. Commitments
Concession Agreement
Significant commitments under the Concession Agreement follow:
Under Section 6.9 of the Concession Agreement, the Parent Company is required to post a
performance bond to secure the performance of its obligations under certain provisions of the
Concession Agreement. The aggregate amount drawable in one or more installments under
such performance bond during the Rate Rebasing Period to which it relates is set out below.
Aggregate Amount
Drawable Under
Rate Rebasing Period Performance Bond
(In Millions)
First (August 1, 1997 – December 31, 2002) US$120.0
Second (January 1, 2003 – December 31, 2007) 120.0
Third (January 1, 2008 – December 31, 2012) 90.0
Fourth (January 1, 2013 – December 31, 2017) 80.0
Fifth (January 1, 2018 – May 6, 2022) 60.0
Within 30 days from the commencement of each renewal date, the Parent Company shall
cause the performance bond to be reinstated to the full amount applicable to the rate rebasing
period as set forth above.
In connection with the extension of the term of the Concession Agreement (see Note 1),
certain adjustments to the obligation of the Parent Company to post the performance bond
under Section 6.9 of the Concession Agreement have been approved and summarized as
follows:
ƒ The aggregate amount drawable in one or more installments under each performance bond
during the Rate Rebasing Period to which it relates has been adjusted to US$30.0 million
until the Expiration Date.
ƒ The amount of the Performance Bond for the period covering 2023 to 2037 shall be
mutually agreed upon in writing by the MWSS and the Parent Company consistent with
the provisions of the Concession Agreement.
ƒ The Parent Company posted the Surety Bond for the amount of US$90.0 million issued by
Prudential Guarantee and Assurance, Inc. (the Surety) in favor of MWSS, as security for
the Parent Company’s proper and timely performance of its obligations under the
Concession Agreement. On December 6, 2012, the Parent Company renewed the Surety
Bond for the amount of US$80.0 million issued by the Surety in favor of MWSS.
The liability of the Surety under this bond will expire on December 31, 2017 (see Note 6).
c. To pay half of MWSS and MWSS-RO’s budgeted expenditures for the subsequent years,
provided the aggregate annual budgeted expenditures do not exceed P =200.0 million, subject to
CPI adjustments. As a result of the extension of the life of the Concession Agreement,
the annual budgeted expenditures shall increase by 100%, subject to CPI adjustments,
effective January 2010 (see Notes 1 and 7).
*SGVFS023949*
- 54 -
d. To meet certain specific commitments in respect to the provision of water and sewerage
services in the West Service Area, unless modified by the MWSS-RO due to unforeseen
circumstances.
f. To repair and correct, on a priority basis, any defect in the facilities that could adversely affect
public health or welfare, or cause damage to persons or third-party property.
g. To ensure that at all times the Parent Company has sufficient financial, material and personnel
resources available to meet its obligations under the Concession Agreement.
h. To prevent incurrence of debt or liability that would mature beyond the term of the
Concession Agreement, without prior notice to MWSS.
Failure of the Parent Company to perform any of its obligations under the Concession Agreement
of a kind or to a degree which, in a reasonable opinion of the MWSS-RO, amounts to an effective
abandonment of the Concession Agreement and which failure continues for at least 30 days after
written notice from the MWSS-RO, may cause the Concession Agreement to be terminated.
Facilities
The Parent Company has been granted the right to operate, maintain in good working order,
repair, decommission and refurbish the movable property required to provide the water and
sewerage services under the Concession Agreement. MWSS shall retain legal title to all movable
property in existence at the Commencement Date. However, upon expiration of the useful life of
any such movable property as may be determined by the Parent Company, such movable property
*SGVFS023949*
- 55 -
shall be returned to MWSS in its then-current condition at no charge to MWSS or the Parent
Company (see Note 7).
The Concession Agreement also provides the Parent Company and the East Concessionaire to
have equal access to MWSS facilities involved in the provision of water supply and sewerage
services in both West and East Service Areas including, but not limited to, the MWSS
management information system, billing system, telemetry system, central control room and
central records.
The net book value of the facilities transferred to the Parent Company on Commencement Date
based on MWSS’ closing audit report amounted to P =7.3 billion with a sound value of
P
=13.8 billion.
Beginning at the Commencement Date, MWSS’ corporate headquarters were made available for a
one-year lease to the Parent Company and the East Concessionaire, subject to yearly renewal with
the consent of the parties concerned. As at December 31, 2016, the lease has been renewed for
another year. Rent expense amounted to P =38.0 million in 2016, 2015 and 2014 (see Note 22).
