Breeding Strategy Brachycephalic Dogs in The Netherlands
Breeding Strategy Brachycephalic Dogs in The Netherlands
Breeding Strategy Brachycephalic Dogs in The Netherlands
2
Raad van Beheer breeding strategy brachycephalic pedigree dogs
1 Summary
In March 2019, the report “BREEDING BRACHYCEPHALIC DOGS" was published with enforcement
criteria for the breeding of brachycephalic dogs.
The Dutch Kennelclub ‘Raad van Beheer’ supports the Minister in setting rules for the breeding of
brachycephalic dogs. The Raad van Beheer plays a supervising role in breeding of pedigree dogs and
therefore takes its responsibility, as expressed in “FairFok” (Fairbreeding), and will set additional
requirements for issuing pedigree certificates.
In the future, breeders must demonstrate that brachycephalic dogs are proven free of conformation
related problems. Healthier dogs will be used for breeding. Both crossbreds and look-alikes will be
eligible to enter the studbook in order to breed dogs with a longer muzzle.
The core of the report is a set of criteria about the conformation. When one is exceeded, this will
lead to a prohibition of breeding, regardless of the other criteria. The criteria describe exaggerated
conformations, which are not desirable within the breeds. That is the reason the Raad van Beheer
wants to be supportive in monitoring the breeding stock of pedigree dogs.
The Raad van Beheer concurs with almost all criteria. The Raad van Beheer does not agree with the
breeding-prohibiting criterion of the Craniofacial Ratio (CFR). This criterion would make it impossible
to breed certain breeds while the prognostic value and the reproducibility of the CFR are being
questioned among scientists. Moreover, it involves breeds that have had a place in Dutch society for
decades and are highly appreciated for their character and appearance. The Raad van Beheer
consider the CFR as a risk factor, so it is clear which breeds are at risk, but does not consider the CFR
as a factor of the severity of the disorder BOAS or BOS. Scientific research support this.
The Raad van Beheer wants an exception for the regulated pedigree breeding, therefore these
breeds can be bred in The Netherlands in a healthy form and with a longer muzzle. This is also
important for selecting dogs in crossbreeding where it must be possible to breed again with dogs of
the original breed. All brachycephalic dogs must meet additional requirements:
• Exercise tolerance test: good exercise tolerance, no abnormal breathing sounds and good
temperature regulation. The test must be performed before the dog is used for breeding and
repeated if the dog is intended to be used after the third year of life.
The Dutch Kennel Club is stricter in these rules, than the report “breeding brachycephalic dogs”
prescribes.
Internationally there is a lot of interest into the problems that occur with the brachycephalic dogs.
The Raad van Beheer discussed the problems in various international forums. For example, a strong
plea was made during the international FCI judge meeting about not allowing French Bulldogs to win
titles with too narrow nostrils and very little muzzle. By putting this on the agenda and criticizing it,
people will think differently about how we should judge these dogs at exhibitions. A behavioral
change among all stakeholders to a more normal image with less extreme short muzzles is needed.
3
Raad van Beheer breeding strategy brachycephalic pedigree dogs
The government regulations focus exclusively on Dutch breeders. We take our responsibility for
breeders of pedigree dogs. Importing brachycephalic dogs and the husbandry is not regulated by
government regulations. There is a considerable risk that people offering these dogs to the public will
shift to foreign breeders and traders who are not hindered by any regulations. This does not improve
the health and well-being of brachycephalic dogs in The Netherlands. Given the popularity of these
dogs and the proportion of non-pedigree dogs, there is a high risk that health and well-being will
become even worse. Implementing the regulations may therefore create the opposite effect,
something the government and the kennel club want to avoid.
This proposal assumes several brachycephalic dog breeds. There is no exception or other provisions
for the individual breeds. The proposed measures are identical for all listed breeds.
The Craniofacial Ratio of less than 0.3 is considered by the ECGG (Utrecht University) to be an
important criterion. However, we ask for an exception to this criterion if dogs with a CRF of less than
0.3, who demonstrably show no BOAS or BOS, can still be used to improve the population. Additional
requirements are in place.
• Affenpinscher
• Boston Terrier
• English Bulldog
• French Bulldog
• Griffon Belge
• Griffon Bruxellois
• Petit Brabançon
• Japanese Spaniel
• King Charles Spaniel
• Pug
• Pekingese
• Shih Tzu
This breeding strategy is not the end, but just the beginning. Breeders want to show that they breed
as healthily as possible. The Raad van Beheer will support this by means of the ‘health matrix’, the
publication of the results of screening examinations and, where necessary or desired, covenants with
additional requirement for issuing pedigree certificates.
