48CXV
48CXV
48CXV
ABSTRACT
Several researchers established the importance of open, unbuilt residential community
spaces. Using a complex nomenclature in various ways, these areas are critical in
contemporary planning practice, frequently neglected and treated as leftovers. With their
usefulness in the Indian context of socially engaged and sometimes intrusive
communities, these spaces are gradually losing their position in today's residential
environments due to pressure to provide mass migration patterns to the rapidly rising
population. Due to their inherent order and dignity, these public spaces that offer
residents physical, psychological, and perceptual comfort were present in historically
developed Indian cities. Many new housing projects by renowned designers have also
used well-designed neighbourhood architecture features. This work is a comparative
analysis of three selected projects aimed at improving appropriate methods for
contemporary Indian history and achieving neighbourhood comfort and resident sense
of belonging. It concludes with a set of design guidelines after analysing these case studies
which shall be applicable solutions to physical, perceptive, psychological and social
problems in the present context in neighbourhood residential environments.
INTRODUCTION
Neighbourhood areas are developed, opened or semi-open areas according to the designs
that serve as meeting places, community interactions and other events. The rest of the
building form, which in many ways constitute essential living spaces with diverse
nomenclature in different contexts, are required but often disregarded and designated.
Many researchers have stressed that these residential areas are essential to the
community's overall comfort and development. In the Indian context, these areas are
important as they live, play, work and worship in an informal arrangement of spaces in
socially engaged and sometimes intrusive societies for years. This sense of harmony and
ownership in traditional cities is preserved due to their authenticity by many
METHODOLOGY:
The research attempts to study the various attributes of contemporary Indian housing
and the absence of neighbourhood spaces through various literatures studies. It also
analyses the factors influencing comfort in neighbourhood spaces. It also added to study
the various aspect with description of residential communities through past history
through an insight of traditional Indian cities along with post-independence design
approaches.
Using the Descriptive Analytical Approach, general principles of quality of life,
sustainable growth, and urban quality of life is studied. Moreover, the study explores the
ideas and methods of modern urban planning developed in various case studies to
improve the quality of life. The urban standard of life in a neighbourhood has been
analysed from this study. The three selected schemes, GSFC Housing at B.V. Doshi at
Vadodara Raj Rewal's Asian Games Village at New Delhi, and Charles Correa's Belapur
Housing at Navi Mumbai, were designed by eminent architects responsive to residents
'indoor and outdoor needs are studied. The philosophies of these architects and their
underlying principles are summarized and deduced into design guidelines applied in the
India is a fast-developing country where housing has become a major concern due to
rising population coupled with increasing urbanization. In pursuit of ample numbers and
wide-ranging indifference, contemporary residential developments are not conducive to
the well-being of the inhabitants. Inspired to some degree by initial western models,
these housing schemes are replicated in small towns, irrespective of their effect on living
habits of an evolving Indian society. Taylor and Thapar clarified how "the metaphysics of
space and quest for serenity, recurrent themes in Indian architecture, challenge homeless
migrants and the frenzied needs of an emerging middle-income consumer society"
(Taylor and Thapar, 1992, 26).
Numerous macro-level issues associated with current housing environments include lack
of organized open spaces and movement patterns, loss of enclosure and scale, lack of
open space adaptability, lack of informal character, indifference to prevailing climatic
conditions, and lack of visual relief and spatial character among others. Consequently, in
most housing environments, public parks and leisure areas are often unused negative
parks rather than intended areas of activity or interaction. This pattern is evident not
only in low-income housing, but also in luxury high-end developments; the higher the
cost, the lower living spaces. Most contemporary Indian housing projects therefore lack
viable public spaces to create a clean, liveable environment.
The above shortcomings are apparent in modern housing projects, which should have
constructed individual housing units for efficient area management linked by wide
vehicle roads and green spaces. Nevertheless, these rigid and alienating systems show
lack of hierarchy from private to public and lack of gradual change, with drastic
transformations of spatial enclosure, proportions, and scale. Residents 'comfort level is
often ignored. Moreover, open-grid road networks designed to facilitate vehicles build
blurred pedestrian thoroughfares. Cars also made these situations risky, even hazardous.