The Company’s principal financial instruments are its debts to the local banks and concession fees
payable to MWSS per Concession Agreement. Other financial instruments of the Company are
cash and cash equivalents, short-term investments, and trade and other receivables. The main
purpose of those financial instruments is to finance the Company’s operations.
The main risks arising from the Company’s principal financial instruments are interest rate risk,
foreign currency risk, credit risk and liquidity risk.
The BOD reviews and approves the policies for managing the Company’s financial risks.
The Company monitors risks arising from all financial instruments and regularly reports financial
management activities and the results of these activities to the BOD.
The Company maintains a mix of floating and fixed rate interest-bearing loans, at a ratio of 12%
floating and 88% fixed, and 8% floating and 92% fixed in 2016 and 2015, respectively, per
abovementioned loan agreements. The floating rate interest-bearing loans will increase to a higher
portion over time because of future drawdowns in connection to the MWMP loan agreement.
*SGVFS023949*
- 56 -
The following table shows the Company’s significant financial liabilities that are exposed to cash
flow interest rate risk:
Interest on financial liabilities classified as fixed rate is fixed until the maturity of the instrument.
The following tables show information about the Company’s financial assets and financial
liabilities that are exposed to cash flow and fair value interest rate risks.
2016
Within 1 Year Total
Short-term cash investments:
Cash and cash equivalents (1-90 days)* P5,011,855
= P5,011,855
=
Short-term investments (91-364 days) 3,041,000 3,041,000
=8,052,855
P =8,052,855
P
*Excludes cash on hand amounting to =
P 12,899.
2016
More than Total Total
Within 1 Year 1 Year (In US$) (In P
=)
Liabilities:
Interest-bearing loans:
Interest rate 5.75% 5.75%, 3.12%,
6.00% and
5.50%
Current - local =1,808,101
P – – P1,808,101
=
Noncurrent - foreign – $66,857 $66,857 3,324,117
Noncurrent - local – =21,555,638
P – 21,555,638
26,687,856
Service concession obligation
payable to MWSS:
Interest rate 8.16%
Current - foreign $11,128 – $11,128 P553,289
=
Current - local =775,689
P – – 775,689
Noncurrent - foreign – $73,626 73,626 3,660,698
Noncurrent - local – =2,839,433
P – 2,839,433
7,829,109
=34,516,965
P
*SGVFS023949*
- 57 -
2015
Within 1 Year Total
Short-term cash investments:
Cash and cash equivalents (1-90 days)* P3,069,280
= P3,069,280
=
Short-term investments (91-364 days) 6,088,541 6,088,541
=9,157,821
P =9,157,821
P
*Excludes cash on hand amounting to =
P 23,732.
2015
More than Total Total
Within 1 Year 1 Year (In US$) (In P
=)
Liabilities:
Interest-bearing loans:
Interest rate 5.75% 5.75%, 2.40%,
6.00% and
5.50%
Current - local =1,742,164
P – – P1,742,164
=
Noncurrent - foreign – $42,084 $42,084 1,980,458
Noncurrent - local – =21,356,717
P – 21,356,717
25,079,339
Service concession obligation
payable to MWSS:
Interest rate 8.21%
Current - foreign $9,244 – $9,244 435,008
Current - local =922,697
P – – 922,697
Noncurrent - foreign – $85,617 85,617 4,029,148
Noncurrent - local – =2,708,009
P – 2,708,009
8,094,862
=33,174,201
P
The following table demonstrates the sensitivity of the Company’s profit before tax to a
reasonably possible change in interest rates for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015,
with all variables held constant (through the impact on floating rate borrowings). The estimates
are based on the management’s annual financial forecast. There is no impact on the Company’s
equity other than those already affecting income.
2016
Increase/ Effect on
Decrease Income
in Basis Points Before Tax
Floating rate borrowings +50 (P
=16,621)
-50 16,621
2015
Increase/ Effect on
Decrease Income
in Basis Points Before Tax
Floating rate borrowings +50 (P
=9,902)
-50 9,902
*SGVFS023949*
- 58 -
The Company’s foreign currency risk arises primarily from movements of the Philippine Peso
against the United States Dollar, Euro and Japanese Yen. The servicing of foreign currency
denominated loans of MWSS is among the requirements of the Concession Agreement. Revenues
are generated in Philippine Peso. However, there is a mechanism in place as part of the
Concession Agreement wherein the Company (or the end consumers) can recover currency
fluctuations through the FCDA that is approved by the Regulatory Office.