4
Raad van Beheer breeding strategy brachycephalic pedigree dogs
Proposal for standards by the Raad van Beheer
1 Abnormal breathing At rest (not asleep) the dog makes Dogs are assessed both at rest and
sound (stridor) strong sniffing, snoring or sawing during exercise by a veterinarian when
noises, or there is a nasal, taking an exercise tolerance test.
pharyngeal and / or laryngeal stridor Same standard.
at rest
2 Nose opening Mild stenosis = moderate narrowing Assessment of the nostrils by a
of the nostrils. veterinarian during a clinical
severe stenosis = severe narrowing examination.
of the nostrils. Same standards.
3 Relative nose greater than 0.3 but less than 0.5 Use criterion to determine risk dogs
reduction that must meet additional measures.
Less than or equal to 0.3
4 Nasal fold Nasal fold present but no visible Evaluation of the nasal fold by a
contact of the hair with the veterinarian during a clinical
conjunctiva or cornea of the eye, examination.
wet nasal fold hair or signs of Same standards.
inflammation
Nasal fold present and hair that
from the nasal fold (may) touch the
cornea or conjunctiva (wet nasal
fold hair)
5 Visibility of the White of the eye visible in 2 or more Assessment of the eyes by a
whites of the eyes quadrants-> shallow eye socket and veterinarian specialist during an ECVO
(the sclera) in the / or large eyelids, with a poorly eye examination.
dog looking straight protected eyeball and an increased Same standard.
ahead risk of developing corneal ulcers
6 Eyelid reflex: test Eyelids cannot be closed completely Assessment of the eyes by a
whether the eyes can veterinarian specialist during an ECVO
be closed eye examination.
Same standard.
7 Body Condition Not specified in government criteria. Assessment of the BCS by a
Score (BCS) veterinarian during a clinical
examination. Dogs may not be obese
(BCS> 7/9).
Extra criterion.
8 Exercise tolerance Not stated in this form in Assessment by veterinarian in
test government criteria. accordance with report.
Extra criterion.
9 Neck and chest Not listed as an enforcement Assessment by veterinarian
circumference criterion. Extra criterion.
5
Raad van Beheer breeding strategy brachycephalic pedigree dogs
2 Introduction
The Raad van Beheer is the organization in The Netherlands that stands for the relationship between
people and dogs. This not only involves all kinds of activities that you can do with your dog, such as
hunting, tracking, rescue work, sports or showing, but also the breeding of healthy dogs. Cynology
stands for everything that has to do with this special relationship.
On March 17, 2019, the Minister sent the report "BREEDING BRACHYCEPHALIC DOGS" from Utrecht
University to the Dutch equivalent of the House of Commons. The report contains a nice overview of
the literature, the measurement methods and the problems that can occur in dogs with an extremely
short muzzle. The report is also the starting point for enforcement criteria for the Dutch enforcement
agencies (LID and NVWA).
The criteria provide tools for breeding brachycephalic dogs. In this way, breeders and breed clubs of
certain breeds can test their breeding policy against the criteria. Many of the enforcement criteria
are also included in the breed standard as a (disqualifying) fault. Kennel clubs nationally, but also
internationally, have been working for some time to combat exaggerations in appearance. The ideal
appearance of dogs from brachycephalic breeds is that the nostrils are open, the eyes do not
protrude, and the nasal fold is not a nuisance. In addition, dogs must be able to move normally and
breathing problems must lead to disqualification and / or exclusion at an exhibition.
Internationally there is a lot of attention for the problems that occur with the brachycephalic breeds.
The Raad van Beheer has spoken about the problems in various international forums. For example, a
strong plea was made during the international FCI judges meeting about not allowing French
Bulldogs to win titles with too narrow nostrils and very little muzzle. By putting this on the agenda
and criticizing it, people change perspectives about how we should judge these dogs at exhibitions. A
behavioral change amongst all stakeholders where the ideal has a less extreme short muzzle, is
needed.
At meetings of the European Union, the Raad van Beheer has clearly stated that the appearance of
dogs is only important once health and well-being are secured. Because dog breeding is
international, it is important the same rules and standards are in force to improve health and well-
being. The message from the Raad van Beheer is always that a dog must be functional. A dog must be
able to run and play, while having enough air and having good temperature regulation.
When examining the report, we concluded that we want to go further, achieve more in certain areas.
As the Raad van Beheer we have a key position, because the breeding clubs are represented through
the Raad van Beheer and we record the ancestry. By issuing the pedigree certificate the new owner
has the certainty that certain things have been checked. In addition, the Raad van Beheer offers to
carry out a more extensive check for the brachycephalic breeds. In this way it is known that when a
pedigree dog of these breeds is purchased the parents meet the criteria and that a check has taken
place.
