Heal Briefing Air Serbia Eng
Heal Briefing Air Serbia Eng
Heal Briefing Air Serbia Eng
Air pollution is an important risk factor for health in Europe and worldwide. A recent review of the global burden of disease
showed that it is one of the top ten risk factors for health globally1. Worldwide an estimated 7 million people died
prematurely because of pollution; in the European Union (EU) 400,000 people suffer a premature death2. The Organisation
for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) predicts that in 2050 outdoor air pollution will be the top cause of
environmentally related deaths worldwide3. In addition, air pollution has also been classified as the leading environmental
cause of cancer4.
WHY IS AIR POLLUTION A CONCERN FOR A recent report in Serbia on air quality in 20138 states that
during that year, the annual limit value for PM10, 40
HEALTH? μg/m3, was exceeded in most of locations. In 2013 the air
Exposure to outdoor air pollution is associated with a in the agglomerations of Belgrade, Bor, Uzice and
broad spectrum of acute and chronic health effects ranging Smederevo in 2013 was that of category III, over-polluted
from irritant effects to death6. While the impacts on air.
respiratory and cardiovascular disease are well
documented, new science also shows air pollution as an During 2013, 73 percent of the population in urban or
emerging risk factor for children’s health and even urban-industrial agglomerations was potentially exposed
diabetes7. Sensitive and vulnerable groups such as to the concentrations of pollutants above the reference
pregnant women, children, the elderly and those already level8.
suffering from respiratory and other serious illnesses or
from low income groups are particularly affected.
2
higher risks of developing chronic diseases later in life, Emissions from coal power plants in Europe contribute
including obesity, diabetes, and hormone related cancers significantly to the burden of disease from environmental
such as breast and prostate cancer. Furthermore, recent pollution. The brand-new figures published in HEAL’s
studies found associations between exposure to outdoor report show that EU-wide impacts amount to more than
air pollution during pregnancy and lower birth weight, as 18,200 premature deaths, about 8,500 new cases of
well as higher rates of preterm birth and pre-eclampsia. It chronic bronchitis, and over 4 million lost working days
has been shown that there is an association between each year. The economic costs of the health impacts from
exposure to PM2.5 and birth outcomes, including low birth coal combustion in Europe are estimated at up to €42.8
weight, preterm birth and small for gestational age births. billion per year13.
HOW DOES COAL CONTRIBUTE TO AIR PUBLIC HEALTH INTERVENTIONS PAY OFF!
POLLUTION IN SERBIA?
The largest health burden is attributable to the long-term
Coal power generation adds to already poor air quality in impacts of chronic exposure to PM2.5. In Europe and
Europe and in Serbia - caused mainly by the transport globally, measures have been taken that have
sector, industrial processes, residential heating, and demonstrated a swift benefit to public health.
agriculture.
Coal power plants release substantial amounts of The ban on coal burning in Dublin (Ireland) in
particulate matter, sulphur dioxide, and nitrogen –oxides, the 1990s resulted in the reduction of black
with the latter contributing indirectly to the formation of smoke dust by 71% and sulfur dioxide by 34%.
ozone. Of these, the most worrying for health are fine This reduced the total mortality rate in the city
particulate matter (PM2.5) and ozone. by 8%, including reduction in cardiovascular
14
diseases by 7% and respiratory by 13% .
Other hazardous substances emitted from the smokestacks
of coal power plants are heavy metals, such as mercury, In Launceston, Australia, a new regulation of
and persistent organic pollutants (POPs), such as dioxins 2001 improved the air quality by reducing PM10
and polycyclic aromatic chemicals (PAHs). Special concern dust by 38%. This lead to a decrease in total
for children’s health arise from the large mercury mortality by 11.4%, including reduction in
emissions from coal power plants. cardiovascular diseases by 17.9% and
respiratory by 22.8%. In winter period health
A large coal power plant emits several thousand tons of benefits were even higher, reduction in
hazardous air pollutants every year and has an average cardiovascular diseases by 19.6% and
lifetime of at least 40 years. Building new coal power 15
respiratory by 22.9% .
plants would mean that hazardous emissions and their
effects on health would continue for many years. It would
also counterbalance short-term reductions in air pollutants
achieved in other sectors. In addition, a research project involving 25 European cities
has demonstrated that the compliance with the WHO
guideline of 10 g/m3 for annual mean PM2.5
HEALTH DAMAGE AND FINANCIAL BURDEN concentrations, would increase the life expectancy of up to
FROM COAL POWER GENERATION IN SERBIA 22 months for people aged 30 years and older. Considering
PM10, the compliance with the WHO guideline of 20 g/m3
It is estimated that directly due to in annual mean could save each year 16,000 lives in Serbia
outdoor air pollution more than 1,000 through this improvement in air quality16.