Often an overview of the new projects is an overview of the crowded parking lots.
Thus, this lack of existing small-scale community spaces undermined the sense of
belonging and even privacy, causing more identity and territoriality loss. Many residents
remain impersonal in these unknown areas without a sense of identity, leading to lack of
open space maintenance and loss of associated pride among residents. Large open spaces
function for scheduled, frequently forced, formal activities, but due to lack of enclosure,
scale and inadequacy to tropical Indian climate, they do not facilitate casual, informal and
social interaction or community relationships. Moreover, visual and spatial character of
most contemporary housing is monotonous and uninteresting. This housing is neither
heaven nor earth, resulting in visual relief loss.
• Perceptual needs: Moreover, residents 'primary perceptual need from their living
environment is uniqueness or distinct identification within the dwelling unit
prototype amount. Contemporary housing with similarly built spaces and dwelling
units will provide for shaping individual and
group spaces of residents based on their
preferences and requirements. Residents will
feel happiness and pride. Additionally, visual
feedback and relaxation from the physical
environment is a significant contributing factor
to the inhabitants 'sensory relaxation (Fig. 6).
The need for spaces that give rise to excitement
and anticipation can be fulfilled by creating
interesting numbers, avoiding monotony in Figure 7: Mass parking leading to human
interaction with green buffer space between
building blocks and street facades, effectively pathway and parking (Source: Author)
negotiating with the sky and the land, and
varying visual experiences in a residential
setting.
• Social needs: Social needs are also important to
the well-being of the person. "The hidden truth
of man is that he needs to be confirmed in his Figure 8: Integration of open and built up space
within the built environment for healthy
being and life by fellow people not only in his interaction (Source: Author)
house but even in the context of neighbourly interactions "(Alexander, 1977, 94).
Interactions with other beings satisfy human identity and belonging needs while
promoting the growth of individuals and reducing depression. Such cohesion and
interactions, which are considered to be significant in the Indian context, should be
fostered in desirable neighbourhood areas. However, "social interactions arise more
easily when a sense of individual autonomy, whether through reserve or territorial
force, meets people's social needs" (Lang, 1987, 160). Variables that affect social
interactions in a residential area include proximity and orientation of housing units
to one another, their location and open space arrangements, and their access to
streets and community spaces (Fig. 7). As a condensation of the factors listed above,
while physical needs are addressed by climate-friendly and healthy community
spaces, their privacy, protection and territoriality address psychological needs.
Perceptual expectations can be fulfilled by individual identity, visual variety and
comfort, whereas social needs require informal contact (Fig. 8).
Nonetheless, in the sense of this analysis, the variables associated with all of the above
should be amalgamated as their combined impact contributes to a satisfying and
stable residential environment. On the juxtaposition of these dimensions, the factors
that influence the physical, perceptual and psychological comfort conditions of a
community within a residential setting are the spatial arrangement and relationship
of housing units with each other in terms of the location and their transfer from public
to private areas, and vice versa. In addition, physical access to the location, the flow of
traffic, the separation of vehicle and pedestrian lanes and the linking of open spaces
(Fig. 6) with regard to traffic decide ease, accessibility and orientation. However, the
physical comfort of the surrounding areas is further dependent on the reactions of the
adjacent built environment to the macro-and micro-climate conditions, such as the
sun's position, the prevailing wind direction, the water sources, the vegetation and
the topography of the site. Factors that influence the understanding and psychological
comfort of these public spaces include their spatial hierarchy, enclosure and
accessibility, size and volume, and the effect of the built mass character on open space.
Aspects that define the accessibility of these spaces include the relationship between
the built form and open spaces, the treatment of building edge, the location of
common areas, and their connections.
social features of typical courtyards and gates of ancient Indian cities" (Curtis, 1988, 68).
In contrast, New Delhi's Asian Games Village was built on a 32-acre site comprising 700
housing units centred on urban streets and enclosures. The entire complex has two-to-
three-story buildings with 11 distinctly constructed dwellings.