In the past, the Raad van Beheer has successfully set additional requirements. The Raad van Beheer
received, for example, compliments about the covenant and thus the approach to health problems of
the Cavalier King Charles Spaniel from of the former State Secretary Bleeker.
6
Raad van Beheer breeding strategy brachycephalic pedigree dogs
For years, breeders affiliated with the breed clubs have been subjected to additional requirements
regarding health and well-being in addition to the central regulations of the Raad van Beheer. These
additional requirements are described in a club breeding regulation (VFR). These club breeding
regulations (VFRs) form the basis for the new, to be created, health matrix, when pedigree
certificates are issued. This health matrix will be implemented next year. This makes it clear to every
new owner whether the dog has passed the screening tests required for that breed. Here too we
want to go one step further with the brachycephalic breeds, namely by no longer issuing a pedigree
certificate if screening tests are not sufficient.
The Raad van Beheer, the breed clubs and the breeders are aware that these measures may cause
fewer people to breed brachycephalic dogs. Dogs will disappear from the gene pool, including dogs
with good characteristics. We are aware of that and we accept that. We choose to continue openly
and transparently and to offer consumers a dog that has been carefully bred.
We also want to promote these measures within the international forums. This creates the
opportunity that other kennel clubs will adopt the rules and that the health and well-being of these
dogs will also improve beyond our borders and increase the chance of importing healthy dogs.
3. Scope
Article 3.4 Decree on Animal husbandry applies to anyone who breeds companion animals for
business or hobby purposes, in order to prevent the health and welfare of the parent or offspring
from being harmed. Companion animal breeding must be done in a responsible manner. Breeding by
appearance should not lead to diminish health or well-being.
The report ‘breeding brachycephalic dogs’, describes the criteria that should be met when breeding
brachycephalic dogs. The position of the government is that these criteria can be used for the
enforcement of Article 3.4.
3.1 Responsibility
The ultimate responsibility for breeding lies with the breeder. Within organized cynology in The
Netherlands, the breeder is the owner of the bitch that is used for breeding (based on registration
with the Raad van Beheer). The owner of the stud dog is also registered at the Raad van Beheer.
Outside of organized cynology, the owner of the stud dog might be unknown. There is not necessarily
a (good) registration, and it is not necessarily known that a litter is being bred.
The breed clubs affiliated with the Raad van Beheer all have the purpose of promoting the health and
well-being of their breed. This translates into support for their members and into rules to which their
members are bound. Violation can, in ultimate cases, leads to cancelling their membership.
The breed clubs therefore have no legal but a moral responsibility regarding compliance with article
3.4. However, the influence of the breed clubs is limited to its members. In addition, a breeder can
always cancel the membership himself and is therefore no longer bound by the rules of the breed
club.
One of the objectives of the Raad van Beheer is to promote the health and well-being of all purebred
dogs (or preferably all dogs). This translates into support for the breed clubs and breeders in that
area and into rules to which members of members and other recipients of services are bound.
Violation can in the ultimate case lead to disqualification and therefore not being able to use
services, such as requesting pedigree certificates.
7
Raad van Beheer breeding strategy brachycephalic pedigree dogs
The Raad van Beheer therefore also has no legal responsibility but does have a moral and social
responsibility to commit itself to compliance with article 3.4. The authority of the Raad van Beheer is
limited to its members and to recipients of its services.
Veterinarians should be better equipped for this. A training or course would contribute to this. The
Raad van Beheer would like to assist in promoting this expertise and can make additional agreements
with veterinarians. The Raad van Beheer wants to publish the results of the examinations.
3.2 Jurisdiction
The jurisdiction of the breed club is limited to their members. The board of the breed club has been
given a mandate to perform acts and conversations on behalf of the collective of members. As in any
form of democracy, this is focused on the collective interest and can sometimes go against an
individual interest. However, this representation is limited to the affiliated members.
The same principle applies to the Raad van Beheer. The Raad van Beheer is also authorized to
preserve the collective interests of its members.
In addition, the Raad van Beheer also provides services to non-members like, among other things,
the issuance of pedigree certificates. Because they have a special status at the government (see the
exception of pedigree dogs in earlier regulations with regard to high-risk dogs) and the Dutch Kennel
Club is the only organization that can issue FCI pedigree certificates, it also has a representation of
the recipients of those services.
The Raad van Beheer has successfully used this power in the past to reduce certain problems. For
example, the Raad van Beheer has taken collective measures to secure the welfare of the bitch. This
concerns measures whereby the bitch may not be too young or too old to have a litter. The number
of litters is also limited, and special attention is paid to inbreeding restrictions due to the prohibition
on breeding of closely related dogs. In addition, there are collective measures about the use of dogs
with the Merle color. Although this is a very popular color, it is unwise from a health perspective to
combine two dogs with this color. The combination is therefore prohibited within organized
cynology. The Raad van Beheer monitors this measure.