Information on the Company’s foreign currency-denominated monetary assets and liabilities and
the Philippine Peso equivalent of each as at December 31, 2016 and 2015 is presented as follows:
2016
Total Peso
US Dollar Euro JPY Equivalent
Asset
Cash and cash equivalents,
short-term investments and
sinking fund $4,623 €– ¥– P
=229,847
Liabilities
Interest-bearing loans ($66,857) €– ¥– (P
=3,324,117)
Service concession obligation
payable to MWSS (82,081) (19) (312,776) (4,213,987)
(148,938) (19) (312,776) (7,538,104)
Net foreign currency
denominated liabilities ($144,315) (€19) (¥312,776) (P
=7,308,257)
The spot exchange rates used were P
=49.72:US$1, =
P51.84:EUR1, and =
P0.43:JPY1 as at December 31, 2016.
2015
Total Peso
US Dollar Euro JPY Equivalent
Asset
Cash and cash equivalents,
short-term investments and
sinking fund $6,346 €– ¥– P
=298,664
Liabilities
Interest-bearing loans ($42,084) €– ¥– (P
=1,980,458)
Service concession obligation
payable to MWSS (84,589) (33) (1,228,775) (4,464,156)
(126,673) (33) (1,228,775) (6,444,614)
Net foreign currency
denominated liabilities ($120,327) (€33) (¥1,228,775) (P
=6,145,950)
The spot exchange rates used were P
=47.06:US$1, =
P51.74:EUR1, and =
P0.39:JPY1 as at December 31, 2015.
*SGVFS023949*
- 59 -
The following table demonstrates the sensitivity to a reasonably possible change in foreign
exchange rates, with all variables held constant, of the Company’s profit before tax (due to
changes in the fair value of monetary assets and liabilities) and equity as at December 31, 2016
and 2015. The estimates in the movement of the foreign exchange rates were based on the
management’s annual financial forecast.
Increase/Decrease in
Peso and U.S Dollar,
Euro and JPY Foreign Effect on Income
Exchange Rates Exchange Rate Before Income Tax
2016
U.S Dollar +1% 49.72 (P
=71,753)
Euro +1% 51.84 (10)
JPY +1% 0.43 (1,345)
U.S Dollar -1% 49.72 71,753
Euro -1% 51.84 10
JPY -1% 0.43 1,345
Increase/Decrease in
Peso and U.S Dollar,
Euro and JPY Exchange Foreign Effect on Income
Rates Exchange Rate Before Income Tax
2015
U.S Dollar +1% 47.06 (P
=56,626)
Euro +1% 51.74 (17)
JPY +1% 0.39 (4,792)
U.S Dollar -1% 47.06 56,626
Euro -1% 51.74 17
JPY -1% 0.39 4,792
The Company recognized net foreign exchange loss of P =510.8 million and =
P152.7 million in 2016
and 2015, respectively, mainly arising from the translation of the Company’s cash and cash
equivalents, short-term investments, deposits, interest-bearing loans and service concession
obligation payable to MWSS. However, the net foreign exchange gain or loss on interest-bearing
loans and service concession obligation payable to MWSS is subject to foreign exchange recovery
mechanisms under the Concession Agreement (see Note 2).
Credit Risk
Credit risk is the risk that a counter party will not meet its obligations under a financial instrument
or customer contract, leading to a financial loss.
The Company trades only with recognized, creditworthy third parties. It is the Company’s policy
that except for connection fees and other highly meritorious cases, it does not offer credit terms to
its customers. Because of the basic need service it provides, historical collections of the Company
are relatively high. Credit exposure is widely dispersed. Receivable balances are monitored on an
ongoing basis.
With respect to credit risk arising from the other financial assets of the Company, consisting of
cash and cash equivalents, short-term cash investments, deposits and sinking fund and
miscellaneous deposits, the Company’s exposure to credit risk arises from default of the
counterparty, with a maximum exposure equal to the carrying amount of these instruments.
The Company transacts only with institutions or banks which have demonstrated financial
soundness for the past five years.
*SGVFS023949*
- 60 -
The table below shows the maximum exposure to credit risk for the components of the
consolidated statements of financial position as at December 31, 2016 and 2015:
2016 2015
Cash and cash equivalents* (see Note 4) P
=5,011,855 =3,069,280
P
Short-term investments (see Note 4) 3,041,000 6,088,541
Trade and other receivables - net (see Note 5) 2,492,645 2,428,812
Deposits and sinking fund (see Note 6) 1,928,175 1,914,093
Miscellaneous deposits** 319,980 220,016
Total credit risk exposure P
=12,793,655 =13,720,742
P
*Excludes cash on hand amounting to =P 12,899 and =P23,732 as at December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively.