Serbians suffer from chronic bronchitis
cases, 600 are hospitalised due to
respiratory or cardiovascular
WHAT CAN MEDICAL EXPERTS DO?
symptoms, and 2,000 die yearly Health and medical experts are becoming increasingly
because of polluted air in Serbia13. concerned about air pollution and the role of coal
combustion, and they have continuously highlighted the
enormous health risks of air quality. Medical experts in the
Costs to ill-health by only one source of
USA such as the Physicians for Social Responsibility (PSR),
pollution - coal power plants, are
Australian physicians, British medical journal, the Lancet,
estimated to be up to €4.98 billion per
European Respiratory Society (ERS) and many others are
year13.
vocal clean air advocates.
3
current air pollution is a cause of adverse health effects Engage in policy developments
and, that improvements of air quality do result in better
health. At the same time health professionals should Become involved in the debates on higher air quality
engage in policy processes with decision-makers to show standards at national level.
how pollution can successfully be reduced.
Highlight to national decision makers that the health
The time is right to advocate on the health damage from impacts and external costs of coal have to be taken into
coal. Based on the established scientific evidence about account in energy decisions. From a health perspective
the health risks from coal combustion, doctors and health building new coal power plants is detrimental to efforts of
organisations can add a long neglected health perspective tackling chronic disease and creates unnecessary costs.
to the debate about Serbian future energy supply. Existing regulations need to be enforces and updated,
stronger regulation needed
STEPS OF ACTION
Educate the public on health risks due to air pollution
Physicians Raise awareness on the health risks from coal power in
local consultation processes and help to ensure the
Consider environmental factors when diagnosing patient enforcement of better pollution control for existing coal in
illness order to protect public health. Also, use the opportunity to
organise events to promote the importance of clean air.
Assess and include environmental information into the
medical history of patients. Such information can be
invaluable in discovering underlying causes of disease and
FURTHER INFORMATION
contributing to the body of knowledge on environmental http://env-health.org
risks. http://www.who.int/topics/air_pollution/en
http://www.eea.europa.eu
Check the air quality situation http://www.sepa.gov.rs
http://www.knowyourairforhealth.eu/
Check the air quality situation in the area where your
patient lives with the data from the local monitoring REFERENCE:
1. Global Burden of Disease: http://www.thelancet.com/themed/global-burden-of-disease
station for SO2, NO2 and PM10. Also, analyse the situation
2. EU Commission 2013: http://ec.europa.eu/environment/air/index_en.htm
in your area over a longer time interval. 3. OECD Environmental Outlook to 2050. The consequences of inaction
4. International Agency for Research on Cancer (WHO): Outdoor air pollution a leading
environmental cause of cancer deaths:
5. EMRC (2014). Cost-benefit Analysis of Final Policy Scenarios for the EU Clean Air Package
Public health professionals 6. Committee of The Environmental and Occupational Health Assembly of the American
Thoratic Society (ATS). Health effects of outdoor air pollution, Part 1&2. American journal
of respiratory and critical care medicine, 153: 3–50 (1996).
Inform the public or flag up a health alert 7. WHO (2013). Review of evidence on health aspects of air pollution (REVIHAAP).
8. SEPA. Godišnji izveštaj o stanju kvaliteta vazduha u Republici Srbiji 2013. godine
http://www.sepa.gov.rs/download/VAZDUH2013.pdf
Highlight to local authorities, the media, and the public if 9. American Thoratic Society (ATS). What constitutes an adverse health effect of air
pollution? American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine, 161: 665–673 (2000).
thresholds for SO2, NO2 and PM10 are exceeded. Coal 10.GAUDERMAN, W. J. ET AL. Association between air pollution and lung function growth in
power plants in the region might contribute to high southern California children. Results from a second cohort. American journal of respiratory
and critical care medicine, 166: 76–84 (2002).
concentrations. Obtain weather data (e.g. wind directions) 11.AVOL, EL ET AL. Respiratory effects of relocating to areas of differing air pollution levels.
for the same period in order to determine potential point American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine, 164: 2067–2072 (2001).
12.WHO (2003). Health Aspects of Air Pollution with Particulate Matter, Ozone and Nitrogen
sources. Dioxide
13.HEAL (2013). The Unpaid Health Bill - How coal power plants make us sick?
14.CLANCY, L ET AL. (2002). Effect of air-pollution control on death rates in Dublin, Ireland: an
Depending on the air quality situation, you may advise intervention study. Lancet, 360: 1210–14
sensitive groups to stay indoors. 15.JOHNSTON, FH ET AL. (2013). Evaluation of interventions to reduce air pollution from
biomass smoke on mortality in Launceston, Australia: retrospective analysis of daily
mortality, 1994–2007. British Medical Journal.
CONTACT 16.Calculation developed by HEAL based on CAFE methodology