Ghalia Doshan - Classwork - Evaluating Localisation Theory

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 2

One strength is that there is research evidence supporting the idea of localisation of mental

functions in the brain. For example, the case study of Phineas Gage demonstrated that he
experienced neurological damage to his left frontal lobe due to a railway incident. He
survived however the left brain damage shifted his personality from calm to quick-tempered
and rude. This ground-breaking research has better informed present neuroscientists'
understanding of how our brains operate, and has incentivised further scientific methods to
brain research due to emerging technology e.g fMRI scanning, to support the localisation
theory.

For example, Peterson et al (1988)’s objective research used brain scans to demonstrate
how Wernicke’s area (left temporal lobe) was active during a listening task and Broca’s area
(left frontal lobe) during a reading task. This provides scientific credibility and validation to
the localisation theory that was initially drawn from case studies, as findings from research
suggest that specific parts of the brain-e.g Gage’s frontal lobe, are associated with specific
mental functions which are localised to a part of the brain (e.g personality). This increases
our confidence in that the theory can explain the reasons behind specific behaviours
associated with brain damage cases/mental illnesses, which has also led to the
establishment of innovative procedures such as neurosurgery in an attempt to treat
illnesses.

For example, Dougherty et al. (2002) reported on 44 OCD patients who had undergone a
cingulotomy (neurological procedure) and at a follow up after 32 weeks, it was found that a
third of patients had met the criteria for successful response to surgery (reduction in
compulsions etc.). This further objective evidence to localization can be applied by
psychologists to treat patients with serious mental disorders to improve the living standards
of individuals. Hence this practical application of the theory has positive effects on the
economy as the mental functioning of individuals can be improved, to help them undergo
daily acitivities such as going to work which could improve their efficiency and financial
stability in the long run.

However, Lashley’s (1950) contradictory research suggests that higher cognitive functions
such as the processes involved in learning like memory are not localised but distributed in a
more holistic way in the brain rather than being reduced to specifc areas. He removed areas
of the cortex in rats that were learning a maze and found that no area was proven to be
more important than any other area in terms of the rats’ ability to learn the maze. This
suggest that learning is too complex to be localised and requires involvement of the whole
brain.

These overall ideas stated above suggest that while there is credible research supporting
the localisation theory, we cannot ignore other recent objective research into holistic brain
functioning. Hence we cannot generalise the localisation theory to all mental functioning that
we undergo- it may be that more complex mental functioning like decision-making and
learning require activity in several areas of the brain (more holistic) to undergo it effectively.
Hence, as psychologists seem to generate contradictory/ new found evidence to localisation
over the recent decades, this suggests that the brain is a very complex human organ to
study and remains unknown. Neuroscientists dont fully understand how information is
processed by the brain, and the relatively limited sample of individuals within brain research
suggests that findings generated are unable to provide an overall realistic picture of how a
normal human brian operates.

You might also like