**Included as part of “Other noncurrent assets” in the consolidated statements of financial position.
As at December 31, 2016 and 2015, the credit quality per class of financial assets that were neither
past due nor impaired are as follows:
2016
Neither Past Due nor Impaired Past Due but
High Grade Standard not Impaired Impaired Total
Cash and cash equivalents* P
=5,011,855 P
=– P
=– P
=– P
=5,011,855
Short-term investments 3,041,000 – – – 3,041,000
Trade and other receivables 2,338,887 31,188 122,570 953,772 3,446,417
Deposits and sinking fund 1,928,175 – – – 1,928,175
Miscellaneous deposits** – 319,980 – – 319,980
P
=12,319,917 P
=351,168 P
=122,570 P
=953,772 P
=13,747,427
2015
Neither Past Due nor Impaired Past Due but
High Grade Standard not Impaired Impaired Total
Cash and cash equivalents* P
=3,069,280 =
P– =
P– =
P– P
=3,069,280
Short-term investments 6,088,541 – – – 6,088,541
Trade and other receivables 2,166,300 160,752 101,760 1,030,624 3,459,436
Deposits and sinking fund 1,914,093 – – – 1,914,093
Miscellaneous deposits** – 220,016 – – 220,016
P
=13,238,214 P
=380,768 P
=101,760 P
=1,030,624 P
=14,751,366
*Excludes cash on hand amounting to =P 12,899 and =P23,732 as at December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively.
**Included as part of “Other noncurrent assets” in the consolidated statements of financial position.
Cash and cash equivalents, short-term investments, and deposits and sinking fund are placed in
various banks. These are held by large prime financial institutions that have good reputation and
low probability of insolvency. Management assesses the quality of these financial assets as high
grade.
For trade and other receivables, high grade relates to those which are consistently collected before
the maturity date, normally seven days from bill delivery. Standard grade includes receivables
from customers that are collectible beyond seven days from bill delivery even without an effort
from the Company to follow them up, or those advances from officers and employees that are
*SGVFS023949*
- 61 -
collected through salary deduction. For miscellaneous deposits, standard grade consists of meter
and security deposits that are normally refundable upon termination of service.
Liquidity Risk
Liquidity risk is the potential for not meeting the obligations as they become due because of an
inability to liquidate assets or obtain adequate funding.
The Company monitors its risk to a shortage of funds using a recurring liquidity planning.
Cash planning considers the maturity of both its financial investments and financial assets
(e.g., trade and other receivables, other financial assets) and projected cash flows from operations.
The Company’s objective is to maintain a balance between continuity of funding and flexibility
through the use of bank drafts, bank loans and debentures.
The tables below summarize the maturity profile of the Company’s financial liabilities as at
December 31, 2016 and 2015 based on contractual undiscounted payments.
2016
Due Between
Due Within 3 and Due after
On Demand 3 Months 12 Months 12 Months Total
Interest-bearing loans* P
=– P=1,129,031 P
=1,026,171 P =24,879,755 P
=27,034,957
Trade and other payables** 601,454 2,660,299 1,941,696 4,566,705 9,770,154
Service concession obligation payable
to MWSS – – 1,328,978 6,500,131 7,829,109
Customers’ deposits – – – 911,338 911,338
P
=601,454 P
=3,789,330 P
=4,296,845 P
=36,857,929 P
=45,545,558
**Principal plus interest payment
**Excludes taxes payable and interest payable
2015
Due Between
Due Within 3 and Due after
On Demand 3 Months 12 Months 12 Months Total
Interest-bearing loans* =
P– P
=1,100,226 P
=972,157 P =23,337,175 P
=25,409,558
Trade and other payables** 1,045,691 2,804,270 2,222,174 4,649,417 10,721,552
Service concession obligation payable
to MWSS – – 1,357,705 6,737,157 8,094,862
Customers’ deposits – – – 828,077 828,077
P
=1,045,691 P
=3,904,496 P
=4,552,036 P
=35,551,826 P
=45,054,049
**Principal plus interest payment
**Excludes taxes payable and interest payable
The table below shows the maturity profile of the Company’s financial assets based on contractual
undiscounted cash flows as at December 31, 2016 and 2015:
2016
Due Between
Due Within 3 and Due after
On Demand 3 Months 12 Months 12 Months Total
Cash and cash equivalents P
=977,357 P=4,047,397 P
=– P
=– P
=5,024,754
Short-term investments – – 3,041,000 – 3,041,000
Trade and other receivables 2,233,358 188 259,099 – 2,492,645
Deposits and sinking fund 1,777,626 – 150,549 – 1,928,175
AFS financial assets 132,387 – – – 132,387
Miscellaneous deposits – – – 319,980 319,980
P
=5,120,728 P=4,047,585 P
=3,450,648 P
=319,980 P=12,938,941
*SGVFS023949*
- 62 -
2015
Due Between
Due Within 3 and Due after
On Demand 3 Months 12 Months 12 Months Total
Cash and cash equivalents P
=982,791 P
=2,110,221 =
P– =
P– P
=3,093,012
Short-term investments – – 6,088,541 – 6,088,541
Trade and other receivables 2,039,961 230 388,621 – 2,428,812
Deposits and sinking fund 1,773,843 – 140,250 – 1,914,093
AFS financial assets 132,387 – – – 132,387
Miscellaneous deposits – – – 220,016 220,016
P
=4,928,981 P
=2,110,452 P
=6,617,412 P
=220,016 P=13,876,861
Capital Management
The primary objective of the Company’s capital management strategy is to ensure that it maintains
a healthy capital structure in order to maintain a strong credit standing while it maximizes
shareholder value.
