Case Study MR Smith

Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 6

CASE STUDY

Case Study: Mr. Smith

Joshua D. Winn

College of Education, Grand Canyon University

EAD-530-O501

Dr. Dawn Johnson

December 21, 2022


CASE STUDY

Part 1

Overall, it appears that Mr. Smith’s class is engaged and he is confident in his

curriculum. It appears that he has a good control of his classroom environment as most students

are actively working. Using Domain 2 of my school’s observation checklist which focuses on

classroom environment, it appears that Mr. Smith has a positive learning environment, he

demonstrates an appropriate commitment to his subject matter, and he demonstrates high

expectations for most students which is reflective in their engagement in the notes. What was not

observed was whether or not Mr. Smith creates high levels of student energy and demonstrates

passion for science and whether or not students demonstrate pride in their work and initiate self-

improvement. Mr. Smith may cultivate these areas in his classroom, they simply were not seen in

the short time in the classroom.

My assumption is that Mr. Smith has established classroom norms, expectations, and

procedures that he enforces. I believe this is evident as the majority of the class is engaged, quiet,

and doing what is expected of them. I also assume that Mr. Smith is very knowledgeable of his

content area. His twenty years of experience seem to appear in his thorough, informative

presentation with appropriate diagrams and infographics that drive home the points being

conveyed. My final assumption is that Mr. Smith is comfortable in his role as a teacher. His

behavior and demeanor did not change during the observation. He did not leave his area in the

front of the room by the computer when the observation began. I believe this is another example

of his two decades of experience in the classroom.

There are three questions I would ask Mr. Smith. First, I would ask how he establishes

classroom norms, expectations, and procedures. I would also ask him how he checks for

understanding. Does he ask higher order thinking questions during his instruction, or do he
CASE STUDY

simply answer questions that are asked of him. Finally, I would ask how he motivates those who

are not engaged in the lesson to get back on task. For instance, does he call on them from the

front of the classroom since he instructs from his computer?

I would commend Mr. Smith on his well-organized presentation. Based on the

observation, it appears his slides are organized and very detailed which allows students to have

all the information they need ask they seek to become proficient in the topic or standard being

covered. My constructive feedback would be around his classroom management style. If he is at

the podium for the duration of the presentation, he cannot ensure that all students are engaged.

For example, are students in the back listening to music on their headphones or using their cell

phone? He would not know if he is not circulating the room. I would encourage him to move

around more during instruction so he can have a better feel for understanding and hold the

students who tend to be off task accountable.

Part 2

My assumptions were based on visual observation without any understanding of Mr.

Smith as an individual. An administrator may be able to make better assumptions and inferences

about a teacher having the knowledge of the teacher’s work ethic and professionalism. For

example, without any knowledge of Mr. Smith as an individual, I perceive him standing in front

of the room instructing as lackadaisical, especially for a teacher with two decades of experience.

However, Mr. Smith might have a health issue that can prevent him from moving around

comfortably. It takes good communication, interpersonal, and leadership skills to be able to

know one’s faculty in a way to make a holistic and well-informed assumption during an

observation.
CASE STUDY

This was not the case during one of my observations. It was my second year as a teacher

under the same administrators. It was the last day before winter break which was an early release

day. The observation happened during my lunch class which was the longest period of the day.

My students were working quietly on a paper-based activity while listening to soft holiday jazz

in the background when my assistant principal entered the room five minutes before lunch. She

stood in the corner for the last five minutes looking mostly at her iPad with the occasional glance

around the room. When I left, I had the automated email saying a walkthrough had been

conducted and to go to Peoplesoft to look at the notes. I was frustrated by the observation in

general because it felt like a terrible time to conduct a walkthrough. She also marked “area of

focus” for technological use in the classroom because my Smartboard wasn’t being utilized and

students were not using their Chromebook. There wasn’t any feedback or follow up from her

other than the observation notes. She assumed I did not use technology in my classroom when in

actuality it was one of the rare times my students were not using their Chromebooks (all of my

classwork is in Google Classroom) and I did not have my Google slides presentation on the

board. Her assumption was not accurate and my observation notes were not reflective of what

actually goes on within my classroom.

If one is not careful, their own personal biases can influence assumptions and judgements

made during observations. One way I plan to prevent personal biases from influencing my

assumptions is using a strategy I learned when I was a hospital chaplain. When I was a hospital

chaplain, my task was to enter into a patient’s room and not allow my beliefs and biases from

influencing the conversation. I did this by relying on the psychologist Carl Roger’s principle of

unconditional positive regard. This principle This principle states that nothing someone does or

says can stop you from viewing them as inherently human and inherently lovable. In my belief
CASE STUDY

system, this means I must view all people as the image of God and must show them empathy and

positive regard was an equal imager bearer. The personal implementation of this principle will

allow me to keep my personal biases in check as a school leader and provide equal and

empathetic coaching as an administrator.


CASE STUDY

Reference

Cakerice, S.D. (1991). "Peer coaching and the role of the principal. UNI Scholarworks.

https://scholarworks.uni.edu/grp/2146.

Farver, A.R. & Holt, C.R. (2015). Value of Coaching in Building Leadership Capacity of

Principals in Urban Schools. Education Leadership Review of Doctoral Research, 2(2), 67–76.

https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1105730.pdf.

Guiding Questions for Pre-Observation Discussion. (n.d.).

https://www.nd.gov/espb/sites/www/files/documents/Guiding%20Questions%20for

%20Pre-Observation%20Discussion%20fillable.pdf.

You might also like