Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 2K views

    ETRI / KAIST Video Codec Patent Revoked by EPO

    Uploaded by

    Jennifer M Gallagher
    ETRI / KAIST video codec patent revoked by EPO on Feb. 6

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd

    ETRI / KAIST Video Codec Patent Revoked by EPO

    Uploaded by

    Jennifer M Gallagher
    2K views2 pages
    ETRI / KAIST video codec patent revoked by EPO on Feb. 6

    Original Title

    ETRI / KAIST video codec patent revoked by EPO

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    ETRI / KAIST video codec patent revoked by EPO on Feb. 6

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf
    2K views2 pages

    ETRI / KAIST Video Codec Patent Revoked by EPO

    Uploaded by

    Jennifer M Gallagher
    ETRI / KAIST video codec patent revoked by EPO on Feb. 6

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf
    of 2
    Applicaton No TieG088T.6 INFORMATION ‘The oral proceedings o 06.02.28 Resulted in [The European patent is revoked because atleast one ground for opposition prejudices the x maintenance of the European patent (Art. 101(2) EPC) ‘The European patent is revoked because, account being taken of the amendments made by the patent proprietor during opposition proceedings, the patent and the invention to which it relates were found not to meet the requirements of the EPC (Art. 101(3)(b) EPC). ‘The opposition(s) is/are rejected (Art. 101(2) EPC). ‘Account being taken of the amendments made by the patent propriotor during the opposition proceedings, the patent and the invention to which it relates are found to meet the requirements of the EPC (Art. 101(3)(a) EPC). The claims on the basis of which the patent will be maintained (provided that the conditions laid down in the Implementing Regulations are fulfilled) are annexed. ‘The opposition(s) of the following opponent(s) is/are deemed not to be filed: ‘The opposition(s) of the following opponent(s) is/are inadmissible: ‘After withdrawal ofall oppositions, the opposition proceedings were discontinued (Rule 84(2) EPC). ‘The oral proceedings are adjourned. ‘The proceedings will be continued in writing, EPO Form 2941 0822 page 1 of 2 O other: 2023 Dato Signature Lombardi, Giancarlo NB: this form is provided for the sake of information only. The written decision prevails. EPO Form 2941 0822 page 2 of 2

    You might also like