The Raad van Beheer has covenants with breed clubs for specific breed-related problems. Additional
conditions to issue a pedigree certificate are included in the covenant. The Raad van Beheer checks
whether this obligation has been met before it proceeds to issue a pedigree certificate.
Finally, the Raad van Beheer is an ANBI organization (an organization for public benefit). This means
that it represents a social interest.
8
Raad van Beheer breeding strategy brachycephalic pedigree dogs
4.1 Market size
The total dog population in The Netherlands is estimated around 1.5 million dogs. The estimated
growth per year is around 10%. These are an estimated 150,000 new dogs, mostly puppies.
Around 35,000 pedigree puppies are born every year and registered at the Raad van Beheer, a small
proportion of which find their way abroad. That means every year about 115,000 puppies come onto
the market that are not bred with a Raad van Beheer pedigree certificate. A small proportion of these
are pedigree dogs imported from abroad, but the majority are dogs that are bred in The Netherlands
without a pedigree or dogs that are bred and traded abroad. Where pedigree dogs bred in The
Netherlands are subject to all sorts of rules and controls imposed by the Raad van Beheer, this does
not apply to these non-pedigree dogs. The assumption that these non-pedigree dogs are healthier
because they are crossbreeds is (usually) not valid. It often concerns so-called look-alikes, which are
bred via the same process of selection of appearance.
Looking at the breeds affected by the enforcement criteria, it appears that they are already
influenced by the effect of the communicating vessels. Although good statistics are lacking, the
number of pedigree dogs of these breeds bred in The Netherlands has fallen sharply, while in the
streets they are fashion dogs. Earlier research commissioned by the government to Utrecht
University shows that the proportion of non-pedigree dogs of certain popular breeds is approaching
90%.
The consequence of these communicating vessels not only places limitations on the Raad van Beheer
and its members in the pursuit of improving health and well-being, it will also seriously influence the
effect of Article 3.4 and enforcement.
To start with, no obstacles are imposed on foreign breeders and traders by article 3.4, because this
article only relates to dogs bred in The Netherlands (and not to selling and keeping them). In
addition, there is also a large circuit in The Netherlands of illegal breeders or traders, who work
unregistered and are therefore much more difficult to identify and control. In many cases these
traders work via Marktplaats (Ebay), providing false information (for example, incorrect photos of
parents), under false names and with temporary telephone numbers and addresses.
This creates the risk that enforcement will concentrate on the registered breeder who is already
subject to a certain amount of regulation and control, while the unregistered breeders will continue
9
Raad van Beheer breeding strategy brachycephalic pedigree dogs
to do their work undisturbed without any scruples. The effect on the health and welfare of dogs in
The Netherlands will be negative if these 70% to 90% of the market is not included in legislation and
enforcement.
The involved breeders will be contacted. This will help to stress the necessity, explain the breeding
strategy and will help with a broad support. The Raad van Beheer wants to take its responsibility.
Arrangements between the Raad van Beheer and the relevant breed clubs will be formalized.
Additional requirements for the pedigree certificate issue are included in a covenant. Before a
breeder can request pedigree certificates for the offspring, the tests described below must be
successfully completed.
Without a covenant, no pedigree certificates will be issued for these dogs. This regulation will
therefore also apply to breeders who are not affiliated with a breed club.
This is in line with several scientific researches that the CFR sees as a risk factor, but not as a fact that
has a direct relationship with BOAS and BOS. Therefore, the CFR should not be used as a breeding-
prohibiting criterion.
10
Raad van Beheer breeding strategy brachycephalic pedigree dogs
Due to this measurable and transparent breeding strategy, the Raad van Beheer and the breed clubs
believe an extension of the muzzle of these brachycephalic breeds will be achieved. As already
indicated in Fairfok, the extremes of brachycephaly should disappear. It is important that the snout
(muzzle) of the dog gives enough space to the structures of the anterior airways.
Working on breed crossings and inspections of dogs will be an ongoing effort. It is important that the
popularity of these breeds is considered. So, the dogs bred must resemble the breed, but with an
extension of the muzzle length. Therefore, giving the consumer a choice. That choice is important
because these regulations are limited to national borders, while the breeding of dogs is international.
Dogs without a pedigree certificate but with characteristics of that breed can also be selected to
request an Appendix G-0 pedigree certificate. Of course, these dogs are tested, so no health and
welfare limiting characteristics are present, before they can be used for breeding. Breeders are given
the opportunity to breed from these new insights and then register the dogs in Appendix G-0.
A frequently asked question, also to ourselves, is whether the Raad van Beheer should currently
publish pedigree certificates for litters of brachycephalic breeds.
