Case Study MR Smith
Case Study MR Smith
Case Study MR Smith
Joshua D. Winn
EAD-530-O501
Part 1
Overall, it appears that Mr. Smith’s class is engaged and he is confident in his
curriculum. It appears that he has a good control of his classroom environment as most students
are actively working. Using Domain 2 of my school’s observation checklist which focuses on
classroom environment, it appears that Mr. Smith has a positive learning environment, he
expectations for most students which is reflective in their engagement in the notes. What was not
observed was whether or not Mr. Smith creates high levels of student energy and demonstrates
passion for science and whether or not students demonstrate pride in their work and initiate self-
improvement. Mr. Smith may cultivate these areas in his classroom, they simply were not seen in
My assumption is that Mr. Smith has established classroom norms, expectations, and
procedures that he enforces. I believe this is evident as the majority of the class is engaged, quiet,
and doing what is expected of them. I also assume that Mr. Smith is very knowledgeable of his
content area. His twenty years of experience seem to appear in his thorough, informative
presentation with appropriate diagrams and infographics that drive home the points being
conveyed. My final assumption is that Mr. Smith is comfortable in his role as a teacher. His
behavior and demeanor did not change during the observation. He did not leave his area in the
front of the room by the computer when the observation began. I believe this is another example
There are three questions I would ask Mr. Smith. First, I would ask how he establishes
classroom norms, expectations, and procedures. I would also ask him how he checks for
understanding. Does he ask higher order thinking questions during his instruction, or do he
CASE STUDY
simply answer questions that are asked of him. Finally, I would ask how he motivates those who
are not engaged in the lesson to get back on task. For instance, does he call on them from the
observation, it appears his slides are organized and very detailed which allows students to have
all the information they need ask they seek to become proficient in the topic or standard being
the podium for the duration of the presentation, he cannot ensure that all students are engaged.
For example, are students in the back listening to music on their headphones or using their cell
phone? He would not know if he is not circulating the room. I would encourage him to move
around more during instruction so he can have a better feel for understanding and hold the
Part 2
Smith as an individual. An administrator may be able to make better assumptions and inferences
about a teacher having the knowledge of the teacher’s work ethic and professionalism. For
example, without any knowledge of Mr. Smith as an individual, I perceive him standing in front
of the room instructing as lackadaisical, especially for a teacher with two decades of experience.
However, Mr. Smith might have a health issue that can prevent him from moving around
know one’s faculty in a way to make a holistic and well-informed assumption during an
observation.
CASE STUDY
This was not the case during one of my observations. It was my second year as a teacher
under the same administrators. It was the last day before winter break which was an early release
day. The observation happened during my lunch class which was the longest period of the day.
My students were working quietly on a paper-based activity while listening to soft holiday jazz
in the background when my assistant principal entered the room five minutes before lunch. She
stood in the corner for the last five minutes looking mostly at her iPad with the occasional glance
around the room. When I left, I had the automated email saying a walkthrough had been
conducted and to go to Peoplesoft to look at the notes. I was frustrated by the observation in
general because it felt like a terrible time to conduct a walkthrough. She also marked “area of
focus” for technological use in the classroom because my Smartboard wasn’t being utilized and
students were not using their Chromebook. There wasn’t any feedback or follow up from her
other than the observation notes. She assumed I did not use technology in my classroom when in
actuality it was one of the rare times my students were not using their Chromebooks (all of my
classwork is in Google Classroom) and I did not have my Google slides presentation on the
board. Her assumption was not accurate and my observation notes were not reflective of what
If one is not careful, their own personal biases can influence assumptions and judgements
made during observations. One way I plan to prevent personal biases from influencing my
assumptions is using a strategy I learned when I was a hospital chaplain. When I was a hospital
chaplain, my task was to enter into a patient’s room and not allow my beliefs and biases from
influencing the conversation. I did this by relying on the psychologist Carl Roger’s principle of
unconditional positive regard. This principle This principle states that nothing someone does or
says can stop you from viewing them as inherently human and inherently lovable. In my belief
CASE STUDY
system, this means I must view all people as the image of God and must show them empathy and
positive regard was an equal imager bearer. The personal implementation of this principle will
allow me to keep my personal biases in check as a school leader and provide equal and
Reference
Cakerice, S.D. (1991). "Peer coaching and the role of the principal. UNI Scholarworks.
https://scholarworks.uni.edu/grp/2146.
Farver, A.R. & Holt, C.R. (2015). Value of Coaching in Building Leadership Capacity of
Principals in Urban Schools. Education Leadership Review of Doctoral Research, 2(2), 67–76.
https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1105730.pdf.
https://www.nd.gov/espb/sites/www/files/documents/Guiding%20Questions%20for
%20Pre-Observation%20Discussion%20fillable.pdf.