Figure 16: Layout Plan of selected Case studies (Image Courtesy: Ritu Gulati- Neighbourhood spaces in residential
environments)
Grid output is often determined by the distance, movement and visual properties of the
movement and edge treatment.
The peripheral path is the direct periphery of the spinal cord in the Asian Games Village
and the quick transition from the external path is perpendicular. With current road
networks, the GSFC Housing can do the same by separating a perimeter circuit of housing
and highway networks, which end in a stalemate. The Belapur Housing then prevents
entry into a hierarchical network that leads to tiny deacons in a peripheral backbone in
the parks. The three residential areas are totally free and raise the distance between the
car park and the entrance at the same time. However, the roads are low, with wide curves,
narrow entrances and reduced visibility. This raises vehicle speeds and allows the
vegetation and terrain around them to suit. Doorways and road widths between vehicles
and footpaths can be found in the Asian Games Village. The second perpendicular
orthogonal vehicle network provides ample common space and transfers for GSFC turf.
Belapur Housing has a separate car and foot path by restricting vehicle access and making
hierarchical accessible pathways which, in some instances, increase the distance to walk.
Both of the cases contains well-distributed car parks with less than 10 percent allocation
although the difference is much higher between parking areas in Belapur.
issue, though Belapur housing alleviates intense radiation effects by efficient shading in
intimate clusters. The central water stream also alters the microclimate and makes for
fun outdoor areas, while on terraces and the upper floors the wind is more productive.
FINDINGS
The previous studies already established the value for residents of complete holistic
comfort of well-planned public spaces in a residential community. The rising
demographic patterns and migration patterns that lead to poorly planted residential
areas have also underlined today's needs for these ecosystems. Although the traditional
Indian settlements can theoretically solve these problems, recent examples can be
inadequate due to rapidly growing numbers, widespread incompetence and lack of
concern. Three existing examples from well-known designers must therefore be
reviewed, in order to create useful solutions to physical, perceptive, psychological and
social problems in the present context. The following guidelines are established through
this review:
• Although the spatial structure and configurations of site units differ in the three cases,
their relationships, unity, hierarchy, and transformation depend on the
neighbourhood spaces. In both cases, towns and buildings are located almost
centrally and people are competing in the open space. The desires and comfort of
users are also addressed. Human needs will always be satisfied by passive, supportive
interactions and a sense of comfort.
• The thorough study of the three cases chosen indicates that designers build a living
environment that is similarly favourable.
• Built mass and character are visually interesting together with the street landscape,
offering elements that contribute to the unit's distinctive personal presence while
retaining a human scale. The locks, colours of the doors and materials make a
reference to territoriality.
• It's not only built living areas that are residential environments. Compared to the
built-up the unbuilt, which plays a greater role in the comforts of residents and users,
must respond equally.
• Comfort factors in these environments range from physical to psychological and
perceptive, as well as people 's social needs.
• Weather comfort, accessibility and convenience for discharge of the operation and
effective transfer between locations depend on physics.
• Anonymity, security and territoriality, identity, visual pleasure and comfort,
psychological and perceived characteristics are essential to respond.
• In the three situations, the vehicle and pedestrian movements are well described and
delimited reducing the transitional hierarchy and are fixed properly. Parking lots are
well built to minimize walking distances and are also well shielded from the view for
optimum visual comfort.
• Spatial hierarchy obtained from various housing clusters leads to an apparent sense
of location, privacy and territory, thereby encouraging community surveillance, social
activity and common vandalism and aloofness.
• The edges of the built forms are interactive with alcoves and niches in both instances,
favouring informal interaction, collaboration and debate.
• All living conditions can be accommodated in various climatess by providing shared
shade, suitable wind and multi-activity areas, which can alter weather and seasons.
• Even in identical settings, no case warrants repetition. It focuses on the importance of
community space in residential environments and the diverse tools and techniques
that popular designers use to create living conditions, particularly in the Indian
context, for fostering a sense of belonging and wellbeing.