The issuing of such a pedigree certificate seems to be contrary to our wish to have the pedigree
certificate guaranteeing for a dog that has been bred in the best possible way and to legitimize
violation of article 3.4.
As soon as the measures proposed here are final, we can test the applications against the criteria in
this new policy and issue a pedigree certificate based on the outcome. The decision whether to issue
a pedigree certificate is therefore a problem for a limited period and our decision is not to refuse
pedigree certificates at this time based on the following arguments:
• If these puppies do not get a pedigree certificate now, their ancestry will no longer be easily
traceable in the future and this may have consequences for the possibilities to use them in
breeding, without knowing whether we can judge whether or not these puppies meet the
criteria to be defined. This could lead to unnecessary loss of suitable genetic material and
genetic diversity;
• The puppies that are born now will receive a pedigree certificate; however, they will never
be able to be used for breeding if they do not meet the new criteria;
• this policy, with arguments, will be clearly communicated through the channels of the Raad
van Beheer so that potential buyers can become aware of this. At the same time, we will
encourage breeders to hold off mating until the new policy is clear.
Despite the strong relationship between CFR and BOAS risk, it is likely that other genetic
and environmental factors will also contribute to the likelihood and severity of BOAS in individual
11
Raad van Beheer breeding strategy brachycephalic pedigree dogs
dogs.
We found some exceptional individuals that were unaffected by BOAS despite
extreme brachycephaly (e.g. 18 individuals in Study 1, and 29 in Study 2, appeared unaffected
despite having CFRs <0.2), that may have anatomical and/or physiological adaptations.
In addition, scientists indicate that the CFR is not suitable as a breed prohibiting criterion, because
both reproducibility and predictive value are insufficient. This has been demonstrated by Liu et al.
From the University of Cambridge where many dogs have been examined. The number of dogs
examined is much larger than the previous studies by Packer et al.
A previous study suggested that BOAS risk increases in dogs with relatively shorter muzzles
(craniofacial ratio, CFR) and thicker necks, across different brachycephalic breeds: from extreme
brachycephalic breeds such as the Pug (median CFR = 0.08) to moderate brachycephalic breeds
such as the Staffordshire Bull Terrier (median CFR = 0.5).
In our study with large numbers of dogs of the three breeds, we obtained supportive data on
NGR, but only a weak association of BOAS status with CFR in a single breed. Within breeds, the
variations in CFR were very limited. CFR overlapped considerably between the different BOAS
functional grades. Our findings on the reproducibility of these measures and the large differences
in detailed conformation between brachycephalic dog breeds suggest that the true associations
between CFR and BOAS for specific breeds may not be comparable to the findings in the Packer et
al. (2015) study that compared multiple breeds with, in most cases, relatively small numbers of
dogs. Anatomically, the CFR measurement cannot determine the main internal BOAS lesions along
the upper airway.
Within cynology it is important to keep dogs with the right characteristics. Dogs that have a low CFR,
but that show no problems, are interesting for breeding. Apparently, they have a genetic
composition that protects them from the problems. It is precisely these dogs that should not be lost.
The CFR will be used to determine whether a dog should be subjected to additional investigations
regarding brachycephaly, but not as a criterion to prohibit breeding with the dog. The owners of dogs
with a low CFR (as indicated in the report) must show that the health and well-being of their dog is
NOT limited by these external characteristics. By placing this responsibility with the owner, he
becomes more aware of the problems that occur within these breeds. The responsibility is thus
placed with the key person in the process.
The dogs will then have to show that they can breathe normally and without any problems, including
the functionality of the front airways regarding temperature regulation. The exercise tolerance tests
mentioned in the report will be used for this. The Raad van Beheer and the breed clubs think it is
important that these tests are repeated during the life of the dog and set the validity of the fitness
test to 3 years.
The eyes will be examined by specialists (ECVO - European College of Veterinary Ophthalmologists),
who record this through a standardized protocol. The Raad van Beheer receives the results from the
specialists, registers the results and then publishes them on the website.
In addition to these characteristics, the Raad van Beheer and the breeders want to register more
details in order to improve breeding and get more information for a breeding strategy. The collection
of relevant data is essential. The central database, mentioned in the report, can be set up by the
Raad van Beheer for pedigree dogs and should be filled with reliable information in collaboration
12
Raad van Beheer breeding strategy brachycephalic pedigree dogs
with veterinarians who carry out health examinations for the Raad van Beheer.
Although the following examinations will be mandatory before an animal can be used for breeding,
both the Raad van Beheer and the breed clubs will make every effort to let all dogs (also non
breeding animals) participate in the examinations. This makes it possible to make a baseline
measurement and evaluations in the future.