The Company closely manages its capital structure vis-a-vis a certain target gearing ratio, which is
net debt divided by total capital plus net debt. The Company’s target gearing ratio is 75%.
This target is to be maintained over the next five years by managing the Company’s level of
borrowings and dividend payments to shareholders.
For purposes of computing its net debt, the Company includes the outstanding balance of its long-
term interest-bearing loans, service concession obligation payable to MWSS and trade and other
payables, less the outstanding cash and cash equivalents, short-term investments, deposits and
sinking fund. To compute its capital, the Company uses net equity.
2016 2015
Interest-bearing loans and service concession
obligation payable to MWSS
(see Notes 10 and 12) P
=34,516,965 P
=33,174,201
Trade and other payables (see Note 11) 10,892,909 11,327,222
Less cash and cash equivalents, short-term
investments, deposits and sinking fund
(see Notes 4 and 6) (9,993,929) (11,095,646)
Net debt (a) 35,415,945 33,405,777
Net equity 40,261,654 35,538,655
Net equity and debt (b) P
=75,677,599 =68,944,432
P
Gearing ratio (a/b) 47% 48%
For purposes of monitoring debt ratio covenants, the Company computes using both interest-
bearing debt and total liabilities. The Company closely monitors its debt covenants and maintains
a capital expenditure program and dividend declaration policy that keeps the compliance of these
covenants into consideration.
*SGVFS023949*
- 63 -
The following table summarizes the carrying values and fair values of the Company’s financial
assets and financial liabilities as at December 31, 2016 and 2015:
2016 2015
Carrying Value Fair Value Carrying Value Fair Value
Financial Assets
Loans and receivables -
Miscellaneous deposits (included
under “Other noncurrent assets”
account) P
=319,980 P
=270,064 P
=220,016 P
=171,339
Financial Liabilities
Other financial liabilities:
Interest-bearing loans P
=26,687,856 P
=28,175,873 P
=25,079,339 P
=26,959,364
Service concession obligation
payable to MWSS 7,829,109 9,302,022 8,094,862 9,569,586
Customers’ deposits 279,363 312,192 244,434 271,883
P
=34,796,328 P
=37,790,087 P
=33,418,635 P
=36,800,833
The following methods and assumptions were used to estimate the fair value of each class of
financial assets and financial liabilities for which it is practicable to estimate such value:
Cash and Cash Equivalents, Short-term Investments, Trade and Other Receivables, Deposits and
Sinking Fund, and Trade and Other Payables. Due to the short-term nature of these transactions,
the carrying values approximate the fair values as at the reporting date.
AFS Financial Assets. Fair value is equivalent to the carrying value because the Company’s AFS
financial assets pertain to unquoted equity investments.
Interest-bearing Loans. For floating rate loans, the carrying value approximates the estimated fair
value as at the reporting date due to quarterly repricing of interest rates. For fixed rate loans, the
estimated fair value is based on the discounted value of future cash flows using the applicable
rates for similar types of financial instruments.
The fair values of fixed rate interest-bearing loans, miscellaneous deposits, service concession
obligation payable to MWSS and customers’ deposits are determined using Fair Value Hierarchy
Level 3.
In 2015, the noncash operating activities pertain to unpaid concession fees amounting to
=
P500.0 million and effect of change in rebased rate amounting to =P632.3 million (see Note 7).
In 2016, the noncash operating activity pertains to MWSS loan drawdown for Angat Water
Transmission Improvement Project (AWTIP) amounting to P =92.4 million (see Note 7).
*SGVFS023949*
- 64 -
On February 27, 2017, during the regular meeting, the Parent Company’s BOD set and approved
the declaration of cash dividends amounting to P
=3.0 billion to all shareholders.
*SGVFS023949*