CONCLUSION
This research managed to holistically establish broad recommendations and discuss
issues of quality open spaces. Moreover, it has left a void in trying to assess the total
population and quality of life benefits of quality urban open spaces in suburban
communities. The study will promote policy-making to include quality open spaces and
accessibility and activity rates. Nevertheless, the study has laid the groundwork for more
study on the relationship and co-location of open spaces and community and the benefits
gained in the same field. Therefore, it is this study's perception that further research
should be undertaken to try and focus on the qualitative assessment of such
interventions.
REFERENCES
1. Alexander, C., 1977. A Pattern Language. Oxford University Press New York.
2. Appleyard, D., 1981. Liveable Streets. University of California Press, California.
3. Bonaiuto, M., Aiello, A., Perugini, M., Bonnes, M., Errcolant, A.P. 1999.
Multidimensional perception of residential environment quality and
neighbourhood attachment in the urban environment.J. Env. Psychol. 19,
331e352.
4. Ching, Francis D.K., 1979. Form Space and Order. Van Nostrand Reinhold, New
York.
5. Curtis, W., 1988. J.R. Balkrishna Doshi: An Architecture for India. Mapin Publishing
Pvt Ltd., Ahmedabad.
6. Gehl, Jan, 1987. Life between Buildings: Using Public Space. Van Nostrand
Reinhold, New York.
7. Greater London Council (GLC), Department of Architecture and Civic Design, 1978.
An Introduction to Housing Layout: A GLC Study. The Architectural Press Ltd,
London.
8. Hillier, B., 1996. Space Is the Machine- A Configurational Theory of Architecture.
Cambridge University Press, New York.
9. Jacobs, Jane, 1961. The Death and Life of Great American Cities. Random house,
New York.
10. Khan, Hasan-Uddin, 1987. Charles Correa-Architect in India. Butterworth
Architecture, London.
11. Lang, Jon, 1987. Creating Architectural Theory- the Role of Behavioural Sciences
in Environmental Design. Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York.
12. Lawrence, Roderick J., 1987. Housing, Dwellings and Homes: Design Theory,
Research and Practice. Wiley, Chichester West Sussex.
13. Lynch, K., 1981. A Theory of Good City Form. MIT Press, Cambridge.
14. Lynch, K., Hack, G., 1984. Site Planning. Mass: MIT Press, Cambridge.
15. Marcus, C., Sarkissian, W., 1986. Housing as if People Mattered: Site Design
Guidelines for Medium-Density Family Housing. University of California, Berkeley.
16. Moniteur, E., 1985. Architecture in India. Electronique Saint Goban, Serge
Dassault.
17. Newman, O., 1972. Defensible Space. Macmillan, New York.
18. Oktay, D., Rustemli, Ahmet, 2010. Measuring the quality of urban life and
neighbourhood satisfaction: findings from Gazimagusa (Famagusta) area. Int. J.
Soc. Sci. Humanity Stud. 2 (2).
19. Rashid, S.T., Ngrah, Ibrahim bin, Stephen, Enyinnaya Eluwa, 2013. Study of
neighbourhood choice factors and resident’s satisfaction in old and new
neighbourhoods of Slemani city Kurdistan Iraq. J. Environ. Earth Sci. 3 (2).
20. The Compact Oxford Reference Dictionary, 2001. Oxford University Press, Indiana.
21. Taylor, B.B., Thapar, R., 1992. Raj Rewal. Mimar Publications, London.
22. Taylor, R.B., Harrell, A.V., 1996. Physical Environment and Crime. A Final Report,
presented to the National Institute of Justice. U.S Dept. of Justice. NCJ 157311.
23. Untermann, R., Small, R., 1977. Site Planning for Cluster Housing. Van Nostrand
Reinhold Company, New York.
24. Vastu-Shilpa Foundation, 1988. Residential Open Spaces: A Behavioural Analysis.
Vastu Shilpa, Ahmedabad.
25. Gulati Ritu ,2019. Neighborhood spaces in residential environments: Lessons for
contemporary Indian context.