A substantial part of the population will be measured at the beginning. The Raad van Beheer can
invite both breeders and owners to participate in these tests. An effort will be made to offer this
financially achievable to lower the threshold for participation. The aim is to investigate a
considerable part of the population, in order to get statistically relevant data. An attempt will be
made to examine dogs of different ages.
During the baseline measurement, the measurements will be taken in combination with an exercise
tolerance test and a standardized eye examination.
The scope of the studies on the population is shown in the following diagram:
* Initial estimate, the percentage strongly depends on the breed. The goal is to investigate a
statistically relevant group. For the baseline measurement, owners will be contacted who are
registered in the studbook. Breed clubs will promote this. We count on support from the KNMvD, the
ECGG and the government for measuring non-pedigree dogs.
13
Raad van Beheer breeding strategy brachycephalic pedigree dogs
When a veterinary intervention has taken place to perform a correction or when there has been a
previous luxation of the eyeball, dogs may not be used for breeding. The examination must be
carried out before breeding, it is not mandatory to repeat.
1 Abnormal breathing At rest (not asleep) the dog makes Dogs are assessed both at rest and
sound (stridor) strong sniffing, snoring or sawing during exercise by a veterinarian when
noises, or there is a nasal, taking an exercise tolerance test.
pharyngeal and / or laryngeal stridor Same standard.
at rest
2 Nose opening Mild stenosis = moderate narrowing Assessment of the nostrils by a
of the nostrils. veterinarian during a clinical
severe stenosis = severe narrowing examination.
of the nostrils. Same standards.
3 Relative nose greater than 0.3 but less than 0.5 Use criterion to determine risk dogs
reduction that must meet additional measures.
Less than or equal to 0.3
4 Nasal fold Nasal fold present but no visible Evaluation of the nasal fold by a
contact of the hair with the veterinarian during a clinical
conjunctiva or cornea of the eye, examination.
wet nasal fold hair or signs of Same standards.
inflammation
Nasal fold present and hair that
from the nasal fold (may) touch the
cornea or conjunctiva (wet nasal
fold hair)
14
Raad van Beheer breeding strategy brachycephalic pedigree dogs
5 Visibility of the White of the eye visible in 2 or more Assessment of the eyes by a
whites of the eyes quadrants-> shallow eye socket and veterinarian specialist during an ECVO
(the sclera) in the / or large eyelids, with a poorly eye examination.
dog looking straight protected eyeball and an increased Same standard.
ahead risk of developing corneal ulcers
6 Eyelid reflex: test Eyelids cannot be closed completely Assessment of the eyes by a
whether the eyes can veterinarian specialist during an ECVO
be closed eye examination.
Same standard.
7 Body Condition Not specified in government criteria. Assessment of the BCS by a
Score (BCS) veterinarian during a clinical
examination. Dogs may not be obese
(BCS> 7/9).
Extra criterion.
8 Exercise tolerance Not stated in this form in Assessment by veterinarian in
test government criteria. accordance with report.
Extra criterion.
9 Neck and chest Not listed as an enforcement Assessment by veterinarian
circumference criterion. Extra criterion.
With this proposal, the Raad van Beheer can ensure compliance with the criteria stated in the report.
The dogs that are used for breeding are checked in advance for abnormal breathing sound, shape
and structure of the nostrils, whether the nasal fold is irritating the eyes, but also whether the eyes
bulge too much.
A veterinarian is pre-eminently suitable for assessing the health of the dog and is also the right
person to record this well and clearly.
In addition, pedigree dogs have an 100% DNA parentage verification. All parent animals, all litters
and all puppies are checked.
6.3 Import
Foreign dogs must comply with these rules before they can be used for breeding in The Netherlands.
The Raad van Beheer wants to go even further and only register dogs of these breeds that enter The
15
Raad van Beheer breeding strategy brachycephalic pedigree dogs
Netherlands at an older age when the measurements are met. Therefore, every dog of the
mentioned breeds, of 12 months and older, that is imported must comply with the proposed
measures. In this way, the Raad van Beheer offers a much broader impact than the proposals in the
report "breeding brachycephalic dogs". Certain breeds have more than 60% of the ancestors from
abroad. The Raad van Beheer plays an important role in the internationalization of the measures.
6.4 Exhibitions
Judges are not allowed to reward dogs that show exaggerated characteristics that could limit health
and well-being. Extensive training and mandatory documentation of specific breeds thereby
guarantee the Dutch judges will judge according to the Dutch policy. To be sure that these dogs are
judged by well-trained judges, judges will only be allowed originating from The Netherlands or from a
country that has a policy on breed specific interventions for assessing appearance (for example the
Scandinavian countries).
7 Behavioral change
To achieve success, it is important that the behavior of both breeders and the new owners will
change. The government has instructed Utrecht University to draw up criteria. With these criteria it is
possible to hold people accountable for violations.
