ICL PPoint

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 26

INTERNATIONAL

CRIMINAL LAW
Dr Russell Bucha
University of Sheffield
n

Two Issues:

● 1. Substantive crime

● 2. Enforcement mechanisms
s

Substantive Crimes
Concept
● Direct individual criminal responsibility as opposed to state responsibility

● Protection of fundamental interests of the international society

● What are these interests? International peace and security, which includes humanity.

● Aims: Retribution, deterrence and rehabilitation

● ICL has a long history in international law: piracy, slavery


Sources of International Criminal Law

● International treaties (Geneva Conventions; Genocide


convention

● Customary international la

● General principles of international la

● Statutes of international criminal tribunals


)

Recognised crimes
● Genocid
● War Crime
● Crimes against Humanit
● Aggression

● Terrorism? (Lebanon tribunal


● Torture?
e

Genocide
• Response to WW II atrocities

• Genos = genealogy/cide = to kill

• Crime of crimes

• Genocide Convention 1948:

• State responsibility (The Gambia v Myanmar)


• Obligation to criminalise under national law, and to prevent and punish

• GC provides a working definition: acts committed with the intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group, as such
Genocide: Actus Reus

• Article 6 ICC Statute: genocidal acts include


a) Killing members of the group; 


(b) Causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the
group; 


(c) Deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated
to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part; 


(d) Imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group; 


(e) Forcibly transferring children of the group to another group

Protected Groups

● Physical destruction of the group, rather than the conditions


for its enjoyment eg cultural genocide, forced migratio

● Must be: ‘national, ethnical racial or religious group

● Other groups?
● Gay
● ‘Non-Serbs’

● ‘Substantial part’ of a protected group suffices (Krstic)


?

Mens Rea

● Double intent (Jelisic, ICTY):

● i) intent to commit the specific act and


● ii) intent to destroy a group

● This is what distinguishes genocide from mass


murder

Crimes against Humanity


● Article 7 ICC Statute

● A ‘crime against humanity means any of the following acts when committed as part of a widespread
or systematic attack directed against any civilian population, with knowledge of the attack:

● (a)     Murder

● (b)     Extermination

● (c)     Enslavement

● (d)     Deportation or forcible transfer of population

● (e)     Imprisonment or other severe deprivation of physical liberty in violation of fundamental rules
of international law

● (f)     Torture

● (g)     Rape, sexual slavery, enforced prostitution, forced pregnancy, enforced sterilization, or any
other form of sexual violence of comparable gravity

● (k)     Other inhumane acts of a similar character intentionally causing great suffering, or serious
injury to body or to mental or physical health.
Crimes against Humanity: Actus Reus
● Must be one of the prohibited acts listed in Art 7

● Within or beyond armed conflict i.e. peacetim

● Attack must be against the civilian population i.e. not


combatant

● The attack must be part of a


● widespread attack (massive, large scale – Akayesu) or
● systematic attack (organised violence – Blaskic)
s

War Crimes
● Article 8 ICC Statut

● International armed conflict:


(1) Grave breaches of the Geneva Convention
(2) Other serious violations of laws and customs of war accepted in
international la

● Non international armed conflict:


(1) Serious violations of common Article 3 Geneva Conventions
(2) Other serious violations of laws and customs of non international
conflict accepted in international law
w

Aggression
● War of aggression/crime against peace - WWI

● GA Res on the definition of Aggression (1974): war of aggression is


a crime. It enumerates acts of aggressio

● ICC and Kampala conference 201

● July 2018 – crime of aggression came into force


0

Art 8bis ICC Statute

● Generic definition
the planning, preparation, initiation or execution, by a
person in a position effectively to exercise control over
or to direct the political or military action of a State, of
an act of aggression which, by its character, gravity and
scale, constitutes a manifest violation of the Charter of
the United Nations
:

Enforcement Mechanisms
WW I and II
● Treaty of Versailles 191
● Created military tribunals to try leaders/Kaiser for
violations of the laws of wa

● 1945 – International Military Tribunals for Nuremberg


and for the Far East to establish individual criminal
responsibility
9

Tribunals
● National courts

● ICTY 1993 (SC Res 808)

● ICTR 1994 (SC Res 955)

● Sierra Leone 2002 (SC Res 1315)

● Cambodia 2003

● Lebanon 2008 (SC Res 1715)


Strengths and Weaknesses


● Strengths
● Internationalized justice
● Primacy
● Procedural fairness

● Weaknesses
● Cooperation with implicated actors
● Victor’s justice
● Selectivity

The Road to Rome


● 1980s USSR and Trinidad
● Terrorism and drug trafficking
● GA’s request to ILC 1989
● ILC Draft Statute 1994
● GA established Prepcom
● Rome Statute 1998
● Votes 120-7 (China, Israel, USA, Libya, Iraq, Qatar,
Yemen) 21 abstentions

The International Criminal Court


● ICC came into force after 60 ratifications in 2002

● ICC is an independent international organisation

● But see relationship to the the UN and in particular the


Security Council

Jurisdiction
● Not universal jurisdiction
● Article 12 Rome Statute
● 1. State party must have accepted jurisdiction (or the Security
Council refers under Chapt VII

● and

● 2. The individual is a national of a state party, or


● 3. The crime is committed on the territory of a state party

ICC: Trigger Mechanisms


● Article 13 Rome Statute delineates the ICC’s ‘triggers’

● The court may exercise jurisdiction over a crime if:

● A situation in which one or more such crimes is referred to


the Prosecutor by:

● A state party
● By the Security Council acting under Chapter VI; or
● By the Prosecutor initiating an investigation

Security Council and the ICC


● SC can refer cases to the Court under Article 13
● SC Res 1593 (2005) - Darfur

● SC can defer cases under Article 16


● SC Res. 1422 (2002) - peacekeeping

Complementarity
● ICC does not have primacy

● ICC jurisdiction is ‘complementary’ to national courts –


‘unable or unwilling’ (Article 17)

● Unable: ‘total or substantial collapse’ of the national system


● Unwilling:
i) Refusal to prosecute to shield the individual from responsibility
ii) Unjustified delay in bringing the case
iii) Biased proceedings

Case Study: Complementarity in


Colombia
● Justice and Peace Law
● Amnesty (democratically approved)
● Heavily reduced/discounted sentences
● Is Colombia ‘unwilling’? Does Art 17 require bad faith?
● Article 53 Rome Statute: if in the ‘interests of justice’ the
prosecutor can discontinue a prosecution.

You might also like