However, more is needed to achieve the desired behavioral change. The Raad van Beheer wants to
initiate this change for the breeding of pedigree dogs.
The Raad van Beheer wants to achieve this with the following actions:
• Realize awareness of the brachycephalic problems among the various parties.
• A change of perception. This is done, among other things, by having the dogs examined. In
addition, owners are approached to have their (non-breeding) dog examined.
• Involve veterinarians in the assessment of the problems and have the dogs assessed with a
fixed protocol. Recent research from England indicates that the problems with
brachycephalic dogs are underestimated by their owners.
• An extra course / training for veterinarians for the assessment of the problems. The Raad van
Beheer can then show which veterinarians have followed this additional learning course.
• Stimulating the natural birth of puppies. A caesarean section in an animal in need must be
performed. If this was necessary a second time, an animal may no longer be used for
breeding. The Raad van Beheer will check a natural birth (randomly) within 10 days after the
birth. Registration and reporting in possible cooperation with veterinarians play a role in this.
• Transparency. The Raad van Beheer will publish the results of the examinations on its
website "Generations & Health Online".
• Issue certificates of performed examinations. Breed clubs and breeders have asked the Raad
van Beheer whether they can receive proof of the examination results. This allows them to
show (potential) new owners that they have met the requirements.
• Information and communication by the Raad van Beheer: The Raad van Beheer can inform
the breeders who have bred a litter in recent years and inform them of the new rules
through their own media.
• Information and communication by breed clubs and other members of the Raad van Beheer:
The breed clubs will bring the rules to the attention of the affiliated breeders.
• Implementation and contribution by breeders. Breeders go with their potential breeding
animals to the veterinarian for the exercise tolerance test, the clinical examination and the
ECVO eye test. The costs for the tests will be done at the breeder expense.
• Checking the results. The control of the results of the examinations is carried out at the office
of the Raad van Beheer. Based on the number of litters in the last 10 years, it is estimated
16
Raad van Beheer breeding strategy brachycephalic pedigree dogs
that there will be around 700 matings per year. The audit will be implemented within the
existing procedures. The Raad van Beheer will use its own resources for this.
By organizing a baseline measurement, the policy can be followed properly, and adjustments can be
made if necessary. All breeding animals that are used in The Netherlands for the breeding of
pedigree dogs and for which pedigree certificates are requested for the offspring, will be checked.
8 Risks
The Raad van Beheer influences the issuing of pedigree certificates to dogs whose parents meet the
criteria. The Raad van Beheer has no influence on other dogs. With non-pedigree dogs we see many
side effects, such as:
• Husbandry of dogs that have health and welfare problems that are the result of their
appearance is not prohibited. Only breeding of these dogs is not permitted in The
Netherlands.
• It is possible that Dutch breeders will offer the dogs using a foreign address.
• Brachycephalic dogs can be imported from other countries. The report "as sick as a dog?"
recently presented to the Dutch’ House of Commons indicates that dogs from abroad are less
healthy and less social.
• Veterinarians will be asked to perform corrective operations on animals at a young age to
adjust appearance and the dogs may meet the criteria later in life.
• Owners who prefer a brachycephalic dog because of their character and behavior are now
being forced to fetch a dog from abroad or choose another type of dog that may not fit well
in terms of character and behavior.
8.1 Inequality
The rules only apply to Dutch breeders. Free movement of people and animals applies within the
European Union. With these rules, Dutch breeders are strongly disadvantaged compared to fellow
breeders in the surrounding countries. This inequality can also lead to a lower degree of acceptance
of the measures.
9 Preconditions
The differences mentioned in this document in the treatment between (pedigree) dogs bred in The
Netherlands and dogs that are imported from abroad, can form an obstruction in the
implementation of the measures proposed by us. In addition, it is likely to have a negative effect on
the health of the total population of dogs in The Netherlands.
The Raad van Beheer and its affiliated breed clubs therefore see it as a condition for success that
additional measures are taken to eliminate this inequality and to regulate the health of the imported
dogs.
Therefore, we call on the Minister to reflect on adequate additional measures and regulations.
It is also important to realize that The Netherlands is not an island. A future-proof approach requires
international attention and cooperation. Recently, the Ministry and the Raad van Beheer have
worked together to bring this problem to the attention. We urgently request that this collaboration
be continued in order to draw attention to this problem internationally and to keep it that way.
We also ask the Minister to remind the various stakeholders of their responsibility for equal
treatment. Recently the Journal of Veterinary Medicine has indicated that the Dutch enforcement
17
Raad van Beheer breeding strategy brachycephalic pedigree dogs
agency (NVWA) will not prosecute veterinarians who perform fertility assistance and insemination in
brachycephalic dogs. This cannot be the intention, on the contrary, a proactive alert from the
veterinarians should be issued, whereby a duty to report is more in line than promoting an attitude
to turn a blind eye to these procedures.
We plead for mandatory reporting of corrective procedures, caesarean sections and insemination by
veterinarians. These veterinary interventions limit natural selection and ensure that animals that are
biologically unable to live healthily and multiply, are maintained. Healthy breeding is only
accomplished when everyone works together and takes responsibility. We urge the Minister to also
address the responsibility of veterinarians.
To perform a good baseline measurement, it is important that the non-pedigree dogs are included.
We ask the Minister to help think about how these owners can be approached. Again, we see a role
for the veterinarians. Veterinarians also assess non-pedigree dogs. The Raad van Beheer would like
to try to collect that information so that a good representation of the population can be formed with
the aim of monitoring whether the policy provides the desired improvement in the area of well-being
and health of the dogs.
10 Conclusion
The Raad van Beheer requests an exception for pedigree dog breeding to use dogs that are healthy,
but have a CFR of less than 0.3, for breeding. The Raad van Beheer will check whether the breeders
are keeping to the agreements. The Raad van Beheer will only issue pedigree certificates if the
parents meet the conditions.
In addition, we draw attention to the side effects that the regulations can cause and the inequality
that this entails. The government remains responsible for the enforcement of both import dogs and
dogs that are bred in The Netherlands but are not under the influence of the Raad van Beheer.
It is important that the popularity of these breeds is taken into consideration. Fortunately, The
Netherlands is not known for an enormous rise in popularity of these breeds (see appendix for
number of registrations) as seen in England, for example. Such an increase in popularity causes
people to breed these dog breeds for economic reasons, whereby the health and well-being of the
dogs is often not a priority.
For a success in The Netherlands it is essential that the bred dogs continue to resemble the breed
concerned in appearance and behavior, but with an extension of the muzzle length. In this way the
consumer has a choice. This choice is of utmost importance because the regulations are limited to
national borders.
This breeding strategy is not the end, but the beginning. Breeders want to show they breed as
healthy as possible and have clearly demonstrated their commitment and unity during our meetings
and consultations. Knowing about earlier contradictions, this shows that the desired behavioral
change is taking place rapidly within this group.
The Raad van Beheer will support the ambition to breed as healthily as possible by means of the
health matrix, the publication of the results of screening examinations and, where necessary or
desirable, drawing covenants if additional conditions are required to issue the pedigree certificate.
By working together as a government, scientists, breeders, breed clubs, veterinarians and kennel
club, but also with international stakeholders, it is possible to make a difference for brachycephalic
dogs.
We have the same goal: A healthy and social dog.
18
Raad van Beheer breeding strategy brachycephalic pedigree dogs
Appendix 1 (studbook registrations)
aantal inschrijvingen NHSB
Boston terrier Engelse Bulldog Franse Bulldog Mopshond Shih Tzu
1164
1131 1148
1101 1081
1031 1033 1011
947 967 974 956 968
924 921 917 936 910
881 888 912
858 859 848 842
799 789 816 791
732 711
674 694
664 661 645 657
634
582
512
453
406 422 406 416 394 377
349 333 342 367 340 377
344 323 360 339
299 321 322 310
276 258
314 294 304 322
275
308 293 305
306 289
269 263 267 245 267 269
234 232
208
189 192
164 155 168 136 128 129 147
109 92
78 64 75 72 72 98 99 104 78 120 93
62 54 48 73 70 62
1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018
Number of registrations of the breeds with more than 100 registrations per year
81
71 70
56
53
49
42
40 39
38 38 38
35
31 31 31
28 28 29 29 29
27 27 27
25 25 25 24 25 25
23 22 23
21 21 20 20 20 20
18 19 18 18 18
17 16 16 16 17 17 16
14 14 14 14 15
13
12 12 12
12 12 12 13
12
10 10 10
10 10 11 10 9 11
8 8 87 8
7 8 77 7 8 78 7 7
5 6 6 5 6 6
55 5 56
5 6
5
5 6
4
3 3 3 4 3 3 43 4 4 3 4
3
2 2
1 2 2 2 2
1 1 2
1
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018
Number of registrations of breeds with fewer than 100 registrations per year
19
Raad van Beheer breeding strategy brachycephalic pedigree dogs
Appendix 2 (examples of brachycephalic dogs from report and
examples of pedigree dogs)
Report indicates that there is variation in muzzle length within the different French Bulldogs
20
Raad van Beheer breeding strategy brachycephalic pedigree dogs
Example of a pedigree pug with nice open nostrils and some muzzle length
Example of a pedigree English Bulldog with some muzzle length and open nostrils
21
Raad van Beheer breeding strategy brachycephalic pedigree dogs